The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit PL18-0091 - TUKWILA VIEW ESTATES - SEPATU KW I LA VIEW ESTATES 2623049135 PARENT FILE PL18-0091 THIS FILE E18-0015 SEPA/CHECKLIST File Numbers: Applied: Issue Date: Applicant: Lead Agency: City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor Department of Community Development - Jack Pace, Director DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) E18-0015 November 6, 2018 April 19, 2019 Nora Gierloff, Deputy Director City of Tukwila Description of Proposal: Address: Parcel Number: Request for a rezone and comprehensive plan map amendment to change the subject parcel from Low Density Residential to Tukwila Urban Center —Commercial Corridor. 17301 Southcenter Parkway, Tukwila WA 98188 262304-9135 This notice is to confirm the decision reached by Tukwila's SEPA Official to issue a Determination of Non -significance (DNS) for the above project based on the environmental checklist and the underlying permit application. The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., at Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, WA 98188. The project planner is Nora Gierloff, who may be contacted at (206) 4313-7141 for further information. This DNS is issued under the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 and there will be no second comment period. Jack Pace,esponsible Official City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431-3670 Date t I Ai The decision is appealable to the Superior Court pursuant to the Judicial Review of Land Use Decisions, Revised Code of Washington (RCW 36.70C). Any appeal shall be linked to a specific governmental action. The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of action unrelated to a specific governmental action. Appeals of environmental determinations shall be commenced within the time period to appeal the governmental action that is subject to environmental review. (RCW 43.21C.075) Copy: State Department of Ecology, SEPA Division Tukwila City Hall • 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, WA 98188 • 206-433-1800 • Website: TukwilaWA.gov City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor Department of Community Development - Jack Pace, Director FINAL STAFF EVALUATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST File No: E18-0015 Tukwila View Estates SEPA Review I. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION Request for a rezone and comprehensive plan map amendment to change the subject parcel from Low Density Residential to Tukwila Urban Center — Commercial Corridor. II. GENERAL INFORMATION Project Name: L18 -0107 Tukwila View Estates Rezone Applicant: Brad Decker Location: 17301 Southcenter Parkway, Tukwila WA 98188 Zoning and LDR Comprehensive Plan Designation: SEPA: This is a non -project SEPA determination for the proposed change in zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations. The following information was considered as part of review of this application. 1. ESA Screening Checklist and SEPA Checklist dated November 1, 2018. 2. Public Comments III. BACKGROUND/PROPOSAL The Southcenter Subarea adjoins a steep, wooded slope up to the I-5 Freeway that is zoned LDR. The property owner is requesting that the adjacent commercial zoning, TUC -CC, be extended to the southern half of his parcel which had been graded in the past and has a more gradual slope. The area to be rezoned is approximately 57,500 square feet. The proposed use would be parking for the adjacent businesses to the east. The parcel sits behind the row of existing buildings, has limited visibility and is accessed from a private easement. The western property line of the site is adjacent to the City of SeaTac. Tukwila City Hall • 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, WA 98188 • 206-433-1800 • Website: TukwilaWA.gov • • IV. REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The following lists the elements contained within the Environmental Checklist submitted for the proposed project. The numbers in the staff evaluation correspond to the numbers in the Environmental Checklist. If staff concurs with the applicant's response, this is so stated. If the response to a particular item in the checklist is found to be inadequate or clarification is needed, there is additional staff comment and evaluation. A. BACKGROUND: 1 4—Concur with checklist. 5—The hearing on the proposed amendments is scheduled on May 6, 2019 and City Council action will occur the following week after the hearing. 6 — While a specific development proposal has not been provided the intent of the rezone is to facilitate commercial development of the site. 7 — The provided geotechnical report is for an adjacent site and does not address the steep slopes on and adjacent to the subject parcel. 8-12—Concur with checklist. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: 1. Earth: a—f—Concur with checklist. Phone: 206-433-1800 • Email: Mayor@TukwilaWA.gov • Website: TukwilaWA.gov g. — While no specific proposal is listed the applicant cites expanding the retail opportunities as justification for the change. Presumably this would result in an increase in impervious surfaces. h. — Tukwila has ordinances in place to require erosion prevention and sedimentation control during construction. Development of the site would require a site specific geotechnical report with recommendations for slope stability and building foundations. 2. Air: a. - While no specific proposal is listed the applicant cites expanding the retail opportunities as justification for the change. Presumably this development would result in an increase in emissions from automobiles and building HVAC equipment during and after development. b. — The site is directly downhill from Interstate 5. c—Concur with checklist. 3. Water: a(1) — The checklist refers to a drainage ditch that Tukwila has mapped as a regulated watercourse. (2) - While no specific proposal is listed the applicant cites expanding the retail opportunities as justification for the change. Presumably this development would result in an increase in impervious surfaces within 200 feet of the drainage/watercourse. (3)—(6)—Concur with checklist. b(1) and (2)—Concur with checklist. c(1)-c(3) While no specific proposal is listed the applicant cites expanding the retail opportunities as justification for the change. Presumably this would result in an increase in impervious surfaces that would be subject to Tukwila's stormwater and water quality regulations. d—Concur with checklist. 4. Plants: a. — The survey submitted with the application shows a variety of mature big leaf maple and alder trees throughout the rezone area. b. - While no specific proposal is listed the applicant cites expanding the retail opportunities as justification for the change. Presumably this development would result in an increase in impervious surfaces and removal of vegetation. Tukwila has tree replacement and commercial landscaping regulations that would apply to redevelopment of the site. c—e—Concur with checklist. 5. Animals: a-d—Concur with checklist. Phone: 206-433-1800 • Email: Mayor@TukwilaWA.gov • Website: TukwilaWA.gov 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a. - While no specific proposal is listed the applicant cites expanding the retail opportunities as justification for the change. Presumably this would result in development and an increase in energy use for site lighting and building power. b-c—Concur with checklist. 7. Environmental Health: a(1)-(5)—Concur with checklist. b(1) — The site is directly downhill from Interstate 5. b(2)- While no specific proposal is listed the applicant cites expanding the retail opportunities as justification for the change. Presumably this development would result in an increase in noise from automobiles and building HVAC equipment during and after development. b(3)—Concur with checklist. 8. Land and Shoreline Use: a—m Concur with checklist. 9. Housing: a-c—Concur with checklist. C 10. Aesthetics: a-c—Concur with checklist. 11. Light and Glare: a. - While no specific proposal is listed the applicant cites expanding the retail opportunities as justification for the change. Presumably this would result in development and an increase in light and glare from parking lot and building lighting. b-d—Concur with checklist. 12. Recreation: a. — Tukwila Pond Park is approximately half a mile from the site. b-c—Concur with checklist. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation: a-d—Concur with checklist. 14. Transportation: a-b - Concur with checklist. c. — While no specific proposal is listed the applicant cites expanding the retail opportunities as justification for the change. Presumably this would result in an increase in parking demand from employees and customers. d e—Concur with checklist. Phone: 206-433-1800 • Email: Mayor@TukwilaWA.gov • Website: TukwilaWA.gov f. - While a specific development proposal has not been provided the intent of the rezone is to facilitate commercial development of the site. The number of trips generated would depend on the specific use developed. g-h—Concur with checklist. 15. Public Services: a-b—Concur with checklist. 16. Utilities: a-b—Concur with checklist. C. Non -project proposal responses: This a zoning code amendment proposal without a specific development identified. However, the intent of the rezone is to facilitate commercial development of the site which would likely increase emissions, noise, stormwater and energy use and require the grading of the site and removal of existing trees. Site specific geotechnical recommendations would be required to reduce the risk of altering the steep slopes adjacent to the project site. Tukwila has ordinances, permits and procedures in place to address these environmental impacts. IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS Notice was sent to property owners and tenants within 500' of the site and agencies with jurisdiction. No comments were received. VI. CONCLUSION The proposal can be found to not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and pursuant to WAC 197-11-340, a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is issued for this project. This DNS is based on impacts identified within the environmental checklist, attachments, and the above "Final Staff Evaluation for Application No. E18-0015", and is supported by plans, policies, and regulations formally adopted by city of Tukwila for the exercise of substantive authority under SEPA to approve, condition, or deny proposed actions. Prepared by: Nora Gierloff, Deputy DCD Director Date: April 19, 2019 Phone: 206-433-1800 • Email: Mayor@TukwilaWA.gov • Website: TukwilaWA.gov • • Rezone/Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application File # L18-0107 Applicant/Property Owner: Brad Decker Public Meeting: April 17, 5-6:30 PM Public Hearing: May 6, 7 PM both at Tukwila City Hall Project Location: 17301 Southcenter Parkway, Parcel #262304-9135 Project Description: Rezone of the southern half of a vacant parcel from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Tukwila Urban Center —Commercial Corridor (TUC -CC) to allow for future development. Comments: By 4/22/19 to Nora Gierloff at 206.433-7141 or Nora.Gierloff@TukwilaWA.gov 4 Existing zoning at site and surrounding area Onsite looking east to Southcenter Parkway Onsite looking west toward 1-5 City of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist Date: 11 /1 /2018 Applicant Name: Tukwila View View Estates LLC Street Address: 117 East Louisa Street, Suite 230 City, State, Zip: Seattle, WA 98102 Telephone: 206-545-4964 DIRECTIONS: This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in adverse effects to salmonids - Chinook, Coho, Cutthroat trout or char - as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). If potential effects are identified, the project may need further evaluation. Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if additional action is indicated. R _CE1V D NOV 0 62018 fir •:':;II,,�•:-��=•t WAAPPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5.9-16.doc If ESA listed species are present or ever were present in the watershed where your project will be located, your project has the potential to affect them, and you need to comply with the ESA. The questions in this section will help determine if the ESA listings will impact your project. For more information on potential salmonid presence in your project area contact the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Habitat Biologist for your region, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife or use the SalmonScape tool, WDFW SalmonScape. 1. Are ESA listed salmonids currently present in the watershed within which your project will be located? Yes1 NoE Please describe. Hood Canal Summer run Chum Salmon Ozette Lake Sockeye Salmon Puget Sound Chinook Salmon Puget Sound Steelhead 2. Has there ever been an ESA listed salmonid stock present in this watershed? YesflNon Uncertain Please describe. If you answered "yes" to either of the above questions you should complete the remainder of this checklist. W AAPPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SF.PA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-I6.doc City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part A - PROJECT SPECIFICS: Project and Vicinity 1. Name of watershed: Green - Duwamish River Watershed 2. Name of nearest water body: Green River 3. What is the distance from this project to the nearest body of water? over 4,400 feet 4. What is the current land use between the project and the potentially affected water body (parking Tots, farmland, etc)? Vacant Land 5. Is the project above a: • Natural permanent barrier (waterfall) • Natural temporary barrier (beaver pond) • Man-made barrier (culvert, dam) • Other (explain): Yesn Noj Yesn No0 Yes Non 6. If answered Yes in #5, are there any resident salmonid populations above the blockage? YesEll NoQ Don't known \\citystoretCuy Common\Teri - DCD\ktrby\SEPA to 8x\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-I6.docx W:\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Flandottts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-16.doc Part B - Project Specifics: Grading and Land Alteration I. Does the project involve grading or land alteration of any kind? Yes No 0 City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist If your project DOES NOT involve grading please skip to Part C. 2. Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank between Ordinary High Water (OHW) and the top of the bank? If yes, which water course? This includes anv rading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but does not require work below OHW. Yes n No 3. Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bottom below OHW? If yes, please explain. Yes n No ❑ 4. Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of equipment for the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and/or sedimentation in watercourses? If no, please explain. Most projects involving grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of land disturbance. Yes n No_ ❑ 5. If the project involves grading, have you prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan? Yes n No If no are you exempt under TMC 16.54.90? Yes I I No n 6. Will the project result in new impervious services? Include all hard surface are such as rooftops, asphalt or concrete pavin , compacted surfaces, etc. Yes n No 7. What percent of the project will be impervious surface (including pavement & roof area)? W:'%APPI.ICATIONS - Land Usc Apps R handouts%CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-I6.doc City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part C — Project Specifics: Water Quality 1. Will the project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? Please explain. For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into the ground Yes ❑ No 0 7. WilI the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include firel properly stored in a vehicle fuel tank, but does include fuel or other chemicals stored on -site during construction. Yes 0 No 0 3. Will the project require long-term or re -occurring maintenance requiring the use of fertilizers, pesticides, or other chemicals? This may include landscape maintenance, bridge or parking lot cleaning, ice removal/melt, repeated chemical vegetation clearing, etc. Yes fl No fl 4. Will turbidity be increased during construction or operation of the project? Please explain any measures to be taken to ensure turbidity is not increased. Construction near the water or below OHW often will increase turbidity, both on -site and downstream. Yes n No n 5. Will the project either reduce or increase shade along or over a water body? Removal of trees/vegetation or the building of over -water structures (docks or floats) will often result in a change to shade. Yes 0 No 0 6. Will the project require debris removal from below OHW of a water course? Debris includes, but is not litnited to, fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, riprap, submerged metal, broken concrete, pipes, or other construction material. Yes ENoO W:UPPLICATIONS - Land Usc Apps do Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA F,nvironmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-16.doc City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part D — Project Specifics: Flow Alterations and Fish Migration 1. Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a water course? This includes both temporraar}' and .ermanent modifications. If yes, please explain. Yes INo 2. Will the project involve any physical alteration to a wetland which is connected to a water course? Feiv wetlands are isolated. most contain either surface or subsurface connection to a flowing water course. Yes n No n 3. Will water be rerouted, either temporarily or permanently as a result of the project? If yes, please explain. Yes n No Fi 4. Will a culvert be installed or removed as part of this project? Yes rI No 0 5. Will the project require withdrawal of surface water? If yes, please include amount and name or water body. Yes n No 0 6. Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception or groundwater? Examples of projects that might affect groundwater include, but are not limited to, construction of a new well, changes in withdrawal from an existing well, projects involving prolonged dewatering, installation of French drains, swales, or sewer lines. Projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to TMC 18.45.060 should answer Yes. Yes ❑ No 7. Will topography changes on the site affect the duration/direction of surface runoff flows? If yes, please describe changes. Yes n No I It 8. Will the project include bank stabilization? If yes, explain. Bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, riprap, rock, logs, soil, vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar. Yes n No 0 9. Will there be retention or detention ponds? If yes, will this be an infiltration pond or a surface discharge to either a municipal storm water system or a surface water body? Yes n Nojj 10. Will the project involve any reduction of the floodplain or floodway by filling or other partial blockage of flows? If yes, how will the loss of flood storage be mitigated by your project? Yes n Non 11. Will project include the construction of a new wetland or waterway that is connected by surface flow to an existing waterway that contains salmonids? Yes n No❑✓ w:\APPLICA'rIONs - Land Ilse Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS'SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-')-16.doc City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part E — Project Specifics: Vegetation 1. Will the project involve the removal of any vegetation? If yes, please describe existing conditions and the amount and t pe of vegetation to be removed. Yes n No ✓ 2. Will the project involve the removal of any vegetation within 200 feet of OHW of a water course? If yes, please describe type, size, method, and amount of vegetation to be removed. A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self-supporting woody plant, generally characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter o 2inches or more at breast height and a minimum height of 10 feet. Yes n No (✓ 3. If vegetation is to be removed, do you plan to mitigate by replanting? Please explain. Yes No ✓ No vegetation being removed W:\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Rcvicw Application FINAL 5-9-16.doc SEPA Checklist STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT CHECKLIST Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Department of Ecology provides a guidance on filling the SEPA checklist at Department of Ecolosx Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Change in zoning 2. Name of Applicant: Tukwila View Estates LLC 3. Date checklist prepared: 11/1/2018 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 2019 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion. or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Not at this time 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Geotechnical study 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. none known \\citystore\City Common\Teri - DCD\Kirby SERA to Lix'SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-I6.docx W.\.APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-I6.doc Agency Comments SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Comprehensive Plan Amendment 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Zoning Change from LDR to TUC - CC 11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 17301 Southcenter Parkway, Tukwila WA 98188 The vacant land behind La - Z- Boy at 17305 Southcenter Parkway and Chick Fil A (Under Construction). 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Yes, number 3 slope classification — Landslide potential is high W.\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-I6.doc SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS I. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: one acre mostly flat and two plus acres sloping b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? over 25% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? [f you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. Silty fine sand d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. not known e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. None W:IAPPLICATIONS • Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SF..PA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-I(, don Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. yes g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? No change in the site h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: None 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. None b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None W \APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps S 1landouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Enviromnental Review Application FINAL 5.9-16.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it Flows into. Yes, year round drainage ditch - storm sewer on the south portion. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. no 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. None W \APPLICATIONS - land Use Apps & liandouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPI.ICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-I6.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? if so, note location on the site plan. No 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1. Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well? Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: None W \APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps Re Handouts\CURRENT LAND USG APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL. 5-9-16 doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including stonn water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. None 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. None 3. Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts if any: No W-\APPLICATIONS - land Use Apps R handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SERA Environmental Rcview Application FINAL 5-9-IG.duc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen. other Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other Shrubs Grass Pasture Crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other Other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. Blackberries W:WPPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-IG.doc SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 5. Animals a. List any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Mammals: Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Fish: Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None Known c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not known d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site: None Known 6. Enemy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. None W.\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-16 doc Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. NO c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of (ire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. NO 1. Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. None Known SEPA Checklist Agency Comments 2. Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. None Known 3. Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. None W:\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-It .doe SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 5. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None it is a rezone 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. None 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None W-UPPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps err Handouts\CURRF,NT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SERA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5.9-16.doc SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. Current Use: Vacant Land Adjacent Properties: Retail centers and fast food b. Has the project sire been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? Not known 1. Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? if so, how: NO c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No W'\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPI.ICATTONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-I6.doc Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? LDR f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? LDR zoning . If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes, Steep Slopes i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None W.'APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS‘SF.PA Environmental Review Application FINAL 3-9-t6.doc SETA Checklist Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None m. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and forest lands of Ion-termcommercial significance, if any: None W-'APPLICATIONS - Land Usc Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-I6.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing? None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? None b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None W'APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps Re Handouts CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-16 doc SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None known b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state or local preservation registers located on or near the site? If so, specifically describe. NO \V:\APPLICATIONS - I. nd Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-I6.doc SEPA Checklist c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? None c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None WAAPPI,ICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS'SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-16.doc SEPA Checklist b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation. This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. None Known c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. Historical Maps Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. None Planned 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Southcenter Park Way WAAPPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps S Handouts\CURRENT LAND CSE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-I6.doc SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, On Southcenter Parkway c. How many parking spaces would the completed project or non -project proposal have? How many would the project eliminate? None d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity ot) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? None W:\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts \Cf RRENT LAND USE 1PPI.ICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-I6.doc SEPA Checklist g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. No h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system other: b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. None W*4.PPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps Sc I-Iandouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS.SF.PA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-I6,doc SEPA Checklist (NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). C. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 1. How would the proposals be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? None Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: None 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? None Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: None WIAPPLICATIONS - Lind Use Apps & Ilandonts\CL:RRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS'SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-16.doc Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? None Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areasor areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitats, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? None Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? None SEPA Checklist Agency Comments W;\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5.9-16.doc SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public service and utilities? No Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: None 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with Local, State, or Federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. None Known D. SIGNATURE Under the penalty of perjury the above answers under ESA Screening Checklist and State Environmental Policy Act Checklist are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: 11 /1 /2018 W.\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SERA Environmental Review Application FINAI. 5-9-16 doc City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor Department of Community Development - Jack Pace, Director Affidavit of Distribution Project Name: TUKWILA VIEW ESTATES Project Number: PL18-0091 Associated File Number(s): E18-0015 Date Mailed: 04/22/2019 Mailing requested by: NORA GIERLOFF Mailer's signature: SM ❑ Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet ❑ Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Z Determination of Non -Significance ❑ Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice ❑ Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance ❑ Notice of Action ❑ Notice of Application Parties of Record: ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit CX Notice of Decision ❑ Notice of Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Public Meeting ❑ Official Notice ❑ Other: SEPA CHECKLIST ❑ Shoreline Mgmt Permit ❑ Short Subdivision Agenda AGENCY LABELS ( ) City Clerk Office — Ana Le PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS need to go to Ana to include in Digital Records Center ( ) US Corps of Engineers ( ) Federal HWY Admin ( ) Federal Transit Admin, Region 10 ( ) Dept of Fish & Wildlife Section 1 FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) US Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.) ( ) US Dept of HUD ( ) National Marine Fisheries Service Section 2 WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) Office of Archaeology ( ) Dept of Social & Health Services (0,, Transportation Department (WSDOT NW) ( ) Dept of Ecology NW Regional Office, Shoreland Div. Q ( ) Dept of Natural Resources SHORELINE NOD REQUIRES RETURN RECEIPT ( ) Office of the Governor (>1 Dept of Ecology, SEPA **Send Electronically ( ) WA State Department of Commerce (formerly Community Dev) ( ) Office of Attorney General ( ) WA Fisheries & Wildlife, MillCreek Office ( ) Office of Hearing Examiner ( ) WA Fisheries & Wildlife, Larry Fisher, 1775 12th Ave NW Ste 201, Issaquah WA 98027 Section 3 ( ) KC Boundary Review Board ( ) Fire District # 11 ( ) Fire District # 2 ( ) KC Wastewater Treatment Div ( ) KC Dept of Parks & Recreation ( ) KC Assessor's Office ( ) KC Watershed Coordination WRIA 9 KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) Health Department ( ) Port of Seattle ( ) KC Dev & Environmental Services-SEPA Info Center ( ) KC Metro Transit Div-SEPA Official, Environmental Planning ( ) KC Dept of Natural Resources ( ) KC Dept of Natural Resources, Andy Levesque ( ) KC Public Library System ( ) Foster Library ( ) Renton Library ( ) Kent Library ( ) Seattle Library Section 4 SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES ( ) Westfield Mall Library ( ) Tukwila School District ( ) Highline School District ( ) Seattle School District ( ) Renton School District ( ) Century Link ( ) Seattle City Light ( ) Puget Sound Energy ( ) Highline Water District ( ) Seattle Planning &Dev/Water Dept ( ) Comcast Section 5 UTILITIES ( ) BP Olympic Pipeline ( ) Seattle Public Utilities ( ) Val-Vue Sewer District ( ) Water District # 20 ( ) Water District # 125 ( ) City of Renton Public Works ( ) Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge Sewer/Water Dist ( ) Waste Management ( ) Cascade Water Alliance ( ) Tukwila City Departments ( ) Public Works ( ) Fire ( ) Police ( ) Finance ( ) Planning ( ) Building ( ) Parks & Rec ( ) Mayor ( ) City Clerk (PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS) Section 6 CITY AGENCIES ( ) Kent Planning Dept ( ) Renton Planning Dept ( ) City of SeaTac ( ) City of Burien ( ) City of Seattle ( ) Strategic Planning *Notice of all Seattle Related Projects Section 7 OTHER * send notice of all applications on Green/Duwamish River ( ) Duwamish River Clean Up Coalition * ( ) Muckleshoot Indian Tribe * ( ) Cultural Resources ( ) Fisheries Program ( ) Wildlife Program ( ) Duwamish Indian Tribe * ( ) People for Puget Sound * ** LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) Puget Sound Clean Air Agency ( ) Sound Transit/SEPA ( ) Puget Sound Regional Council ( ) Washington Environmental Council ( ) Futurewise ( ) Puget SoundKeeper ( ) SW KC Chamber of Commerce ( ) Tukwila Historical Society** send notices for all Tukwila projects which require public notice — via email to: tukwilahistsociety@tukwilahistory.org and rcwieser@comcast.net ( ) Seattle Times ( ) Highline Times Section 8 MEDIA ( ) South County Journal (4 City of Tukwila Website W:\\Planning\Development Review Manual\LU Application Review Process\Public Notice Procedures\Mailing\Agency Checklist Public Notice Mailings For Permits SEPA MAILINGS (Comment period starts on date of mailing) Notice of Application mailed to: Department of Ecology (send checklist with Notice of Application), applicant, other agencies as necessary, property owners and tenants within 500 feet. It is also posted on site. KC Transit Division - SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand. Tribes - For any application on the Green/Duwamish River, send the checklist and a full set of plans with the Notice of Application CSEPA Determination mailed to Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record -/�� * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE at the time of SEPA determination: SEPA Determination Staff report SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to applicant, property owners and residents within 500 feet of subject property, agencies with jurisdiction. Comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The Notice of Application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the Notice of Application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Notice is sent to Ecology's NW Regional Office Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21-day appeal period begins date of filing with DOE) - Notice to DOE must be by return receipt requested mail (this requirement included in SSB 5192, effective 7-22-11). Department of Ecology Shorelands Section, NW Regional Office State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the notice of decision and staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: One complete packet should also be sent to Muckleshoot Indian Tribe if they commented on the project during comment period. Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Decision (Signed by Director) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) - Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements - Cross -sections of site with structures & shoreline - Grading Plan - Vicinity map SEPA determination (Signed by Director) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) W:\\Planning\Development Review Manual\LU Application Review Process\Public Notice Procedures\Mailing\Agency Checklist CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila City Council will hold a public hearing on May 6, 2019 at 7:00 p.m. in the Tukwila City Hall Council Chambers located at 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, WA, to discuss the following: REZONE/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FILE NUMBER: L18-0107 Project Name: Tukwila View Estates Rezone/Comprehensive Plan Amendment APPLICANT: Brad Decker REQUEST: Rezone to change a vacant parcel from Low Density Residential to Tukwila Urban Center Commercial Corridor in preparation for redevelopment LOCATION: 17301 Southcenter Parkway, Tukwila, WA (Quasi -Judicial) Information on the above project may be obtained at the Tukwila Planning Division at 206-431-3670, or by contacting the project planner Nora Gierloff at Nora.Gierloff(c�TukwilaWA.00v. All interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval, disapproval, or opinions on this issue. For those unable to attend in person, you may submit written testimony to the City Clerk's office until 5:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Tukwila City Hall is wheelchair accessible. The City strives to accommodate people with disabilities. Reasonable accommodations are available at the public hearing with advance notice. This notice is also available in alternate formats for individuals with disabilities. Please contact the City Clerk's Office at TukwilaCityClerk@Tukwilawa.gov for assistance. Christy O'Flaherty, MMC, Records Governance Manager/City Clerk Published: Seattle Times — April 22, 2019 City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor Department of Community Development - Jack Pace, Director Affidavit of Distribution Project Name: TUKWILA VIEW ESTATES Project Number: PL18-0091 Associated File Number(s): L18-0107, E18-0015 Date Mailed: 03/25/2019 Mailing requested by: NORA GIERLOFF Mailer's signature: SM ❑ Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet ❑ Board of Appeals Agenda Packet ❑ Determination of Non -Significance ❑ Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice ❑ Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance ❑ Notice of Action I Notice of Application Parties of Record: ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit ❑ Notice of Decision ❑ Notice of Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Public Meeting ❑ Official Notice ❑ Other: SEPA CHECKLIST ❑ Shoreline Mgmt Permit ❑ Short Subdivision Agenda AGENCY LABELS (\,0 City Clerk Office — Ana Le PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS need to go to Ana to include in Digital Records Center ( ) US Corps of Engineers ( ) Federal HWY Admin ( ) Federal Transit Admin, Region 10 ( ) Dept of Fish & Wildlife Section 1 FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) US Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.) ( )US Dept of HUD ( ) National Marine Fisheries Service Section 2 WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) Office of Archaeology ( ) Dept of Social & Health Services (aC) Transportation Department (WSDOT NW) ( ) Dept of Ecology NW Regional Office, Shoreland Div. ( ) Dept of Natural Resources SHORELINE NOD REQUIRES RETURN RECEIPT ( ) Office of the Governor ( <3,Dept of Ecology, SEPA **Send Electronically ( ) WA State Department of Commerce (formerly Community Dev) ( ) Office of Attorney General ( ) WA Fisheries & Wildlife, MillCreek Office ( ) Office of Hearing Examiner () WA Fisheries & Wildlife, Larry Fisher, 1775 12th Ave NW Ste 201, Issaquah WA 98027 ( ) KC Boundary Review Board ( ) Fire District # 11 ( ) Fire District # 2 ( ) KC Wastewater Treatment Div ( ) KC Dept of Parks & Recreation Sjc) KC Assessor's Office ( ) KC Watershed Coordination WRIA 9 Section 3 KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) Health Department ( ) Port of Seattle ( ) KC Dev & Environmental Services-SEPA Info Center ( ) KC Metro Transit Div-SEPA Official, Environmental Planning ( ) KC Dept of Natural Resources ( ) KC Dept of Natural Resources, Andy Levesque ( ) KC Public Library System ( ) Foster Library ( ) Renton Library ( ) Kent Library ( ) Seattle Library Section 4 SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES ( ) Westfield Mall Library ( ) Tukwila School District ( ) Highline School District ( ) Seattle School District ( ) Renton School District ( ) Century Link ( ) Seattle City Light ( ) Puget Sound Energy ( ) Highline Water District ( ) Seattle Planning &Dev/Water Dept ( ) Comcast Section 5 UTILITIES ( ) BP Olympic Pipeline ( ) Seattle Public Utilities ( ) Val-Vue Sewer District ( ) Water District # 20 ( ) Water District # 125 ( ) City of Renton Public Works ( ) Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge Sewer/Water Dist ( ) Waste Management ( ) Cascade Water Alliance ( ) Tukwila City Departments (}f) Public Works (V Fire ( ) Police ( ) Finance ( ) Planning ( ) Building ( ) Parks & Rec (K) Mayor (N) City Clerk (PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS) Section 6 CITY AGENCIES ( ) Kent Planning Dept ( ) Renton Planning Dept ( ) City of SeaTac ( ) City of Burien ( ) City of Seattle ( ) Strategic Planning *Notice of all Seattle Related Projects Section 7 OTHER * send notice of all applications on Green/Duwamish River ( ) Duwamish River Clean Up Coalition * ( ) Muckleshoot Indian Tribe * ( ) Cultural Resources ( ) Fisheries Program ( ) Wildlife Program ( ) Duwamish Indian Tribe * ( ) People for Puget Sound * ** LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) Puget Sound Clean Air Agency ( ) Sound Transit/SEPA ( ) Puget Sound Regional Council ( ) Washington Environmental Council ( ) Futurewise ( ) Puget SoundKeeper ( ) SW KC Chamber of Commerce (5s) Tukwila Historical Society** send notices for all Tukwila projects which require public notice — via email to: tukwilahistsociety@tukwilahistorv.orq and rcwieser@comcast.net ( ) Seattle Times ( ) Highline Times Section 8 MEDIA ( ) South County Journal (K) City of Tukwila Website W:\\Planning\Development Review Manual\LU Application Review Process\Public Notice Procedures\Mailing\Agency Checklist Public Notice Mailings For Permits SEPA MAILINGS (Comment period starts on date of mailing) Notice of Application mailed to: Department of Ecology (send checklist with Notice of Application), applicant, other agencies as necessary, property owners and tenants within 500 feet. It is also posted on site. KC Transit Division — SEPA_Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand. Tribes — For any application on the Green/Duwamish River, send the checklist and a full set of plans with the Notice of Application SEPA Determination mailed to Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE at the time of SEPA determination: SEPA Determination Staff report SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to applicant, property owners and residents within 500 feet of subject property, agencies with jurisdiction. Comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The Notice of Application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the Notice of Application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Notice is sent to Ecology's NW Regional Office Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21-day appeal period begins date of filing with DOE) — Notice to DOE must be by return receipt requested mail (this requirement included in SSB 5192, effective 7-22-11). Department of Ecology Shorelands Section, NW Regional Office State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the notice of decision and staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: One complete packet should also be sent to Muckleshoot Indian Tribe if they commented on the project during comment period. Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Decision (Signed by Director) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) - Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross -sections of site with structures & shoreline - Grading Plan — Vicinity map SEPA determination (Signed by Director) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) W:\\Planning\Development Review Manual\LU Application Review Process\Public Notice Procedures\Mailing\Agency Checklist ParcelNumber ToLine 7888920020 7888920020 7888920020 7888920020 7888920020 7888920020 7888920020 7888920020 7888920020 7888920020 2623049071 2623049071 2623049071 2623049071 2623049071 2623049071 2623049071 2623049071 2623049071 2623049071 2623049069 7888920020 7888920020 7888920020 7888920020 7888920020 7888920020 7888920020 7888920020 7888920020 7888920020 7888920020 7888920020 Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occu pant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Attn Line AddrLine CityState ZipCode 17100 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 100 TUKWILA WA 17100,SOUTHCENTER PKWY 104 TUKWILA WA 17100 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 108 TUKWILA WA 17100 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 110 TUKWILA WA 17100 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 112 TUKWILA WA 17100 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 116 TUKWILA WA 17100 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 128 TUKWILA WA 17100 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 136 TUKWILA WA 17100 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 144 TUKWILA WA 17100 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 160 TUKWILA WA 17105 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 17115 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 17125 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 17135 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 98188 17139 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 98188 17145 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 98188 17155 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 98188 17165 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 98188 17185 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 98188 17195 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 98188 17197 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 98188 17200 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 100 TUKWILA WA 98188 17200 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 110 TUKWILA WA 98188 17250 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 100 TUKWILA WA 98188 17250 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 104 TUKWILA WA 98188 17250 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 108 TUKWILA WA 98188 17250 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 112 TUKWILA WA 98188 17250 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 124 TUKWILA WA 98188 17250 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 128 TUKWILA WA 98188 17250 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 132 TUKWILA WA 98188 17250 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 136 TUKWILA WA 98188 17250 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 144 TUKWILA WA 98188 17250 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 148 TUKWILA WA 98188 AddrSource CRWAddresslD 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00811 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00812 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00813 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00814 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00815 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00816 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00817 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00818 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00819 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00820 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00822 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00823 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00824 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00825 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00826 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00827 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00831 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00832 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00833 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00834 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00835 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00837 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00838 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00840 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00841 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00842 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00843 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00844 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00845 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00846 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00847 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00848 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00849 7888920020 2623049063 2623049063 2623049063 2623049024 2623049024 2623049110 2623049066 2623049120 2623049120 2623049120 2623049120 2623049067 2623049067 2623049067 2623049067 2623049110 2623049110 2623049110 2623049110 2623049110 2623049110 2623049110 2623049110 2623049110 2623049110 2623049110 2623049110 2623049110 2623049110 2623049110 2623049110 2623049110 2623049110 Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occu pant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant 17250 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 152 TUKWILA WA 17275 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 100 TUKWILA WA 17275 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 140 TUKWILA WA 17275 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 160 TUKWILA WA 17305 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 100 TUKWILA WA 17305 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 140 TUKWILA WA 17332 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 17333 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 17401 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 101 TUKWILA WA 17401 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 121 TUKWILA WA 17401 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 141 TUKWILA WA 17401 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 161 TUKWILA WA 17501 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 100 TUKWILA WA 17501 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 200 TUKWILA WA 17501 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 300 TUKWILA WA 17501 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 400 TUKWILA WA 17300 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 98188 17304 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 98188 17308 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 98188 17310 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 98188 17320 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 98188 17326 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 98188 17328 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 98188 17334 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 98188 17340 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 98188 17348 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 98188 17356 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 98188 17364 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 98188 17380 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 98188 17388 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 98188 17400 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 98188 17420 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 98188 17424 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 98188 17430 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 98188 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00850 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00852 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00853 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00854 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00859 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00860 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00862 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00863 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00865 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00866 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00867 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00868 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00873 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00874 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00875 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-00876 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-12357 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-12359 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-12360 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-12361 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-12362 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-12363 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-12364 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-12365 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-12367 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-12368 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-12369 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-12370 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-12371 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-12372 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-12373 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-12375 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-12376 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-12377 2623049110 2623049110 2623049110 2623049110 2623049110 2623049110 2623049110 2623049110 2623049071 7888920020 2623049067 2623049063 2623049066 2623049069 2623049110 8125200360 7888920020 8125200400 2623049096 8125200390 Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant Occupant CLPF-TUKWILA LP C/O JSH PRC MASAO C/O SCR LLC KOMETANI MICHAEL KTM GROUP LLC KIR TUKWILA 050 LL C/O KIMCO CHEN TING-WEI WIG PROPERTIES LLC-SS DAVISON RANDALL A CASTELLO LAND CO MOCK CATHERINE A BRAD DECKER MANAGING WSDOT NW REGIOP TRANSPORT 17450 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 17460 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 17470 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 17480 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 17500 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 17570 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 17574 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 17580 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 17191 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 17250 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 116 10655 NE 4TH ST #901 117 E LOUISA #230 1823 HALEKOA DR 2810 EASTLAKE AVE E 3333 NEW HYDE PARK RD #100 4312 129TH PL SE 4811 134TH PL SE 6409 146TH ST SW 7330 WEST MERCER WAY 8706 183RD AVE SW 117 EAST LOUISA STREET #230 PO BOX 330310, MS 240 TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA BELLEVUE WA SEATTLE WA HONOLULU HI SEATTLE WA PO BOX 5020 NEW H' BELLEVUE WA BELLEVUE WA EDMONDS WA MERCER ISLAND WA ROCHESTER WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-12378 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-12379 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-12380 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-12381 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-12382 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-12383 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-12384 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-12385 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-13042 98188 TukwilaAdddress ADDR-13044 98004 KCA Table 98102 KCA Table 96821 KCA Table 98102 KCA Table 11042 KCA Table 98006 KCA Table 98006 KCA Table 98026 KCA Table 98040 KCA Table 98579 KCA Table 98102 98133 Tukwila iMap 26230 35 tit fit, 11/6/2018, 2:22:25 PM ❑ City Limits I Parcels 1 Buildings ■.■ Potential Annexation Areas • Addresses (Tukwila) ft f1 0* 'ivy LD- LDF: Lei r r- Zoning C TUC-P --i TUCC C rl r---- t.4 to -lei t•.1._ TUC ' C Ftrdi �4.i til i = 1!, tit LDR Low Density Residential MDR Medium Density Residential `I� iJ TUC-W P ti I is RECEIVED NOV 21 2010 Community Development to c -WE� TUC-WP TUC-WP • 1:9,028 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 mi f ' H 0 0.07 0.15 0.3 km Tukwila Technology Services, King County City of Tukwila4 • • City of Tukwila Notice Of Application Rezone/Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment & SEPA Tukwila View Estates, Files #L18-0107, E18-0015 Project Planner: Nora Gierloff at 206.433-7141 or Nora.Gierloff@TukwilaWA.gov File# L18-0107 Applicant/Property Owner: Brad Decker Project Location: 17301 Southcenter Parkway, #262304-9135 Project Description: Rezone of the southern half of a vacant parcel from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Tukwila Urban Center — Commercial Corridor (TUC -CC) to allow for future development. Written comments on the project are requested and can be delivered to Dept. of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100, Tukwila WA 98188. Comments must be received by 5:00 PM on April 15, 2019 for environmental issues or April 22 for comments on the map change. An information meeting on April 17 from 5:00-6:30 PM and the public hearing on May 6 at 7 PM, will both be held at Tukwila City Hall. You may view the application, request a copy of any decision, comment on the project, and learn your appeal rights by contacting the project planner above, or by visiting our offices M-F, 8:30 to 5:00. City of Tukwila Notice Of Application Rezone/Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment & SEPA Tukwila View Estates, Files #L18-0107, E18-0015 Project Planner: Nora Gierloff at 206.433-7141 or Nora.Gierloff@TukwilaWA.gov File# L18-0107 Applicant/Property Owner: Brad Decker Project Location: 17301 Southcenter Parkway, #262304-9135 Project Description: Rezone of the southern half of a vacant parcel from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Tukwila Urban Center — Commercial Corridor (TUC -CC) to allow for future development. Written comments on the project are requested and can be delivered to Dept. of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100, Tukwila WA 98188. Comments must be received by 5:00 PM on April 15, 2019 for environmental issues or April 22 for comments on the map change. An information meeting on April 17 from 5:00-6:30 PM and the public hearing on May 6 at 7 PM, will both be held at Tukwila City Hall. You may view the application, request a copy of any decision, comment on the project, and learn your appeal rights by contacting the project planner above, or by visiting our offices M-F, 8:30 to 5:00. • • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100 Tukwila, WA. 98188 You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner or tenant within 500ft of this project. City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100 Tukwila, WA. 98188 You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner or tenant within 500ft of this project. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED RETAIL BUILDING 17305 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY TUKWILA, WASHINGTON L&A Job No. 6A0Q2 Date: January 25. 2006 Prepared for: Decker Development & Construction, Inc. 117 East Louisa Street, Suite 230 Seattle, Washington 98102 Prepared,By: Liu & Associates, Inc. 19213 Kenlake Place NE Kenmore, Washington 98028 RECEIVED NOV 062018 Community Development LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnicat Engineering Engineering Geology Earth Science January 25, 2006 Mr. Brad Decker Decker Development & Construction, Inc. 117 East Louisa Street, Suite 230 Seattle, WA 98102 Dear Mr. Decker: Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Study Proposed Retail Building 17305 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila, Washington L&A Job No. 6A002 SUMMARY The site on which the proposed retail building is to be constructed is surrounded by paved parking lots and adjacent commercial/retail buildings in a developed commercial/retail zone. Underlying the site for about the upper 30 feet or so are layers and interbeds of loose fill, medium -dense silty fine sand, highly compressible silty peat and very -loose alluvium deposits. Underneath these weak soil strata are very -dense Kame terrace and very -hard Older Clay deposits. To provide proper foundation support to the building without causing excessive settlement, pile foundations penetrated into the underlying Kame terrace and Older Clay deposits should be used. Augercast piles appear to be. well -suited to provide adequate foundation support and minimize potential complications which may be associated with pile installation in the the subsurface conditions of the site. INTRODUCTION OVERVIEW The subject site is located at 17305 Southcenter Parkway in Tukwila, Washington. The Parcel No. of the property is 2623049024. The site is an irregularly -shaped parcel, totaling about 1.24 19213 Kenlake Place NE • Kenmore, Washington 98028 Phone (425) 483-9134 • Fax (425) 486-2746 January 25, 2006 Proposed Retail Building L&A Job No. 6A002 Page 2 acres. The proposed development for the subject site is to construct a new one-story retail building to replace an existing restaurant building currently occupying the site. The subsurface condition of the site were explored with three test borings. The type of foundations to be used for supporting the proposed is based on the subsurface conditions encountered by the test borings. BACKGROUND The site is located in the Tukwila valley which is known to have alluvium deposits with limited foundation support capability and liquefaction potential. Therefore, subsurface investigation is required to explore the subsurface conditions of the site, with obtained soil data to be used for determining the type and bearing capacities of foundations to be used for supporting the building and the method of mitigating liquefaction potential, if required. We are unaware of whether contaminants exist under the site, or whether environmental site assessment had been perfomred on the site. Our observation of soil cutting from the drilling of the test borings and examination of soil samples obtained -from subsurface exploration of the site, however, seems to indicate that the site is free of contaminants. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES The purpose of this geotechnical engineering study is to explore and characterize the subsurface conditions of the site, perform geotechnical engineering analyses, and provide geotechnical recommendations for site grading, surface and ground water drainage control, erosion mitigation. and type and bearing capacities of foundations, etc. for the proposed development. To achieve the above purpose. our scope of services for this study comprises specifically the following: 1 Review the geologic and soil conditions at the site based on a published geologic map. LIU .& ASSOCIATES, INC. January 25, 2006 Proposed Retail Building L&A Job No. 6A002 Page 3 2, Explore the subsurface conditions of the site with three test borings. 3. Perform necessary geotechnical analyses and provide geotechnical recommendations for site grading, erosion mitigation, surface and ground water control, and foundation type, design and construction, based on subsurface conditions encountered in the test borings and results of our geotechnical analyses. 4. Prepare a written report to present our findings, conclusions, and recommendations. INVESTIGATIONS SUMMARY Subsurface conditions at the site were explored on January 5, 2006, with three test borings drilled with a track -mounted Mobile 20 drilled rig owned and operated by Davies Drilling. Soil samples were obtained from the test borings with a standard split -spoon sampler of 2-inch outside diameter. Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) were conducted, in accordance with ASTM D-1586, in the bore holes, by advancing the soil sampler with a 140-pound hammer that was raised and released for a 30-inch free fall. The number of blows required to advance the sampler a given distance is an indication of the density for granular soils or the consistency of cohesive soils. The sampler was advanced 18 inches and the total number .of blows for the cast 12 inches were recorded on the boring logs as SPT N-values. SITE CONDITIONS LOCATION AND SURFACE CONDITIONS The general location of the subject site is shownon Plate 1 — Vicinity Map. It is located in a commercial/retail zone, a short distance to the soitttiwest of Southcenter Shopping Mall. The site is bounded by Southcenter Parkway to the east and adjoined by commercial properties to the north and south, and backed into a wooded hillside to the west. The site is situated near the western fringe of a flood plain of the nearby Green River, and is at the base of a moderate to steep, east -declining hillside. An existing one-story restaurant building LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. January 25, 2006 Proposed Retail Building L&A Job No. 6A002 I Page 4 currently occupies the site. This existing building is surrounded by a paved parking lot to its north, south and west sides, and a grass covered lawn to its east. Th entire site, including the I paved area and grass -covered lawn area, slopes very gently eastward towards Southcenter Parkway. GEOLOGIC SETTING The Geologic Mao of the Des Moines Quadrangle. Washington, by Howard H. Waldron, published by U. S. Geological Survey in 1962, was referenced for the geologic and soil conditions at the site. According to this publication, the surficial soil units at and in the vicinity of the site are mapped as Kame-terrace deposits (Qit) overlain by alluvium deposits (Qa). The geology of the Puget Sound Lowland has been modified by the advance and retreat of several glaciers in the past and subsequent deposits and erosions. The latest glacier advanced to the Puget Sound Lowland is referred to as the Vashon Stade of the Fraser Glaciation which had occurred during the later stages of the Pleistocene Epoch, and retreated from the region some 14,500 years ago. The Kame-terrace deposits were lain down, by ice -marginal streams flowing between higher ground on one side and an ice margin on the other side during the last glaciation. They consist mostly of silty sand and gravel to cobble. Locally. they also contain lenses and pods of till and beds of sand, silt and clay. The alluvium deposits. are mainly composed of silt and fine sand with minor amounts of peat and clay. They were mostly laid down by the flooding water of the nearby Green River and the hillside streams to the west. SUBSURFACE SOIL CONDITIONS The approximate locations of the test borings are shown on Plate 2 - Site and Exploration Location Plan. The test borings were drilled to depths of 30.0 to 36.5 feet. Soil samples obtained from the test borings were visually classified in general accordance with Unified Soil LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. January 25, 2006 Proposed Retail Building L&A Job No. 6A002 Page 5 Classification System, a copy of which is presented on Plate 3. A geotechnical engineer from our office was present during the exploration, who examined the soil samples retrieved from the test borings and he soil and geologic conditions encountered, and completed logs of test borings. Detailed descriptions of the soils encountered during site exploration are presented in test boring Togs on Plates 4 through 6. A soil profile of the site is shown on Plate 7. Except a grass lawn at its east end, the site is covered with 2 to 3 inches of asphaltic concrete pavement constructed over 3 to 24 inches base material consisting of crushed rock or gravelly sand. Underlying the pavement base material is a layer of fill, consisting of loose to dense, silty tine sand to gravelly fine to coarse sand, about 5 to 6 feet thick. A thin layer of relic topsoil was found underlying the fill in Test Boring B-1. Underlying the fill and relic topsoil are thick beds of very loose bog sediment and/or alluvium, down to the depths of about 24 to 31 feet below existing grade. Underlying the beds of bog sediment and alluvium deposit is a Kame terrace deposit of medium -dense to very -dense, fine to coarse sand to the depths explored, except that a deposit of gray, very -hard silt with thin sand interbeds was found underlying the Kame terrace in Test Boring B-1. The soil conditions encountered in the test:borings seem to indicate that there had been an old drainage swale or gully running through the north side of the site. Beds of very -loose alluvium deposit of silty fine sand and fine sandy silt, containing drift tree trunks, was laid down over most of the site following the retreat of the last glaciation. The old drainage swale or gully along the north side of the site was also filled with thick bog sediment that contains silty peat, roots and wood chips. The site was then filled and paved oVer to its current condition during subsequent development of the site and its surrounding areas. GROUNDWATER CONDITION Groundwater table was encountered at about 11.0 feet deep in Test Boring B-1, 6.5 feet deep in Test Boring B-2, and at about 7.0 feet in Test Boring B-3, after completion of test borings. The LIU. & ASSOCIATES, INC. January 25, 2006 Proposed Retail Building L&A Job No. 6A002 1 Page 6 high groundwater level measured may be highly representative of the winter high groundwater table under the site as the test borings were drilled in the midst of a very wet winter after many I consecutive days with precipitation. The groundwater table may fluctuate seasonally, depending on precipitation, surface runoff, ground vegetation cover, site utilization, and other factors. The groundwater table may lower significantly in the dryer Summer months and accumulate and rise in the wet Winter months. SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION No contaminants or materials suspected of contaminants were observed on the surface of the site ' or encountered in the test borings under the site. t DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS I Underlying the pavement and its base material is a 5-to-6-foot layer of inconsistently constructed fill underlain by thick beds of very -loose bog sediment and/or alluvium deposit down to depths I about 24 to 31 feet. The bog sediment and alluvium deposit are underlain by medium -dense to very -dense Kame terrace deposits. The underlying Kame terrace deposits will be able to provide I excellent foundation support to the proposed building. Piles should be used to penetrate through the bog sediment and alluvium deposit and seat into the underlying Kame terrace deposits to I transfer structural Toads to the competent Kame terrace deposits and to minimize potential foundation settlement. SLOPE STABILITY The site is nearly flat. Slope stability is not an isiCte. SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS The Puget Sound region is classified as Seismic Zone 3 by the Uniform Building Code (UBC). The very -loose bog sediment and alluvium deposit underlying the site coupled with high ' LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. January 25, 2006 Proposed Retail Building Ld&A Job No. 6A002 Page 7 groundwater table may be prone to liquefaction during strong earthquakes. The effect of Liquefaction potential can be mitigated by supporting the proposed building on piles embedded with sufficient depths into the underlying very -dense Kame terrace deposits. The proposed building should be designed for the seismic forces during strong earthquakes. Based on the soil conditions encountered by the test pits, it is our opinion that Seismic Use Group I and Site Class D should be used in the seismic design of the proposed residences in accordance with the 2003 International Building Code (IBC). SITE WORK Site preparation should include clearing and grubbing and removal of the existing parking pavement within construction limits. The ground within the building footprint should be excavated a foot or two below the finish subgrade level. The exposed soils should be compacted to a non -yielding state with a vibratory mechanical compactor, then covered with a layer of 4-to- 6-inch rock spalls for erosion control and to provide a firm working surface for foundation construction. Storm runoff will be contained in the excavated pit surrounded by nearby existing paved parking lot. Silt fence will likely only be required along the eastern boundary of the site to prevent sediments being transported onto the street bordering the site on this side. RETAINING STRUCTURES Not applicable. ROCKERIES Not applicable. • FOUNDATION SUPPORT Due to the layer of very -loose bog sediment and alluvium deposit underlying the site, varying from about 17 to 28 feet in thickness and with tree logs intermixed in the, we recommend pile foundations be used to support the proposed building. The piles should penetrate through the LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. January 25, 2006 Proposed Retail Building L&A Job No. 6A002 Page 8 .._ , t+7L ....YM... fc� .:.....•+,.,.._.,.......vwi...•'._.::•..�'.:•_ak.. v.WN+40aiihr7�a+aLi:.f.ewyur+w.r'rry�.' bog sediment and alluvium deposit and seat into the underlying very -dense Kame terrace deposits. The alluvium deposits underlying the site are very loose, and densification of very -loose alluvium sand deposits may be induced by ground vibrations from pile driving, which may result in foundation settlement and damages to adjacent buildings and parking pavement if driven piles are to be used. High groundwater table in very -loose bog sediment and sandy alluvium deposit may cave severely during hole drilling if drilled piers are to be used. Casing and drilling mud will have to be used to keep drilled holes open and to minimize ground loss for drilled pier installation. Therefore, neither of these two types of piles is suitable from a construction viewpoint. Augercast piles should be suitable for supporting the building. Augercast piles are cast -in -place concrete piles. They are installed by drilling a hole in the ground with a continuous -flight, hollow -stem auger. The continuous -flight auger can maintain an open hole even in potentially caving or squeezing soils. After the holes are drilled to.depth, fluid cement -sand grout is then pumped into the hole through the hollow stem, filling the hole from bottom up as the auger is slowly withdrawn out of the ground. A rebar cage is then inserted into the grout -filled holes to complete the pile construction procedure. The installation of augercast piles would generate minimal ground vibration. RECOMME IDATIONS SITE GRADING AND EARTH WORK Site preparation should include clearing and grubbing within construction limits. The surficial topsoil, loose sandy soils and unsuitable soils in the root zone should be stripped. The exposed surface should be compacted to a non -yielding state using a vibratory roller compactor. Storm LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. January 25, 2006 Proposed Retail Building L&A Job No. 6A002 Page 9 runoffff, if any, should be directed with sandbag or asphalt curbs away from construction area to minimize erosion during construction,. The on -site, on -site surficial fill of silty fine sand is sensitive to moisture. A layer of clean quarry spalls should be placed over the excavated areas and areas of frequent traffic, as required, to protect the subgrade soils from disturbance by construction traffic. A silt fences should be erected along the east side of the site to prevent sediments being transported onto adjacent street. The bottom of silt fence filter fabric should be anchored in a trench filled with gravel. EXCAVATION SLOPES Under no circumstance should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified by local, state and federal safety regulations if workers have to perform construction work in excavated areas. Temporary, unsupported cuts greater than 4 feet in height should be no steeper than 111:1V in the surficial fill and no steeper than 1-1/2 in the underlying very -loose bog sediment or alluvium deposit, assuming that groundwater will not be encountered over the depths of excavation during construction. If groundwater is encountered, sufficient numbers of dewatering wells or sump pits should be installed to lower the groundwater table to at least 2 to 3 feet below the bottom of excavation to facilitate grading work. STRUCTURAL FILL Structural fill is the fill placed under roadway pavements, footings, slabs -on -grade, and behind retaining walls where it support loads. Structural fill should consist of clean soils with particles not larger than four inches and should be free of organic and other deleterious substances. Structural fill should have a moisture content within 1% of its optimum moisture content at the time of placement. The optimum moisture content is the water content in the soil that enable the soil to be compacted to the highest dry density for a given compaction effort. The on -site sandy soils may be used for structural fill if their moisture content can be controlled to close to their optimum water content at the time of placement. Imported material to be used as structural fill. LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. January 25, 2006 Proposed Retail Building L&A Job No. 6A002 Page 10 should be clean, free -draining, granular soils containing no more than 5% by weight finer than the No. 200 sieve based on the fraction of the material passing No. 4 sieve, and should have individual particles not greater than four inches. Structural fill should be placed in lifts no more than 10 inches thick in its loose state, with each lift compacted to a minimum percentage of the maximum dry density determined by ASTM D1557 (Modified Proctor Method) as follows: Application % of Maximum Dry Density Within building pads of the building lots 95% Roadway/driveway subgrade 95% for top 3 feet and 90% below Retaining wall backfill 90% Utility trench backfill 95% for top 4 feet and 90% below TEMPORARY SHORING AND RETAINING WALLS Not applicable. ROCKERIES Not applicable. REINFORCED SOIL STRUCTURES Not applicable. • STRUCTURE AND FOUNDATIONS We recommend that 16-inch-diameter augercast piles be used for supporting the proposed building. Our recommended allowable vertical hearing and uplift capacities for 16-inch-diameter augercast piles are as follows: LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. January 25, 2006 Proposed Retail Building L&A Job No. 6A002 Page 11 a Pile Embed. Allow. Comp. Allow. Uplift Length. Feet Capacity. Kips Capacity, Kips 12 25 15 14 35 22 16 46 26 18 56 35 20 70 42 a Pile embedment length is the length of piles penetrated into the very dense Kame terrace deposit underlying the loose to medium dense alluvium deposits. The augercast piles should have a minimum penetration of 12 feet into the underlying very -dense Kame terrace deposits. No reduction in pile capacities is required if the pile spacing is kept at least three times the pile diameter. A one-third increase in the above allowable pile capacities can be used when considering short-term transitory wind or seismic loads. We estimate that with the building supported on augercast piles, the total maximum post -construction settlement should be about 3/8 inch or less, and the maximum differential settlement across the building width should be 1/4 inch or Tess. Calculation of lateral resistance of the augercast piles may be based on assumed average soil stratification of 22 feet of very -loose bog sediment and alluvium deposit underlain by Kame terrace deposits. A lateral modulus of subgrade reaction of 600 kcf (kips per cubic foot) for the bog sediment and alluvium deposits and of 2,000 kcf for the Kame terrace deposit may be used in calculating the lateral resistance of the piles. The allowable lateral load resistance of the piles should include a proper factor of safety on their ultimate resistance. The performance of augercast piles depends on how and to what bearing stratum the piles are installed. Since a completed augercast pile in the ground cannot be observed, it is critical that judgement and experience be used as a basis for determining the embedment length and acceptability of a pile. Therefore, we recommend that Liu & Associates be retained to monitor pile installation operation, collect and interpret installation data, and verify suitable bearing stratum. We also suggest that the contractor's equipment and installation procedure be reviewed by L&A prior to pile installation to help mitigate problems which may delay work progress. LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. January 25, 2006 Proposed Retail Building L&A Job No. 6A002 Page 12 ON -GRADE FLOORS Due to the very -loose bog sediment and alluvium deposit underlying the site, with tree logs mixed in the alluvium deposit, it is our recommendation that concrete floor slabs, if required, should be structural slabs supported on grade beams capping the augercast piles. Where moisture control is critical, the floor slabs should be poured on a capillary break placed on compacted unyielding subgrade soils. The capillary break should consist of a minimum four -inch -thick layer of free -draining gravel or crushed rock containing no more than 3% by weight passing the No. 4 sieve. A vapor barrier, such as a 6-mil plastic membrane, may be placed over the capillary break, as required, to keep moisture from migrating upwards. PAVEMENTS Performance of driveway and parking lot pavement is critically related to the conditions of the subgrade soils underlying the pavement. It is economically impractical to excavate out all the very -loose bog sediment and alluvium deposit, which may be from 14 to 24 feet thick, and replaced them with structural fill to support pavement. For the construction of driveway and parking lot pavement, we recommend that the surficial fill under the existing pavement be over - excavated for at least 3 feet, and the exposed soils are then compacted to a non -yielding state with a vibratory mechanical compactor. The over -excavation is then backfilled with structural fill to finished subgrade. A minimum 8-inch-thick, crushed rock base (CRB), consisting of 7/8- inch-minus crushed rock, compacted to a non -yielding state, should be constructed over the structural fill. The crushed rock base should be topped with a 3-inch-thick asphalt treated base (ATB) and 2-inch-thick Class B asphalt concreti(AC). With the very -loose bog sediment and alluvium deposit underlying the driveway and parking lot, maintenance and repair of pavement may be required every few years. UTILITIES Trenches cut in surficial loose fill and the underlying very -loose bog sediment and alluvium deposit for installation of underground utilities may cave easily. Trenches should be shored with LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. January 25, 2006 Proposed Retail Building L&A Job No. 6A002 Page 13 trench blocks or other methods to protect workers in the trenches. Utility trenches should be backfilled with structural fill in accordance with recommendations in the STRUCTURAL FILL section of this report. DRAINAGE CONTROL Runoff From Hillside A steady stream of runoff down from the hillside west of the site was observed flowing onto the parking lot during subsurface exploration. An interceptor trench drain should be installed along the west boundary of the site to intercept and drain away this runoff. Building Footprint Excavation Groundwater may be encountered during excavation of the building footprint. If encountered, the bottom of the building footprint excavation should be sloped and ditches excavated along the bases of the cut slopes to direct collected groundwater into a sump pit from which water can be pumped out of the building footprint excavation. A layer of 4-to-6-inch rock spalls should be placed over subgrade soils, as required, to provide a working surface for construction equipment and workers. Surface Drainage Final site grades should allow storm runoff to be drained away from the building. We suggest the unpaved finish ground be sloped at a gradient of three percent minimum for a distance of at least 10 feet away from the building. Pavements surrounding the building should have sufficient slope to drain storm runoff away from the building., Roof runoff should be collected by an underground drain line system. Runoff over the pavements should be captured by catch basins. Collected water by the underground drain line system and catch basins should be tightlined to drain into a storm sewer or a suitable stormwater disposal facility. LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. January 25.2006 Proposed Retail Building L&A Job No. 6A002 Page 14 HAZARDS The site is nearly flat and the risk for landslide to occur on the site should be non-existent. The effect of liquefaction of the surficial loose to medium alluvium deposits on the building will be nullified by supporting the building on augercast piles penetrating into the underlying very -dense Kame terrace deposits. Storm runoff during construction will be confined in the pit of building footprint excavation surrounded by adjacent parking pavement. and erosion hgArd during construction will be minimal. LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared for the specific application to this project for the exclusive use by Decker Development and Construction, and their associates. representatives. consultants and contractors. We recommend that this report, in its entirety, be included in the project contract documents for the information of the prospective contractors for their estimating and bidding purposes. The conclusions and interpretations in this report, however, should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. The scope of this study does not include services related to construction safety precautions and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in this report for design considerations. Our recommendations and conclusions are based on soil conditions encountered in the test borings, our engineering analyses, and our experience and engineering judgment. The conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised' other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. No warranty. expressed or implied, is made. The site subsurface conditions encountered in the test borings may vary from those actually encountered during construction. The nature and extent of such variations may not become LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. January 25, 2006 Proposed Retail Building L&A Job No. 6A002 Page 15 evident until construction starts. If variations appear then, we should be retained to re-evaluate the recommendations of this report, and to verify or modify them in writing prior to proceeding further with construction. CLOSURE We are pleased to be of service to you on this project. Please call if you have any questions regarding this report or need further consultation. MIRES 7/17/ PLATES AND ILLUSTRATIONS 1. Vicinity Map 2. Site and Exploration Location Plan 3. Unified Soil Classification System 4, 4A, 5, 5A and 6 - Boring Logs • Yours very truly, LIU SOCIATES, IN J. S. (Julian) Liu, Ph.D., P.E. Consulting Geotechnical Engineer LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotectinical Engineering • Engineering Geology • Earth Science V CINITY MAP PROPOSED RETAIL BUILDING 17305 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY TUKWILA, WASHINGTON JOB NO. 6A002 I DATE 1/8/2006 PLATE 1 MFR. it mann Ea ai Ili Ili woo thms was N NN NN \N 4,\ ic ••41NPIVAdot‘ 2 3\ • Z4, N • Zio 41b --Owsc lroyP0441.6 ige TEMASia • •115” OP* 4 E) -3 • lit V* •••130,14c-120-041.- -.2:ZPaev.P ,40g17 54 -:'44 Srialtle-LAWD e tr pet -L- " • ati.(isio6.r.::t• .1_&4422.8_46...,fav 41' 510WW• —r-- \ 644 Veac, e4/40/P*12- \e. 1,•4.. \ 1 1:1410-3sralr•i7Ai4ld'F' gi7ifflOr&k.'" •)\\,...sst, ID 143 •`• • 21 naN 5;t .y 1141 °` \• � ,rl .s "'"`•-`0�; � (ems .� E�.i` _ . ', oUTK cetsiTeK PARKwA`f LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Engineering • Engineering Geology • Earth Silence SITE AND EXPLORATION LOCATION PLAN PROPOSED RETAIL BUILDING 17305 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY TUKWILA, WASHINGTON JOB NO. 6A002 I DATE 1/8/2006 I PLATE I I I i i i i I i 1 BORING NO. B-1 - Logged By: JSL 1/512006 Ground Elev. t r Depth tL USCS Sample (N) Blows/ ft. W % Other Test Soil Description Type No. r 5 ~ 2-In Asphalt Pavement over 3-In Crushed Rods Base— B • 1 S 1/12' 2 3 SM Dark -gray, loose. silty fine SAND. trace gravel. moist (FILL) SSJ1 Dark -brown, loose, organic, silty fine SAND. trace gravel, (rah; TOPSAIL) —" — 10 — OL Inojst Brown, very -loose, silty fine SAND to fine sandy SILT, intermixed with dark -brown, organic, silty fine SAND. moist (BOG SEDIMENT) e SS SM/ML/ OL 15— - Same, with wood log fragment SS J '''jjj p Intermixed very -loose, brown, silty fine SAND to fine sandy SILT and gray, silty fine SAND, with wood tog fragments. very moist (ALLUVIUM) • ss 1 SM/ML — 20 — Gray, very -soft, fine sandy SILT, with thin fine sand interbeds, very moist (ALLUVIUM) . (continued on Plate 4A) , SS 11/1B' 25 = 30 ML LEGEND: SS - 2' O.D. Split -Spoon Sample GROUNDWATER: Seat y ST - 3' O.D. Shelby -Tube Sample Water Level B - Bulk Sempta Observation Well Tip LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. GeoradnlmiEnglneeing • Engineering Geology Earth Science BORING LOG RETAIL BUILDING 17305 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY TUKWILA, WASHINGTON JOB NO. 6A002 I DATE 118/2006 I PLATE 4 i i i i i i i i i i i i i BORING NO. B-1 (continued from Pate 4) Logged By: JSL 1/512006 Ground Elev. t Depth ft. USCS Sample (N) Blows/ ft. W % Other Test Soil Desatption Type No. Gray, soft, fine sandy SILT, with thin fine sand interbeds. SS 6 21 23 a 5015.75- _ — — 35 _,--i_ - 40 45 50 55 _ 60 — `— ML very moist (ALLUVIUM) _J-- Gray, very -dense, fine to coarse SAND. some fine gravel, wet (fresh (CAME TERRACE) SS 7 ___._ ----►„ Gray, very -hard, fine sandySILT, slightly moist r Boring terminated @ 36.5 ft; groundwater encountered @ 11.0 ft at completion of drilling. . • LEGEND: SS - 2' O.D. Split -Spoon Sample GROUNDWATER: ST - 3' O.D. Shelby -Tube Sample Water Level B - Buck Sample Seal Observation Well Tip LIU & ASSOCIATES. INC. GededwNcalEngineering • ErrgfrrseringGeology • EBnhsdwnes BORING LOG RETAIL BUILDING 17305 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY TUKWILA. WASHINGTON JOB NO. 8A002 I DATE 1/8/2006 I PLATE 4A _ i i i i i i i 1 BORING NO. B-2 (continued from Plate 5) i Logged By: JSL 1/5/2006 Ground Elev. t Depth ft. USCS Sample (N) Blows/ ft. W % , Other Test Soil Description T No. — — ^ 10 15 20 25 30 SP Gray, medium -dense, fine to medium SAND, very moistSS (fresh KAME TERRACE) - Same, grades to dense and brown -gray in color 1 SS 6 7 28 44 • J Boring terminated at 38.5 ft groundwater table encountered © 6.5 ft at completion of drilling. • LEGEND: SS - r O.D. Split -Spoon Sample GROUNDWATER: ST- 3' O.D. Shelby -Tube Sample Water Levet B - Bulk Sample Seal Observation Well Tip LIU & ASSOCIATES; INC. Ge technlealEngIneminp • E+eineeriwGeoloer • Earth Science BORING LOG RETAIL BUILDING 17305 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY TUKWILA. WASHINGTON JOB NO. 6A002 I DATE 1B/2006 PLATE SA i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i 1 I BORING NO. B-3 ' Logged By: JSL 1/5/2006 Ground Elev. t Depth {t. USCS Sample (N) Blows/ ft. W 95 Other Test Soil Description Type No. — 5 2-in Asphalt Pavement + 24-In Crushed Rock Base 31 3 4 6 45 Gray, dense, gravelly, fine to coarse SAND, wet (FILL) V ]ss 1 SW 10 _ —I 15 _ — —I Gray, very -loose, silty fine SAND to fine sandy SILT, occasional roots and wood chips, moist (ALLUVIUM) ]SS 2 SM/ML Grey, very -loose. Interbedded silty fine to medium SAND and SILT, occasional roots and wood chips. very -moist to wet (ALLUVIUM) ]ss 3 SM/ML 20 • 25 _ 30 SP/ML Loose, interbedded gray, fine to medium SAND and brown- gray SILT, occasional wood chips, moist to very -moist (ALLUVIUM) • • ]ss 4 Gray, very -dense. fine to medium SAND, wet Test boring terminated @ 30.0 ft due to sand boiling. Groundwater table ® 7.0 at comptetlon of drilling. — SS J 5 SP LEGEND: SS - 2" O.O. Spilt -Spoon Sample GROUNDWATER: Seal ST - 3' O.D. Shelby -Tube Sample Water Level B - Bulk Sample Observation Well Ttp LIU & ASSOCIATES. INC. Geotew+tehEngineering • Engineering Geology Earth Science BORING LOG RETAIL BUILDING 17305 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY TUKWILA, WASHINGTON JOB NO. 6A002 I DATE 118/2008 1 PLATE 8 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM ` MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP SYMBOL GROUP NAME COARSE- GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50% RETAINED ON THE NO. 200 SIEVE GRAVEL MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION RETAINED ON NO. 4 SIEVE CLEAN GRAVEL GW WELL -GRADED GRAVEL. FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL GP POORLY -GRADED GRAVEL GRAVEL WITH FINES GM SILTY GRAVEL GC CLAYEY GRAVEL SAND MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION PASSING NO. 4 SIEVE CLEAN SAND SW WELL -GRADED SAND. FINE TO COARSE SAND SP POORLY -GRADED SAND SAND WITH FINES SM SILTY SAND SC CLAYEY SAND FINE- GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50% PASSING ON THE NO. 200 SIEVE SILT AND CLAY LIQUID LIMIT LESS THAN 50% INORGANIC ML SILT CL CLAY ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT. ORGANIC CLAY - SILTY AND CLAY LIQUID LIMIT 50% OR MORE INORGANIC MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY. ELASTIC SILT CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY. FAT CLAY ORGANIC OH ORGANIC SILT. ORGANIC SILT HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT AND OTHER HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS NOTES: SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS: 1. FIELD CLASSIFICATION IS BASED ON VISUAL EXAMINATION DRY - ABSENCE OF MOISTURE, DUSTY. DRY TO OF SOIL IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2488-83. THE TOUCH 2. SOIL CLASSIFICATION USING LABORATORY TESTS IS BASED SLIGHTLY MOIST - TRACE MOISTURE, NOT DUSTY ON ASTM D2487-83. MOIST - DAMP. BUT NO VISIBLE WATER 3. DESCRIPTIONS OF SOIL DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY ARE VERY MOIST -VERY DAMP, MOISTURE FELT TO THE TOUCH BASED ON INTERPRETATION OF BLOW -COUNT DATA, VISUAL` WET - VISIBLE FREE WATER OR SATURATED. APPEARANCE OF SOILS, AND/OR TEST DATA. USUALLY SOIL IS OBTAINED FROM BELOW WATER TABLE • LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Engineering • Engineering Geology • Earth Science UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM PLATE 3 City of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist Date: 11/1 /2018 Applicant Name: Tukwila View View Estates LLC Street Address:117 East Louisa Street, Suite 230 City, State, Zip: Seattle, WA 98102 Telephone: 206-545-4964 DIRECTIONS: This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in adverse effects to salmonids - Chinook, Coho, Cutthroat trout or char - as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). If potential effects are identified, the project may need further evaluation. Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if additional action is indicated. RECEIVED NOV 062018 Community Development W:\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-16.doc If ESA listed species are present or ever were present in the watershed where your project will be located, your project has the potential to affect them, and you need to comply with the ESA. The questions in this section will help determine if the ESA listings will impact your project. For more information on potential salmonid presence in your project area contact the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Habitat Biologist for your region, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife or use the SalmonScape tool, WDFW SalmonScape. 1. Are ESA listed salmonids currently present in the watershed within which your project will be located? Yes{ ✓1 No❑ Please describe. Hood Canal Summer run Chum Salmon Ozette Lake Sockeye Salmon Puget Sound Chinook Salmon Puget Sound Steelhead 2. Has there ever been an ESA listed salmonid stock present in this watershed? YesnNo❑ Uncertainty Please describe. If you answered "yes" to either of the above questions you should complete the remainder of this checklist. W:\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-16.doc Cuy of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part A - PROJECT SPECIFICS: Project and Vicinity I. Name of watershed: Green - Duwamish River Watershed 2. Name of nearest water body: Green River 3. What is the distance from this project to the nearest body of water? over 4,400 feet 4. What is the current land use between the project and the potentially affected water body (parking lots, farmland, etc)? Vacant Land 5. Is the project above a: • Natural permanent barrier (waterfall) YesQ Noj • Natural temporary barrier (beaver pond) Yesn No0 • Man-made barrier (culvert, dam) YeNo0 • Other (explain): 6. If answered Yes in #5, are there any resident salmonid populations above the blockage? YesQ NoQ Don't know \\citystorc\City Common\Teri - DCD\Kirby\SEPA to fix\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-16.docx W:\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-16.doc City t f Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part B - Project Specifics: Grading and Land Alteration 1. Does the project involve grading or land alteration of any kind? Yes n No 0 If your project DOES NOT involve grading please skip to Part C. 2. Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank between Ordinary High Water (OHW) and the top of the bank? If yes, which water course? This includes any grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but does not require work below OHW. Yes n No 3. Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bottom below OHW? If yes, please explain. Yes No 0_ 4. Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of equipment for the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and/or sedimentation in watercourses? If no, please explain. Most projects involving grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of land disturbance. Yes No= 5. If the project involves grading, have you prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan? YesilNo n If no, are you exempt under TMC 16.54.90? Yes_ELNo_ 6. Will the project result in new impervious services? Include all hard surface are such as rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, etc. Yes n No 1 7. What percent of the project will be impervious surface (including pavement & roof area)? W:\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-16.doc Guy of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part C — Project Specifics: Water Quality 1. Will the project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? Please explain. For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into the ground. Yes No FA 2. Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include fuel properly stored in a vehicle fuel tank, but does include fuel or other chemicals stored on -site during construction. Yes ❑ No 0 3. Will the project require long-term or re -occurring maintenance requiring the use of fertilizers, pesticides, or other chemicals? This may include landscape maintenance, bridge or parking lot cleaning, ice removal/melt, repeated chemical vegetation clearing, etc. Yes n No 0 4. Will turbidity be increased during construction or operation of the project? Please explain any measures to be taken to ensure turbidity is not increased. Construction near the water or below OHW often will increase turbidity, both on -site and downstream. Yes No j✓ 5. Will the project either reduce or increase shade along or over a water body? Removal of trees/vegetation or the building of over -water structures (docks or floats) will often result in a change to shade. Yes ❑ No 0 6. Will the project require debris removal from below OHW of a water course? Debris includes, but is not limited to, fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, riprap, submerged metal, broken concrete, pipes, or other construction material. YesENo 0 W:WI'PLICAI IONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-16.doc Cuy of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part D — Project Specifics: Flow Alterations and Fish Migration 1. Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a water course? This includes both tempora and �ermanent modifications. If yes, please explain. Yes INo ki 2. Will the project involve any physical alteration to a wetland which is connected to a water course? Few wetlands are isolated, most contain either surface or subsurface connection to a flowing water course. YesENo ✓n 3. Will water be rerouted, either temporarily or permanently as a result of the project? If yes, please explain. Yes No 0 4. Will a culvert be installed or removed as part of this project? Yes No Fi 5. Will the project require withdrawal of surface water? If yes, please include amount and name or water body. Yes n No FA 6. Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception or groundwater? Examples of projects that might affect groundwater include, but are not limited to, construction of a new well, changes in withdrawal from an existing well, projects involving prolonged dewatering, installation of French drains, swales, or sewer lines. Projects that require a geotechnical report rsuant to TMC 18.45.060 should answer Yes. Yes n]No[1 7. Will topography changes on the site affect the duration/direction of surface runoff flows? If yes, please describe chan:es. Yes n No FA 8. Will the project include bank stabilization? If yes, explain. Bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, riprap, rock, logs, soil, vegetated revetments, concrete .structures, or similar. Yes No 0 9. Will there be retention or detention ponds? If yes, will this be an infiltration pond or a surface discharge to either a municipal storm water system or a surface water body? Yes n Non 10. Will the project involve any reduction of the floodplain or floodway by filling or other partial blockage of flows? If yes, how will the loss of flood storage be mitigated by your project? Yes n Non✓ 11. Will project include the construction of a new wetland or waterway that is connected by surface flow to an existing waterway that contains salmonids? Yes Non WA\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Ilandouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-16 doc City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part E — Project Specifics: Vegetation 1. Will the project involve the removal of any vegetation? If yes, please describe existing conditions and the amount and type of vegetation to be removed. Yes 0 Nor✓ 2. Will the project involve the removal of any vegetation within 200 feet of OHW of a water course? If yes, please describe type, size, method, and amount of vegetation to be removed. A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self-supporting woody plant, generally characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter o 2inches or more at breast height and a minimum height of 10 feet. Yesr NoJi I 3. If vegetation is to be removed, do you plan to mitigate by replanting? Please explain. Yes I No No vegetation being removed W:\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-I6.doc SEPA Checklist STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT CHECKLIST Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Department of Ecology provides a guidance on filling the SEPA checklist at Department of Ecology Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Change in zoning 2. Name of Applicant: Tukwila View Estates LLC 3. Date checklist prepared: 11/1/2018 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 2019 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Not at this time 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Geotechnical study 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. none known \\citystorc\City Common\reri - DCD\Kirby\SEPA to fix\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-16.docx W:WPPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SFPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-16.doc Agency Comments SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Comprehensive Plan Amendment 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Zoning Change from LDR to TUC - CC 11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 17301 Southcenter Parkway, Tukwila WA 98188 The vacant land behind La - Z- Boy at 17305 Southcenter Parkway and Chick Fil A (Under Construction). 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Yes, number 3 slope classification — Landslide potential is high W:\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-16.doc SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: one acre mostly flat and two plus acres sloping . • b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? over 25% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. Silty fine sand d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. not known e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. None WA\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-I6.doc /• SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. yes g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? No change in the site h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: None 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. None b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None W:\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps .@ Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-16.doc Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes, year round drainage ditch - storm sewer on the south portion. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. no 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. None W:\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-16.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1. Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well? Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: None W:\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & I1andouts\CURRENT LAND USE API'LICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-16.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. None 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. None 3. Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts if any: No W:\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-16.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other Shrubs Grass Pasture Crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other Other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. Blackberries W:\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-I6.doc SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 5. Animals a. List any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Mammals: Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Fish: Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None Known c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not known d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site: None Known 6. Enerpv and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. None W:\APPLICATIONS - Land Usc Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-I6.doc Agency Comments SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. NO c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. NO 1. Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. None Known 2. Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. None Known 3. Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. None W:\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-16 doc SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 5. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None it is a rezone 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. None 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None W:\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-16.doc SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. Current Use: Vacant Land Adjacent Properties: Retail centers and fast food b. Has the project sire been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? Not known 1. Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: NO c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No W:\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-I6.doc Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? LDR f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? LDR zoning g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes, Steep Slopes i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None W:\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & 1-landouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-16.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None m. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and forest lands of lon-termcommercial significance, if any: None W \APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-16.doc SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing? None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? None b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None W:\APPLICAI IONS - Land Use Apps & Ilandouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-16.doc SEPA Checklist c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None 11. LiRht and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? None c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None W:\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICAlIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-I6.doc SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as,necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None known b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state or local preservation registers located on or near the site? If so, specifically describe. NO W:WI'PLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-16.doc SEPA Checklist b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation. This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. None Known c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. Historical Maps Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. None Planned 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Southcenter Park Way W:\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-16.doc SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, On Southcenter Parkway c. How many parking spaces would the completed project or non -project proposal have? How many would the project eliminate? None d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? None W:\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-I6.doc SEPA Checklist g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. No h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system other: b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. None W:WPPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-I6.doc SEPA Checklist (NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). C. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 1. How would the proposals be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? None Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: None 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? None Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: None W \APPLICATIONS - [.and Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-16.doc SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? None Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitats, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? None Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? None Agency Comments W.\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-16.doc SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public service and utilities? No Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: None 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with Local, State, or Federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. None Known D. SIGNATURE Agency Comments Under the penalty of perjury the above answers under ESA Screening Checklist and State Environmental Policy Act Checklist are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: 11 /1 /2018 W:WPPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS \SERA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-I6.doc CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OF WASHINGTON ss COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: I. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its emplo ees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's ] real property, located at % O I Sd✓�1►CrA it1 �a/�L � / .ra/co 'A tldlor the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at $/loie /, (city), t'' /4 (state), on ✓e , 20 / ti (Print Name) / 1 7 SC z (Address) _Sc.?, '!Q AJi- 93it2 7 o -Syr y 9 G y (Phone Numb (Signature On this day personally appeared before me .gfit 1 Peelz r executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes meik6,0401Mit, SUBSCRIB 41' 4,� /'ORE ME •N THIS % DAY OF A.`� 8' Hee , 20 / 7y AvBt.o • S / FIiiiiiOB i118;Zp G,sp�� tor to me known to be the individual who NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the Stof Washington residing at S l W A 031,9/�28 My Commission expires on \\dcptstore\City Common\Teri\Revisions In Progress\Zoning Code Amend-Jan20l l.docx RECEIVED NOV 062018 Community Development CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Ste 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus TYPE: P-SEPA Planner: File Number: / v —00 IS Application Complete Date: Project File Number: Application Incomplete Date: Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: 7;kw, /a V� cw �s/�• BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SCOPE OF WORK: CLiai+yL a c c/ ev/Hp �la ^ fAie-n e,(r„ e- a I JCA.ch /7 3 4 Zca..-, 12) oa h %'�i(G - This application requires public notice. Please see section 7 of the application checklist. LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 730 .Sooce.. �q.,4.�, kw,i4 44 LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). ice Z3 U (7/— DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR/ PROJECT CONTACT: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. • PLEASE PRINT CLEARL Y Name: /1 7 .4 J 1.e..)v' 34 Address: CITY, ST, ZIP SCE 15' ! Gad' "S/U Z Phone: E-mail: zo&- sYs- y94 17 Signature: Date: ‘ra4f1 \\citystore\City Common\Teri - DCD\Kirby\SEPA to 8x\SEPA Fnvirontncntal Review Application FINAL 5-9-I6.docx RECEIVED 1IOV 062018 Community Development COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the City may require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206-431-3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206-433-0179 (Department of Public Works). Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning APPLICATION MATERIALS: 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. 2. Completed ESA Screening Checklist, SEPA Environmental Checklist and drawings (5 copies). i 3. One set of all plans reduced to 8 1/2" x 11" or 11" x 17". 4. Application Fee: See Land Use Fee Schedule. 5. Underlying permit application that triggers SEPA review. PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: 6. Payment of notice board fee (see Land Use Fee Schedule) to FastSigns OR provide a 4' x 4' public notice board on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received (see Public Notice Sign Specifications Handout). 7. Pay the fee as established by the Land Use Fee Schedule for generating mailing labels; OR provide an excel spreadsheet of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents and businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. Each unit in multiple family buildings e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks --must be included. Once your project is assigned to a planner, you will be required to provide an electronic copy of the mailing label spreadsheet in the following format: Name, Street Address, City St Zip, with each of these fields as an individual column: Name Street Address City, St, Zip Mr. Smith 1234 Park Ave S Tukwila WA 98188 PLEASE NOTE: Regardless of whether you pay the City to generate the mailing labels or you provide them, there is an additional fee for postage and material as listed under Public Notice Mailing Fee on the Land Use Fee Schedule. Payment of this fee is due prior to issuance of the decision and you will receive a separate bill for this fee. ✓ 8. If providing own labels, include King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 ft. of the subject lot. \\citystore\City Common\Teri - DCD\Kirby\SEPA to fix\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL. 5-9-16.docx RECEIVED NOV 0 6 2018 Community Development Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: 9. Vicinity Map with site location. 10. Provide four (4) copies of any sensitive area studies such as wetland or geotechnical reports if needed per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45). See the Geotechnical Report Guidelines and Sensitive Area Special Study Guidelines for additional information. 11. Any drawings needed to describe the proposal other than those submitted with the underlying permit. Maximum size 24" x 36". \\citystore\City Common\Teri - DCD\Kirby\SEPA to fix\SEPA Environmental Review Application FINAL 5-9-16.docx RECEIVED NOV 06 2018 Community Development TU KW I LA VIEW ESTATES 2623049135 PARENT FILE PL18-0091 THIS FILE L18-0107 COMP PLAN_ZONE AMEND/REZONE COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS Initials Meeting Date Prepared by Mayor i mum Council review 05/06/19 NG nU� 1 Al ITEM INFORMATION ITEM No. 5.B. & 6.B. STAFF SPONSOR: NORA GIERLOFF ORIGINAL. AGENDA DAT:: 5/6/19 AGENDA ITEM TITLE A Comprehensive Plan and Zoning map change request from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Tukwila Urban Center Commercial Corridor (TUC -CC) for the Tukwila View Estates property at 17301 Southcenter Parkway. CA"I'I:;GoRY ❑ Discussion Mtg Date /1 Motion Date 5/6/19 ❑ Resolution Mtg Date ❑ Ordinance Mfg Date ❑ Bid Award tM{g Date Public Heating ❑ Other Nitg Date AN Mtg Date 5/6/19 SPONSOR ❑Council ❑Mayor ❑HR ►II DCD ❑Finance ❑Fire TS ❑P&R ❑Police ❑Pir ❑Court SI'ONSOR'S Tukwila may amend its Comprehensive Plan/Zoning map once per year. All of the SUNIMAItY applications received during the previous year are assembled and heard at the same meeting. A property owner submitted a request for a map change from LDR to TUC -CC. Following the required public hearing, the City Council may approve, modify or deny the request. REV IEWND BY ❑ C.O.W. Mtg. ❑ CDN Comm ❑ Finance Comm. ❑ Public Safety Comm. ❑ Trans &Infrastructure ❑ Arts Comm. ❑ Parks Comm. ❑ Planning Comm. DATE: NA COMMITTEE CHAIR: RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR/ADMIN. COMMITI Department of Community Development EE Quasi -Judicial Item, no Committee COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $0 $ $ Fund Source: Comments: MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 05/06/19 MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS 05/06/19 Staff Report to City Council dated 4/29/19 with Attachments 107 City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor Department of Community Development - Jack Pace, Director STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL 4/29/19 Hearing Date: May 6, 2019 Notification: Mailed to properties and residents within 500' radius Site Posted: 3/25/19 Notice published in the Seattle Times File Numbers: E18-0015 SEPA L18-0107 Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone Applicant: Brad Decker Project Name: Tukwila View Estates Request: Change Comprehensive Plan and zoning designation from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Tukwila Urban Center Commercial Corridor (TUC -CC) Location: 17301 Southcenter Boulevard (Tax Parcel # 262304-9135) Comprehensive Plan: Low Density Residential (LDR) Zoning: Low Density Residential (LDR) SEPA Determination: Determination of Non -Significance issued April 22, 2019 Staff: Nora Gierloff, Deputy Director of DCD Attachments: A. Applicant's response to Decision Criteria B. Vicinity Map C. Wetland, Watercourse & Buffer Map SW 26/23/04 Tukwila City Hall • 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, WA 98188 • 206-433-1800 • Website: TukwilaWA.gov 109 L18-0107 Staff Report Page 2 FINDINGS Background This application is part of the 2018-2019 annual docket for amendment of the Comprehensive Plan (the "Plan"). The purpose of an annual docket is to ensure that changes to the City's Plan are only considered once a year and that they are considered collectively for impact to the Plan. The Applicant is seeking to rezone 57,456-square feet of an 86,172-square foot lot located at 17301 Southcenter Boulevard (Tax Parcel # 262304-9135) (the "Subject Site") from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Tukwila Urban Center Commercial Corridor (TUC -CC), with corresponding Comprehensive Plan and Zoning map amendments, in preparation for future development. This non -project proposal is a quasi-judicial change to the land use designation on the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code maps. If the rezone is approved, any TUC -CC use would be permitted subject to all City regulations. The Applicant has discussed plans for a parking lot or creating additional retail space. A Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map depicting the Subject Site is below. The map shows existing Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations with the Subject Site highlighted and the portion to be rezoned called out as "SITE". Existing LDR zoning is yellow, and existing TUC -CC zoning is pink. Figure 1 - Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map 110 L18-0107 Staff Report Page 3 Site Information The Southcenter Subarea adjoins a steep, wooded slope up to the 1-5 Freeway that is zoned LDR. The Applicant is requesting that the southern part of a parcel on this slope be rezoned to match the adjacent commercial zoning, TUC -CC. This portion of the Subject Site appears to have been graded in the past and has a more gradual slope than property to the North, South and West. The Subject Site sits behind the row of existing buildings, has limited visibility and is accessed from a private easement between Chick-fil-a and Vitamin Shoppe. A portion of the western property line of the Subject Site is adjacent to the City of SeaTac. Utilities are available at the property line. The Subject Site contains environmentally sensitive areas, including a Type 3 watercourse with an 80-foot buffer (shown on the map below in blue ovals) that covers a large portion of the area to be rezoned. The Subject Site are contains Class 2 — Moderate landslide areas and Class 3 — High risk landslide areas. r. ifiet •� I -- '" '-ter R .lq a.4-1I ;,i:91194: lYa-'1 . i �i 3 ;l A3i;q <w 1 re a: Figure 2 — Map with Watercourse Buffers and Landslide Hazard Areas -g 9 r Zoning History This general zoning pattern —with the steeper portions of the hillside having residential zoning while the valley floor was zoned for commercial uses —has been in place, with varying boundaries, since at least 1977. When the Comprehensive Plan and city-wide zoning were revised in 1995, the entire hillside was zoned Low Density Residential and the flat portion was zoned Tukwila Urban Center. In 2014, the Southcenter Plan was adopted and the TUC zoning was split into subdistricts with the area along Southcenter Parkway zoned TUC -CC. 111 L18-0107 Staff Report Page 4 Public Comment On April 17, 2019, staff held a public information meeting for residents and property owners within 500 feet of the site. No one attended and no public comments were submitted during the comment period. Land Use The land uses to the east of the Subject Site reflect the zoning in a mix of retail and restaurants. The Subject Site and adjoining hillside properties are vacant. Photo 1 - Onsite looking west toward 1-5 112 L18-0107 Staff Report Page 5 Photo 2 - Onsite looking east to Southcenter Parkway Photo 3 - View of the Subject Site at the end of the access road Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment Criteria The Applicant's response to the decision criteria is attached hereto as Attachment A. 1. The proposed amendment to the [Comprehensive Plan and] zoning map is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan 113 L18-0107 Staff Report Page 6 The Southcenter Element of the Comprehensive Plan defines the western boundary of the Southcenter District as the "toe of (the) west valley wall." The goals, policies and development standards for the subarea do not address the steep, wooded hillside where the Subject Site is located. The Natural Environment Element has the following goals: Watercourses and their buffers, ...., are protected from encroachment and degradation and improved through mitigation, enhancement, and restoration projects. (Goal 4.6) Potential impacts and liabilities associated with development in areas of potential geologic instability and coal mine hazard areas are minimized, erosion is prevented, and natural surface water features are protected from loss, disruption or channelization. (Goal 4-11) The mapped watercourse buffer constrains the majority of the area adjacent to the access road, see Attachment C. Developing the Subject Site in accordance with the more intensive proposed commercial zoning could create a conflict with the goal of protecting the watercourse and its buffer. In his response, the Applicant does not address the watercourse and landslide issues. Rather, the Applicant focuses on his belief that the Subject Site "has never been looked at properly," and "should not be zoned LDR" because there are no residential amenities within two miles of the Subject Site. However, Tukwila Pond Park is located a half mile away and the Green River and its trail are one mile away. The nearest school is Thorndyke Elementary which is two miles away and there are three grocery stores within a mile. In addition, the Applicant cites to Comprehensive Plan Policy 10.2.8, regarding ensuring adequate parking supply, but the Applicant has not pointed to a need for additional parking within this area. 2. The proposed amendment to the Zoning Map is consistent with the scope and purpose of this title (the Zoning Code) and the description and purpose of the zone classification applied for. The proposed TUC -CC zoning would allow "auto -oriented retail and services in a manner similar to the existing patterns of development in the area." (TMC 18.28.040.B.4). As seen in the surrounding area, this development type is typically larger in size, taller in height, much more impervious and significantly more intensive than the single-family homes permitted in LDR. In contrast, the purpose of the Low Density Residential (LDR) district is "... to provide low - density family residential areas together with a full range of urban infrastructure services in order to maintain stable residential neighborhoods, and to prevent intrusions by incompatible land uses." (TMC 18.10.010) Residential uses do not have the same need as retail for visibility from the street and its potential customers so the location 375 feet back from the Southcenter Parkway R-O-W with only a narrow view corridor between existing buildings better suits residential zoning. In 114 L18-0107 Staff Report Page 7 response to this criteria, the Applicant again cites to Comprehensive Plan Policy 10.2.8, regarding ensuring adequate parking supply, but has not pointed to a need for additional parking within this area. 3. There are changed conditions since the previous zoning became effective to warrant the proposed amendment to the Zoning (and Comprehensive Plan) Map In 2014, the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning map were amended by dividing the Southcenter District into subareas and adopting new zoning standards. At that time, housing was allowed more widely throughout the District and 644 residential units have since been developed or are under construction. While these units are located to the north of Subject Site, the increase in residents will support additional residential amenities nearby, supporting the existing LDR zoning. In his response, the Applicant states that "the original zoning was done before any idea of mass transit or housing being built in the urban core of Tukwila;" however, the designation of the Southcenter Area as a PSRC-recognized Urban Center in 1995 was based on just those principles of dense, mixed use, transit served development. Furthermore, the Applicant has failed to identify any changed conditions since the current zoning became effective in 2014. 4. The proposed amendment to the [Comprehensive Plan and] Zoning Map will be in the interest of furtherance of the public health, safety, comfort, convenience, and general welfare, and will not adversely affect the surrounding neighborhoods, nor be injurious to other properties in the vicinity in which the subject property is located. The Applicant provided a geotechnical report for a nearby project, but it was located on a nearly flat site and did not address the stability of the hillside. Therefore, geotechnical issues constraining development of the Subject Site are unknown. Any sort of commercial development on the Subject Site would require grading, paving and likely tree removal. The parking stalls that the Applicant identified as a potential development option on the Subject Site would be at least 400 feet away from the entrances to the nearest buildings with no safe pedestrian pathways to connect them to those sites. Even if a parking lot were well lit, the adjacent buildings do not have windows facing that direction and it would be set back so far from the public street that it would have very little visibility to deter crime. The Applicant has not provided a conceptual site plan of the proposed parking lot or discussed how Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design principles could be applied to prevent this parking from posing a danger of personal and property crime to its users. In his response, the Applicant argues that the disruptive market forces currently affecting the retail sector would be partially offset by the flexibility of having additional parking available on the Subject Site. However, the Applicant has not provided any support for these assertions to demonstrate that the public health, safety, comfort, convenience, and general welfare will be furthered by the rezone. 115 L18-0107 Staff Report Page 8 CONCLUSIONS 1) Consistency with Comprehensive Plan The extension of the Southcenter District onto the adjacent hillside is inconsistent with the description and intent of the Southcenter Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The Subject Site is constrained by landslide hazards and a regulated watercourse that would be negatively impacted by more intensive development, conflicting with the Natural Environment Element of the Plan. The applicant did not address the environmentally sensitive areas in his response. 2) Consistency with Zone The LDR zone permits a low level of development intensity consistent with a wooded hillside containing a regulated watercourse hidden from the street by existing buildings. The effect of the proposed upzoning to an auto -oriented development pattern would be at odds with the environmental constraints of the Subject Site. 3) Changed conditions While there is a contrast between the types of development permitted on the Subject Site and the adjacent properties to the east, this has been the case for decades and the Applicant has not identified changed conditions that would justify the rezone. In fact, the housing that has been built in Southcenter over the last 5 years improves the residential climate in the area and supports retaining the Low Density Residential zoning. 4) Benefit to community A rezone of the Subject Site from LDR to TUC -CC to potentially use for new retail or parking has not been shown to be in the furtherance of the public health, safety, comfort, convenience, and general welfare, and could actually injure adjacent environmentally sensitive areas. Potential development suggested as an option by the Applicant of a distant, low use parking lot with poor visibility and no safe pedestrian access paths could invite car prowls and other crimes and not benefit customers or employees in the Southcenter area. The Applicant has not documented a parking shortage for the surrounding businesses that would be addressed by a new parking lot in this location. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends denying the rezone request, thereby retaining the existing Low Density Residential (LDR) zoning and Comprehensive Plan designation on the Subject Site. 116 Comp Plan Amendment L18-0107 DECISION CRITERIA (TMC 18.84.020) The burden of proof that a change to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps are warranted lies solely upon the proponent. The greater the degree of change proposed, the greater will be the burden of showing that the change is justified. This is a type 5 decision. It is a quasi-judicial decision made by the City Council who will decide your request using the criteria listed below. It is essential that you describe in a clear and precise manner why the change should be approved. You may submit other documentation in support of your proposal. Provide a written response that demonstrates how each of the following circumstances justifies a map change for your property: 1. The proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning map is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan; This property, we believe, has never been looked at properly. It is currently zoned LDR (Low Density Residential) and we are requesting a change to TUC -CC (Tukwila Urban Core — Commercial Corridor). Changing from LDR to TUC -CC would help achieve the comprehensive plan's goals expressed in the following Sections: 10.2.7, "Development standards will consider the needs of land owners, developers, businesses, and the community." 10.2.8 "Parking. Ensure an adequate supply of parking for visitors, employees, residents and customers. Provide a variety of flexible regulations, strategies and programs to meet parking demands. On -going needs will also be assessed to ensure appropriate parking requirements and to encourage efficient and effective use of land in parking design." This site should not be zoned LDR. This is not in a single-family neighborhood district as shown on the map on page 145 (see attached) of the Comprehensive Plan. This site is within the Commercial Corridor District as defined in the District Map (see attached). There are no residential developments anywhere near this project nor are there any parks, schools, or family amenities within the two miles of the site This district was not intended to have any residential and should be rezoned to come into alignment with the Commercial Corridor District. 2. The proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning map is consistent with the scope -and purpose of the TMC- Title 18, Zoning Code, and the description and purpose of the zone classification applied for; Yes. This rezone to TUC -CC will allow this site to fall within the surrounding zoning and the intention of the designated Commercial Corridor as described in section 18.28.040, B, 4 "TUC -CC: Commercial Corridor District. Southcenter Parkway will continue to feature auto - oriented retail and services in a manner similar to the existing patterns of development in that area" and as shown on District Map Figure16 (See attached map) and help achieve goals 10.2.7 and 10.2.8 of the Comprehensive plan. 3. There .are changed conditions since the previous zonino_became_effective_to_ warrant the proposed amendment to the [Comprehensive Plan and] Zoning Map; 117 The original zoning was done before any idea of mass transit or housing being built in the Urban Core of Tukwila and the zoning did not change when the Comprehensive Plan was created. The Comprehensive Plan specifically calls out for this area to be a "Commercial Corridor District" in the Tukwila Urban Core. The Comprehensive plan prescribes only Transit Orientated development (TUC-TOD) in the TUC. The current zoning conflicts with vision statement of section 10 of the Comprehensive plan: "...areas of high -quality housing near water amenities and within walking distance of the Sounder commuter rail/Amtrak Station and the new bus transit center.". The location is over 1.8 miles from the train, this is not "Transit Orientated". This zoning also creates a conflict with Section 3 and the goals of Family Sized Housing as detailed in the Comprehensive Plan, "with access to transit and proximity to schools, parks, and other child -oriented infrastructure" This site is more than 2.5 miles from the closest school and park and is only accessible through a private retail driveway and Southcenter Parkway, which is a designated Commercial Corridor. This, is far from "child oriented infrastructure". Furthermore, this site is an anomaly on Southcenter Parkway and in the Tukwila Urban Core (TUC) due to its Low Density Residential (LDR) zoning. The development of family housing in this area would create a micro neighborhood that does not fit with the character of the Commercial Corridor or the TUC and is in direct conflict with goals; 7.1.1 "Maintain a comprehensive land use map that supports the preservation and enhancement of single-family and stable multi -family neighborhoods; eliminates incompatible land uses; and clearly establishes applicable development requirements through recognizable boundaries.", 7.5.3 "Support single-family residential in -fill housing that is in harmony with the existing neighborhood...", 7.8 'Noise Abatement: Residential neighborhoods are protected from undue noise impacts, in order to ensure for all residents, the continued use, enjoyment and value of their homes, public facilities and recreation, and the outdoors." And 18.28.040, B. 4 "TUC -CC: Commercial Corridor District. Southcenter Parkway will continue to feature auto -oriented retail and services in a manner similar to the existing patterns of development in that area". 