HomeMy WebLinkAboutCAP 2012-10-22 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKETCity of Tukwila
Community Affairs
Parks Committee
O Kathy Hougardy, Chair
O Joe Duffie
O Allan Ekberg
AGENDA
Distribution
Recommended Action
K. Hougardy
C. O'Flaherty
J. Duffle
S. Kerslake
A. Ekberg
K. Matej
V. Seal
B. Giberson
D. Robertson
R. Still
Mayor Haggerton
D. Cline
b. Grant agreement for Duwamish Gardens project.
MONDAY, OCTOBER 22, 2012
CONFERENCE ROOM #3, 5:00 PM
Item
Recommended Action
Page
1. PRESENTATION(S)
2. BUSINESS AGENDA
a. Special Events Calendar.
a. Information only.
Pg.1
Rick Still, Parks Recreation Director
b. Grant agreement for Duwamish Gardens project.
b. Forward to 11/5 Consent
Pg.5
Bob Giberson, Public Works Director
Agenda.
c. Supplemental agreement for additional design work
c. Forward to 11/13 C.O.W.
Pg.21
for Duwamish Gardens project.
and 11/19 Regular Mtg.
Bob Giberson, Public Works Director
3. ANNOUNCEMENTS
4. MISCELLANEOUS
Next Scheduled Meeting: Tuesday, November 13, 2012
S The City of Tukwila strives to accommodate those with disabilities.
Please contact the City Clerk's Office at 206 433 -1800 (TukwilaCityClerk @TukwilaWA.gov) for assistance.
p
TUKWILA
PARKS REC REATI N
GOOD HEAL! HY FUN
DATE: October 16, 2012
TO: City Council Members
City Administration
Department Heads
M
FROM: Rick Still, Parks Recreation Director
RE: Tukwila Parks Recreation— Events Calendar
Attached you will find our Tukwila Parks Recreation Upcoming Activities Events calendar for No-
vember and December 2012. We hope that you will find this a useful tool to keep up to date on the many
activities, events and programs that our department offers to the Tukwila community.
Some upcoming events that should be of special note include:
October 30 Autumn Harvest Carnival at TCC, Sister City Fundraising Dinner begins at 5pm
(Pizza dinner event admission for S5), Costume Carnival Activities between 6 -8pm.
November 4 Pooch Plunge at Tukwila Pool, 11 am- 1pm.
November 5 Tukwila Pool closes for renovation project.
November 5 TCC Fitness Facility, Gymnasium and Racquetball Courts will open to the public at
5:30am. This temporary hours adjustment to serve Tukwila Pool participants with early morning health
fitness options and will continue until the Tukwila Pool reopens (anticipated for February 2013).
November 14 Thanksgiving Dinner for Senior at TCC Sponsored by the Tukwila Rotary, doors open at
11:00am and lunch is served at 12noon. Reservations must be made in advance.
December 8 Holiday Giving Program distribution event at TCC, loam -fpm.
December 15 An Evening with the Grinch! Event includes hands on kids craft activities, performances
by the Cascade View and Tukwila Elementary School Choirs, and an indoor movie.
December 19 -31 Winter Break Camp at TCC, 6:30am -6pm daily (no camp on 12/25).
*Please note that this is the final activities and events calendar for 2012.
p
TUKWILA
PARKS RECREATION
GO0D ir_ G;LT -tY FUN
Upcoming Activities
NOVE
2 Parents Night Out, 6 -1 Opm
2 Teen Late Night at TCC, 8 -11 pm
4 Pooch Plunge at Tukwila Pool
5 '1'ukwi1a Pool Closed for Renovation
9 Teen Late Night at TCC, 8 -11 pm
9 Young Adults Specialized Recreation Social at
TCC, 5 -7pm
12 TCC Closed Veteranus 1: av Observed
14 Thanksgiving Dinner for Seniors, 11 am- 1pm
1.4 Youth /Teen Basketball Registration Night at
TCC, 5 -7pm
14 15 Youth/Teen Basketball Coaches Meeting
16 Teen Late Night at TCC, 8-11 pm
17 Holiday Giving gram Donation Drive event at
Westfield Mall, gam until 4pm
22 -23 TCC Closed .-.—Thanksgiving Holiday
24 Youth Teen Basketball Tip Off Skills Drills
Event at TCC,
30 Teen Late Night at TCC, 8 -11pm
L Inderlined updated information or new to calendar
3 Youth Teen Basketball League practices begin
7 Parents Night Out, 6 -1 Opm
8 Holiday Giving Program distribution event at TCC
(by invitation only), l l am- 1pm
14 Young Adults Specialized Recreation Social at
Hi -Lanes Bowling, 5 -7pm
15 An Evening with the Grinch! Doors open for the
event at 5pm. There will be a performance by two lo-
cal choirs: Cascade View Elementary Choir at
5:30pm and the Tukwila Elementary Choir at 6rw
followed by a free holiday movie beginning at
6:30pm.
19 -31 Winter Break Camp at TCC, 6:30am -6pm
25 TCC Closed
p
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Community and Parks Committee
FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director
By: Ryan Larson, Senior Engineer
DATE: October 19, 2012
SUBJECT: Duwamish Gardens
Project No. 06 -DR02
Grant Agreement King County Flood Control District
ISSUE
Authorize the Mayor to sign a grant agreement with the King County Flood District.
BACKGROUND
The City acquired the Duwamish Gardens site in 2008 for future restoration as a salmon habitat
site. The project is currently in the design phase and staff is in the process of clearing the site of
all existing structures and securing construction funds.
Staff applied for construction funding through the Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO)
and the King Conservation District (KCD). KCD initially planned on awarding this project
$500,000 in construction funding, but then all KCD funding in 2012 was put on hold pending the
outcome of a recent court case regarding their property assessment. The King County Flood
District (Flood District) was approached by KCD to see if they could provide funding for
programs related to habitat and water quality in 2012. The Flood District approved the original
funding of $500,000 and the grant will now be administered by the Flood District. The grant
requires no additional matching funds.
ANALYSIS
The Flood District grant includes $91,000 for a Cultural /Historic Investigation Plan that is an
additional item that is being required by the Corps of Engineers during the design process. The
remaining grant funding of $409,000 can be used for structure demolition and site construction.
The total construction costs are estimated at $3,000,000.00 for this project and the remaining
grant funding for construction has not yet been secured.
RECOMMENDATION
The Council is being asked to approve a grant agreement with the King County Flood Control
District for $500,000.00 for the Duwamish Gardens project and consider this item on the Consent
Agenda of the November 5, 2012 Regular Meeting.
Attachments: King County Flood Control District Resolution
King County Cooperative Watershed Management Grant Proposals
W: \PW Eng \PROJECTS\A- DR Projects \Duwamish Gardens 06 -DR02 90630102) \Grants \Construction \KCFCD \Info Memo GRFCD Grant Accept 10 -19 -12 gl.docx 5
A
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
L
King County
Proposed No. FCD2012 -07.2
KING COUNTY
Signature Report
May 14, 2012
FCD Resolution
Sponsors
1200 King County Courthouse
516 Third Avenue
Seattle. WA 98104
A RESOLUTION authorizing the expenditure of King County Flood Control
District funds on cooperative watershed management arrangements and actions for
purposes of water quality and water resource and habitat protection and management.
WHEREAS, RCW 86.15.035 authorizes flood control zone districts to participate in
and expend revenue on cooperative watershed management arrangements and actions,
including without limitation those under chapter 39.34 RCW, under chapter 39.106 RCW
and under other intergovernmental agreements authorized by law, for purposes of water
supply, water quality, and water resource and habitat protection and management; and
WHEREAS, the District board of supervisors desires to fund water quality and water
resource and habitat protection and management activities and projects currently being
funded by the King Conservation District; and
WHEREAS, the King Conservation District has been providing grants for salmon
recovery activities and projects in Water Resource Inventory Areas 8 and 9 and the
Snoqualmie Watershed, as well as grants for such activities and projects in all
jurisdictions that are part of the King Conservation District; and
WHEREAS, there is a policy nexus between flood control and stormwater projects
and cooperative watershed management; now, therefore
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE KING COUNTY
FLOOD CONTROL ZONE DISTRICT:
1
7
FCD Resolution
20 SECTION 1 The Board establishes a policy to fund water quality and water
21 resource and habitat restoration and management projects and activities as authorized by
22 RCW 86.15.035 and consistent with RCW 39.34.190,
23 SECTION 2. The Board authorizes the King County executive or his designee to
24 develop and administer a grant award program of up to $3 million in 2012 for water
25 quality and water resources and habitat restoration and management projects and
26 activities allocated in the amounts of $1.2 million for WRIA 8, $1.2 million for WRIA 9
27 and $600,000 for the Snoqualmie Watershed, provided that the project list shall be
28 approved by the District executive committee.
29 SECTION 3 King County's administrative costs for the grant award program
30 shall not exceed 5 including all direct, indirect and overhead charges.
31 SECTION 4 The Board requests the King County executive or his designee to
32 include water quality and water resource and habitat restoration and management projects
33 and activities and agreements relating to them as part of the Flood Hazard Management
34 Plan update.
35 SECTION 5. The Board intends to pursue on -going funding for water quality and
36 water resource and habitat restoration management projects and activities.
37 SECTION 6. The King County executive or his designee is requested to
38 prepare for the District by October 1, 2012 a report that analyzes and includes (1) a
39 review of the current evaluation criteria to determine whether it is an equitable
40 allocation formula within King County and adjoining counties and (2) possible
41 expenditure of District revenue for activities and projects of WRIAs 7 (Snoqualmie
42 Watershed), 8 and 9, beginning in 2013 and continuing into the future.
2
FCD Resolution
43 SECTION 7. The Board establishes a policy to limit WRIA activities and
44 projects funded by District revenue to no more than 10% of annual property taxes
45 collected.
