HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOW 2013-02-11 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKETc
Age Tukwila City Council Agenda
• COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE • ❖
Jim Haggerton, Mayor Counciimembers + Joe Duffie + Dennis Robertson
-9 David Cline, CityAdministrator + Allan Ekberg + Verna Seal
Kathy Hougardy, Council President + De'Sean Quinn + Kate Kruller
Monday, February 11, 2013, 7:00 PM Tukwila City Hall Council Chambers
1. CALL TO ORDER / PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. SPECIAL
PRESENTATIONS
a. Proposed gypsy moth eradication program. Brad White, Ph.D, Program
Manager, Washington State Department of Agriculture, Plant Protection Division.
b. Alive and Free Program. Seth Goode, Metrocenter YMCA.
3. CITIZEN COMMENT
At this time, you are invited to comment on items not included on this agenda
is
(p /ease limit your comments to five minutes per citizen). To comment
on an item listed on this agenda, please save your comments until the issue
presented for discussion.
4. SPECIAL ISSUES
a. An ordinance regarding the Nuisance Code.
b. A resolution regarding the non - represented employees' wages and
benefits for 2013.
c. A briefing on County -wide Planning Policies.
Pg.1
Pg.31
Pg.49
5. REPORTS
a. Mayor
b. City Council
c. Staff
d. City Attorney
e. Intergovernmental
6. MISCELLANEOUS
7. EXECUTIVE SESSION
8. ADJOURNMENT
Tukwila City Hall is wheelchair accessible.
Reasonable accommodations are available at public hearings with advance notice to the
City Clerk's Office (206- 433 -1800 or TukwilaCityClerk @TukwilaWA.gov). This notice is available at
www,tukwilawa,gov, and in alternate formats with advance notice for those with disabilities.
Tukwila Council meetings are audio taped.
HOW TO TESTIFY
If you would like to address the Council, please go to the podium and state your name and address clearly for
the record. Please observe the basic rules of courtesy when speaking and limit your comments to five
minutes. The Council appreciates hearing from citizens but may not be able to take immediate action on
comments received until they are referred to a Committee or discussed under New Business.
COUNCIL MEETINGS
No Council meetings are scheduled on the 5th Monday of the month unless prior public notification is given.
Regular Meetings - The Mayor, elected by the people to a four -year term, presides at all Regular Council
Meetings held on the 1st and 3rd Mondays of each month at 7:00 p.m. Official Council action in the
form of formal motions, adopting of resolutions and passing of ordinances can only be taken at Regular
Council meetings.
Committee of the Whole Meetings - Council members are elected for a four -year term. The Council
President is elected by the Council members to preside at all Committee of the Whole meetings for a
one -year term. Committee of the Whole meetings are held the 2nd and 4th Mondays at 7:00 p.m.
Issues discussed are forwarded to the Regular Council meeting for official action.
GENERAL INFORMATION
At each Council meeting citizens are given the opportunity to address the Council on items that are not
included on the agenda during CITIZENS COMMENTS. Please limit your comments to 5 minutes.
Special Meetings may be called at any time with proper public notice. Procedures followed are the same as
those used in Regular Council meetings.
Executive Sessions may be called to inform the Council of pending legal action, financial, or personnel
matters.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Public Hearings are required by law before the Council can take action on matters affecting the public interest
such as land -use laws, annexations, rezone requests, public safety issues, etc. Section 2.04.150 of the
Tukwila Municipal Code states the following guidelines for Public Hearings:
1. The proponent shall speak first and is allowed 15 minutes for a presentation.
2. The opponent is then allowed 15 minutes to make a presentation.
3. Each side is then allowed 5 minutes for rebuttal.
4. Citizens who wish to address the Council may speak for 5 minutes each. No one may speak a second
time until everyone wishing to speak has spoken.
5. After each speaker has spoken, the Council may question the speaker. Each speaker can respond to the
question, but may not engage in further debate at this time.
6. After the Public Hearing is closed and during the Council meeting, the Council may choose to discuss
the issue among themselves, or defer the discussion to a future Council meeting, without further public
testimony. Council action may only be taken during Regular or Special Meetings.
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
Initials
Meeting Date
Prepared by
Ma review
Council uncil review
02/11/13
KAS
/pis
/,7a(_
_i_t
02/19/13
KAS
❑ Bid Award
Mtg Date
l
❑ Other
Mtg Date
CATEGORY ■ Discussion
I, Ordinance
Mtg Date
Mtg Date 02/19/13
SPONSOR ❑ Council ❑ Mayor ❑ HR DCD ❑ Finance ❑ Fire ❑ IT ❑ P&R ❑ Police ❑ PW
SPONSOR'S Updating TMC Chapter 8.28 to include revisions to Vacant Structures section and adding
SUMMARY regulations regarding Recreational Vehicles in residential zones.
REVIEWED BY ❑ COW Mtg.
❑ Utilities Cmte
DATE: 01/28/13
ITEM INFORMATION
ITEM NO.
4.A.
STAFF SPONSOR: BOB BENEDICTO
ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 02/11/13
AGENDA ITEM TITLE
An Ordinance to update TMC Chapter
8.28 regarding
public nuisances.
02/11/13
❑ Motion
Mtg Date
❑ Resolution
Mtg Date
❑ Bid Award
Mtg Date
❑ Public Hearing
Mtg Date
❑ Other
Mtg Date
CATEGORY ■ Discussion
I, Ordinance
Mtg Date
Mtg Date 02/19/13
SPONSOR ❑ Council ❑ Mayor ❑ HR DCD ❑ Finance ❑ Fire ❑ IT ❑ P&R ❑ Police ❑ PW
SPONSOR'S Updating TMC Chapter 8.28 to include revisions to Vacant Structures section and adding
SUMMARY regulations regarding Recreational Vehicles in residential zones.
REVIEWED BY ❑ COW Mtg.
❑ Utilities Cmte
DATE: 01/28/13
1 CA &P Cmte
❑ F &S Cmte ❑ Transportation Cmte
❑ Parks Comm. ❑ Planning Comm.
COMMIT TEE CHAIR: EKBERG
❑ Arts Comm.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN.
COMMITTEE
Department of Community Development
Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole
COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$ $
Fund Source:
Comments:
MTG. DATE
RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
02/11/13
MTG. DATE
ATTACHMENTS
02/11/13
Informational Memorandum dated 2/1/13 (Amended after CAP meeting)
Ordinance as it appeared in CAP packet with changes to existing TMC (strike- through/
underlined) and after changes by the Committee (shaded)
Draft ordinance with all changes incorporated
Color photographs of vacant structures
Spreadsheet of known vacant structures
Minutes from the Community Affairs and Parks Committee meeting of 1/28/13
2/19/13
2
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Community Affairs and Parks
FROM: Jack Pace, Director
Department of Community Development
BY: Bob Benedicto, Building Official
Kathy Stetson, Code Enforcement Officer
DATE: February 1, 2013
SUBJECT: An Ordinance to update TMC Chapter 8.28 regarding public nuisances
(Amended after CAP Meeting as shown below)
ISSUE
TMC Chapter 8.28 contains a general statement concerning the declaration of nuisance. In
general, violations of development, land use, licensing, and public health ordinances are
declared to be nuisances. Since certain violations deal with private property rights, it is
important that specific violations are clearly defined in order to support abatement actions.
BACKGROUND
Since 2010, Code Enforcement has been reacting to an increase in vacant nuisance properties
(structures and vacant lots). The process for abatement of these nuisances can take several
months to several years to accomplish. Current language in Chapter 8.28 includes many topics
that are duplicated in the International Property Maintenance Code. Eliminating these
duplications and replacing them with needed definitions will serve to simplify and consequently
expedite the process of abatement.
Unregulated car repair in residential zones aid- Recreational vehicles used as permanent
dwellings outside of a licensed mobile home park are not specifically addressed in Chapter
8.28. Consequently, complaints that are received regarding these activities cannot be pursued
as nuisances.
individual operating the business cloaked his activities by registering the twelve to fifteen
vehicles in his name. Our recourse was to issue civil citation(s) to correct violations of parking
A • _
Enforcement the individual moved from Tukwila. Although we proposed some language
regarding car repair operations at the Community Affairs and Parks Committee, we have
decided to pull that portion of the ordinance changes from consideration while we conduct
further research on the matter.
DISCUSSION
The proposed ordinance is intended to define and regulate three -two enforcement issues:
Vacant structures, car repair in residential zones and the use of recreational vehicles as
permanent dwellings outside a licensed mobile home park. The most critical is the vacant
nuisance structure and property. This is the seed of urban blight that will destroy neighborhoods
if permitted to continue unabated.
3
4
INFORMATIONAL MEMO
Page 2
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Fifty thousand dollars for 2013 and 2014 has been budgeted for the abatement of vacant
nuisance structures and property. Abatement will proceed each year as funds allow. The City
will recover the cost of abatement by tax liens or liens against the real property.
RECOMMENDATION
The Council is being asked to consider this item at the February 11, 2013 Committee of the
Whole Meeting and subsequent February 18, 2013 Regular meeting.
ATTACHMENTS
1. A version of the ordinance as it appeared in the CAP packet with changes to existing
TMC (strike- through /underlined) and after changes by the Committee (shaded); and
a version of the ordinance with all changes incorporated
11. Photos — Vacant structures of Tukwila.
111. Vacant structure inventory.
W:12013 Info Memos- CouncillNuisanceOrd2.doc
Shaded text =
Removed after
1-28-13 CAP.
This version of the ordinance is as it appeared in the
1-28-13 CAP agenda packet, showing changes from
existing Tukwila Municipal Code language, by using
strike-through and underlining of text. The shaded text
was recommended for deletion after the CAP meeting.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2144
§2, AS CODIFIED AT TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE (TMC)
SECTION 8.28.030, TO CLARIFY AND UPDATE THE
NUISANCE CODE AND ITS PROVISIONS; ESTABLISHING
NEW REGULATIONS REGARDING CAR REPAIR IN
RESIDENTIAL ZONES AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLES, TO
BE CODIFIED AT TMC SECTION 8.404474-4tsp 8.28.070
RESPECTIVELY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND
ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, it is necessary from time to time to add, revise and redefine the
nuisance code provisions as codified in Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 8.28;
and
WHEREAS, the abatement of nuisances caused by vacant buildings or premises
and the repair and rehabilitation of vacant buildings and premises is in the best interest
of the citizens of Tukwila, and it is the City Council's desire to regulate vacant buildings,
structures and premises to provide for the health, safety and welfare of its citizenry; and
WHEREAS, the current regulations regarding vacant buildings have proven to be
difficult to understand and enforce, and the City Council desires to update and clarify
those regulations; and
WHEREAS, regulations currently exist in the International Property Maintenance
Code and the International Building Code 0t-Nd, 0167 tntornational Frc O6d6 that
address the problem of vacant buildings, structures and premises; and
WHEREAS, consolidating code language in a single location in the Tukwila
Municipal Code will facilitate enforcement of these regulations; and
WHEREAS, vacant buildings, structures and premises in general, particularly those
that contain hazardous materials or that are unknowingly occupied, may pose an
extraordinary danger to police officers or firefighters entering the premises during an
emergency; and
Shaded text =
Removed after
1-28-13 CAP.
W: Word Processing \Ordinances\Nuisance Code updated-with shading from CAP 1-31-13
KS:bjs
Page 1 of 7
5
WHEREAS, it is in the City's best interest to discourage property owners from
allowing their properties to remain indefinitely vacant and/or in a state of disrepair, and
to provide an incentive for the return of vacant buildings, structures or premises to
productive use; and
WHEREAS, the elimination of neighborhood blight is in the City's best interest; and
WHEREAS, car air businesses are not a permitte d MC in residential zones
Qnd major car ropair conducte d in residential zones is a nuicanco for the
Shaded text =
Removed after
1-28-13 CAP.
6
osal or storage o
tiids and ...tarparts7,,,,art: and
WHEREAS, the use of recreational vehicles as dwelling units on private property
was formerly regulated in TMC Chapter 5.32, which was repealed by Ordinance No.
2355; and
WHEREAS, the use of recreational vehicles as dwelling units on private property
can pose a threat to public health due to lack of proper sanitary disposal facilities; and
WHEREAS, use of the public right-of-way for long-term storage of recreational
vehicles interferes with the public's use of such right-of-way for short-term parking and
other authorized uses;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. TMC Section 8.28.030 Amended. Ordinance No. 2144 §2, as codified
at Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Section 8.28.030, is hereby amended to read as
follows:
8.28.030 Vacant Buildings, Structures and Premises
A. All vacant buildings, structures and premises, and all vacant land, shall be
maintained in a clean, safe, secure and sanitary condition as required by the
International Property Maintenance Code.
B. Definitions. As used in TMC Chapter 8.28, the following definitions shall have
the meanings set forth below:
1. "Abandoned Premises" means buildings, structures and premises for
which an owner cannot be identified or located by dispatch of a certificate of mailing to
the last known or registered address, which persistently or repeatedly becomes
unprotected or unsecured, or which have structural collapse or fire spread to adjacent
properties.
2. "Boarded" means covering of all entry points, including all doors and
windows, with I wood or other materials for the .ur.ose of preventing entry into the
building by persons or animals.
W: Word Processing \Ordinances\Nuisance Code updated-with shading from CAP 1-31-13
KS:bjs
Page 2 of 7
3. "Chronic Nuisance Building or Premises" means a vacant nuisance building
or vacant nuisance premises that has been abated but is not maintained free from
violations for at least one year following abatement.
4. "Code Official" means the Building Official or designated Code
Enforcement Officer.
Shaded text =
Removed after
1-28-13 CAP.
5 "IBC" means International Build in. Code.
6. "IPMC" means International Property Maintenance Code.
7. "Vacant Building" means a building or structure that has not been occupied
for over 30 days.
A. "Vacant Building" Defined
1. Definition: The Codc Enforcement Officials or Building Official (otherwise
referred to as "Code Official") may evaluate buildings in the City they believe to bc
8. "Vacant Nuisance Building" means a building, structure or portion thereof
that is vacant and exists with an one or more of the followin conditions:
a. Unoccupied and unse-cured;
a. Unsecured against entry,
b. - -* -se-Old, dilapidated or has become so out
of repair as to be dangerous, unsafe, and unsanitary or otherwise unfit for human
habitation or occupancy;
c. Condemned by the Code Official;
c. Unoccupied and secured by boarding or other similar moans;
d. Unoccupied and a dangerous structure;
c. Unoccupied and condemned by the Building Official;
f. Unoccupied and has multiple code violations;
Unoccupied, and the building or its premises has been thc site of
-hd. Unoccupied Vacant for over 1-8-0-30 days, during which time the Code
Officials have has issued an order to correct the public nuisance violations and those
violations have not been corrected;
e. Not monitored and maintained in accordance with the IPMC
W: Word Processing \Ordinances\Nuisance Code updated-with shading from CAP 1-31-13
KS:bjs
Page 3 of 7
7
f. Incomplete construction whereby the building permit has expired and
the construction project has been abandoned for more than 30 days;
q. An abandoned premises as defined in this section.
i. Unoccupied for over two years.
9. "Vacant Nuisance Premises" means the exterior premises of a vacant
building, or vacant land that harbors junk vehicles, accumulation of rubbish or garbage,
overgrown weeds, noxious weeds, unmaintained plant material- and landscaping, or
other violation of the IPMC for over 30 days, during which time the Code Official has
issued an order to correct the public nuisance violations and those violations have not
been corrected.
C. Authority to Inspect. Whenever the Code Official has reason to believe that a
premise or a building is vacant, the Code Official may inspect the premises and /or the
building and surrounding premises.
D. Declaration of Nuisance. Abandoned premises, chronic nuisance buildings or
premises, vacant nuisance buildings, and vacant nuisance properties are found and
declared to be public nuisances.
2. Exceptions: Vacant buildings which are undergoing construction,
codes and regulations, and for which construction, renovation or rehabilitation is
proceeding diligently to completion. New buildings and those buildings undergoing
renovation that do not receive final inspections, or whose permits expire due to lack of
3. Inspection: Whenever the Code Official has reason to believe that a
building is vacant, the Code Official may inspect the building and surrounding premises.
upon which the building is located, stating the violations and required corrections, and
or real property upon which the building is located is in violation of this Section, an
•
approve if found acceptable. A Plan of Action may allow:
a. Extended boarding of openings;
b. Extended use of temporary security fencing;
c. Extended time before the demolition of a building is required; or
d. For substandard conditions to exist for a specific period of time, provided
the building is secured in an approved manner.
When considering a Plan of Action, the Building Official shall take into consideration
•• •• - •ee •--- -•= - --
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Nuisance Code updated -with shading from CAP 1 -31 -13
KS:bjs
8
Page 4 of 7
B. APPEARANCE: Vacant buildings shall, in the opinion of the Code Official,
entry, which shall include the provision of windows and doors with adequate strength to
from the date the building becomes unoccupied or vacant. Where it is impractical to
secure the building by normal building amenities, the Code Official may permit thc use
consistent with the rest of the structure.
D. SECURITY FENCES: Temporaryy construction fencing shall not be used as a
method to secure a building from entry, but in the event the property owner is repairing
or remodeling the structure, temporary construction fencing may be used for a
E. WEATHER PROTECTION: The exterior roofing and siding shall be maintained
• - - 1 4 -
FIRE SAFETY:
1. Fire protection systems: All fire suppression and alarms systems shall be
Department
Flammable liquids: No vacant building or premises or portion thereof shall
fire hazard.
3. Combustible materials: All debris, combustible materials, litter and
garbage shall be removed from vacant buildings, their acce -sory buildings and
items.
1. Fire inspections: Periodic fire inspections may be required at intervals set
forth by the Fire Chief or his designee.
G. TERMINATION OF UTILITIES:
1. Termination: The Code Official may, by written notice to the owner and to
the appropriate water, electricity or gas utility, request that water, electricity or gas
2. Restoration of service: If water, electricity or gas service has been
terminated-or-disconnected, no one except the utility may take any action to restore thc
written notification is given by the Code Official that service may be restored.
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Nuisance Code updated -with shading from CAP 1 -31 -13
KS:bjs
Page 5of7
H. ABATEMENT:
As determined by the Code Official, a vacant building is
by law.
I. UNSAFE BUILDINGS AND EQUIPMENT: Any vacant building declared
Section 110.
E. Enforcement.
1,1 - e - - - e e • e .
1 Enforcement of this section shall be in accordance with TMC Chapter 8.45.
2. The owner of an abandoned premise, vacant nuisance building, or vacant
nuisance premises, shall be subject to the penalties set forth in TMC Chapter 8.45.
3. Should a Violation Notice and Order be issued pursuant to TMC Chapter
8.45 and if compliance has not been achieved within 30 days from the date of the
Violation Notice, the Code Official may proceed with abatement of the nuisance in
accordance with TMC Section 8.45.105. The costs of such abatement, including any
unpaid penalties, shall be recovered through a lien against the property.
4. Owners of chronic nuisance buildin s or •emises shall im ediatel and
without notice be cited with penalties in accordance with TMC Section 8.45.100.
8.060. "Gar Rcpiir in
Shaded text =
Removed after
1-28-13 CAP.
10
minor Car
ono" or tho
1
V,A.V.;b9
Section 2. Regulations Established. TMC Section 8.28.070, "Recreational
Vehicles," is hereby established to read as follows:
8.28.070 Recreational. Vehicles
W: Word Processing\Ordinances\Nuisance Code updated-with shading from CAP 1-31-13
KS:bjs
Page 6 of 7
A. Definitions:
1. "Recreational Vehicle" means travel trailer, motorhome, or the like used for
temporary accommodations while traveling. Recreational vehicles also include boats,
personal watercraft, snowmobiles and the like.