4. The proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning map will be in the interest of and furtherance of the public health, safety, comfort, convenience, and general welfare; and will not adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood; nor be injurious to other properties in the vicinity in which the subject property is located. The current zoning calls for low density family housing, this would cause a conflict with the surrounding neighborhood that would adversely affect the retailers and the families that would be living in direct proximity to each other. Family residential mixed with traffic orientated retail would not be in interest of the public safety or improve the general welfare of the neighborhood. The change would best meet the public needs by expanding the retail opportunities for the TUC -CC area. This land is directly adjacent to the retail corridor and surrounded by retailers. The change in zoning would benefit the surrounding parcels by providing the flexibility for Tukwila to save its retail businesses. All Tukwila retail is adversely affected by, "The Amazon Effect", shoppers can go to a store and touch an item of furniture or clothing and then use their phones to purchase•the same item on Amazon for less than the store can afford to sell it. Tukwila must be able to provide the retail stores what they need to be successful. Market fbTces are causing Landlord's to divide larger bulk use spaces into smaller regular retail spaces 118 to accommodate service sector tenants who are Amazon resistant. Landlord's need the flexibility to provide parking for a restaurant or to go from bulk retail to regular retail in order to lease the space to successful retailers. The area is in a rapidly changing retail environment and Tukwila must be able to respond quickly to meet the needs of its Landlord's and their retailers. Landlord's have watched the vacancy signs go up in large spaces and remain vacant for years due to zoning restrictions. We recognize the impact this has on the tax revenues for Tukwila. Landowners need more flexibility to attract the types of regional retailers that the comprehensive plan outlines. This property is zoned LDR which is a waste of valuable retail land. A change of zoning will allow landowners to develop this area into retail appropriate uses and thus enable the flexibility to lease to a larger pool of national and local retailers. 119 Districts Commercial Corridor Pond Regional Center Transit Oriented Development Workplace �•�•• Southcenter Plan Boundary •r.�•.,` \tL e Ner ‘3T •r.r " I ..••r......744.ekvata.Rkra!i r.•r•� I — iT ! _-_ Eitana Black Dr.- -.1_� Y d II I .. Baker BlNd 1 X 2 Q_ N f I I_44- P f, j 31 > U a .c -771 o. . _ - _- a; < -a• _ _- Strand e: Blvd 1 rN orate pr Uplaid Or Midland. Dr . 1 1 Triland Dr . I _ -- circle Park DDr Tredc Dr '� j Duaamisn River .r t—; To in j I.,_�S C } Minkter Blvd 4, _ d CosicoDr :y —;i S180r1,St -2t & j �'t"rs;7c Dr ��.�• Figure 16 District-Map- AdoptedTMC18.28_Formatted.docx Page 9 06/03/2014 121 S-158th St Boeing Access R4, 1017th. St 5;4' • co 44' 4." 111 , - S1/4/4 116th St ' \ • S 120th 1) :,177"-tvw ..•' , 4'''I`P . . . ,.. . , • , ; S V2nd St .. .11t4.1f.v..‘, •-r.. . d'e I 7'7'71", `" S 124th S Cl) ,co cr.„,.....- ,ft . . _ › S 128th 'sr \ ,.' .1% f.'," - ' 1280 8 ,4e.si A 1 ‘e S 13oth St - :. • Gs W . Ck.§. S 130h : it 0)..i.i,...rCW.,,, .. t.., . P, .-.: •rfI..)." ' .- V ;: 4.ran v" .. •,q.,..P6 ; . , S135thSt t A, • 1, -14.6, - ,s Fll ',5 137th St 5).- '1' d°-"\-c. %.1'. S 134th St - Uk,tLiYS kii";G:HBORHOODS 7. -.,T. c.) .1, ...: S 140(h St 1- -- -, -,2 S 142.2:d S t ; : : 0 S 144th Sr ;51 1S.- A it•-) in - u" -S 144th St S-- tp E. 6'l'..i-.i-'-.' 1•••,1:1444•n:o•-cu aA,.l4.•:3,..S146thSt .tS141S .:..,7.•• 150thSt :-,e . ia>.. i=<v) 'mEr-t . 67- ws152:dstS152ndt r 4 CS:„4.. —f4:7,.-I;--.t."::f•1i:i.5f' ,,:.-.?.7!:,...f..•..:- sothcn:sivu) ' '.. Lipilt Pad a. 4C . - Sgatio • .. - crt " S 156th St c ' c`i _ I jr, ‘r .• • . - Pkw ,..;Ti it.kwila g ' — _ - - ..: --- s1:7 S 160th St -. • 1 Ictk-r_rilr• r..LIEllam t5:4):,7 S 164th St t 4.- - • V) . ta. • l' .---``- Strarider Eilvd --..-2 ,---- Nt• I '1.4tcnt,cgriial .I -,... E ..= 1, TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 201 5 •-• —ccirWsg-thva — .MInkler Blvd - o. Treck Dr I .• To I - PO/1C!..; PAGE 7-5 122 VICINITY MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION REZONE TO TUG-GG THAT PORTION OF PARCEL B, CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER L06-05, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDER'S FILE NUMBER 20061025400010, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL B; THENCE N OO°50'36" E ALONG THE WEST MARGIN OF SAID PARCEL B, 114.83 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF SAID LINE; THENCE N 61°26'34" E, 31.01 FEET; THENCE N 16°32'15" E, 61.22 FEET; THENCE N 11°I3'40" E, 61.36 FEET; THENCE 5 84°02'02" E, 50.10 FEET; THENCE N 51 °06'45" E, 31.62 FEET; THENGE N 45°13'21" E, 32.12 FEET; THENGE N 35°OW'II" E, 451 FEET; THENGE 5 51 °42'03" E, 14.33 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID PARGEL B, AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE, SAID MARGIN BEING A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 44028 FEET, SAID POINT BEARING N 51°42'03" W FROM ITS RADIUS, AND LYING NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1°0132", AN ARC DISTANGE OF 1.88 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF PARGEL A OF SAID GITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER L06-05 THEREOF. 123 a_y I '1—Tukwila City Limits 0 00 Type 2 Stream Ez=c Type 2 Stream in Pipe Type 3 Stream �... Type 3 Stream in Pipe Type 4 Stream Type 4 Stream in Pipe I♦ 1 NW 35/23/04 Potential Wetlands Type 1 Wetland Type 2 Wetland Type 3 Wetland Type 1 Wetland Buffer (100') Type 2 Wetland Buffer (80') Type 3 Wetland Buffer (50') SW Quarter 26/23/04 City of Tukwila Wetland, Watercourse & Buffer Maps Printed July 15, 2006 Type 2 Watercourse Buffer (100') j The mapping of areas of potential geologic instability is approximate. Type 3 Watercourse Buffer (80') on site verification of topography & geology is necessary. Wetland sizes & locations are approximate only & watercourses shown on Type 4 Watercourse Buffer (50') I this map have not been surveyed. NE 35/23/04 1'=t00' December 13, 2004 124 2018-2019 Comprehensive Plan Docket Public Hearings May 6, 2019 Two Map Change Requests 1) Metro Training Facility 2) Tukwila View Estates Map Change Request Project name: Tukwila View Estates Request: Rezone southern half of parcel 262304-9135 from - Low Density Residential to - Tukwila Urban Center —Commercial Corridor Map Change Review Criteria 1. Is the request consistent with the Comprehensive Plan? 2. Is the request consistent with the zone? 3. Do changed conditions merit the change in zoning? 4. Is the rezone in the community interest? '1-1 C � -1 _ 1 I 1 " ' I r'I�li am.. ..!..__ 'e — ti Site of Proposed Map Change SITE 0 TI1C-CC TUC -CC Site of Proposed Map Change Background • The west hillside has had residential zoning while the valley floor has had commercial zoning since at least 1977 • In 1995 the hillside was zoned Low Density Residential and the valley floor was zoned Tukwila Urban Center • In 2014 subdistricts were zoned within the TUC • The request is to create split zoning with the southern, flatter portion of the parcel rezoned Environmentally Sensitive Areas Environmentally Sensitive Areas c, View of the Subject Site from Southcenter Parkway ,„ ) Analysis • No public comments received • No conceptual site plan for proposed development provided • Applicant response did not address environmentally sensitive areas Map Change Review Criteria 1. Consistent with the Comprehensive Plan? • Increased intensity inconsistent with Comprehensive Plan's protection of environmentally sensitive areas • Inconsistent with definition of Southcenter Plan extent 2. Consistent with the zone? • Site has poor visibility and is not suited to retail uses Map Change Review Criteria 3. Changed conditions merit the change in zoning? • Applicant has not shown changed circumstances 4. Is the rezone in the community interest? • Applicant has not demonstrated a public benefit from the rezone • Applicant has not documented a parking shortage Staff Recommendation Denial of the rezone request • Retaining the existing Low Density Residential (LDR) zoning and Comprehensive Plan designation QUESTIONS? Nora Gierloff From: Brad Decker <brad@seattleretail.net> Sent: Monday, May 6, 2019 10:17 AM To: Jack Pace Cc: Nora Gierloff Subject: FW: Links to Council Packets - Week of 5/6/19 - Comp Plan Amendment L18-0107 Hi Jack, Thank you for your time today. We would like to pull the application (Comp Plan Amendment L18-0107) from this evening meeting and have an opportunity to work with the City of Tukwila to revise the current application to be an acceptable application for the City of Tukwila. Please confirm you have receive the email and are able to pull the application from this evenings City Council meeting. Thank you Brad Decker Managing Member 117 East Louisa Street #230 Seattle, WA 98102 Phone 206-545-4964 Fax 206-545-4952 From: Nora Gierloff <Nora.Gierloff@TukwilaWA.gov> Sent: Monday, May 6, 2019 5:52 AM To: Brad Decker <brad@seattleretail.net> Subject: Fw: Links to Council Packets - Week of 5/6/19 Brad, here is the packet for tonight's meeting if you have not already reviewed it. Nora Gierloff AICP Deputy DCD Director City of Tukwila From: Ana Le Sent: Friday, May 3, 2019 9:45:48 AM To: All City Users Subject: Links to Council Packets - Week of 5/6/19 Hi. The following links will take you to the Digital Records Center and packet materials for the week of 5/6/19. The packets have been compiled and page numbered based on being 2-sided (and being green). After you click on a link, just click on the PDF button to print the document or review it on your computer. Thanks so much! i CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 5/6/19: http://records.tukwilawa.gov/WebLink/1/fol/314210/rowl.aspx Public Safety 5/6/19: http://records.tukwilawa.gov/WebLink/1/fol/314211/row1.aspx Transportation & Infrastructure 5/7/19: http://records.tukwilawa.gov/WebLink/1 /fol/314201 /rowl .aspx Park Commission 5/8/19 ** Rescheduled to 5/15/19 **: http://records.tukwilawa.qov/WebLink/1 /doc/314183/pagel .aspx CAUTION: This email originated from outside the City of Tukwila network. Please DO NOT open attachments or click links from an unknown or suspicious origin. 2 Nora Gierloff From: Nora Gierloff Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2019 1:40 PM To: reviewteam@commerce.wa.gov Subject: Tukwila Annual Amendment Rezone Request Attachments: Handout.docx; Rezone Notice of App.pdf; Response to Criteria.pdf Tukwila is processing a comprehensive plan amendment/rezone request for a vacant site at 17301 Southcenter Boulevard (Tax Parcel # 262304-9135). The request is to change the comprehensive plan and zoning designation of a wooded hillside from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Tukwila Urban Center Commercial Corridor (TUC -CC). A Determination of Non -Significance issued April 22, 2019 and the City Council public hearing is scheduled for May 6, 2019. Attached is the applicant response to the decision criteria. Norm Gierlo ff Deputy DCD Director City of Tukwila 1 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development RECEIVED MAR 18 2019 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS Land Use File Number(s) L18-0107 (Rezone) E18-0015 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: ® Building ❑ Planning ® Public Works ® Fire Dept. ❑ Police Dept. ❑ Parks/Rec Project: Tukwila View Estates Rezone Address: APN 2623049135 Date transmitted: 3-18-19 Response requested by: 4-1-19 Staff coordinator: Nora Gierloff Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (/ (Attach additional comment sheets /and/or support materials as needed.) c1 Octni Plan check date: IComments prepared by: Update date: MEMORANDUM www.tukwila@tukwilawa.gov Development Guidelines and Design and Construction Standards TO: PLANNING DEPT. — Nora Gierloff, Deputy Director FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. — David McPherson, Development Engineer DATE: April 10, 2019 SUBJECT: Tukwila View Estates located just Southwest of 17301 Southcenter Parkway TL no. 262304-9135 SEPA, Comp. Plan Amend. & Rezone, and Miscellaneous Comments SEPA — E18-0015 1. A completed Traffic Concurrency Certificate Application and Test Fee is required as part of the future Building permit. 2. A Transportation Impact Fee applies to the future Building permit. 3. The project will require a current and site -specific Geotechnical Report. Geotechnical peer review shall be required and paid for by the Owner/Applicant. A Geotechnical Engineering Study, by Liu & Associates, Inc, dated January 25, 2006 was submitted by the Applicant. 4. Project will require a completed Notice of Intent (NO1) application form — Construction Stormwater General Permit to the Washington State Department of Ecology. 5. City of Tukwila by Ordinance has adopted Low Impact Development (LID) - Washington State Department of Ecology on January 1, 2017. Developers required to install/construct Low Impact Development (LID); including rain gardens, bio-retention facilities, pervious pavement, etc. 6. Exhibit Map (Sheet 1 of 1) should be BLA L06-059. 7. Comprehensive Plan Amendments (Sht. A1.0) should be BLA L06-059. Comp. Plan Amend. & Rezone — L18-0107 1. A completed Traffic Concurrency Certificate Application and Test Fee is required as part of the future Building permit. 2. A Transportation Impact Fee applies to the future Building permit. 3. This project will require a current and site -specific Geotechnical Report. Geotechnical peer review shall be required and paid for by the Owner/Applicant. A Geotechnical Engineering Study, by Liu & Associates, Inc, dated January 25, 2006 was submitted by Applicant. 4. Project will require a completed Notice of Intent (NOI) application form — Construction Stormwater General Permit to the Washington State Department of Ecology. Page 1 of 3 5. City of Tukwila by Ordinance has adopted Low Impact Development (LID) - Washington State Department of Ecology on January 1, 2017. Developers required to install/construct Low Impact Development (LID); including rain gardens, bio-retention facilities, pervious pavement, etc. 6. Exhibit Map (Sheet 1 of 1) should be BLA L06-059. 7. Comprehensive Plan Amendments (Sht. A1.0) should be BLA L06-059. Miscellaneous Comments 1. As part of future Building permit Public Works will prepare and Owner shall sign with Notary, a Storm Water Covenant and Maintenance Agreement. City will sign with Notary and have the document recorded at the King County Office of Records. Applicant shall pay cost of recording all documents at the King County Recorder's Office. 2. All utilities are required to be underground, per City ordinance. 3. Owner shall sign with Notary, a Sensitive Areas Ordinance Hold Harmless Agreement to be prepared by Public Works. Agreement will be recorded at King County, after Mayor signs the document. (Submit signed agreement at least ten (10) days prior to expected future Building permit final, as City must have time to process this document). Public Works contacts for utility information: Ryan Larson, P.E. (Senior Program Manager — Surface Water) City of Tukwila Public Works Department (206) 431-2456 ryan.larson@tukwilawa.gov Scott Bates (Traffic Engineering Coordinator) City of Tukwila Public Works Department (206) 431-2193 scott.bates@tukwilawa.gov Public Works contact for surface water information Ryan Larson, P.E. (Senior Program Manager - Surface Water) City of Tukwila Public Works Department (206) 431-2456 ryan.larson@tukwilawa.gov Public Works contact for sanitary sewer & water information. Pat Brodin, P.E. (Development Manager) City of Tukwila Public Works Department (206) 431-2441 pat.brodin@tukwilawa.gov Page 2 of 3 Public Works contact for NPDES information. Greg Villanueva (NPDES Coordinator) 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188-2544 206-431-2442 Office / 206-571-6321 Cell greg.villanueva@tukwilawa.gov Page 3 of 3 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Land Use File Number(s) L18-0107 (Rezone) E18-0015 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: ® Building ❑ Planning ® Public Works X❑ Fire Dept. ❑ Police Dept. ❑ Parks/Rec Project: Tukwila View Estates Rezone Address: APN 2623049135 Date transmitted: 3-18-19 Response requested by: 4-1-19 Staff coordinator: Nora Gierloff Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Plan check dat Comments Update date: Z� / 1 1 prepared by: City o Tukwila "EVISION SUBMITTAL Department of Community Development PLANNING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center, ACCOMPANIED BY RESPONSE DOCUMENTS AND THIS COMPLETED FORM. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, email, fax, etc. Date: //! Z i /I Permit Number: Z. 0 /Q 7 Project Name: TukwdU e ESW�5 Project Address: 1- -3 0 l Sod PG ( 11 U ( Project Contact: CAC) kef Contact Phone number: .2-C76 — Z ZCo —I 7-00 City Planner: ' I' n 1 t J Y `A I i oat PLEASE ATTACH A COPY OF ANY LETTER REQUESTING CORRECTIONS / ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ❑ Response to Preliminary Approval ❑ Response to letter requesting additional information (Please attach a copy of the letter) ❑ Final Short Plat Submittal Summary of revision/response submittal: s. P(mot „L SA V' lie Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: IECEWED ❑ Entered in TRAKiT on W:\C'SHAREPOINT POLDER RES7RUCTURE\Refcrcncc\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\Revision Suhmival Form.doc Revised: March 2014 NOV 212018 Community Development City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Land Use File Number(s) L18-0107 (Rezone) E18-0015 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: ® Building ❑ Planning ® Public Works © Fire Dept. ❑ Police Dept. ❑ Parks/Rec Project: Tukwila View Estates Rezone Address: APN 2623049135 Date transmitted: 3-18-19 Response requested by: 4-1-19 Staff coordinator: Nora Gierloff Date response received: 3 /off 0 ) I a, REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Plan check date: /%l Comments prepared by: I Update date: CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF APPLICATION PROJECT INFORMATION Brad Decker has filed applications for the rezone of a vacant site for future development located at 17301 Southcenter Parkway. Permits applied for include: L18-0107 Rezone/Comprehensive Plan Amendment Studies required with the application include: Geotechnical Report An environmental checklist E18-0015 has been submitted with the studies identified above. FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW The project files are available at the City of Tukwila. To view the files, you may request them at the counter at the Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard #100, Tukwila WA 98188. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Your written comments on the project are requested. They must be delivered to DCD at the address above or postmarked no later than 5:00 P.M., April 15, 2019 for environmental issues and April 22 for comments on the zoning/comprehensive plan change. Tukwila has reviewed the project for probable adverse environmental impacts and expects to issue a determination of non -significance (DNS). The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is being used. There will be a single integrated comment period for the land use permits and the environmental review so this may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the project. If timely comments do not identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the anticipated determination the DNS will be issued without a second comment period. A meeting to provide you with information on the project is scheduled for April 17, 2019 in the Tukwila City Hall Council Chambers from 5:00 to 6:30 PM. Information and comments submitted at the meeting shall be considered by the Department in its recommendation but shall not be part of the public record considered by Council in its deliberations. Opportunity for additional oral and written public comments will be provided at a public hearing before the City Council, tentatively scheduled for May 6, 2019. To confirm this date call the Department of Community Development at (206) 431-3670. APPEALS You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling DCD at (206) 431-3670. The rezone decision by the City Council is final and may only be appealed to Superior Court pursuant to RCW 36.70C. For further information on this proposal, contact Nora Gierloff at (206) 431-3670 or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, M-F, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Application Filed: 11/21/18 Notice of Application Issued: 3/25/19 Nora Gierloff From: FASTSIGNS 157 <fastsigns.157@fastsigns.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 4:37 PM To: Nora Gierloff Subject: Re: Land Use Invoice and Proof Hi Nora, Great! I'll make those changes and revise the billing to the end customer and we'll have this installed no later than Monday the 25th. Have a great evening! Kind regards, Rene' Reeves, Visual Communications Specialist Please note our correct phone number below. st'ZS✓"SJ ?.iVS 33Cent Sautheente't 7825 South Meth St., Xent, wa 9802 206-575-2110 www.fa,3t,ign,.cam/157 " 2V1 ateueu you ace, be a good ane!" On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 4:25 PM Nora Gierloff <Nora.Gierloff@tukwilawa.gov> wrote: Hi Rene, Thanks for the prompt response. The board looks good, but let's add a second permit number, E18-0015. I would also like to adjust the sign location to the barked area at the end of the landscape strip closest to the street, see attached and below. Billing should go to the applicant: Brad Decker 117 E. Louisa St. #230 Seattle, WA 98102 (206)545-4964 Thanks, 1 • • Nora, Gi.evlo ff Deputy DCD Director City of Tukwila From: FASTSIGNS 157 <fastsigns.157@fastsigns.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 11:20 AM To: Nora Gierloff <Nora.Gierloff@TukwilaWA.gov> Subject: Land Use Invoice and Proof Hi Nora, 2 CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila City Council will hold a public hearing on May 6, 2019 at 7:00 p.m. in the Tukwila City Hall Council Chambers located at 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, WA, to discuss the following: REZONE/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FILE NUMBER: L18-0107 Project Name: Tukwila View Estates Rezone/Comprehensive Plan Amendment APPLICANT: Brad Decker REQUEST: Rezone to change a vacant parcel from Low Density Residential to Tukwila Urban Center Commercial Corridor in preparation for redevelopment LOCATION: 17301 Southcenter Parkway, Tukwila, WA (Quasi -Judicial) Information on the above project may be obtained at the Tukwila Planning Division at 206-431-3670, or by contacting the project planner Nora Gierloff at Nora.Gierloff(a�TukwilaWA.gov. All interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval, disapproval, or opinions on this issue. For those unable to attend in person, you may submit written testimony to the City Clerk's office until 5:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Tukwila City Hall is wheelchair accessible. The City strives to accommodate people with disabilities. Reasonable accommodations are available at the public hearing with advance notice. This notice is also available in alternate formats for individuals with disabilities. Please contact the City Clerk's Office at TukwilaCityClerk@Tukwilawa.gov for assistance. Christy O'Flaherty, MMC, Records Governance Manager/City Clerk Published: Seattle Times — April 22, 2019 RECEIVED Nov 212010 Comp Plan Amendment L18-0107 Community DECISION CRITERIA (TMC 18.84.020) The burden of proof that a change to the Development Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps are warranted lies solely upon the proponent. The greater the degree of change proposed, the greater will be the burden of showing that the change is justified. This is a type 5 decision. It is a quasi-judicial decision made by the City Council who will decide your request using the criteria listed below. It is essential that you describe in a clear and precise manner why the change should be approved. You may submit other documentation in support of your proposal. Provide a written response that demonstrates how each of the following circumstances justifies a map change for your property: 1. The proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning map is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan; This property, we believe, has never been looked at properly. It is currently zoned LDR (Low Density Residential) and we are requesting a change to TUC -CC (Tukwila Urban Core — Commercial Corridor). Changing from LDR to TUC -CC would help achieve the comprehensive plan's goals expressed in the following Sections: 10.2.7, "Development standards will consider the needs of land owners, developers, businesses, and the community." 10.2.8 "Parking. Ensure an adequate supply of parking for visitors, employees, residents and customers. Provide a variety of flexible regulations, strategies and programs to meet parking demands. On -going needs will also be assessed to ensure appropriate parking requirements and to encourage efficient and effective use of land in parking design." This site should not be zoned LDR. This is not in a single-family neighborhood district as shown on the map on page 145 (see attached) of the Comprehensive Plan. This site is within the Commercial Corridor District as defined in the District Map (see attached). There are no residential developments anywhere near this project nor are there any parks, schools, or family amenities within the two miles of the site This district was not intended to have any residential and should be rezoned to come into alignment with the Commercial Corridor District. 2. The proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning map is consistent with the scope -and -purpose -of -the TMC Title 18, Zoning Code, and the description and purpose of the zone classification applied for; Yes. This rezone to TUC -CC will allow this site to fall within the surrounding zoning and the intention of the•designated Commercial'Corridor as described in section 18.28:040; B, 4 "TUC -CC: Commercial Corridor District. Southcenter Parkway will continue to feature auto - oriented retail and services in a manner similar to the existing patterns of development in that area" and as shown on District Map Figure16 (See attached map) and help achieve goals 10.2.7.and 10.2.8 of the Comprehensive plan. 3. There are changed conditions since the previous zoning_became effective to warrant the proposed amendment to the [Comprehensive Plan and] Zoning Map; The original zoning was done before any idea of mass transit or housing being built in the Urban Core of Tukwila and the zoning did not change when the Comprehensive Plan was created. The Comprehensive Plan specifically calls out for this area to be a "Commercial Corridor District" in the Tukwila Urban Core. The Comprehensive plan prescribes only Transit Orientated development (TUC-TOD) in the TUC. The current zoning conflicts with vision statement of section 10 of the Comprehensive plan: "...areas of high -quality housing near water amenities and within walking distance of the Sounder commuter rail/Amtrak Station and the new bus transit center.". The location is over 1.8 miles from the train, this is not "Transit Orientated". This zoning also creates a conflict with Section 3 and the goals of Family Sized Housing as detailed in the Comprehensive Plan, "with access to transit and proximity to schools, parks, and other child -oriented infrastructure". This site is more than 2.5 miles from the closest school and park and is only accessible through a private retail driveway and Southcenter Parkway, which is a designated Commercial Corridor. This, is far from "child oriented infrastructure". Furthermore, this site is an anomaly on Southcenter Parkway and in the Tukwila Urban Core (TUC) due to its Low Density Residential (LDR) zoning. The development of family housing in this area would create a micro neighborhood that does not fit with the character of the Commercial Corridor or the TUC and is in direct conflict with goals; 7.1.1 "Maintain a comprehensive land use map that supports the preservation and enhancement of single-family and stable multi -family neighborhoods; eliminates incompatible land uses; and clearly establishes applicable development requirements through recognizable boundaries.", 7.5.3 "Support single-family residential in -fill housing that is in harmony with the existing neighborhood...", 7.8 "Noise Abatement: Residential neighborhoods are protected from undue noise impacts, in order to ensure for all residents, the continued use, enjoyment and value of their homes, public facilities and recreation, and the outdoors." And 18.28.040, B. 4 "TUC -CC: Commercial Corridor District. Southcenter Parkway will continue to feature auto -oriented retail and services in a manner similar to the existing patterns of development in that area". 4. The proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning map will be in the interest of and furtherance of the public health, safety, comfort, convenience, and general welfare; and will not adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood; nor be injurious to other properties in the vicinity in which the subject property is located. The current zoning calls for low density family housing, this would cause a conflict with the surrounding neighborhood that would adversely affect the retailers and the families that would be living in direct proximity to each other. Family residential mixed with traffic orientated retail would not be in interest of the public safety or improve the general welfare of the neighborhood. ' •The change would bet,Meet the public rie'eds.by expanding the retail -opportunities for the TUC -CC area. This land'is-directly adjacent to the retail corridor and surrounded by retailers. The change in zoning would benefit the surrounding parcels by providing the flexibility for Tukwila to save its retail businesses. All Tukwila retail is adversely affected by, "The Amazon Effect", shoppers can go tora store and touch an item of furniture or.clothing and then.use their phones'to purchase' thesarrie-item on Amazon fogless than the store-can.affofd to 'Sell -it. - Tukwila must be able to provide the retail stores what they need to be successful. Market -forces are causing Landlord's to divide larger bulk use spaces into smaller regular retail spaces • to accommodate service sector tenants who are Amazon resistant. Landlord's need the flexibility to provide parking for a restaurant or to go from bulk retail to regular retail in order to lease the space to successful retailers. The area is in a rapidly changing retail environment and Tukwila must be able to respond quickly to meet the needs of its Landlord's and their retailers. Landlord's have watched the vacancy signs go up in large spaces and remain vacant for years due to zoning restrictions. We recognize the impact this has on the tax revenues for Tukwila. Landowners need more flexibility to attract the types of regional retailers that the comprehensive plan outlines. This property is zoned LDR which is a waste of valuable retail land. A change of zoning will allow landowners to develop this area into retail appropriate uses and thus enable the flexibility to lease to a larger pool of national and local retailers. • • Districts ICommercial Corridor Pond Regional Center Transit Oriented Development Workplace •-••• Southcenter Plan Boundary I.. 1 i 1. 1 1 S178th` I L •••�.�7�k�ila.Akry�._.+ a 2i iVlidland,Dr -•wale Park D Dr Evans Black D; Lll! F3aker R!vci - SUande. Blvc c, Duwamish Rroe Sr 56th St 0. `. 7 8 Dostco Dr o • S Longacres Way 1 I 'S:180th St Figure 16 District Map AdoptedTMC18.28_Formatted.docx Page 9 06/03/2014 ELEMENT 7 • RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS Boeing Access Rd S114t S 116th St co v cr. a., 4 ra > > ..,c ,,,s, < 0 S 120th PI `-`,-..'- , - _ -....r. , . .c,sit 4 S 122nd St c? .0. . ,.r co ..- S 124th St ,°' cr, cr. (1) cn .3., S 128th St a = 109 1Q3L'P7 . • cl.ac4:,. S\:8," (u<NCC>C1)1 P;3 f CC S1' S135thSt : (r)S134thS 0S140thStC ,IIg"0..b)) <'I S.6. 9tVa.= -7o1" ).. l 4i2.Pt. >ono'LI d., S A S144thSEttS144thSt oS146thSt (.)a< >,S148thSt " l--0) 0) toS150thSt 0 5 > 0-S152ndSt IS152ndSt7 r. ":"' 1 S ,,- 7. '.• T U K WILAi'c ESDENTAL NEIGHBORHOODS L igh na4 > Sfati,1 S 156th St CSI S 158th St S 160th St S 164th St Southcenter Blvd cri * Ff/ Tukwila Pkwy 0) 0 0 v) Strander Blvd -E' Kt >, < .. Treck Dr u ..c S 6 ---o—iNig Blvd l!'- cr) a, L'•• Minkler Blvd 0 c -0 c TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2015 PAGE 7-5 a, • • Rezone/Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application File # L18-0107 Applicant/Property Owner: Brad Decker Public Meeting: April 17, 5-6:30 PM Public Hearing: May 6, 7 PM both at Tukwila City Hall Project Location: 17301 Southcenter Parkway, Parcel #262304-9135 Project Description: Rezone of the southern half of a vacant parcel from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Tukwila Urban Center —Commercial Corridor (TUC -CC) to allow for future development. Comments: By 4/22/19 to Nora Gierloff at 206.433-7141 or Nora.Gierloff@TukwilaWA.gov Existing zoning at site and surrounding area Onsite looking east to Southcenter Parkway Onsite looking west toward 1-5 • • 2/27/2019. 