HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOW 2012-10-08 Item 4C - Discussion - 42nd Avenue South Phase III Utility UndergroundingCOUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
Initials
Meeting Date
Prepared b
or's review
Council review
10/08/12
BG
Resolution
Mtg Date
Ordinance
Mtg Date
10/15/12
BG
Other
Mtg Date
SPONSOR Council Mayor HR DCD Finance Fire IT P&R Police PIV
SPONSOR'S Council is being asked to direct staff on undergrounding of 42 Ave S Phase III, from
SUMMARY Southcenter Boulevard to S 160 St. The current proposed budget does not include design
or construction costs for undergrounding 42 Ave S Phase III. Staff could negotiate a
project specific agreement with Seattle City Light that stipulates that utility
undergrounding costs for the 42nd Ave S Phase III project be rate based. At this time,
there are no other capital projects in the CIP that have undergrounding programmed.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 10/01/12 COMMITTEE CHAIR: ALLAN E EKBERG
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Public Works
COMMITTEE Committee recommends no underground; forward to C.O.W
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$1,822,000.00 $0.00 $1,822,000.00
Fund Source: 103 RESIDENTIAL STREETS (PAGE 2, PROPOSED 2013 CIP)
Comments:
MTG. DATE
RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
10/08/12
ITEM INFORMATION
ITEM NO.
4.C.
-W
STAFF SPONSOR: BOB GIBERSON
ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 10/08/12
AGENDA ITEM TITLE 42nd Ave S Phase III Utility Undergrounding
(Southcenter Blvd S 160 St)
CATEGORY Discussion
Mtg Date 10 /OS /IZ
Motion
Mtg Date 10/15/12
Resolution
Mtg Date
Ordinance
Mtg Date
.Bid Award
Mtg Date
Public.Heanng
Mtg Date
Other
Mtg Date
SPONSOR Council Mayor HR DCD Finance Fire IT P&R Police PIV
SPONSOR'S Council is being asked to direct staff on undergrounding of 42 Ave S Phase III, from
SUMMARY Southcenter Boulevard to S 160 St. The current proposed budget does not include design
or construction costs for undergrounding 42 Ave S Phase III. Staff could negotiate a
project specific agreement with Seattle City Light that stipulates that utility
undergrounding costs for the 42nd Ave S Phase III project be rate based. At this time,
there are no other capital projects in the CIP that have undergrounding programmed.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 10/01/12 COMMITTEE CHAIR: ALLAN E EKBERG
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Public Works
COMMITTEE Committee recommends no underground; forward to C.O.W
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$1,822,000.00 $0.00 $1,822,000.00
Fund Source: 103 RESIDENTIAL STREETS (PAGE 2, PROPOSED 2013 CIP)
Comments:
MTG. DATE
RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
10/08/12
10/15/12
MTG. DATE
ATTACHMENTS
10/08/12
Informational Memorandum dated September 28, 2012
42 Ave S Phase III CIP Page 2, Proposed 2013 CIP
42 Ave S Funding Fact Sheet
Minutes from the Transportation Committee meeting of 10/01/12
10/15/12
-W
I
ho ILM
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Transportation Committee
FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director IS
BY: Cyndy Knighton, Senior Engineer
DATE: September 28, 2012
SUBJECT: 42 Ave S Phase III (Southcenter Blvd S 160th SO
Project No. 99410303
Utility Undergrounding
ISSUE
Utility undergrounding as part of the 42nd Avenue S Phase III project.
BACKGROUND
In February 2012, CH2MHill was retained by the City to design the 42nd Avenue S Phase III project. Limits of this phase are
Southcenter Boulevard south to S 160 Street (southern City limits) and the road project includes the design of a failing culvert
over Gilliam Creek. The scope of work includes full design for both the roadway improvements and the culvert replacement, up
to and including support during bidding. The current scope and budget do not include the costs to convert overhead power and
phone lines to underground vaults. Optional tasks are included in the existing scope but additional budget will be needed to
complete the underground engineering. The estimated cost for the additional design for undergrounding is estimated at
$72,700.00.
