HomeMy WebLinkAboutReg 2012-06-18 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKETTukwila City Counci /Agenda
REGULAR MEETING
Jim Haggerton, Mayor Counci /members: Joe Duff ie Dennis Robertson
David Cline, City Administrator Allan Ekberg Kathy Hougardy
Verna Seal, Council President De'Sean Quinn Kate Kruller
EXECUTIVE SESSION 6:15 PM 7:00 PM
Potential Land Sale Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(c)
Potential Property Acquisition— Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(b)
(45 minutes)
Monday, June 18, 2012; 7:00 PM Ord #2378 Res #1770
1. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL
2. SPECIAL Promotion of Rick Mitchell, Police Commander. Mike Vi/ /a, Po /ice Chief.
PRESENTATIONS
3. CITIZEN At this time, you are invited to comment on items not included on this agenda
COMMENT (please limit your comments to five minutes per citizen). To comment
on an item listed on this agenda, please save your comments until the issue is
presented for discussion.
4. CONSENT a. Approval of Minutes: 6/4/12 (ReguiarMtg.)
AGENDA b. Approval of Vouchers.
c. Authorize the Mayor to enter into an Interlocal Agreement with the City Pg•1
of Seattle for Hearing Examiner services. [Reviewed and forwarded to
Consent by Community Affairs Parks Committee on 6111112.]
d. Authorize the Mayor to sign an amendment to the Conservation Futures Pg.11
Interlocal Agreement -113) with King County for open space
acquisitions and accept $250,000 toward acquisition of property for the
Duwamish Hill Preserve. [Reviewed and forwarded to Consentby
Community Affairs Parks Committee on 6/11/12.]
5. PUBLIC HEARING A resolution adopting a six -year Transportation Improvement Program for Pg.45
2013 -2018.
6. UNFINISHED a. A resolution adopting a six -year Transportation Improvement Program for Pg.45
BUSINESS 2013 -2018.
b. Authorize the Mayor to sign Supplement No. 2 to contract #10 -055 with Pg.91
Carollo Engineers for the Water and Sewer Comprehensive Plans in the
amount of $21,721.50 (unbudgeted).
Please refer to 6111112 C. 0. W. packet. Q
c. An ordinance establishing new regulations relating to Development Pg.93
Agreements.
(continued...)
x
REGULAR MEETING
Monday, June 18, 2012
Page 2
6. UNFINISHED d. Authorize the Mayor to enter into an Interlocal Agreement with the Kent
BUSINESS Fire Department Regional Fire Authority relating to a training consortium.
(continued) Please refer to 6111112 C. 0. W. packet. Q
e. Authorize the Mayor to enter into a three -year Interlocal Agreement with
King County for animal control services in an amount not to exceed
$225,000.
Please refer to 6111112 C. 0. W. packet. Q
7. NEW BUSINESS
8. REPORTS a. Mayor
b. City Council
c. Staff City Administrator Report
d. City Attorney
e. Intergovernmental
9. MISCELLANEOUS
10. EXECUTIVE SESSION
11. ADJOURNMENT
Pg.101
Pg.109
Pg.111
Tukwila City Hall is wheelchair accessible.
Reasonable accommodations are available at public hearings with advance notice to the
City Clerk's Office (206- 433 -1800 or TukwilaCityClerk @TukwilaWA.gov). This notice is available at
www.tukwilawa.aov, and in alternate formats with advance notice for those with disabilities.
Tukwila Council meetings are audio taped.
HOW TO TESTIFY
If you would like to address the Council, please go to the podium and state your name and address clearly for
the record. Please observe the basic rules of courtesy when speaking and limit your continents to five
minutes. The Council appreciates hearing from citizens but may not be able to take immediate action on
continents received until they are referred to a Committee or discussed under New Business.
COUNCIL MEETINGS
No Council meetings are scheduled on the 5th Monday of the month unless prior public notification is given.
Regular Meetings The Mayor, elected by the people to a four -year term, presides at all Regular Council
Meetings held on the 1st and 3rd Mondays of each month at 7:00 p.m. Official Council action in the
form of formal motions, adopting of resolutions and passing of ordinances can only be taken at Regular
Council meetings.
Committee of the Whole Meetings Council members are elected for a four -year term. The Council
President is elected by the Council members to preside at all Committee of the Whole meetings for a
one -year term. Committee of the Whole meetings are held the 2nd and 4th Mondays at 7:00 p.m.
Issues discussed are forwarded to the Regular Council meeting for official action.
GENERAL INFORMATION
At each Council meeting citizens are given the opportunity to address the Council on items that are not
included on the agenda during CITIZENS COMMENTS. Please limit your comments to 5 minutes.
Special Meetings may be called at any time with proper public notice. Procedures followed are the same as
those used in Regular Council meetings.
Executive Sessions may be called to inform the Council of pending legal action, financial, or personnel
matters.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Public Hearings are required by law before the Council can take action on matters affecting the public interest
such as land -use laws, annexations, rezone requests, public safety issues, etc. Section 2.04.150 of the
Tukwila Municipal Code states the following guidelines for Public Hearings:
The proponent shall speak first and is allowed 15 minutes for a presentation.
2. The opponent is then allowed 15 minutes to make a presentation.
Each side is then allowed 5 minutes for rebuttal.
4. Citizens who wish to address the Council may speak for 5 minutes each. No one may speak a second
time until everyone wishing to speak has spoken.
5. After each speaker has spoken, the Council may question the speaker. Each speaker can respond to the
question, but may not engage in further debate at this time.
6. After the Public Hearing is closed and during the Council meeting, the Council may choose to discuss
the issue among themselves, or defer the discussion to a future Council meeting, without further public
testimony. Council action may only be taken during Regular or Special Meetings.
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
Initials ITEM NO.
Meeting Date Prepared by Mayors revien) Council revieiv
06/18/12 JT 4.C.
ITEM INFORMATION
STAFF SPONSOR: JOYCE TRANTINA OIZIGIN,\]-.AGI DA'rE: 06/18/12
1�GI ;ND,� II I ;�.rTrII,I. Interlocal Agreement for Hearing Examiner services
CATI'GORY Discussion ®Motion1consent Resolution Ordinance .Bid Award Public Nearing Other
t14tg Date Mtg Date 618112 Mt
g Date P1tg Date lltg Date 11�tg Date Alt
g Date
SPONSOR Council M Mayor HR DCD Finance Fire IT Pd-R Police PWI
SPONSOR'S The City of Tukwila's Interlocal Agreement with the City of Seattle for Hearing Examiner
SUMMA services is up for renewal. This proposed agreement renews the agreement for two years.
RI W1 I M1 M BY CO`N/ Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 06/11/12 COMMITTEE CHAIR: HOUGARDY
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADJMIN. Mayor's office
C0KVIFI f1` Unanimous Approval; Forward to Consent Agenda
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
Exi)i M)ITURF. RI?()UIRE ?D AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
Fund Source:
Cotnrnents:
I MTG.DATEI RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
06/18/12 1
MTG. DATE I ATTACHMENTS
06/18/12 Informational Memorandum dated 6/4/12
Interlocal Agreement
Minutes from the Community Affairs and Parks Committee meeting of 6/11/2012
1
x
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Community Affairs and Parks Committee
FROM: Joyce Trantina, Executive Assistant
DATE: June 4, 2012
SUBJECT: Hearing Examiner Interlocal Agreement
ISSUE
The current Interlocal Agreement with the City of Seattle for Hearing Examiner services expires
July 1, 2012. Attached is the proposed contract for the period July 1, 2012 thru June 30, 2014.
DISCUSSION
The City of Seattle is willing to continue providing the City of Tukwila with Hearing Examiner
services with no increase in hourly rates, other than a five (5) cent increase in the mileage rate
to reflect the current government reimbursement rate of 55 cents per mile.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that this contract be forwarded to the Consent Agenda of the June 18, 2012
Regular Meeting for approval.
ATTACHMENTS
Draft Interlocal Agreement
El
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY OF TUKWILA AND THE CITY OF SEATTLE FOR
HEARING EXAMINER SERVICES
This INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT "Agreement is made and entered into pursuant to the
Interlocal Cooperation Act, Chapter 39.34 of the Revised Code of Washington, by and between
the City of Tukwila, a Washington municipal corporation "Tukwila and the City of Seattle, a
Washington municipal corporation acting through its Office of Hearing Examiner "Seattle for
Tukwila's utilization of Seattle's hearing examiner services.
WHEREAS, Tukwila is in need of the services of a hearing examiner; and
WHEREAS, Seattle has the experience, personnel, and willingness to provide hearing examiner
services,
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions set forth herein, it is agreed by
and between Tukwila and Seattle as follows:
1. Statement of Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is for Seattle to provide hearing
examiner services to Tukwila.
Scope of Services. Seattle shall provide hearing examiner services and accompanying
support services for Tukwila as required by Tukwila.
3. Compensation. Tukwila shall pay Seattle $105.00 per hour for Seattle's hearing
examiner services. Tukwila shall pay Seattle $30.00 per hour for any support services
requested by Tukwila. Seattle shall be reimbursed for any direct expenses advanced on
Tukwila's behalf including mailing and copying charges. If Seattle is required to provide
any copying services in the performance of this Agreement, Tukwila shall pay Seattle
$0.15 per page for the copies.
Drug asset forfeiture hearings shall have a one -hour minimum hearing examiner service
charge unless Tukwila notifies Seattle of the hearing cancellation at least 24 hours prior
to the scheduled hearing time.
Seattle shall not bill for travel time between Seattle and Tukwila. Tukwila will pay a
$20.00 flat fee for round trip travel to Tukwila, together with mileage at the current
government reimbursement rate (currently 55 cents per mile). Each individual
providing hearing examiner services under this Agreement shall separately present to
Tukwila a monthly statement detailing the mileage and number of trips to Tukwila for
which the individual is eligible for reimbursement. Each individual providing hearing
examiner services under this Agreement shall be paid directly and monthly within thirty
(30) days after Tukwila receives the individual's detailed request for reimbursement.
5
4. Method of Pavment. Seattle shall bill Tukwila on a monthly basis for work performed.
Within thirty (30) days of receiving Seattle's invoice, Tukwila shall issue a check to
Seattle for services rendered.
5. Scheduling Services. Seattle's hearing examiner services shall be scheduled on a case by
case basis. Tukwila shall contact Seattle to schedule appropriate dates and times.
6. Hearing Location. Hearings shall be held at Tukwila City Hall. Seattle shall provide the
necessary recording equipment in order to record the hearings. The hearings may be
held in the day or evening as required by Tukwila.
7. Hearing Decision. Hearings shall be concluded in compliance with the Tukwila Municipal
Code. Upon conclusion of the hearing, Seattle shall issue a written decision. This
decision shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law based on the Tukwila
Municipal Code. The written decision shall be issued within fifteen (15) business days of
the hearing unless unusual circumstances exist.
8. Duration. This Agreement shall take effect upon execution of the Agreement by both
parties, and the appointment of the hearing examiner by the Mayor of Tukwila and the
approval of the Tukwila City Council. This Agreement shall remain in effect for two
years and shall be subject to renewal by mutual agreement.
9. Termination. Either party may terminate this Agreement by giving thirty (30) days
written notice of termination to the other party.
10. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. Seattle shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless
Tukwila and its officers, agents, and employees from any and all claims, actions, suits,
liability, loss, costs, expenses, and damages of any nature whatsoever, by reason or
arising out of any negligent action or omission of Seattle, its officers, agents, and
employees in relation to the Agreement. Likewise, Tukwila shall defend, indemnify, and
hold harmless Seattle and its officers, agents, and employees from any and all claims,
actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, and damages of any nature whatsoever, by
reason or arising out of any negligent action or omission of Tukwila, its officers, agents,
and employees in relation to this Agreement.
Except as provided below, in the event the parties are determined jointly liable to any
claimant or litigant, each party shall bear responsibility for its own defense, including
the payment of all attorney fees and costs associated therewith, and shall satisfy any
judgment or settlement to the extent fault is allocated to such party.
Seattle does not assume liability or responsibility for, or in any way release Tukwila
from, any liability or responsibility that arises, in whole or in part, from the existence or
effect of Tukwila's ordinances, code, policies, rules, or regulations. If any cause, claim,
X
or action of any kind is commenced in which the enforceability and /or validity of any
Tukwila ordinance, code, policy, or regulation, including its constitutionality, is at issue,
Tukwila shall defend the same at its sole cost and expense, and if judgment is entered,
or damages are awarded against Seattle, or against Seattle and Tukwila jointly, Tukwila
shall promptly satisfy the same.
11. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with
the laws of the State of Washington. In the event any suit, arbitration or other
proceeding is instituted to enforce any term of the Agreement, the parties specifically
understand and agree that venue shall be exclusively in King County, Washington.
12. Administrator. No administrator is needed for this Agreement.
13. Records Retention and Transference. Seattle my retain records up to one year from the
date of final disposition after which Seattle shall transfer the records to Tukwila.
14. Notices. All notices required or permitted pursuant to this Agreement shall be
addressed as follows:
City of Seattle
Office of Hearing Examiner
P.O. Box 94729
Seattle, WA 98124
City of Tukwila
Office of the City Clerk
6200 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, WA 98188
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed.
CITY OF TUKWILA
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
Dated:
Approved as to Form
Tukwila City Attorney
CITY OF SEATTLE
OFFICE OF HEARING EXAMINER
Sue A. Tanner, Hearing Examiner
Dated:
7
x
City of Tukwila
Community Affairs and Parks Committee
COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND PARKS COMMITTEE
Meeting Minutes
June 11, 2012 5:00 ,p.
PRESENT
Councilmembers: Kathy Hougardy, Chair; Joe Duffie and Allan Ekberg
Staff: Jack Pace, Rick Still, David Cline and Kimberly Matej
CALL TO ORDER: Committee Chair Hougardy called the meeting to order at 5:04 p.m.
I. PRESENTATIONS
No presentations.
IL BUSINESS AGENDA
A. Interlocal Aareement: Hearina Examiner Services
Staff is seeking full Council approval to renew an interlocal agreement with the City of Seattle for hearing
examiner services. The current contract expires in July, and the new interlocal will be valid from July 1, 2012
June 30, 2014.
1\ The Committee last saw this agreement in 2008. In 2010, the agreement was not required to move through the
Council process; however, all interlocal agreements are now required to have Council approval. The agreement
remains the same as the 2010 agreement with one exception, which is a $0.05 increase in the reimbursable
mileage rate, reflecting a reimbursement rate of $0.55 per mile (current government rate).
The City of Seattle is by experience, able to offer greater flexibility in accommodating and providing these
services including evening hearings. They conduct land use and forfeiture (police) hearings. Additionally, for
budget efficiency, this contract will be moved from the Mayor's Office to the Department of Community
Development since that department uses this service the most. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO
JUNE 18 CONSENT AGENDA.
B. Amendment to Interlocal Agreement: Kina Countv Conservation Futures Duwamish Hill Preserve
Staff is seeking Council approval of an amendment to the interlocal agreement between Tukwila and the City of
Seattle for Conservation Futures Levy funding in the amount of $250,000 for acquisition of land adjacent to the
Duwamish Hill Preserve.
In 2011, the City applied for $500,000, and was recommended for a $250,000 grant from King County
Conservation Futures for acquisition of a parcel of land due west of the Duwamish Hill Preserve (1.9 acres). The
King County Council has approved funding in the budget, and distribution is now ready. A dollar for dollar City
match is required, and is currently budgeted in the Capital Improvement Plan, page 46. UNANIMOUS
APPROVAL. FORWARD TO JUNE 18 CONSENT AGENDA.
III. MISCELLANEOUS
Meeting adjourned at 5:16 p.m.
Next meeting: Tuesday, June 25, 2012 5:00 p.m. Conference Room #3
Committee Chair Approval
MinUi�B$ by KAM.
0
10
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
ITEM NO.
AGF:NIX\ ITI? "M TrrJJ-�.
Meeting Date Prepared by Mayor's review Council review
06/18/12 RS 4.D.
ITEM INFORMATION
STArr SPONSOR: RICK STILL ORIGIN,\, AGE NDA DATE: 6/18/12
Duwamish Hill Preserve: King County Conservation Futures Interlocal
Agreement
Cx rr('.OIty Dis67ISSion ®llotionlConsent Resolution Ordinance BidAivard PublicHearins Other
tAltg Date Altg Date 6/18/12 Mtg Date Mtg Date Alt
g Date 11ltg Date Mtg Date
SPONSOR Counal Mayor HR DCD Pinance .Fire IT P &R E] Police P1V
SPONSOR'S The City has been awarded $250,000 in King County Conservation Futures funding for
SUMMITRY acquisition of land adjacent Duwamish Hill Preserve. Parks and Recreation seeks
authorization for the Mayor to sign an amendment to an interlocal agreement allowing for
the City to receive the funding.
R1?N I ?D BY cow Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 6/11/12 COMMITTEE CHAIR: KATHY HOUGARDY
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADNMN. Parks and Recreation
Comm"' Unanimous Approval; Forward to Consent Agenda
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
E \PI:N'l�l'I'URI? Rr( AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
Fund Source: THE 2012 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS PROGRAM, SEEPAGE 46 OF THE CIP BOOK
Comments:
MTG. DATE
RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
MTG. DATE I ATTACHMENTS
6/18/12 Informational Memo Dated 6/6/12 and attachments
Minutes from the Community Affairs and Parks Committee dated 6/11/12
11
12
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Community Affairs and Parks Committee
FROM: Rick Still, Parks and Recreation Director
DATE: June 6, 2012
SUBJECT: Duwamish Hill Preserve: King County Conservation Futures Interlocal
Agreement
ISSUE
Duwamish Hill Preserve (DHP): Conservation Futures Interlocal Agreement
BACKGROUND
Conservation Futures Tax (CFT) levy funds are collected from property taxes levied throughout
King County and its cities for the purchase and permanent protection of open space lands. CFT
funds are allocated during the King County annual budget each November, based on an
application review process conducted by the King County Conservation Futures Citizens
Committee in the spring. Applicants must provide a minimum of dollar- for dollar matching funds
for all CFT funds received.
DISCUSSION
The City applied in 2011 for 2012 funding and has been authorized by the King County Council
and Executive to receive $250,000 towards acquisition of the west parcel (also referred to as
the White property) adjacent to Duwamish Hill Preserve. A King County ordinance is expected
to be passed by the end of June authorizing the King County Executive to sign the Conservation
Futures Interlocal Agreement for distribution of the CFT Funds. If the City accepts the funding a
match equal to the amount distributed ($250,000) is required.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign the CFT Interlocal
Agreement and accept the $250,000 for acquisition of land adjacent to Duwamish Hill Preserve.
Funding for the City's $250,000 match has been allocated through the 2012 Capital
Improvement Projects Program, see page 46 of the CIP book. The Council is being asked to
consider this at the June 25, 2012 Committee of the Whole meeting and subsequent July 2,
2012 Regular Meeting.
ATTACHMENTS
Draft Amendment to the Conservation Futures Interlocal Cooperation Agreement (final
version expected by end of June)
King County Conservation Futures Tax Levy Committee recommendations report
iR,
ME
AMENDMENT TO THE CONSERVATION FUTURES
INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT
BETWEEN KING COUNTY AND THE CITY OF TUKWILA
FOR OPEN SPACE ACQUISITION PROJECTS
Preamble
The King County Council, through Ordinance 91.28, has established a Conservation Futures
Levy Fund and appropriated proceeds to King County, the City of Seattle and certain suburban
cities. This amendment is entered into to provide for the allocation of additional funds made
available for open space acquisition.
THIS AMENDMENT is entered into between the CITY OF TUKWILA and KING COUNTY,
and amends and attaches to and is part thereof of the existing Interlocal Cooperation Agreement
entered into between the parties on the 25 day of August, 1992, as previously amended.
The parties agree to the following amendments:
Amendment 1: Article 1. Recitals
A paragraph is hereby added to the Recitals Section to provide for a Conservation Futures Levy
Fund allocation for the Duwamish Hill Preserve Acquisition, and hereafter reads:
On November 9, 2011 the King County Council passed Ordinance 17232, which
appropriated a total of Two Hundred and Fifty ($250,000) in Conservation Futures Levy
proceeds to the City of Tukwila for the Duwamish Hill Preserve acquisition Project. On
2012 The King County Council passed Ordinance authorizing
the King County Executive to enter into interlocal agreements with the City of Tukwila
for the disbursement of Conservation Futures Funds appropriated in Ordinance 17232.
Amendment 2: Article V. Conditions of Agreement
Section 5.1 is amended to include Attachment G, which lists a 2012 Conservation
Futures Levy Allocation for the Duwamish Hill Preserve Acquisition project.
Amendment 3: Article VII. Responsibilities of Countv
The first two sentences of this article are amended to include references to Attachment G, which
lists a 2012 Conservation Futures Levy proceeds allocation for the Duwamish Hill Preserve
Acquisition Project:
Subject to the terms of this agreement, the County will provide Conservation
Futures Levy Funds in the amounts shown in Attachments A through G, to be
used for the Projects listed in Attachments A through G. The City may request
Amendment G
Annual CFT Interlocal "Tukwila- King County
2012 CFT proceeds
additional funds; however, the County has no obligation to provide funds to the
City for the Projects in excess of the total amounts shown in Attachments A
through G. The County assumes no obligation for the future support of the
Projects described herein except as expressly set forth in this agreement.
AMENDMENT 4: Attachment G
The Attachments to the interlocal agreement are hereby amended by adding Attachment G,
which is hereby attached to the interlocal agreement, incorporated therein and made a part
thereof.
I.n all other respects, the terms, conditions, duties and obligations of both parties shall remain the
same as agreed to in the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement as previously amended.
This document shall be attached to the existing Interlocal Cooperation Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, authorized representatives of the parties hereto have signed their
naives in the spaces set forth below:
KING COUNTY
Ron Sims
King County Executive
CITY OF TUKWILA
Mayor
Date:
Acting under the authority of
Ordinance:
Approved as to form:
Dan Satterbeg
King County Prosecuting Attorney
Amendment G
Annual C1 Interlocal Tukwila- Kind CountY
2012 CFT proceeds
2
Date
Acting under the authority of
Ordinance:
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
16
ATTACHMENT G
2012 CONSERVATION FUTURES LEVY
CITY OF TUKWILA ALLOCATION
Jurisdiction Project Allocation
Tukwila Duwamish Hill Preserve 250,000
TOTAL
Project Description:
250,000
This is a 2 parcel, 1.9 acre open space acquisition project, located on South 115 Street near East
Marginal Way in Tukwila. The project will buffer the Duwamish Hill Preserve from adjacent
industrial and commercial uses.
City of Tukwila Duwamish Hill Preserve
Amendment G
Annual CPT Interlocal "1likwila- King County
2012 CPT proceeds
250,000
17
ilg
King County Conservation Futures Citizens Committee
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE ALLOCATION OF
2012 CONSERVATION FUTURES TAX LEVY COLLECTIONS
and 2012 PARKS EXPANSION LEVY OPEN SPACE ACQUISITION FUNDS
July 1, 2011
Brief Background
Conservation Futures Tax Levy
The Conservation Futures tax (CFT) levy is a portion of the property taxes collected throughout
King County, and is dedicated to the purchase of rural and urban open space. By Ordinance 14717, the CFT
Citizens Committee is directed to conduct an annual review of applications for CFT funds, and to make
recommendations to the King County Council and Executive on the expenditure of the funds. King County
then approves the project funding as part of King County's annual budget. CFT projects must have a dollar
for- dollar matching finds to help leverage the benefits of the program. There is an estimated $7,765,000 in
fiscal year 2012 CFT collections available for distribution.
King County Parks Expansion Levy
The King County Parks Expansion Levy (PEL) was approved by King County voters in August,
2007. By Motion 12587, the King County Council requested the Executive to effectively coordinate CFT
and PEL open space acquisition funding proposals. The CFT Citizens Committee makes a coordinated
annual recommendation on project funding from the two funding sources, and the Committee's
recommendation is included in this report. There is $4,376,377 in these PEL funds available in 2012.