46
FCD Resolution was introduced on and passed as amended by the King County Flood
Control District on 5/14/2012, by the following vote:
Yes: 9 Mr. Phillips, Mr. von Reichbauer, Mr. Gossett, Ms. Hague,
Ms. Patterson, Ms. Lambert, Mr. Ferguson, Mr. Dunn and Mr.
McDermott
No: 0
Excused: 0
KING COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
I PO
Jul' Patterson, Chair
ATTEST:
Anne Noris, Clerk of the District
Attachments: None
3
01
ius
Kit n L County
Water and Land Resources Division
Department of Natural Resources and Parks
King Street Center
201 South Jackson Street, Suite 600
Seattle, WA 98104 -3855
206 2966519 Fax 206- 296 -0192
TTY Relay: 711
July 16, 2012
T0: Kjristine Lund, Executive Director, King County Flood Control District
FR: Markclo Division Director, Water and Land Resources Division, King County
Department of Natural Resources and Parks
RE: Cooperative Watershed Management Grant Proposals
We are pleased to convey to the King County Flood Control District Executive Committee
twenty -five Cooperative Watershed Management Grants projects for your approval. There
were 45 proposals submitted for atotal of $4,750,182 fora maximum outlay of $3,000,000. A
list is attached as well as cover letter from the Chairs or representatives of the Snoqualmie
Forum and the WRIA 8 and 9 Forums. The proposed projects have been vetted by review
teams according to a review process that selects proposals on the basis of individual watershed
salmon conservation plan priorities and project merit.
Materials for the Flood Control District Executive Committee meeting are sent a week prior to
the meeting. However, the Snoqualmie Forum and the WRIA 8 Forum will officially approve
the projects respectively on July 18 and 19 The WRIA 9 Forum list is official except for
two recently, substituted projects that will be presented for formal recommendation at its
August meeting.
We have read each proposal and verified the documentation in support of its selection. The
proposals -all follow the eligibility guidelines and meet or exceed the selection criteria The
record indicates that each proposal has been evaluated by a review team in an equitable and
transparent manner according to the review methodology set forth by each Forum. We have
found no objections to any of the proposals on this list or to their review.
After the proposals have been approved by the Board of Supervisors, we will develop an
agreement with each recipient that includes measurable outcomes and deliverables tied to a
detailed scope of work and budget. We will track project progress and pay recipients based on
their performance and documented expenses.
We are looking forward to your endorsement of the list of proposals for the Snoqualmie Forum,
the WRIA 8 Forum and the WRIA 9 Forum. Meanwhile, should you have any questions
concerning any of these proposals, please feel free to contact me at 206 -296 -6587. Thank you.
KC Flood Control District Exec Comm July 23, 2012 33
11
Kjristine Lund
July 16, 2012
Page 2
cc: Ken Pritchard, Grants Administrator, Water and Land Resources Division (WLRD),
King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks (DNRP)
Brian Murray, Supervisor, Countywide Policy and Planning Unit, WLRD, DNRP
KC Flood Control District Exec Comm July 23, 2012 34
W
July 13, 2012
Councilmember Julie Patterson, Chair,
King County Flood Control District
516 3rd Avenue, Room 1200
Seattle, WA 98104
RE: Snoqualmie Watershed Forum Preliminary Funding Recommends
for Cooperative Watershed Management Grants
Dear Chair Patterson,
1 Zvi
On behalf of Snoqualmie Watershed Forum, I would like to express my gratitude to the
King County Flood Control District for deciding to support the important regional salmon
recovery work. The Snoqualmie Watershed Forum is a partnership of elected officials,
citizens and representatives from conservation organizations supporting salmon recovery
and ecological health in the Snoqualmie and South Fork Skykomish Watersheds
(spanning the King County portion of WRIA 7). Member governments include King
County, the Snoqualmie Tribe, and the cities of Duvall, Carnation, North Bend and
Snoqualmie.
I would like to present the attached preliminary Forum funding recommendations for the
2012 Cooperative Watershed Management Grant (CWMG) Program funded through the
King County Flood Control District. The projects and programs on the list have been
vetted according to King County's CWMG Program rules and procedures. The
recommended projects and programs have also been reviewed and prioritized by our local
Project Review Committee for the Snoqualmie Watershed Forum's consideration and
approval at their meeting on July 18. We will notify you of any changes to the
recommendations based on discussion and decisions at this meeting.
Through the 2012 CWMG Program, the Forum received $600,000 to allocate to high
priority salmon recovery projects and programs. In this grant round, we received 20
proposals for a total request of over $1.3 million, resulting in approximately a $750,000
funding shortfall. Of the 20 proposals received, we recommend full or partial funding for
nine proposals. Please note that the List includes a suite of alternate projects that would
receive funds in the event that a project recommended for funding cannot be
implemented.
These grant funds help implement critical salmon recovery priorities called for in the
Snohomish River Basin Salmon Conservation Plan, including habitat acquisition and
restoration projects, watershed stewardship, and sustaining critical project- related
outreach activities to keep residents informed of our progress throughout the watershed.
Many of our high priority salmon habitat acquisition and restoration projects also provide
multiple benefits, including flood hazard management and landowner stewardship.
As you know, our efforts in WRIA 7 are part of the overall regional effort to recover
Puget Sound Chinook salmon, and we have been engaged with our partners in that effort
l ®Odre��iJtrOr tslli �tq�iscC tto� �ma► Jrutth siSti�r01rrity3raf tPre V13
for over 12 years. These CWMG funds represent a crucial source of our habitat
acquisition and restoration funding, and in these resource constrained times, they keep
important salmon recovery projects moving forward. If you have any questions, please
contact Perry Falcone, Snoqualmie Watershed Forum Project Coordinator, at (206) 296-
1940.
Sincerely,
Elizabeth Walker Forum Chair,
City of Duvall Councilmember
Cc:
Charles Peterson Forum Vice Chair,
City of Snoqualmie Councilmember
Kjristine Lund, Executive Director, King County Flood Control District
Mark Isaacson, Director, King County Water and Land Resources Division
Janne Kaje, Acting Snoqualmie Watershed Forum Coordinator
KC Flood Control District Exec Comm July 23, 2012 36
WATER RESOURCE
INVENTORY AREA (WRIA 8) SALMON RECOVERY
COUNCIL
July 16, 2012
q
9
Councilmember Julia Patterson, Chair, King County Flood
`�AMiS1
Control District
the rake
516 3rd Avenue, Room 1200
Washington/
cedar/
Beaux Arts Village
Seattle, WA 98104
Sammamish
Watershed
Bellevue
Bothell
1'Iyde H
RE: WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council Preliminary Funding
Edmonds
Recommendations for 2012 Cooperative Watershed Management Grants
Hunts Point
Issaquah
Kenmore
Dear Chair Patterson,
Kent
King County.
I am writing you in my capacity as Coordinator for the Lake
Kirkland
Washington /Cedar/ Sammamish Watershed (WRIA 8) Salmon Recovery
Lake Forest Park
Council which is comprised of 27 local governments, businesses,
Maple Valley
Medina
community groups, concerned citizens and state and federal agencies who
Mercer Island
have been working together since 2000 to recover Chinook salmon in our
Mul i reek
watershed. Our effort is part of the overall. regional effort to recover listed
Mountlake Terrace
Puget Sound Chinook salmon. On behalf of the WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery
Muklteo
Newcastle
Council I would like to express gratitude to the King County Flood Control
Redrriona
District for deciding to support the important regional salmon recovery
�Repton z
work through the 2012 Cooperative Watershed Management Grant
Sammamish
(CWMG) Program.
Seattle
shoreline
Snohomish County
Attached please find the preliminary WRIA 8 funding recommendations
v�[oodmvule
for the 2012 CWMG Program. The projects and programs on the list have
Yarrow Point
been vetted according to rules and procedures that have been reviewed
by King County as proper to the CWMG Program. The recommended
The Boeing Company
projects and programs have also been reviewed and prioritized by our
ceaarRivercov��i(,
Greater Maple'vaney
local Project Subcommittee for the WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council's
Area counal
consideration and approval at their meeting on July 19. We will notify you
Greater Seattle
Chamber of Commerce
Of an g
y chart es to the recommendations based on discussion and
Mid Sound Fisfienes
decisions at this meeting.
Enhancement Group.
Northwest Marine Trade
association
Through the 2012 CWMG Program, WRIA 8 received $1.2 million to
save lake Sammamisn
allocate to high priority salmon recovery projects and programs. In this
Sustainable Fisheries
grant round we received 14 proposals for a total request of over $2.2
>Foundation
Trout Unlimited
million, resulting in approximately a $1 million funding shortfall. Of the 14
proposals received, we recommend full or partial funding for six
Us Army Corps of Engineers
proposals.
Washington Departments:
Ecology
and Wildlife
These rant funds help implement critical salmon recover p riorities
g p p ry p
_Fish
"Natural Resources
called for in the WRIA '8 Chinook Conservation Plan, including habitat
Washington association of
acquisition and restoration projects, continued monitoring of Chinook
-Sewer and Water Districts
King Conservation District
KC Flood Control District Exec Comm July 23, 2012 37
15
WRIA 8 2012 Cooperative Watershed Management Grant Program Funding Recommendations Page 2
population status and trends, and sustaining popular outreach and
education programs that reach and benefit citizens throughout the
watershed. Many of our high priority salmon habitat acquisition and
restoration projects also provide multiple benefits, including flood
management.
