HomeMy WebLinkAbout26-169 - Contract - Mithun - Planning & Engineering Services: Lower Green Riverfront Master Plan26-169
Council Approval 6/22/26
City of Tukwila Standard Contract
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
(Includes consultants, architects, engineers, accountants, and other professional services)
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Tukwila, Washington, hereinafter
referred to as "the City", and Mithun, hereinafter referred to as "the Consultant", in
consideration of the mutual benefits, terms, and conditions hereinafter specified.
Project Designation. The Consultant is retained by the City to perform Planning and
Engineering services in connection with the project titled Lower Green
Riverfront Master Plan.
2. Scone of Services. The Consultant agrees to perform the services, identified on
Exhibit "A" attached hereto, including the provision of all labor, materials, equipment and
supplies. The standard of care for Consultant's services shall be the care and skill
ordinarily used by members of Consultant's profession practicing under the same or
similar circumstances at the same time and in the same locality.
3. Duration of Agreement: Time for Performance. This Agreement shall be in full force
and effect for a period commencing upon execution and ending June 30, 2027 unless
sooner terminated under the provisions hereinafter specified. Work under this
Agreement shall commence upon written notice by the City to the Consultant to
proceed. The Consultant shall perform all services and provide all work product required
pursuant to this Agreement no later than June 30, 2027 unless an extension of such
time is granted in writing by the City.
4. Payment, The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work and for services
rendered under this Agreement as follows:
A. Payment for the work provided by the Consultant shall be made as provided on
Exhibit "B" attached hereto, provided that the total amount of payment to the
Consultant shall not exceed $380,000 without express written modification of the
Agreement signed by the City.
B. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City once per month during the progress
of the work for partial payment for that portion of the project completed to date. Such
vouchers will be checked by the City and, upon approval thereof, payment shall be
made to the Consultant within 30 days of receipt of Consultant's voucher in the
amount approved.
c. Final payment of any balance due the Consultant of the total contract price earned will
be made promptly upon its ascertainment and verification by the City after the
completion of the work under this Agreement and its acceptance by the City.
D. Payment as provided in this section shall be full compensation for work performed,
services rendered, and for all materials, supplies, equipment and incidentals
necessary to complete the work.
E. The Consultant's records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to be kept
available for inspection by representatives of the City and the state of Washington for
a period of three (3) years after final payments. Copies shall be made available upon
request.
1 1II "' r u g Www:,
5. Ownership and Use of Documents. To the extent payment has been received, all
documents, drawings, specifications and other materials produced by the Consultant in
connection with the services rendered under this Agreement shall be the property of the
City whether the project for which they are made is executed or not. The Consultant shall
be permitted to retain copies, including reproducible copies, of drawings and specifications
for information, reference and use in connection with the Consultant's endeavors. The
Consultant shall not be responsible for any use of the said documents, drawings,
specifications or other materials by the City on any project other than the project specified
in this Agreement, or without the involvement of Consultant on this Project.
Notwithstanding the above, Consultant shall retain ownership of all standard details,
drawings, and specifications not specifically created for this Project, but the City shall have
the right to use them to the extent that they are utilized or incorporated in the instruments
of service.
6. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant shall, in performing the services contemplated
Ty this Agreement, faithfully observe and comply with all federal, state, and local laws,
ordinances and regulations, applicable to the services rendered under this Agreement.
7. Indemnification. The Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages,
losses or suits including attorney fees, arising out of or resulting from the acts, errors or
omissions of the Consultant in performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and
damages caused by the negligence of the City.
Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW
4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons
or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the
Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, the Consultant's
liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence. It is further
specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein constitutes
the Consultant's waiver of immunity under Industrial Insurance, Title 51 RCW, solely for
the purposes of this indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the
parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this
Agreement.
8. Insurance. The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the
agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which
may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the
Consultant, its representatives, consultants, or employees. Consultant's maintenance of
insurance as required by the agreement shall not be construed to limit the liability of the
Consultant to the coverage provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City's
recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity.
A. Minimum Amounts and Scope of Insurance. Consultant shall obtain insurance of
the types and with the limits described below:
1. Automobile Liability insurance with a minimum combined single limit for
bodily injury and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident.
Automobile Liability insurance shall cover all owned, non- owned, hired and
leased vehicles. Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office
(ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability
coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual
liability coverage.
2. Commercial General Liability insurance with limits no less than
3. $2,000,000 each occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate. Commercial
General Liability insurance shall be at least as broad as ISO occurrence
form CG 00 01 and shall cover liability arising from premises, operations,
stop -gap independent contractors and personal injury and advertising
injury. The City shall be named as an additional insured under the
am
Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to
the work performed for the City using an additional insured endorsement at
least as broad as ISO endorsement form CG 20 26.
4. Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance
laws of the State of Washington.
5. Professional Liability with limits no less than $2,000,000 per claim and
$2,000,000 policy aggregate limit. Professional Liability insurance shall
be appropriate to the Consultant's profession.
B. Public Entity Full Availability of Contractor Limits. If the Contractor maintains
higher insurance limits than the minimums shown above, the Public Entity shall
be insured for the full available limits of Commercial General and Excess or Umbrella
liability maintained by the Contractor, irrespective of whether such limits maintained
by the Contractor are greater than those required by this Contract or whether any
certificate of insurance furnished to the Public Entity evidences limits of liability lower
than those maintained by the Contractor.