Summary of the Committee's Review Process
This year, applications for CFT funds were sent to city and King County agencies in mid January,
with a deadline of March 17, 2011. In February, the Committee conducted a workshop at the Mercerview
Community Center on Mercer Island. The workshop goals were to help applicants learn about various
aspects of the program, including the review criteria, field trips, and the schedule for the process. King
County agencies, including the Parks Division and Water and Resource Land Division (WLRD) conducted
an internal review for selecting PEL applications for projects in unincorporated King County, and these were
then submitted to the Committee with the same deadline as the CFT applications. The CFT and PEL
applications often contain complementary goals of different King County agencies, for example, a proposed
project on the Snoqualmie River that would preserve agricultural land and improve salmon habitat. This year
there were 41 overall applications between the two funding sources, a record number. While King County
and the suburban cities submitted about the same number of applications as last year, Seattle expanded from
three large and more expensive projects last year to proposals for nine less- expensive projects this year.
CFT Citizens Committee Annual Recommendation July 1, 2011
IM
In late March, 2011 the CFT and PEL applications were forwarded to the Citizens Committee, and
after their initial review, the Committee met to begin discussions of the applications. After the first meeting,
the Committee took field trips to the applicant sites on Saturdays and on Wednesday afternoons in April. The
applicants were encouraged to meet Committee members on the field trips to show the project sites,
summarize the purposes of the projects, and answer any questions of the Committee. After the field trips, the
Committee held two additional meetings in early May, 2011. In those meetings the Committee discussed
how the proposed open space acquisition projects meet the funding criteria, and they subsequently made
recommendations on how much funding should be allocated to each project. The Committee made its
funding recommendations based on a balance of project types, demographic equity needs, transaction
opportunities, and the threat of loss of the open space resources of the projects. The Committee also
considered the geographic range of the projects over time for both rural and urban CFT projects, and for the
unincorporated King County PEL projects.
2011 Recommendation Highlights:
Suburban City Projects:
Auburn is working to acquire a 9.2- acre property containing a 1.8 -acre lake in the West Hill community.
This acquisition will preserve a high quality natural resource in a residential neighborhood that is
underserved with open space. Auburn plans to have a passive trail around the lake. The property is two
blocks from a school, making it a potential local resource for environmental education.
In Bellevue's Greenways and Open Space System, a 14 -acre woodland property is recommended for
funding that will double the size of Eastgate Park, which contains the South Bellevue Community
Center. Two other forested greenway properties are also recommended or funding. They provide access
from West Lake Sammamish Parkway to Weowna Park, and to public open space at 165 Avenue NE.
A 1.9 -acre property on the western side of Tukwila's Duwamish Hill Preserve is an important cultural
heritage site on the Green River for the Duwamish Tribe. It will be restored with native trees and
vegetation to provide a buffer between the park and industrial businesses to the west.
The City of Snoqualmie is pursuing an ambitious, visionary project to create a riverfront park along the
Snoqualmie River. The project is being done in combination with federal funds the city has received to
purchase and remove houses that flood regularly.
In Kent, two parcels on the Green River are recommended for funding. The first is an inholding near
Van Doren's Landing Park, and the second is located near the confluence of Mill Creek and the Green
River, which is undergoing an extensive ecological restoration effort that is a high priority for WRIA 9.
On Swamp Creek in northern King County, Kenmore is continuing its efforts to preserve and restore the
creek and its associated wetland on 73` Avenue NE. The wetland is part of the foraging habitat for the
north Lake Washington Heron colony located there.
Des Moines is working to purchase a wooded corridor that was acquired decades ago by the State of
Washington for a highway it no longer intends to build. The city wants to acquire to corridor for a trail
and to protect Barnes Creek, which runs through part of it.
Normandy Park's Beaconsfield -on -the -Sound has goals of protecting and restoring the natural functioning
of this important Puget Sound shoreline, and preserving a scenic bluff. The shoreline habitat is a critical part
CFT Citizens Committee Annual Recommendation July 1, 2011
20
of the salmon life cycle, and it supports numerous other marine aquatic species. The project also has a goal
of allowing public beach access to be extended northward from the city's Marine View Park.
Federal Way will acquire approximately 14 acres of fee simple and conservation easement lands to
conserve salmon habitat along Hylebos Creek near the Pacific Highway, north of SW 373' Street.
Seattle .Projects:
In the Northeast Capitol Hill Hub Urban Village, two blocks east of Broadway on Federal Avenue,
Seattle is developing a neighborhood green space within the half of this urban village that is currently
not served by a park. Seattle recently purchased the property, and CFT funds are recommended to help
cover the acquisition costs. A community design process will help shape the design of the future park.
Seattle is purchasing a strategic 1.65 -acre wooded hillside inholding at Carkeek Park in northeast Seattle
to help better connect the two main areas of the park. This property is a main source of invasive weeds
into the 220 -acre park, and ownership control of it will have broad benefits.
in the underserved West Seattle neighborhood of Puget Ridge, a .67 -acre property is proposed for
acquisition. Local residents will practice sustainable agriculture and restore a small segment of Puget
Creek, which flows into the Duwamish Waterway. The project is called the Puget Ridge Edible Park.
Seattle will purchase an inholding the Leschi Natural Area to link two sides of this local neighborhood
greenbelt, which has excellent views of Lake Washington, downtown Bellevue, and the Cascades.
In north Seattle, funding is recommended for two neighborhood parks in the University District and
Wedgewood residential neighborhoods, to help keep pace with ongoing residential density increases in
those communities.
A 4.15 -acre addition is proposed for the West Duwamish Greenbelt, a longstanding acquisition project in
West Seattle that is highly visible from downtown Seattle and Interstate 5. It also buffers the industrial
uses of the Duwamish Waterway from the residential neighborhood to the west.
Unincorporated King County Projects:
On the main stem of the Cedar River, a multiple- parcel acquisition project with two main focus areas, one
near Jones Road and one near Taylor Creek, King County will acquire properties to relocate or remove
levees and to restore salmon habitat, important components of the WRIA 8 salmon recovery plan.
Funding is recommended for the acquisition of approximately 300 acres of forest land south of Carnation,
including fee simple property buffering the Griffin Creek Natural Area, and a conservation easement
adjacent to the Snoqualmie Valley Regional Trail. The easement component of the project will allow the
continuation of equestrian and hiking trails in a working forest that is actively managed for timber harvest.
in the Middle Green River basin, King County will preserve up to 160 acres of habitat lands to help
connect publicly -owned ecological lands near Bass Lake and Beaver Lake to public lands in the Green
River Gorge.
A missing link in the south King County Lake -to -Sound Regional Trail is recommended to receive CFT
funding. The project is located along the Black River adjacent Fort Dent Park. The securing of this trail
segment will complete the land acquisition phase of this regional trail project.
CFT Citizens Committee Annual Recommendation July 1, 2011
21
On the Snoqualmie River in Fall City, King County is recommended to receive funds to supplement CFT
and PEL funds allocated the project last year. The project will protect important Chinook salmon spawning
habitat and preserve agricultural land further away from the river. The project will enable widening of the
river channel by moving flood levees. This promotes the formation of new gravel bars that are necessary
for endangered Chinook spawning, but lost as a result of the river levee construction of past decades.
King County will acquire additional property and conservation easements on two areas of Bear Creek east
of Woodinville, as part of its efforts to buffer and extend existing salmon habitat areas on the creek.
PEL Funding is recommended for acquisition of a 20 -acre inholding property on Pinnacle Peak, a well
used hiking area south of Enumclaw that also contains critical winter habitat for the White River elk herd.
In the Interstate 90 /Mountains to Sound Greenway near Issaquah, King County is recommended to receive
funds for the Cougar Mountain Precipice trail project, which will connect Issaquah's city center to Cougar
Mountain Regional Wildland Park. Funds are also recommended to acquire and inholding parcel on Grand
Ridge Mitchell Hill, and possibly a trailhead for improved access to Mitchell Hill Forest.
King County's Agriculture Program will acquire a farmland preservation easement over a 39 -acre farm on
the Enumclaw Plateau, north of Enumclaw. The property is partially forested and is habitat for some of the
Enumclaw Plateau's raptor population.
The Point Heyer Drift Cell shoreline habitat protection project, a multiple -year, multiple- parcel acquisition
effort along a two mile shoreline eastern Vashon Island, has a goal of preserving an additional 16 acres this
year. This project will allow shoreline sand and gravel replenishment, which is critical for marine aquatic
habitat and is important portion in the life cycle for salmon from throughout Puget Sound.
King County's TDR Program is recommended to receive additional CFT funds for the TDR Urban
Partnerships project. This program offers open space funds as an incentive for cities to sign agreements to
accept development rights from important open space lands in unincorporated King County.
Themes from this year's recommendation
A large number of the projects this year are inholdings and buffers to existing open spaces and parks,
as well as trail links and trailheads that provide better public access to parks and open spaces. Many of the
projects place strong emphasis on habitat protection, particularly for salmon. These projects reinforce the
ecological sustainability of permanently protected public lands that are the core assets of our region's
venerable green infrastructure. The urban open space projects provide additional green spaces in underserved
neighborhoods in Seattle and the suburban cities. This makes our cities more livable by providing access to
nature closer to home, by providing green spaces that can offer a bit of respite from busy lives, and by
providing a setting for environmental education.
While there are fewer CFT funds available this year than last year, it is important that our region has
continued to make significant progress preserving open space during the recent economic downturn. We saw
good projects that needed more funding, but next year there should be additional CFT funds. The open spaces
that are being preserved provide a reminder that it is important to have funds available to take advantage of
real estate opportunities that occur during weaker economic times. Some of the projects funded in the past
two or three years have become available because of the broader economic weakness, while others have are
available due to the normal course of events whereby landowners need to sell their properties. Both situations
require funds to take advantage of the once -in -a- generation opportunities that can arise, and we commend
King County for its long -term vision and commitment to this important work.
CFT Citizens Committee Annual Recommendation July 1, 2011
22
Funds Funds
Apnlvin2 Jurisdiction Proiect Requested Recommended
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INDIVIDIUAL PROJECTS:
SUBURBAN CITIES
Auburn West Hill Lake Property 386,000 350,000
Recommendation: The goal of this project is to purchase two parcels totaling 9.2 acres that
surround a 1.8 -acre lake in the West Hill neighborhood of Auburn. The project is located near the
intersection of 321" Street South and 53th Avenue South. It will enhance and maintain unique wildlife
habitat in a residential neighborhood, and allow for interpretive and educational opportunities in the
newly annexed West Hill portion of Auburn. There are no nearby public parks in this Auburn
neighborhood. The lake was recognized almost 20 years ago for the quality of its urban wildlife species,
as part of a special assessment of wildlife in Auburn. The proposed park will allow for the development
of a trail for passive use recreation. The property is listed for sale and the seller is working with Auburn
towards reaching a mutually- agreeable transaction.
Bellevue Bellevue Greenways and Open Space System 2,157,850 750,000
Recommendation: This project is a continuation of a multiple- parcel, multiple -year open space
acquisition effort. The overall goal of the project is to connect and buffer Bellevue's Open Space and
Greenways System with the acquisition of high- priority properties as they become available over time.
This year the Committee recommends as a first priority the funding of three properties; the first is a 14-
acre property adjacent to Eastgate Park; the second is a 1.43 acre property to provide access to Wewona
Park from West Lake Sammamish Parkway; and the third is a 13 acre property adjacent to open space
near 166` Avenue NE. The 14 -acre property adjacent to Eastgate Park will almost double the size of
that park. It is located south of Interstate 90 and contains the popular South Bellevue Community
Center within its boundaries. The property is forested and has an existing woodland trail that connects
pedestrians to the nearby community. The second of the priority properties is forested and contains a
trail corridor that will connect Wewona Park to West Lake Sammamish Parkway. The third property is
also located on West Lake Sammamish Parkway and will provide access from the Parkway to public
open space at 165' Avenue NE. Bellevue is working with the property owners within the respective
areas to reach purchase and sale agreements.
Bellevue Bel -Red Area Subvision 1,100,000 0
Recommendation: This is a long -term multiple- parcel project in Bellevue within the area
known as the Bel -Red Corridor. The project's geographic area is between the Bellevue Redmond Road
and State Route 520, east of Interstate 405. This project was funded two years ago with CFT funds, and
property was acquired with those funds. There are currently no specific properties identified for
acquisition in this year's application, but Bellevue is instead seeking funding for future opportunities.
The basic premise for this application is that before CFT funds would be dispersed to Bellevue, the city
would need to propose a final site location to the Conservation Futures Citizens Committee, which
would then make a recommendation to King County for final approval. While the Committee thinks
this is an important long -term project for Bellevue and the region, given that there is less available CFT
funding this year, it is more strategic to use 2012 CFT funding for properties described above in the
Bellevue Greenways and Open Space System that are currently available and have willing sellers.
CFT Citizens Committee Annual Recommendation July 1, 2011
23
Funds Funds
ADDlving Jurisdiction Protect Requested Recommended
Des Moines Barnes Creek Corridor 500,000 50,000
Recommendation: This is a proposed trail corridor and urban greenbelt acquisition of up to 25
acres. it is a wooded corridor that is partly in a ravine, and it was acquired decades ago for a highway
corridor by the State of Washington Department of Transportation (State DOT). That agency no longer
wished to construct the highway so the land is being readied for disposition as surplus property. The
Greenbelt is located between South 220' Street and the Kent -Des Moines Road in Des Moines. The
portion of the corridor being proposed for funding with CFT funds is approximately 2/3 mile in length.
This is a densely populated urban area in south King County that is underserved with open space and
trails. The corridor buffers Barnes Creek, a tributary in the Massey Creek system. Des Moines has been
seeking county, state and federal funds to help improve fish passage and restore habitat in Barnes
Creek, and this proposed acquisition will also help preserve creek habitat. The proposed trail in the
corridor is identified in Des Moines's 2010 parks master plan as part of a larger trail system in the city.
There are Borne significant unresolved variables regarding the amount of property Des Moines will
ultimately acquire, as well as the economic value of that property. When State DOT acquired the
property, it had mapped city streets on it, so the economic value of the streets may need to be deducted
from the overall value of the property. It may also be that the some of the trail corridor can be routed on
portions of those street rights -of -way. These issues need to be addressed as part of the appraisal process
to inform subsequent negotiations with State DOT. Des Moines has not often applied for and received
CFT funds in recent years, however, this project received CFT funding in the amount of $472,000 last
year. The Committee recommends adding a modest level of CFT funds this year to bring the overall
project to over half a million dollars in CFT funds. This demonstrates continued support for the project
to the State, and this property should therefore not be immediately threatened with sale to an outside
party. Des Moines should consider applying for future CFT funds when the trail route and valuation
issues have better resolution and the acquisition costs are identified.
Federal Wav Hylebos Creek 400,000 300,000
Recommendation: This multiple- parcel project has a goal of preserving salmonid habitat in the
Hylebos Creek Corridor in Federal Way. The city has been working to preserve lands along the creek
for two decades. This year, there is a first priority of up to 14 acres of fee simple or conservation
easement habitat lands within the current Hylebos Creek CFT project scope, and in addition, one
additional fee acquisition property and three conservation easement properties should be added to the
scope. The project area is located on Hylebos Creek in Federal Way between South 373` Street and
South 356 Street near the Pacific Highway. The properties are inholdings in the Hylebos Creek
corridor, with five parcels in the Spring Valley area and three more located east of the Pacific Highway.
Federal Way has matching funds in hand and it has had preliminary discussions with the property
owners, who are willing sellers subject to the results of appraisals that will be conducted. Last year,
Federal Way lost significant CFT funds when it had to abandon the Camp Kilworth property on Puget
Sound, after a court ruling nullified the sale. The ruling was the result of a claim by heirs of the camp's
donor, who had given it to the Bay Scouts of America several decades ago.
Issaquah Issaquah Creek Waterways 500,000 100,000
Rec07711nendation: For two decades, Issaquah has been acquiring riparian habitat on Issaquah
Creek within the city boundaries. The city has had much success and it has recently purchased
additional parcels this past year with local park bond funds. There are six target parcels along Issaquah
Creek in this year's application for CFT funds. The creek is habitat for salmon migrating to the State
CFT Citizens Committee Annual Recommendation July 1, 2011
24
Funds Funds
ADDivinLL Jurisdiction Proiect Requested Recommended
hatchery, and eventually there will be fish access to habitat upstream beyond the hatchery when a
bypass is developed in the future. Issaquah has significant match credit for acquisitions it has conducted
in the past two years. A public opinion survey conducted for Issaquah's 2009 Parks Plan determined
that 76% of city residents feel that protection of Issaquah Creek's natural resources is a high priority for
the city. This acquisition work complements habitat acquisition being done upstream in unincorporated
King County by the King County Water and Resource Lands Division (WLRD). There is currently one
owner who has expressed interest in discussing sale of the property, but those negotiations have further
to go. The owners of the other parcels have not expressed interest in selling to date. This project
received $300,000 in CFT funds last year and the Cougar Mountain Precipice trail project, which will
connects downtown Issaquah to Cougar Mountain, has also received significant CFT funds in recent
years. The funding recommended for this year will help meet the remaining funding shortfall for the
parcel with an identified willing seller.
Kenmore Swamp Creek 324,207 S300,000
Recommendation: This project consists of the acquisition of up to two parcels totaling .63
acres on Swamp Creek, located on 73` Avenue NE near NE 192` Street in Kenmore. The properties
contain portions of Swamp Creek and its associated wetlands. The parcels are located near the Kenmore
heronry and provide feeding habitat for nesting Great Blue Heron. This portion of Swamp Creek is a
local greenway along 73` Avenue North, an arterial road in Kenmore. The Kenmore Parks and
Recreation Master Plan identifies this area as a central element of the plan, including a passive trail
through the corridor that will connect to the Tolt Pipeline Regional Trail. The trail will offer
environmental education opportunities for nearby schools, as well as local residents who wish to view
Great Blue Heron and other wildlife. Kenmore has recently purchased one of the properties identified in
the application, located at NE 192 Street and 73` Avenue North, and this allocation would reimburse
a portion of that acquisition. Kenmore does have matching funds for this recommended allocation.
Kenmore acquired a property in this area last year with 2011 CFT funds, but overall it has not applied
for or received significant CFT funds over the past several years. This allocation will help Kenmore
acquire both properties in the application and will help move this vision forward in the coming year.
Kent Green River Parcel 256,650 150,000
Recommendation: This project consists of the acquisition of two properties totaling 3.9 acres,
with fi ontage on the Green River. The goal of the project is to restore habitat on the properties after
acquisition. The first parcel is located on Russell Road at South 220"' Street. It is .7 acres in size and is
adjacent to the Green River Regional Trail on Russell Road near Van Doren's Landing Park. The
second parcel is located at State Route 167 and South 259 Street. It is 3.3 acres and is located across
from Kent's Riverview Park, which contains a segment of the Green River Trail. The second parcel is
located about three miles south of the first parcel, just downriver from the confluence of Mill Creek and
the Green River. This confluence area is important for migrating salmon and steelhead as a refuge
during winter flooding, and it has been planned for habitat restoration for over a decade. This second
parcel has a house, which would be removed as part of the broader restoration effort. Both parcels are
listed as an acquisition target in the WR1A 9 Salmon Habitat Plan, and the second parcel is also
identified for acquisition in the City of Kent Drainage Master Plan. Kent has had preliminary contact
with the owners of the parcels, but it does not have firm commitments on their willingness to sell at this
point. This status warrants providing funding for one of the parcels, given the amount of available CFT
funds this year. The Kent Parks Department currently has over $1 million in unexpended CFT funds for
the Clark Lake and Patchen Property projects, which Kent continues to pursue this year.
CFT Citizens Committee Annual Recommendation July 1, 2011
25
Funds Funds
ADnlvin2 Jurisdiction Project Requested Recommended
Normandv Park Beaconsfield Feeder Bluff 1,275,750 300,000
Recommendation: This is a multiple -year shoreline acquisition project with many parcels. It
has multiple goals, including preserving wooded Puget Sound shoreline wildlife habitat, providing
natural gravel replenishment for Puget Sound shoreline that is important habitat for part of the salmon
life cycle and for many marine aquatic species, providing additional public Puget Sound shoreline
access from Marine View Park, and protecting a scenic resource on Puget Sound. This is a rare,
relatively undeveloped shoreline bluff for mainland central Puget Sound and the project area has the
potential to allow improved gravel replenishment function that would provide critical habitat in the life
cycle of endangered salmon from rivers up and down the Sound. if feasible, cement bulkheads and rock
walls that that currently prevent sand and gravel from reaching the beach may be removed, at least in
part, to allow for greater sand and gravel replenishment of the beach and intertidal zone. This project is
a high priority project for WRIA 9, but it also serves the other Puget Sound WR1As. For this reason the
project is of regional importance. The project progress has been good to date. The Cascade Land
Conservancy has served as the acquisition agent and has acquired 16 narrow, linear parcels referred to
collectively as the "piano keys Normandy Park is now expanding the project beyond those parcels to
acquire additional property that connects to Marine View Park and also further uphill, since in the
longer term those parcels would supply sand and gravel to the lower properties. An uphill property
owner opposes the removal of the sea wall down below, claiming easement rights to the sea wall and
concerned that such removal could impact the uphill properties. In its March, 2011 annual report on
project progress, the Committee recommended re- allocating $563,000 from Normandy Park's
abandoned Walker Creek Preserve Addition CFT project to this project.
Snoqualmie Snoqualmie Riverfront Reach 1,636,000 400,000
Recommendation: The city of Snoqualmie has been pursuing this ambitious, multi- parcel open
space acquisition project for several years. The project has a visionary goal of protecting riverfront
habitat and creating a shoreline park on over one mile of Snoqualmie River riverfront in the city. Much
of this riverfront is already in city ownership as park land. Some of the remaining properties contain
houses that often flood, and Snoqualmie has been able to obtain FEMA flood buyout funds to purchase
some of them, including a mobile home park. Some of the properties are vacant and are not eligible for
FEMA grants, while others are not as significantly impacted by flooding and therefore are also not
FEMA eligible. in the past year Snoqualmie has expended over one million dollars in FEMA funds,
which meet the CFT matching fund requirements this year, but they will exceed the two -year
retroactive eligibility requirement by next year's application round. Snoqualmie currently has 5 top
priority parcels, with three that are ready to go, and those parcels are estimated to cost over $400,000.
The Committee's recommended allocation will cover most of those anticipated costs for three
properties, and if it so chooses the city can make up any remaining shortfall. Except for two grants
totaling $125,000 in recent years, Snoqualmie has not received significant CFT funds in the past
decade, and this grant will therefore help move this important project forward.
Tukwila Duwamish Hill Preserve Addition 500,000 250,000
Recommendation: This 2- parcel, 1.9 -acre open space acquisition project is located on South
115' Street, near East Marginal Way in Tukwila. The purpose of the acquisition is to establish a buffer
between the 8 -acre Duwamish Hill Preserve and adjacent industrial and commercial uses. The Preserve
is on a small hill overlooking the Green River, just south of the Seattle border, near Boeing Field and
interstate 5. The Preserve has important regional cultural significance. It was a sacred site for the
Duwamish Tribe, and it s about a half mile upriver from the culturally important North Wind Weir site.
CFT Citizens Committee Annual Recommendation July 1, 2011
W
Funds Funds
Armlvinu Jurisdiction Proiect Requested Recommended
The Duwamish Hill Preserve offers scenic views along the Green River and also southward towards
Tukwila. The proposed acquisition is identified in the city's adopted Parks Master Plan. The main
parcel in this application is a flat piece of open land adjacent to the preserve that is currently being used
to store cranes and other industrial equipment. A schematic plan for the future Preserve shows how this
property could be re- planted with trees to visually buffer the preserve from the industrial area to the
west. This buffer would add to the quality of the experience of the open space. In the past five years,
Tukwila has done an admirable job overseeing restoration of the site, with the help of many dedicated
volunteers. A second, smaller parcel between 1 15` South and the Green River is also included in the
application. It is a narrow strip of land between the road and the river, with about 800 feet of riverbank.
It might be possible to restore and improve riparian habitat on the river, including moving the road
further way from the river some time off into the future. Tukwila has $512,000 in local matching funds
for this phase. It is also seeking grants from the State of Washington and King Conservation District.
There is more appraisal work to do to determine the property value. Tukwila has not applied for or
received significant CFT funds in recent years. The recommended contribution to this project by CFT is
a reasonable level, given the level of information currently available about the property value.
