The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCOW 2012-10-08 Item 4A - Grant Application - Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian-Bicycle Bridge for $6,870,000 (20% City Match)COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS In 11116 Is • Meeting Llan Prepared by MIr r ret Caranci I rav�iau, 08/271/12 BG ..o.oaf 66123/12 10 /0 8/12 BG ❑ Oraitiarici Nkg Dale ❑ _ilia / 2vlar6 MIIg Llate ❑ Mullis Hearing Mtn Llaala ❑ Other NISI Llata CATECICIRII @ Discum,ion @ Mai Dani Mtg SIIICINSCIR ❑ Counlcil ❑ Mkj oil ❑ Adrn ,Blass ❑ DCLI ❑ Firlcnce ❑ Fire ❑ LlgaiI ❑ P&RI ❑ Ilolace @ AW SIIICINSCIR'S Council is being asked lc approve a grant application lc tH a WSIDO71 Regia nal Mc blilityj SUMMARII Grant Plrogram k r the llukwila Urban C enter Aedestrian) Bicylole Bridge. Stall props sesi applying k r a grant of1$6,870,000 and committing a 210% match iIrom city c perating revenues and pank impact Hees. ITEM INFORMATION ITEMNa, CA 9 NUMBER: .I'IAFIF NIACINSCI t BCH GIE EIRISCIN ORIGIINALAGEN EIA DATE: 08/22)12 AGENDA ITEM TITLE llukwila Su limit Urtlan Center Pedestrian) Bicycle Bridge WSDO1I Regic nal Grant Program Alpplication 66123/12 Miami Daaki 10/68/12 ❑ Ae.i iit tiotl Mi Da1ki ❑ Oraitiarici Nkg Dale ❑ _ilia / 2vlar6 MIIg Llate ❑ Mullis Hearing Mtn Llaala ❑ Other NISI Llata CATECICIRII @ Discum,ion @ Mai Dani Mtg SIIICINSCIR ❑ Counlcil ❑ Mkj oil ❑ Adrn ,Blass ❑ DCLI ❑ Firlcnce ❑ Fire ❑ LlgaiI ❑ P&RI ❑ Ilolace @ AW SIIICINSCIR'S Council is being asked lc approve a grant application lc tH a WSIDO71 Regia nal Mc blilityj SUMMARII Grant Plrogram k r the llukwila Urban C enter Aedestrian) Bicylole Bridge. Stall props sesi applying k r a grant of1$6,870,000 and committing a 210% match iIrom city c perating revenues and pank impact Hees. REIIIEWELI HY ❑ COWI Mtgl. ❑ C A&P Cm to ❑ F&S C rrl l e ❑ U tiE t es Cm to ❑ Ari s C amm. ❑ Parks Comm. DIATB: 08/20 )12 COMMITTEE! C HAIR AIJ LAN / 1 'I rar sr artation C ril l e l ❑ Plan ring Comm. EKBERCI RECOMMSNDIAT11CNS: SACIN SC IR/ADMIN. COMMITTEE Public We rks Rorward to Committee oflthe Whsle for discussion. COST IMPACT) FUND SOURCE F1) PEN IIITURE RE( UIRED AMOUN1 BUDC ETED AAPRC ARIATION RE( UIRED $0.0 0 $ C .00 $0.00 Fund Source!: 1104 ARTEIRIAIII SITREIEIT RI. ND AND 301 PARK IIMPAC1I MS (PAGE 12, PIRCIPCISED 2013 CIPI) Comm n is: MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 08) 27/12 Rorward to the 10)8 112 Ccunoil meeting. 1C)08) 12 MTG. DA71E ATTACHMENTS 08/27/12 Informational Memorandum dated August 17, 20112 Page 112, Props sed 2C 13 C IP Minutes from Ole Transportation C on mittee meeting c f C8/20/12 10)0/3)12 Informatic nal Memorandum dated October 3, 20112 win attalcH menta 2 City of Tukwila J:m HlaggEMon, Mayo INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM 110: Mayor Haggerlon City Cc unciil FROM: Bab C iberson, RL blici %forks Director Derel Speak, Bcc nc rn is Develc pmenl Adrr inistual c r I7 ATE: Octobeu 3, '1012 SUBJECT: llukwiila Unbars Center RErdestrian-Bicrycla Midge ISSUE At ih€i City Cat. nail's Committee of the W I-cile meErling an Aug' st 27, th e Council negL esiec ac ditional inllcuimation relaiec to the City's crgportt. nity to apply fou a State guani to Flt. rcih ase land and cicrnsiruci the llLkwila L rban Center pedesinian-bicycle bridge. Th is memo is intendec to rpm ide 11 a1 information. BACKGROUND llhe 1IL k wile U rban Center IITU C) AEic est nian-Biay cl€i Bridge pinojeci was finst is entiilied as cine cd the key ciaialyst pincrjecis 11cni th e 11UC duning six publics wonkshogs heft in 2CICI3. Th e llukwila Uutan Clenter chagien oil th e ClomprehensNe Plan calls ilor "high. quality inansil and pecEIstrian facilities, llacILsing on meeting strong cionnections between Ire TUC CICIIIEI anc the Sounden commuter nail/Amtrak station." llhe tuidge woulc enhance the Mall to Station link, leveraging the Mall, kwila 1luansil Center and Scat. nden Station investments 10 pinomote high er intensity uec evelopmeni. 111- a bnic ge project I -as been included in the CIi1y's Capital Improvement Rrognam (CIA) since 2006. In 201'1 the City completed 11- El Ty qe, Size, anc L crciai ion study and it' El City Council approved the conceptual design and location. Design is well L nderway and IL Ily IL nc ed and shoulc meal- 30% eacih30% cicrmpletion in January 2CI13 and llirial design in late 2013. If funding wiEire a%ailat le, land acigt. isition coulc start in 2013, ciansinuction ciould start in 2014, and the projecii ciould be ciompleIElc as early as 2015. A projecit t udget is attach- ed fon* Er imposed 0013-20'1E1 CIIP.1II- a cunnent expendiiunes are Eisi1imated al $1 CI.218 rri illion. Of that, approximately $1.6 m illion is for c esign, 11.1 million is fon land acquisition, and $7.485 million is for cioristruciion. It is perssit le that WEI construction contingency cost estimates coy Id k e uec L tied as more c esign work is completed. In ions oil projecit func ing, the proposed 2013-18 CIA nEIIIEIcls a guard oil $1.496 million which the City was alneac y awauc ed from Fedenal funds. The proposed bL c get also anticipates) $1,042,CI00 to ciorrEl from City crperaling revenue, 11810,0001hiom 11 -El pinks impact fees, anc $0.81 million lhicrm additional grants. The City has an opportunity to apply llcrr a W SD011 Regional Mot ility Clrani toward 11- e 11E1.9E15 million in lanc acigiisiiion and cionsi11cition phaiEis shown in the kpicrposed CTIA in 20'14-19. 3 4 IN RC RMATIC NAL M BM C Page 2 BEraaL se this is a Stale fi nding soy uce, the City c'or. Id aai ni part alit El $1.49€I milliori federal 111- rid guard toward rrSEiiir'g the grant mato- ing reqiiremeni; 1 owever, iri stairs opinion 11 -El application would not k EI competitive wilt out a higt er match aoril nit L liar'. In order) lci k EI aomrleliliNJEl for the grant, ite Clily would need to provide a match oil greaten )tan 20% 011 ite total needed Ili rids. For the $8.585 rr illion cd Ili rids needed, stall recommends the City commit $1,715,000 oil Icrc'al funds and apply for a grant oil $6.87 million. Elven if we apply Ian anc receive it is guarri, we will ciorilir'ue 10 monitor for' additional grant °mark, r'iiies wt ich clay' k e used 10 rediae 1te Clily's gene"al func contribution to the 11 -EI grunt application is di El ori Oatoben 10, 2(112. The City reeds 10 decide wtelter to apply Ian it e grant anc , i1l so, for wt al am our't. 11111- e C Hy is awarded and accepts tt e grant, it e C fly woulc need to decide ori 1t e soL Has of the mala- ing func s. DISCUSSION Beneiilits The main pi uperse of the proposec p€ic esiniar'-bicycile bridge is to enable people to walk between Baker Bok, le\ and arid Wesi Valley Higt way, resulting iri a 15 minute walk from the nden coma ler' rail station to Bak EDI Boulmand. This pedestrian-iluiendly distance is cmiliaal if the City wants 101 aN,El new condominiums, apauiments, and offices between it e Green Rivers and Westfield SoulI-miniau. With the bridge, an officio basec blsir'ess located ori Baker Btu levard could market itself as walkak le 10 it e aommuter Trail station and tap ir'ia the employment kasEI between Tukwila anc Tacoma. A similanly located condominium on apartment built ing could market itself as walkak le 101t a commuter Trail station lor' a 15 minute train ride and walk 10 it e office builc ings in downtown Seattle. In adc ii ion 10 it e Fly re nledesiuian lur'atior'ality, 1t e k uidge provides a crIEIC ibl€i conr'EICIlior' to the comrr Lien rail station wt ich climates a positive perception and represents the Tukwila L iik an Center core as a speaial place. A111-a� gh 1 -EI King CoLr'tyj