Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReg 2026-06-15 Item 7B - Ordinance / Resolution - Concurrency Standards & Management / 2025-2026 Transportation Impact FeesCity of Tukwila Thomas McLeod, Mayor Marty Wine, City Administrator AGENDA BILL ITEM NO. 7.B. Agenda Item Sponsor Legislative History May 28, 2026 Transportation & Infrastructure Services Committee June 8, 2026 Committee of the Whole June 15, 2026 Regular Meeting Recommended Motion ❑ Discussion Only ❑x Action Requested MOVE TO adopt an ordinance repealing and replacing Chapters 9.48 and 9.50 of the Tukwila Municipal Code. Adopt a resolution updating the Citywide Consolidated Permit Fee Schedule for 2025 and 2026. Transportation Impact Fees & Concurrency Updates Cyndy Knighton, Senior Program Manager - Transportation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY New growth projections and transportation level of service standards, adopted in December 2024 as part of the Comprehensive Plan update, introduced a new multi -modal element required by changes in state law as well as Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC). These changes require both updates to the Tukwila Municipal Code, chapters 9.48 and 9.50, and updates to the Transportation Impact Fee and Concurrency Review Fee. Upon reviewing the code section, additional changes are proposed to address inconsistencies between code language and actual practice, clarification of some sections, and general housekeeping. DISCUSSION As part of the most recent update to the City's Comprehensive Plan, and specifically the Transportation Element (TE), growth models predicting changes in population and employment were updated to the 2044 horizon year. The TE modeled the impacts to the City's current transportation network as well as introduced a new requirement to measure multi -modal level of service (MMLOS) — a way to determine existing and future congestion/available capacity for more growth in trips. Adopting this new MMLOS has expanded Tukwila's transportation network to include pedestrian and bicycle capacity as stand- alone needs instead of focusing solely on vehicular transportation. This significant change in approach along with accommodating future growth in the transportation network created a new list of needed capital improvement projects. A new Transportation Impact Fee schedule (TIF) has been developed to include the new capital project needs and updated project cost estimates. Needed projects on the TIF project list include streets, sidewalks, and bicycle facilities. The TE update established some boundary changes to the TIF zones. When Tukwila first established impact fees in 2005, a zone map was created dividing the City into four zones with a fifth zone overlaying the entire City providing for signal interconnectivity. The zones ensure that the TIF is funding projects that are reasonably related to new development, a key requirement in the 1990 Growth Management Act and subsequent legal challenges to the definition of what is a reasonable nexus. Over time, the first zone map has worked well, but changes in some boundaries between the zones for clarity and to better reflect travel within and between zones warranted some boundary changes. The new TIF zones were established in the TE updated and the TIF project list has been revised to reflect the new boundaries. 89 In the past, the TIF schedule has been adopted via ordinance modifying Table 9-1 in TMC 9.48. The attached proposed ordinance removes the 9-1 Table and delegates authority to the Public Works Director to establish administrative rules and procedures to implement TIFs, including routine updates. The attached proposed resolution incorporates the updated TIF schedule into the Citywide Consolidated Permit Fee Schedule and updates the Concurrency Review Fee table. Additional changes to TMC 9.48 and 9.50 have also been incorporated such as updating language to reflect current state law and actual City practice, remove unnecessary language, and clarify unclear language. Because the changes to the two chapters became significant, a "repeal and replace" approach is recommended. The attached redline version shows the changes between the existing code and the proposed code. Routine monitoring of the City's transportation network has been done in the past, but will be required to be done more frequently with the advent of the MMLOS standard. The first Concurrency Report, covering 2025 through 2031 is attached. The report is an important tool for Tukwila to ensure the City is maintaining the transportation network at an acceptable level of service as well as to aid in planning and funding necessary capital projects to accommodate new growth. With the exception of the Southcenter Boulevard/I-405 SB Off Ramp intersection, the vehicle level of service standard is being met. By 2031, two more intersections are projected to fail: Klickitat Drive/SR 518 EB Ramps and S 133rd Street/SR 599 SB Ramps. All three intersections are within WSDOT limited access and are technically not subject to the City's MMLOS standard, but all three have already been identified as needs for Tukwila. The future Lake to Sound trail under design by King County Parks may address the Southcenter Boulevard intersection within the next few years but the other two will require coordination with WSDOT. Non -motorized level of service standards are also currently being met and will continue to do so by 2031 with construction of some high -priority projects included on the new TIF project list. FINANCIAL IMPACT Revenue associated with collection of Transportation Impact Fees charged to new development is restricted funding only projects on the TIF list. Revenue associated with the Concurrency Review Fee is intended to be used only for future Transportation Element updates and routine Concurrency Reports. ATTACHMENTS (05/28 TIS Committee & 06/08 COW) A. PowerPoint Slides B. Draft Ordinance C. Draft Resolution D. Rate Study ATTACHMENTS (06/15 Regular Council Meeting) A. Final Ordinance B. Final Resolution 90 tlj tot. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO CONCURRENCY; REPEALING ORDINANCE NUMBERS 2111 AND 2635; REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTERS 9.48, "CONCURRENCY STANDARDS AND TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES", AND 9.50, "CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT", OF THE TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE; UPDATING AND REVISING LANGUAGE TO REFLECT CHANGES IN STATE LAW AND THE CITY'S 2024 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Washington State updated the 1990 Growth Management Act (GMA) with new requirements for cities and counties required to plan under the GMA; and WHEREAS, via Ordinance No. 2753, approved by the City Council on December 16, 2024, the City of Tukwila ("City") adopted a significant update to the City's Comprehensive Plan, including an updated Transportation Element; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a new multimodal level of service standard as part of the Transportation Element; and WHEREAS, a new transportation impact fee and transportation concurrency standard is required to be codified in the Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC); and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to repeal and replace chapters 9.48 and 9.50 of the Tukwila Municipal Code as set forth in this Ordinance and Exhibits A and B attached hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Repealer. Ordinance 2111 as codified in TMC Chapter 9.48 "Concurrency Standards and Transportation Impact Fees", is hereby repealed, thereby eliminating this chapter in its entirety. 