Woodinville Little Bear Creek 200,000 0
Recommendation: This proposed project would acquire approximately .25 acres of land
adjacent to Little Bear Creek and State Route 509, at 134 i Avenue NE in Woodinville. The property is
currently an unpaved parking lot and small building serving a local towing business, incongruously
situated within an undeveloped, wooded creek corridor. If business moved Woodinville could remove
the road and the bridge crossing, which would help to restore the site as riparian habitat for salmonid
species, including endangered Chinook, Coho, Sockeye and Kokanee that are resident in the creek. The
property is surrounded by publicly -owned land, and it is also part of a planned trail between the
Sammamish Slough and the Snohomish County line. The trail would pass by Woodinville High School,
which is about one mile away. State of Washington DOT owns the adjacent parcel to the southwest, and
Woodinville also owns adjacent open space on Little Bear Creek. The city has long -term plans to
acquire more land in the creek corridor. There are significant unknown factors with this project related
to the range of potential cost of acquisition. In the application, Woodinville identifies a significant
portion of the potential acquisition costs as high relocation costs for the business, which may be
excessive. The business is an older one and it is a non conforming use under current zoning regulations,
and moving it to a property where it is a conforming use would likely be expensive, and such costs are
not typically covered by CFT. There is a low threat of loss of this property, since the property is not
listed for sale. The Committee recommends that given the reduced amount of CFT funds available this
year, this project should be revisited after Woodinville has more accurately identified the costs and
better determined the willingness of the owner to sell the property within a price range.
SEATTLE
Seattle Northeast Capitol Hill Urban Center Park 51,000,000 855,000
Recommendation: This project consists of the acquisition of 2 parcels totaling .28 acres at
Federal Avenue East and East Republican Street in Seattle's Capitol Hill Neighborhood. The project
will provide additional community open space in this underserved neighborhood. Seattle's successful
2008 Parks and Green Spaces levy identified 20 high- density urban villages throughout the city in
which over half of the urban village was not served by a local neighborhood park. Seattle Parks and
Recreation's 2006 Gap Report specifies that Capitol Hill near Broadway was one of those
CFT Citizens Committee Annual Recommendation —July 1, 2011
27
Funds Funds
ApplvinLi Jurisdiction Project Requested Recommended
neighborhoods, and this neighborhood park will provide a local neighborhood green space that serves
pedestrians from nearby city blocks. This is a street corner vacant property where three houses were
demolished by a developer two years ago. The owner was not able to develop the site because of factors
related to the recent economic recession, and Seattle purchased it in 2010, making this a reimbursement
request. There is strong community support for this park and Seattle has begun a neighborhood design
process. In the interim, there may be P -Patch use on some of the property until the final master plan is
developed and implemented. This park will serve a large number of visitors on a regular basis, as this
mixed -use neighborhood continues to accept a significant share of regional growth in the coming years.
Seattle University District Urban Center Park $500,000 500,000
Recommendation: The goal of this project is to acquire a new neighborhood park south of 45
Street in the designated University District Urban Village in Seattle. Seattle is identifying parcels with
willing sellers and is also working with developers on projects that would combine open space with
compatible land uses. There are currently two top priorities under the University District Park Plan
(2005), which was conducted with much public process. The sites are two residential lots south of
Christie Park at 9 Avenue and NE 43` Street, and a potential pocket park site on Brooklyn Avenue
NE. The final site will be determined through a community planning process. This urban village is
highly populated and is receiving additional density, yet it does not currently meet Seattle's urban
village open space goals of one acre per 1000 residents. This project should be funded with the
contingency that before CFT funds are dispersed to Seattle for the project, Seattle will identify the final
site location to the Conservation Futures Citizens Committee, which will make a recommendation to
King County, before King County grants final site approval.
Seattle Wedgewood Neighborhood Park $500,000 500,000
Recommendation: The goal of this project is to acquire a .33 -acre community park in Seattle's
Wedgewood neighborhood. The property, located on 35` Avenue at NE 86 Street, is a former Seattle
City Light substation. The Wedgewood neighborhood is on the list developed for the city's 2008 Parks
and Green Spaces Levy that identified Seattle neighborhoods with over half of the neighborhood not
served by a neighborhood park. The local community canvassed the neighborhood and picked this site
as the best place for a local community green space. The Wedgewood Vision Plan also identifies the
need for a new park, and it identifies the City Light property as a potential park site. This project
continues Seattle's strong track record of acquiring close -to -home green spaces within residential
neighborhoods to help preserve daily quality of life in the city.
Seattle Thornton Creek Park 2 Addition $50,000 0
ReCO1721nendation: This project has a goal of preserving a .31 acre vacant property in Thornton
Creek Park 2 at NE 98 °i Street AT 20 Avenue NE, in northern Seattle. The property is mostly a
steep hillside, and part of it recently slumped during some of the high rainfall Seattle experienced this
past winter. This property would add additional land to help buffer the natural resources of park and it
offers potential for planting trees and native vegetation to help restore habitat near the creek. Because of
the unstable slope, this property is not under great threat of development in the near term. While this
property would make a good addition to Thornton Creek Park system, given the reduced level of CFT
available this year, this site is a lower priority for funding and can likely be revisited for consideration
in a future funding round. Seattle may use other funds for this purchase and would be eligible to re-
submit another CFT application in the future to seek reimbursement.
10
CFT Citizens Committee Annual Recommendation July 1, 2011
Funds Funds
ADDlvinL- Jurisdiction Project Requested Recommended
Seattle Thornton Creek Natural Area (Ravenna Avenue) $205,000 0
Recommendation: The goal of this project is to add a strategic parcel to the Thornton Creek
Natural Area near Ravenna Avenue and North 100` Street in northern Seattle. Thornton Creek is a
salmon- bearing stream that Seattle has been working to protect since the Forward Thrust Program of
the 1970s. This parcel is adjacent to property where Seattle Public Utilities has stabilized the bed of the
creek to protect it from extreme storm water flows that damage creek habitat and natural resources. The
property identified in this application contains a house, and the owner is willing to consider selling it.
Seattle sees this property as a lower priority with les urgency, relative to some of the other CFT
applications for this year. Given that there is a lower level of available CFT funding than last year, the
Committee recommends that this project could funded with other city funds, or could wait to be funded
with CFT funding at a future point in time.
Seattle Carkeek Park Addition $155,000 155,000
Recommendation: This project will acquire an important 1.65 -acre wooded inholding on the
edge of Carkeek Park along Carkeek Park Road in Northwest Seattle. Acquisition of the property will
also buffer Pipers Creek and the Pipers Creek Trail. The property is located at a connection point
between two main areas of the park that has a shape resembling a bow -tie, and this acquisition will help
connect the two areas. The site is located on a hillside immediately below the entrance road into the
park. Development of the parcel would be difficult, but if done it would be highly intrusive to the park.
The property has invasive vines and plant species, and the site has been identified as the main source of
invasive species into Carkeek Park. Seattle would like to restore the property with native vegetation,
and its ownership of the property will help with long -term resource land management in the park.
Acquisition of this parcel has been a long -term priority of Seattle, and the Carkeek Park Advisory
Council. It has had a long -term owner who is now interested in selling it, and who would like it to
become an addition to the park. This is a timely acquisition opportunity for this property, and Seattle
wishes to take advantage of it while there is available local funding.
Seattle West Duwamish Greenbelt $180,000 180,000
Ree0177777endation: This project consists of the acquisition of a 4.14 -acre wooded addition to the
West Duwamish Greenbelt, which is Seattle's largest greenbelt. it is located along West Marginal Way
in West Seattle, on the west side of the Duwamish Waterway. The acquisition of this property is a
continuation of Seattle's long -term efforts to preserve this highly visible scenic greenbelt, which buffers
and separates the residential neighborhood uphill to the west, from the industrial and trucking activities
located along this portion of the waterway. The greenbelt is home to upland wildlife and avian species
that are found in urban areas, including perching areas for Eagles that catch fish in the Duwamish.
Acquisition of the property will help connect a significant portion of the wildlife corridor between
publicly -owned parts of the Greenbelt. Seattle has been trying to acquire this property for over 15 years,
but, it was unable to reach an agreement with the prior owner. The current owner has expressed
willingness to sell the property, contingent on reaching an acceptable price.
Seattle Leschi Natural Area
$205,000 205,000
Recommendation: This project includes acquisition of a. I 7-acre wooded property that is an
inholding in the Leschi Natural Area, located on East Terrace Street in the Leschi neighborhood of
Seattle. This addition will connect two halves of the Leschi Natural Area. The Natural Area has
outstanding views of Lake Washington, Bellevue, and the Cascade Mountains beyond. This smaller,
CFT Citizens Committee Annual Recommendation July 1, 2011
29
ADDIvini! Jurisdiction Proiect
Funds Funds
Requested Recommended
community -scale greenbelt has significant local volunteer stewardship to help maintain the quality of
the greenbelt. Seattle has worked with the Leschi Community Council to preserve and steward the
properties in the greenbelt for over 10 years, and the city will continue to work with the neighborhood
in the future. Seattle has been interested in acquiring the property for over a decade to link the two
halves of the natural area. The property owner has approached Seattle and is willing to sell the property,
which has a house that will need to be removed. This property was identified as an acquisition
candidate as far back as the 1993 Seattle Green Spaces Policy, and in the Seattle Park and Recreation
COMPLAN 2000.
Seattle Puget Ridge Edible Park $105,000 105,000
Recommendation: This project will provide a new .67 -acre park in West Seattle's Puget Ridge
neighborhood, which is underserved with open space. The project will allow for sustainable agriculture
activities and for habitat improvement along Puget Creek, which flows across the western side of the
property. The park was nominated by a local community group called Sustainable Puget Ridge under
the Parks and Green Spaces Levy's Opportunity Fund. The Seattle Parks Levy Oversight Committee
conducted an extensive project selection process for the Opportunity Fund, and this was one of projects
chosen. There is a small house on the property that will be removed. The property is currently for sale,
presenting a timely opportunity to acquire it. The combination of potential creek restoration,
community farming, community gathering place, and environmental and agricultural education, will
make this a unique small -scale community open space resource.
KING COUNTY
Kine Countv Regional TDR Partnerships CFT: 400,000 250,000
Parks Levy: 0 0
Recommendation: This is a programmatic, non site specific project that provides funding for
open space acquisition in cities, as an incentive for those cities to accept rural development rights under
King County's Transferable Development Rights (TDR) Program. Before the TDR amenity funds are
allocated to a city, the city must first enter into an Interlocal Agreement (ILA) with King County that
allows TDR credit transfers to occur. Of King County's 39 cities, three are currently enrolled in a TDR
ILA (Issaquah, Bellevue and Sammamish), while the TDR Program is currently in the process of
developing and negotiating TDR ILAs with four more cities. Those include Seattle and Normandy Park
in 2011 and Kirkland and Redmond in 2012. The Bellevue TDR ILA has the potential to protect
between 1,000 and 3,000 acres of rural lands. The Sammamish TDR ILA allows up to 75 TDR credits
from the Patterson Creek area to be transferred into the city, which could preserve about 750 acres of
important natural resource lands near Sammamish. If fully successful, over a period of years these
agreements have the potential to preserve three to four times as much rural open space land than the
same amount of CFT funds would protect if expended directly on easement acquisitions. The Bellevue
TDR ILA included $750,000 in CFT amenity funding, while the Sammamish TDR ILA will use
$375,000 in CFT funds. While those ILAs have been funded, there is not currently enough amenity
incentive funding available to support all of the remaining agreements the TDR Program is currently
pursuing. The Committee did recommend allocating $135,000 to this project from other abandoned
CFT projects earlier this year, and combined with an allocation of $250,000 from 2012 CFT funds, the
project will have received $385,000 in additional CFT funds, almost fully finding this project.
12
CFT Citizens Committee Annual Recommendation July 1, 2011
30
Funds Funds
Aunlving Jurisdiction Project Requested Recommended
Snoqualmie Watershed
King Countv Grand Ridge Duthie Hill Inholding CFT: 200,000 0
Parks Levy: 200,000 0
Recommendation: This project would acquire a 5 -acre inholding within the corridor that links
Grand Ridge Park and Duthie Hill Park. The property is located in unincorporated King County, east of
Issaquah, and north of Interstate 90 on the Issaquah -Fall City Road. The property is adjacent to another
similarly -sized inholding parcel that King County is also attempting to acquire with other funds,
although the success of those negotiations is uncertain. King County Parks is considering alternatives
for locating a parking lot in the southern side of the park, though not on this property. If the parking lot
is sited nearby, this property could serve as a buffer to the parking lot. The property owner has been
difficult to contact, but has expressed an interest in negotiating with King County if funds can be
secured. The Committee recognizes that this property is an important Inholding In the Grand Ridge
Mitchell Hill corridor and that it should be acquired in the future, but given the overall level of
available funds this year, this acquisition should wait another year. The trailhead site on Mitchell Hill
discussed below is a more important acquisition priority for this funding round, given that it is currently
listed for sale and will likely be sold if it is not funded this year.
King Countv— Grand Ridge -Mitchell Hill Additions CFT: 300,000 300,000
Parks Levy: 650,000 340,000
Recommendation: This project has a goal of acquiring up to I l acres, comprised of two main
components; an approximately 2 -acre trailhead that would serve as an eastern entrance to Grand Ridge
Park at 290 Avenue SE, and the acquisition of an 8.5 -acre inholding in King County's Mitchell Hill
Forest off of 290 Avenue SE. The properties are located east of Issaquah, and north of interstate 90.
The first priority is the trailhead property, situated immediately adjacent to the start of the trail at 290`"
Street NE. There are large trees that can buffer a small parking area from the road and from neighbors.
290 Avenue SE becomes a private road as it turns the corner to the east from this property, and if
purchased, King County would need to provide adequate signage warning of the end of the public road.
The second component of this application, the eight -acre Mitchell Hill Forest inholding, is a second
priority of this project. Project funds not expended for the trailhead property should be used to purchase
this inholding property. The property is adjacent to an inholding that was purchased earlier this year,
and this allocation would allow work in this area to continue to move forward.
King Countv Snoqualmie -Fall City Reach CFT: 300,000 200,000
Parks Levy: 300,000 300,000
Recommendation: This is a 52 -acre acquisition project with twin goals of restoring critical
salmon habitat on the Snoqualmie River near Fall City, while preserving agricultural land on the
property further off the river. The project is located on the north side of the SE Fall City Snoqualmie
Road in Fall City. The project will help improve salmon habitat by removing or setting -back river
levees, and by re- connecting a river side channel that is important habitat in part of the salmon life
cycle. The reach has been identified in the WRIA 7 salmon recovery plan as a high priority property for
acquisition and restoration, based on the historic side channels on the site. King County is currently
undertaking an assessment of the Snoqualmie River from the mouth of the Raging River to the mouth
of Patterson Creek, which is one of King County's most important areas for Chinook and steelhead
spawning habitat in a study is funded by the State of Washington SRFB. It is finding that this reach has
been heavily armored by levees, with approximately 70% of the left bank and 55% of the right bank
being impacted. This armoring narrows the river channel and greatly reduces or eliminates the gravel
13
CFT Citizens Committee Annual Recommendation July 1, 2011
31
Funds Funds
Applving Jurisdiction Proiect Requested Recommended
bars necessary for fish spawning. A portion of the 52 -acre property is farmland and King County
WLRD is currently working to determine the best mix of farmland preservation and salmon habitat on
the site. This project will help King County achieve the Snohomish River Basin Salmon Conservation
Plan goal of restoring 80 acres of off channel habitat and 5 miles of edge habitat in this priority reach.
The project has previously received $300,000 CFT and $350,000 in Parks Levy funding, in addition to
$200,000 in King County Flood District funding. The recommended allocation should provide
sufficient funds to complete this first acquisition in the reach.
Kin! Countv Snoqualmie Forest Addition CFT: 750,000 100,000
Parks Levy: 750,000 600,000
Recommendation: This project has a goal of preserving forest land adjacent to the Snoqualmie
Valley Regional Trail between Carnation and Snoqualmie. The project has two main focus areas. The
first area is about 300 acres and is adjacent to the Snoqualmie Valley Trail and the Griffin Creek
Natural Area. The second focus area is comprised of about 200 acres northeast of the former
Weyerhaeuser Mill site in Snoqualmie, also on the Snoqualmie Valley Regional Trail. Both focus areas
form part of a scenic corridor adjacent to the trail itself, and also a territorial view for residents and
visitors to the Snoqualmie Valley. The northernmost focus area is the King County Parks Division's
first priority for funding. It is second growth forest, some of which has been recently logged, and it
contains several informal hiking, off -road bicycling, and equestrian trails. Part of the project area
buffers the 50 -acre Griffin Creek Natural Area, a high quality salmonid stream that was first selected as
one of six pilot project streams that were protected under the Waterways 2000 program in the 1990s.
King County would acquire about 50 acres of fee simple property buffering Griffin Creek. The other
component of this project area is to acquire a conservation easement adjacent to the Snoqualmie Valley
Trail to buffer the regional trail, protect existing trails on the property. There is currently a party that is
interested in buying the property containing the overall first focus area for commercial forestry. This
potential buyer is willing to work with King County to sell the County the Griffin Creek buffer, and to
develop a mutually- acceptable conservation easement that will buffer the Snoqualmie Valley Trail,
preserve some of the existing recreational side trails, and at the same time allow for sustainable harvest
forestry activities. For the second, more southerly focus area near Snoqualmie, the property is not
currently on the market and the project goals are less developed, but it seems they would generally
buffer the Snoqualmie Valley Regional Trail and allow for forestry activity as well. Given the financial
constraints, the Committee recommends funding only the northernmost focus area with this year's
funding, while encouraging the Parks Division to more fully develop the proposal for funding the 200
acre southern focus area in a future application.
KinE Countv Three Forks Natural Area /Park Addition CFT: 200,000 200,000
Parks Levy: 200,000 200,000
Recommendation: This project consists of the acquisition of a 21.53 acre addition to King
County's Three Forks Natural Area, located west of 428` Avenue SE, near Snoqualmie. The property is
located at the confluence of the North Fork and Middle Fork of the Snoqualmie River, adjacent to King
County's Three Forks Natural Area. It is a regionally significant site. King County currently owns a
habitat buffer easement along each bank of the river on the property. The easement was acquired under
the voter approved 1989 Open Space Bond Program from an owner who wished to remain on the
property, but who has recently passed away. This property has an outstanding view of Mount Si, which
will make it a unique destination for visitors from throughout King County. This project will fully
acquire the remaining property at the river confluence and would allow public significantly improved
access for enjoyment of the river. The former property owner's estate is a willing seller to the King
14
CFT Citizens Committee Annual Recommendation July 1, 2011
32
Funds Funds
ADDlvin2 Jurisdiction Proiect Requested Recommended
County Parks Division. A portion of the property is currently leased for grazing a small herd of cattle,
which helps control invasive plant species, and this use should be allowed to continue in the period
after acquisition while a site plan is developed. This is a special property that should be fully funded to
help ensure that it will be added to Three Forks Park.
King County Tolt River Natural Area CFT: 510,000 0
Parks Levy: 510,000 400,000
Recommendation: This is a multiple- parcel salmon habitat acquisition project that has been
funded periodically in the past several years with CFT and PEL funds. This year there are five target
parcels totaling up to 16 acres. The project will allow for the restoration of critical riparian and
floodplain habitat between the Tolt River and Tolt River Road, east of Carnation. The lower Tolt River,
between miles one and six on the river, is one of the highest priority salmonid preservation areas in
King County. The river hosts Chinook, chum, Coho, and pink salmon, along with steelhead and bull
trout. Approximately 20% of the Snoqualmie basin component of the Snohomish Fall Chinook stock
spawns in the Tolt River. The major risk to fish in this river is homes that require levees for protection
from regular flooding along the river. The levees severely restrict salmon spawning habitat. This project
will either purchase vacant parcels to prevent them from being developed, or parcels with houses that
are in danger of flooding and need to be removed. King County WLRD works in partnership with the
King County Flood District, which uses either local funding or Federal Emergency Management Act
(FEMA) funding to purchase properties with homes that need to be removed and are prioritized under
that agency's Flood Hazard Management Plan. The Tolt River provides opportunities for passive
recreation and recreational sport fishing, and this project will directly support such activity.
Cedar /Lake Washington Watershed
King County Bear Creek Waterways CFT: 275,000 125,000
Parks Levy: 275,000 250,000
Recommendation: This project has a goal of acquiring streamside property that will allow for
restoration of critical salmon habitat on Bear Creek, north of Redmond. There are two acquisition
priorities; one is a 10 -acre, two parcel property at NE 106 °i Street and Avondale Road at the confluence
of Mackey Creek, and the second is a property located on Bear Creek Road NE at NE 142 Street. The
owners of both properties have expressed a willingness to work with King County towards selling their
properties in fee simple ownership, or conservation easements. The property at the confluence of
Mackey Creek abuts the line between urban and rural zoning, and thus it serves to reinforce urban and
rural land use separation. The main stem of Bear Creek on this property is good salmon habitat, with
fallen trees and gravel bed forming pools that are necessary for supporting fish. Mackey Creek has been
channeled and armored by the owners to help control flooding of the house that stands just a few feet
away from the confluence. If acquired by King County, the creek habitat could be greatly restored and
the creek allowed to flow more freely at the confluence. The small house is about a century old and can
potentially be moved somewhere nearby. The property on Bear Creek Road has a willing seller, but King
County needs additional funds to purchase it. This property would add to other recently- funded adjacent
properties, one of which King County has purchased, and one currently under negotiation.
15
CFT Citizens Committee Annual Recommendation —July 1, 2011
33
Funds Funds
Apnlvinq Jurisdiction Proiect Reauested Recommended
King Countv Cougar Mountain Park/Precipice Trail CFT: 0 0
Parks Levy: 240,000 200,000
Recommendation: This project continues King County's efforts to acquire property on the
northeast slopes of Cougar Mountain Regional Wildland Park for a trail connection to downtown
Issaquah. There are several properties that should be acquired to complete the trail connection and to
buffer to the trail. Additional trail access from the Talus development is also a priority. Last year, King
County purchased a key 35 -acre property at the base of the Cougar Mountain on Newport Way. Two
more key parcels totaling about 20 acres are needed next to connect Cougar Mountain Park with the
35 -acre parcel, and those are recommended for funding this year. In its recent annual progress report
on uncompleted Conservation Futures tax Levy (CFT) projects (March 31, 201 1) the Committee
recommended that $375,000 in funds from other uncompleted CFT projects should be reallocated to
this project because of its regional importance. The Committee recommends additional 2012 PEL
funding to help fund this next phase of the trail project. In addition to the trail connection, this is the
closest side of Cougar Mountain to Interstate 90, and it is a scenic view that is enjoyed by thousands of
people daily. It is also a key part of the scenic mountainside view enjoyed from downtown Issaquah by
the residents and visitors to that city. A trail connection from downtown Issaquah to Cougar Mountain
has been a goal of Issaquah and Issaquah Alps Trail Club for over two decades, having been funded as
far back as the voter approved 1989 Open Space Bond Program. Unfortunately, there were not willing
sellers at that time, but Issaquah and King County have persisted and they are now moving forward
towards achieving this vision.
King Countv Lower Cedar River Conservation CFT: 1,000,0000 200,000
Parks Levy: 700,000 600,000
Recommendation: King County has been steadily acquiring important habitat lands on the
Cedar River since the Forward Thrust Program in the 1970s. This year's project has a goal acquiring up
to six properties totaling approximately 30 acres on the Lower Cedar River in two main focus areas.
The first area is between Jones Road Cedar Grove Road, and the second is between State Route 18 and
the Cedar River's confluence with Taylor Creek. Both of these areas have significant ecological
features and some public ownership. Both areas include the Cedar River Regional Trail, which travels
from Renton through Maple Valley, and on to Landsburg. The project will support the removal of
levees that constrict the river channel and increase velocity of the river, which significantly diminishes
salmon spawning grounds in this regionally significant fishery. These acquisitions are goals of the
WRIA 8 Salmon Conservation Plan on the three year priority list to benefit endangered Chinook. The
project will also provide greater access for bird and wildlife viewing and passive recreation, for users of
the Cedar River Regional Trail and other public conservation lands on the river.
Green River Watershed
Kin-a Countv Bass Beaver Lake Complex /Plum Creek CFT: 600,000 400,000
Parks Levy: 775,000 600,000
Recommendation: This project has a goal of continuing to protect habitat lands in the Green
River Watershed near Bass Lake, Beaver Lake, and the Green River Gorge. The properties
recommended for funding this year are approximately 160 acres in total and situated in two locations.