2. "Occupied as a dwelling unit" means used for sleeping, cooking, eating or
bathing for longer than two weeks in any six month period.
B. Recreational vehicles may not be occupied as a dwelling unit in any zone,
except when parked in a licensed mobile home park.
C. Recreational vehicles may be stored on private property on improved surfaces
as specified in TMC Chapter 8.25.
D. It is unlawful to park or store recreational vehicles on the public right -of -way
except when actively loading or unloading.
Section 3. Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the
City Attorney, the City Clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary
corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; references to
other local, state or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations; or ordinance numbering
and section /subsection numbering.
Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be
invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the
remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation.
Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published
in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days
after passage and publication as provided by law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at
a Regular Meeting thereof this day of , 2013.
ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED:
Christy O'Flaherty, MMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:
Shelley M. Kerslake, City Attorney
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Published:
Effective Date:
Ordinance Number:
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Nuisance Code updated -with shading from CAP 1 -31 -13
KS:bjs
Page 7of7
11
12
DRAFT
This version of the draft ordinance reflects
the ordinance language if all the proposed
changes are accepted by the City Council.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE
NO. 2144 §2, AS CODIFIED AT TUKWILA MUNICIPAL
CODE (TMC) SECTION 8.28.030, TO CLARIFY AND
UPDATE THE NUISANCE CODE AND ITS PROVISIONS;
ESTABLISHING NEW REGULATIONS REGARDING
RECREATIONAL VEHICLES, TO BE CODIFIED AT TMC
SECTION 8.28.070; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;
AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, it is necessary from time to time to add, revise and redefine the
nuisance code provisions as codified in Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 8.28;
and
WHEREAS, the abatement of nuisances caused by vacant buildings or premises
and the repair and rehabilitation of vacant buildings and premises is in the best interest
of the citizens of Tukwila, and it is the City Council's desire to regulate vacant buildings,
structures and premises to provide for the health, safety and welfare of its citizenry; and
WHEREAS, the current regulations regarding vacant buildings have proven to be
difficult to understand and enforce, and the City Council desires to update and clarify
those regulations; and
WHEREAS, regulations currently exist in the International Property Maintenance
Code and the International Building Code that address the problem of vacant buildings,
structures and premises; and
WHEREAS, consolidating code language in a single location in the Tukwila
Municipal Code will facilitate enforcement of these regulations; and
WHEREAS, vacant buildings, structures and premises in general, particularly those
that contain hazardous materials or that are unknowingly occupied, may pose an
extraordinary danger to police officers or firefighters entering the premises during an
emergency; and
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Nuisance Code updated final 1 -31 -13
KS:bjs
Page1 of 5
13
WHEREAS, it is in the City's best interest to discourage property owners from
allowing their properties to remain indefinitely vacant and /or in a state of disrepair, and
to provide an incentive for the return of vacant buildings, structures or premises to
productive use; and
WHEREAS, the elimination of neighborhood blight is in the City's best interest; and
WHEREAS, the use of recreational vehicles as dwelling units on private property
was formerly regulated in TMC Chapter 5.32, which was repealed by Ordinance No.
2355; and
WHEREAS, the use of recreational vehicles as dwelling units on private property
can pose a threat to public health due to lack of proper sanitary disposal facilities; and
WHEREAS, use of the public right -of -way for long -term storage of recreational
vehicles interferes with the public's use of such right -of -way for short -term parking and
other authorized uses;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. TMC Section 8.28.030 Amended. Ordinance No. 2144 §2, as codified
at Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Section 8.28.030, is hereby amended to read as
follows:
8.28.030 Vacant Buildings, Structures and Premises
A. All vacant buildings, structures and premises, and all vacant land, shall be
maintained in a clean, safe, secure and sanitary condition as required by the
International Property Maintenance Code.
B. Definitions. As used in TMC Chapter 8.28, the following definitions shall have
the meanings set forth below:
1. "Abandoned Premises" means buildings, structures and premises for
which an owner cannot be identified or located by dispatch of a certificate of mailing to
the last known or registered address, which persistently or repeatedly becomes
unprotected or unsecured, or which have structural collapse or fire spread to adjacent
properties.
2. "Boarded" means covering of all entry points, including all doors and
windows, with plywood or other materials for the purpose of preventing entry into the
building by persons or animals.
3. "Chronic Nuisance Building or Premises" means a vacant nuisance building
or vacant nuisance premises that has been abated but is not maintained free from
violations for at least one year following abatement.
4. "Code Official" means the Building Official or designated Code
Enforcement Officer.
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Nuisance Code updated final 1 -31 -13
KS:bjs
14
Page 2 of 5
5. "IBC" means International Building Code.
6. "IPMC" means International Property Maintenance Code.
7. "Vacant Building" means a building or structure that has not been occupied
for over 30 days.
8. "Vacant Nuisance Building" means a building, structure or portion thereof
that is vacant and exists with any one or more of the following conditions:
a. Unsecured against entry;
b. Old, dilapidated or has become so out of repair as to be dangerous,
unsafe, and unsanitary or otherwise unfit for human habitation or occupancy;
c. Condemned by the Code Official;
d. Vacant for over 30 days, during which time the Code Official has
issued an order to correct the public nuisance violations and those violations have not
been corrected;
e. Not monitored and maintained in accordance with the IPMC;
f. Incomplete construction whereby the building permit has expired and
the construction project has been abandoned for more than 30 days;
g. An abandoned premises as defined in this section.
9. "Vacant Nuisance Premises" means the exterior premises of a vacant
building, or vacant land that harbors junk vehicles, accumulation of rubbish or garbage,
overgrown weeds, noxious weeds, unmaintained plant material and landscaping, or
other violation of the IPMC for over 30 days, during which time the Code Official has
issued an order to correct the public nuisance violations and those violations have not
been corrected.
C. Authority to Inspect. Whenever the Code Official has reason to believe that a
premise or a building is vacant, the Code Official may inspect the premises and /or the
building and surrounding premises.
D. Declaration of Nuisance. Abandoned premises, chronic nuisance buildings or
premises, vacant nuisance buildings, and vacant nuisance properties are found and
declared to be public nuisances.
E. Enforcement.
1. Enforcement of this section shall be in accordance with TMC Chapter 8.45.
2. The owner of an abandoned premise, vacant nuisance building, or vacant
nuisance premises, shall be subject to the penalties set forth in TMC Chapter 8.45.
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Nuisance Code updated final 1 -31 -13
KS:bjs
Page 3of5
15
3. Should a Violation Notice and Order be issued pursuant to TMC Chapter
8.45 and if compliance has not been achieved within 30 days from the date of the
Violation Notice, the Code Official may proceed with abatement of the nuisance in
accordance with TMC Section 8.45.105. The costs of such abatement, including any
unpaid penalties, shall be recovered through a lien against the property.
4. Owners of chronic nuisance buildings or premises shall immediately and
without notice be cited with penalties in accordance with TMC Section 8.45.100.
Section 2. Regulations Established. TMC Section 8.28.070, "Recreational
Vehicles," is hereby established to read as follows:
8.28.070 Recreational Vehicles
A. Definitions:
1. "Recreational Vehicle" means travel trailer, motorhome, or the like used for
temporary accommodations while traveling. Recreational vehicles also include boats,
personal watercraft, snowmobiles and the like.
2. "Occupied as a dwelling unit" means used for sleeping, cooking, eating or
bathing for longer than two weeks in any six month period.
B. Recreational vehicles may not be occupied as a dwelling unit in any zone,
except when parked in a licensed mobile home park.
C. Recreational vehicles may be stored on private property on improved surfaces
as specified in TMC Chapter 8.25.
D. It is unlawful to park or store recreational vehicles on the public right -of -way
except when actively loading or unloading.
Section 3. Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the
City Attorney, the City Clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary
corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; references to
other local, state or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations; or ordinance numbering
and section /subsection numbering.
Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be
invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the
remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation.
Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published
in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days
after passage and publication as provided by law.
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Nuisance Code updated final 1 -31 -13
KS:bjs
16
Page 4 of 5
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at
a Regular Meeting thereof this day of , 2013.
ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED:
Christy O'Flaherty, MMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:
Shelley M. Kerslake, City Attorney
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Published:
Effective Date:
Ordinance Number:
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Nuisance Code updated final 1 -31 -13
KS:bjs
Page 5of5
17
18
Vacant Structures of Tukwila
15010 MacAdam Road S.
4651 S 146th Street
ATTACHMENT 11
13217 40th Ave. S.
5155 S. 160th Street
19
20
ATTACHMENT 111
Vacant Structures
Cc
Status
On 02 -29 -12 Bank of
America secured and
cleaned up property.
Attractive nuisance.
Problem Property
Owner walked away.
Property has become a
dumping site for
neighborhood. Possible
squatters.
Attractive nuisance
Problem Property
----- ------ - - - - -- - - --
'Attractive nuisance
Problem Property
03 -23 -12 Property cleaned
up. Repeat offender
Property owner has fenced
off the property.
Police and
citizen
complaints
Police, fire
and citizen
complaints
Citizen
Complaints
and Police
Calls
a
Comments
Recent Foreclosure.
Structure destroyed by Fire.
No one taking responsibility
Unable to locate property
owner.
2001 Construction of and
moving existing house onto
a foundation. All permits
expired.
2006 Remodeling &
relocating home onto
foundation. All permits
expired.
Unable to locate property
owner
Across from High School.
Unable to locate property
owner
Unable to locate property
owner
Church is trying to sell
property
o
slew
X
X
Z
L4 moJElonp
X
X
X
2
saioiyan )tunr
X
i
Property Address
11854 42nd Ave S.
15010 MacAdam Road S.
5155 S. 160th Street
13217 40th Ave S.
4033 S. 128th Street
4321 S. 140th Street
113862 38th Ave S.
15436 42th Ave S.
0
Owner from KC taxes
Gaskill, Herbert
(Deceased)
Dempere, Jackie
Dempere, Jackie
Calleung, Flory A.
San Sung Pres.Church
RFA10 -284
RFA10 -395
IRFA12 -399
No open
RFA
No open
RFA
RFA10 -482
RFA09 -085
RFA10 -230
RFA10 -307
Vacant Structures
ATTACHMENT 111
Page 2 of 7
1- Unoccupied maintained, 2- Unoccupied not maintained
3- Unoccupied derelict
RFA08 -292
Rahinan, Peter
6427 S. 143rd Street
Derelict Structure is secured
Citizen
Complaints
and Police
Calls
06 -19 -12 Property has
been cleaned up.
13
1
RFA09 -353
Rivers, Effie ( Deceased)
10834 48th Ave S.
Citizen
Complaints
and Police
Calls
14
3
RFA09 -345
Wu, Wen
15026 42nd Ave S.
(0042000247)
On Busy right -of -way.
Moved unfinished home to
property and never finished
building it. All permits
expired.
Citizen
Complaints
10 -12 -12 Owner has
signed a voluntary
correction agreement
with the following three
conditions: 1) Secure
the structure, remove
the debris, disconnect all
utilities, clear the
overgrowth and call for
inspection not later than
11/12/12; 2) Repair the
exterior such that it
appears to be occupied,
including siding, window
glazing, and landscape
maintenance not later
than 11/12/13; and, 3)
Complete the interior
repairs not later than
11/12/14. Boarding has
been completed.
15
1
RFA10 -381
Cheung, Lai, Chiu
4245 S. 148th S.
x
Citizen
Complaints
04 -20 -12 Overgrowth
cutback. Repeat offender
16
3
RFA10 -400
Corniel, Jessica
13802 37th Ave S.
Basement under water.
Unable to locate property
owner.
Citizen
Complaints
Attractive nuisance
Problem property
Page 2 of 7
1- Unoccupied maintained, 2- Unoccupied not maintained
3- Unoccupied derelict
Vacant Structures
ATTACHMENT 111
Page 3 of 7
1- Unoccupied maintained, 2- Unoccupied not maintained
3- Unoccupied derelict
RFA10 -032
- RFA10-
245
Phan, Jimmy
12060 44th Place S.
Structure was being
remodeled without permits.
All work ceased January
2010. Unable to locate
responsible party.
Citizen
Complaints
and Police
Calls
Attractive nuisance
Problem Property
No open
RFA
No open
RFA
Campbell, Brie & Michael
Rivera, Romeo E.
12909 E. Marginal Way S.
Structure is deteriorating.
PL10 -062 Development
agmt for 12,500 sq. ft mixed
use bldg. NCC Zoning
Citizen
Complaints
Citizen
complaints
Attractive nuisance.
Problem Property.
Overgrowth cutback
12017 44th Ave S.
RFA10 -378
US Bank National
Association
4464 S. 158th Street
R
X
Citizen
Complaints
January 2013 - Property
being worked on.
RFA11 -275
Sayson, Joanna
4232 S. 164th Street
Citizen
Complaints
Possibly rental property 02-
12 -12 Property cleaned up
22
3
RFA11 -316
Loiselle, Leroy
12834 34th Ave S.
Dead end road, Property
owner out of state.
Citizen
complaints
and Prior
Police Activity
with Squatters
Attractive nuisance
Problem Property
23
3
RFA11 -310
Watts, Charles
13612 52nd Ave S.
X
R
X
Unable to locate property
owner
Citizen
Complaints
Problem Property.
Someone working on
the overgrowth.
Page 3 of 7
1- Unoccupied maintained, 2- Unoccupied not maintained
3- Unoccupied derelict
Vacant Structures
ATTACHMENT 111
Page 4 of 7
1- Unoccupied maintained, 2- Unoccupied not maintained
3- Unoccupied derelict
RFA12 -290
Tongue, Roy
13906 51st Ave S. / 5115 S.
139th Street - Rental unit
13030 37th Ave S.
Two Vacant residential
structure. Unoccupied and
derelict (structural damage).
Citizen
Complaints
RFA12 -290 Owner has
secured the structures,
disconnected utilities.by
Owner agreed to either
repair or demolish by
June 30, 2013.
Voluntary Correction
agreement signed.
25
3
No open
RFA
Harlan, Timothy
X
X
R
Citizen
complaint
26
1
No open
RFA
Baldridge, Robert
4059 S. 158th Street
X
R
Citizen
complaint
27
1
No open
RFA
Dinh, Luan
5005 S 114th Street
X
R
Citizen
complaint
Citizen
complaint
28
29
1
3
No open
RFA
RFA10 -466
Guadia, Marcelino
3909 S 117th Street
X
R
Luu Le
4921 S 107th Street
X
R
X
X
X
Entire structure rebuilt
without Permits.
Citizen
complaint
Citizen
complaint and
Police action
Owner living in un-
permitted structure.
Owner refusing to
comply with Plans
Examiner requirements
30
2
No open
RFA
Nguyen Vu
4908 S. 114th Street
X
R
X
Structure is way back on the
lot, out of sight of the road.
Squatters have been
removed.
31
2
No open
RFA
McKnight, Ian F
4014 S. 115th Street
X
R
X
X
Citizen
complaint
32
1
No open
RFA
Williamson, Thomas
4464 S, 158th Street
4010 S. 152nd Street
X
X
R
Recent Sale
Citizen
complaint
Property being worked
on.
33
1
No open
RFA
Hall, Ronald
R
X
X
Two vacant trailers on
property.
Citizen
complaint
Page 4 of 7
1- Unoccupied maintained, 2- Unoccupied not maintained
3- Unoccupied derelict
ATTACHMENT 111
Vacant Structures
CC
Property cleaned up and
maintained.
01 -11 -12 Garbage
removed.
Structure being worked
on
Property is cleaned up
and now up for sale.
Recent purchase
Overgrowth being cut
back and new gate
being put up.
Structure is being used.
0
C
N a
U chi
C
N a
U S
Citizen
complaint
Citizen
complaint and
Police action
C
N a
U u
Citizen
,complaints
I
a 0) i
c, c
co C co C a
U a) QI N Q
d U Co Co) O
a
Structure is tucked away
behind large trees and
bushes; can not be seen
from right -of -way. Unable to
locate property owner.
New complaint trying to
reach property owner.
Property owner acquired
Demo permit 011 -057
(March 2011) Structure
remains.
Vacant for years. Owner
passed away; family walked
away from property. BAC
Field Services maintaining
,front yard.
Recent new owners.
Bank now owns property
Prior tenants were hoarders,
tenants were evicted and
property owner working on
removing all rubbish.
Someone working on
property.
Accessory structure was in
fire years ago, never
demolished or repaired.
Owner died 2 years ago,
Property being cleaned up
slowly.
O
z
a
X
x
x
2
X!
X
J
i
X;
Y
X
=
X
C9
X
W
X
X
Xi X! X
X
X
X
x
X
Q
13741 Macadam Road S.
5210 S. 142nd Street
12221 44th Ave S.
14426 42nd Ave S.
4462 S. 150th Street
N
co
s_
C6
W
ca
c0
(/)
a
a
c
N
La
co
V
0
M
.—
N
v
.—
in
c0
V
N
co
v
.--
r
V
V
V
C.)
Chen, Jojo
Cyril, Mork
c
o
Oc
N
U
N
Y
Y
a)
O
co
N
U_
a)
N
-O
N
I
m
c
0
L
I-
E
a
Federal National Mortgage
Assn.
c
a
C
O
E
co
c
c
Z
(n
a-
a.)
Ln
Z
c
Y
c
L
cu
m
C
d
Q
Z CC
N
Q
X
N
M C
0
Q O Q
X Z CC
CO
r
N
Q
X
RFA11 -293
RFA12 -143
O
7
Q
X
RFA12 -091
c
Q
O
O Q
Z X
No open
RFA
<
N
.� , ^
N
N
r
1-
N
a-
M - co
CO
M
CO co
co
V
V
C
V
V
25
ATTACHMENT 111
Vacant Structures
New property owner
Property being
maintained.
0
Citizen
complaints
Owners walked away from
property, Stopped paying
Mortgage but was still
renting out property. 06 -18-
12 CEO found tenants gone
and structure vacant.
Property being maintained.
Accessory structure is
derelict. Falling apart and
being used.
Structure was completely
destroyed inside when
home was foreclosed.
4260 S. 148th Street
4454 S. 158th Street
12253 47th Ave S.
12219 47th Ave S.
0
Sergio, Salinas
Flagstar Bank, FSB
Baldridge, Thelma
Veeny, Van
Rivera, Romeo E.
Albrecht, Leanna
Wallin, James G
Vacant Structures
ATTACHMENT 111
Page 7 of 7
1- Unoccupied maintained, 2- Unoccupied not maintained
3- Unoccupied derelict
No open
RFA
Norris, James
11621 39th Ave S.
No open
RFA
Norris, Nancy
11609 39th Ave S.
Property being
maintained.
58
No open
RFA
Behnke, John
3915 S. 117th St.
No open
RFA
Wells Fargo Bank
13759 34th Ave S.
Property being
maintained
Property being
maintained
60
1
No open
RFA
Sec. Housing Urban
Development
13616 34th Ave S.
DUB Properties LLC
13862 38th Ave S.
Property being
maintained
62
1
No open
RFA
Jensen, Martin David
14657 42nd Ave S.
X
R
Property being
maintained
63
1
No open
RFA
Adams, David
14243 58th Ave S
X
R
R
Property being
maintained
64
1
No open
RFA
Rigdon, Robin
14209 58th Ave S.
X
Citizen
Complaints
Property being
maintained
65
2
RFA12 -278
Voiland, Steven
16642 53rd Ave S.
X
R
X
Unable to locate property
owner.
