Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTrans 2012-06-18 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKETCity of Tukwila Transportation Committee Allan Ekberg, Chair Kathy Hougardy De'Sean Quinn AGENDA Distribution: A. Ekberg G. Labanara K. Hougardy C. Knighton D. Quinn S. Kerslake D. Robertson Clerk File Copy V. Seal 2 Extra Mayor Haggerton D. Cline e -mail pkt pdf to A. Le K. Matej e -mail cover to: C. B. Giberson O'Flaherty, D. Almberg, F. Iriarte B. Saxton, S. Norris, R. Tischmak M. Hart, S. Kirby, D. Robertson MONDAY, JUNE 18, 2012 Time: 5:15 PM Place: Conference Room #1 Item Recommended Action Page 1. PRESENTATION(S) 2. BUSINESS AGENDA a) 2012 Overlay Repair Program a) Forward to 6/25/12 C.O.W. Pg. 1 Bid Award and 7/2/12 Regular b) 2012 Overlay Repair Program b) Forward to 6/25/12 C.O.W. Pg. 5 Construction Management Selection and Agreement and 7/2/12 Regular c) Duwamish Transportation Management Association c) Information Only Pg. 15 3. SCATBd a) Minutes from May 2, 2012 Pg. 39 b) June 19, 2012 Agenda 4. MISCELLANEOUS 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS Future Agendas: Transportation Benefit District 42 Ave S Phase III Utility Undergrounding Next Scheduled Meeting Monday, July 2, 2012 i& The City of Tukwila strives to accommodate individuals with disabilities Please contact the Public Works Department at 206- 433-0179 for assistance. x Jim Haggerton, Mayor TO: Mayor Haggerton Transportation Committee FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director BY: Robin Tischmak, City Engineer DATE: June 15, 2012 SUBJECT: 2012 Overlav Repair Proaram Project No. 91210401 BID AWARD ISSUE Award the bid for construction of the 2012 Overlay Repair Program. BACKGROUND This project will provide roadway repairs and overlays at 2 locations. The project was advertised for bids on May 29 and June 5, 2012 and three bids were received and opened on June 12, 2012. The lowest bid of $974,259.00 was from ICON Materials. The Engineer's estimate was $988,610.00. ANALYSIS The bids were reviewed and tabulated. No errors were discovered in any of the three bids received. ICON Materials has successfully worked for the City on past projects and references were contacted with positive feedback. (See attached bid tabulations recommendation letter.) The 2012 Overlay Repair Program list includes overlay for Tukwila Parkway and Andover Park West: (See attached vicinity map.) BUDGET AND BID SUMMARY Bid Results Estimate Budqet Construction (Base Bid) $974,259.00 $988,610.00 $1,100,000.00 Contingency (10.0 97.425.90 98.861.00 0.00 Total $1.071.684-90 $1.087.471.00 $1.100.000.00 RECOMMENDATION The Council is being asked to award the construction bid for the 2012 Overlay Repair Program to ICON Materials in the amount of $974,259.00 and consider this item at the June 25, 2012 Committee of the Whole meeting and subsequent July 2, 2012 Regular Meeting. Attachments: Vicinity Map Bid Tabulations Recommendation Letter 2012 Overlay Program Map WE 2 0 I A CO 0 D IL LL C) �z UJ LL 0 IL LU C E .2 c- m Ca A 0 Ca 0 1.4 IL c 0. 9 .8 .8 0 8 py w® .0.8.289.,-- S a .13 Do 0 O �O OC .8. .0 a s ps EMU 8 -0 g w �C N N O S 0 2 0 0 0, �g! c tq C� m M +ab 'Y3 u3 esk VF eAk V3 fJ3 q c c o 0 o o o N M 00 0 00+.,}0 Es s s 8 D cqqqqc�qqoq u q 9 o c o q q q o o c c o c q o o o c o q a o a c U O O O@ Q o Do o O o a o o Q° N a Do CR a� 1 Ot 6 6 16 �6 6 -:115 Cd o 7 77 7 7 7 7 7 77 o o c 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 777 7 7 O@ O 7 7 q D q 0 o C 0 m J O 0 0 0 0 t0 c 0 O O c 0 0 0 LLJ C C O O Q O a O N O G a O m c^ �R �2 C a c coo la vN. a-- m m c o v@ g g I S o 0 o q q Cp IN mm M L2 cc, ...Do q 0 0 o o 8988sq'B q 'g q o 9 c o q q o c c o w coo coo c o.op.c. q 9 o c o o 6 d 6 6 6 L 9 q I q p q q D, I D 2 9 7i h; o� VL O c� LQ 0 N o 9.- Z qc?qo.qq v:cp c(=? c O. 9 O Q qq oc a q q 9 q c c D c D c N U o N I D: c N m Cl! a o c o cc coo. c a a i Q o.00., coo. N p a0 o O c R 'R c -R m q M c M '4 C�! N -R -R C:�'q q N U� "'n m �2 uj a§ I. o o G. a Ln 01 •Q U 01 z LD c z �z Z Z Z 00 ul z U� u. U.. Lti :3 0 R 0 w Lu uj w u, w w w w w W W DD Lu- ul 0 mm 0: l� ci g E c IL m U 0 m m m .Ll o) L) L S I.. L C) 0 "T 2 F- 6 m (L o E E E ch 2 0 c E C 0 Z5 2 5 CO L) H F- O N N C) E E E 0 0,5 I x (r 2 0 0 0 Ck A N cV 4 Ln 6 6 6 IL m t6 m z 1 w a. IL C C W .2 9 u C6 E E x t4 w a5 E -2 LD 5 0 o W mUfeU 0 E E 1,6 T ID 0 u C) 15 W 1; 4 CL 00 f! w 92 E F LLJ Z V M E E U 0 L) U w 0 a� FL EL 0 w W 0ON U) 0 N o 7 .b b c6 m6 6 L L �6 �6,6 c6 c6 �6 �6 6 6 mm -2 U. w Z w a z A D N 0 4 N rvN N NNra N c cars 0 O uj 0 I.- June 13, 2012 Mr. Robin Tischmak, P.E. Senior Transportation Engineer City of Tukwila, Department of Public Works 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: 2012 Overlay Program Project No. 91210401 Recommendation for Contract Award Dear Robin, KPG has reviewed the projects and references submitted by ICON Materials for the Overlay Program. References including City of Maple Valley and City of Renton indicated that ICON Materials does a good job with paving, overlay, and repair projects. We are therefore recommending that the City award Project No. 91210401 entitled 2012 Overlay Program to ICON Materials. Please call me at (206) 284 -1640 if you should have any questions or require further information. Sincerely, O�Wi�. &wblnl� Olivia Buban, P.E. Project Manager 4 C ,r it of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Haggerton Transportation Committee FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director BY: Peter Lau, Senior Engineer DATE: June 15, 2012 SUBJECT: 2012 Overlav and Reaair Program Project No. 91210401 Construction Management Consultant Selection and Agreement ISSUE Approve consultant agreement with Parametrix, Inc. for construction management (CM) services. BACKGROUND As internal CM staff have been devoted to other on -going construction projects, project staff proposes to use a CM consultant to assist with inspection and construction engineering for this project. The construction project bid opening was on June 12, 2012 and is scheduled to be awarded along with this contract. Construction is anticipated to begin in the second half of July. DISCUSSION City project staff reviewed the Municipal Research and Services Center (MRSC) Consultant Roster, and short- listed three firms capable of performing the desired CM services. Parametrix, Inc. was determined to be the most qualified to perform the work for the 2012 Overlay and Repair project. Parametrix offers services that include CM, Construction Inspection, Transportation, Natural Resources and Planning, Water, Wastewater, and Environmental Engineering and Sciences. FISCAL IMPACT A cost has been negotiated with Parametrix for $96,996.32, which is reasonable for the size and scope of this project. A material testing sub consultant is also included in this consultant proposal, mainly for asphalt compaction, oil content and subgrade evaluation tests. The CM budget is $150,000.00 (see page 14, 2012 CIP). An in -house CM Project Manager has been assigned to work with the proposed Consultant's Inspector and Project Panager to successfully complete the 2012 Overlay and Repair project. RECOMMENDATION Council is being asked to approve the Construction Management Consultant Agreement with Parametrix, Inc. in the amount of $96,996.32 for the 2012 Overlay and Repair Program and consider this item at the June 25, 2012 Committee of the Whole meeting and subsequent July 2, 2012 Regular Meeting. Attachment: Consultant Agreement 5 CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Tukwila, Washington, herein -after referred to as "the City and hereinafter referred to as "the Consultant in consideration of the mutual benefits, terms, and conditions hereinafter specified. 1. Project Designation. The Consultant is retained by the City to perform services in connection with the project titled Scope of Services. The Consultant agrees to perform the services, identified on Exhibit "A" attached hereto, including the provision of all labor, materials, equipment and supplies. 3. Time for Performance. Work under this contract shall commence upon the giving of written notice by the City to the Consultant to proceed. The Consultant shall perform all services and provide all work product required pursuant to this Agreement within 30 calendar days from the date written notice is given to proceed, unless an extension of such time is granted in writing by the City. 4. Payment. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work and for services rendered under this Agreement as follows: A. Payment for the work provided by the Consultant shall be made as provided on Exhibit "B" attached hereto, provided that the total amount of payment to the Consultant shall not exceed without express written modification of the Agreement signed by the City. B. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City once per month during the progress of the work for partial payment for that portion of the project completed to date. Such vouchers will be checked by the City and, upon approval thereof, payment shall be made to the Consultant in the amount approved. C. Final payment of any balance due the Consultant of the total contract price earned will be made promptly upon its ascertainment and verification by the City after the completion of the work under this Agreement and its acceptance by the City. D. Payment is provided in this section shall be full compensation for work performed, services rendered, and for all materials, supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work. E. The Consultant's records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to be kept available for inspection by representatives of the City and state for a period of three (3 years after final payments. Copies shall be made available upon request. I 5. Ownership and Use of Documents. All documents, drawings, specifications and other materials produced by the Consultant in connection with the services rendered under this Agreement shall be the property of the City whether the project for which they are made is executed or not. The Consultant shall be permitted to retain copies, including reproducible copies, of drawings and specifications for information, reference and use in connection with the Consultant's endeavors. The Consultant shall not be responsible for any use of the said documents, drawings, specifications or other materials by the City on any project other than the project specified in this Agreement. 6. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant shall, in performing the services contemplated by this Agreement, faithfully observe and comply with all federal, state, and local laws, ordinances and regulations, applicable to the services to be rendered under this Agreement. 7. Indemnification. The Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees, from and against any and all claims, losses or liability, including attorney's fees, arising from injury or death to persons or damage to property occasioned by any act, omission or failure of the Consultant, its officers, agents and employees, in performing the work required by this Agreement. With respect to the perform- ance of this Agreement and as to claims against the City, its officers, agents and employees, the Consultant expressly waives its immunity under Title 51 of the Revised Code of Washington, the Industrial Insurance Act, for injuries to its employees, and agrees that the obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless provided for in this paragraph extends to any claim brought by or on behalf of any employee of the Consultant. This waiver is mutually negotiated by the parties. This paragraph shall not apply to any damage resulting from the sole negligence of the City, its agents and employees. To the extent any of the damages referenced by this paragraph were caused by or resulted from the concurrent negligence of the City, its agents or employees, this obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless is valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence of the Consultant, its officers, agents and employees. 8. Insurance. The Consultant shall secure and maintain in force throughout the duration of this contract comprehensive general liability insurance, with a minimum coverage of $500,000 per occurrence and $1,000,000 aggregate for personal injury, and $500,000 per occurrence/ aggregate for property damage, and professional liability insurance in the amount of $1,000,000. Said general liability policy shall name the City of Tukwila as an additional named insured and shall include a provision prohibiting cancellation of said policy except upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City. Certificates of coverage as required by this section shall be delivered to the City within fifteen (15) days of execution of this Agreement. 9. Independent Contractor. The Consultant and the City agree that the Consultant is an inde- pendent contractor with respect to the services provided pursuant to this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be considered to create the relationship of employer and employee between the parties hereto. Neither the Consultant nor any employee of the Consultant shall 7 be entitled to any benefits accorded City employees by virtue of the services provided under this Agreement. The City shall not be responsible for withholding or otherwise deducting federal income tax or social security or for contributing to the state industrial insurance program, otherwise assuming the duties of an employer with respect to the Consultant, or any employee of the Consultant. 10. Covenant Against Contingent Fees. The Consultant warrants that he has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warrant, the City shall have the right to annul this contract without liability, or in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. 11. Discrimination Prohibited. The Consultant, with regard to the work performed by it under this Agreement, will not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, national origin, religion, creed, age, sex or the presence of any physical or sensory handicap in the selection and retention of employees or procurement of materials or supplies. 1?. Assignment. The Consultant shall not sublet or assign any of the services covered by this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. 13. Non Waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision. 14. Termination. A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time by giving ten (10) days written notice to the Consultant. B. In the event of the death of a member, partner or officer of the Consultant, or any of its supervisory personnel assigned to the project, the surviving members of the Consultant hereby agree to complete the work under the terms of this Agreement, if requested to do so by the City. This section shall not be a bar to renegotiations of this Agreement between surviving members of the Consultant and the City, if the City so chooses. 15. Attorneys Fees and Costs. In the event either party shall bring suit against the other to enforce any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such suit shall be entitled to recover its costs, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred in such suit from the losing party. N 16. Notices. Notices to the City of Tukwila shall be sent to the following address: City Clerk City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Notices to Consultant shall be sent to the following address: 17. Integrated Agreement. This Agreement, together with attachments or addenda, represents the entire and integrated Agreement between the City and the Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both the City and the Consultant. DATED this CITY OF TUKWILA Mayor Attest /Authenticated City Clerk day of �0 CONSULTANT II Printed Name: Title: Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney N City of A U1 2 1 1 gr ann Parametrix, Inc. (PARAMETRIX) will provide Observation and Engineering Services as defined below. These services are intended to assist the City of Tukwila (CITY) in observation for construction and verify that the Contractor's work is in substantial compliance with the contract documents, and assist the CITY in responding to events that occur during the construction. The services under this scope of services will commence upon the receipt of a Notice to Proceed, which will be issued on approximately July of 2012. The period of performance will extend from the Notice to Proceed date through October of 2012. PARAMETRIX's ability to meet this schedule is contingent upon the Contractor's activities. Services performed after October of 2012 will be considered Additional Services and will require written authorization from the CITY. PARAMETRIX's services are based upon the schedule or duration of construction of 56 calendar days anticipated at the time that these services are agreed upon. PARAMETRIX will not perform services beyond the agreed to contract amount without written authorization from the CITY. The level of effort to perform the work described is based on a 5 -day work week and standard 8 -hour workday. This task includes overall project management of PARAMETRIX's contract with the City of Tukwila including the following: Budget and Schedule Tracking— Track the project budget using PARAMETRIX's in -house tools to verify that progress is keeping pace with spending. Monthly Progress Repor -ts Prepare one- page maximum monthly progress reports for distribution to the CITY. Prepare a monthly invoice for services performed by PARAMETRIX. Correspondence Prepare written correspondence as needed to document project management issues and /or concerns. MAIN 10 IRSOMRITUMM 0 The presence of PARAMETRIX's personnel at a construction site is for the purpose of providinv to the CITY a greater degree of confidence that the completed construction work will conform generally to the construction documents and that the integrity of the design concept, as reflected in the construction documents, has been implemented and preserved by the Contractor(s). PARAMETRIX's construction observation will arrange for taking daily photographs of the work in progress by the Contractor, which will be made available to the CITY. Daily photographs will also document existing conditions that may relate to changed conditions or utility conflicts as they are 0 PARAMETRIX's construction observer