Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOW 2026-06-08 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKETCITY OF TUKWILA City Council Committee of the Whole Meeting Monday, June 8, 2026 at 7:00 p.m. Location: Tukwila City Hall, Council Chambers, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Join remotely: 1-253-292-9750, Access Code: 670077847# or click here to join virtually AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER/ PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The City of Tukwila is located on the ancestral lands of the Coast Salish people. We acknowledge their continuing connections to land, waters and culture. We pay our respects to their elders past, present and emerging. 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS Those wishing to provide public comments may verbally address the City Council both on -site at Tukwila City Hall or remotely via phone or Microsoft Teams for up to 5 minutes for items both on and not on the meeting agenda. Per the Council Rules of Procedure, the total time for public comment should not generally exceed 30 minutes and time may be reduced to 3 minutes if there are more than 6 speakers. To provide comment remotely, please email citycouncil(abtukwilawa.gov with your name and topic by 5:00 PM on the meeting date. Please clearly indicate that your message is for public comment during the meeting, and you will receive further instructions. 4. PUBLIC HEARING a. 2027-2032 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Pg. 4 To provide public hearing comments, please email citycouncil(a_tukwilawa.gov, provide your first and last name, and reference the public hearing topic in the subject line, by 5:00 p.m. on June 8, 2026. Once you have signed up by email, your name will be called upon during the meeting to speak for up to 5 minutes. You may also attend the Public Hearing in person and provide your comments on - site. This agenda is available at www.tukwilawa.qov, and in alternate formats with advance notice for those with disabilities. Tukwila Council meetings are audio/video taped, and available at www.tukwilawa.gov If you are in need of translation or interpretation services at a Council meeting, please contact us at 206-433-1800 by 12:00 p.m. on the meeting date. City Council Meeting — C.O.W. Page 2 of 2 June 8, 2026 5. SPECIAL ISSUES a. Resolution Adopting Six -year Transportation Improvement Program Pg. 4 (2027-2032) b. Legislation to Update Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) 9.48 & 9.50 and Pg. 55 Transportation Impact Fees (1) Ordinance to Repeal/Replace Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) 9.48, Pg. 82 Concurrency Standards & Transportation Impact Fees and TMC 9.50, Concurrency Management (2) Resolution to Amend Transportation Impact Fee Pg. 109 6. REPORTS 7. MISCELLANEOUS 8. ADJOURNMENT This agenda is available at www.tukwilawa.qov, and in alternate formats with advance notice for those with disabilities. Tukwila Council meetings are audio/video taped, and available at www.tukwilawa.gov If you are in need of translation or interpretation services at a Council meeting, please contact us at 206-433-1800 by 12:00 p.m. on the meeting date. WELCOME TO THE TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEETING The Tukwila City Council encourages community participation in the local government process and welcomes attendance and public comment at its meetings. MEETING SCHEDULE Regular Meetings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the 1s` and 3d Mondays of each month. The City Council takes formal action in the form of motions, resolutions and ordinances at Regular Meetings. Committee of the Whole Meetings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the 2d and 41h Mondays of each month. The City Council considers current issues, discusses policy matters in detail, and coordinates the work of the Council at Committee of the Whole meetings. PUBLIC COMMENTS Members of the public are given the opportunity to address the Council for up to 5 minutes on items both on and not on the meeting agenda during Public Comments. Per the Council Rules of Procedure the total time for public comments should not generally exceed 30 minutes and time may be reduced to 3 minutes each if there are more than 6 speakers. When recognized by the Presiding Officer, please go to the podium if on -site or turn on your microphone if attending virtually and state your name clearly for the record. The City Council appreciates hearing from you but may not respond or answer questions during the meeting; members of the City Council or City staff may follow up with you following the meeting. PUBLIC HEARINGS Public Hearings are required by law before the Council can take action on matters affecting the public interest such as land -use laws, annexations, rezone requests, public safety issues, etc. The City Council Rules of Procedure provide the following guidelines for Public Hearings: 1. City staff will provide a report summarizing and providing context to the issue at hand. 2. City staff shall speak first and be allowed 15 minutes to make a presentation. 3. The applicant is then allowed 15 minutes to make a presentation. 4. Each side is then allowed 5 minutes for rebuttal. 5. After City staff and the applicant have used their speaking time, the Council may ask further clarifying questions of the speakers. 6. Members of the public who wish to address the Council on the hearing topic may speak for 5 minutes each. 7. Speakers are asked to sign in on forms provided by the City Clerk. 8. The Council may ask clarifying questions of speakers and the speakers may respond. 9. Speakers should address their comments to the City Council. 10. If a large number of people wish to speak to the issue, the Council may limit the total amount of comment time dedicated to the Public Hearing. 11. Once the Presiding Officer closes the public hearing, no further comments will be accepted, and the issue is open for Councilmember discussion. 12. Any hearing being held or ordered to be held by the City Council may be continued in the manner as set forth by RCW 42.30.100. For more information about the City Council, including its complete Rules of Procedure, please visit: https://www.tukwilawa.gov/departments/city-council/ City of Tukwila Thomas McLeod, Mayor Marty Wine, City Administrator Agenda Item Sponsor Legislative History Recommended Motion ITEM NO. 4.A. & 5.A. AGENDA BILL Resolution for Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (2027- 2032) Jen Tetatzin, Public Works Director, City Engineer Cyndy Knighton, Senior Program Manager - Transportation May 28, 2026 Transportation & Infrastructure Services Committee June 8, 2026 Committee of the Whole June 15, 2026 Regular Meeting ❑ Discussion Only x❑ Action Requested MOVE TO adopt a resolution adopting the Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (2027-2032) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY State law requires cities to approve a resolution adopting the annual update to the Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) after holding a public hearing. The proposed Six Year TIP for 2027-2032 include 22 new projects related to the 2024 Transportation Element, the 2025 Local Road Safety Plan, and the proposed Transportation Impact Fee updated schedule. Staff is requesting the Committee forward this item to the June 8, 2026 Committee of the Whole Meeting for a Public Hearing. DISCUSSION The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is updated annually as required by the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 35.77.010. The TIP is adopted by resolution after a public hearing at the local agency level and incorporated into regional and state TIPs. The TIP is primarily a financial planning document for projects competing for grants. Any project submitted for federal grant funding must be included in the local, regional, and state adopted TIPs. The TIP is a rolling plan showing various funding sources: grants, developer, and local funds. Projects "roll" as funds or stages occur (design report, final design, and construction). Tukwila's Six Year TIP, the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), the Transportation Element, and the Local Road Safety Plan list many of the same transportation -related projects. The TIP typically lists only those transportation -related projects planned within the next six years that are deemed regionally significant or that have grant funding awarded or expected. The attached Draft 2027 - 2032 TIP and was created by modifying the 2026 - 2031 TIP to add or remove projects and adjust project costs. With the current budget cycle beginning and the proposed Transportation Impact Fee schedule being discussed along the same timeline as the TIP update, the draft TIP also includes many more new projects than a typical year. The list of projects is presented in alphabetical order. Prioritization of projects is reflected in the current CIP but new projects added are not prioritized at this point. During the current budget cycle, Council priorities will be established along with budget projections, which will help identify the top priority projects to consider over the next 6 years and beyond. The TIP can be modified at any time throughout the year to rearrange project schedules or the Council can simply wait until next year's annual update to add, remove, or modify projects based on the final biennial budget adopted this year. n One Twe-projects were removed and 22 new projects were added. The majority of new projects added are identified as top priority projects in the Transportation Element and the Local Road Safety Plan. All new projects added to the proposed Transportation Impact Fee schedule are included as they are the majority of the top priority projects in the Transportation Element. The Draft 2027-2032 TIP summary identifies all the new projects and where they originate from, as well as the current projects with the page number of the current CIP. Deleted S 144th Bridge Sidewalks ATTACHMENTS Lunn County is tokinn loon and project 's i nnlu ded in their TIP Grant was returned, project can be added back in once funding is identified • Draft 2027-2032 TIP Summary • Draft Resolution & 2027-2032 Draft Transportation Improvement Program • Current Adopted 2025-2030 TIP (begins on page 3) * Track changes reflect changes requested at the May 28, 2026 Transportation and Infrastructure Services (TIS) Committee meeting. 9 DRAFT 2027 - 2032 TIP SUMMARY Source' or 2025-2030 CIP Project Costs in Thousands of Dollars Funding Sources Unsecured Sheet PROJECT TITLE 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 T TAL Federal StatelTIB City/Local Grant City* 39 42nd Avenue S Bridge Replacement 600 17,500 17,500 35,600 23,600 17,000 4,500 47 42nd Avenue S Bikeway 295 295 295 30 46th Avenue Safe Routes to School 325 2,070 2,395 1,895 500 1,725 420 New Airport Way Overlay 574 3,424 3,998 3,988 10 49 ADA Improvements 61 61 61 61 61 61 366 54 APE/Minkler Blvd Intersection 375 2,400 2,775 1,900 875 1,900 500 58 APE/Industry Drive Intersection 265 2,400 2,665 2,665 2,400 LRSP Andover Park W (Strander to Tukwila Pkwy) 923 923 923 923 45 Annual Bridge Inspections and Repairs 232 237 242 242 247 247 1,447 1,447 35 Annual Overlay and Repair Program 2,520 2,520 2,720 2,720 3,155 3,155 16,790 16,720 43 Annual Traffic Signal Program 160 160 170 190 190 190 1,060 1,060 38 Boeing Access Road Overlay 3,526 3,526 3,990 TE, TIF Buffered Shared Path on 42nd Ave S Sect. 3 550 550 550 550 57 E Marginal Way S (BAR - S 112th St) 75 75 75 75 TE, LRSP E Marginal Way S (N City Limit to BAR) 6,917 6,917 6,917 6,917 New E Marginal Way S Overlay 685 5,058 5,743 5,743 TE, TIF E Marginal Way S Section 2 Sidewalks 803 803 803 803 LRSP Interurban Avenue S (140th St to S 144th St) 1,484 1,484 1,484 1,484 52 Interurban Avenue S Overlay 356 356 356 TE, LRSP Klickitat Dr (53rd Ave S to Southcenter Pkwy) 582 582 582 582 31 Macadam Road S Complete Streets 300 200 3,100 3,600 3,160 350 3,160 350 TE, TIF Macadam Road S Sect. 1 Sidewalk 992 992 992 992 TE, TIF Minkler Blvd Sect. 2 Sidewalk 1,430 1,430 1,430 1,430 44 Orillia Road S Overlay 1,204 1,204 1,204 TE, TIF S 115th SUE Marginal Way Intersection Impr 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 41 S 119th St Pedestrian Bridge Painting 200 200 200 55 S 124th St/50th PI S Reconfiguration 50 1,022 1,072 898 254 59 S 133rd SUSR 599 SB Intersection 550 2,700 3,250 1,620 1,630 1,620 1,630 TE, TIF S 141st St Sect. 1 Sidewalk 510 510 510 510 TE, TIF S 142nd St Sidewalk 541 541 541 541 TE, TIF S 144th St Complete Streets 869 869 869 869 LRSP S 144th St Improvements (Military Rd to TIB) 580 580 580 580 28 S 152nd Street Ped & Bike Improvements 530 4,950 5,480 3,960 1,520 3,960 990 LRSP S 180th St (Sperry Dr to IU Trail) 806 806 806 806 TE, TIF S Norfolk St Bike Facilities 497 497 497 497 37 S Ryan Way 1,275 13,060 14,335 8,850 55,606 8,850 4,231 48 Southcenter Blvd Bike and Ped Xing Upgrades 352 352 352 352 46 Southcenter Blvd Road Diet (with L2S Trail) 135 3,000 3,135 2,400 735 2,400 600 TE, TIF SR 518 EB Off Ramp/Klickitat Drive Improvements 850 850 850 850 TE, TIF Strander Boulevard Sidewalk 467 467 467 467 TE, TIF TIB Sect. 2 Sidewalk (north) 377 377 377 377 TE, TIF TIB Sect. 2 Sidewalk (south) 1,673 1,673 1,673 1,673 TDM Implementation 52 52 52 52 52 52 312 312 Tukwila and South King County TDM 260 260 130 650 832 208 South King County Regional TDM 159 159 159 159 636 550 56 LRSP Tukwila Int'I Blvd (S 152nd St to S 144th St) 4,347 4,347 TOTAL 14,491 56,738 37,911 11,769 6,984 10,622 138,515 39,431 42,883 111,853 23,615 34,399 PROJECTS REVISED FROM 2025-2030 TIP New Deleted/Completed: Airport Way Overlay - fully grant funded S 144th Bridge Sidewalks E Marginal Way S Overlay - fully grant funded ' TE: Transportation Element, TIF: Transportation Impact Fee Schedule, LRSP: Local Road Safety Plan " Unsecured City funding includes all funds necessary outside of the current biennial budget cycle 6 June 2 2026 NOTE: Changes were made after the May 28, 2026 Transportation and Infrastructure Services (TIS) Committee Meeting. See added page (pg 38 of Exhibit A). A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A SIX -YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (2027- 2032), AND DIRECTING THE SAME TO BE FILED WITH THE STATE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BOARD. WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of RCW Chapters 35.77 and 47.26, the City Council of the City of Tukwila has previously adopted a Transportation Improvement Program and thereafter periodically modified said Transportation Improvement Program by resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the work accomplished under said program, determined current and future City street and arterial needs and, based upon these findings, has prepared a Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program for the ensuing six calendar years (2027-2032); and WHEREAS, on June 8, 2026, a public hearing was held regarding the City's Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Program Adopted. A Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program for the calendar years 2027 to 2032, attached hereto as Exhibit A, is hereby adopted. Section 2. Filing of Program. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a copy of this resolution, together with the exhibit attached hereto, with the Secretary of Transportation and the Transportation Improvement Board of the State of Washington 2026 Legislation: 2027-2032 TIP Version: 04/30/2026 Staff: C. Knighton Page 1 of 2 7 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of , 2026. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Andy Youn-Barnett, CMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Office of the City Attorney Armen Papyan, Council President Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council: Resolution Number: Exhibit A: City of Tukwila Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program for 2027 to 2032 2026 Legislation: 2027-2032 TIP Version: 04/30/2026 Staff: C. Knighton Page 2 of 2 i �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o r A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y 2 ,c. c D. Road Name or Number m o o. 0 '� n 01 c 0 m 0 c E. Begin & End Termini M. v m z a - -. m m m F. Project Description G. Structure ID a T ? N m o 05 / 1037(004) TUK-62 06/08/26 06/15/26 11 0.100 DCE Yes 42nd Ave S Bridge Replacement 42nd Ave S over the Duwamish River Interurban Ave S to Northern end of bridge Replace the existing 42nd Ave S steel truss bridge. The replacement will require preliminary engineer design, and construction phases. The new structure will meet current road and bridge design standards. The replacement structure configuration will be two through -lanes, possibly a turn pocket, and include sidewalks. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S PE 2027 0 0 500,000 500,000 S RW 2027 0 0 100,000 100,000 P CN 2028 BR 13,000,000 0 0 13,000,000 S CN 2028 BR 10,599,306 MAW 17,000,000 3,900,000 31,499,306 Totalsl 23,599,3061 17,000,0001 4,500,0001 45,099,306 Expenditure Schedule Phase list 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th PE 500,000 0 0 0 0 RW 100,000 0 0 0 0 CN 0 17,500,000 17,500,000 0 0 Totals 600,000 17,500,000 17,500,000 0 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 1 9 Adw �� Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program TWO Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y m ,c. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 '� n 01 c 0 m 0 c E. Begin & End Termini M. v m z a _ S. m m F. Project Description G. Structure ID a ? N s m o 05 WA-15812 06/08/26 06/15/26 28 C G P S T No W 42nd Avenue S Bikeway 42nd Avenue S Southcenter Blvd to S 150th Street Develop a traffic -calmed bikeway along 42nd Ave S between S 150th St and Southcenter Blvd. On the west side of the street, add striped southbound bike lane between Southcenter Blvd and S 150th St. On the east side of the street, add striped bike lane between Southcenter Blvd and S 151st St. Remove on -street parking to widen the sidewalk on the east side of the street between S 151st St and S 150th St, creating a shared path; add shared lane markings to the roadway Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S CN 2027 0 0 295,000 295,000 Totals 0 0 295,000 295,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th CN 295,000 0 0 0 0 Totals 295,000 0 0 0 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 2 10 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' � v 'o - m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y m n T. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 '� n 01 c m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M v m z a _ -. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID to o, o N s m o. 19 WA-11113 06/08/26 06/15/26 05 C G P S T 0.370 Yes W 46th Avenue Safe Routes to School 46th Avenue S S 150th Street to S 144th Street Design and construct curb, gutter and sidewalk on the west side of 46th Avenue S, including curb bulb -out at the SE corner of 46th Avenue S/S 144th Street with raised crosswalk across S 144th Street with RRFB. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S PE 2027 0 SRTS 170,000 80,000 250,000 P RW 2027 0 SRTS 65,000 10,000 75,000 P CN 2028 0 SRTS 1,660,000 410,000 2,070,000 Totals 0 1,895,000 500,000 2,395,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th PE 250,000 0 0 0 0 RW 75,000 0 0 0 0 CN 0 2,070,000 0 0 0 Totals 325,000 2,070,000 0 0 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 3 11 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y 2 01 T. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 '� n c n m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M v m z a - -. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID to o, T o N m o. 03 TUK-71 06/08/26 06/15/26 05 0.380 CE No Airport Way Overlay Airport Way S Boeing Access Road to North Tukwila City Limit Plane, pavement repair, pave; channelization, and repair of curb and gutter, sidewalk, and guardrail, as necessary. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S PE 2027 NHFP 564,000 0 10,000 574,000 S CN 2028 NHFP 3,424,000 0 0 3,424,000 Totals 3,988,000 0 10,000 3,998,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th PE 574,000 0 0 0 0 CN 0 3,424,000 0 0 0 Totals 574,000 3,424,000 0 0 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 4 12 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y m T. c D. Road Name or Number o a 0 '� n 01 c n m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini m M. v m z a - -. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID to o, T o N s o. 00 WA-05405 06/08/26 06/15/26 06 No Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Improvements Various locations to Design and construct ADA compliant upgrades to City infrastructure in conjunction with a City developed plan. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S ALL 2027 0 0 366,000 366,000 Totals 0 0 366,000 366,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 61,000 61,000 61,000 61,000 122,000 Totals 61,000 61,000 61,000 61,000 122,000 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 5 13 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' � v 'o - m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y m n T. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 '� n 01 c m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M v m z a - -. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID to o, o N s m o. 16 WA-07746 06/08/26 06/15/26 03 C G O P S No TW Andover Park E/Minkler Blvd Intersection Andover Park E Minkler Blvd to Construct left turn lanes on Andover Park East and reconstruct traffic signal Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S PE 2027 0 0 275,000 275,000 S RW 2027 0 0 100,000 100,000 P CN 2028 0 TIB 1,900,000 500,000 2,400,000 Totals 0 1,900,000 875,000 2,775,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th PE 275,000 0 0 0 0 RW 100,000 0 0 0 0 CN 0 2,400,000 0 0 0 Totals 375,000 2,400,000 0 0 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 6 14 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y m T. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 '� n 01 c n m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M v m z a - -. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID to c o N s M. 04 WA-15107 06/08/26 06/15/26 03 C G P S T 0.100 Yes W Andover Park East/industry Dr Intersection Andover Park E Industry Drive to Design and construct traffic signal with Andover Park East left turn lanes and crosswalks. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S PE 2027 0 0 190,000 190,000 S RW 2027 0 0 75,000 75,000 P CN 2028 0 0 2,400,000 2,400,000 Totals 0 0 2,665,000 2,665,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th PE 190,000 0 0 0 0 RW 75,000 0 0 0 0 CN 0 2,400,000 0 0 0 Totals 265,000 2,400,000 0 0 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 7 15 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y m ,c. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 '� n 01 c 0 m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M. v m z a - -. m m F. Project Description G. Structure ID to o, T o N s m o. 05 WA-17047 06/08/26 06/15/26 04 0.390 No Andover Park W (Strander to Tukwila Parkway) Andover Park W Strander Boulevard to Tukwila Parkway Construct driveway access improvements, provide bus lanes, install RRFB's, and ,improve signal timing Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2030 0 0 923,000 923,000 Totals 0 0 923,000 923,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0 0 923,000 0 Totals 0 0 0 923,000 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 8 16 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y m T. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 '� n 01 c n m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M v m z a - -. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID to o, T o N s o. 14 WA-03731 06/08/26 06/15/26 06 No Annual Bridge Inspections and Repairs Various City Street to Perform load ratings and bi-annual inspections as well as construct necessary epairs and maintenance Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S ALL 2027 0 0 1,447,000 1,447,000 Totals 0 0 1,447,000 1,447,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 232,000 237,000 242,000 242,000 494,000 Totals 232,000 237,000 242,000 242,000 494,000 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 9 17 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y m T. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 '� n 01 c n m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M v m z a - -. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID to o, o N s m o. 16 WA-03733 06/08/26 06/15/26 06 C G O P S No TW Annual Overlay and Repair Program Various City Streets to Repair, rehabilitate, and overlay City streets as needed in an annual program Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S ALL 2027 0 0 16,790,000 16,790,000 Totals 0 0 16,790,000 16,790,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 2,520,000 2,520,000 2,720,000 2,720,000 6,310,000 Totals 2,520,000 2,520,000 2,720,000 2,720,000 6,310,000 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 10 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y m T. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 '� n 01 c n m 0 c E. Begin & End Termini M. v m z a - S. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID a T o N s m o. 00 WA-15104 06/08/26 06/15/26 44 P No Annual Traffic Signal Program Varies to Design and construct traffic signal upgrades and repairs of signals that exceed routine maintenance work loop replacement, head replacement, and controllers. Replace direct bury cable for existing lighting system. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S ALL 2027 0 0 1,060,000 1,060,000 Totals 0 0 1,060,000 1,060,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 160,000 160,000 170,000 190,000 380,000 Totals 160,000 160,000 170,000 190,000 380,000 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 11 19 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y 2 01 T. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 '� n c n m 0 c E. Begin & End Termini M. v m z a - -. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID o. T o N g m o 03 / 1380(005) TUK-68 06/08/26 06/15/26 05 0.560 CE No Boeing Access Road Overlay Boeing Access Road East Marginal Way S to Martin Luther King Jr Way S Grind and overlay roadway, replace concrete overlay of bridge deck over BNSF railway. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S PE 2027 NHPP 564,000 0 0 564,000 S CN 2027 NHPP 3,426,000 0 0 3,426,000 Totals 3,990,000 0 0 3,990,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase tat 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th PE 100,000 0 0 0 0 CN 3,426,000 0 0 0 0 Totals 3,526,000 0 0 0 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 12 20 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' � v 'o - m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y m 0 ,c. c D. Road Name or Number m o °L 0 n c m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M. v m z a _ -. m m F. Project Description G. Structure ID CL T o N s o. 05 WA-17026 06/08/26 06/15/26 28 No Buffered Shared Path on 42nd Ave S Section 3 42nd Ave S S 150th St to S 144th St Remove parking on one side and widen sidewalk to create shared -use path Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2030 0 0 550,000 550,000 Totals 0 0 550,000 550,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0 0 550,000 0 Totals 0 0 0 550,000 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 13 21 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y m T. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 '� n 01 c n m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M v m z a - -. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID to c o N s Q. 04 WA-15109 06/08/26 06/15/26 03 C G O P S 0.270 Yes TW E Marginal Way S (BAR - S 112 St) E Marginal Way S Boeing Access Road to S 112th St Planning phase to determine project parameters. Goal is to design and construct full street improvements and traffic control. Could include additional lanes and bike lanes to support the new Sound Transit Link Light Rail infill station. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P PL 2028 0 0 75,000 75,000 Totals 0 0 75,000 75,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th PL 0 75,000 0 0 0 Totals 0 75,000 0 0 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 14 22 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y 2 T. c D. Road Name or Number m o °L 0 n c n m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M v m z a - -. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID to CL T o N m o. 03 WA-17053 06/08/26 06/15/26 04 CPS 1.900 CE No E Marginal Way S (N City Limit to S Boeing Access Rd) Boeing Access Road to Northern City Limit Widen and extend asphalt paving on E Marginal Way S north of S Boeing Access Road. Bike facilities may be desired here, pending BAR Infill station and area redevelopment, could connect to bike facilities on Airport Way if Seattle/Tukwila install, connecting via Norfolk to EMWS If this project moves forward, need to update bike network. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2032 0 0 6,917,000 6,917,000 Totals 0 0 6,917,000 6,917,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0 0 0 6,917,000 Totals 0 0 0 0 6,917,000 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 15 23 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y 2 01 T. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 '� n c n m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M v m z a - -. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID a T o N m o. 03 TUK-70 06/08/26 06/15/26 05 0.960 CE No E Marginal Way S Overlay E Marginal Way S Interurban Avenue S to MP 2.27 Plane, pavement repair, pave, channelization, and repair of curb and gutter and sidewalk, as necessary. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S PE 2027 NHPP 685,000 0 0 685,000 S CN 2028 NHPP 5,058,000 0 0 5,058,000 Totals 5,743,000 0 0 5,743,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th PE 685,000 0 0 0 0 CN 0 5,058,000 0 0 0 Totals 685,000 5,058,000 0 0 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 16 24 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y m ,c. c D. Road Name or Number m o °L 0 n c 0 m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M. v m z a - -. m m F. Project Description G. Structure ID to CL T o N s m o. 05 WA-17043 06/08/26 06/15/26 28 0.140 No E Marginal Way S Section 2 Sidewalk E Marginal Way S Interurban Ave S to S 120th PI Construct sidewalk on both sides of road segment. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2031 0 0 803,000 803,000 Totals 0 0 803,000 803,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0 0 0 803,000 Totals 0 0 0 0 803,000 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 17 25 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y m T. c D. Road Name or Number m o °L 0 n c n m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M v m z a - -. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID to CL T o N s m o. 03 WA-17049 06/08/26 06/15/26 28 0.270 No Interurban Ave (140th St to S 144th St) Interurban Ave S 140th St to 144th St Construct two landscape medians, install RRFB's, and a new pedestrian crossing Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2031 0 0 1,484,000 1,484,000 Totals 0 0 1,484,000 1,484,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0 0 0 1,484,000 Totals 0 0 0 0 1,484,000 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 18 26 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y 2 T. c D. Road Name or Number m o °L 0 n c n m 0 c E. Begin & End Termini M. v m z a - -. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID o. T o N g m o 03 / 1391(004) TUK-66 06/08/26 06/15/26 05 2.250 CE No Interurban Avenue S Overlay Interurban Avenue S E Marginal Way S to S 143rd Street Complete pavement repairs, overlay, and curb and gutter repair. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S CN 2027 NHPP 4,561,000 0 0 4,561,000 Totals 4,561,000 0 0 4,561,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th C N 356,100 0 0 0 0 Totals 356,100 0 0 0 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 19 27 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o r A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y 2 01 ,c. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 '� n c 0 m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M. v m z a - -. m m F. Project Description G. Structure ID to o, T o N m o. 05 WA-17054 06/08/26 06/15/26 28 0.410 CE No Klickitat Dr (53rd Ave S to Southcenter Pkwy) 53rd Ave S to Southcenter Pkwy Multimodal improvements to improve connectivity and accessibility of existing path wayfinding, signage, width improvements, etc. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2029 0 0 582,000 582,000 Totals 0 0 582,000 582,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0 582,000 0 0 Totals 0 0 582,000 0 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 20 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y 2 01 T. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 '� n c n m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M v m z a - -. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID a T o N m o. 17 WA-11110 06/08/26 06/15/26 04 0.350 CE No Macadam Rd S Complete Streets Project Macadam Road S 150th Street to S 144th Street Design and construction of a complete street on Macadam Road. Road widening and rechannelization to add 5-foot bike lanes and 5-foot sidewalks on both sides of the roadway. Includes illumination, curb, and storm drainage. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P PE 2027 0 Ped/Bike Program 350,000 50,000 400,000 P RW 2028 0 Ped/Bike Program 10,000 0 10,000 P CN 2029 0 Ped/Bike Program 2,800,000 300,000 3,100,000 Totals 0 3,160,000 350,000 3,510,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th PE 300,000 100,000 0 0 0 RW 0 100,000 0 0 0 CN 0 0 3,100,000 0 0 Totals 300,000 200,000 3,100,000 0 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 21 29 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' � v 'o - m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y m 0 ,c. c D. Road Name or Number m o °L 0 n c m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M. v m z a - -. m m F. Project Description G. Structure ID to o, T o N s o. 05 WA-17028 06/08/26 06/15/26 28 0.340 No Macadam Rd S Section 1 Sidewalk 42nd Ave S and Macadam Rd S S 124th St to S 130th St Construct sidewalk on west side of 42nd Ave S from S 124th St to entrance of 42nd Ave S Bridge, construct sidewalk on both sides of 42nd Ave S from entrance of 42nd Ave S Bridge to Interurban Ave S. Construct sidewalk on both sides of Macadam Rd S from Interurban Ave S to S 130th St. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2031 0 0 992,000 992,000 Totals 0 0 992,000 992,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0 0 0 992,000 Totals 0 0 0 0 992,000 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 22 30 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' � v 'o - m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y m n T. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 '� n 01 c m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M v m z a - -. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID to o, T o N s o. 04 WA-17027 06/08/26 06/15/26 28 No Minkler Blvd Section 2 Sidewalk Minkler Boulevard Andover Park W to Andover Park E Construct sidewalk on both sides of oad segment Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2029 0 0 1,430,000 1,430,000 Totals 0 0 1,430,000 1,430,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0 1,430,000 0 0 Totals 0 0 1,430,000 0 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 23 31 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y 2 01 T. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 '� n c n m 0 c E. Begin & End Termini M. v m z a - -. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID a T o N m o. 03 / 1230(007) TUK-67 06/08/26 06/15/26 05 0.640 CE No Orillia Road South Overlay Orillia Road S S 200th Street to S 188th Street/WSDOT ROW Complete pavement repairs; overlay; and curb and gutter, sidewalk, and guardrail repair. Make minor improvements to channelization and improve safety near the 188th street intersection. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S CN 2027 NHPP 1,204,000 0 0 1,204,000 Totals 1,204,000 0 0 1,204,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th C N 1,204,000 0 0 0 0 Totals 1,204,000 0 0 0 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 24 32 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y m T. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 '� n 01 c n m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M v m z a - -. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID to o, T o N s m o. 03 WA-17025 06/08/26 06/15/26 03 0.000 No S 115th St/E Marginal Way Intersection Improvements E Marginal Way 300' South of S 115th St to 300' North of S 115th St Design and construct a new traffic signal, lighting, and pedestrian facilities, including crosswalks and pedestrian push buttons. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2029 0 0 2,000,000 2,000,000 Totals 0 0 2,000,000 2,000,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0 2,000,000 0 0 Totals 0 0 2,000,000 0 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 25 33 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y m T. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 '� n 01 c n m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M v m z a - -. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID to CL T o N s m o. 00 WA13494 06/08/26 06/15/26 2117 06 0.040 No S 119th St Pedestrian Bridge Painting S 119th Street Bridge West bank Duwamish River to East bank Duwamish River Ongoing maintenance of the S 119th Street Pedestrian Bridge in the Allentown/Duwamish neighborhoods. Painting of bridge is outstanding maintenance needed. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S CN 2027 0 0 200,000 200,000 Totals 0 0 200,000 200,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th CN 200,000 0 0 0 0 Totals 200,000 0 0 0 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 26 34 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y m ,c. c D. Road Name or Number m o °L 0 n c 0 m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M. v m z a - -. m m F. Project Description G. Structure ID to a T o N s o. 05 WA-16476 06/08/26 06/15/26 21 0.140 No S 124th St/50th PI S Reconfiguration S 124th Street 49th Ave S to 51 st PI S Reconfigure intersection to remove EB slip lane, new c/g/s on S 124th from 49th to 51 st, new paved shoulder walkway on south side of 124th connecting to existing walkway on west side of 50th Pk, new stormwater treatment/rain garden in old slip Pane ROW. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S PE 2027 0 TIB 101,000 29,000 130,000 S CN 2028 0 TIB 796,300 225,200 1,021,500 Totals 0 897,300 254,200 1,151,500 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th PE 50,000 0 0 0 0 CN 0 1,021,500 0 0 0 Totals 50,000 1,021,500 0 0 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 27 35 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y m T. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 '� n 01 c n m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M v m z a - -. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID to c o N s M. 03 WA-15108 06/08/26 06/15/26 03 C G O P S 0.100 Yes TW S 133 St/SR599 Southbound Intersection S 133rd Street SR 599 SB Ramp to Design and construct intersection improvements, which could include a new traffic signal or a roundabout, lighting, pedestrian facilities, and drainage. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P PE 2028 0 0 400,000 400,000 P RW 2028 0 0 150,000 150,000 P CN 2029 0 TIB 1,620,000 1,080,000 2,700,000 Totals 0 1,620,000 1,630,000 3,250,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th PE 0 400,000 0 0 0 RW 0 150,000 0 0 0 CN 0 0 2,700,000 0 0 Totals 0 550,000 2,700,000 0 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 28 36 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' � v 'o - m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y m n T. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 '� n 01 c m 0 c E. Begin & End Termini M. v m z a - S. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID a T o N s m o. 07 WA-17045 06/08/26 06/15/26 28 0.120 No S 141st St Section 1 Sidewalk S 141st 37th Ave S to Tukwila International Boulevard Construct sidewalk on both sides of oad segment Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P PE 2029 0 0 510,000 510,000 Totals 0 0 510,000 510,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0 510,000 0 0 Totals 0 0 510,000 0 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 29 37 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' � v 'o - m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y m n T. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 '� n 01 c m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M v m z a - -. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID to o, T o N s m o. 07 WA-17044 06/08/26 06/15/26 28 0.130 No S 142nd St Sidewalk S 142nd St 37th Ave S to Tukwila International Boulevard Construct sidewalk on both sides of oad segment Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2029 0 0 541,000 541,000 Totals 0 0 541,000 541,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0 541,000 0 0 Totals 0 0 541,000 0 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 30 Adw �� Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program TWO Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o r A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y 2 01 ,c. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 '� n c 0 m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M. v m z a _ -. m m F. Project Description G. Structure ID CL o N m o. 05 WA-17041 04 C G P S T 0.500 CE No W S 144th St Complete Street 42nd Ave S to 51 st Ave S Restripe and remove parking on one side to accommodate 2-1 Oft lanes, 1-2ft buffer, and 1-10ft two-way cycle track. Construct sidewalk facilities on the south side of the street. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2030 0 0 869,000 869,000 Totals 0 0 869,000 869,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0 0 869,000 0 Totals 0 0 0 869,000 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 31 39 Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 7, Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y m ,c. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 '� n 01 c 0 m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M. v m z a - -. m m F. Project Description G. Structure ID to o, T o N s m o. 05 WA-17046 06/08/26 06/15/26 28 0.310 No S 144th St Improvements (Military to TIB) S 144th St Military Rd S to Tukwila International Boulevard Construct sidewalk improvments, curb and gutter, install RRFB's, and a pedestrian refuge island Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2028 0 0 580,000 580,000 Totals 0 0 580,000 580,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 580,000 0 0 0 Totals 0 580,000 0 0 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 32 no] Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 7, Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y 2 01 T. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 n c n m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M v m z a - -. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID a o N m o. 19 WA-11112 06/08/26 06/15/26 05 C G O P S 0.300 CE Yes TW S 152nd Street Pedestrian and Bike Improvements S 152nd Street Tukwila International Blvd to 42nd Avenue S Install curb, gutter, sidewalks on S 152nd Street, including widening pavement and construction of a buffer between the roadway and sidewalk on the south side. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S PE 2027 0 0 300,000 300,000 S RW 2027 0 0 230,000 230,000 P CN 2028 0 TIB 3,960,000 990,000 4,950,000 Totals 0 3,960,000 1,520,000 5,480,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th PE 300,000 0 0 0 0 RW 230,000 0 0 0 0 CN 0 4,950,000 0 0 0 Totals 530,000 4,950,000 0 0 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 33 L Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 7, Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y m T. c D. Road Name or Number o a 0 '� n 01 c n m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini m M. v m z a - -. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID to o, T o N s m o. 04 WA-17048 06/08/26 06/15/26 28 0.280 No S 180th St (Sperry Drive to Interurban Trail) S 180th St Sperry Drive to Interurban Trail Construct shared use path on the north side and stall no turn on red phasing at 180th and Sperry Dr. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2030 0 0 806,000 806,000 Totals 0 0 806,000 806,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0 0 806,000 0 Totals 0 0 0 806,000 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 34 42 Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 7, Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' � v 'o - r A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y 2 01 0 ,c. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 '� n c m 0 c E. Begin & End Termini M. v m z a - S. m m F. Project Description G. Structure ID CL T o N m o. 05 WA-17021 06/08/26 06/15/26 28 P S T W 0.140 CE No S Norfolk St Bike Facilities S Norfolk Street E Marginal Way S to East city limit Add bike facilities on S Norfolk St Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2029 0 0 497,000 497,000 Totals 0 0 497,000 497,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0 497,000 0 0 Totals 0 0 497,000 0 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 35 M1 �� Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program TWO Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y m T. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 '� n 01 c n m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M v m Z a - -. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID to o. ? N s m o 04 WA-15829 06/08/26 06/15/26 06 C G P S T 0.500 No W S Ryan Way SR 900 to 51 st Ave S Resurface and rechannel S Ryan Way to improve failing pavement and improve safety. Add pedestrian and bicycle facilities where appropriate. Signalize intersection with 47th Avenue S to accommodate future growth and improve safety. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S PE 2027 0 0 1,275,000 1,275,000 P RW 2028 0 TIB 200,000 100,000 300,000 P CN 2028 0 TIB 8,650,000 4,131,000 12,781,000 Totals 0 8,850,000 5,506,000 14,356,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th PE 1,275, 000 0 0 0 0 RW 0 300,000 0 0 0 CN 0 12,760,000 0 0 0 Totals 1,275,000 13,060,000 0 0 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 36 �� Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program TWO Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y m T. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 '� n 01 c n m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M v m z a _ -. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID to o. ? N s m o 04 WA-15813 06/08/26 06/15/26 28 C G P S T No W Southcenter Blvd Bikeway and Pedestrian Crossing Upgrades Southcenter Boulevard International Boulevard to 42nd Avenue S Improve the existing bike lanes and crosswalks on Southcenter Blvd within a half - mile of Tukwila International Boulevard Station (TIBS). Re-channelize to 11 ft general purpose lanes to accommodate separated bike lanes. Tighten intersection with 40th Ave S to shorten crossing distance. Add bike channelization and upgrade to high -visibility crosswalk markings at Southcenter Blvd/TIBS station entrance and Southcenter Blvd/42nd Ave S intersections. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S CN 2027 0 0 325,000 325,000 Totals 0 0 325,000 325,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th CN 325,000 0 0 0 0 Totals 325,000 0 0 0 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 37 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila Added after 05128126 Special TIS Committee Meeting County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID 3 0 3 0 Z C. Project Title y m m 2 T. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 '� n 01 c n m 0 c E. Begin & End Termini M. v m z a - S. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID a T o N m o. 03 WA-17128 06/08/26 06/15/26 21 DCE No Southcenter Blvd Road Diet (with Lake to Sound Regional Trail) Southcenter Boulevard S 66th Ave to 53rd Ave S As part of the King County led Lake to Sound Regional Trail F1 Phase, narrow Southcenter Blvd from 5 lanes to 3 lanes between approx. 62nd Ave S and 66th Ave S. Reconfigure signal operations at 66th Ave S to include dual WB left turn lanes and a single WB thru lane. All lanes will generally shift to the south of the existing ROW to allow for construction of the Lake to Sound trail and trail buffering. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S PE 2027 0 0 135,000 135,000 P CN 2029 0 TIB 2,400,000 600,000 3,000,000 Totals 0 2,400,000 735,000 3,135,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th PE 135,000 0 0 0 0 CN 0 0 3,000,000 0 0 Totals 135,000 0 3,000,000 0 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 38 Eno �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o r A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y 2 ,c. c D. Road Name or Number m o °L 0 n c 0 m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M. v m z a - -. m m F. Project Description G. Structure ID to o. T ? N m o 05 WA-17022 06/08/26 06/15/26 03 P S W 0.020 CE No SR 518 EB Off-ramp/Klickitat Dr Intersection Improvements Klickitat Drive 51 st Ave S to Klickitat Drive Design and construct a new traffic signal, lighting, and pedestrian facilities including crosswalks and pedestrian push buttons. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2030 0 0 850,000 850,000 Totals 0 0 850,000 850,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0 0 850,000 0 Totals 0 0 0 850,000 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 39 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y m T. c D. Road Name or Number m o oL 0 n c n m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M v m z a - -. m 2 m F. Project Description G. Structure ID to o. T ? N s o 04 WA-17029 06/08/26 06/15/26 28 0.200 No Strander Blvd Sidewalk Strander Blvd and SW 27th St Christensen Rd to Interurban Trail Construct sidewalk on south side of Strander Blvd from Christensen Rd to W Valley Hwy. Construct sidewalk on both sides of Strander Blvd from W Valley Hwy to east boundary of Tukwila city limits Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2029 0 0 467,000 467,000 Totals 0 0 467,000 467,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0 467,000 0 0 Totals 0 0 467,000 0 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 40 Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 7, Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y 2 T. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 n 01 c n m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M v m z a - -. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID o. ? N m o 03 WA-17039 28 C G P S T 0.260 CE No W TIB Section 2 Sidewalk (North) Tukwila International Blvd S 112th Ave to SR99 Construct sidewalk on east side of Tukwila International Blvd from S 112th St to the HW 99 Exit Ramp. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2029 0 0 377,200 377,200 Totals 0 0 377,200 377,200 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0 377,200 0 0 Totals 0 0 377,200 0 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 41 I • �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y 2 T. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 n 01 c n m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M v m z a - -. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID o. ? N m o 03 WA-17040 28 C G P S T 0.440 CE No W TIB Section 2 Sidewalk (South) SR 99 to 12400 Block Construct sidewalk on both sides of Tukwila International Blvd from the HW 99 Exit Ramp to 12400 Block. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2029 0 0 1,672,800 1,672,800 Totals 0 0 1,672,800 1,672,800 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0 1,672, 800 0 0 Totals 0 0 1,672,800 0 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 42 50 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y m T. c D. Road Name or Number m o °L 0 n c n m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M v m z a _ -. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID to o. T ? N s o 00 WA-13491 06/08/26 06/15/26 44 0.000 No Transportation Demand Management Implementation to Provision of TDM services to Commute Trip Reduction -affected employment sites. Facilitate employer reporting and records associated with biennial CTR survey. Engage CTR employment sites with opportunities for improvement and remain connected via technical meetings with other CTR jurisdictional representatives. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S ALL 2027 0 WSDOT 103,200 0 103,200 P ALL 2028 0 WSDOT 258,000 0 258,000 Totals 0 361,200 0 361,200 Expenditure Schedule Phase list 2nd hk 3rd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 51,600 51,600 1451,600 51,6001 103,200 Totals 51,600 51,600 51,600 51,6001 103,200 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 43 51 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y m T. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 '� n 01 c n m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M v m z a _ -. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID to o. T ? N s o 00 WA-17063 06/08/26 06/15/26 18 No Tukwila and South King County TDM to Provide TDM services to help people use sustainable transportation options that increase access to opportunity, and reduce drive -alone travel and traffic congestion in Tukwila and South King County. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S PL 2027 0 OTHER 832,000 208,000 1,040,000 Totals 0 832,000 208,000 1,040,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th PL 260,000 260,000 130,000 0 0 Totals 260,000 260,000 130,000 0 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 44 52 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y 2 01 T. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 n c n m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M v m z a _ -. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID a T o N m o. 00 TUK-69 06/08/26 06/15/26 24 0.000 CE No Tukwila and South King County TDM Tukwila and South King County N/A to N/A This project will provide TDM programming and services to help people access sustainable transportation options that reduce drive -alone travel and traffic congestion in Tukwila and South King County. Tukwila's TDM Program reaches people regionally at employment centers, community hubs, multifamily housing complexes, and educational institutions. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S PL 2027 CMAQ 550,000 WSDOT 85,838 0 635,838 Totals 550,000 85,838 0 635,838 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th PL 158,959 158,959 158,960 158,960 0 Totals 158,959 158,959 158,960 158,960 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Page 45 53 �_ Washington State Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -/' Department of Transportation From 2027 to 2032 Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside N Outside m 3 <' - � v 'o m A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID D m o D m 0 Z C. Project Title y 2 T. c D. Road Name or Number m o a 0 n 01 c n m 0 Cr E. Begin & End Termini M v m z a - -. m 2 F. Project Description G. Structure ID o. T ? N m o 03 WA-17042 04 C P S W 0.530 CE No Tukwila International Boulevard (S 152nd St to S 144th St) S 152nd St to S 144th St Construct landscape median, refine corridor access, roadway diet, and multimodal anes. Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2030 10 01 4,347,000 4,347,000 Totalsl 0 0 14,347,000 4,347,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0 0 4,347,000 0 Totals 0 0 0 4,347,000 0 Report Date: June 01, 2026 Federal Funds I IState Funds ILocal Funds ITotal Funds Grand Totals for Tukwila 143,635,3061 142,961,3381 66,509,2001 153,105,844 Page 46 54 City of Tukwila ITEM NO. Thomas McLeod, Mayor AI 5. B . Marty Wine, City Administrator AGENDA BILL Agenda Item Transportation Impact Fees & Concurrency Updates Sponsor Cyndy Knighton, Senior Program Manager - Transportation Legislative History May 28, 2026 Transportation & Infrastructure Services Committee June 8, 2026 Committee of the Whole June 15, 2026 Regular Meeting Recommended Motion ❑ Discussion Only ❑x Action Requested MOVE TO adopt an ordinance repealing and replacing Chapters 9.48 and 9.50 of the Tukwila Municipal Code. Adopt a resolution updating the Citywide Consolidated Permit Fee Schedule for 2025 and 2026. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY New growth projections and transportation level of service standards, adopted in December 2024 as part of the Comprehensive Plan update, introduced a new multi -modal element required by changes in state law as well as Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC). These changes require both updates to the Tukwila Municipal Code, chapters 9.48 and 9.50, and updates to the Transportation Impact Fee and Concurrency Review Fee. Upon reviewing the code section, additional changes are proposed to address inconsistencies between code language and actual practice, clarification of some sections, and general housekeeping. DISCUSSION As part of the most recent update to the City's Comprehensive Plan, and specifically the Transportation Element (TE), growth models predicting changes in population and employment were updated to the 2044 horizon year. The TE modeled the impacts to the City's current transportation network as well as introduced a new requirement to measure multi -modal level of service (MMLOS) — a way to determine existing and future congestion/available capacity for more growth in trips. Adopting this new MMLOS has expanded Tukwila's transportation network to include pedestrian and bicycle capacity as stand- alone needs instead of focusing solely on vehicular transportation. This significant change in approach along with accommodating future growth in the transportation network created a new list of needed capital improvement projects. A new Transportation Impact Fee schedule (TIF) has been developed to include the new capital project needs and updated project cost estimates. Needed projects on the TIF project list include streets, sidewalks, and bicycle facilities. The TE update established some boundary changes to the TIF zones. When Tukwila first established impact fees in 2005, a zone map was created dividing the City into four zones with a fifth zone overlaying the entire City providing for signal interconnectivity. The zones ensure that the TIF is funding projects that are reasonably related to new development, a key requirement in the 1990 Growth Management Act and subsequent legal challenges to the definition of what is a reasonable nexus. Over time, the first zone map has worked well, but changes in some boundaries between the zones for clarity and to better reflect travel within and between zones warranted some boundary changes. The new TIF zones were established in the TE updated and the TIF project list has been revised to reflect the new boundaries. 55 In the past, the TIF schedule has been adopted via ordinance modifying Table 9-1 in TMC 9.48. The attached proposed ordinance removes the 9-1 Table and delegates authority to the Public Works Director to establish administrative rules and procedures to implement TIFs, including routine updates. The attached proposed resolution incorporates the updated TIF schedule into the Citywide Consolidated Permit Fee Schedule and updates the Concurrency Review Fee table. Additional changes to TMC 9.48 and 9.50 have also been incorporated such as updating language to reflect current state law and actual City practice, remove unnecessary language, and clarify unclear language. Because the changes to the two chapters became significant, a "repeal and replace" approach is recommended. The attached redline version shows the changes between the existing code and the proposed code. Routine monitoring of the City's transportation network has been done in the past, but will be required to be done more frequently with the advent of the MMLOS standard. The first Concurrency Report, covering 2025 through 2031 is attached. The report is an important tool for Tukwila to ensure the City is maintaining the transportation network at an acceptable level of service as well as to aid in planning and funding necessary capital projects to accommodate new growth. With the exception of the Southcenter Boulevard/1-405 SB Off Ramp intersection, the vehicle level of service standard is being met. By 2031, two more intersections are projected to fail: Klickitat Drive/SR 518 EB Ramps and S 133rd Street/SR 599 SB Ramps. All three intersections are within WSDOT limited access and are technically not subject to the City's MMLOS standard, but all three have already been identified as needs for Tukwila. The future Lake to Sound trail under design by King County Parks may address the Southcenter Boulevard intersection within the next few years but the other two will require coordination with WSDOT. Non -motorized level of service standards are also currently being met and will continue to do so by 2031 with construction of some high -priority projects included on the new TIF project list. FINANCIAL IMPACT Revenue associated with collection of Transportation Impact Fees charged to new development is restricted funding only projects on the TIF list. Revenue associated with the Concurrency Review Fee is intended to be used only for future Transportation Element updates and routine Concurrency Reports. ATTACHMENTS A. PowerPoint Slides B. Draft Ordinance C. Draft Resolution D. Rate Study 56 Attachment A Transportation Impact Fee & Concurrency Program Updates Transportation and Infrastructure Committee May 28, 2026 Jen Tetatzin, PE, PMP Public Works Director and Cyndy Knighton Senior Program Manager 1905 The City of opportunity, the community of choice. Agenda • Concurrency Management • Transportation Impact Fee Program Update • Proposed Code Changes ��\� bli�� r TPA/ �= �d�4es in PL�� 061 Concurrency Management What is Concurrency? Growth Management Act (GMA) requires that public infrastructure and facilities keep pace with development and the adopted level of service (LOS) standards. To comply with the GMA, cities must: • Promote orderly growth and development • Implement the policies of the Comprehensive Plan • Ensure that adequate facilities are available • Ensure that financial commitments are in place • Ensure that impact fees imposed are not arbitrary or duplicative of other fees for the same impact What if we don't meet Concurrency? • Loss of eligibility for transportation grant funding • Options available to comply • Prohibit or limit development • Reduce the scale/impacts of a proposed development • Require developer to construct needed improvements to meet adopted standards • Accelerate capital project delivery timeline • Change the City's standards to accept a lower level of service • Impact Fees ensure the City stays "open for business" 61 How is Concurrency Measured? Multimodal Level of Service (MMLOS) establishes minimum standards for various modes of travel. Each mode has its own metric that must be monitored. Free flow Degree of 0elay: .. Negligible to moderate delays Intersection Operation: - LOS D Less stable flow 0 lay: 10 Long delays Degree of - LOS E - Intersection Unstable Flow, i1=� � s Degree of Delay: AIL Substantial delay -- LOS F Intersect[on Operation: r Unpredictable Flow/wait 1 ` through multiple cycles ����■,�` .�1_ Degree of Delay: Excessive delays Vehicle LOS Standards — Status Quo • Rates traffic congestion by measuring delays at intersections and certain corridors • Most have LOS E as the acceptable level of congestion • Signalized intersections: 55 to 80 seconds • Unsignalized intersections: 35 to 50 seconds • LOS in Southcenter is based on corridor averages • Strander Blvd and S 180t" Street: LOS F with average delay not to exceed 120 seconds • Vehicle traffic must now be balanced with the needs of active modes of travel 62 How is Concurrency Measured? Bike / Pedestrian LOS Standards • The 2024 Comprehensive Plan identified a set of projects that need to be completed by 2044 to accommodate pedestrian and bicycle demand generated by anticipated growth. • Concurrency is measured by tracking the rate of active mode project implementation relative to the rate of growth in Tukwila. • The concurrency analysis is verified using a tracking tool that will be maintained by staff. t Impact Fee Zones Project Type t � Birycle Projea 3 �PetlePshian Projea 4 VeM1ide Projea �comd0r� o�M1ideProj�t,i�te�aaio�� 0 4 0 0 10 v 3 2 _F o _ 4i SW 2ith St e'S1fi6m St Settle -Tacoma • Q iltBril ati0 to .� Mmkler elvda� � Airport r s Isom st i S 200th St , 0 0.5 1 O 111111E� Miles � 63 Transportation Impact Fee Program Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) Program • One-time charges paid by new development • Authorized in 1990 by Growth Management Act (GMA) as funding source for transportation improvements • Helps to fund improvements that add capacity to the transportation network • Can only be used for facilities that serve new growth, not to address condition deficiencies or preservation of existing facilities • Tukwila's policy established December 2005 in TMC 9.48 65 How do we currently assess TIP • Council adopted current Fee Schedule in Jan 2020 • Fee based on expected traffic impacts and costs of identified projects • Fees determined for four geographic zones Rates charged based on PM peak hour vehicle trips TIF revenues are restricted and may only be used for approved vehicle capacity projects Zone 1 $4,438.73 $4,863.14 LVI IC J ' $5,345.42 Zone 4 W $27057.66 of Tukwila )act Fee Zones n • • • Historic average annual revenue is $813,000 • Zone 1 has generated the most revenues and has received the most investment • It takes years of accumulation of TIF fees to fund a capital project $1,800,000 $1,600,000 $1,400,000 $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400, 000 $200, 000 s- TIF Fund Revenues and Balance 2022 Revenue 2023 Revenue 2024 Revenue 2025 Revenue Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 —Fund Balance $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $0 67 Why are changes needed? • Cities must now account for multimodal capacity needs • Pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular facilities • New level of service (LOS) standards adopted in 2024 Comprehensive Plan • State legislative changes regarding proportionality and housing types • Refresh TIF project list • Reflect completed work and new needs • Adjust costs for inflation and increasing regulations 46 �71 0 -�' S:001� IS THERE ADEQUATE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE TO MEET TRAVEL DEMAND OF NEW GROWTH? * PEDESTRIAN .: What is changing? • Zone boundaries • List of TIF projects and TIF fee rates • Method for addressing existing system deficiencies • Method for identifying growth outside City and across zones • Method for assigning fees attributable to zones • Replacing vehicle -trips with person -trips to assess proportional impacts on the multi -modal system 1 (4 .