HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOW 2013-05-28 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET
Tukwila City Council Agenda
° • COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE ❖
Jim Haggerton, Mayor Counciimembers + Joe Duffie + Dennis Robertson
David Cline, CityAdministrator + Allan Ekberg + Verna Seal
Kathy Hougardy, Council President + De'Sean Quinn + Kate Kruller
EXECUTIVE SESSION — 6:15 PM — 7:00 PM
Potential Litigation — Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(i)
(45 minutes)
May 28, 2013, 7:00 PM Tukwila City Hall Council Chambers
1. CALL TO ORDER / PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. SPECIAL
PRESENTATIONS
a. 2011 Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting:
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). Peggy McCarthy,
Finance Director.
b. 2012 Financial Report. Peggy McCarthy, Finance Director.
Pg.1
3. CITIZEN COMMENT
At this time, you are invited to comment on items not included on this agenda
is
(p /ease limit your comments to five minutes per citizen). To comment
on an item listed on this agenda, please save your comments until the issue
presented for discussion.
4. SPECIAL ISSUES
a. An ordinance adopting the 2012 State Building Code and the
International Energy Conservation Code, 2012 Edition.
b. An ordinance amending Ordinance No. 2306, as codified at Tukwila
Municipal Code Section 7.20.020, "Dogs at Large— Requirement of a
Leash or Chain."
c. A consultant agreement with Rice Fergus Miller for the City Facilities
Needs Assessment & Feasibility Study.
d. A resolution regarding compensation policies.
Pg.37
Pg.57
Pg.67
Pg.105
5. REPORTS
a. Mayor
b. City Council
c. Staff
d. City Attorney
e. Intergovernmental
6. MISCELLANEOUS
7. EXECUTIVE SESSION
8. ADJOURNMENT
Tukwila City Hall is wheelchair accessible.
Reasonable accommodations are available at public hearings with advance notice to the
City Clerk's Office (206- 433 -1800 or TukwilaCityClerk @TukwilaWA.gov). This notice is available at
www,tukwilawa,gov, and in alternate formats with advance notice for those with disabilities.
Tukwila Council meetings are audio /video taped.
HOW TO TESTIFY
If you would like to address the Council, please go to the podium and state your name and address clearly for
the record. Please observe the basic rules of courtesy when speaking and limit your comments to five
minutes. The Council appreciates hearing from citizens but may not be able to take immediate action on
comments received until they are referred to a Committee or discussed under New Business.
COUNCIL MEETINGS
No Council meetings are scheduled on the 5th Monday of the month unless prior public notification is given.
Regular Meetings - The Mayor, elected by the people to a four -year term, presides at all Regular Council
Meetings held on the 1st and 3rd Mondays of each month at 7:00 p.m. Official Council action in the
form of formal motions, adopting of resolutions and passing of ordinances can only be taken at Regular
Council meetings.
Committee of the Whole Meetings - Council members are elected for a four -year term. The Council
President is elected by the Council members to preside at all Committee of the Whole meetings for a
one -year term. Committee of the Whole meetings are held the 2nd and 4th Mondays at 7:00 p.m.
Issues discussed are forwarded to the Regular Council meeting for official action.
GENERAL INFORMATION
At each Council meeting citizens are given the opportunity to address the Council on items that are not
included on the agenda during CITIZENS COMMENTS. Please limit your comments to 5 minutes.
Special Meetings may be called at any time with proper public notice. Procedures followed are the same as
those used in Regular Council meetings.
Executive Sessions may be called to inform the Council of pending legal action, financial, or personnel
matters.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Public Hearings are required by law before the Council can take action on matters affecting the public interest
such as land -use laws, annexations, rezone requests, public safety issues, etc. Section 2.04.150 of the
Tukwila Municipal Code states the following guidelines for Public Hearings:
1. The proponent shall speak first and is allowed 15 minutes for a presentation.
2. The opponent is then allowed 15 minutes to make a presentation.
3. Each side is then allowed 5 minutes for rebuttal.
4. Citizens who wish to address the Council may speak for 5 minutes each. No one may speak a second
time until everyone wishing to speak has spoken.
5. After each speaker has spoken, the Council may question the speaker. Each speaker can respond to the
question, but may not engage in further debate at this time.
6. After the Public Hearing is closed and during the Council meeting, the Council may choose to discuss
the issue among themselves, or defer the discussion to a future Council meeting, without further public
testimony. Council action may only be taken during Regular or Special Meetings.
S
a
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
City -wide, unreserved fund balances decreased by $5.3 million in 2012. Projects in fund 104
Arterial Streets is the main reason for the net decline in City -wide fund balances. Major pro-
jects include Southcenter Parkway Extension and the wrap up of the Tukwila Urban Center
Access project. The City budgeted for the project to be completed and bonds for the Local
Improvement District (LID) issued in 2012, however, the bonds for the LID will not be sold
until 2013.
All enterprise funds have a net gain in fund balance for fiscal year 2012. Total increase in
fund balance in the enterprise funds is $878,684.
The General Fund balance increased $114,414 for the year yielding an ending fund balance of
$6.0 million. When compared with budget, actual operating results for the year were positive
with expenses at 91.74% of budget producing a cost savings of $4.6 million and offsetting the
revenue shortfall of $2.7 million. Sales and use tax revenues exceeded budget by $626 thou-
sand for the year while gambling excise taxes and charges for services were lower than budget
by $224 thousand and $477 thousand respectively — due to economic conditions and other
factors.
Although financial challenges remain, the City's finances have stabilized over the year. As the
economy improves, the City will continue to follow conservative financial policy positioning
itself well for the future.