Mai no bus SEIRICIEI arid future transit ciente!' on Andover Ralik West provide gooc transit conned ions, wilt out a short walk to the commLler) rail station, it is cit allarrging to affect iNJely market the area as transit ouienied. lit e blici perception of a transit oriented neige borhooc is rr i at stronger' with a commulEui rail station than 'Rs service alone. In adc iiion oil increasing the mark eta ility of a r'eighba" t ood, the walkability anc amoi ni of transit in a neigh k ort ood clan deduce 1 he developm ent costs by "educing 11- e am cu ni of parking necessary for new niicijecls. lite cost savings is especially iri portant ill we want citta paci development using silk, atured or c r'dergroL r'c pauk ing sir'ae that style oil developrr Err'1 is so expensive. The currently vacant Circuit C iiy 5i1E1 is one example of these potential benefits. llhe retail built ing has sat aciar'1 since Circuit Cil went k ankrupt in 2009. llhe current owner of 11 - property has a a-aiae cd re -tenanting 11 -Er existing bLildir'g on consinicitir'g somelt ing new. He is a�'u'ar'1ly evaliaiir'g the IlElasibiliiy oil cor'strucilir'g a 49(1 k, nil building comprising short stay t olel looms, e) ler'c ed stay t oiel looms, arid apart mer'ts. As showy' in the attached analysis, 1t a new c eN, elopmer'1 would generale over' $60 millicrr' cd consul, citior' anc properly N,alue mcu'e than simply r'e-tenanting the spate. As aomnlared to re -tenanting 11- e species with a n€ilailer, tt e c eN, elopmer't would generale at least $2 million all additional one lirr a peumit fees, irr pad lees, arid taxes and $100,00a of ac ditional annual la) for the City of Tukwila. The bridge itself is riot a giaranlEle that chis partici lar) development will pliocieed; howEl\Er', it makes the development lin a- more feasik le, particularly the residential compor'Err'1. 11111 e pr'aperly is ne-tenar'iec as W:\De rel\TUCI Ped Bike Bridge\TUCI Ped Bridge Memo V4.daax INRORMA1IIONAL MBMO Page 6 retail, ii will likely be lied L p as it al use ilor' lilteen years ar more. 111 the Cliiy bor'r'owec against the annL al 1a)EIs dLEI to the addiiiar'al develoklrrEErl1 liar fifleEErl yeans, ii could generale applicD irr aieiy $1.2 rr illion in c ebt issuance capacity, what is rr ore 11- an the City's nnarlosed $11.042 million of match ing geriElnal funds. 11 is irr portant is r'oie 1t al at this lime we do not know if the Cincuii City re-developrr ent will rr ove lorwanc and wt ell- or the bridge is 11 -EI deier'rr ining factor. We also do riot, and plot al: ly will not, have a clam mita aril it al if the bridge is consi'IL clled, Thai 11 -EI CinaLii City site, ar any other si1EI, will r'edEo\eiop. HowElvell, stafil belie\es the bridge will significar'ily increase the pr'otabiliiy and qualify of fuil.IIEI dEl\Edoprr ent kE11wEIE111the comrrllen rail siaiicir' and 1hEi rr all. lit e Clircuit Ciiy si1E1 is just one a ample. AI low others exarr pies are: (I) During the Circuit Cliiy bankruptcy anc pnicm to the property k Eiing purchased by 11- EI ac rrEini owrlElr, Ec'ar'omic ❑ENEllopment stallf worked wilt a senior hosing developer who put an offer ori the property. llhat c evelopEln expressed sinong IC11EIIIEls1 in 11- El Ionic ge. (12) Fliiior toil -El 2C109 IElciElssiarl, E aonomic ❑EI\Ellopmerlt stafil had spoked with oil- er mulii- ilamily hoL sing developers who expressed sinor'g ir'iEIIIEist in ff i 111. C c1011EI anc the k ridge. (13) Currently, a ml. iii-lamily hoLsirlg c evelopen has expressed siror'g ir'ienest wilt Washir'gicir' Fedenal, the owner al part of the vacant pnoFlerty north 0111- comrr user nail siatior' (on it e north sidEl of L cir'gacres Bogy levardj 10 build new apart m anis. If 11- ai developer sees a commitment anc centair'ty to aampleie the bridge in a timeluarrEl that rr ak EIS theirs propenty more attracii\ a to highs' ir'c'ome tenants, 1l- e c e\ eloper wog Id be ellen able to increase 11 -El IEIEISEI nates and c'ansiruct a higher qi ality project. (4) llhe lorrr Ell! Texaco station on Andover Rank E ass al ill. k wila Flarkway is vacant property and 11- EI Ionic ge Gould affect the desir'ak ility anc qi ality of lIL 1 urie developrr ent of 11 -al property . 15) llhe Helen Nelsen lluL st Kluaperty has scimEl uric erL 1 ilized properly k eiween 11 - historic' h ouse and 1t e ni\EW which coulc k El dEe\eloped with iawnhouses, cor'c os, or senior' apartm anis. ill- e k uidge woulc enak le it Eli develarlmE'ni to affer a walk able experience 10 it a Clreen Riven flail, transit center on Alr'c o‘ or Rank Wesi, Bak or BoulEi\ arc , and the mall. llh ere are some addii icir'al benefits. Basec ori Public' Wanks stafil analysis, it e k uidge can reds c'e vehicilEl miles traveled (VMT] k y appncD imaiely 667,192 in the lint yeah afiEui corr pletir'g th e k ridge. Fewer vehicilEl trips may also improve the le\el of ser iiciEi on sur'roL r'c ing sineEiis. In start the pedestrian-bik EI br'ic ge is critical if the City war'is 10 encoL nage h igh qualify, new multi-11arrily an rr ulti-siany "class A" office developmer'1 in 11-e TUC acII'EI. It is the moll significar'1 rerr air'ir'g public' ir'frasiuLatm project necessary is enable 1t e TUC core to ilLr'c'iior' as a ir'ar'sii- orier'iec , walkak le neigh k ort ood. L r'1 it this project has certainty, new develcFlmenl will k e likely is k El more of the same th at is in place today. Parks Impact Fetes llh e Ranks Irr pact Fee program QOuc inar'c'e 236E1) pr'ojec'ts 118 million of 'uric ing 11cm lour nIIcijecis, inclL c ing $2 million fora 11- EI TUC k ridge project. Of the $8 million, 20°k is k udgeted lo come ilr'om aiiy ger'eual fur'c s anc 80°%o, which equals $6.4 million, llncim Hees on new de\elopment. llhus, cil ih a 110 million llor the 11L bridge showy' in the FlE'rks Impact Fee program, $1.6 rr illion is projected io come lr'om lees on new developmElr'1. Only $E110,000 oil that is cu rIiElnily reflected W:\Derek\TUC Ped Bil E ridge'TUCI Ped Bridge N amo4.docn 5 6 IN RO RMATIC NAL M UMC PIsig6 4 in the pnoposEId'1013-18 CIR due to t, ricIEIrtairiiy ovElr the availability oil funds. W Fen ii was ac opted, those 1Ic rids WEIIIEI giicrjecdE'c to k e aollectEIc ci\En' a twelve year period. Since if e program's inception in 2009,11 -El eaonomy and development have been slow such if at jL st o\ Ern $220,000 of the $6.4 million has been receivec . Thai $220,000 has been spent ion tF e ❑� warmish F ill preserve. Ali it is time, due to the economy, sialf c oes not have a higl degree cd ciorilic ence I l- al if El im flacii flees planned lion i F e identified projeats will be rEIaElived by if El time the projeats are needy to go. Fon all of the projects iri the parks Impact Fee pnoguam, 11 -El City will neec to c ecide whether id bannow funds io be rElpaic later' when impact fees are received. If the Ciiy coes not want io issue debt to be nEipaid llnom il-El imrlac'1 lees, 11- en i1 will need id prioritize wF ich projeat aan dnaw upon the impact fees. Rnaparty As'sessm'ent District CIiliEII l- a\ El the legal ac 1l- aniiy id create kpicrperty assessment districts io fL nd portions o1I pc k Iic inlluasiructc re p iicrjecis. 