HomeMy WebLinkAboutTrans 2012-06-04 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKETCity of Tukwila
A.Ekberg
G.Labanara
Transportation Committee
K. Hougardy
D. Quinn
C. Knighton
S. Kerslake
D. Robertson
Clerk File Copy
Chair
Allan Ekberg,
V. Seal
2 Extra
Mayor Haggerton
Kathy Hougardy
D. Cline
e-mail pkt pdf to A. Le
K. Matej
e-mail cover to: C.
i De'Sean Quinn
B. Giberson
O'Flaherty, D. Almberg,
F. Iriarte
B. Saxton, S. Norris,
R. Tischmak
M. Hart, S. Kirby,
D. Robertson
AGENDA
MONDAY, JUNE 4 2012
Time: 5:15 PM Place: Conference Room #1
Item
1. PRESENTATION(S)
2. BUSINESS AGENDA
a) WSDOT Pedestrian Bicycle Grant Program
Applications
b) Resolution for Six -Year Transportation Improvement
Program 2013 2018
c) Ordinance Establishing
Development Agreement Procedures
3. SCATBd
a) SCATBd June 19, 2012 Draft Agenda
4. MISCELLANEOUS
5. ANNOUNCEMENTS
Recomm0nded,-Actiion Rage
a) Committee Approval Pg. 1
b) Forward to 6/11/12 C.O.W. Pg. 3
and 6/18/12 Regular
c) Forward to 6/11/12 C.O.W. Pg. 47
and 6/18/12 Regular
Future Agendas:
Transportation Benefit District
Next Scheduled Meeting Monday, June 18, 2012
Pg. 57
S The City of Tukwila strives to accommodate individuals with disabilities.
Please contact the Public Works Department at 206- 433 -0179 for assistance.
x
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Transportation Committee
FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director 4 0
BY: Cyndy Knighton, Senior Engineer
DATE: June 1, 2012
SUBJECT: TUC Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Tukwila MIC "Street Smart" Non Motorized
Project No. 98810404 New Project
WSDOT Pedestrian Bicycle Grant Program Applications
ISSUE
Grant applications to the WSDOT Pedestrian and Bicycle Program.
BACKGROUND
The WSDOT Pedestrian and Bicycle Program has a current call for grant applications, which are due
on June 30, 2012. Staff is proposing to submit for two projects: ROW acquisition associated with the
TUC Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge (PW lead) and a Study /Preliminary Engineering for the Tukwila
Manufacturing "Street Smart" Non Motorized Project; specifically a Boeing Access Road Corridor
Study project (DCD lead).
DISCUSSION
This grant program has been modified significantly from past practice and it is unknown what kind of
project will be successful. It is estimated that $8 -10 million will be available state -wide for this
program.
The Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge requires acquisition of one full property (single family home at 16113
W Valley Highway, Parcel #0005800033) and a partial acquisition of a second property (Riverview
Plaza office building at 16040 Christensen Road, Parcel #2523049039 and #2523049077) along
with the loss of 27 parking stalls. Permanent easements from Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) are also
expected as this project crosses over the SPU 60 -inch water main ROW. The WSDOT grant
application is for $870,000 to acquire the necessary ROW.
The Tukwila MIC "Street Smart" Non Motorized Project are for improvement options between 51
Ave S and E Marginal Way. The Boeing Access Road Corridor Study will be done concurrent with
the Boeing Access Road Bridge Rehabilitation Project. Committee approval was given on May 21,
2012 to also submit this same project for the Countywide Congestion, Mitigation and Air Quality
(CMAQ) grant process which is currently ongoing. The WSDOT grant will be submitted for $200,000
to cover the estimated cost of the BAR Corridor Study. The 2013 2018 Six Year Transportation
Improvement Plan will include this as a new project.
If successful, funds would be available in June, 2013. No City match is required for these grants.
RECOMMENDATION
Committee approval to submit both grant applications to the WSDOT Pedestrian and Bicycle
Program for the TUC Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge and the Tukwila MIC "Street Smart" Non Motorized
Project.
Attachments: TUC Ped /Bicycle Bridge CIP sheet
wApw eng \projects \a rw rs projects \tuc ped bicycle bridge (90510403) \grant0nfo memo wsdot ped -bike grant application 6 -01 -12 sb.docx
CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY
Land(R/W)
Const. Mgmt.
Construction
TOTAL EXPENSES 267
FUND SOURCES
Awarded Grant 245
Proposed Grant
Mitigation Actual
Park Impact Fees Expected
City Oper. Revenue 22
TOTAL SOURCES 267
1,100 1,100
1,000 1,000
6,485 6,485
984 382 1,100 7,485 0 0 0 0 10,218
930 321
870 5,210
35 90 1,475
54 26 140 800
984 382 1,100 7,485
XW Project Location
816881
8[
0 0 0
0 0 0
1,496
6,080
0
1,600
0 1,042
0 10,218
2013 2018 Capital Improvement Program 12 2
2013 to 2018
PROJECT:
Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Project No. 90510403
DESCRIPTION:
Construct a new pedestrian /bicycle bridge over the Green River.
Pedestrian /bicycle connection between Tukwila's Urban Center and commuter rail /Amtrak station.
JUSTIFICATION:
Supports local and regional goals and policies regarding land use and transportation in Urban Center.
Pedestrian System Report identified the optimal location for bridge crossing to be south of the Best
STATUS:
Western Hotel. Type, Size, and Location Report was completed in 2011. Council approved a design of
a twin -tied arch bridge with no accommodation for a future bridge crossing over West Valley Highway.
MAINT. IMPACT:
To be determined.
State Enhancement design grant for $190k and Transit Oriented Development (TOD) planning grant of $55k.
COMMENT:
State Enhancement grant of $500k and Federal CMAQ grant of $750,833 for final design. Project is on Park
Impact Fee list with funding of $2 million with an 80 %/20% split.
FINANCIAL
Through Estimated
(in $000's)
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 BEYOND TOTAL
EXPENSES
Design
267 984 382 1,633
Land(R/W)
Const. Mgmt.
Construction
TOTAL EXPENSES 267
FUND SOURCES
Awarded Grant 245
Proposed Grant
Mitigation Actual
Park Impact Fees Expected
City Oper. Revenue 22
TOTAL SOURCES 267
1,100 1,100
1,000 1,000
6,485 6,485
984 382 1,100 7,485 0 0 0 0 10,218
930 321
870 5,210
35 90 1,475
54 26 140 800
984 382 1,100 7,485
XW Project Location
816881
8[
0 0 0
0 0 0
1,496
6,080
0
1,600
0 1,042
0 10,218
2013 2018 Capital Improvement Program 12 2
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Transportation Committee
FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director 1 9
BY: Cyndy Knighton, Senior Engineer
DATE: June 1, 2012
SUBJECT: Resolution for Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (2013.2018)
ISSUE
Resolution to adopt the annual update of the Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for 2013 2018.
BACKGROUND
The TIP is updated annually as required by the Revised Code of Washington (RCW). The TIP is adopted by
resolution after a public hearing at the local agency level and incorporated into the regional and state TIPs. The TIP
is primarily a financial planning document for projects competing for grants. Any project submitted for Federal grant
funding must be included in the local, regional and state adopted TIP's.
The TIP is a rolling plan showing various funding sources: grants, developer, and local funds. Projects "roll" as
funds or stages occur (design report, final design, and construction).
Tukwila's TIP and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) list many of the same transportation- related projects. The
TIP lists only those transportation- related projects planned within the next six years that are deemed regionally
significant. The City's CIP lists transportation projects planned in the next six years and beyond, as well as water,
sewer, surface water, and capital facilities. The TIP is required to be adopted by June 30 on an annual basis, while
the CIP is prepared during Summer /Fall, in conjunction with the City's budget preparation. Differences between the
two may be due to priority changes, funding availability changes, or other factors that normally occur during the
time between adoptions of each document.
ACTION TAKEN
The attached spreadsheet is the "Draft" 2013 2018 TIP and was created by modifying the 2012 2017 TIP to add
or remove projects, adjust project costs, and reprioritize the list of projects.
Added: Cascade View Safe Routes to School (new Residential Street CIP page)
Thorndyke Safe Routes to School (new Residential Street CIP page)
Tukwila MIC "Street Smart" Non Motorized Project
RECOMMENDATION
The Council is being asked to approve the resolution for the 2013 2018 Six -Year Transportation Improvement
Program and consider this item at the June 11, 2012 Committee of the Whole and subsequent June 18, 2012
Regular Meeting with a Public Hearing.
Attachments: Resolution
2013 2018 "Draft' Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Spreadsheet
Current Adopted 2012 2017 TIP
W:\PW Eng \PROJECTS\A- RW RS Projects \TIP \Info Memo TIP 2013 sb.docx
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A SIX -YEAR
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (2013-
2018), AND DIRECTING THE SAME TO BE FILED WITH
THE STATE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION AND
THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BOARD.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of RCW Chapters 35.77 and 47.26 as
amended, the City Council of the City of 'Tukwila has previously adopted a
Transportation Improvement Program and thereafter periodically modified said
Transportation Improvement Program by resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the work accomplished under said
program, determined current and future City street and arterial needs and, based upon
these findings, has prepared a Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program for the
ensuing six calendar years (2013 2018); and
WHEREAS, on June 18, 2012, a public hearing was held regarding the City's Six
Year Transportation Improvement Program;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Program Adopted. A six -year Transportation Improvement Program
for the calendar years 2013 -2018 is hereby adopted.
Section 2. Filing of Program. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
file a copy of this resolution, together with the exhibit attached hereto, with the
Secretary of Transportation and the Transportation Improvement Board of the State of
Washington.
W:1Word Processing City \Resolutions \TIP 2013 -2018 5 -30 -12
CK:bjs Page 1 of 2
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON,
at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 2012.
ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED:
Christy O'Flaherty, MMC, City Clerk Verna Seal, Council President
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Resolution Number:
Shelley M. Kerslake, City Attorney
Exhibit: City of Tukwila Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program from 2013 to 2018
WAWord Processing- City\ResolutionsUIP 2013 -2018 5 -30 -12
CK:bis Page 2 of 2
six year transportation improvement program
2013 to 2018
N
N
r�
Q
G 0
N
D• ce)
.F�
N
d p
O 1i
0.
O
IP
co
O
to
t A Q t
W
v
RW Required °Z
I
vironm ental TYPOI U
I�n
0
10
Total Length
I t)tilitV Codesl
Improvement Type o
Resolution No.