will make be on site every day the contractor is workin Based on the schedule this will be up to 56 trips to the project site. I City of TuAwild 2012 Overlay Progrant Ane 2012 11 s- It Daily Photos and photo log Should PARAMETRIX discover or believe that any work by the Contractor is not in accordance with the contract for construction, or is otherwise defective, or not conforming to requirements of the contract or applicable rules and regulations, PARAMETRIX will bring this to the attention of the Contractor and the CITY immediately. PARAMETRIX will thereupon monitor the Contractor's corrective actions and shall advise the CITY as to the acceptability of the corrective actions. .3 Subsurface and Physical Conditions Whenever the Contractor notifies PARAMETRIX or CITY of subsurface or physical conditions at the site which differ from the contract documents, PARAMETRIX will advise the CITY and inspect the conditions at the site. PARAMETRIX will advise the CITY as to the appropriate action(s) and assist the CITY in responding to the Contractor. K r PARAMETRIX will supplement engineering design support and assist the CITY with review of and response to the Contractor's submittals and requests for information as requested by the CITY. The level of effort anticipated for this support shall be limited to the hours and costs indicated in the fee estimate for this subtask. CITY will track and provide written responses to the Contractor's request for interpretation or clarification of the contract documents. PARAMETRIX will assist CITY with evaluating Contractor's requests and with preparing written responses. CITY will coordinate and collaborate with the FOR as appropriate for any design clarifications and /or interpretations. 3.2 Submittals The CITY will obtain from the Contractor a proposed shop drawing and submittal schedule, which shall identify all shop drawings, samples, and submittals required by the contract for construction, along with the anticipated dates for submission. The CITY will log and track all shop drawings, samples, and submittals. PARAMETRIX will assist the CITY with reviews of the Contractor's schedule, Traffic Control Plans, erosion control, gravel materials, and HMA- related materials and other items if requested by the CITY. City of Tulnvila 2012 Overlay Pragra,n 3 June 2012 12 PARAMETRIX's review of submittals shall be for general conformance with the design concept and general compliance with the requirements of the contract for construction. Such review shall not relieve ihe Contractor from its responsibility for performance in accordance with the contract for construction, nor is such review a guarantee that the work covered by the shoy, drawings,_$,=91es and submittals is free of errors, inconsistencies or omissions. r, IT. T =-1 PARAMETRIX will assist the CITY in review of the Contractor's requests for information or clarification of the contract for construction. PARAMETRIX will coordinate such review with the CITY znd with the EOR if requested by the CITY. The CITY will coordinate and issue responses to the requests. The CITY will log and track the Contractor's requests. PARAMETRIX will assist the CITY in reviewing and responding to the Contractor's requests for gubstitution of materials and equipment. PARAMETRIX will review such requests and will advise the- CITY as to the acceptability of such substitutions. 4.0 MATERIALS TESTING MINE 1 11 1 1 MINOR Fill I I i I I 1 1111 SO i I I. 13 uoilenJasgo 0 ®0 0 u oilonJlsuo� N N aaueuid dJo: lsilei�ad5 0 N w m m SIOJluo:) laarwd Jaaui9u3 J5 0 N v a P° 0 w 0 m N Ln •q N :g V' a 00 W W O 0 et S O JJ 8888 ®8 9T 00 m w .4 m m Ln rl r ry (i S yr +n v} 4A m Ln art +n +n v} `O a IMF O Ln Ln O m ND N jm- 0 N m r-1 N N m e N 0 w v C CBLnm c ;N °gym u w t C O Ol v F m m O1 LU J.+ Z w y m u r-1 E r c a' -E u E m m° p O y EA L` m -O O` is C 0 L/L uo ba C N M C y M Z w w �J C O u Yi i v, A +J g E CL E C tw m .O O d .0 0 E y c c C EA p e0 U U L at d u w f0 N N Y O Y 7 6 h 000 O O 0 O u Z U t u C y w C tll W 'O m W O O 7 .0 r/ N r/ r-1 N N m m m m U d d Ln 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMF O Ln Ln O m ND N jm- 0 N m r-1 N N m e N 0 w v C CBLnm ;N °gym M N E N Ln Ol v Ln zr Ln zr rH •-1 E in in a Ln m m r-1 N 1^ vn L N vs u C Ln Ol v m a H N 0 7 w x M Ln Z Z c F W Z J C 7 C C a L r, y N M C y M Z w w X C X X O W Q tf'1 `'i vii c 0 C C m, u G p m .O O d .0 3 a vt Ln O 'n q O m m 2 Lu N m CA CA LO CD O F d �O d 14 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Haggerton Transportation Committee FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director and Jack Pace, Community Development Director BY: Moira Carr Bradshaw, Senior Planner DATE: June 6, 2012 SUBJECT: Duwamish Transportation Management Association (DTMA) ISSUE Briefing Alternatives to Drive Alone Commuting in the Duwamish Manufacturing Industrial Center BACKGROUND The DTMA is a non profit group dedicated to improving transportation services in, to and through the Duwamish business community. Because of the many challenges of transportation within the Duwamish Industrial Centers, a group of local businesses several years ago joined together to form the DTMA. The DTMA is a partner to the Manufacturing and Industrial Council (MIC), which formed in 1998 with a handful of volunteers concerned about the future of Seattle's industrial business community. Today the group includes many members some big, some small all sharing a commitment to retain and support the family wage job base of this area and in the region. DISCUSSION Dave Gering, Executive Director of the MIC will provide an overview of the results of the Street Smart report and answer any questions about his organization and the report. In collaboration with King County Metro and the Port of Seattle, and with Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality grand fWnds, the DTMA produced the Street Smart report. The goal of the study is to reduce single occupant vehicle use in the Manufacturing and Industrial Centers of Tukwila and Seattle. Attached are the recommendations within Tukwila. The recommendations within the report were used to support a Tukwila 2012 King Countywide Non motorized application that is currently on the contingency list. FINANCIAL IMPACT Not applicable RECOMMENDATION No action needed, information only. ATTACHMENT Street Smart Executive Summary and North Tukwila Excerpt WALong Range Projects \Walk and Roll \Street Smart \draft Street Smart transp committee.doc 15 Executive Summary The Duwamish industrial area presents major challenges to those who seek to travel by bicycle or foot, and the barriers often make it hard for people to reach bus stops and other public transit facilities. Some major new improvements for non motorized transportation are occurring through construction for high profile projects, including the Alaskan Way Viaduct, Spokane Street, and the South Park Bridge. But those projects will conclude with no solutions in place for extensive areas throughout the Duwamish where bicycle riding and walking are limited by unpaved roads, no sidewalks, "stranded" bicycle paths, lousy drainage, and poor or no street lighting. Street Sniart: Alternatives to Drive Alone Conininting in the Duwamish sets forth recommendations for overcoming these barriers through further implementation of local government master plans for bicycling and walking and other measures. The project emphasizes projects that would improve connections between the Seattle and North Tukwila Manufacturing and Industrial Centers and the local communities that comprise those centers SODO, Georgetown, South Park, and North Tukwila. Recommendations were produced by a multi -modal advisory group that reviewed public plans and policies with input from more than 100 community organizations and businesses. On an area -wide basis, the multi -modal effort prioritized future capital improvements to: improve cycling safety through safer, more complete trail routes; increase the use of "hybrid" commutes that combine cycling with transit, and enhance pedestrian access to existing transit services through sidewalk, bus stop, crosswalk, and lighting improvements. Consensus was not reached on all issues. The Cascade Bicycle Club seeks separated bicycle facilities such as buffered bicycle lanes or separated cycle tracks for many planned bike routes in the industrial community, including sections of major truck streets such as East Marginal Way and Airport Way. The Duwamish Transportation Management Association feels it may be premature to determine that such improvements are warranted. However, most recommendations were agreed to by all the parties, including a recommendation to determine if Airport Way could become a north -to -south bike route through the Duwamish that could be pursued through collaborative efforts by Seattle, Tukwila, and King County International Airport. Such an effort on Airport Way could be tied to other north -south improvements on East Marginal Way and West Marginal Way to improve connectivity with the Green River Trail and other facilities in the south Duwamish planning area. Completion of the South Park Bridge in 2013 will also present new opportunities to pursue related sign, lighting, transit, bike, pedestrian, and road surface improvements. 