C. Other Insurance Provision. The Consultant's Automobile Liability and Commercial
General Liability insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain that
they shall be primary insurance with respect to the City. Any Insurance, self-
insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of the
Consultant's insurance and shall not be contributed or combined with it.
D. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.
Best rating of not less than A:VII.
E. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates
and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to
the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the
Contractor before commencement of the work. Upon request by the City, the
Consultant shall furnish redacted copies of all required insurance policies, including
endorsements, required in this Agreement and evidence of all subcontractors'
coverage.
F. Notice of Cancellation. The Consultant shall provide the City with written notice of
any policy cancellation, within two business days of their receipt of such notice.
G. Failure to Maintain Insurance. Failure on the part of the Consultant to maintain the
insurance as required shall constitute a material breach of contract, upon which the
City may, after giving five business days notice to the Consultant to correct the
breach, immediately terminate the contract or, at its discretion, procure or renew such
insurance and pay any and all premiums in connection therewith, with any sums so
expended to be repaid to the City on demand, or at the sole discretion of the City,
offset against funds due the Consultant from the City.
9. Independent Contractor, The Consultant and the City agree that the Consultant is an
independent contractor with respect to the services provided pursuant to this Agreement.
Nothing in this Agreement shall be considered to create the relationship of employer and
employee between the parties hereto. Neither the Consultant nor any employee of the
Consultant shall be entitled to any benefits accorded City employees by virtue of the
services provided under this Agreement. The City shall not be responsible for withholding
or otherwise deducting federal income tax or social security or for contributing to the state
industrial insurance program, otherwise assuming the duties of an employer with respect
to the Consultant, or any employee of the Consultant.
10. Covenant Against Continaent Fees. The Consultant warrants that he has not employed
or retained any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the
Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any
company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant,
any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration
contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or
violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to annul this contract without liability,
3 IC: ,;:;a g e
or in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover,
the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent
fee.
11. Discrimination Prohibited. Contractor, with regard to the work performed by it under this
Agreement, will not discriminate on the grounds of race, religion, creed, color, national
origin, age, veteran status, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, political
affiliation, the presence of any disability, or any other protected class status under state
or federal law, in the selection and retention of employees or procurement of materials or
supplies.
12. Assignment. The Consultant shall not sublet or assign any of the services covered by
this Agreement without the express written consent of the City.
13. Non -Waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation
provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision.
14. Termination.
A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time by giving ten (10)
days written notice to the Consultant.
B. In the event of the death of a member, partner or officer of the Consultant, or any of
its supervisory personnel assigned to the project, the surviving members of the
Consultant hereby agree to complete the work under the terms of this Agreement, if
requested to do so by the City. This section shall not be a bar to renegotiations of
this Agreement between surviving members of the Consultant and the City, if the City
so chooses.
15. Aoolicable Law: Venue: Attorney's Fees. This Agreement shall be subject to, and the
Consultant shall at all times comply with, all applicable federal, state and local laws,
regulations, and rules, including the provisions of the City of Tukwila Municipal Code and
ordinances of the City of Tukwila then in effect at the time of the rendition of the services.
In the event any suit, arbitration, or other proceeding is instituted to enforce any term of
this Agreement, the parties specifically understand and agree that venue shall be properly
laid in King County, Washington. The prevailing party in any such action shall be entitled
to its reasonable attorney's fees and costs of suit. Venue for any action arising from or
related to this Agreement shall be exclusively in King County Superior Court.
16. Severability and Survival. If any term, condition or provision of this Agreement is
declared void or unenforceable or limited in its application or effect, such event shall not
affect any other provisions hereof and all other provisions shall remain fully
enforceable. The provisions of this Agreement, which by their sense and context are
reasonably intended to survive the completion, expiration or cancellation of this
Agreement, shall survive termination of this Agreement.
17. Notices. Notices to the City of Tukwila shall be sent to the following address:
City Clerk
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA 98188
Notices to Consultant shall be sent to the following address:
4 1 IC: ,;:;a g e
18. Entire Aareement: Modification. This Agreement, together with attachments or
addenda, represents the entire and integrated Agreement between the City and the
Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements written
or oral. No amendment or modification of this Agreement shall be of any force or effect
unless it is in writing and signed by the parties.
5 1 IC: ,;:;a g e
DATED this 24th day of June, 2026.
CITY OF TUKWILA
[L�
Signed by:
Thomas McLeod, Mayor
ATTEST/RUTH ENTICATED:
Signed by:
Jk
Jennifer Marshall, Acting City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Signed by:
nnr I
Office of the City Attorney
6 a
CONSULTANT: Mithun
By:
Printed Name: Anne Torney, FAIA
Title: Partner
June 12, 2026 M 1 iii 5
Ms. Sherry Edquid
Levee and Floodplains Project Manager
City of Tukwila — Public Works
Tukwila, WA
Re: Lower Green Riverfront Master Plan: Draft Scope of Work Mithun Project
No. 2625800
Dear Sherry,
Seat—de
)(m ";0,
Thank you for meeting with us to advance the Lower Green Riverfront
! M I Ake "Ihm vv(y;f"uo
Master Plan scope, schedule, and budget. This revised draft clarifies what
k,, WA `;'N 1Oil
the Mithun team will do, where the work will focus, when decisions and
deliverables are due, and how the work will be reviewed so the plan can
scin u�`In:n�n:nSc
be finalized in early May 2027 and positioned for Planning Commission and
Y)") I kw,"iid ")h('H 81)00
Council adoption by June 2027.