CITY -WIDE
FUND BALANCES
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES
Variance
ACTUAL
-- ACTUAL - - -
-- BUDGET - --
YTD
12/31/2011 12/31/2012
YTD
YTD
Governmental funds
$ 24,804,483 $ 18,149,419
$ (6,655,064)
$ 1,464,855
$ (8,119,919)
Enterprise funds
10,132,635 11,011,319
878,684
(3,451,240)
$ 4,329,924
Internal service funds
10,144,619 10,638,313
493,695
(181,938)
$ 675,633
City -wide Total
$ 45,081,737 $ 39,799,051
$ (5,282,686)
$ (2,168,323)
$ (3,114,363)
$50
$45
$40
$35
O
$30
$25
$20
$15
$10
$5
General Fund
m1 Arterial Street
as Other Governmental
Enterprise Funds
Internal Service
City -Wide Fund Balances
2011
Actual
$5,911,616
$6,929,396
$10,132,635
$10,144,619
2012
Actual
$6,026,530
$483,330
$11,785,036
$10,638,313
2012
Budget
$2,684,429
$10,434,990
$10,430,969
$656,993.
$8,906,817
lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Inside this issue:
Governmental funds
2 -7
Enterprise funds
8
Internal Service funds
8
1
Overview
GOVERNMENTAL
FUNDS
FUND BALANCES
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES
Variance
YTD
ACTUAL
12/31 /2011 12/31/2012
- -- ACTUAL - - -
YTD
- - -- BUDGET - - --
YTD
General Fund
$ 5,911,616 $ 6,026,030
$ 114,414
$ (1,757,223)
$ 1,871,637
Arterial Street
6,929,396 483,330
(6,446,066)
5,645,521
(12, 091, 587)
Other Special Revenue
4,269,741 4,270,129
388
(369,744)
370,132
Debt Service
3,316,312 3,012,381
(303, 930)
(485, 951)
182,021
Capital Project
4,377,418 4,357,548
(19, 870)
(1,567,748)
1,547,878
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
$24,804,483 $18,149,419
$ (6,655,064)
$ 1,464,855
$ (8,119,919)
General fund fiscal year activity increased fund balance by
$114,414. Results for the year include revenues of $51.0 million
or 96.97% of budget. The City had budgeted $1.1 million for
bond proceeds to help finance MPD pool improvement project.
However, these bonds were not sold until 2013. Additionally,
$673 thousand was budgeted for sale of capital assets. Rather
than selling the assets, several were repurposed for other uses by
the City. These two items accounts for the largest variance in
revenue budget to actual.
The General Fund had year -to -date expenditures of $50.9 mil-
lion or 91.74% of annual budget. City departments have been
diligent in managing their budgets and all departments are within
budget as of year -end.
Departments experiencing very positive budget results include
Public Works at 87.63 %, Finance at 87.68 %, Human Resources
at 89.75 %, and Department 20 at 70.18 %. It should be noted
that the $280K savings on salaries and benefits in the Public
Works department is due to project allocations to the arterial
street fund which shows salaries and benefits over budget by
$280K.
• Salaries and benefits (97.4 %): vacancies, reduction in
use of extra labor, and medical costs lower than budget.
• Supplies & professional services (91.8% & 95.4 %): all
departments worked to hold costs down when possible
• Intergovernmental (67.1 %): reduction in jail costs as
well as lower than anticipated loan to the MPD.
Page 2
2
2012 ANNUAL
ENE
F
]EPART ]ENTA.L EXP]EN.
ITUR
DEPARTMENTS
2009
% of
Budget
2010
% of
Budget
2011 % of Budget
2012
% of
Budget
CITY COUNCIL
MAYO.. R ................................................................................. ...............................
HUMAN RESOURCES ............................... ...............................
FINANCE
CI TI'.. ATTORNEY .................................................. ...............................
RECREATION............................................................. ...............................
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MUNICIPALCOURT ........................................ ...............................
POLICE.................................................................................. ...............................
FIRE
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
PUBLIC WORKS ................................................... ...............................
PARK MAINTENANCE ............................... ...............................
STREET MAINTENANCE & OPERATION
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DEPT 20
$ 251,563 91.8%
2,492,492 95.6%
506,060 86.1%
1,963,333 97.0%
685,691 113.2%
3,350,801 98.2%
2,779,459 101.7%
1,181,132 104.3%
12,994,938 98.8%
9,874,049 97.4%
951,073 90.1%
5,756,107 89.9%
979,084 95.5%
2,280,106 89.4%
709,444 100.0%
242,851 85.8%
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0
2,228,656' 85.6 /0
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
464,095 ' 81.2%
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2,183, 069 ' 102.2%
578,908 ' 97.2%
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3,130, 852 ' 89.4%
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0
2,635,296' 86.4 /0
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0
1,208,632' 103.6 /0
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
13,165, 552 ' 93.9%
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0
9,920,730' 96.3/0
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
953,361 ' 87.8%
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0
4,572,757 ' 92.6/0
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0
992,222' 99.3 /0
2,368,562 ' 92.1%
252,671 82.8%
$ 244,029
2,218,089
487,920
1,446,736
647,990
2,513,184
2,560,151
945,174
14,296,485
9,814,177
1,046,573
3,199,554
982,596
2,517 ,770
7,062,750
92.9%
94.1 %..
89.9%
94.9%
92.2 %..
88.1%
97.3%
96.6%
99.9%
98.6%
94.7%
95.1%
100.0%
94.. 9 %....
86.5%
$ 251,197 93.2%
2.,. 486,.1.58 ...............93.0 %.
514,637 ...............89.8 %.
1,405,588 ...............87.7 %.
595,140 ...............92.6 %.
2,273, 480 ...............89.9 %.