1
Amendmen
1
A d o pted
1
-r-Tg' gl g g
v
LL li
r
0 0
N
9
1 LL
1 N
O O O
O
S
O Hearing
Z
O
r
N
1
9
N
C
Y
1
dS
r
mI�
0
S
LL 1
v
0
c�
V
a I
LL
d
'o
O O O
4 m
N w t
a t
o 0O 0
o
c t)
o v
d
1
a
LL
6_
V
O O
r
N
1..
d
Y O 0
i O
N
N
m m G
N
S
r–
3 0
LL7 111 V X
Z d t d Ta c O
y Z
U
I Y
m
U I
4cjpW•-
1
1m+0
3
priority Numper
3 N o. o
d
J
LL
FUnCtlOnal
Class
U
3 a
r Y
T 6
4 U oQ.
N
M
N
N
m
0
CL
CL
7
E 00
r
L
N
0 O
a
i.r r
N
E E
0 O
I-
0 U
Q
E
G
O
i+
M
I t
O
CL
L
L
�i
m
N
0
z
w
_c
Y
RW Requiredl
z
ct
ro
m
c
w
U
0
0
d
G
0
m
O
Total Length
a.
d
0 K
Q
O
2
RW Requiredl
z
Environmental Typel
w
U
0
0
0
m
0
m
Total Length
h
LL
N
a
w
F-
0
Utility Codes 0
L)
o
Improvement Type v
o
o
t
0
Resolution No.
ii
v
0
Amendment
0
o
0
N
v
c
0
o
0
N
s
o
li
y
d
L
N
Adopted
0
0
II
0
U
Hearing
II
a F
LL
m
s
v
O O
m
W
a n
o
(n
h
131
0
0
N
y
t7
e
U.
LL
m
O
U N
d
LL
9
M
d
U N
N
m
d
o a
o
O
h
o
0
c
U
m c
a o
C
E m
LL
N p
!C
gyp
y N
y
c
N
U C
LL
N
M O
E
y N
O N
O
Is
0
a-
`m
o
0
E N O
N
N
N
D
Z C
d N
N J
O)
1
C;
aN N
�cya
Ew d
m=
ft a
a m
3 a 3 iN
zoa a."
�a
acc
N z
a anima o
m
E m
0
y
0
4J DWu Q
Q t5
U 3 O1
d
d
Priority Number
w
z
a
c V
3
v
L
Functional
o
Class
S
LL
CL
x
M
N
rn
m
a
W
0
N
0
M
a
N
ui
O
a
m
8
G 00
N
O O
a M
d N
W
O
0 V.
Q.
i
O
(1V
Q
N
ca
L
r
L
ii
RW Required z
A
V�
0
Environmental Type
c
o 4
b
C
Total Length
7
LL
0
r
utility Codes
o
O O
tr
O
N
N
I Improvement Type o
r
9 c
LL
LL
c
7
J
Resolution No.
O
C
O
O
O
L
'�O
C
O
Amendment
LL
m
L
9
is
N
U
o
d
'O
O
z
N
C
7.
Adopted o N
N
O
V
G L
LL
O
a
N
0]
Nearing
A
V�
N
tr
Y
N
m
LL
c
7
Y y
O
C
N O
6 U
aO.
Adopted o N
N
O
V
G L
LL
O
a
N
0]
Nearing
A
N
c
7
LL
ro
z
m
LL
N d
9
i O
O O
U
C
N
N N
L
w y V
R n
N LL
3
N
N
O
0
d
7
Y
r
9
A
d
C
C V
b
O
R C
L
7 0
V
ID y
6
N qu10
y Q
3
6
3
o a a a
7 n
4 m
dvoUi
s
cn
d d
priority Number
N
Y
w R (n
c
C
J
Functional
LL
Class
R
a
M
N
M
R
d
R
0
0
a
tY
A
L
N
O O
a M
r
N
E E
0 C
I—
0 LL
CL
E
Y
O
M
O
CL
CAI
\V
L
L
CD
0
A
0
z
d
a
_C
RW Requiredl z
Environmental Type
Total Length
a
0
Utility Codes 0 3
U,
Improvement Type 1 0
O
Resolution No.
Amendment
Adopted
Hearing
O O M
a
(n o
cd 2 3
y
N
01
0
a
c
m
N
a
N
N
C
N
d
V1
E
U
o T
(0
a`
n o
d a
Q G
(0
c y ai
N a
4i r
0 U d
N
O N
Q o
00
N O O
C
LL
LL
A
o_ o
o O O
C c N
LL
U
J
0 0
O O 0 0 0 0
N N
M M
N L M M
c co
LL
W L
R N
o O
m o 0
a o m
O N
a
G L
LL V
d
A
y
0 0
0 0
0
0
N O O
O O
C w 0
L O N
LL
d M
LL
a
v c
G F o 0
a o 0
C o 0
L N N
LL
y a
a
LL N
O O
0 00
M N W)
N
ti c
u
L
a
d
L J N
R
IL H
d
a a 2
w
rn
w
LO
a>
rn
a
0
N
c
r)
C (0
L
d
4
a
m
iY
Iff
2Eo
z
Z d O a N
J w
m E
F
to
�Z
a0
z'o c rn o
aasa�a
rpM
E
Q U O W i
y
F'
Y a
j i g
Y O
Priority Number
c a
Q
U
f
Functional o
Class)
N
01
0
a
c
m
N
a
N
N
C
N
d
V1
E
U
o T
(0
a`
n o
d a
Q G
(0
c y ai
N a
4i r
0 U d
N
O N
Q o
00
N O O
C
LL
LL
A
o_ o
o O O
C c N
LL
U
J
0 0
O O 0 0 0 0
N N
M M
N L M M
c co
LL
W L
R N
o O
m o 0
a o m
O N
a
G L
LL V
d
A
y
0 0
0 0
0
0
N O O
O O
C w 0
L O N
LL
d M
LL
a
v c
G F o 0
a o 0
C o 0
L N N
LL
y a
a
LL N
O O
0 00
M N W)
N
ti c
u
L
a
d
L J N
R
IL H
d
a a 2
w
rn
w
LO
a>
rn
a
0
N
c
r)
C (0
L
d
4
a
m
iY
Iff
m
m
d
C>
N
O
M
a
m
d
m
r
0
a
a�
m
0 0
RW Required) zo
r
i N
Environmental Type
o
°o
O
O
C
L
M
C
O
N M
f+
Total Length
LL
A
C1
N
Utility Codes a
Q
Q
O
Q
LL
Improvement Type a
o
c t
c
Q
Resolution No.
LL
o
Q
o
0 00 0
o
0 0
L
Q
L
Amendment
c
Q
N
i
d
as
t
Y
H
N
L
IV
Adopted
n
r
O
a
o
U
0 0
Z
Hearing
u.
LL
s
V
V/
O O
M
O
N
v O
p
O
O O
O
CO OD
O O
LL
N
Q
d
LL
N
O
N N
V
M
p 0
M
r
d
O
N
N
O
O O
U
9
o
c
N
N
LL
m
m
N
C
1 C
LL
L
N
C
O
O
O o
O
m
M
N
N
N
Y
N
N
r
N rn
e g
=Eo
m`
m
z
Zma
Z `o F
u
o
o
m
C
V
6
uZ c Q
Z •O A m o
Q
rn
Q m
rn C
2
c
y
o
w
Z
A
o d
ao �ma
d�dwLC
C
o
m
C
'o n
m a
o
w
L
a
d
U
F
U
3
r y
m W
v
F
Y a_
Q
a
a
U
O
Priority Number
a
u
rn
a
o
U a
Functional v
I
c y
a
Class
LL'
x
m
m
d
C>
N
O
M
a
m
d
m
r
0
a
a�
m
r`
a>
rn
CO
a
V-
0
N
0
M
m
0
0
C
12
RW Required) z°
L
r
N
Environmental Type
w
0
0
s
0
0
0 0
M
a
.1.+
Total Length
i
O
A
E E
Utility Codes
Q
C
0 0
Q
LL
Improvement TypelN
of of Ct
N
W 10
C
E
C
LL
Resolution No.
i
Q
0
O
77
O
0 0
O
0 0
Q
CL
Amendment
N
n
N
LL
L
A
y
L
L
Adopted
0
0 0 0
O
o
U
x
z
Hearing
O
0
O
0
O
ti
s
A
a r
v Q
0
3
0 0
0
0 0 0
(7
N
O
LL
d
d
'O
M
N
L
N
2
U
LL
d
a
m
C
U
9
c
i
O
O O O
I
c
CO
Y
i
m
-gyp
a
C
N
3
N
U.
Q
L
O
O O O
V
A
O
O O
(/J
n
t0 U)
N M
W M
M
W O
c
7€ O
0
N
d y
a
N
S
G~ C
6
N
6
O
Z d 9 N
"OM
N M
d
d"ELu
a3i
co
m°
y o
oj
wa c y
z o o CM
m
N
o
n
s a
U
J
aazma
a
8
U O ui U:
U
4l
o«
U
2
F
t
x
m K
d
.51
H
Y d
u R
LLl
Z J
Priority Number
m a
a
0 a
U
Y
c
c a
U
r
N
a
Functional rn
c
n
Class)
LL
W
r`
a>
rn
CO
a
V-
0
N
0
M
m
0
0
C
12
E
0 0
RW Required) zo
r
I
q
Environmental Type
N
W
o
o
S o
0
L
ry
a
M
M
O
N
M
f+
Total Length
LL
O
m
N
3
Utility Codes N
0
a
o
o
o o
o
Q
LL
Improvement Type Mo
0
0
0 0
0
L
CL
E
C
7
LL
N
Resolution No.
V
O
0
0
0 0
0
C 0
0 C
M
a M
N M
O
Q
Amendment
c
to
LL
O
op
E
N
U)
N
L
L
Adopted
0 0
0 0
M
W
m
o
m
o
v
x
Z
Hearing
c
LL
0 0
W
F- r°
V)
0
0
0 0
o
0
oi 2�
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
v
n
C
LL
LL
ii
LL
V
M
Y
(0
N
A
O
O
O O
O O
y
V
o
N
0
L
a
C
06
O
a
U
m
LL
c
W
U C
C p
C
y
C
O O
O O
M J
O
N
Y
C
5 o
3 m
N
r
E
Z C
U C
z
G4
Z
0
U
N
y` EW d
N
8
QI
ft z -6
U
c N
o
awv5a
zocd'o
m
g
c
0�
N L a
W a
z
N
C
aaz ma
m
8
a
F-
W
W CO
v
7
iiiAAA
H
Y d
Priority Number
N
A
a
W 3:
LL z
Z
U
T
T
c a
'o P
m U)
a
a a
:o
Q
a
Functional o
L
c N
c
a
Class)
LL
W
OD
a)
0)
M
d
V—
O
N
0
M
T
(6
r
a
a�
13
m
a
M
N
M
C
G
N
N
a
O
Q
14
RW Required z
CO
mo
o g
O
fnvironment
W
U
o
AA{{
y1
C
O O
a
LL
L 0
TotalLen9th
o
a M
r
N
utility Codes
'o
E F
p N
N ID
W
Improvement Type N
N N
o u.