The first area is approximately 120 acres northeast of Beaver Lake, on the upper slopes of the Green
16
CFT Citizens Committee Annual Recommendation July 1, 2011
34
Funds Funds
ADDlvin2 Jurisdiction Project Requested Recommended
River Gorge on the Enumclaw -Black Diamond Road. It contains a pond and is high quality wildlife
habitat. The second area is approximately 40 acres, located southwest of Bass Lake at SE 387` Street
and it contains a mature forested wetland /bog that is home to several amphibian species. This is a
headwaters property between Christy Creek, which flows between Bass and Beaver Lakes, and the
Newaukum Creek drainage, thus providing a corridor for amphibians and other wildlife between the two
systems. Both of these areas were previously owned by the State of Washington and had been presumed
to be relatively secure conservation land until two years ago. They were exchanged with the Plum Creek
Timber Company as part of a complex TDR transaction that permanently preserved 48,000 -acres of
forest land in the upper Green River watershed. Plum Creek is willing to sell these properties to King
County. The overall Bass /Beaver and Dandy Lake complex is noted as an important area for permanent
protection in several plans dating back over a decade, the most recent being the WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat
Plan. A study by King County two decades ago listed this lake complex as having the highest bird
diversity in King County. This complex provides an excellent setting for outdoor passive recreation such
as hiking, nature viewing, birding and non motorized boating.
Kinu Countv Enumclaw Forested Foothills Trailhead CFT: 250,000 0
Parks Levy: 250,000 75,000
Recommendation: This project has a goal of securing a 240 -acre trailhead and providing trails
for equestrian use in the foothills of the Cascade Mountains, north and east of Enumclaw on SE 418`
Street. This property is adjacent to land in the Forest Production District in the Cascade Foothills owned
by Hancock Timber, which has historically allowed public access, but is not obligated to do so. The
240 -acre property contains a large number of equestrian trails that are currently being used. There is a
second area noted in this year's application that is a roadside equestrian parking area for accessing the
White River Tree Farm. It is located adjacent to the King County solid waste transfer station along SE
440` Street, east of Enumclaw. This is a temporary parking area, but the goal is to eventually acquire a
trailhead here with a permanent parking facility. The long -term status of Hancock's White River Tree
Farm is holding up any final decisions on trailhead facilities. Since the tree farm could be subdivided
and developed, it is not guaranteed that the tree farm will have trail access in the future. A more
permanent level of protection for these lands is necessary before significant trailhead decisions can
effectively be made. The owner of the 240 -acre trailhead site is a willing seller if King County wishes
to purchase the property in fee simple ownership. This project received funding from King County two
years ago, and this recommended allocation will help King County move forward with negotiations,
possibly for a phased acquisition. It will also allow King County to seek additional matching funds
from other sources. The Enumclaw Forested Foothills Recreation Association (EFFRA) has been a long
time advocate for protection of the Cascade foothills and it strongly supports this project.
Kind Countv FPP Murray Farm CFT: 100,000 100,000
Parks Levy: 0 0
Recommendation: This project is a proposed Farmland Preservation Program development
rights purchase over 39 acres on the Enumclaw Plateau. The property is located at SE 384' Street and
212` Avenue SE, north of Enumclaw. About one third of it is open pasture, and about two thirds are
forested, though half of the forest floor has pasture grasses and is used for grazing. The trees are tall
conifers that provide habitat for nesting birds and for hawks that prey on rodents, an important
component of all farmland ecosystems. The remainder of the forest provides habitat for wildlife such as
deer, elk, and coyote, and even bears and cougars have been sighted here in recent years. The barn and
farmhouse on the northeast portion of the property are now almost a century old, providing an historic
link to an earlier era of agriculture on the Enumclaw Plateau. This is the only agricultural land
17
CFT Citizens Committee Annual Recommendation July 1, 2011
35
Funds Funds
AnDlvinLY Jurisdiction Proiect Requested Recommended
preservation easement request this year and the Committee strongly recommends that King County
strengthen its efforts to apply for more CFT funds to conserve more farmland in the future. There are
many important and sizable farms in King County's Agricultural Production Districts that are still not
permanently protected from subdivision and development.
Kine Countv Lake -to -Sound Trail Corridor CFT: 50,000 50,000
Parks Levy: SO 0
Recommendation: This Project consists of the acquisition of a trail corridor easement on four
to six parcels located between 68` Avenue South and Fort Dent Park, along the Black River in Tukwila
and Renton. The properties will fill a missing link in public ownership that provides a connection in the
Lake -to -Sound regional rail corridor. A portion of this trail corridor segment will pass under elevated
rail trestles, which is necessary to make the connection. The Lake -to -Sound trail project will connect
multiple trail links from Lake Washington in Renton, through the cities of Tukwila, Seatac, Burien and
Des Moines. Most of the trail corridor is already located on public parks and road rights -of -way, and
the vast majority of funds for the trail will be for design and construction. This project will help with
the acquisition component of the trail, which has an approximately 600 foot ownership gap between
Fort Dent Park in Tukwila and 68 i Avenue South and Black River Forest in Renton. There are already
matching funds in place from the King County Parks Levy. This is an important and ambitious trail
corridor for southern and southwest King County, and this acquisition will help complete the
acquisition phase of the trail.
Kin Countv Soos Creek Regional Park Trail Addition CFT: 150,000 0
Parks Levy: 150,000 0
Reconvnendation: This project proposes the addition of three properties along the 750 -acre
Soos Creek Regional Park and Trail, to help improve access to the trail. The first priority parcel is
located at the south end of the developed trail in Soos Creek Park, near SE 268 °i Street, within the city
of Covington. This parcel will buffer and widen a narrow easement that is part of an interim trail
alignment spur for the Soos Creek Regional Trail corridor. it connects to the King County Roads
Division's Calhoun gravel pit, which is proposed for an interim trail route that would proceed
southward from there. Unfortunately, since the application for CFT and PEL funding was submitted,
King County has determined that the owner is not a willing seller. The second priority parcel is an
inholding that is primarily a wetland and may effectively be undevelopable. it is located in the northern
part of Soos Creek Park at SE 208` Street. The owner of that property purchased it at a price that
significantly exceeds King County's expectation of likely current fair market value and therefore it may
have a low likelihood of a successful negotiation. The third parcel, located at SE 251 Street, would add
a buffer and local connection to Soos Creek Park. It has a willing seller. It is a potential link in a
proposed future trail between Covington, Maple Valley and Black Diamond that is still in the in the
early planning stages. Black Diamond and Covington had to return CFT funds for their most recent
projects, because they could not secure matching funds, and Maple Valley has never applied for CFT
funds. This Connection to Soos Creek Park therefore seems preliminary and can wait until further work
is done to indentify the likely route and funding for the proposed tri -city trail. The Friends of Soos
Creek Park, which has provided local stewardship in the park for over a decade, supports this
application and has assisted the King County Parks Division in planning the trail connections. The
Committee recommends that there are higher funding priorities this year, given the lower amount of
available CFT funds and the other Parks Division priorities elsewhere that require PEL funds.
18
CFT Citizens Committee Annual Recommendation July 1, 2011
36
Avolving Jurisdiction Proiect
White River Watershed
King Countv Pinnacle Peak Additions
Funds Funds
Requested Recommended
CFT: so s o
Parks Levy: 160,000 160,000
Recommendation: This project will acquire a 20 -acre inholding on Pinnacle Peak, also known
locally as Mount Peak, on the Enumclaw Plateau south of the city of Enumclaw. There are four parcels
in a single ownership. Earlier this year the Committee recommended re- allocating $245,000 in CFT
funds from the abandoned White River PSE project to this project, and in combination with the
requested PEL funds, there should be sufficient funds to purchase this inholding. The property is habitat
for upland wildlife, including some of the wintering White River elk herd, which is often sighted in the
fields immediately down slope from this property. This herd has a range of 600 to 900 members, and
Pinnacle Peak is an important winter refuge for many of them, particularly in a winter like the past one
that had near record snowfall. CFT and PEL funds were used to acquire several parcels on the back side
of Pinnacle Peak in the past four years that are now actively used by hikers climbing the mountain. in a
short time it has become a popular destination, having received write -ups in the local newspapers.
Vashon /Maury Island
King Countv Island Center Forest CFT: 100,000 S100,000
Parks Levy: S 490,000 300,000
Recommendation: This project consists of the acquisition of lands that buffer Island Center
Forest on Vashon Island. The first priority is the acquisition of two parcels totaling 39 acres, located at
107` Avenue SW. These parcels will provide trail access between island Center Forest and Vashon's
commercial center, as well as a trail head for the forest. This project was granted initial funding last
year, but the total overall costs were still in question, as there was some possibility that a trail easement
could be purchased over part of the property instead of purchasing the entire property in fee simple
ownership. The King County Parks Division has since found that the owner wishes sell the property in
its entirety, and is not interested in selling an easement. if the owner were to sell a trail easement and
develop the drier land on the site, King County would likely have high trail development costs and
higher long -term maintenance costs, as it would need to build extensive elevated boardwalks over the
wetlands. An added benefit of purchasing the entire parcel is that it will buffer the historic Mukai Farm,
which is located immediately to the west and is bordered by Island Center Forest on two sides. A
longer -term vision for Mukai Farm is to permanently preserve it to keep it in farming for educational
and historic preservation purposes. Other parcels identified in the application for funding for this
project are not a priority. This project is strongly supported by the Friends of Island Center Forest, the
Vashon /Maury Island Land Trust, the Vashon Parks District, and several other local conservation
organizations. Working with King County over the years, this coalition has supported and funded the
permanent protection of 369 acres of Island Center Forest, and this project will better enable local
residents and Island visitors to access this important public resource.
�u
CFT Citizens Committee Annual Recommendation July 1, 201 1
37
Applving Jurisdiction Proiect
King Countv Judd Creek/Paradise Valley
Recommendation: This project is part of a longer -term effort to protect Judd Creek, Vashon
island's largest creek, in the Paradise Valley area. The parcels recommended for funding include
acquisition of 7.7 acres of riparian habitat conservation easements on two parcels along Judd Creek,
located on 1 V" Avenue SW, north of SW 212` Place, as well as a third parcel at 107"' Avenue SW. Judd
Creek is habitat for sea -run cutthroat trout, Coho, and chum salmon. The Vashon /Maury Island Land Trust
has provided local leadership on this project in recent years by purchasing lands with important riparian
habitat along the creek. King County has worked in partnership with the land trust by purchasing
conservation easements over the properties. A long -term goal of the land trust is to create a passive trail
along .ludd Creek from its outlet into Puget Sound to the headwaters at Island Center Forest, ultimately
connecting to a trail on Shinglemill Creek on north Vashon. An appraisal for these Judd Creek properties
must be conducted to determine the value of the conservation easements King County will purchase, and
this recommended allocation is within the potential range of value. This is the most significant ongoing
conservation effort in King County where privately- raised, local funds are expended on conservation land
acquisition costs, and this recommendation acknowledges that worthy effort.
King Countv Maury Island Additions CFT: 400,000 0
Funds Funds
Requested Recommended
CFT: 97,500 50,000
Parks Levy: 97,500 51,000
Parks Levy: 400,000 0
Recommendation: This project has a proposed scope with three components. The first
subcomponent consists of two forested parcels totaling 10 acres, immediately east of Maury Island
Marine Park. They contain Puget Sound shoreline, are undeveloped, and have one owner. The second
component would acquire four parcels totaling 20 acres, east of Maury Island Marine Park at 75`
Avenue SW. The goal of this part of the project is to provide a trail connection between the upper
portion of Maury Island Marine Park and Docton Park, which is located on the western side of Maury
Island on Quartermaster Harbor. There is a longer -term vision for a trail the connects Docton Forest
with the recently acquired Maury Island Gravel pit property, which will become a park that has about
one mile of Puget Sound shoreline, with the existing Maury Island Marine Park. There is a Madrone
Forest on the eastern portion of these parcels. These properties are currently for sale, and one of them
has a developed water system, which may make it more likely to be sold. The third component of this
application would be the conversion of a 40 -acre property owned by the State of Washington
Department of Natural Resources (State DNR), which is currently being leased to King County, into
King County ownership. This parcel is located along the proposed trail corridor discussed above. The
Committee recommends that goal of connecting the three parks noted above by a trail system needs to
be more fully developed, including the likelihood of success for the route alternatives. More properties
would need to be acquired and the likelihood of all of the owners needed for a complete connection is
not clear. There was a large amount CFT funding for the Maury Island Marine Preserve last year and
significant additional 2012 CFT and PEL funding is recommended for three other projects on Vashon
Island.
20
CFT Citizens Committee Annual Recommendation —July 1, 2011
Funds Funds
At)plvinL Jurisdiction Proiect Requested Recommended
King Countv Point Heyer Drift Cell Phase II CFT: 400,000 240,000
Parks Levy: 400,000 300,000
ReC0772177enda /ion: The goal of the Point Heyer Drift Cell preservation project is to acquire fee
simple and conservation easement property on over 10,500 feet of shoreline within the Point Heyer drift
cell shoreline on eastern Vashon Island. The project will protect the natural functioning of the bluffs
above the beach, where sand and gravel are transported to the beach through natural erosion. This
provides the shoreline and underwater littoral zone with the sand and gravel it needs to support and
maintain high quality underwater and intertidal marine aquatic habitat. The Point Heyer drift cell bluffs
provide sand and gravel to the Point Heyer barrier lagoon. This lagoon is also known locally as KVI
Beach, because it has long had a radio tower owned by the radio station with that call name. The lagoon
is a rare Puget Sound salt marsh, and though it is only about five acres in size, it is the largest remaining
one in King County. The marsh supports abundant marine and avian wildlife. To survive in the long
term, the lagoon must be replenished with sand and gravel from over a mile away along the Point Heyer
drift cell. When local residents armor the beach with rock walls and cement bulkheads, this inhibits the
beach replenishment process and can significantly damage shoreline habitat. Salmon species from up
and down Puget Sound use this area as part of their life cycle, and therefore this project is a top priority
of the three -year work plan of the WRiA 9 salmon recovery plan. It is also a priority in other Puget
Sound -wide salmon conservation plans, such as the nearshore chapter of the federally adopted
nearshore recovery plan. This project has received funding from six other funding sources since 2008,
an indication of its broadly recognized importance.
21
CFT Citizens Committee Annual Recommendation July 1, 2011
W
king county conservation futures citizens committee
summary of 2012 cft and pel
funding recommendations
x
42
City of Tukwila
Community Affairs and Parks Committee
COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND PARKS COMMITTEE
Meeting Minutes
June 11, 2012 5: 00 p.m.
PRESENT
Councilmembers: Kathy Hougardy, Chair; Joe Duffie and Allan Ekberg
Staff: Jack Pace, Rick Still, David Cline and Kimberly Matej
CALL TO ORDER: Committee Chair Hougardy called the meeting to order at 5:04 p.m.
I. PRESENTATIONS
No presentations.
1I. BUSINESS AGENDA
A. Interlocal Agreement: Hearing Examiner Services
Staff is seeking full Council approval to renew an interlocal agreement with the City of Seattle for hearing
examiner services. The current contract expires in July, and the new interlocal will be valid from July 1, 2012
.Iune 30, 2014.
The Committee last saw this agreement in 2008. in 2010, the agreement was not required to move through the
Council process; however, all interlocal agreements are now required to have Council approval. The agreement
remains the same as the 2010 agreement with one exception, which is a $0.05 increase in the reimbursable
mileage rate, reflecting a reimbursement rate of $0.55 per mile (current government rate).
The City of Seattle is by experience, able to offer greater flexibility in accommodating and providing these
services including evening hearings. They conduct land use and forfeiture (police) hearings. Additionally, for
budget efficiency, this contract will be moved from the Mayor's Office to the Department of Community
Development since that department uses this service the most. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO
JUNE 18 CONSENT AGENDA.
B. Amendment to Interlocal Agreement: King County Conservation Futures Duwamish Hill Preserve
Staff is seeking Council approval of an amendment to the interlocal agreement between Tukwila and the City of
Seattle for Conservation Futures Levy funding in the amount: of $250,000 for acquisition of land adjacent to the
Duwamish Hill Preserve.
In 2011, the City applied for $500,000, and was recommended for a $250,000 grant from King County
Conservation Futures for acquisition of a parcel of land due west of the Duwamish Hill Preserve (1.9 acres). The
King County Council has approved funding in the budget, and distribution is now ready. A dollar for dollar City
match is required, and is currently budgeted in the Capital Improvement Plan, page 46. UNANIMOUS
APPROVAL. FORWARD TO JUNE 18 CONSENT AGENDA.
IIl. MISCELLANEOUS
Meeting adjourned at 5:16 p.m.
Nexi meeting: Tuesday, June 25, 2012 5:00 p.m. Conference Room #3
t Committee Chair Approval
Minut.e8 by V7W.
4
M A
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
Initials ITEM NO.
Meeting Date Prepared U Mayor's review Cou 7 review
06/11/12 BG4 a. nM 5
1 06/18/12 BG Y/
6.A.
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER: STAFF SPONSOR: BOB GIBERSON I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 6/11/12
AGr_;NDA Irr M TITLE Resolution adopting the Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013 2018
CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other
Aft g Date 06/11/12 Mtg Date Mtg Date 06/18112 Mtg Date Mt Date Mtg Date 06118112 Mtg Date
SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P &R Police PW
SPONSOR'S The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is required by RCW to be updated
SUMMARY annually. The TIP is primarily a finanical planning document for projects competing for
grants. A Public Hearing is scheduled on June 18, 2012 for the 2013 2018 TIP. After the
Public Hearing, the TIP is adopted by resolution and is then incorporated into the Regional
and State TIPs.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 6/04/12 COMMITTEE CHAIR: ALLAN EKBERG
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR/ADMIN. Public Works
COMMITTEE Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Fund Source:
Comments:
MTG. DATE I RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
6/11/12 Forward to next Reqular Meeting
6/18/12
MTG. DATE
6/11/12
6/18/12
ATTACHMENTS
Informational Memorandum dated 06/01/12
Draft Resolution
Draft 2013 2018 TIP Spreadsheets
Current Adopted 2012 2017 TIP
Minutes from the Transportation Committee meeting of 06/04/12
Resolution in fina form
45
m
k a
Washington
Resolution No.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of RCW Chapters 35.77 and 47.26 as
amended, the City Council of the City of Tukwila has previously adopted a
Transportation Improvement Program and thereafter periodically modified said
Transportation Improvement Program by resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the work accomplished under said
program, determined current and future City street and arterial needs and, based upon
these findings, has prepared a Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program for the
ensuing six calendar years (2013-2018); and
WHEREAS, on June 18, 2012, a public hearing was held regarding the City's Six-
Year Transportation Improvement Program
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Program Adopted. A six-year Transportation Improvement Program
for the calendar years 2013-2018 is hereby adopted.
Section 2. Filing of Program. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
file a copy of this resolution, together with the exhibit attached hereto, with the
Secretary of Transportation and the Transportation Improvement Board of the State of
Washington.
W: \Word Processing-City\ResolutionsMP 2013-2018 5-30-12
CKtjs Page 1 of 2
47
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON,
at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 2012.
ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED:
Christy O'Flaherty, MMC, City Clerk Verna Seal, Council President
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Resolution Number:
Shelley M. Kerslake, City Attorney
Exhibit: City of Tukwila Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program from 2013 to 2018
W: \Word Processing- City \Resolutions \TIP 2013 -2018 5 -30 -12
48 CK:bjs Page 2 of 2
draft 2013-2018 transportation improvement program summary
00
o
N
O O
a M
0
N
E E
O
L U—
E
r-
0
.iJ
O
CL
d
V
W
a
x
cn
ro
tl
N
O
N
C
7
N
m
C
0
G r1
RW Required) z
Environmental Type
T° o o
IU
a r m
'O
p
Total Length
i
C
N
r
a
0
Utility Codes 13 3�
O b
Improvement Type o
i
�N
Resolution No.
o
J
p
9
C
Amendment
t
W
d
3
N
Adopted
d
N
N
o
V 2
7
O
c
7 Q
LL
Z Nearing
w
ro
rn
'o
�Io
a
p
2
N
m
V
LL
iy
d
v
m
LL
9
M
V r
o
N U
9
'o 0 O
d C
E
N LL
C
V
E d
y
F LL
O
C
O O
O
C
r
N
N N
c
N
O
v
N
II C
CO
V
Vi
N a.
0.
j
Z �'a
W w o
Q Z O
C
a
a o m H Z
o
F
S
Z O N-
N o
9 O m
N
v
w
p. o_eCmo.
Q c
Qc G-
v
d
QUp Wtil
N W Z
m
'y
m L a U
rn N
E a
J
Priority Number
N
Y
Q U O Functmnall
Glas
s
LL
ro
tl
N
O
N
C
7
N
m
C
0
G r1
E
c*
RW Required) z
T
L
N
E Type
l
w
U
o
0
0 0
O
O
0
m
o
0
0 0
t
L
M
9
Total Length
O
N
E E
Utility Codes
Q
o
0
0 0
Q
U
Improvement Typel o
0
o
N N
c
Resolution No.
m
U
O
o
0
0 0
0
O
0 0
N N
N
Q
Amendment
LL
a
erg
L
N
L
Adopted
0
0 0
m
a
m
U
o
0
U
v
z
Hearing
C
LL
L
O
/A
U
V)
a m
m
F-
0
0
0
U)
N
V
LL
N
v
m
n
O
Of
C
C
LL
m
m
c
o
V
N
N
m
a
C
m
E
m
LL
10
O
N
V
E
m
LL
N
C
N
U
N
O
O O
m
O
r•
A
w N
N
N
m
O
m
L^
h
E
'E o
m
`m
m
N
m
r
Z m n
5
L
a
o
0 F-
_z U
d
U E w
Y Y
U Y
o_ d_vo�;
�E
m w
w
z
aa�mLL
dc5ouiu
a a
o�
Y a
u
w
z
Priority Number
Z. O
c 0
W
I
'o
m Y
a
a
v
a
U
y
ma
a
Functional m
c
f
Classy
i
w
N
N
rn
ro
a
V
O
N
0
ro
c
Ts
0
if
0
CL
tY
51
w- N
IM
O O
d N
L
0 u-
i
O
;J
co
O
I
Vf
L
L
co
W
I ptVq R z
Ignvironmental Type w
U
Total Length p
a-
0
Utility Codes U I-
H
ImprovementTYPe o
Resolution N°'
Amendmen
Adopted
0
N
z
ffi
r
Hearing
r
u
v
CD N
m
G
Y
U
3 C N
r a
y r O
c
p K
Q U O
d
c c
Z d 6
O O U
dt=mW 01
a�Z
Z Q om
a
QUp ui u.
Priority Number
m
v
U
m
H
m
i
N
JO 0 ~O o
C
R V
m M
b
m
O LL
p O
O
O
O
N
N N
N
O O
o6
O
�m v r
0
.t+
ro
o a U
N
c
o
v LL
m 0 m
a
d O 9
U W
T
Y
p
y r C Y
r
p
O
O
O
U N
p
N
3 d Q V, U
Y
79
m d m d 9 w z
U
o
h
m y v a c a
m
U
d d
V
7
N
v
runctional m
Class
a
p o
CJ .J
m
N
LL
R
Y
o o
0 0
p O
p M
M
N M M
V
LL
U
O
J
p O
CL
CL
W
N
L6
O
N
G
O
p O
O
O
N N
i
C
o6
7
LL
.t+
ro
N
p O
CL
CL
W
N
L6
O
N
G
O
E
cO
RW Required) z
r
EnvironmentalTypel
N
o
g
O
O
N
Total Length
i
4—+
r
O
m
d
N
E E
Utility Codes
O L
o o
o
Q
Improvement Typel o
0
CL
C
E
e
m
u
C
Resolution No.