2,861,070 .............100.1%
1,014, 372 ...............99.9 %.
14,019, 692 ...............98.2 %.
10, 476, 394 ...............99.4 %.
1, 106,138 ...............95.9 %.
3,166, 787 ...............87.6 %.
1,072,302 .............100.0%
2,711, 41.5 ...............98.4 %..
6,955,261 ................7012 %.
TOTAL
$ 46,755,332 1 96.6% $44,898,214 93.3% $ 49,983,178 95.4%
$ 50,909,629 1 91.7%
EXPENDITURE BY TYPE 2009 % of Budget 1 2010 1 % of Budget 1 2011
% of Budget
2012 %of Budget
Salary and benefits
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Supplies
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Professional services
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Intergovernmental
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Capital expenditures
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Miscellaneous general
32,831,104
1,000,789
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9,788,809
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2,201, 354
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
126,527
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
806,749
95.8% $ 32,629,767 92.5% $ 31,521,305
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
79.5% 1,243,720 96.6% 1,153,105
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
89.8% 8,255,412 86.7% 7,694,782
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
104.2% 2,183,336 104.9% 3,119,057
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
39.4% 330,504 86.7% 212,643
- 178.2% 255,475 -62.1% 6,282,288
97.5%
$ 33,182,824, 97.4%
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,095, 524
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8,156, 708
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2,582,425
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
273,560
5,618,587 74.6%
TOTAL $ 46,755,332 96.6% 1 $ 44,898,214 1 93.3% 1 $ 49,983,180 95.4%
$ 50,909,629 91.7%
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Page 3
11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111"-------------
2012 ANNUAL
3
Tax
Sae Tax
Local retail sales and use tax earned in 2012 totaled
$15.0 million compared with $15.3 million in 2011 rep-
resenting a $303K decrease year- over -year but a 4%
increase compared with budget.
Over 75% ($11.8 million) of the City's sales tax revenue
was derived from the Retail Trade and Services NAICS
categories with code 448 - Clothing and Accessories, con-
tributing $2,089,897, code 452 - General Merchandise
Stores, contributing $2,000,865, and 443- Electronics
and Appliances, contributing $1,146,203.
The Construction category represented $961 thousand or
6% of total sales tax earned.
As in previous years, sales tax earned in December was signifi-
cantly higher than any other months owing to the holiday sea-
son.
Sales tax charged in the City of Tukwila is 9.5 %. Of this, the
State receives 6.5 %, King County Transit Benefit Area (Metro)
receives .9 %, King County receives .25 %, RTA (Sound Trans-
it) receives .9 %, Criminal Justice receives .1% and the City
receives .85 %. The City is charged a 1% admin fee by the
State of Washington for collecting and distributing sales tax.
$2,000 _
$1,900
$1,800
$1,700
$1,600
$1,500
$1,400
$1,300
$1,200
$1,100
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. ..............................�
Sales Tax by Month - In Thousands (000)
12
$1 689,71
$1 890,80
1,757,634
-
—
—
—
—
_
1
7
$1,47326
$1,25069
1,236,570
417...
—
—
—
—
—
$1,172,08
$1,035,64
....1.,. 038
1,028,654
—
1., �489
—
—
—
—
—
............
11
$1 139,76
$1 201,70
20 1.,.396......�.1,718013...
,321,621
—
—
—
—
—
$1,000
$900
$800
$700
$600
$500 -
02009
02010
• 2011 ...�
2012
1
574.......1,
$1,051
$1,00582
1,098,803
2
043 007.......1,
—
—
—
—
17
3
$1,14579
$1,15745
452
1,222,643
656......�.1,252282.......�
—
—
—
—
—
—
$1,191
$1,06959
1,127,588
4
—
—
—
—
47
5
$1 081,97
$1 066,89
.... 277
,186,117
—
—
—
—
—
772.......1...
$1
$1
386658.......1...281.,.
1,276,721
6
217,49
247,97
—
—
—
—
—
—
...�.1,215705........1.,.
8
$1,118,09
$1,215,85
1,285,945
9
$1,10990
$1,35668
256
1,294,340
832............
10
$1 032,28
$1 081,70
22
,205,863
mnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Page 4
4
2012 ANNUAL
General fund property taxes earned in 2012 is $38,084 less than
budget but $402,721 more than 2011. The City's levy rate
for 2013 is $2.98778 per $1,000 of assessed value based on a
City -wide assessed valuation of $4,649,191,308. AV declined
1/2 of 1% and is expected to stabilize or increase in 2013 for
2014 collections. The City has a nice cushion in its levy rate as
AV could decline another 3% before impacting the 1% annual
property tax assessment increase and $3.10 per $1,000 levy rate
cap.
2009
2010
2011
2012
$12,190,219
$13,188,942
$13,427,445
R
Licenses a
Rental
g License
Collection of Revenue Generating Regulatory license (RGRL) and Rental Housing license fees began in 2011. RGRL fees were
lower than budget by $219,382 but added $1.8 million to General Fund revenues. RGRL increased in 2012 over 2011 collections
by $114K. Rental housing license fees came in less than budget by $7,500 but did add $35K to revenue. Business license fees
earned $716,459 but were $91K lower than budget.
Utility Taxes
The City of Tukwila imposes a utility tax on elec-
trical energy, natural gas, solid waste, cable tele-
vision service and telephone service at a rate of
0
6 / °. Additionally, tax is levied on City-owned
Y� t3'
water sewer and surface water utilities. The rate
was 15/ t r ou g h April 30 ,
2010 and 10% th r - after.
Th e customer based utility tax r eve n ue is below
budget by $839K while the interfund utility tax
exceeds budget by $11K. Actual 2012 customer
utility tax collections are $51K lower than 2011
and interfund utility taxes are $162K higher than
2011.