1I1- e Cliiy recently dic this ilcm tF e Sat il-aenien AciciEiss project (IKlickiiati . We woulc neEld to perform additional research io determine i1I this project wog Id be eligible anc cost effect i% El to implement a p IicIgerty assessment c isinicit. Financing If the City accepts the grant, we woulc neEld to determine the best way to klro% fide 1 F EI Cliiy matching funds lon both the Ciiy general openaiing nevem E' anc the panks imklacii 11EIes. 11 is passible 1 F e City woulc I a\ EI suflliciient capacity in a\ ailak le fir, ric k alance. The City coy Id also bcnmcrw the 11L rids. If the City issL ec general obligation bonds, the annL al interest rate way Id be approximately 3% kasEld cm a recent qL o1EI for a fifteen yeah boric for the MEIiroklolitan Rark District. If the City wene to apply and be approved 'kris a loan from the E1ate's RL blia Wanks Trust Fund, the interest nate woulc be approximately 1%. W E' believe 11- is pucrjeci wog Id k E' likely 10 be approved Hort a RL blia Wonks Trust Fc nd loan, F owever, we won't know until early 201 c1 if the State IElgislaiune appnopnia1EIS money 110111E El Anagram. The City currently l- as sof iaient c ebt limit capacity id IISL a the debt, especially as we are sal - EIC uled to pay oft existing boric Ei oven 1l- El rEI) 1 1Eiw years. Oppc rl unity Closts L nless the City is awaudEld ac ditional guanis, receives 1IL II parks impact lees for this project, on implements an aliennative source oil matching funds such as an assessment district, in orders io meet 11 -El metal- ing 1IL rid i€iquinement for the grant, the City woulc l- a\ El to cont uibute approximately $1 million of general 1IL nds arid possibly in1EmEIsi. 11 not for this project, those funds coulc be used llor other city purposes si al- as oft er aakliiai irrmpro\ errant pnojElciis or operating aosis. Typically with capital projeats of a regional signilliaanaEl, tF e aiiy's IL rids ane metal- EId 4:1 anc thus "leverage" 1Iederal or state funcs. For example, $800,CI00 cal date or Federal funds can be metal- ed io $2C10,CI00 al local 11i nds fon a $1 million projeat. orrnEI capital pucIjecls, sL al- as riesicElntial sidewalks, are Lnlikely to neaei\e State on Federal matching funds since il-EIy do not of or regional transportation kElnefits. The cosi of construciing now residential sidewalks depends on many facious si ah as how mmuah land is aagL ired, topography, pavement condition, enc ergrounding oil utilities, and oil- or facious. $1 million would iypiaally pay ion 5001 to 8(10 feet of new "Elsidential sidewalks. WADI re;qua Ped Bike Bridge\TUCI Ped Bridce Menta Vd.docx INFIORNATICNAL MBNC Page 5 Other Considerations Even if the City applies 'Ian anc is awaridec the grant, it is not IErquirled to acicept 11 -El gnarls. If 11-E1 Cily is awarded tt e granl it clot Id c ecide whether' lo accept ii. Not acicIEINliirlg i1, I crwever, coulc affect tt a City's ability to gel 11h li ne griarits. Staff rlecommends it al we Ell- ould only apply for ihEl gnaril if we aliEe willing to acicIEINli it arid commit the matching func s. 11 is important to note that ii is c ifflicull lo priediai whetr er ihenEI will k e future grant ft. nding opportunities ilcui prlo,jErats all 11- is type. WSDOT neclei\ ad the ft. nding from the FedEnial government. H iri the 1Lture 11-E1 Federal govennmenl sees less neec to prcr%ide infrasinLclture stimuli s funds, gneaierl need 1cr fund mlaintenarlclEl anc replaclemlErnl of Ery isting inllnastruclL 11E1, or nElduces total infrasinLcture llurlc ing in order lo reduce 11 e Federal debt, lhis fi nding may not be availak le. Decision Options llhe City's k asic ci crines ane tcr: (1) No1 si bmil tr e granl request. (2) Submit ihEI grant uErquest anc, if awauc ed ihEI gnarls, then decide WI" EIltErr to acicIErpl it. (3) Submit 1hEr grlarll vaguest at a neck clad level, such as fora property acgiisilion. (4) Submit 1hEr grlarll vaguest for the Ili II amount needed ($6.87 million; . In choices 3 and 4, tt e implication is Thai ill tr e grant is awandErc ,ire Clily woulc acicepl il. At that lime tI e Cily can mall El the sgleaillia dErclision on I- ow 10 prlovidEl financing. Staff supports the vision of a tuarlsil-cniiented, walkable aommi pity iri tt e clorEI of ihEI ih Nwila L uban Center arid sEIEIEs tr is as a key project. Althougt initially 11- are me oggorti rlily costs ICI providing the matching func s far the grant, we beliEe\ El the bridge will speed up lh El gaciEl of c evelogmenl and 11' a nEiNdens es from futi re riew c evelopmenl will more It an offset tt e costs. We reaommlErrld tiglian #4. RECIOMMEN DATION llhEI Coy, riciil is k Ering asked lo appnona submittal of lt Er 1IV S ❑Olt Regional Mobility grant fora $6,870,000 million arid cicnsider chis item al 11-e OctobEru 8th, 2(112 Committee dig e Whole meeting and Ocicrber EI, 2012 F. pecial Meeting. ATTACH M EI N iiS Informational Memoranda m Dated Pig' s1 17, 2(112 Rage 12, Proposed 20'13-0(118 Capital Imlppmemerll Rucrgrarn QCIR; Minutes from the llransportation Committee meeting of 8/20/12 Ranks Impact Fee Ordinance #2366 Circuit Clit9 HE! Development Reveni e Analysis Letlen of Supgcrrl lriom Embassy SLiies Calalysl Map of It Er Ti kwila Urban Cenlen W:\Derek\TU( I Ped Bil e Bridge'TUCI Ped Bridga N emo '4.doax 7 8 CA of Tukwila INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM 10: Maya Fagglerton lnanspclrlalicin Ccimmittee Ii1FICIM: Bah Gibenscin, Ruh lic Works Director Bti: CyncNKnighton, Senior Bngineen DALE: August 117, 20'12 SU ELIECIT: lukvlila Urtan Cell len Pec esilnianiBicvcle Bnicge Pioject Nci. 905/10403 Wti1D01 Regional Mobility Gnarl' Pragnam Application ISSl B Submit gnanl application io the VI EIDOT Region al Mobility F nognam floe the Tl CI F edeisirian IBicyclei Biidgel. Jim Haggari on, Maya! BACKGROUND The WSDO1 Regional Mobility Gianl F nognam t as a curnent call kin applications, which ane dt a cin October '10, 20'12 but the pnaceiss includes earl) Iieview and approval o11 a se'ation al 11 el g pant which is duel Eleipiembeii 14, 2012. the Eianly submittal cifl the ccimple)i Vehicle Mile Tnavel (VMTI) neduction and Vehicle lime (VT) reduciicni calculations 'equine that wool on the giant applicaiicin muss begin earlier than naiimal. SIafI is pnoposing submitting Ikir R.O.W. and construction phases cin It 1L CI Pedesiniari/Eliatcle Bnidge project. lukwila was s uccesslully awarded a Regional Mobility Giant 'Ion the lul v ila leansit Centel and remains in good standing with ti e granting agency. Staff submitted a grant application through th e u<SDO1 Pedestnian and Bicycle puognan fol the 11.0.W. phase in ,lune, 2012. 11 eie wane 170 ap plications ieaeived flan tl El approximate $8 millian available state-wide and it is nal yet known ifl lukwila will be s (icceIssftll in this i ighly competitive program. The Flegional Mobilitl Gnarl Pnognam is expected ta have about $40 million availat le state-wide. DISCUSSION Design is underway bn the 1L CI Redeisirian Bnidge and a naw cost estimate based on 30% engineering will be available' in October. Tie CIA cuniiently a ows ti el need ton $7,485,000 in constnuciion lunding, which is based cin intkirmation from the Typo, Sizes, and Location Report, finalized in 20'11. 