HomeMy WebLinkAbout22-138 - HDR Engineering, Inc - Allentown Truck Reroute Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)City of Tukwila Agreement Number: 22-138(e)
Council Approval N/A
6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188
CONTRACT FOR SERVICES
Amendment #5
Between the City of Tukwila and HDR Engineering, Inc.
That portion of Contract No. 22-138 between the City of Tukwila and HDR Engineering, Inc. is
hereby amended as follows:
Section 02:
The Consultant agrees to provide services in accordance with the Scope of Services
provided by the Consultant in the attached Contract Amendment 5 for the Allentown Truck
Reroute EIS.
Section 03:
The agreement shall be in full force and effect for a period commencing upon execution and
ending December 31, 2025, unless sooner terminated under the provisions hereinafter
specified.
All other provisions of the contract shall remain in full force and effect.
Dated this 26th
day of June _,2025
CA Reviewed May 2020 Page 1 of 2
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188
CITY OF TUKWILA
Signed by:
Jen TetaubR16-Works; Director
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
LSS,ned by:
EOUE5'16"v374...
Jennifer Marshall, Deputy City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
FSigned by:
Office o e i y ttorney
CONTRACTOR:
By. (oo�.signea by:
Pa.. �t vvtc t
Printed Name: P"I Ferrier
Title: vice President
CA Reviewed May 2020 Page 2 of 2
May 13, 2025
Mark Hafs
Project Director, City of Tukwila
RE: Allentown Truck Reroute Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
Dear Mark,
Please find attached HDR Engineering, Inc.'s (HDR's) proposed scope of work (SOW) for Contract Amendment 5 for
the Allentown Truck Reroute EIS. This amendment includes additional fee that has not been included previously
and also extends the date of the contract through December 31, 2025.
HDR is fully committed and vested in the successful completion of this project. Thank you for the opportunity to
offer our services. Should you require further clarification of this proposal, please do not hesitate to reach out to
me.
Regards,
HDR Engineering, Inc.
Melissa Becker
Project Manager
hdrinc.com
555 1.1.011' Avenue NIE, Sufte 1.200, Bellevue, \AIA 08004 5.1.24
(2.06) 826 4700
Olivia Williams, PE
Vice President
Ciity of "1)ulkw la I Amendment 5
AlletntDwn truck Revoute EIS FN
Background
This amendment captures additional services to the original Allentown Truck Reroute EIS scope and extends the
contract date to December 31, 2025. As requested by the City of Tukwila (City), this scope amendment captures
the addition of a no -construction alternative to the EIS via creation of a Supplemental EIS (SEIS), as detailed below.
Task 1: Project Initiation and Coordination
Extending the contract time by six months increases administration time and costs. These increases are estimated
at one hour per month for invoicing and one hour for amendment processing by HDR accounting, in addition to
five hours per month for project management.
Task 2: Data Collection and Alternatives Development
Task 2 remains unchanged.
Task 3: Public Involvement
Scoping is not required to be conducted for an SEIS. The City will present the new alternative at an Allentown
Advocates or other regularly scheduled meeting, with support from two HDR staff. Costs and details are included
in Task 6 for this meeting.
Task 4: Draft EIS
Task 4 remains unchanged.
Task 5: Final EIS
Task 5 remains unchanged.
Task 6: Supplemental EIS
HDR will prepare an SEIS that addresses the requirements of SEPA to assess the impacts of a no -construction
alternative (Alternative 6). This additional alternative would route trucks permanently along existing roads. This
detour routes trucks out of the Allentown neighborhood on 139th Street.
II.1I1DIR ,S11:..1RVIlCll:..!S
HDR will analyze the impacts of one new no -build alternative, as shown in the figure below, and document analysis
methods and results in a SEIS. The same disciplines as analyzed in the Draft EIS (DEIS) for the other alternatives will
be included in the SEIS, though the analysis of impacts from the other alternatives will not be repeated. A summary
table of impacts from all scoped alternatives will be included in the SEIS. Similar evaluation methods to the other
alternatives will be applied, with adjustments as required, based on the new alternative being significantly larger
than the other alternatives Disciplines with detailed assumptions or items of note are detailed below.
Greenhouse Gases
HDR will conduct a qualitative assessment to study the mobile source air toxics (MSAT) per FHWA MSAT
Guidelines and / or WSDOT SEPA Guidelines to determine whether the project has an elevated potential
of MSAT effect. The FHWA guidelines stipulate that a quantitative assessment using MOVES modeling
AlletntDwn truck Revoute EIS FN
must be used if this project falls within this designation. This is the same level of study conducted on the
DEIS alternatives.
Please note that a quantitative analysis will still need to be performed to meet the requirements of
impact analysis once an alternative is selected and/or advanced to design and construction phase, in
accordance with WSDOT and FHWA guidelines. Costs for this required quantitative effort are not included
in this amendment.
Traffic
HDR will provide a new forecast, new traffic reassignment, updated Synchro, VMT calculation, truck
percentage calculation, percentage background growth, and documentation detailing the methodology,
results, and impacts. The route of the alternative and intersections for which data will be needed is shown
on the following page. Routing is assumed based on existing conditions, including anecdotal and observed
truck turning movements.
Cultural
A desktop study will be conducted for historic built environment. Results will be reported in a memo
update for the technical appendix and summarized in the SEIS main document, similar to DEIS format. No
field survey will be conducted. No documentation of historic built environment resources will be
prepared. No consultation with tribes will be conducted by HDR staff.
Wetlands and Waters
A desktop analysis will be conducted for wetlands using existing data. No field delineation will be
conducted. A memo will be prepared to detail the findings, and a summary will be included in the SEIS
main document, similar to the DEIS format.
Stormwater analysis will include identifying watersheds where stormwater is currently flowing from road
surfaces. No changes to stormwater flow locations are anticipated with this alternative.
Noise
Noise analysis will be qualitatively assessed for the new alternative, including appropriate updates to the
text provided in the DEIS. A similar level of detail as was provided in the DEIS will be provided for this
discipline in the SEIS. Traffic volumes will be needed from the city to assist in accuracy of this analysis.
CII...IENT III SPONSIIBIIUVIIIS
• The City will provide prompt review and responses to requests for information and draft content review,
within two (2) weeks of requests.
• The City will provide updated traffic count data related to the intersections indicated in the map on the
following page.
City of "T"oullomfla I Amendment 5
AllentlOwn truck Revoute. EIS FN
13
G I rY OF T J KVV I LA
AI_I ENTOWN EIS
PROPOSAL
AL'rERNA-rlVE 6
..........................................................................
op,
Amilyzed
Alt rinative 6 Truck
R.utes
-ol Bidirectionol
of
-0— Unidiroctional
Glenetal Project
Alteirlhative Study Arcas
Alteinafive
Y TI
Footprint
AltemAve 3B
Footpfint
Allerpiat�vo,l
0
FoolpfinI
No Action Truck Rmaes
- Bidirectional
. . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . .
— Unidled[onal
Vm ", . .................
BNSF
Intermodal Rail
10 Yard
11.0
n
"a„milli
\�14
n 'mm'O' 0I ;,0
01,11,
�01
4 MiM lot �M
I IYIY.ln §w
Cy
19
A
QM
t
&
00 "C�
Im
Bpllovueo
gc.y"q” IN
... .....
M) qcxb @n
Seattle
0
...
%/
I/
V
0 CUM m 'o
J� 11 Y 7l EQ
I�//
Alt
A 2
Ali
�l
NOACIon
3B R
toi
116
Al
M.'' tm' Cal
.3-
Kent
0
ul
FnDate d/29/2025
N1101T�151
t3
0 (? 1 Feet
.660
13
Ciity of" )ulkw lla I Aa^ endment 5
AlletntDwn truck Revoute EIS FN
A,S U M P'TII OIM S„
• The route is as depicted above, and will be the basis for the areas of impact analysis.
• No additional data will be collected from the field.
• The City will consult directly with Tribes and provide them with updated information regarding the
alternatives being assessed in the SEIS.
• The public meeting will take place in person at the Tukwila Community Center, with a duration of up to 3
hours. HDR will provide two staff to attend this meeting in person.
• One round of consolidated review from the City will be provided for both the Draft SEIS and Final SEIS
prior to public release.
• Deliverables will be provided electronically, with the exception of maps for the public meeting, which will
be provided in 24" x 36" hard copy format..
• Compliance with the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Section 504 and 508 of
the Rehabilitation Act, and Washington State Policy #188 (generally known as Section 508 formatting) is
not required for this project and is not included in this scope of work or fee assessment.
• SEIS will be developed to address the requirements of SEPA, but final confirmation of SEPA compliance
will be the responsibility of a SEPA-responsible City Official or SEPA Lead Agency, and not of HDR.
DEILIV IRAIIIII...ES„
• Public meeting materials — Power Point presentation and up to 4 maps
• Draft and final Draft SEIS
• Draft and final Final SEIS
Schedule
Preparation of the SEIS with one new no -build alternative is estimated to be completed within six months of notice
to proceed and confirmation of the route to be analyzed.
• Draft SEIS delivered to the City within three months of notice to proceed
• Analysis results presented at public meeting within one month of Draft SEIS delivery to City
Final SEIS delivered in December 2025, or within six months of notice to proceed
V
AlletntDwn truck Revoute EIS FN
Compensation for proposed services will be billed on a Time and Materials basis. The total fee for these services is
not to exceed $64,926, unless mutually agreed upon by HDR and the Client. The additional fee for these services
will be funded utilizing remaining funds from completed tasks. Total not -to -exceed value remains at $914,601.
These services are proposed to be completed under HDR and the City of Tukwila's existing contract, #22-138,
executed November 8 2022. The proposed services listed in this document complement and supersede those listed
in the original contract and its subsequent Amendments 1-4, executed May 5 2023, October 9 2023, April 25 2024,
and January 1, 2025, respectively.
This proposal is valid for 60 work days from the date of submission. Thereafter, it may be subject to change.
City of Tukwila Agreement Number: 22-138 (d)
Council Approval N/A
6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188
CONTRACT FOR SERVICES
Amendment #4
Between the City of Tukwila and HDR Engineering, Inc.
That portion of Contract No. 22-138 between the City of Tukwila and HDR Engineering, Inc. is
hereby amended as follows:
Section 02:
The Consultant agrees to provide services in accordance with the Scope of
Services provided by the Consultant in the attached Contract Amendment 4 for the
Allentown Truck Reroute EIS.
Section 03:
This agreement shall be in full force and effect for a period commencing upon execution and
ending June 30, 2025, unless sooner terminated under the provisions hereinafter
specified.
Sar_tinn nA-
Payment for work shall be amended as per the estimated budget detailed in the Labor
Estimate provided by the Consultant in the attached Contract Amendment 2 for the
Allentown Truck Reroute EIS, provided that payment for the total amount of the amended
contract shall not exceed $ 914,601 ($28,815 for Amendment #4) without express written
modification of the Agreement, signed by the City.
All other provisions of the contract shall remain in full force and effect.
Dated this 2nd
day of January 2025
CA Reviewed May 2020 Page 1 of 2
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188
CITY OF TUKWILA
Signed by:
DS
1,bv�as
Thomas McLeod, Mayor
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
Signed by:
FEgD#�kFF�fc�4
Andy Youn-Barnett, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Signed by:
E*3Q5e7"
Office of the City Attorney
CONTRACTOR:
L661
ned by:
By:��T
9E525E&2E4fc1...