Property in limbo, No
foreclosure started
66
1
No open
RFA
Baker, Debra
4433 S. 146th Street
X
R
Property being
maintained
67
1
No open
RFA
Condon, Florence
4434 S. 146th Street
X
R
Property being
maintained
68
1
No open
RFA
Folau, liaise
14800 46th Ave S.
X
R
Property being
maintained
69
1
No open
RFA
US Bank National
Association
12238 42nd Ave S.
X
R
X
Property being
maintained
Page 7 of 7
1- Unoccupied maintained, 2- Unoccupied not maintained
3- Unoccupied derelict
28
Community Affairs & Parks Committee Minutes January 28, 2013 — Page 2
C. Ordinance: Public Nuisances
Staff is seeking Council approval of an ordinance amending Tukwila Municipal Code Chapter 8 regarding
public nuisances. The amendment will define and regulate vacant structures, car repair in residential zones,
and recreational vehicles as dwellings outside of a licensed mobile home park. Additionally many topics
previously included in the Chapter are also included in the International Property Maintenance Code used
by the City. This duplication is not necessary.
The three significant changes are summarized below:
• Clarification of definitions for vacant buildings, structures and premises, including abandoned,
boarded and chronic nuisance. Defines vacancy as 30 days.
• Adds regulations for car repairs in residential zones, allowing minor car repair to be conducted be a
vehicle owner inside a garage at the vehicle owner's residence.
• Defines and adds regulations regarding recreational vehicles including storage and use as a
dwelling unit when not in a license mobile home park.
Committee Members expressed concerns in regard to regulating car repair to the extent of the specificity as
outlined in the draft ordinance. The Committee requested additional research be conducted in comparison to
surrounding cities' codes relating to specific car repair regulations and the length of time a recreational
vehicle can be occupied as a dwelling unit. Staff will conduct the research as requested by the Committee,
and present the findings during discussion at full Council. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO
FEBRUARY 11 COW FOR DISCUSSION.
III. MISCELLANEOUS
Meeting adjourned at 6:33 p.m.
Next meeting.: Monday, February 1 1, 2013 — 5:00 p.m. — Conference Room #3
Minutes by KAM.
Committee Chair Approval
29
30
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
Initials
Meeting Date
Prepared by
Ma is review
Council review
02/11/13
SB
1�C
02/11/13
02/19/13
SB
❑ Ordinance
Mtg Date
t
❑ Public Hearing
Mtg Date
❑ Other
Mtg Date
CATEGORY // Discussion
/1 Resolution
Mtg Date
Mtg Date 02/19/13
SPONSOR ❑ Council ❑ Mayor
❑ DCD ❑ Finance ❑ Fire ❑ IT ❑ P &R ❑ Police ❑ PW
ITEM INFORMATION
ITEM No.
4.B.
31
STAFF SPONSOR: STEPHANIE BROWN
ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 02/11/13
AGENDA ITEM TITLE
A Resolution establishing
Schedule.
the
2013 Non - Represented employees Wage and Benefit
02/11/13
❑
Mtg
Motion
Date
❑ Ordinance
Mtg Date
❑ Bid Award
Mtg Date
❑ Public Hearing
Mtg Date
❑ Other
Mtg Date
CATEGORY // Discussion
/1 Resolution
Mtg Date
Mtg Date 02/19/13
SPONSOR ❑ Council ❑ Mayor
❑ DCD ❑ Finance ❑ Fire ❑ IT ❑ P &R ❑ Police ❑ PW
/1 HR
SPONSOR'S The Council is being asked to consider adoption of a resolution establishing a cost of living
SUMMARY wage adjustment and benefits schedule for non - represented employees effective
January 1, 2013.
REVIEWED BY ❑ COW Mtg. ❑ CA &P Cmte
❑ Utilities Cmte ❑ Arts Comm.
DATE: 02/05/13
/1 F &S Cmte
❑ Transportation Cmte
Comm. ❑ Planning Comm.
CHAIR: ROBERTSON
❑ Parks
COMMITTEE
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN.
COMMITTEE
Human Resources Department
Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole
COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$ $
Fund Source:
Comments:
MTG. DATE
RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
02/11/13
MTG. DATE
ATTACHMENTS
02/11/13
Informational Memorandum dated 1/30/13 (Amended after FS Meeting)
Resolution in Draft Form
Attachment A - Draft 2013 Non - Represented Wage Schedule
Attachment B - Draft 2013 Non - Represented Schedule of Benefits
Attachment C - Draft 2013 Non - Represented Longevity Pay Schedule
Attachment 1 - Spreadsheet of 2013 Wage adjustments of comparable cities.
Draft minutes from the 02/05/13 Finance and Safety Committee meeting.
31
32
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
Mayor Haggerton
Finance and Safety Committee
Stephanie Brown, Human Resources Director
January 30, 2013
2013 Non - Represented Wages and Benefits
(Amended at FS meeting 2/5/13 as shown below)
BACKGROUND
In August 2011, an external market study was conducted for 2012 wage adjustments for
non - represented employees. This information was presented to the Finance and Safety
Committee in October, 2011 where a decision was made to table implementation until a
review by an outside compensation consultant was completed.
The results from the outside consultant review validated the analysis that was
conducted internally. This delayed the decision on wage adjustments for non -
represented employees until May 2012 with the adoption by the City Council of
Resolution No. 1769. The wage adjustment for 2012 provided for a market increase,
and a one -time COLA adjustment for a majority of the non - represented positions, to
recognize that management level positions (Director Level) had not received an
adjustment to their wages since 2009.
Generally, cost of living adjustments are presented prior to the end of even numbered
years, to become effective January 1, of the next year. Due to a request by the Council
to review positions that were +1- 5% above or below the market based upon the 2011
study, a decision was made to not present a wage adjustment for 2013 until that
process was completed.
In alignment with the intent of Council Resolution No.1537, which establishes that the
cost of living adjustment occur in odd numbered years, and is based on 90% of the CPI -
W for Seattle- Tacoma - Bremerton Area Semi - Annual Average (1st half of the calendar
year to the 1st half of the following calendar year), the proposed wage adjustment for
2013 is 2.61%. In addition, there are no recommended changes being proposed to the
non - represented benefit schedule.
Also for information only, Attachment 1 shows the 2013 wage adjustments for non -
represented City comparators that were used in the 2011 market study, and also those
cities that were recommended for consideration by the outside consultant.
At the Finance and Safety Committee meeting on February 5, 2013, there were a few
questions askinq for clarification about the non - represented salary schedule,
Attachment A.
33
INFORMATIONAL MEMO
Page 2
The Management Coordinator and Management Analyst classifications have always
been banded at C42 due to similar job responsibilities. The Management Coordinator is
different in that these positions manage a division.
As noted earlier, due to the December 2012 review of positions, the Court Administrator
was reclassified from C42 to D63, and the Administrative Secretary 1 in Parks &
Recreation B23, was reclassified with a title change to Parks & Recreation Analyst and
banded at C42.
Finally, Attachment A has also been updated to reflect other title changes, such as the
Council Analyst and Government Relations Manager.
RECOMMENDATION
The Finance and Safety Committee is being asked to consider the wage adjustments
and benefits for non - represented employees retroactive to January 1, 2013, and to
forward the Resolution to the Committee of the Whole meeting on February 11, 2013 for
discussion and approval at their Regular meeting on February 19, 2013.
ATTACHMENTS
-Draft Resolution
Attachment A-
Attachment B-
Attachment C-
Attachment 1-
34
Draft 2013 Non - Represented Wage Schedule
Draft 2013 Non- Represented Schedule of Benefits
Draft 2013 Non - Represented Longevity Pay Schedule
A spreadsheet of 2013 wage adjustments of comparable cities.
2
RAFT
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, UPDATING AND CLARIFYING
THE NON - REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES' COMPENSATION
AND ADOPTING THE NON - REPRESENTED SALARY
SCHEDULE AND BENEFITS SUMMARY, EFFECTIVE
JANUARY 1, 2013.
WHEREAS, the Tukwila City Council approved Resolution No. 1537, dated
December 1, 2003, which provided that a COLA would be applied to the non -
represented employee wage schedule in odd - numbered calendar years; and
WHEREAS, the COLA in previous years has been based on 90% of the Consumer
Price Index, All Wage Earners (CPI -W) Seattle- Tacoma - Bremerton Area Semi - Annual
Average (first half of calendar year to first half of following calendar year); and
WHEREAS, the CPI -W Average for the above - stated period of time (first half of
2011 compared to first half of 2012) is 2.9 %; and
WHEREAS, 90% of CPI -W as stated above is 2.61 %; and
WHEREAS, City Administration recommends a flat rate increase of 2.61% to base
wage effective January 1, 2013 for non - represented employees;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Non - Represented Employees Wage Plan.
A. The 2013 wage schedule for non - represented employees shall be increased by
a rate of 2.61%.
B. Longevity pay will continue to be a part of the plan.
C. Merit will continue to be eliminated from the plan, but may be considered as a
plan element in subsequent years.
W: \Word Processing-City \ Resolutions \Non-Represented Employees Compensation -2013 1- 28- 13.doc 1 -28 -13
KG:bjs
Page 1 of 2
35
Section 2. Non - Represented Salary Schedule, Employee Benefits Summary
and Longevity Pay Plan.
A. The "Non- Represented Salary Schedule — 2013," Attachment A hereto, shall
be approved, effective January 1, 2013.
B. The "Non- Represented Employee Benefits Summary — 2013," Attachment B
hereto, shall be approved, effective January 1, 2013.
C. The "Longevity Pay Plan for Non - Represented Employees — 2013," Attachment
C hereto, shall be approved, effective January 1, 2013.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON,
at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of , 2013.
ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED:
Christy O'Flaherty, MMC, City Clerk Kathy Hougardy, Council President
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Resolution Number:
Shelley M. Kerslake, City Attorney
Attachments:
- Attachment A, Non - Represented Salary Schedule — 2013
- Attachment B, Non - Represented Employee Benefits Summary — 2013
- Attachment C, Longevity Pay Plan for Non - Represented Employees — 2013
W: \Word Processing -City \Resolutions \Non - Represented Employees Compensation -2013 1- 28- 13.doc 1 -28 -13
KG:bjs
36
Page 2 of 2
Attachment A (Page 1 of 3)
City of Tukwila
Non - Represented Salary Schedule - 2013
Classification Title
Job Title
Range
Administrative Support Technician
Administrative Support Technician
Al2
Office Technician
Human Resources Technician
B21
Office Specialist
Assistant to the Chief
B22
Administrative Assistant
Deputy City Clerk
Executive Assistant
Assistant to the Director
Council Administrative Assistant
B23
Program Coordinator
Systems Administrator
Human Resources Assistant
C41
Management Coordinator
City Clerk
Police Records Manager
C42
Management Analyst
Council Analyst
Government Relations Manager
Human Resources Analyst
Parks & Recreation Analyst
Project Analyst
Public Works Analyst
C42
Program Administrator
Internal Operations Manager
Public Works Coordinator
Emergency Manager
C43
Program Manager
Assistant City Administrator
Senior Engineer
Building Official
D61
Administrative Manager
Maintenance Operations Manager
D62
Assistant Director
Deputy Community Development Director
Deputy Finance Director
Deputy Public Works Director
Deputy Parks & Recreation Director
Municipal Court Administrator
D63
Department Manager
Assistant Fire Chief
Assistant Police Chief
City Engineer
D72
37
Attachment A (Page 2 of 3)
City of Tukwila
Non - Represented Salary Schedule - 2013
Classification Title
Job Title
Range
Department Administrator
Economic Development Administrator
E81
Department Head
Human Resources Director
DCD Director
Finance Director
IT Director
Parks & Recreation Director
E83
Department Director
Fire Chief
Police Chief
Public Works Director
E91
City Administrator
City Administrator
F102
38
Attachment A (Page 3 of 3)
2013 - Non - Represented Salary Structure
Non - Represented Salary Structure (Monthly)
DBM
Rating
(Minimum)
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Step 6
Step 7
All
3,860
3,981
4,103
4,223
4,343
Al2
4,166
4,299
4,432
4,562
4,691
A13
4,483
4,621
4,761
4,902
5,040
B21
4,682
4,858
5,035
5,210
5,389
B22
4,987
5,174
5,361
5,549
5,738
B23
5,287
5,487
5,686
5,884
6,086
B31
5,550
5,793
6,036
6,279
6,522
B32
5,992
6,255
6,519
6,781
7,045
C41
6,173
6,418
6,666
6,914
7,161
7,408
C42
6,520
6,783
7,043
7,304
7,565
7,829
C43
6,810
7,083
7,357
7,629
7,901
8,177
C51
7,032
7,347
7,663
7,980
8,294
8,614
C52
7,516
7,854
8,192
8,531
8,871
9,137
D61
7,436
7,808
8,180
8,554
8,925
9,294
D62
7,570
7,946
8,325
8,702
9,082
9,459
D63
7,834
8,226
8,618
9,011
9,403
9,793
D71
8,015
8,453
8,893
9,332
9,771
10,212
D72
8,411
8,870
9,330
9,789
10,251
10,710
E81
8,499
8,924
9,351
9,773
10,229
10,688
11,126
E82
8,812
9,254
9,696
10,137
10,580
11,022
11,463
E83
9,071
9,526
9,978
10,433
10,886
11,340
11,795
E91
9,387
9,857
10,327
10,798
11,267
11,738
12,208
E92
9,774
10,265
10,756
11,244
11,734
12,225
12,714
F101
10,168
10,676
11,183
11,694
12,204
12,710
13,220
F102
10,051
10,552
11,056
11,561
12,064
12,567
13,069
The rates above are a 2.61% increase from 2012 rates.
39
40
Attachment B (Page 1 of 2)
Non - Represented Employee Benefits - 2013
Social Security (FICA): Social Security benefits shall be provided as contained in Section
2.52.010 of the Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC).
State -Wide Employee Retirement System (PERS): Retirement shall be provided as contained
in Section 2.52.020 of the TMC.
Holidays: Holidays shall be provided as contained in Section 2.52.030 of the TMC. Regular
part -time employees shall be entitled to benefits on a pro -rata basis.
Sick Leave: Sick leave shall be provided as contained in Section 2.52.040 of the TMC. Regular
part -time employees shall be entitled to benefits on a pro -rata basis.
Medical Insurance: The City shall pay 100% of the 2013 premium for regular full -time
employees and their dependents under the City of Tukwila self - insured medical /dental plan.
Premium increases above 8% per year shall result in a modified plan document to cover the
additional cost above 8 %, or a premium shall be implemented for the difference, at the City's
discretion. The City reserves the right to select all medical plans and providers. Regular part -
time employees shall be entitled to benefits on a pro -rata basis. Employees who choose
coverage under the Group Health Cooperative plan shall pay the difference between the City of
Tukwila plan full - family rate and the rate charged to them by Group Health.
Dental Insurance: The City shall provide 100% of the 2013 premium for the regular full -time
employees and all dependents under the City of Tukwila self - insured medical/ dental plan for
dental coverage. Regular part -time employees shall be entitled to the same benefits on a pro -
rata basis.
Life Insurance: For regular full -time employees, the City shall pay the premium for Plan C
(Multiple of annual earnings) or similar group life and accidental death and dismemberment
insurance policy. Said plan shall be at 100% of annual earnings rounded up to the next $1,000.
Regular part -time employees that work at least 20 hours per week shall be entitled to benefits
on a pro -rata basis (per insurance program requirements).
Vision/Optical: To non - represented regular full -time employees and their dependents at the
rate of $200 per person, to a maximum of $400 per family unit each year. Regular part -time
employees and their dependents shall be entitled to benefits on a pro -rata basis.
Disability Insurance: The City shall provide 100% of the premium for regular full -time
employees for a comprehensive long -term disability policy. Regular part -time employees that
work at least 20 hours per week shall be entitled to benefits on a pro -rata basis (per insurance
program requirements).
Health Reimbursement Arrangement /Voluntary Employee Benefit Association (HRA/VEBA):
VEBA benefits shall be provided as contained in Resolution No. 1445 and as amended.
41
Attachment B (Page 2 of 2)
Non - Represented Employee Benefits - 2013
Vacation: Following the sixth month of continuous employment, annual vacation leave of six
full days (each day is calculated at eight hours, regardless of schedule worked) shall be granted.
Thereafter, an additional day of annual leave shall accrue each month, up to a total of 12 days.
Three additional days of annual leave shall be granted on the employee's anniversary date after
the third, fourth and fifth years. After six years, the employee shall be granted one day per year
additional annual leave to a maximum of 24 days per year. The maximum number of accrued
hours is 384 or 48 days.
Years of Service
Vacation Accrual
Years of Service
Vacation Accrual
0 -1 years
12 days*
10 years
19 days
1 -2 years
12 days
11 years
20 days
3 -6 years
15 days
12 years
21 days
7 years
16 days
13 years
22 days
8 years
17 days
14 years
23 days
9 years
18 days
15 years
24 days (maximum)
*Six full days will be granted following the sixth month of continuous employment.
(Days accrue at eight hours, regardless of schedule worked.) Regular part -time
employees shall be entitled to benefits on a pro -rata basis.
Uniform Allowance: An annual uniform allowance of $350 shall be granted to the following
employees: Fire Chief, Assistant Fire Chief, Police Chief, Assistant Police Chief, and Records
Manager.
42
Attachment C
Longevity Pay Plan for Non - Represented Employees - 2013
The monthly longevity flat rates shall be as follows for regular full -time employees after the
completion of the number of years of full time employment with the City set forth below.
Regular part -time employees shall receive longevity on a pro -rata basis.
Completion of 5 years
$75
Completion of 10 years
$100
Completion of 15 years
$125
Completion of 20 years
$150
Completion of 25 years
$175
Completion of 30 years
$200
43
44
Attachment #1
in
a)
a)
0
0
E
w
1)
+,
c
v
N
EL
0
0
CL
0
Z
0
Y
Y N
a)
E
N
7
Q
a)
to
cu
m
,-1
0
N
H
a,
0
z
Furloughs /wage concessions ended 12/31/12
1100% of CPI -W June to June SeaTac Brem
No increase for 2013 and 2014
No increase for NR and Union employees
wage increase dependent on what is decided in the contracts - -still in negotiations
(95% CPI SeaTacBrem) plus .8% increase and 3 days paid time off to catch up with AFSCME
Non -Rep Wage Action
0
O
0
O
Ni
0
N
0
N
0
00
0
%0S'Z
0
0
unknown
0
�
to
N
City
'Auburn
Bothell
IBurien*
Edmonds *
Federal Way
Kent
Kirkland
Lakewood*
Renton
SeaTac
*
to their Assessed Valuation.
data current as of 1/11/13
45
46
FINANCE AND SAFETY COMMITTEE
Meeting Minutes
February 5, 2013 — 5:30p.m.; Conference Room #3
City of Tukwila
Finance and Safety Committee
DRAFT
PRESENT
Councilmembers: Dennis Robertson, Chair, Chair; Verna Seal and De'Sean Quinn
Staff: Bruce Linton, Peggy McCarthy, Stephanie Brown, Kim Gilman, Gail Labanara, Cyndy
Knighton, David Cline and Kimberly Matej
CALL TO ORDER: Committee Chair Robertson called the meeting to order at 5:39 p.m.
I. PRESENTATIONS
No presentations.
II. BUSINESS AGENDA
A. Ordinance: 2013 Non - Represented Employees' Wages & Benefits
Staff is seeking Council approval of a draft resolution that provides for a 2.61% cost of living adjustment
(COLA) for all non - represented employees retroactive to January 1, 2013, as well as a salary schedule,
benefit summary, and longevity pay plan.
