The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit PL18-0093 - FIRE STATION 51 PARKING - SPECIAL PERMISSIONFIRE STATION 51 PARKING 3523049008 PARENT FILE PL18-0093 THIS FILE L18-0109 SPECIAL PERMISSION/ADM PARKING VARIANCE City of Tukwila Department of Community Development - Jack Pace, Director Affidavit of Distribution Project Name: FIRE STATION 51 PARKING Project Number: PL18-0093 Associated File Number(s): L18-0109 Date Mailed: 12/10/2018 Mailing requested by: LYNN MIRANDA Mailer's signature: SM ❑ Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet ❑ Board of Appeals Agenda Packet ❑ Determination of Non -Significance ❑ Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice ❑ Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance ❑ Notice of Action ❑ Notice of Application Parties of Record: Allan Ekberg, Mayor ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit ® Notice of Decision ❑ Notice of Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Public Meeting ❑ Official Notice ❑ Other: SEPA CHECKLIST ❑ Shoreline Mgmt Permit ❑ Short Subdivision Agenda tGENCY LABELS v1t2-I /S 5 ❑ Clerk Office — Ana Le PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS need to go to Ana to include in Digital Records Center ❑ US Corps of Engineers ❑ Federal HWY Admin ❑ Federal Transit Admin, Region 10 ❑ Dept of Fish & Wildlife Section 1 FEDERAL AGENCIES ❑ US Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.) ❑ US Dept of HUD ❑ National Marine Fisheries Service Section 2 WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ❑ Office of Archaeology 0 Dept of Social & Health Services ❑ Transportation Department (WSDOT NW) ❑ Dept of Ecology NW Regional Office, Shoreland Div. ❑ Dept of Natural Resources SHORELINE NOD REQUIRES RETURN RECEIPT ❑ Office of the Governor 0 Dept of Ecology, SEPA **Send Electronically ❑ WA State Department of Commerce (formerly Community Dev) 0 Office of Attorney General ❑ WA Fisheries & Wildlife, MillCreek Office 0 Office of Hearing Examiner ❑ WA Fisheries & Wildlife, Larry Fisher, 1775 12th Ave NW Ste 201, Issaquah WA 98027 ❑ KC Boundary Review Board ❑ Fire District # 11 ❑ Fire District # 2 ❑ KC Wastewater Treatment Div KC Dept of Parks & Recreation KC Assessor's Office KC Watershed Coordination WRIA 9 Section 3 KING COUNTY AGENCIES ❑ Health Department ❑ Port of Seattle ❑ KC Dev & Environmental Services-SEPA Info Center ❑ KC Metro Transit Div-SEPA Official, Environmental Planning ❑ KC Dept of Natural Resources ❑ KC Dept of Natural Resources, Andy Levesque ❑ KC Public Library System ❑ Tukwila Library ❑ Renton Library ❑ Kent Library ❑ Seattle Library Section 4 SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES ❑ Westfield Mall Library ❑ Tukwila School District ❑ Highline School District ❑ Seattle School District ❑ Renton School District ❑ Century Link ❑ Seattle City Light ❑ Puget Sound Energy ❑ Highline Water District ❑ Seattle Planning &Dev/Water Dept ❑ Comcast Section 5 UTILITIES ❑ BP Olympic Pipeline ❑ Val-Vue Sewer District ❑ Water District # 20 ❑ Water District # 125 ❑ City of Renton Public Works ❑ Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge Sewer/Water Dist ❑ Seattle Public Utilities 0 Waste Management O Cascade Water Alliance O Tukwila City Departments ❑ Public Works ❑ Police ❑ Planning El Parks & Rec ❑ City Clerk (PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS) O Fire ❑ Finance ❑ Building ❑ Mayor Section 6 CITY AGENCIES ❑ Kent Planning Dept ❑ Renton Planning Dept ❑ City of SeaTac ❑ City of Burien ❑ City of Seattle ❑ Strategic Planning *Notice of all Seattle Related Projects Section 7 OTHER * send notice of all applications on Green/Duwamish River ❑ Duwamish River Clean Up Coalition * ❑ Muckleshoot Indian Tribe * O *Cultural Resources ❑ *Fisheries Program ❑ *Wildlife Program ❑ Duwamish Indian Tribe * ❑ People for Puget Sound * LOCAL AGENCIES ❑ Puget Sound Clean Air Agency ❑ Sound Transit/SEPA ❑ Puget Sound Regional Council ❑ Washington Environmental Council ❑ Futurewise ❑ Puget SoundKeeper ❑ SW KC Chamber of Commerce ❑ Tukwila Historical Society** ** send notices for all Tukwila projects which require public notice — via email to: tukwilahistsociety@tukwilahistory.org and rcwieser@comcast.net 0 Seattle Times Section 8 MEDIA ❑ Highline Times 0 South County Journal ❑ City of Tukwila Website W:\\Planning\Development Review Manual\LU Application Review Process\Public Notice Procedures\Mailing\Agency Checklist Public Notice Mailings SEPA MAILINGS (Comment period starts on date of mailing) Notice of Application posted on site and mailed to: Department of Ecology (send checklist with Notice of Application) Applicant other agencies as necessary including Tribes property owners and tenants within 500 feet KC Transit Division - SEPA_Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand. SEPA Determination mailed to: Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE at the time of SEPA determination: SEPA Determination Staff report SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be posted on site and mailed to: applicant property owners residents within 500 feet of subject property DOE's NW Regional Office Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program agencies with jurisdiction Comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The Notice of Application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the Notice of Application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Notice of Decision must be mailed within 8 days of decision to: Department of Ecology Shorelands Section, NW Regional Office Notice to DOE must be by return receipt requested State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the notice of decision and staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination 21-day appeal period begins date of filing with DOE Include these Documents_ to DOE and Attorney General: One complete packet should also be sent to Muckleshoot Indian Tribe if they commented on the project during comment period. Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Decision (Signed by Director) Shoreline Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) - Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements - Cross -sections of site with structures & shoreline - Grading Plan - Vicinity map SEPA determination (Signed by Director) SEPA Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) W:\\Planning\Development Review Manual\LU Application Review Process\Public Notice Procedures\Mailing\Agency Checklist HANDLING 1, 2 1, 2 1, 2 RACHEL BIANCHI RACHEL.BIANCHI@TUKWILAWA.GOV BRANDON.MILES@TUKWILAWA.GOV 1 Christie.Most@kingcounty.gov 1 ANA.LE@TUKWILAWA.GOV 1 tukwilahistsociety@tukwilahistory.org 1 rcwieser@comcast.net 1 NoD 2 STAFF REPORT HARD COPY (INTEROFFICE MAIL) 0400 File Number City of Tukwila Department of Community Development L18-0109 Special Permission Parking Determination LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: C Building { Planning fl Public Works ire Dept. LI Police Dept. fl Parks/Rec Project: Fire Station 51 Address: 17951 Southcenter Parkway Date transmitted: 11.19.18 Response requested by: 12.3.18 Staff coordinator: Lynn Miranda Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Plan check date: 4 ' �'d Comments prepared by: Update date: TO: City of '. ukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor Department of Community Development - Jack Pace, Director December 10, 2018 NOTICE OF DECISION SPECIAL PERMISSION PARKING DETERMINATION Rachel Bianchi, Applicant/Owner King County Department of Assessments This letter serves as a Notice of Decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approval. Project File Number: Applicant: Type of Permit Applied for: Project Description: Location: Associated Files: Comprehensive Plan Designation/Zoning District: I. PROJECT INFORMATION L18-0109, Special Permission from the Director Rachel Bianchi, Deputy City Administrator, City of Tukwila Special permission from the Director. Special permission application for a parking standard determination for uses not specified (TMC 18.56.100) 17951 Southcenter Parkway King County Parcel # 3523049008 and 3523049040 D18-0321 Building Permit Tukwila South Overlay (TSO) II. DECISION SEPA Determination: Exempt from SEPA, per TMC 18.21.04.110.A.3 exempting office and commercial buildings up to 12,000 square feet in size. Decision on Substantive Permit: The Community Development Director has determined that the special permission application does comply with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved a minimum of 9 vehicle parking stalls and 2 bicycle stalls for Fire Station 51. III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 2 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code § 18.104.010. Other land use applications related to this project may still be pending. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 No administrative appeal of a DNS or an EIS is permitted. One administrative appeal to the Hearing Examiner of the Decision on the Permit itself is permitted. A party who is not satisfied with the outcome of the administrative appeal process may file an appeal in King County Superior Court from the Hearing Examiner decision. IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING In order to appeal the Community Development Director's decision on the Permit Application, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 14-days of the issuance of this Decision, that is by December 20, 2018. The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code 18.116. All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials MUST include: 1. The name of the appealing party. 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing parry's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision, including any specific challenge to an MDNS. 4. The Notice of Appeal shall identify (a) the specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; (b) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and (c) the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. 5. Appeal fee per the current fee schedule, additional hourly charges may apply. In addition all hearing examiner costs will be passed through to the appellant. V. APPEAL HEARINGS PROCESS Any administrative appeal regarding the Permit shall be conducted as an open record hearing before the Hearing Examiner based on the testimony and documentary evidence presented at the open record hearing. The Hearing Examiner decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. Any party wishing to challenge the Hearing Examiner decision on this application must file an appeal pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW 36.70C. An appeal challenging a DNS, an MDNS or an EIS may be included in such an appeal. If no appeal of the Hearing Examiner decision is properly filed in Superior Court within such time limit, the Decision on this permit will be final. The City's decision to issue a DNS, an MDNS or an EIS is final for this permit and any other pending permit applications for the development of the subject property. VI. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Lynn Miranda, who may be contacted at 206.433.7162 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contact the King County Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. \I Jack P.:e, Director Depa lent of Community Development City of Tukwila City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor Department of Community Development - Jack Pace, Director Staff Report to the Director Special Permission: Parking Determination Prepared December 10, 2018 File Number: L18-0109 Applicant and Property Owner: Rachel Bianchi, Deputy City Administrator for the City of Tukwila Request: Parking Determination for Relocation of Fire Station #51. Location: 17951 Southcenter Parkway Associated Files: D18-0321 SEPA Determination: Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Designation: SEPA Exempt Tukwila South Overlay (TSO) Staff: Lynn Miranda, AICP, Senior Planner Attachments: A. Application for Special Permission received October 26, 2018 B. Letter from Rachel Bianchi (Deputy City Administrator) and Jay Wittwer (Fire Chief) dated October 22, 2018 C. Architectural Site Plan received November 8, 2018 D. Floor Plan, sheet A101, dated October 15, 2018 E. Area Summary dated November 21, 2018 FINDINGS Project Description The City is relocating Fire Station #51 from Andover Park East to 17951 Southcenter Parkway, King County Parcels # 3523049008 and 3523049040. The new station will be located on a 5.67-acre site that is currently vacant. The proposed Fire Station is a structure of approximately 11,240 square feet in 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 size that includes living quarters and support spaces, gear storage, training room, station offices, an apparatus bay, and other associated spaces for the Fire Department. The building will be used for 3-7 on -duty personnel, as well occasional use by the public, meetings by other City employees, or other irregular business activities. The building is not proposed to be used for large meetings or events. Currently, Fire Station #51 is used as the headquarters for the City's Fire Department, however, the