Printed Name: Olivia Williams
Title: vice President
CA Reviewed May 2020 Page 2 of 2
Ciity ofr" Phew lla I Scope Amendment 4
AIII<mtow Tiruck Reroutf.:! 115
FN
This scope amendment is intended to capture additional services to the original Allentown Truck Reroute EIS scope
and to extend the contract date to June 30, 2025. As requested by the City of Tukwila, this scope amendment
captures the additional work required to produce visual renderings and quantitative assessment of greenhouse
gases as detailed below.
Task 1: Project Initiation and Coordination
Extending the contract time by six months increases administration time and costs estimated at one hour per
month for accounting and five hours per month for project management.
Task 2: Data Collection and Alternatives Development
2.1 Data Collection/Project Description/EIS Outline/Admin Record
Task 2.1 remains unchanged.
2.2 Pre -Conceptual Design
Task 2.2 remains unchanged.
2.3 Draft Conceptual Design
Task 2.3 remains unchanged from previous amendments.
2.4 Final Conceptual Design
Task 2.4 remains unchanged.
Task 3: Public Involvement
Work remaining under this task consists of preparing materials for and presenting information at a Draft EIS public
meeting (Allentown Advocates meeting), and Draft EIS comment processing as described in Amendment 1.
Task 4: Draft EIS
Modifications to two resource areas will be made. A visual / aesthetic analysis will be added, and a quantitative
analysis of air quality will be added (greenhouse gases). Details are provided below.
Visual/Aesthetic
Visual simulations of aesthetic impacts from the alternatives being assessed support the full analysis of impacts.
Alternatives 2 and 4 are assumed to only require narrative description of impacts and a simple 2D graphic to
adequately convey information, with no formal photosimulations prepared. Alternative 3b requires two
photosimulations to demonstrate the visual impacts of the proposed bridge design. HDR will conduct a brief initial
desktop review to identify any potentially relevant key observation points (KOPs) near the Project Site, particularly
from places where relevant visual receptors will be most exposed to the project alternative. HDR will then provide
instructions for how photographs should be taken along with any technical hardware/equipment requirements.
Select images will be chosen as backgrounds for the visual simulations showing the proposed design.
Ciity ofr" Phew lla I Scope Amendment 4
Allkmtown Tiruck Reroutf.:! EIIS
FN
In the visual simulation process, a rendered image from a digital three-dimensional (31D) model of the alternative
scenario will be integrated with the existing conditions photography. Using Project and locational specifics, HDR
will build a 3D model using Autodesk 3DS Max. The model will include the topography of the Project Site and the
area between the Project Site and the subject KOPs. A virtual sun will be added to the model with real-world
attributes, such as locational data along with date and time, to match the selected photographs, and virtual
cameras will be created in the model with the same parameters as the actual photos to match the perspective of
each photograph. Finally, V -Ray rendering engine for 3DS Max will be used to produce the rendering of proposed
conditions, and Photoshop will be used to combine the rendering with the photographs. Efforts will be made for
the final image composites to appear seamless, but the cleanliness of the composite can be affected by the
vegetation between the viewer and proposed rendered condition.
Final deliverable will be two high-resolution JPG composited images for Alternative 3b and 2D graphics for
Alternatives 2 and 4. Methodology narratives will be incorporated into the appropriate section of the EIS.
Camera requirements are anticipated to be a full frame DSLR or mirrorless camera body (i.e. Nikon, Canon, Sony)
capable of shooting a minimum of 24 MP (6,000 x 4,000 px images) and a full -frame compatible lens capable of
shooting 24-50mm focal length. Photos should be captured in RAW (16-bit) image format for best post -processing
flexibility and fidelity. GPS coordinates will need to be captured either by camera or another external GPS device,
with a target accuracy of +/- 1 meter. More specific instructions will be provided by HDR following the initial
desktop review.
Assumptions:
• City will provide camera and photographer to obtain photos under HDR guidance
Deliverables:
• 2 photo simulations from 2 KOPS for Alternative 3b
• 2D graphic of visual impacts of Alternatives 2 and 4
• Narrative of impacts and methodology
Greenhouse Gas
WSDOT's Guidance on Addressing Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Energy for WSDOT Projects Section
2.3.1 requires a qualitative operational analysis be conducted.
HDR will conduct a qualitative assessment to study the mobile source air toxics (MSAT) per FHA MSAT Guideline
and / or Wash DOT SEPA guidelines to determine if the project has a high potential of MSAT effect. The FHWA
guidelines stipulate that a quantitative assessment using MOVES modeling must be used if this project falls within
this designation.
Assumptions:
• MOVES modeling will not be required and is not included in this scope
• The project will be exempt from quantitative analysis based on classification as a safety improvement
project.
Deliverables:
• Qualitative operational analysis of the project alternatives to document if quantitative MSAT analysis is
needed.
Cilty of Vblkwfla I Scope Amendment
Alkmtown nruck Reroutf.:! E,1�5 FN
Task 5: Final EIS
Task 5 remains unchanged.
Cilty ofr" bllewiilla I Scope Amendment 4
blll<mtowrr "nruck Rerout<:! E.:IIS
FN
Additional fees for this scope are as follows:
Task 1: Project management and accounting
Six hours of accounting time: $107.71 * 6 = $646.27
30 hours of PM time: $205.63 * 30=$6,168.90
Subtotal $6,815
Task 4: Draft EIS
Visual
The cost of producing one (1) photosimulation can vary depending on extent and complexity of proposed design
that needs to be shown but will cost around $7,000 — $8,000 for the first view. Subsequent views of the same
project build alternative that don't require additional modeling work will cost an additional $3,000 each. As
detailed above the estimate for this project is two photosimulations.
Subtotal $11,000
Greenhouse Gas
The estimate to conduct the analysis and complete the narrative is 40 hours.
Subtotal $11,000
Total: $28,815
Terms and Conditions
These services are proposed to be completed under HDR's standard Professional Services Agreement and Terms
and Conditions.
This proposal is valid for 60 work days from the date of submission. Thereafter, it may be subject to change.
City of Tukwila Agreement Number: 22-138(c)
Council Approval N/A
6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188
(D -
CONTRACT FOR SERVICES
Amendment #3
Between the City of Tukwila and HDR Engineering, Inc.
That portion of Contract No. 22-138 between the City of Tukwila and HDR Engineering, Inc. is
hereby amended as follows:
Section 3:
This agreement shall be in full force and effect for a period commencing upon execution and
ending December 31, 2024, unless sooner terminated under the provisions hereinafter
specified.
All other provisions of the contract shall remain in full force and effect.
Dated this 25th day of
CITY OF TUKWILA
2024
CONTRACTOR:
EDocuSigned by:
CkP
IV -Ma's h66 ,t�4/25/2024 1 9:05 AM PDT By:
a"aae.
Thomas McLeod, Mayor
ATTEST/AUTH ENT ICATED:
DocuSigned by:
3D04AB9746FA4E8...
Andy Youn, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Ea
DocuSigned by:
V 0. - NMI"
402D232E834A49E...
Office of the City Attorney
1� —
Printed Name: Rob Berman
Title: Senior Vice President
CA Reviewed May 2020 Page I of I
City of Tukwila Agreement Number: 22-138(b)
Council Approval N/A
6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188
CONTRACT FOR SERVICES
Amendment 2
Between the City of Tukwila and HDR, Inc.
That portion of Contract No. 22-138 between the City of Tukwila and HDR, Inc. is hereby amended
as follows:
Exhibit A, Scope of Services, shall be amended as follows:
The Consultant agrees to provide services in accordance with the Scope of
Services provided by the Consultant in the attached Contract Amendment 2 for the Allentown Truck
Reroute EIS.
Exhibit B, Fee Estimate, shall be amended as follows:
Payment for work shall be amended as per the estimated budget detailed in the Labor Estimate
provided by the Consultant in the attached Contract Amendment 2 for the Allentown Truck Reroute
EIS, provided that payment for the total amount of the amended contract shall not exceed $885,786
(original Professional Services Agreement $798,603 + $49,134 for Amendment 1 + $38,049 for this
amendment) without express written modification of the Agreement, signed by the City.
All other provisions of the contract shall remain in full force and effect.
Dated this 9th
day of October 12023
CA Reviewed May 2020 Page I of 2
City of Tukwila Agreement Number: 22-138(b)
Council Approval N/A
6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188
CITY OF TUKWILA
DS rDOCUSIgned by:
Allan Ekberg, Mayor 10/9/2023 1 1:08 PM PDT
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
EDacuSigned by:
�l$fy 11 rfw
8S67B483CB594E7...
Christy O'Flaherty, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OcuSigned by:
°N�GJt t -` . a"�E4.h9%:B41C��52
Office of the City Attorney
HDR ENGINEERING, INC:
By: ?-��
Printed Name: Rob Berman
Title: Senior Vice President
CA Reviewed May 2020 Page 2 of 2
III �1 UDII
II(II l`
f
August, 7, 2023
Mark Hafs
Project Director, City of Tukwila
RE: Allentown Truck Reroute Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
Dear Mark,
Please find attached HDR Engineering, Inc.'s (HDR's) proposed scope of work (SOW) and fee summary for
Contract Amendment 2 for the Allentown Truck Reroute EIS.
HDR is fully committed and vested in the successful completion of this project. Thank you for the opportunity to
offer our services. Should you require further clarification of this proposal, please do not hesitate to contact
Project Manager, Adam Teepe, at 206-826-4694 or adam.teepe@hdrinc.com.
Regards,
HDR Engineering, Inc.
Adam Teepe
Project Manager
hdrrl"Ilrnc.corrmn
929108'" Avenue NE.., Suite1:300, Bellevue, WA 98004
(206) 826 4 700
Rob Berman
Sr. Vice President
City d Tukwih I Scope AMe:ndme:nt 2
Allentown Truck Reroute: EIS FN
Background
This scope amendment is intended to capture additional services to the original Allentown Truck Reroute EIS
scope. As requested by the City of Tukwila, this scope amendment captures the additional work required to
produce two additional roll plots for Alternatives 1 and 3 and additional coordination with BNSF about project
design.
Scope of Services
Task 1: Project Initiation and Coordination
OII JIEC"'FIVE
The original scope for Task 1 was intended to monitor, coordinate, and communicate scope, schedule, and
budget for the project as well as provide monthly status reporting, accounting, and invoicing. This amendment
will provide the additional funding needed to fulfill this task given the added modifications to the original scope.
II°1II'.)IR SII::.:1lRV11C11:::S (INIEW SCOIf'lE)
• Additional time for accounting monitoring for this contract amendment.
C11111EIN"I" 11111.:S11"01NSIIB111111"1"1116.5
• Client responsibilities remain the same as in the original SOW.
ASSUM11"I"I'110INS
• Assumptions remain the same as in the original SOW.
IC:)Ifii'11...11V EICSAB11...1Ei S
• Deliverables remain the same as in the original SOW.
Task 2: Data Collection and Alternatives Development
2.1 Data Collection/Project Description/EIS Outline/Admin Record
OBJECTIVE
As outlined in the original scope of work, Task 2.1 included time for coordination with BNSF regarding the
proposed alternatives. The level of coordination with BNSF has grown beyond what was originally scoped, and
this amended subtask now includes hours related to preparation for and participation in up to three (3) design
review meetings.