�_,rn honn',nO, C A `gni?0',)
The scope follows the work plan structure in Mithun's RFQ submittal, Los Angeles
integrates the Washington State Department of Ecology FCAAP grant /'18 N1, „, I i„ ph ", /t7 00B
requirements, and incorporates your follow-up comments regarding adding Ami (,Iw,, (_,n 900 11
local artist -in -residence, Sarah Kavage, and review of the Lower Green
River Corridor Visioning report. It assumes scope and contract confirmation
will be completed in June 2026, with kickoff in mid/late July 2026.
We have assumed the Park Commission will serve as the Commission
Advisory Group (formerly resident learning sessions). rn
G" i ii t &"s u n ,, alb aCu aV"p
Sandra Girgis
Senior Associate, and Project Manager
Enclosure: Draft Scope of Work; Schedule
cc: Deb Guenther, Partner in Charge, Mithun
""f11'II' HI, har::rrl""f1
I ow""r { rl`> > Y I 'I ✓""r[r 1'11 1"An' ""r Phi, i I.'rn[I S(;opi !1l"f1 ork
U t�dJYY I'roj d Pkx W ',8'00
Geography
The study area spans the Green River corridor through Tukwila from 1-405 to the southern Tukwila city
limits, consistent with the Ecology grant description of Lower Green River levee and shoreline projects
from S. 204th Street to 1-405. The client is the City of Tukwila Public Works Department. The Master Plan will
address the river corridor, levee and shoreline edges, adjoining properties, public access, parks,
transportation connections, and priority opportunity segments where multi -benefit implementation may
be feasible.
Study area context map.
Background
The City of Tukwila is advancing the Lower Green Riverfront Master Plan to establish a long-term,
implementable vision for the Green River corridor between 1-405 and the southern city limits. The corridor
is made up of complex intersections of flood risk management infrastructure, ecological systems,
transportation networks, and adjacent urban development. Existing levee systems and floodplain
conditions present both constraints and opportunities for future riverfront investment, requiring a
coordinated approach that integrates flood risk reduction, habitat enhancement, public access and
community priorities.
""fiiII' H1, I r::rrl""f1
ow""r { rl`> > Y I 'I ✓""rlro1'1'1 1"An' ""r Phi, i L'ufl l `,(;op"' of "Nork
Uil�a.rrtiProj d Pkx W ',8'00
Overview
May/June 2026 Mobilization / scope Finalize scope, fee, schedule, review protocol,
confirmation SharePoint/file-transfer approach, and contract
assumptions.
Mid/Late July Kickoff
2026
Project kickoff and Interdepartmental Workshop #1
with key City departments and decision makers.
Jul 2026 - Apr Task 2: Public Engagement Public engagement plan, commission advisory group
2027 and Agency Alignment sessions with Park Commission, online engagement,
agency/stakeholder coordination, Tribal coordination
support, one art -based making session and
conversation, outreach documentation and
storymap.
Jul - Oct 2026 Task 3: Analysis, Synthesis Desktop analysis, prior plan synthesis, technical
and Future Development baseline assumptions, zoning/economic baseline
Considerations assumptions, and priority geography selection.
Oct 2026 - Feb Task 4: Vision and Concept Vision, principles, programming -to -place exercises,
2027 Development alternatives, segment studies, visualizations, and
preferred direction.
Jan - Mar 2027 Task 5: Funding and Funding, governance, acquisition/easement
Implementation Strategy screening, priority projects, phasing, and
implementation framework.
Mar - Jun 2027 Task 6: Draft/Final Master Draft Master Plan in April, one City/Ecology review,
Plan and Adoption Support Final Master Plan by May, Planning Commission and
Council support by May/June.
""fiiII'YH1, I :rel""f1
Iow""r{rl`>>Y i l'I✓"rlr1' 111"Af`J""r Phi,i L'ufll`,(;opi ol'"f1ork
Uil�a.rrtiPrj d PIr,. W ',8'00
Team rales
Mithun
Prime consultant; project
Manage scope, fee, schedule, meetings, QA/QC, and
management; master
subconsultants. Lead engagement strategy, resident
planning; urban design;
shared learning curriculum, vision, urban design, segment
landscape architecture;
studies, public realm, trails, access, zoning/design
architecture; public
integration, plan graphics, and Planning
engagement lead; visual
Commission/Council materials.
storytelling; plan production.
Community
Park commission will be the advisory group.
Engagement
Partnerships
Other engagement will occur through the City including
Community Navigators, tabling at community events
such as Salmon Saturday, Civics 101 group, and art
making conversation.
