HomeMy WebLinkAboutRes 1448 - Ratify 3 Proposed Amendments to Countywide Planning Policies ..11LA, t
stir
p 2
�so8
City of Tukwila
Washington
Resolution No.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, RATIFYING THREE
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE COUNTYWIDE
PLANNING POLICIES FOR KING COUNTY, AS
RECOMMENDED BY THE KING COUNTY GROWTH
MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL.
WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policies for King County were adopted and
ratified through an inter- jurisdictional planning process in 1992; and
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Planning Council for King County has
recommended three proposed amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; and
WHEREAS, on May 22, 2000, the King County Council approved and ratified the
proposed amendments on behalf of unincorporated King County through adoption of
Ordinance 13858; and
WHEREAS, interlocal agreement provides that amendments to the Countywide
Planning Policies become effective only if ratified by at least thirty percent of local
jurisdictions within King County representing at least seventy percent of the county's
population; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments have been reviewed by the Tukwila City
Council and found to be beneficial to continued regional cooperation and coordination
in managing growth;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Ratification of GMPC Motion 99 -1. The City of Tukwila supports
ratification of Growth Management Planning Council Motion 99 -1, attached hereto as
Exhibit A, amending the Countywide Planning Policies to adjust targets for new
housing units to reflect annexations and incorporations from April 1994 through
January 1998.
Section 2. Ratification of GMPC Substitute Motion 99 2. The City of Tukwila
supports ratification of Growth Management Planning Council Substitute Motion 99 -2,
attached hereto as Exhibit B, amending the Countywide Planning Policies to reassign
new housing targets for potential annexation areas (PAAs) and adopting an Interim
Potential Annexation Areas map which will remain interim until all unincorporated
urban areas are included in city PAAs without gaps or overlap.
cpp 8 -00
Section 3. Ratification of GMPC Motion 99 -4. The City of Tukwila supports
ratification of Growth Management Planning Council Motion 99 -4, attached hereto as
Exhibit C, amending the Countywide Planning Policies to remove the six -year
development capacity work item and to incorporate the review and evaluation
("Buildable Lands program as required by the State Growth Management Act under
RCW 36.70A.215.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON,
at a Regular Meeting thereof this 2 s6 day of 2000.
v
°'REF' 1
j VC I 4 r
cil Presid G
ATTEST/ AU C THENTICATED:
(_.--efi✓l.Gw
0 e E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Office orthe 6it o rney
Filed with the City Clerk: 8- 7-
Passed by the City Council: FS• Z/ O
Resolution Number 9
CPP 8 -00
EXHIBIT A
May 26, 1999
Sponsored By: Executive Committee
/pr
1 MOTION NO. 994
2 A MOTION amending the Countywide P1rn;ng Policies to adjust targets
3 for new housing units to reflect annexations and incorporations from April
4 1994 through January 1998.
5
6 WHEREAS, the 1994 Countywide Planning Policies established a housing target range for each
7 city and for King County, and annexations and incorporations have occurred since that time; and
8
9 WHEREAS, the 1994 targets need to be revised to establish target ranges for the new incorporated
10 areas and to increase the target range for cities which have annexed formerly unincorporated areas,
11 and to correspondingly decrease the target range for unincorporated areas.
12
13 TEE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY HEREBY
14 MOVES AS FOLLOWS:
15
16 The attached. Table CPP Appendix 2A is hereby adopted in the Countywide
17 Planning Policies to revise housing growth targets to reflect annexations and
18 incorporations from April 1994 through January 1998.
1 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on
2 9? and signed by the rnembers of the G V CKC Executive Committee on
3 7 9 '7 in open sessi autnen ation of its doption.
4
6 1/
7 u, Growth Management Planning Council
8rAth
9 u onalIson, City of Seattle Representative
10
11 Bol) Edwards, Suburban Cities
1
13 uise Miller, King County Representative
14 Attachment:
15 1. Table CPP Appendix 2A Household Growth Target Re- Allocation Based on Annextions
16 and Incorporations between 4/94 and 1/98.
EXHIBIT B
May 25Iune 15, 1999
Sponsored By: Executive Committee
/pr
1 Substitute MOTION NO. 99 -2
2 A MOTION amending the Countywide Planning Policies to assign new
3 housing targets for potential annexation areas.