As you know, our effort in WRIA 8 is part of the overall regional effort to
recover Puget Sound Chinook salmon, and we have been engaged with
our partners in that effort for over 12 years. These CWMG funds
represent approximately two thirds of our annual habitat acquisition and
restoration funding, and in these resource constrained times, help sustain
key programs and keep important projects moving forward.
Please note that all documents associated with the request for proposals,
the proposals, review process, and funding recommendation are
available.
Sincerely,
1 Jea White
a rshed Coordinator, Lake Washington /Cedar /Sammamish Watershed
(WRIA 8)
Cc:
Kjristine Lund, Executive Director, King County Flood Control District
Mark Isaacson, Director, King County Water and Land Resources Division
Ken Pritchard, King County, Cooperative Watershed Management Grant
Program Administrator
Dr. Don Davidson, DDS; Chair, WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council;
Councilmember, City of Bellevue
Jason Mulvihill- Kuntz, WRIA 8 Actions and Funding Coordinator
KC Flood Control District Exec Comm July 23, 2012 38
im
WAT RESOURCE
INVENTORY AREA o /VUR|8 o\ WATERSHED ECOSYSTEM FORUM
AND
July ]6
ComuiLmcmber Julia Patterson, Chair
King County Flood Control District K-ING COUNTY
5l6 3rd Avenue, Room |20O
A Auburn
8ca�|c WA 98104
Black Diamond
DE: Water Resource Inventory Area 9 Forum of Local Governments
UUnen
Funding Recommendations for Cooperative Watershed Management Grants
Covington
Des Moines
Dear Chair Patterson,
Enumclaw
Federal Way
The Gcecn/Duvvunnioh and Central Puget Sound (\�RJ/\9)VVu1erobcdl�cosyatomn
Kent
Forum (Forun/} �/�a1h/ appreciates the Flood {�onoo|Di�zict"mfunding auppoduf
K|og�wn�
Maple Valley
high priority n:cov�rypr �ectuand pvo&yuons The Forum approved the
p
NunoamdyPark
attached list of funding recommendations for the 2012 Cooperative Watershed
Renton
Management Grant Program u1 their May 9, 2012 meeting. The list includes funding
SeaTac
for projects tbu1huvcbocuaulectedthnnughusoieuoc-buocd,pdodtizcd,project list,
Seattle
and education/support programs which are annually funded to maintain program
Tacoma
continuity.
Tukwila
King Conservation District
The WRl}\ 9 allocation of$| 2 million will contribute towards funding the
��otu,tb�F�n��rL�v�c�otbuu�project
conyUnuti000[ two large reytnm1innpr in
vayhon8Nau�bbod
��uburnand Do"/anuiuh Gardens [�otuudneConstruction in Tukwila, revcgctu1ion
Community Council
along the Dup/unuiuh River, support for community bused restoration projects by non-
Covington Water District
profit organizations, environmental education, and monitoring of water quality and
Port of Seattle
Chinook population status. The Cooperative Watershed Management Grant Program
Washington Department
is critical for matching $1,060,255 in other grant funds towards these projects and
of Ecology
programs.
Washington Department
mf Fish and Wildlife
The projects ondprognznnopnopoued for 6undin�are included as habitat strategic
Washington Department
Initiatives aa outlined in the draft Puget Sound Action Agenda. The Action Agenda
of Natural Resources
prioritizes cleanup and improvement projects, coocdinutcsK:dcruLmtNc,|ocuitrihu|
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and pri osources, and ensures cooperative ecosystem efforts in Puget Sound.
Washington
Environmental Counc
Watershed Alliance
Trout Unlimited/Mid-Sound
Fisheries Enhancement Group
Save Habitat and Diversity of
Wetlands (SHADOW)
The Boeing Company
Master Builders Association
King County Agricultural
Commission
We would bc pleased to provide background documents related to the development of
the project list, proposals and funding recommendations upon request.
Sincerely,
WRIA 9 Watershed Ecosystem Forum:
MarlluMboon
Ci of Covi
���rem.
City of Federal Way
Financial support provided by signers of Watershed Planning Interlocal Agreement for WRIA 9 including:
1004 W9 �A�w�. No�e��nun� d y������Loun�,��,|eVoUe�
1
Snoqualmie Watershed Forum 2012 CWM Grant Program Recommendation
'VVR1�1
P�`�►��� Narr�e
�rbj�ct s�c�ns�ar
Pro�a�� Aesr�ript�ar� r z
fUlatch
CWM
Snoqualmie at Fall City
Upper Carlson Floodplain
Restore floodplain habitat along the mainstem Snoqualmie River by removing and setting
7
Reconnection
King County
back 1600 feet of levees and revetments on King County land. This critical Chinook salmon
$2,068,207
$200,000
CWM 12 -SF -1
restoration project is a high priority in the Snohomish Basin Salmon Conservation Plan.
2013 Snoqualmie Restoration
and Project Assistance
King County (on
behalf of the
Provide project assistance, project related outreach, and regional coordination to implement
7
Program
Forum and the
the Snohomish River Salmon Conservation Plan in King County portion of WRIA 7. Direct
$39,690
$98,000
CWM 12 -SF -2
Cities
project assistance includes design review, grant writing and project coordination.
Snoqualmie Riverfront Reach
City
Continue an on -going city effort to purchase riverfront properties along the Snoqualmie River
7
Acquisition
u
Snoqualmie
with the multiple benefit of habitat projection, future restoration, and flood hazard reduction.
$173,000
$72,000
CWM 12 -SF -3
To date the city has purchased 28 parcels and plans to target three more.
Stillwater Wildlife Area
As part of the larger Stillwater Floodplain Restoration Project, Ducks Unlimited will provide
7
Riparian Restoration
Ducks Unlimited
construction management for the overall project, stakeholder outreach, and restore 1200 feet
$735,110
$65,889
CWM 12 -SF -4
of riparian area.
7
Tolt River Priority Acquisitions
Kin g County
Acquisition of at least 2 parcels along the lower Tolt River that will lead to high priority
$250,000
$50,000
CWM 12 -SF -5
mainstem Chinook restoration projects.
Kimball Creek Water Quality
Work with three landowners to remove invasive plants and restore native plans along Kimball
7
Improvement Project Phase 2
Snoqualmie Tribe
Creek near the City of Snoqualmie in the Upper Snoqualmie Basin. Restoration will involve
$975
$8,131
CWM 12 -SF -6
0.3 acres and 315 linear feet of creek.
McCormick Park Cooperative
Sound Salmon
Maintain existing restoration projects at Duvall's McCormick Park along the Snoqualmie
7
Maintenance Project
Solutions
River. The riparian restoration projects are more than 3 years old and have experienced
$31,500
$29,990
CWM 12 -SF -7
unforeseen flood and beaver related site damage.
7
Snoqualmie Restoration
Initiative
Stewardship
Restore riparian areas on three farms in the lower Snoqualmie Valley including: along lower
$60,400
$44,000
CWM 12 -SF -8
Partners
Cherry Creek, at the mouth of Ames Creek and along the mainstem Snoqualmie River.
Tollgate Farm E. Bookend
NW Parcel Weed Control
City of North
Continue work to restore North Bend's Tollgate Farm Bookend property including removal of
7
Project: Phase 2
Bend
a minimum of 8 acres of invasive weeds. 1000 conifers will be planted in the phase 1 area
$12,000
$31,990
CWM 12 -SF -9
east of Ribary Creek.
Total Match Leverage $3,370,882
R C rn"' hdod ,WM GrantRequ���Ttitai
KC Flood Control District Exec Comm July 23, 2012 40
co
rQ
C:)
WRIA 8 2012 CWM Grant Program Funding Recommendations
Total Match Leverage $6,506,020
KC Flood Control District Exec Comm
July 23, 2012
a
P Orl 416`n
Mach
CWM Grant
di
F
Riverbend Acquisition (Cedar
This project will acquire the 18.6 acre Riverbend mobile home park along the Cedar River in Maple
8
River)
King County
Valley for future restoration of important floodplain habitat. Acquiring this property fills a gap in
$6,084,000
$750,000
publicly—owned habitat along the left bank of the Cedar River and enables future levee setback and
JCWM 12-8-1
floodplain restoration opportunities.
Cedar River Stewardship-in-
This project will build on Seattle Public Utilities' existing effort with Forterra and the Friends of the
8
Action: Focus on Invasives
Seattle Public Utilities
Cedar River Watershed to remove invasive species and restore riparian ecosystems in the lower
$67,200
$61,312
Cedar River Watershed. Stewardship-in-Action will focus on invasive species identification and
CWM 12-8-2
eradication, replanting treated areas, and outreach and education of river-front property owners.
WRIA 8 Fish In/Fish Out
This monitoring effort will track the number of Chinook salmon on the spawning grounds and trap
8
Monitoring 2013
King County
juvenile Chinook migrating out of the Cedar River to assess the productivity of habitat in WRIA 8
$182,646
$299,141
for sustaining Chinook salmon. These data are provided to stakeholders annually to help
I CWM 12-8-3
understand if recovery goals outlined in the WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Plan are being met.
Cedar River Salmon Journey
The Cedar River Salmon Journey educates watershed residents about salmon ecology and
8
2013
Friends of the Cedar
watershed health. Trained community volunteers make family-friendly riverside presentations to the
River Watershed
public in the fall at several locations on the Cedar River and at the Hiram Chittenden Locks in the
$71,207
$33,017
CWM 12-8-4
summer.
Beach Naturalists Program
The Beach Naturalist Program engages and educates Puget Sound citizens how to protect and
8
2013
Seattle Aquarium
conserve the marine and nearshore environment, including the vital role the nearshore plays as
$57,793
$12,600
habitat for salmon rearing and migration. Volunteers are trained and scheduled to work on ten local
CWM 12-8-5
beaches between 13 and 16 days during spring and summer.