Utility Taxes
2009
2010
2011
2012
Electricity
Natural Gas
Solid Waste ......... ...............................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cable
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Telephone
CUSTOMER
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interfund - Water
....................................................... ...............................
Interfund - Sewer
Interfund- ...Storm
INTERFUND
$ 1,639,591
748,772
79,932
238,586
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,652,412
4,359,293
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
676,241
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
754,017
383,019
1,813,277
$ 1,504,325
533,811
339,654
229,841
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,456,322
4,063,953
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
501,592
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
480,511
378,094
1,360,197
1,550,245
617,296
345,375
224,985
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,314,362
4,052,263
475,210
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
561,831
335,339
1,372,380
$ 1,554,587
567,841
347,835
227,755
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,303,368
4,001,385
518,461.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
647,043
369,077
1,534,581
TOTAL
$ 6,172,570 $ 5,424,150 $ 5,424,643 $ 5,535,966
Exc se Taxes
In 2012, 94% of the gambling excise tax revenue
was derived from card games with the remainder
generated by punchboards, pull tabs and amuse-
ment ames. The excise tax charged on card
g g
games is 10% of gross proceeds; the excise tax
0
charged on most other forms of gambling is 5% of
g g g
gross proceeds. 2012 revenue is $172,932 less
than budget but $857,448 more than collected in
2011. 2012 revenue includes $439K for prior year
back taxes.
Real estate excise tax (REET) is levied on all sales
of real estate. The City credits the first quarter
percent of the REET to the 301 Park Acquisition
Fund and the second quarter percent to the 104
Arterial Street Fund. REET revenue earned in
2012 exceeded budget by $548,000 or 374 %. The
significant increase is due to a $6.7M property sale
that occurred during the year.
Excise Tax
2009
2010
2011
2012
Leasehold Excise Tax
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real Estate Excise Tax
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gambling Excise Tax
TOTAL
$ 2,824,406 $ 2,488,357 $ 1,780,293 $ 3,294,893
Leasehold excise tax is charged in lieu of a property tax and is collectible on
most leases of publicly -owned real and personal property in the state. The
leasehold tax rate is 12.84% of the rent paid for the property and payment of
the tax is the responsibility of the lessee. The City remits the tax to the
State, then receives back approximately 30.5% of the tax collected. The ma-
jority of the excise tax is earned by the general fund. General Fund leasehold
tax revenue for 2012 was $51K less than budget. The largest generator of
leasehold excise tax is King County International Airport at 85 %.
Page 5
2012 ANNUAL
5
The General Fund receives 100% of permit revenue. Permit revenue for 2012 was less than budget by $206K and was less than
2011 amounts by 25% or $283K. Permit activity increased in 2012 in all categories except building. The highest value for each of
the permit types for 2012 and 2011 were as follows:
BUILDING PERMITS
MECHANICAL PERMITS
PLUMBING /GAS PERMITS
ELECTRICAL PERMITS
2012: Westfield Mall: $2,375,000, Boeing #9 -101: $1,680,000
2011: Interurban Office Building: $5,402,482, Boeing #14 -01: $5,082,600
2012: Westfield Mall: $435,495, Boeing #9 -96: $1,499,543
2011: Sabey Data Center: $8,075,000, Boeing #14 -01: $1,152,000
2012: Providence Infusion and Pharmacy: $194,860, Fruititude: $130,000
2011: Sabey Data Center: $243,000, PSF Mechanical: $126,740
2012: Boeing #9 -101: $1,073,709, Boeing #9 -101: $753,409
2011: Sabey Data Center: $5,356,864, City of Tukwila Pump Station: $932,780
Permit Revenue
2009 2010
2011
2012
Buildings / Structures
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Electrical
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mechanical
Plumbing / Gas / Other
TOTAL
$ 599,322 $1,068,414
$ 1,135,588
$ 852,885
Permits
Issued
2009 2010
2011
2012
Building
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mechanical
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Electrical
Plumbing / gas
264
158
819
145
306
177
1,040
172
389
180
1,158
187
354
191
1,175
210
TOTAL
1,386 1,695
1,914 1,930
Ha C ek & Ot
Fees
Plan check and other fees recorded into the Gen-
eral Fund in 2012 totaled $640,127, a decrease of
$159,010 or 20% from 2011 and $273K less than
budget.
The fire impact fees and park impact fees re-
ceived in 2012 were significantly less than
amounts received in 2011 but close to budget.
Park and fire impact fees are budgeted based on
planned projects.
Plan Check
& Other Fees
2009
2010
2011
2012
Plan checking fees
Zoning and subdivision
Electrical plan review
Other
$ 331,007
42,740
12,616
15,825
$ 582,422
95,321
35,505
5,612
$ 417,590
97,025
24,971
13,410
$ 479,119
93,374
16,966
(4,146)
TOTAL GENERAL FUND
$ 402,188
$ 718,860
$ 552,996
$ 585,313
Fire impact fees
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Park impact fees
13,342
17,767
142,383
108,177
157,654
88,487
33,686
21,128
TOTAL
$ 433,297
$ 969,420
$ 799,137
$ 640,127
Intergovernmental revenue comprises grant funds
from federal, state and local governmental entities
and other governmental receipts.
Just under $1 million was received as grant funding
indirectly from the federal government, $888K in
grant revenue was received from the sate, and the
balance from various other governmental sources
including sales tax for criminal justice, liquor excise
2009
2010
$15,614,600 $12,915,585
2011
$22,436,436
2012
$8,591,989
tax, and the City's share of the EMS levy.