HDR
Levee/flood-risk, habitat-
Ground the plan in levee performance, floodplain
adaptation, stormwater,
behavior, regulatory thresholds, levee certification,
cultural resources,
habitat opportunity, stormwater, cultural resources,
environmental permitting,
constructability, and future permitting risk. Provide
GIS/StoryMap, and technical
technical QA for concepts and project cut sheets.
feasibility lead.
ECOnorthwest
Economics, real
Provide strategic light -touch implementation advisory: up
estate/acquisition screening,
to four stakeholder/client interviews,
funding, governance,
acquisition/easement screening criteria, funding/grant-
phasing and implementation
readiness scan for priority sites, governance options, and
advisor.
memo/slides for integration into the Master Plan.
Sarah Kavage
Plan and lead one participatory outdoor art build with
Artist -in -Residence
living willow along the Green River in the project area as
part of community engagement. Includes
administration/planning, willow harvest, public art build
sessions with structured conversations, and wrap-
up/reporting.
City of Tukwila
Project owner and decision
Approve scope, schedule, deliverables, and decisions.
maker.
Lead grant administration/EAGL, public notice, adoption
path, Tribal coordination protocols, and one
consolidated comment log per deliverable.
Ecology, KCFCD,
Reviewers, partners and
Provide technical, policy, funding, and implementation
Tribes, residents,
implementers.
input. Ecology reviews outreach materials before
businesses and
distribution as applicable and reviews the Draft Master
property stakeholders
Plan.
""f1I'II' H1, II
I ow""r ti rl`> > Y I l'1'/""rlr 1'1'I 1"An' ""r Phi, I L'ufl l `,(;op"' of "f1 ork
Uil�a.rrtiPrj d 'Ir,, W ',8'00
Scapa of Work
• Finalize consultant scope, fee, contingency reserve, schedule, meeting cadence and review
protocol by the end of May 2026 for contract execution.
• Set up a project SharePoint site or equivalent secure file -transfer folder for City uploads, subject
to City/Mithun IT and security requirements. If a Mithun-hosted SharePoint is not feasible, Mithun
will coordinate with the City on an approved City -hosted alternative.
• Confirm the City decision path, including interdepartmental decision makers, Planning
Commission public hearing/recommendation, City Council adoption path, and Ecology
closeout requirements.
• Confirm Ecology review points, EAGL deliverables, grant -eligible expense rules, outreach -
material review requirements, and light -refreshment approval process.
• Prepare data requests for prior plans, GIS layers, parcel/ownership data, zoning, parks,
transportation, flood/levee information, capital projects, and the Lower Green River Corridor
Visioning report.
• Hold Interdepartmental Workshop #1 at kickoff to confirm shared opportunities, constraints,
project goals, decision points, and cross -departmental roles. In person, with a virtual option.
• Conduct up to 20 half-hour project manager check-in meetings and up to four
budget/schedule health checks.
r ..
• Final workplan, fee, schedule
• Data Request including previous relevant plans, and GIS layers including open -source layers
• Up to one site visit by vehicle (organized by City) up to 2 hours, using City vehicle/trail access
where feasible
• Stakeholder, agency, department, Tribal coordination support, and engagement contact list.
• Up to 4 budget/schedule health check notes
• Up to 1 introductory City Council meeting presentation early in the process
• Up to 3 Interdepartmental meetings (up to 2 hours) with agendas and summaries in Word;
• Up to 20 -half hour project manager check -In meetings
• Develop a public engagement plan, message framework, accessibility/language approach,
and review protocol for all outreach materials.
""f ii I I' II..JYYI
Iow""I"{.I`>>Y i l`1✓"Ir[ro1, 1'11"Af`J""I"Phi, i L'Aufll`(ro , ol'"f1fork,
l/Ili'lun Prof r.:'I Hkx WO',8'00
• Create a facilitation guide to be used by community connectors, high school teachers, artist -in -
residence that provides advocacy based materials and resident shared learning curriculum
focused on river history, flood risk, habitat, public access, cultural use, and the programming -to -
place question: "What experiences do people want to have along the river and where do they
best fit?" "How do people want to get to know the river as a part of the culture of Tukwila?"
• Coordinate with the City to use the existing Park Commission as the primary resident shared
learning forum and, as directed.
• Work with City community connectors and the Park Commission meeting schedule to support
up to four commission advisory group; each session will include a short learning component, a
mapping/programming exercise, and discussion questions tied to vision, segment studies, or
preferred plan refinement.
• Up to 2 community events such as the existing civics -group, or Vietnamese Church New Years
celebration
• Support City -led Tribal coordination by preparing meeting materials, maps, and
technical/design context; City leads government -to -government protocols and invitations.
• Document stakeholder, resident, business/property owner, department, agency and Tribal input
and track how input changes the plan.
• Develop storymap that can be used externally to share context and engagement with project
and internally to document and information exchange regarding projects.
• One art -making based conversation, in fall 2026 or spring 2027 Led by Sarah Kavage.
• Public Engagement Plan
• Project message framework, tagline/slogan, flyer template, email/banner, and QR code/online
feedback link
• Facilitation guide
• Up to four commission advisory group sessions with agendas, materials and notes up to 2 hours
• ArcGIS online Story Map both for internal and external purposes
• One art -making based community event
• Up to 2 community events for targeted engagement
• Tribal coordination support materials.