LL
u
L
0
No.
E
Resolution
o o'
o
Amendment
7
LL
Oa
t
O
Q
N
Adopted
o
L
V
N
7
0
z Hearing
LL
x
N
i, 3:
m
LL
A
Q1
'O
d
4
u
a
c
m
S
a U
o
o
LL
G
N j LL
U N
O
O E
y O C
Ct
N
0.
p
M 1n
N
C_0
c
V
N
c
N
O
n
c
N
E
7 S .02
o_
o n2
w
i4
Z y¢
G O r
a
'7
y o
c 0 N
yo
.%,V- 0 6
Q1 u
m
`roE
cd
m W
010
N
y U
D.
9
y
y$clma
Q pL
z
4 C) a W
W
o
m
v n
Y a Priority Number
N r
M
N N G
i y
9 N a
O
c W
w
4 v a
Functional
°o
LL
Class
m
a
M
N
M
C
G
N
N
a
O
Q
14
0
m
m
m
CL
V
O
N
0
M
C
CO
N
CO
O
0
0
N
15
Q
RW Required)
T-
I-
Q
Environmental Type
N
W
O
C
0
0 C
0 C
a
M
9
Total Length
LL
Q
m
G)
N
a
a-
0
Utility Codes
E
3
v
p
o
o °o
7 3
o o
Q
LL
Improvement Type o
u
o 0
o v
Q
v
c
LL
Resolution No.
V
O
0
0 0
o —°0
0
i
0 0 0
L2 o o
0
Q
Amendment
O O
O O
N r
N
n
p
L
N
06
N
N
N
L
L
Adopted
0
0 1 0
y
o
C
O
0
o
v
x
Z
Hearing
c
U.
m
s
O n
N
a n
to
o
0 c
m 2�
Mf
o m
0
0 0 0
N p
M
O M
LL
A
`m
M
a
y'
t0
3
d
N
v
d
LL
N
M
C
m
o
0
H
0
0 0 0
c
U
E
a
N
C
di
m
li
N
N
M
M
w
N
LL
c
N
m
-e
U
O
O O O
W
C
M
A
Y
M
o
W CO
0 0
OD
0
D.
Y
a
N
N N
N
a
w
4
c
E
C
Z
c
o
a
F-
Z d N C N
N N
r
LL
d
y- E W m
V
N a
W
V Z V
C m C m
N
2 N
w
a d a m
zoc o
'O
M
N C
om
N
W
a
W
a
Z
U
N
r
gamma
O Ld ii
2
u` m
a
a
F
y m
(if
U T
a
Priority Number
0
a a-
v
c
Q 'o
c a
O a
Functional v
Y
c y
m
a M
a
V
a
2
Class)
0
U-
x
W
0
m
m
m
CL
V
O
N
0
M
C
CO
N
CO
O
0
0
N
15
m
(0
a
O
N
0
Cl)
m
CO
0
O
n
m
m
Q
RW Required z°
V
6.
Q
Environmental Type
DY
N
w
L)
0000S
O
O
0
0 0
0
0
N
O) O
V
f
a
T
Total Length
LL
Q
A
N
E E
Utility Codes
Q
LL
Improvement Typel M o
o 0
0
L
rn rn
v
m
Q.
v
c_
LL
Resolution No.
u
O
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0 0
L
p
r
v m
Amendment
r
o
Q
U.
N
t� L
r
Adopted
0
0
0 0
y
d
W
y
O
O
V
z
Hearing
a
LL
L
O
N
M
m
N
M
O
U) u Q
O
O O
O
O
3
0
0
0 0
V)
N
l7
LL
A
N
d
LL
9
M
d
O
F
H
O
O
O O
d
V
0
c
L
N
C
LL
A
41
d
C LL
d
C
N
C
O
U
N
C
L T
C N M
o
W N
0 0
CO
0
O
O
O
O 0
O
m
m Y
V1
E 'c
E
ME
w
m
E.2
C Z H o
m
O L
x 0
S
a
Z u o v o
d
a)
a
o
E
C N
d L
0
0
N
0
N
a
m
m
H
s
w
w 3
z
w
4
(L
o a
Q.
U
o
F-
U
QVOWti
m
3
m
c
d
H
Y d
Priority Number
u
a
a a
v
Fa
u
T O
y
O�
0
O 1`'
C A V)
d o_
Q-
y
a.
Functional r
C
d
Class)
LL
W
m
(0
a
O
N
0
Cl)
m
CO
0
O
n
m
m
a�
rr
a
N
N
ch
d
O
0
R.
w
17
I RW Required Z
o
c
¢ntal Type W
6
'n rn N
O
Environm U
ro
s.. N
a
Q `a
Total Length
c
d. M
N
utility Codes
o q
M
/1\
W O
o
O
c
I ImprovementTyp¢
LL
O U.
a
L
o
Resolution No.
O
a N
O
t
Amendmen
7
LL
m
O
N
Adopted
c
o
O
Nearing
A 0
Q
r
p 4
w
N
m
ro
m
LL
1
9 F
C 0
4 C
t
Y_
O LL
'6 d
N
C
9
m
U
1
G
N m c0
0.
ill a N
O y
c
C
a y
Z d 4
C
t`
c m
m a c m
o
U
orz°sQ
Z
m m a
1 m
u cZ.�
t
au�
m a
3
Y C� t!)
Priority Number
a
a o.
c
c w
n
a
r
'v
C
1W�
3
v o
Functional
1
Class
g
a�
rr
a
N
N
ch
d
O
0
R.
w
17
E cO
L
CD N
L- o
M
r
N
E E
0
L-
0 U
M
E
C
O
M
O
Q
L
Fn
-o
O
Z
_c
RW Requiredl
YT
z°
M �r
Environmental Type
C Y4
y
U
F�
c
Y a
Total Length
v
O
r
LL
o
Q
V O
Utility Codes
f
RW Requiredl
z°
Environmental Type
Total Length
r
LL
Utility Codes
Improvement Type v
N
9
C
Resolution No.
LL
V
0
Amendment
v
c
io
LL
d
-a
r
A
N
v>
Adopted
o 0
V
U
Hearing
D
LL
d
t
V
O O
A
W
a
I= o
En u Q
o
o
pj 2
0 0
fn
y
C
7
LL
d
3 y
M
N
d a
M
d
m C
C
-G'
O O
co
V
C.0
N
N
LL
p
N
U
D
U.
N
N y
C
U 0
C C
U O
U
O O
N
I?
a
O Cc
M
£O
q N
m
E E?
V
U
N
C Z
V
U
t
0
o�Zro°
awv�m
Z m p
B o
E
m>o
m
L J
aa A'ma`
rn
o `a
a Q
O
Q6 6 ul U.
Z
a
4
a
Priority Number
v
v�
t
N
a
7
s3.
Functional a,
y
Class
x Lu
M
N
rn
nz
a
V,
0
N
O
M
C
CO
ai
m
r
n
18
C
d
TP
CL.
N
M
m
m
a
O
Q.
19
R W Required) z
00
.p.O O.
Environmental
TYPe� v
o o
O
N
r
0
O
LL
y
7ota1 Length
a
a M
C11
Utility Codes
'o c
o
0
Improvement TYPe� o
N N
L
0 LL.
Y
I
LL
5—
a
M
o
J
Resolution No'
0 0
N N
O
O Amendment
u'
CL
N
f
I-
Adopted
r
L
U
YI
p
C
L
0
Hearing
LL
d
m
N
o
N
5
m
N
c
LL
H
N
•O
N
'O
M
LL
C
O
C
r
0
m U
v
N
O LL
C
L
X LL
N
O�
08
y p) CO
Q
~o 0
U
A N N
N
m
r
G
m
15
2
o
'Z
Z. 0,0
N u
y-
Q :e R W
a m
r w
O
c
N
0.
7
W
d
N N
Z
'O
g
ci ui u:
W
t p Z
N L a U
x c N
r
a Priority Number
3 0.
a c
d
Q
C G
4 y
X
Fa-
Q v p
Functional
2
Class`
C
d
TP
CL.
N
M
m
m
a
O
Q.
19
0
y
C
C
RW Requiredl
z°
I-
r
LL
A
H
0
'D
C
7
A
t c
0 0
N
Environmental Typel
w
V/
O
O o
U
0
Q
L
rn
W
A
(A
d d 9 N
E L u
a
M
2 0
o
yy
PJ7
Total Length
adv5a°i
Z O A 'M, O
f�
r�
0
aa�ma
Q
0 0
Q U O Lu LL
Ct
N
m K
c
a
O O
E
Utility Codes
0
E
u
0
U 3
p
CL
O N
Q
L
LL
Improvement Type
o
L
O
O
N
a
Functional m
CL
2
Classl
E
m
r—
Resolution No.
cL d
O
A w
L a
w
a
Z
U
c
a
7
v
r
Q.
w
LL
Amendment
H
N
a
rn
r
c
w
L
L
Adopted
d
0
Z Hearing
V/
a
M
cn
ti v
o
Q
co
3
N
0
y
C
c
O
U
N
i
d
C
N
a
E
Q;
m o
E
a a rn
M rn
N
N U m L
0 0
M
C
O o
LL
A
H
0
'D
C
7
A
t c
0 0
E c
O
J
O
U.
O
O o
Z y
L
c ora
Z
W
A
(A
d d 9 N
E L u
w
C
2 0
O.~.z°��
yy
PJ7
L
V
adv5a°i
Z O A 'M, O
U.
A
N
0
a
LL
LL
0
aa�ma
0
0 0
Q U O Lu LL
Ct
3
m K
c
O
O O
H
Y d
u
0
Priority Number
Ri
W
CL
O N
Q
CO
o
OD
0
O
O
N
a
Functional m
Ia'
2
Classl
c
O
U
N
i
d
C
N
a
E
Q;
m o
E
a a rn
M rn
N
N U m L
0 0
M
C
O o
LL
A
H
0
'D
C
7
A
0
0 0
O
J
O
U.