1h ei new .10'13 CIIR sheet will t ei updated once' the most recent inhumation is necEiived and the 'nal giant request will be updated to nefleat the more curien t cosi eslimate prian to submittal. The TUC Redestrian Bnidge equines acquisition of one Ilull properly (Nelsen pnoperly) and a parial acquisition, including 27 panking stalls, all a second properly (Riveniiev F laza). Flenma nent easements tom Seattle Public L Ries are also expected. Estimated ccist be acquiring ti is . is $1,100,000. the 2012 CIR sh earl 1 as only $100,000.00 km R.O.W., which was a places olden until mone inhumation was known on the actual nee ds. Match is Required km these giants, with ti e minimum al 20%. Unlike most gnant souices, previous expenditunes and staff salaries can be used as match. Ill the two grana Requests are successful, the funds cannot be used as matal ta each othen, but other Iledenal giant flunds alieady avoided Ion the design can. 11 success'lul, flunds would be available in June, 2013. Rhase City Responsibility Park Impact flees Amandec Giants Gnanl . Request Total Amount Design $ '102,000 1 35,000 $1,49( ,000 $ 0 $ '1,633,000 ROW 230,000 810,000 '1,100,000 Clansllnuclkin 710,000 775,000 6,000,000 7,i 85,000 Total $1,042,000 $ 810,000 $1,496,000 $6,870,000 $'10,1'18,000 Match Percentage '10'h 8', 15%a 67% 100% RBCIOMME NDAllICIN Counail is being asked to app nom tl e submission of a giant application to the V13DOT Flegional Mobility Grant Riogiiam km tie 1ILC RedesInianIBicycle Elnidge in the amount all $6,870,000 with a minimum 20%I kcal match, and considen this item at tt e Plugusi 27, 20'12 Committees al the Whole and subsequeni 3epiembei 4, 201 Reg ulai meeting. Attaahment: CIIP sheet W:1PW Eng\PRO IECTSV - R W 8 RS Projents\'Il C F Bicycle Bridge (9(1910401)\Grants \INFO N EMO W9 DOT Regional Ma bilitti Gra nt App Et g.dacx 9 CITY OHTIUKWILACAFITALPFICJECTSUN MAP Y 201131 to 21218 PROJECTI: Tlukwila Urban Center - PEIdclsl rie r ABicycle BI idge OBEICRIPTIOI : Canslrual a new pedEISIniandbicycle bnidgEi en the GIreEIn Ri%Ell. ,IUSTIHICAl110N: Fledeestrialn/bicycle conned neian betweenTukwila' 9UrbanCentei and co 9u ca arts local and nenquails ciails and poIIaIEIS re �Irdinglanc u rtati n Centel. Fledeslrian Sys IElm Repan idElnlitlied the optimal locati•, � too..• be sciulh cif the BElsl STA TL S: Western Hotel. llyge, Eliza, and IlocEitian REipertwEis ci `•l;et in 2:111. Council apppci%ed a c eisign all a Min- lied aluch 11 midge with nci accorrimcidalior fciii a fut'.o'e bridge c rcssing cis• en Weis Valley Highway. NAZI T. IMPACT: lc be delEinmined. FrcjEIcl No. 9(1910403 9Ia1Ei EnharlaEimEird desk n gnanl iloil $19CIk and liransit Cuieri1eid DEN elcipmE ni (ICD1 planning grant oil 1199k CION MENT: State EnhancemerIt c nanl cd 115C15k and FledEuial CM AQ grant cif 19(I,E133 fan limit cesicIn. larcifEIc1 is ar nark Impaal Flee list with tlundinc oil 112 millian with an EI(1%/2(I1/4 spill. FINANCIAL Thraugtl 9stimallEid in. 000's 2011 210121 21013 2014 21015 Ale 21(1171 21018 BEYC NCI TOTAL E'XPENSES Desic n 2167 984 3821 1,(133 Land (RM.') 1,10(1 1,'I(ICI Cor st. Mgm1. 1,(Ia(1 1,a(1a CansInuctian 6,485 5,4E1E1 110TAL BXREls 999 2(171 984 382 11,100 7,485 (1 a a 0 101,218 Hl ND SOURCE'S Awanded Giiant 245 93a 321'1 '1,49EI Pecpased Gnanl EI7C1 6,(10(1 6,87(1 Miligatiari Actual (I Hank Impaal REies E'xpected 39 Eia E189 f1'I(I Clity Open. RElver UEI 2121 `.4 216 1, a EIOCI CI a 0 CI 1,(142 11O1AL SCIURCES 2E11 9E14 3E12 1,'1(10 7,485 a a 0 a 10,21'IEI 2013 2018 Carinal Improvement Pro jam 10 12 1-441[74-1,.--- � pJ/4'y 1J1 e,-_ Iyi TRANSPORIIIATION COMMITITIEE Meielir g Mint 1cis Abgu112(,2(ILI— I:J Ip.n.—CcnferenciRiccm#1 City of Tuhlu; ila Tran spor tation C omrr ittee HR ESHN1I C auncilmembens: Allan Ekberg, C Hair; IJalhy 1-Iauglardy zinc ❑e'9eian Quinr Staff: David Clinic', Bol: CiUerscn,Frank 'nix eiand Rutin Tisehmak Guest: CHuak Alarmist. CADE 110 ORDER: The meeting was called tc crc er a t l: ] _`I p .rr . I. PRDIENTATICINS - Nc crew talicir's. Il. BIUSINH95I A C E NDA A . W 9L1OT Rleigianad N cbility G ran : TUC Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge Staff is seeking Commitee arpravad 10 apply for the WasHrgtan Slate Llepartmem al Transparaian 1IW9DOT) Regional Nobility Cnanl fon right-cf-way anc cor stn. clicn plasm cif the Tukwila Whin Center Pedestnian/E icyc le Bridge prc; ect. The total grar1 vaguest waulc Hea ir the amoun of 916,817CI,C10(I, and requires a minimum 20% City match. 'Re Committee c iscussed cor Germs rcigardir gl the amour 1 cif C ity matchinEi funds fcir 1 he gear 1, a nd 11 ei amaunl cf effcirt reiquired to ciaic dale the Vehicel Mile Travel (VMT; anc Vehicel 'llimei (VT' red'. clic n calculations. WiiIlcul ccncerns this applicaticr wculd usually le alpnoveid fon submission by tiles Cammitlee; [1aweven, the Ccimmineei wc uld like to mavei tI is forward 10 flail Ccunc11 fbr discussior duel la the cor cams all ave. FORW ARD 110 A UGUS11 211 CONN FOR DISCUSSICIN. H. TUC Tnansil Centel — Sc pplemer lal A graerrienl 1\' o. !I Staff) is secikinEi Council applrcval for the Supplemental Agraemert Na. 15 wit) IBI Cuoup fbr ai new scope and fee lhzt ac dresses acditional utility canflicl resoluIlani fathcling, minor lie-dasilin ftr conflict nein dutiom, ad ditior al right -aft way acqu isitian servic es and ac ditior al suiveiy walk far 111e Tnansil Colter ir the amour' of13165,SI710. UNANIMOUS APPRICIMAII. flORWARU TO AUGUSTI 21 CICIW FOR DISCUSSION. C. A nc aver Palk Wast S Ineeit Widening — 9u pplemental A greemenit No. 1 Staff is seeking Cauricil approval fan the SuPFI1emental Agleiament No. 1( with :IBI Clot fou a rem scapci and file shat addresses additional utility canflicl resolution polhcding, mina' re-cesi€in for conflict resalutioni, additional right -cif way acquisition services an additioral sunvay wouk fcir ltle Anidavcir Park W wi Sired Wic ening ir the amou nt cif) 3 8(,4 5(1. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL!. FORW AP 1 110 AUGUST 21 COW FOP DIICIUSSION. III. 9C A1IHd 1\o discussian het( . INFORMATICIN CINL' 1I. IV. M19CIEDLA NEOU9 Committee Chair Ekberg menlianed that the brush in the mac ian an nartHbaunc 9R -59S1 jusl north of lhei hridgle Giver 1-5 appears 1a hci a hinc lance to the sight distance for nartUbounc vehicles. Bab Gibersan will forward this on 10 the WSDCT mak tenancci affica fcui review and raspanse. 11 12 City of Tukwila Washington C rdinance N cI. o AN C RDINANCIB OR 111- E CIITY CIO U N CIU CFI THE CITY CR TUKWILA, WASIHIN G T1C N, REPEALING ORDINAN CIE NC. 2220, AS CODIRIED IN TUKWILA MU N ICIIRA L CODE (TMC) CHARTER 16.28; REENACTING TMC CIHAP118R 18.38, "PARKS IMRACI 1 BEES," 110 AMEN( THE PROCESS ROR IMRCSING AND ADMINISTERING PARKSI IMPACT' FEES TC BETTER ADDRESS THE NATURE CR DEVELCRMBNT ACTIVITY IN TUKWILA; RRCVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY'; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFIRECTIV 8 DATE. WHEREAS, if e City Counoil adopted Ordinance No. 2020 cin Deciember 15, 20(18; Bind WHEREAS, afler implementation oil C rdinanoe No. 2230, certain refinements have k eerl identified k ased on it a unique nal i re of the c eve lopmlent acik iiy in 1k k wila; and WHEREAS, 11.e Cliiy c esires 10 simplify it a process oil imposing and administering darks impact feels; NCW, THEREFORE, THE CITY CCUNCIL OF THE WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS ASI FCLLICWS: ecticn 1. TMC Chapter 16.38 Reenacted. Tukwila ClhaFller 16.28 is hereby reenacted to read as follcws : Sections: 1E1.28.010 1E1.08.020 1E1.28.030 16.38.04(1 1E1.08.050 1E1.38.060 18.38.07(1 16.38.08(1 16.28.09(1 CHARTER 1E1.38 HARKS IMPACT' FEES CITY OF TUKWILA, Municipal Code 111MCI; Authotiily and Rt rpose Findings Definitic ns Rarks Impact Fee Assessment Use of Rarks Impact Fees Rarks Impact Fee Capital Facilities Plan Rarks Impact Feei Formula Rarks Impact Fee Adjustments Credits W: Word Piiocess ing` Ordinances \Flarks Impact Fee Od amended fin al 2.38-1: D1181;I14 :bjs Rac€ 1 of 9 13 '16.28.10(1 Appeals '1E1.28.1'1(1 Refunds '16.28.12(1 9berr ptionsi '16.28.13(1 Auti oriity Unirr paired 16.28.010 Authority and FIL rpose. A. Aullhcrity. The City o1 TLkwila's irrpact fee financing prognarr has been developed pursuant lo the C ity oil Tukw ila's policy powers, 11' e C nowth N anagerr ent Act as coc ifiE d in Chapter 36.7CIA o1l t I' e REvised Coc e of Washington (RCIW ; . B. Flurpc se. The purpose cif the financing plan is to: 1. Develop a program consistent wilt Tukwila's Pariks anc Recreation Deparime n1 Capital Facilities Ftlan for joint pL blit anc prii ale financing of put tic parks facilities arid ser.iiciesi necessitaiad in whole or in pari t y c evelopment within it e City of Tukwila; 2. C reate a mecif anisrr la charge and dolled flees to ensure 11 at de%eloprrent leans its proportionate sihane of the ciapital costs of public parks ilaciliiies necessitated by development; and 3. 