2026 Legislation: Replace TMC 9.48 & 9.50 TMC Version: 05/18/26 Staff: C. Knighton, H. Greenwood Page 1 of 4 91 CHAPTER 9.48 CONCURRENCY STANDARDS AND TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES Sections: 9.48.010 Authority and Purpose. 9.48.020 Definitions. 9.48.030 Imposition of Transportation Impact Fees. 9.48.040 Calculation of Impact Fees. 9.48.050 Credit. 9.48.060 Time of Payment of Impact Fees. 9.48.070 Adjustments. 9.48.080 Establishment of Impact Fee Amount. 9.48.090 Use of Impact Fees. 9.48.095 Transportation Impact Fee Deferral. 9.48.100 Plan and Fee Update. 9.48.110 Refunds. 9.48.120 Appeals. 9.48.125 Exemptions. 9.48.130 Residential Impact Fee Deferral. 9.48.150 Authority Unimpaired. 9.48.160 Relationship to SEPA. Section 2. Replaced. TMC Chapter 9.48, "Transportation Impact Fees" of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby reenacted to read as follows: CHAPTER 9.48 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES Sections: 9.48.010 Authority and Purpose. 9.48.020 Purpose. 9.48.030 Imposition of Transportation Impact Fees. 9.48.040 Calculation of Impact Fees. 9.48.050 Credit. 9.48.060 Adjustments. 9.48.070 Time of Payment of Transportation Impact Fees. 9.48.080 Establishment of Transportation Impact Fee Amount. 9.48.090 Use of Transportation Impact Fees. 9.48.100 Plan and Fee Update. 9.48.110 Refunds. 9.48.120 Appeals. 9.48.130 Applicability. 9.48.140 Residential Transportation Impact Fee Deferral. 9.48.150 Authority Unimpaired. 9.48.160 Relationship to SEPA. 9.48.170 Delegation. 92 2026 Legislation: Replace TMC 9.48 & 9.50 TMC Version: 05/18/26 Staff: C. Knighton, H. Greenwood Page 2 of 4 Section 3. Chapter Established. All chapters of TMC Chapter 9.48 are hereby established to read as referenced in Exhibit A. Section 4. Repealer. Ordinance 2635 as codified in TMC Chapter 9.50 "Concurrency Standards and Transportation Impact Fees", is hereby repealed, thereby eliminating this chapter in its entirety. CHAPTER 9.50 CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT Sections: 9.50.010 Purpose. 9.50.020 Definitions. 9.50.030 Concurrency Test. 9.50.040 Test Criteria. 9.50.050 Concurrency for Phased Development. 9.50.060 Exemptions. 9.50.070 Vesting. 9.50.080 Improvements to Concurrency Facilities. 9.50.090 Capital Facilities Plan and Capital Improvement Program. 9.50.100 Intergovernmental Coordination. 9.50.110 Administrative Rules and Procedures. 9.50.120 Appeals. 9.50.130 SEPA Exemption. Section 5. Replaced. TMC Chapter 9.50, "Concurrency Management", of the Tukwila Municipal Code hereby reenacted to read as follows: CHAPTER 9.50 CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT Sections: 9.50.010 Purpose. 9.50.020 Definitions. 9.50.030 Transportation Concurrency Review. 9.50.040 Review Criteria. 9.50.050 Transportation Concurrency for Phased Development and Rezones. 9.50.060 Development Accounted for in the Model. 9.50.080 Improvements to Transportation Facilities. 9.50.090 Capital Facilities Plan and Capital Improvement Program. 9.50.110 Administrative Rules and Procedures. 9.50.120 Appeals. 9.50.130 SEPA Exemption. 2026 Legislation: Replace TMC 9.48 & 9.50 TMC Version: 05/18/26 Staff: C. Knighton, H. Greenwood Page 3 of 4 93 Section 6. Chapter Established. All chapters of TMC Chapter 9.50 are hereby established to read as referenced in Exhibit B. Section 7. Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser Authorized. Upon approval of the City Attorney, the City Clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this Ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; references to other local, state or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations; or ordinance numbering and section/subsection numbering. Section 8. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. Section 9. Effective Date. This Ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City and shall take effect and be in full force effective October 14, 2026, after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of , 2026. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Andy Youn-Barnett, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Office of the City Attorney Thomas McLeod, Mayor Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council: Published: Effective Date: Ordinance Number: Exhibit A — TMC Chapter 9.48, Transportation Impact Fees Exhibit B — TMC Chapter 9.50, Concurrency Management 94 2026 Legislation: Replace TMC 9.48 & 9.50 TMC Version: 05/18/26 Staff: C. Knighton, H. Greenwood Page 4 of 4 Exhibit A CHAPTER 9.48 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES § 9.48.010. Authority and Purpose. A. Authority. The City of Tukwila's transportation impact fee financing program has been developed pursuant to the City of Tukwila's police powers, the Growth Management Act as codified in Chapter 36.70A of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW), the enabling authority in Chapter 82.02 RCW, Chapter 58.17 RCW relating to platting and subdivisions and the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), and Chapter 43.12C RCW. B. Purpose. The purpose of the financing plan is to: 1. Develop a program consistent with Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan, the Six -Year Transportation Program and the Capital Improvement Program, for joint public and private financing of transportation improvements necessitated in whole or in part by development within the City of Tukwila; 2. Ensure adequate levels of transportation service consistent with the level of service identified in the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan; 3. Create a mechanism to charge and collect fees to ensure that new development bears its proportionate share of the capital costs of transportation facilities necessitated by new development; and 4. Ensure fair collection and administration of such transportation impact fees. C. The provisions of the City of Tukwila's transportation impact fee ordinance shall be liberally construed to effectively carry out its purpose in the interests of the public health, safety and welfare. § 9.48.020. Definitions. The words and terms contained in this chapter shall have the following meanings for the purposes of this chapter, unless the context clearly requires otherwise. Terms or words not defined herein shall be defined pursuant to RCW 82.02.090. Terms not defined herein and RCW 82.02.090 shall be given their usual and customary meaning. A. "Building permit" means an official document or certification of the City of Tukwila issued by the City's building official which authorizes the construction, alteration, enlargement, conversion, reconstruction, remodeling, rehabilitation, erection, placement, demolition, moving, or repair of a building or structure. B. "City" means the City of Tukwila, Washington. C. "Development" means any construction or expansion of a building, structure, or any changes in the use of the land that requires a building permit and creates additional demand and need for transportation facilities. "Development" does not include: (a) buildings or