0
J
O
0
0
0 0
L
0 0
N N
O
N
L
Q
Amendment
v
c
e
LL
d
L
\V
N
m
Adopted
o c
y
j
O
O
U
V
N N
Z
Hearing
c
LL
L
V
N
ry
O O
N
M
0
0
tD Z
o
W
N
9
c=
O O
LL
N
d
V
N
d
o
a
LL
y
R
M
O
C
N
C
d
0
o
U
3
o
O O
o 0
N N
C
O
U
LL
N
C
N
d
N
IO
d
LL
C
O
m
Y
z O O
of
C
d
N
W
E.-
E c
4
a d
c u
me
m
N
t
�Eo�
a
d
d t; E
N aE
1Ye
O 5z t;
LL N V C y
m
V O�
y E N
d
y J
N
Q
zii o d 'iS
m
E 2
J
m
aa`KMEL
m m
QU OUILL
o
am
cc:
cn
F
Y O
Priority Number
U
N J
L
v
O
m
v
r
O W
m
v
Q
U a
Functional a
c
L
F
Classy
LL
w
v
N
M
CL
i
0
N
O
a)
c
C
O
Cif
53
O)
m
a
50
O
N
O
c
7
N
(6
C)
O
(Y
a
RW Required) Z
M
P
EnvironmentalTypel
t3! N
o
0
O O
M
A
M
Total Length
c
LL
+r P
To
r
a) 04
a
O
Utility Codes
O
C)
O r
o
0
0 LL
Improvement Typel o
w
ow
L
w M
M
CL
E
J
LL
n
Resolution No.
o
0
o
0
0
0
0 o
N n
y
O
Amendment
N
L
M M
LL
V/
m
L
N
0
m
N
1V
2 7
Adopted
77 0
o O
m
m
0
N
U
O
v
Z
Hearing
c
u',
L
a
'cN
m
w
p O M
M
a
M
u)
rl] 2
W
0 c
U
c
J
A
`m
V
v
M
N N
IQ N
E
m
W
LL
R
m
n
m
c
m
m
o
U
c
LL
F
o 0
0 0
o
o 0
lei 11
r
m
c
N
m
m
N
LL
v
N
N
m
r
o 0
E
y
c
O O
C
m
U
e o
O`
a
b
N
r r
in
c
I
o
N
E
S .E o
m
K
c m
z
z
ai
a
z ot
m
d
m
U
tL
o uOtl�
Z
ll m y C m
O
N
N
J
N
Q
Z Q O m
7
o
aao to c,
a
m
r°
m
U
ce
QU t]ui u:
Q
K
m
Priority Number
m a
9t
O
c a
m
q
U 0
a
Functional to
9 N
m
Class c
u
W
O)
m
a
50
O
N
O
c
7
N
(6
C)
O
(Y
a
ro
a
M
0
N
L6
O
6J
C
7
ro
O
O JJ
(L
RW Required z
11111
C O
y
r
O
Environmental Type
O O o
O p p o
N
oop�
O O
r
Total Length
M
0
CO
Utility Codes O IL
I
O p G
W
o o
O N Y1
y
Improvement Type o
N
N N N
O L.
t,..
u.
o
E
Resolution No.
J
J
T
N tD
9
C
Amendment
O LL
N
y
N
N
o
>V
Adopted
m
1V
v
o
m
y
U
t
O
c
v
ly
z Hearing
A n
O N
N
O O
3
d
D
d
LL
9
t!i
9
O
U
O
O O
p o
m
4 a
LL m m m
b
of
C
9
d
ll.
o
}0
y
°O
O
p
p
p O
O
O
M
y N N N
m
N
m
r
W
�.E E
o
p
v
L
v LL
To
Z`m n
o
o N a
0
E
Vi
d j- O
u u
U
Q
U IC N z
Q in m w z U
LL
f-
Z
o 0 a
0
aalY to n.
m
m a�
an
QU QLL1 LL
d
a lY U
U
CC'
y C
m
a
N
priority Number
CL
Functional
a
li
ro
a
M
0
N
L6
O
6J
C
7
ro
O
O JJ
(L
E
0 0
RW Required z
r
L
N
Environmental Type
77
w
U
o o
73
o
o
A
O
m
o
M
c
Total Length
�d
r
LL
O
R
d
N
E
Utility Codes
Q
0 0
0 0
0
Q
U
Improvement Type N
0
m
0
o
L
Q
C
L y
E
O
LL
U
Resolution No.
0
J
O
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
o c
0 0
O
N
O O
O O
N
O
0
m
Q
Amendment
v
p
V/
LL
L
r
N
N
L
L
Adopted
0
0 0
0 0
W
O
N
v
o
O
U
x
0 0
0 0
Z
Hearing
c
w
L
m
m
y
a m
M
F- o
0 0
0 77
0
0
0 0
0 0
U!
N
V
N
LL
10
d
V
N
LL
ti
L
U
O
m
d
0
O
U
O
--(S-
O
O
o
-E;-
O O
O
O O
O
o
N
C
t0
N
N
3
m
a
N
LL
N L
r
O
O O
O O
U
U7
l0
U)
N
M
e2 �co
C
m
co
N
iy
C
E o
K
V)
d
m
N
o Z m`a
i
m�
a
Z
uwEWa
M
o0
O Z M
m 0
yr,
d N V C N
O
U
N
N
L
N N
a
w
a
Z J
U a
o
m
co m
QCi O w ti
U
o
N
U
m
x
m K
L
O
F
N
Y a_
u
w
Z
J
Priority Number
a n
0
a
u
Y O
c 0.
N
o
m M
a o
o a
a
a
U 0
v N
m
a
Functional rn
c
a
Class
LL
w
N
o�
m
d
1
O
O
N
C
N
R
0
0
56
co
RW Required 0
CO
o P
l
Ty
ental e W
Environm v
o Q o
o
c)
N N
N
V
3
tr
Total Length
N
A
Uti lit y Codes d
O
O
Type o
v
I Improvement
Q
L
Ta
/1
U
O
No.
J
o
Resolution
O
L
N Ct
t0
9
Amendmen
O y
O
w
CL
N
Adopted
v
U
w
N
D
c
O Hearing
lL
ei
N
7
00
E;
O O O O
o
o
P
r
cd
c
A
d
9
M
d
LL
O
4 d h
U
W N
d
P
y
a
N
C
U LL
9
N v
N N
Zn O T N N
d
N
n
U) v m H
N
O
F G c
o m
d
O
o m
o L
N
O
4 U U
'o z ob
G
ca
V
gUOW"
t6 U
v
CY
r priority
Number
N d a n.
c
a
y
c
N
U)
4
G
W
W O
q 0 o
Functional
LL
o. I
Class
E cO
L
O O
CL
CD
^L C'4
W
E E
E
O L
0- U-
ii
E
a
0
O
Q.
N
C
L
L
liz
N
0
z
v
N
_C
RW Required)
Z
m
F
Y d
�Q
�C
C O
a
Q
o K
o O
iL
iL
N
0
z
v
N
_C
RW Required)
Z
Environmental Type w
�C
U
o
0
c�i
0 0
0 0
0 C
o d
Total Length
N
a
LL
N
M
N u7
Utility Codes
O
H
Improvement Typel ro
N
V
C
o
N
M
0 0
O N
N h
Resolution No.
LL
R
v
0
o
Amendment
v
c
0
0 0
°o a
0 0 0
t0 M CO
N N
L
in
LL
d
!q
r
N
Adopted
0 0 0
V
U
Hearing
v
LL
m
z
v
O O M
a m M
m
h
F O
0 0
Di 2 3
0 0 0
d
9
C
J
LL
t0
O
v
d
LL
�y
f0
C
N
m
a
N
N
o
E
c
LL
O N
d U
A
O iE
d
d
LL
U N
O
O
o E
y
O N
O
N
C
O
N
O
N
U
O
y
E
E- c o
E o n
m y
d
ro
o Z F n a
c
r
o
Z
u
E w d
u a
LL N 9 C N N
E
N
ZO Om 'p
C a�
w
t d
Z
y
oM d
a
o
QUCui u. (9
o
pa
m
v
F-
Priority
Priori Number
d
w z
r d U
a
c A U)
N
3
Functional
o
y
m
Class
i
w
rn
N
rn
m
a
M
0
N
N
0
N
c
7
C)
O
a
tY
w
0
a
0
a
w
0
N
0
N
C
N
m
0
o
0
iY
59
00
RW Required i
E
T
L-
Environmental Type
CD
N
w
U
O o
O o
O o 0 0
O
o
0
0
0 0
o
16-
0
v
0
LL
O
II
c
Total Length
O
R
N
a
d
o
Utility Codes
U
Q
F
0
0
0 0
Q
LL
Improvement Type m
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
L
CL
m
II
C
LL
0 0
N
E
Resolution No.
U
O
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
77 0
0 0
v a
Q
Amendment
N
N.
oy
Y
N
N
L
L
Adopted
0
0
0 0
W
v
7
y
O
0
U
x
z
Hearing
m
m
Yo
2 O n
N
a m
F-
Q
E,
O
O
O O
2>
O O
O O
O
O
O O
(n
N
II
O O
O O
LL
t0
d
lU
d
II
d
LL
N
C
O
o
U
N
r
o
0
77
0 0
o 0
E
v
o 0
o O
o
N
N
LL
(p
N
o 0
C
OI
C
t0
y
LL
N
d
O)
d
U
ET
O
O
O O
O
G
d M
M
y
O
O
O
N
N
N
w
C
n,
II
N
r
E o
z
0 0
z d II O
m
CO m o
m
u« E W m
y
a s
Q�
FF
O Q
O U z u c
Q
c
�m
i y
l
o dv` d
a
y
w
O
z o o
a
a
v
dLLKm O_ d
a`, a
o
a
o
U
Q U O LLl u.
v7
Of m
K
x
K
m
Y
W a
o
Priority Number
a
Df
U
T
EL
O
C
Q
U p
v y
m
a
Functional
Class
LL
W
0
a
0
a
w
0
N
0
N
C
N
m
0
o
0
iY
59
a
.1
O
N
ui
0
c
7
7
d
c6
r
0
CL
0
K
I
RW Required z
M
V—
L
N
Environmental Type
w
U
o
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
O
O
a
M
o
II
c
C
i�
r
Total Length
LL
O
ro
N
E E
Utility Codes
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0
Q
Improvement Type o
0
0 0 0
1
L
a
m
m a
N
Q
E LL
c
Resolution No.
U
O
Q
0
0
0 0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Q
v
L
m rn
c�
V fO
Q
Amendment
c
LL
d
t
N
Adopted
0 0
0 0
d
v
m
N
0
V
U
V
x Z
Hearing
L
ro
O 2 M
o
N
a n
r�
N
-E
ro 2
V)
N
0 0
0 0
V
J
LL
ro
d
LL
M
d
V
O
U
V
c
A
F
O O
O O
C
LL
�Q
d
LL
J
N
_N
9
C
o
n r
L
o 0
O
0 0
O
O
N_
V
ro
ro
C
'E c
t
v
V N
ro
Z y a
o
0 a
6 r
rn
Z
C
ro ro
FFFf****
m m
m
2 y
ft@
z o 1Opj Q
v
t a-
a
K v
aa�mn.
m m
m
a o
c
O o
F
Y a
Priority Number
t
W
n- rr
Z
U
K
T
T O
c a
CL
Q
'o F-
v 0
Functional
N
c
a
Class
LL
w
a
.1
O
N
ui
0
c
7
7
d
c6
r
0
CL
0
K
I
E cO
M Ir"
L CD
N
0 0
r— O
d N
E E
0 O
L
0 U
L
Q
E
C
O
�J
O
Q
L
L
L
VJ
W
Q
Ct
Its
IM
m
N
0
z
d
v
N
C
m
x m K
N
r O
c c a
m F
rn o
Q O O
2
RW Required Z
Environmental Type w
U
O
O
Total Length
Utility Codes
LL
Improvement Type Mo
Resolution No.
Amendment
Adopted
Hearing
O O
M
N U Q
Ed _2
h
17
Functional
Class
LL
l0
O
0 0 0 0 0 0
vi of o
c
R
O
J
O O O
O O O
O O O O O O
N ifl O
n
N L
9
C
LL
b
N
a
O
U
v
C L
m
y
O O O
fA
V
LL
m
`a v
N M
LL
N
m O
r o 0 0
U 0
a
c
LL
N
d V
C
LL N
N
r Zs
o 0 0
`m
N N
H
N r
a
t
0- U
a o
F-
L N
rn M w z
r LL U
d a
N
J
rn a a v
c c
n
C n
LL W
w
m
C
CO
d
N
cv
tf
0
61
U
c0
d
Of
C
a
m
3
N
9
N
N
J
O)
D
Y
R
LL
U
m
v
3
U
C
p�
E C
o
U
O
Q
N
C
t0
M
E
Z of c
0
o
C
Z o F
T
m
d Ew d
LL
a
U
CL C d d
m m
U d
M
Z O p d 0
N m r
U
Q60 ui u:
0
L)
Priority Number
Functional
Class
LL
l0
O
0 0 0 0 0 0
vi of o
c
R
O
J
O O O
O O O
O O O O O O
N ifl O
n
N L
9
C
LL
b
N
a
O
U
v
C L
m
y
O O O
fA
V
LL
m
`a v
N M
LL
N
m O
r o 0 0
U 0
a
c
LL
N
d V
C
LL N
N
r Zs
o 0 0
`m
N N
H
N r
a
t
0- U
a o
F-
L N
rn M w z
r LL U
d a
N
J
rn a a v
c c
n
C n
LL W
w
m
C
CO
d
N
cv
tf
0
61
E cO
C�
L 0
N
O O
N
E E
0 Q
L
O LL
L
a
E
c
0
�F+
L
O
Q.
N
L
L
x
co
w
Y
t�
1�
m
x m U)
F? Y d
m m D!
Q O O
a.
2
m
a
0
O
z
m
C
T
RW Requiredl Z o
Environmental Type
Total Length
Utility Codes
Improvement Type
l v
+a
Resolution No.
Amendment
Adopted
Hearing
2 p m
rL
U Q
Ed _2
y
ii
m
0
T
3
a
c
m m
o
o
LL
d n
WE
c
m
m m
of rn
C C
d�
m
U
N m
Q
J
m�
c m
0
o
y� U
a'
`m o
U
N
E
C C
O O
U U
mi'
0 0
a
2
C
L
O
C
E.2
E
O
v
8 m d
z o r
U
N
m
m m c y
F m
N
dFEwm
o.. Z.6
t
o`
o 0
E
Z O d ,0
'L W ma`
0
N>
o a
Q c5d Ld
z
Priority Number
Functional m
r
Class
C
N
ii
m
0
co
Q)
m
CL
V
N
U5
0
a)
c
41
0
O
W
a
c
LL
U
J
0
o
c
N
L
c
�c
LL
m
t
R
N
y
m
U
v
r
LL
m
C
N
N
0
0
O O
VI
V
C
LL
m
m
m
LL
M
y
m
0
0
U
c
LL
N
d
c
N
LL
0 0
m`
Y
Y
N
ur
V
ii
N J
J
y
L
CL Q
v
o
m i-
v
m
U A J
m L Q
m.
N
w
OJ W d
N
C
Li
iy
co
Q)
m
CL
V
N
U5
0
a)
c
41
0
O
W
E
RW Required) 0
r
N
Environmental Type
C
o
o
0 0
0
O
O
o
0
c
0 0
L
d
M
R
♦0
r–
Total Length
LL
V
W
wO'
ty 4
E E
Utility Codes
o
o o
Q
U
Improvement Type l 0
0
0 0
N N
W N
L
CL
E LL
c
a
Resolution No.
U
0
0
0 0
0
0 0
0
N
0 0
W N
Q.
Amendment
N
LL
m
otl
L
N
ICU
N
L
L
Adopted
0
0 0
�y
0
U
T
O
v
z
Hearing
c
t
VI
m
m
ro
N v
0
0 0
rD 2
V)
o
0 0
v
LL
N
d
d
C
O
LL
y
l0
z
m
rn
0
U
c
F
O
O O
C
C
9
LL
N
N
O
O
O O
O
O
m
G
r
N
N
m E
E c
E o
n
n
m
z
a
L
0 o F
Z
N
S N
N
O
E
y" E
'o «Zoe
R
c m
LL°
a
U
C
C
ro
QUdui L.
z
z <n
O
o
Lt
m o
a
H
Y a
Priority Number
v
of
a a
C)
o
I
m
r
o
a
Functional rn
c
n
Class
ii
i
w
0)
m
m
a
V
0
N
L6
N
D
65
O
S
0
tY
63
E
00
RW Required z
P
E
o
Environmental Type
m
N
U
0
0
O
Z o F-1
v
U C
U y
W
R N
o
P
Total Length
o
N
N
a
LL
O d
o
Utility Codes
U
A
0
F
0
LL
Improvement Type o
L
Q
N
E
F
Y O_
C
Resolution No.
0
rn
o
CIO
Q
U
0
Functional co
0 0
0
E
Amendment
N
Y
V
C
L
J
L
Adopted
CI
d
y
W
O
x_
Z
Hearing
V
O O
O
O
F- o
u Q
O
O
rri 2
(7
C
O_
d
i
`m
a
K
i
m o
U) i
a
N
N d K t
N V) (a
I I M
M M N
K i
w vi U C
0
0 0
0
0 0
0 0
E
o
c
E
Z m a
0000
O
Z o F-1
v
U C
U y
W
R N
U Z
U
L
LL
O d
aLLmmo_
A
m
U
QU Ci LLi u:
N
y
F
Y O_
Priority Number
T O
rn
o
0
Q
U
a
Functional co
0 0
E
Class
O_
d
i
`m
a
K
i
m o
U) i
a
N
N d K t
N V) (a
I I M
M M N
K i
w vi U C
0
0 0
0
0 0
0 0
C
c
0000
v
LL
A
f
0
0
C 0
0
0
0 0
V
C
J
O
O
J
O O
O
O
O O
O
O
O O
O O
O
O
O O
N t
N
L
C
LL
U
L
N
N
O
0
U
v
L
LL
V
A
fA
0
0
0 0
C C
0
0 0
0 0
C
a v
LL
76
d
V
d
LL
N1
N
t0
d
O
V
O
r
O
O O
U
c
c
O
d
F
LL
N
N
d
C
y
N
LL
ET
O
O
O
O
0
0
in
d
N
L d
d
U
N
a
m
9
m
to N
W
L LL
Z
U
N
d
a
rn M
a
a
w
v
9 N
d
c
LL
a
W
_r.,
a�
N
d
V
CJ
N
U
CD
a)
c6
C)
0
af
E Q
P
L Q
N
0 0
Q
N
E E
0
L
0 U-
E
c
0
V/
L
L L
f"^
L
K
co
G
z�
C
y�yj
N
m
a
5
0
z
d
D
C
m
y O
a U
T O
c c a
m 0 F
U K
Q O
RW Required z
Environmental Type Lu
U
N
O
Total Length
Utility Codes
Improvement Type
l ro
N
Resolution No.
Amendment
Adopted
Hearing
0 0
EL m
F o
N u Q
Ed 2 S;
0
O O
D
c
LL
d
m
h
o O
O O
O O
O O
m
L
U
D
c
LL
LL
m
m
io
0 0
y
D
L
o
0 0
c
LL
m
v
m
LL
N
o H
O
U
D
C
N
y
U)
d
Q
D
M
D
D
y
LL
c
N
l6
U)
d
Q
N
N
N
`m
O O
C
d
N
d
N
d
d
E
E o
N
a
m
O
m
m
a
O
m
rn
LL
c
X
W
0 o F a
m
D
a
u E c y
rt
a
u
o
z o o v°
v
v Q
aLLC tr a
a
D
Priority Number
Functional
Class
0 0
0 0
0 0
O O
c
LL
m
0
0 0
O o
V
C
LL
U
O
J
O O
D
c
LL
d
m
h
o O
O O
O O
O O
m
L
U
D
c
LL
LL
m
m
io
0 0
y
D
L
o
0 0
c
LL
m
v
m
LL
N
o H
O
U
D
C
N
y
v
O O
D
D
y
LL
c
N
N
`m
O O
o
ro N
UJ
a
N
a
m w
t o
N
a
o o_ o
a f-
d
U N W
N t a
EL
rn
LL
c
X
W
M
CL
V-
N
V
0
7
O
0
O
65
r—
0
a
V
O
N
O
N
C
(6
0
O
Cr
RW Required Z
M
V—
L
Environmental Type
N
ui
U
°o
0 0
0 0
o
Q
Q
0
rn
0
m
0
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
CL
M
9
c
Total Length
O
N
n-
o
Utility Codes
O
U
0
0
0 0
0
Q
LL
Improvement Type o
o
0 0
o ro
N O
N
V
/16-
iL
C
LL
Resolution No.
U
O
O
M
0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
a
0 0
m o
O
N
C
0
0
o
o
o
o
0
c
N
ui
y r
Q
Amendment
/H
V�
LL
m
er1
L
/R
47
Adopted
0 0
0 0
m
a
m
G
w
O
U
4
z Hearing
ii
m
H
m
i¢
in
a d
F- 7°
u Q
0 0
0 0
(n
N
7
LL
d
4
O
a m
C
m
LL
G
m
F
0
E
m
o
0 0
0
d E
C
c
N
m
m
m
c
O
y
Y
F
O O
O O
O
O
O j e. 2
m
co
m m
O
O
O
O
O O
E O
tli
a 'c
m U
H
E
z m a
N
3
a
z y V U
u r EW m
?'FZ
N
r m
d
F 2
°gym
me
d
N
o u°
a v
a rn] a
10 a
a�
z
o U
aa�ma
r
m
QU ❑ui
v7 N
a N
m
m
U)
D
F]- Y
a
N@
w
z
Priority Number
a
0
T T
p
m
a
m
Q
U
c
a Functional
Class
x
r—
0
a
V
O
N
O
N
C
(6
0
O
Cr
N M N M (V
D r V M
C N
LL
f0
O
o o 0 0 0
N M N M
C r V M
U
R
O
J
O O O O
O O O O
O O O O O O O O
r O r
M t0 M N
C
LL
N L
t0
N
v
U
D
C L
M
LL V
t0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
N
D
J
LL
A
d
d M
LL
N
o
O F o 0 0 0
U
D
LL
m
y D
D c
y N
LL
7 7 0 0 0
A
0 0 N N N N
N
N r
w Z
t a U
IL 0
D
u
N m w Z
fn
a
N
m w a a a
c c
c a
LL W
00
N
m
M
a
w
O
N
d
O
0
C
Of
67
RW Required
E
00
N
01
l0
C
M
T
L
CD
Environmental Type
0)
N
0
O
O
o
L
C
M
T
Total Length
L
O
C
d
N
a
Utility Codes O
(1)
0
C U
T
O D
LL
Improvement Type o
N
D
O` C
O
L t
E
r—
Resolution No.
O
Q
�n
Z
o
Z
0 9 U
y N
Q Amendment
N
Y
a
C
o
L
mF
L
o Z
ro
D
L
Adopted
m
Z O 0
O
x
0� N
r
Z
Hearing
v,
m
Y
re
Q U❑ LLl u:
CO (n N
a m
M
V) o
N Q,
m
m 2
h
Priority Number
N M N M (V
D r V M
C N
LL
f0
O
o o 0 0 0
N M N M
C r V M
U
R
O
J
O O O O
O O O O
O O O O O O O O
r O r
M t0 M N
C
LL
N L
t0
N
v
U
D
C L
M
LL V
t0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
N
D
J
LL
A
d
d M
LL
N
o
O F o 0 0 0
U
D
LL
m
y D
D c
y N
LL
7 7 0 0 0
A
0 0 N N N N
N
N r
w Z
t a U
IL 0
D
u
N m w Z
fn
a
N
m w a a a
c c
c a
LL W
00
N
m
M
a
w
O
N
d
O
0
C
Of
67
N
01
l0
C
D
m
3=
d
D
N
d j
y D
C
d O
5 rn
m `m
C
d
D
U
O)
C
D C
n
Lu
Y
a
C U
T
O D
N
D
O` C
i4
EEo
Q
�n
Z
o
Z
0 9 U
y N
d
Ew v
Y
a
C
o
mF
o Z
ro
D
Z O 0
O d
gamma
0� N
r
rn
m
Y
re
Q U❑ LLl u:
CO (n N
(n
Y a
m
Priority Number
tQ
c
O
c a
C
U K
a
'o
a.
Functional o
Class
N M N M (V
D r V M
C N
LL
f0
O
o o 0 0 0
N M N M
C r V M
U
R
O
J
O O O O
O O O O
O O O O O O O O
r O r
M t0 M N
C
LL
N L
t0
N
v
U
D
C L
M
LL V
t0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
N
D
J
LL
A
d
d M
LL
N
o
O F o 0 0 0
U
D
LL
m
y D
D c
y N
LL
7 7 0 0 0
A
0 0 N N N N
N
N r
w Z
t a U
IL 0
D
u
N m w Z
fn
a
N
m w a a a
c c
c a
LL W
00
N
m
M
a
w
O
N
d
O
0
C
Of
67
m
a)
m
ro
a
N
0
N
ro
0
K
RW Required) z
00
t�
Environmental Type
I
T p O
o 0
0 0
O
O
O
V
N (h M
O D O
L
CL M
Total Length
u
OP
G? N
Utilit Codes
_c S
d
�L
O
Typel o
V
Improvement
M M
G
L
w
E
U
O
J
Resolution No.
i�
R.
o
M M
L
N O
C
IG
p6
i
Q
Amendment
LL
F
Q
N
N
Adopted
L
v
v
N
U
v or
L
r
o
z Hearing
O
m
N
p1 cn
V
N
c
LL
A
m
C LL
D
D U
m
m N
m O
<D P
N c U
m
c
a m LL
r
U
a�
o
O c
a v
m
c y
Y m D N
U
o
n
Za`io.
c
T Nrn
a.
