Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit PL18-0104 - T-MOBILE - WIRELESS FACILITY TYPE 2
T-MOBILE SE03055 0040001025 PARENT FILE PL18-0104 THIS FILE L18-0119 WIRELESS FACILITY/TYPE 2 City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor Department of Community Development - Jack Pace, Director Affidavit of Distribution Project Name: T-MOBILE SE03055 Project Number: PL18-0104 Associated File Number(s): L18-0119 Date Mailed: 02/15/2019 Mailing requested by: MEREDITH SAMPSON Mailer's signature: SM ❑ Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet ❑ Board of Appeals Agenda Packet ❑ Determination of Non -Significance ❑ Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice ❑ Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance ❑ Notice of Action ❑ Notice of Application Parties of Record: ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit Z Notice of Decision ❑ Notice of Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Public Meeting ❑ Official Notice ❑ Other: SEPA CHECKLIST ❑ Shoreline Mgmt Permit ❑ Short Subdivision Agenda TODD WALTON TWALTON@CENTERSOLUTIONS.COM KC ASSESSOR'S OFFICE ACCOUNTING DIVISION 500 4th AVE, RM# 709A SEATTLE WA 98104 Christie.Most@kingcounty.gov CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT ANA.LE@TUKWILAWA.GOV 3400 S 148TH STREET LLC 3438 S 148TH ST TUKWILA WA 98168 City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor Department of Community Development - Jack Pace, Director February 8, 2019 NOTICE OF DECISION TO: Todd Walton, Centerline Solutions, OBO T-Mobile 3400 38th Street LLC King County Assessor, Accounting Division This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approval. I. PROJECT INFORMATION Project File Number: L18-0119; PL18-0104 Applicant: Todd Walton, Centerline Solutions, OBO T-Mobile Type of Permit Applied for: Type 2 Wireless Facilities Permit Project Description: The applicant is proposing constructing a new T-Mobile "Non -Inhabitable" telecommunications site consisting of installing: six (6) new antennas, six (6) RRU's, and one (1) COVP on an existing building rooftop, equipment to be placed inside existing room on parking level includes: one (1) FSMF, two (2) ASIA, four (4) ABIA, one (1) ASIK, one (1) ABIL, and two (2) AMOB. The project also qualifies as an Eligible Facilities Modification under § 6409 of the FCC's Spectrum Act, which requires the City to approve any eligible facilities request for a modification of an existing tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station. This proposal is not considered a substantial change under the Tukwila Municipal Code 18.58.200.7, and falls within the guidelines for an eligible facilities modification. Location: Parcel 0040001025, 3438 S 148th Street, Tukwila, WA 98168 Associated Files: PL18-0104 Comprehensive Plan Designation/Zoning District: Regional Commercial (RC) Tukwila City Hall • 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, WA 98188 • 206-433-1800 • Website: TukwilaWA.gov II. DECISION SEPA Determination: The City SEPA Responsible Official has determined that this application does not require a SEPA threshold determination because it is categorically exempt. Decision on Substantive Permit: The Community Development Director has determined that the application for a Wireless Telecommunication Facility does comply with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved this application with the following condition: 1. Applicant must apply for a business license to operate the wireless communication facility at this location. III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 2 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code §18.104.010. Other land use applications related to this project may still be pending. No administrative appeal of a DNS or an EIS is permitted. One administrative appeal to the City Hearing Examiner of the Decision on the Permit itself is permitted. If an MDNS was issued, any person wishing to challenge either the conditions which were imposed by the MDNS decision or the failure of the Department to impose additional conditions in the MDNS must raise such issues as part of the appeal to the Hearing Examiner. A party who is not satisfied with the outcome of the Hearing Examiner appeal process may file an appeal in King County Superior Court from the Hearing Examiner's decision. IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING To appeal the Community Development Director decision on the Permit Application, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 14 days of the issuance of this Decision. The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code Ch. 18.116. All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials MUST include: 1. The name of the appealing party. 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision, including any specific challenge to an MDNS. 4. The Notice of Appeal shall identify (a) the specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; (b) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and (c) the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. Phone: 206-433-1800 • Email: Mayor@TukwilaWA.gov • Website: TukwilaWA.gov 5. Appeal fee per the current fee schedule, additional hourly charges may apply. In addition, all hearing examiner costs will be passed through to the appellant. V. APPEAL HEARINGS PROCESS Any administrative appeal regarding the Permit shall be conducted as a closed record hearing before the Hearing Examiner based on the information presented to the Community Development Director, who made the original decision. No new evidence or testimony will be permitted during the appeal hearing. Parties will be allowed to present oral argument based on the information presented to the Community Development Director before their decision was issued. The Hearing Examiner's decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. Any party wishing to challenge the Hearing Examiner's decision on this application must file an appeal pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW Ch. 36.70C. An appeal challenging a DNS, an MDNS or an EIS may be included in such an appeal. If no appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision is properly filed in Superior Court within such time limit, the Decision on this permit will be final. The City's decision to issue a DNS, an MDNS or an EIS is final for this permit and any other pending permit applications for the development of the subject property. VI. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Meredith Sampson, who may be contacted at 206-431-3661 or Meredith.Sampson@TukwilaWA.gov for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contact the ing County Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. Depa City of ' kwila %GQ ent of Community Development Phone: 206-433-1800 • Email: Mayor@TukwilaWA.gov • Website: TukwilaWA.gov City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor Department of Community Development - Jack Pace, Director Staff Report PREPARED February 8, 2019 NOTIFICATION: Notification is not required for a Type 2 land use application with no other agencies of jurisdiction. FILE NUMBER: L18-0119; PL18-0104 APPLICANT: Todd Walton PROPERTY OWNER: 3400 38`h Street LLC REQUEST: Approval of a Type 2 Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Permit to construct a new T-Mobile "Non -Inhabitable" telecommunications site consisting of installing: six (6) new antennas, six (6) RRU's, and one (1) COVP on an existing building rooftop, equipment to be placed inside existing room on parking level includes: one (1) FSMF, two (2) ASIA, four (4) ABIA, one (1) ASIK, one (1) ABIL, and two (2) AMOB. LOCATION: Parcel 0040001025, 3438 S 148th Street, Tukwila, WA 98168 ASSOCIATED PERMITS: SEPA DETERMINATION: Electrical permits issued through the City of Tukwila will be required for service alteration for any other electrical service work that is anticipated but not noted on the plans, per article 85.12 (B), Washington electrical code. Building and mechanical permits are required for scope of work stated on the submitted plans. Exempt COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Regional Commercial (RC) DESIGNATION: ZONE DESIGNATION: Regional Commercial (RC) STAFF: Meredith Sampson, Assistant Planner ATTACHMENTS: Project Plans for Permit L18-0119 Tukwila City Hall • 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, WA 98188 • 206-433-1800 • Website: TukwilaWA.gov Page 2 • • Vicinity/Site Information FINDINGS Protect Description The applicant is proposing constructing a new T-Mobile "Non -Inhabitable" telecommunications site consisting of installing: six (6) new antennas, six (6) RRU's, and one (1) COVP on an existing building rooftop, equipment to be placed inside existing room on parking level includes: one (1) FSMF, two (2) ASIA, four (4) ABIA, one (1) ASIK, one (1) ABIL, and two (2) AMOB. Existing Development There is no existing telecommunications facility development at this site. Surrounding Land Uses The subject property is zoned Regional Commercial (RC). Adjacent properties to the north, south, east, and west are also zoned RC. Tukwila International Boulevard lies to the east of this property. Background In 2006, the City adopted a Wireless Facilities Chapter (TMC 18.71) to the Zoning Code. The chapter provides location and design requirements for the placement of WCF within the City of Tukwila. In 2016 the city adopted amendments to this ordinance in compliance with the Federal Spectrum Act. Phone: 206-433-1800 • Email: Mayor@TukwilaWA.gov • Website: TukwilaWA.gov Page 3 Location Selection Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) provides a hierarchy of appropriate locations within the City. Generally, co - locations and utilizing existing structures are favored over the development of new standalone WCF within the City. TABLE A Type of Permit Required, Based on. Type ofWireless Communication Faclltiy Zoning(1) Type of Facility Residential Commercial industrial Adding antes in an existing tower or Willy Pole Type 1RF Type IR' Type 10 t3gible fa:Vibes modification Type 1 Type 1 Type 1 Wray pole co4ocmtion Type 2 Type 2 Type 2 Concealed harm attached Type 2I Type PI Type 1 Non -concealed building attached Type 2(I Type 2 Type 1 Neu tower or height adjustment request Type 3NI Type 3 Type 3 (1) Zoning for any private/public property or right-of-way Residential — LDR, MDR, or HDR Commercial — O, MUO, RCC, NCC, RC, RCM, TUC, C/LI or TVS Industrial - LI, HI, MIC/L, or MIC/H (2) Provided the height of the tower does not increase and the square footage of the enclosure area does not increase. (3) An applicant may request to install a non -concealed building attached facility, under TMC Section 18.58.150. The applicant is proposing constructing a new T-Mobile "Non -Inhabitable" telecommunications site consisting of installing: six (6) new antennas, six (6) RRU's, and one (1) COVP on an existing building rooftop, equipment to be placed inside existing room on parking level includes: one (1) FSMF, two (2) ASIA, four (4) ABIA, one (1) ASIK, one (1) ABIL, and two (2) AMOB. Design Standards The City provides specific design standards for the placement of WCF within the City of Tukwila. The table below indicates if the applicant's proposal complies with required standards. Phone: 206-433-1800 • Email: Mayor@TukwilaWA.gov • Website: TukwilaWA.gov Page 4 Table 1 (See TMC 18.58.070 for further details) General Requirements Project does comply Project does not comply Not Applicable Notes 1. Generators or other devices which will create noise must comply with TMC 8.22 regarding noise. X • 2.Business License Requirement X Applicant will apply for a business license before operating at this location. 