4
5 WHEREAS, the 1994 Countywide Planning Policies established a housing target range for each
6 city and for King County, and annexations and incorporations have occurred since that time;
7
8 WHEREAS, the housing targets have been revised to reflect annexation and incorporation that
9 have occurred between April 1994 and January 1998; and
10
11 WHEREAS, there is a need to establish household target ranges for the remaining potential
12 annexation areas in order to correspondingly dccrca cidenti the target range for King County in
13 the urban area outside current potential annexation areas;;
14
15 WHEREAS. there is a need to advise cities about bow their respect v_housjrTg targets would
16 increase if the existing agreed upon potential annexation areas were now annexed! arid
17
18 WHEREAS. housing targets will change nvei time as the region receives new cerw data,
19
20 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF K NG COUNTY HEREBY
21 MOVES AS FOLLOWS:
22
23 The attached Table CPP Appendix 2B and Interim Potential Annexation Areas Map
24 are hereby adopted
25 a to estate bousing targetsfor tie
26 potential Annexation Areas as shown on the Interim Potential Annexation Area
27 ,(PAM Map. The Interim PAA Map- describes the areas recei g target allocati ns
28 in Table CPP Appendix 2B. This map is considered interim until all
29 unincorporated urban areas are included) city VAAs without gaps or ovet1R25,
30 This map may also. he amended to tgilect other CPP policy direction.
31
T Jr,MPr/99C.'MPCJMot9o-7 Ant. 1
1 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on
2 7—,A)-/ and signed by the members of the GMPCKC Executive Committee on
3 �a. 7 in open sessio autnerti`ation of its adoption.
4
6
7 t,on Hair, Growth Management Planning Council
8 ltrA SAO
9 1(115onason, City of Seattle Representative
10
11 Bob Edwards, Suburban Cities Representative
12 60
13 ise �v`�i11er, King County Representative
14 Attachments:
15 1. CPP Appendix 2B Household Growth Target Re- Allocation based on Annexations and
16 Incorporations after 1/1/98 and Potential Annexation Areas.
17 2. Interim Potential Annexation Areas Map
VGMPG99CMPCJMot99 -2.doc 2
Steve La ncaster MOT99 -4.DOC
1l
EXHIBIT C
16, 1999
Sponsored By: Executive Committee
cc/1s
MOTION NO. 99-4
A MOTION amending the Countywide Planning Policies to remove the 6 year
development capacity work item and to incorporate the review and evaluation
program as required by the State's Growth Management Act under RCW
36:70A215.
WHEREAS, In 1994, the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) established the Land Capacity
Task Farce (LCTF) and charged them to produce an improved, updated set of land capacity estimates, to
establish a baseline from which regular, ongoing monitoring could. proceed;
WHEREAS, The LCTF has reviewed and recommended a standardized methodology for jurisdictions to
measure the zoned land capacity for residential, and non residential development for the 20 year
plug prod
WHEREAS, The jurisdictions have completed this analysis and the results show that the jurisdictions in
King County have adequate capacity to accommodate the growth expected in their 20 -year plans;
WHEREAS, The remaining work program item for the LCTF is to develop a method for calculating 6-
year development capacity,
WHEREAS, In 1997 the State Growth Management Act was amended to require a review and evaluation
program be established in King 4nd five other counties and the cities within those counties consistent
with elements of RCW 36.70A.215;
WHEREAS, The review and evaluation program requiied of King County and its cities will produce
information to inform the GMPC and the jurisdictions on whether there is sufficient land to
accommodate the countywide population projection, determine whether the actual density of housing
constructed and the amount of land developed for commercial and industrial uses within the urban
growth boundary is consistent with the adopted comprehensive plans, and to determine the amount of
land needed for commercial, industrial and housing for the remaining portion of the 20 year planning
period; and
WHEREAS, The review and evaluation program will prdvide information that is similar to what the 6-
year development capacity would have provided;
THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS
FOLLOWS:
1
VGMPC/99GMPCIMot99-4.doc 1
1 Steve Lancaster N10799-4.DOC W Pape
1. Amend the following policy:
FW -1 Countywide growth management is a multi-step process...
Step 5a: The Growth Management Planning Council or its succc: cor :hall established a
Land Capacity Task Force to accomplish the work program prepared in April
1994 (scc Appendix 1). The Task Force completed the Residential Land
Capacity Report in 1997 and the Industrial and Commercial Land Capacity
Report in 1998. In 1999, in order to comply with RCW 36.70A.215, the April
1994 work program was deleted and replaced with the State's review and
evaluation program.
Step 5b: The Growth Management Planning Council or its successor shall conduct a
review and evaluation program in compliance with RCW 36.70A.215. The
purpose of the review and evaluation program shall be to determine whether
Kin County and its cities are achieving urban densities within Urban Growth
Areas. This shall be accomplished by comparing the growth and development
assumptions. targets and obiectives contained in these policies (and in county
and city comprehensive plans) with actual growth and development that has
occurred. If the results of this program are inconsistent with the reouirements of
the Growth Management Act (GMA). King County and its cities shall identify
reasonable measures in accordance with the GMA. other than adjusting the
Urban Growth Areas. that will be taken to comply with those recuirements.
2. Delete Appendix 4, the April 1994 Land Capacity Work Program.
ADOPTED by the Growth Management P1nTming Council. of King County on 7 -28 -99 and signed by the
members of the GMPCKC Executive Committee on 12 -7 -99 in open session in authentication of its
adoption.
Ron Sims, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council
Sue Donaldson, City of Seattle Representative
Bob Edwards, Suburban Cities Representative
Louise Miller, King County Representative
UGMPCJ990MPC!Mot99 -4.doe 2