II°1II'.)IR SII::.:1lRV11C11:::S (INIEW SCOIf'lE)
• Prepare for and participate in up to three (3) design review meetings with BNSF.
• Prepare meeting notes for the design review meetings.
• Provide strategic communications support for meeting strategy and preparation.
d,C11...111EIN"I" IRIE.: 11"101N 11111111...11"1'1116:'5
• Coordinate with other City departments on meeting agenda.
ASS6.MI I"II0INS
• HDR will have up to four (4) staff participate in the BNSF design review meetings for up to four (4)
hours for each meeting and 1 hour of travel time.
I
City d Tukwih I Scope Arne:ndme:nt 2
Allentown Truck Reroute: EIS FN
II V IE IRA B Il...11i:[ S
• Draft and Final Meeting Notes (Word file, electronically delivered).
2.2 Pre -Conceptual Design
Task 2.2 remains unchanged from the original SOW.
2.3 Draft Conceptual Design
OBJECTIVE
The original scope was to develop up to three alternatives at the conceptual level for inclusion in the EIS. This
scope has been expanded to include an additional two alternatives.
II IiII)IR SII::."Il VIl ll::."S (NIEW S OIPI1::.")
• HDR will develop two additional alternative conceptual level designs for inclusion in the EIS analysis.
The conceptual level design will include roadway pavement, sidewalks, curb and gutter, driveway cuts,
and preliminary location of retaining wall structures that may be required. The design will be displayed
on roll plot exhibits with legends and general notes. The roll plots will also include a single typical
section for the alternative.
• HDR will prepare quantity takeoffs for cost estimating of the two alternatives at a conceptual design
level.
• HDR will develop written description of the design criteria and impacts of each alternative for use in the
EIS documentation.
• HDR will review comments provided by the City on the draft conceptual designs and provide written
responses to each comment.
CII ...IIIEN I" R11:iiSIlI0IlgSIIIBIIII...11"1"1111ii:S
• Provide one round of compiled comments on the draft conceptual designs.
ASSU II"II110NS
• Alternatives 1 and 3 will be further developed at the conceptual design level.
• No new alternatives will be considered or designed beyond the two alternatives described above.
• Each alternative description for roadway design is assumed to be no longer than one page.
I1:.) 11:..: 11 II V IE Ick A IB Il...11i:[ S
• Draft Conceptual Design:
o Two Roll plots (PDF file, electronically delivered).
o Two Roadway Quantity Estimates (Excel file, electronically delivered).
o Written description for each alternative (2) for inclusion in EIS analysis documentation (Word
file, electronically delivered).
2.4 Final Conceptual Design
OIBJIEC if"IIVlE
The original scope for Task 2.4 was to incorporate City comments on the draft conceptual design and produce
final conceptual design for up to three alternatives. This scope has been expanded to include final conceptual
design on two additional alternatives (alternatives 1 and 3), as well as to incorporate changes that come out of
the design review meeting with BNSF.
III
City d Tukwih I Scope Arne:ndme:nt 2
Allentown Truck Reroute: EIS FN
II°111::)111 Slliialzvllcllii:s
• HDR will revise the draft documents to incorporate comments received from the City or BNSF on
alternatives 1 and 3.
• HDR will provide data to support and inform the EIS development; such as right of way (ROW) impact
square footage, wetland impact square footage, and square footage of new impervious surfacing.
C111IIEIN"I" R11:iiSIl' 1lgS11B1111...1l1"IIIIiiC5
• Provide input on which comments from BNSF to incorporate into the final design.
ASSU II"I"I"II INS
• There will be no further comments on the draft conceptual design after the comment review meeting.
• BNSF comment revisions will include small adjustments to the five presented conceptual designs and
not new alternatives.
• Data support required for the EIS will be included in the alternative writeups.
IC:)Ifii'.IL..IIVIEICS. BIl...lfitS
• Comment Responses Document (PDF file, electronically delivered).
• Final Concept Design:
o Revised Rollplots (2) (PDF files, electronically delivered).
o Revised Roadway Quantity Estimates (2) (Excel files, electronically delivered).
o Revised written description for each alternative (2) for inclusion in EIS analysis documentation
(Word files, electronically delivered).
Task 3: Public Involvement
Task 3 remains unchanged from the original SOW.
Task 4: Draft EIS
Task 4 remains unchanged from the original SOW.
Task 5: Final EIS
Task 5 remains unchanged from the original SOW.
IIEstfirinated IFees and D i s bu rse rin1n
Compensation for proposed services will be billed on a Time and Materials basis. The total fee for these services
is not to exceed $38,049, unless mutually agreed upon by HDR and the Client.
Task Task Description Total
1 Project manage42
2 Data Collection and Alternatives $37407
Development '
Public Involvement $
11
City d Tukwih I Scope AMe:ndme:nt Z
Allentown Truck Reroute: EIS FN
4 Draft EIS $0
Final $
•�x
r Ili" I l l arid Cariditiaris
These services are proposed to be completed under HDR's standard Professional Services Agreement and Terms
and Conditions.
This proposal is valid for 60 work days from the date of submission. Thereafter, it may be subject to change.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5066282A-DA92-4B02-AB75-4526537A1 DCF
—411LA
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98181
"Ke
� ILI k Wilt" 9*01;911-1 =11;1TA
Amendment #1
Agreement Number: 22-138(a)
Between the City of Tukwila a nd HDR, I nc.
Council Approval N/A
That portion of Contract No. 22-138 between the City of Tukwila and HDR, Inc. is hereby amended
as follows'.
Exhibit A, Scope of Services, shall be amended as follows:
The Consultant agrees to provide services in accordance with the Scope of
Services provided by the Consultant in the attached Contract Amendment I for the Allentown Truck
Reroute EIS.
Exhibit B, Fee Estimate, shall be amended as follows:
Payment for work shall be amended as per the estimated budget detailed in the Labor Estimate
provided by the Consultant in the attached Contract Amendment I for the Allentown Truck Reroute
EIS, provided that payment for the total amount of the amended contract shall not exceed
$847,737 (original Professional Services Agreement $798,603.00 + $49,134 for this amendment)
without express written modification of the Agreement, signed by the City.
All other provisions of the contract shall remain in full force and effect.
Dated this —4th day of May 120 24
CITY OF TUKVMLA HDR ENGINEERING, INC
[DocuSigned by:
HP uA&
Allan Ekberg, Mayor 5/4/2023 1 10:18 AM PDT
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED
[DocuSigned by:
0-lqakt,V
Christy O'Flaherty, City Clerk
Printed Name, Rob Berman
Title- Senior Vice President
FWAI a ZI 06UN a I 97 -AV 2 1 to] I ; 15601:1L, FA
DocuSigned by:
Office of the City Attorney
CA Reviewed May 2020 Page 1 of 1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5066282A-DA92-4B02-AB75-4526537A1 DCF
T.. i1ii01i309i
Mark Hafs
Project Director, City of Tukwila
RE: Allentown Truck Reroute Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
Dear Mark,
Please find attached the HDR Engineering, Inc.'s (HDR's) proposed scope of work (SOW) and fee summary for
Contract Amendment I for the Allentown Truck Reroute ISIS.
HDR is fully committed and vested in the successful compIetion of this project. Thank you for the opportunity to
offer our services. Should you require further clarification of this proposal, please do not hesitate to contact
Project Manager, Adam Teepe at 206-826-4694 or adamJeepe@hdrinc.corn.
Regards,
HDR Engineering, Inc.
Adam Teepe
Project Manager
hd6ric.com,
9291081 AvenUe NE, SLfltC' 1300, Bellevue, WA 9800d
(206) 826-4700
10 =10
Rob Berman
Sr. Vice President
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5066282A-DA92-4B02-AB75-4526537A1 DCF
City of'Tulkwila I ScopeAir nendinneint I
Allentown I ruck Reroute PS FN
This scope amendment is intended to capture additional services to the original Allentown Truck Reiroute EIS
scope due to requested changes in the public scoping period as requested by the City of Tukwila. The scope
amendment captures changes required to incorporate a second scoping period. Please note that rates have been
adjusted to reflect annual labor rate increases that went into effect on January 1, 2023,
Finally, this amendment will capture additional services required to extend the period of performance end date
from May 1, 2024 to August 31, 2024.
Scope of Services
Task 1: Project Initiation and Coordination
OBJECIFIVE
The original scope for Task 1 was intended to monitor, manage, and communicate scope, schedule, and budget
for the project as well as provide monthly status reporting, accounting, and invoicing. This amendment will
provide the additional funding needed to fulfill this task given the added modifications to the original scope and
project duration.
HSR SERVICES (IIIEW SCOPE)
• Additional time for accounting imoinitoring for this contract amendment.
• Additional project management time due to extending the period of performance to prepare invoices
and monthly progress reports and attend weekly project meetings,
CHIEIN"r RESPOINSIBILMES
0 Client responsibilities remain the same as in the original SOW.
ASS Ump'nONS
0 Assumptions remain the same as in the original SOW,
IIIIIIIIIHIMIdw
0 Deliverables remain the same as in the original SOW.
Task 2: Data Collection and Alternatives Development
2,.1 Data Collection/Project Description/EIS Outflne/Admin (Record
Task 2.1 remains unchanged from the original SOW.
2,.2 Pre -Conceptual Design
OBJECTIVE
The original scope for Task 2.2 included evaluating previously developed alternatives and evaluating the
feasibility of potential new alternatives. This task has been amended to provide a feasibility review of the
additional alternatives suggested during the first of the two scoping meetings.
• HDR will evaluate alternatives suggested during the public scoping meeting.
• HDR will develop a feasibility matrix with up to three new alternatives (two, as previously identified in
the original SOW, and one additional alternative).
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5066282A-DA92-4B02-AB75-4526537A1 DCF
City of'Tulkwila I ScopeArnendinneint I
Allentown I ruck Reroute PS FN
CLIENT RESPONSIBILITIES
0 Provide feedback on the alternatives to include in the feasibility matrix.
A55Ump"noi,As
0 One additional exhibit will be Ipirepared to show the third new alternative.
DELIVERABLES
0 Deliverables remain the same as in the original SOW.
23 Draft Conceptual Design
Task 2.3 remains unchanged from the original SOW.
ZA IFinall Conceptual Design
Task 2.4 remains unchanged from the original SOW.
Taslk 3: IPulblllic involvement
3A PUblic Involvement Strategy
Task 3.1 remains unchanged from the original SOW.
12 Informational IMaterlialls Development
OBJECTIVE
The original scope for Task 3.2 included developing content and graphics for use in public communications. This
task has been amended to account for materials development at a second scoping meeting,
HDR SERVICES
• Develop one mailer, two social media posts, scoping notice, and newspaper notice for the second
scoping meeting,
• Produce one set of scoping meeting materials for the second scoping meeting, including:
• One PowerPoint presentation.
• Up to six display boards.
• Participate in up to nine meeting preparation coordination meetings with the City (three for the first
scoping meeting, three for the second scoping meeting and three for the Draft EIS Comment meeting).
CLIENT RESPONSIBILITIES,
0 Assumptions remain the same as in the original SOW.
As5ump"I-IONS
0 Up to three HDR staff will participate in the meeting preparation coordination meetings with the City,
DEUVERABLES
• Draft and final Second Scoping Notice (electronic Word and PDF).
• Draft and final mailer (electironic Word and PDF format).
• Draft and final social media content (electronic word and PDF)
• Draft and final newspaper notice (electronic Word and PDF format),
• Draft and final PowerPoint presentation,
• Draft and final display boards (electronic Word and PDF format).