3.Only safety signage must be placed on the WCF. X 4. Accommodations for parking for maintenance personnel must be provided. X 5. Towers shall either maintain a galvanized steel finish or be painted a neutral color so as to reduce its visual obtrusiveness. X 6. The design of all buildings and ancillary structures shall use materials, colors, textures, screening, and landscaping that will blend the tower facilities to the natural setting and built environment. X 7. Antennas shall have the same color scheme as the structure they are located on. X 8. WCF poles and towers shall only have safety lights if required by a government agency. X X 9. No advertising is permitted on WCF X No advertising is proposed. 10. Each service provider shall be limited to an equipment enclosure of 360 square feet. X Phone: 206-433-1800 • Email: Mayor@TukwilaWA.gov • Website: TukwilaWA.gov ' Page 5 Table 2 (See TMC 18.58.110 for further details) Non -Concealed Building Mounted Requirements Project Does Comply Project Does Not Comply Not Applicable Notes 1. The proposed facility must meet the height requirements of the applicable zoning category X 2. If building is at or above the maximum height requirements, the antenna must not extend more than 3ft above the existing roof line X 3. Is the proposal utilizing flush mounted antennas X Antennas will be painted to match the color scheme of the buildings/pole instead. 4. IF not flush mounted, will "shrouds" must be provided for a better visual appearance than exposed antenna equipment X 5. Antennas shall be painted to match the color scheme, of the building(s)/pole X 6. Feed lines and coaxial cables will be painted to match the color scheme of the building(s)/pole? X 7. Cabinet equipment is located within X Phone: 206-433-1800 • Email: Mayor@TukwilaWA.gov • Website: TukwilaWA.gov Page 6 the building or on the rooftop 8. Is the equipment cabinet located on the ground with a 6-foot-tall fence X CONCLUSIONS 1. The proposed modifications to the existing WCF will not significantly alter the conditions that currently exist and will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity. 2. As demonstrated in Table 1, the project meets all applicable development standards for a Type 2 WCF. 3. The proposed modifications will not alter the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building or site design. 4. The proposed project is in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. RECOMMENDATIONS The recommendation to the Director of Community Development is to approve this application for a Type 2 Wireless Telecommunications Facility permit with the following condition: 1. Applicant must apply for a business license to operate the wireless communication facility at this location. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS A City of Tukwila electrical permit is required for service alteration. A building and mechanical permit are required for the site work. Phone: 206-433-1800 • Email: Mayor@TukwilaWA.gov • Website: TukwilaWA.gov City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Land Use File Number(s) PL18-0104 L18-0119 TYPE 2 WIRELESS FACILITY LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: ® Building ® Planning ® Public Works ® Fire Dept. ❑ Police Dept. ❑ Parks/Rec Project: T-MOBILE SE03055 Address: 3438 S 148TH ST Date transmitted: 12/28/2018 Response requested by: 01/11/2019 Staff coordinator: MEREDITH SAMPSON Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Aff" fr•i/ eavtAtzdtiks : P-feN I de- Re vt,e,Ac blefe/O— Plan check date: Commentsb prepared by: Update date: TO: ® Building City of Tukwila Department of Community Development ;RECEIVED DEC 2 8 2018 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS Land Use File Number(s) PL18-0104 L18-0119 TYPE 2 WIRELESS FACILITY LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM ® Planning ® Public Works ® Fire Dept. 0 Police Dept. 0 Parks/Rec Project: T-MOBILE SE03055 Address: 3438 S 148TH ST Date transmitted: 12/28/2018 Response requested by: 01/11/2019 Staff coordinator: MEREDITH SAMPSON Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) hi-s (n,O col V1w1.2�,c. S r Plan check date: Comments Update date: //03! , 9 prepared by: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Land Use File Number(s) PL18-0104 L18-0119 TYPE 2 WIRELESS FACILITY LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: ® Building ® Planning ® Public Works 0 Fire Dept. ❑ Police Dept. El Parks/Rec Project: T-MOBILE SE03055 Address: 3438 S 148TH ST Date transmitted: 12/28/2018 Response requested by: 01/11/2019 Staff coordinator: MEREDITH SAMPSON Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) , ;4 �riis�i�1 ,V Plan check date: /2 g8/S Comments prepared by: Update date: Todd Walton 206-334-4116 From: Meredith Sampson <Meredith.Sampson@TukwilaWA.gov> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2018 1:38 PM To: Todd Walton <TWalton@centerlinesolutions.com> Subject: Wireless Facilities Questions In Tukwila, Washington Good Afternoon, Let me know what sites you are considering for the wireless facilities and what questions you have. Thanks! Meredith Sampson Assistant Planner l City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100 l Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431-3661 l Meredith.Sampson@TukwilaWA gov Tukwila: The City of opportunity. the community of choice. This message is solely for the use of the intended recipient. This message is confidential, and may contain legally - privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, reliance upon or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please destroy it and notify me immediately. Thank you CAUTION: This email originated from outside the City of Tukwila network. Please DO NOT open attachments or click links from an unknown or suspicious origin. RECEIVED DEC 28 2618 Community Development From: Meredith Sampson To: Todd Walton Subject: Re: T-Mobile SE03055 - 3438 S 148th St Impact Public School Date: Friday, December 07, 2018 11:20:46 AM Attachments: wireless exemntions PNC, Good Morning, I can confirm that this project would need a Type 2 Permit, but I believe it is exempt from SEPA. We have some outdated language on our wireless facilities modification application that we need to update, because it references a previous iteration of SEPA exemptions, but these are the current ones: (25) Wireless service facilities. (a) The siting of wireless service facilities are exempt If: (i) The collocation of new equipment, removal of equipment. or replacement of existing equipment on existing or replacement structures that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such structures: or (ii) The siting project involves constructing a wireless service tower Tess than sixty feet in height that is located in a commercial, industrial, manufacturing, forest, or agricultural zone. (b) For the purposes of this subsection: (I) " Wireless services" means wireless data and telecommunications services, including commercial mobile services, commercial mobile data services, unlicensed wireless services, and common carrier wireless exchange access services, as defined by federal laws and regulations. (ii) "Wireless service facilities" means facilities for the provision of wireless services. (Ili) "Collocation" means the mounting or installation of equipment on an existing tower, building, structure for the purposes of either transmitting or receiving, or both, radio frequency signals for communication purposes. (iv) "Existing structure" means any existing tower. pole, building, or other structure capable of supporting wireless service facilities. (v) "Substantially change the physical dimensions" means: (A) The mounting of equipment on a structure that would increase the height of the structure by more than ten percent, or twenty feet, whichever Is greater or (8) The mounting of equipment that would involve adding an appurtenance to the body of the structure that would protrude from the edge of the structure more than twenty feet, or more than the width of the structure at the level of the appurtenance, whichever is greater. (c) This exemption does not apply to projects within a critical area designated under GMA (RCW 36.70A.060). Locating a tower on a school no longer requires SEPA outright. The City of Tukwila's fee for a Type 2 Wireless Communication Facility is $1,867.95. Best, Meredith Sampson From: Todd Walton<TWalton@centerlinesolutions.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2018 2:22:48 PM To: Meredith Sampson Subject: T-Mobile 5E03055 - 3438 S 148th St Impact Public School Hi Meredith, T-Mobile is proposing a rooftop antenna installation with equipment located inside the building in a separate room. At this point the plan is to place two sectors on an existing penthouse and to place a 3rd sector inside FRP screening on another part of the roof. It looks like this would be a Type 2 Permit and would require SEPA. Are you able to confirm? Also, Fees look to be: Type 2: $626.00 SEPA: $626.00 Generate mailing list database: $486.00 Public Notice Board: TBD — paid to Fast Signs From: M rdI own To: roes Walmn Subject. Re: T-Moblk 5E03055 - 3438 5 1488, St Impaa Public School Date: Monday, December 17, 2018 9:53:05 AM Attachments: toggillazio Good Morning, Yes, in your application please write how you meet the criteria in TMC 18.58.140. Best, Meredith Sampson From: Todd Walton<TWalton@centerlinesolutions.com> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 9:13 AM To: Meredith Sampson Subject: RE: T-Mobile 5E03055 - 3438 S 148th St Impact Public School HI Meredith, • Is it possible to mount 2 of the 3 sectors on an existing penthouse without placing FRP (screening) around those two? I'm preparing to order my photosimulations for my submittal and I want to be able to get it in this year. 18.58.140 Request to Use Non -concealed Building Attached in Lieu of a Concealed Building Attached. The use of concealed building facilities shall have first priority in all residential and commercial zones. However, an applicant may request to construct a non -concealed building attached wireless communication facility in lieu of a concealed wireless communication facility. The following criteria shall be used: 1. Due to the size of the building and the proposed location of the antennas, the visual impact of the exposed antennas will be minimal in relation to the building. 2. Cables are concealed from view and any visible cables are reduced in visibility by sheathing or painting to match the building where they are located. 3. Cabinet equipment is adequately screened from view. 4. Due to the style or design of the building, the use of a concealed facility would reduce the visual appearance of the building. 