Z m
r+
ELu m
m)
O U z -U
V7
N C U Z
l e i
pct
aawm�
i,3 U:
L
m
;Y cr
m a a
Y rl priority Number
y
w
4}
Q
v o-
c
c
m o
Q u 0 Functional)
Class
m
a)
m
ro
a
N
0
N
ro
0
K
v
IP
C
r
O p0 0 O
R W Required z
0
to
Op O p O
Environmental TyPeI u
s N
O
Y o 0
M
O
N
O
Q
U *4
Total Length
C
0. M
N
m
N
w
Utility Codes
7 O
ImprovementTypel0
0 U
p O
p0 p 0 a
L.
c
CL
E Resolution
s+
d
Z
No.
m
y1 N 7 j Z
U
w
O
0
.iJ
F-
A
U
'Z Qom° �o
O Amendment
O
a artma
zr
N
O
U
Adopted
r N
r
a
m
N
V/
N
3
m
C
O
I ts
c a
C Y
z Hearing
N
c y
9
x
m
4 u a
Functional
m
ii
d
V)
Z
C1ass�
N
v
IP
C
r
O p0 0 O
0
to
Op O p O
N
Y o 0
M
9
Q
C N N N
0
C
N
m
Ec� a
w
p O
p0 p 0 a
c
T m c
M N
s+
d
Z
C
m
y1 N 7 j Z
U
w
O
LL
F-
A
U
'Z Qom° �o
a o
O
a artma
zr
m
O
U
M
r N
r
a
N
W
m
C
r
I ts
c a
C Y
LL
N
c y
9
x
m
4 u a
Functional
m
ii
N
C1ass�
d
a
0
c7
v
r
C
7
d
m
N
P O p
O
O p O
v
c
LL
y
M
v
m
LL
c
r-
0
U
a
c
u_
'm
c
d
N
V
d
Y
o
Y
O
N
O
m
d
W
Q
N
L6
CJ
Q)
G
7
N
m
D
0
O
6�
0
to
N
Y o 0
E
C
Q
C N N N
0
N
Ec� a
w
Ewp a
T m c
s+
d
Z
O
m
y1 N 7 j Z
U
w
O
F-
'Z Qom° �o
a o
a artma
zr
m
U
U
N
r
a
F' x a
Priority Number
m
I ts
c a
C Y
c y
9
x
4 u a
Functional
ii
C1ass�
O
N
O
m
d
W
Q
N
L6
CJ
Q)
G
7
N
m
D
0
O
6�
E
000
RW Required
L-
N
Environmental Type
Cn U
V
w
o
0 0
0
O
0
n
a m
o
A
Total Length
O
m
o
Utility Codes
Q
Q
U
c
0 0
0
Q
L
LL
Improvement Type o
o 0
0
C C
0 0
C
0
L
Li
E
V r
C
J
r (O
o
N
Resolution No.
U
0
w
Q
o
0 0
0
o 0
0 C
0 0
0 00 0
0 0
0 0
Q
0 0
0 0
m o
Q.
Amendment
o
m
N
J
LL
d
L
\V
y
L
Adopted
0 0
0 0
d
p
N
a
p
0
U
Z
Hearing
V
c
J
LL
t
e
N
m
a r
M
(n U Q
O
O O
O
-7
m 2
o 0
0 0
C7
V
j
LL
A
N
d
U
LL
N
M
`p
d
m
d
O
U
V
c
J
R
1'O
O O
O O
N
D
N
01
LL
N
LL
N
d
J
Q
v
O O
O O
l0
O
A
N
of ap
O
O O
a c
=Eo
a
4
m
v_ m
t
z m n
d
a
Z
V
m V U
I C
d F E w d
m m> L
Z .6
Q
CL
M
aaKma
.L.. o o
a a
K U
o
QUO LL1 tL
M n 3 rn
m
s
o U
m
S
Priority Number
d
L
a K
U
O
n
'o E,
m a
d d
v
Q
U
N
c
a
Functional v
C
n
Class
i
w
a)
a>
m
d
V
N
ui
0
a�
Qi
m
r
O
70
d
9
N
O O_ b LL
N
N
d N
V U N
d
rT
a ca
RyN Requir z
a 0
00
u)
N q
o
C)
'EnvironmentalTYPe
U
v m
o v
7
C
7
N
p O
Total Length
1
r
N�
W 1 d
Sul
m d v LL
C
CIA
utility Codes
o
Y
N N
9
O
N
O G
c
1mProvementType
N C O N K AO M C
LL
O U.
V
0o N p N
O
J
iry�
NO,
r U)
(r
Resolution
N
a o
0 P
N
Ion
o m y
O
�E« o 0 0
V eb
G
0
Am endment
zma
r
.t.
LL
N
O
d
Z o
m oNm-
ro
0
awE4 In
N N z
mr as o6. y N j t d L O- U
o-6
r
m
N
in
Z C d v y No L a
N E N X p� �Y
m 6
m
If
Adopted
a�pW,,:
I,
o
v
v
tr
r
U
q a
m
Priority Number a n.
V i- r0 Y
79
n
V3
O
Hearing
Z
N
M
N
U Q
N
9
rn
n
V
d
9
N
O O_ b LL
d N
V U N
o v
7
N
N�
W 1 d
Sul
m d v LL
C
Y
O O
O G
N C O N K AO M C
0o N p N
r U)
N
N
O
�E« o 0 0
0
zma
r
N
d
Z o
m oNm-
ro
0
awE4 In
N N z
mr as o6. y N j t d L O- U
o-6
r
m
N
in
Z C d v y No L a
N E N X p� �Y
m 6
m
If
�yQ
a�pW,,:
a
m a
o
v
w
tr
U
q a
m
Priority Number a n.
n.
r
y O
n
W
r
4 no p
a
u
Functiona
Class
E
00
RW Required o
z
Ifr
N
Environmental Type
0
o
0 0
C
�O
o
0
A
LL
M
w
II
M
n o
N M
Total Length
ii
Q
m
N
F
E
E
Utility Codes
L-
0
LL
Improvement Typel r y
o
0 C
s
C
Resolution No.
LL
v
O
0 0 0
0 0 0
o O o
O
O M
Q
Amendment
v
c
N
L N M
io
LL
O
C
w
41
N
L CU
r
L
Adopted
CU
d
0 0 0
v
0
O
U
Hearing
LL
a
s
a
p_n
m
h
a
o
t
u Q
o
Ed 2-Z�
O
O
O O 6
N
O
O
O
O
C9
C
J
LL
ro
d
d
LL
N
M
N
N
N
O
0
U
10
O O O
V
C
lL
a
ro
C
N
N
E
d
LL
N
T
C
E
o
a
U U
E c c
h
E
o z m a m
a ro
L U
L
a
tq
z C~ u o m
m e
6t
m w o N T
C N
`a
Z 06
U
o_avSv
a
rn
aa`o°ma`
�p
v
ro w
2
z
C)
o
U
QUdwLL
i
y
O r[
I
Y d
z
d
Priority Number
z
z
Sid
0
c o
d
n
a
H
y
b
a.
Functional
Class
O
K
w
N
rn
a
w
N
U
CD
7
ai
r
0
Ctf
72
G cO
cl
P
L
N
O O
-N P
O
Q1 N
E E
0
L
LL
CL
E
c
O
O
I Q I^
v/
L
L
CD
x_
co
y
tR
m
S r m K
X g� E O
m F-
0
E
m
N
z
C
Y
RW Required)
Environmental Type
w
U
O
0
O
O
O
0 0 0
O O O
O O O
O O O
Total Length
LL
A
Utility Codes
O
H
Improvement Type co
N
V
C
o
0
O
0 0 0
0 0 0
O O O
Resolution No.
LL
N
U
0
Amendment
9
G
0 0 o
L
t0
LL
m
N
L
Adopted
0 0 0 0
0
U
Hearing
c
LL
m
z
v
O
m
U)
4 m
ch o
(n
Ed 2
O O
O O O O
LL
N
d
L
m
m
d
Y
LL
m
F
m
O
U
c
F
o 0 0 0
c
m
n
LL
v
4
F-
U)
a
c
O
U
m
m
LL
N
m
v O
T
mc C
T
o 0 0 0
o
m
E
w nU)
T m
o
m
0
ro
j
0
E
y N
N
0
N
m
n
E'E E o
Y m
0 n�
m
N
e ZH a
0
4
Z m m C N 0
d
x
C0
d"Ewm
Z�o�
u u
z 'o o d .p
m
c m
m
w
CL
z
w
4
a
Priority Number
y L a z
y
d 4
4
4
4
w
Functional
n
cn
c
n
Class
a
x
w
N
m
rn
m
a
V
O
N
0
a)
c
ai
W
r
0
a)
tY
73
LO
N
d
m
ca
d
W
cli
U5
0
m
C
N
m
0
O
cL
tY
74
re)
RW Requid 0
M
T
L
N
Environmental Type
w
O
o
o
0
0
o
0
M
Total Length
O
A
C)
N
Utility Codes d
Q
O
O
O
o
o
Q
LL
Improvement Type o
CL
LL
Resolution No.
U
O
o
0
o
o
o
ct
o o
o C
N IQ
O
0
O
0
c
O
N
N
M N
Q
Amendment
c
r
r
LL
d
otl
L
w
N
M
N
L
16-
Adopted
0
0 0
W
m
v
m
0
O
o
U
x
Z
Hearing
i
m
m
U O
N
a m
M
u Q
ro 2
rn
w
o
0 0
v
LL
N
d
d
LL
M
Ol
t0
C
3
d
O
N
F
O
O O
U
c
m
a
j O
U C
d
LL
OIC
C
O
d
N
c C
V
N
O
O O
V
U
R
L
07
Y N
N
n -c
Mn
E o
Z d a
c m
S
y
L
a
O `°�'C
O
o K
2
in a
c c
t5
u T E W v
o rt 0
E
m
c y
`m
v
c
Z
m
a
ro
(A Q
z 'o b 'oi o
o m
m
'Y
m
'Y c
e
w
L a
Z
U
ao.o'mo.
d
o
E
m o
a
m
o
QU6Wii
F-
F- m
F
Y d
Priority Number
y
o-
a
Z
v
T
T o
c
a
C
O1
0
O Q'
Ocl d
d
:0
Q
c
a
Functional
Class
ti
w
LO
N
d
m
ca
d
W
cli
U5
0
m
C
N
m
0
O
cL
tY
74
1
RNI Requ
o1
1 I IP O
O
t onmenlal Type
V
y c
p 3
LL
y Total Length
o o
C•1
Codes o
GG Utility a v:
Improveme =tSyPe 7
O W
O
Re5
lution No.
A m endmen t d
Q N
ii• 1 p O
Adopted v°
m c m 1
N 1 LL
Hearing o
o
Z
in
J 0
t?
m N v
9
d
L
b p l O o
N O
r
0 0
N 1 9I a l 1
I
v
d w d
o Y 0 0
I
tO D p
a r N
m
d
p m m O d
O o G o'
Z a a
'�yi�lil{ O O U N G ar OV
Ul
Qi z y_ y a 9 I r
a R• Q o t .m I 'v
N° m a v
p Q a V�u LL J m 1 1
d V
Number o a c
V�+ F l a priority a m a
3� y n
R r
Q U o. C18ss
[111�11yti"„►►:•
N
d
ro
a
MI
O
O
N
C
7
7
Q1
is
Q
0
c�-
ti
a
Rw
Required Z
v
o o P
o m
0
Environm
V
LL
0
Length
o
y. 4a
Total
r
A. M
O P
N
Utility codes
PO
0
N
improv
LL
0 U-
I
U
6.
J
No.
Resolution
O p
O_
O N y
L
Amen dment
LL
0
N
CL
o
Adopted
v
1
v r 5
y
c o
m
Y
0
Hearing
N
O
M
N �O
in
N
u
V
m
v ai s u
ro -SJ
N
m
O
QpwW o
a
rn LLv V
o
co w LL U
c
N N V
D
Y
E
N
Dm
mro No Y
o P m
N
ro
Q
�D
N F
:m
C
Emcm m M
V
N NCD
n
c c
iy
E
Q
C
Z d
r
o9u
N 9
L m
to wia c Nr
N
m
N
c
7
u' E w
w
U .�om a 4
N
mi -m
Qu cd
y
m cca owd d
m
3
N
z �orno
Y g as �ro
c
uj
QUOwu'•
m 0.
1�
m U
i
9
tY
K
y. a
Number
1M a
a
c
Priority
a
c
l
w
c
4 u o
Q.
F
class
I
E V-
0
N
O O
ll.— `.6d
CL M
C CD 0 N
E E
0) a
0 U—
E
C
0
.}i
O
Q.
M
L
U.
A
W
a
LR
RW Required) r
G
Environmental Typel
0 0
U
a a
y N N
Total Length
V uj N
C
LL
R
O
N
a
0
r
Utility Codes t7
U F
o C
00
ImprovementTyp N
111111
�m
4
Resolution No.
A
o
d
o o
O
Amendment
N
N r N L
V try t� �P
c eb
w r
m v>
m
N
N
D
z
N
F
Y
y
r Y a
U rl
C
m o
Q U a
Adopted
Hearing
M
3
N u Q
C6
C7
W
N
N
m
0.
T
CD
N
ui
O
N
C
d
R
L]
r
0
N
77
G
m
m
U
a
U
ii
m
d
E
F
x
b
E o
Z m a
m
m
d
J
Z o a
ELud
N
C
0 0
U_ d V C N
m
p
G
Z.o mo
t o o
QUC]ui u:,
N
Q U
0
priority Number
V
m
V
r
Functional
d
LL
Class
A
W
N
N
m
0.
T
CD
N
ui
O
N
C
d
R
L]
r
0
N
77
m
a
U
C Q
r
d
N
o° o
C
0 0
0 c
0
LL
m
V
m
V
d
LL
A
O
o r
U
b
c
m
LL
m N
V
`a
c
N
LL
Y
Y
o 0
0 0
N
N
Y O
O O
d.
u
N
R
0.
R Z
w
t U
o
CL
m
r
4
m
N
m
a
N
7
C
N
m
W
LL
W
N
N
m
0.
T
CD
N
ui
O
N
C
d
R
L]
r
0
N
77
I a
RW Req uired 1 Y
co
tat Typo
V—
Environm U
9 m r ti m
u
1 P
O
Lengt h
L O
O P O O
ck O
N
Utility c
r N N N
W O
lmproyem ent Type N
u
U
O U-
9 1
1 'O
Resolution No•
O O O
O
C
.rl
m
pmendmenY
1°.
Y
N
C
Adopted
0 1
I t) y
v e
c N
\V
R�
Y
y
✓1
Hearing
Z
N
yj
O P 00
t1N
rp
N u. •C
A M
LL
m C
1
G N a n i 1 F�
O m O
P O P O'
O
d m N b •O r
p O
O
r in Y n N d 4 1 a
♦Y N V O N
C CD
1
C
m n O b G O 1
N
O
V lf5 d C F 1 1 y
P
CD
G >o rc c w t N I
1 1
S
�o F
A
0
N
m d m o
Ewo n a U
p Nz" U P 7 9 G G q D•
p C
V
O O m 0 M
r�
m z
r(Ct•••a�
qV�W 1
N a
Nu tuber
y
Priority
O�.��
r
o 1
-yam
u
p o
q v a-
I class
G co
L
N
O O
L J
a M
.r+ r
C
d N
E E
O
O O
L LL
C L
L
c
O
�J
y T
O
Q.
N
Y
L
L
Q�
a
11
Q
6i
11`
RW Required) z
Environmental Typel
Total Length
utility Codes
Improvement Type N
Resolution No.
a
N
0
O
Z
d
D
y
C
m
r O
c a
o
Q tJ O
Amendment
Adopted
Hearing
a m M
o
N
N
O
Functional
Class
N
Y
t0
3
d
D
N
N
F
t6
m
Y
t6
FL
0
n
C
D
J
U
C
o
a
n
m
C
m
C
N
N
E
O
O
E
�E o
c
Zma
z y
o
E
a V
Z t m O
oES j
a CL
Q(i O ui Li
3
Priority Number
LL
Functional
Class
O� 3
LL
N D
d C
D r
d
LL
Y
N
`o
0
E m in
c
G N
U N
d
C y
o L
v n.
D
C
D y
m m w
o_
d c a m
U m 75
D
n y a
L
m a
a 3
C X
W
O
co
N
m
0-
a
T
0
N
tr)
O
N
ui
co
D
C
O
a
LL'
79
a
D
C
R
0
c
LL
O
J
p
y L
L
a
^b
LL L
L
N N
N
N
0 0
U
D
C L
L
LL
d
V1
o o
o
0 0
0
V
Q
Q
D
D
D
a
LL
y
O O O
O O
O
O
U
D
c
O
co
N
m
0-
a
T
0
N
tr)
O
N
ui
co
D
C
O
a
LL'
79
00
N
O O
C. M
p
O LL
r
i�
C
O
O
Q.
1..
L
r
R W Required Z
o o
ental Typel
Environm 1 w o
N
�f V
C
3
Total Length m
o
r
+3
-V
1h:
Utility Codes
o
Improvement Type o
w
m
Resolution No.
0
J
0 0 °a
o
P Cif
N O
N f0
C
Amendmen
7 S
LL
i
R
Adopted
v
d
0
U
i
C]
c
LL
z Hearing
m
A
rn
m
o
M
C?
N
d5
C
3
LL
b
d
b
d
LL
O
m r
d U
N G
3
LL
N
9
C
U�
9
Y
V
G
O
7
.o
0 o d m
r U
N
T N
Z V)
n .c G
I: a
Z
6 0
Z 9
y c
rn m om
m
p
m}= E�
ro v c
N UI m N W Z
o
Q0Z
D_ a+
Z Q O O p
E o_
N O
5
'a
60.(Ym0.
K Q U c
N
m
Q U p LL7 LL
U p W U
0.
m U
d d
V_ Y a priority Number
c
a
7
uJ
U
4 p
Functional
a LL
Class
Q�
a
v
N
ui
O
61
(d
Q
S
O
N
C7
d
ro
a
7
N
O
N
G
ai
ro
a
C)
0
a
tY
0
r 1
I
RW Required
00
Type w
O o
O O
V
C
w�
4V
(Environmental
U
r
r
C
V,
O O
LL
Y
I_
Total Length
0
0. C7
r
C)
N
Utility Codes I
O
o vi
E
c m
S
Q� O
a
y
LL
s
ImprowementTYPe
O
L.
u
CL
o
J
O O O
O
E
Re No.
Re
O O
o o o
9 M
O
�N
Amendment
LL
m
N
Vy
O
CL
(0
J
co
Adopted
m
o
v
V
0 liearin9
Z
N
V/
r a
c r
N
F
V)
Z
N
9
LL
N
0
LL
ib
d
N
M LL
'O
d
O
L) d
N
uO
d
V Q
S
O
V
'fl
4
Y
O
ry
G
N
m
r
o 0
r
r-
2
Y o o N
d
L O
L
n-
c
S n
m
d
Z
y
a i-
'o�ZCO
R
W
V F-
6.
N M O
m
_v
>g
p
N N v°
w
QLi AIL
m U
a, a
r
U
a-
Priority Number
r
a N a 0
T✓ O
9 N
X
gi
3
�`p
7
4 U
Functional a
Class
LL
N
C7
d
ro
a
7
N
O
N
G
ai
ro
a
C)
0
a
tY
m
o
O
d
r
d
r
d rig
U
io
d
L L. N CC
O
CQ
Q.
0 N
a
r LL
r
y
I
rn
o r
�n o
N
G.
N
N
O N
L
a d N4'
p
y
N
0
T d✓
C O
LL
O
I� M N
N
[�1
N
N
CO
r
0
itl lA
p to
N
ai ai
C
y O
I
0
C p
co N
U
U
N
N
N
r-
N
o
rojo N
N
m ca
O-
U J
r 0
m u-
L
G
p
m CO
N
0
v
U-
4 O
a
;moo
d dLL
d
LL
!O O
N
3
cr
ca N
a
r
`t
t
m
Fdo
aseud l oa!md
o
0
"goo 3!Il3t
o
I
a
y36ua"1 63 c9
I U7
CL
N o
I
c e) o
In N
o
sn3B35
N
1
�s�adoidw!
m
g
o u N
7
O
r
to
G.
'C
E
2 G
d
R
U E C
ai
o g v
y
2
o7 m
r
a
CC O p
O.E
m c c
m
'o
o
c y
a O o L
E
o 2 s
m�
2CL
[Oo
U
a,
C6 z
tD 3
a O L
dd N
v. 9 d
a$ z
LL o a01yr d d
L� m3E
od<
mom o
o
O d U 0 W
y
O=
zi
o
p,,, N 6
N
1
o
P
C
aagwt)N N
a
•y t--i
t�luoud
I
T� T
O Z SS61�J
Z euo!lound
i�4L
wn
2 Q A! Qd m m
c z f sselo e
\6 Aoue
70
F
ocCL ,eR
V)
e
k
cli
cu
CL
j
k 2
J /j{ §k
Q.cL &k
as
))\E §)k
#kaa £;a!!
e
a-
_2
3
a)
2
j L L
kr r
r- 0
0 0 0CLco e3:CL
+ue-1 1010!
D -E
s_s
i»
m
0
U-
2
k
k
V,
2
o
3
J
CL J
T-
9 C
C
2
2
e
L-
N\�
IL) 7 r
2
e 6 t
t
2
JD
I 2
2�]
bJJ Q
Q.
k� 0
0)
ZU
Rf
Q
\j 2
2
11 C
CL
a
f
2
a
LL
x
;E� §tea
a
0
C
kk
LL
e
c
76
a,
]E
6=
x
k o
F
t2f
e gzG
C o �ta
E
LL
G l
L LL LL 0
wn
2 Q A! Qd m m
c z f sselo e
\6 Aoue
70
F
ocCL ,eR
V)
e
k
cli
cu
CL
j
k 2
J /j{ §k
Q.cL &k
as
))\E §)k
#kaa £;a!!
a-
_2
3
3
kr r
r- 0
0 0 0CLco e3:CL
+ue-1 1010!
s_s
c,�
k
k
2
J
CL J
9 C
C
e
2
e e
e 6 t
t
2
2 I
I 2
2�]
bJJ Q
Q.
k� 0
0)
ZU
Q
\j 2
2
2
11 C
C) C
CL
���3f2 f
f
2
a
i f
;E� §tea
70
F
ocCL ,eR
V)
e
k
cli
cu
CL
j
k 2
J /j{ §k
Q.cL &k
as
))\E §)k
#kaa £;a!!
V)
e
k
cli
cu
CL
j
k 2
J /j{ §k
Q.cL &k
as
))\E §)k
#kaa £;a!!
MR
U- ƒ
I
T-
D
N
j
R
j
�0
e t (3
d
7-
2 g
2
2
N/
u)
CL
J�
E
of
cn
U.
x
w
.0 w
w
7
e
o
o
k
j
r
LL
2
k 05
x_
o 0
F
:z
$)G
e
G o
L
ƒ
a\
a)
I
=�m3
»3
F—
F-
F-
v km
w�
CL elmoo
e=
+uo-1 10101
U�
CL
a-
c a
g
2
2
g
0
T
8
k
2
o
CL
J
B
2
\e
$E
2Q�n
E a
6
r_E q
m
a)
z
2
7
G
d
n.