O
O o
L
o
O
O
O
O
O o
O o
O o
O O
N b
A
(A
C
2 0
m
0
V
a
C
L
V
U.
A
N
0
a
LL
LL
0
0 0
o 0
0 0
v a
0
0 0
m
a
v
d
LL
0
N
A
v
of
O
O O
U
9
c
u.
LL
R
d
d
LL
a
F-
y
c
N
R
Y M
o
CO
o
OD
0
O
O
N
O O
O
N
Y
m
VI
r
cL d
A w
L a
w
a
Z
U
c
a
7
v
r
L d
N A
w
LL
Z
U
H
a
rn
r
c
w
n
N
rn
CO
a
(V
0
N
C
M
T
d
m
0
O
C,
Lu
OR
E 00
r
L
N
a M
N
E E
0
L
Q U
E
C
O
.4+
L
O
Q
L
F..
L
CD
x
iz
to
i C I
s
d
z
m
C
Y
m
c
F Y d
O
c
0
a o
f
RW Requiredl z
Environmental Typal
v
N
0
Total Length
Utility Codes
Improvement Typel N
Resolution No.
Amendment
Adopted
Hearing
p
H o
(n u Q
Od 2
U
N
CO
W
0
N
O
CO
ai
a
m
21
N
Y
M E o
a
c c
5
Z
E d
o
m
o
T]z °a
ih in
o
Z O Q m 0
a s
Q a
aa�ma
y z
Q L) 0 u! ci
(n UJ
cn
Priority Number
Functional
°o
Class
C>
N
CO
W
0
N
O
CO
ai
a
m
21
O
O
C
3
LL
0
°o
C>
0
v
c
IL
u
J
0 0
O
0
r
N
L
c
co
LL
d
L
N
N
0 0
V
U
a
c
t
LL
a
m
m
N
0
0
0 0
N
C
7
LL
N
y
V
L
d
LL
n
m
N
_O
y
r
o c
0 0
a U
c
U L
LL
L
n
L
m
N
U LL
U
t
U
O O
j O
N
f
i N
I N
r
i a.
a
d
N lL
N
t a
m
G.
d
F
d
m
w
y M
a
w
CL
w
N
C
LL
w
N
CO
W
0
N
O
CO
ai
a
m
21
E cO
L
N
O p
N
d
0
0 LL
0-
E
Y
O
iJ
L
O
Q
L
L
V/
d
a
3
O
Z
O
y
_c
RW Required) z
Environmental Typel
w
U
rn
0
Total Length
EL
O
Utility Codes O
U�
Improvement Type I M
0
Resolution No.
Amendment
Adopted
Hearing
m 2 3;
to
d
O O
a
H o
h v
c
0
C U
O C
T
E
c
6 E
M a
o
c y
m
N
Y O)
d
'O
y
d
L
m
3
d
O m
U c
E p 'O N
c c
`c
N
C
L y O O Q
V 7 Q Q a
a
o
0
E,o
z
y
c v aoD
N a
w
m
z of a
a
d Euio
j
a
z •O d •O
LL
aaWoma`
QUO uI Li
F-
Y O
Priority Number
c
0
Q
V
O
Functional r
C
Class)
c
0
C U
O C
T
E
c
6 E
M a
o
c y
m
N
Y O)
d
'O
y
d
L
m
3
d
O m
U c
E p 'O N
c c
`c
N
C
L y O O Q
V 7 Q Q a
a�
rn
CO
a
W
0
N
6
M
m
O
a
N
22
o
S c
0
y
c v aoD
N a
w
m
LL
0
O
0
o 0 CL
C
C
I
V
J
O
o
N
a A
O O
c
L
c
LL
10
-a
y
L
h
a
U
c
m_
t
LL
a
w
N
0
0
0 0
N
L
G
u-
W
IF
ffi
v
m
U
m
C
F
o
0
0 0
V
c
3
U
2
C
9
N
y LL
G
o
0
0 0
10
O
O
O
O
M OJ
OD W
w
(00
N
d
M
IL
d
R W W
Z
N
d
F-
d
a
a
U
N
e a
r
n a
a a
r
o y
c
c
a
x
LL
W
a�
rn
CO
a
W
0
N
6
M
m
O
a
N
22
co
a
c
N
O
Q
L
a CO
N
d p
Q U.
O
N
L
L
to
0)
N
r RW Required
m
LL
I
I
'EnvironmentalTYpe
r
C
Total Leng
O
1
m9
1
t o
n
utility Codes
o
G
I
1 O
y
1 1
u
C IY
1
a,
c
o
N
w
y m
N N N
1
I
r
N 1
,Mendment
m
y
A
d c F 'o
o
Z
o
r
don
r
c m°
N N m
Adopted
v
t
1
o N
Z
U
L
111
V7 -c o K U
c
1
O Hearing
m
m
priority Number
Z
N cL
0. 0 .I
c m
N
C I
m
a 1
O W
i 0 G
p
Class
a
o
u 4
I w
N
1
v
m
9
C
Y I
1
I
R U
a
r
a
m o
Q v o
N
N
co
m
d
Q
O
N
C(
23
m
LL
I
I
m
m
r
y U
m9
m
n
v
G
1 O
y
1 1
C IY
a
y m
N N N
m o c
r
Zma
Y S c�
d c F 'o
CL
Z
o
r
don
r
c m°
N N m
a W K
L 0. U
ab
5
o N
Z
4pLW6.
N w
111
V7 -c o K U
r
priority Number
N cL
0. 0 .I
c m
N
C I
m
a 1
W
y I
p
Class
N
N
co
m
d
Q
O
N
C(
23
E
cO
RW Required
2
0
Environmental T
2
a.
Total Len
LL
Q
N
E
E
Utilit Cod m
0
7
Improvement
0
U
Typ
CL
E
LL
c
__#N
0
o
CL
LL
c
2
Adopted
o
a
cc
k
z
Hearin
FO
d
k}
0
s�
5
0
2
7T
«2
f
y\
kk!
!%I f
k zQ r
Lu
m
)f
22 a
f
3
j
IL
�d0Lu m
xC
$a
Number
\�k
Functional
m
ƒ
j
24
0
N
N
m
c6
CL
7
O
N
O
Cl)
m
N
m
r
0
a
a)
25
RW Required) o
T'
N
Environmental Typel
w
U
o
0
0
0 0
0
0
v
0
0
0
0
0
O
o
N
N M
(D
N
a
9
Total Length
a
O
m
d
N
E E
Utility Codes
O
5 0
0
7 0
0
Q
LL
ImprovementTypelo
C
g
0
C
L
h
t2
N
CL
C
LL
Resolution No.
0
it
o
0
0
0
o 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
N
Q Amendment
c
N
IL
S
r
N
N
L
L
Adopted
0 0
0 0
m
O
0
o
'a
x
Hearing
c
LL
v
O O
U)
a 2
Mo
H M
U) v Q
0
0
0
0
2 3
0 0
0 0
C7
LL
d
9
N
LL
M
d
C
A
O O
O O
U
9
c
L
N
C
LL
2
1 C
d
LL
N
C
O
y
r
v
R
O O
O O
y
O
Y N
W
N
G
a
G
Y N
N
N
w
E C_
E C
N
6
N
N
M
2 o
a
c w o
o
0
a
a
Z O
G N
V_
N
L
s,
E
E u,
o
j P
d
Oc
0_ a' z 6 d
'o
U) U)
N
�O
N
N
G
z o d o
0 0'
o
c
t a
U
aao!mo.
r'
a
U
Qd OUILL
U)
Q
a
C
3
m U)
c
m u
N
a
r
a w
v
r T
Priority Number
a
G
c a
rn
N
v�
3
Y
Q
c
0.
Functional o
a
Classy
e
x
0
N
N
m
c6
CL
7
O
N
O
Cl)
m
N
m
r
0
a
a)
25
T
N
rn
m
tL
W
0
N
C
Cl)
CO
2
d
m
0
n
a>
OM
RW Required
E
00
V
I_
CD
Environmental Type
N
w
O
O
M
a
o
Total Length
U.
C)
w
N
W
a
E
0
Utility Codes
E
U
p
75
Q
LL
Improvement Type o
0
0
0 0
L
i�f.
v°
C
v
rn o
E
Resolution No.
LL
V
o
C
0
0
0 0
0
0 0 0
(a
L
v rn o
m 0
C
Amendment
Q
N
LL
a6
L
N
N
L
I..,
Adopted
y
a
d
0
o
U
'O
X
z
Hearing
LL
CO
O U
N
a r
0 0
fn
N
(7
V
r
LL
N
V
N
d
LL
v
w
p
C
N
W
O
O O O
V
c
A
U
V
9
Q
N
m
LL
A
'DO
LL
N
N
C
a
Vl
O
O O O
A
N'
O2
N
r
m
c
(A
c
m
d
E
�Eo
m
z�a
3
a
C
C5
zd0a`u
m
a
c
m is
d =£w
m
m
m
a
N
orZ�o
LL,a�+� a�i
z o o s
m
r
d y
z O
U7
C r
N
z w
N
w
aci0ul
US
rn
3 m
y m
y
F-
Y N a
t
N
m
R ul
z
a
s
Priority Number
a a
U
2
c a
a
U
y
a
Functional v
c
a
Classy
a
m
T
N
rn
m
tL
W
0
N
C
Cl)
CO
2
d
m
0
n
a>
OM
I
S
a
CO
i�
\V O
N
0 0
L
a M
N
d 0
o U.
L
0
0
N
L
L
A
W
N
1 RW Requiredlz
Environmental Type v
Total Length
Utility codes
1
Improvement TYpeI N
I
Resolution No.
1 S a.
N N
4
LL
Y
r
--000
o.