Salmon Watcher Program
The Salmon Watcher Program involves eight cities in WRIA 8 working together with King County to
8
2013-2014
King County
recruit and train watershed residents about local salmon and salmon conservation issues. The
$43,174
$43,930
program collects data on salmon presence in streams and educates citizens and streamside
CWM 12-8-6
residents about salmon and streams in their watershed.
Total Match Leverage $6,506,020
KC Flood Control District Exec Comm
July 23, 2012
a
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Community Affairs and Parks Committee
FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director
By: Ryan Larson, Senior Engineer
DATE: October 19, 2012
SUBJECT: Duwamish Gardens
Project No. 90630102, Contract No. 12 -007
Supplemental Agreement No. 1
ISSUE
Approve Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to Contract No. 12 -007 with J. A. Brennan Associates.
BACKGROUND
In February 2012, the City entered into a consultant agreement with J.A. Brennan Associates for
the design of the Duwamish Gardens project. An early task of this agreement was to review the
site for evidence of cultural and historic resources. The initial investigation excavated a series of
narrow probes throughout the site and the material was sent to a lab for analysis. Several of the
samples revealed the presence of organic material which can be an indication for historic
resources.
DISCUSSION
The Army Corps of Engineers reviewed the analysis as part of a future permit and is requiring a
more detailed site assessment to further investigate potential impacts to cultural resources. The
consultant worked with the Corps and developed a plan to further study the site. This additional
analysis will include excavating 16 trenches 3 feet wide by 6 feet deep and of variable lengths.
Sediments will be excavated in thin lifts and will be laid out for archaeological inspection and
testing.
Fiscal Impact
This excavation and testing is beyond the initial scope of the consultant's contract and is
required prior to developing a final site design and moving the project forward. The cost for this
additional item is $91,341.80. The current agreement with J.A. Brennan is $316,066.00 and with
this supplement, the new total will be $407,407.80. With the Proposed 2013 CIP, there is
$410,000.00 budgeted in design. Additional grant funding is available through King County
Flood Control District for $500,000 (presented separately tonight) and this grant allows funding
for the additional cultural resources work as well as the demolition of structures and project
construction.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve Supplemental Agreement No. 1 with JA Brennan Associates for additional excavation
work in the amount of $91,341.80.00 and consider this item at the November 13, 2012
Committee of the Whole and subsequent November 19, 2012 Regular meetings.
Attachments: Page 65, Proposed 2013 CIP
Supplemental Agreement No. 1
WAPW Eng \PROJECTSW- DR Projects \Duwamish Gardens 06 -DR02 (90630102) \Design \INFO MEMO Design Supplement 1.docx 21
22
CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY
2013 to 2018
PROJECT: Duwamish Gardens Project No. 90630102
DESCRIPTION:
Purchase and restore site as a salmon estuary and passive park.
This project is included in the WRIA 9 Salmon Recovery Plans efforts to acquire and restore 20 -acres
JUSTIFICATION:
within the Duwamish estuary.
Property acquired in late 2008. Design phase began in 2012. Construction scheduled for 2015, grant
STATUS:
dependent.
MAINT. IMPACT:
With a new passive park, additional maintenance will be needed.
30
Design funding from State Salmon Recovery Board (SRFB), and King Conservation District (KCD).
COMMENT:
Acquisition grants included SRFB, WRIA 9 King Conservation District, KC Conservation Futures, WA
State Aquatic Lands and WA State Earmark.
FINANCIAL
Through Estimated
tin tnnn Qi
2n11 2n12 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 BEYOND TOTAL
EXPENSES
Design
30
110
270
410
Land (R/W)
2,116
2,116
Const. Mgmt.
10
250
50
310
Construction
7
70
1,750
750
2,577
TOTAL EXPENSES
2,153
110
350
2,000
800
0
0
0
0
5,413
FUND SOURCES
Awarded Grant
2,058
110
350
370
2,888
Proposed Grant
1,500
750
2,250
Mitigation Actual
0
Mitigation Expected
0
City Oper. Revenue
95
0
0
130
50
0
0
0
0
275
TOTAL SOURCES
2,153
110
350
2,000
800
0
0
0
0
5,413
2013 2018 Capital Improvement Program 65 23
24
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO.1
to
CONSULTANT AGREEMENT NO. 12 -007
THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Tukwila,
Washington, herein -after referred to as "the City and J.A. Brennan Associates, hereinafter
referred to as "the Consultant in consideration of the mutual benefits, terms, and conditions
hereinafter specified.
The City desires to supplement the agreement entered into with the Consultant and executed on
February 3, 2012, and identified as Agreement No. 12 -007: All provisions in the basic
agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this Supplement.
The changes to the agreement are described as follows:
1. Scope of Services, is hereby changed to include reimbursement for direct expenses and costs
for the development and execution of the Cultural Resources Site Delineation and
Geotechnical and Environmental Support services.
See Exhibit A, attached with additional scope of services.
2. Payment, is hereby changed to include an additional $91,341.80 for this additional scope of
services. The maximum amount payable under this agreement as supplemented inclusive of
all fees and other costs shall not exceed $407,407.80 without express written modification of
the Agreement signed by the City.
See Exhibit B, attached, with additional fees for added scope of work.
3. Time for Performance, is amended to include an additional 120 days for completion of
this additional scope of services. The required completion date for all work under this
agreement as supplemented is now June 6, 2013.
DATED this 1 day of r-C- TrQof—�-L 2012.
CITY OF TUKWILA
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
CONSULTANT
By:
Printed Name: \-)Av''1 7 A Uf- [4 MN
Title: _PHtiGte6\,
25
26
0,
f
October 16, 2012
associates rttc
Landscape Architects Planners
100 S. King Street, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98104
t.206.583- 0620 f. 206.583.0623
Exhibit A www.jabrennan.com
Scope of Work Additional Services for Cultural Resources Site Delineation and
Geotechnical and Environmental Support
Duwamish Gardens
Prepared For:
Ryan Larson, the City of Tukwila Public Works Department
Project Description
The project involves design and permitting services for the construction of estuarine fish habitat on a 2.16
acre City owed site. A conceptual site plan has been developed by the WDFW and calls for the
excavation of 55,000 cubic yards of material to establish approximately 2 acres of shallow water mudflat
and marsh habitat and approximately 0.8 acres of uplands planted with native vegetation.
This extra services scope of work is to provide an Archaeological Site Delineation as requested by the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers "the Corps the lead consulting agency for compliance with Section 106
of the National Historic Preservation Act "Section 106 This extra services scope also includes
additional groundwater monitoring.
Task 1 Administration
Administration tasks include meeting coordination, scheduling, contract administration and subconsultant
administration costs and expenses.
Task 2 Cultural Resources Site Delineation
Initial Cultural and Historical Resource Investigations (Task 2.2 of the Contract) has been completed. At
a meeting on July 12, 2012, it was determined by the Corps that further investigations and delineation of
cultural resources at the site would be required to make a Section 106 determination. Subsequently, ESA
Paragon Associates, in collaboration with the Corps and the Muckleshoot Tribe and other stakeholders,
prepared a site delineation plan, which proposes a series of trenches and test pits throughout the property
to ascertain the extent of cultural resources.
See Attachment A for a detail on this scope of services and products. J.A. Brennan Associates will
provide client agency coordination, attend a site meeting and review ESA Paragon's Technical Report.
Task 3 Geotechnical and Environmental Support
Initial Hydrogeologic Assessments (Task 2.3.7 of the Contract) have been completed. Subconsultant,
Shannon &Wilson installed vibrating wire piezometers at three locations in order to measure fluctuating
groundwater conditions. Data was recorded between June and August, 2012. This additional service
request includes additional groundwater monitoring though the winter and spring 2013, when rainier
conditions are expected that could provide informative groundwater level data.
City of Tukwila Duwamish Gardens Scope of Work
27
See Attachment B for a detail on this scope of services and products. J.A. Brennan Associates will
provide client coordination and review of groundwater monitoring data reporting.
Assumptions
1. This scope of work does not include data recovery work or work associated with mitigation
requirements that may be determined by the Corps.
2. See Attachment A for further assumptions.
City of Tukwila Duwamish Gardens Scope of Work
n� 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW www.paragonresearch.net
Paragon 5309
200
Seattle, WA 98107
206.789.9658 phone
206.789.9684 fax
September 11, 2012
Mike Perfetti
J.A. Brennan Associates
VIA email (mike @jabrennan.com)
Subject: Duwamish Gardens Archaeological Site Delineation
Dear Mike:
Attached is ESA Paragon's scope of work and cost estimate for the Duwamish Gardens Archaeological Site
Delineation for 45 -KI -703. The scope (Attachment A) and cost estimate (Attachment B) have been developed
based on the project approach set forth by USACE and the Delineation Plan prepared for the project.
The scope is phased to include a program of archaeological trenching (Task 2) with a follow -on program of
archaeological test excavations (Task 3). At the completion of Task 2, ESA Paragon will provide an interim
memorandum of results (Task 2.1), and, if requested, participate in an on -site meeting of stakeholders to
examine trench exposures (Task 2.2). Initiation of Task 3 will be contingent upon a decision by the City to
continue with the project based upon Task 2 results. Please note that if the City determines it is not feasible to
continue with the project, we will still need to conduct tasks to document the site and prepare the artifacts for
curation. Further, even if we conduct test excavations, it is possible that additional investigations not included in
this scope of work may be determined necessary during consultation.
Although the cost estimate does not include the curation fees; current pricing for curation at the Burke Museum
may be found at http:// www .burkemuseum.org/pub /09curation brochure.pdf Based on the assumptions about
collection volume included in the cost proposal curation fees would be expected to be approximately $8,100.