Staff explained that this COLA follows the intent of Resolution No. 1537 which provides for application
of a COLA in odd numbered years, and an external comparables and internal equity adjustment in even
number years. Under normal circumstances, this resolution would have come forward to the Council for
consideration in the fall prior to the year in which the adjustment takes effect. However, Resolution No.
1769 required classification evaluation of non - represented positions whose compensation bands varied +/-
5% in comparison to market. It was determined that this evaluation would be completed prior to moving
forward with the 2013 COLA resolution which resulted in the delay.
Staff responded to an inquiry from Committee Chair Robertson regarding changes that were made to the
Non - Represented Salary Schedule (page 5 of the agenda packet), including job titles and reclassifications.
After discussion, Chair Robertson requested that a brief memo be provided to full Council with an
explanation of what changed on the Salary Schedule and why the changes were made.
It was noted that recommendations for City -wide compensation methodologies will be forthcoming to the
Committee. Chair Robertson requested that this item added to the Finance & Safety Committee schedule,
and requested an updated schedule be included in the February 20 Committee packet. UNANIMOUS
APPROVAL. FORWARD TO FEBRUARY 11 COW FOR DISCUSSION.
DRAFT
47
48
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
Initials
Meeting Date
02/11/13
Prepared by
NG
Ma or's review
Council review
INFORMATION
ITEM NO.
4.C.
49
STAFF SPONSOR: NORA GIERLOFF
ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 2/11/13
AGENDA ITEM TITLE
King County Countywide Planning Policy Update
2/11/13
❑ Motion
Mtg Date
❑ Resolution
Mtg Date
❑ Ordinance
Mtg Date
❑ Bid Award
Mtg Date
❑ Public Hearing
Mtg Date
❑ Other
Mtg Date
CATEGORY ►1 Discussion
Mtg Date
SPONSOR ❑ Council ❑ Mayor ❑ HR
❑ Finance ❑ Fire ❑ IT ❑ P&R ❑ Police ❑ PW
■ DCD
SPONSOR'S After an extensive review and update process the Growth Management Planning Council
SUMMARY has forwarded amended King County Countywide Planning Policies to local governments in
King County for ratification. If Tukwila takes no action by March 4th we will be deemed to
have ratified them.
REVIEWED BY ❑ COW Mtg. ❑ CA &P Cmte ❑ F &S Cmte ❑ Transportation Cmte
❑ Utilities Cmte ❑ Arts Comm. ❑ Parks Comm. ❑ Planning Comm.
DATE: COMMITTEE CHAIR:
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN.
COMMITTEE
Department of Community Development
N/A
COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$0 $0 $0
Fund Source:
Comments:
MTG. DATE
RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
02/11/13
MTG. DATE
ATTACHMENTS
02/11/13
Informational Memorandum dated 2/1/13
A. 2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
B. Washington State Land Use Planning Hierarchy
49
50
TO:
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
Mayor Haggerton
Council Committee of the Whole
FROM: Nora Gierloff, Deputy DCD Director
DATE: February 4, 2013
SUBJECT: Amended King County Countywide Planning Policies
ISSUE
After an extensive review and update process amended King County Countywide Planning
Policies have been forwarded to local governments in King County for ratification.
BACKGROUND
The 1990 Growth Management Act required the development of a regional policy framework for
guiding development in all King County jurisdictions to ensure consistency with common goals.
These Countywide Planning Policies (CPP) first adopted in 1992 have been extensively
updated and restructured to reflect the regional direction established in Vision 2040, the regional
growth strategy for our four - county Puget Sound Region. They provide guidance to local
jurisdictions as we update our comprehensive plans and development regulations.
The Policy changes have been recommended by the Growth Management Planning Council
(GMPC), a representative body of elected officials from King County, the cities of Seattle and
Bellevue, and the Sound Cities Association (formerly Suburban Cities Association). The 2012
Policies will become effective upon ratification by 30% of local governments representing 70%
of the KC population. If Tukwila takes no action by March 4th we will be deemed to have ratified
them.
DISCUSSION
Information about Vision 2040, the adopted multi- county growth strategy, is available at
http://www.psrc.orq/growth/vision2040/
A useful summary of the CPP changes is available as part of the SEPA Addendum at
http: / /www. kingcounty.gov /property /permits/ codes /qrowth /GMPC /ProposedCPPs.aspx
The full text of the CPP changes is included with this memo as Attachment A. The CPP
changes have been focused around the following principles:
• Promoting coordination and collaboration among jurisdictions within King County
• Establishing environmental sustainability as a foundational principle
• Promoting economic growth and job creation
• Integrating public health with land use and transportation
• Fostering social equity and environmental justice
51
52
INFORMATIONAL MEMO
Page 2
There are two items of particular relevance to Tukwila in the proposed changes. The first is
Seattle's recent inclusion of the "sliver on the River" in its potential annexation area just north of
the ongoing overlap of Seattle and Tukwila's potential annexation areas. Both of these areas
are on the west side of the Duwamish River north of the Turning Basin. The other is the
language that jurisdictions whose existing housing stock provides a high percentage of
affordable units may meet their regional responsibility to provide affordable housing through
preservation, maintenance and repair of existing units, see page 31.
As Tukwila proceeds with our Comprehensive Plan updates staff will look to the revised CPPs
for direction and consistency. DCD is also working with other Departments to increase their
awareness of these policies.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
No financial impact is expected from these changes. Tukwila has already budgeted to complete
our state mandated update of the Comprehensive Plan by the July 2015 .deadline. Policies
which prioritize infrastructure funding for urban and manufacturing industrial centers may
improve Tukwila's competitiveness for grant funding.
RECOMMENDATION
This briefing is for information only as no action is needed in order to ratify these changes.
ATTACHMENTS
A. 2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
B. Washington State Land Use Planning Hierarchy
W:12013 Info Memos- CouncillPlanningPolicies.doc
ATTACHMENT A
2012 King County
Countywide Planning Policies
November, 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
53
54
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
CONTENTS 2
VISION 2040 STATEMENT 4
VISION & FRAMEWORK 5
Vision for King County 2030 5
Framework 7
Framework Policies 9
ENVIRONMENT 11
Environmental Sustainability 11
Earth and Habitat 12
Flood Hazards 13
Water Resources 13
Air Quality and Climate Change 14
DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS 16
Urban Growth Area 16
Urban Lands 17
Growth. Targets 18
Amendments to the Urban Growth Area 21
Review and Evaluation Program 22
Joint Planning and Annexation 23
Centers 24
Urban Centers 24
Manufacturing/ Industrial Centers 25
Local Centers 26
Urban Design and Historic Preservation 27
Rural Area and Resource Lands 27
Rural Area 28
Resource Lands 29
HOUSING 31
Housing Inventory and Needs Analysis 32
Strategies to Meet Housing Needs 32
Regional Cooperation 34
Measuring Results 34
ECONOMY 36 Z
Business Development 37
People 38 a
Places 38
Ci
2
55
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
TRANSPORTATION 40
Supporting Growth 40
Mobility 42
System Operations 43
PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES 45
Urban and Rural Levels of Service 45
Collaboration Among Jurisdictions 45
Utilities 46
Water Supply 46
Sewage Treatment and Disposal 47
Solid Waste 47
Energy 48
Telecommunications 48
Human and Community Services 48
Siting Public Capital Facilities 49
APPENDIX I :.LAND USE MAP 50
APPENDIX 2: POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREAS MAP 51
APPENDIX 3: URBAN SEPARATORS MAPS 52
APPENDIX 4: HOUSING TECHNICAL APPENDIX 55
APPENDIX 5: KING COUNTY SCHOOL SITING TASK FORCE REPORT 59
GLOSSARY 61
56
ia.pter: CONTENTS
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
VISION 2040 STATEMENT
The 2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies were prepared to address changes to the
Growth Management Act, take into account the passage of 20 years since their initial adoption,
and to specifically reflect the regional direction established in VISION 2040.
Vision 2040 is the product of the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC), an association of cities,
towns, counties, ports, tribes, and state agencies that serves as a forum for developing policies
and making decisions about regional growth management, environmental, economic, and
transportation issues in the four - county central Puget Sound region of Washington state (King,
Kitsap, Pierce and Snohomish counties). Vision 2040's Regional Growth Strategy outlines how
the four - county Puget Sound region should plan for additional population and employment
growth.
As made clear in the Regional Growth Strategy, all jurisdictions in King County have a role in
accommodating growth, using sustainable and environmentally responsible development
practices. The 2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies support this strategy and
provide direction at the county and jurisdiction level with appropriate specificity and detail
needed to guide consistent and useable local comprehensive plans and regulations.
While VISION 2040 is consistent with the overall growth management strategy of the 1992 King
County Countywide Planning Policies, restructuring the Countywide Planning Policies —into the
six chapters of Environment, Development Patterns, Housing, Economy, Transportation, and
Public Facilities and Services —was done to match the structure of VISION 2040.
ter: VISION 2040 STATEMENT
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 20.12
VISION & FRAMEWORK
Vision for King County 2030
It is the year 2030 and our county has changed significantly in the roughly 40 years that have
elapsed since the first Countywide Planning Policies were adopted in 1992. In many ways this is
a result of the successful public - private partnership that has supported a diversified,
sustainable regional economy and has managed and accommodated growth while maintaining
the quality of life and the natural environment throughout King County.
King County in 2030 is characterized by:
• Protected Critical Areas. Effective stewardship of the environment has preserved
and protected the critical areas in the County, including wetlands, aquifer recharge
areas, and fish and wildlife conservation areas.
These critical areas continue to provide beneficial functions and values for
reducing flooding, protecting water quality, supporting biodiversity, and
enriching our quality of life for future generations as the as the region's
population continues to grow.
• Viable Rural Area. The Rural Area, established in 1992, is permanently protected
with a clear boundary between Rural and Urban Areas.
The successful protection of these lands is due in large part to continued
innovation within the Urban Growth Area to create new ways to use land
efficiently and sustainably. In this way, there is minimal pressure to convert rural
lands. The Rural Area is a viable option for those seeking a lifestyle contrast to
the Urban Growth Area. The pressure to urbanize the Rural Area has also been
lessened by market pressures to use the land for agriculture.
• Bountiful Agricultural Areas and Productive Forest Lands.
More people are farming and a greater number of residents are benefiting from
King County agricultural products, which can be purchased through a network of
farmers markets and farm stands throughout the county. Since 2010, the
increase in productive farming in the Agricultural Production District and in the
Rural Area has accelerated as more residents seek locally grown food. Thriving
markets now exist throughout the county for these products. The forests of the
Pacific Northwest remain as some of the most productive in the world with large
scale commercial forestry prevalent in the eastern half of the county.
• Vibrant, diverse and compact urban communities.
Within the Urban Growth Area little undeveloped land now exists and urban
infrastructure has been extended to fully serve the entire Urban Growth Area.
58
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
Development activity is focused on redevelopment to create vibrant
neighborhoods where residents can walk, bicycle or use public transit for most of
their needs. Improvements to the infrastructure now focus on maintaining
existing capacity as opposed to extending the infrastructure into previously
unnerved areas. Because of the innovations developed in public and private
partnerships, there is still ample capacity to accommodate the planned
population and employment growth targets within the Urban Growth Area.
Much of the growth in employment and new housing occurs in the Urban Centers. These
centers successfully provide a mixture of living, working, cultural, and recreational activities for
all members of the community. All the centers are linked together by a high- capacity transit
system, including light rail and high capacity bus transit. Transit stations and hubs are within
walking distance to all parts of the center and the high capacity transit system facilitates people
moving easily from one center to another. Within the collection of Urban Centers there is
balance between jobs and housing. Each center has developed its own successful urban
character and all are noted for their livability, vibrancy, healthy environment, design, and
pedestrian focus.
Smaller concentrations of businesses are distributed throughout the Urban Growth Area to
provide goods and services to surrounding residential areas. Most residents are within walking
distance of commercial areas, fostering a healthy community through physical exercise and a
sense of neighborhood. Local transit systems provide convenient connections to the Urban
Centers and elsewhere within the Urban Growth Area.
Manufacturing/ Industrial Centers continue to thrive and function as important hubs of the
regional economy. These areas too are well served by transportation systems that emphasize
the efficient movement of people, goods and information to and within Manufacturing/
Industrial Centers as well as connecting to other regions.
The entire Urban Growth Area is characterized by superior urban design with an open space
network that defines and separates, yet links, the various jurisdictions and central places.
Countywide and regional facilities have been equitably dispersed — located where needed, sited
unobtrusively —and have provided appropriate incentives and amenities to the surrounding 0
neighborhoods.
Rural Cities have created unique urban environments within the Rural Area and provide
commercial services and employment opportunities for their residents. These include retail,
business, educational and social services for residents both of cities and the surrounding Rural
Area while protecting and supporting the surrounding Rural Area and Resource Lands. p
Federal, state and regional funds have been used to further this land use plan and to fund
w
needed regional facilities while local resources focus on funding local and neighborhood
r
o
facilities. The sharing of resources to accomplish common goals is done so that the regional ,-
plan can succeed and all can benefit. ''
6
59
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
The economy is vibrant, vital, and sustainable, and emphasizes diversity in the range of goods
and information produced and the services provided. Regional cooperation has focused on
economic development activities that have retained and expanded key industries such as
aerospace, software, and biotechnology while using the resources of the region to attract new
business clusters such as in renewable energy. Businesses continue to locate in our county
because of the high quality of life; the preservation of the natural environment; the emphasis
on providing a superior education; the predictability brought about by the management of
growth and the effectiveness of public - private partnerships supporting these attributes.
Housing opportunities for all incomes and lifestyles exist throughout the county and with the
balanced transportation system access to employment is convenient and reliable. Innovation in
the development of a diverse range of housing types has been fundamental in accommodating
population growth. The diversity of housing types has allowed residents to stay within their
community as their housing needs change.
King County communities are extraordinarily diverse culturally and this has been embraced and
celebrated by the residents of King County. The needs of residents are attended to by a social
service system that emphasizes prevention but stands ready to respond to direct needs as well.
There is a sense of social equity within our communities and all share equitably in the
distribution of and access to parks, open space, and vibrant neighborhood centers.
The Urban Growth Area is completely located within cities, which are the primary providers of
urban services. Where appropriate, sub - regional consortia have been created for certain
services, and King County government is recognized as a significant provider of regional services
as well as the coordinator of local services to the Rural Area and Resource Lands.
Residents and businesses have recognized that, over time, through clear and reasonable
timelines and financing commitments, issues will be addressed. Residents and businesses trust
in their local governments because the plans and promises made to manage growth starting in
1992 have been followed. Change is accepted and proceeds in an orderly fashion based on the
locally adopted and embraced growth management plans.
Framework
The year 1991 was one of tremendous change for the management of growth in King County
and this environment of change gave rise to the distinctive character of the 1992 Countywide
Planning Policies. While the Countywide Planning Policies have been amended periodically to
address specific issues or revisions required by the Growth Management Act, the first thorough
update of the Countywide Planning Policies was completed in 2012 to ensure that the
Countywide Planning Policies are consistent with VISION 2040, the Growth Management Act
and changes that had occurred in the previous twenty years within King County. In addition for
the 2012 update, the Growth Management Planning Council directed that the revised policies
60
Chapter: VISION & FRAMEWORK
7
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2.012
include countywide direction on three new policy areas: climate change, healthy communities
and social equity. Understanding the history of the 1992 policies is important in order to
establish the context for the revised policies.
In 1991 five major conditions gave rise to the first Countywide Planning Policies and the process
used in their development and adoption:
1. In 1985, the King County Council adopted a Comprehensive Plan that for the
first time established a clear boundary between Urban and Rural Areas and set
forth standards to delineate a clear development character for each.
2. In 1991, the adoption of the Growth Management Act transformed the way
that local jurisdictions looked at land use planning as well as how they
interacted with neighboring jurisdictions.
A fundamental requirement of the Growth Management Act was
coordination between a shared countywide vision on how growth would be
planned for and accommodated and how this would be implemented by local
jurisdictions. In 1991, the Growth Management Act was amended to include
the requirement that Countywide Planning Policies be adopted to describe
this vision and how these relationships would be created. These provisions
gave rise to the creation of the Growth Management Planning Council — an
advisory group of elected officials from jurisdictions throughout the county
charged with overseeing the preparation of the Countywide Planning Policies.
Since the Growth Management Act was new and many jurisdictions had not
created a comprehensive plan before, the Countywide Planning Policies
became a guide for jurisdictions to follow in complying with the Growth
Management Act in areas as diverse as critical area regulation to local growth
targets.
3. In 1991, the Puget Sound Council of Governments was dissolved and replaced
with the Puget Sound Regional Council that initially had significantly reduced
responsibilities for regional land use planning and coordination.
Without an effective regional body for land use planning, it was necessary for
the Puget Sound counties to identify their own process and organization for
developing the Countywide Planning Policies. In the case of King County, this
was the Growth Management Planning Council. Subsequently, as its
responsibilities were expanded over time, the Puget Sound Regional Council
developed VISION 2040, the multi- county vision and planning policies that set
the structure for these revised Countywide Planning Policies.
4. By 1991, the Suburban Cities Association had changed from a loose coalition of
cities outside of Seattle to a formal organization with the ability to represent
constituent jurisdictions in regional forums.
r' .
ter: VISION & FRAMEWORK
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
5. Prior to the development of the Countywide Planning Policies, King County and
METRO attempted and failed to win electoral support for merger.
This defeat left jurisdictions with concerns about the relationship between
city and county governments, and further confusion about the roles of
governments in the Urban Growth Area.
Because of these conditions and the environment they fostered, jurisdictions in King County
decided to go further than just meeting the specific statutory requirements for such policies.
The 1992 King County Countywide Planning Policies provided direction for many issues related
to growth management and established a policy structure for subsequent issue resolution.
Since their adoption, many of the initial Countywide Planning Policies have been codified into
local regulations or carried out in regional or statewide arenas and no longer need to be
included in them. Through amendments to the King County Charter and interlocal agreements,
the relationship between county and city governments has been clearly defined and
annexations and incorporations have brought most of the unincorporated urban area into the
cities.
Other key actions that were required by the 1992 Countywide Planning Policies along with their
current status are described below:
• Complete a fiscal and environmental review of the 1992 Countywide Planning
Policies — completed and adopted in 1994;
• Establish housing and employment targets for each jurisdiction — completed in 1994
and periodically updated pursuant to the Countywide Planning Policies;
• Adopt local comprehensive plans pursuant to the Growth Management Act and
Countywide Planning Policies — each jurisdiction within King County has an adopted
plan that is periodically updated;
• Develop land use capacity and urban density evaluation program — developed and
then superseded by the King County Buildable Lands Program as required by the
Growth Management Act;
• Develop a growth management monitoring program — King County Benchmarks
program established in 1994 and annually updated as described in policy G -2; and
• Evaluate the need to change the Urban Growth Boundary and work to maintain a
permanent Rural Area — established in 1994 and periodically reviewed as described
in the Development Patterns chapter.
General Policies
Unless otherwise noted, the Countywide Planning Policies apply to the Growth Management
Planning Council, King County, and all of the cities within King County.