5. The building where the antennas are located is at least 200 feet from the Duwamish/Green River • \• .._\ �.�,�,�-.-\ TNobile- .. j • • • •� • n n- n ri , -. - ri - j p 41y � i I ....AT. 1...•.,..�., •'.r / 1: 1.ca.:.r. r•11" S. • \ -, ^ mom....=.» . . d= - --w-_—_....,..,.i..rT•.i� • ."..."'fit ""��i♦ I- .N.T U: .CHXI '' • • • I l �.. - Ill. 11 • 0. Q! ; _ • . •..I• .. • I ...., MS.. A3.0 - ------------------------...... ..... .... ------------- • 2 SOUTH ELEVATION .., . Todd Walton 206-334-4116 From: Meredith Sampson <Meredith.Sampson@TukwilaWA.gov> • • •CENTERLINE RF Safety and NIER Analysis Report 12/24/2018 Site: SE03055A - SeaTac North Intl Blvd Tukwila, WA Prepared for: T-Mobile DEC 28 23 Community Development Table of Contents 1 Certification 3 2 Executive Summary 4 2.1 Conclusion and Recommendations: 5 3 Introduction 6 3.1 Site Description: 6 3.2 Site Configuration Being Modeled: 7 3.3 Assumptions: 7 4 Predictive Analysis Details 8 4.1 Analysis Locations: 8 4.2 Antenna Inventory• 9 4.3 RF Emissions Diagram(s)- T-Mobile Transmitters Only: 10 5 Signage/ Mitigation 12 5.1 Signage/ Barrier Detail 12 5.2 Signage/ Barrier Diagram 13 6 Conclusions and Recommendations 14 7 Appendix A: FCC Compliance and RF Safety Policies 15 8 Appendix B: Overview of RoofView® Functions and Assumptions 17 9 References 18 10 Limited Warranty 19 Page 2 of 19 1 Certification This report, prepared by Centerline Solutions, LLC for T-Mobile, is intended to document compliance and evaluate power density levels as outlined in the report. The computations, analysis, and resulting report and conclusions were based on applicable FCC guidelines and regulations for maximum permissible exposure to humans consistent with FCC OET Bulletin 65, Edition 97-01. Additionally, Centerline Solutions, LLC certifies that the assumptions are valid and that the data used within Centerline Solutions' control are accurate, including information collected as part of Centerline Solutions' field surveys. Centerline Solutions, LLC does not however certify the accuracy or correctness of any data provided to Centerline Solutions, LLC for this analysis and report by T-Mobile or other third parties working on behalf of T-Mobile. I certify that the attached RF exposure analysis and report is correct to the best of my knowledge, and all calculations, assumptions and conclusions are based on generally acceptable engineering practices: EXPIRES 2/22/2020 Patrick A. Kearns, P.E. Report Prepared by: Ibrahim Ali, 12/21/18 Report Reviewed by: Nick Doyle, 12/24/18 Page 3 of 19 2 Executive Summary This report provides the results of an RF power density analysis performed for T-Mobile at site SE03055A SeaTac North Intl Blvd in accordance with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) rules and regulations for RF emissions described in OET Bulletin 65, Edition 97-01. This report addresses RF safety for two classified groups defined by OET Bulletin 65: Occupational/ Controlled and General Population/ Uncontrolled. Based on the analysis, this site will be Compliant with FCC rules and regulations and T-Mobile's Signage and Barrier Policy if the mitigation details provided in Table 1 are implemented. Minimum Required For Compliance Mitigation Information NZCZEII ell*ru® rxaaria.la i.....• f ��� 1 r -.lir _- --- a --' ..... - ,:,..! Guidelines She Info Caution Warning Notice Barrier Marker Access Point TBD TBD Alpha 2 1 5' Beta 3 (2) 4' Ganuna 2 1 (2) 7' Notes/ Additional Compliance Requirements(s): A Warning sign needs to be posted on the wall next to the antennas at the Alpha sector with Caution signs on the wall below Alpha sector and on a 5' indicative marker on the Lower Roof. Two 4' indicative markers with Caution signs need to be installed on the Main Roof with another Caution sign in front of the antenna screenwall. Two 7' indicative markers need to be installed on the Main Roof with Caution signs in front of the Gamma sector and a Warning sign installed on the wall with the antennas. Guidelines and Notice Signs to be posted on any access point to the Upper Roof and Lower Roofs which need to be kept locked at all times. Table 1 - Mitigation Requirements for Compliance Page 4 of 19 2.1 Conclusion and Recommendations: • The results of the analysis indicate that the power density levels in the generally accessible areas on the Upper Roof Level will exceed the FCC's MPE limit for Occupational/General Population environments. • The results of the analysis indicate that the power density levels in the generally accessible areas on the Lower Roof Level will exceed the FCC's MPE limit for General Population environments. • The maximum theoretical %MPE (Occupational) is 518.7% directly in front of the accessible T-Mobile antennas at the Upper Roof level. • A Warning sign needs to be posted on the wall next to the antennas at the Alpha sector with Caution signs on the wall below Alpha sector and on a 5' indicative marker on the Lower Roof. Two 4' indicative markers with Caution signs need to be installed on the Main Roof with another Caution sign in front of the antenna screenwall. Two 7' indicative markers need to be installed on the Main Roof with Caution signs in front of the Gamma sector and a Warning sign installed on the wall with the antennas. Guidelines and Notice Signs to be posted on any access point to the Upper Roof and Lower Roofs which need to be kept locked at all times. • This site will be operating in general compliance with FCC OET Bulletin 65 and T-Mobile's signage policy as the mitigation requirements outlined in the Executive Summary are implemented. See Signage/Barrier Diagram section for further details on the recommended signage placement locations. Page 5of19 3 Introduction The purpose of this analysis and report is to evaluate the cumulative power density levels of all non -excluded antennas located on the rooftop and identify any areas of concern that require mitigation. This report also assesses the rooftop's compliance with FCC OET Bulletin 65; "Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio -frequency Electromagnetic Fields". The power density simulation performed for this site utilized RoofView® analysis software. All antennas were assigned an operating frequency and transmit power and were deemed to be operating at 100% of their rated output power. 3.1 Site Description: • Site Name: • Street Address: • • . • Latitude: Longitude: Structure Type: Structure Height: SE03055A-SeaTac North Intl. Blvd. 3400 S 148th St. Tukwila, WA 98168 47.471109° -122.287777° Rooftop 57' AGL at Penthouse Roof BTS Equipment Location: The BTS Equipment is located on the Upper Roof at the southeast side of the building beside the Beta sector. • Co -Locators/ Other Antennas: The CD shows no co -locators identified at this site. • Access: TBD. Page 6 of 19 3.2 Site Configuration Being Modeled: • This will be a three -sectored site with two active antennas on each sector. • Each sector supports LTE in the 600, 700, 1900, and 2100 MHz bands, with GSM in the 1900 MHz band. • All LTE supports MIMO. 3.3 Assumptions: • All technologies were evaluated assuming the maximum number of channels and were running at maximum power 100% of the time. Page7of19 4 Predictive Analysis Details For purposes of this analysis, RoofView® was configured to provide an output based on the appropriate MPE limit(s) published in the FCC's guidelines. The antenna information was loaded into RoofView®, an MPE predictive analysis tool by Richard Tell and Associates, Inc. 4.1 Analysis Locations: Number of Elevations Analyzed: 2 • Upper Roof Level • Lower Roof Level • A Ground study was not required as the antennas exceed 33' AGL. Page 8 of 19 4.2 Antenna Inventory: The following table contains the technical data used to simulate the power density that may be encountered with all antennas simultaneously operating at full rated power with the exception of any excluded antennas cited in this document. If co -locators' antennas exist and specific antenna details could not be secured, generic antennas, frequencies, and transmit powers were used for modeling. The assumptions used are based on past experience with communications carriers. FTt iuDq XL31 ,r i f ll't4) itu• li�il3 [ =31 _. ..:�1 .L :Wl . 'Slid . 0 ( Ii ami6 P.32ti TMA1A L700 730 30.0 _ 4 0.3 112.O+Commscope FFHH-65C-R3 TMA1B G1900, 1930 80.0 2 0.3 149.3 Commscope FFHH-65C-R3 TMA1C L600 600 30.0 4 0.3 112.0 _Commscope FFHH-65C-R3. TMA2A L19001960. 6.3 16 0.0 100.8 __Nokia AAFIA TMA2B L2100~ 2150 . 6.3 16 0.0 100.8T Nokia AAFIA TMB1A L700 730 30.0 4 0.3 112.0 Commscope FFHH-65C-R3 TMB1B G1900~ m 1930 80.0 2 0.3 149.3 Commscope FFHH-65C-R3__ TMB1C L600 600 30.0 4 _0.3 112.0�Commscope FFHH-65C-R3 TMB2A L1900 1960 6.3 16 F 0.0 } 100.8 Nokia AAFIA TMB2B L2100 2150 . 6.3 16 0.0 100.8 Nokia AAFIA TMC1A_ L700 730 , 30.0 4 0.3 112.0 Commscope FFHH_65C-R31 TMC1B G1900 1930 �_ 80.0 2 0.3 149.3 Commscope FFHH_65C-R3 TMC1C 66 100 - 00 30.0 ' 4 0.3 112.0_ Commscope FFHH-65C-R3 TMC2A L1900 1960 6.3 16 0.0 100.8 Nokia AAFIA TMC2B 12100 2150 6.3 16 0.0 100.8 Nokia AAFIA 4.0 4.0 4.0 _ 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 _ 4.0 5.0 5.0 9.3 octoport8.0 15.5 63;0 9.3 Octoport8.0 18.2 66;0 9.3 Octoport 8.0 15.3 67;0 10.3 16-Port - 6.0 18.0_ 60;0 10.3 16-Port 6.0 f 18.0' 60;0 9.3 Octoport' 8.0 15.5_63;110 9.3 Octoport 8.0 + 18.2 66;110 9.3 Octoport 8.0 15.3 67;110 10.3 16-Port 6.0 18.0 60;110 10.3 _ 16-Port 6.0 18.0,60;110 9.3 O _to port 8.00 15.5�63;230 9.3 Octoport 8.0 18.2 66;230 9.3 _ Octoport 8.0 15.3 67;230 10.3 ' 16_-Port 6.0 18.0 -60;230-- 10.3 16-Port 6.0 18.0 60;230 Table 2 - Antenna Inventory Page 9 of 19 • • 4.3 RF Emissions Diagram(s)- T-Mobile Transmitters Only: The following Diagram(s) represent the theoretical spatially averaged Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) percentages that are expected for each study's elevation. An additional 1% Occupational MPE Limit (5% General Population MPE limit) is included to demonstrate where T-Mobile is a significant contributor to accessible areas where multiple carriers' transmitters are present. Tan < 1% Occupational Limit (< 5% General Population Limit) Green >_ 1% through 20% Occupational Limit (< 100% General Population Limit) Blue >_ 20% through 100% Occupational Limit (>_ 100% General Population Limit) >_ 100% through 1000% Occupational Limit Red >_ 1000% Occupational Limit Diagram 1 - MPE% for Upper Roof Level Max MPE (Occupational): 517.7% Page 10 of 19 TT✓I $eta Ground 110° Tan < 1% Occupational Limit (< 5% General Population Limit) Green >_ 1% through 20% Occupational Limit (< 100% General Population Limit) Blue >_ 20% through 100% Occupational Limit (>_ 100% General Population Limit) >_ 100% through 1000% Occupational Limit Red >_ 1000% Occupational Limit Diagram 2 - MPE% for Lower Roof Level Max MPE (Occupational): 64.9% Page 11 of 19 5 Signage/ Mitigation 5.1 Signage/ Barrier Detail Minimum Required For Compliance Mitigation Information 3 :.CAUTION; �.� A MAANINO a — ...