I
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5066282A-DA92-4B02-AB75-4526537A1 DCF
City of'Tuili I ScopeArnendinneink I
Allentown I ruck Reroute PS FN
33 IPulblllic IMeeting Support
OBJEC"FIVE
The original scope for Task 3.3 included providing oversight and support for public meetings. This task has been
aimencled to accoluint for a second scoping meeting.
HDR SERVICES
• Develop public scoping meeting plain,
• Facilitate public scoping meeting.
• Provide two additional support staff to assist with setup and operations at the public scoping meeting.
CLIENT RESPONSIBILITIES
0 Assumptions remain the same as in the original SOW,
ASSUMPTIONS
0 HDR will provide one meeting facilitator and up to two support staff for up to 4 hours.
DELINERABLES
0 Draft and final Ipu.ablic scoping meeting plain (electronic Word and IPDF formats).
3.4 Scoping Comments and Scoping (Report
OBJECTIVE
The original scope for Task 3.4 included processing EIS scoping comments submitted during the scoping period.
This task has been amended to account for processing of comments received during the second scoping
meeting.
1118=41MME
0 Collect comments via print and electronic formats. All comments will be tracked using Zoho CRM
Professional, an onhine communications, contact and event management system. Comments will be
organized by project phase, date received and name (if provided).
C L11 IEINIT RESPO N S1 IB 11 LIT11 ES
0 Assumptions remain the same as in the original SOW.
ASSUMPTIONS
• Up to 50 unique comments and 25 form letters/petitions would be received during the second scoping
period.
• Scoping period is 30 days.
DE11.11VERABLES
0 Deliverables remain the same as in the original SOW (online).
IS Draft EIS Comment processing
Task 3.5 remains unchanged from the original SOW.
Ta slk 4: Draft ISMS
Task 4 remains unchanged from the original SOW.
4
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5066282A-DA92-4B02-AB75-4526537A1 DCF
Task 5: Final EIS
City of'Tulkwila I ScopeAir nendinneint I
Allentown I ruck Reroute PS FN
Task 5 remains unchanged from the original SOW.
WIMIZEME =1
Compensation for proposed services will be billed on a Time and Materials basis. The total fee for these services
is not to exceed $49,133.29, unless mutually agreed upon by HUR and the Client.
Task Task Description Total
I Project Management $5,744
2 Data Collection and Alternatives $3,967
Development
3 Public Involvement $39,393
4 Draft EIS $0
5 Final EIS $0
Termis and Cordfloins
These services are proposed to be completed under HDR's standard Professional Services Agreement and Terms
and Conditions.
This proposal is valid for 60 work days from the date of submission. Thereafter, it may be subject to change.
I
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5066282A-DA92-4B02-AB75-4526537A1 DCF
FEE ESTIMATE
City of Tukwila-. Allentown Truck iReroute ISIS Arad 1
N � 1W
Task# Task Desceiptiion
1: Project Management
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillilliillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillilillimm
Toted
Labor
7
$5,74
Total
�__Expenses
$0
Total
, $0
Total;
Subconsultants
$0
2
iData Collection and Altematives Illevelopm
$3,967
$0
$0
$0
3
iPublic Involvement
$39,393
$0
$0
$0
4
lDraft IEIS
so
$0
$0
$0
5
IN nal El S
$0
$0
$0
$0
LL
$49,134
$o
so
$o
,Aq., —, fl,y oi kAwli A R-tm fw cu A yid i L51 I fM rt Ax ri Page I
Toted! For
Proposal
$5,774
$3,967
$39,393
$0
$1D
$49,134
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5066282A-DA92-4B02-AB75-4526537A1 DCF
LABOR ESTIMATE, HDR ENGINEERING STAFF
��� Sandeirom, Shigaya, Camryn rise' Frankel, Isabelle Raaberg, Leanne Baumbach, Bassett, Malia Kim, Hong
Teepe, Atlam K Dennis Karl Kotsuru (Cami) Lawrence S Saleh, Rana A Grace N Hannah Nicole Ashley Kyung (Herika)
(SsOt Johnson) Total Labor
Profatt Rol. PM St—Leatl St --Support Design L— Design Support Design Support —ph -Support Project Accountant DPM Comment Manager
Hours Total Labor Dollars
Billing Rat® 211.39 242.91 95.58 368.16 17306 125.98 153.95 169.57 21603 13603
Project Mg tPl / Quality Mgmt Plan/HASP 0 $
Coordination
tl ati tl Monitoring
0 $
i ng / St t Reporting / EV / WorkPlan 14 8 6 28 $ 5.132.20
S b onsult t M nagement 0 $
Poled Closeout 0 $
2.2 Pre -Conceptual
I Desi n 4 4 8 4 1 20 $ 3.966.60
2.160.761
3.4 Spool, na Commen s and Scooma Resort 3 18 40 8 5 64 $ 18.809.04
Task Total Hours 39.00 36.00 190.00 1 4.00-1 25.00 10.00 22.00 5.00 345.00 0
Task Total Fee $ 6 244.21 $ 9 230.56 $ 16 160.20 1 $ 1 232.64 $ 1 364.46 $ 503.92 $ 3646.75 $ 1 095.70 $ 4 752.66 $ 660.15 $ 49 133.29
ens — iPrinted 41101202311 16 AM
City of Tukwila Contract Number: 22-138
Council Approval 10/24/22
8200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
(Includes consultants, architects, engineers, accountants, and other professional services)
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Tukwila, Washington, hereinafter
referred to as "the City" and HDR Engineering, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "the Consultant", in
consideration of the mutual benefits, terms, and conditions hereinafter specified.
1. Project Designation. The Consultant is retained by the City to perform engineering,
environmental planning, and public engagement services in connection with the project titled
Allentown Truck Reroute EIS.
2. Scope of Services. The Consultant agrees to perform the services, identified on Exhibit "A"
attached hereto, including the provision of all labor, materials, equipment and supplies.
3. Duration of Agreement; Time for Performance. This Agreement shall be in full force and
effect for a period commencing upon execution and ending May 1, 2024, unless sooner
terminated under the provisions hereinafter specified. Work under this Agreement shall
commence upon written notice by the City to the Consultant to proceed. The Consultant shall
perform all services and provide all work product required pursuant to this Agreement no later
than May 1, 2024 unless an extension of such time is granted in writing by the City.
4. Payment. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work and for services
rendered under this Agreement as followers:
A. Payment for the work provided by the Consultant shall be made as provided on Exhibit
""B" attached hereto, provided that the total amount of payment to the Consultant shall not
exceed $798,803 without express written modification of the Agreement signed by the
City.
B. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City once per month during the progress of
the work for partial payment for that portion of the project completed to date. Such
vouchers will be checked by the City and, upon approval thereof, payment shall be made
to the Consultant in the amount approved. City will pay all approved amounts within 4
days following receipt of Consultant's voucher.
C. Final payment of any balance due the Consultant of the total contract price earned will be
made promptly upon its ascertainment and verification by the City after the completion of
the work under this Agreement and its acceptance by the City.
D. Payment as provided in this section shall be full compensation for work performed,
services rendered, and for all materials, supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary to
complete the work.
E. The Consultant's records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to be kept
available for inspection by representatives of the City and the state of Washington for a
period of three (3) years after final payments. Copies shall be made available upon
request.
t I26806.30.DCCX,,l/'1:.31-/5,000001 t I
5. QwnershiI2 and Use of Documents. All documents, drawings, specifications and other
materials produced by the Consultant in connection with the services rendered under this
Agreement shall be the property of the City whether the project for which they are made is
executed or not. The Consultant shall be permitted to retain copies, including reproducible
copies, of drawings and specifications for information, reference and use in connection with
the Consultant's endeavors. The Consultant shall not be responsible for any use of the said
documents, drawings, specifications or other materials by the City on any project other than
the project specified in this Agreement.
6. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant shall, in performing the services contemplated by
this Agreement, faithfully observe and comply with all federal, state, and local laws, ordinances
and regulations, applicable to the services rendered under thi s Agreement.
7. Indemnification. The Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages,
losses or suits including attorney fees, to the extent arising out of or resulting from the willful
misconduct, breach of this Agreement, or negligent acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant
in performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole
negligence of the City.
In the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to
property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City,
its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, the Consultant's liability hereunder shall be
only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence. It is further specifically and expressly
understood that the indemnification provided herein constitutes the Consultant's waiver of
immunity under Industrial Insurance, Title 51 RCW, solely for the purposes of this
indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of
this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
8. Insurance. The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement,
insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from
or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents,
representatives, or employees. Consultant's maintenance of insurance as required by the
agreement shall not be construed to limit the liability of the Consultant to the coverage provided
by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City's recourse to any remedy available at law or in
equity.
A. Minimum Amounts and Scope of Insurance. Consultant shall obtain insurance of the
types and with the limits described below'.
1. Automobile Liability insurance with a minimum combined single limit for bodily injury
and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident. Automobile Liability insurance
shall cover all owned, non -owned, hired and leased vehicles. Coverage shall be
written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute form
providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be endorsed to
provide contractual liability coverage.
2. Commercial General LiabiIity insurance w ith limits no less than $2,000,000 each
occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate. Commercial General Liability
insurance shall be at least as broad as ISO occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall
cover liability arising from premises, operations, stop -gap independent contractors
and personal injury and advertising injury. The City shall be named as an
additional insured under the Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance
policy with respect to the work performed for the City using an additional insured
endorsement at least as broad as ISO endorsement form CG 20 26.
{IEFM2680630 IDOCX; 8113175.000 011/ CA reAsed
May 2020 Page 2
3. Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of
the State of Washington.
4. Professional Liability with limits no less than $2,000,000 per claim and $2,000,000
policy aggregate limit. Professional Liability insurance shall be appropriate to the
Consultant's profession.
B. Public Entity Full Availability of Contractor Limits. If the Contractor maintains higher
insurance limits than the minimums shown above, the Public Entity shall be insured for the
full available limits of Commercial General and Excess or Umbrella liability maintained by
the Contractor, irrespective of whether such limits maintained by the Contractor are greater
than those required by this Contract or whether any certificate of insurance furnished to
the Public Entity evidences limits of liability lower than those maintained by the Contractor.
C. Other Insurance Provision. The Consultant's Automobile Liability and Commercial
General Liability insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain that they shall
be primary insurance with respect to the City. Any Insurance, self-insurance, or insurance
pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and
shall not be contributed or combined with it.
D. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.
Best rating of not less than A,VII.
Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and a
copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the additional
insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the Contractor before
commencement of the work. Upon request by the City, the Consultant shall furnish redacted
copies (information redacted would include HDR financial information, employee information,
premiums, and rates) of all required insurance policies, including endorsements, required in
this Agreement and evidence of all subcontractors' coverage.
E. Notice of Cancellation. The Consultant shall provide the City with written notice of any
policy cancellation, within two business days of their receipt of such notice.
F. Failure to Maintain Insurance. Failure on the part of the Consultant to maintain the
insurance as required shall constitute a material breach of contract, upon which the City
may, after giving five business days notice to the Consultant to correct the breach,
immediately terminate the contract or, at its discretion, procure or renew such insurance
and pay any and all premiums in connection therewith, with any sums so expended to be
repaid to the City on demand, or at the sole discretion of the City, offset against funds due
the Consultant from the City.