N N
LL
u 1
0
Amend
I
Plum ber
I Adopted
Priority
O Nearing
Z
II,
a, U n.
functional
Class
y
o
N
4
3
m
iN
I
1
I
5
Y
1
I
Y4
LIU
t G
G O
1 m1=n
O V Z G y
4V 6 U.
o' a
0
O M d
N
I Zn
N
r d
U F 1O M
O U 1 a
N
I LL 3
d
A
N
1
O
v I
A �ry
9 1 I
M
C
I LL
u O O O
cod Y 4 d
o N u L) 1 1
7 E
0 0
v
G1
A S
p N Q R N N N Y C N 1 1 N
v R`
p j Na o0 U1 L
O O I O
O m L N G
7 G y
O O
0
m GrCKI O
N L y
O j a N y O I 1 N 111 Z
U
Y Y a
Plum ber
Priority
r a
r—
II,
a, U n.
functional
Class
w 9
L�' J
N
N
d
0
O
m
27
M
N
N
O
a
MT
N
M
A
O
l7
O
0
Cr
28
I RW Requir z
a
0 Ok
00
e
Typ
o
o or o
D
Environmental
M N Vol
N
LL I
Length
Total
t
O
oC
N
Utility Codes
o 0
0
ImpYpVementTYpe N
r
1 W
7
I
R 1
LL
1
J
0
Resolution wo•
0 0
N
y�
Y
L
y
pmendment
W 'n
0
Clo
o
Adopte
c
N
Z
N
co
I 4
d
LL
1
M O
lV r
N 0
CI d
r 1
v IW N
9
d
C d
N °1
N
I
U
O Y a N
G 0
y
d d
N
N
7 E« U
1 a r 4
O v N
N N G O
d0 O y�
ISi
ZOO Z
O
4U- d a
x U v
a
Num per
n
Priority
in 1 1
r a
o
v 0
F ►'`D L
Class
M
N
N
O
a
MT
N
M
A
O
l7
O
0
Cr
28
N
N
co
tb
0.
1
N
M
m
d
[6
Q
C
0
a.
29
Required, Y
I
RW
0 0
t...
O
11
�Environmental w
o 0 0
o q o
s.. N
M
O O
LL
Total Length
A
0. M
o
r
r
d N
Utility codes
o
o 0 o c
4
o
O 0
I O
W
Improvement Type cw
N
9
c
O LL.
I
i
L
U
CL
J
p o
O
Resolution
O
O
C
y
Amendment
LL
L
N
O
Adopted
a
r
L
LL
O
Z Hearing
ro
N
s
•A
a
p
o o g o
0 0 0 0
o
0 0
Z
m
N
c
t�
LL
N
d
01
9
LL
G
0
f
O
G W
L a
r
9
•O
N
N
C
d
G LL
O
C
W
C
a0
d o7 a0
Y
N
6
E
U
m e p 2 0
z
a
o0zcu
a a d c c W Z o
c a u r
r
Qaam
j m Q iD
t v 2
H Lu
Priority Number
m
ftt
y
o_ m
0
N
c i
Function I
j
class
N
N
co
tb
0.
1
N
M
m
d
[6
Q
C
0
a.
29
N
N
LT
a
RW Req uired z
o
o
ental Type U
CO iro N
•r IEnvnm
.N
N o
.O Total Length
g 0 0
N t)tility code O
N
0 i Improvement TYPe o a
LL
o U o
CL
Resolution No• T
TO
t w
o M tD I 1 I
�i A dopted
f" o
•o m
L m I c r a
N LL I`
7 H
0 Hearing
a
I
A 1 M
1
LL
G
O
O
p F"
1 y 0 I
C U
9 I
9
O
O>
a
6>9
d
1( N �O� O� N
m
1 0 3
m,r 7-
o�z� a m fl. a 'o
Z do
C OD a CD
Q
t
T priority Numper
0.
T T A• L
•`.C i L 7 1 t.i
3 o d functional g
a sC v o I Ctass
N
M
m
a
O
a
I
N
N
tP
a.
N
C•1
C
G
�i
D
t
0
a
tY
31
I
RW Requ iredl Z
00
Type
o 0
o 0 0
Q
Environmental
w
U
o
o N
L N
a
m N
O C
o
u
L 4
Length
A
a M
Total
I
o
r
d N
Utility Codes
o
FE F
O N
0
Improvement Type "o
a N
c
O U.
I
L.
R
E
Resolution No.
O
00 p O
O
0 G G N
o c d
C
Amendment
O
A
CL
N
h Adopted
L
w
o
U
V Lo
7
w, 1Y
Hearing
IL
a
N
wr
N
0 r
F
0
0
8
N
2
v
N
c
3
LL
m a
N M
V
IL
L
co r
o
U
N V
D.
U.
N C
N
L
G
m
'O
4 N LL
c
O c
c
K
N N
p 00 R
-5
�e E
O N
O L
m C Q
co
o~
m m C
o
i N
dL.
N
r y
o
Lu Z O
G m
a v
E
3 c
Priority Number
O
C L
L
:p N X.
G
F
m O
q v
Functional
p
class
N
N
tP
a.
N
C•1
C
G
�i
D
t
0
a
tY
31
N
N
d
co
r
N
O
.1J
a M
N
o
o u.
c
O
O
N
L
Q�
RW Re Quired' Z o 0
o°o ao O
o m
Environmen
1 1
Q
-Total Length r
-1' o
Utility C
N
3 1
ImprpYementTYPe N u
O
Resolution NO'�
r
7
d
A.e"
N
0
o
J Adopted 1 c
o Hearing N
PC
F u Q c
LL- 9
d
I LL
p=� N
yyUm o
°ww
1
Viz° 0 d
N NO a 3
R
O 0
CV to Q 9
d
0 0
U N d rl� A o cN T
odacioE N
N N
3 0
ZYQ N 3 d f6L O Q
f-
z�a,
(n o¢'
ash aa�°roa 7 la
yy QU�wu:
um c
Priority N per
o Functions'
2
4 v n. Cla
N
N
M
d
oa
32
E
00
RW Required
i
r
N
Environmental Type
l
w
U
o
0
Q
C
v
v
L
4J
N
N
N
a
M
Total Length
r
LL
O
m
N
a
F
E
o
Utility Codes (D
E
G
3
0 0
o
C
L L
Improvement Type M
N
o
L
N
o
r
Q
c
A
O
O
Resolution No.
O
0 0
M
�r
o
C
0
M
Q
Amendment
N
LL
qS
L
d
N
N
L
L Adopted
0 0
a
0
O
o
X
z
Hearing
a
c
O
U-
rn
2
u Q
o 0
c
0 0
(n
d
c
LL
R
V
�O
M
LL
LL
w
m
m
c
0 0
U
a
w
c
m
O
v
c
N
W
LL
d
O O
M
01 w
U
p
Z
L"'
N
O Oi
R V
E• c
E
n€ O
m
t
z
E
y U
a
c F a
Z y o �O V
U
E C W
O
O V Z
d
`m
m
m
d
e
ad0 d
Z 0 d'o
a rn
N
L
z
m
r!j
U
QUOUILL
i- Q
cn
3
x
w L)
v d
c Q
Y a
Priority Number
L
U N
N r
U
p
0
IL
m
c
E
Functional o
c yr
a
111111rrr"'
Class)
LL
W
00
N
O)
es
a
O
N
O
M
a
w
m
r
O
a
N
33
N
N
rF
(6
n.
N
RW Re quired' o M
r N
E n vironm entalTYpe v N p x
0
N a W'
o
4
0 Total uengO r
A y
Y+
J r
ty Utility Code N
N
W N
Q ImPrpVementType�N U.
L
ution No. 0 0
Resol
o
N
q r LL
d
p„ ,endme
O o 0
0
Adopte c
L► v p c
r 4
1
\V N m
A
d o Nearing 'n
0 0
t7 d
m
LL
d G
y N
U N W
U
a+ C m W
r d
�DN�1 a
m m° LL U N z
CD
N O W
b
i �9
0-
a' o
m
1 m y I y N' N
c�" p N r N
A N
y m r m
m u
t! W fir 9 y� O u, 2 i U
W N s` �m i m a s o- CL 7 cC
o c 3 a i9 u a Wp, U
0 11
U N a n d
L—
c: Y p Priority N a N W
Q LL
3C m cuonat
°o
4 U Funriass
34
E
tQ
L
N
O O
CL
N
E E
0 O
L
O LL
L
Q
C
0
L
O
Q.
N
L
L
V/
m
IN
d
0
O
z
N
y
_C
m
y 01
C
v Z
c c d
O U K
Q o
2
RW Requiredl z
Environmental Type
Total Length
Utility Codes
l
Improvement Type) N
Resolution No,
Amendment
Adopted
Hearing
O
a m
H a o
N u Q
S c
a Q
IL
o o
N p r
II
c
LL
e0
O
J
0 0
W L
c io
LL
d L
A
U)
a
U
II
C t
LL a
N
N
N
0 0
0 0
C 0
W O O
b o G
L V V
LL
d II
LL
N
A
a c
C H o 0
U
II
C
7
LL
L
W II
LL N
0 0
N
N o
m
r
a
h w
M a
IL
7
II
d
w
y L a
N
a
N c
LL w
0
CO
c)
CO
a
O
N
0
M
c
6
ai
m
Q
r
C L
a
35
N
N
7z
3
d
N
N
N
m
m
Y
c
a
c
o
O)
c
C
N
U
41
o
f a
0
O
6
fl.
N
O
N
12
E
d
G
N
a
O
o
U
E o
o
Z
o F
o 2
2
,a
z
a b u
E w d
a
d
V p
m
o U
N
ZOO dp
of
o
�m
E:(L0:
m�
Q tUO LI Li
(n m
Priority Number
Functional
Class
S c
a Q
IL
o o
N p r
II
c
LL
e0
O
J
0 0
W L
c io
LL
d L
A
U)
a
U
II
C t
LL a
N
N
N
0 0
0 0
C 0
W O O
b o G
L V V
LL
d II
LL
N
A
a c
C H o 0
U
II
C
7
LL
L
W II
LL N
0 0
N
N o
m
r
a
h w
M a
IL
7
II
d
w
y L a
N
a
N c
LL w
0
CO
c)
CO
a
O
N
0
M
c
6
ai
m
Q
r
C L
a
35
N
O
p. M
G
7 O
O Il-
L
t
O
O
N
to
d
RW R Z
I n vironm entalType
0
Total
Utility c odes
t wvov .--lt
TYp o
I Resolution O
V�
pmen
O
Z
a
t�
CO
N
4�
t6
0.
o
o°o oc 0
O
L
L
o
ilo
A dopted 1
Nearing
P r'
O ry
a o
m N
N
N
a
a
r Y
a
d o
d
sG t) tea.
a
l o l O
o re
o 0 o
z
LL 1
in C
3
Y'
A
c
LL
r
LL
o
o o
O
v
d
N
LL
u
y}
y
1
1 0
0
o
G
U Y O
c
LL
0
CO
N
4�
t6
0.
o
o°o oc 0
O
L
L
o
ilo
A dopted 1
Nearing
P r'
O ry
a o
m N
N
N
a
a
r Y
a
d o
d
sG t) tea.
a
o re
L
in C
3
e
I
c
LL
LL
U
d
N
y}
y
1
vo
o
G
U Y O
o
0
N
c
T
m
R
m aTi r9 y c
d
LL
u=
eCV�
N
r' 1
N
N
M
N
O
r
d
0
U
N L
d a fl
'9
d
X 1
m U
in C
3
LL
ad
U
1
y}
y
1
vo
U Y O
N
N
T
m
3 o
m aTi r9 y c
u=
eCV�
priority Numper
d a
N
,t al r
Class
N
r' 1
N
N
M
N
O
r
d
0
U
N L
d a fl
'9
d
X 1
N
ch
N
rti
a
7-
N
M
ai
m
0
Q
37
l y
RW Requ ired
Do
o
Environm ental Type U1
r
o
N
c
O
r w
LL
L N
v
y
O O
S.