structures constructed by a regional transit authority or (b) buildings or 95 structures constructed as shelters that provide emergency housing for people experiencing homelessness or emergency shelters for victims of domestic violence as defined in RCW 70.123.020. D. "Early learning facility" is defined consistent with RCW 43.31.565(3) as now enacted or hereafter amended. E. "Fee payer" is a person, corporation, partnership, an incorporated association or governmental agency, municipality, or similar entity commencing a land development activity, which requires a building permit and creates a demand for additional facilities. F. "Letter encumbered" means to reserve, set aside, or earmark the transportation impact fees in order to pay for commitments, contractual obligations, or other liabilities incurred for the provision of transportation facilities. G. "Low-income housing" means housing where monthly costs, including utilities other than telephone, do not exceed 30 percent of the resident's household monthly income and where household monthly income must be 80 percent or less of the King County Median family income adjusted for family size as reported by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. H. "Owner" means the owner of record of real property, as found in the records of King County, Washington, or a person with an unrestricted written option to purchase property; provided, that if the real property is being purchased under a recorded real estate contract, the purchaser shall be considered the owner of the property. I. "Proportionate fair share" means that portion of the cost for transportation facility improvements that are reasonably related to the service demands and needs of new development. §9.48.030. Imposition of Transportation Impact Fees. The City hereby authorizes the assessment and collection of transportation impact fees on development activity. § 9.48.040. Calculation of Transportation Impact Fees. A. The method of calculating the transportation impact fees in this chapter incorporate, among other things, the following: 1. The cost of public streets, roads, and pedestrian and bicycle facilities necessitated by the development; 2. An adjustment to the costs of the public streets, roads, and pedestrian and bicycle facilities for past mitigation payments made by previous development on the property to pay for the same required transportation system improvements that would be covered by the transportation impact fee. 3. The availability of other means of funding public street, road, pedestrian, and bicycle facility improvements; and Exhibit A - TMC Chapter 9.48, Transportation Impact Fees Version: 05/18/26 Staff: C. Knighton, H. Greenwood 96 Page 2 of 8 4. The methods by which public streets, roads, and pedestrian and bicycle improvements are financed. 5. The current edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual and other city information, including, but not limited to, rate studies. 6. Information provided by the applicant and any publicly available information regarding the development. The City may request additional information in order to properly assess the transportation impact fee. B. Fees for development shall be calculated based on their net new "daily person trip" generation rates as determined by the Public Works Director, or designee. If the development concerns an existing use on the same parcel, the fee shall be based on net -new trips generated by the development. C. Impact fees shall be collected only once for each development, unless changes or modifications to the development are proposed which result in greater impacts on transportation facilities than were considered when the development was first approved. § 9.48.050. Credit. A credit, not to exceed the transportation impact fee otherwise payable, shall be provided for the fair market value of any dedication of land for, improvement to, or new construction of any system improvements provided by the developer to facilities that are identified in the Transportation Impact Fee project list and that are required as a condition of approving the development. The determination of "value" shall be consistent with the assumptions and methodology used by the City Engineer in estimating the capital improvement costs. § 9.48.060. Adjustments. For developments with land uses not included in the Transportation Impact Fee Schedule, the amount of fee to be imposed on a particular development may be adjusted by the Public Works Director. The adjustment, if granted, will give consideration to studies and other data submitted by the developer demonstrating by clear and convincing evidence that an adjustment should be made in order to carry out the purposes of this chapter. A. The Public Works Director shall review the study to determine if the adjustment request: 1. Is based on the City's accepted impact fee assessment practices and methodologies; 2. Uses acceptable data sources and if the data used is comparable with the uses and intensities planned for the proposed development activity; 3. Complies with the applicable State laws governing impact fees; 4. Is prepared and documented by professionals who are mutually agreeable to the City and the developer and are qualified in their respective fields; and Exhibit A - TMC Chapter 9.48, Transportation Impact Fees Version: 05/18/26 Staff: C. Knighton, H. Greenwood Page 3 of 8 97 5. Shows the basis upon which the independent fee calculation was made. B. In reviewing the study, the Public Works Director or designee may require the developer to submit additional or different documentation. C. If the developer has not demonstrated through clear and convincing evidence that an adjustment should be made, the developer shall pay the full transportation impact fee amount. § 9.48.070. Time of Payment of Transportation Impact Fees. Transportation impact fees shall be due and payable in full at the time of issuance of a building permit unless deferred pursuant to TMC 9.48.130. The fee paid shall be the amount calculated by the Public Works Director, or designee, including any adjustments made pursuant to TMC 9.48.060, as of the date the permit is issued. § 9.48.080. Establishment of Transportation Impact Fee Account. Transportation impact fees received pursuant to this chapter shall be dedicated revenues and retained in a special interest -bearing account. All interest shall be retained in the account and expended for the purpose or purposes for which the transportation impact fees were collected. § 9.48.090. Use of Transportation Impact Fees. A. Pursuant to this chapter, transportation impact fees shall be used for transportation facilities that will reasonably benefit the development. B. Transportation impact fees shall not be used to make up for existing deficiencies in City facilities. C. Transportation impact fees shall not be used for maintenance and operations, including personnel. D. Transportation impact fees may be used for, but not limited to land acquisition, site improvements, engineering and architectural services, permitting, financing, administrative expenses and applicable mitigation costs, and capital equipment pertaining to transportation systems and facilities. E. Transportation impact fees may also be used to recoup public improvement costs incurred by the City to the extent that new growth and development will be served by the previously