62
ter: VISION & FRAMEWORK
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
Amendments. While much has been accomplished, the Countywide Planning Policies were
never intended to be static and will require amendment over time to reflect changed
conditions. While the formal policy development is done by the Growth Management Planning
Council, ideas for new policies begin in a variety of areas including individual jurisdictions. Policy
G -1 below describes the process for amending the Countywide Planning Policies:
G - -1 Maintain the currency of the Countywide Planning Policies through periodic review and
amendment. Initiate and review all amendments at the Growth Management Planning Council
through the process described below:
a) Only the Growth Management Planning Council may propose amendments to the
Countywide Planning Policies except for amendments to the Urban Growth Area
that may also be proposed by King County in accordance with policies DP -15 and DP-
16;
b) Growth Management Planning Council recommends amendments to the King
County Council for consideration, possible revision, and approval; proposed
revisions by the King County Council that are of a substantive nature may be sent to
the Growth Management Planning Council for their consideration and revised
recommendation based on the proposed revision;
c) A majority vote of the King County Council both constitutes approval of the
amendments and ratification on behalf of the residents of Unincorporated King
County.;
d) After approval and ratification by the King County Council, amendments are
forwarded to each city and town for ratification. Amendments cannot be modified
during the city ratification process; and
e) Amendments must be ratified within 90 days of King County approval and require
affirmation by the county and cities and towns representing at least 70 percent of
the county population and 30 percent of those jurisdictions. Ratification is either by
an affirmative vote of the city's or town's council or by no action being taken within
the ratification period.
Monitoring. Periodically evaluating the effectiveness of the Countywide Planning Policies is key ate'
to continuing their value to the region and local jurisdictions. In 1994 King County and cities
established the current Benchmarks program to monitor and evaluate key regional indicators. W
G -2 Monitor and benchmark the progress of the Countywide Planning Policies towards
achieving the Regional Growth Strategy inclusive of the environment, development patterns, c
housing, the economy, transportation and the provision of public services. Identify corrective 0
actions to be taken if progress toward benchmarks is not being achieved.
Investment. Key to ensuring the success of the Countywide Planning Policies is investment in
regional infrastructure and programs. Balancing the use of limited available funds between
regional and local needs is extremely complex.
U
1
0
63
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
G -3 Work collaboratively to identify and seek regional, state, and federal funding sources to
invest in infrastructure, strategies, and programs to enable the full implementation of the
Countywide Planning Policies. Balance needed regional investments with local needs when
making funding determinations.
Consistency. The Countywide Planning Policies provide a common framework for local planning
and each jurisdiction is required to update its comprehensive plans to be consistent with the
Countywide Planning Policies. The full body of the Countywide Planning Policies is to be
considered for decision - making.
G -4 Adopt comprehensive plans that are consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies as
required by the Growth Management Act.
ENVIRONMENT
Overarching Goal: The quality of the natural environment in King County is restored and
protected for future generations.
Environmental Sustainability
Local governments have a key role in shaping sustainable communities by integrating
sustainable development and business practices with ecological, social, and economic concerns.
Local governments also play a pivotal role in ensuring environmental justice by addressing
environmental impacts on minority and low- income populations and by pursuing fairness in the
application of policies and regulations.
EN -1 Incorporate environmental protection and restoration efforts into local comprehensive
plans to ensure that the quality of the natural environment and its contributions to human
health and vitality are sustained now and for future generations.
EN -2 Encourage low impact development approaches for managing stormwater, protecting
water quality, minimizing flooding and erosion, protecting habitat, and reducing greenhouse
gas emissions. O
aG
EN -3 Encourage the transition to a sustainable energy future by reducing demand through
planning for efficiency and conservation and by meeting reduced needs from sustainable
sources.
'mad-
EN-4 Identify and preserve regionally significant open space networks in both Urban and
Rural Areas. Develop strategies and funding to protect lands that provide the following valuable
functions:
64
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
• Physical or visual separation delineating growth boundaries or providing buffers
between incompatible uses;
• Active and passive outdoor recreation opportunities;
• Wildlife habitat and migration corridors that preserve and enhance ecosystem
resiliency in the face of urbanization and climate change;
• Preservation of ecologically sensitive, scenic or cultural resources;
• Urban green space, habitats, and ecosystems;
• Forest resources; and
• Food production potential.
EN -5 Identify and mitigate unavoidable negative impacts of public actions that
disproportionately affect people of color and low- income populations.
Earth and Habitat
Healthy ecosystems and environments are vital to the sustainability of all plant and animal life,
including humans. Protection of biodiversity in all its forms and across all landscapes is critical
to continued prosperity and high quality of life in King County. The value of biodiversity to
sustaining long -term productivity and both economic and ecological benefits is evident in
fisheries, forestry, and agriculture. For ecosystems to be healthy and provide healthful benefits
to people, local governments must prevent negative human impacts and work to ensure that
this ecosystem remain diverse and productive over time. With the impending effects of climate
change, maintaining biodiversity becomes even more critical to the preservation and resilience
of resource -based activities and to many social and ecological systems. Protection of individual
species, including Chinook salmon, also plays an important role in sustaining biodiversity and
quality of life within the county. Since 2000, local governments, citizens, tribes, conservation
districts, non - profit groups, and federal and state fisheries managers have cooperated to
develop and implement watershed -based salmon conservation plans, known as Water
Resource Inventory Area plans, to conserve and restore habitat for Chinook salmon today and
for future generations.
EN -6 Coordinate approaches and standards for defining and protecting critical areas
especially where such areas and impacts to them cross jurisdictional boundaries.
EN -7 Encourage basin -wide approaches to wetland protection, emphasizing preservation and
enhancement of the highest quality wetlands and wetland systems.
EN -8 Develop an integrated and comprehensive approach to managing fish and wildlife
habitat conservation, especially protecting endangered, threatened, and sensitive species.
EN -9 Implement salmon habitat protection and restoration priorities in approved Water
Resource Inventory Area plans.
h
z
z
0
rx
0
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
Flood Hazards
Flooding is a natural process that affects human communities and natural environments in King
County. Managing floodplain development and conserving aquatic habitats are the main
challenges for areas affected by flooding. The King County Flood Control District exists to
protect public health and safety, regional economic centers, public and private property and
transportation corridors. Local governments also have responsibility for flood control within
their boundaries.
EN -10 Coordinate and fund flood hazard management efforts through the King County Flood
Control District.
EN -11 Work cooperatively to meet regulatory standards for floodplain development as these
standards are updated for consistency with relevant federal requirements including those
related to the Endangered Species Act.
EN -12 Work cooperatively with the federal, state, and regional agencies and forums to develop
regional levee maintenance standards that ensure public safety and protect habitat.
Water Resources
The flow and quality of water is impacted by water withdrawals, land development, stormwater
management, and climate change. Since surface and ground waters do not respect political
boundaries, cross - jurisdictional coordination of water is required to ensure its functions and
uses are protected and sustained. The Puget Sound Partnership was created by the
Washington State Legislature as the state agency with the responsibility for assuring the
preservation and recovery of Puget Sound and the freshwater systems flowing into the Sound.
King County plays a key role in these efforts because of its large population and its location in
Central Puget Sound.
H
EN -13 Collaborate with the Puget Sound Partnership to implement the Puget Sound Action
Agenda and to coordinate land use and transportation plans and actions for the benefit of
Puget Sound and its watersheds. p
as
EN -14 Manage natural drainage systems to improve water quality and habitat functions,
minimize erosion and sedimentation, protect public health, reduce flood risks, and moderate W
peak storm water runoff rates. Work cooperatively among local, regional, state, national and
tribal jurisdictions to establish, monitor and enforce consistent standards for managing streams
and wetlands throughout drainage basins. `'
66
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
EN -15 Establish a multi - jurisdictional approach for funding and monitoring water quality,
quantity, biological conditions, and outcome measures and for improving the efficiency and
effectiveness of monitoring efforts.
Air Quality and Climate Change
Greenhouse gas emissions are resulting in a changing and increasingly variable climate. King
County's snow -fed water supply is especially vulnerable to a changing climate. Additionally, the
patterns of storm events and river and stream flow patterns are changing and our shorelines
are susceptible to rising sea levels. Carbon dioxide reacts with seawater and reduces the
water's pH, threatening the food web in Puget Sound. While local governments can individually
work to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, more significant emission reductions can only be
accomplished through countywide coordination of land use patterns and promotion of
transportation systems that provide practical alternatives to single occupancy vehicles.
Efficient energy consumption is both a mitigation and an adaptation strategy. Local
governments can improve energy efficiency through the development of new infrastructure as
well as the maintenance and updating of existing infrastructure.
EN -16 Plan for land use patterns and transportation systems that minimize air pollution and
greenhouse gas emissions, including:
• Maintaining or exceeding existing standards for carbon monoxide, ozone, and
particulates;
• Directing growth to Urban Centers and other mixed use/ high density locations that
support mass transit, encourage non - motorized modes of travel and reduce trip
lengths;
• Facilitating modes of travel other than single occupancy vehicles including transit,
walking, bicycling, and carpooling;
• Incorporating energy- saving strategies in infrastructure planning and design;
• Encouraging new development to use low emission construction practices, low or
zero net lifetime energy requirements and "green" building techniques; and
• Increasing the use of low emission vehicles, such as efficient electric - powered
vehicles.
EN -17 Establish a countywide greenhouse gas reduction target that meets or exceeds the
statewide reduction requirement that is stated as the 2050 goal of a 50 percent reduction
below 1990 levels.
EN -18 Establish a greenhouse gas emissions inventory and measurement framework for use
by all King County jurisdictions to efficiently and effectively measure progress toward
countywide targets established pursuant to policy EN -17.
ENVIRONMENT
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
EN -19 Promote energy efficiency, conservation methods and sustainable energy sources to
support climate change reduction goals.
EN -20 Plan and implement land use, transportation, and building practices that will greatly
reduce consumption of fossil fuels.
EN -21 Formulate and implement climate change adaptation strategies that address the
impacts of climate change to public health and safety, the economy, public and private
infrastructure, water resources, and habitat.
68
ENVIRONMENT
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS
The policies in this chapter address the location, types, design and intensity of land uses that
are desired in King County and its cities. They guide implementation of the vision for physical
development within the county. The policies also provide a framework for how to focus
improvements to transportation, public services, the environment, and affordable housing, as
well as how to incorporate concerns about climate change and public health into planning for
new growth. Development patterns policies are at the core of growth management efforts in
King County; they further the goals of VISION 2040, and recognize the variety of local
communities that will be taking action to achieve those goals.
Overarching Goal: Growth in King County occurs in a compact, centers focused pattern that
uses land and infrastructure efficiently and that protects Rural and Resource Lands.
The Countywide Planning Policies designate land as Urban, Rural, or Resource. The Land Use
Map in Appendix 1 shows the Urban Growth Area boundary and Urban, Rural, and Resource
Lands within King County. Further sections of this chapter provide more detailed descriptions
and guidance for planning within each of the three designations.
DP -1 All lands within King County are designated as:
• Urban land within the Urban Growth Area, where new growth is focused and
accommodated;
• Rural land, where farming, forestry, and other resource uses are protected, and very
low- density residential uses, and small -scale non - residential uses are allowed; or
• Resource land, where permanent regionally significant agricultural, forestry, and
mining lands are preserved.
Urban Growth Area
H
The Urban Growth Area encompasses all of the urban designated lands within King County.
These lands include all cities as well as a portion of unincorporated King County. Consistent
with the Growth Management Act and VISION 2040, urban lands are intended to be the focus
of future growth that is compact, includes a mix of uses, and is well- served by public p
infrastructure. Urban lands also include a network of open space where ongoing maintenance is w
a local as well as a regional concern.
Q
The pattern of growth within the Urban Growth Area implements the Regional Growth Strategy
through allocation of targets to local jurisdictions. The targets create an obligation to plan and
provide zoning for future potential growth, but do not obligate a jurisdiction to guarantee that
a given number of housing units will be built or jobs added during the planning period.
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
Several additional elements in the Development Patterns chapter reinforce the vision and
targeted growth pattern for the Urban Growth Area. Procedures and criteria for amending the
Urban Growth Area boundary address a range of objectives and ensure that changes balance
the needs for land to accommodate growth with the overarching goal of preventing sprawl
within the county. A review and evaluation program provides feedback for the county and cities
on the effectiveness of their efforts to accommodate and achieve the desired land use pattern.
Joint planning facilitates the transition of governance of the Urban Growth Area from the
county to cities, consistent with the Growth Management Act.
Urban form and development within the Urban Growth Area are important settings to provide
people with choices to engage in more physical activity, eat healthy food, and minimize
exposure to harmful environments and substances. In particular, the quality and safety of
walking and biking routes children use to reach school is known to affect their health.
Goal Statement: The Urban Growth Area accommodates growth consistent with the Regional
Growth Strategy and growth targets through land use patterns and practices that create
vibrant, healthy, and sustainable communities.
Urban Lands
DP -2 Promote a pattern of compact development within the Urban Growth Area that includes
housing at a range of urban densities, commercial and industrial development, and other urban
facilities, including medical, governmental, institutional, and educational uses and parks and
open space. The Urban Growth Area will include a mix of uses that are convenient to and
support public transportation in order to reduce reliance on single occupancy vehicle travel for
most daily activities.
DP -3 Efficiently develop and use residential, commercial, and manufacturing land in the Urban cn
Growth Area to create healthy and vibrant urban communities with a full range of urban
services, and to protect the Tong -term viability of the Rural Area and Resource Lands. Promote w
the efficient use of land within the Urban Growth Area by using methods such as: d
• Directing concentrations of housing and employment growth to designated centers; H
• Encouraging compact development with a mix of compatible residential, Z
commercial, and community activities; w
• Maximizing the use of the existing capacity for housing and employment; and a.,
O
• Coordinating plans for land use, transportation, capital facilities and services. .4
w
W
DP -4 Concentrate housing and employment growth within the designated Urban Growth Area.
Focus housing growth within countywide designated Urban Centers and locally designated local
o
centers. Focus employment growth within countywide designated Urban and
Manufacturing /Industrial Centers and within locally designated local centers. U
70
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
Novernber 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
DP -5 Decrease greenhouse gas emissions through land use strategies that promote a mix of
housing, employment, and services at densities sufficient to promote walking, bicycling, transit,
and other alternatives to auto travel.
DP -6 Plan for development patterns that promote public health by providing all residents with
opportunities for safe and convenient daily physical activity, social connectivity, and protection
from exposure to harmful substances and environments.
DP -7 Plan for development patterns that promote safe and healthy routes to and from public
schools.
DP -8 Increase access to healthy food in communities throughout the Urban Growth Area by
encouraging the location of healthy food purveyors, such as grocery stores and farmers
markets, and community food gardens in proximity to residential uses and transit facilities.
DP -9 Designate Urban Separators as permanent low- density incorporated and unincorporated
areas within the Urban Growth Area. Urban Separators are intended to protect Resource Lands,
the Rural Area, and environmentally sensitive areas, and create open space and wildlife
corridors within and between communities while also providing public health, environmental,
visual, and recreational benefits. Changes to Urban Separators are made pursuant to the
Countywide Planning Policies amendment process described in policy G -1. Designated Urban
Separators within cities and unincorporated areas are shown in the Urban Separators Map in
Appendix 3.
DP 10 Discourage incompatible land uses from locating adjacent to general aviation airports
throughout the county.
Growth Targets
DP -11 GMPC shall allocate residential and employment growth to each city and
unincorporated urban area in the county. This allocation is predicated on:
• Accommodating the most recent 20 -year population projection from the state Office
of Financial Management and the most recent 20 -year regional employment
forecast from the Puget Sound Regional Council;
• Planning for a pattern of growth that is consistent with the Regional Growth
Strategy including focused growth within cities with countywide designated centers
and within other larger cities, limited development in the Rural Area, and protection
of designated Resource Lands;
• Efficiently using existing zoned and future planned development capacity as well as
the capacity of existing and planned infrastructure, including sewer and water
systems;
1
8
71
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
• Promoting a land use pattern that can be served by a connected network of public
transportation services and facilities and pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure and
amenities;
• Improving the jobs /housing balance within the region and the county;
• Promoting sufficient opportunities for housing and employment development
throughout the Urban Growth Area;
• Allocating growth to individual Potential Annexation Areas within the urban
unincorporated area proportionate to its share of unincorporated capacity for
housing and employment growth.
DP -12 GMPC shall:
• Update housing and employment targets periodically to provide jurisdictions with
up -to -date growth allocations to be incorporated in state - mandated comprehensive
plan updates;
• Adopt housing and employment growth targets in the Countywide Planning Policies
pursuant to the procedure described in policy G -1; and
• Adjust targets administratively upon annexation of unincorporated Potential
Annexation Areas by cities. Growth targets for the 2006 -2031 planning period are
shown in table DP -1.
DP -13 All jurisdictions shall plan to accommodate housing and employment targets. This
includes:
• Adopting comprehensive plans and zoning regulations that provide capacity for
residential, commercial, and industrial uses that is sufficient to meet 20 -year growth
needs and is consistent with the desired growth pattern described in VISION 2040;
• Coordinating water, sewer, transportation and other infrastructure plans and
investments among agencies, including special purpose districts; and
• Transferring and accommodating unincorporated area housing and employment
targets as annexations occur.
72
apter: DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS
2012 King County Countywide Pionning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
Urban Growth Area Total
233,077
Tab|eDP'1:
King County iurisriktion Growth
Targets 2006-2031
Net
uvu"i"a
Target
New Units 2006-2031
Potential Ap"p""x"nArea
uo..c/"« Tar o"'
we,mewJob,
Employment_
Tar t
2006e031
Potential w`pe,v'mnArea
pmpTaqpt
met'op"//t""'*'e,
9~n~°"~
17,»no
mo
sl,ono
wan|p
xroon 14E1,700
rwet,vvmlitattati°"v"h*"ta/
103,Cu0--
199,700
Av.burn
8,620__-
_19,350 -----
nmh°U
'non
_-4,800
200
_aurien
-4,440 _-_
_810
-4'960_-_-__
cu
z
8,100
-2,30
90
_1.2,300
_13,280 _____
290
zzO
-Eadtrdvmay
_Kent__
-9,270 ___'
E
8,578
-20,850 ____'
_Kirkland
�
640
-u3,noO'_____
_Redmond_ ___ __-__'-10,20O
14,835
3'1;95
.29,000
470
_Renton
Sp" r",
sx)n
95,1o0
Tukwila
4100 so 15,500 uso
Core Cities
subtvta/
-zu*sn__
_168,340. __-_
Des Mo*°`
l000
s,000
Issaquah
5,750
290
_20,000----_-
'
�
^«
1,000
j
.'....
wap/"«"//~v
1,800
1n«o
„2,1200__
M°,'~` /`/""d
9,000
1'000
�
S"",m°m/u.
4,000
xso
_�DO0____-
5h",°//np
Fnno
»»»
wnua/n"/np
1,000 5,0u0
Larger
n'/e`Subtotal
7R,050-
42,800-_-
Algona
190
210
Beaux Arts
3
3
Black Diamond
1'900
1'050
Carnation
_3()
_370
_Clyde Hill. -_-__--zu___-_
-u
Covington
1,470
1
Duvall
1,140 _-_
,.•;7»
-o«o
Enumclaw
_145
'rs
1-Ixm.pmnt
Y,
0
~
/"k~ Pored- Park
-z_---_
475
710
�
E
ri
Medina
19
90
-o_-_____
zau--____-
' ---'
_so
. Newcastle
_1,200 __
-z»s _'
-___zzu_
_xs__--__--_
_mormanu*Pazk_-
North .Bend
'ass___-_
-1,050 -----
zos....
135 -
_a7o______'
'
_Pacific_
-zo_-__
_o_------
Song! "/mi°
1 5
1,1160
vnrro=*nir,
„61
14 n
Ive,Sl**vta/
10,977
nincorp c
eoteoual_Aone^auvoxue,s -_zu,0eo__-_-___-__--_--_____-__-».zzn------'--__-_____-__-_____
North H/'»on=
-a/o
Bear Creek UPD
910
3'580
Unclaimed Urban Uninc.