Total Length
o
N Codes
a
utility
o
N p.
r
o
7
improvementTYPe
c
O U-
LL
R
U.
u
Resolution NO*
o C4 c
o
o o
a m
r
3
tO
y
Amendm
LL
N
L
O
m
N
L
Adopted
m
o
U
L
y
U
p
Hearing
m
r
z
O
o
9
LL
N
m
N
s
m
V
v
m
t
o
`3 a o c
0
c o
U
m LL
U y c
(n ro
i 9
N m
U
G
v
t-
N
9
r C N C N
N N
i y O
M
9
m
O
o Z}"°
O o r
a, n a
'It
m
m m
y F q
N r
m
C U D
m O
W
d V
O vZ L u
m$ K
L m
es
a d, a 'rn o
c c
v
a4�
m
Grp
cLU ❑Wu
N
0.
X l
r a
Priority Number
m a
3 N a a c
3
C
0 o
I
Functional a
Class
g
N
ch
N
rti
a
7-
N
M
ai
m
0
Q
37
Z
W
U
O r
P n
N
r
0 0
N r
N n
M n
N
N r N
a
Y
N
W
U
III O N
T U
P
O N 0 M
co r
m
in
m I-
a
d
N
N
w
w, C
LL
r
A%
0
o
E O C
N o
P r
t7
C
a O M
to N
N
P
r o S
N
c O Q O
N O N
L V
M m
N
O
O 0
X
x
N
i
O
N
C
O
T
N d
F 1y
ig
O
•V Q
N
N
9
co
C
O
J LL
i a
'R
°S
0
CO
i ii
0
Q L
N 'O
L r
v
W N
N
Q N
3
o c
N W r
o
d d
U
F li
u
c_
`o
N
N
7
LL
O
U
N
a o 0
y
LL U
0
LL
a
N m
N
N
0-
C
a
N
a
assyd 108101d ro
sopoo Almin
416uai 18101 cO
sn181s u N
(s)adA.L
V
luawanoidwl
6 C
ma
9
0
N w
C
C
W
O Q
z
m?
t
y O
V
E
o
o
O
Q
m
c�
tD
N LY
0
U c
U
E d
CC
Z M
L
Y Q
W O
c a 4
0 0
0 E
i
CL
E
z c c
Z e
v°
a d r
d
t4
t;
'O 1y N N v
E V o E o
L
11 N
ya a ill mQ
o N E 5
Q._° ma
m
D a V w LL
m m o o ac
a m
D1 Y
T I N
a
Z
M
N
aagwnN N
f
APOIld
3 T
W
0
O
Z Z
11
OL
Ieuol3ound
ollou
4
U v
Z
W
U
O r
P n
N
r
0 0
N r
N n
M n
N
N r N
a
Y
N
W
U
P
O
P
co r
in
i0
N
P
r
rn
W
0
o
a
P r
t7
O
a O M
to N
N
N
C
O
d
N
7
O
N
d
d
M
N
LO
N 7
N N
F- d U
1- n. 0
0
0
0
a
,o
J
G P
o
V N
m °o
m P
R
c
m
c m
4
c m my
7Z 8 m'ro
mU or
v
N
r
d
O
v�
N N
N N
O
3 Z F-
QU
0
0
l a
M O
0
A
r a
m
Z U
N L
m
N m x
a 30
m o0
cc
N
-r
m
'o d
C7
t
C y
U b o
c
e N
Z) m m
m m 'S
d'
0
m
a�
a
m`
s m m
mm
M
f
m
N
m
ui
N
t
N
a
38
o
P
O
mo d
co r
in
N N
N
rn
W
a
on M
mm
N 7
N N
F- d U
1- n. 0
0
0
0
a
,o
J
G P
o
V N
m °o
m P
R
c
m
c m
4
c m my
7Z 8 m'ro
mU or
v
N
r
d
O
v�
N N
N N
O
3 Z F-
QU
0
0
l a
M O
0
A
r a
m
Z U
N L
m
N m x
a 30
m o0
cc
N
-r
m
'o d
C7
t
C y
U b o
c
e N
Z) m m
m m 'S
d'
0
m
a�
a
m`
s m m
mm
M
f
m
N
m
ui
N
t
N
a
38
NE
2
Fk
LL =/3{
7
k
o
2
N
2
R co
j/
t
f
d
k
T-
05
2
N
k7 co
C
22
E
�f
f
g)
a
L\
x
S
2;
G
ui
K
o
CL
M k
,2
L
m
)k
x
o 0
e «2G
r
E )j�
7Uj LL
cm
J
co
U-
a\
I
OJdc
7!
7)
kr r-
o0 0CL(n (L e
o0a.co
+ue-1 10101
me r
n
m
2
G
2
2
0
2
E
t
)E
2�]
&2.
B2
ca
2
)J ,.0 o
2
v a
k (Jf�
k!
}2$ E=
(f
)a.
¢6
c
f
7� ƒk��
�G
e!
3
ƒ�d���
\k}
\\ƒ\
2
cr
>2
IA
°m a
r
m
2
A! @a
u
f
ƒ
6
mo ue
NE
E
a,
T 0�
Z
Z
Z
y
c
O
O o
N
LLU mpg
N
N
N
a r !r
M
o o o
W
W
W
N
d
O
r
LLa WF
N
U
U
U
G
Q�
r 0
Z
t i t
tD
ID O
t0 O
O
L
N
Q O
d V
0.
r
o 2
v
N
N
a
O
C
a o
CD
r -o
co
ul
N
Q-
E
a w
N m
La
d
E
R a
N
O
C o N
1
O
L-
b
av
r
y.r
LL
N
p
K
w
w
w
yr
N
L
(O
O
fWp
W I� O
N 0
N
O (UJ
M
ii
cc
0
o
l6 t6
Q Q
LL
OJ O
OD 1� O
n N
N N
N
0
U"O
�r
a0 X 10
0 c0
f 1
E
0 O
LL
C
Q�
d
Q
h C
75 m E
6 L
X
o o
Q
a
ago
O y m 3�O
T
a
a in LL 0
c
y 5 m
O C p r
U. 'm LL U
c z
Cl)
Y1 u-
O
0
N
m
cu
a
N 'D
U)
LL 0LLU
O LL
a
(p /C
CL 65
0)
N
N N
N r
00
M
N
O
N
N
a
co
aSe4d loa(oad
oo I
a v
O
H a U
O
F U
O J
F
O
F-
sepoo Almin
n l
o_ H 3 <n a
a
4loue lelol
co
o°
snlelS
'n I
Ql
(s)edRl
LO
N
N
luewenadwl
o
0
S
C
C O
z
N
m e
t
r
Ol O
c
o
s y
o
0
CL
m
c y
C
0-
o f
N
C
'0
N N
m
LL
O
c c
y
m
d O
3
p N
U 0 .m
cn m
.0 LU
N
c cn
O
U)
7 C CD
o
.o 0o
d oro
o
Y 0_
Z O
mm
v r
a
5
d
E
O
O O d
c
4
O
C y cc
o d E o
o
m
m
m
6
m H
N v z a
E a
a o
s s ad
d
Z
w O
N
t5
d
O O
V a
W 07
C w F c d
h
h
�a
N c
LU ca_`q
d m a
3 c °o°
o
N
W
M
°m t; E a
LL d d= V
vlt6
U�
a o m
v
oy�
N i u�
2 0,..'o
N
G
Z O i rn W
N a a N m
hN
a c o
y tom
E E m
a
a c o
m A°
S R c
j US
r
it
r N
i s G ul Li
av
E. 2
mro
E a
o oe
e E D
°oi
E
3 °v°
ca
5
c2
T
d
n n
°o=
°3
aogwnN
N
0 c
4JOIJd
r
=Z
6f
Z.
SSelo
r
f
a
f�
Q
U U
leualounj
40
N
r O 7 d
W N
U. U LLN
tp
0 p N^
p N N M T M Y
a
rr d 0
N
0
p 0 o y N nti
o
O
i+r Y N r O O N
N r a o
L N 4 S m o
I
O N
3 O C 6
m y N u.
N U1 N T a
O
N
LL N
U
N LL tJ M
y LL
J i l
asEUd N a 0 o
sap00 F1!llin
a
0
ul�us 11w,
co
a o
sfllt2lS U� C-4
C
z uawa^° idwl
D
N A Q N
U C O O•
m
y U j f O
-Z 'O
C Q E
d c~Y
iif O Z Z
c
m
CD
d W S o m m
a 2 n 9 c A ti N 9 Yn N
O E ro
d O C m •L d a m o C o
O
(36.
`m
c lv 2N m =4 °0_�
vl
N N o O d V O W u.
r
N a ce)
r m
ssel�
3 v z
a
X U
O
N
r
v
ui
Q
�i.
41
N
G
O
N
0
z
V
A
/y W
d r l C M I I� I 7
7 Q o N N
O Cy
O Y LL Q O
C o o
U C
t
m
o p.