9. Indel2endent Contractor. The Consultant and the City agree that the Consultant is an
independent contractor with respect to the services provided pursuant to this Agreement.
Nothing in this Agreement shall be considered to create the relationship of employer and
employee between the parties hereto. Neither the Consultant nor any employee of the
Consultant shall be entitled to any benefits accorded City employees by virtue of the services
provided under this Agreement. The City shall not be responsible for withholding or otherwise
deducting federal income tax or social security or for contributing to the state industrial
insurance program, otherwise assuming the duties of an employer with respect to the
Consultant, or any employee of the Consultant.
10. Covenant Against Contingent Fees. The Consultant warrants that he has not employed or
retained any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the
Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any
company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, any
fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration contingent upon
or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warrant,
{IEFM2680630 IDOCX; 8113175.000 011/ CA reAsed
May 2020 Page 3
the City shall have the right to annul this contract without liability, or in its discretion to deduct
from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee,
commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee.
11. Discrimination Prohibited. Contractor, with regard to the work performed by it under this
Agreement, will not discriminate on the grounds of race, religion, creed, color, national origin,
age, veteran status, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, political affiliation,
the presence of any disability, or any other protected class status under state or federal law,
in the selection and retention of employees or procurement of materials or supplies.
12. Assignment. The Consultant shall not sublet or assign any of the services covered by this
Agreement without the express written consent of the City.
13. Non -Waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation
provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision.
14. Termination.
A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time by giving ten (10) days
written notice to the Consultant.
B. In the event of the death of a member, partner or officer of the Consultant, or any of its
supervisory personnel assigned to the project, the surviving members of the Consultant
hereby agree to com p I ete the work under the terms of this Agreement, if requested to do
sobythe City. This section shall not be a bar to renegotiations of this Agreement between
surviving members of the Consultant and the City, if the City so chooses.
15. Applicable Law
, Venue• Attorney's Fees. This Agreement shall be subject to, and the
Consultant shall at all times comply with, all applicable federal, state and local laws,
regulations, and rules, including the provisions of the City of Tukwila Municipal Code and
ordinances of the City of Tukwila. In the event any suit, arbitration, or other proceeding is
instituted to enforce any term of this Agreement, the parties specifically understand and agree
that venue shall be properly laid in King County, Washington. The prevailing party in any such
action shall be entitled to its attorney's fees and costs of suit. Venue for any action arising
from or related to this Agreement shall be exclusively in King County Superior Court.
16. Severability and Survival. If any term, condition or provision of this Agreement is declared
void or unenforceable or limited in its application or effect, such event shall not affect any other
provisions hereof and all other provisions shall remain fully enforceable. The provisions of this
Agreement, which by their sense and context are reasonably intended to survive the
completion, expiration or cancellation of this Agreement, shall survive termination of this
Agreement.
17. Notices. Notices to the City of Tukwila shall be sent to the following address'.
City Clerk
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA 98188
Notices to Consultant shall be sent to the following address'.
Adam Teepe
600 University Street, Suite 500
Seattle, WA 98101
{IEFM2680630 .1DOCX; 8113175.000 011/ CA reAsed
May 2020 Page 4
18. Entire Ag reem e ryt; M od if icati o n'. This Agreement, together with attachments or addenda,
represents the entire and integrated Agreement between the City and the Consultant and
supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements written or oral. No
amendment or modification of this Agreement shall be of any force or effect unless it is in
writing and signed by the parties.
{IEFM2680630 IDOCX; 8113175.000 011/ CA reAsed
May 2020 Page 5
DATED this 8th day of November
CITY OF TUKVMLA
HP
eeS�ig/nejtl�vi9a SeamlaeelJooe/o�(om�J� �/
Kay:[Sa9Ka69353f�1ao'l9clhoa6heoa9ab✓[6b
Allan Ekberg, Mayor 11-08-2022
Attest/Authenticated'.
e' ed vie Seeml sDocs.com-
Kay .say -03,31 r_a-,ia-a-.sn?—Dai
City Clerk, Christy O'Flaherty
{IEFM2680630 IDOCX; 111 3175 000001/
May 2020
2022
CONSULTANT
Fob german
Sr. Vice President
Approved as to Form:
' aril vi rsslJor:s �n
Key: 33K8f684L40.`i-4e8c-�f66-fff62e2681.'i.'i -
Office of the City Attorney
CA reAsed
Page
Exhibit A- city of"rukwfla I Scope of Wio�k and ree Siarillirnary
AHe nt ownDck R
'ue ro�A e EnV� onirn entaV knipact St atem ent
The City of Tuikwilai (City) has selected HDR Engineering, Inc. (h-iDR) to prepare an, Environmental Impact Statement (EIIS)
evailuating potential truck re-routing associated with the local BNSF initermoclail Facility. This scope assumes
prepairaition, of ain, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) US, Preparation of ain, US to meet the requirements of the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is not included in, this scope of work. This scope of work does not include
preparation of local, state or Federal permits that may be required for implementation of the project, including bust not
limited to Clean Waiter Act permits and Enclaingered Species Act consuiltaition, and permits.
The duration of the contract will be 18 months, beginning at contract execution, anticipated by November 1, 2022 and
extending thirouigh May 1, 2024.
Scope of Services
fim i TOM MI,
The purpose of this task is to monitor, control, and adjust scope, schedule, and budget as well as provide monthly
status reporting, accounting, and invoicing. This task also includes project initiation and kickoff meetings as well as
general coordination meetings with the City and the conisuiltaint team. This task will be continuous throughiouit the
duration of the project, and includes project management oversight, quality assurance, and overall project
coordination.
• Prepare a, project rnainiagernent plain, outlining the project scope, team orgainiizationi, quaility control procedures,
health, and safety procedures, and communication, protocols. The project management plan, will be updated if
necessary to reflect changes in, scope, staffing, or other elements critical to the project.
• Prepare a, schedule for the project showing key milestones and critical path, items to be updated up to once
monthly for the duration of the project.
9 Prepare monithily progress reports suimmairizinig the following items:
(D Services completed during the month.
* Services planned) forthe next month,.
* Needs for additional information, or direction, from the City.
* Scope, schedule, and/or budget issues.
* Financial statues summary.
• Prepare monthly invoices.
• Conduct internal kickoff meeting with, the consultant team to confirm project understainding, roles, and review
scope/schedule/budget with all team members.
• Coordinate and manage the project team.
• Plain, prepare agenclas for, and participate in kickoff meeting and site visit with, the City to confirm project
priorities, roles, public engagement strategy, schedule, and approach.
• Plan, prepare agenclas for, participate in, and provide notes (including maintaining action, item and decision
logs) for weekly project team meetings with, the City.
• Establi sh, a, Shaire Poi nit site for storage and file -sharing, purposes.
K
Exhibit A- city of"rukwfla � Scop�e oWio�k and
f ree Siarillirnary _N
AHe nt ownD 'uck Re rorA e EnV� onirn entaV knipact St atem ent I
9 Complete project close out activities including electronic transfer of finiail documents and aidlminiistraitive record
to the City.
9 Provide input on project schedule.
• Provide input on, agenclais and participate in, project team meetings.
• Review meeting notes from project team meetings.
• Complete -timely processing and payment of invoices.
• Review and process contract arnencirnents, if needed.
• The duration, of this scope of services is IS months.
• They project schieduile will be updated up to once monthly with, input from the City.
• ]Invoices will be HDR standard invoice format.
• Internal kickoff meeting will be up to 1 hour with up to 6 l --M staff attending via conference call.
• Kickoff meeting and site visit with, the City will be up to 4 hours with, up to six FiDR'teaim staff attending in,
person in Tuikwila, WA.
• Weekly project team meetings with, City staff for 1 hour with, up to four HDR team staff attending' (all project
team meetings will be held) via, teleconference). A total of up to 60 project team meetings are inicluded in, this
scope of work. Project manager or deputy projiect manager will attenci aill 60 meetings; traffic lead will attend
up to 15 meetings; public involvement lead will attend up to 15 meetings.
MANVISM14M
1. Project management plain, (PDF file).
2. Initial project schedule and monthly updates (Microsoft Project or, PDF file).
3. Monthly progress reports and invoices (e-mailed PDF file).
4. Kickoff meeting agendas for kickoff meeting with, the City (Word or PDF file).
5. Pro)ect team meeting agendas and notes for up to 60 pro)ect team meetings (Worcl or PDF file).
PIT!
Riinfl,111111i maiM.-ii
OBJECTNE
The purpose of this'task is to compile and review available data. This task includes organizing and collecting daitai and
information on, various elements of the environment for the study area, establishing baseline assumptions about the
existing condlitions or no action alternative, and identifying data gaps that may affect the aipproa,ch, to development of
the EIIS. This task includes further defining project goals, idlenitifying options for the action, alternatives, and considlerinig
key aissuimptionis for ea,ch, alternative. Finally, this task inicludles preparing a, preliminary draft outline of the EIIS
dlocumenit for dliscussion, with the City.
11FIGMANTINW,
• Review previous studies prepared by others for the proposed rerouting project.
• Prepare questions and issues list -following literature review for discussion with, City at project team meeting.
ki
Exhibit A
cnity of"rukwflp
a � copy of Wo�k and re Sa
erilirnary
AHe nt ow'D uck Re ro�A e EnVonirn entakripact St atelm ent
• Prepare initial information, request for the City for cliscussion, at project team meeting. Adldlitionial information,
requests may be discussed over the course of several team meetings.
• Prepare a, preliminary draft annotated ouitlinie that summarizes the organization of the Draft EIIS, the resources
to be analyzed), and the methodology to be used for the analyses. The ouitlinie will highlight areas needling
additional discussion or input from the City. The outline may be discussed and refined over the course of,
several team meetings.
• Coordlinaite with, City to prepare written, description of proposed action, no aiction, alternative, and up to two
aidlditioniail alternatives, and use data, and information, compiled under this task to refine the dlescriptionis and)
prepare draft dlescriptions for dliscussion, at project team meeting.
• Coordinate with, City to prepare project objective statement arid potential alternatives for discussion at
project team meeting.
• Refine project objective and alternatives discussions and dlevelop preliminary Draft EES chapters (Chapter 1,
Introduction; and) Chapter 2, Proposed Project and Alternatives).
• Maintain project aidminiistrative record throughout -thee duration, of the contract.
9 H DR will providle coordlination, with BNSF as requiredl during the duration of the project.
WENT RESPONSMILIMES
0 Coordinate with, othier City departments regardling information, requests as needed.
• Providle responses to data requests in, a, timely manner.
• Provide any non -publicly available data or reports.
• Provide input and feedlback on, draft materials in, a, -timeframe consistent withithe agreed upon, project
schiedlule and coordinate with other City departments as neecled.
• Providle one set of compiled comments on, draft materials.
• Follow guidelines for and providle documentation, for the administrative record).
• Provide existing BNSF contacts and participate in, outreach meetings.
U"IMMOGIM
• Questions / issues list and information, request may be augmented at later meetings as the project progresses.
• Information, providled by the City will include similar level of detail for each, alternative to be described) and'
ainailyzedL
9 Theis scope of work includes the proposed action,, no aiction, alternative, an�dl up to two aiddlitioniail design
alternatives for analysis in, the Draft EBS. Analysis of additional alternatives would require an amendment to
this scope and fee.