Please contact me with any questions about this scope of work and cost proposal. We appreciate the opportunity
to participate in the creation of Duwamish Gardens.
Sincerely,
Chris Lockwood
Principal Investigator
Northwest Cultural Resources
29
wt
Paragon
Attachment A
Scope of Work
Duwamish Gardens
Site Delineation
Project Description: The City of Tukwila is proposing to enhance fish and riparian habitat along the right
(north) bank of the Duwamish River, in Tukwila, King County, Washington. Conceptual designs for the project
will require removal of existing buildings and structures, excavation, and alteration of vegetation. The USACE
has requested site delineation for 45 -KI -703, a precontact archaeological site that extends into the project Permit
Area, as well as other archaeological components that may exist within the Permit Area. ESA Paragon has
developed a Site Delineation Plan which outlines the procedures to be followed during site delineation activities.
Scope of Work: The Scope of Work to be conducted by ESA Paragon includes seven tasks:
Task 1. Client and Agency Coordination. Under this task, ESA Paragon will assist in coordinating
between City of Tukwila, US Army Corps of Engineers, the design team, DAHP, King County Historic
Preservation Program, and the interested tribes. ESA Paragon will also maintain project schedule and
budget.
Task 2. Archaeological Trenching. ESA Paragon will direct archaeological trenching of 17 trenches to be
completed by a City supplied excavator. Trenches will be excavated to a maximum depth of 2 meters (6
feet), and may be internally stepped to provide safe access. ESA Paragon will document trenches using
standard archaeological methods. Opportunistic screening (1/8" mesh) and hand sampling may be
conducted in areas containing artifacts, features, or other cultural evidence.
Task 2.1. Interim Report of Results: ESA Paragon will provide a brief report of Task 2 results within
3 days of completion of Archaeological Trenching.
Task 2.2. Stakeholder Site Visit: ESA Paragon will participate in a site visit by stakeholders to
examine exposed trenches.
Task 3. Test Excavations. If, based on the results of Archaeological Trenching (Task 2), the City of
Tukwila opts to proceed with the project, ESA Paragon will then hand excavate up to 10 test excavation
units. Units will be 1 m wide by I m long, and will extend to 1.3 m below ground surface or 30 cm beyond
sterile, whichever is deeper, and may require safety benching. It is expected that test units will be oriented
along trenches. Test unit walls will be inspected, photographed, and stratigraphic profiles drawn. All
material will be screened through 1/8" mesh. Artifacts and samples will be collected for analysis and
curation.
Task 4. Artifact Analysis. Functional, typological, and preliminary chronological analysis will be
conducted for all artifacts. No specialists will be retained and no samples will be dated.
Task 5. Technical Report. ESA Paragon will summarize the findings of our work and recommendations
in a comprehensive Technical Report. If Task 3 is conducted, the Technical Report will include the results
of this work; otherwise, the Technical Report will only synthesize the Interim Report (Task 2.1) with
results of any Artifact Analysis (Task 4). The Technical Report will meet the current SHPO standards for
cultural resources assessment including making recommendations for mitigating or minimizing potential
adverse effects, if warranted by the results of the field work. ESA Paragon will submit a draft report (PDF
format) for review by the Client and selected stakeholders. Once comments are received, ESA Paragon
31
A Paragon
Attachment A
Scope of Work
Duwamish Gardens
Site Delineation
will submit four (4) bound copies and two (2) electronic copies (in PDF format) as the final deliverable.
Client will be responsible for distributing the technical report to appropriate stakeholders.
Alternatively, if it is determined that data recovery will be conducted as mitigation to enable to project to
proceed, the Technical Report would be prepared and structured as a draft chapter for the anticipated Data
Recovery report, rather than as a stand -alone report. In this case, no hard copies will be distributed.
Task 6. Update Site Form /New Site Form(s). ESA Paragon will complete an archaeological site form
update for 45 -KI -703, as required by DAHP. One new archaeological site forms will be completed if
historic period components that are not temporally associated with precontact occupation at 45 -KI -703 are
encountered during fieldwork.
Task 7. Curation Preparation. ESA Paragon will prepare records, photographs, and data for curation,
meeting the Burke Museum's curation requirements; ESA Paragon assumes that project records,
photographs, and data will not exceed 20 linear inches of curation space. If test excavations are conducted,
and artifacts or samples requiring curation are collected, ESA Paragon will prepare artifacts /samples for
curation, meeting the Burke Museum's curation requirements; ESA Paragon assumes that the collection
will consist of not more 300 unique catalog numbers, and occupy not more than 4 cubic feet. This cost
estimate does not include Burke Museum curation fees.
Deliverables: ESA Paragon will prepare an Interim Report of Results (Task 2.1), and draft and final Technical
Report (Task 5; see Data Recovery exception above) that meet DA-HP standards. ESA Paragon will prepare an
archaeological site form update, and up to one (1) new archaeological site /isolate forms, as necessary. ESA
Paragon will prepare associated records (and artifacts /samples, if collected) to meet Burke Museum curation
standards.
Schedule: ESA Paragon will provide a schedule following receipt of a Notice to Proceed.
Assumptions:
All work will be conducted under the provisions set forth in the Site Delineation Plan.
Per the Site Delineation Plan, the focus of this work will be delineation of prehistoric archaeological site
45 -KI -703; one trench will be excavated to investigate a depression near the historic bunkhouse.
ESA Paragon will not conduct tasks with aboveground resources under this work order.
City will provide excavator and operator (3 days of trenching, plus 1 day of backfilling at completion of
fieldwork); excavator to have 3 -4 foot wide, smooth "ditch" bucket (no teeth), and be capable of
excavating to minimum of 2 meters (6 feet) below ground surface. The excavator may be tracked or
wheeled, as available. City to furnish all safety posts /markers (e.g., pylons, candlesticks) to mark
trenches /test excavations.
Trenches may be left open for stakeholder inspection until completion of Task 2 or Task 3, whichever
pertains. Archaeological deposits exposed in profiles or floors will be covered with geotextile cloth or
similar protective material prior to backfilling; an archaeologist will be present during backfilling.
Under Task 2, 17 trenches will be excavated, requiring three (3) days of mechanical trenching.
32
E, S
Attachment A
Scope of Work
Duwamish Gardens
Site Delineation
Under Task 3, up to 10 archaeological test units will be excavated. Each test unit may take up to two (2)
days to excavate by two (2) archaeologists (4 person days total), including any necessary benching.
Task 3 will only be completed if directed by the City following completion of Task 2.
Actual costs for Tasks 4 -7 will vary based upon results of Task 2 and Task 3 (if conducted).
Under Task 7, cost estimate assumes that project records, photographs, and data will not exceed 20 linear
inches, and artifacts /samples will not exceed 300 unique catalog numbers occupying not more than 4
cubic feet.
One set of consolidated comments on the draft Technical Report will be provided to ESA Paragon by the
Client.
Cost Proposal: ESA Paragon has estimated the cost for the Duwamish Gardens Site Delineation based on the
hours and rate schedule included in Attachment B. ESA Paragon estimates that the sum of $71,846 will be
required to complete Tasks 1 through 7 as described above. Extra services will be initiated by ESA Paragon only
after agreement by both ESA Paragon and the Client concerning revisions to the scope of work and additional
compensation, if necessary. This scope and cost estimate does not include preparation of a Supplemental
Treatment Plan, or conducting data recovery. This scope and cost estimate does not include Burke Museum
curation fees.
33
34
Z
N
c
C o�o�
m a�
O C co
W O
Cl) W
r
c 3 woo
�(n(nN N
L
a
ca
co
a.
IN
r 4
m
0
o.
0 NI
a
am o
N
7 d
07
O
3
Y
U
O
N
�I
im z.
c R�o
G r J
C
d U
�O
a`
0
d
c
CD
c
Q)
"6
65 O
L C
o¢
z m o
d y
O C
0.
0]
6
ro
rn
m
D_
35
N
c0
'1'
-'T
c0
O
(0I
O
CO
M
M
<D
(O
d'
C
0
O
a1
r
N
N
00
0
co
co
e»
j
r
O
I
O
M
iU,
Lo
N
O
0
0
O
O
O
'O
O
O
O
w
r
(�iO
�i
c6
d'
O
O U
�I�.I
S
T
Cl)
V
d
N
O
d N
tC
O
0
O
O
l6
L
j 0
O
LO
O i
ui I
'p
C
O
0
1
N,
00
CO
n,a
mp0o
j
'n
O
I�
a
r
i
o
07
E O
O 7
O
O
O
O
O
O
OI
o
co
M
1
Z=
O
O
O
c6
V
OI N
F p a
O
O
O
O
O
O
d
p
0
o
O
O
N
1-
c
m
O
N
V
t W
o
O.
O
O
j
O
O t�
dC
d O 3
o er o
o
1 M
O
O
o
r
r O
c+3 m
9 0
d
d S
N
N
m
U a
O
O
d d
N
O p
S
00
O
'O
C
�O N
m
N O
O
(O
C
2
m O 2
M
2
Q
t
U) m
O
c
c
o T
O
Y
N
Cl)
co
a T
r
o
N
O
1
N
C
0
0
C
0
0
O
C P 0
0�0
VI
O
O
O)
ct:.)
0) y O
J
65 O
0
N
E d
m
.0
L 0
o
0
0 0 0
O
Co
q
O
0 3
c
-3
�f'
d'
d'
d'
V
N
U p d
O) L
a
6 63 d l Y (n
iiU :jm(D
d
C13
rz
m
o
L
U)
(A y
D:
CD
t6
U
t
l6
V
H
O
O
c
mil
o
5)
m
4i
x
v
v
I
i
i
'm
o:
I
iN
N'NIM
h1
C,
Y
N
c
N
Y
W
YI
N!