9nsiure fain collection and ac rr inlet nation of sc ch parks impact fear. 16.2E11.020 Findings. The City Council hinds and determines tt at gnowl I' anc dE'eloklm erit iri if a City create additional demand and need fon pc blic panks facilities in if a City, arid It e City Clounail ilirds If at gnowtt and de‘eloprr ent shot. Id pay its prciportionate chane of Ite costs of tI'e ilaciliiies needed lc serve 11Fe growtf and de N,aloprr ant iri the City . l t erefone, pi, rst, aril to RCW 36.7CIA and RCW 82.02.090 1f rough 82.02.'100, which authoniae the City ici imrlose and ciollecil impact flees to furic put lice faciilities 1I- at serve gnowi l , the City Coc mil 2 doklts this ordinance ici impose panks impact fees for parks s€irmices. It is if a Coy ncil's intern that the provisions of if is ordinance be liberally corisinued in estat lisp ing the parks impact tete program . 6.28.030 DE fir itic ns. Terms or words not defined herein sF all be c efined pi, rsi. aril lo RCW 82.02.090 when given 1I- ein L sual arid aL slorr ary meaning. Flor the pi, rposes of this ordinanci€i, 1 nless the cicintexi or sut ject matter clearly requires otherwise, the wont s or phrases defined in tt is section sf aII have ire following meanings: 1. "Building perm it" means an ofiliciial document or certiilicaticin of tha City of Ti kwila issued by the City's balding official which authoniaas the construation, alienation, enlangemern, conversion, recionstruction, remodeling, nEhabilitaticin, erection, placement, demcilition, ming, or repair of a ix ilc ing or structure. 2. "City" means 1I -e Clity of Tukwila, Washington, ClouriN of king. 3. "Clevelcipment activity" means any constnuciticin, recciristrLciion, on expansicn of a building, structure, on t se, or any changes in L se of a building or elk tic re, or any cihanges in the use of Iarid, naquiring development ariproval. W: Woid Rrocessing\C rdinarces1Parks Impact Fee Ord amended final2-28-12 0T8I9K:bjs 14 Race 2of9 4. "Development approval" means any written al_ if orizaiion from 11e City, mit ich a.111 arises the commencement of the "de\ elopmenl activity." 5. "Encumber" means lc reserve, set asice, or earmark the parks impact fees in order 10 pay for comlmillments, corlinacIL al of ligations, on other liabilities irlcurrec for 1 f e prcv ision of parks services. 6. "Fee payer" is a person, corporation, pari nership, an irlccngoratec association or governmental agency, municipality, or similar entity comma enaing a land det, elopmerli activity if at requires a building permit arid creates a c emand fon additional parks capital facilities. �. "Impact fee" means the payment of money imposed by 111- e City on del‘ellopmerl1 acdNiiy pursuant' to this ordinance as a aondilion of granting dei\elopmeril approval in onder to pay fon the parks facilities needed to serve grclwtf and development that is a pnoportionate share cf the cosi of panks capital facilities USE for facilities than reasonat ly benefit development. Impact fees do nal include reasonable permit fees, appliaation fees, administrative fees far collecting and handling parks impaal lees, or 11- e cost of reviewing inc ependent fee cialculatioris. 8. "Owner" means the cwnen of record of real Klrope riy, as founc in the retorts cif King County, Washington, or a person with ars unnesinicled weer' option to punct ase property; pno, idec , if at if if a heal property is being purcf asec L rider a recorc ed real estate contract, the pt.rchasen shall t e considered 1f e owner cf the prcperty. 9. "Rreiperticnate share" means 1F at portion of the cost for parks facility' improvements thal are reasonably related llo 11-e services demands and neec s of developmlerlt. '10. "Harks 1lacilities" means thcse capital facilities iderlilified as park and recrealional facilities in the City's Capital Facilities Plan. 16.28.040 Parks Impact Hee Assessrr ent. A. The City stall collect parks impact fees fnclml appliaants seeking de%elcipmerll approvals from the City for any development aatMly in the City for wf ich building pewits are nequinelc , effective ani ary 1, 2(109, consistent wilt the phot, isiclris of this ordinance. B. Parks impact fees sihall be assessed al the time of a technically -complete building permit application chat complies wilt- if e City's aonirlg ciidinances and building and c eveilopment nodes. Harks impact fees sf all t e collected from the fee Flayen at 1F e lime if a building permit is ism, ed. C. Except if otherwise e)emlpt, the City stall riot issue the required bcilding permit unless or until the parks imlpaclt fees area paid. : Word Frecessing \CIndinances\F arils Impact Hees Ord amended final 2-28-12 CITSISK:bjs Plage 3 of 9 15 16.28.050 Use all Parks Irr pact Fees. A. FIS rsuar 1 to this ordinar ae, pariks imipacrl fees shall be used fora parks facilities that will reasonably benefit growth and dErvelclpmerri, ar d only far park facilities addressec t y the City's C apile I FacrilitiErs alemer 1 of it e Comprehensi‘ e Flan. B. Rees sh all riot be usec icr make up deficriencies it C ityl facrilities serving an existing c eveilopment. C. Flees shell not be L sed for mainter ancre and orleraticlns, incl ding pensonr el. D. Parks impact fees shall be L. sed fora bit rot limiiec icr land acquisition, site impnovemer is, erlgirreerir g ar d ancrh itectural servicers, permitting, firrancring, administrative e) penses ar d applicat le mitigation costs, and capital equipment pertaining to parks facrilities. 9. Parks impact fees may also be usec to necoL FI pr. blic imigrovemer t costs incurred by the City to the extern it at growth a nd developmierl will t e served by the previously corrsinr, diet irr provemient. F. In 1 h e ever it t onds or similar debt instruments are on have been issued for parks facility irr primerr tints, impaot fees may be Lsed to pay the principal on sucIh bonds. 16.28.060 Rarks Impact Fee Capital Facrilitie s Plan. In older to collect penks impact feces, 1 h e City mist ilirst ac opt a parks capital ilacililies plan as ar element of the Clity's CompnErhensivei RIan. Ilhe City's capital facrilities plan for parks ser'vrices sh aII consist of the following elements: 1. The City's cape city ovein It a next six years, be sed on an inventory oil le City's panks facilities bolt e)isiling arrc under cronstructiorl; 2. The forecast oil future needs fon parks facilities based L. pori the Clity's pop' lation pnojections; 3. A si)-year financial plan component, c pdaled as necessary, to maintain at least a six-year forecast fon financing meet ed wilt in pnojeicted funding levels; 4. Applicralion of the formula set for h in this orc inancei based upcin the infonmalion in the capital facilities plan; and 5. City CoL rrcil Action. No new or revised irr pant fee shall t ei efileiative until adopted by the City Councril following a duly advertised public hearing to aonsic err the City's capital fe cililies plan or plan L pdale. V11: Wold FrocessinglcndinaricesIF arks Impact Fee Ord amended final 2-28-12 OTSI5 K:bjs 16 Page 4 of 9 16.28.CI70 Rarks In' pact Fee Formula. A. The impact fee formula is based on it e E s.iumptions found in Tukwila (larks Impact