• Draft annotated outline will include high level discussion of resources to be included), information, sources and)
gaps/'limitations, methods to be used in, the analysis, and identification /,justification, of resources that were
not previously anticipartedl to be analyzed in, the EIS.
• Cine round of review of dlraift materials is anticipated; City will have another opportunity to review these
materials in, the preliminary Draft ElS.
• Comments on draft materials will be consolidated provided in electronic format (tracked changes in Word or
comments in PDF files).
• H DR will provide up to 16 houirs of coorclination, with BNSF dluirinig the dluraition, of the project.
M
Exhibit A- city of"rukwfla � Scop�e of Wo�k and ree Sarilirnary
AHe nt own'D uck Re ro�A e EnVonirn entaV kripact St atelm ent
X411014117m1w
L Questions / issuies list andl initial information, requiest for discussion at project team meeting (Word) or PDF
file).
2. Draft ElS outline (Word) file).
I Initial draft Chapters I and 2 (Word) file).
4. Project administrative record (electronic -files).
Rffl� ==�
OBJECTIVE
Thiis will include evaluating previouisly dlevelopedl alternatives and evaluating the feasibility of potential new
alternatives.
INOWSWIINW,
• HDR will support the alternatives screening effort with, input and feasibility analysis for up to two new
alternatives not inicludled iin the previous alternatives analysis report.
• Develop a feasibility matrix to evaluate potential alternatives. The criteria will be developed in consultation
with the City.
• Consultant will participate in, alternative brainstorming and screening, meeting.
WENT RESPONSMWITIES
• Work with, HDR to dlevelop the criteria, that will be used in, the feasibility matrix to evaluate potential
alternatives.
• Provide input and feedlbaick on draft materials in, a, timeframe consistent with the agreed upon, project
schedule and coordinate with other City departments as needled).
• Providle one set of compiled comments on, draft materials.
• Feasibility matrix will evaluate the alternatives previously considered in, the 2016 Feasibility Study and two
new build alternatives.
• Up to two exhibits will be prepared to show the location of the new alternatives.
• Alternative Brainstorming meeting will last 2 hours and be aittendled by two Consultant staff.
• Screening Meeting will last for I hour and inicludle -two Consultant staff.
• Consultant will not provide cost estimates or quantity takeoffs on, the alternatives for this task.
• Onie round of review of draft materials is anticipated); City will have another opportuin,ity,to review these
materials inithe preliminary Draft EES.
• Comments on draft materials will be consoliciated provided in, electronic -format (tracked) changes in Word or
comments in PDF files).
DELIIVERABLES.
1. Two Alternative exhibits (IIxI7 PDF).
I Draft and Final Feasibility Matrix (Word) file).
01
Exhibit A
2.3 Diraft Conceptual Design
cnity of"rukwfla 0 Scop�e of Wino and ree Siarilirnary
AHe nt ow'D uck Re ro�A e EnVonirn entaknipact St atelm ent
OBJECTIVE
Develop up to three alternatives at the conceptuail level for inclusion in, the ElS.
9 HDR will develop up to three alternative conceptual level designs for inclusion in, the EIIS analysis. The
conceptuiail level dlesign will inicludle roadway pavement, sidewalks, curb and gutter, driveway cuts, and
preliminary location, of retaining wall structures -that may be required. Thee design will be displayed on, roll plot
exhibits with, legends and general notes. The roll plots will also include a, single typical section, for the
alternative.
• HDR will prepare quiainitity takeoffs for cost estimating of the three alternatives at a, conceptual design, level.
• FIDIR will develop writeuips covering design criteria, and impacts of the alternative for use in, the ElS
documentation.
9 HDR will review comments provided by the City on, the draft conceptual design, and provide written, responses
MIUMMIT&TIMEM
9 HDR shall attend once meeting with, the City to discuss the comment response and path, forwardl.
MIN0,10TWIMMMINVIEW
9 Provide one round of compiled comments on, the draft coniceptuail design.
9 Up tothiree total alterniatives will be developed to be selected from 'theBNSIF Ra,ilwaiy intermodal Facility
Access Study Alternative Screening Analysis Report or from the pre-conceptuiail design alternatives developed
undle r Taisk 2.2.
• The City will provide concurrence on, the -three alternatives to carry into conceptual design.
• Ea,ch, alternative writeuip for roadway design, is assumed to be no longer than, two pages.
• Up to three Consultant staff will attend the conceptual design review meeting.
1. Draft Conceptual Design
a. Three Rollplots (PDF)
b. Three Roadway Quantity Estimates (Excel)
c. Writeup for each, alternative (3) for inclusion in, EOS analysis documentation, (Word)
2. Comment Responses Document (PDF).
"UH M. • �-
OBJECTIVE
Incorporate City comments on the draft conceptual design and produce a, finial conceptual design,.
• HDR will revise the draft documents to incorporate comments received from the City.
• HDR will provide data to support the EIIS such as right of way (ROW) impact square footage, wetland impact
square footage, square footage of niew impervious surfacing to inform the ElS development.
M
Exhibit A- city of"rukwfla � Scop�e of Wio�k and ree Siarillirnary
AHe nt ownD 'uck Re rorA EnV
e � onirn entaV knipact St atem ent
WROMARMIMMORNIUM
9 Provide input ainid feedlbaick on draft maiteriails in, a, timeframe consistent with, the agreed upon, project
schedule and coordinate with other City departments as needed.
0 Provide one set of compiled comments on, draft materials.
ASSUMP'nONS
• There will be no further comments on, the draft conceptual design, after the cornment review meeting.
• Data, support required for the ElS will be included in, the alternative writeups.
DEUVERABLES
1. Three Rollplots (PDF).
I Three Roadway Quantity Estimates (Excel).
I Writeuip for ea,ch, alternative (3) for incluision in ElS analysis documentation (Word).
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this task is to prepare a, public involvement strategy for the project.
1111MMISMOM,
• Prepare a draft and final public participation plan that outlines a, tailored outreach, process and how public
input will be incorporated into the ElS development process.
• Prepare for and attend a, meeting with, the City to discuss the public participation, plan, and incorporate
feedback.
CLIENT RE, PONSIBMITIE
9 Provide input and feedback on draft materials in, a, timefrarne consistent with'the agreed upon, project
schedule and coordlinate with other City departments as needed.
0 Up to three l--iDR staff would attend virtual public participation, plain, discussion meeting for 1 hour.
DELIVERABLES
1. Draft and finial public participation plain, (electronic Word format).
HMMM=,
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this task is to develop content and graphics for use in public communications.
• Develop content and graphics for one project faictshieet and one FAQs.
• Develop content and graphics for quarterly email updlaites.
* Develop one mailer, two social rnedia, posts, and newspaper notice for the scoping meeting.
7
Exhibit A
cnity of"rukwfla � Scope of Wino and ree Siarilirnary
AHe nt ow'D uck Re ro�A e EnVonirn entaknipact St atelm ent
• Produce one set of scoping meeting materials, including:
* One PowerPoint presentation,.
* Up to six display boards.
• Develop one mailer, two social media posts and newspaper notice for the Draft EIIS public meeting.
• Produce one set of Draft ElS public meeting materials, including:
* One PowerPoint presentation.
* Up to six display boards.
* Draft ENS readers guide.
CLIENT RESPONSMILITIMS
9 Provide input and feedback on draft rnaterials in, a, tirnefrarne consistent with the a r'eedl upon, project
schedule and coordinate with other City departments as needed.
ASSUMPTONS
9 Scope does not include printing or mailing costs.
DELIVERABLES
1. Draft and final factshieet and FAQs (up to three updates), (electronic M ordl and PDF -format).
I Quarterly email updates (uip to four).
I Draft and final mailer (electronic '+ ordl and PDF format).
4. Draft and final newspaper notice (electronicWordl and PDF format).
5. Draft and final PowerPoint presentation.
6. Draft and finial display boards (electronic Word and PDF -format).
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this task is to provide oversight and support for public meetings.
HDR SERMICES
• Develop public scopinig meeting plan.
• Develop Draft EIIS meeting plan,
• Provide facilitator for public scoping meeting andl Draft DUOS meeting.
• Provide three additional support staff to assist with setup and operations at the public scopinig meeting and
Draft EIIS meeting.
• Provide one staff to support up to 10 Allentown Community meetings.
CLIENT RESPONS OLMES
• Provide input and feedlback on, draft materials in, a, -timeframe consistent with, the agreed upon, project
schedule and coordinate with other City departments as needed.
• The City will be responsible for securing and booking the public meeting locations.
ASSUMMONS
• NIDDM will provide one meeting facilitator and up to -three support staff for each meeting for up to 4 hours.
• Public meetings would be in-person.
M
Exhibit A
n
City of"rukwfla � Scope of Wino and re e Siarilirnary
AHe nt ow'D uck Re ro�A e EnVonirn entaknipact St atelm ent
9 Allentown Community meeting support would be for up to 10 meetings for up -to 2 hours eaichi.
DEUVERABLES
1. Draft and final public scoping meeting plain (electronic Word and PDF formait).
I Draft and finial Draft ElS meeting plain, (electronic Word and PDF format).
I A] I enitown, Community Meeting Summaries (up to 10), (el ectroni c Word) format) .
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this task is to process EIIS scoping comments that are submitted during the EIIS scoping period and
produce the scopinig report.
HDR SEMCES
• Collect comments via, print and electronic formaits. All comments will be tracked using Zoho CRM Professional,
an, online communications, contact and event management system. Comments will be organized by projlect
phase, date received and name (if provided).
• Prepare a, draft and finial scoping report incorporating the comments received during the scopinig period.
CLIENT RESPONSOLMES
• Provide scopinig comments as they are received).
• Provide input and feedback on, draft scoping report in a, timeframe consistent with the agreed upon, project
schiecluile.
ASSUMMONS
• Up to 50 uniiquie comments and 100 form I etters/petitionswould be received duringthe scoping period.
• Scoping period) is 50 dlays.
DELIVERABLES
1. Comment database, (online).
1 Draft Scoping Report (Word).
3, Finial Scopinig Report (Word and PDF).
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this task is to process public and agency comments received during the Draft RIS public comment
period.
HDR SERMICES
• Collect comments via print and electronic formaits. All comments will be tracked using Zohio CRM Professional.
• Comments will be reviewed and categorized by comment -topic area,.
CUENT RESPONSMWITIES
9 Provide Draft EES public and agency comments ass they are received.
9
Exhibit A
-
City of"rukwfla P Scop�e of Wino and re e Siarilirnary
AHe nt own'D uck Re ro�A e EnVonirn ental knipact St atelm ent
ASSUMPT$ONS
• Up to 50 uniquie comments and 100 form letters/'petitions would be received duringthe public comment
period.
• Public comment period is 30 days.
• Comment responses will be developed uinidler the Final EIS task (Task 5).
DELIVERABLES
1. Comment database (online).
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this task is to prepare a, Preliminary Draft EIIS (PIDUS)ainid public Draft EIIS. The preliminary document will
incluide all components of the Draft EES, inicluding a description of alternatives, affected environment, potential
environmental impacts, mitigation, measures, and significant unavoidable adverse impacts for scoped elements of the
environment and alternatives and will conisidler input from the public scopinig period). This task includes coordination
with the City to idlenitify recommended mitigation, measures and a workshop to review the City's comments on, the
PDEIIS. Following the workshop, the public Draft US will be prepared).
HDR SERVICES
• Prepare SEPA Determination of Significance and Scopinig Notice.