• Existing Facility Inventory Traffic Modeling Growth Projections Grant Assumpt ions Zone Designation Project Costs Project List TMC Updates Fee Schedule 2026 — 2044 TIF Program Costs • Estimated Cost for all TIF Projects: $81M • Assumed Future Grant Funding: $51M • Remaining Funding Need: $30M • TIF Eligible Costs: $24M (Assigned to Zones) • Ineligible Costs: $7M (Attributable to external traffic impacts) • Covers 21 projects and: • City-wide traffic signal network connections • Traffic data collection and engineering • Carryover costs (fees for completed projects not yet collected) • Does not include $4M of projects deferred beyond the program planning horizon 71 TIF Rate Comparison: Existing and Proposed 10L � 9w� 4 Example: Housing Comparison Single Family Home(Detached)Multi-Family Sin g y (Mid -Rise) 3 `1 z per dwelling unit* (1-bedroom unit) 0 i Existing TIF • • • - • Existing TIF • • • - • Zone 1 $4,394.34 $963.99 $2,012.22 $472.98 Zone 2 $4,814.51 $3,191.52 $2,204.62 $1,565.92 Zone 3 $5,291.97 $6,414.98 $2,423.26 $3,147.50 Zone 4 $2,037.08 $1,302.13 $932.81 $638.89 72 TIF Rate Comparison: Existing and Proposed Retail Comparison 4 Restaurant Retail 3 (High -Turnover, Sit -Down) (Small Grocery) 0 ��, sl 10,000sf 10,000sf 0 Existing TIF • • • - • Existing TIF • • • - • Zone 1 $247,200.00 $54,067.90 $262,500.00 $64,124.10 Zone 2 $270,080.00 $178,991.10 $287,600.00 $212,297.10 Zone 3 $297,700.00 $359,779.50 $316,100.00 $426,718.70 Zone 4 $114,600.00 $73,029.00 $121,700.00 $86,616.50 73 TIF Rate Comparison: Existing and Proposed Example: Office 4 Office Space (General) 3 ` Z 10,000sf 1 0 Existing TIF • • • - • Zone 1 $48,337.77 $6,986.58 Zone 2 $52,959.59 $23,130.63 Zone 3 $58,211.62 $46,492.72 Zone 4 $22,407.92 $9,437.22 74 Tukwila (Current)-$4,176 (Average) Tukwila (Proposed) $952 - $6,355 SeaTac Kent Federal Way Auburn Renton Based on current PM peak vehicle trip rates (average of all Tukwila TIF Zones). Ranging from Zone 1 to Zone 3 based on 13.2 person-trips/unit. Recently updated in January 2025 (per PM peak $4,355 hour trip). SeaTac is looking to increase this fee this year based on construction cost indexing. Kent recently updated their scaling rate to 55% -$7,000+ of the maximum; effective rates are moderately high. -$7,500 - $10, 000 $11,485 Burien (proposed) $16,357.52 Based on 2024 regional TIF rate study comparisons. Based on 2024 regional TIF rate study comparisons. Very high compared to the region Phase in over 6 years to a cap of 80% of the maximum allowable fee will be recommended by staff to elected officials in June 2026 75 Tukwila Municipal Code Changes Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Changes TMC 9.48 and 9.50 chapters are recommended to be repealed and replaced due to the substantial changes to both chapters. Common updates include: • Language updates to align with recent State law changes • Streamline the method for tracking progress • Align appeal process to match other appeals in TMC 18.116 • General housekeeping including removing unneeded language 77 TIVIC 9.48 Transportation Impact Fees Key changes to this chapter include: • Expand definition of transportation system to include bicycle and pedestrian facilities • Change impact unit of measure from PM vehicle trips to daily person trips • Clarify timing of impact fees and adjustment request process • Clarify process for adjustments and appeals • Clarify low-income housing reduction program • 10-year restriction for low-income covenant removed • RCW requires permanent covenant to qualify for TIF reduction • Process for adopting TIF fee schedule Wel TMC 9.50 Transportation Concurrency Key changes to this chapter include: • Remove water and sewer concurrency because they are addressed in Title 14 • Clarify process to match current practices • Clarify the rezone and phased development process • Clarify what is accounted for in the model 79 Ah U • Ordinance and Resolution Adoption • Repeal and replace TMC 9.48 and TMC 9.50 • Effective 5 days after adoption (standard) • Modify Consolidated Permit Fee Schedule • Recommended effective date 90 days after adoption Communication Plan • Developers and Property Owners • Permit Center staff • Hazelnut Follow On Actions • Concurrency monitoring and reporting • Capital project delivery • TIF Fund balance monitoring :e Thank You 1905 The City of opportunity, the community of choice. Attachment B DRAFT AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTERS 9.48 AND 9.50 OF THE TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE; UPDATING AND REVISING LANGUAGE TO REFLECT CHANGES IN STATE LAW AND THE CITY'S 2024 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Washington State updated the 1990 Growth Management Act (GMA) with new requirements for cities and counties required to plan under the GMA; and WHEREAS, via Ordinance No. 2753, approved by the City Council on December 16, 2024, the City of Tukwila ("City") adopted a significant update to the City's Comprehensive Plan, including an updated Transportation Element; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a new multimodal level of service standard as part of the Transportation Element; and WHEREAS, a new transportation impact fee and transportation concurrency standard is required to be codified in the Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC); and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to repeal and replace chapters 9.48 and 9.50 of the Tukwila Municipal Code as set forth in this Ordinance and Exhibits A and B attached hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Repealer. Ordinance 2111 as codified in TMC Chapter 9.48 "Concurrency Standards and Transportation Impact Fees", is hereby repealed, thereby eliminating this chapter in its entirety. CHAPTER 9.48 CONCURRENCY STANDARDS AND TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES 2026 Legislation: Replace TMC 9.48 & 9.50 TMC Page 1 of 4 Version: 05/18/26 82 Staff: C. Knighton, H. Greenwood Sections: 9.48.010 Authority and Purpose. 9.48.020 Definitions. 9.48.030 Imposition of Transportation Impact Fees. 9.48.040 Calculation of Impact Fees. 9.48.050 Credit. 9.48.060 Time of Payment of Impact Fees. 9.48.070 Adjustments. 9.48.080 Establishment of Impact Fee Amount. 9.48.090 Use of Impact Fees. 9.48.095 Transportation Impact Fee Deferral. 9.48.100 Plan and Fee Update. 9.48.110 Refunds. 9.48.120 Appeals. 9.48.125 Exemptions. 9.48.130 Residential Impact Fee Deferral. 9.48.150 Authority Unimpaired. 9.48.160 Relationship to SEPA. Section 2. Replaced. TMC Chapter 9.48, "Transportation Impact Fees" of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby reenacted to read as follows: Sections: 9.48.010 9.48.020 9.48.030 9.48.040 9.48.050 9.48.060 9.48.070 9.48.080 9.48.090 9.48.100 9.48.110 9.48.120 9.48.130 9.48.140 9.48.150 9.48.160 9.48.170 CHAPTER 9.48 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES Authority and Purpose. Purpose. Imposition of Transportation Impact Fees. Calculation of Impact Fees. Credit. Adjustments. Time of Payment of Transportation Impact Fees. Establishment of Transportation Impact Fee Amount. Use of Transportation Impact Fees. Plan and Fee Update. Refunds. Appeals. Applicability. Residential Transportation Impact Fee Deferral. Authority Unimpaired. Relationship to SEPA. Delegation. 2026 Legislation: Replace TMC 9.48 & 9.50 TMC Page 2 of 4 Version: 05/18/26 Staff: C. Knighton, H. Greenwood Section 3. Chapter Established. All chapters of TMC Chapter 9.48 are hereby established to read as referenced in Exhibit A. Section 4. Repealer. Ordinance 2635 as codified in TMC Chapter 9.50 "Concurrency Standards and Transportation Impact Fees", is hereby repealed, thereby eliminating this chapter in its entirety. CHAPTER 9.50 CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT Sections: 9.50.010 Purpose. 9.50.020 Definitions. 9.50.030 Concurrency Test. 9.50.040 Test Criteria. 9.50.050 Concurrency for Phased Development. 9.50.060 Exemptions. 9.50.070 Vesting. 9.50.080 Improvements to Concurrency Facilities. 9.50.090 Capital Facilities Plan and Capital Improvement Program. 9.50.100 Intergovernmental Coordination. 9.50.110 Administrative Rules and Procedures. 9.50.120 Appeals. 9.50.130 SEPA Exemption. Section 5. Replaced. TMC Chapter 9.50, "Concurrency Management", of the Tukwila Municipal Code hereby reenacted to read as follows: CHAPTER 9.50 CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT Sections: 9.50.010 9.50.020 9.50.030 9.50.040 9.50.050 9.50.060 9.50.080 9.50.090 9.50.110 9.50.120 9.50.130 Purpose. Definitions. Transportation Concurrency Review. Review Criteria. Transportation Concurrency for Phased Development and Rezones. Development Accounted for in the Model. Improvements to Transportation Facilities. Capital Facilities Plan and Capital Improvement Program. Administrative Rules and Procedures. Appeals. SEPA Exemption. 2026 Legislation: Replace TMC 9.48 & 9.50 TMC Version: 05/18/26 Staff: C. Knighton, H. Greenwood Page 3 of 4 Section 6. Chapter Established. All chapters of TMC Chapter 9.50 are hereby established to read as referenced in Exhibit B. Section 7. Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser Authorized. Upon approval of the City Attorney, the City Clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this Ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; references to other local, state or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations; or ordinance numbering and section/subsection numbering. Section 8. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. Section 9. Effective Date. This Ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City and shall take effect and be in full force effective October 14, 2026, after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of , 2026. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Andy Youn-Barnett, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Office of the City Attorney Thomas McLeod, Mayor Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council: Published: Effective Date: Ordinance Number: Exhibit A — TMC Chapter 9.48, Transportation Impact Fees Exhibit B — TMC Chapter 9.50, Concurrency Management 2026 Legislation: Replace TMC 9.48 & 9.50 TMC Page 4 of 4 Version: 05/18/26 Staff: C. Knighton, H. Greenwood Exhibit A CHAPTER 9.48 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES § 9.48.010. Authority and Purpose. Authority. The City of Tukwila's transportation impact fee financing program has been developed pursuant to the City of Tukwila's police powers, the Growth Management Act as codified in Chapter 36.-70A of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW), the enabling authority in RGVV Chapter 82.02, RCW Chapter 58.17 relating to platting and subdivisions and the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), and RGVV Chapter 42 .12C — "'. Purpose. The purpose of the financing plan is to Develop a program consistent with Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan, the Six -Year Transportation Program and the Capital Improvement Program, for joint public and private financing of transportation improvements necessitated in whole or in part by development within the City of Tukwila; --. Ensure adequate levels of transportation and tFaffiGservice consistent with the level of service identified in the i ransportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan; Create a mechanism to charge and collect fees to ensure that new development bears its proportionate share of the capital costs of transportation facilities necessitated by new development; and } Ensure fair collection and administration of such transportation impact fees. [ . The provisions of the City of Tukwila's transportation impact fee ordinance shall be liberally construed to effectively carry out its purpose in the interests of the public health, safety and welfare. § 9.48.020. Definitions. The words and terms contained in this chapter shall have the following meanings for the purposes of this chapter, unless the context clearly requires otherwise. Terms or words not defined herein shall be defined pursuant to RCW 82.02.090 wheR. I erms not defined herein and RCW 82.02.090 shall be given their usual and customary meaning. 2: "Building permit" means an official document or certification of the City of Tukwila issued by the City's building official which authorizes the construction, alteration, enlargement, conversion, reconstruction, remodeling, rehabilitation, erection, placement, demolition, moving, or repair of a building or structure. i• B. "City" means the City of Tukwila, Washington. 3-. C. 4—"Development" means theaan �� construction, Feee;Stru^+i^^ .en G+n,^+„ral ccrvrr-cvrrr�uccarar alteration rel^oatien or enlarrgeMeeRtexpansion of an-ya building, structure o, r any changes in the use of the land that requires a building permit. "Development antiVity' moons any nonstr„ntion of a building or str„nfi,re that and creates additional demand and need for transportation facilities. "Development approval' —means any eri�tteR aa r, za.,ien from the City, whRiGh a „therirzSthe Gommennement" does not include: (a) buildings or structures constructed bV a regional transit authority or (b) buildings or structures constructed as shelters that provide emergencv housing for people experiencing homelessness or emergencv shelters for victims of the "development a^Gt vitadomestic violence as defined in RCW 70.123.020. 6-.D. "Early learning facility" is defined consistent with RCW 43.31.565(3) as now enacted or hereafter amended. 7L. E. ""Fee payer"" is a person, corporation, partnership, an incorporated association or governmental agency, municipality, or similar entity commencing a land development activity, which requires a building permit and creates a demand for additional facilities. in order to pay for the transportation facilities needed to serve new growth and is used fer fancilitiaieS that reaSeRa�b benefit n i d pm t 'Impart fees are e►� ��,-rev�ev eFl�-rr„p���� 0 ndependent of a permit fee, aR appliGatien fee, a GenGUrrenGy test fee, and the i nrdepenrdent fee ralGUlations F. 10. Letter encumbered"" means to reserve, set aside, or earmark the transportation impact fees in order to pay for commitments, contractual obligations, or other liabilities incurred for the provision of transportation facilities. G. 11 Low-income housing"" means housing where monthly costs, including utilities other than telephone, do not exceed 30% ep rcent of the resident's household monthly income and where household monthly income must be 80 percent or less of the King County Median family income adjusted for family size as reported by the U.-S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. H. 12. ""Owner"" means the owner of record of real property, as found in the records of King County, Washington, or a person with an unrestricted written option to purchase property; provided, that if the real property is being purchased under a recorded real estate contract, the purchaser shall be considered the owner of the property. 4—"Proportionate fair share"" means that portion of the cost for transportation facility improvements that are reasonably related to the service demands and needs of new development. §9.48.030. Imposition of Transportation Impact Fees. The City hereby authorizes the assessment and collection of transportation impact fees on development activity at the rates se*� forth a 9-12_ § 9.48.040. Calculation of Transportation Impact Fees. A. The method of calculating the transportation impact fees in this chapter incorporate, among other things, the following: &1 imnant fees imnesedThe cost of public streets, roads, and pedestrian and bicycle facilities necessitated by this GhapteF.the development; i. Shall enly be impesed for syste gnts that are reasonably related to the new development; 2. Shall not eXGeed the proportionate fair share of the GE)StS of systern improvements that are reasonably relater) to the new development; 2 Shallbeused for the systen,An adjustment to the costs of the public streets, roads, and pedestrian and bicycle facilities for past mitigation payments made by previous development on the property to pay for the same required transportation system improvements that would be covered by the transportation impact fee. 3. The availability of other means of funding public street, road, pedestrian, and bicycle facility improvements; and 4. The methods by which public streets, roads, and pedestrian and bicycle improvements that will reasonably benefit neware financed. 5. The current edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual and other city information, including, but not limited to, rate studies. 3-.6. Information provided by the applicant and any publicly available information regarding the development,. The City may request additional information in order to properly assess the transportation impact fee. 4. May be GGlleGted and spent only for systern whiGh are Previded for n the transper-tatiu ion element of the Capital Imnrniement�—ai�v Comprehensive Land Use Plan; date of adeptien of this Ghapter; a-nd B. ShaltFees for development shall be calculated based on their net new "daily person trip" generation rates as determined by the Public Works Director, or designee. If the development concerns an existina use on the same oarcel. the fee shall be based on net -new trips generated by the development. 6-.C. Impact fees shall be collected only once for each development, unless changes or modifications to the development are proposed which result in greater d+reetimpacts on transportation facilities than were considered when the development was first approved. § 9.48.050. Credit. A credit, not to exceed the transportation impact fee otherwise payable, shall be provided for the fair market value of any dedication of land for, improvement to, or new construction of any system improvements provided by the developer; to facilities that are identified in the Gapital Improvement DrogramTransportation Impact Fee project list and that are required as a condition of approving the development aGtivity. The determination of ""value"" shall be consistent with the assumptions and methodology used by the City. Engineer in estimating the capital improvement costs._ § 9.48.060. A. The rr tom, at he PUFSH z date e § .48.070. Adjustments. TheFor developments with land uses not included in the Transportation Impact Fee Schedule, the amount of fee to be imposed on a particular development may be adjusted by the Public Works Director. The adjustment, if granted, will give :• consideration to studies and other data submitted by the developer demonstrating by clear and convincing evidence that an adjustment should be made in order to carry out the purposes of this chapter. B. The Public Works Director shall review the study to determine if the adjustment request.- 1. Is based on the City's accepted impact fee assessment practices and methodologies; 4-2. Uses acceptable data sources and if the data used is comparable with the uses and intensities planned for the proposed development activity; 2-. Complies with the applicable State laws governing impact fees; 3-A. Is prepared and documented by professionals who are mutually agreeable to the City and the developer and are qualified in their respective fields; and 4-. Shows the basis upon which the independent fee calculation was made. In reviewing the study, the Public Works Director uc;o,, .4,iu, may require the developer to submit additional or different documentation. C. If the P ibliG Works Direr agrees with the study's fond s,developer has not demonstrated through clear and convincing evidence that an adjustment to the 0mpaGt fee ;;Tshould be made. if a GE)FnpeuRg case has Rot been made the developer shall pay the full transportation impact fee amount. 9.48.07P. A developer requesting an adjustment or independent fee GaIGUlation may pay the 0 rnpaGt fees imposed by thiG GhapteF te obtain a buildiRg peFrnit whole the Gity determines whether to partially reirnburse the developer by makiRg an adjustment Gr anneptiRg the ORdependent foe GaIG ilatinn Time of Pavment of Transportation Impact Fees. Transportation impact fees shall be due and savable in full at the time of issuance of a building permit unless deferred pursuant to TMC 9.48.130. The fee paid shall be the amount calculated by the Public Works Director. or desianee. includina anv adiustments made pursuant to TMC 9.48.060, as of the date the permit is issued. § 9.48.080. Establishment of Transportatior Impact Fee Account. Im Transportation impact fees received pursuant to this chapter shall be earmarked dedicated revenues and retained in a special interest -bearing aGts . All interest shall be retained in the account and expended for the purpose or purposes for which the transportation impact fees were collected. § 9.48.090. Use of Transportation Impact Fees. A. Pursuant to this chapter, transpul ldllUll impact fees shall be used for transportation .o facilities that will reasonably benefit the remity onrd its residentsdevelopment. B.eesTransportation impact fees shall not be used to make up for existing deficiencies in City facilities se WiRg on exi6tinn ideye )pn4ent— C. €,9esTransportation impact fees shall not be used for maintenance and operations, including personnel. D. TrTraffm ;Transportation impact fees &haf4may be used for, but not limited to land acquisition, site improvements, engineering and architectural services, permitting, financing, administrative expenses and applicable mitigation costs, and capital equipment pertaining to transportation systems and facilities. E. TrTrafricTransportation impact fees may also be used to recoup public improvement costs incurred by the City to the extent that new growth and development will be served by the previously constructed improvement. F. In the event bonds or similar debt instruments are or have been issued for transportation system improvements, transportation impact fees may be used to pay the a1debt service on such bonds. G. Transportation impact fees shall be expended or letter encumbered for a permissible use within ten years of receipt, unless there exists an extraordinary or compelling reason for fees to be held longer than ten years. The Public Works Director may recommend to the Council that the City hold fees beyond ten years in cases wherewhen extraordinary or compelling reasons exist. Such reasons shall be identified in written findings by the Council. H. The Finance Director shall prepare an annual report on the transportation impact fee account showing the source and amount of all moneys collected, earned or received and projects that were financed in whole or in part by transportation impact fees. § 9.48.A95. Transportation In;paGt 00. Plan and Fee Def�rra! Jpdate. A. in order toenge residential and mixed ;ed nmeRt withinThe transportation impact fee schedule may be updated annually by applying the Tukwila Urban renter Trap Development (TUG TOO) Rimy rdiStFinf foe rdef olo of all er o -,ter,-rs+t-9rEer�ted �e,,,g-a,�r„�r��rer�- n/lrtlen of the required traRSpertotlen imnort feet Mortenson Construction Cost Index for a pFeient may he rvronteid nreyirderd the fe"GWiRg nriterio ore met: 91 5. A fee deferral agreement betwe^eg the Gity and the owner must e�ceeuted ppi�rrvp tol""crRe o iss Gf the builr7iRg pepmtThe Mayer is autherized to exGGWte o„nh agreementsSeattle. Once every two years, protects on behalf the Sifiy. PFGV*S;Grsmustbe ORG16:dedORthe agFeemeRt tO seGWFe payrR,eRt of the eWRer. Pre oi�e,rnrjthe Transportation Impact Fee list may , ;Gl de, but are not limited to a lion against s bjent property, letter of nredit and/or surety henrl The vor y oopoid o t information in appro"ino foe d of I��nc— F�Fay--cvr,�crer� er F eil� c�a eKrur robe updated to address changed conditions including, but not limited to, tie welfare.deferred impaGt fees. The Mayer is authorized te ORG'ude any other -F requiremeRtS OR the deferral agFeeMeRt that heishe deems ne ssaFy tG Meet the ORteR § Q 48 1 00 Plan and Gee Update. The impaGt fee may be updated aRRLAally to evaluate the GGRsistenGy of developmeRt density assumptions estimated growth patterns, project costs., and adjusted for awarded grant funding, if any. Updates that result in a change in transportation impact fees will be reviewed by the City Council. Impact fee changes will only occur through ap errlipapnea resolution requiring Council action. § 9.48.110. Refunds. 