The General Fund received $4.8 in intergovernmental revenue with $2.1
million derived from the Seattle City Light agreement and $1.1 from sales
tax mitigation.
Page 6
6
2012 ANNUAL
GOVERNMENTAL
Special Revenue
FUND BALANCES
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES
Variance
YTD
ACTUAL
12/31/2011 1 2/31 /201 2
- -- ACTUAL - - -
YTD
- - -- BUDGET - - --
YTD
101 - Hotel /Motel Tax Fund
$ 787,568 $ 710,707
$ (76,861)
$ (302,106)
$ 225,245
103 - Street Fund
903,937 1,046,771
142,834
(207,124)
349,958
104 - Arterial Street Fund
6,929,396 483,330
(6,446,066)
5,645,521
(12,091,587)
105 - Contingency Fund
1,457,728 1,460,454
2,726
1,816
910
107 - Fire Equip Cum Reserve
890,797 892,072
1,276
119,670
(118,394)
109 - Drug Seizure Fund
229,711 160,125
(69,586)
18,000
(87,586)
Total Special Revenue
$11,199,137 $ 4,753,460
$ (6,445,678)
$ 5,275,777
$ (11,721,455)
Special revenue funds declined $6.4 million for the fiscal year. Fund recover costs the City fronted for this project.
104 - Arterial Street Fund was the largest contributor to this decline as
discussed below.
Additionally, $4.7M was paid out on the Southcenter Parkway
project in 2012. This was a $19.4M project that began prior to
Fund 103 - Street: Work on 40 -42 Ave S (S 160st —S 131P1) was 2012 and has now been substantially completed.
delayed which contributed to the higher than anticipated ending fund
balance.
Fund 104 - Arterial Street. The budget includes receipt of $9.2M in
bonds for the Tukwila Urban Center Access project. The Southcenter
Access Project (Local Improvement District No. 33) was completed
and accepted by Council in February 2013. It is anticipated that
bonds will be sold to pay for the project in the second half of 2013 to
GOVERNMENTAL
Capital Project
FUND BALANCES
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES
Variance
YTD
ACTUAL
12/31/2011 12/31/2012
- -- ACTUAL - - -
YTD
- - -- BUDGET - - --
YTD
301 - Parks Acq Fund
$ 1,427,973 $ 1,090,188
$ (337,785)
$ (1,447,403)
$ 1,109,618
302 - Facility Replacement Fund
2,027,014 2,005,520
(21,494)
(106,372)
84,878
303 - General Gov Improvements
608,613 913,830
305,217
(64,073)
369,290
304 - Fire Impact Fee Fund
313,819 348,010
34,192
50,100
(15,908)
Total Capital Project
$ 4,377,419 $ 4,357,548
$ (19,870)
$ (1,567,748)
$ 1,547,878
Capital project funds decreased only $19,870 for the fiscal year.
Fund 301 -Parks Acquisition: Has the largest decline in actual fund
balance of $337,785. The decline was significantly less than budget-
ed decline of $1.4M. The City received $177K and $275K over
budget in property taxes and REET respectively. Additionally, the
Duwamish Hill Preserve project was pushed into 2013.
Fund 302 - Facilities Replacement: Fund balance higher than
planned because a demo on TIB did not occur, as scheduled.
Fund 303 - General Government Improvements: Received addi-
tional funds from King County Flood Control District to help pay for
the removal of the Hesco containers.
Page 7
2012 ANNUAL
7
Ente
eF
ENTERPRISE
FUNDS
FUND BALANCES
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES
Variance
YTD
ACTUAL
- -- ACTUAL - - -
- - -- BUDGET - - --
501 - Equipment Replacement
12/31 /2011 12/31 /2012
YTD
YTD
$ 264,216
401 - Water Fund
$ 5,982,649 $ 6,077,949
$ 95,300
$ (1,279,716)
$ 1,375,016
402 - Sewer Fund
1,886,825 2,199,821
312,996
(1,168,617)
1,481,613
411 - Foster Golf Fund
140,550 404,390
263,840
(157,514)
421,354
412 - Surface Water Fund
2,122,611 2,329,158
206,547
(845,393)
1,051,940
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
$10,132,635 $11,011,319
$ 878,684
$ (3,451,240)
$ 4,329,924
All enterprise funds increased fund balance for the fiscal year.
Fund 401 - Water. The Water fund realized a fund balance increase
of $95K for the fiscal year. Total revenue exceeded budget by 3%
or $172K and expenses were under budget by 19% or $1.2M. This
is primarily due to the Andover West project not completed in 2012
as scheduled.
Fund 402 - Sewer. The Sewer fund realized a fund balance in-
crease of $313K for the fiscal year. Revenues exceeded budget by
20% or $1M and expenses were under budget by 6% or $394K.
Revenues exceeded budget due to conservative budgeting.
Fund 411 -Golf Course. The Golf Course realized a fund balance
increase of $263,840 for the fiscal year. Revenues were under
budget by $242K but expenses were significantly lower than
budget by 32% or $663K. Director of Parks and Recreation costs,
originally charged 25% to the golf course, were removed in 2012.
Additionally, staff reduced costs where possible and the capital
project (replacing bathroom counters) was delayed.
Fund 412 - Surface Water. The Surface Water fund realized a
fund balance increase of $207K for the fiscal year. Revenues
exceeded budget by 4% or 140K while expenses were lower than
budget by 20% or $912K.