headquarter functions will move to the relocated Fire Station #52 located at City Hall. The proposed design for the fire station shows 12 secure parking spaces in the rear of the building (staff parking), and 4 parking spaces in the front of the building (public parking), for a total of 16 parking spaces. Request The applicant is requesting a special determination for required off-street parking for the proposed relocated Fire Station #51. The Off-street Parking Regulations Chapter of the City's Zoning Code (TMC 18.56) specifies that a required number of parking and bicycle spaces must be provided for all uses (Required Number of Parking Spaces - TMC 18.56.050). The Purpose section of the Chapter states that the regulations are to "provide for adequate, convenient, and safe off-street parking and loading areas for the different land uses". When those uses are not specified, the Director of Community Development must specify the requirements of the off-street parking facilities. Further, the determination shall be based upon the requirement for the most comparable use specified in the Off -Street Parking Chapter of the Zoning Code (Uses Not Specified — TMC 18.56.100.) ANALYSIS Vehicle Parking Spaces As stated above, the requirements for off-street parking must be determined based upon the most comparable use specified in the Off -Street Parking Chapter of the Zoning Code (Uses Not Specified — TMC 18.56.100.). This section provides an analysis of parking requirements for comparable uses, as well as an analysis of the ITE parking manual, comparable fire stations, and other nearby jurisdictions. The proposed station will be subject to the City's Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) program. The City provides incentives to encourage its employees to walk, bike, carpool and take transit, which is intended to reduce the vehicle trip generation and therefore the parking demand. However, this was not included in this parking analysis. Comparable Uses: Much of the building space is used for sleeping bunks and bathrooms for fire personnel. The building is not a typical office setting but includes some office space for use by on -shift fire fighters. The building is not intended for public assembly or frequent public use. The space may occasionally be used by the public for blood pressure tests, or meetings with other government employees. Other spaces in the building include physical training space, gear storage, kitchen, and a shop. The overall building is 11,240 sq. ft. (7,745 if excluding the apparatus bay). The floor plan (attachment D) and area summary (Attachment E) depict a breakdown of the building by individual rooms. Page 2 of 5 12/06/2018 Based on Figure 18-7 Required Number of Parking Spaces for Automobiles and Bicycles of the Tukwila Municipal Code, no listed uses are directly interchangeable to the Fire Station use. The most comparable uses that are listed in the parking table are hospitals and office use. Hospital was chosen as a comparable use because the parking demand for this fire station is dependent on the available beds on site, similar to a hospital. While the fire station includes ancillary spaces, such as a gym, vehicle bays, and storage, the primary driver for parking demand will be the living quarters, as the number of available beds is consistent with the maximum number of on -duty personnel at a given time. The applicant stated that all shift personnel are on 48-hour shifts, and there will no additional staff working shifts during the day. The applicant expects up to 6 staff members at a time in the future, and as such the building will provide 6 beds. Table 18-7 requires hospitals to provide 1 parking space for each bed; the fire station provides 6 beds and would require 6 parking stalls using this standard. Aside from on -site fire personnel using beds, there may be additional parking demand at the fire station that should be accounted for. While the applicant stated that the office space is intended to be used for on -site personnel, it is possible that it will be used for the occasional meeting with the public or other City employees. For office uses, Table 18-7 requires 3 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of usable floor area. The floor plan of the station shows 845 sq. ft. of total office space, which would amount to 3 required spaces. The applicant stated that some public visitors may be anticipated for reasons such as blood pressure checks, or meetings with other city employees. However, a letter provided by the applicant (Attachment B) stated that on -duty firefighters observed an average of only approximately four public visits per week, requiring very little additional parking. Using Hospital and Office as comparable uses, the parking demand can be summarized as follows: Comparable Use Parking Requirement Fire Station #51 Required Spaces Hospital 1 per bed 6 beds 6 spaces Office 1 per 1,000 square feet 845 square feet* 3 spaces Total Required: 9 spaces. Total Proposed: 16 spaces. *Includes offices, entry vestibule, corridors, and bathroom. ITE Manual: Staff consulted the ITE Parking Generation Manual, 4th Edition, for a usable parking standard. However, the ITE Manual does not include Fire Station as a land use. Again, staff used the most comparable land use for analysis, which was Government Office Building. During peak periods, the parking demand for this use is 0.88 vehicles per employee. The proposed Fire Station #51 will have a maximum number of 7 employees at a given time, which would result in a demand for 7 parking spaces. Comparable Fire Stations and Nearby Jurisdictions: While the comparable uses provide a metric for anticipated parking demand, it may not perfectly apply Page 3 of 5 12/06/2018 for the specific parking demands required by a Fire Station. To draw comparison, the applicant provided an analysis of parking at existing fire stations compared to the proposed Fire Station #51. Location Proposed Fire Station #51 Fire Station # 52 — Tukwila Hill Fire Station #53 — Allentown Fire Station #54 — Foster High School Number of on duty personnel 3-4 3-4 3-4 6 Max. number of personnel on site for shift change 6-7 6-7 8 12 Total parking stalls provided 16 5 13 5 The chart above shows that the proposed station #51 provides more total stalls than three other stations in the City. In addition, the ratio of stalls to maximum number of personnel for the proposed Station #51 is 2.3, which is greater than the other examples, which are 0.7, 1.6, and 0.4, respectively. Staff also researched other local jurisdictions' parking requirements for a comparable fire station parking standard. Most cities do not specify a standard for fire stations and defer to a similar process as the City of Tukwila. For example, the cities of Kent, Burien, Newcastle, Renton, Des Moines, Fife, Maple Valley, Sammamish, and Auburn, do not specify a standard and determine parking standards on a case -by -case basis. Other cities include comparable parking standards as follows: City Type of Use Parking Standard Calculation for Proposed Fire Station #51 SeaTac (SMC 15.455.12) Fire Facility 1 per Employee, Plus 1 per 100 sf of office area 16 Issaquah (IMC 18.090.050) Fire Station 1 per 300 sq. ft. GFA 26* *GFA excludes the Apparatus Bay The comparison to parking standards from SeaTac and Issaquah show that the parking demand for proposed Fire Station 51 would be 16-26 spaces. The proposed station would have few employees and provide limited functions, so can be assumed that the parking demand may be less than other fire stations (such as a headquarters). Bicycle Parking The City of Tukwila requires bicycle parking stalls based on the use and number of parking stalls. For both the Hospital and Office land uses, 1 bicycle space per 50 parking stalls is required, with a minimum of 2 spaces. Because the fire station has less than 50 parking stalls, 2 bicycles spaces are required. Page 4 of 5 I2/06/20I 8 CONCLUSIONS 1. The site plan (Attachment C) for Fire Station 51 shows that 16 parking stalls will be provided on the site; 12 secured stalls in the west and north portion of the site (staff parking), and 4 stalls in the front of the building (public parking). In addition, an unofficial parking location on the back apron can be used during a major event or emergency. 2. Staff reviewed four methods of determining the parking demand at the proposed station: comparable uses, the ITE Parking Generation manual, a comparison of other jurisdictions parking requirements, and a comparison of parking provided at other fire stations in the city. 3. The analysis of comparable uses shows that a minimum of 9 spaces should be required at Fire Station 51. Using the ITE Parking Generation Manual, 7 spaces would be required. Using standards from other jurisdictions would require a range of 16-26 required spaces. Lastly, a comparison to other Tukwila fire stations shows 5 to 13 spaces; less than the proposed facility. 4. Based on this evaluation, the parking standard for comparable uses (9 spaces) should be used to determine the minimum number of parking spaces for Fire Station 51. Hospital is an appropriate comparable use because the parking demand for this fire station is dependent on the available beds on site, similar to a hospital. Additional parking demand at the fire station may be generated by the on -site office space. While it is intended to be used for on -site personnel, it is possible that it will be used for the occasional meeting with the public or other City employees. By providing 16 vehicle spaces, the proposal would meet a required minimum of 9 vehicle spaces. Given that the building will be staffed by 3-7 on -duty personnel and there will be minimal use by the general public, 16-26 spaces (using the standards of other jurisdictions) would be more than required for this station. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Director require a minimum of 9 vehicle parking stalls and 2 bicycle stalls for Fire Station 51. Page 5 of 5 12/06/2018 Attachment A CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 SPECIAL PERMISSION - DIRECTOR APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type: P-SP Planner: File Number: ;_ ; << -- • .. , J Application Complete Date: Project File Number: t'; 1 .- 00 7 - Application Incomplete Date: Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT Fire Station 51 Parking Determination BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Construction of new (less than 12,000 square feet) fire station. LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 17951 Southcenter Pkwy LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 3523049008 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Rachel Bianchi, Deputy City Adminstator Address:Tukwila City Hall; 6200 Southcenter Blvd; Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: (206) 454-7566 FAX: E-mail•i: chi@Tukwilawa.gov Signature: Date: 10/26/2018 \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\Revisions In Prog ess‘Special Permission Director -March 2011.docx Attachment B City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor Mayor's Office - David Cline, City Administrator October 22, 2018 Mr. Jack Pace City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Parking Determination for Proposed Fire Station #51 Dear Jack: Pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) 18.56.100 the City of Tukwila (City) is requesting a determination for the required number of parking stalls for the City's relocated Fire Station #51 to Tukwila South, to be located at S. 180th Street and Southcenter Parkway. The facility has unique operational functions that are not outlined in Figure 18-7 of the TMC. In 2016, Tukwila voters approved Proposition #1, a bond measure, which will make significant investment in public safety infrastructure within the City. As part of the public safety improvements, the City is relocating Fire Station #51 from Andover Park East to the new location in Tukwila South. The new location will provide superior emergency access within the Southcenter and Tukwila Valley South areas, as well as prepare the City for the expected growth in the emerging Tukwila South neighborhood. Fire Station #51 currently is the headquarters for the City's Fire Department. The headquarters functions will move to the relocated Fire Station #52 on the City Hall campus. For the required parking for new Fire Station #51 Mayor's Office staff and the Fire Chief reviewed the parking demand at stations the existing fire stations #52, #53, and #54. Proposed Fire Station #51 Existing Fire Station #52 Fire Station #53 Fire Station #54 Location Southcenter District/Tukwila South Tukwila Hill Allentown Near Foster High School Number of on duty personal. 3-4 3-4 3-4 6 Maximum number of personal on site for shift change. 