constructed improvement. F. In the event bonds or similar debt instruments are or have been issued for transportation system improvements, transportation impact fees may be used to pay the debt service on such bonds. G. Transportation impact fees shall be expended or letter encumbered for a permissible use within ten years of receipt, unless there exists an extraordinary or compelling reason for fees to be held longer than ten years. The Public Works Director may recommend to the Council that the City hold fees beyond ten years in cases when Exhibit A - TMC Chapter 9.48, Transportation Impact Fees Version: 05/18/26 Staff: C. Knighton, H. Greenwood 98 Page 4 of 8 extraordinary or compelling reasons exist. Such reasons shall be identified in written findings by the Council. H. The Finance Director shall prepare an annual report on the transportation impact fee account showing the source and amount of all moneys collected, earned or received and projects that were financed in whole or in part by transportation impact fees. § 9.48.100. Plan and Fee Update. The transportation impact fee schedule may be updated annually by applying the Mortenson Construction Cost Index for Seattle. Once every two years, projects on the Transportation Impact Fee list may be updated to address changed conditions including, but not limited to, growth patterns, project costs, and grant funding, if any. Updates that result in a change in transportation impact fees will be reviewed by the City Council. Impact fee changes will only occur through a resolution requiring Council action. § 9.48.110. Refunds. A. A developer may request and shall receive a refund when the developer does not proceed with the development for which transportation impact fees were paid, and the developer shows that no impact has resulted. The developer must submit a request for a refund to the City in writing within one year of the expiration of the development permit as defined in TMC 9.50.020 or the building permit. B. Any transportation impact fees that are not expended or encumbered within the time limitations established, and for which no application for a refund has been made within a one-year period of the notice required by RCW 28.02.080 as amended, shall be retained and expended on any project identified in the Transportation Impact Fee Project List. C. In the event that transportation impact fees must be refunded for any reason, they shall be refunded with interest earned to the applicant. § 9.48.120. Appeals. A. Any fee payer seeking to appeal a transportation impact fee imposed by the City may file an appeal as provided in Chapters 18.104 and 18.116 TMC for Type 2 decisions. B. Any fee payer may pay the impact fees imposed by this chapter under protest in order to obtain a building permit while an appeal under this section is pending. Should the appeal be successful, the City will refund any overpayment per TMC Section 9.48.110. § 9.48.130. Applicability. A. The transportation impact fees are calculated as set forth in the Citywide Consolidated Permit Fee Schedule. All development located within the City shall be charged a transportation impact fee, consistent with this chapter, provided that the following exemptions shall apply. B. The following shall be exempt from transportation impact fees: Exhibit A - TMC Chapter 9.48, Transportation Impact Fees Version: 05/18/26 Staff: C. Knighton, H. Greenwood Page 5 of 8 99 1. Replacement of a structure with a new structure having the same use, at the same site, and with the same gross floor area, when such replacement is within 24 months of demolition or destruction of the previous structure. 2. Alteration, expansion, or remodeling of an existing dwelling or structure where no new person -trips are generated and the use is not changed. 3. Construction of an accessory residential structure, such as a garage, carport, shed or greenhouse, that does not generate additional person -trips. 4. Miscellaneous improvements including, but not limited to, fences, walls, swimming pools and signs that do not impact the transportation system. 5. Demolition of or moving an existing structure within the same parcel. C. Construction of low-income housing units will reduce the transportation impact fee per the following fee reduction table. Impact fees for mixed -use or combined market rate and low-income development that includes low-income housing will be prorated based on the table below. Fee reduction table. Unit Size Affordability TargetFee Reduction 2 or more bedrooms 2 or more bedrooms Any size 80%2 60%2 50%2 40% 60% 80% The developer must record a covenant per RCW 82.02.060(4) that prohibits using the property or the portion of the property that had reduced fees for any purpose other than for low-income housing at the original income limits on a form approved by the City Attorney. At a minimum, the covenant must address price restrictions and household income limits for the low-income housing, and that if the property is converted to a use other than low-income housing the property owner must pay the City the applicable transportation impact fees in effect at the time of conversion. D. Change of Use or Occupancy. A change of use or occupancy that has Tess impact than the existing use shall not be assessed a transportation impact fee. E. A fee payer required to pay for system improvements pursuant to RCW 43.21C.060 shall not also be required to pay a transportation impact fee for the same improvements. F. An Early Learning Facility is exempt from paying 80 percent of the required Transportation Impact Fee. G. A fee payer is required to pay 50% of the transportation impact fee that is imposed for a single-family residence when constructing an accessory dwelling unit as defined in Exhibit A - TMC Chapter 9.48, Transportation Impact Fees Version: 05/18/26 Staff: C. Knighton, H. Greenwood 100 Page 6 of 8 RCW 36.70A.696 as amended. § 9.48.140. Residential Transportation Impact Fee Deferral. A. Deferral Request Authorized. 1. Applicants for single-family attached or single-family detached residential building permits may request to defer payment of required transportation impact fees until the sooner of: a. Final inspection; or b. The closing of the first sale of the property occurring after the issuance of the applicable building permit; which request shall be granted so long as the requirements of this chapter are satisfied. B. Method of Request. 1. A request for transportation impact fee deferral shall be declared at the time of preliminary plat application (for platted development) or building permit application (for non -platted development) in writing on a form or forms provided by the City, along with applicable application fees. 2. Calculation of Transportation Impact Fees. The amount of transportation impact fees to be deferred under this chapter shall be determined as of the date the request for deferral is submitted. C. Deferral Term. 1. The term of a transportation impact fee deferral granted under this chapter may not exceed 18 months from the date the building permit is issued ("Deferral Term"). If the condition triggering payment of the deferred transportation impact fees does not occur prior to the expiration of the Deferral Term, then full payment of the transportation impact fees shall be due on the last date of the Deferral Term. D. Deferred Transportation Impact Fee Lien. 1. Applicant's Duty to Record Lien. An applicant requesting a deferral under this chapter must grant and record a deferred transportation impact fee lien, in an amount equal to the deferred transportation impact fees, against the property in favor of the City in accordance with the requirements of RCW 82.02.050(3)(c). 