` )01.1) -_ Notice Caution Warning Guidelines Site Info Barrier Marker Access Point TBD TBD Alpha 2 1 5' Beta 3 (2) 4' Gamma 2 1 (2) 7' Notes/ Additional Mitigation Details from Audit: A Warning sign needs to be posted on the wall next to the antennas at the Alpha sector with Caution signs on the wall below Alpha sector and on a 5' indicative marker on the Lower Roof. Two 4' indicative markers with Caution signs need to be installed on the Main Roof with another Caution sign in front of the antenna screenwall. Two 7' indicative markers need to be installed on the Main Roof with Caution signs in front of the Gamma sector and a Warning sign installed on the wall with the antennas. Guidelines and Notice Signs to be posted on any access point to the Upper Roof and Lower Roofs which need to be kept locked at all times. Table 3 - Mitigation Requirements for Compliance Page 12 of 19 5.2 Signage/ Barrier Diagram A Caution signs need to be posted on both markers for the Gamma sector. Caution signs need to be posted on the wall below Alpha sector and at the marker. A Warning sign needs to be posted on the wall at the Gamma sector. A Warning sign needs to be posted on the wall next to the antennas at the Alpha sector at the Upper Roof level. Lower Roof Upper Roof Guidelines and Notice Signs to be posted on any access point to the Upper Roof and Lower Roofs. Ground Caution Signs need to be posted on the front of the antenna screenwall and on both markers for the Beta sector. Page 13 of 19 AINOM rinE 6 Conclusions and Recommendations • The results of the analysis indicate that the power density levels in the generally accessible areas on the Upper Roof Level will exceed the FCC's MPE limit for Occupational/General Population environments. • The results of the analysis indicate that the power density levels in the generally accessible areas on the Lower Roof Level will exceed the FCC's MPE limit for General Population environments. • The maximum theoretical %MPE (Occupational) is 518.7% directly in front of the accessible T-Mobile antennas at the Upper Roof level. • A Warning sign needs to be posted on the wall next to the antennas at the Alpha sector with Caution signs on the wall below Alpha sector and on a 5' indicative marker on the Lower Roof. Two 4' indicative markers with Caution signs need to be installed on the Main Roof with another Caution sign in front of the antenna screenwall. Two 7' indicative markers need to be installed on the Main Roof with Caution signs in front of the Gamma sector and a Warning sign installed on the wall with the antennas. Guidelines and Notice Signs to be posted on any access point to the Upper Roof and Lower Roofs which need to be kept locked at all times. • This site will be operating in general compliance with FCC OET Bulletin 65 and T-Mobile's signage policy as the mitigation requirements outlined in the Executive Summary are implemented. See Signage/Barrier Diagram section for further details on the recommended signage placement locations. Note: Modifications to the site; and/or increases in channel counts or power levels exceeding those listed in this report will require additional evaluation to determine compliance. Page 14 of 19 7 Appendix A: FCC Compliance and RF Safety Policies In August of 1997, the FCC published OET Bulletin 65 Edition 97-01 to regulate methods for evaluating compliance with FCC guidelines for human exposure to radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields. The FCC guidelines for human exposure to RF electromagnetic fields incorporate two categories of limits; namely "Controlled" (a.k.a. Occupational) and "Uncontrolled" (a.k.a. General Public). The guidelines offer suggested methods for evaluating fixed RF transmitters to ensure that the controlled and uncontrolled limits deemed safe by the FC for human exposure are not exceeded. OET Bulletin 65 recommended guidelines are intended to allow an applicant to "make a reasonably quick determination as to whether a proposed facility is in compliance with the limits." In addition, the guidelines offer alternate supplementary considerations and procedures such as field measurements and more detailed analysis that should be used for multiple emitter situations. These guidelines define RF as emissions in the frequency range of 300 kHz to 100 GHz. The FCC define Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits within this frequency range based on limits recommended by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), and by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). The specific MPE limits defined by the FCC are as follows: Frequency Range [MHz] 0.3 - 3.0 3.0 - 30 30 - 300 300 - 1,500 1,500- 100,000 Electric Field Strength (E) [V/m] 614 1842/f 61.4 Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure Magnetic Field Power Density Strength (H) [A/m] (S) [mW/Cm"2] 1.63 100' 4.89/f 900/f^2* 0.163 1 f/300 5 Averaging Time IEI"2, IHI"2 or S [minutes] 6 6 6 6 6 Frequency Range [MHz] 0.3 - 3.0 3.0 - 30 30 - 300 300 - 1,500 1,500 - 100,000 Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure Electric Field Magnetic Field Power Density Averaging Time IEIA2, Strength (E) [Vlm] Strength (H) [Alm] (S) [mW/Cm"2] IHI"2 or S [minutes] 614 1.63 100* 30 842/f 2.19/f 180/f^2* 30 27.5 0.073 0.2 30 f/ 1500 30 1 30 f = frequency 'Plane -wave equivalent power density The FCC states that "Occupational/ Controlled limits apply in situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment provided those persons are fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Limits for Occupational/ Controlled exposure also apply in situations when an individual is transient through a location where Occupational/ Controlled limits apply provided he or she is made aware of the potential for exposure." Page 15 of 19 • • For General Population/ Uncontrolled limits, the FCC states that "General Population/ Uncontrolled exposures apply in situations in which the general public may be exposed, or in which persons that are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not fully be aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure." For purposes of this analysis, all limits are evaluated against the Power Density limits. Typical guidelines for determining whether Occupational/ Controlled limits can be applied include insuring the environment (such as a rooftop) as limited/controlled access via locked doors or physical barrier that are preferably controlled by a landlord that is aware of the situation and can inform anyone going through the locked door of the existence of the RF emissions. Such notification/awareness is typically accomplished by means of signage on the door, or other access to the area of concern, as well as signage on or near the antennas. Examples of such signs include the following: Radio frequency fields beyond this point may exceed the FCC general public exposure limit Obey all posted signs and site guidelines tor o^arng in radio frequency en wxo mans. ACAUTION Ow)) Beyond this point: Radio frequency fields at this site may exceed FCC rules for human exposure. For your safety obey ail posted signs.slid site guidelines to no mg in radio frequent ye vuonments QWARNING Beyond this point: Radio frequency fields at this site exceed the FCC rules for human expo sule. Failure to obey .YI postal vgnt and sde guidelines to wor lung In who Itequency environment. could result in.«bus inlnty. Standards for when to use each of the above signs for Occupational situations are as follows: No sign required: <20% of Occupational MPE Blue Sign, Notice: 20% to <100% of MPE Yellow Sign, Caution: 100% to <1000% of MPE Red Sign, Warning: >1000% of MPE All MPE references are to the FCC Occupational limits. Page 16 of 19 8 Appendix B: Overview of RoofView® Functions and Assumptions RoofView® is a tool developed and supported by Richard Tell Associates, Inc. to be used for analysis of RF field levels at telecommunications sites produced by antennas of the type commonly used in cellular, paging, SMR, PCS and two-way radio communications services. Although its name suggests that the tool is only for use in evaluating emissions for roof top applications, it can also be used to evaluate ground level effects of tower facilities. RoofView® allows the user to apply near field, far field, or a combination of near and far field computational methods as desired by the user. For this analysis, near field computations are used for areas within the near field, and far field computations are used beyond the near field. Specific break points are dynamic based on the aperture of the antenna being analyzed. The near field methodology is based on a cylindrical model that assumes the power into an antenna is distributed as a cylinder around the aperture of the antenna. Research by Richard Tell Associates, Inc. found that using such a model, along with corrections for height and antenna pattern, is very accurate, if not slightly conservative in estimating RF exposure. FCC Bulletin 65 recognizes the use of the cylindrical model for near field calculations. The following picture and corresponding equation summarizes the computations used by RoofView® on a bin -by -bin basis when the near field method is used: h 360P S = A Bw 2nRh 3 dB Bearn (degrees) - 0 Bw Each bin's results are then also adjusted by spatially averaging the portion of a 6-foot-tall human that intercepts the aperture over 6 feet. Once the antenna is completely above (or below) the height that corresponds to a 6-foot-tall human, the cylindrical results are Page 17 of 19 reduced to 10% of their results and then dissipated inversely in proportion to the square of the distance. Once bins being analyzed fall outside of the near field (as determined by a method and variable that is user -selectable; see below for method and variable used in this analysis), a far -field spatial average is calculated. Spatially averaged power density in the far -field is calculated by reducing the spatially averaged power density inversely, by the square of the distance from the antenna(s). There are several input variables to RoofView® that can impact the results produced when evaluating specific cell sites. Those variables are summarized accordingly: Standard FCC 1997 Occupational (default) FCC 1997 General Population (as applicable) Model Near/Far Spatial Average Uptime 100% (vary as applicable) Near/Far Field Transition Method X ApHt Near/Far Field Transition At Ht Factor 1.5 9 References FCC (1997). "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields"; Federal Communications Commission; Office of Engineering and Technology, OET Bulletin 65, Edition 97-01, August. Richard Tell Associates, Inc. (2003). RoofView® User Guide Version 4.15, Richard Tell Associates, Inc., February 10, 2003. Page 18 of 19 10 Limited Warranty Centerline Solutions, LLC warrants that this analysis was performed in good faith using the methodologies and assumptions covered in this report and that data used for the analysis and report were obtained by Centerline Solutions, LLC employees or representatives via site surveys or research of T-Mobile's available information. In the event that specific third party details were not available, best efforts were made to use assumptions that are based onindustry experience of various carriers' standards without violating any confidential