92 A. A developer may request and shall receive a refund when the developer does not proceed with the development ont�ty for which transportation impact fees were paid, and the developer shows that no impact has resulted. The developer must submit a request for a refund to the City in writing within one Year of the expiration of the development permit as defined in TMC 9.50.020 or the building permit. B. Any transportation impact fees that are not expended or encumbered within the time limitations established, and for which no application for a refund has been made within thisa one-year period of the notice required by RCW 28.02.080 as amended, shall be retained and expended on any project identified in the Capital Imnreyement P4RTransportation Impact Fee Project List. C. In the event that transportation impact fees must be refunded for any reason, they shall be refunded with interest earned to the applicant. § 9.48.120. Appeals. A. Any fee paver seeking to appeal a transportation impact fee imposed by the City may file an appeal as provided in Chapters 18.104 and 18.116 TMC for Type 2 decisions. A. Any fee payer may pay the impact fees imposed by this chapter under protest in order to obtain a building permit. B. Appeals regarding traffiG irnpaGt fees imposed on any development aGtiVity may nnlxl IUTTry Ne appeal shall be permitted unless and unto! the irnpaGt fee at issue has been paid. G. Determinations of the P blin Works Director or his designee, resne��the �� cn�-rn-ru r-vr- �on�v-v-vr�cor-rnr avr�nro�n , rr-rcvpc e or the availability 0 Gan be appealed te the City's Hearing Examiner. SuGh appeal shall be a Glesed rem while an appeal. MEN �rr_�srzrs� _ . - 1101. M---- • vision The a one n rrers of font er errors in the de�,�„--r„e�et+C-e-A�-a p�ea�s#a�ta#� �c�#i�er,�a�r-�,�,�-„�R R. appkatieR ef the law te the faGtS preseRted and shall also state the relief seught. The SGepe ef the appeal shall be limited te issues raised !R the RotiGe of appeal. B. this section is pending. Should the appeal be successful, the City will refund any overpayment per TMC Section 9.48.125. Exemptions110. 93 § 9.48.130. Applicability. A. The transportation impact fees are generated from the fermi Ala fer eal^i Mating the foes sett feeF h inn this en# a e� �n# of the imnen# f 's `J in by the �er�f�e—�� ��rees�-I��eter-ram reds,-� infeYp�,,,at eRdepiEted OR Figure 9-1 herein.Icalculated as set forth in the Citywide Consolidated Permit Fee Schedule. All development aGtiVity located within the City shall be charged a transportation impact fee, consistent with this chapter, provided that the following exemptions shall apply. B. The following shall be exempt from transportation impact fees: Replacement of a structure with a new structure having the same use, at the same site, and with -the same -gross floor area, when such replacement is within 4224 months of -demolition or destruction of the previous structure. 2. Alteration, expansion, or remodeling of an existing dwelling or structure where no new sperson-trips are oreatedgenerated and the use is not changed. 3. Construction of an accessory residential structure, such as a garage, carport, shed or areenhouse. that does not aenerate additional Derson-trips. 4. Miscellaneous improvements including, but not limited to, fences, walls, swimming pools and signs that do not impact the transportation system. 5. Demolition of or moving an existing structure within the Gity fir eoe Site aeethersame parcel. 6 Transportation irnp•a�^fees for the—eeRStFUGtieeConstruction of low-income he r i in at the dis en of the ihlin pk- Direeter .. en housing I�h�y-��r uc Z+rcrr�rnvC-Fetivn—vrzrr� vTrcccv�--oorrcTr requested her the property owner in writing prier to permit submittal and si ihie^t teunits will reduce the transportation impact fee per the following cue ia= a-.0 Submittal of a fiscal impae# analysis of h�fge reduction On impae# fees for the praise# -,A,ei ilyd ^on+rib ,#e #e the erea#ion eftable. Impact fees for mixed -use or combined market rate and low-income development that includes low-income housing will be prorated based on the table below. b, Fee reduction table. Unit Size 2 or more bedrooms 2 or more bedrooms Any size No Affordability Target' 80%2 60%2 50%2 Fee Reduction 40% 60% 80% tivinIits to he sell er rented to a persen or hoseheld whese menthly T-csz i i MI E The developer must record a covenant per RCW 82.-02.-060(3-4) that prohibits using the property or the portion of the property that had reduced fees for any purpose other than for low-income housing at the original income limits fer a peFied of at boot 1 0 Pearson a form approved by the City Attorney. At a minimum, the covenant must address price restrictions and household income limits for the low-income housing, and that if the property is converted to a use other than low-income housing withh'R T 0 years, the property owner must pay the City the applicable transportation impact fees in effect at the time of conversion. 7-.D. Change of Use_= or Occupancy. A development per-mit for a change of use or occupancy that has less impact than the —existing use shall not be assessed a transportation impact fee. 8 E. A fee payer required to pay for system shall not also be required to pay a improvements WRGIeF thiG GFGli.,aRGe improvements pursuant to RCW 43.21 C.060 fa transportation impact fee for the same -9-.F. An Early Learning Facility is exempt from paying 80 percent of the required Transportation Impact Fee. G. A fee paver is required to pay 50% of the transportation impact fee that is imposed for a single-family residence when constructing an accessory dwelling unit as defined in RCW 36.70A.696 as amended. § 9.48.430140. Residential Transportation Impact Fee Deferral. 95 A. Deferral Request Authorized. - Applicants for single-family attached or single-family detached residential building permits may request to defer payment of required transportation impact fees until the sooner of: a. Final inspection, or b. The closing of the first sale of the property occurring after the issuance of the applicable building permit, which request shall be granted so long as the requirements of this chapter are satisfied. B. Method of Request.- 2L.1. A request for transportation impact fee deferral shall be declared at the time of preliminary plat application (for platted development) or building permit application (for non -platted development) in writing on a form or forms provided by the City, along with applicable application fees. 2. 3—Calculation of Transportation Impact Fees. — The amount of transportation impact fees to be deferred under this chapter shall be determined as of the date the request for deferral is submitted. 44.-C. Deferral Term. The term of ai4a transportation impact fee deferral granted under this chapter may not exceed 18 months from the date the building permit is issued �t("Deferral Term. If the condition triggering payment of the deferred transportation impact fees does not occur prior to the expiration of the Deferral Term, then full payment of the transportation impact fees shall be due on the last date of the Deferral Term. E—D. Deferred Transportation Impact Fee Lien. . AEI Gapvt�sApplicant's Duty to Record Lien. -An applicant requesting a deferral under this chapter must grant and record a deferred transportation impact fee lien, in an amount equal to the deferred transportation impact fees, against the property in favor of the City in accordance with the requirements of RCW 82.-02.-050(3-)(c). 2. Satisfaction of Lien. -Upon receipt of final payment of all deferred transportation impact fees for the property, the City shall execute a release of deferred transportation impact fee lien for the property. The property owner at the time of the release is responsible, at his or he their own expense, for recording the lien release. FLE. Limitation on Deferrals. The deferral entitlements allowed under this chapter shall be limited to the first 20 single-family residential construction building permits per applicant, as identified by contractor registration number or other unique identification number, per year. 0 § 9.48.150. Authority Unimpaired. Nothing in this chapter shall preclude the adverse and environmental effects of a Environmental Policy Act, Chapters 43.21 C plats and subdivisions i provided, that the Chapters 43.21 C and 82.02 RCW. § 9.48.160. Relationship to SEPA. City from requiring the fee payer to mitigate specific development pursuant to the State RCW armor Chapter 58.17 RCW, governing exercise of this authority is consistent with A. All development shall be subject to environmental review pursuant to SEPA and other applicable City ordinances and regulations. B. Payment of the transportation impact fee pursuant to this chapter shall constitute satisfactory mitigation of those tra#ietransportation impacts related to the specific improvements identified on the project list. C. Further mitigation in addition to the transportation impact fee shall be required for identified adverse impacts, appropriate for mitigation pursuant to SEPA, that are not mitigated by an impact fee. D. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to limit the Sifiy' sCity's authority to deny development permits when a proposal would result in significant adverse traff+etransportation impacts identified in an environmental impact statement and reasonable mitigation measures are insufficient to mitigate the identified impact. § 9.48.170 Delegation. The Public Works Director shall be authorized to establish administrative rules and procedures for administering the transportation impact fee program. The administrative rules and procedures shall include but not be limited to application forms, necessary submittal information, processing times, and calculation of transportation impact fees consistent with this chapter. 97 Exhibit B CHAPTER 9.50 CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT § 9.50.010. Purpose. A. Pursuant to the State Growth Management Act, R-SWChapter 36.70A RCW, after the adoption of its Comprehensive Plan, the City of Tukwila is required by RCW 36.70A.070(6)(b) to ensure that transportation improvements or strategies to accommodate the impacts of development are provided concurrent with the development. Farther, the Gity is bound by the planning goals of RGW 36.70A.020 to ensure that publiG faGilities and seFViGes neGessary to support development shall be adequate W %R�e the develapmeRt at the tome the developmeRt is available fGF OGGUpanGy and use without deGreasing GUrrent serViGe levels below IeGally established minima ,m standards, , ihereinafter TennrrenGy " RThe intent of this chapter is to establish a transportation concurrency management system to ensure that transportation facilities and services needed to }}maintain minimum level of service standards can be provided simultaneous te,oncurrent with, or within a reasonable time after rde„elonment oon,,nanoY or use , GA. six years of development. The transportation concurrency management system provides the neGessaFy Fegulatery � The ts or developm te eRSHF8 that adequate GGRGUFFenGy faGilitieS GaR be pFevided within a reaseRable tome oft,—medey � nmnaG . The GenGUrreRGY maRagerneRt systemtse provides a framework for determining transportation facilities and services needs and provides a basis for meeting those needs through capital facilities planning. D-.B. For water, sewer, and surfaGewater a�C�ties must be on at the of r-vi--vcaccr� cr—� and rcr— rrc�r-n-,vo c�a� rm�� the time of the development approval 4nnlinants with /dey lonmentsDeyelopments that would cause the level of service on GenGUrFeP.Gyfor_transportation facilities to decline below City standards ease—theip de nn^entsrmay be approved provided they include implementing measures that offset theirthe impacts and would maintain the City's standard for transportation level of service. § 9.50.020. Definitions. The definitions contained in TMC Section 9.-50.-020 apply throughout this chapter unless, from the context, another meaning is clearly intended. �A. "Adequate" means equal to or better than the level of service standards specified in the current adopted capital facilities 8leMeRtplan. 2L.B. "Applicant" means a person who applies for a-ycertificate Of nnnni irren-Gy under this chapter and who is the owner of the subject property or the authorized agent of the property owner. 4• „ "Building permit" refers to any permit issued under the . •• Exhibit B .. par-trnent' s developmeRt standards that are issued with an approved development permit or the PubliG Works ■_ partmeRt' S GORditions of approval that are issued with aR appre �A ashington state adopted building permit. The staterneRt shall state th 6-.D. "Concurrency" means transportation facilities or strategies that achieve the G4YLSQity's level of service standards afdor that: {4-}1_Are included in the City's Capital Improvement Plan and on the Transportation Impact Fee project list at the time development is approved by the Publicc VVGFkG no;tCity; or MZ. Will be available and complete no later than six years after completion of the development, and the applicant and/or the City provides a financial commitment whinh is in mare at the time the development is approved by the PG Works Department 7. Concurrency fa Gilities" moon facilities fer which rGRG irreRGY is required in 8 GenGurreeGtest eview" means: ,a. r water, sewer, anal si irfa Ge water, the comparison of o development's demand to the aya'lohle ronority of eaGh GGRG irre RGY forility; onr♦ • . • .. - • • • • level of service standards of each effected subarea. 100 E. subareas and the available capacity of the transportation facilities. A transportation concurrency testreview must be passed for reads, when applicable, and a notice issued by the P blin Works Department in order to obtain a nertifiGate efwith the development permit or building permit as proof of transportation concurrency. -9-.F. "Development permit" means a land use permit and short plat, preliminary or final rezone/reclassification, zoning permit, master plan, shoreline substantial development permit/conditional use permit, planned unit development, subdivision, or any other permit or approval under the Zoning Code or Subdivision Code or Shoreline Master Program. a-O.G. ""Financial Gommitment'commitment" means: a-.1. Revenue sources are budgeted or anticipated to be available and designated for facilities in the Gernprehencurrent Capital Improvement Plan; reneiyed notice of appreyak, e E2.Funding that is assured by the applicant in a form approved by the Public Works Department. H. 11 ""Level of service st d''standard" means those standards specified in the adopted transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan. For water, sewep, and Title 1 it 17 "Non_nity managed facilities' inrli de any non_nity provider of water er sewer. I. 13""Planned Gapa&y2gpp city" means 4:ea4transportation facilities that do not currently exist but for which the necessary facility construction, expansion, or modification prejeEt—is contained in the current capital facilities element of the Comprehensive Plan and is necessary for meeting the level of service standard. The improvements must be scheduled to be completed within six years and the financial commitment must be in place at the time of approval of the ^er+if a transportation concurrency certificate to complete the improvements within six years. J. 14 Public works den eRt''department" means the Public Works Director or designee. K. "Transoortation concurrencv certificate" means the statement accomoanvina the Public Works Department's development standards that are issued with an approved development permit or the Public Works Department's conditions of approval that are issued with an aooroved buildina permit. The statement shall state that a transportation concurrency certificate is issued and indicate The specific use(s), densities and intensities as described in the development permit or building permit are adequate; and 2. Conditions of approval, if applicable; and 3. An effective date; and 101 4. 4-&.--"An expiration date. L. "Transportation o+ra+-s!concurrency facilities" means facilities for which concurrency is required in accordance with the provision of this chapter and includes roads, streets, sidewalks, and other transportation demand manageriTen strategies an T teGhRiques er pregrams that redUGe Single ,,GGUnag+ vehiGle + facilities. M.16. "Vested"'Vested" means the right to develop or continue development in accordance with the laws, rules, and other regulations in effect at the time the building permit application is deemed complete. § 9.50.030. Transportation Concurrency TestReview. A. Timing. All applicants must apply fer the -be issued a transportation concurrency test and renei.,e ne+iGe of passing the toot certificate before the City will approve an application for any development permit or building permit..., if no development permit is required. An application for a transportation concurrency testcertificate may be submitted with other development submittals. B. Procedures. Applications for a transportation concurrency testcertificate shall be submitted on forms provided by the Public Works Department. The transportation concurrency test shall be denecertificate review will be completed in order of ""first in, first out,"." once the Public Works Department determines the application is complete. The applicant shall submit a detailed project description of the development, including location, "ehinUlar ^irni 1la+iensite plan, and gross floor area by use, as part of the transportation concurrency certificate application. 3.A transportation concurrency annlinatien an`+ shall nay the nensUrrens" toot fee 4-9 o nenni irrenGy +es+review shall be performed only for specific property, uses, densities and intensities based on the information provided by the applicant. The annlirant shall snerify densities and intensities that are eensietent with rthe uses allowed for the property. If the concurrency testreview is being requested in conjunction with an application for rezone, the applicant shall specify densities and intensities that are consistent with the proposed zoning for the property. Changes to the uses, densities and intensities that create additional impacts on GenGUrenGy transportation facilities shall be subject to an additional transportation concurrency testreview. �5-.3. The Public Works Director or designee shall perform the concurrency testreview. The project must pass t4ereceive a transportation concurrency testcertificate prior to approval of the development permit or building permit. 4A. The Public Works Director or designee shall notify the applicant of the testreview results in writing. The date of written notification to the applicant shall be the date of issuance of the transportation concurrency certificate. -7-.5. The transportation concurrency certificate, other than a transportation concurrency certificate for a phased development or a rezone, shall expire within one year of its issuance unless the applicant submits a building permit application, a SEPA environmental checklist and all required documentation pursuant to TIVIGChapter 21.04 TMC, or an extension is granted within one year from the date of issuance of the transportation concurrency certificate. 8-.6. If the deadline for submittal of a complete building permit application, SEPA environmental checklist and all required documentation, is met as de-v�ibed in T�CoeG� 0.030 L2 i or nther�rfttat-as determined tithe P blin VVeFks D;Fe^+„r OF designee, t4etransportation concurrency certificate, other than a certificate for a rezone or phased development, shall be valid for two years from the date of issuance of the building permit, SEPA Determination, or other City -issued approval. If the building permit, SEPA environmental checklist, or other submittal is withdrawn by the applicant prior to approval by the City or expires, the transportation concurrency certificate shall expire one year after the date of issuance. �7. An applicant must apply for a new transportation concurrency testcertificate if the certificate expires or an extension is not granted. 10. The Public Works Director may approve anone extension of up to one year if: a.8. T44e the applicant submits a letter in writing requesting the extension before the expiration date. The applicant must show that they--arcthe applicant is not responsible for the delay in obtaining a building permit, SEPA approval, or other City -issued approval, and has acted in good faith to obtain the permit or approval, and b.i theroperty is s. erviced by a nOR City m edutility, theR the appliGaR must submi�r TettefromTrthe flit, the ov}�onn before the expiFat'GR date-. 9. 11—The Public Works Department shall be responsible for accumulating the impacts created by each application and removing any impacts from the G4yL-sCity's concurrency FeGOrdsmodel for an expired transportation concurrency certificate, an expired development permit or building permit, or other action resulting in an applicant no longer causing impacts that have been accounted for in the City records. 103 non_Gity managed utility operators for maintenanne and monitoring of available and planned napaoity for those utilities. 10. 43—A „ertifiGate oftransportation concurrency certificate shall apply only to the approved specific land use, density and intensity described in the application for a I^"ale. t permit or building permit-.. No development shall be required to obtain more than one eedifi�m�ransportation concurrency certificate for each building, unless the applicant or subsequent owner proposes changes or modifications to the property location, density, intensity, or land use that creates additional impacts on senGUr encytransportation facilities. 11. T4A transportation concurrency certificate Of nenni irren^" is not transferable to other land but may be transferred to new owners of the original land. § 9.50.040. TestReview Criteria. DevelopmentTransportation concurrency certificate applications that would result in a transportation level of service reduction below the adopted standard shall not be approved. , 1 Cer water and sarRita-ry seweF GE)Rvcyarn-r ysterns, a GertifiGate of availability must be issued te pass the GGRG6irF8RGY test. F=er surfaGe water GGRveyaRGe systerns, the water quality and detention standards deSGribed on the GUrrently The transportation concurrency test. 2-. A Corr vi Team the ^enG irreRGY t review compares level of service at intersentiens or —^^�,,;ders, as defined in the transportation element, both With and without theconsidering the transportation demand generated by the proposed development at a time 6 years after the estimated orri panGy of the deyelonmen+ _ If the level of service is equal to or better than the level of service standard, the transportation concurrency testreview is passed. �B. If the GenGtirrenGy test isCity does not paesedissue a transportation concurrency certificate for water, sewer, surfa^^ ,^,ater, or reads +hena proposed development, the applicant may retest feTrequest additional review for transportation concurrency after doing one or both of the following: a-.1.Modifying the application to reduce the need for the n^„�, existe;i seRGUFF y`transportation facilities that do not meet the level of service standard. Reduction of need can be through the reduction of the size of the development, reduction of trips generated by original proposed development, or phasing of the development to match future senGUrreecytransportation facility construction; or 4 2.Arranging to fund the improvements for the additional capacity required for the senGLIFfenGytransportation facilities, as approved by the Public Works Director. § 9.50.050. Transportation Concurrency for Phased Development and Rezones. A. An applicant may request transportation concurrency for a phased development if the 104 Public Works Director or designee determines that the two criteria described in TMC Section 9.-50.-050.