6-7 6-7 8 12 Total Parking Stalls Provided 16 5 13 (many of these stalls are hardly 5 Tukwila City Hall • 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, WA 98188 • 206-433-1800 • Website: TukwilaWA.gov Proposed Fire Station #51 Parking Determination October 22, 2018 Page 2 used on a daily basis). Attached is a draft site map showing proposed Fire Station #51. On duty fire personnel will be able to park their private vehicles in the rear of the building in the secure area. These stalls allow for sufficient parking for overlap during shift change. Four public parking stalls will be provided in the front of the building. These parking stalls would be used for the public for visits for blood pressure checks, meetings by other City employees, or other irregular business activities at the fire house. It is important to note that this fire station will not have large meetings or public gatherings. No publicly - accessible meeting rooms are included in the design. Public visitors are expected for blood pressure checks, though the location of this facility will not attract as many visitors as stations located in neighborhoods. From the observations of on -duty firefighters, these average approximately four per week, and the proposed number of public parking stalls are more than sufficient to meet this demand. It is important that the City not add parking that would not be unnecessary and only used for an occasional event that would trigger a higher parking demand. Unofficial parking on the back apron during a major event is available in the rear of the building. This would only be contemplated for a major emergency mobilization. In conclusion, the Mayor's Office and Fire Department recommend that new Fire Station #51 should have at least eight parking stalls to accommodate shift changes and a visiting command vehicle, as well as other parking demand throughout the day. As you can see, the site is proposed to have 16 total parking stalls, which allows for public parking but above what is needed for the fire station. Sincerely, Rachel Bianchi Deputy City Administrator Jay Wittwer Fire Chief Phone: 206-433-1800 • Email: Mayor@TukwilaWA.gov • Website: TukwilaWA.gov Mar OWN r r<VE„.5114M. • Attachment C -^ I c rg-Oro9 NOV ' S 201 T►.YE E..Em,l. P LIMINAftY I NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. A002; WEINSTEINA+U Attachment E TUKWILA FIRE STATION 51: AREA SUMMARY Number Room Area (sq ft) 101 Entry Vestibule 166 102 ADA WC 64 104 Great Room 742 105 Electric Room 123 106 Physical Training 689 107 Station Office 323 108 Captain's Office 138 111 Bath 93 112 Bunk 69 113 Bath 93 114 Bunk 69 115 Bath 93 116 Bunk 69 117 Laundry/Janitor 105 118 Bunk 69 120 Bunk 69 121 Bunk 69 122 Receiving 110 125 WC 55 126 Decon 153 127 Comm 96 128 Gear Wash 135 129 Gear Storage 483 130 Apparatus Bay 3495 132 EMS 101 133 Mechanical 216 134 Shop 150 137 SCBA 198 138 Storage 151 201 Storage 322 202 Mechanical Platform 461 203 Mechanical Porch 273 Net square footage (w/o App Bay) Net Square footage (w/ App Bay) Gross Square footage (w/o App Bay) Gross Square footage (w/App Bay) 7,007 10,502 7,745 11,240 Tukwila Fire Station 51 11/21/18 City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor Department of Community Development - Jack Pace, Director December 7, 2018 Rachel Bianchi, Deputy City Administrator City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Fire Station 51 SEPA Exemption Dear Ms. Bianchi: The purpose of this letter is to confirm exemption under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for the need to submit a SEPA checklist to the City. The City of Tukwila (City) is proposing to construct an 11,240 square foot fire station at 17951 Southcenter Parkway (King County Parcel #352304-9008). Cut and fill for the project is proposed to be less than 500 cubic yards. Pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code 21.04.110, the project is exempt from SEPA because the square footage of the building is less than 12,000 square feet and the estimate cut fill is less than 500 cubic yards. It should also be noted that in July of 2005 the City issued a FINAL Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Tukwila South Project. As part of the EIS the City did consider the future construction of 14 million square feet of retail, residential, industrial, and office in the Tukwila South area (where the proposed Fire Station 51 is located). Even if the Fire Station was above the categorical exemptions outlined above, the project would have already complied with SEPA. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, eV--e-- ck Pace DCD Director SEPA Responsible Official Tukwila City Hall • 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, WA 98188 • 206-433-1800 • Website: TukwilaWA.gov 0400 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number L18-0109 Special Permission Parking Determination LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: Building U Planning 01 Public Works U Fire Dept. U Police Dept. n Parks/Rec Project: Fire Station 51 Address: 17951 Southcenter Parkway Date transmitted: 11.19.18 Response requested by: 12.3.18 Staff coordinator: Lynn Miranda Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Plan check date: Comments Update date: n 20-/ '� prepared by: 0400 RECEI'. ..a File Number City of Tukwila Deportment of Community Development NOV 19 2018 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS L18-0109 Special Permission Parking Determination LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: Building in Planning ublic Works ❑l Fire Dept. Police Dept. 'D Parks/Rec Project: Fire Station 51 Address: 17951 Southcenter Parkway Date transmitted: 11.19.18 Response requested by: 12.3.18 Staff coordinator: Lynn Miranda Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) (fu6ticGietts 1-05 n(3 (L6 V I E (I) Co hleri /.rcS Plan check date: Comments Update date: prepared by: CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 SPECIAL PERMISSION - DIRECTOR APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type: P-SP Planner: File Number: L 1 K— 0/ D 9 Application Complete Date: Project File Number: in /8 _ 0Q93 Application Incomplete Date: Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: ire Station 51 Parking Determination BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Construction of new (less than 12,000 square feet) fire station. LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 17951 Southcenter Pkwy LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 3523049008 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Rachel Bianchi, Deputy City Adminstator Address:Tukwila City Hall; 6200 Southcenter Blvd; Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: (206) 454-7566 E-mail. ►eta chi@Tukwilawa.gov 0% Signature: _ Date: 10/26/2018 FAX: • \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\Revisions In Progress\Special Permission Director -March 2011.docx CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OF WASHINGTON ss COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its etwloyees, agents, engineers, c ntracto or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at 4i 51 J ) L }'� t. (N t ✓ f � r,� f for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. / 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees,II-- LL j V4 LI 111 (city), "� A' (state), on Af 't 11Lit' ✓ C 2 EXECUTED at , 20 A di) (Print Name) ``''i f" / bh, Addr ss Li 51 i (Pho/ Numb (Signature) On this day personally appeared before me ..?;rie—A vtd.o nr1A i Lt.o to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged th she signed the same purposes mentioned therein. • I SUBSCRIBED AND SWcIt&N TO BEFORE ME ON THIS O DAY OF \‘‘‘ rlll •� gERGDtklit „till, -4.•& ' �gg�t)N '�itt 04, / 0g0 -- $ iV ' . y Z .� AuB%)�q x 1/11, OF�W 14N9 \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\Revis,o1nss in'Pro�s\Special Permission Director -March 2011.docx er voluntary act and deed for the uses and N ov e r-Y) e , 20 l 8 fn �� d NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the to of Washington Do.ri M mbe41 Or -SW' residing at j a.C.o1M My Commission expires on ) a - 19 - 1 `1 y>D1fo1m.myna YMIry WR ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN • none KN.. COI cor an wn AFAR APRON FRONT A,ROM 7- DWAIN .M.Lw.mMICE TYPOS _.. yallnafr, aanM fan Ina. lir MAN WWI Su..arrE (t 1 Tax NFL n1UD7111! (OEMERATOR, NEl TRASH ENCLOSURE) t wn.E EV j 1`4• IDACREDROR /L • NVAh Oalva SWIM Er EEC O+moT c MO. .onw.e i ey CET(6E'R tot !Mt 1fr• Is uaS .. 111111.41 au RECEIVED NOV 08 2018 Community Development L,/e-O/o9 GINLIAL MID MS U.mfI.F MAMf EM ' Myn.ai. Snt 11.e011.106 eNtrotrT 1,031.12 COMM.. Mncannya acunl.rtn¢ Row Da. Yu Tukwila Fire Station 51 Ma. w.mmm Aw MAIM. • Mon D.y..ILC 11m W.YnAn le«.YIAMIT T 101 .n®e 291 M1121E PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION bay 1DC%paaw.RapTev ORee NW1E Shut 1 . ARCHITECTURAL SITE AUb A002 WE I N 5 T E IN A+ U ARCHITECTS+URBAN DESIGNERS TUKWILA FIRE STATION 51 3523049040 PARENT FILE PL18-0093 THIS FILE L19-0101 SPECIAL PERMISSION/SENSITIVE AREAS City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor -,---- I- - - - - - - -- -- \ I ----- II I 1 Department of Community Development - Jack Pace, Director NOTICE OF DECISION March 6, 2020 TO: Rachel Bianchi, Applicant This letter serves as a Notice of Decision and is issued pursuant toTMC 18.104.170 on thefollowing project and permit approval. I. PROJECT INFORMATION FILE NUMBER: L19-0101 APPLICANT: Rachel Bianchi, City of Tukwila REQUEST: Approval of Special Permission Director —Wetland Buffer Reduction to reduce two Category IV wetland buffers from 50' to 25' and enhance the buffer with native plants in order to construct Fire Station 51. LOCATION: SEPA DETERMINATION: ASSOCIATED FILES: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION/ ZONING DISTRICT: 17951 Southcenter Parkway Parcels 3523049008, 3523049040 SEPA Exempt L18-0109 Special Permission Parking Determination PL18-0093 Project File Tukwila South Overlay (ISO) II. DECISION SEPA Determination: The SEPA Responsible Official has previously determined thatthe project, as proposed, does not create a probable significant environmental impact and issued a Determination of Non -Significance on May 9, 2017. Decision on Substantive Permit: The Community Development Director has determined that the special permission application does comply with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved that application. Tukwila City Hall • 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, WA 98188 • 206-433-1800 • Website: TukwilaWA.gov III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 2 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code §18.104.010. Other land use applications related to this project may still be pending. No administrative appeal of a DNS or an EIS is permitted. One administrative appeal to the Hearing Examiner of the Decision on the Permit itself is permitted. A party who is not satisfied with the outcome of the administrative appeal process may file an appeal in King County Superior Court from the Hearing Examiner decision. IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING In order to appeal the Community Development Director's decision on the Permit Application, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 14-days of the issuance of this Decision; that is, by September 28, 2017. The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code 18.116. All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials MUST include: 1. The name of the appealing party. 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision, including any specific challenge to an MDNS. 4. The Notice of Appeal shall identify (a) the specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; (b) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and (c) the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. 5. Appeal fee per the current fee schedule, additional hourly charges may apply. In addition, all hearing examiner costs will be passed through to the appellant. V. APPEAL HEARINGS PROCESS Any administrative appeal regarding the Permit shall be conducted as an open record hearing before the Hearing Examiner based on the testimony and documentary evidence presented at the open record hearing. The Hearing Examiner decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. Any party wishing to challenge the Hearing Examiner decision on this application must file an appeal pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW 36.70C. An appeal challenging a DNS, an MDNS or an EIS may be included in such an appeal. If no appeal of the Hearing Examiner decision is 2 decision to issue a DNS, an MDNS or an EIS is final for this permit and any other pending permit applications for the development of the subject property. VI. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Lynn Miranda, who may be contacted at 206.431.3670 or Lynn.miranda@Tukwilawa.gov for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contact the KingCountyAssessor's Officeforfurther information regarding property tax valuation changes. Lynn Miranda, AICP, Planning Supervisor Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 3 1908, City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor Department of Community Development - lack Pace, Director STAFF REPORT TO THE DIRECTOR March 2, 2020 FILE NUMBER: L19-0101 APPLICANT: Rachel Bianchi, City of Tukwila REQUEST: Approval of Special Permission Director —Wetland Buffer Reduction to reduce two Category IV wetland buffers from 50' to 25' and enhance the buffer with native plants in order to construct Fire Station 51. LOCATION: 17951 Southcenter Parkway Parcels 3523049008, 3523049040 DETERMINATION: SEPA Exempt COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Tukwila South Overlay (TSO) ZONING DISTRICT: Tukwila South Overlay (TSO) RECOMMENDATION: Approval STAFF: Lynn Miranda, Planning Supervisor ATTACHMENTS: A. Memo: Tukwila Fire Station 51 Wetland Delineation, April 12, 2019 B. Sheet A001 Architectural Full Site Plan, dated 10/15/2018 C. Plan Set, Sheets W001 — W006, dated 12/31/2019 • • FINDINGS PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting Special Permission Director Review approval to reduce the width of the buffers surrounding two Class IV wetlands on a 5.6 acre site by 50 percent, from 50 feet to 25 feet, in order to construct a new fire station approximately 11,240 square feet in size for the City of Tukwila. Earth removal, grading, and construction of the parking lot will occur within the 50-foot buffer surrounding the wetlands, and temporary impacts from minor grading will occur within the outer portion of the proposed 25-foot wetland buffer during construction. A buffer enhancement plan, including restoration and replanting, is proposed in compliance with the City's Environmentally Sensitive Areas regulations (TMC 18.45). Mitigation monitoring will be required for a five-year period. Figure 1. Fire Station #51 Location and Site 11141111 Southcente Pkwy —► , ', BACKGROUND I • - a• .. S180St r •• • The City is relocating Fire Station #51 from Andover Park East to 17951 Southcenter Parkway. A new fire station is proposed to be constructed on two parcels situated west of Southcenter Parkway and east of S. 184th Place. The parcels are undeveloped and approximately 5.7 acres in combined area. A stormwater detention pond (approximately 100,000 square feet in size) is adjacent to the southern boundary of the site, residential development is located to the west of the site at the top of a large, steep hill, and commercial development is located to the north. The proposed project includes parking areasforvisitors and employees, an access driveway, an outdoor generator and solid waste collection area, and stormwater infrastructure (see Attachment B). The facility will be surrounded by fencing and perimeter landscaping. 2 • • The wetland delineation memo prepared by ESA (Attachment A) confirms the presence of two Category IV wetlands in the western part of the parcel (see Figure 2). TMC 18.45.080 describes Category IV wetlands as having the lowest levels of functions and are often heavily disturbed, but still requiring protection. TMC 18.45.080.D requires 50-foot wide buffers for Category IV wetlands. Combined together, the total wetland area is 7,173 square feet in size. Portions ofthe proposed driveway and parking area will intrude into the 50-foot buffer of the Category IV wetlands. Consequently, the applicant has applied fora Type 2 Special Permission from the Director to reduce the required buffer widths for the wetlands in some areas by 50 percent, from 50 feet to 25 feet, in accordance with TMC 18.45.080.F (see Attachment C, Sheet W002). Figure 2. Wetland with 50-Foot Buffer and 10-Foot Building Setback „� f �' / / `\ � / N. / N. .. / �` .�, / `N. / \ / \ .�` \ N. \ i / ��, \ // /\'` \ \ /• / 1 ,'. \\ \ ' / / J k ` �„\4s \ \ \ 1 , , \ \ / / / r j r • t... \ \ / / i t `�\ \ \ '\. f // / / / N. i+ r \ \\ \• The applicant proposes wetland buffer enhancement actions consistent with TMC 18.45.080.F including planting of native species as mitigation for the buffer reductions. A portion of the wetland buffer is proposed to be reduced to less than 25 feet. To maintain the 25-foot buffer, the applicant has designated portions of the wetland area as wetland buffer (approximately 422 square feet identified as "paper fill" area on Attachment C, Sheet W002). To mitigate this impact, the applicant proposes additional enhancements to approximately 1,825 square feet of the adjacent wetland (Attachment C, Sheet W002 & W003). The buffer mitigation and restoration plan has been prepared for the project and submitted with the application materials in accordance with TMC 18.45. 3 DECISION CRITERIA The following section of the report provides an overview of project consistency with applicable criteria in TMC 18.45. TMC 18.45.080.F for variation of standard buffer widths: 1. The Director may reduce the standard wetland buffer only where buffer conditions are currently degraded (due to existing development within the prescribed buffer width, the presence of significant amount of invasive vegetation that impairs buffer function, and/or lack of native vegetation) on a case -by -case basis, provided the remaining buffer is enhanced and the buffer does not contain slopes 15% or greater. 2. Buffer reduction with enhancement may be allowed by the Director as a Type 2 permit with an approved buffer enhancement plan prepared by a qualified wetland biologist, if: a. Additional protection to wetlands will be provided through the implementation of a buffer enhancement plan; b. The existing condition of the buffer is degraded; and c. Buffer enhancement includes, but is not limited to: 1) Planting vegetation that would increase value for fish and wildlife or improve water quality or hydrology; 2) Enhancement of wildlife habitat by incorporating structures that are likely to be used by wildlife 3) Removing non-native plant species and noxious weeds from the buffer area and replanting the area subject to 2.c.1 above. The buffer is currently in a degraded condition. Signs of prior grading and disturbance were observed in the study area. Vegetation is composed primarily of herbaceous species with small patches of scrub -shrub vegetation. In addition, some scrub -shrub vegetation exhibit stunted growth. The project adequately complies with the criteria for varying the standard buffer width. The applicant has provided an adequate buffer enhancement plan. Proposed enhancements include planting vegetation that would improve buffer functions and wildlife habitat and removing non-native invasive species. Plantings include an adequate mix of native trees, shrubs and groundcover. Irrigation will be provided during the first three years while the plantings become established. TMC 18.45.090 Wetland Uses, Alterations, and Mitigation: TMC 18.45.090.A Use or Development. Any use or development allowed is subject to review and approval by the Director. No use or development will occur within the wetland. A fire station and supporting infrastructure are permitted uses in the ISO zoning district. TMC 18.45.090.8.4. Alterations. Alterations to Category IV wetlands are allowed, only where unavoidable and adequate mitigation is carried out in accordance with the standards of TMC Section 18.45.090. The proposed project adequately meets these criteria. The proposed work within the wetland will not have an adverse effect on water quality , fish and wildlife, drainage and/or storm water detention capabilities, or other sensitive areas. The proposal will also not lead to unstable earth conditions, create an erosion hazard, or contribute to scouring actions. TMC 18.45.090.C. Mitigation Sequencing —Applicants shall demonstrate that reasonable efforts have been examined with the intent to avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands and wetland buffers. When an alteration of a wetland or its required buffer is proposed, such alteration shall be avoided, minimized or compensated for in the following order of preference: 4 1. Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action; 2. Minimizing wetland and wetland buffer impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation, by using appropriate technology, or 3. Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment. 4. Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action; 5. Compensating for the impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute resources or environments; and/or, 6. Monitoring the impact and taking appropriate corrective measures. The applicant has demonstrated that reasonable efforts were made to follow mitigation sequencing requirements of TMC 18.45.090.C. TMC 18.45.090.D Wetland Mitigation Plan Content TMC 18.45.090.E states that a mitigation or enhancement plan must be developed and must comply with the standards of mitigation required in TMC Chapter 18.45. Detailed site plans for existing conditions, buffer modifications, buffer enhancement, and planting details for this project have been prepared by The Watershed Company and included in the building permit plan set for Fire Station 51 (Permit #D18-0321, See Attachment C for plan set). The mitigation plan within the 25-foot buffer area includes removal of invasive weeds and adding topsoil, compost, and woodchip mulch to improve the soil prior to planting. Within the wetland enhancement area, invasive plants will be removed and woodchip mulch added to the soil prior to planting. The City's Urban Environmentalist agrees with the proposed plant species and quantity of the proposed mitigation plantings which include a mix of native trees, shrubs and groundcover. The applicant proposed detailed construction sequence and installation details for shrubs, seedlings and bare root plants. The plan set also includes performance standards, a maintenance plan, and a 5-year monitoring program and contingency plan identifying potential courses of action and any corrective measures to be taken to provide for survival and replacement of any plantings during a 5-year establishment period as required by TMC 18.45.090.D.e & f (see Attachment C, Sheet W006). TMC 18.45.090.E Mitigation Standards. Mitigation for alteration to a Category IV wetland will be 1:5:1 for creation or re-establishment, 3:1 for rehabilitation or 6:1 for enhancement. The proposed work proposes to rehabilitate 1,825 square feet of wetland for appropriating 422 square feet of adjacent area as wetland buffer - more than required by the 3:1 ratio. CONCLUSIONS 1. The proposed use of the site as a fire station and wetland buffer enhancement site are permitted uses in the ISO zoning district. 2. The wetlands are classified as Category IV wetlands requiring a 50-foot wide buffer. 3. The proposal meets the criteria for approval of a variation to the standard wetland buffer width and buffer enhancement is proposed to mitigate for the request for a 50% reduction in buffer width. Buffer enhancement will include removal of invasive weeds, soil improvements and the addition of native vegetation. 4. The existing condition of the wetland buffer is degraded, and the proposed work will improve wildlife habitat through the removal of invasive species within the 25-foot wetland buffer and wetland enhancement areas. 5 5. The proposed work within the wetland will not have an adverse effect on water quality , fish and wildlife, drainage and/or storm water detention capabilities, or other sensitive areas. The proposal will also not lead to unstable earth conditions, create an erosion hazard, or contribute to scouring actions. Adequate mitigation is provided in accordance with TMC 18.45.090. 6. The applicant has demonstrated that reasonable efforts were made to follow mitigation sequencing requirements. 7. The project includes performance standards and a 5-year mitigation monitoring and maintenance plan consistent with TMC 18.45.090.D. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Special Permission permit to reduce wetland buffer widths. INFORMATION The City prefers mechanical weed control methods in the wetland and wetland buffer, and herbicide will only be used if deemed absolutely necessary. Herbicide use is permitted only with prior approval by the City's Urban Environmentalist. Dates, products, rates, and certified applicant information will be required prior to use. 6 17 ESA Attachtient A memorandum 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 206.789.9658 phone 206.789.9684 fax date April 12, 2019 to Andrea Cummins, City of Tukwila from Christina Hersum and Teresa Vanderburg, PWS subject Tukwila Fire Station 51 Wetland Delineation, Tukwila, WA attached Figures, Photos, Wetland Rating Forms, Data Plot Sheets www.esassoc.com This memorandum summarizes the results of a wetland delineation conducted, at the City of Tukwila's request, for the proposed Tukwila Fire Station 51 Project (project). An earlier wetland reconnaissance was conducted on the site by The Watershed Company (TWC). The project is proposed on two parcels (3523049008 and 3523049040) located in the City of Tukwila (City) and situated west of Southcenter Parkway and east of S 184`' Place (Figure 1). The parcels (study area) are undeveloped and approximately 5.7 acres in combined area. The findings of the wetland delineation are based on an analysis of existing background information, a field investigation conducted by Environmental Science Associates (ESA) biologists Teresa Vanderburg, PWS, and Christina Hersum on February 215t, 2019, and a review of the current City of Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 18.45 Environmentally Sensitive Areas. ESA identified and delineated two wetlands in the study area. Wetland boundaries were recorded using a Global Positioning System (GPS device). The wetland boundaries depicted on the attached map are approximate. Methods Methods defined in Regional Supplements to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1987 Wetlands Delineation Manual (Corps, 2010) were used to determine the presence and extent of wetlands in the study area. The methodology is based upon three essential characteristics of wetlands: (1) hydrophytic vegetation; (2) hydric soils; and (3) wetland hydrology. Field indicators of these three characteristics must all be present in order to determine that an area is a wetland (unless problem areas or atypical situations are encountered). The "routine on -site determination method" was used to determine the wetland boundaries. The routine method is used for areas equal to or less than 5 acres in size, or for larger areas with relatively homogeneous vegetative, soil, and hydrologic properties. Formal data plots were established where information regarding each of the three wetland parameters (vegetation, soils, and hydrology) was recorded. This information was used to distinguish wetlands from non -wetlands. City of -Tukwila Fire Station 51 Wetland Delineation Memo April 12, 2019 Background Review Prior to our field investigation, ESA reviewed the following background materials for information pertaining to the subject parcels: • City of Tukwila iMap (City of Tukwila, 2019); • City of Tukwila Sensitive Areas Map (City of Tukwila, 2016); • King County iMap (King County, 2019); • National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Mapper (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [USFWS], 2019); • U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey of project area (NRCS, 2019); • Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) Priority Habitat and Species (PHS) database (WDFW, 2019); • Google Earth aerial imagery dated 2010 through 2018; and • Tukwila Fire Station 51, Wetland Reconnaissance Report (prepared by TWC and dated October 12, 2018) The study area is located within the City of Tukwila, King County, Washington and lies within Section 35, Township 23 North, and Range 4 East; and Water Resources Inventory Area (WRIA) 9 the Duwamish-Green River basin. A stormwater detention pond (approximately 100,000 square feet size) borders the southern study area. Southcenter Parkway borders the eastern study area, residential and commercial development border the remaining portions of the study area with the exception of a small patch of deciduous forest that borders a portion of the northwest study area. No wetlands are identified in the study area by the City's iMap or Sensitive Areas Map, or by King County iMap, NWI mapper, or WDFW PHS database. According to historical aerial imagery available on King County iMap, a majority of the study area was previously forested and contained a road (an extension of S 180'h Street) that bisected the southern parcel of the study area (2019). Based on the historical aerial imagery, the road as well as the vegetation in the study area were removed as part of an excavation project from 2013 to 2014 (King County, 2019). Field Investigation Signs of prior grading and disturbance were observed in the study area. According to historical images on Google Earth, this site was extensively graded in 2014 and 2015 during road construction and interchange work to relocate South 180'h Street. Within the western portion of the study area, steep slopes are present that drop to the east before abruptly flattening out. This steep slope appears to be a cut into the valley wall during earthwork. The majority of the study area is generally flat with a few shallow depressions. Soils are loamy sand in some areas but are underlain by primarily clay hardpan. Vegetation in the study area is composed primarily of herbaceous species with small patches of scrub -shrub vegetation. Several bare areas of vegetation are also present. Upland herbaceous areas consist of bentgrass (Agrostis sp.) and hairy cat's ear (Hypochaeris radicata); wetland herbaceous areas consist of common cattail (Typha latifolia), small -fruited bulrush (Scirpus microcarpus), toad rush (Juncus bufonsis), and tapered rush (Juncus acuminatus). Patches of scrub -shrub vegetation in the study area are primarily located within wetland Page 2 of 8 City of Tukwila Fire Station 51 Wetland Delineation Memo April 12, 2019 areas and include black cottonwood (Populus balsamiifera), and willow (Salix sp.). In addition, some scrub -shrub vegetation within the wetland exhibit stunted growth. See attached photographs (Photos 1 through 7). ESA biologists confirmed the presence of two marginal wetlands in the study area (2018). The general characteristics, wetland rating category, and required standard wetland buffer widths are summarized in the following table: TABLE 1. WETLAND CHARACTERISTICS Wetland Name Approximate Size (acres) Hydrogeomorphic Type Cowardin Classa Wetland Category (2006 and 2014 Wetland Rating System)° TMC Required Buffer Width° A <0.1 (1,592 SF) Depressional PEM/PSS IV 50 B 0.1 (5,581 SF) Depressional PEM/PSS IV 50 a: PEM=Palustrine emergent, PSS=Palustrine scrub -shrub b: TMC 18.45.080(C) requires use of the 2006 Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington (Ecology Publication #04-06-025). Effective, January 1, 2015, Ecology requires the use of the 2014 Wetland Rating System for Western Washington (Ecology Publication #14-06-029) for any projects needing Corps or Ecology authorization. ESA rated wetlands in the study area using the 2006 and 2014 wetland rating systems and determined that both resulted in the same wetland categories (see attached 2014 wetland rating forms). c: Buffers per the TMC 18.45.080(D). Regulatory Considerations Wetlands are regulated at the federal, state, and local levels. Agencies with jurisdiction include the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology), and City of Tukwila. In this case, the degraded wetlands identified on site have formed on fill soils after major earthwork, excavation and construction activity in the area. In our professional opinion, although these areas meet the three parameters for wetland, they are likely exempt from the definition of "waters of the U.S." in the Clean Water Act. According to 40 CFR 122.2 (Definitions) the following features are not considered "waters of the U.S." (E) Water -filled depressions created in dry land incidental to mining or construction activity, including pits excavated for obtaining fill, sand, or gravel that fill with water. Since these degraded wetland areas are definitely "water filled depressions created in dry land incidental to mining or construction activity," we do not believe the Corps of Engineers or Ecology would consider these areas jurisdictional wetlands under Section 404/401 of the Clean Water Act. Some smaller, degraded wetlands may be exempt from regulations at the state or city level. These areas are either considered low value or, in some cases, may not meet the state definition of wetlands according to the Growth Management Act (GMA). According to the definitions in the GMA (RCW 36.70A.030): "Wetland" or "wetlands" means areas that are inundated or saturated by surface water or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas. Wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from non -wetland sites, including, but not limited to, irrigation and drainage Page 3 of 8 City of Tukwila Fire Station 51 Wetland Delineation Memo April 12, 2019 ditches, grass -lined swales, canals, detention facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, and landscape amenities, or those wetlands created after July 1, 1990, that were unintentionally created as a result of the construction of a road, street, or highway. Wetlands may include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from non -wetland areas created to mitigate conversion of wetlands. The wetlands identified on the proposed Fire Station 51 site do not meet the exemptions in the definition that pertain to artificial wetlands, detention facilities, or wetlands created unintentionally as a result of the construction of a road, street or highway. In this case, the wetlands do appear unintentionally created, but as a result of earthwork, fill and excavation related to road removal and not construction. In our experience, the exemption for wetlands created after July 1, 1990 for road construction is associated with impoundment of water by road prisms or wetland ditches alongside recently constructed roads. The City of Tukwila regulates wetlands through its environmentally sensitive areas ordinance, TMC 18.45.080 and 18.45.090. According to TMC 18.45.090.B, certain wetlands are exempted from the development requirements in the ordinance; however, they must meet the following criteria as defined in the code: wetlands must be less than 1,000 square feet in area, have no association with a riparian corridor, are not part of a wetland mosaic, do not contain habitat identified as essential for local populations of priority species identified by WDFW, and do not score 20 points or greater for habitat using the wetland rating system. The wetlands identified on the proposed Fire Station 51 site do not meet any of the City's wetland exemption criteria listed above. In our professional opinion, the City of Tukwila regulates these wetland features as critical areas. For development approval, the City requires applicants demonstrate that mitigation sequencing has been applied to avoid and minimize impacts to critical areas, per their code standards (TMC 18.45.090). Requirements for compensatory mitigation are also applied by the City through the critical areas code standards (TMC 18.45.090). According to TMC 18.45.090(B)(4) alterations to Category IV wetlands are allowed only where unavoidable and adequate mitigation is carried out in accordance with the standards of TMC 18.45.090. Conceptual Mitigation Alternatives ESA investigated conceptual mitigation alternatives to satisfy potential impacts for the proposed Fire Station 51 project. These conceptual mitigation alternatives are limited to: 1) use of the King County In -Lieu Fee (ILF) program or 2) permittee-responsible mitigation in the form of wetland enhancement at Tukwila Pond. King County ILF Program King County's ILF Program operates under the Mitigation Reserves Program (KC MRP) and allows applicants to purchase credits to offset debits associated with project impacts. ESA conducted a preliminary estimate of the debits associated with potential impacts to wetlands due to the proposed project. Using the wetland rating assessment completed for Wetlands A and B with Ecology's debit worksheet, ESA calculated the project's debits by wetland function as summarized in the following table: Page 4 of 8 City of Tukwila Fire Station 51 Wetland Delineation Memo April 12, 2019 TABLE 2. PROJECT DEBITS BY WETLAND FUNCTION Wetland Function Debit Acre - Points Water quality 1.17 Hydrologic 0.825 Habitat 0.585 Total Debit Acre- Points 2.85 ESA consulted directly with KC MRP Manager, Megan Webb, to identify the amount of needed credits based on the project's calculated debits as well as the pricing for needed credits. According to KCMRP, the proposed project would require 2.85 credits with a cost of $50,000 per credit (Webb, personal communication, March 6 2019). In addition, a land fee of $0.61 per square foot of project impact must also be applied. Therefore, the total cost for using the KC MRP to mitigate for potential impacts from the proposed project would be as follows: $50,000 x 2.85 credits ($129,000) + $0.61 x 7,173 square feet of wetland impact [Areas of Wetland A + Wetland Bl ($4,375.53) = $133,375 Permittee-responsible Mitigation at Tukwila Pond ESA visited Tukwila Pond Park on the same day as the delineation. We identified the southern wetland boundary of Tukwila Pond as a possible area for wetland enhancement as permittee-responsible mitigation for potential impacts from the Fire Station 51 project. This area of Tukwila Pond is currently dominated by Himalayan blackberry and English ivy with some native deciduous shrubs and trees (willow, red -osier dogwood and red alder). Based on the existing, degraded conditions of the wetland, potential wetland enhancement in this area could include the following techniques: • Removing invasive vegetation and refuse from the area; • Enhancement of the area through planting of appropriate native shrubs in the fall or early spring, primarily in areas where invasive vegetation has been removed; and • If suitable, the installation of habitat features (e.g. logs, bird and bat boxes, etc.) that will provide refuge for wildlife and increase species diversity. Native vegetation would improve the functional attributes of the wetland. Potential wetland shrub species appropriate for the southern boundary of Tukwila Pond could include salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis) and red - osier dogwood (Cornus sericea), and willow (Salix sp.) livestakes. According to TMC 18.45.090(E)(1), a ratio of 6:1 is typically applied for wetland enhancement as mitigation for alterations to Category IV wetlands. Therefore, if both Wetland A and B (7,173 square feet in combined total Page 5 of 8 City of Tukwila Fire Station 51 Wetland Delineation Memo April 12, 2019 area) were impacted by the project, the required area of enhancement would be 43,038 square feet. Based on this enhancement area, we estimate the total cost of permittee-responsible mitigation for enhancing the southwestern boundary of Tukwila Pond to range from approximately $28,000 to $75,000. The higher range of this cost estimate assumes costs for shrub plantings and willow livestakes, mulch, hydroseeding, as well as 10 years of maintenance and monitoring for the enhancement site. The low range of this cost estimate only assumes costs for willow livestakes and 10 years of maintenance and monitoring for the enhancement site. Tukwila South SAMP Sites A third, potential option for mitigation could include exploring the use of the Tukwila South Sensitive Areas Master Plan (SAMP) sites. Additional mitigation credit may remain at these sites that could be applied to this project since the Fire Station property was originally part of the City's agreement with the Tukwila South developer. The application of remaining wetland mitigation credit would need to provide for the required area outlined in the City's code for the appropriate mitigation type. Limitations Within the limitations of schedule, budget, and scope -of -work, we warrant that this delineation was conducted in accordance with generally accepted environmental science practices, including the technical guidelines and criteria in effect at the time this delineation was performed. The results and conclusions of this memorandum represent the author's best professional judgment, based upon information provided by the project proponent in addition to that obtained during the course of this delineation. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. The final determination of jurisdictional status for wetlands would need to be determined by the Corps of Engineers and/or Washington Department of Ecology. Thank you for the opportunity to prepare this memorandum. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call ESA at (206) 789-9658. Page 6 of 8 City of Tukwila Fire Station 51 Wetland Delineation Memo April 12, 2019 References Brinson, M. August 1993. A Hydrogeomorphic Classification for Wetlands. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wetlands Research Program. City of Tukwila. 2016. Sensitive Areas Map. Available at: http://www.tukwilawa.gov/wp-_ content/uploads/2015/11/Sensitive-Areas-Map.pdf. Accessed February 2019. City of Tukwila. 2019. Tukwila iMap. Available at: http://tuk.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=7ca122cdae08429e974f57c148ad887e . Accessed February 2019. Corps (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region. Version 2. Wetlands Regulatory Assistance Program. May 2010. ERDC/EL TR-10-3. http://www.usace.army.mil/CECW/Documents/cecwo/reg/west mt finalsupp.pdf. Hitchcock, C.L., and A. Cronquist. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest: An Illustrated Manual. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington. Hruby, T. 2004. Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington. Washington Department of Ecology (Publication #14-06-029). Olympia, WA. Hruby, T. 2014. Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington: 2014 Update. Washington Department of Ecology (Publication # 14-06-029). Olympia, WA. King County. 2019. King County iMap. Available at: https://gismaps.kingcountv.gov/iMap/ . Accessed February 2019. Munsell Color. 2000. Munsell Soil Color Charts. GretagMacbeth, New Windsor, New York. NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). 1995. Hydric Soils List for Washington. Revised December 15, 1995. NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). 2010. Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States - A Guide for Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils. Version 7.0, 2010. ftp://ftp- fc.sc.egov.usda.gov/NSSC/Hydric_Soils/Fieldlndicators v7.pdf. USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture), NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). 2019. Web Soil Survey. Available at: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx. Accessed: February 2019. USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 1988. National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). Biol. Rpt. 88(26.9). United States Department of Interior, Washington, DC. USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 1993. 1993 Supplement to List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 2019. National Wetlands Inventory, Wetlands Mapper. Available at: http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html. Accessed: February 2019. Page 7 of 8 City of Tukwila Fire Station 51 Wetland Delineation Memo April 12, 2019 Vepraskas, M.J. 1999. Redoximorphic Features for Identing Aquic Conditions. Technical Bulletin 301. North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). 2019. Priority Habitat and Species on the Web. Available at: http://wdfw.wa.gov/mapping/phs/. Accessed: February 2019. Webb, Megan. 2019. Personal communications re: use of the King County Mitigation Reserves Program. March 6, 2019. Page 8 of 8 • • Photo 1. Looking northeast across Wetland A - 02/21/19 Photo 2. Looking southeast across Wetland A - 02/21/19. Photo 3. Looking northwest across the northern portion of Wetland B — 02/21/19. Photo 4. Looking south across Wetland B — 02/21/19. • • Photo 7. Looking southeast across Wetland B — 02/21/19. ,-_r! ! ...; M4,5, orr asik Photo 5. Looking west across excavated ditch within Wetland B — 02/21/19. Photo 6. Looking south along the southeastern portion of Wetland B — 02/21/19. a1UETNST i MEI 11110111111111 - Ear r�n Mil Mil 1RR I Iii'Ci[I 91' (I 1 1 HI �s ` ' r i}1 71:i 1 1li'_� .„zI ; �jil i • • 9 luaWL 3e;;y W E I N S T E I N A+ U NRCNITECTS ♦ URBAN DESIGNER Attachment C TUKWILA FIRE STATION 51 PROPERTY LIVE — WETUNDBUFFERBSAL MO FT) / - �,- / WETLAND BUFFER ISO FT) \ / // --NAJ„ 1 / / / / / / / / / • '14,_ T / \ A\ EXISTING CONDITIONS TOE OF SLOPE PROJECT LOCATION VICINITY MAPS J FGFNOI DELINEATED WETLANDBOUNDARY — - — WETLAND BUILDING SETBACK LINE(BSBLI TOE OF SLOPE PARCEL LINES SHEET INDEX N001 EXISTING CONDITIONS W002 IMPACTS ASSESSMENT MITIGATION PLAN wall SITE PREPARATION PLAN WOOS MNC PLAN AND SCHEDULE WNW PLANT INSTALLATION AND MnIGATION PLAN NOTES NOTES1. DELINEATED BY THE WATERSHED COMPANY ON MAY S. 2019. 2PROJECT VESTED TOTE 2004 TUKWILA MuN.PAL WWE. SEE SENSITIVE AREAS STUDY BY T HE ATERSHED COMPANY (2019) FOR MORE INFORMATION. J. SURVEY RECEIVED FROM LPD ENGNEERING PLLC ON JULY 1. 2019. SCALE 1,20 WHEN PRINTED AT JO'. CZ IVA I 09' 19 REV. PERMIT Pon Doe Imo Tukwila Fire Station 51 7915 SaiIhcentecPNL..T itkwia. 1,18168 Rojen Nn 22 O�3Mq 1801148 ANC HwAMC WATERSMf1) KwAd WA 9101.3 a r , PRELIMINARY NONSSTTRUUC O CN D. 124112019 ,_Ta. EOsWNG 101001 WEINSTEINA+U • -- wETLNDaVFER!l0. pYF'I)� .�" \� •� /' �i \ —N..„ • •••-. 1 • \ `•mac . \ \ • / % / PIIOPOlFD YODs®AMMO!REFER Ql RIa YM IMPACTS ASSESSMENT SCA, I. 20 WHEN PRINTED AT 30 --� L.�ooe,a��r \.\ - riRroo`" do ao'ir +r O cYa a �000e�+off.:: �,ti +o;*.� +roo.*e»\. DISTu ENCE.REAAi ssF) �o��:�e!Ei�:i��! �o��'o��.o��.; t �r+�. wrr� PROPOSED PAPER FILL ANY\ WETUNp (3N SFI DISTURBANCE AREA MB SF) PROPOSED BUFFER REDUCTION AREA IL MSFI PROPOSED TENNOPARY DISNRBANCE AREA OM SF) EFREUMONAARA aM S) \ PROPOSED PAPER FILL • •\ WETLAND (,le SF) \. \ \\ \ \ � I AL. 1 , LOPE PROPOSED TEMPORARY DISTURBANCE LIMITS I FC,FNI) 1''�:.� DELINEATED WETLAND BOUNDARY 1....,.. PAPER FILL WETLAND (02 SF) R�{y,XO PROPOSED WETLAND BUFFER REDUCTION STANDARD WETLAND BUFFER PR ED MODIFIED WETLAND BUFFER -- PROPOSED WETLAND BSBL ®PROPoseDTEMPORARVDNTURBANCE N MODIFIFED BUFFER (I.SN SF) — — PROPOSED TEMPORARY°MOANS... LIMITS TOE OF SLOPE PARCEL LINES a ,a AY • , fit S REV.PENN ] EV. PENT Tukwila Fin Salon 51 091S M.P. Mow eaaWOMB INgel 0,1090, Own by p Harp ATE R,t.4 PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REMO PERNT) COMMONS IZR,rs,l IMPACTS AMESSNENT W002 LAND ENHANCEMENT EM1 �� WETLAND aUFFER AREA WEWAPD BUFFER TEMPORARFBiACTS A NT AREA IB MITIGATION PLAN \ 1 A PROPOSED TEMPORARY'—� 1 1 FrfFND 1..`.� REVISED WETLAND BIXINDARV PAPER FBL WETLAND (ltt SF) - PRP)M0SFD WETLAND ENHANCEMENT 11.100 SF) PROPOSED WETLAND BUFFER ENHANCEMENT : PROPOSED N£f WlV BUFFFA T[A�Qq�q ACE FMINlCEMEM AREA I4.T�J 9R)5 - — PROPOSED WETLAND BUFFER —.— PROPOSED WETAND SSW — — — PROPOSED TEMPORARY DISTURBANCE LIMITS TOE OF SLOPE PARCEL LINES 11EPRTOPPOSSEES RESTORATION IMPACTSOTO SE MITIGATED THROUGH WETLAND ENHANCEMENT AT GREATER RAT1p '2:' THROUGH NKMCEIEHT AT A.XiEa^^. PROPOSEBTEMPCRARANCEMES ATA LMIT MITIGATED J. PROPOSEDENHANCEMENT tlAT A241RA M.IgATED THROUGH EMEM ATA2A:I RAM. ® wine REV FENMITl I 0300/19 REV. PERMIT Tukwila Flre Station 51 99155 So..... PMway 90168 Proen Own S 180048 MAI IMMIX 2 WAIFk1Ht1) 730 Wan Sm. Sown swine WA 96033 PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DAN RE RMaT COMMCLIDN9 1,31,2019 SnPH TRa MITIDAnmPwr W003 • • 3 MULCH AREA C (1,69T SF) ADJACENT ROLLS SHILL TIGHTLY ABUT TOE CON LOG OR STRAW WATTLE INTO SLOPE K 1' WOOD STALES ir-2r DEPTH OTESC: BIODEGRADABLE WATTLE SITE PREPARATION PLAN SCALE 1.423 WHEN PRINTED AT Mr 42" S NCH COP LOG OR STRAW WATTLE, TYPICAL 1• WOOD STAKES lr-24' DEPTH. TYPICAL CLR COIN LOG OR STRAW WATTLE AS LIMLE AS POSSIBLE. ADJACENT LOGS OR WATTLES SHALL TIGHTLY ABUT TO PREVENT S.L SEEPAGE. STAKE AT TIEENDDOAT O OF EACHLOG OR CENTER PLAN VIEW E PR NN e AREA SOIL AREA O.D6 A MULCH MEAL (12S SF) PROPO6En movRARY DISTURBANCE LAMS NOTES CON LOG OR STRAW WATTLE SHALL BE 9INCHINSTALLED PRIOR TO GROUND DSNRBNG ACTIVITIES. 2. CON LOG OR USE WOC WATTLE AKESTSHALL EC INCH THE L. J. ES TO ENSURE USEWOOOW GROUND MX EmE CON LOGOS STRAW AKESSHALLSE. INE9* LEND ENSURE GEE STAKES BELOW GECESS AND 2'S ABOVE DLL. ROIL. STAKES SHALL BE MIN.2r IN LENGTH: USE NI £TILINGRUNNING LSSMVTOF ECURE COP LOG A VMENINSTALLINGHE FIRS. DOOm3OCDNL HE OR ENDS. STRAW WATTLE. BUTT THE SECOND LOG TIGHTLYE AGAINST THE WATTLES SAT NOT EACH AND ENDS. 5. DRIEOUTLOGS ORSIDTHE WATTLES AT EACH END ANDTIRESIJI FEETEON NOUGH TER.BTMES SHOULD BE LEA EN OUTSIDE THE CON LOG PROTRUDING STRAW WATTLE. OM CLOSE ENOUGH TO HOLD R N PUCE. L HEN CO OF THE STAKE WWATTLARnB WE THE FLAT LOG ON STRAW WATTLE. TORS. 6. WNENCgRAILOG E STRAWWATTLEINSTALLING C CPR GORSTR ND APPLICAWATTLE. SLOPES. THE D1v STAKES NRI COIN LOG OR STRAW WATTLE OL SLOPES. DRIVE THE STAKES PERPENDICULAR L TIE STRAWWn THE SLOPE. THE FIRST END STAKE THE SECONDCONLOGOU STAW TM AT tOwAROE FIRST CP LOG OR STR AW ALE IN ORDER TO HELP THEM ABUT TIGHTLY r TOPSOIL El ANTS., AREA PREPARATION STEP I REMOVE WVASNE WEEDS. DECOMPACT TO TWELVE (MI INCHES. STEP STSDI CHES 3-WAY TOPSOIL. EP FI IN] MCORPOMTE TOPSOIL TO A MN. TWELVE (lz) NCH DEPTH STEP. M TALLCOMPOST LAYER G) INCHES WOODCHIP MULCH UYER FOUR (41 INCHES DEEP AHD INSTALL PLANTS. (SEE PUNTING DETAIL.) EXISTING STEP STEP § STEPA EISIE PRof wFPARK.AN(�jM€TI AND BUFFF➢FNHANCFMFNT NCE gL O SOIL PREPARATION AREA A Sule NTS CMUCH RING 7 QOSTNG 1 STEP 2 STEP EEL s1Evs A PLANTING AREA PREPARATION STEvMDe INV.. ELVES. DEcoLEAcr TO TVIELVE(121 NCIEs. scvz RACE SIX WI INCHES 3-WAY TOPSOIL. ( STEW NCORMRATE T%M TO AMML TWELVE �wg10FPFH. )(SCE ( EELLPUNTING SOF COPRAMEND wrni GALLONSOFCOMPOST. DETAIL).ALL TREE (SEE PLANTING PUCE NCHES DE PVTI ULCH YETI OUR R RADIUS TREE. 3 MVO/FOOT RADDS AROUND TREE.( STEP S AND SOEED UNIFO SURFACE AT 9 MD APPLY SEED UFORAILY AT 1 LB ) PER 1,0008F. ) SOILNPEOF WORK RANTDIONN SEEDING AREA O SOIL PREPARATION AREA B Stale NTS CLEAR AND GRAB CHIP r WDD0 M LQI ii pws9RG STEP STEP2 aelallGmEeeaEeeeBT]vn STEP 1 CLEAR PLANTS PER STANDARD INVASIVE MOVE CLIPPINGS OFFSRE. TEP P PLACE FOUR (L) INCHES WOO2CHIP MULCH AND STALL LIVE STAKES. (SEE PUNTING DETAIL.) SOIL PREP RATION: W T AND NHAN MENT OLEM:E DF woRK-NOT To scuE O MULCH AREAL F(/FND REVISED WET)MO BOUNDARY PARER FILL WETLAND(A22 SF1 r„,,,-„,,JJSOIL PREPARATON AREA SOIL PREPARATOM AREA MULCH AREA (1ffi5 TESC BOOEOAWXE WATTLE (Mi LE) — — — PROPOSED WETLAND BUFFER PROPOSED TETI/JOBS% — - — PROPOSED TEMPORARY DISTURBANCE LWRS TOE OF SLOPE PARCEL LINES JAW Sml NTS CITE PRFPARATION_NOTFS 1 PI SOIL DISTURBANCE SRAM .CUR THE ^ WETLAND, INCLUDING THE PAPER FILLED WETLANDr AREAS. t 2017113Kf W1 1LALC50AVEYOZWL RSTHE DELINEATED WETLAND BOUNDARIES PRIOR TO STARTING W.K. ]. CONTRACTOR SHALL MARK THE LNRS OF CLEARING AND PUNTING AREAS PRIOR TO BEGINNING LING TEEMING OR PLANT LAYOUT. I. ESC MI BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED PRIOR TO MY GROUND DISNRBNG ACTIVITES. 