• Engagement summary in word
• Complete a searchable literature review and synthesis of plans, studies, capital plans and
regulatory context relevant to this project (in the last 10 years), including the Lower Green River
Corridor Visioning report, and prepare a brief memo summarizing key takeaways for
consideration in the Master Plan.
""f ii I I' Y H1, I I
Iow""I"{.I`>> Yi l`1✓""Ir[ro1'1'11"A f`J""r Phi,i L'Aufll`(ro pi ol'"f1fork,
l/Ili'd.JYY Prof r.:'I 'kx WO',8'00
• Prepare the grant -required desktop analysis of existing levees, watercourses, adjacent
properties, critical areas and existing / planned transportation features for inclusion in the Draft
Master Plan.
• Document existing and planned (where applicable) conditions, including property ownership,
public access to the river, parks, trail connections, utilities, shoreline conditions, zoning districts
and allowable development type and intensity, street types, transit, redevelopment constraints,
and capital projects.
• ECOnorthwest will provide input on baseline market conditions, funding context and feasibility
constraints.
• Identify spatial opportunities and constraints to inform potential levee typologies. This includes
constrained areas where levee enhancement would be most challenging, places where
acquisitions or easements could be valuable, and opportunity areas with potential to provide
multiple benefits.
• HDR will identify levee typologies, flood -risk considerations, habitat -adaptation opportunities,
fish/habitat enhancement opportunities, stormwater/cultural-resource flags and technical
dependencies.
• Develop an opportunities/constraints synthesis and gather precedents for levee typologies for
discussion with departments and agencies.
• Hold Interdepartmental Workshop #2 to review opportunities and constraints, discuss
precedents, inform acquisition or easement criteria, and select up to 4 priority sites for further
study.
• Conduct Commission advisory group #1: current river use, desired future activities, barriers to
river access, and discuss existing and future cultural relationships to the river.
• Up to one meeting is included with King County, the King County Flood Control District, and
WRIA stakeholders. Suggest grouping these stakeholders into a single workshop meeting if that
works for the City and the partner agencies.
r ..
• Opportunities and Constraints presentation that summarizes desktop analysis and a brief prior -
plan synthesis memo
• Provide summary write-up of background material, focused on high level takeaways on baseline
market conditions, funding context, and feasibility constraints.
• Mithun and ECOnorthwest to co -facilitate a local business focus group (1 hour) to share
the findings and risks; Eco will facilitate the discussion and questions needed to address concerns
early on,
• List of city department and community priorities for programming and amenities
• HDR technical constraints/opportunities memo.
• Up to 4 priority sites to study
0 1 workshop with Flood control/King County/WRIA Stakeholders
""fiiII' H1, I r::rrl""f1
Iow""r{rl`>>Y i l'I✓"rlr1' 1'11"Af'fai'r Phi,i L'ufll`(ropi ol'"f1ork
Uil�a.rrtiPrj d 'kx W ',8'00
tasks
• Develop draft vision, principles and community priorities from technical findings, stakeholder
input and public engagement for discussion in commission advisory group.
• Create a Programming Matrix and Map linking feedback on desired programmatic activities
with specific sites along the Lower Green River. This matrix will answer questions such as: What
experiences do people want to have here? Who is it for? What existing and future
cultural/community activities should the riverfront support? How do people want to get to know
the river as part of the culture of Tukwila? Where does each activity fit best? What technical,
access, land use or maintenance conditions must be true for it to work?
• Conduct Commission advisory group #2 to review vision/principles and identify what resonates,
what is missing, and what cultural/programming needs should shape the plan.
• ECOnorthwest will develop real estate/acquisition screening criteria to inform strategies
regarding future development and property disposition.
• Create corridor segment typologies and levee alignment concept alternatives that integrate
flood protection, levee adaptation, habitat, trails, parks, public access, art, wayfinding, lighting,
water access and adjoining property opportunities.
• Prepare priority site studies focused on integrated site design and development opportunities at
up to 4 priority sites. Priority site studies will be feasibility level of design and will not constitute
design or engineering design, survey, hydraulic modeling or permitting documents. Each site
study will include concept image, a conceptual site plan with circulation, open space, and
building locations, and a land use summary.
• Prepare an aerial district view, one urban design framework diagram, and up to six illustrative
perspectives or vignettes. Visualizations will be used to support decision-making and
engagement, not to imply final design / engineering proposals or commitments.
• Screen concepts for permitting, constructability, real estate, zoning, economic viability and
document potential implementation risks with HDR and ECOnorthwest.
• Hold Interdepartmental Workshop #3 to discuss alternative strategies to achieve vision and
redevelopment approaches
• Conduct Commission advisory group #3 to review alternatives and segment concepts and
identify what resonates, what is missing, and what may encourage greater community use.
• Develop a preferred direction by January/February 2027 to support implementation strategy
and plan production.
• Up to one meeting is included with King County, the King County Flood Control District, and
WRIA stakeholders. Suggest grouping these stakeholders into a single workshop meeting if that
works for the City and the partner agencies.
""f ii I I' Y H1, I I
Iow""I"{rl`>> Yi l`1✓""Ir[ro1'1'11"A f`J""r Phi,i L'Aufll`(ro pi ol'"f1fork,
l/Ili'd.JYY Prof r.:'I Hkx WO',8'00
r ..