650 90
//,h""/""","",°,~a*.h,","/
17 uro q_000
Urban Growth Area Total
233,077
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
Amendments to the Urban Growth Area
The following policies guide the decision - making process by both the GMPC and King County
regarding proposals to expand the Urban Growth Area.
DP -14 Review the Urban Growth Area at least every ten years. In this review consider
monitoring reports and other available data. As a result of this review, and based on the criteria
established in policies DP -15 and DP -16, King County may propose and then the Growth
Management Planning Council may recommend amendments to the Countywide Planning
Policies and King County Comprehensive Plan that make changes to the Urban Growth Area
boundary.
DP -15 Allow amendment of the Urban Growth Area only when the following steps have been
satisfied:
a) The proposed expansion is under review by the County as part of an amendment
process of the King County Comprehensive Plan;
b) King County submits the proposal to the Growth Management Planning Council for
the purposes of review and recommendation to the King County Council on the
proposed amendment to the Urban Growth Area;
c) The King County Council approves or denies the proposed amendment; and
d) If approved by the King County Council, the proposed amendment is ratified by the
cities following the procedures set forth in policy G -1.
DP -16 Allow expansion of the Urban Growth Area only if at least one of the following criteria
is met:
a) A countywide analysis determines that the current Urban Growth Area is insufficient
in size and additional land is needed to accommodate the housing and employment
growth targets, including institutional and other non - residential uses, and there are
no other reasonable measures, such as increasing density or rezoning existing urban
land, that would avoid the need to expand the Urban Growth Area; or
b) A proposed expansion of the Urban Growth Area is accompanied by dedication of
permanent open space to the King County Open Space System, where the acreage of
the proposed open space
1) is at least four times the acreage of the land added to the Urban Growth Area;
2) is contiguous with the Urban Growth Area with at least a portion of the
dedicated open space surrounding the proposed Urban Growth Area
expansion; and
3) Preserves high quality habitat, critical areas, or unique features that
contribute to the band of permanent open space along the edge of the Urban
Growth Area; or
c) The area is currently a King County park being transferred to a city to be maintained
as a park in perpetuity or is park and that has been owned by a city since 1994 and
is less than thirty acres in size.
74
a,
O
U
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
DP -17 If expansion of the Urban Growth Area is warranted based on the criteria in DP -16(a) or
DP- 16(b), add land to the Urban Growth Area only if it meets all of the following criteria:
a) Is adjacent to the existing Urban Growth Area and is no larger than necessary to
promote compact development that accommodates anticipated growth needs;
b) Can be efficiently provided with urban services and does not require supportive
facilities located in the Rural Area;
c) Follows topographical features that form natural boundaries, such as rivers and
ridge lines and does not extend beyond natural boundaries, such as watersheds, that
impede the provision of urban services;
d) Is not currently designated as Resource Land;
e) Is sufficiently free of environmental constraints to be able to support urban
development without significant adverse environmental impacts, unless the area is
designated as an Urban Separator by interlocal agreement between King County and
the annexing city; and
f) Is subject to an agreement between King County and the city or town adjacent to
the area that the area will be added to the city's Potential Annexation Area. Upon
ratification of the amendment, the Countywide Planning Policies will reflect both the
Urban Growth Area change and Potential Annexation Area change.
DP -18 Allow redesignation of Urban and currently within the Urban Growth Area to Rural land
outside of the Urban Growth Area if the land is not needed to accommodate projected urban
growth, is not served by public sewers, is contiguous with the Rural Area, and:
a) Is not characterized by urban development;
b) Is currently developed with a low density lot pattern that cannot be realistically
redeveloped at an urban density; or
c) Is characterized by environmentally sensitive areas making it inappropriate for
higher density development.
Review and Evaluation Program
The following policies guide the decision - buildable lands program conducted by the GMPC and
King County.
DP -19 Conduct a buildable lands program that meets or exceeds the review and evaluation
requirements of the Growth Management Act. The purposes of the buildable lands program
are:
• To collect and analyze data on development activity, land supply, and capacity for
residential, commercial, and industrial land uses;
• To evaluate the consistency of actual development densities with current
comprehensive plans; and
• To evaluate the sufficiency of land capacity to accommodate growth for the
remainder of the planning period.
Chapter: DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012 .
DP -20 If necessary based on the findings of a periodic buildable lands evaluation report, adopt
reasonable measures, other than expansion of the Urban Growth Area, to increase land
capacity for housing and employment growth within the Urban Growth Area by making more
efficient use of urban land consistent with current plans and targets.
Joint Planning and Annexation
DP -21 Coordinate the preparation of comprehensive plans among adjacent and other affected
jurisdictions as a means to avoid or mitigate the potential cross - border impacts of urban
development.
DP -22 Designate Potential Annexation Areas in city comprehensive plans and adopt them in
the Countywide Planning Policies. Ensure that Potential Annexation Areas do not overlap or
leave unincorporated urban islands between cities.
DP -23 Facilitate the annexation of unincorporated areas within the Urban Growth Area that
are already urbanized and are within a city's Potential Annexation Area in order to provide
urban services to those areas. Annexation is preferred over incorporation.
DP -24 Allow cities to annex territory only within their designated Potential Annexation Area as
shown in the Potential Annexation Areas Map in Appendix 2. Phase annexations to coincide
with the ability of cities to coordinate the provision of a full range of urban services to areas to
be annexed.
DP -25 Within the North Highline unincorporated area, where Potential Annexation Areas
overlapped prior to January 1, 2009, strive to establish alternative non - overlapping Potential
Annexation Area boundaries through a process of negotiation. Absent a negotiated resolution,
a city may file a Notice of Intent to Annex with the Boundary Review Board for King County for
territory within its designated portion of a Potential Annexation Area overlap as shown in the
Potential Annexation Areas Map in Appendix 2 and detailed in the city's comprehensive plan
after the following steps have been taken:
a) The city proposing annexation has, at least 30 days prior to filing a Notice of Intent
to annex with the Boundary Review Board, contacted in writing the cities with the
PAA overlap and the county to provide notification of the city's intent to annex and
to request a meeting or formal mediation to discuss boundary alternatives, and;
b) The cities with the Potential Annexation Area overlap and the county have either:
i) Agreed to meet but failed to develop a negotiated settlement to the overlap
within 60 days of receipt of the notice, or
ii) Declined to meet or failed to respond in writing within 30 days of receipt of the
notice.
76
U
ti
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
DP -26 Develop agreements between King County and cities with Potential Annexation Areas to
apply city - compatible development standards that will guide land development prior to
annexation.
DP -27 Evaluate proposals to annex or incorporate unincorporated land based on the following
criteria:
a) Conformance with Countywide Planning Policies including the Urban Growth Area
boundary;
b) The ability of the annexing or incorporating jurisdiction to provide urban services at
standards equal to or better than the current service providers; and
c) Annexation or incorporation in a manner that will avoid creating unincorporated
islands of development.
DP -28 Resolve the issue of unincorporated road islands within or between cities. Roadways
and shared streets within or between cities, but still under King County jurisdiction, should be
annexed by adjacent cities.
Centers
A centers strategy is the linchpin for King County to achieve the Regional Growth Strategy as
well as a range of other objectives, particularly providing a land use framework for an efficient
and effective regional transit system. Countywide designation of Urban Centers and local
designation of local centers provide for locations of mixed -use zoning, infrastructure, and
concentrations of services and amenities to accommodate both housing and employment
growth. Manufacturing /Industrial Centers preserve lands for family -wage jobs in basic
industries and trade and provide areas where that employment may grow in the future.
Goal Statement: King County grows in a manner that reinforces and expands upon a system of
existing and planned central places within which concentrated residential communities and
economic activities can flourish.
Urban Centers
DP -29 Concentrate housing and employment growth within designated Urban Centers.
DP -30 Designate Urban Centers in the Countywide Planning Policies where city- nominated
locations meet the criteria in policies DP -31 and DP -32 and where the city's commitments will
help ensure the success of the center. Urban Centers will be limited in number and located on
existing or planned high capacity transit corridors to provide a framework for targeted private
and public investments that support regional land use and transportation goals. The Land Use
Map in Appendix 1 shows the locations of the designated Urban Centers.
apter: DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
DP -31 Allow designation of new Urban Centers where the proposed Center:
a) Encompasses an area up to one and a half square miles; and
b) Has adopted zoning regulations and infrastructure plans that are adequate to
accommodate:
i) A minimum of 15,000 jobs within one -half mile of an existing or planned
high- capacity transit station;
ii) At a minimum, an average of 50 employees per gross acre within the Urban
Center; and
iii) At a minimum, an average of 15 housing units per gross acre within the
Urban Center.
DP -32 Adopt a map and housing and employment growth targets in city comprehensive plans
for each Urban Center, and adopt policies to promote and maintain quality of life in the Center
through:
• A broad mix of land uses that foster both daytime and nighttime activities and
opportunities for social interaction;
• A range of affordable and healthy housing choices;
• Historic preservation and adaptive reuse of historic places;
• Parks and public open spaces that are accessible and beneficial to all residents in the
Urban Center;
• Strategies to increase tree canopy within the Urban Center and incorporate low -
impact development measures to minimize stormwater runoff;
• Facilities to meet human service needs;
• Superior urban design which reflects the local community vision for compact urban
development;
• Pedestrian and bicycle mobility, transit use, and linkages between these modes;
• Planning for complete streets to provide safe and inviting access to multiple travel
modes, especially bicycle and pedestrian travel; and
• Parking management and other strategies that minimize trips made by single -
occupant vehicle, especially during peak commute periods.
DP -33 Form the land use foundation for a regional high- capacity transit system through the
designation of a system of Urban Centers. Urban Centers should receive high priority for the
location of transit service.
Manufacturing/ Industrial Centers
DP -34 Concentrate manufacturing and industrial employment within countywide designated
Manufacturing/ Industrial Centers. The Land Use Map in Appendix 1 shows the locations of the
designated Manufacturing /Industrial Centers.
78
DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS
2
5
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
DP -35 Adopt in city comprehensive plans a map and employment growth targets for each
Manufacturing/ Industrial Center and adopt policies and regulations for the Center to:
• Provide zoning and infrastructure adequate to accommodate a minimum of 10,000
jobs;
• Preserve and enhance sites that are appropriate for manufacturing or other
industrial uses;
• Strictly limit residential uses and discourage land uses that are not compatible with
manufacturing and industrial uses, such as by imposing low maximum size limits on
offices and retail uses that are not accessory to an industrial use;
• Facilitate the mobility of employees by transit and the movement of goods by truck,
rail, air or waterway, as appropriate;
• Provide for capital facility improvement projects which support the movement of
goods and manufacturing /industrial operations;
• Ensure that utilities are available to serve the center;
• Avoid conflicts with adjacent land uses to ensure the continued viability of the land
in the Manufacturing/ Industrial Center for manufacturing and industrial activities;
and
• Attract and retain the types of businesses that will ensure economic growth and
stability.
DP -36 Minimize or mitigate potential health impacts of the activities in Manufacturing/
Industrial Centers on residential communities, schools, open space, and other public facilities.
DP -37 Designate additional Manufacturing/ Industrial Centers in the Countywide Planning
Policies pursuant to the procedures described in policy G -1 based on nominations from cities
and after determining that:
a) the nominated locations meet the criteria set forth in policy DP -35 and the criteria
established by the Puget Sound Regional Council for Regional Manufacturing/
Industrial Centers;
b) the proposed center's location will promote a countywide system of Manufacturing/
Industrial Centers with the total number of centers representing a realistic growth Q
w
O
L1.1
strategy for the county; and
c) the city's commitments will help ensure the success of the center.
Local Centers
DP -38 Identify in comprehensive plans local centers, such as city or neighborhood centers,
transit station areas, or other activity nodes, where housing, employment, and services are
accommodated in a compact form and at sufficient densities to support transit service and to
make efficient use of urban land.
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
Urban Design and Historic Preservation
The countywide vision includes elements of urban design and form intended to integrate urban
development into existing built and natural environments in ways that enhance both the urban
and natural settings. These elements include high quality design, context sensitive infill and
redevelopment, historic preservation, and the interdependence of urban and rural and
agricultural lands and uses.
Goal statement: The built environment in both urban and rural settings achieves a high degree
of high quality design that recognizes and enhances, where appropriate, existing natural and
urban settings.
DP -39 Develop neighborhood planning and design processes that encourage infill
development, redevelopment, and reuse of existing buildings and that, where appropriate
based on local plans, enhance the existing community character and mix of uses.
DP -40 Promote a high quality of design and site planning in publicly- funded and private
development throughout the Urban Growth Area.
DP -41 Preserve significant historic, archeological, cultural, architectural, artistic, and
environmental features, especially where growth could place these resources at risk. Where
appropriate, designate individual features or areas for protection or restoration. Encourage
land use patterns and adopt regulations that protect historic resources and sustain historic
community character.
DP -42 Design new development to create and protect systems of green infrastructure, such as
urban forests, parks, green roofs, and natural drainage systems, in order to reduce climate -
altering pollution and increase resilience of communities to climate change impacts.
DP -43 Design communities, neighborhoods, and individual developments using techniques that
reduce heat absorption, particularly in Urban Centers. H H
DP -44 Adopt design standards or guidelines that foster infill development that is compatible
with the existing or desired urban character. w
0
Rural Area and Resource Lands
The Rural Area and Resource Lands encompass all areas outside of the Urban Growth Area and
include Vashon Island in Puget Sound and the area just east of the Urban Growth Area all the
way to the crest of the Cascade Mountains. The Rural Area is characterized by low density
development with a focus on activities that are dependent on the land such as small scale
farming and forestry. The Rural Area also provides important environmental and habitat
80
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
functions and is critical for salmon recovery. The location of the Rural Area, between the Urban
Growth Area and designated Resource Lands, helps to protect commercial agriculture and
timber from incompatible uses. The Rural Area, outside of the Rural Cities, is to remain in
unincorporated King County and is to be provided with a rural level of service.
Rural Area
Goal Statement: The Rural Area provides a variety of landscapes, maintains diverse low density
communities, and supports rural economic activities based on sustainable stewardship of the
land.
DP -45 Limit growth in the Rural Area to prevent sprawl and the overburdening of rural
services, reduce the need for new rural infrastructure, maintain rural character, and protect the
natural environment.
DP -46 Limit residential development in the Rural Area to housing at low densities that are
compatible with rural character and comply with the following density guidelines:
a) One home per 20 acres where a pattern of large lots exists and to buffer Forest
Protection Districts and Agricultural Districts;
b) One home per 10 acres where the predominant lot size is less than 20 acres; or
c) One home per five acres where the predominant lot size is less than 10 acres.
d) Allow limited clustering within development sites to avoid development on
environmentally critical lands or on productive forest or agricultural lands, but not to
exceed the density guidelines cited in (a) through (c).
DP -47 Limit the extension of urban infrastructure improvements through the Rural Area to
only cases where it is necessary to serve the Urban Growth Area and where there are no other
feasible alignments. Such limited extensions may be considered only if land use controls are in
place to restrict uses appropriate for the Rural Area and only if access management controls are
in place to prohibit tie -ins to the extended facilities.
H
DP-48 Establish rural development standards to protect the natural environment by using
seasonal and maximum clearing limits for vegetation, limits on the amount of impervious
surface, surface water management standards that preserve natural drainage systems, water
quality and groundwater recharge, and best management practices for resource -based
activities.
DP -49 Prevent or, if necessary, mitigate negative impacts of urban development to the
adjacent Rural Area. 0
DP -50 Except as provided in Appendix 5 (March 31, 2012 School Siting Task Force Report), limit
new nonresidential uses located in the Rural Area to those that are demonstrated to serve the
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012 .
Rural Area, unless the use is dependent upon a rural location. Such uses shall be of a size, scale,
and nature that is consistent with rural character.
DP -51 Allow cities that own property in the Rural Area to enter into interlocal agreements with
King County to allow the cities to provide services to the properties they own as long as the
cities agree to not annex the property or serve it with sewers or any infrastructure at an urban
level of service. The use of the property must be consistent with the rural land use policies in
the Countywide Planning Policies and the King County Comprehensive Plan.
Resource Lands
The Resource Lands are designated areas with long term commercial significance for
agriculture, forestry, and mining, and are depicted in the Land Use Map in Appendix 1 as Forest
Product Districts, Agricultural Production Districts, and Mineral Resource Lands. The use and
designation of these lands are to be permanent, in accordance with the Growth Management
Act. King County has maintained this base of agriculture and forest lands despite the rapid
growth of the previous decades. The Resource Lands are to remain in unincorporated King
County but their benefit and significance is felt throughout the county into the cities. Within
cities, farmers markets are becoming important and sought after neighborhood amenities.
The forests of the Pacific Northwest are some of the most productive in the world and King
County has retained two - thirds of the county in forest cover. Large scale forestry is a
traditional land use in the eastern half of King County and remains a significant contributor to
the rural economy. In addition, forests provide exceptional recreational opportunities,
including downhill and cross - country skiing, mountain biking, hiking, and backpacking.
Goal Statement: Resource Lands are valuable assets of King County and are renowned for their
productivity and sustainable management.
DP -52 Promote and support forestry, agriculture, mining and other resource -based industries
outside of the Urban Growth Area as part of a diverse and sustainable regional economy.
DP -53 Conserve commercial agricultural and forestry resource lands primarily for their long-
term productive resource value and for the open space, scenic views, wildlife habitat, and
critical area protection they provide. Limit the subdivision of land so that parcels remain large
enough for commercial resource production.
DP -54 Encourage best practices in agriculture and forestry operations for long -term protection
of the natural resources.
DP -55 Prohibit annexation of lands within designated Agricultural Production Districts or within
Forest Production Districts by cities.
82
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
DP -56 Retain the Lower Green River Agricultural Production District as a regionally designated
resource that is to remain in unincorporated King County.
DP -57 Discourage incompatible land uses adjacent to designated Resource Lands to prevent
interference with their continued use for the production of agricultural, mining, or forest
products.
DP -58 Support local production and processing of food to reduce the need for long distance
transport and to increase the reliability and security of local food. Promote activities and
infrastructure, such as farmers markets, farm worker housing and agricultural processing
facilities, that benefit both cities and farms by improving access to locally grown agricultural
products.
DP -59 Support institutional procurement policies that encourage purchases of locally grown
food products.
DP -60 Ensure that extractive industries maintain environmental quality and minimize negative
impacts on adjacent lands.
DP -61 Use a range of tools, including land use designations, development regulations, level -of-
service standards, and transfer or purchase of development rights to preserve Rural and
Resource Lands and focus urban development within the Urban Growth Area.
DP -62 Use transfer of development rights to shift potential development from the Rural Area
and Resource Lands into the Urban Growth Area, especially cities. Implement transfer of
development rights within King County through a partnership between the county and cities
that is designed to:
• Identify rural and resource sending sites that satisfy countywide conservation goals
and are consistent with regionally coordinated transfer of development rights
efforts;
• Preserve rural and resource lands of compelling interest countywide and to
participating cities;
• Identify appropriate transfer of development rights receiving areas within cities;
• Identify incentives for city participation in regional transfer of development rights
(i.e. county -to -city transfer of development rights);
• Develop interlocal agreements that allow rural and resource land development
rights to be used in city receiving areas;
• Identify and secure opportunities to fund or finance infrastructure within city
transfer of development rights receiving areas; and.
• Be compatible with existing within -city transfer of development rights programs.