information obtained under non -disclosure terms. Centerline Solutions, LLC also warrants that this analysis was performed in accordance with industry acceptable standards and methods. There are no other warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, relating to this agreement or to the services rendered by Centerline Solutions hereunder. In no event shall Centerline Solutions be held liable to T-Mobile, or to any third party, for any indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages, including but not limited to loss of profits, loss of data, loss of good will, and increased expenses. In no event shall Centerline Solutions be liable to T-Mobile for damages, whether based in contract, tort, negligence, strict liability, or otherwise, exceeding the amount payable hereunder for the services giving rise to such liability. Page 19 of 19 • CENTERLINE SOLUTIONS 8218 154th Ave NE, Suite 120 Redmond, WA 98052 425-828-1008 December 20, 2018 City of Tukwila, WA I 6300 Southcenter Boulevard I Tukwila, WA 98188 I Phone: 206-431-3670 Subject : Wireless Telecommunication Facilities Submittal T-Mobile — SE03055 3438 S 148th St., Tukwila WA 98168 APN: 0040000-1025 Dear Planning & Building Department: RECEIVED CEC 28 2018 Community Development On behalf of T-Mobile, Centerline Solutions is pleased to submit a Wireless Telecommunication Facilities application for a new wireless communication facility at the above referenced location. Based upon review of the Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) and discussions with Staff, a Type 2 Permit is being applied for. 18.58.140 Request to Use Non -concealed Building Attached in Lieu of a Concealed Building Attached. The use of concealed building facilities shall have first priority in all residential and commercial zones. However, an applicant may request to construct a non -concealed building attached wireless communication facility in lieu of a concealed wireless communication facility. The following criteria shall be used: 1. Due to the size of the building and the proposed location of the antennas, the visual impact of the exposed antennas will be minimal in relation to the building. The antennas are proposed to be flush mounted to an existing penthouse (2 sectors) and one sector located in an FRP enclosure on a different part of the rooftop. The antennas and FRP will be painted to match the building. 2. Cables are concealed from view and any visible cables are reduced in visibility by sheathing or painting to match the building where they are located. The cables are proposed to be shielded by a shroud painted to match the building. 3. Cabinet equipment is adequately screened from view. The equipment cabinets are proposed at ground level within a separate equipment room. 4. Due to the style or design of the building, the use of a concealed facility would reduce the visual appearance of the building. Utilizing the existing penthouse alleviates the need to place all the antennas in a new, structural sound FRP structure and/or structures that would increase the amount of visual impact on the rooftop. CENTERLINE SOLUTIONS 8218 154th Ave NE, Suite 120 Redmond, WA 98052 425-828-1008 5. The building where the antennas are located is at least 200 feet from the Duwamish/Green River The building is approximately 6,355' from the Duwamish river. Additional questions and/or responses required for All Wireless Telecommunication Facilities and those requiring Type 2 Review: (1) Application Checklist; (5) Completed Application Forms (Full Plan sets below); (4) 11x17 Plan Sets + (1) = (5) 11x17 Plan Sets; (1) Application Fee; (1) Completed and Notarized Affidavit of Ownership and Hold Harmless Permit to Enter Property; (1) SEPA EXEMPT per Staff (Correspondence attached); (1) Letter addressing City's Code Requirements (see above); *Sensitive areas not identified; *Generator not proposed; (4) sets of Photo simulations; (1) Materials Board (FRP sample); *Landscaping not required; (1) NIER report; *Site is located in the Regional Commercial (RC) zone. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. I may be reached during business hours at (206-334-4116), or via email at twalton@centerlinesolutions.com. Thank you for your time in reviewing our application. III MI T-Mobile Site Name: SEA TAC Buddhist Center T-Mobile Site Number: SE03055A Existing View from the South New T-Mobile Antennas Inside—\ FRP Screened Enclosure Ti New T-Mobile Antennas Mounted to Penthouse, (Not Visible Beyond Roofline) New View with New T-Mobile Screened Enclosure CENTERLINE SOLUTIONS (This photo simulation is for illustrative purposes only) •• • •Viobile• uommuni!y Development T-Mobile Site Name: SEA TAC Buddhist Center T-Mobile Site Number: SE03055A Existing View from the Northwest New T-Mobile Wall Mounted Antennas, (Painted to Match Existing Building) New View with New T-Mobile Wall Mounted Antennas �'CENTERLI„NE FMobi1e' (This photo simulation is for illustrative purposes only) • • T-Mobile Site Name: SEATAC Buddhist Center T-Mobile Site Number: SE03055A ie Existing View from the South New T-Mobile Antennas Inside—.\ FRP Screened Enclosure 11111111111111 New T-Mobile Antennas Mounted to Penthouse, (Not Visible Beyond Roofline New View with New T-Mobile Screened Enclosure CENTERLINE S0111T1(1r.IS (This photo simulation is for illustrative purposes only) T • •M it ob e s 5 . E L E:,. nn4< Community nAve.Iooment T-Mobile Site Name: SEATAC Buddhist Center T-Mobile Site Number: SE03055A Existing View from the Northwest New T-Mobile Wall / Mounted Antennas, (Painted to Match Existing Building) New View with New T-Mobile Wall Mounted Antennas 'CENTERLIUT1N0N5 E T ' Mobile' "Ol (This photo simulation is for illustrative purposes only) T-Mobile Site Name: SEA TAC Buddhist Center T-Mobile Site Number: SE03055A Existing View from the South New T-Mobile Antennas Inside--\ FRP Screened Enclosure 1111111 111111 New T-Mobile Antennas Mounted to Penthouse, (Not Visible Beyond Roofline) New View with New T-Mobile Screened Enclosure •CENTERL!NE%■M bil O (This photo simulation is for illustrative purposes only) a . • l� �u Community Development T-Mobile Site Name: SEA TAC Buddhist Center T-Mobile Site Number: SE03055A Existing View from the Northwest New T-Mobile Wall /-- Mounted Antennas, (Painted to Match Existing Building) New View with New T-Mobile Wall Mounted Antennas •CENTERLI„NE ■ ■ ■ •Mobile (This photo simulation is for illustrative purposes only) • 1\— New T-Mobile Antennas Mounted to Penthouse, (Not Visible Beyond Roofline) T-Mobile Site Name: SEATAC Buddhist Center T-Mobile Site Number: SE03055A Existing View from the South New T-Mobile Antennas Inside—\ FRP Screened Enclosure IIV 1111111111111 New View with New T-Mobile Screened Enclosure <>CENTERLINE SOLUTIONS (This photo simulation is for illustrative purposes only) T • •Mobile Br:CEP/ED Community DevelOPrnent T-Mobile Site Name: SEA TAC Buddhist Center T-Mobile Site Number: SE03055A Existing View from the Northwest New T-Mobile Wall Mounted Antennas, (Painted to Match Existing Building) New View with New T-Mobile Wall Mounted Antennas <'CENTER 1_01Nv ■E F••Mobile• (This photo simulation is for illustrative purposes only) CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OF WASHINGTON ss COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly swom and upon oath states as follows: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at 3 y ,3fj f y057N 6T, 7/ 4/16/9 /i✓A SP M for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees.� , �7 Q� EXECUTED at / l �- (city), V " I (state), on ! \ , 20 I t l�� \\������11��II���iii�� �' `� f'� \\\����` D R F � <) L p\ y,on ErA�� _COI YA 0-cp,RY s'• _ Ei :off ., .Z= B�\G o % J,�. 72• p2.2°ti•'\Y\\ ''%�F OF W P-) s\ /////1ill1itlt\\\\ (Address)aolo ' 747 � O S` / (Phone Number) On this day personally appeared before me j, .XU,e ,(A)1 S �� I ��� to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME • THI (41A DAY OF , 20 1 RECEIVED DEC 28 261E Community Development NOTA'�` PUB C i°r e Washington residing at -K My Commission expires on I — I W:V@SHAREPOINT FOLDER RESTRUCTURE Refercrce\APPLICATIONS - Lard Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\DRAFT Wireless Communication Facility.docx CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 WIRELESS TELE- COMMUNICATION FACILITIES APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Planner: File Number: 4 /''_ ()//9 Application Complete Date: Project File Number: /3 /2' _O/D Y Application Incomplete Date: Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: T-Mobile SE03055 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: CIRCLE TYPE : TYPE 1 Construct a new wireless facility with antennas on the rooftop and equipment on parking level TYPE 2 TYPE 3 Public Hearing Notices and Hearing Examiner Fees Apply. LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 3438 S 148th St. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 0040000-1025 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Todd Walton Address: 8218 154th Ave NE Suite 120 Redmond, WA 98052 Phone: 206-334-4116 E-mail: twalton@centerlinesolutions.com Signature: �.�,.,2 .10.11..07 a.. a�«w...d...... Date: 12-20-2018 RECEIVED W:\@SHAREPOINT FOLDER RESTRUCTURE\Refcrence\APPLICATIONS - Land Use Apps & Handouts\CURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS\DRAFT Wireless Communication Facility.docx UE' 26 aid Community Development 0.• iji$4 4t. 4-lui‘Vi4*,....4-"'" 'ler< • 160: rk • 44 . 'Act ot47k....- Ir:Vt.ct.2-Ca 31..eLA kr, -alp._ a RECEVED CEC 2 201a Community Development M • •Mobi1e® SEATAC NORTH INTL BLVD - BUDDHIST CENTER 3438 S 148TH ST. TUKWILA, WA 98168 SITE ID: SE03055A CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS PROJECT SUMMARY CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW T-MOBILE "NON -INHABITABLE" TELECOMMUNICATIONS SITE CONSISTING OF INSTALLING (6) NEW ANTENNAS, (6) RRU'S, (1) COVP ON AN EXISTING BUILDING ROOFTOP. EQUIPMENT TO BE PLACED INSIDE EXISTING ROOM ON PARKING LEVEL. PROJECT VICINITY & AERIAL MAPS SITE INFORMATION SITE NAME: SITE ID: SITE ADDRESS: LATITUDE: LONGITUDE: SOURCE: PARCEL NUMBER: ZONING CLASSIFICATION: JURISDICTION: TOP OF (E) PENTHOUSE: OCCUPANCY GROUP: CONSTRUCTION TYPE: SEA TAC BUDDHIST CENTER SE03055A 3438 S 148TH ST. TUKWILA, WA 98168 47.471083' -122.288028° 1A 004000-1025 RC (REGIONAL COMMERCIAL) CITY OF TUKWILA 57.0' AGL U II-B bt PROJECT LOCATION V I DRIVING DIRECTIONS FROM T-MOBILE BOTHELL OFFICE: 1. GET ON 1-405 S FROM NORTH CREEK PKWY AND NE 195TH ST (0.8 MI) 2. FOLLOW 1-405 S, WA-520 W AND 1-5 S TO S BOEING ACCESS RD IN TUKWILA. TAKE EXIT 158 FROM 1-5 S (26.1 MI) 3. TAKE TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD TO S 148TH ST (3.2 MI) ESTIMATED DISTANCE: ESTIMATED TIME: 30.1 MILES 54 MINUTES 15.56° GOVERNING CODES IBC-2015, INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE W/ WASHINGTON AMENDMENTS NEC-2017, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE A.DA COMPLIANCE INSTALLATION IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION. HANDICAP ACCESS IS NOT REQUIRED PER A.D.A. PROJECT CONTACTS DRAWING INDEX APPLICANT T-MOBILE 19807 NORTH CREEK PKWY N BOTHELL, WA 98011 PROPERTY OWNER 3400 S. 148TH STREET, LLC ATTN: ALEXANDRA FRIEDEMAN 3438 S. 148TH ST. TUKWILA, WA 98168 CELL1/847-989-1474 PROJECT MANAGER CENTERLINE SOLUTIONS 8218 154TH AVE NE, SUITE 120 REDMOND, WA 98052 RICK YOUNG PH• 425.954.8613 SITE ACQUISITION CONSULTANT CENTERLINE SOLUTIONS 8218 154TH AVE NE, SUITE 120 REDMOND, WA 98052 TAMI DREW PH: 425.828.1008 x6006 ZONING & PERMITTING CONSULTANT CENTERLINE SOLUTIONS 8218 154TH AVE NE, SUITE 120 REDMOND, WA 98052 TODD WALTON PH: 206.334.4116 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER CENTERLINE SOLUTIONS 8218 154TH AVE NE, SUITE 120 REDMOND, WA 98052 RYAN HARMON PH: 425.999.2323 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER T-MOBILE 19807 NORTH CREEK PKWY N BOTHELL, WA 98011 MIKE REED PH: 425.753.0525 RF ENGINEER T-MOBILE 19807 NORTH CREEK PKWY N BOTHELL, WA 98011 ALDRIN DIMABAYAO ENGINEER OF RECORD CENTERLINE SOLUTIONS 16035 TABLE MOUNTAIN PARKWAY GOLDEN, CO 80403 KHRISTOPHER SCOTT, P.E. PH: 303.993.3293 SHEET DESCRIPTION T1.0 TITLE SHEET SV-1 SURVEY GN1.0 GENERAL NOTES A1.0 OVERALL SITE PLAN A2.0 ENLARGED SITE / ROOF PLAN A3.0 ELEVATIONS A4.0 EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE & ANTENNA PLAN A5.0 ANTENNA & EQUIPMENT DETAILS A6.0 DETAILS A7.0 DETAILS A8.0 DETAILS RF1.0 RF DETAILS Know what's below. CaII before you dig. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO T-MOBILE SERVICES IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. SIGN OFF OF FINAL CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS REVIEWERS SHALL CLEARLY PLACE INITIALS ADJACENT TO EACH REDLINE NOTE AS DRAWINGS ARE BEING REVIEWED CONSULTANT SIGNATURE DATE SITE ACQUISITION PERMITTING CONSULTANT RF ENGINEER: CONST. MNGR. OPS MNGR. PROJECT MNGR, REGULATORY REV. DEV. MNGR. • •Mobile , CENTERLINE SOLUTIONS CP PROJECT NO.. TMO-18-0089-4 PRELIMINARY NO. DATE D/C DESCRIPTION 0 11-21-18 YK/RS 90% CD REVIEW 1 12-12-18 JKITT 90% CD REVIEW 2 12-26-18 TT/TT INT. REV SUBMITTAL NO. DATE D/C DESCRIPTION SITE NAME: SEA TAC BUDDHIST CENTER SITE ID: SE03055A SITE ADDRESS: 3438 S 148TH ST. TUKWILA, WA98168 SHEET TITLE TITLE SHEET SHEET NO. T1.0 GENERAL NOTES 1. THE FACILITY IS AN UNOCCUPIED SPECIALIZED MOBILE RADIO FACILITY. 2. PLANS ARE NOT TO BE SCALED AND ARE INTENDED TO BE A GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF THE FINAL INSTALLATION. THE WORK SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, APPURTENANCES AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE ALL INSTALLATIONS AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. 3. PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF BIDS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE JOB SITE AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, FIELD CONDITIONS, AND DIMENSIONS AND CONFIRMING THAT THE WORK MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED AS SHOWN PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE TO BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE PROJECT MANAGER. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE, IN WRITING, AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED BEFORE STARTING WORK. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY OTHERWISE INDICATED OR WHERE LOCAL CODES OR REGULATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE. 6. ALL WORK PERFORMED AND MATERIALS INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES. CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE ALL NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS, AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY BEARING ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE MUNICIPAL AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS AND LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONAL CODES, ORDINANCES, AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE WORK USING BEST SKILLS AND ATTENTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES. SEQUENCES, AND PROCEDURES AND FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT INCLUDING CONTACT AND COORDINATION WITH THE PROJECT MANAGER AND WITH LANDLORD'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. 8. PROVIDE A PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER WITH A RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 2-A OR 2-A1OBC WITHIN 5 FEET OF TRAVEL DISTANCE TO ALL PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT AREA DURING CONSTRUCTION. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SITE FOREMAN WITH A CELLULAR PHONE, AND KEEP SAME ON SITE WHENEVER ANY PERSONNEL ARE ON SITE. 10. DETAILS ARE INTENDED TO SHOW END RESULT OF DESIGN. MINOR MODIFICATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED TO SUIT JOB DIMENSIONS OR CONDITIONS, AND SUCH MODIFICATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THE WORK. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECESSARY PROVISIONS TO PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, PAVING, CURBS, GALVANIZED SURFACES, ETC., AND UPON COMPLETION OF WORK, REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT OCCURRED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE PROJECT MANAGER AND/OR LANDLORD. 12. ON A DAILY BASIS: KEEP GENERAL AREA CLEAN, HAZARD FREE, AND DISPOSE OF ALL DIRT, DEBRIS, RUBBISH, AND REMOVE EQUIPMENT NOT SPECIFIED AS REMAINING ON THE PROPERTY. LEAVE PREMISES IN CLEAN CONDITION AND FREE FROM PAINT SPOTS, DUST OR SMUDGES OF ANY NATURE. 13. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE COMPLETE SET OF AS -BUILT DRAWINGS WITHIN 10 WORKING DAYS OF PROJECT COMPLETION. 14 WHERE A CONSTRUCTION DETAIL IS NOT SHOWN OR NOTED, THE DETAIL SHALL BE THE SAME AS FOR OTHER SIMILAR WORK. 15. ASTM SPECIFICATIONS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE OF THE LATEST REVISION. 16 IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHETHER SHOWN HEREON OR NOT AND TO PROTECT THEM FROM DAMAGE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BEAR ALL EXPENSE OF REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE EXECUTION OF THIS WORK. 17. ALL ITEMS REMOVED OR DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION WORK WILL BE REPLACED OR REPAIRED TO MATCH EXISTING. 18. ALL ELEMENTS OF EXISTING STRUCTURE TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EXISTING STRUCTURE IS ASSUMED TO BE IN GOOD CONDITION, FREE OF DAMAGE OR DETERIORATION. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL ELEMENTS OF EXISTING STRUCTURE AFFECTED BY THIS MODIFICATION AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF RECORD IF ANY DAMAGE, DETERIORATION OR DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN EXISTING CONDITIONS AND THOSE DEPICTED ON THESE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS ARE FOUND. SPECIAL INSPECTION 1. IF REQUIRED, SPECIAL INSPECTIONS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY AN INDEPENDENT SPECIAL INSPECTOR. 2. THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR SHALL PROVIDE A COPY OF THEIR REPORT TO THE OWNER. ARCHITECT, STRUCTURAL ENGINEER, CONTRACTOR, AND BUILDING OFFICIAL AS EACH TEST IS COMPLETED. 3. ANY MATERIAL WHICH FAILS TO MEET THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS SHALL IMMEDIATELY BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT AND THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. SPECIAL INSPECTION TESTING REQUIREMENTS APPLY EQUALLY TO ALL BIDDER DESIGNED COMPONENTS. 4. INSPECTION FOR PREFABRICATED CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE THE SAME AS FOR THE MATERIAL USED IF THE CONSTRUCTION TOOK PLACE ON SITE. CONTINUOUS INSPECTION WILL NOT BE REQUIRED DURING PREFABRICATION IF THE APPROVED AGENCY CERTIFIES THE CONSTRUCTION AND FURNISHES EVIDENCE OF COMPLIANCE. 5. THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR SHALL SUBMIT A FINAL REPORT CERTIFYING THAT ALL WORK REQUIRING SPECIAL INSPECTION WAS, TO THE BEST OF THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR'S KNOWLEDGE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE APPROVED PERMIT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE APPLICABLE WORKMANSHIP PROVISIONS. STRUCTURAL NOTES GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES: 1. WHERE A CONSTRUCTION DETAIL IS NOT SHOWN OR NOTED, THE DETAIL SHALL BE THE SAME AS FOR OTHER SIMILAR WORK. 2. NOTES AND DETAILS ON DRAWINGS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER GENERAL NOTES. 3. NO PIPES, DUCTS, SLEEVES, CHASES, ETC., SHALL BE PLACED IN SLABS, BEAMS, OR WALLS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY SHOWN OR NOTED, NOR SHALL ANY STRUCTURAL MEMBER BE CUT FOR PIPES, DUCTS, ETC., UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN PRIOR APPROVAL FOR INSTALLATION OF ANY ADDITIONAL PIPES, DUCTS, ETC. 4. CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD T-MOBILE AND THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF T-MOBILE OR THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER. 5. THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS REPRESENT THE FINISHED STRUCTURE. THEY DO NOT INDICATE THE METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL MEASURES NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE STRUCTURE, WORKERS, AND PEDESTRIANS DURING CONSTRUCTION. SUCH MEASURES SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO BRACING, SHORING FOR LOADS DUE TO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT. TEMPORARY STRUCTURES, AND PARTIALLY COMPLETED WORK, ETC. OBSERVATION VISITS TO THE SITE BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SHALL NOT INCLUDE INSPECTION OF SUCH ITEMS. 6. ASTM SPECIFICATIONS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE OF THE LATEST REVISION. 7. CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS SHALL BE SPREAD OUT IF PLACED ON FRAMED FLOOR OR ROOF. LOAD SHALL NOT EXCEED THE DESIGN LIVE LOAD PER SQUARE FOOT. PROVIDE ADEQUATE SHORING/BRACING WHERE STRUCTURE HAS NOT ATTAINED DESIGN STRENGTH. 8. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHETHER SHOWN HEREON OR NOT AND TO PROTECT THEM FROM DAMAGE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BEAR ALL EXPENSE OF REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PROSECUTION OF THIS WORK. 9. DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALES SHOWN ON DRAWINGS. 10. THESE NOTES SHALL BE CONSIDERED A PART OF THE WRITTEN SPECIFICATIONS. 11. ALL ITEMS REMOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION WORK (I.E., DRYWALL, PLYWOOD, CEILING PANELS, ETC.) SHALL BE REPLACED TO MATCH EXISTING. THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE MET FOR SPECIAL INSPECTION: A. THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR SHALL BE UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. B. THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR SHALL FURNISH INSPECTION REPORTS TO THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER, AND OTHER DESIGNATED PERSONS. ALL DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE IMMEDIATE ATTENTION OF THE CONTRACTOR FOR CORRECTION: THEN, IF UNCORRECTED, TO THE PROPER DESIGN AUTHORITY AND THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. C. THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR SHALL SUBMIT A FINAL REPORT SIGNED BY BOTH HE AND HIS SUPERVISOR STATING WHETHER THE WORK REQUIRING SPECIAL INSPECTION WAS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE APPLICABLE WORKMANSHIP PROVISIONS OF THE CODE. D. COMPLY WITH ALL CITY SPECIAL INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS. STANDARD STRUCTURAL STEEL NOTES: 1. ALL METAL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATION GALVANIZED ASTM A123-A123M-02 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2. STRUCTURAL TUBING MEMBERS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A500. GRADE B. 3. ALL WELDING SHALL BE DONE USING E70XX ELECTRODES AND WELDING SHALL CONFORM TO AISC AND AWS 01.1 WHERE FILLET WELD SIZES ARE NOT SHOWN, PROVIDE THE MINIMUM SIZE PER TABLE J2.4 IN THE AISC 'MANUAL OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION', 14TH EDITION. 