• Provide draft and final evaluation criteria for opportunity site acquisition options
• Technical review comments on alternatives and concepts by HDR
• One aerial district view.
• One urban design framework map.
• Up to four perspectives/vignettes.
• Up to four priority site studies with conceptual site plan, land use and development summary,
and feasibility score developed by ECONorthwest
• Public engagement summary for alternatives/preferred direction.
• 1 workshop with Flood control/King County/WRIA Stakeholders
u mo,/=o )o ;;
Key tasks
• Conduct Commission advisory group #4 to review the preferred plan and ask: What would bring
you here? What would discourage you from coming here? What is high priority from your
perspective?
• ECOnorthwest will conduct up to four strategic stakeholder/client interviews, participate in up to
three advisory meetings, and prepare strategic light -touch advice on acquisition/easement
screening, priority site value, funding/grant-readiness and governance approaches. Interview
targets may include affected businesses, property stakeholders, and implementation partners
along the river corridor.
• Develop screening criteria to help explain why some sites, adjoining -property investments,
easements or acquisition opportunities may be higher value for flood protection, habitat, public
access, cultural programming, funding competitiveness and implementation readiness.
• Identify potential grant categories and funding pathways for priority sites and project types,
including flood -risk reduction, habitat/salmon recovery, parks/trails/public access, climate
resilience, private investments, lodging taxes, environmental justice and funding to support
interagency collaboration.
• Develop governance and implementation strategies for priority projects and long-term
coordination among City departments, Ecology, KCFCD, parks, agencies, Tribes, property
owners and implementation partners.
• Explore preliminary concepts and cost estimates for up to three priority projects to be
determined, with priority projects selected through the planning process and, where
appropriate, aligned with current KCFCD CIP projects and levee segments.
• HDR will confirm planning -level technical assumptions and identify future modeling, survey,
geotechnical, design, permitting, environmental review and cultural -resource steps needed for
implementation.
• Mithun will integrate implementation strategy into the Master Plan narrative, priority project list,
segment studies and adoption materials.
""f ii I I' Y H1, I I
Iow""I"{rl`>> Yi l`1✓""Ir[ro1'1'11"A f`J""r Phi,i L'Aufll`(ro pi ol'"f1fork,
l/Ili'd.JYY Prof r.:'I Hkx WO',8'00
r ..
• ECOnorthwest Implementation and acquisition advisory memo. Providing a high-level
assessment of real estate market conditions and high-level funding and implementation strategies
for three projects.
• 4 stakeholder interviews and summaries conducted by EcoNW
• 4 meetings with EcoNW, City staff and Mithun
• 1 additional site visit for HDR up to 3 hours, 1 staff • Planning level Cost estimate for up to three
priority projects (Class 5 per AACE)by HDR
• Assemble the Draft Master Plan with required desktop analysis results, engagement
documentation, concepts, implementation strategy, priority investments, costs, priorities and
timelines.
• Submit Draft Master Plan to City and Ecology for one consolidated review cycle.
• Incorporate comments once and prepare Final Master Plan
• Prepare Planning Commission and Council presentation materials and adoption support
materials.
• Support one Planning Commission work session/briefing and one Planning Commission public
hearing/recommendation, as directed by the City.
• Support one Council committee/adoption presentation package, as directed by the City.
• Support EAGL deliverables, including final digital educational products, meeting
agendas/attendance logs and closeout materials.
I ..
• Draft Master Plan,
• Final Master Plan.
• Planning Commission / Council presentation deck and staff -support graphics.
• Final digital outreach closeout support package for EAGL
""fiiII' H1, I r::rrl""f1
Iow""r{rl`>>Y i l'I✓"rlr1' 1'11"Af'""r Phi,i L'ufll`(ropi ol'"f1ork
Uil�a.rrtiPrj d Pkx W ',8'00
Assumptions
• One consolidated City review cycle per deliverable. City coordinates department, Ecology and
stakeholder input and returns one reconciled comment log.
• Standard review window: 5 business days for memos, engagement materials and interim
packages; 10 business days for Draft Master Plan review.
• Final Plan review is limited to confirmation that consolidated comments were addressed.
• Additional review cycles, additional public meetings, new alternatives, additional project cut
sheets, expanded cost estimating or deeper technical/economic testing draw from
contingency or require amendment. Contingency reserve is intended solely for unforeseen
conditions or City -authorized scope changes and shall not be utilized without prior written
approval from the City.
• Ecology review of education/outreach materials is built into the schedule before distribution as
required by the grant agreement.
• City will lead translation of materials for main languages relevant to the project area.
• City will lead Tribal coordination protocols and invitations; the consultant team will support with
materials, maps, issue tracking and integration of input.
• City will lead and send mailed notices, unless separately authorized.
• City will print materials, except for the $1,000 printing allowance identified in the budget.
• City will upload each meeting attendance log and meeting agenda in EAGL and notify the
Ecology Project Manager.
• City will request written approval from Ecology before light -refreshment reimbursement is sought
for public meetings.
• The consultant team will create digital files and materials suitable for City/Ecology review, but
the City is responsible for final public notice, hearing logistics and legislative procedures.