INTERNAL SERVICE
FUNDS
FUND BALANCES
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES
Variance
YTD
ACTUAL
12/31/2011 12/31 /2012
- -- ACTUAL -- - -
YTD
- - -- BUDGET - - --
YTD
501 - Equipment Replacement
$ 3,532,153 $ 4,132,396
$ 600,243
$ 336,027
$ 264,216
502 - Self- Insurance Fund
4,983,480 4,794,386
(189,095)
(414,480)
225,385
503 - LEOFF Insurance Fund
1,628,986 1,711,532
82,547
(103,485)
186,032
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
$ 10,144,619 $10,638,313
$ 493,695
$ (181 ,938)
$ 675,633
Fund 501 - Equipment Replacement. Fund balance increased by
$608K for the fiscal year. Expenses were less then budget by 6% or
$128K primarily due to command car for Battalion Chief not pur-
chased as planned.
Fund 502 - Insurance. Fund balance decreased by $189K for the
fiscal year, however, the decrease is less than budgeted by $225K.
This is primarily due to investment earnings being higher than budg-
et by $252K.
Fund 503 -LEOFF Insurance. Fund balance increased by $83K
for the fiscal year. Fund balance was budgeted to decrease by
$104K. The positive results in this fund are attributable to expendi-
tures lower than expected.
Page 8
8
2012 ANNUAL
City of Tukwila
General Fund 000 - Revenue and Expenditures
As of December 31 2012
% of year expired 100.00%
Revenue
General Revenue
Property Taxes $ 13,868.250 $ 13,830,166 $ (38,084) 99.73%
Sales and Use Taxes 15.048,000 15,673,891 625,891 104.16% (a)
Revenue Generating Regulatory Lics 1,975.000 1,755,618 (219,382) 88.89% (b)
Rental housing license
42.750 35,250 (7,500) 82.46%
Admissions Tax 654,000 587,396 (66,604) 89.82%
Utility Taxes 4,840.000 4,001,385 (838,615) 82.67% (c)
Interfund Utility Tax 1,524.000 1,534,581 10,581 100.69%
Gambling /Excise Taxes 2,641.370 2,457,327 (183,976) 93.03%
Total General Revenue 40,593,370 39,875,613 (717,690) 98.23%
Licenses and Permits
Business Licenses and Permits
Building Permits and Fees
Total Licenses and Permits
Intergovernmental Revenue
Sales tax mitigation
Seattle City Light Agreement
Grants
State entitlements, in -lieu taxes
Other
Total Intergovernmental Revenue
Charges for Services
General Government
Security
Engineering Services
Transportation
Plan Check and Review Fees
Culture and Rec Fees
Total Charges for Services
Fines and Penalties
Miscellaneous Revenue
Sale of Capital Assets
Sale of bond proceeds for MPD
Indirect cost allocation
Change in Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance
Cash and investments
(a) Sales and use tax:
(b) RGRL:
(c) Utility tax:
(d) Building permits /fees:
(e) Other intergovernmental:
(f) Sale of capital assets:
(g) Sale of bonds proceeds (MPD):
807,227 716,459 (90,768) 88.76%
1,058.589 852,885 (205,704) 80.57% (d)
1,865,816 1,569,344 (296,472) 84.11%
1,200,000 1,127,394 (72,606) 93.95%
2,050,000 2,147,366 97,366 104.75%
533;111 620,196 87,085 116.34%
308,504 379,186 70,682 122.91%
52,532 535,978 483,446 1020.29% (e)
4,144,147 4,810,121 665,974 116.07%
60,951 43,279 (17,672) 71.01%
533.134 543,396 10,262 101.92%
9,867 - (9,867) 0.00%
158,149 145,671 (12,478) 92.11%
858,500 585,313 (273,187) 68.18%
611,500 437,894 (173,606) 71.61%
2,232,101 1,755,554 (476,547) 78.65%
213,270 220,752 7,482 103.51%
652.760 452,090 (200,670) 69.26%
672.882 9,903 (662,979) 1.47% (f)
1,100,000 - (1,100,000) 0.00% (g)
2,261,235 2,330,665 69,430 103.07%
(1,757,223)
4,441,652
114,414
5,911,616
$ 3,826,856
1,871,704
1,469,964
-6.51%
133.09%
Exceeded budget and Nov & Dec exceeded 2011 figures.
Revenue did not meet expectations. Budget adjusted in 2013 -2014 due to
more experience.
Based on consumption.
Value of permits lower than estimated but number of permits higher than
2011 (1,930 vs 1,914).
Received funds for emergency services and other gov't services not budgeted.
Assets not sold as planned.
Bonds not sold until 2/13.