• Prepare draft materials, including methodology, affected environment and environmental consequiences
sections for l I DR Team quality aissurainice/quaility control (QA/QC) review -to include the following resource
areas:
* Geology/soils.
* Public services and utilities.
* Land and shoreline use, including recreation.
* Fiealth and safety, including public/worker safety and hazardous materials.
* Environmental justice.
* Cuilturail resources.
* Transportation.
* Noise.
* Air quality.
* Curnuilative effects.
* Waiter resources, including floodplains, wetlands, water quality, surface water, and groundwater.
* Plants and animals, including state -listed species.
• Collaborate with the City to identify recommended mitigation, measures as needed in each area, of
environmental analysis. This task includes clear narrative dlocumenitaition of the range of mitigation, measures
that could be considered.
• Compile PDUS and conduct editorial review and QA/QC.
• Prepare PDElS for City review and comment.
ME
Exhibit A
cnity of"rukwfla � Scope of Wo�k and ree Sarilirnary
AHe nt ow'D uck Re ro�A e EnVonirn entakripact St atelm ent
• Prepare for andl lead an, EIS works hop to highlight key findi rigs andl conclusions andl ouitstainidlinig issues and
dliscuss approach, to resolution of City's comments on, the PIDEIIS.
• Incorporate revisions to the PHIS into the Draft EIIS.
• Provide a proof copy of the Draft ENS tothe City to confirm -that all reques'tedl changes hiave been, made and
authorize publication, of the document.
• Upon authorization, by the City, provide electronic files of the public Draft EDS for City issuance and compressed
electronic files for posting on, the City's website.
• Providle input andl feedback on draft materials in, a timeframe consistent with, the agreedl upon, project
schiedlule andl coordinate with other City departments as nieedledl.
• Providle one set of compiled comments on, draft materials.
• Ilf requiredl, the City would providle ain, aesthetic/visual resources analysis of the proposed alternatives.
• Coordinate publication, and copying of the Draft EIIS for public issuianice and related press releases and
notifications, to include direct mailers, social medlia outreach, and newspaper notice.
ASSUMPnONS
9 The clescription, of alternatives will not chainige substaintiailly once the once the HIDIR team has begun, analysis of
impacts.
• The noise analysis will be not incluidle noise monitoring or noise modeling and will include a, qualitative
discussion of the potential impacts associated with the project.
• The air quality analysis will not include air quality modelling as the project is not expected to generate a,
change in, traffic levels between, potential alternatives. The air quality analysis will focus on qualitative
impacts, such as odor.
9 No field work for this EIIS will be requiredl beyondl that described uinider Tasks 4.3 ancl 4.4.
• Unless otherwise noted), the analyses in, this scope of work will be conducted utilizing a, desktop review of
publicly available data.
• Cine round of review of the PIDEIIS will be conduicted; comments may be resolved via tracked changes, in
project team meetings, and)/'or in, the EIS workshop. Comments will be provided in electronic format (either in
-tracked changes in, Word, in, a comment responise matrix, or both)
• EIS workshop will be up to 4 hours in duration, and up to six FIDIR team staff will attend).
• if the public scopinig process identifies additional elements of the environment or alternatives -for study in the
Draft EIS beyond those describecl in, this scope of work, an amendment to 'this scope and fee may be
necessary.
9 Comments anidl/or changesto the PHIS requestedl by the City will not require substantive niew ainiailysis.
• This scope of work does not include -formatting for accessibility (ADA/508 requirements).
• The scope of work does not cost for printing 'the Draft EIS.
9 Thie City will assumethe costs of -thie printing, posting social medlia, posts, andl issuing thie mailer andl Draft EIS
Newspaper notice.
DEUVERABLES
1. PIDDS (Word file).
2. Draft EIS technical appendices (PDF file)
M
Exhibit A
I Agenda, for EIIS workshop (Word) or PDF file).
4. Public Draft E iS (P D F fiI e).
4.2 Tr°affic Analysis
n
city of"rukwfla � Scopse of Wino and ree Siarilirnary
AHe nt ow'D uck Re ro�A e EnVonirn entaV knipact St atelm ent
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this task is to prepare the traffic analysis for the US.
• Review existing documentation,:
* Review traffic analysis software files providledl for previous analysis and assess any needs for
improvements/adjustments.
* Review the City's Comprehensive Plain, with, focus on, Transportation Element.
* Review/document findings from study reports for previous or adjacent projects.
• Evaluate Traffic and Crash Data, Collection:
• Existing traffic counts from 2018, 2020, and 2021 will be utilized and provided by the City. Traffic counts
will be reviewed in collaboration with, the City and any additional traffic couints required to complete the
analysis will be provided by the City's -traffic count vendor.
• New AM arid PM peak period turning movement counts will be collected by the City's traffic count
vendor at two intersections.
0 Five-year crash, history for impacted intersections will be provided by the City.
9 Analyze Traffic Operationsforthe following scenarios:
* Existing Year.
* Design, Year with, no Changes:
• Background Growth Rate, based on, review of historic AADT and City's Comprehensive Plan.
City to approve proposed growth rate prior to future conditions analysis
• Trips expected'from development projects in process but not yet open,
0 Designi Year with, Truck Routing Alternatives:
0 Re-routed Truck Traffic for four alternatives studied previously and uip to two new or hybrid
alternatives
0 Identification of mitigation measures.
9 Analyze Traffic Safety data,. Report the findings on the following:
o Craish, severity and types.
• Intersection vehicle crash rates at study intersections.
• Roadway craish, rates (not intersection, related)) on S 124111 Street between, 42"'d Avenue S and 5111 Place
S,
• Potential countermeasure assessment.
9 Develop Traffic Analysis Report and Draft EIIS section:
0 Prepare the traffic Draft US section, and standalone Traffic Analysis Report with, associated
attachments for City review.
* Traffic Analysis Report to be included as an appendix to the EiS report.
* Address/reconcile City's comments on, draft report. Submit finial report.
* Prepare for and participate in, up to six virtual meetings for the traffic analysis with, City staff.
M
Exhibit A- city of"rukwfla � Scop�e of Wo�k and ree Sarillirnary
AHe nt ownD uck
' Re rorA EnV
e � onirn entaV kripact St atem ent
MIRMIUMMMMUNIUM
• City will provide traffic counts for impacted intersections collected in, 2018, 2020, and 2021.
• The City's traffic couinit vendor will provide any required AM/PM peak period tuirniinig movements and traffic
counts.
• City will provide Synchiro models that are in a, condition that requires rninirnal or no calibration.
• City will provide the final or most recent version, of traffic study reports for Allentown, development projects
approved in, the last 5 years.
• City will provide one round of cornments on, the Draft Traffic Analysis Report.
• HDR will use previous Synichiro modlel as starting point for traffic analysis.
• HDR will reconcile comments to the Draft Report with the City prior to submitting the Final Report.
• HDR will summarize findings of the KPG Traffic Calming Report for the safety analysis.
141"UNIffffaqw,
L Draft Traffic Analysis Report and associated EIIS section, (Word) file).
I A inal Traffic Analysis Report and associated EIIS section, (Word -file).
OBJECTNE
The purpose of this task is to conduct a, dlesktop-level review and field assessment of wetlands in the project area, of the
proposed alternatives.
[IMMMaTINW,
0 l--iDR will assess wetlands using the following niethods:
o Wetlainidls and streams within, the project effects area, that may be affected by construction, of the
proposed alternatives:
identify wetlanidls and streams based on publicly available databases (existing National
Wetland ]inventory, King County Nap, National I lydlrograiphy Dataset, and Statewide
Washington Integrated Fish Dstribution, mapper)
Conduct site reconnaissance to ground -truth location, and extent of inventoried wetlainidls
and streams.
• Map approxiniate location and extent of wetlainidls and strearns based on, site
reconnaissance, aerial photographs, and topographic dlaitai.
• Prepare preliminary rating -forms for the wetlainidls per Washington Department of Ecology's
2014 Washington State Wetland Rating System for Eastern Woshington.
9 HDR will prepare a Wetlainid an�dl Stream Technical Memorandurn that summarizes the approximate size,
Cowairdlin, Class, and preliminary Category of wetlainidls.
CUENT RESPONSMMITIES
• Providle timely review of all deliverables and one consolidated list of review comments to FiDR, in, accordlanice
with the project schedule.
• Obtaiin, and provide rights of entry for the wetlainidls field staff.
M
Exhibit A- city of"rukwfla � Scop�e of Wio�k and ree Siarilirnary
AHe nt own'D uck Re ro�A e EnVonirn entaV knipact St atelm ent
MUSIMEMIX M,
• The wetland assessment and desktop review project review includes up -to four alternatives.
• The build alternatives will be identified prior to completing the site reconnaissance to ground-truith wetlainid
and stream locations,
9 Up to seven, wetlainids, and four streams will be assessed. For the purpose of thiis assumption, each, proposed
crossing of the Duiwaimish River will couint as a, separate wetlaind and stream.
• Task assumes that wetlainidls requiring site investigation will be accessible from public roadls.
• Wetlands will not be formally delineated for permitting purposes. Location, and extent of wetlands will be
mapped with limited GPS points in, the field, and available aerial photos and topographic daita.
9 HDR will have full access to -the areas requiring entry and will be providled with access keys, if nieedledL. No
permits will be required for HDR to conduct its fieldwork.
9 A discussion, of potential wetlaind and stream mitigation will not be will not be inicluded.
1. Draft and Final Wetland and Stream Technical Memorainiclurn (electronic Wordl and PDF format),
2. Draft Wetlaind Section, for inclusion in, PDEIIS (electronic Word) and PIDF format).
4.,4 Cultural Resources
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this task is to perform 'the cuilturail resources analysis for the ElS. This includes reviewing available
background data and the previous analysis completed for the BNSF Railway Intermodial Facility access Study in 2016, as
well as coordination with the Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, (DAHP), King County
Historic Preservation, Program (HPP), affected Indian, tribes, and other par -ties who may hold interests ini'the project
area, regarding cultuirail resources. A field survey for archaeological and architectural history resources will be
conducted within, and adjacent to, the footprint of the designalternatives (referred to as `"Alternatives Survey Arca").
identified cultural resources will be recorded and a preliminary assessment of their eligibility for state and federal
historic registers and local landmarks will be madle. Potential impacts of the project will be considered for identified
cultural resources, as applicable. A technical report will be prepared that meets the DAHP guidlelines and will serve as
the basis for the cultural resources affected environment and impacts analysis sections of the ElS. Work will be
overseen by archaeologist and/or' airch,itectuirail historians who meet the Secretary of'the Interior's Professional
Quail if i caitionis Standards for'their respective disciplines.
9 HDR will support -thie City in, coordliniati on, with, the DAFiP, KC HPP, IIndian, tribes, and other pair ties (e.g.,
historical societies, Waishiinigton, Trust for Historic Preservation, etc.) who maiy hold an, interest in, the project.
This coordination will consist of emails and/or phone calls to determine if the parties have any concerns in the
Project area,. Specifically, tribes will be asked to share information concerning ainiy resources of religious and
cuilturail significance'that may be located in proximity to the project alternatives, should they wish to share
such information. FiDR is aware -that the Tribes may have information gathered from elders regarding the
Project area, and will welcome the opportunity to coordliniaite with them regarding incorporation of this type of
iniformation, in, a, secure and respectful rnaininer. H DR staff will be available -for telephone consultations with, the
City, and DAHP, as necessary, regarding the project and our findings.