4. BOLTED CONNECTIONS SHALL USE BEARING TYPE GALV. ASTM A325 BOLTS (5/8" DIA. UNO) AND SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF TWO BOLTS U.N.O AND SHALL INCLUDE HEAVY -HEX NUTS AND STANDARD CUT WASHERS. 5. NON-STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS FOR HANDRAIL, LADDERS AND STEEL GRATING MAY USE 5/8" DIA GALVANIZED ASTM A307 BOLTS U.N.O. 6. ALL STRUCTURAL PIPE ASTM A53, TYPE E OR S, GRADE B. SPECIAL INSPECTION: B. IF REQUIRED, SPECIAL INSPECTIONS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY AN INDEPENDENT SPECIAL INSPECTOR PER CODE FOR THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: CONTINUOUS DURING THE INSTALLATION OF EXPANSION AND/OR ADHESIVE ANCHORS: INSPECT HOLE SIZE, DEPTH, CLEANLINESS, AND INSTALLATION PER ICC REPORT. PERIODIC FOR HIGH STRENGTH BOLT INSTALLATIONS (A325). DRAWING ABBREVIATIONS AFF ABOVE FINISH FLOOR LF LINEAR FEET AGL ABOVE GRADE LEVEL MAX MAXIMUM AWG AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE MECH MECHANICAL AC AIR CONDITIONING MFR MANUFACTURER ADJ ADJUSTABLE MGR MANAGER APPROX APPROXIMATELY MIN MINIMUM AZ AZIMUTH MISC MISCELLANEOUS BLDG BUILDING MTL METAL CM CONSTRUCTION MANAGER MTZL METALIZE(D) CAB CABINET MW MICROWAVE CL CENTERLINE NEC NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE CLG CEILING NIC NOT IN CONTRACT CLR CLEAR NTS NOT TO SCALE CO COPPER WA NOT APPLICABLE CONC CONCRETE OC ON CENTER COND CONDUIT OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER CONST CONSTRUCTION OP OVERHEAD POWER CONT CONTINUOUS OT OVERHEAD FIBER CPM CASCADIA PM OPP OPPOSITE D/C DRAFTER/CHECKER PL PROPERTY LINE DEMO DEMOLISH PLYWD PLYWOOD DIA DIAMETER PM PROJECT MANAGER DIM DIMENSION PROJ PROJECT DN DOWN PROP PROPERTY DTL DETAIL PT PRESSURE TREATED DWG DRAWING RO ROUGH OPENING EA EACH ROW RIGHT OF WAY ELECT ELECTRICAL RRU REMOTE RADIO UNIT ELEV ELEVATION REO REQUIRED EO EQUAL SBTC SOLID BARE TINNED COPPER EQUIP EQUIPMENT SF SQUARE FEET EXT EXTERIOR SHT SHEET FIN FINISH SPEC SPECIFICATION FLR FLOOR SQ SQUARE FT FOOT, FEET SS STAINLESS STEEL GA GAUGE STL STEEL GALV GALVANIZED STRUCT STRUCTURE, STRUCTURAL GC GENERAL CONTRACTOR TOC TOP OF CONCRETE GWB GYPSUM WALL BOARD TOM TOP OF MASONRY GR GRADE THRU THROUGH GRND GROUND TNND TINNED HVAC HEATING, VENTING 8 AIR CONDITIONING UBC UNIFORM BUILDING CODE HORIZ HORIZONTAL UG UNDERGROUND HT HEIGHT UNO UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE IBC INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE UP UNDERGROUND POWER ID INSIDE DIAMETER OF UNDERGROUND FIBER IN INCH VIF VERIFY IN FIELD INSUL INSULATION VERT VERTICAL INT INTERIOR WP WATERPROOF JBOX JUNCTION BOX W/ WITH LB(S) POUND(S) W/O WITHOUT T • •Mobile • •CENTERLINOE SOLUTIONS .. a it POLv i, 1 +s s 6.. J S.. ar� I-, (1 r ^ ") L n /s v Community Development CP PROJECT NO.: TMO-18-0089-4 PRELIMINARY NO. DATE D/C DESCRIPTION 0 11-21-18 YK/RS 90% CD REVIEW 1 12-12-18 JK/TT 90% CD REVIEW 2 12-26-18 TT/TT INT. REV SUBMITTAL NO. DATE D/C DESCRIPTION SITE NAME: SEA TAC BUDDHIST CENTER SITE ID: SE03055A SITE ADDRESS: 3438 S 148TH ST. TUKWILA, WA 98168 SHEET TITLE GENERAL NOTES SHEET NO. GN1.0 � I L 979-= S. 148TH STREET - 0,4 Ilil1- 'o (E) ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE (TYP) (E) SUBJECT PROPERTY LINE (TYP) - (E) BUILDING T-MOBILE PROJECT AREA SEE SHEET A2.0 INGRESS/EGRESS FROM S. 148TH STREET ,97_ 7 - -°"-„CE2 DRAWING LEGEND - - - - - - SUBJECT PROPERTY LINE - - ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE COAX COAX ROUTE HYBRID HYBRID CABLE ROUTE • k EXISTING FENCE eELEVATION MARKER DETAIL REFERENCE ® ® SECTION MARKER COMMON ABBREVIATIONS (E) EXISTING (N) NEW ABBREVIATIONS CONTINUED (TYP) TYPICAL ON SHEET GN1.0 NOTE: SITE PLAN DERIVED FROM: EXISTING DRAWINGS, GIS, AERIAL IMAGES AND SITE PHOTOS. S SCALE: 1" = 80'-0" (11X17) 0' 40' 80' 160' T • • •Mobile •. «CENTERLINNE SOLUTIONS Z./r-0/f9 (! :-'i1 0 (1 r 141 Is;�v V :..i 1 Community Development CP PROJECT NO.: TMO-18-0089-4 PRELIMINARY NO. DATE D/C DESCRIPTION 0 11-21-18 YK/RS 90% CD REVIEW 1 12-12-18 JK/TT 90% CD REVIEW 2 12-26-18 TT/TT INT. REV SUBMITTAL NO. DATE D/C DESCRIPTION SITE NAME: SEA TAC BUDDHIST CENTER SITE ID: SE03055A SITE ADDRESS: 3438 S 148TH ST. TUKWILA, WA98168 SHEET TITLE OVERALL SITE PLAN SHEET NO. A1.0 1 OVERALL SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 40'-0" (22X34) re 0 O 0 (E) ELEVATOR PENTHOUSE (E) ELECTRICAL/FIBER ROOM LOCATED IN UNDERGROUND — - PARKING GARAGE y 4 • • 4 a a BRID (P) T-MOBILE ANTENNAS (TYP. 2 PER SECTOR, TOTAL OF 6) MOUNTED ON (E) PENTHOUSE WALL it (P) T-MOBILE ROOF TOP JUNCTION BOX, MOUNT TO (P) UNISTRUT ON (E) PENTHOUSE WALL •_ (E) ROOFTOP ACCESS DOOR iI I (3) (P) HYBRID CABLES TO BE ROUTED ACROSS THE ROOF DECK ON SLEEPERS WITHIN CONDUIT TO THE PENTHOUSE LOCATED ONITHE ROOF (P) POWER/FIBER RUN (150') VIA CONDUIT IN CEILING. FROM (E) ELECTRICAL ROOM TO (P)I4EASE AREA a •..i;.: a <7 a HYBRID -- HYBRID \_/ F/P 4 F/P/ F/P HYBRID F/P (P) T-MOBILE 10'x20' FENCED EQUIPMENT LEASE AREA LOCATED IN UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE HYBRID HYBRID F/P F/P / a 4 a a a d a 4 <7 a a 4 a a (P) 3" THICK FRP SCREENED ENCLOSURE; PAINT TO MATCH (E) ROOFTOP FEATURES 0 � l � I IF/P 'F/P • 0 x r; I l LI era Lr; �II _ A • >- x =1 -� <7 a 4 a 4 0 0 (3) (P) HYBRID CABLES TO PENETRATE THE BUILDING AT GROUND LEVEL FROM EQUIPMENT ROOM, AND TO BE ROUTED UP THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING AND A SHROUD - PAINTED TO MATCH THE BUILDING - INSTALLED OVER 4 a .11 a APPROX. LOCATION — OF (E) ROOFTOP MOUNTED FLAGPOLE d a 4 W FC 5.56• S SCALE: 3/32" = 1-0" (11X17) 0' 10' 20' T • •Mobile •a 4► EOLCENTRLINE SOLUTIONS k ' �o !;. a L'��1T r<) nr-r, C' O '1.{ 14,..v <do ::,114 Community Development CP PROJECT NO.: TMO-18-0089-4 PRELIMINARY NO. DATE D/C DESCRIPTION 0 11-21-18 YK/RS 90% CD REVIEW 1 12-12-18 JK/TT 90% CD REVIEW 2 12-26-18 TT/TT INT. REV SUBMITTAL NO. DATE D/C DESCRIPTION SITE NAME: SEA TAC BUDDHIST CENTER SITE ID: SE03055A SITE ADDRESS: 3438 S 148TH ST. TUKWILA, WA98168 SHEET TITLE ENLARGED EQUIPMENT PLAN SHEET NO. A2.0 1 (P) ENLARGED SITE / ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" (22X34) • (P) ANTENNA TIP HEIGHT (FFHH-65C-R3 .(P) ANTENNA TIP HEIGHT (AAFIA) (E TOP OF PENTHOUSE �7-57,-0„ AL (P) T-MOBILE ANTENNA RAD CENTER • (E) UPPER PARAPET 48'-3" 4 (E) UPPER ROOF 47'-0" S (E) LOWER PARAPET 43'-2" (E) LOWER ROOF 41'-8" (E) GRADE n,-n" (E) BUILDING (P) T-MOBILE ANTENNAS (TYP. 2 PER SECTOR, TOTAL OF 6) MOUNTED ON (E) PENTHOUSE WALL (P) T-MOBILE FXFB (RRU) (TYP. OF 1 PER SECTOR, TOTAL OF 3) MOUNTED TO (P) ANTENNA MOUNT (P) T-MOBILE ROOF TOP JUNCTION BOX, MOUNT TO (P) UNISTRUT ON (E) PENTHOUSE WALL (P) T-MOBILE AHLOA (RRU) (TYP. OF 1 PER SECTOR, TOTAL OF 3) MOUNTED TO (P) ANTENNA MOUNT • • • • ' 1 (P) 3" THICK FRP SCREENED ENCLOSURE; PAINT TO MATCH (E) ROOFTOP FEATURES • , • 1 1 . is • • 1 WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0• (11X17) SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" (22X34) 0' 8' 16' 32' •�• NOTES: • IF REQUIRED, PAINT TO MATCH ANTENNAS AND ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT TO MATCH THE EXISTING STRUCTURE WITH NON -REFLECTIVE PAINT AS REQ'D. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY COLOR AND FINISH WITH LANDLORD AND/OR JURISDICTION. • PRIOR TO MATERIALS PROCUREMENT CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY CONDITION OF STRUCTURE AT PROPOSED MOUNTING LOCATION TO ENSURE EXISTING CONDITIONS ARE SUITABLE AT SPECIFIED ELEVATION. • RETURN ALL USED EQUIPMENT AND HARDWARE TO T-MOBILE WAREHOUSE. • ALL CLIMBING PATHS ON TOWER/MONOPOLE TO REMAIN FREE & CLEAR OF MOUNTS, EQUIPMENT, ETC. (P) T-MOBILE ANTENNAS (TYP. 2 PER SECTOR, TOTAL OF 6) MOUNTED ON (E) PENTHOUSE WALL (P) T-MOBILE AHLOA (RRU) (TYP. OF 1 PER SECTOR, TOTAL OF 3) MOUNTED TO (P) ANTENNA MOUNT (P) T-MOBILE FXFB (RRU) (TYP. OF 1 PER SECTOR, TOTAL OF 3) MOUNTED TO (P) ANTENNA MOUNT - (P) T-MOBILE ROOF TOP JUNCTION BOX, MOUNT TO (P) UNISTRUT ON (E) PENTHOUSE WALL (P) 3" FRP SCREEN PAINT TO MATCH (E) ROOFTOP FEATURES • ) • -• • f • • • • • J (P) ANTENNA TIP HEIGHT (FFHH-65C-R3) 59'-0" (E) BUILDING (P) ANTENNA TIP HEIGHT (AAFIA) (E) TOP OF PENTHOUSE Lik (P) T-MOBILE ANTENNA RAD CENTER (E) UPPER PARAPET a, 48'-3" (E) UPPER ROOF dik 47'-0" (E) LOWER PARAPET 43.-2" (E) LOWER ROOF 41-8" (E) GRADE n•_n• SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" (11X17) 0' 8' 16' 32' T • -Mobile.' *CENTERLINE SOLUTIONS ,----�� - F , if, 9-, 1.1 .. '4d b.. C d L....J DECry EC 28 ,31e Community . Development CP PROJECT NO.: TMO-18-0089-4 PRELIMINARY NO. DATE D/C DESCRIPTION 0 11-21-18 YK/RS 90% CD REVIEW 1 12-12-18 JK/TT 90% CD REVIEW 2 12-26-18 TT/TT INT. REV SUBMITTAL NO. DATE D/C DESCRIPTION SITE NAME: SEA TAC BUDDHIST CENTER SITE ID: SE03055A SITE ADDRESS: 3438 S 148TH ST. TUKWILA, WA98168 SHEET TITLE ELEVATIONS SHEET NO. A3.0 2 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" (22X34) 6 ANTENNA SCHEDULE - FINAL CONFIGURATION SECTOR POS. EXIST. / NEW MNFR. ANTENNA MODEL PORT DIMENSIONS (L x W x D) WEIGHT (LBS) ALPHA Al NEW NOKIA AAFIA QUAD 72.44" x 25.59" x 11.81" 273.37 A2 NEW COMMSCOPE FFHH-65C-R3 OCTO 95.9' x 25.2" x 9.3" 127.6 BETA B1 NEW NOKIA AAFIA QUAD 72.44" x 25.59" x 11.81" 273.37 B2 NEW COMMSCOPE FFHH-65C-R3 OCTO 95.9" x 25.2" x 9.3" 127.6 GAMMA C1 NEW NOKIA AAFIA QUAD 72.44" x 25.59" x 11.81" 273.37 C2 NEW COMMSCOPE FFHH-65C-R3 OCTO 95.9" x 25.2" x 9.3" 127.6 *TOWER - FINAL EQUIPMENT INVENTORY SCOPE QTY. TECHNOLOGY MNFR. MODEL DIMENSIONS (LXWXD) WEIGHT (LBS) ADD (N) (3) ANTENNA COMMSCOPE FFHH-65C-R3 95.9" x 25.2" x 9.3" 127.6 ADD (N) (3) ANTENNA COMMSCOPE AAFIA 72.44" x 25.59" x 11.81" 273.37 ADD (N) (1) COVP RAYCAP RNSNDC-7771-PF-48 20.38" x 18.86" x 5.83" 19.0 ADD (N) (3) RRU NOKIA FXFB 19.3" x 22.0" x 5.2- 55.0 ADD (N) (3) RRU NOKIA AHLOA 26.6" x 12.9" x 8.1" 83.8 *GROUND - FINAL EQUIPMENT INVENTORY SCOPE QTY. TECHNOLOGY MNFR. MODEL DIMENSIONS (LXWXD) WEIGHT (LBS) ADD (N) (1) BASEBAND NOKIA FSMF 19.3" x 22" x 5.2" 55 ADD (N) (2) BASEBAND NOKIA ASIA 1.9" x 8.3" x 14.8" 6.83 ADD (N) (4) BASEBAND NOKIA ABIA 1.9" x 8.3" x 14.8" 4.63 ADD(N) (1) BASEBAND NOKIA ASIK TBD TBD ADD (N) (1) BASEBAND NOKIA ABIL TBD TBD ADD (N) (2) BASEBAND NOKIA AMOB 14" x 19.1" x 23.8" 19.0 • THE "TOWER' AND "GROUND" REFERENCES REFER TO NOMENCLATURE REFLECTED IN THE PLUMBING DIAGRAM ON THE RF1.0 SHEET AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFER TO ACTUAL