Fees, 2008, Exhibit A, and Tu kwila Planks C apical Facilities List, E) h ibil 8, t oth itaah ed h ereto and by it" is neilerence fully inconporatec h erein. RA RIKS IMPACT FEE CIA LC ULATIONS 8. Bach de%elopmenl shall mitigate its imipacits ori the C ity's panks facilities by payrr ent of a fee that is t ased cin 11 e type of land use and squane footage of the development, and pnoporticinate Ica the cost cif the panks facility impuovemerits necessary to serve 11I e needs of growth. Cl. Applications llcir a change of use shall recei‘ a ciredii based cin 111" a existing use. This coedit is calcic Iatec by dec ucting the lee amo. nt of It e existing use from the fee oil the pnciposed use. 1E1.38.080 Rarks Impact Fee AdjustmEIntS. A. The City may ac just a parks impact fee at 1 a time the fee is imposed in order to consider unL sual circumstances in specific cases to ensure that impact lees are imposed fairly. B. In calcic latirlg the fee imposed on a partici lar de%eloprrent, the City shall permit consideration of sit. dies and data submitted t y a c eveloper in order to ac jL sl the amount of the fee. The c eveloper sl- all submit an inc ependent fee calm lalion study to the ❑lirecilor of Parks and Recreation, who shall review the Elk dy to determine 1I• at lh e study: 1. Is based ori accepted impact fee assessment practices and methodologies; 2. Uses acceptable c ata sources and 11 a data used is comparable wilt 1 h e uses and intensities planned for 1ha proposed development acldi%ily; 3. Complies will- the applicable slate Taws go%erning impact fees; el . Is pnepaned and documented by professionals who are miulu ally agreeable 10 the City and the developen anc who ane qualified in thein respective fields; anc 5. E. how s the basis a pori which the independent fee calculation was mace. W: Wold Flnoceissing\Ordinances\Parks Impact Fee Clod an ended final ; -28-12 OT &:IK :bjs Rage 5 of 9 17 Impact Fee hand Use Rer Residential Unit Rer 1,000 Sq. Ft. GFA Single Family $'1,426 Mi Iti-Farr fly $'1,398 Office $837 F etail $419 Industrial $262 8. Bach de%elopmenl shall mitigate its imipacits ori the C ity's panks facilities by payrr ent of a fee that is t ased cin 11 e type of land use and squane footage of the development, and pnoporticinate Ica the cost cif the panks facility impuovemerits necessary to serve 11I e needs of growth. Cl. Applications llcir a change of use shall recei‘ a ciredii based cin 111" a existing use. This coedit is calcic Iatec by dec ucting the lee amo. nt of It e existing use from the fee oil the pnciposed use. 1E1.38.080 Rarks Impact Fee AdjustmEIntS. A. The City may ac just a parks impact fee at 1 a time the fee is imposed in order to consider unL sual circumstances in specific cases to ensure that impact lees are imposed fairly. B. In calcic latirlg the fee imposed on a partici lar de%eloprrent, the City shall permit consideration of sit. dies and data submitted t y a c eveloper in order to ac jL sl the amount of the fee. The c eveloper sl- all submit an inc ependent fee calm lalion study to the ❑lirecilor of Parks and Recreation, who shall review the Elk dy to determine 1I• at lh e study: 1. Is based ori accepted impact fee assessment practices and methodologies; 2. Uses acceptable c ata sources and 11 a data used is comparable wilt 1 h e uses and intensities planned for 1ha proposed development acldi%ily; 3. Complies will- the applicable slate Taws go%erning impact fees; el . Is pnepaned and documented by professionals who are miulu ally agreeable 10 the City and the developen anc who ane qualified in thein respective fields; anc 5. E. how s the basis a pori which the independent fee calculation was mace. W: Wold Flnoceissing\Ordinances\Parks Impact Fee Clod an ended final ; -28-12 OT &:IK :bjs Rage 5 of 9 17 C. In reviewinc the study, the Director of Panks and Recreation 1r Dirieci1cir"' may reqs ire the de%eloper to sut mit additional on c ifferent dcic. mentation. If an ac c eptat le sft. dy is presented, the Direcicir of Panks arc Recreation may ac just 11[ a fee fon th e parliaL Ian dei eloprr ent activity . The Direcicir shall considers 11[ a dos c mentation submitted by 11[ a applicant, k ut is not required to accept sr. ch documentation that 1[ e Dinecilc r neasonably deems 1c1 k e inacci rate or unreliable. D. A developer nequesting art adjustment oil independent fee calmlaticn may clay the impact fees imposed by this ordinance in order to obtain a bL ilding penmil wr ile the City delerm ines whet F er to pari ially reimbi rse the developer by mak ing an adji s11 m ent or by accepting Ire independent fee calculation. 16.28.C190 Credits. In computing 1[e flee applicable to a given development, Cres it shall be given for ire fair market value rreasLlled at the time of cedicatiori, fon arty dedication of land fon irr prop err ents to, or new corlsit nL ction of, arty panks facilities tr at are identified in the Clapiial Facilities Element and that are reqs, ired by tI a City ass a ccndiiion cf approving .the development act i% 16.28.1(10 Appeals. A. Any fee payer may clay the in pacil fees imposed by this ordirarce ur der protest in orders to otlain a building permit. E. Appeals regarding panks impact fees irrpcseid on any development activity may orily be siubmiitec by Ire fee slayer of the pncperly where siuch develcpmerll acii%ily will c ccur. No appeal sr aII be clermitiled ur less and c ntil the impacil fee at issue I as beers paid. CL Determinations by the City staff wiir respect to Ire applicability of Clarks impact feesi to a givers development activity, or Ire availability of a credit, care be appealed to the City's I- earsing Examirlen pL rst, ant io this section. D. An appeal shall be filed within 10 working days of payment of 11.e irr pact fees i. nder protest or withir 10 work ing days cif the City's issuance of a written determination cif a cneicit on exemption decision ty filirg with Ire Clity Clerk a notice of appeal giving the reasans for the appes 1 arid pay ing the accompanying appeal fee as set forth in the E xisting fee schedule for Ianc i. se decisiions. 16.28.110 Refunds. A. If 1 I e City fails to expend or a ncumt er it e impact fees with in 10 years from tr e date the fees were paic , unless exlracirdir ary, compelling masons exist fon feces to be held lorigen than 10 years, the current owner of the properly cin which the impact fees were paic may receive a net nd of such fees. Such extraondinaryl or compelling reasons shall be identified in written firdings by the City Clouncil. El. The City shall notify' potential claimants by first class mail that they are entitled to a heft nd. In determining whether impacil fees have t eerl expendec or encumbered, irr pact flees at all be considered exper ded sir encumt ered ori a ilinst-in, first -out basis. W: Wond Piioae:: ing\Oulinances\FlarH: Impact Fee Old amended final 2••28-12 ❑78ISM :bjs 18 Page 6 of 9 C. Owners seeking a refunc mt. s 1 sut mit a written regt est ilor E refunc of if a fees io the Clity wiltin one year of the dale the rigf l to claim a refund arises or notice is given, w F ichever comes later. D. Any impact fees nor whici no application has been made within 11-e one-year peniod shall be nelainec t y the Clilly and expended on appropriate parks facilities. E. Ref' nds oil impact fees shall include any interest earned ori the impE cit fees by 1 h e City. 16.28.120 9xemptior s. The panks impact fees are gerienalec from the formula alar aalc� latincl the fees as sell fort fire this ordinance. The E rr ouni of the impact fees is c etenmined by the information coritainec in if a adopted panks master ply n and related c ocL ments, as appended to 11 e Clity's Corr pneh ens i‘ a Rlan. All c evelogment aai iv illy localec within the Ciily sh all t e charged a panks impact flee; provided, that the following exemptions shall apply. Any development aclNityj on pncijecit which has submitted a tecih nicis lly complete be ilding perrr it s pplicatiari prior to 1f• e effective dale all this cirdiriancie shall be exempt from the payment of parks impact lees. Tf a following shall t e exerr ql from parks impact fees: 1. Replacement of a structure with E new structure h avirig the same use, al the same site, and win' a same gross floor Erea, when such replE cement is within 12 months of demolition or destruction of tlh a precious sirucli re. 2. Altercation, expansion, cir remodeling of an existing cwellirlg on structure where rio new knits are created arid 1f a use is not changed. 