FE
Exhibit A
-
city of"rukwfla O Scop�e of Wino and ree Siarilirnary
AHe nt own'D uck Re ro�A e EnVonirn entaknipact St atelm ent
9 HDR staff will conduct an, online records search of the DN -V Washington Information System for Architectural
and Archaeological Records Data (MSAARD) to determine what previous studies have been conclucted within
and in, a 1 -mile buffer around all of the project alternatives, as well as to identify previously recorded
archaeological and historic resources in, the project vicinity. HDR personnel will also review publicly available
data from online sources inicluding county soil books, aerial photography, General Land Office survey plaits,
and historic maps to develop a, preliminary impression of the -type and number of cultural resources that may
be located within the Alternatives Survey Area, and surrounding area. This review will build upon, the previous
analysis completed for, the BNSF Railway Intermodal Facility Access Study in, 2016.
9 HDR will perform a, field survey to document archaeological ainid historic built environment resources within,
'the Alternatives Survey Area. The archaeological survey will focus within, the alternatives footprint where
ground disturbance is anticipated. The historic built environment Survey will focus on, the footprint and
immediately adjacent areas where both, grouinid dlistuirbainice and visual impacts are anticipated. l..M will
arrange for utility locates to meet the requirements of Washington's Underground Utilities regulations (RCC
19.122). The field survey will consist of the following:
* 1--iDR will conduct an, archaeological pedestrian survey of the Alternatives Survey Area, including up
to 10 acres. Survey transects shall be 20 meters apart or less on, average for the survey; however,
nairrowertranisects may be used according to the judgment of the field supervisor. The surveyors
will seek oust and examine all ground exposures (e.g., exposed) bank, roads, trails, ditches) for
evidence of subsurface -features and/or cultural materials. All survey areas recorded using a, GPS
instrument that achieve submeter accuracy in, the field.
* Assessment of the character of the landscape, its potential for containiing intact archaeological
dleposits, and the presence of any existing utilities and other impediments will determine subsurface
-testing methods. Up to 40 shovel probes, measuring aipproximaitely4O centimeters (cm) in diameter,
will be excavated within, the Alternatives Survey Area, in, approximately 20 meter spacing, where
feasible. The shovel probes will be excavated to a, maximum depth, of I meter unless sterile
sedlimenits or impediments are enicouinteredl. Up to 25% of the shovel probes will be extended to 2
meters deep -through the use of bucket augers to verify that deeply buried archaeological materials
are not present. Shovel probes may be terrninated at shallower depths if the sediments reveal that
substantial ground disturbaince has previously occurred at a location. Excavated sediments will be
screened -thirough, 0.25 -inch i hardware mesh, -to identify cultural materials that may be present. The
identification of any suibsuirface cultural materials in, a single shovel probe will result in, the
excavation of up to -four adlditionial shovel probes in a, cruciform pattern at a distance of 5 meters
(called radiad probes) within the Alternatives Survey Area,, as feasible, to determine resource
boundairies. All shovel probes will be completely backfilled), and their locations will be marked with,
the GPS instrument after recordation is complete.
* if archaeological materials are found, they will be analyzed in the f'ieldl but not collected. To the
extent possible, they will be identified as to type, material, function, and cuilturail and chronological
association. All encountered archaeological materials will be documented on, DAl--iP site and isolate
forms. Draft archaeological site and isolate forms, and historic property inventory (HPII) forms, will
be submitted to DAHP for, review and assignment of Smithsonian Trinomials for inclusion with, the
Final Report dlelivera,ble. Cultural resource locations and/or boundaries will be recor'dedl with the
GPS instrument. Photographs will be -taken, of the resource(s) and a, GIIS sketch, map will be prepared
to accompany the form.
is
Exhibit A
- city of"rukwfla D Scop�e of Wino and re e Siarilirnary
AHe nt own'D uck Re rorA e EnVonirn entaknipact St atelm ent
• An, FiDR architectural historian, will conduct a, reconnaissance -level architectural history survey
within the Alternatives Survey Area, and affronting parcels. Architectural features that are 45 years
old or older will be recorded on DDA,NHP HPII forms, photographed), and evaluated for their eligibility
for listing in federal, state, and local registers, per IDAHP guidelines. For the purposes of scopinig, it is
estimated that up to 20 architectural resources maiy have dates of construction that extend prior to
19,75 and that need to be evaluated. The architectural historian, will assess potential project effects
on, any historically significant properties identified during the inventory and recommend
appropriate avoidance, minimization, and)/or mitigation meaisuires, as feasible.
• HDR will prepare a Cultural Resources Inventory Report summarizing the results of the records
review arid field survey. This report will adhere to the DAHIP reporting guidelines and professional
staindaircls. The report will include:
• A description of the project and applicable laws and regulations
• A summary of the results of the records review
• The field methods and results
• A description of any cuilturail materials found
• A preliminary assessment of potential Project effects on, identified cultuirail resources
• Recommendations for any further cultural resources work required for the project
• A statement outlining what steps the projiect should follow in, the event of an, uinianiticipaited
dliscovery of buried cultural materials or hurnan, remains during conistruction,
• References cited
• Tables, maps, photographs, and other graphics as are needed to dlepict the study results.
Forms for any recorded resources will be included in, an, appendix to the report.
CUENT RESPONSWILMIES
• Provide input and feedlback on, draft materials in, a, timeframe consistent with, the agreed upon, project
schedule and coordliniate with other City departments as needed.
9 The City will obtain and provide rights of entry for the cultural resources field staff.
UMMINEOM M,
9 HDR will have full access to the Alternatives Survey Area, and will be provided with access keys, if needed. No
permits will be required for HDR to conduct its fieldwork.
0 HDR will not begin, subsurface fieldwork until an, Excavation Confirmation Codle is obtained from the utility
locate service arid all known, utilities are marked, or HIDIR has received direct confirmation from each utility
that they have no facilities in, the project area. Once l --M's fieldwork is completed, we will not be responsible
for maintaining any location survey markings.
9 No more thian, 44 shovel probes will be excavated within the Alternatives Survey Area.
9 One archaeological site or isolate will be identified cluiring survey and documented on, a, DAli IP site/isolate
form.
0 20 historic built environment resources will be identified during survey and documented on a, l -VII form.
9 No overnight stays are anticipated to conidluct field work.
9 Rounicitrip mileage at the IRS rate is included for crews to perform the field study.
* Teleconferences with, the City, agencies, and Tribes will not exceed 4 hiouirs overthe term of the project.
9 Reporting will not include the preparation, of ain inaidvertenit dliscovery plain, or agreement documents (e.g.,
Memoraindurn of Agreement).
16
Exhibit Acity of"rukiwila copse oWio�k and
f ree Siarillirnary _N
AHe nt ownDck R
'ue ro�A e EnV� onirn entaV kripact St atem ent I
0 HDR will use the approved technical report as the basis of Affected Environment and Impacts Assessment
cultural resources sections of the EIS.
DEUVERABLES
1. Draft and Finial Cultural Resources Report (electronic Word) and PIDF formats).
2. Draft and Final Archaeological Site/Isolate Form (electronic PDF format).
I Draft and Final HPII Forms (up to 20; electronic PIDF format).
4. Draft EIS section for inclusion, in PHIS (electronic Word and PDF formats).
AMCWHY1,01
The purpose of this task is to coordinate with the City to prepare responses to comments on, the Draft US and prepare
the Final EIIS (PEAS).
ITIFUMMW
• Collaborate with, City staff to refine approach, and to prepare responses to comments.
• Prepare annotated outline of FEIIS, describing recommended modifications, corrections, and/or additions, for
discussion at project team meeting.
• Prepare preliminary FMS and conduct editorial review and QA/QC.
• Preparefor and lead an, EES workshop to confirm approach to resolution of City's comments on, the preliminary
FEIIS.
• Revise FUS based on, City comments.
• Prepare a, final proof copy of the document for City confirmation, that all requested changes have been made.
• Provide electronic files of the HIS for publication by the City and compressed electronic files for posting on, the
City's website.
CUENT RESPONSIBILIMES
• Provide input and feedback on, draft rnaterials in a, timeframe consistent with, the agreed upon, project schedule
and coordinate with, other City departments as needed.
• Provide one set of compiled comments on, draft materials,
• Assist with preparing responses to comments that require City staff, input and coordinate with, other City
departments as needed.
• Coordinate publication and copying of the HIS for public issuance and related press releases and notifications.
9 Onie round of review of the preliminary FEIIS; comments may be resolved via, tracked changes or in, project team
meetings.
• Comments on draft materials will be provided in electronic format (-tracked changes in Word or comments in PDF
-riles) via the project Share Point site.
• Comments and/or changes to the HIS will be minimal and editorial / qualitative in, nature and not require
substantive new analysis. Additional analyses to complete the HIS are not included in, this scope of work.
• EIS workshop will be up to 4 hours in duration and up to six l --M team staff will attend.
• This scope of work does riot iniclude formatting for accessibility (ADA/508 requirernents).
17
Exhibit A
cnity of"rukwfla O Scop�e of Wo�k and ree Sarilirnary
AHe nt ow'D uck Re ro�A e EnVonirn entakripact St atelm ent
• Responses to comments will be providled in, table -format with, minimal formatting.
• Appendices will require minimal -formatting and will be attached to the EIS in, their original -format.
• Assistance with SEPA appeal is not included in, this scope of work.
• The scope of work does not cost for printing the FEIS.
DEUVERABLES
L HIS ouitlinie (Word) file).
I Compiled draft comment responses for City review (Word) file).
I Preliminary IFUS (Word file).
4. Public HIS and appendices (PDF file).
Estimated Fees and Disbursements
Compensation for proposed services will be billed on, a Time and Materials basis. The total fee for these services is not
to exceed $7918,603, unless rnutually agreed upon, by HDR and the Client.
Task Task Description Total
I 1project Managernent $81,542
2 Data Collection and Alternatives Development $115,7891
3 Public Involvement $114,596
4 Draft EIS $,3291,010
5 Final IE IIS $157,666
SUBTOTAL $798,603
Terms and Conditions
These services are proposed to be completed under the City of Tukwilai's Professional Services Agreement with
negotiated 'terms between HDR and the City. The standlardl of care for HDIR's set -vices shall be the care and skill
ordinarily uised by members of HDR's profession, practicing uinidler the same or similar circumstances at the same time
and) in, the same locality.
This proposal is valid for 60 workdays from the date of submission. Thereafter, it may be subject to change.
M
Exhibit B
FEE ESTIMATE
City ofTUkwila: Allentown, Truck Reroute EIS
FYZ
MI All M .1 [TL',I I M I I. ,I cm, Pap I
Total I Total
Toted
Toted
Task #
Task Description
-----------------------------------------..............
....... Labor .... Escalation
Expenses
Subconsultants
1
Project Management
$78,55�7 $2,985
1
$0
$0
2
Data Collection and Alternatives Developm
.................................................................................. ...................................................................................
$111 550 $4,239
.
so
.......................................................................................................... .
$0
3
Public Inolvement
$110,135 $4,185
$276
$o
4
Draft EIS
$316�,48,4 $12,026
$500
$0
5 Final EIS
-----------
$151,894 $5,772
$o
so
$768,620 $29,207
$776
$0
MI All M .1 [TL',I I M I I. ,I cm, Pap I
Exhibit B