2. Satisfaction of Lien. Upon receipt of final payment of all deferred transportation impact fees for the property, the City shall execute a release of deferred transportation impact fee lien for the property. The property owner at the time of the release is responsible, at their own expense, for recording the lien release. E. Limitation on Deferrals. 1. The deferral entitlements allowed under this chapter shall be limited to the first 20 single-family residential construction building permits per applicant, as identified Exhibit A - TMC Chapter 9.48, Transportation Impact Fees Version: 05/18/26 Staff: C. Knighton, H. Greenwood Page 7 of 8 101 by contractor registration number or other unique identification number, per year. § 9.48.150. Authority Unimpaired. Nothing in this chapter shall preclude the City from requiring the fee payer to mitigate adverse and environmental effects of a specific development pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act, Chapters 43.21 C RCW or Chapter 58.17 RCW, governing plats and subdivisions; provided, that the exercise of this authority is consistent with Chapters 43.21 C and 82.02 RCW. § 9.48.160. Relationship to SEPA. A. All development shall be subject to environmental review pursuant to SEPA and other applicable City ordinances and regulations. B. Payment of the transportation impact fee pursuant to this chapter shall constitute satisfactory mitigation of those transportation impacts related to the specific improvements identified on the project list. C. Further mitigation in addition to the transportation impact fee shall be required for identified adverse impacts, appropriate for mitigation pursuant to SEPA, that are not mitigated by an impact fee. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to limit the City's authority to deny development permits when a proposal would result in significant adverse transportation impacts identified in an environmental impact statement and reasonable mitigation measures are insufficient to mitigate the identified impact. § 9.48.170 Delegation. The Public Works Director shall be authorized to establish administrative rules and procedures for administering the transportation impact fee program. The administrative rules and procedures shall include but not be limited to application forms, necessary submittal information, processing times, and calculation of transportation impact fees consistent with this chapter. Exhibit A - TMC Chapter 9.48, Transportation Impact Fees Version: 05/18/26 Staff: C. Knighton, H. Greenwood 102 Page 8 of 8 CHAPTER 9.50 Concurrency Management § 9.50.010. Purpose. Exhibit B A. Pursuant to the State Growth Management Act, Chapter 36.70A RCW, after the adoption of its Comprehensive Plan, the City of Tukwila is required by RCW 36.70A.070(6)(b) to ensure that transportation improvements or strategies to accommodate the impacts of development are provided concurrent with the development. The intent of this chapter is to establish a transportation concurrency management system to ensure that transportation facilities and services needed to maintain minimum level of service standards can be provided concurrent with, or within six years of development. The transportation concurrency management system provides a framework for determining transportation facilities and services needs and provides a basis for meeting those needs through capital facilities planning. B. Developments that would cause the level of service for transportation facilities to decline below City standards may be approved provided they include implementing measures that offset the impacts and maintain the City's standard for transportation level of service. § 9.50.020. Definitions. The definitions contained in TMC Section 9.50.020 apply throughout this chapter unless, from the context, another meaning is clearly intended. A. "Adequate" means equal to or better than the level of service standards specified in the current adopted capital facilities plan. B. "Applicant" means a person who applies for a transportation concurrency certificate under this chapter and who is the owner of the subject property or the authorized agent of the property owner. C. "Building permit" refers to any permit issued under the Washington state adopted building code. D. "Concurrency" means transportation facilities or strategies that achieve the City's level of service standards or that: 1. Are included in the City's Capital Improvement Plan and on the Transportation Impact Fee project list at the time development is approved by the City; or 2. Will be available and complete no later than six years after completion of the development, and the applicant and/or the City provides a financial commitment at the time the development is approved. E. "Concurrency review" means the comparison of the development's impact on the level of service standards of each effected subareas and the available capacity of the transportation facilities. A transportation concurrency review must be passed, when applicable, and a notice issued with the development permit or building permit as proof 103 of transportation concurrency. F. "Development permit" means a land use permit including short plat, preliminary or final rezone/reclassification, zoning permit, master plan, shoreline substantial development permit/conditional use permit, planned unit development, subdivision, or any other permit or approval under the Zoning Code or Subdivision Code or Shoreline Master Program. G. "Financial commitment" means: 1. Revenue sources are budgeted or anticipated to be available and designated for facilities in the current Capital Improvement Plan; 2. Funding that is assured by the applicant in a form approved by the Public Works Department. H. "Level of service standard" means those standards specified in the adopted transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan. "Planned capacity" means transportation facilities that do not currently exist but for which the necessary facility construction, expansion, or modification is contained in the current capital facilities element of the Comprehensive Plan and is necessary for meeting the level of service standard. The improvements must be scheduled to be completed within six years and the financial commitment must be in place at the time of approval of the transportation concurrency certificate to complete the improvements within six years. "Public works department" means the Public Works Director or designee. K. "Transportation concurrency certificate" means the statement accompanying the Public Works Department's development standards that are issued with an approved development permit or the Public Works Department's conditions of approval that are issued with an approved building permit. The statement shall state that a transportation concurrency certificate is issued and indicate: 1. The specific use(s), densities and intensities as described in the development permit or building permit are adequate; and 2. Conditions of approval, if applicable; and 3. An effective date; and 4. An expiration