16 The stadium district in north SODO also presents a large number of problem areas where significant cycling and pedestrian improvements should be pursued as government agencies complete the Alaskan Way Viaduct replacement project. One such effort, already under way, is improving bicycle access and safety along the surface route of Alaskan Way adjacent to the major marine cargo terminal at Terminal 46 west of the sports stadiums. That project provides a good template for other collaborative efforts. The safety improvements should be extended to the south along Alaskan Way to connect with Spokane Street and the bridge to West Seattle. The Duwamish will remain a challenging area for those who seek alternatives to drive alone commuting, but new online programs and networks provide new tools that make it possible for every employee and employer to find alternatives. Some of those programs are available through the online version of this report available at www.duwamishtma.org. The top recommendations of this report are summarized below, referenced to the fold -out map at the conclusion of the Executive Summary. SODO: 1. Rehab the Alaskan Way S multi -use trail as a separated north -to -south route in to and out of the Duwamish M &I Center. 2. Complete separated multi -use SODO Trail south from S Forest St to S Spokane St. 3. Provide sharrows between S Spokane St and S Royal Brougham Way along Airport Way S to increase driver awareness of cyclists. 4. Connect the planned multi -use path on the lower level of the S Spokane St project to SODO Trail and Airport Way S. 5. Incorporate bicycle and pedestrian facilities into proposed S Lander St grade separation project. 6. Complete planned extension of Mountains -to -Sound Trail at S Royal Brougham Way and 4th Ave S. 7. Create access to SODO from Beacon Hill for connecting with the Chief Sealth Trail (proposed) continuation. Georgetown: 8. Signs beginning at S Hudson St should direct southbound cyclists to alternative routes leading to the S River St entrance to the 1 st Ave S Bridge so that they may avoid the S Michigan St intersection. 17 9. Take advantage of the bike lanes on E Marginal Way S from S Albro St to S Ellis St to South Park Bridge (once bridge construction is complete), to bypass residential and commercial pockets of Georgetown as part of a commute route. 10. Continue planned sharrows and signs along E Marginal Way S from Corson Ave S to the S River St crossing to the west for the 1" Ave S Bridge, or east to 6' Ave S heading to the north and the east -west route on S Lucile St. 11. Paint sharrows along S Lucile St, the east -west link between l Ave S and Airport Way S. 12. Enforce sidewalk and parking regulations on the east side of 4th Ave S, north of the railyard bridge to keep parked cars out of the pedestrian path and to reduce sidewalk maintenance and repair costs. 13. Construct a raised platform or repair the drainage systems at the northbound transit stop at 4th Ave S and S Industrial Way to combat the flooding that users regularly experience. 14. Provide signs and kiosks along S Lucile St connecting pedestrians from transit routes on 1 st Ave S and 4th Ave S to the Design District and Commercial area along Airport Way S. South Park: 15. Direct travelers from the Duwamish River Trail or the 1 st Ave S Bridge to the new South Park Bridge by placing an informational kiosk at S Holden St and directing them to S Kenyon St, Dallas Ave S, and finally 14th Avenue S. 16. Place a kiosk on 14 Avenue S. near the SR 599 cloverleaf to show cyclists how to reach the South Park Bridge and retail area along 14th Avenue S via W Marginal Way S. 17. Install a kiosk at the South Park Bridge directing westbound bridge travelers to bike routes and trails on the west side of the Duwamish.� 18. Improve access to transit by providing a bus platform at 2nd Ave S and S Holden St in the eastbound direction. 19. Provide better lighting for transit users and pedestrians along 14 Avenue S between S Cloverdale St and SR99 intersection and W Marginal Way S and S Holden St. 20. Use new signage and improved maintenance to encourage use of the stairs near Sea Mar Community Health Center. 18 North Tukwila: 21. Widen the existing pathway on the west side of Airport Way Sfnorth side of S Boeing Access Road to facilitate a safer connection between Airport Way S and E Marginal Way S, a 12' multi -use trail from EMW to Airport Way S to S Norfolk St. 22. Remove inactive rail line to install a separated multi -use trail on the west side of E Marginal Way S, connecting to the Green River Trail. 23. Continue Green River Trail north connecting to South Park. 24. As recommended in the Walk and Roll plan, the proposed trail connection between S 115' St along the western edge of the future Duwamish Riverbend Hill Park up to S Boeing Access Road and Airport Way S would provide a much- needed trail bypass route to the complex intersection of S Boeing Access Road and E Marginal Way S. 25. Rechannelize S Norfolk St to provide 6' bicycle lanes on both sides of roadway (existing: four travel lanes, low traffic volumes). 26. Widen existing pathway on the north side of S Boeing Access Road to provide a multi -use trail connection between E Marginal Way S and Airport Way S. 27. Restripe S 112th St to provide 5' bicycle lanes on both sides, and install wayfinding signage directing users to Green River Trail. 28. Provide signage directing users to Green River Trail from Tukwila International Blvd., deal with access management issues (between S Boeing Access Road. and S 112th St); parking is encroaching on sidewalk. In the long term, Green River Trail should be extended on the east side of the waterway, along Tukwila International Blvd. and E Marginal Way S. 19 Non-motorized Commute Network through the Duwamish M&I Center Duwamish Transportation Management Association 6 C j (De A' Ij n3 7 5 o- 41, Al 2 I ','1 11 I �II F J 12 d TT C8 r 11 I III I� I L 14 F U in :fir_ °.L X, 15 7 L� C 18 V t T T 17 20 19— Legend Existing Facilities r ck. L.— L4 Planned/Under Construction eke L.— A 1 2@6 Recommendations CZ) B 28 Definitions of bicycle facility terms B­ L ,­d� 4-5 ­­d, ­,­d lanes far h,d- to on th--d Sh, rr"' -111 1, d.. f d, =h th t th Th, t,, t—, t, I th, Id th, with b,­I,­ Sh,,,.­a­t, t� b, the h­ pi lane SM1airows are typically 1—t— h­ the ­d­y,,,dth,, not adequate to I d.d...t.d bike lacilibes dwe 11 1.— "h.,. Y .1— g simila p as —.1 ".h..- 20 V. North Tukwila When the North Tukwila Manufacturing and Industrial Center was designated in 1992 as part of the region's land use and transportation plan, the plan called for the area to set a light -rail station along the Boeing Access Road as part of the new light -rail system that was then being planned. However, the proposed station was indefinitely postponed because of cost benefit issues, and the nearest light -rail station was built instead at the Tukwila transit center on International Boulevard, about 3 miles south of the Boeing Access Road. Companies in the North Tukwila area still want the station. Other issues cited by community members include: Poor east -west connectivity in the road system; Underutilization of the Green River Trail; Large blocks that make pedestrian crossings uncomfortable; and Many transit routes require two or more transfers. Like Seattle's industrial areas to the north, North Tukwila has a disconnected sidewalk network and a high volume of truck traffic on its streets. Unlike Seattle, Tukwila possesses a major regional bike route, the Green River Trail, running right through the M I Center, that can be used as part of a bike or pedestrian separated commute. The Green River Trail could tie in the Airport Way route for a new regional, north -south bike connection between north Seattle and south King County. But the effort would probably require collaboration between the cities of Seattle and Tukwila in partnership perhaps with King County International Airport. A similar opportunity exists to better continue the Green River Trail into South Park along West Marginal Way to connect with 14th Avenue South leading to the South Park retail area. From there, cyclists could travel west to the 1 st Avenue South Bridge over the Duwamish River, or continue north on the Duwamish Trail along West Marginal Way to West Seattle. Or, they could ride from the retail area over the new South Park Bridge and on to Georgetown. The multi -modal group reviewing North Tukwila also recommended: Promoting hybrid bike bus rail commutes to increase east -west connectivity, taking advantage of Tukwila being served by both light and heavy rail; Increasing signage and lighting on the Green River Trail to encourage its use as a commute option, not just a recreational facility; and Installing mid -block crossings on selected roadway segments to reduce block size to a more approachable scale for pedestrians and transit users. 