N
N
N
NI
N
Y 0)
N o>
Im
iT
6
ro
rn
m
D_
35
36
ARCHAEOLOGICAL TESTING PLAN DUWAMISH GARDENS
Prepared by Chris Lockwood, Ph.D., ESA Paragon
At the direction of the US Army Corps of Engineers, ESA Paragon has developed this archaeological
testing plan for the City of Tukwila's Duwamish Gardens project. Archaeological survey and
archaeological monitoring of geotechnical geoprobing suggests that archaeological remains associated
with precontact site 45 -KI -703 extend into the Duwamish Gardens Permit Area. The Permit Area also has
a lengthy history of use as a farmstead and residence since the 1880s.
Archaeological testing is being conducted for the purposes o£ 1) delineating the extent of archaeological
remains associated with archeological site 45 -KI -703, and 2) assessing the potential of these remains to
address research questions relevant to 45 -KI -703 as set forth by Blukis Onat et al. (2010:33 -36). The
testing efforts will also be used to determine if there is a separate historic archaeological site related to the
historic farm.
FIELD METHODOLOGY
Testing will commence with mechanical trenching, followed by excavation of 8 -10 controlled test units;
the exact number and location of test units will be determined based upon the results of trenching.
Trenching
ESA Paragon will direct excavation of 12 -16 backhoe trenches across the Duwamish Gardens Permit
Area (Figure 1). Trenches will be 1.5 m wide x 1.5 in deep, and of variable length. Sediments will be
excavated in thin lifts, and spoils will be laid out for archaeological inspection. Trench walls will be
inspected, photographed, and stratigraphic profiles drawn. Opportunistic screening (1/8" mesh) and hand
sampling may be conducted in areas containing artifacts, features, or other cultural evidence.
Trenches will be oriented to evaluate the stratigraphy that has developed from the river towards the higher
elevation riverbank in order to expose the greatest stratigraphic variability and to provide greater
environmental information. Because natural depositional units would be oriented parallel to the river, the
trenches will be oriented perpendicular to expose these in cross section. Other trenches will be oriented
parallel to the river to test the hypothesis that there is a discernible change in stratigraphy as highlighted
in the organic matter testing.
One trench will be excavated to specifically investigate the depression in front of the bunkhouse building.
Test Units
Based on the results of trenching, ESA Paragon will hand excavate 8 -10 test units in locations estimated
to have the highest potential to address research questions set forth in Blukis Onat et al. (2010:333 -348).
Units will be lm wide x 1 in long, and of variable depth. Excavation will be conducted by natural
stratigraphic layer; natural stratigraphic layers thicker than 10 cm will be subdivided into arbitrary 10 cm
levels. Test units will extend to 1.3 in below ground surface or 30 cm beyond sterile, whichever is deeper,
and may require safety benching. Test unit walls will be inspected, photographed, and stratigraphic
profiles drawn. All material will be screened through 1/8" mesh; artifacts and samples will be collected
for analysis and curation.
45 -KI -703 Testing Plan Page 1
July 2012
37
Figure 1. Proposed Trenching Plan at Duwamish Gardens; note that test unit locations will be determined
based on trenching results.
EXPECTED DATA CATEGORIES
Prehistoric archaeological remains recovered during testing and data recovery at 45 -KI -703 include flaked
stone and ground stone tools, animal and fish bones and shell, botanical remains, pollen, fire modified
rock, fire features, postmold, depressions /pits, and pebble /rock concentrations. The archaeological site is
characterized by organic -rich sand layers.
Historic archaeological materials in archaeological deposits may include; food bone from processing and
consumption of mammal (including domesticates), avifauna (including domesticates), and fish;
manufactured items (e.g., glass, ceramic, metal, wood) associated with domestic life within residences;
tools, equipment and /or materials associated with agriculture; and foundations, post molds, pits, privies,
oxidized matrices, and other soil stains associated with residential and agricultural use.
ARTIFACT AND SAMPLE COLLECTION AND PROCESSING
Artifacts encountered during Duwamish Gardens archaeological testing are planned for curation at the
Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture in Seattle.
Artifacts will be collected and bagged in inert polyethylene 4mil ziptop bags with exact proveniences
recorded. Artifacts will be transported to the ESA Paragon archaeological analysis laboratory for
description, photography, illustration, and analysis, and prepared for curation. Analyses will be
conducted concurrently with fieldwork. All analyses will be completed within 30 days of fieldwork.
45 -KI -703 Testing Plan
July 2012
Page 2
W
ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES
Analyses of artifacts and samples collected during archaeological testing at Duwamish Gardens will be
conducted for the purpose of assessing the potential to address research domains relevant to 45 -KI -703 as
set forth by Blukis Onat et al. (2010:33 -36). If investigations continue into data recovery, additional
analyses of materials collected during test excavation may be needed.
Lithic Artifacts
Lithic artifact classification would include assessment of materials used for stone tools, techniques used
to manufacture stone artifacts, and functions of stone tools based on use -wear patterns and traditional
formal typologies. Stylistic analyses of projectile points and other temporally sensitive stone tools provide
chronological information. (If investigations continue into data recovery, trace element or other sourcing
techniques may be used to estimate the source lithic raw materials, and to infer mechanisms that operated
in the economic system to obtain raw materials, such as long distance trade).
Mammal, Fish, and Bird Bone
Bone analysis would include weights and counts (NISP), identification to taxonomic class (e.g., fish, bird,
or mammal), assessment of bone breakage and burning patterns to infer processing techniques and post
depositional changes. (If investigations continue into data recovery, additional analysis may include
identification to lower taxonomic levels and demographic analysis (age /sex) to make inferences regarding
seasonality and diet).
Shellfish
Shellfish analysis would include bulk weights, counts (NISP) and relative abundance of fragments by size
class (1", ''/2 o" and 1/8 (If investigations continue into data recovery, additional analyses may
include identification of hinges and spines to lowest possible taxonomic level; measurement of hinge size
to estimate variation in sizes of shellfish collected over time; and estimation of hinge /shell weathering).
Botanical Remains
Botanical analyses would include bulk weights of material, and estimation of relative abundance of wood
versus other botanical remains. (If investigations continue into data recovery, additional analyses may
include identification of samples to lowest possible taxonomic level, estimation of seasonality, inferences
of kinds of activities associates with different botanical materials such as use for fuel, food, or
technology, and evidence for post- depositional disturbance of archaeological sediments).
Perishable Artifacts
Perishable artifacts such as basketry or matting may occur in archaeological deposits. Field and laboratory
personnel would stabilize, clean, and store perishable materials following standard archaeological
procedures. Analysis would include assessment of artifact function. (If investigations continue into data
recovery, additional analyses may include identification to lowest possible taxonomic level and
estimation of seasonality).
Fire Modified Rock
Fire modified rock would be analyzed, using a classification system including material type,
discoloration, and breakage patterns. Samples of fire modified rock from bulk samples would be
classified, measured, weighted and counted.
45 -KI -703 Testing Plan
July 2012
Page 3
39
Utilized Bone and Shell
A functional classification system will be used to categorize shaped bone and shell artifacts into types that
reflect probable uses, uses such as fishing (e.g., fishhooks and harpoons) and woodworking (e.g., chisels
and wedges).
Sediment Samples
Soils data (e.g., soil pH, organic matter content, grain -size distribution, and other attributes) may be used
to infer past geomorphic conditions and post depositional processes.
Radiocarbon Analysis
Samples of charcoal, wood, and /or shell may be analyzed by a professional radiocarbon dating laboratory
to provide age determinations for samples in radiocarbon years. AMS radiocarbon dating will be
preferred over conventional radiocarbon dating. Samples will not be aggregated as a method for
obtaining sample sizes sufficient for radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon age determinations will be
calibrated to correct for temporal variation in atmospheric 14C. If shell samples are submitted for
radiocarbon analysis, additional age corrections may be required to account for variation in the carbon
content of marine water.
Thermoluminescence Analysis
Samples of fire modified rock may be analyzed at a specialized archaeological laboratory for
thermoluminescence analysis. Age determinations from thermoluminescence analysis may be used to
provide independent chronological control to corroborate age determinations from radiocarbon analysis.
Historic Ceramics
Analyses of ceramics will include assessment of form and function, analysis of style and manufacturing
technique, and determination of manufacturer and date of manufacture through seriation and analysis of
makers' marks, stamps, or other evidence.
Historic Glass
Analyses of vessel glass and other "non -flat" glass will include assessment of form and function, analysis
of style and manufacturing technique, and determination of manufacturer and date of manufacture
through seriation and analysis of makers' marks, stamps, or other evidence. "Flat" or window glass will
be characterized (modern or historic), recorded, dimensions (area and thickness) recorded with an
estimate of panes, but not further analyzed. If possible we will correlate the flat glass with a specific
building.
Historic Metal
Analyses of metal artifacts will include assessment of form and function, analysis of style and
manufacturing technique, and determination of manufacturer and date of manufacture through seriation
and analysis of makers' marks, stamps, or other evidence.
Other Historic Artifacts
Other types of historic artifacts will be analyzed using generally- accepted methods as appropriate.
CURATION
Artifacts collected during archaeological test excavations at Duwamish Gardens will be curated at the
45 -KI -703 Testing Plan
July 2012
Page 4
ON
Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture, in Seattle, WA, which has agreed to act as repository for
collections, records, photographs and data from the Duwamish Gardens project. The collections from
2005 excavations at 45 -KI -703 are curated at the Burke. Collections will be curated to meet the Burke's
Curation Guidelines.