DISCUSSION
One of the consultant's first order of work was to study the costs of the utility undergrounding so a decision could be made by
the City on whether or not to pursue utility undergrounding or leave the utilities above ground on aerial lines. Approximately
one -third of the project limits already have undergrounded utilities, which were completed by Sound Transit as part of the Light
Rail line construction.
Fiscal Impact: Design work for the roadway is budgeted in the
draft 2013 CIP at $650,000.00 (pg. 2). Design for the overhead
utility conversion will require additional budget. The road
construction budget is currently $2.9 M (shown in 2014,
including construction management). Undergrounding utilities
will require additional funds. Options for funding the
underground conversion include: (1) General fund; (2) Local
Improvement District; (3) Citywide Utility Rate basing; and (4)
Grants. If no undergrounding is pursued, the poles will still
need to be relocated but at Seattle City Light's expense.
Planning Level Cost Estimate
Roadway Construction
$2,790,000
Gilliam Creek Culvert
940,000
Sub -Total without
$3,730,000
Undergroundin
Utility Undergrounding
$1,750,000
Total Including
$5,480,000
Undergroundin
An LID would affect approximately 25 parcels, whereas citywide utility rate basing would allocate the costs to all residents and
businesses within Tukwila that are served by Seattle City Light. However, at this time utility rate basing is not available to
Tukwila unless the current franchise agreement is amended, a new franchise is negotiated, or a project specific project
agreement is negotiated. Many grant sources, such as the Transportation Improvement Board, disallow most or all of the cost
of utility undergrounding.
RECOMMENDATION
The Council is being asked to authorize staff to negotiate a project specific agreement with Seattle City Light that stipulates that
the utility undergrounding costs for the 42nd Ave S Phase III project will be rate based, and consider this item at the October 8,
2012 Committee of the Whole meeting and subsequent October 15, 2012 Regular Meeting.
Attachments: Draft 2013 CIP page 2
Overhead to Underground Relocation Cost Estimate Funding Fact Sheet
47
WAPW Eng \PROJECTS\A- RW RS Projects \42nd Ave S Phase 111 (99410303 94 -RS03) \INFORMATION MEMO Undergrounding Decision 9- 18.12.docx
CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY
2013 to 2018
PROJECT: 40 -42 Ave South (S 160 St S 131 PL) Project No. 99410303
DESCRIPTION: Design and construct street improvements, drainage, undergrounding, and driveway adjustments.
JUSTIFICATION: Provide pedestrian and vehicle safety, drainage, and neighborhood revitalization
STATUS: (Phase III (SIC Blvd (154th) S 160 St) $3m, Design in 20 12, construction in 2014. Project No. 94 -RS03
Phase I (SIC Blvd (154) S 144 St) $3,796, Completed. Project No. 90 -RW15
Phase II (S 144 St S 139 St) $1,850, Completed. Project No. 94 -RS02
Phase IV (S 139 St S 131 PI) $1 m in beyond. Project No. 94 -RS01
MAINT. IMPACT: Reduce pavement, shoulder, and drainage work.
COMMENT: Only Phase III is showing in active years. Design contract with CH2M Hill includes Surface Water's Gilliam Creek
42nd Ave S Culvert project (pg. 146).
FINANCIAL Through Estimated
tin 'snnn'cl 2n11 2n12 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 BEYOND TOTAL
EXPENSES
Phase IV
Design
9
391
250
650
Land(R/W)
100
100
Const Mgmt.
400
560
960
Construction
2,400
3,800
6,200
TOTAL EXPENSES
1 91
3911
250
1 2,900
1 0
1 0
1 01
01
4,360
1 7,910
FUND SOURCES
Awarded Grant
0
Proposed Grant
0
Motor Vehicle Tax
160
262
265
687
Mitigation Expected
0
City Oper. Revenue
9
231
(12)
2,635
0
0
0
0
4,360
7,223
TOTAL SOURCES
9
391
250
2,900
0
0
01
01
4,360
1 7,910
2013 2018 Capital Improvement Program 2
W
42nd Avenue S
Funding Fact Sheet
General Fund
The general fund would be responsible for the entire $1,750,000 undergrounding costs.