39 21 S[n,'r, S 1;lIrC The two most recent plans that have been developed relating to non motorized transportation in North Tukwila include the City of Tukwila's Walk and Roll Plan (adopted in 2009) and the Tukwila Bicycle Friendly Routes and Sidewalk Segments Design Report. The Walk and Roll Plan recommends a network of bicycle facilities throughout the city. The Design Report provides detailed design recommendations and cost estimates for specific bicycling projects along the city's recommended network. Note about S 102nd Street. A privately owned facility (by The Boeing Company), S 102nd St is identified in both the Walk and Roll Plan and the Design Report as a recommended bicycle friendly route. The Design Report also recommends improvements along S 102nd St; however, the report also states that S 102nd St is private from East Marginal Way to S River St, and that any work would require agreements with The Boeing Company. The Tukwila Walk and Roll Plan identifies S 102nd St as a "bicycle friendly route" and indicates a planned trail between the S 102nd St Bridge and W Marginal Place, however, there is no discussion of proposed bicycle facilities along S 102nd St and no discussion of the ownership of this right of way. While S 102nd St presents a key opportunity for bicycle connectivity, issues involving access and improvements to this facility would need to be worked out with the private property owner. Barriers The multi -modal group agreed on the following barriers to safe pedestrian and bicycle travel in North Tukwila. Location Airport Way Lack of bicycle infrastructure; high- speed traffic; no paved shoulder (pavement edge drops off creating unsafe bicycle conditions); important M 22 E Marginal Way Disconnected bicycle infrastructure; varying right -of -way widths; high -speed corridor: major intersections; key commute route. W Marginal PI Existing gap in trail network; high -speed traffic: narrow shoulder in sections; poor pavement quality; difficult intersections at S 102nd St and l lth Ave S. Boeing Access Road Lack of bicycle infrastructure; high traffic volume and speeds 36,301 ADT; 10 mph posted speed limit): ramp merge areas Airport Way, 1-5); free right turning movements at the intersection of B Marginal Way Boeing Access Rd. S 129 St Lack of bicycle infrastructure; high speed, narrow shoulder width. S 112` St Wide right -of -way; disconnected bicycle infrastructure; no signage to Green River Trail. 41 23 Tukwila International Sections lacking curbs and gutters; wide Boulevard (Boeing Access entrances to adjacent business parking Rd to S 130th St) lots; key connection to the Green River Trail; conflict points at SR 99 merge areas; lack of bicycle infrastructure. S 102nd St Private road; bridge over the Duwamish River; intersects with E Marginal Way. Green River Trail Intersection driveway conflicts, poorly design trail entrances exits, pavement issues In sections; signage needed directing to from trail; sand bags blocking trail access south of 1-405). Intersection of S Boeing Access Rd (BAR), East Marginal Way S (EMW) Tukwila International Blvd No dedicated bicycle facilities; long signal phases; multi -leg /lane intersection; no crosswalk at free -right turn from westbound BAR to northbound EMW; difficult connection for bicyclists continuing south to Bast Marginal Way through the intersection. 42 24 'nip d Merge areas along S Boeing Access Road (Airport Way, I -5) Major conflict points for bicyclists traveling along Boeing Access Road. S Norfolk St Signal detectors are not calibrated to E Marginal Way sense bicycles, requiring bicyclists to wait at the intersection until a motor vehicle triggers the light. S 102nd St W Navigating the Green River Trail at this Marginal PI intersection is not intuitive bicyclists mint cross diagonally to continue on the trail, however no signage exists providing direction to the trail. Terminus of Green River Gravel area; bicyclists need to walk Trail (W Marginal PI S bikes; no trail access signage; trail dead 96th St) ends. 43 25 pith Ave S W Marginal PI S Difficult connection from southbound l lth Ave S to W Marginal PI (cyclists forced to ride facing oncoming traffic). 116th E Marginal Way When the B Marginal Way Bridge was (SE entrance to trail) reconstructed, the SE entrance to the trail was removed cyclists ride facing oncoming traffic on B Marginal Way. 56th Ave S Railroad Road blocked (unable to access Railroad Ave Ave). Green River Trail Parking blocking trail exit entrance. entrance exit north of BBCU 0 26 Green River Trail driveways unsibnalized intersections Green River Trail intersection at 56th Ave S and Interurban Ave S Maintenance needed for vegetation encroaching trail; poor sight lines. Unprotected left turn crossin" the trail, no "trail crossing" signage. 45 27 RECOMMENDATIONS The multi -modal group endorsed the recommendations set forth in both the Walk and Roll Plan and the Tukwila Bicycle Friendly Routes and Sidewalk Segments Design Report, subject to additional review as noted in the recommendations. The Duwamish TMA would su --est a caveat that the cities of Tukwila and Seattle should collaborate in planning for their mutual connections between Airport Way, East Marginal Way, and West Marginal Way, hopefully in partnership with King County International Airport (KCIA) and other property owners including The Boeing Company. Boeing employees make up a large share of cyclists and pedestrians in the local vicinity of the potential improvements. They along with the broader community should be engaged. The following recommendations provide timely starting points for a collaborative review. Issue Recommendation Airport Way (Boeing Widen the existing pathway on the Access Road to Seattle west side of Airport Way /north side of city limits) BAR to facilitate a safer connection between Airport Way and East #21 on Map Marginal Way S 12 -foot multi -use trail from EMW to Airport Way to Norfolk. Provide painted bike lanes at merge areas (Boeing Access Rd and Airport Way). E Marginal Way Recommendation 1 (near- term): Provide #22 on Map dedicated bicycle facilities between S 128th St and the Seattle city limit. Bicycle facilities could include cycle tracks or buffered bicycle lanes with painted bike lanes at key conflict points. Opportunities for installing bicycle lanes include: BAR to S 90th St: Remove 1 southbound lane (to provide cycle tracks or buffered bicycle lanes); S 90th to S 81st St—if ADT is too high to remove 1 south- or northbound lane, evaluate turn lane necessity, S 81 st St north: remove 1 southbound lane. Recommendation 2 (long- term): Remove inactive rail line to install a separated multi -use trail on the west side of EMW, connecting to the Green River Trail. M 28 Location (image; W Marginal Place S See #1 on Tukwila portion of the map in Appendix A. #23 on Map Multi -use Trail Opportunity #24 on Map S Norfolk St (between Airport Way S and E Marginal Way S) #25 on Map W Marginal Place S: Continue Green River Trail north connecting to South Park Trail alignment recommended on the east side of W Marginal PI S; Near term improvements are needed at existing trail terminus, including signage and paving at entrance. If construction of multi -use trail is determined a long -term project, sharrows along West Marginal Way S may be an appropriate facility during the interim. As recommended in the Wall: and Roll plan, the proposed trail connection between S 1 15th St along the western edge of the future Duwamish Riverbend Hill Park up to S Boeing Access Rd and Airport Way S would provide a much- needed trail bypass route to the complex intersection of Boeing Access Rd S and E Marginal Way S. S Norfolk St (Airport Way S and E Marginal Way S): Reehannelize to provide 6 -foot bicycle lanes on both sides of roadway (existing: four travel lanes, low traffic volumes). 47 29 S Boeing Access Rd S Ryan Way #26 on Map S 112th St #27 on Map Railroad Ave Widen existing pathway on the north side of S Boeing Access Rd to provide a multi -use trail connection between E Marginal Way S and Airport Way S. Install buffered bicycle lanes on both sides of Boeing Access Rd along with signage and bike lanes at merge areas. Bike lanes should extend along from E Marginal Way S to S Ryan Way to _51 Avenue S. In the future, a multi -use trail corridor adjacent to Sound Transit "s light -rail alignment (or in close proximity to S Boeing Access Rd) should be explored to provide a bypass option for pedestrians and bicyclists using the Boeing Access Roadway corridor. Restripe to provide 5-foot bicycle lanes on both sides, Construct sidewalk, Install bicycle Wayfinding, directing cyclists to Green River Trail, Ensure signal loop detectors are calibrated to sense bicycles (E Marginal Way S and Tukwila International Blvd). Provide sharrows and bicycle signage along Railroad Ave. Provide bicycle access from S 56th St. 30 Tukwila International Blvd #28 on Map 42nd Ave S Macadam S 115th St) 40th Ave S 42nd Ave S (E Marginal Way S S 144th St) Long -term: Green River Trail should be extended on the east side of the waterway, along TIB and East Marginal Way, Near -term: Rechannelize roadway to provide buffered bicycle lanes on both sides of the roadway between BAR and S 130th St. Reehannelization opportunities include removing one north- or southbound lane or removing a turn lane and providing turn pockets. Painted bike lanes are recommended at SR 599 on and off -ramps Provide si -nage directing to GRT, Address access management issues (between Boeing Access Rd and S 112th SO parking encroaching sidewalk. Install traffic calming measures; Preferred: Provide bicycle lanes on both sides of the roadway, If right -of -way is constrained, provide Sharrows and signage. Continue bicycle lanes from S 128th St to 40th Ave S; Install sharrows and traffic calming measures along 40th Ave S (potential for bicycle boulevard), Provides access to a park, school, library, and residential properties. 