RESEARCH DESIGN
Archaeological testing is being conducted to determine the extent, nature, and age archaeological remains
at Duwamish Gardens for the purpose of assessing whether deposits have the potential to address and
provide new information regarding the following research domains previously developed by Blukis Onat
et al. (2010:33 -36; see scanned attachment) for 45 -KI -703:
Research Domain 1: Site Formation Processes
Research Domain 2: Resource Specialization
Research Domain 3: Environmental Enhancement and Settlement System Development
Research Domain 4: Artifact Types and Distributions, Trade, and Regional Contacts
Research Domain 5: Ethnographic Correspondence
Because the Duwamish Gardens archaeological testing will be conducted in proximity to historic
agricultural and residential areas where there is the potential to encounter historic archaeological remains,
and because no historic research domain was developed previously, it is anticipated that an additional
research domain related to historic landuse will be developed, and archaeological testing results evaluated
against this additional research domain. However, we expect that any historic archaeological remains will
be recorded as a separate site.
REPORTING
Reporting will occur after analysis of fieldwork has been completed. A summary technical report will
present all data from the archaeological testing, evaluate the potential for additional archeological
deposits and their ability to address the various relevant research domains. A site form update for 45 -KI-
703 would be prepared and included as an appendix to the report. If a historic site is identified it will be
recorded as well.
REFERENCES
Blukis Onat, Astrida, Philippe D. LeTourneau, and Timothy L. Cowan
2010 3. Research Design and Data Recovery Investigation Methods. In The Duwamish River Bend Site
Data Recovery at 45 -KI -703, edited by Astrida Blukis Onat, pp.31 -50. Prepared by BOAS, Inc., Seattle.
Submitted to Sound Transit. On file, ESA Paragon, Seattle.
45 -KI -703 Testing Plan
July 2012
Page 5
41
W
45KI703 DATA RECOVERY REPORT
Data recovery excavations at 45KI703 addressed research domains outlined in the ARMT
Blukis Onat et al. 2004:53 -55). Research questions were adapted for the Supplemental
Treatment Plan (LeTourneau and Blukis Onat 2004b) (Appendix B). The five prehistoric
research domains considered: (1) environmental adaptation and landform use; (2) resource
specialization; (3) environmental enhancement and settlement system development; (4) artifact
types and distributions, trade and regional contacts; and (5) ethnographic correspondence.
The research questions that were part of the data recovery plan at site 45KI703 are itemized
below in the context of the five research domains. The complete text is provided in LeTourneau
and Blukis Onat 2004b (Appendix B).
Within each research domain, the questions are grouped by topic. Not all questions listed could
be addressed at 45KI703, nor are they exhaustive. They are suggestions of topics that might be
addressed at the site, not predictors of what would be found. Research questions that arose in the
course of investigations are presented and discussed in SECTION 15.
3.2.1. Environmental Adaptation and Landform Use
Site Formation Processes at 45KI703
1. How have geological processes impacted the landform on which site 45KI703 is located?
2. What evidence of flood deposits is present at 45KI703?
3. What is the substrate on which site 45KI703 was established?
4. What evidence is present to indicate that geological processes caused site 45KI703 to be
abandoned?
5. How did geological processes influence site occupation?
Site Formation Processes at Other Sites in the Region
1. How do the cultural changes and environmental circumstances at 45KI703 compare with
those at other sites in the region?
2. What evidence for change in regional prehistoric cultural systems can be derived from
the site?
3. What are the similarities and differences between site 45KI703 and Allentown
(45KI431)?
Impact of Tectonics on site 45KI703
1. What kinds of evidence are present testifying to the impact of earthquakes on peoples and
settlements?
2. What was the impact of the uplift associated with the magnitude 7 earthquake that shook
the region ca. 1000 -1100 BP?
3. If the Duwamish River floodplain was uplifted, what were the resulting changes to local
drainage patterns, erosion and deposition processes, vegetation types, and emergent
terrestrial surfaces?
4. How did these changes impact people and settlements?
5. What evidence is there for other tectonic events at 45KI703? What kinds of events are
represented at the site?
6. How did tectonic events affect site 45KI703?
33
43
45KI703 DATA RECOVERY REPORT
Resource Specialization
Ethnographic Model for 45KI703 Resources and Features
1. Is the currently used ethnographic model of hunters, gatherers, and fishers appropriate for
interpreting cultures in the site region?
2. What other models can be developed from ethnographic resources that better integrate
archaeological data and the basic elements of Pacific Northwest culture?
3. It appears there may be a structural feature at site 45KI703. Does the feature represent a
house?
4. If a house, is the excavation inside or outside the dwelling?
5. Does the house appear to be permanent or temporary?
6. What is the evidence for duration of occupation? Intensity of occupation?
Ethnographic Modeling at Other Sites in the Region
1. What kinds of archaeological sites are associated directly with the Tukwila Formation
and the floodplain promontories associated with the Duwamish Epic of the Winds?
2. The Allentown site (45KI431) has been defined as a fishing camp. Is site 45KI703 a
fishing camp also?
3. What other interpretations can be derived from materials at site 45KI703?
4. Would these possibly warrant revisions to the interpretations of site 45KI43I?
Invertebrates at 45KI703
1. What is the nature of evidence for pre -2000 BP shell midden sites in the region? Are
there shell midden sites in the region along ancient channels of the Duwamish River that
have been covered by alluvial or estuarine deposits?
2. How old is site 45KI703?
3. How much shell is present at site 45KI703?
4. What is the evidence that site 45KI703 is a degraded shell midden?
5. Is shell preservation at 45KI703 a factor of shell abundance or a factor of soil conditions?
6. There is greater abundance of shell at the Duwamish No. 1 site; how else is site 45KI703
different from it?
7. How are these two sites similar?
Vertebrates at 45KI703
1. How did fishing technology at the site change through time?
2. What are the regional differences in access to various fish species?
3. What are the changes through time in species utilized?
4. What is the evidence of differential access to marine, anadromous, and fresh -water
species at sites in various geographic locations?
5. What is the evidence for fishing at site 45KI703?
6. Is there evidence of change in fishing over time?
7. Are different fish species represented at different times?
8. Is there a relationship between fish species represented and evidence for landform
alterations?
34
45KI703 DATA RECOVERY REPORT
3.2.3. Environmental Enhancement and Settlement System Development
Site Chronology and Site Function
1. Is there evidence at the site for the chronological sequence of Duwamish River delta
progradation?
2. Where was the mouth of the Duwamish River at the time of site occupation?
3. Is there a chronological sequence of occupation and sediment deposits at 45KI703, or is
the site the result of a single use event?
4. What is the evidence in the stratigraphic sequence at site 45KI703 for habitat alterations
during the time the site was occupied?
5. Where was site 45KI703 in relation to delta and tidal marsh?
Subsistence and Settlement at 45KI703 and Other Sites in the Region
1. What evidence is present for changing subsistence /settlement patterns?
2. How can such changes be linked to region -wide shifts in subsistence organization and
settlement type? When did the changes occur?
3. What is the degree of bone and shell preservation?
4. How do the bone and shell add to evidence from tools to determine subsistence patters?
5. What is the evidence for changes in subsistence patterns? When did the changes occur?
6. How are these changes reflected in nearby sites (45KI431 and Duwamish No. 1)?
3.2.4. Artifact Types and Distributions, Trade, and Regional Contacts
Lithic Technology
1. What differences are evident from site to site with respect to technological organization?
2. Are there differences in technological organization in the lower Duwamish River valley
based on environments (e.g., littoral or riverine settings)?
3. What is the evidence for technological organization of lithic artifacts at the site?
4. What kind of information on technological organization can be derived from
relationships between artifacts and features?
5. How does the technological organization at 45KI703 compare with that at other nearby
sites (45KI431 and Duwamish No. 1)?
6. Where do the lithic materials present in the site come from?
3.2.5. Ethnographic Correspondence
Site 45KI703 and Epic of the Winds
1. Site 45KI703 is adjacent to one of the Tukwila Formation promontories associated with
the Duwamish Epic of the Winds. What was the nature of Duwamish use of the hills
located at South Boeing Access Road?
2. Were these culturally important places actually occupied?
3. What kinds of activities took place at these locations?
4. Are fragments of the Tukwila Formation present at 45KI703?
5. If so, can these be considered evidence for an association between site 45KI703 and the
Epic of the Winds promontories?
35
45
45KI703 DATA RECOVERY REPORT
Settlement Interdependence
1. Did Duwamish villages participate in an interdependent economic system where each
village's ecological or economic strengths resulted in a surplus that was traded to other
villages?
2. How did downstream villages interact with those upriver?
3. Did the trade networks linking Duwamish River villages also extend to other parts of
Puget Sound or to eastern Washington?
4. What evidence is there that the practices evident at 45KI703 are also described in the
ethnographic record of Duwamish people?
5. Is there oral history evidence that can explain features and artifacts found in the site?
3.3. Data Recovery Management and Methods
Fieldwork safety and security, archaeological excavation strategies, and laboratory processing
methods for data recovery investigations at site 45KI703 are detailed herein. The methods used
were based on those that had been proposed (LeTourneau and Blukis Onat 2004b) (Appendix B).
Divergence from these methods was limited and resulted from field conditions that could not
have been anticipated. They are noted in the following discussion. Procedures for specific
analyses are included in separate SECTIONS that describe the respective analysis results and in
specialist appendices.
Overall staffing for data recovery investigations has been detailed in SECTION 1. The more
specific responsibilities assigned to different persons are indicated in the following.
3.3.1. Fieldwork Safety and Security
During the data recovery field excavations, the archaeological crew followed standard OSHA
safety regulations. Lucy F. Zuccotti acted as BOAS safety officer. All Field Archaeologists and
supervisory staff wore safety vests as a preventive measure due to vehicular traffic on a nearby
driveway. Hard hats were worn when construction took place near the archaeological
excavations.