** Variance = Actual over (under) prorated budget Fund 000
9
CITY OF TUKWILA
General Fund Expenditures - By Category
As of December 31 2012
TRANSFERS OUT
SALARIES AND BENEFITS
SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
INTERGOVERNMENTAL
LOAN TO MPD
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
00 TRANSFERS OUT
11 SALARIES
12 EXTRA LABOR
13 OVERTIME
15 HOLIDAY PAY
21 FICA
22 LEOFF
23 PERS
24 INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE
25 MEDICAL,DENTAL,LIFE,OPTICAL
26 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION
28 UNIFORM CLOTHING
31 OFFICE & OPERATING SUPPLIES
34 ITEMS PURCH. FOR INVENT /RESALE
35 SMALL TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPMENT
41 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
42 COMMUNICATION
43 TRAVEL
44 ADVERTISING
45 OPERATING RENTALS & LEASES
46 INSURANCE
47 PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICES
48 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
49 MISCELLANEOUS
51 INTERGVRNMTL PROFESSIONAL SVCS
52 LOAN TO MPD
53 EXT TAXES & OPERATING ASSMNTS
63 OTHER IMPROVEMENTS
64 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT
9r
(a) Transfers out:
(b) Salaries & benefits:
(c) Supplies:
(d) Professional services:
(e) Intergovernmental:
(f) Loan to MPD:
(g) Capital expenditures:
% of year expired 100.00%
$ 7,532,717 $ 5,618,587 $ (1,914,130) 74.59% (a)
34,064,946 33.182,824 (882,122) 97.41% (b)
1,193,673 1,095,524 (98,149) 91.78% (c)
8,546,993 8,156,708 (390,285) 95.43% (d)
2,022,475 1,923,719 (1,265,050) 95.12% (e)
1,825,000 658,706 (1.173,252) 36.09% (f)
07,000 273,560 (33,440) 89.11% (g)
7,532,717
23,436,489
455,520
1,376,947
178,248
1,415,429
590,397
1,021,688
436,940
5,112, 743
30,000
10,545
1,005,457
14,200
174,016
2,420,844
348,381
121,815
49,550
2,148,245
550,535
1,406,285
596,960
904,378
2,022,475
1,825,000
7,000
300,000
5,618,587
23,432,811
352,417
1,383,704
186,764
1,449,042
691,586
801,107
333,779
4,531,965
14,945
4,705
908,868
36,412
150,245
2,131,258
317,975
92,709
17.847
2,164,781
579,668
1395,411
559,989
897,070
1,923,677
658,706
42
273,560
$ (1,914,130)
(3,678)
(103,103)
6,757
8,516
33,613
101,189
(220,581)
(103,161)
(580,778)
(15,055)
(5,840)
(96,589)
22,212
(23,771)
(289,586)
(30,406)
(29,106)
(31, 703)
16,536
29,133
(10,874)
(36,971)
(7,308)
(98,798)
(1,166,294)
42
(7,000)
26,440)
74.59%
99.98%
77.37%
100.49%
104.78%
102.37%
117.14%
78.41 %
76.39%
88.64%
49.82%
44.62%
90.39%
256.42%
86.34%
88.04%
91.27%
76.11%
36.02%
100.77%
105.29%
99.23%
93.81%
99.19%
95.11%
36.09%
0.00%
0.00%
91.19%
Transfers out were only done as necessary.
Under budget due to vacancies, reduction in use of extra labor, medical costs
lower than budgeted (6% increase not implemented).
Staff held the line wherever possible
Permit software budgeted in 2012 but not paid in 2012, preschool cancelled
which resulted in less need for instructors, lower audit costs.
Reduction in jail costs.
Loan to MPD for capital project occurred in 2013.
Capital purchases delayed.
"* Variance = Actual over (under) prorated budget Fund 000 By Category
10
CITY OF TUKWILA
General Fund Expenditures - By Department
As of Decem ber 31 2012
CITY COUNCIL
MAYOR
HUMAN RESOURCES
FINANCE
CITY ATTORNEY
RECREATION
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MUNICIPAL COURT
POLICE
FIRE
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
PUBLIC WORKS
PARK MAINTENANCE
STREET MAINTENANCE &OPERATION
DEPT 20
41,n I rtio 1,40916e34,
lie 4( 414104; Ore
11 SALARIES
21 FICA
23 PERS
24 INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE
25 MEDICAL,DENTAL,LIFE,OPTICAL
31 OFFICE & OPERATING SUPPLIES
41 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
42 COMMUNICATION
43 TRAVEL
49 MISCELLANEOUS
269,655
2,673,991
573,396
1,603,133
642,734
2,530,147
2,858,579
1,015,849
14,274,710
10,542,961
1,153,947
3,613,803
1,072,647
2,756,535
9,910,717
'CkaliNgibiSOLS6d
% of year expired
4,4 44,41
Wroillpdoatp
251,197
2,486,158
514,637
1,405,588
595,140
2,273,480
2,861,070
1,014,372
14,019,692
10,476,394
1,106,138
3,166,787
1,072,302
2,711,415
6,955,261
(18,458)
(187,833)
(58,759)
(197,545)
(47,594)
(256,667)
2,491
(1,477)
(255,018)
(66,567)
(47,809)
(447,016)
(345)
(45,120)
(2.955.458)
93.15%
92.98%
89.75%
87.68%
92.60%
89.86%
100.09%
99.85%
98.21%
99.37%
95.86%
87.63%
99.97%
98.36%
70.18%
177,720
13,274
8,016
2,745
20,630
3,870
1,500
4,400
25,000
12,500
411" 1111 '1671111111111117.!