31 Green River Trail Extend Green River Trail north along W Marginal PI and along the east side of the Duwamish Waterway (providing a connection to Seattle and ultimately downtown Seattle). Trail is currently closed south of I -40.5 due to potential flooding associated with failure of the Howard Hanson Dam. Sandbags temporarily in place to be removed in Fall 2012. Please note: The trail closure is nor loca/ed iri /hin North Tukwila; however /he impacts of /his closure ex/ends /o Nor /h Tukwila conninaers (and conninaers /hroughou/ south King Counlv). Improve bicycle access from GRT to the 42nd Ave S Bridge (paved trail entrance), Complete trail gap east of 42nd Ave S. In the near -term, work with property owners to provide sharrows and /or signage along trail gap east of 42nd Ave S (along Access Roadway privately owned), Install wayfinding signage at key locations throughout north Tukwila directing to GRT; Discourage unintended trail use near Starfire soccer fans sitting on the trail during games); Provide additional signage where trail intersects driveways, unsignalized and signalized intersections. For example, where the trail intersects an unsignalized intersection or commercial driveway, a "Trail X -ing" sign might be used. 50 32 S 102nd St Work with Boeing to support bicycle Currently in work access along S 102nd St, Reconstruct shoulders to support bike lanes on both sides, Near -term: Provide sharrows on both sides of the S 102nd St Bridge, Long -term: Provide a grade separated bicycle and pedestrian path on the north side of S 102 St connecting to E Marginal Way S (will require reconstruction of the S 102nd St Bridge to support a grade separated path). S 115th St With low traffic volumes, S 1 15th St can serve as a bicycle boulevard or neighborhood greenway, connecting from E Marginal Way to the Allentown neighborhood. Traffic calining, sharrows, and signage are recommended along S 115th St. S 124th St Organize right -of -way to provide dedicated and consistent space for bicyclists. If right -of -way allows, provide 5-foot bicycle lanes on both sides; If right -of -way is constrained, provide sharrows and bicycle signage. S 56th St Provide traffic calming and signage to establish a bicycle boulevard along S 56th St, providing a residential connection to the Green River Trail and Railroad Ave. Bicyclists should be given access to Railroad Ave (the road is currently blocked for all users from 56th Ave S). Continue the bicycle boulevard signed route through Allentown neighborhood (suggested routes below). 51 33 S 19th St Pedestrian Improve signage and access for bicyclists Bridge using the S 19th St Pedestrian Bridge. This should serve as an access route to the Green River Trail. Bicycle Boulevard S 56th St Railroad Ave 50th PI S Opportunity S 125th St 46th Ave S 44th PI S 44th Ave S —S 116th St S 1 15th St. Bicycle Boulevard S 56th St Railroad Ave 50th PI S Opportunity S 124th St 42nd Ave S S 19th St Pedestrian Bridge GRT Intersection Recommendations Direction Recommendation Railroad Ave S Provide bicycle access to Railroad Ave from 56th St S 56th St. 14th Ave S Des Continue the multi -use trail through this Moines Memorial intersection (on east side) into Downtown Drive W South Park (to provide access for southbound bicyclists). In the interim, until Marginal PI the full trail can be constructed, a continuation of the 2 -way sidepath facility (existing on 14th Ave S) is recommended to connect to W Marginal Pl. Alternatively, a signed route through the properties to the east of 14th Ave S Des Moines Memorial Drive should be provided. 52 34 Location (Image), Terminus of Green Provide trail signage, River Trail (north Continue multi -use trail north (in the of S 102nd St) meantime, pave trail entrance). Interurban S /Green River Trail S 56th St Provide dedicated left -turn phase to reduce left -hook potential (trail crossing), Provide signage above left -turn arrow indicating trail crossing. Vicinity of East Improve Green River Trail Access at this Marginal Way location (signage, improved trail entrance on S 116th St SE and SW side). Curb cut needed on SW side of E Marginal Way S. Entrance /Exit for Work with property owner to relocate Green River Trail parking spaces blocking the entrance /exit to (north of BECU) the Green River Trail (wheel stops have now been removed, however painted parking spaces still need to be removed). 53 35 1 t 1 35 1 t Improve signage throughout the neighborhood, directing bicyclists to safe and direct routes (such as the Green River Trail). Key locations: International Blvd S and S 11?th St, E Marginal Way S and S I1?th St, Intersection of S 102nd St and W Marginal PI S (GRT) diagonal crossing for bikes, hard to navigate to trail on SW corner. Provide bicycle signal- detection at traffic signals, with a bicycle marking at the location where cyclists should align their bike. Enforce parking restrictions along bicycle and pedestrian ways. Install bicycle push buttons at trail intersections. Key location: Green River Trail and S 102nd St. 54 36 �.ry Provide regular maintenance along existing (and Future) multi -use trails and bicycle Facilities improve sightlines at trail driveway crossings. 55 37 Non-motorized Commute Network through the DUWAM15H Duwamish M&I Center t. TMA C­t,A 1212nnt North Tukwila Recommendations M I, T spxth_ Q. p 22 21 F.' d f U 11 V 0 27 Legend Existing Facilities 0 At% Mu h-use Trai 4 7 S Bike Lane 11 1, Sharr Plannedl der Construction Multi uueTijil Definitions of bicycle facility terms Bi Lane Multi-use Trail: 1r1- feat -wide pathways designated for rise by h,th pedestrians ;an! nyrlists Bike Lanes: provide 4- t. dedicated lanes t bir to �Perate on Recommendations the read Mu h-use Trai I Sharrows: nl!;.. kirwi v; .;hared Line iiixkiiiy nre �-ii Aieet lejeridi, that reinnirce the ecsting rules or the road They are not separate bike lanes a Bike Lane rn can stil drive over the sharrnws Motorists should e:llpect to see an share the lane wi tr bicyclists indir at- to lbi the best place tn r e Ivvs are tvpi 311v 3ti ns where the r �Iiw I W d In the lane rarr used in h cadwav width is ri adequate tr providp dedir ated bike facilities r nn downhill lanes Bus 6tops where bi�_,y6iLtj I fliglittlivel jill Idl :;peed dL lflud�[ Veiii-Jej 56 38 JOINT MEETING OF THE SOUTH COUNTY AREA TRANSPORTATION BOARD (SCATBd)/REGIONAL ACCESS MOBILITY PARTNERSHIP (RAMP) May 2, 2012 MEETING SUMMARY L Introduction, Comments, December 20, Meeting Summary SCATBd Chair Dave Hill and RAMP Co -Chair Tom Pierson thanked everyone for attending the joint meeting of the SCATBd /RAMP groups. Nancy Backus, Deputy Mayor for the City of Auburn, also took this opportunity to welcome everyone to the new downtown area of the City of Auburn. There were approximately 85 people in attendance, see Attachment A for a partial list of attendees. IL Opening Remarks Pierce County Executive Pat McCarty gave a brief history of the RAMP group and said that one of the strengths of RAMP was that it was a combination of business, labor, industry, local /county government, and legislative representatives that meet to share and discuss transportation issues. She said RAMP is a long standing body that was formed to have a single voice to inform state and federal government representatives about transportation needs for the South Sound area. Executive McCarty noted that RAMP has a lot in common with SCATBd as far as transportation priorities and needs. Mayor Hill introduced SCATBd and said it was a collaborative effort of local elected officials who were committed to improving the regional transportation system in the South Sound area. SCATBd includes representatives from 16 cities in the South King County area. He said that the South King County area contained about 691,600 people and had over 300,000 jobs. SCATBd members also include representatives from Pierce County, Pierce Transit, the Port of Seattle, PSRC, TIB, and WSDOT. Mayor Hill also announced that the South Sound Chambers of Commerce Legislative Coalition and the Port of Tacoma have agreed to participate in SCATBd's regular monthly meetings. Mayor Hill introduced Rob McKenna as the invited speaker to the joint meeting. HI. The Future of Transportation in the South Puget Sound Region, Rob McKenna, State Attorney General and Gubernatorial Candidate Mr. McKenna began his presentation by briefly summarizing his jobs plan for Washington State. He said it was focused on how to create conditions that will foster jobs creation. His plan was developed based from input from 14 small business roundtables that included 450 business leaders and managers, representing 350 different businesses. He said the key message he heard from the roundtables was that this is an expensive state to do business in, which resulted in not creating as many jobs as we might like