«72
CD
Q\k
ee/
c
ƒk Jk
\a\k\
`mC!
lb
C
f
�CL
ƒ�
\j\
\k
k
c
2o'
2
m
cm
3
A! 9d
z
d
7 ue
MR
a F-
N
N
R R N
J
ase4d loalOad w I a
sepoo Aumn I 3 N a
0
416ual 10101 I o
snle1S n
(s)edA I I a
juawanwdwj
N n
r
a
c C G= N` N
Z
O
N
y
(6
N
LL O
a)
Z
O
O
N
N
U
�0
?�F V)U' 0 I
aNh?i
CO
'D o
Q
w
d
N
U
�a
N
O
0
m C
W
a
1=
O
M Z
t L_ 6
�L m
a
G
N
O C
a)
0
0
a
O
N
c c
Y
4
O
N
N
e
M
c d E¢ o
`o
o
v d
o
.p 0
c
N a)
My za"
Q
i m
O
N
C
d
f= O C N
y 9 P-C
Z W o y
Lu o
G
V
C O
N
d U o W U:
C
7
r
M
a
Y
N
CO
r
jagwnN N I
O
Lo
3
CL
c
c
Z
R _0 In
C
LL
sseV�) I
C
A
U
suoVlound
G
n
O
o
L
r
C
a)
J LL
L
E
C
fa
is G
LL
!C
0 0
O c
0) a�
N
m c a
v
in Li U
N N
Ra N
O C
r
N R
0 N L r
O
H
O a
LL U
LL
S
o
c
w
N
0
C.1
L
W
Z!
m c a o
y
�O
Li LLLLU
L%
a F-
N
N
R R N
J
ase4d loalOad w I a
sepoo Aumn I 3 N a
0
416ual 10101 I o
snle1S n
(s)edA I I a
juawanwdwj
N n
r
N
N
O
N
y
(6
Z
Z
0
CL
?�F V)U' 0 I
aNh?i
o
CL
a
U
U
N
U
C0
O
tp
N
a
H
0
m C
a-
a
1=
a
o
a F-
N
N
R R N
J
ase4d loalOad w I a
sepoo Aumn I 3 N a
0
416ual 10101 I o
snle1S n
(s)edA I I a
juawanwdwj
N n
r
N N
to L
N N
cn
N
y
(6
N
H
Q
F av
O J
Q
0
CL
?�F V)U' 0 I
aNh?i
o
CL
a
I
0
N
co
C0
O
tp
N
a
H
m` LT
C
m C
a-
a
1=
a
o
o'
0
0
a
N
(V
a F-
N
N
R R N
J
ase4d loalOad w I a
sepoo Aumn I 3 N a
0
416ual 10101 I o
snle1S n
(s)edA I I a
juawanwdwj
m
d m
c
U
N
V
O y
k y
O C
c 0 E
o d
V O
w n
E
c o
E
cc C
m
U) C
cc
o
w LL U
u) v N
M M C
VI
m
0
a
ot5
N C
O
o m
A
M C
o Z.
iT
10 R U j t
U N N
Q
O. 01 N
C
A
W W
*F.
cD
cE
E
N
O y
0
Ui
a6
o
U
i�
a
�.n
N c
N v$
c �g
V
C C 2 N
2 2 3
mm E8a
r
N
C
Q
d
N
7
O
Q
N
4)
13
N
m
Q
7
N
ti
M,
I
e
o�
a
0
N
t
R
N
Cl
r
cr
i•
N n
r
N N
to L
N N
cn
N
y
(6
N
H
Q
F av
O J
Q
0
o
CL
?�F V)U' 0 I
aNh?i
o
CL
a
I
a
a
N
co
C0
O
m
d m
c
U
N
V
O y
k y
O C
c 0 E
o d
V O
w n
E
c o
E
cc C
m
U) C
cc
o
w LL U
u) v N
M M C
VI
m
0
a
ot5
N C
O
o m
A
M C
o Z.
iT
10 R U j t
U N N
Q
O. 01 N
C
A
W W
*F.
cD
cE
E
N
O y
0
Ui
a6
o
U
i�
a
�.n
N c
N v$
c �g
V
C C 2 N
2 2 3
mm E8a
r
N
C
Q
d
N
7
O
Q
N
4)
13
N
m
Q
7
N
ti
M,
I
e
o�
a
0
N
t
R
N
Cl
r
cr
i•
R
O
Z
d E
O
v n
4
y
E
O r
c
a
H
m` LT
C
o
LL u
m C
w
a
1=
U
a W
o
E d
O
9
O
Y
a_
M
0 0 9
4
rn
E
ai
Q
c d E¢ o
`o
o
v d
A
My za"
O
N
d
O
U
d
f= O C N
y 9 P-C
Z W o y
Lu o
d U o W U:
C
7
r
M
a
Q
N
h
r
jagwnN N I
r
Lo
3
AIuoud
c
c
Z
z
sseV�) I
co
U
suoVlound
m
d m
c
U
N
V
O y
k y
O C
c 0 E
o d
V O
w n
E
c o
E
cc C
m
U) C
cc
o
w LL U
u) v N
M M C
VI
m
0
a
ot5
N C
O
o m
A
M C
o Z.
iT
10 R U j t
U N N
Q
O. 01 N
C
A
W W
*F.
cD
cE
E
N
O y
0
Ui
a6
o
U
i�
a
�.n
N c
N v$
c �g
V
C C 2 N
2 2 3
mm E8a
r
N
C
Q
d
N
7
O
Q
N
4)
13
N
m
Q
7
N
ti
M,
I
e
o�
a
0
N
t
R
N
Cl
r
cr
i•
O N
O N
o N
d
N
N M
O
C,
M
a
F-
N
O
Y Q
3: na
0
N
a
0
0
o
M
O
O
A
O
M
0
O
N
N
r
N Z
r"
C
cc d g
R
CD O N
L
z-
O
4
C N N d o
y a
LLI
N U
a r u
W
O
0
m C
111
w
o
0
E c
.~i.
d
N
o
o m
V
O
a s Z e C
N
N
oC
UU
E
a
c d O
N r
tC
ui
0
C
W
U
N
c C
U
d�
o
p s-
LL
o
W I
r
N_
z
0
O
s
N
l.
N
N
7
LL
h3i�oiad
3
V
Z z
ssE!`J
C
U-
r
61
N
u
Y
Z Q
C
O
N
r
N
a
N
R E
l
R
N
N
R j O s
N
C O
th
o
6 Q vO N
0 c
d o a
s 3
m LLU
c
N
L
LL a
IL d lA- U
O
LL
a`.
O N
O N
o N
d
N
N M
O
C,
M
a
F-
N
O
Y Q
3: na
0
N
a
0
0
o
M
O
O
A
O
M
0
O
N
N
r
C cr
7
C
R
R
o_
O
4
a
U
o
co C
N
9
U
Z
m C
111
w
0
E c
.~i.
d
z
Z v 0 co
CL
b
tR m �O
oC
UU
E
a
c d O
N r
tC
ui
0
Q
C
W
U
d
U
o
W
N
v
z
0
aaci6ui�
s
aagWnN
m
T
h3i�oiad
3
V
Z z
ssE!`J
nuogound
N
u
Q.
N
O N
O N
o N
d
N
N M
O
C,
M
a
F-
N
O
Y Q
3: na
0
N
a
0
0
o
M
O
O
A
O
M
r
N
R
O J
a�3o
0
S ri
Cl-
C')
0
r
A
0. N
IJ
aseUd loa!oad CO a
sapoO
to
yi6ual 18101 0
snletS
(s,adhi IT C) 0
luawanw
0
O
N
r
C cr
7
d�
R
R
o_
d
4
a
U
co C
N
9
U
0
m C
111
r
N
R
O J
a�3o
0
S ri
Cl-
C')
0
r
A
0. N
IJ
aseUd loa!oad CO a
sapoO
to
yi6ual 18101 0
snletS
(s,adhi IT C) 0
luawanw
N VS
c6
O J
3:~
N
dg
�g
�o
m
65
r
N n5
O g
'0.
L A
d N D
o
>iQmc
c
co C b
4 rn
E m
rn
d
R
c
a
c
E
o
m
p' 3
C
N C
0 6
s N vR
QU
N
0
N
r
V
C
r
0
t
N
a
m
Y
C cr
7
d�
Z
R
y
4
r
co C
N
9
U
0
N d d
m C
111
w
0
E c
.~i.
d
cc
Z v 0 co
CL
b
tR m �O
o
t
oC
UU
E
a
c d O
N r
tC
Y
0
Q
C
m~ 2 n
d LA N
O N
d
n a N m O
N
y
z
aaci6ui�
s
aagWnN
m
T
h3i�oiad
3
V
Z z
ssE!`J
nuogound
a
u
N VS
c6
O J
3:~
N
dg
�g
�o
m
65
r
N n5
O g
'0.
L A
d N D
o
>iQmc
c
co C b
4 rn
E m
rn
d
R
c
a
c
E
o
m
p' 3
C
N C
0 6
s N vR
QU
N
0
N
r
V
C
r
0
t
N
a
m
Y
x
7
d�
y
c
9
U
0
N d d
c
N
0 o
d
CL
b
tR m �O
o
t
c_c ooh
UU
V N
N r
I
0
N VS
c6
O J
3:~
N
dg
�g
�o
m
65
r
N n5
O g
'0.
L A
d N D
o
>iQmc
c
co C b
4 rn
E m
rn
d
R
c
a
c
E
o
m
p' 3
C
N C
0 6
s N vR
QU
N
0
N
r
V
C
r
0
t
N
7
d
N
N
d
N
c
I
Oro
N 0 0
N
N a!
t@� N
N
N
O
r
r U.
c
I
0
N
p
r
1
Z
LU
O t
U
U
1 ti d
d W
f
C
m
Z 0
d 6
7
o�W
r
N o N
A O
O
U
4
yqj
I
m N ul
Q Q. O
I�
Q
m
to
e1o1
Ql
L
L
d J
SnIals
d
�s)adRl d
N
O
O d
i
c ;ro
I
fl-
1.� Z Z d, G
'O
m
A j
A
Q c d f N
C
CD
aai
is O O
V
N
N
LO
o_'
j p n E
7
d
N
N
d
N
c
I
Oro
N 0 0
N
N a!
t@� N
3uat uanmdwl
N
c
c
r U.
c
I
0
N
p
r
1
Z
7
I
Ln
0
d
O
f
C
m
Z 0
d 6
7
o�W
r
N o N
A O
O
U
4
yqj
I
m N ul
N
D 4
I�
Q
m
U0 p_cA
�[Y N
N `fl
e1o1
Ql
N
L
SnIals
1 0
�s)adRl d
N
t
v
c ;ro
I
fl-
1.� Z Z d, G
'O
m
A j
C
a) LO U
aai
o p
0.
C 0 m c a
0
N
sd
LO
7
d
N
N
d
N
c
I
Oro
N 0 0
N
N a!
t@� N
3uat uanmdwl
N
c
r U.
c
I
I S
N
p
r
1
o
7
N
I
Ln
0
O
c
C
m
Z 0
d 6
N
o�W
r
N o N
A O
N
ca
4
yqj
I
m N ul
N
D 4
�J
G
aseUd 1oe!oid
F-
I
N
sapo0�
I
U0 p_cA
�[Y N
I c
3�
e1o1
o
y v C C)
L
SnIals
1 0
a
�s)adRl d
t
o
Ir
N
R
O J
r
Cf'�
o
a
a
0
co
Q_
O
N
r
v
U1
i�
3uat uanmdwl
N
c
r
r J
Q
o
3Y NC.0
o
N
I
Ln
0
m
c
C
m
Z 0
d 6
N
o�W
d
yqj
N
m N ul
N
D 4
p
N
5 6
x
I c
3�
3
CL r
y v C C)
L
Y R.
d
y p
a
N O_--
t
v
c ;ro
61 Q
1.� Z Z d, G
'O
m
A j
C
a) LO U
aai
o p
0.
C 0 m c a
0
an d
sd
o_'
j p n E
m
r,
N
a$
ul
N
G
.Q
r l N p`.
N
N
"Co
N
r
p
z
2
1~
!euo!loun�
co
Q_
O
N
r
v
U1
i�
N
N
N
r
r J
Q
3Y NC.0
o
a-
I
Ln
0
Y
3
v
d
A
m
x m
d
9 N
N
o a
P
r
o
5 6
x
I c
3�
3
a.
25
O 0
o n
7 C C
rn-
N O_--
1
N
N
d
r
r
co
Q_
O
N
r
v
U1
i�
E
k
k
e
f
C
LL a)
L.
N
0
c
LL i¢
m
o
k
CL
U)
T
0a
)7
o�
7 2
r
oo
2
JJ
0
E
g\
cn
U.
CL
x
LLI
(o
2
o
CL
k
LL
f J
U
.2
R E 65
x
0 0
«2a
«zG
U) -0
Ca
7
E
0
2 o
cm
cu
2
ƒ))\
A
�k
e kr
yea-
ooCL
=eR
to
N
me
m�
G
2
Lr)
i 2«
o
e
f
k
k
a
k
2f
m
c
yQ-
2§R
{r
E
o
k�
|§a
i
2�
)J�§
0
da
k
u®
J f�
§k
c�
gƒ
f
g/
a
LL Q)
)a -2
G
k,
2
f
(DZL
t o
2#
/G!
f{
2
ƒ
fadouj�
e
K!
2=01>
6!]
c
a
!!:!e
m
was!!
e kze
u^
m
m
k
m
m
2
9d
4)
2
2de
moue
o
cli
0
k k 3
E t
r a«
G 0 Cl)
E
a-
E
c 2 %k
g U- 6 w
o 2ƒ 01
co
c R o f
7 �LL-
■k 7)
Y ƒ m LU
K
N
LL
LL
LL
ƒ ƒƒ\
2
ƒ L
E
E
6
t
j
-�e
Q k
2 0
1 9101
smels
ai
a
co
CO
co
co
co
m
gam =�3
e AlmIn
7
e a
a§
CL
I\
E 0
«GJm
&ƒ2
.2
$I
22/$�`
\$�32k
7kda
a ,qg
A wa
_e
J'auo pun3
0
W
R
a
\k
\a
§f
\E
\i
N
k
k
k
k
g
ui
ƒ
j
E
f \k\
L f
O N
1 0 i
iE
CL.
Q) u
uj
ƒ L
E
E
6
t
j
-�e
Q k
2 0
1 9101
smels
ai
a
co
CO
co
co
co
m
gam =�3
e AlmIn
7
e a
a§
CL
I\
E 0
«GJm
&ƒ2
.2
$I
22/$�`
\$�32k
7kda
a ,qg
A wa
_e
J'auo pun3
0
W
R
a
\k
\a
§f
\E
\i
N
k
k
k
k
g
ui
ƒ
j
E
CouNCILAGENDA SYNOPSIS
Initials
Meeting Date Prepared by J Mayor' s
06/11/12 BG
06/18/12 BG
ITEM INFORMATION
STAFF SPONSOR: BOB GIBERSON
ITEM NO.
l review
6. B.
ORIGINAL AGENDA DA'Z'E: 06/11/12
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Water and Sewer Comprehensive Plans
Consultant Supplemental Agreement No. 2 with Carollo Engineers
CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date 06111112 Mtg Date 06118112 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date
(SPONSOR Council [:]Mayor HR DCD Finance Fire IT P&'R Police PWI
SPONSOR'S Carollo Engineers were hired as the consultant for the Water and Sewer Comprehensive
SUMMARY Plans in 2010. Due to additional requirements on the Water Comprehensive Plan,
Supplement No. 2 with Carollo is required to add to the scope of work. Additional water
funds will come from the Interurban Water Reuse Project with $25,000.00 budgeted.
Council is being asked to approve Supplement No. 2 with Carollo Engineers in the amount
of $21,721.50.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 05/30/12 COMMITTEE CHAIR: DENNIS ROBERTSON
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Public Works Department
COMMITTEE Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURI7 REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$21,721.50 $328,000.00 $0.00
Fund Source: 401 WATER (PGS 86 90, 2012 CIP)
Comments:
MTG. DATE
06/11/12
06/18/12
RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
Forward to next Reaular Meeti-nq
MTG. DATE J ATTACHMENTS
06/11/12 Informational Memorandum dated 05/25/12
Carollo Engineers' Supplement No. 2 to Contract 10 -055
Minutes from the Utilities Committee meeting of 5/30/12
06/18/12 No attachments
91
92
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
Meetig' Date I Prepared by I Mayor's regiew
06/11/12 BM
06/18/12 BM
ITEM INFORMATION
STAFF SPONSOR: BRANDON MILES
Development Agreement Procedures
ITEM NO.
Cmtn view
ORIG INA], A( VNDA DATI-": 6/11/12
C, \'I+x',0RY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance .Bid, ward Public Heating Other
All 06111112 11�tg Date tlltg Date Alt g Date 06/18/12 [l7tg Dote illtg Date 06/11/12 117tg Date
SPONSOR Council JAtlayor [].HR DCD .Finance E] Fire IT P &R Police PIS'
S1'ONSOR The City Attorney's office is recommending that the City add specific language to the
SU ,NI ,\IARY Tukwila Municipal Code Title 18 to codify the process for the City to enter into
Development Agreements and specify the scope and content of such agreements.
RI j1AVF1I) BY cow Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 6/4/12,5/21/12 COMMITTEE CHAIR: EKBERG
RECOMMENDATIONS:
j SPONSOR /ADMIN. Department of Community Development
COMMITTl;r- Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
E yPI;NDI'I'111tI:RI?QUIRI ?D AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$N /A $N /A $N /A
FLInd Source: N/A
C01771nenlS: N/A
I MTG. DATE I RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
06/11/12 Forward to next Reaijlar Meetinn
y
I MTG.DATEI ATTACHMENTS
6/11/12 I Informational Memorandum to Transportation Committee, dated May 30, 2012.
Ordinance in Final Form.
Minutes from June 4, 2012 Transportation Committee Meeting.
Memorandum to the Planning Commission, dated May 18, 2012.
Draft Minutes from May 24, 2012 Planning Commission Meeting.
Informational Memorandum to Transportation Committee dated May 18, 2012.
Minutes from May 21, 2012 Transportation Committee Meeting.
6/18/12 Ordinance in final form
93
x
Ci ty of Tu�lki la
Washington
Ordinance No.
WHEREAS, RCW 36.708.170 authorizes the City to enter into "development
agreements" with persons having ownership or control of real property; and
WHEREAS, in adopting such statute, the Washington Legislature made the following
finding:
The legislature finds that the lack of certainty in the approval of development
projects can result in a waste of public and private resources, escalate
housing costs for consumers and discourage the commitment to
comprehensive planning which would make maximum efficient use of
resources at the least economic cost to the public. Assurance to a
development project applicant that upon government approval the project
may proceed in accordance with existing policies and regulations, and
subject to conditions of approval, all as set forth in a development
agreement, will strengthen the public planning process, encourage private
participation and comprehensive planning, and reduce the economic costs
of development. Further, the lack of public facilities and services is a serious
impediment to development of new housing and commercial uses. Project
applicants and local governments may include provisions and agreements
whereby applicants are reimbursed over time for financing public facilities. It
is the intent of the legislature by RCW 36.70B.170 through 36.70B.210 to
allow local governments and owners and developers of real property to enter
into development agreements.
1995 c 347 501; and
WHEREAS, the City Council concurs with the legislative findings referenced above;
and
W: Word Processing\ Ordinances \Development Agreements purpose and procedures 6 -5 -12
sK:bjs Page 1 of 5
95
WHEREAS, on June 11, 2012, the Tukwila City Council conducted a public hearing to
consider the proposed ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that development agreements may be appropriate
in certain circumstances as a means to consolidate numerous issues involved in complex
development projects into a single controlling instrument, benefiting the City, its citizens,
and members of the regulated public;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF T17 ILA;
WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Regulations Established. Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter
18.86, "Development Agreements," is hereby established to read as follows:
NEENEffaum-a
Sections:
18.86.010
Development Agreements Authorized
18.86.020
"Development Standards" Defined
18.86.030
Development Standards, Flexibility
18.86.040
Exercise of City Police Power and Contract Authority
18.86.050
Form Public Hearing Required
18.86.060
Conditions of Approval
18.86.070
Recording
18.86.080
Discretionary, Legislative Act
Section 2. T Section 18.86.010 is hereby established to read as follows:
The City may enter into a development agreement with a person having ownership or
control of real property within its jurisdiction. The City may enter into a development
agreement for real property outside its boundaries as part of a proposed annexation or a
service agreement. A development agreement must set forth the development standards
and other provisions that shall apply to and govern and vest the development, use, and
mitigation of the development of the real property for the duration specified in the
agreement.
Section 3. T Section 18.86.020 is hereby established to read as follows:
For purposes of this chapter, the term "development standards" means and includes, but
is not limited to
1 Project elements such as permitted uses, residential densities, and non-
residential densities and intensities or building sizes
VV: Word Processiiig\Ordinances\Development Agreements-purpose and procedures 6-5-12
96 SK.bjs Page 2 of 5
2. The amount and payment of impact fees imposed or agreed to in accordance
with any applicable provisions of state law, any reimbursement provisions, other financial
contributions by the property owner, or dedications;
3. Mitigation measures, development conditions, and other requirements under
chapter 43.21 C RCW;
4. Design standards such as maximum heights, setbacks, drainage and water
quality requirements, landscaping, and other development features;
5. Parks and open space preservation;
6. Phasing;
7. Review procedures and standards for implementing decisions;
8. A build -out or vesting period for applicable standards; and
9. Any other development requirement or procedure deemed appropriate by the
City Council.
Section 4. T C Section 13.36.030 is hereby established to read as follows:
A development agreement shall be consistent with applicable development regulations to
the fullest extent possible; provided, a development agreement may allow development
standards different from those otherwise imposed under the Tukwila Municipal Code in
order to provide flexibility to achieve public benefits, respond to changing community
needs, or encourage modifications which provide the functional equivalent or adequately
achieve the purposes of otherwise applicable City standards. Any approved development
standards that differ from those in the Code shall not require any further zoning
reclassification, variance from City standards or other City approval apart from
development agreement approval. The development standards as approved through a
development agreement shall apply to and govern the development and implementation of
each covered site in lieu of any conflicting or different standards or requirements
elsewhere in the Tukwila Municipal Code. Subsequently adopted standards that differ
from those of a development agreement adopted by the City as provided in this chapter
shall apply to the covered development project only where necessary to address imminent
public health and safety hazards or where the development agreement specifies a time
period or phase after which certain identified standards can be modified. Determination of
the appropriate standards for future phases that are not fully defined during the initial
approval process may be postponed. Building permit applications shall be subject to the
building codes /regulations /ordinances and fire codes /regulations /ordinances in effect when
the permit is applied for.
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Development Agreements purpose and procedures 6 -5 -12
sK:bjs Page 3 of 5 97
Ir r 1 11111111 iiiiiiiiiiii��illill �111
As provided in RCW 36.708.170(4), the execution of a development agreement is a
proper exercise of the City's police power and contract authority. Accordingly, a
development agreement may obligate a party to fund or provide services, infrastructure, or
other facilities. A development agreement shall reserve authority to impose new or
different regulations to the extent required by a serious threat to public health and safety.
Development agreements shall be consistent with RCW 36.70B.170 through 36.70B.210.
All development agreements shall be in a form and content as approved by the City
Attorney. Development agreements shall be approved by ordinance or resolution and
shall be subject to review and approval by the City Council after a duly noticed public
hearing pursuant to RCW 36.708.200.
0 i i 11� I I 1111191IMSINT01111=11119 M,
9111"11111: 1111I;ZJ4��S
18.86.060 Conditions of Approval.
In approving a development agreement, conditions of approval shall at a minimum
establish:
1. A site plan for the entire project, showing locations of sensitive areas and
buffers, required open spaces, perimeter buffers, location and range of densities for
residential development, and location and size of non-residential development
2. The expected build-out time period for the entire project and the various
phases, if proposed;
3. Project phasing, if proposed, and other project-specific conditions to mitigate
impacts on the environment, on public facilities and services including transportation,
utilities, drainage, police and fire protection, schools, and parks;
4. Road and storm water design standards that shall apply to the various
phases, if proposed, of the project
5. Bulk design and dimensional standards that shall be implemented throughout
subsequent development within the project,
6. The size and range of uses authorized for any non-residential development
within the project, and
7. Any sewer and/or water comprehensive utility plans or amendments required
to be completed before development can occur.
8. Any other item deemed necessary by the City Council.
W. Word Processing\Ordinances\Developmeiit Agreements-purpose and procedures 6-5-12
98 SK:bjs Page 4 of 5
Section 8. T Section 18.86.070 is hereby established to read as follows
A development agreement shall be recorded with the real property records of the county
in which the property is located pursuant to RCW 36.70B.190.
Section 9. T Section 18.86.080 is hereby established to read as follows
7A.
The decision of the City Council to approve or reject a request for a development
agreement shall be a discretionary, legislative act.
Section 10. Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the
City Attorney, the City Clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary
corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors references to
other local, state or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations or ordinance numbering
and section/subsection numbering.
Section 11. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause
or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to
be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the
remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation.