date. "Transportation concurrency facilities" means facilities for which concurrency is required in accordance with the provision of this chapter and includes roads, streets, sidewalks, and other transportation facilities. M. "Vested" means the right to develop or continue development in accordance with the laws, rules, and other regulations in effect at the time the building permit application is deemed complete. Ord: Exhibit B - TMC Chapter 9.50, Concurrency Management Version: 05/18/26 Staff: C. Knighton, H. Greenwood 104 Page 2 of 6 § 9.50.030. Transportation Concurrency Review. A. Timing. All applicants must be issued a transportation concurrency certificate before the City will approve an application for any development permit or building permit, if no development permit is required. An application for a transportation concurrency certificate may be submitted with other development submittals. B. Procedures. Applications for a transportation concurrency certificate shall be submitted on forms provided by the Public Works Department. The transportation concurrency certificate review will be completed in order of "first in, first out," once the Public Works Department determines the application is complete. 1. The applicant shall submit a detailed project description of the development, including location, site plan, and gross floor area by use, as part of the transportation concurrency certificate application. 2. A transportation concurrency review shall be performed only for specific property, uses, densities and intensities based on the information provided by the applicant. If the concurrency review is being requested in conjunction with an application for rezone, the applicant shall specify densities and intensities that are consistent with the proposed zoning for the property. Changes to the uses, densities and intensities that create additional impacts on transportation facilities shall be subject to an additional transportation concurrency review. 3. The Public Works Director or designee shall perform the concurrency review. The project must receive a transportation concurrency certificate prior to approval of the development permit or building permit. 4. The Public Works Director or designee shall notify the applicant of the review results in writing. The date of written notification to the applicant shall be the date of issuance of the transportation concurrency certificate. 5. The transportation concurrency certificate, other than a transportation concurrency certificate for a phased development or a rezone, shall expire within one year of its issuance unless the applicant submits a building permit application, a SEPA environmental checklist and all required documentation pursuant to Chapter 21.04 TMC, or an extension is granted within one year from the date of issuance of the transportation concurrency certificate. 6. If the deadline for submittal of a complete building permit application, SEPA environmental checklist and all required documentation, is met the transportation concurrency certificate, other than a certificate for a rezone or phased development, shall be valid for two years from the date of issuance of the building permit, SEPA Determination, or other City -issued approval. If the building permit, SEPA environmental checklist, or other Ord: Exhibit B - TMC Chapter 9.50, Concurrency Management Version: 05/18/26 Staff: C. Knighton, H. Greenwood Page 3 of 6 105 submittal is withdrawn by the applicant prior to approval by the City or expires, the transportation concurrency certificate shall expire one year after the date of issuance. 7. An applicant must apply for a new transportation concurrency certificate if the certificate expires or an extension is not granted. 8. The Public Works Director may approve one extension of up to one year if the applicant submits a letter in writing requesting the extension before the expiration date. The applicant must show that the applicant is not responsible for the delay in obtaining a building permit, SEPA approval, or other City -issued approval, and has acted in good faith to obtain the permit or approval; and 9. The Public Works Department shall be responsible for accumulating the impacts created by each application and removing any impacts from the City's concurrency model for an expired transportation concurrency certificate, an expired development permit or building permit, or other action resulting in an applicant no longer causing impacts that have been accounted for in the City records. 10. A transportation concurrency certificate shall apply only to the approved specific land use, density and intensity described in the application. No development shall be required to obtain more than one transportation concurrency certificate for each building, unless the applicant or subsequent owner proposes changes or modifications to the property location, density, intensity, or land use that creates additional impacts on transportation facilities. 11. A transportation concurrency certificate is not transferable to other land but may be transferred to new owners of the original land. § 9.50.040. Review Criteria. Transportation concurrency certificate applications that would result in a transportation level of service reduction below the adopted standard shall not be approved. A. The transportation concurrency review compares level of service as defined in the transportation element, considering the transportation demand generated by the proposed development. If the level of service is equal to or better than the level of service standard, the transportation concurrency review is passed. B. If the City does not issue a transportation concurrency certificate for a proposed development, the applicant may request additional review for transportation concurrency after doing one or both of the following: 1. Modifying the application to reduce the need for the transportation facilities that do not meet the level of service standard. Reduction of need can be through the reduction of the size of the development, reduction of trips generated by original proposed development, or phasing of the development to match future transportation facility construction; or Ord: Exhibit B - TMC Chapter 9.50, Concurrency Management Version: 05/18/26 Staff: C. Knighton, H. Greenwood 106 Page 4 of 6 2. Arranging to fund the improvements for the additional capacity required for the transportation facilities, as approved by the Public Works Director. § 9.50.050. Transportation Concurrency for Phased Development and Rezones. A. An applicant may request transportation concurrency for a phased development if the Public Works Director or designee determines that the two criteria described in TMC Section 9.50.050.B are met. An applicant may request transportation concurrency for rezoning if the Public Works Director or designee determines that the criteria described in TMC Section 9.50.050.0 are met. The application for transportation concurrency must be accompanied by a schedule for construction of the buildings, parking and other improvements and by a written request for the development to be considered in phases. The Public Works Director or designee may approve transportation concurrency for phased development if both of the following criteria are met: 1. No associated development permit is required before building permit applications can be submitted; and 2. The application is for an integrated development site plan with multiple buildings that are interdependent for vehicular and pedestrian access and parking. C. The Public Works Director or designee may approve transportation concurrency for rezoning a parcel or parcels if all the criteria are met: 1. All the parcels are contiguous and have common ownership. 