5. ENHANCEMENT AREAS MIST BE EVALUATED FOR AND CLEARED OF INVASIVE WEEDS. INCLUDING LOMBARDY POPLM MOP.. NORA) PR. TO RESTORATION RANTING • 1 MTGE REv. MHO Prr OM Mae Tukwila FM Station 51 IT0595SWovPabW Piy.e N. IEOM W Dem CNQM W NWAYC PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION / LIVE STAKE PLANTING 2X NW OK RODTBALL 1 C•. CONTAINERIZED SHRUBS SEEDING AREAS PLANTINGNOTES PIT SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN (2) TIMES THE WIDTH OF THE ROOT BALL Ow PLANTINGLOOSEN SIDES AND PIT AK PI G PIT AAFTERPI N2ING SAME PLANTING HOLES SHALL BE THE DEPTH THE SIZE OF THE ROGTBALL A 4L FROM POT OR BURLAP 6 HOUGHLP ROOTING. BEFORE INSTALLING. u AND STRAIGHTEN CIRCLING ROOTS" DROE IF MECESBARY. E PUNT 15 EXCEPTIONALLY ROOT430B0. CO NOT PLANT AND RETURN TO NURSERY FOR AN ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE MULCHMULCH LAYER 4011*A NINON MULCH -FREE RING AROUND THE BASE OF TREE TRUNKS AND WOODY STEMS OF SHRUBS. FINISH G.OE REMOVE DEBRIS AND LARGE ROCKS FROM PLANTING PIT AND SCARE' SUES AND BASE. BACKFILL WITH MENDEL, SOU. FIRM UP SOIL AROUND PLANT. O CONTAINER PLANTING DETAIL Sc. NTS PLANTING PLAN AND SCHEDULE ,ALE WHEN PRINT. Ai IX PLANT SCHFDUI E ALNUS RUBRA I RED ALDER o IS O.G. TCAL. CORNUS LII'EDDIE'S WHITE WONDER/ A 1S O.C. YCµ. EDDIES WHITE WONDER DOGWOOD CRATAEGUS DOUGUSII/BLACK HAWTHORN 18 IS0.C. 'CAL. PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIES. DOUGUSFIR 12 IS'O.C. 8. TALL THU.W PLICATA/ WESTERN REOCEDAR 15 1S O.C. B'TAIL SUFFER PLANTING AREA A 00.A90HOLOCKSCUS SFL SHRUBS \ \ PHYSOCA00USDISCOLOR /OCEACSPMT 55 PHYSOCARPUS CANTATA / PACIFIC NINEBPRK 55 ROSA NUTKAIU/N00TKA ROSE 85 RUBUS PARVIFLOOUSITHIMBLEBERRY 30 US SPECTABILIS ISALMONBERRY 30 SYMPHORICARPOS µBUS I SNOWIER.' 50 ....COVERS PNUS POLTPHYLLLS I NGLEAF LUPINE POLYSTICHUM MLNITUM I SWORD FERN 450 LIVE STAKE PLANTING NOTES I INSTALL DWOODCIITTNGS DURING THEW DORMANCY. DO NOT ALLOW THEM TO DRY OUT. 2 CUTTINGS SHALL BE r TO 1-NOAAETER OR APPROVED EOUIVA ENT 3 INSTALLTO1.4IN..10S DEPTH INTO WC USE TRIANGULAR SPACING SEE PUNTING SCHEDULE FOR SPACING. T INSDHE THAT BUDS APE POINTING UP 5 FIRM UP a AROUND INSTALLED CITING 6 WATER AFTER PUNTING. ••�IQIEILIEL EJIEIIC—IIEi' O LIVE STAKE PLANTING DETAIL 1811141111118111.0 LIVE BUDS .POSED ABOVE GRDUND. TAMP SOIL AROUND CUTTING. ENSUE NO AIR POCKETS A- LAYER WOOOCHIF MULCH NISH GRADE FORM PILOT HOLE W/ ROCK BAR. REBAR OR OTHER PLANTING TOOL. DO NOT HAMMER OR POUND IN CUTTINGS UNLESS APPROVED V RESTORATION PROFESSIONAL. ANGLE CUT AT BASE SOAR'. NTS SPACING 00.C. O.C. Io.c. SPACING BUFFER SEEDING AREA B L354SSF( % AGRI LEA MNLEFOLIUM I WESTERN YARROW 2116 BROMUS CARhuTUS I CµIFORNw BROME 21% ELYMUS GLAUCUS/BLUE WILORYE 2. 6UPNUS RMAARS/ STREAK.. LUPINE 24% SA... RACEMOSA/PLED ELDERBERRY 2% SYMPHORK:ARPOS µBUS/...BERRY 296 SwµE SEEDING AREA C 0..232 SF1 % HOROEUM EUM IMF wBARLEY 11% HO. CµIC 1FORNARCµIFORNIA OATGRASS 11% BRWUR GUCUTI BLUE WILDRY'E 1116 OMUSUCARIWNS I CAIFORNIA BROME 11% FESTUCA ROEMERI I WIENERS FESCUE 11% .ESCHAMPSIA CESPITOSA/ TUFTED.1RGRASS 11% GNOSTIS EXARATA/SPIKE BENTGRA55 11% ALOPECL.US C£NICULATU51 RATER FOXTAS 11% DESCHAMPS. ELONGATA I SLENDER HAIRGRASS I. SWINE SHRUB AREA 01345 SF1 GAULTHERML SHALLON/Sµµ LIVE STAKES W WETLAND 11825 SF( CORNUS SERICEA/ REO-TWIG DOGWOOD STUD LUCE./PACIFIC WILLOW SAL. SDCENSIS I SRKA WILLOW MIN Gµ 18' GAL tom' GAL GAL IB' GAL IB GAL IB' 1 GAL IGµ UM 9_IY SPACING 512E MW. HEIGHT N 1Gµ iS ga SPACING S. 310 1S O.C. 4MIN. LENGTH 310 18.0.C. 4MIN. LENGTH 310 1. D.C. 1' MIN. LENGTH NOTES IPL ACE TREES 15 FEET APART ACCORDING TO PLAN. 2 PLANT SHRUBS IN GROUPS OF 3 OR INDIVIDUALS PER SPECIES USING TRWNGULAR SPACING. SL 3. . GROUNDCOVERS W CLUSTERS OF 5 TO 9INDMDUALS PER SPECIES IN ODD NUMBERS USING TRIANGULAR SPACING. PLANT STAKES W GROUPS OF EEO 13INDMDUALS PER SPECIES IN.0 NUMBERS USING TRIANGULAR SPACING. 5. BUFFER SEEDING AREA B USE SIMILAR OR EQUAL TO Pf AOA NATIVE UPLAND MIX WITH COLOR AVAILABLE IN OREGON THROUGH PT LAWN SEED. M.IN ELDERBERRY AND SNOWBERRY SEEDS. APPLY AT 1 LB PER 1,000 SF. TREES PUNTED IN BUFFER SEED. AREA B SHALL HAVE A AFOOT DIAMETER WOOOCHIP MULCHING PLACED AROUND THEM. 6. SWALE SEEDING AREA C. USE SIMILAR OR EQUAL TO TT AO BED...SWAGE NATIVE WC AVAILABLE N OREGON THROUGH PT LAWN SEED. APPLY AT 1 LB PER J FE`TFND �.--� REWSED WETLANDBDUAMY PAPER FILL NERVED I. SF) PROPOSED%ETUTO BUFFER PROPOSED WETLAND BSBL TOE OF SLOPE PARCEL LIVES PLANTINGW I. SEE SHEET NAOOORESITE PREPARALTAIDTI NOTES. 3, µL E T FOR P S lLIZA IE= P' WATER PER WEEK FOR THE FWST THREE CONSEG.. SUMMERS(JUNE 1-5EPT.) FOLLOW.. INSTALLATION, PER DAC 18.52.20E3.3. IlL, WA ®12OIN9 RV. PERNIT2 1 08.19 REV. PERM. RA Do Wm Tukwila Fire Station 51 I71115SNWN0P.L.ey T W. WA*. PAUMIYL INWFM eawaN NOM AIM IY'A11C 'I WATERSHED 750 So. 1.8....981133 4.25 Pa SRO PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION WE I N S T E I N A+U ARcHrrECR+URRANDESIGNERS PLANT INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS ¢{METE. .TES DUPLITY ASSURANCE WANTS SNYL MEET OR EXCEED DE saw...m OF FEDERAL. STATE_ NO LOCAL LAWS RECO.. INS COIN FCR PUNT D Y AND INSECT CONTROL 1. PLAITS SNVLEMWIM'.VIGOROUS. AM WELLIDMED.WTL WELL DE.10PED. ROODS ROOT SYS... FREE FROM CEAD BRNIOES OR ROOTS. PLANTS SNAIL E FREE FROST DAMAGE CADS. SY TEMPERATURE EXTREMES. Vat OR O MOTSTuRE OF GODC OR PLANTS WNNLTE WLOTWT TO TE OUT.. FNAROTENTAL 11pNSEODO V.. AND WILL E PLANTED INMOEMD9FFT. S. TREES WITH MMMGEO.CROONED.eLLTREOR NOLEN LEADERS WU E REJECTED. WOMF PLANTS TON ARRAS... MI BAR OR SW SCALD WILL E REJECTED. •. N.O.LATUa RANT RASES S.. CONFORM TO FLORAE MErKTO MRTNMST eV MCNCOCl NO OI.OIDST, ONEAMTY M WASMMOTON MESS. nIs NO. TO FELD OuE TO TIE COMWON .MANS PLANTS. .SSE. vWMwGTON I NORTIAESTEW OREGONL CO. SWAN SPEAR COOKE. SFATTF N CANON SOOETV. Isar. PINITIONS IE MAWOLOOT INTEMALS. PLANTS NO RANI MATERIALS SHALL INCLUDE MY LIVE PUNT IMEEIAL UE0 ON PROJECT 040 MESSES SRANM LS NOT WRFO TO COO.. GROWN. SIR AEW OR SRR PLANTS. LIVE SINES AND FASOOS (WATTLES, TUBERS C.ULS. MSS. E1C. SPRIGS PAL.... U<AI. C.TARER CAONM CORNIER MO. PLANTS APE TOE WOK RUNTIMES ARE ENCLOEG IN A POT OR 4Genact4 NW PLANT GREve SLOS* TUTORS I Sra CONTRACTORS WSPOSMUT TO DeTNN SPEEDED WIFFNS IN PENANCE IF SWOAL OROWgO. SUSSIME Tv.OROraAAMANHOf f.1.. MOUE. UST WLLIHOIE PERMITTE0 LINE. IITS MIST SE WEE PI CARDER TO SUPPLY SPEC.. MATERIALS. WW1.. TE RESTORATION PROFESS., FOR LSE OF TIE NEAREST OW MNF WE OR NiFNNAT ANY PUTT MATERIAL DFIED jITA SPIN. OS WAR OCWESPROPOSAL .ADASL CWO NIOF CONTRALT PRICE. •. SOU PROOF WELE WOSIAMATEOAM sm...ORwins. TO TIE WSTCATON PROFESSIONAL AT LEAST)0 LAYS PRIOR TO START OS vORA LAGER TM SECTION. LOPECTON • SMELT TO INSPECT. AAO APPROVAL BY MERESTOS.. PAOESSOWI FOR COMDR MACE TO SPfSE SMELT ETIER AT THE M DELIVERY ONWTE OR AT ME GROWERS NURSERY NVRDV L NOT OMAR THE SOSE W ENT MOM OF INSPECTS. MD REJECT. WAG P PUNT NOCRESSOF T. ME 1. PLANTS INSPECTED. SIE NO REJECTED(. MI MEM. SPEC COONS METE REMOVED ITDEOATELY FROM Sin CR RED TOGO, NO REMOVED AS S0. AS POSSIYE 1 raRESTOMT. PNMFSS.. MAT ELECT TO INSPECT RANT MATERIALS AT no PLACE M GR.WRM.AFTER SPEL.AM ALTSFIACE. TIE WSW..A PROFESSIONAL ANY REQUIRE TW INSPECTED PLANTS E LMSLEo AND RESERVED F. PROJECT, SLESTT TON M TEAR PLANTS WM OTIER WTVOu.S. FAN O TIE SANE SPICES APO WE IS UNALCEPTAKE MEASUREMENT M RANTS PEARS SHALL CONFORM 10 WISES SPEWED UNLESS SUBSTITUTE.. WOE K OUR.. IN MS CONTRACT. NEIGNI NO SPREAD OMENSMONS SPECPED RElU TO MAIN PD. M PONT AND.. DOME OR ROOT TIP TO TIP Pawn D124.10g WKLEME.1.0 WEN TER SRMOES OR ROOTS MEMOS. NOON POSITION LLON.ROIWGWLLTAAE PIACF OMLE NpWI1YMra SPWMAM NNLFORFNF SPEARS VFM.M MAMORYO WILL t SSE IS OWN.. RANT Sµ4L SELESS MAN ra YWMOM STII AM AT LUST SRA M ME PLANrS� S SWL E AS TAPE AS TE WOW M TW WE RANGE /EXAMPLE IF TE SSE RUNE IS IT TO IC. AT LEAST SOS O C.. ACE IN ME FIRST FALL SUIKOUEM TO KCE VANCE BY WE OnPURRS MIST SE IT TALL, MITIGATION PLAN NOTES TANNIENANCE AND MAmO.. RAN TIE SITE SHALL OE INININT.0 AND MONTORLO I.E. YEARS FOLLOWING SUCCESSFUL O6TM]An0•. COAPOEMS OF TIE SYVA YNNRWNCE AM MONITOR. RAN ARE MULLED SFL. GOALS EST.. ENS( NAME VEEIATON MAT a APRORM1E TO THE ECOIEOOI AM STE ROI.ra WETAMMO SuESFR IMPROVE wan AT AOLOCT, AO RATER OLALIT FUNCTIONS M TIE WETLAND AND SW FEW. WOKE PREVALENCE OF MASnI RANTS R1.1.71 OMEN RREDRwtE TOGA DS TEE STANDARDS LISTED KIM WILL E USED. JUDGE MI SUCCESS OR TIE OPSTNUDON OVER ME. U PEPEOR MENC STANDARDS An TAFT AT TO END . 21AR S. ME UTE Wu. TION IC MIMED SUCCESS. PEOOOIC S NIEAANS.IIKLII6O WEESE EDNIO NO WATERNO. Wu NECESSARY 10 YES MNTMEE STNS.... S MI. STANDARD ION BEWI M/MULLEDT ESTA GMAEOGROUOC GMRAND STANfS DYCEEMORYFM•TAN RECT. O CAN E uFl TI1Wf�N RANI fSTASISNEM OR ...GM RERAMR. AS NECESSARY i0 ALHLVF TIE' WOWED STANDARD OF 109•Cf WOW As. C.. ELON. IN ME USE MAT STANDARD LCFIS NOT ADEVEOS AND WOODYfMNES BY WAR SMAY APPLY WLEUM STNOAID AATIA RAM COVEIR. A WOW OE WET U RANTING MU ATAUNTED WM ONES AOWOODY STRUM KNEW.. COVER . WOW WOODY RAMS. YEAR 1. WARE VOLUNTEER SPECIES MAY COL. TOVNE. DES STANDARD. S WOW LIE SUFFER PLANTING AREA A/PUNTED MEIN TREES PO WWOY SHRUBS) AORVE SOIL COVER,. AVERAGE Of WNCANTSVENT A WOVE VOLWILER SPECES MAY COMR TOWARD, LSE STANDARD 5A O. PLANTS. AREA A ORM.° WMTW. NO NOWT SW.. ACE. N COWS. COI AS[R. OF WOVE WOODY PLANTS. WAS S W1NF VOLU M . SPEWS MAY COLOR TOWARDS TANS STANDARD. D IN MEM RANTED N W MI...EVEGRASSSOEL0 1. ...EVE REAM., OOr N. CLAM COVE.. NATO GRASSES NO FORLSTWMEO AS NECESSARY TO ACAEVE SPA CAOOOCOLEAN DEAR AREAS SC ME END Of YEAR SPECE.!+5i.fjiAeuf.IA 1Ka iAT/� fi[FiFs. FOLaI w.Sf�Ei�SA• sk—as TAREA MO WANMIIWTYM TON TOPS OTOtW 1TORS WOVE VOLUNTEER SPECKS • COVER M ENGESSEIMIONON GETATEN WET COUNT TOWARDS MEE STANDARDS ON 4VF COMA AREAL COVER F. NL ..AMINE. RVMNE NO.1.21 AEDS WILL NOT UCELO UDR W THE SYFEA RESTOENTONAREAAI AM YEAR WOO THE MONITOR. PEROO. BIVALVE RAMS MUM MOSE. DE TONG COUNTY. WALSNOT. STATE NOUMIS WEEDS LISTS. /ISTED K SPECES. CCP.. TINT MONNOO. PROGRAM LS DESIGNED TO TMCA OE SUCCESS O OE Y110AT04 SITE ONES DARE ME, TO SEMPLE TE DEGREE 10 MCAT ME STYEMEETING TE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OFTMFO M TIE PEEWO MCMR BueMITAu PROPOSED RAM SWAGES I WENN 45 DAYS AMR AWARD OF TIE CONTRACT. SWART A COMPLETE LIST OF RANT WIEAALS PROPOSED TO E PRONGED EM.STENTM COWOUMME WIN PE REQ.:DENTS SPEOFEC P.O. TO NA.5 AM PER ESMS M ALL GROWERS .PD AIRMmFS pRoOLCT CERTIFICATES I. TO W STM4TH. PROFFSSON. AT LEAST 10 OATS PRE. To SLANT M V.W ORDER TOPS KCTON TAT PENT WTEMNS WISE SEEN ORDERED . AMUR. PROUD.. FOR RSEECTON M PLANT 14ATTRIAL NON RESTORATION PROFESSONN AT THE M SUMSSION 2 RAW CARES M VENDORS OR MOWERS INVOICES...ONO SUPS FOAL AL RANTS. NE ORt. MiNUT.. MVOE OR MCA. SLIP SNOW) MST SPEOFS BY SOODDIC MANE. WANTIT AM WOE co,. KO WO EMAIL OR . E THAT INFORMATION WAS PWNOLISV 1.0.11.1 AN ORA, RAN Wu E PREPARED ay TIE RESTMMTON'W.F... PRIOR TO TIE EOH..M M TIE MONTIOR . PERIOD THE AS...LT PLAN WILL IC A MARA. OF TS PLANT. WILL DOCOFM AR DEPARTURES R RANI RACE M OR OMER CALiOEANS MS FROM TE PROPO0 IN TINS PLAN SED DPLA µNMLTRAN SuurliA FALLANO TOE OTT NOR MONa WEIT SALL RECORD NO REPORT TIE FOLO.* M MAIwNL REPOT WOOL ASSESSATENT OF TIE OLERNL STE YEAR.%COUNTS . SBYYS .,TFEA. DROyMN YENTA C0.MTSEST/MUSEDESTUSED NAME S�Sry � COUNTS. CVO RANTS WERE MORTALITY IS SLON.NR IA AM..R.. TEAR FSTGIATE OF TnE COVER IN TIE MITIUTON AREA W414 TIE W EINRERCFa MF MOOOLOOT TOR OTTER SAWUO ESTIMATE M M.NARRE.RVA FUN.. CONFIRM OE 1.11OA1ON AREA TABULATION OFFSTMIDED WINE SULKS. MKOO WM PLANTED. VOLUNTEER SPECIES MOTOGRAMIC DOCLIMENTATION FR. AT PORTS AM urtMIS.S INDOOR CUM. M DELPLANA. AREAS. VRO.gM.. OraR ACTONS'NAT mNA TIE INTENDED MANCTONS Of TIE MITIGATION AREA. ELMEwr, MANOLEIG• SOMA. S. WCODEMAM)NSFOR MNMRMNE OR REPLAN M ANY PORT.. OIF MIOOA1OH AREA ILADREALMCI NOTIFTLADON CONTRACTOR MSI TOUT raRESIDENT. MAMFSSOMM 5Hg1S ORLMGRE R ADVANCE MELAERES SO MAT ME ArRE SATE RILE MAPIINED ER DE CITY OF TI.aWILAIN ACCORD.. WM TIE FOLLOWING MSTRUCTIOS FOR AT !FAST RESTOATI NPROEESSONAI WY ADRAN EFOR UNSPECTP. YEARS FOLLOW. CONSLET. M CONSOUGno. 3 FOLIC. TE RECOMDENDAnMO NOTED LN MF PREVIOUS.4.01 MC WE NWT. ENE RN WE FONG FOR ALL RANTED AREAS AT LEST TA. AYN.LY. WM. ALL I.NNATT E MAUVE OR NOXIOUS WEEDS AS LISTED IN ME I O CONY ORWAMOT. STATE NOXIOUS WEEDS USES OR USTEO AI SPICES OF COME.. AM ALL WELD, TIE RESTORATION15. LEAST OWE 0.104RLY. REMOVE ALL COMPETING WEEDS NO WEED..TS FR. EIEAM EA. MST.LED OSTMCE M IS1.N ES FROM LIE MAW WW1 STEAL YEEDNG SNOBD OCCOR A LEAST MCA DU.. TALL SPRIT. NO ELMER (REGENT BUONO PILL TESL., M LOWER MORTALITY LOITER PLANT OVO!ry YFMREPO...NT COSTS. AND MUEASED I NFLDODI MAT ME PLAN/EETS WEFLMO WY E NECESSARY E PE... WEED COMM. TWIT ONO. *TEA PLAN c m• MUM PLANT WM STOOL TWAER AL SO MOAN AS WHO WACAEROR WEED UTEFI NOM ...AR OfFFAMs� ONTAGESO. KILLED NO WEDS FAST. RECOVER AFTER Ma... E SEOM WEECONDO, LECTIVEAPRICATNO TER.. MATE D TO ONASIVE NEEDS. ESPECIAL T PEN (AYIEO WM WARE SPICES. TERROR APPLICATION. WEN EESSMY. DOLL E COOUCTED OSY ST A APPLY SOWRELEAK. G.... TIMMER TO EACH.TNL EC MAW NRN.LY M THE SPRING (eV ME I) M YEARS 2 THROAT. ) Rm....ca KREESSMY TO MARTA. A 4.INCRITICA LATENT...SOIL MIOITPE. APD WO WEEDS. REPLACE NSAYER NT FO ...IN TE M ER MOMTO VISITS OARING ME UPCOMING 13..00 SE.. IOCTOEACIISS TO MAR. IL FOR EST STANA PINT OATS I 0 TO PROM. PROTECT.... CLPLATE EXTREMES TRANSPORTATION WO DRYMO PROPER KIOILATONH NO PREVENTION M OA ACE 10 SAW M N DES. MD ROOT UUN MDMAST BE (XIS TD. 1. ELTEWONOOSf TO NMIMGAS PL)SEARF RAMS IN MST SE RROILCTEO AGAINST ANY CONDIOM OILAI q E. TROD! TO TER CONTR.