LOCATION OF EQUIPMENT. (E) PENTHOUSE (P) T-MOBILE AHLOA (RRU) (TYP. OF 1 PER SECTOR, TOTAL OF 3) MOUNTED BELOW (P) ANTENNA 0 a (P) T-MOBILE ANTENNAS (TYP. 2 PER SECTOR, TOTAL OF 6) MOUNTED ON (E) PENTHOUSE WALL (P) T-MOBILE ROOF TOP JUNCTION BOX, MOUNT TO (P) UNISTRUT ON (E) PENTHOUSE WALL (P) T-MOBILE FXFB (RRU) (TYP. OF 1 PER SECTOR. TOTAL OF 3) MOUNTED TO (P) ANTENNA MOUNT (P) 3" THICK FRP SCREENED ENCLOSURE; SEE SHEET A2.0 FOR (P) LOCATION APPROX. LOCATION OF (E) ROOFTOP MOUNTED FLAGPOLE; SEE SHEET A2.0 FOR APPROX. LOCATION BETA A2 110. N ppM BETSC A � q2 R3 /o. W S SCALE: NTS (11)07) • • • •Mobile •� •CENTERLINE SOLUTIONS i -�.c 4d a.. 0 'C •. L/...v i..V :.:1 Community Development CP PROJECT NO.: TMO-18-0089-4 PRELIMINARY NO. DATE D/C DESCRIPTION 0 11-21-18 YK/RS 90% CD REVIEW 1 12-12-18 JK/TT 90% CD REVIEW 2 12-26-18 TT/TT INT. REV SUBMITTAL IJO. DATE D/C DESCRIPTION SITE NAME: SEA TAC BUDDHIST CENTER SITE ID: SE03055A SITE ADDRESS: 3438 S 148TH ST. TUKWILA, WA98168 SHEET TITLE ANTENNA DETAILS & PLANS SHEET NO. A4.0 1 ANTENNA AND ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT SCALE: NTS (11X17) SCALE: NTS (22X34) 2 FINAL ANTENNA PLAN SCALE: NTS (22X34) TOP FRONT WIDTH -/DEPTT NOKIA FXFB (REMOTE RADIO UNIT) HEIGHT: 19.3" WIDTH: 22.0" DEPTH 5.2" WEIGHT: 55.0 LBS SIDE AHLOA: WIDEBAND 4T4R BAND12 & BAND 71 (REMOTE RADIO UNITZ HEIGHT: 22.0" WIDTH: 12.1" DEPTH 7.4" WEIGHT: 83.0 LBS NOKIA FPKA BRACKET UP TO (3) RADIO HEADS AROUND (1) PAIR OF FPKA POLE MOUNTING BRACKETS FPKA CLAMPED & TIGHTENED TO PIPE TYP. x2 RRU MOUNTED TO FPKA FPKA CLAMPED & TIGHTENED TO PIPE TYP. x2 RRU MOUNTED TO FPKA ANTENNA MOUNTING BRACKET PER MANUFACTURER TYP. ANTENNA, TYP. PIPE MOUNT 1 FXFB (RRU) DETAIL SCALE: NTS (11X17) SCALE: NTS (22X34) 2 AHLOA (RRU) DETAIL SCALE: NTS (11X17) SCALE: NTS (22X34) 3 ANTENNA MOUNT DETAILS SCALE: NTS (11X17) SCALE: NTS (22X34) TOP FRONT WIDTH w 2 �OEPThI� SIDE ANTENNA DATA MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONS MANUFACTURER HEIGHT WIDTH DEPTH WEIGHT NOKIA 71.0 IN 26.0 IN 8.0" IN 242.0 LBS PART X CONNECTORS STANDARD MOUNTING HARDWARE MASSIVE MIMO MID -BAND AAFIA TBD INCLUDED TOP FRONT WIDTH d d d EPT SIDE ANTENNA DATA MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONS MANUFACTURER HEIGHT WIDTH DEPTH WEIGHT COMMSCOPE 95.9 IN 25.2 IN 9.3 IN 127.6 LBS PART # CONNECTORS STANDARD MOUNTING HARDWARE FFHH-65C-R3 (8) 4.3-10 FEMALE INCLUDED 2' LONG X 1/2" 0 COPPER AIR TERMINAL (TYP. PER ANTENNA) ANTENNA MOUNTING PIPE AIR TERMINAL MOUNTING BRACKET (HARGER PART #CPRB 2.5/3AT12) ANTENNA SCALE: NTS (11X17) T • .Mobile.a *CENTERLINE SOLUTIONS Lie- 0/if rra _.P,' {, 0 1.4 Community Development CP PROJECT NO.: TMO-18-0089-4 PRELIMINARY NO. DATE D/C DESCRIPTION 0 11-21-18 YK/RS 90% CD REVIEW 1 12-12-18 JK/TT 90% CD REVIEW 2 12-26-18 TT/TT INT. REV SUBMITTAL NO. DATE D/C DESCRIPTION SITE NAME: SEA TAC BUDDHIST CENTER SITE ID: SE03055A SITE ADDRESS: 3438 S 148TH ST. TUKWILA, WA 98168 SHEET TITLE ANTENNA AND EQUIPMENT DETAILS SHEET NO. A5.0 4 ANTENNA DETAIL 5 ANTENNA DETAIL 5 AIR TERMINAL DETAIL SCALE: NTS (22X34) PURCELL SITE FLEX CABINET: SFX31 PWR/BAX VOLTAGE: -48 VDC NOMINAL (RANGE -42 V TO -58 V) CURRENT: 1 A TYPICAL FOR DAC 8 A TYPICAL FOR EACH TEC POWER CONSUMPTION: 2 TECs, 440 W EACH @ 55 VDC - 1 DAC, 55 W @ 55 VDC BREAKER/FUSE RATING: - 15 A FOR EACH TEC -5AFORDAC CLEARANCES: 36" ON ALL SIDES WEIGHT: 350 Lbs SUB PANEL W/ MOUNT SPACE: 31 RU DC BREAKERS POWER SYSTEM DC GENERATOR INTERFACE RACK MOUNT - EQUIPMENT SPACE 7705 SAR CONVERTERS BATTERY SPACE (3 STRINGS) ATTACH SSC TO PLINTH PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS ONO J111111114 a! 11111 11111 N h 30" 1/2" EXPANSION ANCHOR io 1/2" BOLT PLINTH CONCRETE PAD PLINTH EQUIPMENT PLATFORM 1/2" NUT PL-3"x3"x3/8" BACK PLATE ID NOKIA FCOA CABINET DIMENSIONS HxWxD: 61" x 30.3" x 28.65" CLEARANCES: 36" ON ALL SIDES WEIGHT (FULLY EQUIPPED): 807 Lbs MOUNT SPACE: 40 RU e FCOA CABINET BOLT CABINET TO BEAMS PER NOKIA REQUIREMENTS (2) W6X9 BEAM 28" LONG W6X9 BEAM EQUIPMENT PLATFORM 30.3" .o m 1/2" EXPANSION ANCHOR 1/2" BOLT PL-3'x3"x3/8" BACK PLATE 1/2" NUT i0 PURCELL CABINET SPECIFICATIONS SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS 2 FCOA CABINET SPECIFICATIONS SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS NOT TO SCALE SCALE: NTS NOT TO SCALE T • •Mobile •e *CENTERLINNE SOLUTIOS r+ r rre j 1 ! .i� r` . ..., i., tl_. 0 . •... [...0 2L 28 :313 Community Development CP PROJECT NO.: TMO-18-0089-4 PRELIMINARY NO. DATE D/C DESCRIPTION 0 11-21-18 YK/RS 90% CD REVIEW 1 12-12-18 JK/TT 90% CD REVIEW 2 12-26-18 TT/TT INT. REV SUBMITTAL NO. DATE D/C DESCRIPTION SITE NAME: SEA TAC BUDDHIST CENTER SITE ID: SE03055A SITE ADDRESS: 3438 S 148TH ST. TUKWILA, WA 98168 SHEET TITLE DETAILS SHEET NO. A6.0 3 NOT USED SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS 4 NOT USED SCALE: NTS REFER TO PLAN 0 \ \ 0000000 LJ ve00000000000l < f LJ (2) LED WORK LIGHTS ATTACHED TO POST PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS (4) 1-5/8" UNISTRUT 8'-0" LONG (2) 3" SCH 40 POST UNISTRUT CAPS INSTALLED © ENDS (TYP.) ATTACH UNISTRUT TO POST W/ U-BOLT (TYP.) FINISHED SURFACE (4)*3 VERTICAL 83 HOOPS TOP & BOTTOM @ 24" O.C. NOTES: 1. SPRAY CUT ENDS OF ALL UNISTRUT WITH COLD-GALV. AND PAINT ON CLEAR LAQUER, OR CAP WITH PLASTIC UNISTRUT CAP. 2. ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE POURED TO BELOW FINISHED STONE z ih STRETCHER BAR FENCE PIPE 03-3/8" OD HOLE IN TOP OF RETAINING WALL 03-1/2" ID CORNER, GATE. END OR PULL POST TOP BRACE RAIL DIAGONAL ROD W/ STEEL TURNBUCKLE BOTTOM TENSION WIRE NEW RETAINING WALL (FINAL REINFORCEMENT AND DIMENSIONS DETERMINED BY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER) *6 ©12" O.C. 86 ©12" CONT. 1 UNISTRUT H-FRAME DETAIL SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS 2 FENCE DETAIL SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS T • •Mobile •' •CENTERULITIONSNE SOL R i i ... V is.. 2 l ` t,.� p._,ti i, ",14 LJ4—u ki l-/ 1.4J Iii Community Development CP PROJECT NO.: TMO-18-0089-4 PRELIMINARY NO. DATE D/C DESCRIPTION 0 11-21-18 YK/RS 90% CD REVIEW 1 12-12-18 JK/TT 90% CD REVIEW 2 12-26-18 TT/TT INT. REV SUBMITTAL NO. DATE D/C DESCRIPTION SITE NAME: SEA TAC BUDDHIST CENTER SITE ID: SE03055A SITE ADDRESS: 3438 S 148TH ST. TUKWILA, WA 98168 SHEET TITLE DETAILS SHEET NO. A7.0 3 NOT USED SCALE: NTS 4 NOT USED SCALE: NTS 5 NOT USED SCALE: NTS ANDREWS COAXIAL CABLE TRAY PM: MT-F1543 WEIGHT PER 96": 50.9 lbs MATERIAL: GALV. STEEL INCLUDES: CHANNEL, THREE SLEEPERS, HOLD DOWN CLAMPS & HARDWARE INSTALL NEOPRENE PAD BENEATH SLEEPERS (ROOFTOPS ONLY) NOTE: REFER TO DETAIL 3 FOR PARTS & CABLE APPLICATION 9.2" FRONT PIPE COVP MOUNTING BRACKET (2) 3/8" U-BOLT COUP BACK COUP MOUNTING BRACKET 1 STEEL CABLE TRAY DETAIL SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS 2 COMPOUND / ACCESS SURFACING DETAIL SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS NOT TO SCALE HCS: HIGH CAPACITY (1-1/4" OD, 1.33 LB/FT) • 10x6 AWG CONDUCTORS • 18 FIBER PAIRS (36 PAIRS) HIGH CAPACITY CABLE SHOWN 12-FIBER INDOOR/OUTDOOR DISTRIBUTION CABLE TYP. x3 MDPE OUTER JACKET DIELECTRIC CENTRAL MEMBER 6 AWG THHN/THWN COPPER CONDUCTOR TYP. x10 18 AWG TWISTED COPPER PAIR ARAMID RIPCORD TYP. x2 CORRUGATED LAMINATED STEEL TAPE GPS ANTENNA MINIMUM OF 75% OR 270' IN ANY DIRECTION GPS ANTENNA — OBSTRUCTIONS MUST BE BELOW 10' 0 TYPICAL POST FYGA GPS ANTENNA FYGA GPS MOUNTING KIT GPS COAX TO MOUNTING KIT ATTACH MOUNTING KIT TO POST WITH (2) HOSE CLAMPS W/ WORM SCREW FYGA GPS ANTENNA 1. THE GPS ANTENNA MOUNT IS DESIGNED TO FASTEN TO A STANDARD 1-1/4" DIA. SCH. 40 GALVANIZED OR STAINLESS STEEL PIPE. THE PIPE MUST BE THREADED AT THE ANTENNA MOUNT END. THE PIPE SHALL BE CUT TO THE REQUIRED LENGTH (MIN. OF 18') USING A WAND OR ROTARY PIPE CUTTER TO ASSURE A SMOOTH PERPENDICULAR CUT. THE CUT PIPE END SHALL BE DEBURRED AND SMOOTH IN ORDER TO SEAL AGAINST THE NEOPRENE GASKET ATTACHED TO THE ANTENNAS MOUNT. 2. THE MOUNTING PLATE SHALL BE FABRICATED AS SHOWN AND ATTACHED TO THE APPROPRIATE SUPPORT STRUCTURE USING U-BOLTS. THE SUPPORT PIPE FOR THE GPS SHALL BE MOUNTED USING OVERSIZED U-BOLTS TO ALLOW ADJUSTMENT. IT IS CRITICAL THAT THE GPS ANTENNA IS MOUNTED WITHIN 2" OF VERTICAL AND THE BASE OF THE ANTENNA IS WITHIN 2" LEVEL. 3. INSTALL GPS ANTENNA AS SPECIFIED ON SITE PLAN. IF INSTALLING ON ICE/CABLE BRIDGE ENSURE THAT GPS IS A MINIMUM OS 10' ABOVE GRADE, ON THE FURTHEST POST FROM THE TOWER TO ATTAIN MAXIMUM COVERAGE. 4. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THE GPS ANTENNA HAS THE REQUIRED FULL EXPOSURE TO THE SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE/HORIZON. SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS T • -Mobile.. «CENTERLINE SOLUTIONS gig -on 9 2ECEr/E 1 D2C 28 nl Community Development CP PROJECT NO.: TMO-18-0089-4 PRELIMINARY NO. DATE D/C DESCRIPTION 0 11-21-18 YK/RS 90% CD REVIEW 1 12-12-18 JK/TT 90% CD REVIEW 2 12-26-18 TT/TT INT. REV SUBMITTAL NO. DATE D/C DESCRIPTION SITE NAME: SEA TAC BUDDHIST CENTER SITE ID: SE03055A SITE ADDRESS: 3438 S 148TH ST. TUKWILA, WA 98168 SHEET TITLE DETAILS SHEET NO. A8.0 3 CABLE APPLICATION DETAIL SCALE: NTS 4 GPS MINIMUM SKY VIEW SCALE: NTS 5 GPS ANTENNA MOUNTING SCALE: NTS RFDS V.0.1 ir444 11 A' C11t •w�ra-t a-" .. ,.a Amor NOTES: 1. ALL COAXIAL CABLE CONNECTIONS TO BE WEATHERPROOFED. 2. CONTRACTOR TO DIP CABLES AND JUMPERS WHERE NECESSARY. 3. TAGGING: ALL COAXIAL CABLES TO BE MARKED WITH COLOR CODED TAPE TO INDICATE THE ANTENNA SECTOR. COLORED ELECTRICAL TAPE SHALL MARK EACH END OF CABLE AND EACH END OF JUMPERS AS CLOSE TO EACH END AS POSSIBLE. (NOT TO INTERFERE WITH WATERPROOFING.) 4. COAXIAL CABLE SPECIFICATIONS REQUIRE CABLE SUPPORT EVERY 3'-0" ON CENTER. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY SUPPORTS AS REQUIRED TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. 5. VERTICAL CONNECTIONS SHALL BE TAPED FROM THE BOTTOM UP SO OVERLAP MOVES WATER AWAY FROM CONNECTION (SEE STEP 4). 6. PROVIDE HEAT SHRINK IN PLACE OF TAPE FOR QUAD POLES & TMAS. 7. ALL ANTENNAS & COAXIAL ANTENNA CABLE TO BE FURNISHED BY T-MOBILE AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. 8. COAX SHALL BE TAGGED WITH COLOR CODING AT (2) PLACES USING 1" WIDE WEATHERPROOF COLORED VINYL TAPE AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: #1 - AT ANTENNA CONNECTION #2 - AT ENTRY TO EQUIPMENT CABINET 9. RUN COAXIAL CABLE WITH MINIMUM 12" SLACK & 12" FROM EDGE OF EQUIPMENT CABINETS, ACROSS WAVE GUIDE BRIDGE (IF APPLICABLE), UP TO TOWER LEG (IF APPLICABLE), AND DISTRIBUTE TO EACH ANTENNA DEVICE. FURNISH AND INSTALL A MINIMUM OF (3) GROUND KITS PER COAXIAL CABLE. VERIFY NUMBER OF ANTENNAS, CABLE, AND CABLE DIAMETER WITH T-MOBILE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. aT • •Mobile • CENTERLINE SOLUTION[ elk r. Community Development CP PROJECT NO.: TMO-18-0089-4 PRELIMINARY NO. DATE D/C DESCRIPTION 0 11-21-18 YK/RS 90% CD REVIEW 1 12-12-18 JK/TT 90% CD REVIEW 2 12-26-18 TT/TT INT. REV SUBMITTAL NO. DATE D/C DESCRIPTION SITE NAME: SEA TAC BUDDHIST CENTER SITE ID: SE03055A SITE ADDRESS: 3438 S 148TH ST. TUKWILA, WA98168 SHEET TITLE RF DETAILS SHEET NO. RF1.0 1 RF DETAILS - ANTENNA & ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT PLUMBING DIAGRAM