3
0
83
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
HOUSING
The Countywide Planning Policies provide a framework for all jurisdictions to plan for and
promote a range of affordable, accessible, and healthy housing choices for current and future
residents. Within King County, there is an unmet need for housing that is affordable for
households earning less than 80 percent of area median income (AMI). Households within this
category include low -wage workers in services and other industries; persons on fixed incomes
including many disabled and elderly residents; and homeless individuals and families. A high
proportion of these households spend a greater percentage of their income on housing than is
typically considered appropriate. This is especially true for low and very low income
households earning 50 percent or less (low) and 30 percent or less (very-low) of area median
income. The county and all cities share in the responsibility to increase the supply of housing
that is affordable to these households.
While neither the county nor the cities can guarantee that a given number of units at a given
price level will exist, be preserved, or be produced during the planning period, establishing the
countywide need clarifies the scope of the effort for each jurisdiction. The type of policies and
strategies that are appropriate for a jurisdiction to consider will vary and will be based on its
analysis of housing. Some jurisdictions where the overall supply of affordable housing is
significantly less than their proportional share of the countywide need may need to undertake a
range of strategies addressing needs at multiple income levels, including strategies to create
new affordable housing. Other jurisdictions that currently have housing stock that is already
generally affordable may focus their efforts on preserving existing affordable housing through
efforts such as maintenance and repair, and ensuring long -term affordability. It may also be
appropriate to focus efforts on the needs of specific demographic segments of the population.
The policies below recognize the significant countywide need for affordable housing to focus on
the strategies that can be taken both individually and in collaboration to meet the countywide
need. These policies envision cities and the county following a four step process
1. Conduct an inventory and analysis of housing needs and conditions;
2. Implement policies and strategies to address unmet needs;
3. Measure results; and
4. Respond to measurement with reassessment and adjustment of strategies.
The provision of housing affordable to very -low income households, those earning less than
30% of AMI, is the most challenging problem and one faced by all communities in the county.
Housing for these very -low income households cannot be met solely through the private
market. Meeting this need will require interjurisdictional cooperation and support from public
agencies, including the cities and the county.
84
iapter: HOUSING
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
Overarching Goal: The housing needs of all economic and demographic groups are met within
all jurisdictions.
H -1 Address the countywide need for housing affordable to households with moderate, low
and very -low incomes, including those with special needs. The countywide need for housing by
percentage of Area Median Income (AMI) is:
50 -80% of AMI (moderate) 16% of total housing supply
30 -50% of AMI (low) 12% bf total housing supply
30% and below AMI (very -low) 12% of total housing supply
H -2 Address the need for housing affordable to households at less than 30% AMI (very low
income), recognizing that this is where the greatest need exists, and addressing this need will
require funding, policies and collaborative actions by all jurisdictions working individually and
collectively.
Housing Inventory and Needs Analysis
The Growth Management Act requires an inventory and analysis of existing and projected
housing needs as part of each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan housing element. Assessing
local housing needs provides jurisdictions with information about the local housing supply, the
cost of housing, and the demographic and income levels of the community's households. This
information on current and future housing conditions provides the basis for the development of
effective housing policies and programs. While some cities may find that they meet the current
need for housing for some populations groups, the inventory and needs analysis will help
identify those income levels and demographic segments of the population where there is the
greatest need. Further guidance on conducting a housing inventory and analysis is provided in
Appendix 4.
H -3 Conduct an inventory and analysis of existing and projected housing needs of all economic
and demographic segments of the population in each jurisdiction. The analysis and inventory
shall include:
a. Characteristics of the existing housing stock, including supply, affordability and
diversity of housing types;
b. Characteristics of populations, including projected growth and demographic change;
c. The housing needs of very -low, low, and moderate - income households; and
d. The housing needs of special needs populations.
Strategies to Meet Housing Needs
VISION 2040 encourages local jurisdictions to adopt best housing practices and innovative
techniques to advance the provision of affordable, healthy, sustainable, and safe housing for all
residents. Meeting the county's affordable housing needs will require actions by a wide range
of private for profit, non - profit and government entities, including substantial resources from
federal, state, and local levels. No single tool will be sufficient to meet the full range of needs in
a given jurisdiction. The county and cities are encouraged to employ a range of housing tools to
apter: HOUSING
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
ensure the countywide need is addressed and to respond to local conditions. Further detail on
the range of strategies for promoting housing supply and affordability is contained in Appendix
4.
Jobs - housing balance, addressed in H -9, is a concept that advocates an appropriate match
between the number of existing jobs and available housing supply within a geographic area.
Improving balance means adding more housing to job -rich areas and more jobs to housing -rich
areas.
H -4 Provide zoning capacity within each jurisdiction in the Urban Growth Area for a range of
housing types and densities, sufficient to accommodate each jurisdiction's overall housing
targets and, where applicable, housing growth targets in designated Urban Centers.
H -5 Adopt policies, strategies, actions and regulations at the local and countywide levels that
promote housing supply, affordability, and diversity, including those that address a significant
share of the countywide need for housing affordable to very -low, low, and moderate income
households. These strategies should address the following:
a. Overall supply and diversity of housing, including both rental and ownership;
b. Housing suitable for a range of household types and sizes;
c. Affordability to very -low, low, and moderate income households;
d. Housing suitable and affordable for households with special needs;
e. Universal design and sustainable development of housing; and
f. Housing supply, including affordable housing and special needs housing, within
Urban Centers and in other areas planned for concentrations of mixed land uses.
H -6 Preserve existing affordable housing units, where appropriate, including acquisition and
rehabilitation of housing for long -term affordability.
H -7 Identify barriers to housing affordability and implement strategies to overcome them.
H -8 Tailor housing policies and strategies to local needs, conditions and opportunities,
recognizing the unique strengths and challenges of different cities and sub - regions.
H -9 Plan for housing that is accessible to major employment centers and affordable to the
workforce in them so people of all incomes can live near or within reasonable commuting
distance of their places of work. Encourage housing production at a level that improves the C7
balance of housing to employment throughout the county.
H -10 Promote housing affordability in coordination with transit, bicycle, and pedestrian plans
and investments and in proximity to transit hubs and corridors, such as through transit oriented
development and planning for mixed uses in transit station areas.
H -11 Encourage the maintenance of existing housing stock in order to ensure that the
condition and quality of the housing is safe and livable.
86
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
H -12 Plan for residential neighborhoods that protect and promote the health and well -being of
residents by supporting active living and healthy eating and by reducing exposure to harmful
environments.
H -13 Promote fair housing and plan for communities that include residents with a range of
abilities, ages, races, incomes, and other diverse characteristics of the population of the county.
Regional Cooperation
Housing affordability is important to regional economic vitality and sustainability. Housing
markets do not respect jurisdictional boundaries. For these reasons, multijurisdictional efforts
for planning and adopting strategies to meet regional housing needs are an additional tool for
identifying and meeting the housing needs of households with moderate, low, and very -low
incomes. Collaborative efforts, supported by the work of Puget Sound Regional Council and
other agencies, contribute to producing and preserving affordable housing and coordinating
equitable, sustainable development in the county and region. Where individual cities lack
sufficient resources, collective efforts to fund or provide technical assistance for affordable
housing development and preservation, and for the creation of strategies and programs, can
help to meet the housing needs identified in comprehensive plans. Cities with similar housing
characteristics tend to be clustered geographically. Therefore, there are opportunities for
efficiencies and greater impact through interjurisdictional cooperation. Such efforts are
encouraged and can be a way to meet a jurisdiction's share of the countywide affordable
housing need.
H -14 Work cooperatively among jurisdictions to provide mutual support in meeting countywide
housing growth targets and affordable housing needs.
H -15 Collaborate in developing sub - regional and countywide housing resources and programs,
including funding, to provide affordable housing for very -low, low -, and moderate - income
households.
H -16 Work cooperatively with the Puget Sound Regional Council and other agencies to identify
ways to expand technical assistance to local jurisdictions in developing, implementing and
monitoring the success of strategies that promote affordable housing that meets changing
demographic needs. Collaborate in developing and implementing a housing strategy for the
four - county central Puget Sound region.
Measuring Results
Maintaining timely and relevant data on housing markets and residential development allows
the county and cities to evaluate the effectiveness of their housing strategies and to make
appropriate changes to those strategies when and where needed. In assessing efforts to meet
their share of the countywide need for affordable housing, jurisdictions need to consider public
actions taken to encourage development and preservation of housing affordable to households
with very low -, low- and moderate - incomes, such as local funding, development code changes,
ter: HOUSING
3 -s
4
87
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
and creation of new programs, as well as market and other factors that are beyond local
government control. Further detail on monitoring procedures is contained in Appendix 4.
H -17 Monitor housing supply, affordability, and diversity, including progress toward meeting a
significant share of the countywide need for affordable housing for very -low, low, and
moderate income households. Monitoring should encompass:
a. Number and type of new housing units;
b. Number of units lost to demolition, redevelopment, or conversion to non - residential
use;
c. Number of new units that are affordable to very -low, low -, and moderate - income
households;
d. Number of affordable units newly preserved and units acquired and rehabilitated
with a regulatory agreement for long -term affordability for very -low, low -, and
moderate - income households;
e. Housing market trends including affordability of overall housing stock;
f. Changes in zoned capacity for housing, including housing densities and types;
g. The number and nature of fair housing complaints and violations; and
h. Housing development and market trends in Urban Centers.
H -18 Review and amend, a minimum every five years, the countywide and local housing
policies and strategies, especially where monitoring indicates that adopted strategies are not
resulting in adequate affordable housing to meet the jurisdiction's share of the countywide
need.
88
C7
c
0
3
5
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
ECONOMY
Overarching Goal: People throughout King County have opportunities to prosper and enjoy a
high quality of life through economic growth and job creation.
The Countywide Planning Policies in the Economy Chapter support the economic growth and
sustainability of King County's economy. A strong and healthy economy results in business
development, job creation, and investment in our communities. The Economy Chapter reflects
and supports the Regional Economic Strategy and VISION 2040's economic policies, which
emphasize the economic value of business, people, and place.
The Regional Economic Strategy is the region's comprehensive economic development strategy
and serves as the VISION 2040 economic functional plan. VISION 2040 integrates the Regional
Economic Strategy with growth management, transportation, and environmental objectives to:
• support critical economic foundations, such as education, infrastructure, technology,
and quality of life; and
• promote the region's specific industry clusters: aerospace, clean technology,
information technology, life sciences, logistics and international trade, military, and
tourism.
Each local community will have an individual focus on economic development, while the
region's prosperity will benefit from coordination between local plans and the regional vision
that take into account the county's and the region's overall plan for growth.
EC -1 Coordinate local and countywide economic policies and strategies with VISION 2040 and
the Regional Economic Strategy.
EC -2 Support economic growth that accommodates employment growth targets (see table DP-
1) through local land use plans, infrastructure development, and implementation of economic
development strategies.
EC -3 Identify and support industry clusters and subclusters within King County that are
components of the Regional Economic Strategy or that may otherwise emerge as having
significance to King County's economy.
EC -4 Evaluate the performance of economic development policies and strategies in business
development and job creation. Identify and track key economic metrics to help jurisdictions
and the county as a whole evaluate the effectiveness of local and regional economic strategies.
ECONOMY
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
Business Development
Business creation, retention, expansion, and recruitment are the foundations of a strong
economy. The success of the economy in the county depends on opportunities for business
growth. Our communities play a significant role through local government actions, such as by
making regulations more predictable, by engaging in public - private partnerships, and by
nurturing a business - supportive culture.
These policies also seek to integrate the concept of healthy communities as part of the county's
economic objectives, by calling for support of the regional food economy, including production,
processing, wholesaling and distribution of the region's agricultural food and food products.
EC -5 Help businesses thrive through:
• Transparency, efficiency, and predictability of local regulations and policies;
• Communication and partnerships between businesses, government, schools, and
research institutions; and
• Government contracts with local businesses.
EC -6 Foster the retention and development of those businesses and industries that export their
goods and services outside the region.
EC -7 Promote an economic climate that is supportive of business formation, expansion, and
retention and emphasizes the importance of small businesses in creating jobs.
EC -8 Foster a broad range of public - private partnerships to implement economic development
policies, programs and projects.
EC -9 Identify and support the retention of key regional and local assets to the economy, such
as major educational facilities, research institutions, health care facilities, manufacturing
facilities, and port facilities.
EC -10 Support the regional food economy including the production, processing, wholesaling,
and distribution of the region's agricultural food and food products to all King County
communities. Emphasize increasing access to those communities with limited presence of
healthy food options.
90
ia.pter: ECONOMY
People
People, through their training, knowledge, skills, and cultural background, add value to the
region's economy. Additionally, creating an economy that provides opportunities for all helps
alleviate problems of poverty and income disparity.
EC -11 Work with schools and other institutions to increase graduation rates and sustain a
highly- educated and skilled local workforce. This includes aligning job training and education
offerings that are consistent with the skill needs of the region's industry clusters. Identify
partnership and funding opportunities where appropriate.
EC -12 Celebrate the cultural diversity of local communities as a means to enhance the county's
global relationships.
EC -13 Address the historic disparity in income and employment opportunities for economically
disadvantaged populations, including minorities and women, by committing resources to
human services; community development; housing; economic development; and public
infrastructure.
Places
Economic activity in the county predominantly occurs within the Urban Growth Area, including
Urban Centers and Manufacturing/ Industrial Centers. Continuing to guide local investments to
these centers will help provide the support needed to sustain the economy and provide greater
predictability to businesses about where capital improvements will be located. In addition to
making productive use of urban land, economic activity adds to the culture and vitality of our
local communities. Businesses create active, attractive places to live and visit, and make
significant contributions to the arts. The Rural Area and Resource Lands are important for their
contribution to the regional food network, mining, timber and craft industries, while Rural
Cities are important for providing services to and being the economic centers for the
surrounding Rural Area.
EC -14 Foster economic and employment growth in designated Urban Centers and
Manufacturing/ Industrial Centers through local investments, planning, and financial policies.
EC -15 Make local investments to maintain and expand infrastructure and services that support
local and regional economic development strategies. Focus investment where it encourages
growth in designated centers and helps achieve employment targets.
91
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
Novernber 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
EC -16 Add to the vibrancy and sustainability of our communities and the health and well -being
of all people through safe and convenient access to local services, neighborhood- oriented
retail, purveyors of healthy food (e.g. grocery stores and farmers markets), and transportation
choices.
EC -17 Promote the natural environment as a key economic asset. Work cooperatively with
local businesses to protect and restore the natural environment in a manner that is efficient
and predictable and minimizes impacts on businesses.
EC -18 Maintain an adequate supply of land within the Urban Growth Area to support economic
development. Inventory, plan for, and monitor the land supply and development capacity for,
manufacturing/ industrial, commercial and other employment uses that can accommodate the
amount and types of economic activity anticipated during the planning period.
EC -19 Support Manufacturing/ Industrial Centers by adopting industrial siting policies that limit
the loss of industrial lands, maintain the region's economic diversity, and support family -wage
jobs. Prohibit or strictly limit non - supporting or incompatible activities that can interfere with
the retention or operation of industrial businesses, especially in Manufacturing/ Industrial
Centers.
EC -20 Facilitate redevelopment of contaminated sites through local, county and state financing
and other strategies that assist with funding environmental remediation.
EC -21 Encourage economic activity within Rural Cities that does not create adverse impacts to
the surrounding Rural Area and Resource Lands and will not create the need to provide urban
services and facilities to those areas.
92
ia:pter: ECONOMY
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
TRANSPORTATION
The Regional Growth Strategy identifies a network of walkable, compact, and transit - oriented
communities that are the focus of urban development, as well as industrial areas with major
employment concentrations. In the Countywide Planning Policies, these communities include
countywide designated Urban Centers and Manufacturing/ Industrial Centers, and locally
designated local centers. An essential component of the Regional Growth Strategy is an
efficient transportation system that provides multiple options for moving people and goods
into and among the various centers. Transportation system, in the context of this chapter, is
defined as a comprehensive, integrated network of travel modes (e.g. airplanes, automobiles,
bicycles, buses, feet, ferries, freighters, trains, trucks) and infrastructure (e.g. sidewalks, trails,
streets, arterials, highways, waterways, railways, airports) for the movement of people and
goods on a local, regional, national and global scale.
Goals and policies in this chapter build on the 1992 King County Countywide Planning Policies
and the Multicounty Planning Policies in VISION 2040. Policies are organized into three
sections:
• Supporting Growth — focusing on serving the region with a transportation system
that furthers the Regional Growth Strategy;
• Mobility — addressing the full range of travel modes necessary to move people and
goods efficiently within the region and beyond; and
• System Operations — encompassing the design, maintenance and operation of the
transportation system to provide for safety, efficiency, and sustainability.
Overarching Goal: The region is well served by an integrated, multi -modal transportation
system that supports the regional vision for growth, efficiently moves people and goods, and is
environmentally and functionally sustainable over the long term.
Supporting Growth
An effective transportation system is critical to achieving the Regional Growth Strategy and
ensuring that centers are functional and appealing to the residents and businesses they are
designed to attract. The policies in this section reinforce the critical relationship between
development patterns and transportation and they are intended to guide transportation
investments from all levels of government that effectively support local, county and regional
plans to accommodate growth. Policies in this section take a multi -modal approach to serving
growth, with additional emphasis on transit and non - motorized modes to support planned
development in centers.
TRANSPORTATION
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
Goal Statement: Local and regional development of the transportation system is consistent with
and furthers realization of the Regional Growth Strategy.
T -1 Work cooperatively with the Puget Sound Regional Council, the state, and other relevant
agencies to finance and develop a multi -modal transportation system that enhances regional
mobility and reinforces the countywide vision for managing growth. Use VISION 2040 and
Transportation 2040 as the policy and funding framework for creating a system of Urban
Centers and Manufacturing/ Industrial Centers linked by high- capacity transit, bus transit and
an interconnected system of freeways and high- occupancy vehicle lanes.
T -2 Avoid construction of major roads and capacity expansion on existing roads in the Rural
Area and Resource Lands. Where increased roadway capacity is warranted to support safe and
efficient travel through the Rural Area, appropriate rural development regulations and effective
access management should be in place prior to authorizing such capacity expansion in order to
make more efficient use of existing roadway capacity and prevent unplanned growth in the
Rural Area.
T -3 Increase the share of trips made countywide by modes other than driving alone through
coordinated land use planning, public and private investment, and programs focused on centers
and connecting corridors, consistent with locally adopted mode split goals.
T -4 Develop station area plans for high capacity transit stations and transit hubs. Plans should
reflect the unique characteristics and local vision for each station area including transit
supportive land uses, transit rights -of -way, stations and related facilities, multi -modal linkages,
and place- making elements.
T -5 Support countywide growth management objectives by prioritizing transit service to areas
where existing housing and employment densities support transit ridership and to Urban
Centers and other areas planned for housing and employment densities that will support transit
ridership. Address the mobility needs of transit - dependent populations in allocating transit
service and provide at least a basic level of service throughout the Urban Growth Area.
T -6 Foster transit ridership by designing transit facilities and services as well as non - motorized
infrastructure so that they are integrated with public spaces and private developments to
create an inviting public realm.
T -7 Ensure state capital improvement policies and actions are consistent with the Regional
Growth Strategy and support VISION 2040 and the Countywide Planning Policies.
T -8 Prioritize regional and local funding to transportation investments that support adopted
growth targets.
94
TRANSPORTATION
•
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
Mobility
Mobility is necessary to sustain personal quality of life and the regional economy. For
individuals, mobility requires an effective transportation system that provides safe, reliable,
and affordable travel options for people of all ages, incomes and abilities. While the majority of
people continue to travel by personal automobile, there are growing segments of the
population (e.g. urban, elderly, teens, low income, minorities, and persons with disabilities) that
rely on other modes of travel such as walking, bicycling, and public transportation to access
employment, education and training, goods and services. According to the 2009 American
Community Survey, about 8.7 percent of all households in King County had no vehicle available.