° ZEAL IN NO VOOR�POS S HMOs. • RAM WTERILS SHALL NOT E HARMED ay TIE TR.A MARS. OR FOLIAGE SLIT OKI SYRIE CONTA.I. S.L. BOA OR OTER PROTECTIVE SITIICTIAf. EXCEPT SMEROOT RANTS WAIL E TUFT IN BUNDLES WIPE PLANT. NO DEN WOOLED URESULLY VT ra ANON OR STEM • RANTS SMALL WA DWAEE. LEGiE UIILS STATE. COOFCT SCLEROTIC NNE AO SR.T FM O AM M CO TOWN MMRHOS M 110 OON BE LAERISUPPLED POT! WALL LFD. PLANTS SUPPLED R RUTS. RACKS BOXES SAGS.. SIAEAFS SW. NAVE ONE LIBEL PER OOP a1.511!M PLANT poRRANIT CLAMS M US7 E OWAANIFFD TO E TRAM TO SOOT.. NAME AM SPECTRE. SUE. AND TO E .411fr NO CAPNLE MC.OROS OIOMOL REPLACEMENT I. PUNTSMT FOLIO WE ONO ALL OF ME MOWED CONDITIONS AT TEE ral.n. pILRRNTS DISCRETION 0USIE REMIOED FR. STE NO REPLACED IMMEDIATELY AT TE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE 1. RATS NOT SLRWHO ASTER ONE W. TO E W PLACED AT THE CONRAC...PEP. RANT WTEIIAS MORN RATS SAU E MRMRY fAtOAMIM.COIIOV tVAIN GOOD MORTICUL NML PRACTICES LOSER C11Anc cowman vulost TO. MORE SEVERE MAN T.SE M TE PROJECT MATE PUNTS SHALL E RILE TO SPECIES NO VASTY OR SGIYECES O CLAMS. OR HAAEO LAME MS SHALL E.EO ▪ SS SPEW. AS Su. OuOenEs SEE PUNT UST ON ACCOMPANYWO PLANS MD RANT SCREDULES ROOT TRU.. I COMMEl1MOW PANTSDNCLLRS RUGS) RANI ROOTB4IS MST NOLO TOCETER WEN T. PURILS REMOVED MOM OE POPE. EXCEPT TAT A WALL MM. M /DOSE SOL MAY BE ON TIE TOP O ra ROGTe.L. TEND! TOM OT E ROOTaMAM. MERE MU51 E M COML. ROOTS PRESENT IN AM PLANT INSPECTED R.TIALLS THAT NAVE C.C.°...RDEN WEN RELRRI O FROM TT CARRIER STK, E REJECTEO 6 TIE .TY OS TMY.A WILL ENSURE TWIT V VOTER IS PROVE...FL ME OM. RANTED AREA WM A LOWS. M IN. O WATER PEA WEER M.A. I WOOL SEPRLEER b FOR ME EDIT TWEE YEARS FOLLOW.. INSTALLATION TIROL. TIE OPEEAIH. M A TEMPORARY ROGATION SYSTEM LESS WATER SS NEEDED DOING MAN.. M. WY MO OCINEA - -- - - TONSTAUCION NOTES M. SPE000ATON4 TOLE RESTOS.. PROFESSION. REEL M011OR ME FOLLOW. WWII. NO COMRETE TE FOLLOW. INSPECTIONS A STA.OF WINO NO OEARROPLAMRO BOAONES. ▪ REMOVAL C. SOL PREPARATION AND AEMLENT MARCH PLACEMENT OPLANT INTER. I SPECT . A PLANT MATERIAL DEANERY SSPECT.. IRA PLANT DOTAL INSPECT. PLANT INSTALLATION AND MITIGATION PLAN NOTES (4 PENEIW WORK SEMINAL{ PREPARATION I SINE WETLAND *MOIRE S F. INSPECTION EV RE STORATION PROFESSOR. ALL EROSION WORM. LEA3URE5. STA. AS COTE WIRES. PEA TIE STE VIEINNmM RAIL woo. V OEM INVASIVE AM OEMYEMN WGETAMIN FROM MITIUTOH AREA ERW O SPRING AND. SV W WLR MOT. G E_ MOLD CRUTNG EXPOSED SCR CODITENS DWRO RE WOER STORM SFASLMI. REMOVE DN.. SPECIES IN ACCORDANCE NON WO COUNTY NOXIOUS WEED EST WNA'EMEM PRACTICES FOR MORE thsonowncot PREPARATION REPARiyRACT sm.. T. ENTIRE PER THESTE S ROES DO NOT DECONRAW. SOL WSOLOSOILU1TE FINOOf1NFaN AP. TLL AEATOAEVMM1 NOT ECON/KT TIE SR W NTW METIER I WONES. TION AREA NO U RASA TILL SOILS YSPICKSNCHES OF OLPEIonEE ARE DTFTOP NTT 2 NOES OF NOMawmFASNO SQaSOILOR II INCHES LPWPARATI.ARU TOP NTT ERILESM COPOST WMTRKFTDEsnOR LMpOST van. WETLAND eMI0AIt5 MMIOIO SEER FILL AREAS • YAW PREPARATION MIA ANO WLCH NLFA C MOT ME SUL. AREAS/ WON W100 ORRCN FOR SCES MCA PER LIE MATE PgU.AOON RAN a Pi MI SHOD. AREAS. PLACE A 1M0400T RAO. RIM O WOOD MUCH FOOR DN. MCA AROUND UCN RSIALFD TREE. C. FNMA. WA CAI DOES NOT TOOH STE. M CHOI.. TON RSTALEOIWCETAOCA4 EE PLAMIO ET.. MEET rl TaXitS AAalaC,aI5laSn2TICA - RSTNy MOOUTI. PLAITS OLIO ra OORMAM SE...TO UR IS. MANOR N R LIE AS LA MigARON AREA PREPARE A PLANTING T FOR FACE TEND NO MVSINL PER DE RANTING CEINS DIWWET. OMPOILDENT AREA INSTAL WEE STARES PER RM. N. DETAILS 3 TIE U NIRACIOT SWILL DESIGN WO INSTALL A TEMPORARY. MORM.. PROVE DO..n. SYSTEM TO PROVIDE MA CORM. TO ALL INSTALLED RAMS ATT. ra RESTORATION AREA NAM./ SPECS... NO DEF... I. 1STROCA ORTNWAT IC, ISW FOLRMANTAI Tnc W RICO EMS. FOLLOW ACRA IN4UPUCTION FORT USE. N EP FERTILISER IN WAITE R.O.T COMMHE R WALE ..TE FFP111.A a ONLY TO E APPLIED R YENSA MO 3 NOT IN TENT .E !. R7uF TOT SYSifY AUTOMATED SYSTEM LbME of E0.1 A11L31 ps ROT E wAER rFR WE 0190)4 ARE T TIEIWSH SEPTEMBER M FOR TIE PRST TWEE TEARS FOAL. . POTAUATON RESTORATION PROJECTS •WOODONP latlCartARKRIST DIPS 1IPPEOWOODY MATERIAL) APTi/yNE DATEL• OTO TREE RCESR M.A. . LM OMENST SAVOUT. SMS WIEO. LS CON.. AVAILABLE P. LANE OWN.. FR. NEMESISOR MESA MLCW SHAu NOT CONTAIN NPRECODF OOWn1E5 M FiMeAE. PLASM MET.. SOW. AID 0114.0A41 AMER OR CMLSTRUCTIONDEMOLITIUN DEAR. S Tomo.-TOPS. SHALL RE A SWAT NOTE. APPRO.AULY 1.091 COMPOST AM fOb.SMO OR SM. LOW ALL Ms STALL E FREE M PNTGTODC MATERIALS M) LIABLE SUDS. RI... OR ROOTS. STATELSTED MNOUS WEEDS. 1. T'.coMIOST SWILL AE[TvMOT n.O.ms vF.Flrn.s lw AOND mmE Ao...Cn. C.STAKT.•. •N• •R) FOR FOE COMPoSO S.runxxc FE DERE LP A SIMNICNO PRODS W MAIN TIE RESIOOMM AREAS MFETRG PEROULNCE STAMNOS A COIMMEACY DEVELOPED NO UpLEMEAMO CMDMMM OY PLANS CAN VDEUT RNE NOTW TF T LO TO SOL IOM AAEFM. AC EPTAL rLANr MSONUT.. NO RANT SWSTTUT.S M TYPE. SUE. WANnTY. AND IOUT.. IIDUI0 OV man ] EATS REV PER. M MA TukwO. FI Stew 51 Tor. WA ATM PEON 0 M D.e Omem.1 IIEE MOO 1111 WATERSHED nIDL ?SOS. Samt SAW Own. PA NOD AmmAmmAmm LL.eyNe L F!.NEn PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REVEO ml.aclMa WNRr RNn.e'NUTaN MIIGOO.mons W EI W006 WEINSTEINA+U MCMIT[pilUl.u.DFswon City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor Department of Community Development - Jack Pace, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION October 22, 2018 Rachel Bianchi 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Subject: L19-0101 Special Permission Wetland Buffer Reduction Dear Rachel, Your applications for Special Permission Wetland Buffer Reduction for the Fire Station 51 project is considered complete on October 22, 2019 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. This notice of complete application applies only to the permits identified above. It is your responsibility to apply for and obtain all necessary permits issued by other agencies. Your application requires one or more public notice boards to be posted onsite. Please contact Fastsigns in Kent as soon as possible at (206) 575-2110 or via email at 157@fastsigns.com to pay for the notice board(s); this is necessary to ensure your application processing is not delayed. Please reference your City File number, above. Please contact me with any questions at 206.433.7162 or Lvnn.Miranda@Tukwilawa.gov. Sincerely, Lynn Miranda Senior Planner Tukwila City Hall • 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, WA 98188 • 206-433-1800 • Website: TukwilaWA.gov WEINSTEINA+U ARCHITECTS + URBAN DESIGNERS Memorandum Project Tukwila Fire Station 51 Project No. 17001 Date 10/10/19 Subject Special Permission Application To Tukwila Permit Center From Emma Nowinski (WAU) Copies to Rachel Bianchi (CoT) Justine Kim (SOJ) Julie Dedonato (SOJ) Remarks Development Permit Number: D18-0321 The above -mentioned project encompasses the construction of a new, 2-bay fire station for the City of Tukwila and associated site improvements. The project site was previously disturbed as part of nearby roadway improvements, which allowed for the establishment of an emergent wetland towards the west edge of the property at the base of a manmade hillside. In order to construct the site improvements necessary for the function of the fire station, the Applicant requests a modification to the required wetland buffer defined in the Tukwila Municipal code. The requested modification consists of a 50% reduction in buffer depth, along with two, small areas of "wetland as buffer," where additional mitigation efforts will offset a further reduction in buffer depth. Impacts to the buffer will be mitigated through buffer enhancement at a greater than 1:1 ratio, while the wetland impacts will be mitigated through wetland enhancement at a greater than 3:1 ratio. The existing wetland and buffer areas do not contain slopes more than 15%and the existing buffer is of low quality. Please refer to the Sensitive Areas Study produced by The Watershed Company for additional detail on both the existing conditions and proposed mitigation efforts. RECEIVED OCT 11 2019 Community Development 2200 Western Ave, Suite 301, Seattle, WA 98121 Page 1 of 1 WeinsteinAU.com T 206 443 8606 19_1010 TFS51 Special Permission - Wetland.docx CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OF WASHINGTON ss COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its emplo ees, agents, en ineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at /7 q. / _$O' ce -•J .. P fe-� for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any Toss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at J (city), 4' /1 (state), on (9 ,20! (Print Name) - �U.G�✓-i-(�� e�V�-� T1,I t''I"/I,k (AVsres_ti 41 S7i umber 4- (Signature) Al C-i-Cdf On this day personally appeared before me /��C �� / "' / a to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that hege�igned the same as his/ erg oluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBEficAN p0 �I hp BEFORE ME ON THIS �� Pa�x Cr `N. // `\••��\nht / i o4•rOIAR�. 'Ilk ,, NOTA Y�LI$�IC in and for the State of Washington • ,. residing at L�,t% 17 �U i 0' AB'-" x ,9 = �' C� ///11t�OF WA`�� litl\\\‘‘‘‘‘‘.... \\dcptstorc\City ('ommon\Teri\Revisions In Progress\Special Permission Director -March 201 I.docx DAY OF My Commission expires on /0 —2V 2 COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the City may require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City Staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206-431-3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206-433-0179 (Department of Public Works). Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning APPLICATION MATERIALS: ✓ 1. Application Checklist one (1) copy, indicating items submitted with application. ✓ 2. Application Fee: See Land Use Fee Schedule. 1 3. Written description of the project, the deviation or approval being requested and response to the applicable decision criteria. ZONING CODE PARKING DEVIATION 4. A complete description of the proposed construction relative to parking areas, and all supporting agreements. 5. Dimensional site plan(s) to demonstrate parking area consistent with Zoning Code requirements. 6. Parking studies as needed to demonstrate adequate parking is provided. LANDSCAPE DEVIATION 7. Landscape plan — two (2) copies showing size and species of existing and proposed plant materials, required perimeter landscape types, parking areas, buildings, walkways, transit facilities, property lines, dimensions and area of planting beds and any calculations necessary to demonstrate compliance with review criteria. SENSITIVE AREA ORDINANCE - Deviations, Alterations or Uses Requiring Administrative Review and Approval ✓ 8. Site Plan — two (2) copies showing all buildings, parking areas, walkways, property lines, planting areas, sensitive areas, their buffers and setbacks. ✓ 9. Sensitive area studies, mitigation and enhancement plans to justify a requested use, deviation, alteration or buffer or setback reduction and demonstrate that the reduction will not result in a direct or indirect short- term or long-term adverse impact to the sensitive area per TMC 18.45.090(D) or 18.45.110(C). See TMC 18.45.040(B) for required element s of wetland and/or watercourse sensitive area studies and TMC 18.45.040(C) for the required elements of a geotechnical report. RECEIVED OCT 112019 Community Development \\dcptstore\City Common\Tcri\Revisions In Progress\Special Permission Director -March 2011.docx Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning CARGO CONTAINER APPROVAL 10. Site plan showing the location of the container(s) in relationship to parking areas, property lines, buildings, streets, trails, landscape areas and setbacks. 11. Description of the proposed screenin. 12. Dimensions of proposed cargo container. SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN STANDARD EXCEPTIONS 13. Dimensioned and scalable building elevations with keyed colors and materials. 14. The site plan must include a graphic scale, north arrow, proposed house footprint, any existing structures, lot lines, setbacks, adjacent streets, driveways, parking areas, any sensitive areas and any fences, rockeries or retaining walls. RECEIVED OCT 112Qig Community Development \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\Revisions In Progress\Spccial Permission Director -March 201 l.docx RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA Cfn 1 ' 2Z 9 Department of Community Development COMMt1NIr 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 DLvt t 0►'h4►tSE RM I SSI ON — Telephone. (206) 431-3670 DIRECTOR SPECIAL APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type: P-SP Planner: File Number: % / 1r> D/ / Application Complete Date: Project File Number: pug3 Application Incomplete Date: Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENTTukwila Fire Station 51 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: New 2-bay fire station with associated site improvements LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 17951 Southcenter Parkway LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 3523049008,3523049040 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in, meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Rachel Bianchi Address:6300 Southcenter Blvd, Tukwila WA 98188 Phone: (206) 454-7566 E-mail' r 'anchi@tukwilawa.gov FAX: Signature: _ / � -- Date: of L zft ( \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\Revisions In Progress\Special Permission Director -March 201 1.docx