12:38:28 PM Buildings Addresses (Tukwila) Parcels Tukwila iMap 0 0.03 0 1.4.514 0.05 0.1 mi i f f f 0.04 0.08 0.16 km Pictometry International Corp., Tukwila Technology Services. King County City of Tukwila Tukwila iMap 4/26/2019, 11:51:28 AM Override 1 • Addresses (Tukwila) Zoning 0 City Limits I I Parcels 0 Buildings LDR Low Density Residential MDR Medium Density Residential _ HDR High Density Residential MUO Mixed Use Office II 0 Office 1.18.056 0 0.1 07 1 0 0.15 0.3 0.6 km Pictometry International Corp., Tukwila Technology Services, King County City of Tukwila 1•dil .rwiw..n w.. I In n..n•. d.4.w.Y41n......— w +r.. y r.w wr w :.1 :' nwi nr. •••••.� rl• It. ea • Y'W I.�••Y .4•..1V. NY i.Iw •s I• ,•••I w i N vY • Y•I a.•\I• M w+ •1.t M.•• A. r••1e M M•• Yllw.• • Y w. j.Y .r .. •.YY�w W•rY •�. • •Y.LI I •pw wgar M•�i ••. . ••••IY•4iiiYlr•w••• • •Y.w as • wY i'w w 4.0141.11 • lY w•IrY ... Yrl 1 Y.YI w.•�.0 w w.rw•••.I a...w w•..•w. “.y SUM w vb• • ma r.mto i...Yo •M•wt•1 w w••• •••• •w ••.1 *MI w'N .• ...I•Y• Or . • •. •.w n•4w w.• = ...,ww .1 w .•u.w r.....n w• w ..wr r•..• +�w •r• � •rl.0 . ••Y ....e w.. w..i w +•m. 'Y'www.•.r•.n ww.-r w\. •r wm w••1, uY a.•\n a.i r r w�wwe, I• •.. w'w. rw.r.w•w a.•••.•1 ••wM .••.• w w .r• w•I r Yw..•. ,1...4w M Y..•• ..��..____•Y fir•♦ w su.•.••.•••w +w .• ..ri.w •I,, r.+lr'�11•I • i\ • .Yw•wlw.'O•� w.1.. I..ww 7 Mi.•�y My —• 11owI, tio 0 1(;-\ild4'71 1 .OV ••-•■ ,4(io;;J AMoZZOCL0. g'/11/ ,4e1040691 rM„ w+ swum ON NIrlel cells I /\ •.y ,o_s¢cen -a xar- --+ i ) • ,n . .. .J �\ �. ..we • 110.11106,6 E LLD Land Surveyor's.Certificate: This short plat correctly represents a survey made by me or under my direction in conformance with the requirements of appropriate state statute. QaAt' 73 /976 Date Certificate Mo. 8393 IPARCEL•A 1 Short Plat Mo. _ Direction:----�/�/ 1,421 ..:f.r.:.‘ 114f°11.1°.°.: ... [010 tOr /.1 „,,,..rei‘.' ID-4 . .. „.,ri."'"°. t C-- ..k . PARCEL/B • ." % •,..., \--. C: 4 /PIA • /JAIN J.• V4: r A Id.1.1..ii 1 ....1•14'.1..r. i' 1. • 1 !.... ...............i.rior ""e 1•;,L0 zor zi • \ . k , • N..... N.--i J. armwrr. — 4/1 A P to —17 MN* I•••••••O • Mt !MOW • • rb• , I '1,4:11.- ''' 778.,•••▪ •*/ —' AP..1/11.0.1••••••• 1 1 ,i .3. r- , !J.,. .so w•Arb \ ‘ AY. YNI11•111 1 '‘ .1 1 11; ,I.‘t • r .• I.:, 'Ilr i •Ii t N ‘ re.frr T . 0 (r1 '. ••••••‘ ... i \ ••.. C\ ... re% k ...‘ .4.\ \ 'M Th .>3 .21.1•••14-;" .' if: r fn..„,. . N. Ft —I—M:7i VOA • \ ...Kw, \ il \ Ards "y• <JP*. ••• • Ad* id SCALE r• 200• 4.1”.....f • •• 04 ••• Ladd Sorvoyod, CortIfIcala: ...file la Ihl• d•••.•, LI. Adpattoa•lAdt Coosoll.• ,,,,,,, ,,,,,, • ,,,,, y• osoa by Olrett lontaIs I . se vadat. ay di ..... l• <sof beam. 1•111. tr.. require...A" obt day••001•,• ..... ▪ et•.#-A;4./esr.e--•‘' • /0 • /J • •1 4.111146to Y. JJ • lot ro.solldation &Des rat rtwalre • ,,,,,, .1 lb. parl.lor doles. Ito I iota aro ad) LT/OLA.P.V) weer orrefa/...•/...• db. Y. •.' • /f12170.- Pap of Ar•VJ,0 ea, dd•Il P.M ....rap J.1 •••41011 .••••••• AWAY DEC 2 .1-1989 , . • : . = EXIWB/7" EOU/TABZE .PEAL EST4YE BOUNDARY 1hVE Allk/USTA/ENr CHADWICKSURVEYING6 ENGINEERING .u510.tre...14111.1. SFATTle.WAILMWCITOPI NOW LW LIM MAI IT I.8,7 Ib••• ••••••11 ...•• j‘ip• ••• te),46e. _It_ or_l_ r- 0 0 0 Li 7Lir49L6T1 E00:0.1.%1? LIM; TUKWILA, ViASHIUGiON Filed for rccord at. - the requont ef: .JACK A. CFNAATIA CO:TAW S950 Sixth Avene-So,itn LEGAL .DESCRIE7I0N PARCEL A 4 APPROVAL Department of Planning Examined and iippro*..ed thit _2 rtif day of )•,ze _ Dtpartment cr Public t.'-dr.e.E. Exa:7.ined rd cpp:tr.,cd thin —4! ... - day. of 1V2.— Direezor That portion of the stiuthc‘ast que;.tcr of the scuth;:ct querter ref Scttich Township 23 horth, Ran;-? 4 Cast, W.;1., in the City of r., • King County. Washington. descrihod a; follos: Uginning at the southeast corner of Si: southeast warter of Southixst quarter of Seczinn th:ree %orth 87°45'5P . the South lire or szit; s:..trthoLst luarter of the soi:thwtsr qua7ter a dish:nee of 4re0.05 feet 13 /7.7::-gin of the Snothconter Par:way; thence North 11""3" Vest alona it distuce 830.2 feet; thence couting faid .we;t o to the rig41I heviru; a razefis of ftot a; erc diftc-Te of ra4.:.? feet throsgh a ccutral engle uf to the trne of t;in- ning; th:J!".0 a dis:1!nte or 2Z;9.76 feet; thee:re Worth 57028' terest a distnce fir 2O'1 fert; ther.ou a;cirg a to the left having a radius of 11..0 fC.Y: au'arz di.-.' of feet thrh a central angle of 2:1'(:!;:ig'1 the evn!,:rilni, ef road eas/o:.;ent; Ciruce northestc.:1) eleng hait: railroad easffent ze a curve to the right,- !AC, comer ef Lh:ch eaors Sooth iest having a redilo df font sn Are (:isterce or 1.:r;.3(‘ t‘xt . central enlihe of 20'17'5ev; 1 1 af.1 dista-tu of 195.64 fcet; 0:once f2St Oistocce of ' thence ScAith 8:::'!A'2!.' fast o of fect; U1sUZ-i'35" Vest a distan,u of 12,!:3 th/:nie a distance of 69.05 ftet to tue rest iu,iroin of Seothounten and the northaist etroer cf the Lrein- c:::scrihad tract; thuote • 01'0225" !-Iest along said west r../-rgin a distance of 71.9!, foot; tht‘nc/! continuing along'si,i west riavgih on a cur;'- 'n the luft :•ovinv a re2iu; of 9i .37 feet an io-c dishnito of .f.lr; (vet through o crntral au* of CY23.3 to the true ;dint of tiel;nuing. FILED tor Record at Request n! UM/ 0 a irr-te% • 1 of 4. /et,- 5/ / 4 se. I I Zi.i897 tiOv 2 9 1978 PARCEL B That ptirtivn rf the sr-'ho:.st e.rt,.n of 0— .-"'f..7..t cn.!lrter rf Toww,hiv za NQrth, 4 ("it] c' Ft4.wHa. Kinl • W4in9tvn. 1,:sciti3O 0s follows: Beginning at thoseoteest cornor uf civet -tor cf the soulhwrst quarter of Sectii.n ZE; Thence North £7'4'57" Vest alc7,n t!.> scuth linc of said so..ttfe.ts: guano": of tfr n-cete- 0 west nargin of the :leethf.:::.tcr Thence Worth 11'59'23Vest aleng s0id rar?in a dtft.7,nle of feet; Thence continvi;le aln-o soi,f 1.ectr fo ti2 r ha'rinii radios of 921.::.! n a centeal au51e of 13"C3'P-; Thence North C1"C7'35" nle-o rar9ir, a distance of 74.95 feet to the true pint vr • Thence North ES'51'20" West a distc.cte of 02.02 foet; Thence North 010'35" Est dista:,ce of 12.U) foot; Thence North C5'51'2" Vest a eisterice of 39.0C Thence SeJth cl'cvas' Kest a dtstnce of 12.00 fe2c.'; Thonce Lorth au ot'25" West a distlaCe •ef faa: totccert-ee'tf a railroad easeont; Thence nerthaastrly alonl said raiircad cn a ccrco to ttf..2. the cen1er of ;:hich bears SoutA ' East a :f feet an arc distence of 1C,2.02 fee: tnro:.-;,. a c:7:zra: t- ; Thence North 12'2830" West a distance cf 23.32 feet; Thence North C4'2;'26" Vest a distract of 22.15 feat; Thence North Cl'41'22" East a disc of 54.76&t the north 7ar;in of said switheast quarter of the soutst cics-rtar; Thence South 27'00'03" East alort7, said r..irth 71arsin a dtstar,ce of feet to the wcst r.argin of 5...3uthce;.ter Thence South 01'92'15' ',test cleng said a:2st r.argr a distance cf fl feet to tne tree paint cf1Jeginnin;. Page 2 of 4. PAUEL C That portion of the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 26, Township 7.3 North, I:.m4p 3 Cast, i,'. 1., in the City of lul.+ila, King County, k'shington, describe,' as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 2C; thence forth B7°45'57" West alter;, the South line of sn1d Southeast Quarter of the Southwest quarter, a distance of 4'1,05 feet to t!'> West r:argin of Southcenter Pert.w.:y; thence !n rth 11'59'33" West alen•1 said Vest rargin a distance of feo' to the true point ::r .eyinning; •,}:�`� "thrdci'Scuth '1&' 16" West e Cistans.e cf fee_ to the Est. 0, • al;:';.._.•t.hc Southeast quarto.,. r` the Southwest QJater of Ser.tion ▪ 26; • thence !:girth 03°i6'3G" East al,,,e said :went lire a di!.t.:^ c 754.53 feet, rore cr less, to th lint of sail s.:.di+is un of Section 26; the'Oce South 87'55'53" tast along said l;wrth line a ,,i,t r. e of "{ � •.'�Cet. rare cr less, to a point rihich bi•8r; . ,, :Iat o distance of 250.03 feet from the oeSt cartJin of Sojthr._n;. Parkway; thence South 01°41'39" nest a distance of 59.7E feet; t.`.erc- `nut!:- 04'34'26" Fast a distance of 50.1E feet; ',.. r:r;i;:.uth 12°26'30" East a distance of 33.3a feet to the center - railroad cascrent; thence so;rth..•esterly alen; said railroad easenent on e :-.:ewe to the left, the center of which tears Sov:t r2 1'tl' E; .. a of 410.2S feet, en arc distant of 247.35"`feet, tnrc.yh a cen.trai angle of 34'32'3 •; thence along a curse to t e tee center of wfitth bc;r: Y :' 09'43'31- West having a rah . .13.00 fee: an arc Ci,t_ __ 44.33 feet through a central _n3:_ of 23'35'559'; thence South 57°09'29° East a distance of 36.50 feet; thence South E3°51'25" East a di;tence of 2E9.73 feet to the west margin of Southcenter Parkway; t: °.aiang said :test margin en a curve to the left, tee center of et9 tin rr• bears .'wort^ f,5'45'26' East having a radius of ti•oi.3' er. .arc :ce of 134.06 feet through a centre; angle of 07'44'51•', i:vnti.^.uing alor;g said i:est :2rgin.Soutn ll'S3'33" East a *ri5t'::,.e of 122.72 feet to the true point of beginning. Page 3 of 4. RV.9 104' pCCIARATIC%; Know all rem by these present: that the nndersIgnA o:iorr tri foe sirele of the land tIcrin descri!:,2J do,'s heity r,.-.kn en o;:plicotilei roo adjust:xnrcof. Tie nndersionod f,..i-LI-.-r dclares that th,.- att.,nop io the graphic inTrosentation of said boundry lire oij1sI.,nit an.: II,ot V17.0 is made with tile free consont and in accer:ioorc: Olh thn eesire of ten: oener. In witnoss v.-hcreef. thn undersigned has cy.rcuted this instr.J.:,ent this Aen I"— day of Lctober, MS. Cr, , C7-'• JACK __ CENWYA COli /. ;NJ -- STAIT OF Coor.ty of King On thisink_Ooy of Cot.-.,.7r, 1573, ;er-s,:ally b''oro A. Renar4a te .k.nor, to tI!ercs tf.:f the A. the coporatlon eAee:;ted t.I.e within ond A,1 . 3cOC'C tesaid instrA-,:ent to 'or,. the fre ‘7,ct of said cor,ocratico. fOr te uz.es ard purnoIes thorein O,-1 or oath st2ted tr.r, i;?.s auth,:ri:ed to e>.r.c.Jte seid iw,trunt tol the: scat affIxed is the cororati, sal of $aid LoroLration. hotary ir. of Washington, Page 4 of 4. Nnv 2 9 1q7R raRcri-c • 1/ •, rnlKt I. G (,% -i_ -. `t r._ .t )� • a ii 1'11 - ,. • .t— l ;;�j t ,U ,.i. OCEHIE% . "•.. Imo/ _ W pkRR'µ • !�nJ Survefor's Certificate: Bounder/ ;.ire'p^ju.trv_nt 'hi;ptierLpdei survey r.:m:c by er_ .,r ur.&r 171 fir ilian in confcr'knce ::it'. tr.e rcqoire^''r.s of appropriate state statute. Garie Certificate GC. ih•KixRIit no. NOV 2 9 1978 Uira.:tIen. --p—N �c•+le: /"•/IO" 4/26/2019 Landmark Web Official Records Search ®061025GOooiv City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 5outhcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 931116 Telephone (206) 431.3670 FAX (206) 4314665 EHnaR: tukplanOhasvnle.wa.us BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER: L06-059 5ET56'33'E Propoeod Parcel B 143,628.9 Square Feet Parcel 8 '' City. of89-10 -Tukwil4.� A'1448LA 62304-9T35'7 34' N LINE TA9.E LENGTH BEARING tt 1200 I 14',T,'I'W 38.00 I 56a"il2 L_. 20.72 5001915'w 639 H1229:,5q ._ 53.07 _(Qa'2426'W Prapoeed Lot Lino CURVE TABLE CURVE LENGTH PAWS [(LTA CI 101.99 . 0.70 1414'36- C2 110 69 440.78 ,.7.•i r' _C3 239.27 410.28 J 3_32 —J r A Proposed Parcel A 61,509.0 Square Feet Edon.% Lot U o Parcel 8 City of Tukwila 8LA 7811290897 APN 262304-9024 u 23077 / PS Note: There ore no existing structures on proposed Parcel B. *cams Easement pat AFN 95072102e3. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 SURVEY IN 5E 1/4 OF SW 1/4 OF SECTION 26 T. 23 N.,R 4 E., W M . IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON RECORDING CERTIFICATE ies 4.4 rt l.Y comas arM Ory M Taira um 20 ......... n._ mXAIM IW amen n Vdanc M P4M. an M94-__ rerq,ts or wan Co0Ny. Wasnrratm. Kale Cowan Mauve sip. of Rena. wd Elmo ONNER/sl ERRE 11 C. EVAILS 10 LLC. SC3 LLC AI9)Rr55 11T FAST LOUISA ST 42.30 PHONE. (206)5414964 CT'191ATEJ2IP. 5EAT11E.w494302 P2 P3 S 60,00' E 9.00' Canc. Yen H ca. C a s Fauna Canc. Mc,, i1 Coao a1 P.I. VOLUME PAGE 02I `f 0 8i MERIDIAN DEED GRAPHIC SCALE 0 50 100 RA ph FITT) inch 50 It. PROPERTY CORNERS P1 Found Tack in Lead w/ Toq, LS 18104, 0.02' S P2 Found Tack in (sod, 0.34' W P3 I ound Mog w/ Shiner, 0.20' W P4 Found roc< in lead, 0.25' W & 0.01' N P5 Found RoUur & Cop, LS 21601, 0.25' W & 0.01' S P6 Found Raba, & Cop. LS 18104, 0.02' E & 0.09' S P7 Found Rebar & Cop, LS 18104. 0.07' W & 0.09' S P8 Found Rebor & Cap, I.S 18104. 0.12' (. & 0.17' N P9 Found Mcg & lay, LS 18104, 0.06' E & 008' S 1'lIl (Munn Iron Pipe w/ lack, 0.17' W & 0.28' S P11 Found Rebar & Cnp, LS 18104. 0.06' E & 0.02' S P72 Found Open 3/4" Iron Pipe, 0.02' E & 0.19' N P13 =ound Rebnr & Cap, LS 21601. 0.05' W & 0.12' N P14 Found Open 3/4" Iron Pipe, 0.16' W & C.05' N SURVEY NOTES INSTRUMENT USED: SOKKIA SET 5 EOM METHOD (15E.D: FIELD. TRAVERSE APPROXIMATE POINT ACCURACY: 1.0.05' SURVEY MEETS OR EXCEEDS STATE STANDARDS PER WAC 332-'30-U90. MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREON WERE VISITED ON JUI Y 15, 2005. THE INFORMATION $MOWN ON THIS MAP REPRESENTS THE RESULTS OF A SURVEY MADE ON THE INDICATED DATE AND CAN ONLY BF CONSIDERF.O AS THE GENERAL EXIS11NC CONDITION AT THAT 0/47 _,. N87'45_57"W 443.91' 26 EMERALD LAND SURVEYING. INC. PO ROR 13694 NOJ, CREEK. WA 90062 099. (426) 3667966 DRAWN 11Y MAW DATE SEPTEMBER 22, 2006 Xta AMMER 05977 CIECJ.13 M 81E SCALE 1" 50' SHEET 3 or 3 https://recordsearch.kingcounty.gov/LandmarkWeb/search/index?theme=.blue&section=searchCriteriaLegal&quickSearchSelection=# 3/3 4/26/2019 Landmark Web Official Records Search •v City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 9outhbnt•r Boulevard, To5wla, WA 98188 Telephone (206) 4314670 FAX (206) 4314665 EHnall; tukple 1I1.wa ue BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER: L06-059 EXISn9c LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS APN 262304-9024 THAT PORTION OF THE SOIIEAST QUARTER OF TIE SOUTHWEST WARIER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 4 EAST. W,M, BEGINNING A7 THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TEE SOUTHEAST OJAR'LR OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE N 87'45'57" W, 481,05 FEET TO THE WEST MARGIN OF SOUTHCF.NT6R PARKWAY; THENCE N 11'59'33' W ALONG SAID MARGIN, 830.58 FEET, THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID MARGIN ALONG A CURVE' TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS 0' 991..5/ FEEL, AN A4C DISTANCE (1F 227.28 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1308'08'. THENCE N 1'08'35' E. 74.95 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT Of' BEGINNING; THENCE N 88'51'25 W. 69 FEET; THENCE N 1'08'35' E. 12 FEET; THENCE N 88'51'25- W. 38 FEET; THENCE S I-08.35 W, 12 FEET. THENCE N 88151'75" W. 195.64 FEET TO THE CENTER Of A RAILROAD EASEMENT; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID RAILROAD EASEMENT ON A CURVE TO THE RI(.11T, CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARING S 56X015'51-. SAID CURE HAVING A RADIUS OF 410.28 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 102 'EET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1414'40'; THENCE. N 1228'30' W. 33.38 FEET. THENCE N 4'3426" W. 50.16 FEET; THENCE N 1'41'39' E, 54.76 FEET TO MI NORTH MARGIN OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SOUIH4ES' WARIER; THENCE S 87'55'53" E, 250 FEE' TO THE WEST MARGIN OF SOUTHCFNTER PARKWAY; THENCE 5 108'35' W, 211 33 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; S•T/AE 'N THE COUNTY OF KING. STATE OF WASHINGTON. (ALSO KNOWN AS PARCEL D, CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE AC2JSTMEI4T RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NUMBER 7811290697.) APN 262304-9135 THAT PORTION CF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER 0-' SECTOR 26. TOWMSHIP 23 NORTi, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE N 0'50'36- E. 819.01 FEE] TO THE POINT OF HEGINNIN6; THENCE N 0'50.36` E. 495.67 FEET 10 THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF ME SOUTHWEST QUARTER CF SAID SECTION 26, THENCE S 87155'52" E. 373.22 FEET TO A POINT TEARING N 87'55'53 W. 286 FEET FROM TNF CENTERLINE OF' S0511110ENTER PARKWAY; THENCE S 01'41'39" W. 54,76 FEET; THENCE 5 4'34'26' F., 50.16 FETE (HENCE 5 12528'30" E. 33.38 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF A RAILROAD EASEMENT, THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CENTF,RIINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT. CENTER OF SAIL CURVE BEARING 5 42'01'11' E AND HAVING A RADIUS Of 410 28 FEE T. ALONG AN ARC DISTANCE OF 341.28 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 47'39'34'; THENCE S 0'19'15' W. 20.72 FEET TO A POINT BEARING N 85'08'34' E !ROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S 8508'34' w, 255.03 FEET; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY Of KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. (ALSO KNOWN AS PARCEL 8, CITY 0, IUKWLA BOUNDARY UNE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 89-10-BLA, A5 RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY AUDITOR FILE NUMBER 8912270422.) SURVEY IN SE 1M OF SW 1/4 OF SECTION 261' 23 N..R 4 E.. W.M.. IN KING COLTN Y, WASHINGTON LAND TO BE TRANSFERRED THAT PORTION OF PARCE.1 B, CITY OF TUKWILA BWNOARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 89-10-BLA, AS RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY AUDITOR FILE NUMBER 8912270427, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL B CITY (1F TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 89-1C-BLA; THENCE S 1'41'39" W. 54.76, (HENCE S 4'34'26' E, 50.16 FEET; THENCE S 12528'30" F. :53.38 FEET TO THE CENTERUNE OF A RAIL ROAD EASEMENT; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY AI ONG SAID CENTERLINE ON A 3IRVE :0 THE LEFT. CENTER OF SAID CURVE REARING 5 42'01'11' E AND PAVING A RADIUS OF 410.28 FEET, ALONG AN ARC DISTANCE Of 101.99 FLET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 141436', THENCE N 88'51'25' W, 35.1:5 FEET 'TO A PORT ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT. 3O FELT NORTHWESTERLY AND PARALLEL W1T/1 SAD CENTERUNE OF A RAI140AD EASENENT, SA;D PANT BEARING S 58'43'35" F. SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OE 440.28 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1424'17", AN ARC DISTANCE OF '10.69 FEET TO A POINT 30 FEET WES11RLY ANO PARALLEL W1TH THE EASTERLY MORON OF SAID PARCEL B CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 89-10-B1.A; THENCE N 1228'30" w, 18.39 FEET; (HENCE N 4'34'26' W. 53.87 FETE THENCE N 1'41'39" E, 56.60 FEET TO THE NORTH MARGIN LW SAID PARCEL 8 CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 89--10-•BLA, THENCE S 87'5053' E ALONG SAID MARGIN, 30,00 FEET TO n1E POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTA.NING IN ALL 7,197.9 SQUARE FEET RECORDING CERTrlGa,E Fraab ranra al ILL re:-esL of Ow Ley*, Tully Na __ and -..--_ . 20_al_ WW1 UAL Yw,a aeal,v4u. of Tan. m tow.. r.9Ha m Kerg (aa9Y. W.Y.' 9*0 ran; Cnny 4av e S14x o! Raorav wre Elmore (T9NER(SI'. ERRE LL ADORE SS 11TEAST L PRO.:. 1206) 545'HV41 CRYISTATE7LP- S6ATTE, WA 9e1 0 LLC. SC0 LTG 2106102$goc}7/a NEW PARCEL A LEGAL DESCRIPTGAN APN 762304-9024 THAI PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTIWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 4 EAST, W M , BEGINNING AT THF SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF :HE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE N 87Y5'5/' W, 481.05 FEET TO ME WEST MARGIN OF SO/1HCENT:R PARKWAY; THENCE N 11'59'33' W ALONG SAID MARGIN, 830.58 FEET; THENCE CONTNUING ALONG SAID MARGIN ALONG A CURVE TO ME RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 991.37 FEET, AN ARC DISFANCE OF 227.28 FEET THROJ0I A CENTRAL ANGLE OF- 13'08'08-; THENCE N 108'35' E. 74.95 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N 88'5E25- W. 69 FEET; THENCE N 1118'15" E. 12 FEET; THENCE N 88'51'25' W. 38 FEET; THENCE S 108'35" W, 12 FEET; THENCE N 88'55'25' W, 195.64 FEET TO THE CENTER OF A RAILROAD EASEMENT; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID RAILROAD EASEMENT ON A CURVE TO TIE RIGHT, (-INTER OF SAID CURVE BEARING 5 56XD1551", SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 410.28 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 102 FEET THR(AIGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14'14'40", THENCE N 1228'3C" W, 33.38 FEET, THENCE N 4'34'26" W, 50.16 FEET; THENCE N 1'41'39' E, 54.76 FEET TO TIE. NORTH MARGIN OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE 5 87'55'53- E, 250 FEET 10 'ME WEST MARGIN CF SOIM(EN1ER PARKWAY; THENCE 5 1'08'35" w, 211.33 FEET TO THE TRITE PONT OF BEGINNING; (ALSO KNOWN AS PARCEL 8, CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY UNE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NUMBER 7811290697.) TOGETHER YAM THAT PORTION OF PARCEL B, CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 89-10-8LA, AS RECORDED TINDER KING COUNTY AUDITOR FILE NUMBER 8912270422, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL B CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY UNE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 89- 10-BLA; THENCE S 1'41'39" W, 54.76; THENCE S 4'34'26" E. 50.16 FEET; THENCE 5 1228'30' E. 33.38 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF A RAILROAD EASEMENT: THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERUNE ON A CURVE TO THE LEVI. CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARING 5 42'01'11' E AND HAVING A RAOIUS OF 410.28 FEET, ALONG AN ARC DISTANCE OF 101.99 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14'14'36', THENCE N 8851'25' W, 35.13 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE TO 111E RIGHT. 30 FEET NORTHWESTERLY AND PARALLEL W1111 SAID CENTERUNE OF A RAILROAD EASEMENT. SAID POINT BEARING 5 5E443'35' E, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 440.28 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 142417", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 110.69 FEET TO A POINT 30 FEET WESTERLY AND PARALLEL WITH THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID PARCEL B CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 89-10-BLA; THENCE N 12'28.30' W. 18.39 FEET, THENCE N 4'34'26' W, 53.87 FEE1; (HENCE N 1'41'39" E. 56.60 FEET 10 THE NORM MARGIN OF SAID PARCEL B CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 89-10-•BLA; THENCE S 87'55'53' E ALONG SAID MARGIN, 30,00 FEET TO THE POINT 01 BEGINNING. SITUATE IN THE COONEY Cf KING. STATE OF WASHINGTON. CONTAINING IN ALL 61,509.0 SQUARE FEET VOLUME PAGE �i +D$7 NEW PARCEL B LEGAL DESCRIPTION APN 262304-9135 THAT PORTION OF 1HE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.N., 8EGIN4119G Al THE SOUTHWEST CORNER CF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF DIE SOUTHWEST WARIER; THENCE- N 050'36' E. 819.01 FF.F1 10 THE POINT OF 9EONNING; THENCE N 0'50.36' E. 495.67 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TIE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTIIWEST QUARTER OF SAID 5I000N 26; THENCE S 87'55'57' E. 373.22 FEET 10 A PONT BFARINC N 8755'53" W, 286 FEE1 FR04/1 THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY; THENCE S 01'41'39' W, 54.76 FEET. THENCE S 4'34'26' E, 50.16 TEFL; THENCE $ 1228'30' E, 33.38 FEET TO THE GENITRIINE OF A RAILROAD EASEMENT; THENCE SOLI1HWESTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE ON A CURVE 10 THE LEFT, CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARING S 4201'11' E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 410.28 FEET, ALONG AN ARC DISTANCE OF 341E 28 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 47'39'34', THENCE S 019'15' W. 20.72 FEET TO A POINT BEARING N 8508'34" E PROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S 8508'34- W. 255.03 FEET, SIll:ATE IN THE COUNTY OF K!NC, STAT1, 0, WASHINGTON. (ALSO KNOWN AS PARCEL B. CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE AD.USTMF'NT NUMBER 89-10-R_A, AS RECORDED LINDER K'NG COUNTY AUDI'G1R FILE NUMBER 8912270422.) EXCEPT TUT PORTION, DESCRIBED AS FOJ.OWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER CF SAID PARCEL 3 CITY OF TUKWLA BOUNDARY LINE' AU.USIMENT NUMBER 89-10BEA; THENCE 5 1'41'39' W. 54.76; THENCE S 4'34'26' E, 50.16 FEET; THENCE 5 1228'30" E, 33..58 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF A RAILROAD EASEMENT, THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE: ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARING S 4201'11" F AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 410.78 FEET. ALONG AN ARC DISTANCE OE 101.99 FIET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANCIE OF 1414'36"; THENCE: N 8851'25" W. 35.13 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, 30 CUT NORTHWESTERLY AND PARALLEL WITH SAID CENTERLINE: OE A RAILROAD EASEMENT. SAID POINT BEARING 5 58'43'35' E, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 440.28 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14'24'17", AN ARC INSTANCE (Y' 110.69 FEET TO A POINT 30 FEET YA:STE8LY AND PARALLEL WITH THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID PARCEL B CITY CF TUKWILA BOUNDARY UNE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 89-10-BIT,; THENCE N 1228'30' W. 18.39 FEET; THENCE N 4'34'26" W, 53,87 FEET; THENCE N 1'45'39' E. 56.60 FEET 10 THE NORTH MARGIN OF SAID PARCEL 8 OTT OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY TINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 89-10-BLA; THENCE 5 8755'53' BEGINNING; E MONO SAID MARGIN, 30.00 FEET TO ME POINT OF CONTAINING IN ALL 143,628.9 SQUARE FEET. EMERALD LAND SURVEYING, INC. P0 BOX 13894 MILL CREEK, WA 28092 PH. (428) 352 7199 DRAWL. OY OAIF SEPTEMBER 22, 2006 JCO NNe1CR 05977 CHECKED BY FILE SCALE SHEET 2 Hx3 https://recordsearch.kingcounty.gov/LandmarkWeb/search/index?theme=.blue&section=searchCriteriaLegal&quickSearchSelection=# 2/3 4/26/2019 Landmark Web Official Records Search City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southsemw Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 94168 Telephone (Res) 4314670 FAX (206) 4314665 Entail: MlplarlNtukMla.wa.ue BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER: L06-059 DECLARATION Know all men by these present that we, the undersigned, owner(a) In fee simple of the lend herein described do hereby make a boundary line adjustment The undersigned further elector, tits boundary lino adjustment to be the graphic representation of sad boundary line adjustment and the same le m*Wewidsth,Mear:o ar`ant and In sncordance with the desire of the owner(s). In witness Wheieof we have set o55- nds)and seals. , i --.-. Name: ,/4.7 i ,.' 1. jf Brad Decker, Manager,__- Robert Soho td. , ERR_6k4andEvana_IO LLC _ SC 3 C Na --Bra Ifiaiirallianager, �''- Robert Schofield, Winner, Tukwila View Estates LLC Tukwila View Estes LLC STATE OF WASHINGTON County of King On this day personally appeared before me Brad Decker to me (mown to be the Individual who executed the within and foregoing in mane and acknowledged that hashe signed Me soma as hlslher voluntary act and deed f the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GNEN under my hand and official th( (r y ofS1. �ri�p�20_of Signalunw Name as dodtmissloned:��c 4Ct rnle: --/bierl7'1.LUL) Ny appointmenttieiplrea: / /!-.0 a STATE OF WASHINGTON County of King On this day personally appeared before me Robert Schofield to me known to be the IndMduel who executed the within and foregoing Instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as hiWher voluntary act and deed, for the (u miss and purposes therein mentioned. M GNEN under my hand and Mitchel $M�ti/(si�A molt, of 20 0 1.p • misslorad: C./ CJ Signalers/I_ !Ar' Name as Title: My appointment expires: / "'"7-6Q Tom. LAND SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE I Brent L. Effie, registered as a land surveyor by the State of Washington, certify Mat thle plat le based on an actual survey of the land described herein, conducted by me or under my supervision; Mat the distances, coursea and angtas ate shown hereon correctly; and that monuments other than those monuments approved for setting at a later date, have been set and 101 corners staked on the ground as depicted on the plat Brent LFEBI6, S 830581 SURVEY M SE 1/4 OF SW 14 OF SECTION 26 T. 23 N..R. 4 E., W.M.. IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON RECORDING CERTIFICATE Feu In_rroand' a e,e rery,/e5C of On Cry al T4nin Ova _25A' ay of .(Jdi�lt�_."tiaf_ al bS/t�mte(n,e 21u44. rod rrnraedN Valentenr�u/�avgF Q�r Iwn ar,6ry Cwnry. WMLL,,y, r J-I.SeYones err ,erg Co,nrr WEIRS. A ET'n a S ok of Rema..0 Soaked OWNERISI FJIRE LI. C. �ILD, SC:I LW AOORESS- :IT EAST L011SA PTI.'LIC (206)S4S-Wed CITYlSTATE/DP SCATTLE WA 91107Cill 2DD6102596wio APPROVALS KING COUNTY FINANC I Daft that an property to pay the taxes for the fo delinquent special assess assessments on any of the are paid In full. VOLUME PAGE 054 DIVISION /• es are pall end a deposit has been made In sufficient amount owing year, Mare are no to flea office for collection; and that all special perlyfiereln dedicated as streets, alleys, or for other public use This d: • of 20 King County Treasurer 'puty Ring County Treasurer KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S APPROVAL Examinedand approved by the Department of Assessments this 25=1.. day of Cantu.,200b tdrlble King County Assessor Deputy Assessor Parcel Numbers: 2823048135-08 end 262304-8063fi4 TUKWILA SHORT SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE APPROVAL Reviewed end approved by the Short Subdivision Committee and hereby certified for firingthis / -7 day a J 7 ,.- 20 06 Chaff on, Slott 3 bd�ision Committee VICINITY MAP EMERALD LAND SURVEYING, INC. PO BOX 136ae MULL CREEK, MA 1140112 PK 4425) 36971111 DRAWN BY HAW DATE 5LP 'EMBER 22, 2006 JCR NUNIER 05977 CRECKEO BY BLE SCALE I" = 50' SHEET 1 or 3 https://recordsearch.kingcounty.gov/LandmarkWeb/search/index?theme=.blue&section=searchCriteriaLegal&quickSearchSelection=# 1/3 lo'-o^ LDR ZONE AREA 86,112.6 SF FARGEL S CITY OF TUKWILA BLA LO6-05 AFN 2623O4-G 135 Of SL°F 17501 SOUTHGENTER PARKWAY, TUKW I LA, WA Q8188 REZONE TO TUG-GG AREA 57,456.2 SF SETBACK— I2 / SETBACK 15'-O° L _ " i* e1 rA j 41 ti 11 I., 1)0th 3t. -I; t • •I " 5. 172rid 3.-.11.111111.1"- • 4 e • AC X EJ • I re A Tmo • ^ • L.. r. ' 1'4 I 1 • • t • Tukwila iMap 111 r &,1L r 4. .• NNi= 1 at Am Clo- g Irks mg! vd ,r.?. Er 45 III krag I , minkler UNE" de 111 I IfBvd I Si 11 rill II I • ---"; I I I • ral 111 1 11 111 LITitrall la .1 1,1110 thST LA ' A • / 4 r3 tr • * \NS'I': 4' ' ../ •,....„.„!_ ot , Cr) : '' •••-- . i1 i 4/26/2019, 11:53:52 AM =I Override 1 • Addresses (TukviAla) WetiandsBuffer so DCity Limits 0 Parcels 0 Buildings El 80 100 Streams • • Type 2 Stream MI Type 2 Stream in Pipe — Type 4 Stream — Type 3 Stream Type 3 Stream in Pipe kik4 1 fie* •••.*0 l• • 1 iumploMMOLArm. sammom... • 1:18,056 0 0.1 Q2 0.4 mi I ? I) I I ' ' • I ' I 0 0.15 0.3 0.6 km P ic tome try International Corp., Tukwila Technology Services. King County City of Tukwila A. Comprehensive plan amendment criteria (TMC 18.8 0.050) 1) Describe how the issue is addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. If the issue is not adequately addressed, is there a need for the proposed change? There is a need to change the Zoning to allow the use of the slightly sloping portion to participate with the big picture retail core of the TUC -CC The current issue is the proposed of the site is zoned LDR, which is situated next to the TUC —CC zoning. This property is not helping the City's overall plan accomplish its goals. By changing the zoning of the slightly sloping to TUC -CC this property can add value to the cities current comprehensive plan. While maintaining the steep slope as low -density residential LDR. 2) Why is the proposed change the best means for meeting at the identified public need? What other options are there for meeting the identified public need? The propose change would best meet the Public need by expanding the retail opportunities for the TUC -CC area, while protecting the steep slope LDR portion. 3) Why will the proposed change result in a net benefit to the community? If not what type a benefit can be expected and why? This proposed change will create a benefit to the community by increasing the retail opportunities in the TMC-CC area while maintaining the low density on the steep slope area. B. Comprehensive plan amendment criteria (TMC 18.8 0.010) 1) A detailed statement of what is proposed and why; We are proposing to do a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zoning Change for the level portion and slightly sloping portion of the site located at 17301 Southcenter Parkway in Tukwila, while maintaining the LDR zoning on the steep slope portion. 2) A statement of anticipated impact of the change, including the geographic area affected and the issues presented by the proposed change; This propose change would increase the density of the retail core area by adding this portion of the land into its currently zone area. 3) An explanation of why the current comprehensive plan or development regulations are deficient or should not continue in affect; The propose Comprehensive Plan Amendment would add value to the city by taking usable land and making it productive for the City of Tukwila and its residents. 4) A statement of how the proposed amendment complies with and promotes the goals and specific requirements of the growth management act; This proposal Comprehensible Plan Amendment would increase the density of the cities retail core area and maintain the residential component on the steep slope. 5) A statement of how the proposed amendment complies with anticipated countrywide planning policies; This Comprehensive Plan Amendment complies with the countywide planning policies by increasing the retail core TUC -CC portion while maintaining the residential buffer on the steep slopes. 6) A statement of what changes, if any, would be required in functional plans, (i.e., the City's water, sewer, storm water or shoreline plans) if the proposed amendment has adopted; RECEIVED NOV 06 2018 Community Development The current site has all the necessary utilities and easements to provide the site with City water, power, sewer, storm sewer, and other utilities. No change is required to the City system. 7) A statement of what capital improvements, if any, would be needed to support the proposed change, and how the proposed change will affect the capital facilities plans of the City; No City capital facility improvements would be required to comply with this Comprehensive Plan Amendment and zoning change. 8) A statement of what other changes, if any, or required in another City codes, plans or regulations to implement the proposed change. No other changes are required. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED RETAIL BUILDING 17305 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY TUKWILA, WASHINGTON L&A Job No. 6A002 Date: January 25, 2006 Prepared for: Decker Development & Construction, Inc. 117 East Louisa Street, Suite 230 Seattle. Washington 98102 Prepare'd,By: Liu & Associates, Inc. 19213 Kenlake Place NE Kenmore, Washington 98028 RECEIVED MAR 18 2019 TUKWILA PUBLIC WOR!' RECEIVED NOV 06 2018 Community Development LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Engineering Engineering Geology Earth Science January 25, 2006 Mr. Brad Decker Decker Development & Construction, Inc. 117 East Louisa Street, Suite 230 Seattle, WA 98102 Dear Mr. Decker: Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Study Proposed Retail Building l 7305 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila, Washington L&A Job No. 6A002 SUMMARY The site on which the proposed retail building is to be constructed is surrounded by paved parking lots and adjacent commercial/retail buildings in a developed commercial/retail zone. Underlying the site for about the upper 30 feet or so are layers and interbeds of loose fill. medium -dense silty fine sand, highly compressible silty peat and very -loose alluvium deposits. Underneath these weak soil strata are very -dense Kame terrace and very -hard Older Clay deposits. To provide proper foundation support to the building without causing excessive settlement, pile foundations penetrated into the underlying Kame terrace and Older Clay deposits should be used. Augercast piles appear to be well -suited to provide adequate foundation support and minimize potential complications which may be associated with pile installation in the the subsurface conditions of the site. INTRODUCTION OVERVIEW The subject site is located at 17305 Southcenter Parkway in Tukwila, Washington. The Parcel No. of the property is 2623049024. The site is an irregularly -shaped parcel, totaling about .24 19213 Kenlake Place NE • Kenmore, Washington 98028 Phone (425) 483-9134 • Fax (425) 486-2746 January 25, 2006 Proposed Retail Building L&A Job No. 6A002 Page 2 acres. The proposed development for the subject site is to construct a new one-story retail building to replace an existing restaurant building currently occupying the site. The subsurface condition of the site were explored with three test borings. The type of foundations to be used for supporting the proposed is based on the subsurface conditions encountered by the test borings. BACKGROUND The site is located in the Tukwila valley which is known to have alluvium deposits with limited foundation support capability and liquefaction potential. Therefore, subsurface investigation is required to explore the subsurface conditions of the site, with obtained soil data to be used for determining the type and bearing capacities of foundations to be used for supporting the building and the method of mitigating liquefaction potential, if required. We are unaware of whether contaminants exist under the site, or whether environmental site assessment had been performed on the site. Our observation of soil cutting from the drilling of the test borings and examination of soil samples obtained from subsurface exploration of the site, however, seems to indicate that the site is free of contaminants. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES The purpose of this geotechnical engineering study is to explore and characterize the subsurface conditions of the site, perform geotechnical engineering analyses, and provide geotechnical recommendations for site grading, surface and ground water drainage control, erosion mitigation, and type and hearing capacities of foundations, etc. for the proposed development. To achieve the above purpose. our scope of services for this study comprises specifically the following: 1 Review the geologic and soil conditions at the site based on a published geologic map. LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. January 25, 2006 Proposed Retail Building L&A Job No. 6A002 Page 3 2. Explore the subsurface conditions of the site with three test borings. 3. Perform necessary geotechnical analyses and provide geotechnical recommendations for site grading, erosion mitigation, surface and ground water control, and foundation type, design and construction, based on subsurface conditions encountered in the test borings and results of our geotechnical analyses. 4. Prepare a written report to present our findings, conclusions, and recommendations. INVESTIGATIONS SUMMARY Subsurface conditions at the site were explored on January 5, 2006, with three test borings drilled with a track -mounted Mobile 20 drilled rig owned and operated by Davies Drilling. Soil samples were obtained from the test borings with a standard split -spoon sampler of 2-inch outside diameter. Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) were conducted, in accordance with ASTM D-1586, in the bore holes, by advancing the soil sampler with a 140-pound hanvmer that was raised and released for a 30-inch free fall. The number of blows required to advance the sampler a given distance is an indication of the density for granular soils or the consistency of cohesive soils. The sampler was advanced 18 inches and the total number of blows for the last 12 inches were recorded on the boring logs as SPT N-values. SITE CONDITIONS LOCATION AND SURFACE CONDITIONS The general location of the subject site is shown on Plate 1 — Vicinity Map. It is located in a commercial/retail zone, a short distance to the southwest of Southcenter Shopping Mall. The site is bounded by Southcenter Parkway to the east and adjoined by commercial properties to the north and south, and backed into a wooded hillside to the west. The site is situated near the western fringe of a flood plain of the nearby Green River, and is at the base of a moderate to steep, east -declining hillside. An existing one-story restaurant building LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. January 25, 2006 Proposed Retail Building L&A Job No. 6A002 I Page 4 currently occupies the site. This existing building is surrounded by a paved parking lot to its north, south and west sides, and a grass covered lawn to its east. Th entire site, including the I paved area and grass -covered lawn area, slopes very gently eastward towards Southcenter Parkway. GEOLOGIC SETTING The Geologic Map of the Des Moines Quadrangle. Washington, by Howard H. Waldron, published by U. S. Geological Survey in 1962, was referenced for the geologic and soil conditions at the site. According to this publication, the surficial soil units at and in the vicinity of the site are mapped as Kame-terrace deposits (Qit) overlain by alluvium deposits (Qa). The geology of the Puget Sound Lowland has been modified by the advance and retreat of several glaciers in the past and subsequent deposits and erosions. The latest glacier advanced to the Puget Sound Lowland is referred to as the Vashon Stade of the Fraser Glaciation which had occurred during the later stages of the Pleistocene Epoch, and retreated from the region some 14,500 years ago. Wy The Kame-terrace deposits were lain down. by ice -marginal streams flowing between higher ground on one side and an ice margin on the other side during the last glaciation. They consist mostly of silty sand and gravel to cobble. Locally. they also contain lenses and pods of till and beds of sand. silt and clay. The alluvium deposits are mainly composed of silt and fine sand with minor amounts of peat and clay. They were mostly laid down by the flooding water of the nearby Green River and the hillside streams to the west. SUBSURFACE SOIL CONDITIONS The approximate locations of the test borings are shown on Plate 2 - Site and Exploration Location Plan. The test borings were drilled to depths of 30.0 to 36.5 feet. Soil samples obtained from the test borings were visually classified in general accordance with Unified Soil L1U & ASSOCIATES, INC. January 25, 2006 Proposed Retail Building 1.&A Job No. 6A002 Page 5 Classification System, a copy of which is presented on Plate 3. A geotechnical engineer from our office was present during the exploration, who examined the soil samples retrieved from the test borings and he soil and geologic conditions encountered, and completed logs of test borings. Detailed descriptions of the soils encountered during site exploration are presented in test boring logs on Plates 4 through 6. A soil profile of the site is shown on Plate 7. Except a grass lawn at its east end, the site is covered with 2 to 3 inches of asphaltic concrete pavement constructed over 3 to 24 inches base material consisting of crushed rock or gravelly sand. Underlying the pavement base material is a layer of fill, consisting of loose to dense, silty fine sand to gravelly- fine to coarse sand, about 5 to 6 feet thick. A thin layer of relic topsoil was found underlying the fill in Test Boring B-l. Underlying the fill and relic topsoil are thick beds of very loose bog sediment and/or alluvium, down to the depths of about 24 to 31 feet below existing grade. Underlying the beds of bog sediment and alluvium deposit is a Kame terrace deposit of medium -dense to very -dense, fine to coarse sand to the depths explored, except that a deposit of gray, very -hard silt with thin sand interbeds was found underlying the Kame terrace in Test Boring B-1. The soil conditions encountered in the test borings seem to indicate that there had been an old drainage swale or gully running through the north side of the site. Beds of very -loose alluvium deposit of silty fine sand and fine sandy silt. containing drift tree trunks, was laid down over most of the site following the retreat of the last glaciation. The old drainage swale or gully along the north side of the site was also filled with thick bog sediment that contains silty peat, roots and wood chips. The site was then filled and paved oVer to its current condition during subsequent development of the site and its surrounding areas. GROUNDWATER CONDITION Groundwater table was encountered at about 11.0 feet deep in Test Boring B-1, 6.5 feet deep in Test Boring B-2, and at about 7.0 feet in Test Boring B-3, after completion of test borings. The LI U & ASSOCIATES, INC. January 25, 2006 Proposed Retail Building L&A Job No. 6A002 1 Page 6 high groundwater level measured may be highly representative of the winter high groundwater table under the site as the test borings were drilled in the midst of a very wct winter after many I consecutive days with precipitation. The groundwater table may fluctuate seasonally, depending on precipitation, surface runoff, ground vegetation cover, site utilization, and other factors. The I groundwater table may lower significantly in the dryer Summer months and accumulate and rise in the wet Winter months. SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION I No contaminants or materials suspected of contaminants were observed on the surface of the site or encountered in the test borings under the site. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS I Underlying the pavement and its base material is a 5-to-6-foot layer of inconsistently constructed fill underlain by thick beds of very -loose bog sediment and/or alluvium deposit down to depths I about 24 to 31 feet. The bog sediment and alluvium deposit are underlain by medium -dense to very -dense Kame terrace deposits. The underlying Kame terrace deposits will be able to provide I excellent foundation support to the proposed building. Piles should be used to penetrate through the bog sediment and alluvium deposit and seat into the underlying Kame terrace deposits to I transfer structural loads to the competent Kame terrace deposits and to minimize potential foundation settlement. 1 s SLOPE STABILITY The site is nearly flat. Slope stability is not an isSie. SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS The Puget Sound region is classified as Seismic Zone 3 by the Uniform Building Code (UBC). The very -loose bog sediment and alluvium deposit underlying the site coupled with high LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. January 25, 2006 Proposed Retail Building L&A .lob No. 6A002 Page 7 groundwater table may be prone to liquefaction during strong earthquakes. The effect of liquefaction potential can be mitigated by supporting the proposed building on piles embedded with sufficient depths into the underlying very -dense Kame terrace deposits. The proposed building should be designed for the seismic forces during strong earthquakes. Based on the soil conditions encountered by the test pits, it is our opinion that Seismic Use Group I and Site Class D should be used in the seismic design of the proposed residences in accordance with the 2003 International Building Code (IBC). SITE WORK Site preparation should include clearing and grubbing and removal of the existing parking pavement within construction limits. The ground within the building footprint should be excavated a foot or two below the finish subgrade level. The exposed soils should be compacted to a non -yielding state with a vibratory mechanical compactor, then covered with a layer of 4-to- 6-inch rock spalls for erosion control and to provide a firm working surface for foundation construction. Storm runoff will be contained in the excavated pit surrounded by nearby existing paved parking lot. Silt fence will likely only be required along the eastern boundary of the site to prevent sediments being transported onto the street bordering the site on this side. RETAINING STRUCTURES Not applicable. ROCKERIES Not applicable. FOUNDATION SUPPORT Due to the layer of very -loose bog sediment and alluvium deposit underlying the site, varying from about 17 to 28 feet in thickness and with tree logs intermixed in the, we recommend pile foundations be used to support the proposed building. The piles should penetrate through the LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. rOn''.ce''^"`...y.'siis6:3c5iG*: .a•J;. ......:wFn ,.r:.� ___......... ..1.::..>_.,.1.r:lC.:WY.ti.Jt{ai::cwiJ.Gn'.�lrnr�{w��T�•u_ January 25, 2006 Proposed Retail Building L&A Job No. 6A002 Page 8 bog sediment and alluvium deposit and seat into the underlying very -dense Kame terrace deposits. The alluvium deposits underlying the site are very loose. and densification of very -loose alluvium sand deposits inay be induced by ground vibrations from pile driving, which may result in foundation settlement and damages to adjacent buildings and parking pavement if driven piles are to be used. High groundwater table in very -loose bog sediment and sandy alluvium deposit may cave severely during hole drilling if drilled piers are to he used. Casing and drilling mud will have to be used to keep drilled holes open and to minimize ground loss for drilled pier installation. Therefore, neither of these two types of piles is suitable from a construction viewpoint. Augercast piles should be suitable for supporting the building. Augercast piles are cast -in -place concrete piles. They are installed by drilling a hole in the ground with a continuous -flight. hollow -stem auger. The continuous -flight auger can maintain an open hole even in potentially caving or squeezing soils. After the holes are drilled to depth, fluid cement -sand grout is then pumped into the hole through the hollow stem, filling the hole from bottom up as the auger is slowly withdrawn out of the ground. A rebar cage is then inserted into the grout -filled holes to complete the pile construction procedure. The installation of augercast piles would generate minimal ground vibration. RECOMMENDATIONS SITE GRADING AND EARTH WORK Site preparation should include clearing and grubbing within construction limits. The surficial topsoil. loose sandy soils and unsuitable soils in the root zone should be stripped. The exposed surface should be compacted to a non -yielding state using a vibratory roller compactor. Storm LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. January 25, 2006 Proposed Retail Building L&A Job No. 6A002 Page 9 runoff; if any, should be directed with sandbag or asphalt curbs away from construction area to minimize erosion during construction,. The on -site, on -site surficial fill of silty fine sand is sensitive to moisture. A layer of clean quarry spalls should be placed over the excavated areas and areas of frequent traffic as required, to protect the subgrade soils from disturbance by construction traffic. A silt fences should be erected along the east side of the site to prevent sediments being transported onto adjacent street. The bottom of silt fence filter fabric should be anchored in a trench filled with gravel. EXCAVATION SLOPES Under no circumstance should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified by local, state and federal safety regulations if workers have to perform construction work in excavated areas. Temporary, unsupported cuts greater than 4 feet in height should be no steeper than 1H:1V in the surficial fill and no steeper than 1-1/2 in the underlying very -loose bog sediment or alluvium deposit, assuming that groundwater will not be encountered over the depths of excavation during construction. If groundwater is encountered, sufficient numbers of dewatering wells or sump pits should be installed to lower the groundwater table to at least 2 to 3 feet below the bottom of excavation to facilitate grading work. STRUCTURAL FILL Structural fill is the fill placed under roadway pavements, footings, slabs -on -grade. and behind retaining walls where it support loads. Structural fill should consist of clean soils with particles not larger than four inches and should be free of organic and other deleterious substances. Structural fill should have a moisture content within 1% of its optimum moisture content at the time of placement. The optimum moisture content is the water content in the soil that enable the soil to be compacted to the highest dry density for a given compaction effort. The on -site sandy soils may be used for structural fill if their moisture content can be controlled to close to their optimum water content at the time of placement. Imported material to be used as structural fill. LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. January 25, 2006 Proposed Retail Building L&A Job No. 6A002 Page 10 should be clean, free -draining, granular soils containing no more than 5% by weight finer than the No. 200 sieve based on the fraction of the material passing No. 4 sieve, and should have individual particles not greater than four inches. Structural fill should be placed in lifts no more than 10 inches thick in its loose state, with each lift compacted to a minimum percentage of the maximum dry density determined by ASTM D1557 (Modified Proctor Method) as follows: Application % of Maximum Dry Density Within building pads of the building lots 95% Roadway/driveway subgrade 95% for top 3 feet and 90% below Retaining wall backfill 90% Utility trench backfill 95% for top 4 feet and 90% below TEMPORARY SHORING AND RETAINING WALLS Not applicable. ROCKERIES Not applicable. REINFORCED SOIL STRUCTURES Not applicable. STRUCTURE AND FOUNDATIONS We recommend that 16-inch-diameter augercast piles be used for supporting the proposed building. Our recommended allowable vertical hearing and uplift capacities for 16-inch-diameter augercast piles arc as follows: LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. _,.. .. ....... _ .. 1 � �..w�:.s: _ .��__ - _•ice January 25, 2006 Proposed Retail Building L&A Job No. 6A002 Page 11 a Pile Embed. Allow. Comp. Allow. Uplift Length, Feet Capacity, Kips Capacity, Kips 12 25 15 14 35 22 16 46 26 18 56 35 20 70 42 a Pile embedment length is the length of piles penetrated into the very dense Kame terrace deposit underlying the loose to medium dense alluvium deposits. The augercast piles should have a minimum penetration of 12 feet into the underlying very -dense Kame terrace deposits. No reduction in pile capacities is required if the pile spacing is kept at least three times the pile diameter. A one-third increase in the above allowable pile capacities can be used when considering short-term transitory wind or seismic loads. We estimate that with the building supported on augercast piles, the total maximum post -construction settlement should be about 3/8 inch or Tess, and the maximum differential settlement across the building width should be 1/4 inch or Tess. Calculation of lateral resistance of the augercast piles may be based on assumed average soil stratification of 22 feet of very -loose bog sediment and alluvium deposit underlain by Kame terrace deposits. A lateral modulus of subgrade reaction of 600 kcf (kips per cubic foot) for the bog sediment and alluvium deposits and of 2,000 kcf for the Kame terrace deposit may be used in calculating the lateral resistance of the piles. The allowable lateral load resistance of the piles should include a proper factor of safety on their ultimate resistance. •i. The performance of augercast piles depends on haw and to what bearing stratum the piles are installed. Since a completed augercast pile in the ground cannot be observed, it is critical that judgement and experience be used as a basis for determining the embedment length and acceptability of a pile. Therefore, we recommend that Liu & Associates he retained to monitor pile installation operation, collect and interpret installation data, and verify suitable bearing stratum. We also suggest that the contractor's equipment and installation procedure be reviewed by L&A prior to pile installation to help mitigate problems which may delay work progress. LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. January 25, 2006 Proposed Retail Building L&A Job No. 6A002 Page 12 ON -GRADE FLOORS Due to the very -loose bog sediment and alluvium deposit underlying the site, with tree logs mixed in the alluvium deposit, it is our recommendation that concrete floor slabs, if required, should be structural slabs supported on grade beams capping the augercast piles. Where moisture control is critical, the floor slabs should be poured on a capillary break placed on compacted unyielding subgrade soils. The capillary break should consist of a minimum four -inch -thick layer of free -draining gravel or crushed rock containing no more than 3% by weight passing the No. 4 sieve. A vapor barrier, such as a 6-mil plastic membrane, may be placed over the capillary break, as required, to keep moisture from migrating upwards. PAVEMENTS Performance of driveway and parking lot pavement is critically related to the conditions of the subgrade soils underlying the pavement. It is economically impractical to excavate out all the very -loose bog sediment and alluvium deposit, which may be from 14 to 24 feet thick, and replaced them with structural fill to support pavement. For the construction of driveway and parking lot pavement, we recommend that the surficial fill under the existing pavement be over - excavated for at least 3 feet, and the exposed soils are then compacted to a non -yielding state with a vibratory mechanical compactor. The over -excavation is then backfilled with structural fill to finished subgrade. A minimum 8-inch-thick, crushed rock base (CRB), consisting of 7/8- inch-minus crushed rock, compacted to a non -yielding state, should be constructed over the structural fill. The crushed rock base should be topped with a 3-inch-thick asphalt treated base (ATB) and 2-inch-thick Class B asphalt concrete(AC). With the very -loose bog sediment and alluvium deposit underlying the driveway and parking lot, maintenance and repair of pavement may be required every few years. UTILITIES Trenches cut in surficial loose fill and the underlying very -loose bog sediment and alluvium deposit for installation of underground utilities may cave easily. Trenches should be shored with LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. January 25, 2006 Proposed Retail Building L&A Job No. 6A002 Page 13 trench blocks or other methods to protect workers in the trenches. Utility trenches should be backfilled with structural fill in accordance with recommendations in the STRUCTURAL FILL section of this report. DRAINAGE CONTROL Runoff From Hillside A steady stream of runoff down from the hillside west of the site was observed flowing onto the parking lot during subsurface exploration. An interceptor trench drain should be installed along the west boundary of the site to intercept and drain away this runoff. Building Footprint Excavation Groundwater may be encountered during excavation of the building footprint. If encountered, the bottom of the building footprint excavation should be sloped and ditches excavated along the bases of the cut slopes to direct collected groundwater into a sump pit from which water can be pumped out of the building footprint excavation. A layer of 4-to-6-inch rock spalls should be placed over subgrade soils, as required, to provide a working surface for construction equipment and workers. Surface Drainage Final site grades should allow storm runoff to be drained away from the building. We suggest the unpaved finish ground be sloped at a gradient of three percent minimum for a distance of at least 10 feet away from the building. Pavements surrounding the building should have sufficient slope to drain storm runoff away from the building., Roof runoff should be collected by an underground drain line system. Runoff over the pavements should be captured by catch basins. Collected water by the underground drain line system and catch basins should be tightlined to drain into a storm sewer or a suitable stormwater disposal facility. LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. January 25. 2006 Proposed Retail Building L&A Job No. 6A002 Page 14 HAZARDS The site is nearly flat and the risk for landslide to occur on the site should be non-existent. The effect of liquefaction of the surficial loose to medium alluvium deposits on the building will be nullified by supporting the building on augercast piles penetrating into the underlying very -dense Kame terrace deposits. Storm runoff during construction will be confined in the pit of building footprint excavation surrounded by adjacent parking pavement, and erosion hazard during construction will be minimal. LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared for the specific application to this project for the exclusive use by Decker Development and Construction, and their associates. representatives. consultants and contractors. We recommend that this report, in its entirety, be included in the project contract documents for the information of the prospective contractors for their estimating and bidding purposes. The conclusions and interpretations in this report, however, should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. The scope of this study does not include services related to construction safety precautions and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in this report for design considerations. Our recommendations and conclusions are based on soil conditions encountered in the test borings, our engineering analyses. and our experience and engineering judgment. The conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised 'by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. No warranty. expressed or implied, is made. The site subsurface conditions encountered in the test borings may vary from those actually encountered during construction. The nature and extent of such variations may not become LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. January 25, 2006 Proposed Retail Building L&A Job No. 6A002 Page 15 evident until construction starts. If variations appear then, we should be retained to re-evaluate the recommendations of this report, and to verify or modify them in writing prior to proceeding further with construction. CLOSURE We are pleased to be of service to you on this project. Please call if you have any questions regarding this report or need further consultation. Yours very truly, LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. J. S. (Julian) Liu, Ph.D., P.E. Consulting Geotechnical Engineer "PIUS 7 / 17 / PLATES AND ILLUSTRATIONS 1. Vicinity Map 2. Site and Exploration Location Plan 3. Unified Soil Classification System 4, 4A, 5, 5A and 6 - Boring Logs LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Engineering Engineering Geology • Earth Science V CINITY MAP PROPOSED RETAIL BUILDING 17305 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY TUKWILA, WASHINGTON JOB NO. 6A002 l DATE 1/8/2006 PLATE 1 N NN 51) N'2 N \\N *4**4(..\N <t. r _Ver•VAfgej •••••••• -(1*- 7.- — R---,--- f/ L4.42171,--.g 4011,0 ,4.,..,. ,.--, ;..1. .__• . ..__.___ —._......, . ____- --- 4---- 15 -3 eRse6cLE 1 1 t PatA4 15 0:5 A '0* lc- 120#411-, LS. :6eiV7 /70 lb srifaiNkAzgr) owe 2 all . _ j4.146..,7. 4 1. 5 OV44, \ 64,2. 12eav 4/4422f. 1%2 , la4ygofis06 --tpg!e 'Faktiaeo • - 1 -1-"A c, N � !a S;b. I MA sfiwt (-1 +21. 3 • 1 • — ai s ' t D 1.s =1�' Vf7l�"6�Sh�'.s'1� . 1.a.-.. •4c-c . R ... I 1 oUTK cet4TeK PARKWAY ��yy ,� r*Y•I 2Lit.xcTPAqi.M LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Engineering • Engineering Geology Earth Science SITE AND EXPLORATION LOCATION PLAN PROPOSED RETAIL BUILDING 17305 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY TUKWILA, WASHINGTON JOB NO. 6A002 DATE 1/8/2006 I PLATE 2 i i i i i i i i i i i i i i BORING NO. B-1 Logged By: JSL 1/5/2005 Ground Elev. ± Depth ft. USCS Soil Description Sample (N) Blows/ ft. W 8/0 Other Test Type No. 5 — 2-in Asphalt Pavement over 3-in Crushed Rock Base SS" SS SS ss SS 2 I 1 5 8 131/12" 2 3 1/18" _- SM Dark -gray, loose, silty fine SAND, trace gravel, moist (ALL) Dark -brown, loose, organic, silty fine SAND. trace gravel, moist (relig TOPSOIL) '_ 1 0 — OL Brown, very -loose, silty fine SAND to fine sandy SILT. intermixed with dark -brown, organic, silty fine SAND, moist (BOG SEDIMENT) Q SM/ML/ OL 15 — - Same, with wood log fragment Intermixed very -loose, brown, silty fine SAND to fine sandy SILT and gray. silty fine SAND, with wood log fragments, very moist (ALLUVIUM) 20 SM/ML Gray, very -soft, fine sandy SILT, with thin fine sand interbeds, very moist (ALLUVIUM) (continued on Plate 4A) 25 30 ML LEGEND: SS - 2" O.D. Split -Spoon Sample GROUNDWATER: 'l Seal ST . 3" O.D. Shelby -Tube Sample Water Level B - Bulk Sample " Observation Well Tip LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Engineenng Engineering Geology Earth Science BORING LOG RETAIL BUILDING 17305 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY TU KW I LA. WAS H I NGTON JOB NO. 6A002 DATE 1/8/2006 1 PLATE 4 i i i i i I i i i i i i I i i i BORING NO. B-1 (continued from Pate 4) Logged By: JSL 1/5/2006 Ground Elev. ± Depth ft. USCS Soil Description Sample (N) Blows/ ft: W °k Other Test Type No. Gray, soft, fine sandy SILT. with thin fine sand interbeds, SS SS 6 7 21 23& 50/5•75' very moist ALLUVIUM) 1Gray, T 35 40 45 50 55 60 ML very -dense, fine to coarse SAND, some fine gravel, wet (fresh KAME TERRACE) fine t Gray, very -hard, sandy SILT, slightly moist r Boring terminated © 36.5 ft; groundwater encountered @ 11.0 ft at completion of drilling. LEGEND: SS - 2" O.D. Split -Spoon Sample GROUNDWATER: � ST - 370.0. Shelby -Tube Sample Water Level B - Bulk Sample Seal Observation Well Tip LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Engineering • Engineering Geology • Earth Science BORING LOG RETAIL BUILDING 17305 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY TU KW I LA. WASH I NGTON JOB NO. 6A002 DATE 1/8/2006 r PLATE 4A i i i i i i i i i i i i i BORING NO. B-2 (continued from Plate 5) Logged By: JSL 1/5/2006 Ground Elev. ± Depth h. USCS 1 Sample (N) Blows/ ft. W % Other Test Soil Description Type No. — 5 70 15 20 25 30 SP Gray, medium -dense, fine to medium SAND, very moist (fresh KAME TERRACE) - Same, grades to dense and brown -gray in color SS — ^ SS 6 7 28 44 1 Boring terminated at 36.5 ft; groundwater table encountered @ 6.5 ft at completion of drilling. • LEGEND: SS - 2' O.D. Split -Spoon Sample GROUNDWATER: ST - 3' O.D. Shelby -Tube Sample Water Level B - Bulk Sample Seal Observation Well Tip LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Engineering Engineering Geology Earth Science BORING LOG RETAIL BUILDING 17305 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY TU KW I LA. WASH I N GTON JOB NO. 6A002 DATE 1/8/2006 PLATE 5A i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i BORING NO. B-3 Logged By: JSL 1/5/2006 Ground Elev. t Depth ft, USCS Soil Description Sample (N) Blows/ ft. W % Other Test Type No. — 5 2-in Asphalt Pavement 24-In Crushed Rock Base 1 SS ]SS ]SS ]SS ]SS 1 2 3 4 5 31 3 4 6 45 Gray, dense, gravelly, fine to coarse SAND, wet (FILL) n— SW — 10 t— — 15 — Gray, very -loose, silty fine SAND to fine sandy SILT, occasional roots and wood chips, moist (ALLUVIUM) SM/ML Gray, very -loose, interbedded salty fine to medium SAND and SILT, occasional roots and wood chips, very -moist to wet (ALLUVIUM) SM/ML Loose, interbedded gray, fine to medium SAND and brown- gray SILT, occasional wood chips, moist to very -moist (ALLUVIUM) SP/ML _ 20 — 25 _ 30 Gray, very -dense, fine to medium SAND, wet Test boring terminated (d3 30.0 ft due to sand boiling. Groundwater table ( 7.0 at completion of drilling SP LEGEND: SS - 2" O.D. Spat -Spoon Sample GROUNDWATER: " Seal ST - 3" O.D. Shelby -Tube Sample Water Level B - Bulk Sample I' Observation Well Tip LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnicai Engineering • Engineering Geology . Earth Science BORING LOG RETAIL BUILDING 17305 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY TUKWILA, WASHINGTON JOB NO. 6A002 DATE 1/8/2006 PLATE 6 W UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP SYMBOL GROUP NAME i- COARSE- GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50% RETAINED ON THE NO. 200 SIEVE GRAVEL MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION RETAINED ON NO. 4 SIEVE CLEAN GRAVEL GW WELL -GRADED GRAVEL, FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL GP POORLY -GRADED GRAVEL GRAVEL WITH FINES GM SILTY GRAVEL GC CLAYEY GRAVEL SAND MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION PASSING NO. 4 SIEVE CLEAN SAND SW WELL -GRADED SAND. FINE TO COARSE SAND SP POORLY -GRADED SAND SAND WITH FINES SM SILTY SAND SC CLAYEY SAND FINE- GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50% PASSING ON THE NO. 200 SIEVE SILT AND CLAY LIQUID LIMIT LESS THAN 50% INORGANIC ML SILT CL CLAY ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY SILTY AND CLAY LIQUID LIMIT 50% OR MORE INORGANIC MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY. FAT CLAY ORGANIC OH ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC SILT HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT AND OTHER HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS l NOTES: 1. FIELD CLASSIFICATION IS BASED ON VISUAL EXAMINATION OF SOIL IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2488-83. 