Local Improvement District
A local improvement district could be formed for all Specially Benefitted parcels. In this case, the
assumption is approximately 25 parcels would receive special benefit by the undergrounding. All
parcels are zoned either for single family (LDR) or multi family (HDR).
Assumptions
All parcels share in bi
Undergrounding cost
LID Formation cost
LID Bonding cost
irden equally
$1,750,000.00 Interest Rate 5%
$105,000.00 Amortization 15 years
$140,000.00 Parcels 25
$1,995,000.00
LID Cost Per Parcel $115,321.72 (estimate)
LID Cost Per Parcel Per Year $7,688.11
City -wide Rate basing
If an LID is formed to underground the overhead utilities, a surcharge rate is added to all electrical bills w
Assumptions
Residential Meters
Commercial Meters
Industrial Meters
Large General Service Meters
Annual amoritized cost
Cost per kilowatt hour
Average residential
Total residential
Average non residential
Total non residential
4,748
804
16
64
$124,167
$0.00021556
Interest Rate
Amortization
2013 MWH
Average kWh cost
18,500 kWh per year
87,838 MWH per year
552,249 kWh per year
488,188 MWH per year
Average Annual Costs Per Meter Total
Residential $3.99 $18,934
Commercial $119.04 $105,233
5%
25 years
576,026 (projected)
$0.06
6/11/12
i
50
Transportation Committee Minutes October 1, 2012 Page 2
B. Utility Undergrounding: 42 Avenue South Phase III
This item was originally heard by the Transportation Committee in January (see Transportation
Committee minutes dated January 17, 2012), when staff sought approval to award a consultant contract
for design of 42nd Avenue South Phase III. Although the project design scope did not include
undergrounding, the consultant analyzed the cost of conversion to undergrounding. Staff is returning to
Committee with the results of this analysis, and seeking direction from Council whether or not a project
specific agreement with Seattle City Light should be negotiated stipulating undergrounding costs which
would be rate -based to the customer.
The estimated costs to design undergrounding are $72,700, and the actual undergrounding is estimated to
cost $1.75 million. This would bring the project total to $5.48 million as compared to $3.73 million
without undergrounding. Staff gave an overview of options that could pay for the undergrounding,
including: general fund monies, a local improvement district, or utility rate basing.
Discussion ensued among the Committee Members about undergrounding utilities and the current City
policy for such. In the end, the Committee determined that in consideration of all the factors of this
specific project, including costs and undergrounding in the neighboring jurisdiction, it would not be
prudent to underground utilities on this project. They also conveyed the importance of having full Council
review the current undergrounding policies for the City in order to determine policy applicability i
today's economic times. The Committee recognizes two separate issues and recommends the following:
Recommends not undergrounding utilities on Phase III of the 42 n Avenue South Project
Recommends conducting full Council review of current City undergrounding policies, and
update and /or modify as appropriate
Although the Committee is urging Council review of the current utility undergrounding policies, a full policy
discussion does not necessarily need to take place at the October 8 COW. The discussion could take place as
part a 2013 Council work item /plan. SEE SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS BULLETED ABOVE.
FORWARD TO OCTOBER 8 COW FOR DISCUSSION.
III. SCATBd
Due to a scheduled Executive Session beginning at 6:30 p.m., the Committee did not have time to discuss SCATBd.
INFORMATION ONLY.
IV. MISCELLANEOUS
Meeting adjourned at 6:25 p.m.
Next meeting: Monday, October 15, 2012 5:15 p.m., Conference Room #1
Committee Chair Approval
Minutes by K.AM. Reviewed by GL.
51