3. Consitri. ction oil an aciciessory residential structure. 4. Miscellaneois improvements including, bit not limited lo, fences, walls, swimming pools, arid signs that do not create E n inanease iri dem anc for parks services. 5. Demolition cif or moving an existing structure within the Oily fnomi one site to another. 6. Low-inocirr a housing dei eloged t y individials, nonprofit conrlorations, or a F ousing au thonily may be exemptec fnomi irnpacl fees al the discretion of City slafll si bject to: a. Sut miitlal of a fiscal in- pact analysis of the elect of irr pact fees upon low-income hcii sing and how exempting such hot, sing from impact fees woi. Id forward the goals for low-incicime hot, sing in the Clity arid King County; b. Sut mitlal of adequate dothm entation shcwing that the housing will remain ailable ilor low-income persons fcir a 10 -year perioc ci l time at affcirdable rents; and W: Wood Pious! ing101dinances\Rark! Impact Hee Oud amended fir al 2-28-12 DT81SI4 :bjs Rage 7 of 9 19 c. In they case of ownerr-ociau pied dwellings, siubrr ittlal oil adequate documentation showing that suar hoi sing will be sold on leased at affordable rates io low-iriciome houset olc s for a period of 10 years. d. The im r act )lee for exempt dev eilocgrr ent uric er this sut section srhall be calculated as provided by this ordinance arid r aic w ilf public func s. Such F aymeriis may be mace by incluc ing such amounts in The F ublic sif• arc of The system) improvements undertaken within ire City for parks services anc facilities. 1. Change of Use. PI development permit for a at arige of use it at has Iesis im r act than It e existing u se shall not be assessed a parks impact fee. El. A fee gayer req. ired to pay for system impncivemerils pi rsuarll to RCA 4.L21 C.OE 0 shall not t e required to pay an im r act flee for le same improv emerlls uriderr this oridinance. 16.28.130 Aul he rity Unimpaired. Nothing in this ordinance :hall preclude the City from requ irirlg the fee r ayen to mitigate adverse erly ironmental effects of a specific dev eloprr errs pursu ant io the Slate Env ironmental Flolicy Act, Cr apters 43.21C RCW anc /or Cr apter 58.17 RCI%, governinc plats arid sut c ivisions, pnov idec it at tr e exenciise of it is autholiiily is consistent wii1F Clhaplersi 43.21 CI and 82.02 RCW. Section 2. Repealer. Ordinance f o. 2220, as codiilied in TMC Clhapter 16.28, "Flarks Impact Fees," is hereby repealed. Section 3. Correctic ns Hy City Clerk e r Code Reviser. Upon ar prov al of the City Altonriey, the City Clerk and it a erode reviser are authorized to make necessary! correcrlions to this ordiriance, including the correction of clerical errors; relerencies to othe rr )octal, state or federal laws, codes, ri les, or regi lations; or ordinance n. mlbenirig anc sectiorulsi bseation numlt ering. Seation 4. Severability. If any section, s. bsectiori, paragrapt , sentence, clause or pr rase of tF is ordinance or its application to any person or silo atiori sr ould be held to be irivalic on 1 nconslilulional fon any reason by a ciourt of competent ,jurisdiction, s.cih irivalic ity on unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality oil tre remaining portions of it is ordiriance or its apr iteration to any other person on situation. Section f . effective Date. lir is ordiriance or a summary thereof sr all be p. blished in the official newsy aper of the City, and st all lake effect and be iri full foncie five days aften passage arid put tical ion as provic ed by law. NI: Woid Hrocessing\Clydinances\Paiks Impact Flee Clnd arnendecl final 2-28-12 1711FI5II<:bjs 20 Page 8 of 9 RASSED BY THE CITY COUNCILOR ill• E CITY CF ilL K \A ILP , \AASHING1ION, al a IRegt.Ian Meeting thereof this 5 7A day of a, -C , 20'I2. A1ITESTIAL 1IHENTICATB❑: CIhrisily O'Flahe MMC, Ciily Clerk' P RRRC VBD P TC RC RM BY: CLC,O-QA�-- Shelley M. Kerslake, City Atilorrley agger o or Filed w it t. the Ci11y Clerk: D.- a9-) I Flamed by the Cily Council: 3 -c-___,,), Rc blished: `R --.6?--/- affective Dal El:I-1_ - / a_ Ordinance Nurrter: 6iv Attact.rr ents: Exhibit P - Tukwila Parks Irr pant Fees, 200€I Exhibit B - Tukwila Panks Capital Faailities L isl W: Word Flnoceiss anceisl Rarlls Impact Hee Oi d amer ded fir al 2-78-12 D1I& II1:bjs Rage 9 of 9 21 22 EXHIBI l A Tukwila Pads ] rripac 1 Pam, 20CI8 1I80°%o impact fetes; C% city cant] ilii tion: 1 AB.L E :I : 21008 Pank 1 mpact Fee Calculations 8(I% - 20% spill') Land U!e 2007 2007 200111 Build ing 2120 Housing 2010 2020 Builc ing Housing Employment Area -3 Units En playnie Area Units -1 2 Single-family 3,822 2.44 1,191 4,338 $735,607 Multi -family Multi -fa miily 4,107 M ulti-family 2.49 6,4 91 Office 52.06% Office 370,500 6,245 1,561,250 Retail 7,1127 1,931,710 Retail 431 20,384 10,15 2,000 $837.29 25,220 12,610,000 Industrial 4,392 20,343 16,274,400 11,144 25,169 20,135,200 TOTALS 7,929 46,972 28,077,654 10,829 58,116 34,676,950 1.OFIN 1. ASRC 2007 Clovered [Implooynianl Estimates 1. Retail: 100gsf Plea amp; Office: 2'I10gsf pen amp; Industrial: 800 gill ail en p; X amp growth 4. 43 SF du/ya; resil is IV A fnono 2001 Buildable Lands Flat for 1. 90% of Buildable Lands Report estimates, al same % a s 1007 amllloyni nl (I. Tukwila Residaat/I on -Tukwila resident bac akdown based on 1000 c aims data In 2000, the number of nesidaats who live a nd work in Tukwila is 1,102, out oil a llopuh tion of 17,181, or 9'/o Ilard Use 1 el Growth, 1008 - 2020 Housinll Err ploym a 1111 • Builc ing Area E m ploym ei I: Err ploym e Units - 4 5 - 3 lullwila nt: Non - 1 esidents - Tukwila 9%-6 Acsidcut s - 91"/o -6 Single-family 516 2.44 1,191 11.49% $735,607 Multi -family 2,384 $1,426 M ulti-family 2.49 2.44 Office 52.06% 1,482 370,500 131 1,349 Retail 4,836 2,418,000 431 4,401 Incusllrial $837.29 4,826 3,860,800 434 4,392 TOTALS 2,900 11,144 6,649,300 1,003 10,141 Land Ili e Im i act Fee 1?ersos s Use Ratio Total Use by "ic Use by Cost Aar Housing' 111111,000 Roundec per Between Land Use Land Use Allocation Unit GFA** Ea using Resident / Calegony Calegouy Unit HmiploNees Single-family 2.54 2.44 1,191 11.49% $735,607 $1,425.'19 $1,426 M ulti-family 2.49 2.44 14,484 52.06% $1,331,715 $1,397.53 $1,398 Olflice 1.00 1,349 4.81% $310,214 $837.29 $837 Retail 1.00 4,401 15.82% $1,012,279 $418.64 $4119 Industrial 1.00 4,392 5.71% $1,010,185 $361.61 $262 TOTALS 27,823 100.00% $6,400,000 ote: $6,4 00,000 is 801 of SI,000, 23 9Hhit it B Tukwila Rarks C aplilal Facilil ices Lisl Fnajecii List — Impact FEIEIS 2009 to 2015 Projecil Cosi DL wamish Hill Rreseuve De\ EIlop Flh ase II g-27800,000 * $ 2, 91100,CICICI 'rail Con r Elctiar s Green Fliver Triad to Renton Black/Cec an River lluail $51100,0CICI TL Idwila Pond De%Edopment — Flh ase IV $3,000,0CICI City ^ IEwila-Roo - - *S-544889 ; .. . features and scrviccsl 1ICID REIC Elstriiarl Briic Ela Sound au Conr actior 2,CI0CI,000 Total $8,CICIC1,000 * TL kw ila F aal rElmo%ed from list c L El 1 a 1 he formal icirl cif 1 he N Ell naplolil an Park Clistricl irI 3CI111; thosEl fl rIc s wEIIIE! ac C EIC 1 a 1 h e CIL Va amisl- Hill RR SE rvEI prcijE ct. AIGTEI: Elreviaus vEirsicir cif Ebihidi1 EI (E rich t o sl riker thrcLgh alar clefs reisL Jll it g from jormatior cif the MPCIJ was it ciluded as cin altnchmEir 11 tci Crdir clr cei PIo. ;122C1. Ilxhib it El - Flanks lair ad FEIE I RE%ised Jam any 30112 24 Circuit City SilIe City, lam and Fee Analvslis UpdatErc 10)3)1121 Re-tenanitErc Project Assumptionis X111] Estimated Conistruaticiri Cost 9quane Feel Unfits Per SH Total REilaiil 411,500 - $ 9C1 $ 3,CI19,0(I(I llal a I 411,500 $ 3,C179,0(I(I New De%elopmenl Project AssumFllions (21) Estimated Claristruation Cosi 9qu are Feel Unfits Per SH Total Hotel 11(1,000 :Iz141 $ 11E13 $ 3111,04i1,0(ICI Mu Iti-family 220,000 :111CI $ 91931 $ 313,EI:IEI,0(ICI Retail 9,000 - $ 91341 $ (1111,000 llcilaI 399,000 4941 $ EI9,31911,00CI Assessec Valu EIS (3] lax Year RErlenianted Redeveloped 21cia9 210112 Land 11,910,100 $ 21,91CI,1ICICI $ 2,910,1ICI0 $ 3,91CI,11CICI Builc inn 41,9fIE1,700 $ 3119,9CICI $ 4,986,1CI0 $ E19,3911,(ICICI llalaI $ 1,99(1,80(1 $ 3,319CI,CICICI 7,996,8CI0 $ EI8,311111,1100 One Time Clity Re% encu EIS 141] Hees taxes RErtenianted Redeveloped HEmmit and Filen REN iElw Fees Bu ildiri8 $ 115,8113 $ 49EI,00CI MEicF ariical TBD $ 99,000 HIu mk iri8 TBD $ E1,00(I Electrical TBD $ 141,0(ICI llriaffic (Iciricurrericy $ $ 119,000 gu ktotal $ 115,8113 $ E1941,CI00 Impact FEies llnaffic TBD $ 413141,(I(ICI Fine TBD $ 393,CICICI Flanks TBD $ 3E11,CICICI 9u ktotal $ $ 11,1194,CIa0 (laristru ctian gales 1aN 0.CICI89 $ 117,€1318 $ 999,41E141 Real Estate BxcisEi flax O.CICI9CI $ 39,184 $ 34111,EICIEI $ 57,422 $ 891,CI89 latal One Time Revenues $ 73,234 $ 2,705,089 Page 11 25 26 AlrinLal Cily REIvenues (9) Flnappenty TE x Du El to N EIW Constnucl iari Cily Rai EI RetenantEid REIdev EIlopEic 0.00299 $ 14,7111 $ SE les Ti > Ilan Raiz it 0.0089(1 1193,189 88,1188 110,E 39 Total Alnn a al RevEinu Els $ 1071,898 $1 2103,41110 Debt Issu aricEl Capacil y Due to Development (6] Tom Interest Rate RetenanitElc Rede%elcipEic 119 Nci1 EIS :I% 11,23EI,391 $2,41218,3011 1111) Retenanting assumes keepIiri€ 11- El sa me builc ings as retail use anc assn mesa 1I El Ell -in cost cif Emile!' a nc 1 Eina nt impinovElments is $50 per sqL ane foot. CIL nnElnt Flnciplerity 511 ats Bu ilc iri€ squ a IIEl sleet 411,500 La ric SIgL arae Feel 148,507 (3) New cevelopment assu mpItians ba SEIC on Oman Lee's concept datElc 4/11:1/201111. Uni1 costs pie isquarafcicll ba9EIC on ICC builcinE %alLatian1abIEI Ihiam 2/210111 nd include Sea 11 le E nEIa multiplier. 11:I) Assessec values ion 1axyears 3009 and 210112 per CIaLrityAssElsson iEILsite 8/28/12. AV as netena rit EIC assumes bu ilc in€ value equal 1a 3[1[19 value (highest yea n in Iasi c EICZ c El). A V i s new c evelop men1 a ssumes bu ilc ing %alu a equals const nu cl ion VE IU El, a Ith aL gh i1 is piassil IEI tH a AV will be higher thi n ccirisl ru ctian. (4) One time city k u ilding plenimit fees Lased ars City Clrc ina rice 2299 da1 EIC 1/3E1/:ICI110. As nede%elciplec plluml ing fee assn mes 4119 Mixtures. MEIChi nical Costs estimated at 110.13% of EL ilding ccist. 9IEICtrica 1 cosi s estimal EIC a 1 11E .6% of b u ilc ing cast. One time city 1naffic ConCL'meinrcy flee pen RLLlic Works 4/1E1/1111. Flenmit nic plan neview fees are intended to covers rIEuimittin® and plan review costs. Implacl flees arae cedica 1EIC 1 ci th El projects identified in the impact fEIEI pro€Illams. Th Ely have ricit teen a djL s1 EIC 1 a to ke iris a a CCaL nt existing credits an exemplar's, if a rIrIlica 11E1. Real est ate excis El 1 ax based on Clity's portions al CI.9%. PEIr RCW i1 mL st bEl spent on CE pli1 al projects. REIII City policy is it split equa Ily for the 301 fund nd rtEuiia I s1 met fund. RBST is only collected L pane SE lea ric tra risfen all pirapiEnll y wh ich c oes rich a Iwa y s OCCL n Wil h now de% edcipiment sa it m y mat 1E1 a pppriappnia to fon this nialy s is. 119) A rim al City IIevEIriL Ell estimates a c c it ion I plriaperty tax due to new constnu c1 ion va lu Ela ric sa les tax Lased ani $ 390 sa les per sqL are foot pier yea n. (E) DE1E1 ser% ice capIacily es1imatesthe amciuri1 of debt tIIal cou lc 1El151LEIC assumiriaa ili.sly amcull izec Icia n with level nniu El ph y mends at the bov El 1 Elrim nd int enest nate, rich cciu ril ani€I Issu ansae costs. In 30112 the Ci1y riecEli%ed a qL ate for a $11.3 million, 115 yea n k anic at n II-iri-tnue-interest ccisl of :1.116%. 111) This a ria lysis estimal Ell rEN encu es la 1F. El City bu t does ncit rellllect nelatec casts sL cll a s for permit re%IElv‘i, 1Lilding inspection, pu blic safety, aric public iriilnastructLrie. Flag' 2 EMBA S SY SIUITES SIep1 emt en 9th, 210121 HOTELSI® lo VU ham It N ay Ccir cern: llhe Embassy Sluites — 5Ieatll le located at 195120 W. Valley I- VV, Tu kwila WA is ar advacate for tli Er plc posec walking bridge in at. r nei€lhbart clad. Fnarr an em irannrental arc financial standpoint, my ppioperl y in plarticu lar woi Id greatly t enefit fnarn tF is capital project. Cur properly offers a comp limenil ary 214 F aur sh uttle tci th e ainp art ar d Icical runs within five miles at au r p noperl y daily from SIAM 1 ci 110PM. Di riniE these li au ns ail aplerat icini, we ri nu p1 to two sh uttles to accammedal a au n gi es1 requests. C u n fleet consists of two, 10 passenger v ans. please see 1 F e at1 act- ed gric that m as ppiepanec by au n Frar 1 Office Mangan. TIi El c ata sham s average Iacal ri r s frarr the F atel ky month. MC NTH Shu 11 le Hu ns Agplro) imal e # of Passengers Manu ary 129 3871 Fat nuary 131 393 Manch 13CI 390 April 11:19 409 May 11:171 4715 .1i ne 140 533 .Ii Iy 144 521E1 August 149 61E1 Sept emt en Forecast: 11421 Forecast: 582 Clctat en Forecast: 129 Forecast: 3E 71 I member Forecast: 128 Forecast:3E4 Dean ben Forecast: 1130 Fcnrecast: 390 Gnanc llatal 1620 95211 Y E mileage estimate = 90k Local runs =1E % cil au n rr ileage cm 1E1.21k 27 Compression is al result al mi Itiple factor's it cluc inE : ovenall F atel occt p ancy, tralr' ier t cri isEI la sinElss wF ich nuns Inom May 1h nu 11epltambar, sh oppir E F alic ays, and grafi, p plerfanrnan cel, partici lanly from the Sports manket. 11 is implari Ir1 1cl rale that the hcalel's pinianity is clurl ainplori transplori ation ar c fllequarll ly our drivel's N ill ctl tinge 1 F sill route tcl 1F a airport in orc mile accclmmodale a few pas! enlgEllls rlEledec tcl Eo 1a 1he mall areal. These Euests are caplturec H it tFa ainplort runes arld are nal accourlled fan tj slaw. T11enefcure,1 h e totals below ane canseruativEl. From a mileage 9tandpair 1, our' ans lag OVEIII SCIk miles a year. YTD mileage a" cif EIOM, Au€µ s1 = EI 1 k miles. Local runs Elqu atEl 1a 1181% of our monad' milEIaEIEl. FIlleaIse car tact me d inectly for acdi' iana1 irllorma tiorl. Thar k yoi, IV a1,Iear Malt, reer Hiffmalrl Genenal MalnalE en emk assy Sli it es Seattle Tacoma Intl. AP 206-]119-211401 28 WOW Akom - lAni.F.Ny PIMA • Mall Expansion L TUC Core Pedestrian Pedestrian Connection Bridge on Bow Lake Pipeline R.Q.W. Pedestrian Underpass Across U.P. Tracks Initial Catalyst Redevelopment Urban Center Subarea Plan CiyofTukwil ,W Washington Envisioned Town Pattern Scenario 9 Station Access from.Longacres Way Relocated Platforms Station Building & Plaza