-B are met. An applicant may request transportation concurrency for rezoning if the Public Works Director or designee determines that the criteria described in TMC Section 9.50.050.0 are met. The application for transportation concurrency must be accompanied by a schedule for construction of the buildings, parking and other improvements and by a written request for the development to be considered in phases. B. B—The Public Works Director or designee may approve transportation concurrency for phased development if both of the following criteria are met: 1. 4—.No associated development permit is required before building permit applications can be submitted; and 2. The application is for an integrated development site plan with multiple buildings that are interdependent for vehicular and pedestrian access and n0 arkin . C. S. AThe Public Works Director or designee may approve transportation concurrency for rezoning a parcel or parcels if all the criteria are met: All the oarcels are contiauous and have common ownershi 2. The rezone will not require a comprehensive plan amendment or, if a comprehensive plan amendment is needed. the comprehensive plan amendment is completed. 3. The rezone is part of a larger project that is sufficiently defined so that the City may reasonably determine the project's transportation impacts. D. A transportation concurrency application for phased development or rezone shall follow the same timing and procedure as set forth in this chapter, except that: Only one transportation concurrency certificate shall be issued for all buildings proposed for phased development or rezone; 2. The transportation concurrency certificate for an approved phased development or rezone shall be valid for five years from the date of its issuance; provided that a building permit is issued for a building within one year of the date of issuance of the transportation concurrency certificate or within two years if an extension is timely requested and the request is granted. E. The Public Works Director or designee may approve a-Rone extension of up to one year of the transportation concurrency certificate for the phased development or rezone, consistent with the terms of this chapter. F. E—.In no case shall the transportation concurrency certificate be valid for more than six years from the date of issuance of the GeFtifiGate0certificate. The applicant must apply for a new transportation concurrency teereview for any building approved for phased development that has not been issued a building permit within six years from the date of issuance of the concurrency certificate. 105 § 9.50.060. Exemptions Applications for single-family dwelling unit building permits, multi -family building permits for projects containing four or fewer units, short plats, any non-residential project that is categorically exempt from SEPA pursuant to TMC Section 21.04004.080, .100, or .110, or any other project that will generate less than 30 net new PO non peak hni "daily person trips shall be nnnsidered as exempt from meeting nnnni irrenni rani iiremen+s and shall he granted a transportation concurrency certificate. The annligan+ is required +e wit upon application because such developments are accounted for GertifiGate, along ,e,i+h in the asvvoFated fee, but is nn+ si ihien+ +n receiving a gassing grade n order to development approvals.City's system -wide transportation concurrence modeling. § 9.50.070. Vesting have,AppliGants shall be vested under the laws, rules and other regulations on effeGt prier to the effeGtiVe date Of thiG Ghapter of they prier te the e#eGt*ve date of the erdiRaRGe Gedified in this ghanter•1 . Subm'tted a building permit appliGation that the Gity has deemed Gemplete; e z. Entered into formal negrrtiati�j with �City fny--ror-a- developmeRt agreem�� annorr+ange with RGVV 36.709.170 +hrni igh 36 7nR 71 n• nr 3Have a signed agreement with the Gity that is still in effen+ § 9.50.080. Improvements to Concurren^,•Transportation Facilities. A. —The City shall provide, or arrange for others to provide, adequate transportation facilities through construction of needed eapitaltransportation improvements in implementing strategies which do the fella gain_• 4 AGhleveachieve level of service standards for anticipated future development and redevelopment caused by previously issued and new development and building permits aid, and improvements to the facilities shall be consistent with the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan. § 9.50.090. Capital Facilities Plan and Capital Improvement Program. The City shall include in the capital appropriations of its budget for expenditure during the appropriate fiscal year financial commitments for all capital improvement projects required for adopted level of service standards, except the City may omit from its budget any capital improvements for which a binding agreement has been executed with another party to provide the same project in the same fiscal ye, rbiennium. 106 10. Administrative Rules and Procedures. The Public Works Department shall be authorized to establish administrative rules and procedures for administering the transportation concurrency testcertificate system. The administrative rules and procedures shall include but not be limited to application forms, necessary submittal information, processing times, and issuance of the transportation concurrency oeY* ecertificates. § 9.50.4-M20. Appeals. A. orneedures- The appliGant rna Any party seeking to appeal the results of thea transportation concurrency test based on three grounds: 2. The pnlp.oGaRtdecision may file an appeal of a Type 2 decision as provided o lte rn oat-tiie rl ot•A Per •a traffin mitigation nlaR that was relented by the Gitynr e• 3. Delay in reviewChapters 18.104and approval Gaused solely by the City that of appeal with the PubliG Works Depai:tmeRt WithiR 15 days ef the RGtifiGatiGR Gf the test results. The RC)tiGe of appeal must speGify the gFOURds thereef, and must ■e appeal must be submitted with the appeal fee set ferth-i!418.116 TIVIC SeGtiGR • • • 107 § 9.50.130. SEPA Exemption. A determination of transportation concurrency shall be an administrative action of the City of Tukwila that is categorically exempt from the State Environmental Policy Act. Attachment C DRAFT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 2105; TO UPDATE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES IN ALIGNMENT WITH RECENT CHANGES TO THE TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE. WHEREAS, Washington state updated the 1990 Growth Management Act (GMA) with new requirements for cities and counties required to plan under the GMA; and WHEREAS, via Ordinance No. 2753 approved by the City Council on December 16, 2024, the City of Tukwila ("City") adopted a significant update to the City's Comprehensive Plan, including an updated Transportation Element; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a new multimodal level of service standard as part of the Transportation Element; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2105 in 2024, establishing the City' s current consolidated permit fee schedule; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2124 in 2025, updating certain sections under the Land Use Fee Schedule; and WHEREAS, a new Transportation Impact Fee Schedule has been established to implement the Transportation Element and in accordance with Ordinance ; and WHEREAS, Ordinance requires adoption of the Transportation Impact Fee Schedule to be set via a City Council approved resolution; and WHEREAS, the consolidated permit fee schedule is the logical vehicle for including the Transportation Impact Fee Schedule; and WHEREAS, the City's consolidated permit fee schedule needs to be updated to reflect these changes. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: 2026 Legislation: Update TIF Schedule Page 1 of 2 Version: 05/20/2026 Staff: C. Knighton 109 Section 1. Resolution No. 2105 is hereby amended to revise Section 4, " Public Works Fee Schedule," of the Consolidated Permit Fee Schedule deleting the "Transportation Concurrency Test Fee Schedule" table in its entirety. Section 2. The Transportation Impact Fee Schedule (Exhibit A) is added to the Public Works Fees section and will be charged according to the schedule and take effect on October 14, 2026. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of , 2026. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Andy Youn-Barnett, CMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Office of the City Attorney 2026 Legislation: Update TIF Schedule Version: 05/20/2026 Staff: C. Knighton Armen Papyan, Council President Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council: Resolution Number: Page 2 of 2 110 Exhibit A Transportation Impact Fee Schedule Land Use ITE by Daily DailyRates Vehicle -to- Daily Pas�by, Net Ne. Impact Fee Per Unit Group Residential Code 210 Des Single Family Detached Housing unit dwelling Vehicle Rate' 9.09 Person Trip Ratio' 1.45 Person Trip Rate 13.18 Diverted Link %3 0% Person Trips per Unit 4 13.18 Zone 1 $ 963.99 Zone 2 $ 3,191.52 Zone 3 $ 6,414.98 Zone 4 $ 1,302.13 215 Single Family Attached Housing dwelling 6.57 1.45 9.53 0% 9.53 $ 696.75 $ 2,306.74 $ 4,636.57 $ 941.14 - Accessory Dwelling Unit (50%SF Detached) dwelling - - - - - $ 482.00 $ 1,595.76 $ 3,207.49 $ 651.07 220 Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) dwelling 6.21 1.45 9.00 0% 9.00 $ 658.57 $ 2,180.35 $ 4,382.51 $ 889.57 221 Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise) dwelling 4.46 1.45 6.47 0% 6.47 $ 472.98 $ 1,565.92 $ 3,147.50 $ 638.89 240 Mobile Home Park dwelling 7.87 1.45 11.41 0% 11.41 $ 834.61 $ 2,763.18 $ 5,554.00 $ 1,127.37 251 Senior Adult Housing (Single Family) dwelling 4.16 1.45 6.03 0% 6.03 $ 441.17 $ 1,460.59 $ 2,935.79 $ 595.91 252 Senior Adult Housing (Multifamily) dwelling 3.25 1.45 4.71 0% 4.71 $ 344.66 $ 1,141.08 $ 2,293.58 $ 465.56 253 Congregate Care Facility* dwelling 2.43 1.45 3.52 0% 3.52 $ 257.70 $ 853.18 $ 1,714.90 $ 348.09 254 lAssisted Living* bed 4.14 1.45 6.00 0% 6.00 $ 439.05 $ 1,453.56 $ 2,921.67 $ 593.05 Lodging 310 Hotel* room 5.84 1.45 8.47 0% 8.47 $ 619.33 $ 2,050.44 $ 4,121.40 $ 836.57 320 Motel room 3.35 1.45 4.86 0% 4.86 $ 355.27 $ 1,176.19 $ 2,364.16 $ 479.88 Auto Services 944 Gasoline/Service Station VFP 172.01 1.25 215.01 60% 86.01 $ 6,290.23 $ 20,825.22 $ 41,858.83 $ 8,496.62 945 Gas Station w/Convenience Market VFP 211.05 1.25 263.81 58% 110.80 $ 8,103.78 $ 26,829.37 $ 53,927.22 $ 10,946.30 Recreational 411 Public Park* acre 0.78 1.25 0.98 19% 0.79 $ 57.58 $ 190.64 $ 383.19 $ 77.78 432 Golf Driving Range* employee 55.57 1.25 69.46 0% 69.46 $ 5,080.34 $ 16,819.62 $ 33,807.56 $ 6,862.35 491 Racquet/Tennis Club* court 27.71 1.25 34.64 0% 34.64 $ 2,533.32 $ 8,387.11 $ 16,858.15 $ 31421.91 495 Recreational Community Center* 1,OOOsf 28.82 1.25 36.03 19% 29.09 $ 2,127.60 $ 7,043.89 $ 14,158.26 $ 2,873.88 Institutional 520 Elementary School student 2.27 1.26 2.86 0% 2.86 $ 209.19 $ 692.57 $ 1,392.07 $ 282.57 522 Middle/JR High School student 2.09 1.26 2.63 0% 2.63 $ 192.60 $ 637.65 $ 1,281.68 $ 260.16 525 High School student 1.94 1.26 2.44 0% 2.44 $ 178.78 $ 591.89 $ 1,189.70 $ 241.49 540 Junior/Community College student 1.15 1.26 1.45 0% 1.45 $ 105.98 $ 350.86 $ 705.23 $ 143.15 560 Church* 1,OOOsf 6.78 1.26 8.54 0% 8.54 $ 624.80 $ 2,068.55 $ 4,157.80 $ 843.96 565 Day Care Center 1,OOOsf 39.3 1.26 49.52 44% 27.73 $ 2,028.12 $ 6,714.55 $ 13,496.29 $ 2,739.51 590 Library 1,0O0sf 72.05 1.26 90.78 20% 72.63 $ 5,311.75 $ 17,585.73 $ 35,347.44 $ 7,174.92 Medical 610 Hospital 1,OOOsf 10.7 1.26 13.48 0% 13.48 $ 986.05 $ 3,264.53 $ 6,561.72 $ 1,331.92 620 lNursing Home* bed 3.06 1.26 3.86 0% 3.86 $ 281.99 $ 933.59 $ 1,876.53 $ 380.90 Restaurant 931 Fine Dining Restaurant* 1,OOOsf 79.03 1.25 98.79 44% 55.32 $ 4,046.06 $ 13,395.40 $ 26,924.86 $ 5,465.28 932 High Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant 1,OOOsf 103.75 1.25 129.69 43% 73.92 $ 5,406.49 $ 17,899.41 $ 35,977.95 $ 7,302.90 933 Fast Food w/o Drive-Thru* 1,OOOsf 413.41 1.25 516.76 53% 242.88 $ 17,763.63 $ 58,810.47 $ 118,209.46 $ 23,994.48 934 Fast Food w/ Drive-Thru 1,OOOsf 448.12 1.25 560.15 53% 266.07 $ 19,459.91 $ 64,426.39 $ 129,497.49 $ 26,285.76 937 Coffee/Donut Shop w/ Drive-Thru 1,OOOsf 600.5 1.25 750.63 76% 177.01 $ 12,946.50 $ 42,862.29 $ 86,153.51 $ 17,487.68 938 Coffee/Donut Shop w/ Drive-Thru (no indoor seat rive-thru Ian 179 1.25 223.75 91% 20.88 $ 1,527.36 $ 5,056.68 $ 10,163.97 $ 2,063.11 970 Wine Tasting Room 1,OOOsf 111.85 1.25 139.81 0% 139.81 $ 10,225.60 $ 33,854.14 $ 68,047.06 $ 13,812.38 971 Brewery Taproom* 1,OOOsf 61.69 1.25 77.11 0% 77.11 $ 5,639.85 $ 18,671.99 $ 37,530.83 $ 7,618.11 Retail 813 Free -Standing Discount Superstore 1,OOOsf 50.52 1.25 63.15 29% 44.84 $ 3,279.25 $ 10,856.69 $ 21,822.03 $ 4,429.49 815 Free -Standing Discount Store 1,000sf 53.87 1.25 67.34 20% 53.87 $ 3,939.94 $ 13,044.06 $ 26,218.65 $ 5,321.93 816 Hardware/Paint Store* 1,OOOsf 8.07 1.25 10.09 26% 7.46 $ 545.96 $ 1,807.51 $ 3,633.11 $ 737.46 820 Shopping Center (>350k) 1,OOOsf 36.39 1.25 45.49 29% 32.30 $ 2,362.07 $ 7,820.17 $ 15,718.60 $ 3,190.60 821 Shopping Plaza (40-150k) - Supermarket* 1,OOOsf 101.43 1.25 126.79 29% 90.02 $ 6,583.81 $ 21,797.20 $ 43,812.51 $ 8,893.18 821 Shopping Plaza (40-150k) - Not Supermarket 1,OOOsf 65.38 1.25 81.73 35% 53.12 $ 3,885.18 $ 12,862.76 $ 25,854.23 $ 5,247.96 822 Strip Retail Plaza (<40k)* 1,OOOsf 54.45 1.25 68.06 40% 40.84 $ 2,986.77 $ 9,888.38 $ 19,875.71 $ 4,034.43 840 Automobile Sales (New) 1,OOOsf 27.84 1.25 34.80 0% 34.80 $ 2,545.20 $ 8,426.46 $ 16,937.24 $ 3,437.97 841 Automobile Sales (Used) 1,OOOsf 27.06 1.25 33.83 0% 33.83 $ 2,473.89 $ 8,190.37 $ 16,462.71 $ 3,341.65 848 Tire Store 1,OOOsf 28.54 1.25 35.68 28% 25.69 $ 1,878.62 $ 6,219.60 $ 12,501.44 $ 2,537.58 850 Supermarket 1,OOOsf 92.29 1.25 115.36 24% 87.68 $ 6,412.41 $ 21,229.71 $ 42,671.87 $ 8,661.65 851 Convenience Store* 1,OOOsf 651.94 1.25 814.93 51% 399.31 $ 29,204.95 $ 96,689.55 $ 194,346.68 $ 39,449.02 857 Discount Club 1,OOOsf 40.34 1.25 50.43 34% 33.28 $ 2,434.07 $ 8,058.53 $ 16,197.70 $ 3,287.85 862 Home Improvement Superstore 1,OOOsf 30.65 1.25 38.31 42% 22.22 $ 1,625.22 $ 5,380.64 $ 10,815.13 $ 2,195.29 863 Electronics Superstore* 1,OOOsf 41.05 1.25 51.31 40% 30.79 $ 2,251.73 $ 7,454.87 $ 14,984.35 $ 3,041.56 880 Pharmacy/Drug Store w/o Drive-Thru 1,OOOsf 90.08 1.25 112.60 53% 52.92 $ 3,870.61 $ 12,814.51 $ 25,757.26 $ 5,228.28 881 Pharmacy/Drug Store w/ Drive-Thru 1,OOOsf 107.2 1.25 134.00 49% 68.34 $ 4,998.25 $ 16,547.82 $ 33,261.24 $ 6,751.46 890 Furniture/Flooring Store 1,OOOsf 6.32 1.25 7.90 53% 3.71 $ 271.56 $ 899.06 $ 1,807.13 $ 366.82 Services 912 Drive -In Bank 1,OOOsf 98.85 1.25 123.56 30% 86.49 $ 6,325.98 $ 20,943.56 $ 42,096.71 $ 8,544.90 941 Quick Lubrication Vehicle Shop* service bay 40 1.25 50.00 28% 36.00 $ 2,632.97 $ 8,717.03 $ 17,521.28 $ 3,556.52 942 Automobile Care Center* 1,OOOsf 33.89 1.25 42.36 20% 33.89 $ 2,478.65 $ 8,206.11 $ 16,494.34 $ 3,348.07 945 Convenience Store/Gas Station VFP 211.05 1.25 263.81 56% 116.08 $ 8,489.67 $ 28,106.96 $ 56,495.19 $ 11,467.55 Office 710 General Office Building 1,OOOsf 7.83 1.22 9.55 0% 9.55 $ 698.66 $ 2,313.06 $ 4,649.27 $ 943.72 715 Single Tenant Office Building* 1,OOOsf 12.3 1.22 15.01 0% 15.01 $ 1,097.51 $ 3,633.55 $ 7,303.45 $ 1,482.48 720 Medical/Dental Office Building 1,OOOsf 34.03 1.22 41.52 0% 41.52 $ 3,036.44 $ 10,052.81 $ 20,206.22 $ 4,101.51 732 Post Office* employee 27.17 1.22 33.15 20% 26.52 $ 1,939.47 $ 6,421.04 $ 12,906.33 $ 2,619.76 IndustriaVPort 110 General Light Industrial 1,OOOsf 3.6 1.08 3.89 0% 3.89 $ 284.36 $ 941.44 $ 1,892.30 $ 384.10 &Terminal 130 Industrial Park 1,OOOsf 2.68 1.08 2.89 0% 2.89 $ 211.69 $ 700.85 $ 1,408.71 $ 285.94 140 Manufacturing 1,OOOsf 4.27 1.08 4.61 0% 4.61 $ 337.28 $ 1,116.65 $ 2,244.48 $ 455.59 150 Warehouse 1,OOOsf 1.38 1.08 1.49 0% 1.49 $ 109.00 $ 360.88 $ 725.38 $ 147.24 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,OOOsf 1.29 1.08 1.39 0% 1.39 $ 101.90 $ 337.35 $ 678.07 $ 137.64 r ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 12th Edition: Daily Weekday Vehicle Trip Generation Rates 'The ratio of vehicle trips to person trips as extracted from the PSRC Household Travel Survey a Excludes pass-bytrips: see "Trip Generation Handbook: An ITE Proposed Recommended Practice" (2014). For Restaurant: sit-down uses, percentage of newtrips based on peer studieswith higher pass-bytrip levels to be more consistent with trends expected in Tukwila. "PM Peak Person Trip Rate multiplied bythe Passby, Diverted Link percentage s dwelling = dwelling unit, sq ft = square feet, pump = vehicle servicing position/gas pump, room = available hotel/motel room, window = number of drive through teller windows/ATM drive through positions * ITE Land Use Category has five or fewer studies for daily vehicle trip rates. 111 Impact Fee Zones (2026) 1 1 S Boeing AcRd, 5nl � 4 m s nsth st 9 ' I� N d \r Of�A 1 59 1 5133rd 5t P t p ° > ` S 1"th St- ,. 1 A As �* SouthcentN enTGradY:NaY Blvd �Tukwita.PkwY S 160th Sti 1 I L N CVf I S 164th St 3 010 grander Blvd 3 Seittle-Tacoma ° ! C 1 t81 j International ; ; a afAirpon t S 1a0th St! r 7 I ,s I I', S 200th St* Impact Fee Zones 2 3 4 t T t 0 0.5 1 '_-- -� Miles N Source: Transportation Element December 2024 112 Attachment D Transportation Impact Fee Rate Study Date: May 2026 To: City of Tukwila From: Fehr & Peers Introduction Since 1990, Washington State law (RCW 82.02.050) has allowed jurisdictions to utilize transportation impact fees (TIF) to fund capacity projects needed to support growth in lieu of relying solely on the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The City of Tukwila adopted a TIF schedule in 2005. The most recent update to the TIF schedule in 2020 included a revised project list with updated project costs. The current schedule includes 17 projects with an estimated capital value of $57 million. These projects consist of intersection improvements and roadway widenings to add vehicular capacity. The current TIF rate, averaged across the four zones, comes to $4,176.24 per PM peak hour trip, which has not increased since the 2020 update. Building on the recently adopted Transportation Element (TE) and Background Report, the City is updating its TIF program to reflect the new multi -modal level of service standard. The adopted TE and Background Report include a wide variety of projects enhancing multimodal capacity, including intersection improvements, complete streets upgrades, bike facilities, and sidewalks. This TIF program introduces significant changes to Tukwila's existing TIF program, with the most notable being the shift from a primary focus on adding vehicle capacity to a program that adds capacity for all modes. As such, there is also a shift from vehicle trips to person trips as a measure of transportation impacts and the basis for assessing fees. This shift better links trip generation from new development to the need for expanding the multimodal transportation network. State law requires jurisdictions to allow independent fee calculations, enabling any development to submit justification for a reduced fee based on trip data specific to its proposal. The remaining sections of the report describe the proposed impact fee changes and methodology, the analyses performed, and the resulting recommendations. 113 Structure and Methodology The multimodal transportation impact fee structure for the City of Tukwila was designed to determine the fair share of multimodal transportation improvement costs that may be charged to new development. Growth in residents, workers, and visitors related to new development will increase travel demand on public facilities. Therefore, the City of Tukwila must expand its multimodal transportation network as the City grows. The basis for calculating a proportionate share of building new transportation facilities stems from understanding how many "person trips" a development generates and how many of those trips use new capacity added through the TIF program. Different calculations are made for people driving, walking, and bicycling. The following key points summarize the City's impact fee structure (see Figure 1). A multimodal TIF project list was developed from the TE and Background Report. These projects were evaluated for impact fee eligibility; impact fees can only fund new capacity. Non -capacity investments, primarily maintenance and safety improvement projects, are not eligible for inclusion in the TIF project list. A calculation was made to subtract the cost of fixing any "existing deficiencies" from the project cost estimates on the TIF project list. Figure 1. Impact Fee Structure List of Projects Capacity Projects Safety/ Maintenance/Other TL_____1 Portion Due to Portion Due to New Growth Existing Deficiency II Growth Outside City -41 Cost Allocated to Cost Paid by Impact Fees City or Others T Eligible Costs Growth in Trips It Cost Per Trip Allocated to Impact Fees Fehr&Peers 114 Tukwila TIF Rate Study 12 Of the remaining eligible projects, the portion of the project's cost that supports non -City growth was subtracted from eligible costs to determine the total eligible impact fee program cost. The total eligible cost per project was divided by the total projected growth in daily person trips. This calculation was carried out for each of the City's four TIF zones. After determining the allowable cost per daily person trip, a land use - based fee schedule was developed for the City to ease administration of the program. Person trip rates for multiple land use categories were estimated using vehicle trip generation rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and the ratio of person trips to vehicle trips based on the PSRC Household Travel Survey. TIF Zones This program assesses fees based on a cost per daily person trip, rather than PM peak vehicle trip. The conversion from vehicle trips to person trips is described in the following sections. Given the shape of Tukwila and the topographical conditions, travel can be isolated to separate areas of the City. Accordingly, the City has a long history of using a zone system for TIFs, such that the costs are allocated across zones. The TIF zones are mapped in Figure 2. Fehr&Peers Tukwila TIF Rate Study 13 115 Figure 2. Map of Impact Fee Zones (2026) City Boundary Parks Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 fle Tacoma 1, 1 lern,, lions ,,r '�r Impact Fee Zones 4 4 0 SW Gt S 160th St v, S 164th St S 1 Both SJ S 200th St 0 0.5 1� Miles Ok The TIF program includes three project types based on which mode is gaining new capacity as part of the project: vehicle/intersection projects, bicycle projects, and pedestrian projects. Additionally, two other citywide programs are included, signal interconnect, and Fehr&Peers 116 Tukwila TIF Rate Study 14 data and engineering studies to support capital projects. The methodology for allocating costs to each zone for the project types is described in Table 1. Table 1. Allocation of Project Costs to Zones by Project Type Vehicle/Intersection Apply proportional share of project fee to each zone based on model trip data. Bicycle Apply proportional share of project fee to each zone based on percentage of 1.5-mile bike shed that falls within the zone. Fees associated with pedestrian projects apply only to the zone Pedestrian where the project is located. If the project falls on the border, the fee is proportionally distributed between adjacent zones based on length. Cost of signal interconnect is distributed among zones based on Signal Interconnect the proportion of trips in each zone as calculated by the 2044 model. Data and The costs associated with data and engineering studies in support Engineering Studies of capital projects are distributed among zones based on the to Support Capital proportion of trips in each zone as calculated by the 2044 model. Projects Fehr&Peers Tukwila TIF Rate Study 15 117 Project List Washington State law (RCW 82.02.050) specifies that transportation impact fees are to be spent on transportation "system improvements."' Transportation system improvements include "public streets, roads, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities that were designed with multimodal commuting as an intended use"z and can include physical or operational changes to existing transportation facilities, as well as new transportation connections that are built in one location to benefit projected needs at another location. Projects on the TIF list must add new multimodal capacity (new streets, additional lanes, sidewalks, bike lanes, low -stress bike routes, signalization, roundabouts, etc.). Transportation projects that cannot be included in the TIF program include facilities that only benefit a single development or property owner (typically local streets that are necessary to connect to the larger network), improvements that correct an existing deficiency (e.g., projects to address an existing traffic congestion issue that exceeds the LOS standard), or other projects that do not expand the capacity of the transportation system (e.g., a project to address a safety concern or a maintenance project). The 2026 TIF project list was based on the City's Transportation Element and Background Report (adopted December 2024) and identified multimodal transportation projects needed to accommodate growth, meet the adopted multimodal policies, and ensure that adequate facilities are provided for all travel modes. The list includes 21 capital projects as well as citywide signal interconnect, data and engineering studies to support capital projects, and carry-over costs for completed TIF projects that have not yet been collected. Fehr & Peers worked with the City to develop the TIF project list using only capacity - improving projects eligible for TIF funding. Other non -capacity improving projects that were identified in the Transportation Element and Background Report must use funding sources other than the TIF. The resulting project list is mapped in Figure 3 and described in Table 2. The TIF project list has a total grant -adjusted capital cost of approximately $30 million3 anticipated between now and 2044. 