O N
N
L C
LL
C7 iv
0 0 p U
V 1 N LL
LL V Ir IN N
N LL tY
r
�oa(oaj a 3r Na
ase4d o
SOP
°J R1!INn o (n
0
LO 6°
o
O U
O
l ot c'�
i• CD C �t6 d O U J N
a m d u N g d
C 9 W
fai C
E d d i6� Z 2
N O G s CO 0 me m id o O�
fi
d Z O G d CL A d Y Q m ro m cfs
R v p O N m O o v v 1
00 cp
1-
y
3
Z T
a Nk ,Suovun�
4 r
V V
0
N
C6
m
G
0
2
42
0
W
S
a
M
h
N
a N
N
ca m
C
N
Z
Z
f
T M
LL lr
c
N
N
A
°o m
O
N
T�
cr
LU
N
N
�0
U
r
^0
U.
o
v o
a o
11J
W
Z. N
N t0
w r
t+
0
u-
d
N
tC
rno
c oo To co m_�
a YaNi o.
(s)adRl I
v o
0
W
O
luawanadwl
L L Q7
O
o
G
G
b
`o
O 00
R
r
Q
d
V
N
fl
L
W
M
o
N
d
v1 d
Cl)
C
A
m c
4m
C
O
9 YJ
o
G
p
E C
Y
o
W
G
C
d
N
O O
m
N o
E
c
a S
c
a
IL
O
R
Z
a
oC
m y z a
.a m O 2°
9
m
O
O
CL
y
U
r N
s
N D n
F LL
O
h
i�
{Q
d c
LL C
N O
O
cn
9 QL d V
Z O
4)
V
O
co
C
d
O a U G ul Lr
J LL
N
i..
c0
r
a
t
N
aaqulnN
m E
�i
3
T
Z
C
O O
r
O d
o
m e "o T
Q
U
v O
U
o
c
U) (n
N
N
O C
N
O
H
m LL
ti
C
h
cp
c
N
0
LL-
O N 0
O
d
N LL 0
LL
O
LL
a
0
W
S
a
M
h
N
a N
N
ca m
C
N
Z
Z
a
T M
U-
d
N
A
°o m
c7
O
J
I I
LU
U
U
r
o
m
sepop Mum n l V c7 a w� 3 a
o�
Z. N
N t0
o
O
snlels `n I d
d
N
tC
rno
c oo To co m_�
a YaNi o.
(s)adRl I
v o
0
W
S
a
M
h
N
a N
N
ca m
C
u C O� p
N
o
a
O
(7
U-
d
N
A
°o m
c7
O
J
I I
O J
a
0
W
S
a
0
m
n
N
U)
O J
J
a
a�3cn
o
d
a
0
N
FAO- O
a
3Hcna-0
N
0
0_
0
A
3
v
h
U L
N
W
ca m
C
u C O� p
N
o
a
m v
U-
d
N
A
°o m
m v
O
J
I I
O J
a
O
H
aseNd lOa(ad a
r
o
m
sepop Mum n l V c7 a w� 3 a
o�
Z. N
416uallelol
o
O
snlels `n I d
d
tC
rno
c oo To co m_�
a YaNi o.
(s)adRl I
v o
0
luawanadwl
m
N
b
`o
C
O 00
R
Z
N
O
n'
M
o
-O
m Q
C
0
an d
N 9
C
A
m c
4m
9 YJ
o
G
p
E C
Y
a
Z- O
G
C
d
O O
m
z
g
E
c
a S
c
a
IL
R
Z
a
oC
m y z a
.a m O 2°
9
m
U
a CC
s
mm
d
L
d c
LL C
L
N
9 QL d V
Z O
4)
c
co
O a U G ul Lr
o o o ro
C
r
l M
CL
N
aaqulnN
F4
N
3
T
Z
C
SSBIJ I
r
leuollound
Q
U
U
0
m
n
N
U)
O J
J
a
a�3cn
o
d
a
0
N
FAO- O
a
3Hcna-0
N
0
0_
0
N
C
a
d
N
3
O
i
CL
N
d
d
i
c.
N
r
u�
ID
m
m
a
Q1
N
V
m
g
ci
r
43
A
3
v
U L
N
W
ca m
C
w o`
O df
o
a
m v
U-
°o m
m v
O
Q
n C
O
H
r
o
m
Z. =a
o�
Z. N
C
o
O d
N
fn (n
tC
rno
c oo To co m_�
a YaNi o.
=U=
N
N
N
T
(D
It
N
C
a
d
N
3
O
i
CL
N
d
d
i
c.
N
r
u�
ID
m
m
a
Q1
N
V
m
g
ci
r
43
Co
2
U)
F—
2
ooCL :e!
C)
�Q-
/cc z
\N
/f
O
o
N
2
_6 km
2
wm�
CL
£6;
a/
k
§E CD
2
0
LL
Ix a
_els LO
E
c,d
__gym
g
C -4
j k
r
o a
CD
2�/
0
0 7
n-
k
22
E
E
kk
§7
O
f
E
zQkm
ZC5
}E
o
2
k&
Lo 2
/0
;o�
y_
cc
2�
\�0
2
0 c R
3 0
5
k
2
e
a2a
CL CL
2 e
x_
0
11,3-
k
w
)LL
i
a um
g
2
�&S
A! and
5,
m
d
po ue
E
LL
Co
2
U)
F—
2
ooCL :e!
I
�Q-
\N
7
\N
/f
_ago 00
2f($\
_6 km
2
wm�
flea-
£6;
m
+ue-I 18101
_els LO
c,d
__gym
g
2
k
2
k
kk
V
2 LLI
f
E
E
zQkm
}E
2
CC
0
/0
;o�
y_
CL
2�
\�0
0 c R
5
k
im
k }7))
a2a
CL CL
2
m
2
(L IL
2ad6Q�
0
11,3-
w
i
a um
g
2
A! and
5,
m
d
po ue
7
\N
)7
2f($\
e
2
wm�
£6;
m
(D
k
V
CL
cc
cli
cli
k
N
C
O
d
N
O
L3.
d
d
N
G.
N
r-
00
w
a
0
N
r
a�
45
o
m N
e"' O
O N
LL N
O N `6
Lu
0.
r LL N M
r M
O L 7� rn rn m�
d L
cp
c
p o 3
0 0
o N M
as dQ
QN
G O
O
L
O
rn
CD
h LL
C
0
b C, rz-
N
y
a N
O N
U
Y U.
LL
�c
N
N LL
o c0 my a) o
U m a`r C S
V N N ll. CJ
d LL LL
O
to
N a
Y
z
r
°e(oyd m
_a
as>?yd 1
r
saPOO }lll�fl r
V.-
o
o
C
y3Buallal °l
i t7
Lo tl
sn►alS
(s)ad &l
luawancadwl
N
m�
R
o
ffi�
R
U
a
v
I
o?
O LS O O d
C m N
E Y o3c.
O
E N Q C 6 O
cc va
6 �y C N
G r
v° m 8 d 0
n nn'� 5
O d
od u 6wu:
`I r aaqunN N
co
w R }�aotad
o 7
Z leu °Ilaun�
Q U
N
C
O
d
N
O
L3.
d
d
N
G.
N
r-
00
w
a
0
N
r
a�
45
46
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Transportation Committee
FROM: Jack Pace, Director
BY: Nora Gierloff, Deputy Director
DATE: May 30, 2012
SUBJECT: Development Agreement Procedures
ISSUE
Should the City adopt an Ordinance establishing the process, scope, and content of
Development Agreements?
BACKGROUND
As authorized by state law, the City regularly uses DAs to provide certainty in the development
process. Municipal Research and Services Center of Washington provides the following
narrative on what a DA is:
'A development agreement is a contract between a local jurisdiction and a person who has
ownership or control of property within the jurisdiction. The purpose of the agreement is to
specify the standards and conditions that will govern development of the property. The
development agreement provides assurance to the developer that he /she may proceed to
develop the project subject to the rules and regulations in effect at the time of approval the
development will not be subject to subsequent changes in regulations. Development
agreements should also benefit the local jurisdiction. The city or county may include conditions
(mitigation measures) that must be met to assure that a project at a specific location does not
have unacceptable impacts on neighboring properties or community infrastructure. The
agreement may clarify how the project will be phased, the required timing of public
improvements, the developer's contribution toward funding system -wide community
improvements, and other conditions. The agreement can also facilitate enforcement of
requirements, since it is a contract that details the obligations of the developer and local
jurisdiction'"
DAs are specifically useful for large and /or complex developments, such as Tukwila South,
Westfield Southcenter and the future Tukwila Village site. The authority for the City to enter into
a DA is granted to the City under Revised Code of Washington 36.706.170. DAs are legislative
acts, which means that the City has considerable discretion on whether to enter into a
development agreement or not.
DISCUSSION
The City Attorney's office is recommending that the City add specific language to the Tukwila
Municipal Code (TMC) Title 18 to codify the process for the City to enter into Development
Agreements and specify the scope and content of such agreements. The attached Ordinance
reflects the processes that are currently used by the City in the process of DAs under state law.
The Ordinance simply codifies the City's process within the City's Development regulations
(TMC Title 18).
http: /www.mrsc.org/subjects/ planning /lu /developagreements.aspx
47
INFORMATIONAL MEMO
Page 2
As required by TMC 18.80.050, the Transportation Committee referred the matter to the
Planning Commission for their review and consideration. On May 24, 2012, the Planning
Commission voted to recommend that the City Council adopt an Ordinance which establishes
procedures for processing of Development Agreements.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
None
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the draft Ordinance be forwarded to the June 11, 2012 Committee of the
Whole meeting for a public hearing and the June 18, 2012 Regular Council meeting for possible
action.
ATTACHMENTS
Draft Ordinance
Memo to Planning Commission dated May 18, 2012
Z: \DCD n Clerk's \Brandon \Development Agreement Ordinance \Transportation Memo, 2012.05.30.doc 48
y k k
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING
NEW REGULATIONS TO BE CODIFIED AT TUKWILA
MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 18.86 RELATING TO
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, RCW 36.70B.170 authorizes the City to enter into "development
agreements" with persons having ownership or control of real property; and
WHEREAS, in adopting such statute, the Washington Legislature made the following
finding:
The legislature finds that the lack of certainty in the approval of development
projects can result in a waste of public and private resources, escalate
housing costs for consumers and discourage the commitment to
comprehensive planning which would make maximum efficient use of
resources at the least economic cost to the public. Assurance to a
development project applicant that upon government approval the project
may proceed in accordance with existing policies and regulations, and
subject to conditions of approval, all as set forth in a development
agreement, will strengthen the public planning process, encourage private
participation and comprehensive planning, and reduce the economic costs
of development. Further, the lack of public facilities and services is a serious
impediment to development of new housing and commercial uses. Project
applicants and local governments may include provisions and agreements
whereby applicants are reimbursed over time for financing public facilities. It
is the intent of the legislature by RCW 36.70B.170 through 36.708.210 to
allow local governments and owners and developers of real property to enter
into development agreements.