,.REV,7
• New hydraulic modeling, topographic survey or geotechnical investigation. The consultant
team will request and review available existing modeling from the City, King County, HDR, NHC
or other sources as part of the data request; new modeling is excluded. Updated hydraulic
modeling results from NHC, if available during the planning process, may be reviewed and
incorporated into the work.
• 307o engineering design, construction documents or permit applications.
• Formal SEPA documentation, detailed property appraisals, title review, acquisition negotiations
or legal services.
• Code amendment drafting beyond zoning/policy recommendations.
• Detailed benefit -cost analysis or grant writing.
• More than four commission advisory group sessions, two community events, one Planning
Commission hearing/support meeting and one Council committee/adoption support package,
unless substituted or authorized through contingency.
• More than four segment framework diagrams or four perspectives/vignettes unless authorized
through contingency.
""f ii I I' Y HI, I I
I ow""I" { rl`> > Y i 11 1"An' ""I" Phi, i I.' rn[ I S(;opi !1l"Nork,
/Ili'd.JYY 'roj r.:'I Hkx WO',8'00
Engagement assumptions
Engagement plan, message Jul/Aug 2026
framework and review
protocol
Project look and feel
Commission advisory group
Tribal coordination support
Up to 2 community events
..]1...11' I % %)W)
Mithun defines audiences, materials, languages,
accessibility, review path and how input informs
decisions.
Jul /Aug 2026 Mithun prepares tagline/slogan, flyer template,
web/email banner and visual identity for
engagement materials.
Sep 2026 -Mar Mithun leads up to four sessions through the existing
2027 Park Commission.
Jul 2026 -Apr City leads protocols/invitations; consultant team
2027 supports maps, materials, issue tracking and
integration.
Fall 2026 Winter Share alternatives and programming -to -place
2027 findings; gather comments without a large open
house, supported by a QR code or online feedback
pathway.
Engagement documentation Nov 2026 -May Summaries, attendance logs, comment matrix and
and comment integration 2027 response -to -input documentation.
""r1I'II' H1, II
Iow""r 1'I 1"An'""r'Iffyi L'Aufil`(r ojpi ol'"f1ork
l/Ili'iun Proj""(J 'ire, WO',8'00
Budget
Table 1 - Budget Summary
Milhun
HDR
2CC7norihwest
Sarch Krauage
Prinfing
Direct Expenses
Stipends and Food
Blase Scope Subtotal
Contingency Reserve
107a,5
3114.,5
144.0
120.0
0.0
$211,175,20
$742k3.86
$1,904..15
$29,930.00
$11,520,00
$1,07OO.fJO
$1,500.00
$7,00(),00
$326,834.06
$11,404.15
$21 ➢,175.20
$7,611.807 $83,729.80
$2,993.00 $32,423,00
$1,p52.00 $12,672.00
$1, 00n.00
$ B , 500.00
$7,000.0()
$11',,756.80 $350,000.00
$211,175.20
$83,729.80
$32,723,00
$12672.00
$1, CiOL?.00
$1,5O0-00
$7.()00'00
$350,000.00
$30,000.00 $50,000.00
Conlingenc:v reserve is s0eY y for unforeseen condiflon.s ar sc or- changes and requires
prier written City approval.
*assumes City will lead the procurement of translation services for the relevant languages for the study area. Mithun
team to provide the text and content to betranslated. Materials maybe printed on 11x17. See Table 3 for detailed staff,
rate, hour, markup, direct expense, stipend, and contingency budget information.
rlitI'1HI, I I
o l ""I` (rl`a a Y l 11 l/f fr.lai'I" Phi, I I.'Aufl l `,(;> jp, of "f1 oi-k
1/Ili'1UYY 'ka. WO',8'00
Table 2-Task/Firm Summary
Y
Prgc a W"t UP Y unmjF i"",e i ."dl
$1 MOM
MA PI/Sri CjWirr,,jI'Ior)
..
PJbIr E,,D.g—rd rtxrnJ AI gnm N
$357,5'00.00
111 1"l�f7c'rrfrir , it, uru:3 H arilc;i�s
3
✓nl rr•ihysh.. Sy,11,—, esis rand Future
$73.1017.20
- $73, 10$.0r
4
wi,k, rrj,0 u�n�rrr nF'F fc FI sNund
$7.194.00
C 1ancr~�t Caaae•eln,^.rnnini
5w1
..Jnr7 "m i Irl Irlr rr1E7r1Yu11li 9trc1t1514y"
$
Fn..ft P,m-frh r ton Final i„I JwntmrPh,,
$11.1'2100
r;1Y1d Ad.pJi l 5,,pj3C]I"f
SwtfMd
Bsa--q--bf.1.1
C.M.
C..Nw..Cy —.".
..J!...)1' I % %k%k
$4'1 `215- FO
$1A.54'"Q0
$1 MOM
$251714.00 -
$57,P1t}.:.140
$357,5'00.00
$19999.20
pr 108.00 $ 00 '.T $7,000.00
$73.1017.20
- $73, 10$.0r
$17.100.00
$23.800.70
$7.194.00
$48.094.70
- ^$48,OW4..70
$'p','t,4flfidf(.P
$10.fi'3,8. pt,N
$11.1'2100
- ..