For site safety and security, the investigation area was surrounded with chain -link fencing
(Figure 15 -d and Figure 17). The fence had a movable gate that was locked at night. Some crew
members lived at the Ray Carrossino Farmhouse and provided informal site security during non-
working hours. Sound Transit assigned security guards to patrol the area during times when
archaeological work was not taking place.
Access to the investigation area was restricted to BOAS excavation personnel and occasional
visiting professional archaeologists and tribal representatives. Substantial wooden stairs were
built into the north and south walls of the excavation area to provide safe, low- impact access
(Figure 17 and Figure 18). Designated walking routes within the area of investigations
minimized impact by excavation personnel.
36
M
August 15, 2012
Mr. Mike Perfetti
J.A. Brennan Associates PLLC
100 S. King Street, Suite 200
Seattle, WA 98104
RE: DUWAMISH GARDENS CONTAMINATED MEDIA STUDIES AND
OTHER COST OVERAGES SUMMARY
Dear Mr. Perfetti:
Shannon Wilson (S &W) is submitting this letter to communicate recent cost overages related
to geotechnical borings and contaminated soils testing and laboratory analysis that are being
incurred on the Duwamish Gardens project. In addition, we understand additional work may be
performed on the project for cultural and archaeological studies, for which we recommend
including time for S &W environmental staff to provide observations during testing. We also feel
that extending the groundwater monitoring efforts would provide additional insight to project
design, and benefit the project. I have summarized our cost overages and recommended proposed
additional work below.
SHANNON
ALASKA
CAL I
6WILSON, INC.
COL ORADO
GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
FLORIDA
MISSOURI
OREGON
WASHINGTON
August 15, 2012
Mr. Mike Perfetti
J.A. Brennan Associates PLLC
100 S. King Street, Suite 200
Seattle, WA 98104
RE: DUWAMISH GARDENS CONTAMINATED MEDIA STUDIES AND
OTHER COST OVERAGES SUMMARY
Dear Mr. Perfetti:
Shannon Wilson (S &W) is submitting this letter to communicate recent cost overages related
to geotechnical borings and contaminated soils testing and laboratory analysis that are being
incurred on the Duwamish Gardens project. In addition, we understand additional work may be
performed on the project for cultural and archaeological studies, for which we recommend
including time for S &W environmental staff to provide observations during testing. We also feel
that extending the groundwater monitoring efforts would provide additional insight to project
design, and benefit the project. I have summarized our cost overages and recommended proposed
additional work below.
TASK 2.3.A GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS (ADDITIONAL GROUNDWATER
MONITORING)
The groundwater monitoring period specified in the scope includes a 2 -month monitoring period,
which occurred during mid -June through mid August 2012. Our current plan is to decommission
400 NORTH 34 °i STREET —SUITE 100
PO BOX 300303
SEATTLE, WA 98103
206 632 -8020 FAX 206 695 -6777
TDD: 1- 800 833 -6388
www.shannonwilson.com
21 -1 -12368 -024
47
IMIM
=10
TASK 2.3.A GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS (ADDITIONAL GROUNDWATER
MONITORING)
The groundwater monitoring period specified in the scope includes a 2 -month monitoring period,
which occurred during mid -June through mid August 2012. Our current plan is to decommission
400 NORTH 34 °i STREET —SUITE 100
PO BOX 300303
SEATTLE, WA 98103
206 632 -8020 FAX 206 695 -6777
TDD: 1- 800 833 -6388
www.shannonwilson.com
21 -1 -12368 -024
47
Mr. Mike Perfetti
SHANNON WILSON, INC.
J.A. Brennan Associates PLLC
August 14, 2012
Page 2 of 4
the data loggers next week (August 20, 2012). We recommend extending the groundwater
monitoring through winter and spring 2013. There are numerous reasons for extending the
groundwater monitoring:
Winter flood and high tide maximum groundwater elevations can be documented for
geotechnical and slope stability design.
The variability in daily fluctuations, related to bank stability, can be observed over
the fall /winter flood and spring runoff periods.
Groundwater elevations measured in B -1 are directly linked to the Green River
surface water elevations. Measurement of this information can be used for finalizing
design elevations for winter and spring juvenile chinook migration periods. Currently,
surface water elevations are being approximated using the Lower Green River HEC-
RAS model.
The estimated cost to continue monitoring through May 2013 is $5,000, including monitoring
equipment rental extensions or purchases, three quarterly data downloads, report updates and
distribution of data, and administration of the work.
21 -1- 12368- 024- L1.docx/wp/1kn
21 -1- 12368 -024
W
owns
21 -1- 12368- 024- L1.docx/wp/1kn
21 -1- 12368 -024
W
Mr. Mike Perfetti
J.A. Brennan Associates PLLC
August 14, 2012
Page 3 of 4
SHANNON MILSON, INC.
A Additiefial shallow sail sample tests ffeffi the 6 additional geoprebe leee4ions-.
Mn
TASK 2.2 CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL RESOURCE INVESTIGATIONS
We have been diligently coordinating with J.A. Brennan and Paragon (ESA Adolfson) on
cultural and archaeological resource investigations. The expansion of the cultural resource
investigations has required additional time on behalf of S &W staff in support of the studies. We
have provided review of the proposed testing program; are recommending site visits during
testing; and have provided comment on potential geologic, sedimentation, and anthropomorphic
history that may provide insight to the site characterization. We would like to request additional
funding to continue supporting J.A. Brennan, Paragon, and the City of Tukwila on this matter.
Our proposed budget is as follows:
Coordination and review time 2 hours Principal- in- ChargeNice President, 2 hours
Associate, and 2 hours Principal Engineer $1,000.
On -site assistance 16 hours Principal Engineer for on -site assistance and 2 days of
travel and 2 hours Associate for administration and contract management for $2,177.
21 -1- 12368- 024- L1.docx/wp/1kn
21 -1 -12368 -024
I
Mr. Mike Perfetti
SHANNON WLSON, INC.
J.A. Brennan Associates PLLC
August 14, 2012
Page 4 of 4
CLOSING
In summary, S &W is requesting proposing a project cost modification to our contract as
follows:
Task 2.2 Cultural and Historical Resources Investigations $3,177
Task 2.3 Geateehnieal hivestiga4ians (east aver X93+
Task 2.3.A Geotechnical Investigations (extend GW monitoring) 5,000
Task 2.4 Contaminated Media investigeAians
G, ner-a r e fi tr et Rate >C.,,, G,. e
Total Request
$15,463
We understand that the project is limited to funding by the City and grant limits and timelines.
However, we do feel that changes in the project schedule, cultural resources conditions,
additional costs to complete soils testing, and the opportunity for extending groundwater
monitoring are justifiable requests to the City.
Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this letter.
Sincerely,
SHANNON WILSON, INC.
C'L�
David R. Cline, P.E.
Associate
DRC /dre
21 -1- 12368- 024 -L Ldocx/wp/Ikn
21 -1 -12368 -024
50
City of Tukwila Public Works
J.A. BRENNAN ASSOCIATES, PLLC ISeptember 17, 2012
DUWAMISH GARDENS DESIGN ADDITIONAL SERVICES
WORK DESCRIPTION I jg
1 Administration Coordination
1 Job set -up
2 Subconsultant Coordination
3 Sche duling
i T otall
2 Cultural Resources Site Delineation
2.1 Client/Agency coordination
2.2 Archaeological trenching
23 Interim report of results
2.4 Site meeting
2.5 Archaelogical test units
2.6 Artifact Analysis
27 Technical Report
2.8 Site form update
2.9 Curation preparation
Total Cultural R esources Site Delineation
3 Geotechnical and Environmental Support
3.1 Additional groundwater monitoring
3.3 On -site assistance for cultural resource investigation
Total Gootechnical Investigations
Total
IN
IM
r
1
3
Labor
176.50
1,228.00
6 684.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
3 303.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
2 241.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
11 1,228.00
MUMM
1 101.00
1 101.00
2 202.00
30 3,316.50
irand
otal
Shan. Wil.
176.50
176.50
165.20
1_,22800
1,228.00
6,838.00
482.00
482.00
4,054 00
1;880,50
405.40
86.5d�
1,044.00
684.00
i
849.20
1,451.40
0.00
68180
3,560.10
0.00
405.40
3,960.00
303.00
407.40
6,716.00
0.00
3,560.10
7,628.60
0.00
396.00
241.00
912.60
9,180.00
0.00
280.10_
1,846.00
0.00
918.00
80258.60
1;228.00
8,412.60
0.00
101.00
601.00
5,000.00
101.00
418.70
3,177.00
202.00
1,019,70
8,177.00
3;316.60
11,318.80
8,177,00
176.50
1,228.00
482.00
Il l7a,l`.1,' 0.00 o a0 „I 1,800;So
1652.00
1,652.00
165.20
2,501.20
6,838 00
6,838.00
683.80
7,521.80
4,054 00
4,054.00
405.40
4,459.40
1,044.00
1,044.00
104.40
1,451.40
5,601.00
35,601.00
3,560.10
39,161.10
3,960.00
3,960.00
396.00
4,356 00
6,716.00
6,716.00
671.60
7,628.60
2,801.00
2,801.00
280.10
3,081.10
9,180.00
9,180.00
918.00
1 10,098.00
1,846.00
71,846.00
7,184,60
80258.60
so=
5,000.00
HEM
500.00
MMM_ 11
5,601,00
3,177.00
317.70
3,595.70
D-1-h GaIde Tukwila, 2012- 09-17.xNx, Option A 10/1772012
i
52