1995 c 347 501; and
WHEREAS, the City Council concurs with the legislative findings referenced above;
and
W: Word Processing \Ordinances\Development Agreements purpose and procedures 5 -18 -12
sK :bjs Page 1 of 5
49
WHEREAS, on June 11, 2012, the Tukwila City Council conducted a public hearing to
consider the proposed ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that development agreements may be appropriate
in certain circumstances as a means to consolidate numerous issues involved in complex
development projects into a single controlling instrument, benefiting the City, its citizens,
and members of the regulated public;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Regulations Established. Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter
18.86, "Development Agreements," is hereby established to read as follows:
CHAPTER 18.86
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS
Sections:
18.86.010
Development Agreements —Authorized
18.86.020
"Development Standards" Defined
18.86.030
Development Standards, Flexibility
18.86.040
Exercise of City Police Power and Contract Authority
18.86.050
Form Public Hearing Required
18.86.060
Conditions of Approval
18.86.070
Recording
18.86.080
Discretionary, Legislative Act
Section 2. TMC Section 18.86.010 is hereby established to read as follows:
18.86.010 Development Agreements —Authorized.
The City may enter into a development agreement with a person having ownership or
control of real property within its jurisdiction. The City may enter into a development
agreement for real property outside its boundaries as part of a proposed annexation or a
service agreement. A development agreement must set forth the development standards
and other provisions that shall apply to and govern and vest the development, use, and
mitigation of the development of the real property for the duration specified in the
agreement.
Section 3. TMC Section 18.86.020 is hereby established to read as follows:
18.86.020 "Development Standards" Defined.
For purposes of this chapter, the term "development standards" means and includes, but
is not limited to:
1. Project elements such as permitted uses, residential densities, and non-
residential densities and intensities or building sizes;
W: Word ProcessinglOrdinances \DevelopmentAgreements- purpose and procedures 5 -18 -12
SK :bjs Page 2 of 5
2. The amount and payment of impact fees imposed or agreed to in accordance
with any applicable provisions of state law, any reimbursement provisions, other financial
contributions by the property owner, or dedications;
3. Mitigation measures, development conditions, and other requirements under
chapter 43.21 C RCW;
4. Design standards such as maximum heights, setbacks, drainage and water
quality requirements, landscaping, and other development features;
5. Parks and open space preservation;
6. Phasing;
7. Review procedures and standards for implementing decisions;
8. A build -out or vesting period for applicable standards; and
9. Any other development requirement or procedure deemed appropriate by the
City Council.
Section 4. TMC Section 18.86.030 is hereby established to read as follows:
18.86.030 Development Standards, Flexibility.
A development agreement shall be consistent with applicable development regulations to
the fullest extent possible; provided, a development agreement may allow development
standards different from those otherwise imposed under the Tukwila Municipal Code in
order to provide flexibility to achieve public benefits, respond to changing community
needs, or encourage modifications which provide the functional equivalent or adequately
achieve the purposes of otherwise applicable City standards. Any approved development
standards that differ from those in the Code shall not require any further zoning
reclassification, variance from City standards or other City approval apart from
development agreement approval. The development standards as approved through a
development agreement shall apply to and govern the development and implementation of
each covered site in lieu of any conflicting or different standards or requirements
elsewhere in the Tukwila Municipal Code. Subsequently adopted standards that differ
from those of a development agreement adopted by the City as provided in this chapter
shall apply to the covered development project only where necessary to address imminent
public health and safety hazards or where the development agreement specifies a time
period or phase after which certain identified standards can be modified. Determination of
the appropriate standards for future phases that are not fully defined during the initial
approval process may be postponed. Building permit applications shall be subject to the
building codes and fire codes in effect when the permit is applied for.
W: Word Processing \Ordinances\Devetopment Agreements purpose and procedures 5 -18 -12
sK:bjs Page 3 of 5
N
Section 5. TMC Section 18.86.040 is hereby established to read as follows:
18.86.040 Exercise of City Police Power and Contract Authority.
As provided in RCW 36.708.170(4), the execution of a development agreement is a
proper exercise of the City's police power and contract authority. Accordingly, a
development agreement may obligate a party to fund or provide services, infrastructure, or
other facilities. A development agreement shall reserve authority to impose new or
different regulations to the extent required by a serious threat to public health and safety.
Section 6. TMC Section 18.86.050 is hereby established to read as follows:
18.86.050 Form Public Hearing Required.
Development agreements shall be consistent with RCW 36.708.170 through 36.70B.210.
All development agreements shall be in a form and content as approved by the City
Attorney. Development agreements shall be approved by ordinance or resolution and
shall be subject to review and approval by the City Council after a duly noticed public
hearing pursuant to RCW 36.70B.200.
Section 7. TMC Section 18.86.060 is hereby established to read as follows:
18.86.060 Conditions of Approval.
In approving a development agreement, conditions of approval shall at a minimum
establish:
1. A site plan for the entire project, showing locations of sensitive areas and
buffers, required open spaces, perimeter buffers, location and range of densities for
residential development, and location and size of non residential development;
2. The expected build -out time period for the entire project and the various
phases, if proposed;
3. Project phasing, if proposed, and other project specific conditions to mitigate
impacts on the environment, on public facilities and services including transportation,
utilities, drainage, police and fire protection, schools, and parks;
4. Road and storm water design standards that shall apply to the various
phases, if proposed, of the project;
5. Bulk design and dimensional standards that shall be implemented throughout
subsequent development within the project;
6. The size and range of uses authorized for any non residential development
within the project; and
7. Any sewer and /or water comprehensive utility plans or amendments required
to be completed before development can occur.
8. Any other item deemed necessary by the City Council.
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Development Agreements- purpose and procedures 5 -18 -12
SK:bjs Page 4 of 5
52
Section 8. TMC Section 18.86.070 is hereby established to read as follows:
18.86.070 Recording
A development agreement shall be recorded with the real property records of the county
in which the property is located pursuant to RCW 36.70B.190.
Section 9. TMC Section 18.86.080 is hereby established to read as follows:
18.86.080 Discretionary, Legislative Act.
The decision of the City Council to approve or reject a request for a development
agreement shall be a discretionary, legislative act.
Section 10. Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the
City Attorney, the City Clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary
corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; references to
other local, state or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations; or ordinance numbering
and section /subsection numbering.
Section 11. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause
or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to
be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the
remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation.
Section 12. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be
published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force
five days after passage and publication as provided by law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at
a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 2012.
ATTEST /AUTH ENT] CATE D:
Christy O'Flaherty, MMC, City Clerk Jim Haggerton, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Published:
Effective Date:
Shelley M. Kerslake, City Attorney Ordinance Number:
W: Word Processing\Ordinances \Development Agreements- purpose and procedures 5 -18 -12
SK:bjs
Page 5 of 5
53
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission
BY: Brandon J. Miles, Senior Planner
DATE: May 18, 2012
SUBJECT: Development Agreement Procedures
ISSUE
The City Council has requested that the Planning Commission review and provide a
recommendation on a draft Ordinance which will provide specific authority for the City to enter
into Development Agreements (DAs).
BACKGROUND
As authorized by state law, the City regularly uses DAs to provide certainty in the development
process. Municipal Research and Services Center of Washington provides the following
narrative on what a DA is:
'A development agreement is a contract between a local jurisdiction and a person who has
ownership or control of property within the jurisdiction. The purpose of the agreement is to
specify the standards and conditions that will govern development of the property. The
development agreement provides assurance to the developer that he /she may proceed to
develop the project subject to the rules and regulations in effect at the time of approval the
development will not be subject to subsequent changes in regulations. Development
agreements should also benefit the local jurisdiction. The city or county may include conditions
(mitigation measures) that must be met to assure that a project at a specific location does not
have unacceptable impacts on neighboring properties or community infrastructure. The
agreement may clarify how the project will be phased, the required timing of public
improvements, the developer's contribution toward funding system -wide community
improvements, and other conditions. The agreement can also facilitate enforcement of
requirements, since it is a contract that details the obligations of the developer and local
jurisdiction"'.
DAs are specifically useful for large and /or complex developments, such as Tukwila South,
Westfield Southcenter and the future Tukwila Village site. The authority for the City to enter into
a DA is granted to the City under Revised Code of Washington 36.70B.170. DAs are legislative
acts, which means that the City has considerable discretion on whether to enter into a
development agreement or not.
DISCUSSION
The City Attorney's office is recommending that the City add specific language to the Tukwila
Municipal Code (TMC) Title 18 to codify the process for the City to enter into Development
Agreements and specify the scope and content of such agreements. The attached Ordinance
reflects the processes that are currently used by the City in the process of DAs under state law.
The Ordinance simply codifies the City's process within the City's Development regulations
(TMC Title 18).
http: /www.mrsc.org/ subjects planning /lu /developagreements.aspx
54
INFORMATIONAL MEMO
Page 2
FINANCIAL IMPACT
None.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the attached Ordinance be forwarded to the City Council for approval.
ATTACHMENTS
Draft Ordinance
Z: \DCD n Clerk's \Brandon \Development Agreement Ordinance \PC Materials \DAs Ordinance SR.doc 55
3M
SOUTH COUNTY AREA TRANSPORTATION BOARD (SCATBd)
MEETING
Tuesday, June 19, 2012
9:00 11:00 a.m.
SeaTae City Hall
4800 South 188 Street
SeaTac
DRAFT AGENDA
Open Meeting Action 9:00 a.m.
Introductions
Approve summary of May 2 joint SCATBd /RAMP
Meeting*
2. Reports, Communications and Citizen Requests to
Reports, 9:10 a.m.
Comment
Discussion,
Chair or Vice Chair
Action
o SCATBd Dues Report
Participant Updates from, RTC and Other Regional
Committees
Citizen Comment
SCATBd 2011 Progress Report* -Action
3 Report on STP /CMAQ regional and countywide grant
Report and 9:40 a.m,
competition Peter Heffernan and Susan Oxholm,
Discussion
King County Department of Transportation
4 PSRC report on economic and demographic changes
Report and 10:00 a.m.
that have taken place in the last decade Sean Ardussi,
Discussion
PSRC
5. SR 516 Corridor Planning Study Report Tom Washington,
Report and 10:30 a.m.
WSDOT Urban Planning Office
Discussion
*Attachment to agenda
57
58