1 https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=82.02.050 2 https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=82.02.090 3 Note: The cost of Signal Interconnect was derived from the previous impact fee program. Fehr & Peers Tukwila TIF Rate Study 16 118 Figure 3. Map of TIF Projects City Boundary Parks Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 Seattle -Tacoma Inteinational Ahport 0 0 4 0 0 �0 St U v 3 Z —[T 0 < p �o S 1601I S 164th St SW 17th St .� Minkler Blvd i i 1 0 s lean si �a S 200th Si , 0 0.5 1 T � Miles Impact Fee Zones 1 2 3 4 Project Type Bicycle Project o Complete Streets Project Pedestrian Project Vehicle Project (corridor) • Vehicle Project (intersection) Fehr&Peers Tukwila TIF Rate Study 17 119 Table 2. TIF Project List and Descriptions A Buffered Lane on 42nd Ave S Remove parking on one side and widen sidewalk to create a 12ft shared use path 8ft parking lane, 2- Section 3 11ft lanes and 8ft sidewalk. C S Norfolk St Bike Facilities Add bike facilities on S Norfolk St. If this project moves forward, need to update bike network. F 42nd Ave S Bridge Replacement Design and construct a replacement structure for the existing 42nd Ave S Bridge near the Tukwila Community Center. H SR 518 EB Off -ramp / Klickitat Design and construct a new traffic signal, lighting, and pedestrian facilities including crosswalks and Drive Intersection Improvements pedestrian push buttons. S 115th Street / E Marginal Way Design and construct a new traffic signal, lighting, and pedestrian facilities including crosswalks and J Intersection Improvements pedestrian push buttons. Coordinate the new traffic signal with the Interurban Ave / E Marginal Way signal. L Andover Park E/Minkler Blvd Design and construct left turn lanes on Andover Park East and reconstruct traffic signal. Improve Intersection safety and provide needed capacity. M Andover Park E/Industry Dr Design and construct traffic signal with Andover Park East left turn lanes and crosswalks. Intersection P S 152nd St Safe Routes to School Install curb, gutter, and sidewalks on both sides of S 152nd St, including widening pavement width. Install curb, gutter, and sidewalk on the west side of 46th Avenue South. Install a curb bulb -out at Q 46th Ave S Safe Routes to School the southeastern corner of 46th Ave S and S 144th St and a raised crosswalk on S 144th St with pedestrian -activated flashing beacons. Macadam Rd S Section 1 Construct sidewalk on west side of 42nd Ave S from S 124th St to entrance of 42nd Ave S Bridge, S Sidewalk construct sidewalk on both sides of 42nd Ave S from entrance of 42nd Ave S Bridge to Interurban Ave S. Construct sidewalk on both sides of Macadam Rd S from Interurban Ave S to S 130th St. T S 146th St Sidewalk Construct sidewalk on south side of entire segment, and extend the sidewalk on the north side to the project extents 4 IDs align with IDs established in the TE and Background Report 120 V Strander Blvd Sidewalk Construct sidewalk on south side of Strander Blvd from Christensen Rd to W Valley Hwy. Construct sidewalk on both sides of Strander Blvd from W Valley Hwy to east boundary of Tukwila city limits X Minkler Blvd Section 2 Sidewalk Construct sidewalk on both sides of road segment Y - North Tukwila International Blvd Section Construct sidewalk on east side of Tukwila International Blvd from S 112th St to the HW 99 Exit Section 2 Sidewalk Ramp. Y - South Tukwila International Blvd Section Construct sidewalk on both sides of Tukwila International Blvd from the HW 99 Exit Ramp to 12400 Section 2 Sidewalk Block. Z E Marginal Way S Section 2 Construct sidewalk on both sides of road segment Sidewalk AB S 142nd St Sidewalk Construct sidewalk on both sides of road segment AC S 141st St Section 1 Sidewalk Construct sidewalk on both sides of road segment Resurface and re -channel S Ryan Way to improve failing pavement and improve safety. Add AD Ryan Way Road Diet pedestrian and bicycle facilities where appropriate. Signalize intersection with 47th Avenue S to accommodate future growth and improve safety. AE S 144th Street Complete Street Restripe and remove parking on one side to accommodate 2-10ft lanes, 1-2ft buffer, and 1-10ft two- way cycle track. Construct sidewalk facilities on the south side of the street. AJ Southcenter Boulevard Road Diet Re -channel Southcenter Boulevard to increase multimodal options and improve safety. Add pedestrian and bicycle facilities where appropriate. SI Signal Interconnect Citywide Signal Interconnect ENGINEERING Data and Engineering Studies to Costs associated with data and engineering studies, as well as regular TIF updates (full TIF update for STUDIES Support Capital Projects every comp plan cycle, concurrency report every 2 years) Fehr & Peers Tukwila TIF Rate Study 12 121 Person Trip Growth Determining the existing travel demand, as well as growth in travel demand caused by new development is a key requirement for a TIF program. Trip generation rates by land use category are the most common approach to quantify travel demand. In short, trip generation represents the desire for mobility by residents, visitors, and workers to access homes, jobs, shopping, recreation, and other activities. For the purposes of the analysis, trip generation represents the movement by one person on a typical weekday from one activity to another regardless of travel mode (driving, riding transit, biking, or walking). Fehr & Peers developed a method to calculate growth in daily person trips using data from Tukwila's TE and Background Report, the City's 2018 travel demand model,5 trip rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), and household survey data from the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC). Person trips are defined as travel between an origin and a destination. Each person trip has two trip ends, one each at the origin and destination. The specific steps to calculate person trips from the Comprehensive Plan land use growth assumptions are listed below: 1. Translate the land use data in the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan into a format used for impact fees: a. Total household dwelling units were converted to single-family and multi -family units based on Tukwila housing statistics: i. Currently, 58% of all housing units in Tukwila are multi-family6 ii. In 2044, 77% of all housing units in Tukwila will be multi -family b. Next, employees were converted by different land use sectors into square footage using standard estimates of square feet per employee, listed below: i. 400 square feet per retail employee ii. 300 square feet per office/government service employee iii. 500 square feet per manufacturing/warehouse employee iv. 300 square feet per all other employees Table 3 shows the resulting growth estimates for each land use by zone. For more detail on the calculations computed for each zone, see Appendix A. Growth Estimations in Dwelling Units (DU) and Square Footage (1000 sq ft) by Zone Calculations. 5 At the time the project was started, the calibrated base year for the Tukwila version of the regional PSRC Model was 2018. Base years are only recalibrated every few years, so they typically lag behind the current year. 6 Table DP04 Selected Housing Characteristics, Tukwila City, 2023 ACS 5-Year Estimates 122 Table 3. Growth Estimations in Dwelling Units (DU) and Square Footage (1000 sq ft) by Zone Households 3,516 265 2,678 270 6,729 Office 2,720 593 563 372 4,249 Education 1,337 8 -53 400 1,692 Industrial -1,054 -668 -483 -795 -3,000 Retail 1,656 68 34 699 2,457 DU = dwelling unit; sq ft = square feet Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 2. Estimating the trip ends associated with the land use using a ratio of the person trip rate to vehicle trip rates from the PSRC Household Travel Survey and vehicle trip rates from the ITE. This approach of using ITE vehicle trip generation rates and then converting them to person trip rates is the most defensible approach as of the time this rate study was prepared. While ITE and other sources are beginning to calculate person trip generation rates directly, the person trip generation dataset is not nearly as robust as the vehicle trip generation dataset. PSRC has strong travel survey data on how many person trips and vehicle trips are generated for different trip purposes and this information is combined with the ITE vehicle trip generation rate to create a more detailed depiction of person trip generation rates than any other source available. a. Daily vehicle trip rates for each land use category were taken from the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 12th Edition. b. Apply the vehicle -to -person trip generation rate factors from the PSRC household travel survey to the associated ITE land use category. Table 4 outlines the ratios used in developing person trip rates for the impact fee, organized by generalized ITE land use category. Each of the unique vehicle -to -person trip ratios in the table below can be multiplied by the associated ITE vehicle trip rate to reach a person trip rate, unless the applicant proposes another vehicle -to -person trip ratio from a credible data source. Fehr&Peers Tukwila TIF Rate Study 12 123 Table 4. Vehicle Trip to Person Trip Ratios Port and Terminal 000-099 1.08 Industrial 100-199 1.08 Residential 200-299 1.45 Lodging 300-399 1.45 Recreational 400-499 1.25 Institutional 500-599 1.26 Medical 600-699 1.26 Office 700-799 1.22 Retail 800-899 1.25 Services 900-999 1.25 1. Vehicle -to -person trip generation rate factors from the PSRC household travel survey Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 3. Total daily person trips within the city were ultimately calculated by multiplying the daily person trip rate by the total growth in dwelling units and non-residential square footage, depending on the land use. This calculation also includes a pass -by adjustment to account for these types of trips.? Table 5 and Table 6 outline the existing person trips by zone and the growth in person trips by zone resulting from the calculations described above. For more detail on the calculations computed for each zone, see Appendix B. Existing Person Trips by Zone Calculations and Appendix C. Growth in Person Trips by Zone Calculations. 7 A pass -by trip is any person trip that may go to a land use, but is part of a larger overall "trip tour." The defining feature of the pass -by trip is that it is an interim stop that did not initiate the overall need to travel. Typical examples are people stopping on their way to work to get coffee on the route they were already traveling on or someone buying gas on their trip between home and a store along the route they were already traveling on. Fehr&Peers 124 Tukwila TIF Rate Study 13 Table S. Existing Person Trips by Zone Single Family 359 12,266 26,838 943 40,406 Multi -Family 244 8,364 18,300 643 27,552 Office/Government 22,439 9,791 13,678 1,186 47,094 Education 4,516 3,317 8,726 2,552 19,111 Industrial 18,071 4,691 5,851 10,947 39,560 Retail 58,493 24,640 14,356 7,664 105,153 Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 Table 6. Growth in Person Trips by Zone Single Family 463175 1,765 178 2,581 2,581 Multi -Family 22,511 1,628 16,453 1,659 42,250 Office/Government 23,388 5,099 4,840 3,202 36,529 Education 34,121 196 -1,363 10,198 43,161 Industrial -4,099 -2,596 -1,879 -3,090 -11,664 Retail 45,204 1,860 920 19,077 67,062 Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 These total daily person trip estimates will be used in the calculation of transportation impact fees rate in each zone. Fehr&Peers Tukwila TIF Rate Study 14 125 Impact Fee Eligible Costs To meet GMA requirements, the TIF methodology must separate the share of project costs that address existing deficiencies from the share of project costs that add multimodal capacity and serve new growth. The resulting growth -related improvement costs are then further separated to identify the share of growth related to land development in Tukwila versus growth from outside of the city. New development in Tukwila cannot be charged a fee to pay for the capacity needs generated by development outside of the City. Figure 4 shows the general calculation steps for determining the total impact fee eligible cost. For Tukwila's program, existing deficiencies are calculated using the concept of "existing system value." This concept calculates the value of the existing transportation system, accounting for depreciation of pavement, and then determines the value per existing person trip generated. In other words, the existing system value is based on the cost of replacing the current transportation system divided by the number of current person trips generated in Tukwila. This provides a general approximation of the per-capita/per- employee value of the current system. This existing system value is used to ensure that the future TIF rate does not exceed the value of the current per trip value of the existing system. The concept that an impact fee cannot exceed the value of the current level of investment in a system is common for parks, schools, and fire impact fees and is thus translated to transportation for Tukwila's program. Should the TIF exceed the existing system value per person trip, the TIF would be capped at this value. Therefore, with this cap in place, there are no existing deficiencies that need to be accounted for in the TIF program. ImpactFigure 4. 1 Project Percentage Not Existing Impact Fee Cost of Growth Deficiency Eligible within City % Cost Percent of Growth in Tukwila Neighboring jurisdictions' growth may also use the new multimodal capacity that Tukwila has committed to building. Tukwila does not have the authority to charge growth in neighboring jurisdictions for their share of building new transportation infrastructure without an interlocal or interagency agreement. To account for this statutory limitation, adjustments were made for trips that pass -through Tukwila or only have one end of the trip starting or ending in Tukwila. The current tools to calculate the share of growth in trips that can be attributed to Tukwila are limited to vehicle and bicycle trips. The percentage of pedestrian trips attributed to city growth are defined based on engineering judgement. For Fehr & Peers Tukwila TIF Rate Study 15 126 this program, we assumed an internal -trip generation proportion of 100% for pedestrian projects, as the Tukwila zones are constrained and the vast majority of new trips using upgraded pedestrian facilities in Tukwila will be generated by new growth within the City (as opposed to pedestrians from SeaTac or Renton walking through Tukwila to reach their destination, for example). For motorized projects, Fehr & Peers analyzed traffic forecasts generated by Tukwila's travel model in areas of the city where the vehicular TIF projects are located to calculate the portion of trips related to growth in each of the four zones, as well as outside of the city. Considering the share of trips, each vehicle has a different share of growth that can be related to the City of Tukwila. A similar process was conducted to calculate the share of trips that are attributed to each TIF zone for bicycle TIF projects. Fehr & Peers created 1.5 mile buffers around each bicycle project segment. A 1.5 mile buffer was used to capture a general bike shed that may utilize the bicycle facility given topography and connectivity. The percentage of the buffer that falls within each zone is used to determine the share of growth attributable to each zone and is applied to the project cost. The percentage of the buffer that falls outside of Tukwila city limits is removed from the portion of the project cost eligible for the TIF program. After applying these percentages to the TIF project list, the total eligible impact fee program cost is $23,611,465 which breaks out to the following total costs per zone: 1. Zone 1: $8,892,688 2. Zone 2: $1,540,612 3. Zone 3: $10,092,686 4. Zone 4: $3,085,478 The overall project list cost (grant adjusted) totals $30,364,801, so the cost that is attributable to internal Tukwila growth is 78% of the total grant adjusted cost of the TIF project list. Accordingly, the TIF program is not the sole funding source for project development. In areas with more pedestrian projects, where 100% of the fee is attributed to the zone, there may be a higher reliance on TIF to fund project development. The City has invested in roadway projects over the years to accommodate vehicular capacity and a key piece of meeting person -trip demand will be expanding the pedestrian network. Developments that may be constructed are already benefiting from excess roadway capacity; therefore, the City is planning to invest a greater share of funding than it has in the past to build out the pedestrian and bicycle networks to ensure people using any mode can connect to their destinations. Fehr & Peers Tukwila TIF Rate Study 16 127 Existing Deficiencies Tukwila has a surface transportation network that provides rights -of -way (streets, sidewalks, and off-street bicycle and pedestrian paths) for nearly all types of travel within the city (excluding I-5, I-405, SR-518, SR-599). The City is responsible for maintaining, improving, and expanding this infrastructure to support transportation services for people traveling by all modes, including walking, biking, transit, and private vehicles. This impact fee program is based on the existing system value, which ensures that new development does not pay a higher rate than existing residents and developments have paid into the City's current transportation system. This methodology sets the maximum allowable impact fee rate at the existing level of investment per existing person trips. In Tukwila's most recent Pavement Conditions Report (received June 2025), the City determined the average replacement cost for a typical roadway of approximately $305 per square yard, not including the value of the land. The City maintains about 160 centerline miles of roadway, and the existing level of investment is $474.3 million for the paved roadway network. This includes depreciation of the existing system based on the Pavement Condition Index across the city. This existing system value is then divided by the existing person trips to determine the existing level of investment per person trip. Dividing the existing system value by the existing person trips results in the maximum legal amount that new development could be required to contribute to maintain the existing level of investment, or maximum allowable cost, of $1,701 per daily person trip. Maximum Allowable Cost per Daily Person Trip = Existing System Value Existing Person Trips Table 7 summarizes the impact fee eligible costs, and maximum allowable cost per person trip. Existing System Value $474,296,340 Existing Daily Person Trip Ends 278,876 Maximum Allowable Cost per Person Trip (Existing System Value/Existing Daily Person Trip $1,701 Ends) Fehr & Peers Tukwila TIF Rate Study 17 128 It is important to note that the $1,716 cost per daily person trip represents the maximum TIF amount that can be charged based on legal and technical requirements related to existing deficiencies. This can be used as check to ensure that new development is not paying more than the existing deficiency limit into the City's transportation system. The total eligible impact fee program cost in each zone (the cost after removing growth not attributable to the city) was divided by the growth in person trips attributed to that zone and compared against the existing system value. Table 8 outlines the cost per daily person trip by zone. Table B. Calculation of Impact Fee Cost per Daily Person Trip by Zone Total Eligible Impact Fee $8,892,68 $1,540,612 $10,092,686 $3,085,478 Program Cost Growth in Daily Person Trip Ends 121,588 6,362 20,737 31,232 (2018-2044) Cost per Daily $73.14 $242.14 $486.70 $98.79 Person Trip Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 As evident in the table above, Zone 3 has the highest maximum fee per daily trip, and Zone 1 has the lowest maximum fee per daily trip. This is reflective of the heavy investment in projects within Zone 1 over recent years. Zone 3 is anticipated to have extensive growth over the plan horizon, and more projects are necessary to accommodate that growth in transportation needs. Fehr & Peers Tukwila TIF Rate Study 18 129 Developing Fee Estimates When the City is estimating an impact fee for a development or land use change, the following procedure can be used to estimate daily person trips and associated impact fees. Note that while this methodology is intended to be applied consistently, it may not always address all project -specific situations and in some cases, it may be reasonable for a fee payer to provide an independent fee calculation per TMC 9.48. 