$114. Oi5H, 1CI
- $114,15 1'u
$"fi31111000
$1,'U,60 30
$11„{"120).01(4
$27, 30,30
$2'1.4070.010
$4,09..30
$1,848.Y00
$1.188.00
$29,1.25.3f5
$29.1 ?sx)
$217.175.29...
$83,724.80...
$32,923.99
$12,37299 $1,(193.99 $1.509.49 '$7,000,00
$350,999.00
- $350006Aa
$34.094.00 $39.489,.92
nn11n[4crn_ p rc s:r,2x e dy for r.,n orr c n :,un¢i'd4r it or —pe. changos rind r gLIII.I Friar ',111.11 Ci'Iw npprc�r L
1'[ ii I I' H1, I I
I ow""" ( 1 11 l"An'J""Ir Phi, I 'ArnH S(ojp,,, ol "Nork,
KAHI'lun Proj""d Ht:x WO't8'00
Table 3 - combined consultant fee table
J!)I, I %, %)W)6
Schedule
ix,
'I',
11C
11,
frL1
1.,
IOdi
1,),,
1"""' x
$1,It "',
Wct
1, MA,
.......... ......
It
:ptl
'It
511 111" 11:1
Ir
It
It
:'o
011
sr -113
111
pe silv.ue
wr 1, 13
t, '-I,
X
vl1U
X C
- 5
- 11
MR.. SAW.] SWIt.1
136,6
2540
lot
IMS
170
102A
66"78 .5
3211, 1 mm
$211,17620
It".11
b1 1ti 41
Rlp ,Pao"
I I 11—i,x
1517
11
11
0
-fill
.I.1
11",
m-,
71111
It
VI isk
115 1 il
$111 1,
. . ..... .....
I Tl —1, 1f 1., 14
it I
N,
1, 0,
W 1 It
lic
N.0
1.11
I.0
'A11
II
OIt
I t,
:11,
171
1
0
C11
0,6tl�,
HtllN.IdtlO�mm,
wo-rt—M 8.bNW.1 Su M.1
6.0
6{4.4
No
M 0
114.0
521.9W 0
58,51 666
SMM N
ill.
GO
, CU
"1
111,
W 111
1,1 1, 1,113
''f11.9:
J,.
4*
till
yu li
:Sl L—
52,W
S, M
01 ill]
't'o,
71-,il
If,
m
SuWRolal
o
ol
oo
5" 1w -
OB
132h
1111.6
=AMIA6
M IAN 16
W.11188'
ssoon M
Schedule
I ow""r ( rl"/ / Y l l'1'// Ir[roP1'1 l/f fr, ""r Phi, I L'Aufl l `,r;r' p of "11fork,
1"AHI'dJPh Pr//j/d Hkx WO',8'00
Lower Green Riverfront Master Plan
ae hil;lrrglul / Work N loll°''
2026
2027
LIIIIIEGEND work prograu %np .idem snored 151,1sesslons
VW Key Dec s un i KAk Olt/ Check n Meeling ��D aft defveroble r nc l r Commission ° Adoption may occur beyond June 2027
Stakeholder Outroach Slott review
'IM,derl rtment Worlohaos ,, Final dotivorable
a
V
O
O
V
o
Z
a
G
E
z
a
Q
F
Z
e 522$9
fi IR202]
.4,p 175431
7142129
5121925
5121976
2 9 TA, 733417
11 2, 2B
4 11 1825
l 015
l 8 152229
512,826
3 1017243,
7,42125
DCSIGIV DRAFT DOCS nN4f'
KI'il` it IEVIYEW 1 C1
Strzi10 111—InV90N-CONC[r'LS EVALa SLRAi EGY _
NFHVEMEM DOCS
aside,, seuio ,o"' I
In
Phase 7 Project Start Up and Management
le cope P',Ilpnment
Rerenecf Plan
Client Check-in meetings
....
Phase 2 Community Engagement and Agency Alignment
Engagement Plan
Commiene Advisory Group Sessions%,tortc.orrs„Waty
eve t
Community Events
CAG In: CAG kR:
CAG#s: CAG R4:
uses/cNNre wsron/program
iew glierngtives
Interdepartmental Workshops (10W)
j-
IDW ril: Kickoff
IDW N]: Opp/
-s
Alternatives
/Goals/Vision
antl Princi
gls Constraints/Prelim
A,
til vise
antl retlevel.
Phase 3 Analysis and Synthesis and Fut Dev Con
Reference document synthesis matrix
Opportunities and Constraints presentation.
HDR technical constrains/opportunities memo.
Phase 4 Vision, Alternatives and Concept Development
Vision, Values and Planning Principles Package
Draft Alternative
Preferred Alt. native,�„ti,
Phase 5 Funding and Implementation Strategy
Acqu s t on advisory memo
Funding Stratefy Memo
Phase 6 Draft/Final Master Plan
Draft Master Plan
Final Master Plan
Henning Commission presentation
Council presentation
Hearing Recommendation
Adoption'
LIIIIIEGEND work prograu %np .idem snored 151,1sesslons
VW Key Dec s un i KAk Olt/ Check n Meeling ��D aft defveroble r nc l r Commission ° Adoption may occur beyond June 2027
Stakeholder Outroach Slott review
'IM,derl rtment Worlohaos ,, Final dotivorable