to. Mr. McKenna said the emphasis of his jobs plan is to first, make the state more competitive in terms of the cost of doing business. His plan included a review of the state's B &O tax, its regulatory burdens, and the state's monopoly on industrial insurance. Second, he noted 39 Page that Washington State businesses that need skilled workers can't find enough qualified applicants to hire. He said we need to do a much better job of developing the skills and education workers need to land well paying jobs. He said the third issue is infrastructure. In order to sustain a modern economy, we need to be able to move people and goods. He said the key is to look at infrastructure in an integrated way, to consider the system as series of components that work together in a seamless fashion. He said that is why groups like RAMP, SCATBd and the TIB were important because they bring together key players to think about how the region can move forward with transportation infrastructure. Mr. McKenna's said his priorities for the South Sound region included: Freight mobility projects like the completion of the SR 509 corridor that would provide a link for the Ports of Tacoma and Seattle, improve travel times, and create an alternative route for traffic on I -5. Addressing the I -5 bottlenecks between Seattle and Tacoma and Tacoma and Vancouver. Congestion in this corridor affects the movement of people and goods and impacts freight mobility. He congratulated the PSRC Transportation Policy Board for adopting the Joint Base Lewis McChord (JBLM) projects into Transportation 2040. He said he supported the interchange justification studies to look at the interchange improvements needed to widen the JBLM portion of the I- 5 corridor. Finish the SR 167 corridor to the Port of Tacoma. He said this project would also greatly benefit the South King County area and improve congestion on I -5. He said we need to address north /south as well as east /west rail freight mobility to improve freight rail capacity and improve commuter rail service. Mr. McKenna noted that the region's ports are under competitive pressures from the Canadian Ports and South Eastern U.S. ports that will be taking advantage of an expanded Panama Canal. He said other regions are making investments in their ports and we need to stay competitive by investing in our ports. Mr. McKenna said that agriculture, one of the top exports in our state, is on the threshold of becoming a boom industry because the standard of living is increasing around the world and the first thing they buy is more food. He said Washington is one of the top food producers in the nation, and said our transportation infrastructure should continue to efficiently move food products to our ports. Mr. McKenna said that I -90 across the mountains is an important corridor linking the agricultural areas of eastern Washington and the Ports of Seattle and Tacoma. Mr. McKenna concluded his presentation by talking about funding. He said we clearly have unfunded needs. This includes unfunded preservation and maintenance needs, unfunded capacity needs for critical corridors like SR 509, SR 167, and bottle necks on I- 5 in the JBLM area. He said that local funding for transportation has been neglected, and if elected governor he would collaborate with local government to identify strategies to 40 Page 3 address local funding needs as well as statewide needs. He said this strategy might include: The possibility of more public private partnership projects to address corridors like SR 509, SR 167 and the Columbia River Bridge. A public vote on a transportation package, which should include roads, transit, and ferries. McKenna mentioned King County's request for local option authority to expand its transit network and BRT routes, and said this request should be considered. Finally, Mr. McKenna said we need to "do no harm That we should not take away funds from programs like the Public Works Trust Fund and FMSIB to fund activities other than transportation. Mr. McKenna was asked about his thoughts about what new revenue source he might consider to replace the gas tax. Mr. McKenna said that for the near future he felt that we will still be relying on the gas tax, but he also said that there should be increasing reliance on tolling. He also said that Public Private Partnership projects should be considered because of dwindling public revenues. One audience member noted that we over -study projects and asked how the region could better move transportation projects forward. Mr. McKenna said that it takes leadership to get projects going. He complimented Governor Gregoire for providing leadership on projects like the SR 520 and SR 99. He said we need to be able to pull the trigger on these types of projects. Mr. McKenna was asked about his thoughts on the need to also improve local highways like SR 169, SR 164, and SR 516. He said local governments will need to help the state to prioritize these types of projects. He agreed that these local corridors are needed to support growth management goals and to support communities, and reiterated the need for local revenue sources. Mr. McKenna also said he supported local communities' ability to form port districts to improve economic development. IV. Port of Seattle Century Agenda Port of Seattle Commissioners Tom Albro and John Creighton. Port of Seattle Commissioners Tom Albro and John Creighton briefed the Boards on the Port's Century Agenda, a plan to expand economic opportunity in the Puget Sound Region. The Century Agenda is a 25 year plan to stimulate economic development while remaining committed to social and environmental responsibility. They began the briefing with a 5 minute video explaining the goals of the Century Agenda. The Port of Seattle is currently presenting the Century Agenda to the community to get feedback on the agenda's goals. The Commissioners said that these goals are regional and the Port can't reach goals by themselves it has to be done in partnership with the community. They said the Port (seaport and airport) is responsible for about 200,000 41 Page 4 jobs, and the goal is to create an additional 100,000 port related jobs in the next 25 years. They noted that Washington State was the most trade dependent State in Nation, and that it was the job of the Port to serve constituents and to provide access to the national and worldwide market place. The Commissioners passed out a brochure that summarized the Century Agenda which included: Position the Puget Sound region as a premier international logistics hub Grow seaport annual container volume to more than 3.5 million TEUs Stricture our relationship with Washington ports to optimize infrastructure investments and financial returns Triple air cargo volume to 750,000 metric tons Triple the value of our outbound cargo to over $50 billion Double the economic value of the fishing and maritime cluster Advance this region as a leading tourism destination and business gateway Make SeaTac Airport the west coast "Gateway of Choice" for international travel Double the number of international flights and destinations Meet the region's air transportation needs at SeaTac Airport for the next 25 years Double the economic value of cruise traffic to Washington state Use our influence as an institution to promote small business growth and workforce development. Increase the proportion of funds spent by the Port with qualified small businesses firms on construction, goods and services to 25% of the eligible dollars spent Increase work force training, job and business opportunities for local communities in trade, travel and logistics Be the greenest and most energy efficient port in North America Meet all increased energy needs through conservation and renewable sources Meet or exceed agency requirements for storm water leaving Port owned or operated facilities Reduce air pollutants and carbon emissions, specifically: Reduce air pollutant emissions by 50% from 2005 levels Reduce carbon emissions from all Port operations by 50% from 2005 levels and reduce aircraft related carbon emissions at SeaTac by 25% Anchor the Puget Sound urban- industrial land use to prevent sprawl in less developed areas Restore, create, and enhance 40 additional acres of habitat in the Green /Duwamish watershed and Elliott Bay The Commissioners also said the Port is willing to work with the region to identify initiatives such as the completion of the SR 509 and 167 corridors but these also needed to be state priorities. They also mentioned that China is the largest luxury goods market 42 Page 5 in world, and they want US produced products. They said the mission of the Port is to support the region's export business that will supply the China market demand. Cargo and logistic is big part of port business, but the movement of people as part of its airport and cruise ships operations is also a big part of the vision going forward. They closed by saying that the Port is focused on creating good- paying jobs for the region. Bill Peloza thanked the Commissioners for the Port's support in the soon to be completed Auburn $23 million M street project. Mr. Peloza noted that M Street will open next year, and will greatly improve freight mobility in the area. Dennis