1. Review the most recent version of the ITE Trip Generation Manual for the estimated number of daily vehicle trips, selecting the most appropriate land use for the proposed development based on sound engineering judgement and land uses available from the ITE Manual. 2. Reduce the estimate using the pass -by rate in the most recent version of the ITE manual. a. The use of pass -by rates from the ITE Trip Generation Manual applies to select land uses from the following land use categories: i. Institutional ii. Retail iii. Services. 3. Apply internal capture rates for mixed -use developments. a. Internal capture adjustments apply to mixed -use developments. These calculations identify the number of internal trips (those within a mixed -use development) and external trips (those starting or ending outside of the mixed -use development). S. The project team is responsible for performing the internal capture rate calculations. a. ITE resources on internal capture, including documented steps and a calculation spreadsheet can be found in Chapter 6 of the ITE Manual and are summarized here: https://www.ite.org/technical-resources/topicsItrip-and- parking- generation other -resources/ 4. Use the vehicle -to -person trip ratio to convert the estimated daily vehicle trips to daily person trips. See 5. Table 9 for the vehicle -to -person trip ratios by land use categories. Fehr&Peers 130 Tukwila TIF Rate Study 19 Table 9. Vehicle -to -Person Trip Ratios Port and Terminal 000-099 1.08 Industrial 100-199 1.08 Residential 200-299 1.45 Lodging 300-399 1.45 Recreational 400-499 1.25 Institutional 500-599 1.26 Medical 600-699 1.26 Office 700-799 1.22 Retail 800-899 1.25 Services 900-999 1.25 6. Multiply the resulting estimate for new daily person trips by the adopted rate for the zone in which the project is located (see Table 10). Table 10. Final Fee per Daily Person Trip by Zone Zone 1 $73.14 Zone 2 $242.14 Zone 3 $486.70 Zone 4 $98.79 6. If calculating the fee for a land use with an exemption or reduction, apply the exemption/reduction percentage from the resulting fee. The current exemptions/reductions are outlined below: a. Early Learning Facility: 80% exemption 7. Accessory Dwelling Units: 50% exemption a. Low Income Housing: variable reduction Fehr&Peers Tukwila TIF Rate Study 110 131 Periodic TIF Review and Updates To ensure that the impact fee program remains relevant to funding projects that are important to the community and support growth needs, Fehr & Peers recommends updating the impact fee program every six to ten years to reflect the changing project list, funding, and growth assumptions. This program will be updated in full aligning with the regular Comprehensive Plan updates. Furthermore, the City shall consider updating the per -person impact fee rates annually to account for inflation. The following steps can be taken to update the impact fee program: 8. Review and update impact fee eligible project list a. Remove projects that are completed or no longer priorities for the city b. Add new projects that were not previously included and are eligible for impact fees i. For any added projects, update the percentage of Tukwila growth (eligible percentage) 9. Update the cost per person trip rate by dividing total eligible project cost in each zone by the daily person trips associated with the zone, using the existing growth estimates by zone, or an updated 20-year person trip growth estimate, if available. 10. Compare the resulting fee to the maximum allowable rate (existing system value). Example Fee Schedule As part of the TIF update, the City of Tukwila developed a sample rate table as an example of how the calculations would fall under the ITE rates at the time of the rate study development (October 2025). The table should be used as reference and should not be the basis for impact fee calculations, as the ITE trip generation rates may change. outlines each piece of information that is included in the sample rate table (Table 12). Table 12 shows an example of the proposed impact fee schedule based on the maximum fee in each Zone and the final TIF rate (capped at the existing system value) using the ITE 12th Edition trip rates. Fehr&Peers 132 Tukwila TIF Rate Study 111 Table 11. Tukwila Fee Schedule Column Descriptions ITE Land Use Category Land use types pulled from the ITE Trip Generation Manual. ITE Code The three -digit numerical code associated with the ITE Land Use Category. ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 12th Edition: Daily Vehicle Daily Trip Rate Vehicle Trip Generation Rates for the Adjacent Street Traffic (Weekday) associated with the ITE Land Use Category. Vehicle -to -Person Trip Ratio The ratio of vehicle trips to person trips as extracted from the 2021 PSRC Household Travel Survey. The daily person trip rate associated with the ITE Land Daily Person Trip Rate Use Category. This is calculated by multiplying the Daily Vehicle Trip Rate by the Vehicle -to -Person Trip Ratio. Exclusion of pass -by trips: see "Trip Generation Pass -by, Diverted Link % Handbook: An ITE Proposed Recommended Practice" (2014). The number of new person trips per unit, excluding the Net New Person Trips per pass -by trips. This is calculated by multiplying the Daily Unit Person Trip Rate by the Pass -by, Diverted Link percentage. Maximum Defensible Rate This is the maximum rate that the City can charge as part of their impact fee program. Unit of Measure Unit of measure for calculating the total fee. Final TIF Rate The TIF rate capped at the existing system value. Fehr&Peers Tukwila TIF Rate Study 112 133 Table 12. Tukwila Multimodal TIF Program Rate Table Example by Zone City of Tukwila Multimodal TIF Program Rates by Daily Person Trip Land Daily Vehicle Vehicle -to- Daily Person Passby, Net New Person Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Use ITE Code Description Trip Rate Person Trip Trip Rate Diverted Trips per Unit of Impact Fee Impact Fee Impact Fee Impact Fee Unit Group Ratio z Link % 3 Measure 4 Per Unit Per Unit Per Unit Per Unit Residential 210 Single Family Detached Housing 9.09 1.45 13.18 0% 13.18 $ 964.56 $ 3,194.84 $ 6,416.57 $ 1,298.51 per dwelling unit 215 Single Family Attached Housing 6.57 1.45 9.53 0% 9.53 $ 697.16 $ 2,309.14 $ 4,637.72 $ 938.53 per dwelling unit 220 Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) 6.21 1.45 9.00 0% 9.00 $ 658.96 $ 2,182.62 $ 4,383.60 $ 887.10 per dwelling unit 221 Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise) 4.46 1.45 6.47 0% 6.47 $ 473.26 $ 1,567.55 $ 3,148.29 $ 637.11 per dwelling unit 240 Mobile Home Park 7.87 1.45 11.41 0% 11.41 $ 835.10 $ 2,766.05 $ 5,555.38 $ 1,124.24 per dwelling unit 251 Senior Adult Housing (Single Family) 4.16 1A5 6.03 0% 6.03 $ 441.43 $ 1,462.11 $ 2,936.52 $ 594.26 per dwelling unit 252 Senior Adult Housing (Multifamily) 3.25 1.45 4.71 0% 4.71 $ 344.86 $ 1,142.27 $ 2,294.15 $ 464.27 per dwelling unit 253 Congregate Care Facility 2.43 1.45 3.52 0% 3.52 $ 257.85 $ 854.07 $ 1,715.32 $ 347.13 per dwelling unit 254 Assisted Living .14 11.45 6.00 1 0% 6.00 $ 439.30 $ 1,455.08 $ 2,922.40 $ 591AO per bed Lodging 310 Hotel 5.84 1.45 8.47 0% 8A7 $ 619.70 $ 2,052.57 $ 4,122.42 $ 834.25 per room 320 Motel 3.35 1.45 4.86 OD/ 4.86 $ 355.48 $ 1,177.42 $ 2,364.74 $ 478.55 per room Auto Services 944 Gasoline/Service Station 172.01 1.25 215.01 609/. 86.01 $ 6,293.92 $ 20,846.89 $ 41,869.22 $ 8,473.02 per VFP 945 Gas Station w/Convenience Market 211.05 1.25 263.81 58% 110.80 $ 8,108.53 $ 26,857.30 $ 53,940.61 $ 10,915.90 per VFP Recreational 495 Recreational Community Center 28.82 1.25 36.03 19% 29.09 $ 2,128.84 $ 7,051.22 $ 14,161.78 $ 2,865.90 per 1,000 square feet Institutional 520 ElementarySchool 2.27 1.26 2.86 0% 2.86 $ 209.31 $ 693.29 $ 1,392.41 $ 281.78 students 522 Middle/JRHigh School 2.09 1.26 2.63 0% 2.63 $ 192.71 $ 638.31 $ 1,282.00 $ 259.44 students 525 High School 1.94 1.26 2.44 0% 2.44 $ 178.88 $ 592.50 $ 1,189.99 $ 240.82 students 565 Day Care Center 39.3 1.26 49.52 44% 27.73 $ 2,029.31 $ 6,721.54 $ 13,499.64 $ 2,731.91 per 1,000 square feet 560 Church 6.78 1.26 8.54 0% 8.54 $ 625.17 $ 2,070.70 $ 4,158.83 $ 841.62 per 1,000 square feet 620 Nursing Home 3.06 1.26 3.86 0% 3.86 $ 282.16 $ 934.57 $ 1,877.00 $ 379.85 per bed Restaurant 931 Fine Dining Restaurant 79.03 1.25 98.79 44% 55.32 $ 4,048.44 $ 13,409.35 $ 26,931.54 $ 5,450.10 per 1,000 square feet 932 High Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant 103.75 1.25 129.69 43% 73.92 $ 5,409.66 $ 17,918.05 $ 35,986.88 $ 7,282.62 per 1,000 square feet 933 Fast Food w/o Drive-Thm 413.41 1.25 516.76 53% 242.88 $ 17,774.04 $ 58,871.69 $ 118,238.81 $ 23,927.85 per 1,000 square feet 934 Fast Food w/ Drive-Thru 448.12 1.25 560.15 53% 266.07 $ 19,471.31 $ 64,493.45 $ 129,529.64 $ 26,212.76 per 1,000 square feet 937 Coffee/Donut Shop w/ Drive-Thm 600.5 1.25 750.63 76% 177.01 $ 12,954.09 $ 42,906.91 $ 86,174.90 $ 17,439.11 per 1,000 square feet 938 Coffee/Donut Shop w/ Drive-Thru (no indoor seating) 179 1.25 223.75 91% 20.88 $ 1,528.26 $ 5,061.95 $ 10,166.49 $ 2,057.38 per drive-thru lane 970 Wine Tasting Room 111.85 1.25 139.81 OD/ 139.81 $ 10,231.59 $ 33,889.38 $ 68,063.96 $ 13,774.02 per 1,000 square feet 971 Brewery Taproom 61.69 1.25 77.11 0% 77.11 $ 5,643.16 $ 18,691.43 $ 37,540.15 $ 7,596.95 per 1,000 square feet Retail/Service 813 Free -Standing Discount Superstore 50.52 1.25 63.15 29D/ 44.84 $ 3,281.17 $ 10,867.99 $ 21,827.45 $ 4,417.19 per 1,000 square feet 815 Free -Standing Discount Store 53.87 1.25 67.34 20% 53.87 $ 3,942.25 $ 13,057.64 $ 26,225.16 $ 5,307.15 per 1,000 square feet 816 Hardware/Paint Store 8.07 1.25 10.09 26% 7A6 $ 546.28 $ 1,809.39 $ 3,634.01 $ 735.41 per 1,000 square feet 820 Shopping Center (>150k) 36.39 1.25 45.49 29% 32.30 $ 2,363.46 $ 7,828.31 $ 15,722.50 $ 3,181.74 per 1,000 square feet 850 Supermarket 92.29 1.25 115.36 24% 87.68 $ 6,416.17 $ 21,251.81 $ 42,682.46 $ 8,637.60 per 1,000 square feet 857 Discount Club .34 1.25 50.43 34% 33.28 $ 2,435.49 $ 8,066.92 $ 16,201.72 $ 3,278.72 per 1,000 square feet 862 Home Improvement Superstore 30.65 1.25 38.31 429/6 22.22 $ 1,626.17 $ 5,386.25 $ 10,817.82 $ 2,189.19 per 1,000 square feet 863 Electronics Superstore 41.05 1.25 51.31 40% 30.79 $ 2,253.05 $ 7,462.63 $ 14,988.07 $ 3,033.12 per 1,000 square feet 880 Pharmacy/Drug Store w/o Drive-Thm 90.08 1.25 112.60 53% 52.92 $ 3,872.88 $ 12,827.85 $ 25,763.65 $ 5,213.76 per 1,000 square feet 881 Pharmacy/Drug Store w/ Drive-Thru 107.2 1.25 134.00 49% 68.34 $ 5,001.18 $ 16,565.05 $ 33,269.49 $ 6,732.71 per 1,000 square feet 890 Furniture/Flooring Store 6.32 1.25 7.90 53% 3.71 $ 271.72 $ 900.00 $ 1,807.57 $ 365.80 per 1,000 square feet 912 Drive -In Bank 98.85 1.25 123.56 30% 86.49 $ 6,329.68 $ 20,965.36 1 $ 42,107.16 $ 8,521.17 per 1,000 square feet Office 710 General Office Building 7.83 1.22 9.55 OD/ 9.55 $ 699.07 $ 2,315.47 $ 4,650.43 $ 941.10 per 1,000 square feet 715 Single Tenant Office Building 12.3 1.22 15.01 0% 15.01 $ 1,098.15 $ 3,637.33 $ 7,305.27 $ 1,478.36 per 1,000 square feet 720 Medical/Dental Office Building 34.03 1.22 41.52 OD/ 41.52 $ 3,038.22 $ 10,063.28 $ 20,211.24 $ 4,090.12 er 1,000 square feet Industrial/Port 110 General Light Industrial 3.6 1.08 3.89 0% 3.89 $ 284.53 $ 942.42 $ 1,892.77 $ 383.04 per 1,000 square feet & Terminal 130 Industrial Park 2.68 1.08 2.89 OD/ 2.89 $ 211.81 $ 701.58 $ 1,409.06 $ 285.15 per 1,000 square feet 140 Manufacturing 27 1.08 4.61 0% 4.61 $ 337.48 $ 1,117.81 $ 2,245.03 $ 454.32 per 1,000 square feet 150 Warehouse 1.38 1.08 1A9 OD/ 1A9 $ 109.07 $ 361.26 $ 725.56 $ 146.83 per 1,000 square feet 151 Mini -Warehouse 1.29 11.08 1 1.39 1 0% 1 1.39 1 $ 101.96 1$ 337.70 1 $ 678.24 1 $ 137.26 1 per 1,000 square feet ' ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 12th Edition: Daily Weekday Vehicle Trip Generation Rates 134 ratio of vehicle trips to person trips as extracted from the PSRC Household Travel Survey I Excludes pass -by trips: see "Trip Generation Handbook: An ITE Proposed Recommended Practice" (2014). For Restaurant: sit-down uses, higher percentage of new trips based on peer studies to be more consistent with expected trends 4 PM Peak Person Trip Rate multiplied by the Passby, Diverted Link percentage s dwelling = dwelling unit, sq ft = square feet, pump = vehicle servicing position/gas pump, room = available hotel/motel room, window = number of drive through teller windows/ATM drive through positions Fehr & Peers Tukwila TIF Rate Study 12 135 Appendix A. Growth Estimations in Dwelling Units (DU) and Square Footage (1000 sq ft) by Zone Calculations Table 13. Zone 1 Growth Estimations in Dwelling Units (DU) and Square Footage (sq ft) Households 65 Office 8,700 300 Education 177 -- Industrial 9,296 500 Retail 5,358 400 DU = dwelling unit; sq ft = square feet Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 65 Households 3,581 -- 3,581 2044 3,516 2,610 Office 17,768 300 5,330 Total minus 2,720 177 Education 1,514 -- 1514 2018 1337 4,648 Industrial 7,187 500 3,594 Total -1,054 2,143 Retail 9,499 400 3,799 1,656 Table 14. Zone 2 Growth Estimations in Dwelling Units (DU) and Square Footage (sq ft) Households 2,224 Office 3,796 300 Education 130 -- Industrial 2,413 500 Retail 2,257 400 DU = dwelling unit; sq ft = square feet Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 2,224 Households 2,489 -- 2,489 265 2044 1,139 Office 5,773 300 1,732 Total 593 130 Education 138 -- 138 minus8 2018 1,207 Industrial 1,078 500 539 Total -668 903 Retail 2,427 400 971 68 136 Table 15. Zone 3 Growth Estimations in Dwelling Units (DU) and Square Footage (sq ft) Households 4,866 -- 4,866 Households 7,544 -- 7,544 2044 2,678 Office 5,303 300 1,591 Office 7,180 300 2,154 Tot' minus 563 Education 342 -- 342 Education 289 -- 289 2018 -53 Industrial 3,010 500 1,505 Industrial 2,044 500 1,022 Tot' -483 Retail 1,315 400 526 Retail 1,399 400 560 34 DU = dwelling unit; sq ft = square feet Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 Table 16. Zone 4 Growth Estimations in Dwelling Units (DU) and Square Footage (sq ft) Households 171 -- Office 460 300 Education 100 -- Industrial 5,631 500 Retail 702 400 DU = dwelling unit; sq ft = square feet Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 171 Households 441 -- 441 04 270 138 Office 1,701 300 510 Total 372 100 Education 500 -- minus 500 1 2018 400 2,816 Industrial 4,042 500 2,021 Tot' -795 281 Retail 2,450 400 980 699 Fehr&Peers Tukwila TIF Rate Study 12 137 Appendix B. Existing Person Trips by Zone Calculations Table 17. Zone 1 Existing Person Trips Single Family 13.18 27 359 Multi -Family R 6.47 X 38 = 244 Office/Government 0.9 9.55 2,610 22,439 Education 0.9 28.35 177 4,516 Industrial 3.89 4,648 18,071 Retail 0.6 45.49 2,143 58,493 Total Existing Person Trips 104,123 Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 Table 18. Zone 2 Existing Person Trips Generalized Land Use Pass -by Person 2018 Land Use in Existin2� Category Adjustment Trip Rate DU, Employees, 1,000 sq It Trips Single Family 13.18 931 12,266 Multi -Family % 6.47 % 1,293 = 8,364 Office/Government 0.9 9.55 1,139 9,791 Education 0.9 28.35 130 3,317 Industrial 3.89 1,207 4,691 Retail 0.6 45.49 903 24,640 Total Existing Person Trips 63,069 Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 Fehr&Peers 138 Tukwila TIF Rate Study 13 Table 19. Zone 3 Existing Person Trips Single Family 13.18 2,036 26,838 Multi -Family X 6.47 X 2,830 = 18,300 Office/Government 0.9 9.55 1,591 13,678 Education 0.9 28.35 342 8,726 Industrial 3.89 1,505 5,851 Retail 0.6 45.49 526 14,356 Total Existing Person Trips 87,749 Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 Table 20. Zone 4 Existing Person Trips Existin,- Category Adjustment Trip Rate DU, Employees, and Person 1,000 sq It Trips Single Family 13.18 72 943 Multi -Family x 6.47 x 99 = 643 Office/Government 0.9 9.55 138 1,186 Education 0.9 28.35 100 2,552 Industrial 3.89 2,816 10,947 Retail 0.6 45.49 281 7,664 Total Existing Person Trips 23,935 Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 Fehr&Peers Tukwila TIF Rate Study 14 139 Appendix C. Growth in Person Trips by Zone Calculations Table 21. Zone 1 Growth in Person Trips Single Family 13.18 176 2,317 Multi -Family X 6.47 X 3,340 = 21,601 Office/Government 0.9 9.55 2,720 23,388 Education 0.9 28.35 1,337 34,121 Industrial 3.89 -1,054 -4,099 Retail 0.6 45.49 1,656 45,204 Total Growth in Person Trips 122,532 Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 Table 22. Zone 2 Growth in Person Trips Generalized Land Use Pass -by Person Total Growth in DU, Growth L Category Adjustment Trip Employees, and iii Person Rate sq It Trips Single Family 13.18 13 175 Multi -Family X 6.47 X 252 = 1,628 Office/Government 0.9 9.55 593 5,099 Education 0.9 28.35 8 196 Industrial 3.89 -668 -2,596 Retail 0.6 45.49 68 1,860 Total Growth in Person Trips 6,362 Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 Fehr&Peers 140 Tukwila TIF Rate Study 15 Table 23. Zone 3 Growth in Person Trips Single Family 13.18 134 1,765 Multi -Family X 6.47 R 2,544 = 16,453 Office/Government 0.9 9.55 563 4,840 Education 0.9 28.35 -53 -1,363 Industrial 3.89 -483 -1,879 Retail 0.6 45.49 34 920 Total Growth in Person Trips 20,737 Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 Table 24. Zone 4 Growth in Person Trips Generalized Land Use Pass -by Person Total Growth in DU, Growth' Category Adjustment Trip Employees, and iii Persor Rate sqft Trips Single Family 13.18 14 178 Multi -Family % 6.47 % 257 = 1,659 Office/Government 0.9 9.55 372 3,202 Education 0.9 28.35 400 10,206 Industrial 3.89 -795 -3,090 Retail 0.6 45.49 699 19,077 Total Growth in Person Trips 31,232 Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 Fehr&Peers Tukwila TIF Rate Study 16 141 DRAFT 2027 - 2032 TIP SUMMARY Attachment E Source' or 2025-2030 CIP Project Costs in Thousands of Dollars Funding Sources Unsecured Sheet PROJECT TITLE 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 TOTAL Federal State IB City/Local Grant City* 39 42nd Avenue S Bridge Replacement 600 17,500 17,500 35,600 23,600 17,000 4,5R 47 42nd Avenue S Bikeway 295 295 295 30 46th Avenue Safe Routes to School 325 2,070 2,395 1,895 500 1,725 420 New Airport Way Overlay 574 3,424 3,998 3,988 10 49 ADA Improvements 61 61 61 61 61 61 366 54 APE/Minkler Blvd Intersection 375 2,400 2,775 1,900 875 1,900 500 58 APE/Industry Drive Intersection 265 2,400 2,665 2,665 2,400 LRSP Andover Park W (Strander to Tukwila Pkwy) 923 923 923 923 45 Annual Bridge Inspections and Repairs 232 237 242 242 247 247 1,447 1,447 35 Annual Overlay and Repair Program 2,520 2,520 2,720 2,720 3,155 3,155 16,790 16,720 43 Annual Traffic Signal Program 160 160 170 190 190 190 1,060 1,060 38 Boeing Access Road Overlay 3,526 3,526 3,990 TE, TIF Buffered Shared Path on 42nd Ave S Sect. 3 550 550 550 550 57 E Marginal Way S (BAR - S 112th St) 75 75 75 75 TE, LRSP E Marginal Way S (N City Limit to BAR) 6,917 6,917 6,917 6,917 New E Marginal Way S Overlay 685 5,058 5,743 5,743 TE, TIF E Marginal Way S Section 2 Sidewalks 803 803 803 803 LRSP Interurban Avenue S (140th St to S 144th St) 1,484 1,484 1,484 1,484 52 Interurban Avenue S Overlay 356 356 356 TE, LRSP Klickitat Dr (53rd Ave S to Southcenter Pkwy) 582 582 582 582 31 Macadam Road S Complete Streets 300 200 3,100 3,600 3,160 350 3,160 350 TE, TIF Macadam Road S Sect. 1 Sidewalk 992 992 992 992 TE, TIF Minkler Blvd Sect. 2 Sidewalk 1,430 1,430 1,430 1,430 44 Orillia Road S Overlay 1,204 1,204 1,204 TE, TIF S 115th SUE Marginal Way Intersection Impr 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 41 S 119th St Pedestrian Bridge Painting 200 200 200 55 S 124th St/50th PI S Reconfiguration 50 1,022 1,072 898 254 59 S 133rd SUSR 599 SB Intersection 550 2,700 3,250 1,620 1,630 1,620 1,630 TE, TIF S 141st St Sect. 1 Sidewalk 510 510 510 510 TE, TIF S 142nd St Sidewalk 541 541 541 541 TE, TIF S 144th St Complete Streets 869 869 869 869 LRSP S 144th St Improvements (Military Rd to TIB) 580 580 580 580 28 S 152nd Street Ped & Bike Improvements 530 4,950 5,480 3,960 1,520 3,960 990 LRSP S 180th St (Sperry Dr to IU Trail) 806 806 806 806 TE, TIF S Norfolk St Bike Facilities 497 497 497 497 37 S Ryan Way 1,275 13,060 14,335 8,850 55,606 8,850 4,231 48 Southcenter Blvd Bike and Ped Xing Upgrades 352 352 352 352 46 Southcenter Blvd Road Diet (with L2S Trail) 135 3,000 3,135 2,400 735 2,400 600 TE, TIF SR 518 EB Off Ramp/Klickitat Drive Improvements 850 850 850 850 TE, TIF Strander Boulevard Sidewalk 467 467 467 467 TE, TIF TIB Sect. 2 Sidewalk (north) 377 377 377 377 TE, TIF TIB Sect. 2 Sidewalk (south) 1,673 1,673 1,673 1,673 TDM Implementation 52 52 52 52 52 52 312 312 Tukwila and South King County TDM 260 260 130 650 832 208 South King County Regional TDM 159 159 159 159 636 550 56 LRSP Tukwila Int'I Blvd (S 152nd St to S 144th St) 4,347 4,347 TOTAL 14,491 56,738 37,911 11,769 6,984 10,622 138,515 39,431 42,883 111,853 23,615 34,399 PROJECTS REVISED FROM 2025-2030 TIP New Deleted/Completed: Airport Way Overlay - fully grant funded S 144th Bridge Sidewalks E Marginal Way S Overlay - fully grant funded ' TE: Transportation Element, TIF: Transportation Impact Fee Schedule, LRSP: Local Road Safety Plan " Unsecured City funding includes all funds necessary outside of the current biennial budget cycle 142 June 2, 2026 Attachment F 0 4A Cl 1�J City Boundary Parks b , \ ,\ 1 \ I \ ds� \\ 2i \ d I \ 9 I \ !Z I \ wl sL \14aY - - --- �� S Boeing AcRd ,r�x fir_; 509 m 4 Ryan Hill gg m S 1751h St 900 \ 3 \y ~' Duwamish Allentown S 124th St 0 IL S115ra" \F Cascade View Segttle-Tacoma International Airport 509 Tukwila�South St s 167 0 0.5 1 N � Miles N Impact Fee Zones 1 2 3 4 O Tukwila Neighborhoods Impact Fee Zones and Neighborhoods - May 2025 Update Attachment G Comparison of Single Family Home (Detached) per dwelling unit Transportation Impact Multi -Family (1- bedroom unit) Fees: Proposed Tukwila and Surrounding Restaurant (High- Office Space Turnover, Sit -Down) 15,000sf 10,000sf Jurisdictions Retail (Small Grocery) 10,000sf Zone 1 $963.99 $472.98 $10,479.86 $94,850.78 $84,373.77 Zone 2 $3,191.52 $1,565.92 $34,695.94 $314,024.80 $279,338.30 Zone 3 $6,414.98 $3,147.50 $69,739.09 $631,192.04 $561,471.94 Zone 4 $1,302.46 $638.89 $14,155.83 $128,121.09 $113,969.11 Burien* $16,357.52 $6,278.65 $246,063.63 $1,307,576.25 $1,246,328.13 Renton $11,370.15 $4,364.30 $203,284.50 $1,054,323.00 $1,004,937.50 Auburn $9,900.00 $3,800.00 $177,000.00 $918,000.00 $875,000.00 Federal Way $7,425.00 $2,850.00 $132,750.00 $688,500.00 $656,250.00 Kent $6,930.00 $2,660.00 $123,900.00 $642,600.00 $612,500.00 * Burien staff is currently proposing a phased in approach over 6 years to charging up to 80% of the maximum allowable fee ($14,244 per PM Peak Person Trip). If passed by Burien Council, this fee would be 50% of the maximum allowable for the first 3 years, then 65% of the maximum allowable for the next 3 years, and then at the cap of 80% of the maximum allowable fee. Tukwila's maximum allowable cost per daily person trip is $1,701, which roughly translates to $17,000 per pm peak hour trip. Tukwila's Zone 3 is proposed to charge the highest fee per daily person trip, which is -29% of the maximum allowable fee per state law. 144