2. The rezone will not require a comprehensive plan amendment or, if a comprehensive plan amendment is needed, the comprehensive plan amendment is completed. 3. The rezone is part of a larger project that is sufficiently defined so that the City may reasonably determine the project's transportation impacts. D. A transportation concurrency application for phased development or rezone shall follow the same timing and procedure as set forth in this chapter, except that: 1. Only one transportation concurrency certificate shall be issued for all buildings proposed for phased development or rezone; 2. The transportation concurrency certificate for an approved phased development or rezone shall be valid for five years from the date of its issuance; provided that a building permit is issued for a building within one year of the date of issuance of the transportation concurrency certificate or within two years if an extension is timely requested and the request is granted. E. The Public Works Director or designee may approve one extension of up to one year of the transportation concurrency certificate for the phased development or rezone, consistent with the terms of this chapter. F. In no case shall the transportation concurrency certificate be valid for more than six Ord: Exhibit B - TMC Chapter 9.50, Concurrency Management Version: 05/18/26 Staff: C. Knighton, H. Greenwood Page 5 of 6 107 years from the date of issuance of the certificate. The applicant must apply for a new transportation concurrency review for any building approved for phased development that has not been issued a building permit within six years from the date of issuance of the concurrency certificate. § 9.50.060. Development Accounted for in the Model. Applications for single-family dwelling unit building permits, multi -family building permits for projects containing four or fewer units, short plats, any non-residential project that is categorically exempt from SEPA pursuant to TMC Section 21.04.080, .100, or .110, or any other project that will generate less than 30 net new daily person trips a shall be granted a transportation concurrency certificate upon application because such developments are accounted for in the City's system -wide transportation concurrency modeling. § 9.50.080. Improvements to Transportation Facilities. The City shall provide, or arrange for others to provide, adequate transportation facilities through construction of needed transportation improvements in implementing strategies which achieve level of service standards for anticipated future development and redevelopment caused by previously issued and new development and building permits, and improvements to the facilities shall be consistent with the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan. § 9.50.090. Capital Facilities Plan and Capital Improvement Program. The City shall include in the capital appropriations of its budget for expenditure during the appropriate fiscal year financial commitments for all capital improvement projects required for adopted level of service standards, except the City may omit from its budget any capital improvements for which a binding agreement has been executed with another party to provide the same project in the same fiscal biennium. § 9.50.110. Administrative Rules and Procedures. The Public Works Department shall be authorized to establish administrative rules and procedures for administering the transportation concurrency certificate system. The administrative rules and procedures shall include but not be limited to application forms, necessary submittal information, processing times, and issuance of the transportation concurrency certificates. § 9.50.120. Appeals. Any party seeking to appeal a transportation concurrency decision may file an appeal of a Type 2 decision as provided in Chapters 18.104 and 18.116 TMC. § 9.50.130. SEPA Exemption. A determination of transportation concurrency shall be an administrative action of the City of Tukwila that is categorically exempt from the State Environmental Policy Act. Ord: Exhibit B - TMC Chapter 9.50, Concurrency Management Version: 05/18/26 Staff: C. Knighton, H. Greenwood 108 Page 6 of 6 Washingt on esolution No. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 2105; TO UPDATE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES IN ALIGNMENT WITH RECENT CHANGES TO THE TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE. WHEREAS, Washington state updated the 1990 Growth Management Act (GMA) with new requirements for cities and counties required to plan under the GMA; and WHEREAS, via Ordinance No. 2753 approved by the City Council on December 16, 2024, the City of Tukwila ("City") adopted a significant update to the City's Comprehensive Plan, including an updated Transportation Element; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a new multimodal level of service standard as part of the Transportation Element; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2105 in 2024, establishing the City' s current consolidated permit fee schedule; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2124 in 2025, updating certain sections under the Land Use Fee Schedule; and WHEREAS, a new Transportation Impact Fee Schedule has been established to implement the Transportation Element and in accordance with Ordinance ; and WHEREAS, Ordinance requires adoption of the Transportation Impact Fee Schedule to be set via a City Council approved resolution; and WHEREAS, the consolidated permit fee schedule is the logical vehicle for including the Transportation Impact Fee Schedule; and WHEREAS, the City's consolidated permit fee schedule needs to be updated to reflect these changes. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: 2026 Legislation: Update TIF Schedule Version: 05/20/2026 Staff: C. Knighton Page 1 of 2 109 Section 1. Resolution No. 2105 is hereby amended to revise Section 4, " Public Works Fee Schedule," of the Consolidated Permit Fee Schedule deleting the "Transportation Concurrency Test Fee Schedule" table in its entirety. Section 2. The Transportation Impact Fee Schedule (Exhibit A) is added to the Public Works Fees section and will be charged according to the schedule and take effect on October 14, 2026. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of , 2026. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Andy Youn-Barnett, CMC, City Clerk Armen Papyan, Council President APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Office of the City Attorney Exhibit A: Transportation Impact Fee Schedule 2026 Legislation: Update TIF Schedule Version: 05/20/2026 Staff: C. Knighton Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council: Resolution Number: Page 2 of 2 110 Exhibit A Transportation Impact Fee Schedule Residential 2 0 215 220 221 240 251 Single Family Detached Housing Single Family Attached Housing Accessory Dwelling Unit (50%SF Detached) Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise) Mobile Horne Park Senior Adult Housing (Single Family) 252 Senior Adult Housing (Multifamily) 253 Congregate Care Facility* 254 Assisted Living* Lodging 310 Hotel* 320 Motel Auto Services 944 Gasoline/Service Station 945 Gas Station w/Convenience Market Recreational 411 Public Park* 432 Golf Driving Range* 491 Racquet/Tennis Club* 495 Recreational Community Center* dwelling 9.09 1.45 13.18 0% 13.18 $ 963.99 dwelling dwelling dwelling 6.21 dwelling 4.46 dwelling 7.87 dwelling 4.16 dwelling 3.25 dwelling 2.43 bed 4.14 room 6.57 1.45 696.75 482.00 1.45 9.00 0% 9.00 $ 658.57 1.45 6.47 0% 6.47 $ 472.98 1.45 11.41 0% 11.41 $ 834.61 1.45 6.03 0% 6.03 $ 441.17 1.45 4.71 0% 4.71 $ 344.66 1.45 3.52 0% 3.52 $ 257.70 1.45 6.00 0% 6.00 $ 439.05 9.53 0% 9.53 91.52 2,306.74 1,595.76 2,180.35 1,565.92 2,763.18 1,460.59 1,141.08 853.18 1,453.56 6,414.98 S 1,302 4,636.57 3,207.49 4,382.51 3,147.50 5,554.00 2,935.79 2,293.58 1,714.90 2,921.67 941.14 651.07 889.57 638.89 1,127.37 595.91 465.56 348.09 593.05 5.84 1.45 8.47 0% 8.47 $ 619.33 $ 2,050.44 $ 4,121.40 $ 836.57 3.35 1.45 4.86 0% 4.86 $ 355.27 $ 1,176.19 $ 2,364.16 $ 479.88 VFP 172.01 1.25 215.01 60% 86.01 $ 6,290.23 $ 20,825.22 $ 41,858.83 $ 8,496.62 VFP 211.05 1.25 263.81 58% 110.80 $ 8,103.78 $ 26,829.37 $ 53,927.22 $ 10,946.30 acre 0.78 1.25 0.98 19% 0.79 $ 57.58 $ 190.64 $ 383.19 $ 77.78 employee 55.57 1.25 69.46 0% 69.46 $ 5,080.34 $ 16,819.62 $ 33,807.56 $ 6,862.35 court 27.71 1.25 34.64 0% 34.64 $ 2,533.32 $ 8,387.11 $ 16,858.15 $ 3,421.91 1,000sf 28.82 1.25 36.03 19% 29.09 $ 2,127.60 $ 7,043.89 $ 14,158.26 $ 2,873.88 nstitutional 520 Elementary School student 2.27 1.26 2.86 0% 2.86 522 Middle/JR High School student 2.09 1.26 2.63 0% 2.63 525 High School student 1.94 1.26 2.44 0% 2.44 540 Junior/Community College student 1.15 1.26 1.45 0% 1.45 560 Church* 1,000sf 6.78 1.26 8.54 0% 8.54 565 Day Care Center 1,000sf 39.3 1.26 49.52 44% 27.73 590 Library 1,000sf 72.05 1.26 90.78 20% 72.63 Medical 610 Hospital 620 Nursing Home* 209.19 192.60 178.78 105.98 624.80 2,028.12 5,311.75 692.57 637.65 591.89 350.86 2,068.55 6,714.55 17,585.73 1,392.07 1,281.68 1,189.70 705.23 4,157.80 13,496.29 35,347.44 282.57 260.16 241.49 143.15 843.96 2,739.51 7,174.92 1,000sf 10.7 1.26 13.48 0% 13.48 $ 986.05 $ 3,264.53 $ 6,561.72 $ 1,331.92 bed 3.06 1.26 3.86 0% 3.86 $ 281.99 $ 933.59 $ 1,876.53 $ 380.90 Restaurant 931 Fine Dining Restaurant* 1,000sf 79.03 1.25 98.79 44% 55.32 $ 4,046.06 $ 13,395.40 932 High Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant 1,000sf 103.75 1.25 129.69 43% 73.92 $ 5,406.49 $ 17,899.41 933 Fast Food w/o Drive-Thru* 1,000sf 413.41 1.25 516.76 53% 242.88 $ 17,763.63 $ 58,810.47 934 Fast Food w/ Drive-Thru 1,000sf 448.12 1.25 560.15 53% 266.07 $ 19,459.91 $ 64,426.39 937 Coffee/Donut Shop w/ Drive-Thru 1,000sf 600.5 1.25 750.63 76% 177.01 $ 12,946.50 $ 42,862.29 938 Coffee/Donut Shop w/ Drive-Thru (no indoor seat .rive-thru Ian: 179 1.25 223.75 91% 20.88 $ 1,527.36 $ 5,056.68 970 Wine Tasting Room 1,000sf 111.85 1.25 139.81 0% 139.81 $ 10,225.60 $ 33,854.14 971 Brewery Taproom* 1,000sf 61.69 1.25 77.11 0% 77.11 $ 5,639.85 $ 18,671.99 26,924.86 $ 5,465.28 35,977.95 $ 7,302.90 18,209.46 $ 23,994.48 29,497.49 $ 26,285.76 86,153.51 $ 17,487.68 10,163.97 $ 2,063.11 68,047.06 $ 13,812.38 37,530.83 $ 7,618.11 Retail 813 Free -Standing Discount Superstore 1,000sf 50.52 1.25 63.15 29% 44.84 $ 3,279.25 $ 10,856.69 $ 21,822.03 $ 4,429.49 815 Free -Standing Discount Store 1,000sf 53.87 1.25 67.34 20% 53.87 $ 3,939.94 $ 13,044.06 $ 26,218.65 $ 5,321.93 816 Hardware/Paint Store* 1,000sf 8.07 1.25 10.09 26% 7.46 $ 545.96 $ 1,807.51 $ 3,633.11 $ 737.46 820 Shopping Center (>150k) 1,000sf 36.39 1.25 45.49 29% 32.30 $ 2,362.07 $ 7,820.17 $ 15,718.60 $ 3,190.60 821 Shopping Plaza (40-150k) - Supermarket* 1,000sf 101.43 1.25 126.79 29% 90.02 $ 6,583.81 $ 21,797.20 $ 43,812.51 $ 8,893.18 821 Shopping Plaza (40-150k) - Not Supermarket 1,000sf 65.38 1.25 81.73 35% 53.12 $ 3,885.18 $ 12,862.76 $ 25,854.23 $ 5,247.96 822 Strip Retail Plaza (<40k)* 1,000sf 54.45 1.25 68.06 40% 40.84 $ 2,986.77 $ 9,888.38 $ 19,875.71 $ 4,034.43 840 Automobile Sales (New) 1,000sf 27.84 1.25 34.80 0% 34.80 $ 2,545.20 $ 8,426.46 $ 16,937.24 $ 3,437.97 841 Automobile Sales (Used) 1,000sf 27.06 1.25 33.83 0% 33.83 $ 2,473.89 $ 8,190.37 $ 16,462.71 $ 3,341.65 848 Tire Store 1,000sf 28.54 1.25 35.68 28% 25.69 $ 1,878.62 $ 6,219.60 $ 12,501.44 $ 2,537.58 850 Supermarket 1,000sf 92.29 1.25 115.36 24% 87.68 $ 6,412.41 $ 21,229.71 $ 42,671.87 $ 8,661.65 851 Convenience Store* 1,000sf 651.94 1.25 814.93 51% 399.31 $ 29,204.95 $ 96,689.55 $ 194,346.68 $ 39,449.02 857 Discount Club 1,000sf 40.34 1.25 50.43 34% 33.28 $ 2,434.07 $ 8,058.53 $ 16,197.70 $ 3,287.85 862 Home Improvement Superstore 1,000sf 30.65 1.25 38.31 42% 22.22 $ 1,625.22 $ 5,380.64 $ 10,815.13 $ 2,195.29 863 Electronics Superstore* 1,000sf 41.05 1.25 51.31 40% 30.79 $ 2,251.73 $ 7,454.87 $ 14,984.35 $ 3,041.56 880 Pharmacy/Drug Store w/o Drive-Thru 1,000sf 90.08 1.25 112.60 53% 52.92 $ 3,870.61 $ 12,814.51 $ 25,757.26 $ 5,228.28 881 Pharmacy/Drug Store w/ Drive-Thru 1,000sf 107.2 1.25 134.00 49% 68.34 $ 4,998.25 $ 16,547.82 $ 33,261.24 $ 6,751.46 890 Furniture/Flooring Store 1,000sf 6.32 1.25 7.90 53% 3.71 $ 271.56 $ 899.06 $ 1,807.13 $ 366.82 Services 912 Drive -In Bank 941 Quick Lubrication Vehicle Shop* 942 Automobile Care Center* 945 Convenience Store/Gas Station 1,000sf 98.85 1.25 123.56 30% 86.49 ervice bay 40 1.25 50.00 28% 36.00 1,000sf 33.89 1.25 42.36 20% 33.89 VFP 211.05 1.25 263.81 56% 116.08 6,325.98 $ 20,943.56 $ 42,096.71 $ 8,544.90 2,632.97 $ 8,717.03 $ 17,521.28 $ 3,556.52 2,478.65 $ 8,206.11 $ 16,494.34 $ 3,348.07 8,489.67 $ 28,106.96 $ 56,495.19 $ 11,467.55 Office 710 General Office Building 1,000sf 7.83 1.22 9.55 0% 9.55 $ 698.66 $ 2,313.06 $ 4,649.27 $ 943.72 715 Single Tenant Office Building* 1,000sf 12.3 1.22 15.01 0% 15.01 $ 1,097.51 $ 3,633.55 $ 7,303.45 $ 1,482.48 720 Medical/Dental Office Building 1,000sf 34.03 1.22 41.52 0% 41.52 $ 3,036.44 $ 10,052.81 $ 20,206.22 $ 4,101.51 732 Post Office* employee 27.17 1.22 33.15 20% 26.52 $ 1,939.47 $ 6,421.04 $ 12,906.33 $ 2,619.76 Industrial/Port 110 General Light Industrial 1,000sf 3.6 1.08 3.89 0% 3.89 $ 284.36 $ 941.44 $ 1,892.30 $ 384.10 &Terminal 130 Industrial Park 1,000sf 2.68 1.08 2.89 0% 2.89 $ 211.69 $ 700.85 $ 1,408.71 $ 285.94 140 Manufacturing 1,000sf 4.27 1.08 4.61 0% 4.61 $ 337.28 $ 1,116.65 $ 2,244.48 $ 455.59 150 Warehouse 1,000sf 1.38 1.08 1.49 0% 1.49 $ 109.00 $ 360.88 $ 725.38 $ 147.24 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,000sf 1.29 1.08 1.39 0% 1.39 $ 101.90 $ 337.35 $ 678.07 $ 137.64 r ITE Trip Gene ation Handbook, 12th Edition: Daily Weekday Vehicle Trip Generation R tes 'The ratio of v hicle trips to person trips as extracted from the PSRC Household Travel Survey Excludes pass -by trips: see "Trip Generation Handbook: An ITE Proposed Recommended Practice" (2014). For Restaurant: sit-down uses, percentage of new trips based on peer studies with higher pass -by trip levels to be more consistent with trends expected in Tukwila. PM Peak Person Trip Rate multiplied by the Passby, Diverted Link percentage dwelling = dw fling unit, sq ft= square feet,pump= vehicle servicing position/gas pump,room= available hotel/motelroom,window= number of drive through teller windows/ATM drive through positions * ITE Land Use Category has five or fewer studies for daily vehicle trip rates. 111