Dowdy commented on SR 167 congestion. As a result of this congestion, general and freight traffic moves through the city impacting local roads. The City of Auburn is unable to keep roads up to standards. Mr. Dowdy wants to work with Port to find a solution to this local congestion problem. Commissioner Albro said that the region must change the conversation on how to improve freight mobility, he noted that in an effort to streamline the sales tax, it reduced the local funding to address transportation problems. He said the purpose of the Century agenda is to reframe the conversation to address the freight mobility problem. The Commissioners were asked about public /public partnerships to fund local state route project needs. Commissioner Creighton said the Port has partnered with locals on such projects, and said the Port's participation in the FAST program was an example of its participation. He noted that the Port, however, doesn't want to be a roads agency, but they also want to support freight mobility projects. Commissioner Creighton said they wanted to work with jurisdictions to come up with local funding options. V. Briefing on Discontinuation of Seattle's Ride Free Area Chris O'Claire, King County Metro. Christina O'Claire, King County Metro Strategic Planning and Analysis Supervisor, presented Metro's proposal for the downtown Seattle Ride Free Area. Ms. O'Claire briefed the board on the proposed elimination of the Ride Free Area in downtown Seattle. She said this was a result of Metro's actions to address a funding shortage that would have caused a potential loss of 600,000 transit service hours. She said that the King County Council faced this challenge by enacting a countywide congestion reduction charge, a $20 vehicle license fee, scheduled to go into effect within the month. As part of this process Metro looked at other cost cutting measures, including the elimination of the Ride Free Area. Analysis showed that while the City of Seattle paid $400,000 a year towards the Ride Free Area, Metro was still losing about $2 million a year in revenues. The King County Council called for the elimination of the Ride Free Area by October 2012 or to re- negotiate a new agreement with the City of Seattle to address the tree cost of Ride Free Area service. Because of budget constraints faced by the City of Seattle, they said they are not able to pay the true cost of Ride Free Area. As a result, King County Metro staff is moving forward with their implementation plan to eliminate the Ride Free Area service. 43 Page 6 Ms. O' Claire explained what will happen when Metro moves towards a pay as you enter system in the former Ride Free Area on September 29, as opposed to the current system where you pay as you leave. The plan will look at ensuring smooth passenger loading and transit operations, clear communications of the change to pay as you go, and mitigating the impacts for low income transit riders. 1) Ensure smooth passenger loading and operations between buses and light rail service and will include: Maintain light rail headways in the downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel Remove 3 routes from the tunnel to the surface streets Reduce bus dwell times Surface streets Bus zone improvements Traffic signal changes to maintain traffic movement on 2" d 3 h and 4 th Avenues in the downtown area. Fare collection Modify ORCA settings to address one or two zone transit trips, and to minimize driver /transit rider interactions Use portable fare transaction processors, and have transit staff at the rear door to facilitate pay -as -you enter transactions. Fare enforcement and collection through working closely with transit security and operators. 2) Deliver clear communications of change to pay -as -you enter system: On September 29 Metro held a Public Open House with partner agencies Sound Transit, Pierce Transit, Community Transit and Seattle to get feedback on how to do the transition as smoothly as possible 300 people attended Almost 800 comments, very informative Additional public outreach to inform the community of the Ride- Free -Area elimination will include: A marketing campaign ORCA outreach Operator /employee training Coordinate with partner agencies 3) Continue working on understanding how to mitigate the impacts of the pay as -you go system on low income, by communicating with the affected human service agencies beginning last fall. 44 Page 7 The purpose is to understand travel behavior of low income riders, and identify how to ensure they can access the services they need from where they live. An in depth survey found out that over 40% of respondents claim to have a transit pass and that most respondents will walls 3 blocks to a transit stop but no more than 10 blocks. Mitigation measures being considered include: Increase subsidy for the Human Services Ticket program. King County Metro currently provides a million tickets a year to these programs. Agencies pay 20% of the cost and King County pays 80 Agencies have said that they did not want to expand these programs because of the increase in administrative cost to non these programs within their organizations. Donate Vans to agency clients. Agencies have communicated to Metro staff that they did not want to become transportation providers for their clients Working on a free circulator. Not all service needs are inside the downtown core, so Metro is looking at providing circulator service beyond the current ride free area. Metro is working with the city of Seattle on these three options and also discussing the City's current $400,000 payment, which is still on the table to help pay for these options. After the September service changes are made, Metro staff will continue to monitor the new pay -as -you enter system to see if adjustments need to be made. VI. Closing Remarks Discussion made to adopt the minutes of March meeting. The discussion and adoption of the draft 2011 SCATBd Progress Report was rescheduled to the next SCATBd meeting. Chair Hill gave special thanks to David Allen for the use of the Rainier Room for the special joint SCATBd /RAMP meeting. Attendees Name I City /Agency Aaron Williams Russ Blount Scott Mason Sanjeev Tandle Dennis Dowdy........................... Sean Eagan Steve Gorcester Mike Mariano FME Chamber City of Fife ILWU 23 City of Puyallup City of Auburn Port of Tacoma Transportation Improvement Board Mariano Associates, Inc. 45 Page 8 Cathy Mooney City of Kent David Schroedel Tacoma Pierce County Chamber of Commerce John Wolfe Port of Tacoma Grant Fredricks City of Des Moines B_ art._ Ta. yl_ or City of Milton Debra Perr City of Milton Katrina Asay Representative, District 30 Geri Poor Port of Seattle Bob Roe g ner Federal Way Mirror George Walk Pierce County Zach Wurtz Washington State Democrats John Creighton Commissioner, Port of Seattle Nancy Wyatt Auburn Chamber of Commerce Carolyn Cogne South Sound Chamber of Commerce Legislative Coalition William Thomas City of Auburn Br ynn Brady Pierce County Government Relations Monica Whitman Suburban Cities Association Dean Moberg Federal Highway Administration Linh Thai Congressman Adam Smith's Office Ron Lucas Town of Steilacoom Rachel Smith Sound Transit Dave Richardson City of Lakewood Alisa O'Hanlon City of Tacoma Justin.._ Leighton i Pierce Transit Briahna Taylor Gordon Thomas Honeywell Government Affairs Brian Zie Pierce County Charles Wittmann -Todd Emiko Atherton King County Julia Patterson's Office Elizabeth Albertson Kent City Council Lynda Osborn City of Algona Nancy Backus City of Auburn Rich Wagner City of Auburn Bill Pelota City of Auburn Keri Rooney i Pierce County Ann McNeil Sound Transit Pat McCarty Pierce County Executive RAMP Co -Chair David Hill SCATBd Chair Tom Pierson RAMP Co -Chair Tom Albro Port of Seattle Commissioner Chris Arkills King County Executive's Office Jeanne Burbidge City of Federal Way Elizabeth Albertson City of Kent Chris O'Claire King County Metro Paul Takamine King County Metro Tom Swanson City of Puyallup Rick Hansen City of Puyallup 46 SCATBd Meeting Minutes May ?O1? Page 9 WSDOT Pierce County Public Works Best Ways Transportation, Tacoma City of Sumner City of Sumner Maple Valley City Council Realtor City of Burien City of Federal Way Washinqton State Attorney General Port of Seattle 9 47 SOUTH COUNTY AREA TRANSPORTATION BOARD (SCATBd) MEETING Tuesday, June 19, 2012 9:00 11:00 a.m. SeaTac City Hall 4800 South 188 Street SeaTac It 1 11 1. Open Meeting Action 9:00 a.m. Introductions Approve summaiN- of May 2 joint SCATBd /RAMP Meeting* 2. Reports, Communications and Citizen Requests to Reports, 9:1t_) a.m. Comment Discussion, Chair or Vice Chair Action o SCATBd Dues Report Participant Updates from, RTC and Other Regional Committees Citizen Comment SCATBd 2(_)11 Progress Report* Action 3 Report on STP /CMAQ regional and countywide grant competition Peter Heffernan, King County Department of Transportation 4 PSRC report on economic and demographic changes that have taken place in the last decade Sean Ardussi, PSRC 5. SR 516 Corridor Planning Study Report Tom Washington. WSDOT Urban Planning Office *Attachment to agenda Report and 9:40 a.m. Discussion Report and 10:00 a.m Discussion Report and 1(_):3(_) a.m Discussion 48