For many minority populations, more than 20 percent had no vehicle available to them.
The movement of goods is also of vital importance to the local and regional economy.
International trade is a significant source of employment and economic activity in terms of
transporting freight, local consumption, and exporting of goods. The policies in this section are
intended to address use and integration of the multiple modes necessary to move people and
goods within and beyond the region. The importance of the roadway network, implicit in the
policies of this section, is addressed more specifically in the System Operations section of this
chapter.
Goal Statement: A well - integrated, multi -modal transportation system transports people and
goods effectively and efficiently to destinations within the region and beyond.
T -9 Promote the mobility of people and goods through a multi -modal transportation system
based on regional priorities consistent with VISION 2040 and local comprehensive plans.
T -10 Support effective management of existing air, marine and rail transportation capacity and
address future capacity needs in cooperation with responsible agencies, affected communities,
and users.
T -11 Develop and implement freight mobility strategies that strengthen King County's role as a
major regional freight distribution hub, an international trade gateway, and a manufacturing
area.
T -12 Address the needs of non - driving populations in the development and management of
local and regional transportation systems.
T -13 Site and design transit stations and transit hubs to promote connectivity and access for
pedestrian and bicycle patrons.
Chapter: TRANSPORTATION
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
System Operations
The design, management and operation of the transportation system are major factors that
influence the region's growth and mobility. Policies in this section stress the need to make
efficient use of the existing infrastructure, serve the broad needs of the users, address safety
and public health issues, and design facilities that are a good fit for the surroundings.
Implementation of the policies will require the use of a wide range of tools including, but not
limited to:
• technologies such as intelligent transportation systems and alternative fuels;
• demand management programs for parking, commute trip reduction and
congestion; and
• incentives, pricing systems and other strategies to encourage choices that increase
mobility while improving public health and environmental sustainability.
Goal Statement: The regional transportation system is well- designed and managed to protect
public investments, promote public health and safety, and achieve optimum efficiency.
T -14 Prioritize essential maintenance, preservation, and safety improvements of the existing
transportation system to protect mobility and avoid more costly replacement projects.
T -15 Design and operate transportation facilities in a manner that is compatible with and
integrated into the natural and built environments in which they are located. Incorporate
features such as natural drainage, native plantings, and local design themes that facilitate
integration and compatibility.
T -16 Protect the transportation system (e.g. roadway, rail, transit, air, and marine) against
major disruptions by developing prevention and recovery strategies and by coordinating
disaster response plans.
T -17 Promote the use of tolling and other pricing strategies to effectively manage the
transportation system, provide a stable and sustainable transportation funding source, and
improve mobility.
T -18 Develop a countywide monitoring system to determine how transportation investments
are performing over time consistent with Transportation 2040 recommendations.
T -19 Design roads and streets, including retrofit projects, to accommodate a range of
motorized and non - motorized travel modes in order to reduce injuries and fatalities and to
encourage non - motorized travel. The design should include well- defined, safe and appealing
spaces for pedestrians and bicyclists.
96
TRANSPORTATION
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
T -20 Develop a transportation system that minimizes negative impacts to human health,
including exposure to environmental toxins generated by vehicle emissions.
T -21 Provide opportunities for an active, healthy lifestyle by integrating the needs of
pedestrians and bicyclists in the local and regional transportation plans and systems.
T -22 Plan and develop a countywide transportation system that reduces greenhouse gas
emissions by advancing strategies that shorten trip length or replace vehicle trips to decrease
vehicle miles traveled.
T -23 Apply technologies, programs and other strategies that optimize the use of existing
infrastructure in order to improve mobility, reduce congestion, increase energy- efficiency, and
reduce the need for new infrastructure.
T -24 Promote the expanded use of alternative fuel vehicles by the general public with
measures such as converting public and private fleets, applying incentive programs, and
providing for electric vehicle charging stations throughout the Urban Growth Area.
Chapter: TRANSPORTATION
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES
Overarching Goal: County residents in both Urban and Rural Areas have access to the public
services needed in order to advance public health and safety, protect the environment, and
carry out the Regional Growth Strategy.
Urban and Rural Levels of Service
The Growth Management Act directs jurisdictions and special purpose districts to provide
public facilities and services to support development. The Growth Management Act
distinguishes between urban and rural services and states that land within the Urban Growth
Area should be provided with a full range of services necessary to sustain urban communities
while land within the Rural Area should receive services to support a rural lifestyle. Certain
services, such as sanitary sewers, are allowed only in the Urban Growth Area, except as
otherwise authorized. The Growth Management Act also requires jurisdictions to determine
which facilities are necessary to serve the desired growth pattern and how they will be
financed, in order to ensure timely provision of adequate services and facilities.
PF -1 Provide a full range of urban services in the Urban Growth Area to support the Regional
Growth Strategy and adopted growth targets and limit the availability of services in the Rural
Area consistent with VISION 2040.
Collaboration Among Jurisdictions
More than 100 special purpose districts, including water, sewer, flood control, stormwater, fire,
school and other districts, provide essential services to the residents of King County. While
cities are the primary providers of services in the Urban Growth Area, in many parts of the
county special purpose districts also provide essential services. Coordination and collaboration
among all of these districts, the cities, King County, the tribes, and neighboring counties is key
to providing efficient, high - quality and reliable services to support the Regional Growth
Strategy.
PF -2 Coordinate among jurisdictions and service providers to provide reliable and cost -
effective services to the public.
PF -3 Cities are the appropriate providers of services to the Urban Growth Area, either directly
or by contract. Extend urban services through the use of special districts only where there are
agreements with the city in whose Potential Annexation Area the extension is proposed. Within
the Urban Growth Area, as time and conditions warrant, cities will assume local urban services
provided by special service districts.
98
iapter: PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
Utilities
Utilities include infrastructure and services that provide water supply, sewage treatment and
disposal, solid waste disposal, energy, and telecommunications. Providing these utilities in a
cost - effective way is essential to maintaining the health and safety of King County residents and
to implementing the Regional Growth Strategy.
Water Supply
Conservation and efficient use of water resources are vital to ensuring the reliability of the
region's water supply, the availability of sufficient water supplies for future generations, and
the environmental sustainability of the water supply system.
PF -4 Develop plans for long -term water provision to support growth and to address the
potential impacts of climate change on regional water resources.
PF -5 Support efforts to ensure that all consumers have access to a safe, reliably maintained,
and sustainable drinking water source that meets present and future needs.
PF -6 Coordinate water supply among local jurisdictions, tribal governments, and water
purveyors to provide reliable and cost - effective sources of water for all users, including
residents, businesses, fire districts, and aquatic species.
PF -7 Plan and locate water systems in the Rural Area that are appropriate for rural uses and
densities and do not increase the development potential of the Rural Area.
PF -8 Recognize and support agreements with water purveyors in adjacent cities and counties
to promote effective conveyance of water supplies and to secure adequate supplies for
emergencies.
PF -9 Implement water conservation and efficiency efforts to protect natural resources, reduce
environmental impacts, and support a sustainable long -term water supply to serve the growing
population.
PF -10 Encourage water reuse and reclamation, especially for high - volume non - potable water
users such as parks, schools, and golf courses.
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
Sewage Treatment and Disposal
Within the Urban Growth Area, connection to sanitary sewers is necessary to support the
Regional Growth Strategy and to accommodate urban densities. Alternatives to the sanitary
sewer system and the typical septic system are becoming more cost effective and therefore,
more available. Alternative technology may be appropriate when it can perform as well or
better than sewers in the Urban Growth Area. Septic systems are not considered to be
alternative technology within the Urban Growth Area.
In the Rural Area and Resource Lands, which are characterized by low- density development,
sewer service is not typically provided. In cases where public health is threatened, sewers can
be provided in the Rural Area but only if connections are strictly limited. Alternative
technology may be necessary to substitute for septic systems in the Rural Area.
PF -11 Require all development in the Urban Growth Area to be served by a public sewer
system except:
a) single - family residences on existing individual lots that have no feasible access to
sewers may utilize individual septic systems on an interim basis; or
b) development served by alternative technology other than septic systems that:
• provide equivalent performance to sewers;
• provide the capacity to achieve planned densities; and
• will not create a barrier to the extension of sewer service within the Urban
Growth Area.
PF -12 Prohibit sewer service in the Rural Area and on Resource Lands except:
a) where needed to address specific health and safety problems threatening existing
structures; or
b) as allowed by Countywide Planning Policy DP -47; or
c) as provided in Appendix 5 (March 31, 2012 School Siting Task Force Report).
Sewer service authorized consistent with this policy shall be provided in a manner that does not
increase development potential in the Rural Area.
Solid Waste
King County and the entire Puget Sound region are recognized for successful efforts to collect a
recyclable waste. Continuing to reduce and reuse waste will require concerted and coordinated a
efforts well into the future. It is important to reduce the waste stream going into area landfills
to extend the usable life of existing facilities and reduce the need for additional capacity.
PF -13 Reduce the solid waste stream and encourage reuse and recycling.
100
4
7
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
Energy
While King County consumers have access to electrical energy derived from hydropower, there
are challenges for securing long -term reliable energy and for becoming more energy efficient.
PF -14 Reduce the rate of energy consumption through efficiency and conservation as a means
to lower energy costs and mitigate environmental impacts associated with traditional energy
supplies.
PF -15 Promote the use of renewable and alternative energy resources to help meet the
county's Tong -term energy needs, reduce environmental impacts associated with traditional
energy supplies, and increase community sustainability.
Telecommunications
A telecommunications network throughout King County is essential to fostering broad
economic vitality and equitable access to information, goods and services, and opportunities
for social connection.
PF -16 Plan for the provision of telecommunication infrastructure to serve growth and
development in a manner consistent with the regional and countywide vision.
Human and Community Services
Public services beyond physical infrastructure are also necessary to sustain the health and
quality of life of all King County residents. In addition, these services play a role in
distinguishing urban communities from rural communities and supporting the Regional Growth
Strategy.
PF -17 Provide human and community services to meet the needs of current and future
residents in King County communities through coordinated planning, funding, and delivery of
services by the county, cities, and other agencies.
Locating Facilities and Services
VISION 2040 calls for a full range of urban services in the Urban Growth Area to support the
Regional Growth Strategy, and for limiting the availability of services in the rural area. In the
long term, there is increased efficiency and cost effectiveness in siting and operating facilities
and services that serve a primarily urban population within the Urban Growth Area. At the
ia:pter: PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES
2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies
November 2012
Amended December 3, 2012
same time, those facilities and services that primarily benefit rural populations provide a
greater benefit when they are located within neighboring cities and rural towns.
PF -18 Locate new schools, institutions, and other community facilities and services that primarily
serve urban populations within the Urban Growth Area, where they are accessible to the
communities they serve, except as provided in Appendix 5 (March 31, 2012 School Siting Task
Force Report). Locate these facilities in places that are well served by transit and pedestrian and
bicycle networks.
PF -19 Locate new schools and institutions primarily serving rural residents in neighboring cities and
rural towns, except as provided in Appendix 5 (March 31, 2012 School Siting Task Force Report) and
locate new community facilities and services that primarily serve rural residents in neighboring
cities and rural towns, with the limited exceptions when their use is dependent upon rural location
and their size and scale supports rural character.
Siting Public Capital Facilities
While essential to growth and development, regional capital facilities can disproportionately
affect the communities in which they are located. It is important that all jurisdictions work
collaboratively and consider environmental justice principles when siting these facilities to
foster the development of healthy communities for all.
PF -20 Site or expand public capital facilities of regional or statewide importance within the
county in a way that equitably disperses impacts and benefits and supports the Countywide
Planning Policies.
102
later: PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES
4
9
Attachment B
WA STATE LAND USE PLANNING HIERARCHY AND POLICY FRAMEWORK
There are four recognized levels in King County's planning hierarchy, each with its own
governing authority:
GMA. Establishing the land use planning hierarchy in Washington, the Growth Management Act
(RCW 36.70A) mandates local comprehensive planning in heavily populated and high growth
counties and their cities. It establishes 13 broad goals, including managing urban growth,
protecting agricultural, forestry, and environmentally sensitive areas, protecting property rights,
reducing sprawl, and encouraging efficient multimodal transportation systems. GMA requires
comprehensive planning in the Puget Sound region to be done in a coordinated and consistent
manner and is implemented through a planning structure of regional, countywide and local plans
as follows.
MPPs. The Multicounty Planning Policies (MPPs) are required by GMA to develop regional
guidelines and principles to guide both regional and local transportation planning. As the
region's federally recognized Regional Transportation Planning Organization, the Puget Sound
Regional Council (PSRC) recently adopted VISION 2040 and its MPPs to provide a consistent
regional framework for growth management planning in King, Kitsap, Pierce and Snohomish
Counties.
CPPs. The GMA further requires King County to prepare broad Countywide Planning Policies
(CPPs) that comply with both the growth principles of the GMA and the more directive policies
of the MPPs. The CPPs provide the vision and policy framework for the development of each
jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, including the King County Comprehensive Plan. Addressing
the principles put forth by VISION 2040, the CPPs are intended to speak specifically to the
unique interests and challenges of King County, as the largest county in the region. The CPPs
are maintained by the Growth Management Planning Council and are currently under review,
with the adoption of newly amended policies anticipated by year -end 2010.
Local Comprehensive Plans. Local comprehensive plans direct land use planning regulations
and activity in unincorporated King County and each of the county's 39 jurisdictions. The King
County Comprehensive Plan maintains the Urban Growth Area boundary. Each local plan,
including the King County Comprehensive Plan, establishes the land use and development
regulations within its jurisdiction. Local plans, when next updated, are expected to align with the
planning hierarchy described above. Anticipating completion of the CPPs in 2010, many cities
have begun the planning effort to revise their comprehensive plans.
103
104
Upcoming Meetings & Events
February 2013
11th (Monday)
12th (Tuesday)
13th (Wednesday)
14th (Thursday)
15th (Friday)
16th (Saturday)
> Civil Service
Commission,
5:00 PM
(PD Conference
Room, 6300
Southcenter
Blvd Suite 205)
(Rescheduled
from 2/4/13)
➢ Community
Affairs & Parks
Crate,
5: 15 PM
(CR #3)
➢ City Council
Committee of
the Whole Mtg.,
7:00 PM
(Council
Chambers)
➢ Transportation
Crate,
5:00 PM
(CR #1)
Council Work
Session
6:00 — 7:00 PM
(CR #3)
➢ Tukwila
International
Boulevard
Action Crate,
7:00 PM
(Community
Center)
18th (Monday)
19th (Tuesday)
20th (Wednesday)
21st (Thursday)
22nd (Friday)
23rd (Saturday)
Presidents Day
it offices closed
������� -
➢Utilities Crate,
5:00 PM
(CR #1)
➢ City Council
Executive
Session,
6:30 PM
➢ City Council
Regular Mtg.,
7:00 PM
(Council
Chambers)
➢ Tukwila
Metropolitan
Park District
Board of
Commissioners
Meeting,
8:00 PM
(Council
Chambers)
➢Finance &
Safety Crate,
5:30 PM
(CR #3)
➢ Parks
Commission,
5:30 PM
(Community
Center)
➢ Library
Advisory
Board,
7:00 PM
(Community
Center)
Circuit City
Development
Concept Open
5:00 -6:30 PM
(Albert Lee
Appliance, 404
pp
Strander Blvd)
For additional
information,
contact
Derek Speck
(206) 433 -1832
> Tukwila
Historical
Society,
7:00 PM
(Tukwila
Heritage &
Cultural Center,
14475 5.0 Ave
S)
Tukwila Int'l.
Action
Trash
9:00 10:
For locat
Rick
at r L: ick(a�forsch1cr.
Blvd.
Cmte's
Day
00 0 AM
1 ",
on contact
or a
City Council Retreat
February 22 - 24
> Arts Commission: 1st Tues., 5:30 PM, Tukwila Community Center. Contact Stephanie Gardner at 206 -767 -2342.
> Chamber of Commerce's Tukwila Government and Community Affairs Committee: 1st Tues., 12:00 Noon, Chamber Offices.
> City Council Committee of Whole (C.O.W.) Meeting: 2nd & 4th Mon., 7:00 PM, Council Chambers at City Hall.
> City Council Regular Meeting: 1st & 3rd Mon., 7:00 PM, Council Chambers at City Hall.
➢ Civil Service Commission: 1st Mon., 5:00 PM, Conf. Room #3. Contact Kim Gilman at 206 - 431 -2187.
> Community Affairs & Parks Committee: 2nd & 4th Mon., 5:15 PM, Conf Room #3 (A) An agreement for the Parks and Recreation
Open Space Plan.
> Equity & Diversity Commission: 1st Thurs., 5:15 PM, Conf Room #3. Contact Joyce Tr•antina at 206 - 433 -1850.
> Finance & Safety Committee: 1st & 3rd Tues., 5:30 PM, Conf. Room #3.
> Library Advisory Board: 3rd Wed., 7:00 PM, Foster Library. Contact Stephanie Gardner at 206 -767 -2342.
> Parks Commission: 3rd Wed., 5:30 PM, Senior Game Room at Community Center. Contact Dave Johnson at 206 - 767 -2308.
> Planning Commission /Board of Architectural Review: 4th Thurs., except 2nd Thursday in Nov. & Dec., 6:30 PM,
Council Chambers at City Hall. Contact Wynetta Bivens at 206 - 431 -3670.
> Transportation Committee: 2nd & 4th Tues., 5:00 PM, Conf. Room #1. (A) Tukwila Urban Center Access Project (Klickitat)
Project Completion and Acceptance. (B) 2012 Overlay and Repair Program Project Completion and Acceptance. (C) TUC
Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge Project Update.
> Tukwila Historical Society: 3rd Thurs., 7:00 PM , Tukwila Heritage & Cultural Center, 14475 59th Avenue S. Contact Pat Br•odin at
206 - 433 -1861.
>Tukwila Int'l. Blvd. Action Cmte: 2nd Tues., 7:00 PM, Tukwila Community Center. Contact Chief Villa at 206 - 433 -1815.
> Utilities Committee: 1st & 3rd Mon., 5:00 PM, Conf Room #1
105
Tentative Agenda Schedule
MONTH
MEETING 1-
REGULAR
MEETING 2 -
C.O.W.
MEETING 3 -
REGULAR
MEETING 4 -
C.O.W.
February
4
11
See agenda packet
cover sheet for this
week's agenda
(February 11, 2012
Committee of the VVhole
Meeting).
19 (Tuesday)
Unfinished Business:
25
Special Presentation:
An ordinance vacating
portions of the existing
South 178th Street
right -of -way.
An ordinance
regarding the Nuisance
Code.
A resolution updating
and clarifying the non-
represented employees'
compensation and and
adopting the non-
represented salary
schedule and benefits
summary, effective
January 1, 2013.
New Business:
King County Airport
Noise Mitigation
Update.
Special Issues:
A proposed
Development
Agreement for 223
Andover Park East.
A resolution
establishing the time
for Council
Committees.
March
4
Special Presentation:
11
Special Presentation:
18
Unfinished Business:
25
Special Presentation:
Somali Community
Services Coalition
Update.
State of the Municipal
Court.
Public Hearing:
A proposal
Development
Agreement for 223
Andover Park East.
An update on the
Hyde Shuttle.
A proposed
Development
Agreement for 223
Andover Park East.
Comprehensive Plan
Updates Process.
Special Issues:
A proposed
Development
Agreement for 223
Andover Park East.
106