2. SOIL CLASSIFICATION USING LABORATORY TESTS IS BASED ON ASTM D2487-83. 3. DESCRIPTIONS OF SOIL DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY ARE BASED ON INTERPRETATION OF BLOW -COUNT DATA, VISUAL' APPEARANCE OF SOILS, AND/OR TEST DATA. SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS: DRY - ABSENCE OF MOISTURE, DUSTY, DRY TO THE TOUCH SLIGHTLY MOIST - TRACE MOISTURE. NOT DUSTY MOIST - DAMP, BUT NO VISIBLE WATER VERY MOIST - VERY DAMP, MOISTURE FELT TO THE TOUCH WET - VISIBLE FREE WATER OR SATURATED. USUALLY SOIL IS OBTAINED FROM BELOW WATER TABLE LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Engineering • Engineering Geology • Earth Science UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM PLATE 3 20 6'1015 8BorD City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone (1206) 4313670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E-mall: tukpllan@tukwila.wa.us BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER: L06-059 DECLARATION Know all men by these present that we, the undersigned, owner(s) in fee simple of the land herein described do herebyr make a boundary line adjustment. The undersigned further declare this boundary line adjustmeent to be the graphic representation of said boundary line adjustment and the same Is m sent and in accordance with the desire of the ewner(s). In w ereof we have set of a tsand seals. Name: Ka/RI/ ra • ' "'-' : : Robert Schofield, nager, Tukwila View Estates LLC Tukwila View E es LLC STATE OF WASHINGTON County of King On this day personally appeared before me Brad Decker to me known to be the individual who executed the within amd foregoing Ins ♦ ment and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and d . the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and ,official thl yo SitgnatureT� Name as • • missioned: Title: Mty appointment e fires: / /j— 07 STATE OF WASHINGTON County of King 0o On this day personally appeared before me Robert Schofield to me known to be the Inilvldual who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her voluntary atct and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. day ofkierIllizot, 20 04P GIVEN under my hand and officlal s Sion Natme as missbned, Tittle: T L�7X(-(J Myr appointment expires: LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE 1 Brent L. Eble, registered as a land surveyor by the State of Washington, certify that ttis plat Is based on an actual survew of the land described herein, conducted by me or under my supervision; that the distances, courses and angles are shown hereon correctly; and teat monuments other than those monuments approved for setting at a later date, have been set and lot corners staked on tfee ground as depicted on the plat. SURVEY IN SE 1/4 OF SW 1/4 OF SECTION 26 T. 23 N.,R. 4 E., W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTOIN RECORDING CERTIFICATE •� Filed for record at the request of the City of Tukwila this,�5 day or DCf�f_ . 2004 , at � minutes past - • A Q pM, and .Z j L' or gY, a•i 5ppage o it records of King County, Washington. recorded In Volume id. F4•Savo sl¢S 1I King County Manager A. akin ` Supt. of Records and Elections OWNER(S): ERRE LLC, EVANS 10 LLC, SC3 LLC ADDRESS: 117 EAST LOUISA ST. #230 PHONE (206) 545-4964 CITY/STATEJZIP: SEATTLE, WA 98102 APPROVALS VOLUME PAGE �.I y deb KING COUNTY FINANC DIVISION I certify that all property es are paid and . at a deposit has been made In sufficient amount to pay the taxes for the fo • wing year, there are no delinquent special assess nts ce r : d to thls office for collection; and that all special assessments on any of the • • • • erein dedicated as streets, alleys, or for other public use are paid in full. This 20 King County Treasurer : puty King County Treasurer KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S APPROVAL Examined and approved by the Department of Assessments this ZS14' day of Q , 20010 . ((\lnble. King County Assessor Deputy Assessor Parcel Numbers: 262304-9135-08 and 262304-9063-04 TUKWILA SHORT SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE APPROVAL Reviewed and approved by the Short Subdivision Committee and hereby certified for filing. this l'7 day of .-Yes-- , 20 ash Chai • = ). on, Short Subdivision Committee VICINITY MAP EMERALD LAND SURVEYING, INC. PO BOX 13694 MILL CREEK, WA 98082 PH. (425) 359-7198 DRAWN BY HMM DATE SEPTEMBER 22, 2006 JOB NUMBER 05977 CHECKED BY BLE SCALE = 50' SHEET OF I1i0.0610254mon City of Tukwila Department: of Community Development 6300 Southa:enter Boulevard, Tukwlia, WA 98188 Telephone (;206) 4313670 FAX (206) 4313665 E-mail: tukgalanatukwIIa.wa.us BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER: L06-059 EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS APN 262304-9024 THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W. M., BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THIE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE N 87'45'57" W, 481.05 FEET TO THE WEST MARGIN OF SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY; THENCE N 11'59'33" W ALONG SAID MARGIN, 830.58 FEET; THENCE CONITINUING ALONG SAID MARGIN ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 991.37 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 227.28 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13'08'08"; THENCE N 1'08'35" E, 74.95 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N 88'551'25" W. 69 FEET; THENCE N 1'08'35" E, 12 FEET; THENCE N 88'51'25" W, 38 FEET; THENCE S 1'08'35" W, 12 IFEET; THENCE N 88'51'25" W, 195.64 FEET TO THE CENTER OF A RAILROAD EASEMENT; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID RAILROAD EASEMENT ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARING S 56RD15"51", SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 410.28 FEET, AIN ARC DISTANCE OF 102 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1414'40"; THENCE N 12'28'30" W, 33.38 FEET; 11HENCE N 4'34'26" W, 50.16 FEET; THENCE N 1'41'39" E, 54.76 FEET TO THE NORTH MARGIN OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S 87'55i'53" E, 250 FEET TO THE WEST MARGIN OF SOUTHCEINTER PARKWAY; THENCE S 1'08'35" W, 211.33 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OFF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. (ALSO KNOWN AS PARCEL IB, CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NUMBER 7811290697.) APN 262304-9135 THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SIECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.I,N.. BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THIE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE N 0'50.36" E, 819.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N 0'50'36" E, 495.67 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 26; THENCE S 87'55'52" E, 373.22 FEET TO A POINT BEARING N 87-55'53" W. 286 FEET FROM THE CENTERUNE OF SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY; THENCE S 01'41'39" W. 54.76 FEET; THENCE S 4'34'26" E, 50.16 FEET; THENCE S 12'28'30" E, 33.38 FEET TO THE CENTERUNE OF A RAILROAD EASEMENT; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAIID CENTERUNE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARING S 42'01'11" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 410.28 FEET, ALONG AN ARC DISTANCE OF 341.28 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 47'39'334"; THENCE S 0'19'15" W, 20.72 FEET TO A POINT BEARING N 85'08'34" E FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING; 1THENCE S 85'08'34" W, 255.03 FEET; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. (ALSO KNOWN AS PARCEL 8, CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY UNE ADJUSTMENIT NUMBER 89-10-BLA, AS RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY AUDITOR FILE NUMBER 8912270422.) LAND TO BE TRANSFERRED THAT PORTION OF PARCEL B, CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY UNE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 89-10-BLA, AS RECORDED UNDER KIUG COUNTY AUDITOR FILE NUMBER 8912270422, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL B CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 89-10-BLA; THENCE S 1'41'39" W, 54.76; THENCE S 4'34.26" E. 50.16 FELT; THENCE S 12'28'30" E, 33.38 FEET TO TFE CENTERUNE OF A RAILROAD EASEMENT; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE ON A CLRVE TO THE LEFT. CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARING S 4S'01'11" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 410.28 FEET, ALONG AN ARC DISTANCE OF 101.99 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14'14'36"; THENCE N 88'51'25" W. 35.13 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, 30 FEET NORTHWESTERLY AND PARALLEL WITH SAID CENTERLINE OF A RAILROAD EASEMENT, SAID POINT BEARING S 58'43'35" E, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 440.28 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14'24'17", AN ARC DISTANCE Of 110.69 FEET TO A POINT 30 FEET WESTERLY AND PARA_LEL WITH THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID PARCEL B CTY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 89-10-BLA; THENCE N 12'28'30' W, 18.39 FEET; THENEE N 4'34'26" W, 53.87 FEET; THENCE N 1'41'39" E. 56.60 FEET TO THE',NORTH MARGIN OF SAID PARCEL B CTY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 89-10-BLA; THENCE'S'87'55'53" E ALONG SAID MARGIU, 30.00 FEET TO TFIL<POINT OF BEGINNING; V CONTAINING IN ALL 7197.9 SQUARE FEET. �J!/ NEW PARCEL A LEGAL DESCRIPTION APN 262304-9024 THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE N 87'45'57" W, 481.05 FEET TO THE WEST MARGIN OF SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY; THENCE N 11'59'33" W ALONG SAID MARGIN, 830.58 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID MARGIN ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 991.37 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 227.28 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13'08'08"; THENCE N 1'08'35" E, 74.95 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N 88'51'25" W. 69 FEET; THENCE N 1'08'35" E. 12 FEET; THENCE N 88'51'25" W, 38 FEET; THENCE S 1'08'35" W. 12 FEET; THENCE N 88'51'25" W, 195.64 FEET TO THE CENTER OF A RAILROAD EASEMENT; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID RAILROAD EASEMENT ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARING S 567.D15'51", SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 410.28 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 102 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14'14'40"; THENCE N 12'28'30" W, 33.38 FEET; THENCE N 4'34'26" W, 50.16 FEET; THENCE N 1'41'39" E, 54.76 FEET TO THE NORTH MARGIN OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE 5 87'55'53" E, 250 FEET TO THE WEST MARGIN OF SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY; THENCE S 1'08'35" W. 211.33 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; (ALSO KNOWN AS PARCEL B, CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NUMBER 7811290697.) e TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF PARCEL B, CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 89-10-BLA, AS RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY AUDITOR FILE NUMBER 8912270422, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ,BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL B T CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER �89,T10-BLA; THENCE S 1'41'39" W, 54.76; THENCE S 4'34'26„ E, 50.16 FEET; THENCE S 12'28'30" E, 33.38 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF A RAILROAD EASEMENT; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERUNE ON A CURVE TO THE LEF,T,!,CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARING S 42'01'11" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 410.28 FEET, ALONG AN ARC DISTANCE OF 101.99 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1414'36"; THENCE N 88'51'25" W, 35.13 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, 30 FEET NORTHWESTERLY AND PARALLEL WITH SAID CENTERLINE OF A RAILROAD EASEMENT, SAID POINT BEARING S 58'43'35" E, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 440.28 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CARVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1424'17", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 110.69 FEET TO A POINT 30 FEET WESTERLY AND PARALLEL WITH THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID PARCEL B CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 89-10-BLA; THENCE N 12'28'30" W, 18.39 FEET; THENCE N 4'34'26" W, 53.87 FEET; THENCE N 1'41'39" E, 56.60 FEET TO THE NORTH MARGIN OF SAID PARCEL B CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 89-10-BLA; THENCE S 87'55'53" E ALONG SAID MARGIN, 30.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. CONTAINING IN ALL 61,509.0 SQUARE FEET. SURVEY IN SE 1/4 OF SW 1/4 OF SECTION 26 T. 23 N.,R. 4 E., W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON RECORDING CERTIFICATE Red for record at the request of the City of Tukwila the day o1 20 at minutes pest M. and recorded in Volume of King County, Washington. King County Manager of Plats, on page , records Supt. of Records and Elections OWNER(S). ERRE LLC, EVANS 10 LLC, SC3 LLC ADDRESS: 117 EAST LOUISA ST. 8230 PHONE: (206) 545-4964 CITYISTATE/Z1P. SFATTLE, WA 98102 VOLUME PAGE 2,I(f 8q7 NEW PARCEL B LEGAL DESCRIPTION APN 262304-9135 THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE N O'50.36" E, 819.01 FEET TO THE PONT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N 0'50'36" E. 495.67 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 26; THENCE S 87'55'52" E, 373.22 FEET TO A POINT BEARING N 87'55'53" W, 286 FEET FROM THE CENTERUNE OF SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY; THENCE S 01'41'39" W, 54.76 FEET; THENCE S 4'34'26" E, 50.16 FEET; THENCE S 12'28'30" E. 33.38 FEET TO THE CENTERUNE OF A RAILROAD EASEMENT; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERUNE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARING S 42'01'11" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 410.28 FEET, ALONG AN ARC DISTANCE OF 341.28 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 4739'34"; THENCE S 019'15" W, 20.72 FEET TO A POINT BEARING N 85'08'34" E FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE 5 85'08'34" W. 255.03 FEET; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING. STATE OF WASHINGTON. (ALSO KNOWN AS PARCEL B, CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY UNE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 89-10-BLA, AS RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY AUDITOR FILE NUMBER 8912270422.) EXCEPT THAT PORTION, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL B CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY UNE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 89-10-13LA; THENCE S 1'41'39" W, 54.76; THENCE S 4'34'26 E. 50.16 FEET; THENCE S 12'28'30" E, 33.38 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF A RAILROAD EASEMENT; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARING S 42'01'11" E AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 410.28 FEET, ALONG AN ARC DISTANCE OF 101.99 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1414'36"; THENCE N 88'51'25" W, 35.13 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, 30 FEET NORTHWESTERLY AND PARALLEL WTH SAID CENTERLINE OF A RAILROAD EASEMENT. SAID POINT BEARING S 58'43'35" E, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 440.28 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14'24'17", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 110.69 FEET TO A POINT 30 FEET WESTERLY AND PARALLEL MTh THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID PARCEL B CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 89-10-B1.A; THENCE N 12'28'30" W, 18.39 FEET; THENCE N 4-34'26" W. 53.87 FEET; THENCE N 1'41'39" E. 56.60 FEET TO THE NORTH MARGIN OF SAID PARCEL B CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 89-10-BLA; THENCE S 87'55'53" E ALONG SAID MARGIN, 30.00 FEET TO THE POIN E OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING IN ALL 143,628.9 SQUARE FEET. EMERALD LAND SURVEYING, INC. PO BOX 13894 MILL CREEK, WA 98082 PH. (425) 359-7198 DRAWN BY HMM DATE SEPTEMBER 22, 2006 JOB NUMBER 05977 CHECKED BY BLE SCALE 1" = 50' SHEET 2 OF 10061025 q 000i o City of Tulkwila Department of Community Development 6300 Souttic enter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone (206) 431-3870 FAX (206) 431-3665 E�nall: tukpllan@tukwiia.wa.us BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER: L06-059 O Y b z S87'55'5.TE 343.22' Proposed Parcel B 143,628.9 Square Feet Parcel 8 City of Tukwila BLA 89-10 APN 262304-9135 Si 85'1034 w LINE 1TABLE UNE LENGTH' BEARING L1 L2 L3 L4 12.00 38.00 12.00 20.72 SO1'06'35'W S88'S1'25'E NO1'08'35'E S0019'15'W L5 18.39 N12'28'30'W L6 53.87 N04'34'26-W J 255.03' CURVE TABLE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA C1 101.99 410.28 1414'36* C2 110.69 440.28 14'24'17* C33 239.27 410.28 33'24'53' S 81'2S' E P�9 fj 230.77' Note: N8755'53'W 280.00' Proposed Parcel A 61,509.0 Square Feet Parcel B City of Tukwila BLA 7811290697 APN 262304-9024 P7 u 1P8 There are no existing -structures on proposed Parcel B. Access Eosem en per AFN 9507210283. -1 \---- SURVEY IN SE 1/4 OF SW 1/4 OF SECTION 26 T. 23 N.,R. 4 E., W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTOIN RECORDING CERTIFICATE Filed for record at the request of the Cny of Tukwila this day of 20 at minutes past M, and recorded in Volume of PtaLs, on pagerecords of tang County, Washington. King County Manager Supt. of Records and Elections OWNER(S): ERRE LLC, EVANS 10 LLC, SC3 LLC ADDRESS: 117 EAST LOUISA ST.11230 PHONE: (206) 545-4964 CITY/STATE/ZIP. SEATTLE, WA 98102 P6 P5 S8851'25"E 69.00' P3 P4 Found Conc. Mon. in Case c 0 0 c 1 oi r: 0 0 0 Z 61k1Found Conc. Mon, in Case of P.I. tl 211 �1 ut -50 VOLUME PAGE a.jtf 021 MERIDIAN DEED GRAPHIC SCALE 0 25 50 100 IM - . toRI (IN FEET) 1 inch = 50 ft. PROPERTY CORNERS P1 Found Tack in Lead w/ Tag, LS 18104, 0.02' S P2 Found Tack in Lead, 0.34' W P3 Found Mag w/ Shiner, 0.20' W P4 Found Tack in Lead, 0.25' W & 0.01' N P5 Found Rebor & Cap, LS 21601, 0.25' W & 0.01' S P6 Found Rebar & Cap, LS 18104, 0.02' E & 0.09' S P7 Found Rebar & Cop, LS 18104, 0.07' W & 0.09' S P8 Found Rebar Sc Cap, LS 18104, 0.12' E & 0.17' N P9 Found Mog & Tag, LS 18104, 0.06' E Sc 0.08' S P10 Found Iron Pipe w/ Tock, 0.17' W & 0.28' S P11 Found Rebor & Cop, LS 18104, 0.06' E & 0.02' S P12 Found Open 3/4" Iron Pipe, 0.02' E & 0.19' N P13 Found Rebor & Cap, LS 21601, 0.05' W & 0.12' N P14 Found Open 3/4" Iron Pipe, 0.16' W & 0.05' N SURVEY NOTES INSTRUMENT USED: SOKKIA SET 5 EDM METHOD USED: FIELD TRAVERSE APPROXIMATE POINT ACCURACY: ±0.05' SURVEY MEETS OR EXCEEDS STATE STANDARDS PER WAC 332-130-090. MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREON WERE VISITED ON JULY 15, 2005. THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS MAP REPRESENTS THE RESULTS OF A SURVEY MADE ON THE INDICATED DATE AND CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED AS THE GENERAL EXISTING CONDITION AT THAT TIME. N87'45'57"W 443.91' 36 EMERALD LAND SURVEYING, INC. PO BOX 13694 MILL CREEK, WA 98082 PH. (425) 359-7198 DRAWN BY HMM DATE SEPTEMBER 22, 20015 JOB NUMBER 05977 CHECKEDBY BLE SCALE = 50' SHEET 3�3 • Z II I1 L I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I L 1 1 1 1 1 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY RECEIVED NOV 06 2018 Community Development SITE PLAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS TUKWILA VIEW ESTATES LLC 17301 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY TUKWILA, WA 98188 r"• D O i llomm LANCE A R E 130 LAKESIDE MUELLER E., ASSC]CIATES ., I T E T 9 A, • SUITE 250 • SEATTLE, WA 98122 • 19061 325.2553 rout "°" VR^A" WOO <..1102J0 ft NY Parcel B City of Tukwila BLA L06-05 APN 262304-9135 97 Rezone to TUC -CC Area 57.456.2 Sf s a50e'N' W Parcel A City of Tukwila BLA L06-05 APN 262304-9024 UNE TABLE UNE LENGTH REARM 11 12.00 5010l•35'W L2 3600 S8051'25'E L3 12.00 N01003SE L4 20.72 50019'1SW is 1139 41220'30'W L9 53.67 N04•34'26'W L7 32.72 N4513'21'1 LB 9.51 N3309'19'E L9 19.33 557-42'03TE CURVE TABLE CURVE 104C19 RADIUS DELTA CI 101.99 410.211 1414.36. C2 110.69 440.21 14241r C3 239.27 410.26 3324'53 04 7.11 440.29 10132' CS 102.61 440.2E 1322'45 RECEIVED MERIDIAN DEED GRAPHIC SCALE 0 2S 50 'CO MI - (IN FEET) 1 inch v 50 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF REZONE THAT PORTION OF PARCEL B, CITY OF TUKWLA BOUNDARY UNE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER L06-05. RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDER'S FILE NUMBER 20E61025900010, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED UNE: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL B; THENCE N 0050'36' E ALONG THE WEST MARGIN OF SAID PARCEL B, 179.83 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF SAID UNE; THENCE N 67'26'39' E, 37.09 FEET: THENCE N 76'32'15' E. 67.22 FEET; THENCE N 71'13'40' E. 69.36 FEET; THENCE S 89'02'02' E, 50.10 FEET; THENCE N 51'06'45' E. 37.62 FEET; THENCE N 4513'21' E. 32.72 FEET; THENCE N 35'09'19' E. 9.51 FEET; THENCE S 57'42'03' E, 19.33 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID PARCEL B, AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID UNE. SAID MARGIN BEING A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 440.28 FEET. SAID POINT BEARING N 5T42'03' W FROM ITS RADIUS. AND LUNG NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1'01'32', AN ARC DISTANGE OF 7.88 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL A OF SAID CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER L06-05 THEREOF. AREA OF SA10 PARCEL 8 LYING SOUTHERLY OF SAID UNE CONTAINS 57,456.2 SQUARE FEET. c a) E 0 0 a) a) SURVEY 1N THE. S.E. 1/4, S.W. 1/4 SEC. 26 TWP 23N., RCE. 4E., W.M. EXHIBIT MAP Tukwila View Estates, LLC 17301 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila, WA ' DRAWN6161 '' CHECKED, • BLE 0, 06472 472 SHEET 1 OF 1 1 EMERALD LAND SURVEYING. INC. DATE. PO SOX 13494 MILL CREEK WA 99012 PH. (425) 359`7198 10/30/18 fa. WW1) rcrOPoR oDNc i o SP(ti -e, TO MWO 1r COMM 414.1. �TIMM VW • n1 1.PA OM DO CT NITS ./ AYl UPGRADE U 11MIS METER DETAIL N3 T<-IP, ..M.((N) APPRO., WOO MIMIC •CMCS Peter Pm 01.-141 CM CAP CTOT 1m TO NC u... P nN Alt 365 COST SW'/a, SEC 26, TWP 23N, RGE 4E •0 Covc,,. h f , Py3, e ) 0Wc�7/ Wa'e/ a eV M. Mlnkler /Ivd ca w ♦ELI w EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY NOTE: VERPY E0SRNO TO'OLRAPNY 01 AREA Or PROPOSED CONSIR(1CimN PRIOR m ANY NOIOL NOTIFY ENGINEER IF CONFLICTS ARE IDEN11)1CD. EXISTING UTILITY NOTE: VFRPY OOIN AND LOCAn01 OF ALL Em51MG URU1[S (WEINER CO NOT 91000 UI POTENTIAL CONFLICT M/ PROPOSED CONSIN(1COO PRIOR TO ANY ROIRL NOTES: 1. MULL AMU® PT . PIVOT/ 4 S.Y MO Tfl n 0TGCT0I 0 M MONK 1CC O' TIC .ATM Km 3 .AOPLGI nK10110 .Im¢s tOCV N ME: SATTS 1T44 Ao � no Po Nm COI OOOTc 4.47TS mra.T 1 PVC PR 51MI SE M AST. Rnl.. sb 4. MO O[ SET 0 APPROVED EMe a .TL A ® PALL[ m Q1O.a. *I GmoJO A.K CCP . A m6TTCK1101 STNON05 0. STL 0 CP.! CCD O c E E o Ea) c > C; (1) Li I/17/07 1NS1 PAT(PNAn AT SS Ca O' CLOG APPm 3/II/c., 4MS(O PIP Ow DOMO.TS m RETAIL BLDG, SC-5 tnm SPUTvON¢. P.N. COM OAR T- 1-Ol us. Om SCA1I 1•-1T SEWER & WATER PLAN CCO. D(4t 401T A COISTTNCTOI. 11C 117 ( SOASA ST. 1SD ,S(ATTl, TM 441m ...IL lOS-MS-MOM 6of7 • t 1 by: I Address j j Search 170 6 .—I cs,-I ;r, 1-- -- •'flYjt� 017050• 5 205 .521`53256o •1700250170 1r� ' 17059)0 - 7 17055 8 021!17202 0220 617Q67 C`17214 0240 023Z 14)2!"4 02,6192 025�• 24 .1722811�51 0(•8 (n15 c1`1 : y 5O ' -•260 5118; Or,z2J do271 �28I `5 7 )16 60) CO 70 `0r' 1 l v `5p 2�i 9013 IIb62 59 25 0 150 300ft 15 2Z os17075 I Find Intersection Zoom to Advanced tools I Basemaps Print 9136 a � 17135 for 9071 • • 17185� • • •17_193 • 9069 9063 • 17275' 9026173 05 g0e l733 9067 •17501 77 rJ vn 617250 ••11324r•• •17•31P• �C :•5 ICutl a o=r>s rc,- ▪ 173 80 T trt 9134 •17555 a_cess iLad 9110 0020 •17348 617356 611364 i� •173 88 17400 • 1145 0 rn 0 0) 1•17470 `17480 •17500 .175 70 •17: •1720 Minkler E 358 • •300 •350 . 344 3 3 01 OC3 17 RECEIVED •321 CO N O 9110 .1105� 00E 11/6/2018, 2:22:25 PM ❑ City Limits Ll Buildings • Addresses (Tukwila) Parcels ■.. ..■ Potential Annexation Areas Zoning LJ LDR Tukwila iMap RECEN L'' NOV2.,201 C MDR Medium Density Residential Comm ment Develop Low Density Residential 1 9,028 0 0.05 0.1 I r I 0 0.07 0.15 Tukwila Technology Services, King County 0.2 mi 0.3 km City of Tukwila Legal Description for Rezone Portion of Parcel B City of Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment Number L06-05 That portion of Parcel B, City of Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment Number L06-05, recorded under King County Recorder's file number 20061025900010, records of King County, Washington, lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at the southwest corner of said Parcel B; thence N 00°50'36" E along the west margin of said Parcel B, 179.83 feet to The Beginning of Said Line; thence N 67°26'39" E, 37.09 feet; thence N 76°32'15" E, 67.22 feet; thence N 71 ° 13'40" E, 69.36 feet; thence S 89°02'02" E, 50.10 feet; thence N 51 °06'45" E, 37.62 feet; thence N 45° 13'21 " E, 32.72 feet; thence N 35°09'19" E, 9.51 feet; thence S 57°42'03" E, 19.33 feet to a point of intersection with the easterly margin of said Parcel B, and the terminus of said line, said margin being a curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 440.28 feet, said point bearing N 57°42'03" W from its radius, and lying northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 1°01'32", an arc distance of 7.88 feet from the southwesterly corner of Parcel A of said City of Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment Number L06-05 thereof. Area of said Parcel B lying southerly of said line contains 57,456.2 square feet. RECEIVED NOV 062018 Community Development CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OF WASHINGTON ss COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at / 730 ! S o,,1(;e��v Pv�(wc. '7vA i# /A� U./4 for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at WO �� 8' � (city),I+0L two /�l 0 V&1N 3G-'� , 20 / !awe J�<tke�-, Nion 40145 >� (Print Name) 7 ems"- Lev,34 Sf Z.3v (Address) SQ4ct/e 1A44 `3' G C( (Ph. •e u�l�T tuber) (Signature) On this day personally appeared before me grad Deejltr to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/X signed the same as hisdld voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. ,\\\xx"11\tl1— SUBSCRIBED ANLZ..��?Ji(,RN S ORE ME 0 / IS / DAY OF f'i�� 3 , 20 / NOTARY PUBLIC in and for th - • -o 'tz O t residing at .5' �ii zN%� use _� %$ 3.19-ti��` My Commission expires on 74)i lOWPS� \ \\\\ NOV 0 6 2018 W:\@SHAREPOINT FOLDER RESTRUCTURE\Reference\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\Comprehensive PGOmmUnity Amendment.doca Development W:\@SHAREPOINT FOLDFR RESTRUCTURE\Reference\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\Comprehensive Plan Amendment docx ILGWUD;DneJp /�iunW WG B1OZ flu AON a3AIJD3a 10'-0' LE R ZONE AREA 56,172.6 SF PARCEL GITY OF TUKWILA BLA LOb-05 APN 262304-9135 L% TOE OF 5L0 1-1301 SOUTI-{GENTER PARKWAY, TUKWILA, WA gSlBS REZONE TO TUG-GG AREA 51,456.2 SF PARCEL A GITY OF TUKWILA BLA LOb-05 APN 2b2304-G024 L_---------- AGGESS EASEMENT PER AFN c1501210253. 1 VICINITY MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION REZONE TO TUG-GG THAT PORTION OF PARCEL B, CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUEER LO6-05, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDERS FILE NXIEER 20061025900010, RECORDS OF KIN& COUNTY, WASHIN0TON, LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE. E650.0145 AT 'E SL41714E5T CORER OF SAID PARCEL 5 THENCE N 005056' E ALONG THE VEST MARGIN OF SAID PARG3 5, MEG FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF SAID LI/E, THENCE N 0'2639' E, 37.09 FEET; THENCE N 16'3215' E., 6722 FEET; THENCE N 1113'40' E, 6436 FEET; THENCE 5 89.02'02' E, 50.10 FEET; THENCE N 51.05'45" E, 31.62 FEET; THENCE N 45.13'21' E, 32.72 FEET; THENCE N 35'04'14' E, 451 FEET; THENCE 5 51'42'03" E, 1933 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID PARCEL 5, AID THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE, SAID MARGIN BEING A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 44028 FEET, SAID POINT BEARING N 51'42.03' W FROM ITS RADIUS, AND LYING NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CONE T RCU6N A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1'0132', AN AFL DISTANCE Cf 7,68 FEET FROM THE SCURb€STERLY CORNER OF PARCEL A OF SAID CITY OF TUKWILA BOUDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NR•E82 L06-05 THEREOF. AREA OF SAID PARCEL 5 LYING SOUTM3RLY OF SAID LINE CONTAINS 51.4562 SQUARE FEET. 1 a 75 9; COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS c CO CO 0, Z n SITE PLAN 15 30 00 RECEIVED NOV o 0 2018 nva Drly IDDm6-1 1uew00lonoa AI!Onww00 O102 DO AON a3AI3D3a rt u N�d( R { S87B8.83i 34122' LDR Zone Area 88,172.6 Sf Parcel B Clty of Tukwila BLA LOB-05 APN 262304-9135 Rezone to TUC -CC Area 57,456.2 Sf 4 5 8651.25' E Parcel A Clty of Tukwila BLA L06-05 APN 262304-9024 UNE TABLE UNE LENGTH BEARING L1 12.00 SO1O8'35'W L2 3600 58851'25 E L3 1200 N01138'35'E L4 70.77 S0019'15'W L5 1639 N1228'301W L6 53.87 N04'34'26 W L7 3272 N451321'E L5 931 N35V9'191 L9 19.33 557'42'03'E CURVE TABLE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA Cl 101.99 410.28 141(39. C2 110.69 440. 25 1424.17' C3 239.27 410.28 3374'63. C4 7.88 440.28 1121'32' C5 10161 440.28 1372'45' MERIDIAN DEED GRAPHIC SCALE 0 25 50 100 L' (IN FEET) 1 inch - 50 1l. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF REZONE THAT PORTION OF PARCEL B, CITY OF TUKIILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER L06-05, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDER'S FILE NUMBER 20061025900010, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL B; THENCE N 00.50'36T E ALONG THE WEST MARGIN OF SAID PARCEL B. 179.83 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF SAID UNE; THENCE N 67'26'39" E, 37.09 FEET; 'THENCE N 76'32'15" E, 67.22 FEET; THENCE N 7113'40. E, 69.36 FEET; THENCE S 89'02'02- E, 50.10 FEET; THENCE N 51'06'45' E, 37.62 FEET; THENCE N 45'13'21- E, 32.72 FEET; THENCE N 35'09'19' E, 9.51 FEET; THENCE S 57'42'03" E, 19.33 FEET 10 A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID PARCEL B, AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE, SAID MARGIN BEING A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 440.28 FEET, SAID POINT BEARING N 57'42'03' W FROM ITS RADIUS, AND LYING NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1.01'32', AN ARC DISTANCE OF 7.88 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL A OF SAID CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY UNE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER L06-05 THEREOF. AREA OF SAID PARCEL B LYING SOUTHERLY OF SAID LINE CONTAINS 57,456.2 SQUARE FEET. SURVEY IN THE: S.E. 1/4. S.W. 1/4 SEC. 26 TWP. 23N.. RGE. 4E.. W.M. EXHIBIT MAP Tukwila View Estates, LLC 17301 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila, WA EMERALD LAND SURVEYING, INC. PO DOLL 13894 MILL CREEK, WA 98082 PH. (428) 359-71911 DRAWN SY, HMI, CHECKED, BLE PROJECT: 06472 DATE, 10/30/18 SHEET 1 OF 1 RECEIVED NOV 06 2018 VICINITY MAP r L5 I9'-0 26,0° LDR ZONE AREA 86,172.6 SF PARGEL B CITY OF TUKWILA BLA LO6-05 APN 262304-1135 ® 25-0' ® 1-5 ACCESSORY PARK INO ASPHALT SETBACK L5 1I 25'-0' PARCEL A CITY OF TUKWILA BLA LO6—O5 APN 262304-1024 J L ACCESS EASEMENT PER AFN 1501210283. — —. 7 I 1 1 1 \ \ \ \ 1 1 \ 1 1 1 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION REZONE TO TUG —GO THAT PORTION OF PARCEL B, CITY OF TUKWILA BOUDARY LINE AD.USTHENT NINEER L06-05, RECORDED UM2E12 KING COUNTY RECORDERS FILE NR•EER 20061025900010, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, Y V�.MINBTON, LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: 5E6I1+1IN6 AT THE SOUTWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 6 THENCE N 00'5036' E ALONG THE WEST MARGIN OF SAID PARCEL 5, 11983 FEET TO THE BE6INNI56 OF SAID LINE; THENCE N 61'2634' E, 37.04 FEET; THENCE N 16'3215' E, 67.22 FEET; THENCE N 7113'40' E, 6936 FEET; THENCE 5 59'0202' E, 50.10 FEET; THRICE N 51.06'45" E, 3162 FEET; THENCE N 45'1371' E, 32.12 FEET; THENCE N 35'0419' E, 951 9MT; THENCE 5 57'42'03" E, 1933 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION 3TH THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID PARCEL 5, AND THE TERMINIS OF SAID LINE, SAID MAR61N BEIN6 A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 44028 FEET, SAID POINT BEAFUN6 N 57'42103° W FROM ITS RADIUS, AND LYING NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE TH♦RLWH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1'0132', AN ARC DISTANI6E OF 130 FEET FROM THE 501JT VESTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL A OF SAID CITY OF 11514LA BOUNDARY LINE AD.UST E NT HAVER L06-05 TH6RFnF. AREA OF SAID PARCEL B LYING SWUTNStLY OF SAID LINE CONTAINS 51,4562 52UARE FEET. RECEIVED NOV 1 20111 Development Q a 1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS 301 SOUTHCENTER PARKWA TUKWILA, WA 98188 Q N 0 0 Z J a— w Al n CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & ZONING MAP CHANGE APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONL Y Planner: File Number: L / t—h /0.7 Application Complete Date: Project File Number: /- / G_g&1�/ a Application Incomplete Date: Other File Numbers: This application requires public notice. Please refer to Public Notice Materials section of the application checklist. NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: 75Ii “l, %Y 1/ lew f- S Adz; LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. ) 7301 S aL-!'hce.., /— R-�4,7 Lt1/4 LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). Pry,ge-/ 7 cicc,u..'tL ZGZ3G4/-3S-Go DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: 6t (Pec./cc_— /ylaict p Address: / / 7 as! ./-0 0 ,1s .Sf Z Q , se,..,. i 1/' t;{1 95'IU Z Phone: ?06"S'/ 9 6 ti FAX: ZOG " 5V5--Y5.1.-Z E-mail: 8'c, ,'/. N ,i Signature: Date: 1//6 //Y Page 4 of 6 RECEIVED NOV 06 2018 Community Development A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Existing: LDR Proposed: TUC-Comercial Corridor to 30 feet past toe of slope B. ZONING DESIGNATION: Existing: L D R Proposed: TUC-Comercial Corridor to 30 feet past toe of slope C. LAND USE(S): Existing: vacant land Proposed: vacant land (for proposed changes in land use designations or rezones) \\dcptstorc\City Common\Tcri\Rcvisions In Progress\Zoning Codc Amcnd-Jan2011.docx RECEIVED NOV 0 6 2018 Community Development