Section 12. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be
published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force
five days after passage and publication as provided by law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at
a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 1 2012.
ATTEST/AUTH E NTI CATE D
Christy O'Flaherty, MMC, City Clerk
Shelley M. Kerslake, City Attorney
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council.
Published.
Effective Date:
Ordinance Number:
VV: Word Processiiig\Ordinances\Development Agreements-purpose and procedures 6-5-12
SK:bjs Page 5 of 5 99
Mrs, s,
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
Initial r ITEM NO.
Meeting Date I Prepared by I Alayor vi 2V Cow review
06/11/12 NJO (�i! 6 D
06/18/12 NJO
ITEM INFORMATION
ST'AI SPONsoiz: NICK OLIVAS IORIGINAI,AGI?ND;\ Dr\'1'I 06/11/12
Ac, I ;1ND I'I'I ?A-1 T rri,1?
C.A'I'� GORY Discussion
An Interlocal Agreement to join the Kent Regional Fire Authority Training
Consortium.
Motion
Resolution
11IItg Date
Ordinance .Bid.A.wa7d Public Hearing ❑Other
M1 g Date 6111112 1VItg Date 6118112
Mtg Date Aftg Date 11ltg Date Mtg Date
SPONSOR Council Mayor .HR DCD Finance Pire IT Pd R Police PId/
SPONSOR", We have been working closely with the Kent Regional Fire Authority Training consortium
SUM'\ \RY since last April or May. The official consortium consists of Kent, SeaTac and Maple Valley.
Since working with the consortium, our training has improved 100%, our personnel are
better prepared to deal with emergencies, and their level of confidence in their abilities
has increased significantly. We would like to officially join the consortium by means of an
Interlocal Agreement that has been prepared by the City Attorney.
131' CO«1 Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 06/05/12 COMMITTEE CHAIR: QUINN
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR/ADMIN. Fire Department
CC)mm"171"l Unanimous Approva; Forward to Committee of the Whole
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
E\PI-,NDI'I L1IZF RI?()UIRri) AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$300,000 $300,000 $0
Fund Source: GENERAL FUND (FIRE DEPARTMENT SALARIES AND BENEFITS)
Conanents: The two existing training officers would remain City of Tukwila employees
I MTG.DATEI RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
1 6/11/12 Forward to next Reqular Meeting, with changes to the duration of the agreement
MTG. DATE
6/11/12
6/18/12
ATTACHMENTS
Informational Memorandum dated 05/29/12
Memorandum from Captain Johnson
Draft Interlocal Agreement
Minutes from the Finance and Safety Committee meeting of 6/5/12
Interlocal Agreement with automatic renewal language
101
lA
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN
THE CITY OF TUKWILA AND KENT FIRE DEPARTMENT
REGIONAL FIRE AUTHORITY
I. PREAMBLE
This Agreement is entered into as of the day of 2012, by
and between the CITY OF TUKWILA, a municipal corporation "City and the KENT
FIRE DEPARTMENT REGIONAL FIRE AUTHORITY, a municipal corporation
"RFA This Agreement is made pursuant to chapter 39.34 RCW (the "Interlocal
Cooperation Act and has been authorized by the governing body of each Party. Each of
the Parties is a "public agency" as defined in the Interlocal Cooperation Act.
II. RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City and the RFA currently each maintain and operate their own
fire departments to provide fire protection, fire suppression and emergency medical
services in their respective jurisdictions.
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Agreement is to allow for the joint operation and
administration of each entity's training divisions; and
WHEREAS, this Agreement is not intended to supersede or conflict with the
collective bargaining agreements of either party.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
III. AGREEMENT
Section 1. Effective Date and Termination of Agreement. This Agreement
shall be effective on July 1, 2012 for an initial Term of one year. The Term will be
automatically extended annually. commencinl? July 1, 2013, unless terminated pursuant to
this Section. Either party may unilaterally terminate this Agreement with 30 days written
notice to the other party.
Section 2. Definitions. The following terms, when used in this Agreement, shall
be defined as follows:
A. "Consolidated Operations" shall mean the operations performed under the
direction of the Chief and shall include the training for personnel of both the RFA and
City.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
Page 1 of 6
103
B. "FTE" shall mean full time employee.
C. "Days" shall mean calendar days, unless otherwise noted.
Section 3. Services Performed by the RFA for the Citv.
3.1 Training Services. The RFA agrees to perform training services for the
City through a training consortium as follows:
(a) See Exhibit A for scope of services to be performed under this Agreement.
(b) Consideration for Training Services. In consideration of the training
services described herein, the City shall provide the following to the RFA:
(i) The City shall assign one and a quarter to one and a half existing
FTE's to the training consortium to assist in providing the training
services pursuant to this Agreement. The level of service provided
by the City pursuant to this Agreement shall be solely determined
by the City, based on its departmental needs.
(ii) In the event the person occupying these positions is on leave or
works a different shift for a period of 30 days or more, the City
shall, at no expense to the RFA, fill the position with another
employee familiar with and adequately trained to provide the
needed services.
Section 4. General Provisions.
4.1 Employees of the RFA are not employees of the City. The RFA
employees who provide the City services pursuant to the Agreement shall be employees
of the RFA and not employees of the City. The RFA shall, at all times, be solely
responsible for the conduct of its employees in performing the services called for in this
Agreement. The RFA shall be solely responsible for all compensation, benefits and
insurance for its employees.
4.2 Employees of the City are not employees of the RFA. All City
employees who provide the RFA services called for in this Agreement shall be employees
of the City and not employees of the RFA. The City shall, at all times, be solely
responsible for the conduct of its employees in performing the services called for in this
Agreement. The City shall be solely responsible for all compensation, benefits and
insurance for its employees.
Section 5. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. Each party agrees to defend,
indemnify, and hold harmless the other party and each of its employees, officials, agents
and volunteers from any and all losses, claims, liabilities, lawsuits or legal judgments
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
Page 2 of 6
104
arising out of any negligent or willful actions or inactions by the performing party or any
of its employees, officials, agents or volunteers, while acting within the scope of duties
required by this Agreement. Each party shall be responsible for its own legal costs and
attorney's fees. This provision shall survive the expiration of this Agreement as it related
to services performed under the terms of the Agreement. It is further specifically and
expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein constitutes each party's
mutually negotiated waiver of immunity under Title 51 RCW, solely to carry out the
purposes of this indemnification clause.
Section 6. Insurance. Each party shall carry and maintain for the duration of this
Agreement property and liability insurance coverage for all operations, facilities,
equipment and personnel, at not less than the amount as existing on the date of this
Agreement and in a form and with a company acceptable to the other party.
Section 7. Propertv Ownership. All property acquired by the RFA to enable it
to perform the services required by this Agreement, shall remain the property of the RFA
in the event of the termination of this Agreement. All property acquired by the City to
enable it to perform the services required by this Agreement, shall remain the property of
the City in the event of the termination of this Agreement.
Section 8. No Special Relationship Created. No Third Party Beneficiarv.
The services provided under this Agreement represent an extension and expansion of
duties owed to the public in general. Neither party intends to create a special relationship
or duty to the other party or to the public served by either party. This Agreement is solely
for the benefit of the Parties hereto and no third party shall be entitled to claim or enforce
any rights hereunder.
Section 9. Dispute Resolution and Governing Law. This Agreement shall be
governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington.
A. If a dispute arises between the Parties concerning the performance of any
provision of this Agreement or the interpretation thereof, the Parties agree to follow the
procedures set forth herein. It is the goal of the parties to resolve differences as early in
this step process as possible.
(1) Sten One Informal Discussions. Each Party shall designate a
representative, who shall meet and attempt to resolve the dispute. This may involve more
than one meeting.
(2) Step Two Written Notification and Resolution. If informal
discussions are not successful, then the aggrieved Party shall mail, via certified mail,
written notice of dispute to the other Party's address shown in Section 12 of this
Agreement. The notice shall set forth the nature of the dispute and the desired outcome.
A written response shall be provided by the recipient of the notice within ten (10) days'
receipt of the certified, mailed notice. The response to the notice shall include the
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
Page 3 of 6
105
respondent's version of the dispute and a proposed resolution. The Parties shall meet
within ten (10) business days following respondent's answer to determine whether the
dispute can be resolved amicably. If the dispute is amicably resolved, the Parties shall
sign a memorandum of understanding with regards thereto.
(3) Step Three Mediation. If the Parties are unable to resolve their
differences at Step Two, the Parties will endeavor to settle the dispute by mediation under
the mediation rules of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Service of Seattle,
Washington. Such mediation will be non binding but a condition precedent to having the
dispute resolved pursuant to Arbitration, below. Mediation shall commence, unless
otherwise agreed, within thirty (30) days of a Party's written request to the other Party for
mediation of a dispute. Any resolution of the dispute at this stage shall be reduced to
writing and, if the resolution involves an interpretation of the Agreement herein, the
Agreement herein shall be amended to include the interpretation.
(4) Step Four Arbitration. If the Parties are unable to resolve their
differences at Step Three, the dispute will be resolved by arbitration. A written notice
requesting arbitration must be delivered to the other Parties. The Parties will select an
arbitrator by mutual agreement. If the parties cannot agree on an arbitrator within 10
working days after the arbitration request notice has been received, then the dispute will
be referred to Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. of Seattle, Washington,
and an arbitrator will be selected either by mutual agreement of the Parties or, failing that,
by the appointment by each Party of a non interested representative who shall jointly
choose an arbitrator.
Section 10. Modification. This Agreement may be amended or terminated only
upon consent of both Parties hereto. Any amendment or termination shall be in writing
and signed by the parties.
Section 11. Non Waiver. The waiver by any Party of any breach of any term,
covenant, or condition of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of such term,
covenant, or condition or any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant,
or condition of this Agreement.
Section 1.2. Impairment of RiLFhts. Nothing in this agreement shall impair a
Party's right to seek injunctive relief from the Court if immediate and irreparable injury,
loss or damage to any rights arising from this Agreement will occur before Arbitration
can be conducted.
Section 13. Record KeepinE. The records and documents with respect to all
matters covered by this Agreement shall be subject to audit by the Parties during the term
of this Agreement and three (3) years after termination or such other longer period as may
be required by applicable law.
INTERLOCALAGREEMENT
Page 4 of 6
106
Section 14. Severabilitv. If any provision of this Agreement or application
thereof to any Party or circumstance, is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction,
such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions of this Agreement which can be given
effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this
Agreement are declared to be severable.
Section 15. Counterparts. This Agreement shall be effective whether signed by
the Parties on the same document or in counterparts.
Section 16. Entire Agreement. The written terms and provisions of this
Agreement, together with any Exhibits attached hereto, shall supersede all prior
communications, negotiations, representations or agreements, either verbal or written of
any officer or other representative of each party and such statements shall not be effective
or be construed as entering into or forming part of or altering in any manner this
Agreement.
Section 17. Notices All notices or other communications shall be deemed
sufficient hereunder if made in writing and delivered by facsimile, e -mail, or by first -class
mail, postage prepaid, to each Party at its respective address set forth below, or such other
address as such Party may hereafter designate to the others in writing:
CITY OF TUKWILA KENT FIRE DEPARTMENT
City Administrator REGIONAL FIRE AUTHORITY
6200 South Center Blvd. Fire Chief
Tukwila, WA 98188 24611 116 Ave. S.E.
Kent, WA 98030
Notices sent by mail shall be deemed given when properly mailed, and the postmark
affixed by the United States Post Office shall be conclusive evidence.
Section 18. Filing /Posting. This Agreement shall be filed with the County
Auditor or posted on the websites of the Parties as authorized by law.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by each Party as set
forth below:
CITY OF TUKWILA KENT FIRE DEPARTMENT /REGIONAL
FIRE AUTHORITY
By: By:
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
Page 5 of 6
107
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Office of the City Attorney
i
City Attorney
IN ERLOCAL AGREEMENT
Page 6 of 6
1:
CO UNcm AGENDA SYNOPSIS
Initials ITEM NO.
tMeetin� Date I Prepared by Mayors reyien �:{il review
06/11/12 PMc i i i 6. E.
06/18/12 PMc v
W
ITEM INFORMATION
STAFF SPONSOR: PEGGY MCCARTHY OIZI(iINA],AGiI'',NI)A DA'1'I 06/11/12
AGI ;N1),\ I'I'kN] Trrl,l; Animal Services Interlocal Agreement for 2013 Through 2015
C.\'I'r("o1n' Discussion [Motion Resolution Ordinance BidAxard Public Hearing ❑Other
d (tg Date 06111112 t]4tg Date 06118112 11tg Date Alt
g Dale -Altg Date 11ltg Date Alt Date
SPONSOR Council Mayor .HR DCD Finance Fire IT P &R Police PIF
SPONSOR'S Approve the new Animal Services Interlocal Agreement with King County for provision of
animal control, sheltering and licensing services for 2013 -2015.
RI 'Xll?WF'11) BY COAX/ Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 06/05/2012 COMMIT mE CHAIR: QUINN
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSO R /AD,miNi Finance Department
Cc �NIN- n'rrl ;I" Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
Exm"NDITURF RI ;()U1R1-ll AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$69,705 $0 $69,073
Fund Source: 000.10.539.300.51.00
C'0177117ents: The cost for the three -year contract is estimated not to exceed $225,000 or $75,000 per year
MTG. DATE I RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
06/11/12 Forward to next Regular Meeting
06/18/12
I MTG.DATEI ATTACHMENTS
06/11/12 Informational Memorandum dated 05/30/12 (revised after 6/5/12 FS Meeting)
Animal Services Interlocal Agreement for 2013 Through 2015
King County /Cities Work Group for Animal Services Interlocal Agreement Briefing
Materials, May 16, 2012
Minutes from the Finance and Safety Committee meeting of 6/5/12
06/18/12 No attachments
109
110
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Councilmembers
FROM: David Cline, City Administrator
DATE: June 13, 2012
SUBJECT: Report for June 18, 2012 Regular Council Meeting
The City Administrator Report is meant to provide the Council, staff and community an update
on the activities of the City and on issues that concern Tukwila. The report consists of
information provided by the Executive Team, with editing and input by the City Administrator.
Please let me know if you have any questions or need additional information about any of the
following items, and please feel free to contact any of the department heads for additional
information.
I. Intergovernmental and Local Issues Update
MEETINGS
Government Affairs Committee: On June 5, Councilmember Hougardy, the City
Administrator, Economic Development Administrator, and Meilee Anderson, Business
Outreach Coordinator for Seattle Southside, attended the Chamber's Government Affairs
Committee. Deputy Community Development Director Nora Gierloff presented the draft
Southcenter Plan and answered questions.
King County City Administrators /Managers Meeting: On June 6, City Administrator
Cline attended this monthly meeting of regional managers and discussed the following
items: Kina Countv Budaet projections the County continues to look for ongoing 3%
reductions in operations to stay within revenue projections. Countywide Assessed Value
estimates have improved from a previous expectation of a 1 decrease next year, to now
being flat or a possible slight increase. Solid Waste Agreements King County invited all
cities to participate in a special meeting in mid -July to continue the discussion on a new
long -term agreement for solid waste services. Liability and long -term capital costs are still
outstanding issues.
Tukwila Rotary: On June 7, staff from Information Technology, Public Works, and
Economic Development attended the Tukwila Rotary morning meeting. John Sheller,
Cluster Manager for King County Library System and Jeanne Thorson, Executive Director of
the King County Library System Foundation spoke about the work being done by the Library
System and their interest in Tukwila Village.
Chamber of Commerce: Councilmember Hougardy, City Administrator Cline and
Economic Development Administrator Speck attended the Chamber of Commerce's monthly
business lunch on June 8. Edie Harding from the Bill Melinda Gates Foundation spoke
about the Foundation's work on families and education in South King County.
Countywide Partnership Opportunities Meeting: Public Works Director Giberson
attended the first gathering of cities and King County to explore areas of possible
collaboration, such as facilities, finance, fleet management, benefits and information
technology. This group will continue to explore these ideas for possible implementation in
2013.
111
City Administrator Report
Page 2
Department Updates
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Destination Marketing Association International (DMAI) has named our own Ashley
Comar, Marketing Communications Coordinator for Seattle Southside Visitor Services, as
one of thirty emerging leaders of the destination marketing industry nationally. Ashley will
receive this award at DMAI's annual conference which will be held in Seattle in July 2012.
HUMAN SERVICES OFFICE
Artful Opportunities: On June 5, Human Services staff participated in the Tukwila Arts
Commission meeting on the issue of making arts- related grants more accessible to diverse
populations.
Housing: On June 6, Human Services staff hosted 4 cities and King County to review the
King County Housing Repair guidelines and make recommendations for future changes to
benefit Tukwila residents.
Community Appreciation: On June 8, Human Services and Economic Development staff
joined the Somali Community Services Coalition in their celebration of volunteers and
students in the youth program.
Integration with Neighboring Cities: On June 15, staff cohosted a joint provider meeting
with the City of SeaTac, as a venue for education, information exchange and networking.
Service to Underserved Populations: Staff brokered a meeting with Washington Cash
and Economic Development for June 18. Washington Cash provides a microloan program
targeted to underserved populations.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Riverton Development LLC has withdrawn their request to enter into a development
agreement and will now look to build a project that meets current code. Review of the revised
project will only require approval by the Board of Architectural Review and will be based on the
City's adopted design standards. The City will not be able to require LEED certification or the
off -site frontage improvements that were proposed as part of the original development
agreement.
Eastland Building Permit 12242 48 Avenue South: The building permit for the placement
of the new double wide mobile home has been issued. The contractor will be installing the
footings, tie downs and connecting the structure to the City's water and sewer systems.
Safe Routes to School Grant Award: The City received notification from the Washington State
Department of Transportation (WSDOT) of a Safe Routes to School grant award in the amount
of $427,588 for a project at Cascade View Elementary School. Grant funds are for design and
construction of a multi -use path, a Safe Routes to School assembly, a Walk to School Day
event, and formation of walking school buses.
Metro Transit Service Guidelines Workshop: Staff from Community Development attended
the kick -off meeting for King County Metro's update to transit service guidelines. The intent of
the update is for Metro to develop a more objective framework for making decisions on how to
make service changes as new development occurs throughout the region. As part of the update,
Metro is reaching out to the 39 cities within King County to obtain input. The next meeting will be
on July 11, 2012. A draft of the updated guidelines is expected to be completed in October
2012.
Z:\ CityAdministratorReports20l2 \CAReportJ une18- 2012FINAL.docx
112
Upcoming Meetings Events
June 2012
18th (nlonday)
19th (Tuesday)
20th (Wednesday)
21st (Thursday)
22nd (F
23rd (Saturday)
7 ransportatmon
Finance
Parks
Tuk%vila
Summer Kickoff.
Touch a Truck
Crate,
Safety C'mte.
Coil] in
Historical
Festival
Event
5:15 PM
5 15 1'M
5 30 I'M
Society,
(Trikii la
(CR ';1)
(CR 143)
(Contnrumty
7'00 PM
Contrnttnal;
(FosterHmgh School
Center)
17'11kirrla
Center)
parking lot
Heritage
Noon 5'00 I'M
4242 S 144th)
Y City Council
ulnrral (-enter,
This free es ent is
11 00 AM to 3:00 PM
Executive
Library
144 7 5 59" A ve
for teens m grades
Children of all ages
Session,
Advisory
Board.
SJ
6 -12.
will have ahands -on
6 15 PM
7 00 PM
There will be
chance to honk horns
food, bouncers,
and kick the tires of an
(Foster LibrarvJ
vendors, and
assortment ofhig rigs.
City Council
various games!
A variety ofexhibnors
Regular Mtg.,
Don't miss this
gill also be on site to
7:00 PM
once a year event_
distribute free summer
((round/
For more
safety tips as well as
Chambers)
information.
emergenev
contact the
preparedness
hukwila
Tukwila
information.
Metropolitan
Commwuty
Center at
Park District
206- 768 822
Board of
Commissioners
Meeting,
S 00 PM
(Council
Chambers)
Q Annual Curbside Clean up Event Week of June 18 through 22
Available to single faun/}' gild dztplex home residents who are customers a' Allied Waste.
Place items out with your trash on vour regular pickup day this week, and then will he collected for r
Click on "Headlines' at irrm u tghii dou a.eov Jor a link to a Elver with restrictions and other guidelines (o)
cull Allied Waste at ?06 -6R2- 9735).
25th (Monday)
26th (Tuesday)
27th (Wednesday)
r Community
Utilities Crate,
COl
Affairs Parks
500 PM
6 30 PM
Crate,
(CR ;11)
(CR1�5)
5:00 PM
Rick it
(CR 113)
w City Council
Committee of
the Whole Mtg.,
7 00 PM
(Council
Chambers)
C.0. [V to he
inimediutelp
follom, ed by a
Special Meeting.
28th (Thursday) 29th (Friday) 30th (Saturday)
"r Planning
Tukwila Int'l. Blvd.
Commission,
Action Crate's
6 30 PM
"Trash Pickup Day
(Council
9 00- )000 AN1
Chambers)
s
For location contact
Rick it
ricktT�orschler.org
City Council Committee of Whole (C.O.W.) Meeting: 2nd 4th Mon., 700 PM, Council Chambers at City I lall
City Council Regular sleeting: Ist 3rd Mon., 7:00 PM, Council Chambers at City Hall.
Community Affairs Parks Committee: 2nd 4th Mon- 5'00 PM, Conf Room 1 43
COPCAB (Community Oriented Policing Citizens Adv. Board): 4th Wed., 6.30 PM, Conf. Rm 45 Phi 11r(vnh (206- 433 7175).
v Equity Diversity Commission: 1 st Thurs., 5 15 PM, Conf Room 43 Contact do,vice 7'rantina at 306 433 -1850.
Finance Safety Committee: 1 st 3rd Tues., 5 15 PM, Conf. Room 73 (A) Financial Plaiting Model and Capital bnp
Program (CIP) Update. (B) 2011 1" Quarter miscellaneous revenue report. (C) A contract for the Alive and Free Program.
Human Services Advisory Brd: 2nd Fri. ofeven months, 1000 AM, Human Services Office. Contact F_vie Brwkan at 206-433-7180.
Library Advisory Board: 3rd Wed., 7 WPM, Foster Library. C'orrtact Stephanie Gardner at 106 -76 -2391.
r Parks Commission: 3rd Wed- 5 30 PM, Senior Game Room at Community Center Contact Dave dohrvsnrr at 'O6 -767 -'308.
Planning Commission /Board of ikrehitectural Review: 4th Thurs.. except 2nd 'Thursday in Nov Dec 6.30 PM,
Council Chambers at City Hall, Contact Ifvnetta Bivensut 206- 431 3670.
i Transportation Committee. 1 st 3rd Mon., 5:00 PM, Conf Room 41 (A) 2012 Overl Repair Program Bid.Awurd (B) 201-'
Overlay RepairPro„rarn Construction .lrlmurgenreru.Se /ectinn and.Agreernew. (C) Dinvamish Traasp7rtatioii rllanagemcw
As.sociaii
Tukwila listorical Society: 3rd fhurs., 7 00 PNI Tukwila Flertage Cultural Center_ 14475 59" Avcnue S Contact Pat Brodie at
206 -433 -1861.
Int'l. Blvd. Action Crate: 2nd Tues., 7'00 PM, Tukwila Connnunrty Center Contact Clnel' i'dia at 2116 -433 -1815.
Utilities Committee: 2nd 4th'Tues., 5:00 PM, Conf Room 41
113
n
1111111111111111111111111i�� Ali 11, Ak
MONTH MEETING 1— MEETING 2 MEETING 3 MEETING 4
REGULAR C.O.W. REGULAR C.O.W.
J une 4
11
I
See agenda packet
cover sheet for this
week's agenda
(dime 18, 2
Kegulm Meeting)
W
Public Hearin
Tukwila Potential
Annexation Area
(PAA) North
Highline
Special Issues:
Tukwila Potential
Annexation Area
(PAA) North
Highline
A resolution ratifying
the amended and
restated Cascade
Water Alliance
Interlocal Agreement.
Special MeetinL
Tukwila Potential
Annexation Area
(PAA) North
Highline
Tukwila Village
Approval of Deal
Terms
Labor Agreements
Ju ly 2
Special Presentation_
COPCAB Yearend
Report and Awards.
2011 Police Annual
Report.
Unfinished Business:
A resolution ratifying
the amended and
restated Cascade
Water Alliance
Interlocal Agreement.
9
Special Presentation:
2011 Police Annual
Report.
Wei
23
114