180,650
13,547
6,646
2,111
21,396
2,527
92
4,701
15,593
i934
** Variance = Actual over (under) prorated budget Fund 000 By Dept
2,930
273
(1,370)
(634)
766
(1,343)
(1,408)
301
(9,407)
(8,566)
101.65%
102.06%
82.90%
76.92%
103.71%
65.29%
8.16%
106.84%
62.37%
31.47%
CITY OF TUKWILA
General Fund Expenditures - By Department
As of December 31 2012
14���
m��r�m�*�o��,*��~�m�w
��������� ��`���
11 SALARIES
12 EXTRA LABOR
13 OVERTIME
21 FICA
23 PERS
24 INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE
25 MEDICAL,DENTAL,LIFE,OPTICAL
31 OFFICE & OPERATING SUPPLIES
35 SMALL TOOLS & MINOREQUIPMENT
41 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
42 COMMUNICATION
43 TRAVEL
44 ADVERTISING
45 OPERATING RENTALS & LEASES
48 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
49 MISCELLANEOUS
51 INTERGVRNMTL PROFESSIONAL SVCS
64 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT
64040446041111111
% of year expired
100.00%
11 SALARIES
21 FICA
23 PERS
24 INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE
25 MEDICAL,DENTAL,LIFE,OPTICAL
31 OFFICE & OPERATING SUPPLIES
41 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
42 COMMUNICATION
43 TRAVEL
44 ADVERTISING
45 OPERATING RENTALS & LEASES
48 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
49 MISCELLANEOUS
.001.51O
15,500
573
71,953
89,697
4,167
173,067
33.855
4,935
889,470
85,300
19,800
17,250
28,108
14,500
176,799
26,500
21,000
67,958
67,296
2.700
141,792
27,409
914,600
73,610
10,645
5,148
28,635
10,482
149,113
24,655
22,200
47,760
25,201
31,151
1,373
56,803
7,103
79,050
2,500
9 00
50
5,405
8,000
359,647
25,847
25,763
1,004
56 627
5,620
27,829
6
1,209
5,269
400
200
5,217
~ Variance = Actual over (under) prorated budget Fund 000 By Dept
12
(61,666)
(15,500)
(573)
(3,995)
(22,401)
(1,401)
(31,275)
(6,447)
(4,935)
25,130
(11,690)
(9,155)
(12,102)
527
(4,018)
(27,686)
(1,845)
1,200
93.84%
0.00%
0.00%
94.45%
75.03%
66.38%
81.93%
80.96%
0.00%
102.83%
86.30%
53.76%
29.84%
101.87%
72.29%
84.34%
93.04%
05.71%
711' 411.1
11,887
646
(5,388)
(369)
(176)
(1,483)
(51,221)
6
(1,291)
(3,732)
350
(5,205)
(2,783)
OW"�
,tv oho
61,
103.42%
102.56%
82.70%
73.14%
99.69%
791296
35.20%
0.00%
48.35%
58.54%
800.28%
3.70%
65.21%
CITY OF TUKWILA
General Fund Expenditmres - By Department
As of Decem ber 31 2012
,
SALARIES
12 EXTRA LABOR
13 OVERTIME
21 FICA
23 PERS
24 INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE
25 MEDICAL,DENTAL,LIFE,OPTICAL
26 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION
31 OFFICE & OPERATING SUPPLIES
41 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
42 COMMUNICATION
43 TRAVEL
46 INSURANCE
48 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
49 MISCELLANEOUS
64 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT
rotmo-
woo
% of year expired
978,689
10,000
1.147
72.356
87,592
4,118
205,614
24.84S
190,000
1.000
5 000
5,000
12,768
5,000
12 EXTRA LABOR
21 FICA
24 INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE
31 OFFICE & OPERATING SUPPLIES
41 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
42 COMMUNICATION
45 OPERATING RENTALS & LEASES
48 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
49 MISCELLANEOUS
leXagirliAftl4rn:' '1111111118114
0
^
'N
2,500
795
439
5,000
628,000
2,500
500
2,000
1,000
891,375
13,640
67,944
64,995
2,833
181,939
12,581
135,010
5,587
2,139
6,475
352
20,716
2
4,510
588,558
2,070
** Variance = Actual over (under) prorated budget Fund 000 By Dept
(87,314)
(10,000)
12,493
(4,412)
(22,597)
(1,285)
(23,675)
(12,268)
(54,990)
4.587
(2,861)
6,475
(4,648)
7,948
(5,000
91.08%
0.00%
1189.23%
93.90%
74.20%
68.79%
88.48%
0.00%
50.63%
71.06%
558.67%
42.78%
0.00%
7.03%
162.25%
0.00%
��■ ,M€4,.."5"
(2,500)
(795)
(437)
(490)
(39,442)
(2,500)
(500)
(2,000)
1,070
0.00%
0.00%
0.46%
90.19%
93.72%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
207.01%
Alirr
CITY OF TUKWILA
General Fund Expenditures - By Department
As of Decem ber 31 2012
% of year expired
11 SALARIES
12 EXTRA LABOR
13 OVERTIME
21 FICA
23 PERS
24 INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE
25 MEDICAL,DENTAL,LIFE,OPTICAL
31 OFFICE & OPERATING SUPPLIES
34 ITEMS PURCH. FOR INVENT/RESALE
41 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
42 COMMUNICATION
43 TRAVEL
44 ADVERTISING
45 OPERATING RENTALS & LEASES
47 PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICES
48 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
49 MISCELLANEOUS
53 EXT TAXES & OPERATING ASSMNTS
64 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT
.105454
296,627
600
130 960
120,980
35,855
247,844
81,188
14,200
200,666
27,380
8.000
21 000
55,861
32,550
90,982
11 SALARIES
12 EXTRA LABOR
13 OVERTIME
21 FICA
23 PERS
24 INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE
25 MEDICAL,DENTAL,LIFE,OPTICAL
28 UNIFORM CLOTHING
31 OFFICE & OPERATING SUPPLIES
35 SMALL TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPMENT
41 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
42 COMMUNICATION
43 TRAVEL
44 RECYCLING KC WRR
45 OPERATING RENTALS & LEASES
47 PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICES
48 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
49 MISCELLANEOUS
51 INTERGVRNMTL PROFESSIONAL SVCS
53 EXT TAXES & OPERATING ASSMNTS
64 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT
6, 0
1.783,293
38.850
4,672
133,308
160,852
11,224
275,436
1,805
34,181
600
86,283
4,500
12,500
33.775
1,000
62,190
21.310
18,000
175,000
1,202,085
224,564
2,721
107,040
93,452
27,186
242,141
71,139
36,412
106,642
7,416
3,301
6,591
46,223
(521)
24,144
67,553
21
5,371
36,631
(72,063)
2,121
(23,920)
(27,528)
(8,669)
(5,703)
(10,049)
22,212
(94,024)
(19,964)
(4,699)
(14,409)
(9,638)
(521)
(8,406)
(23,429)
21
5,371
o
103.14%
75.71%
453.55%
81.73%
77.25%
75.82%
97.70%
87.62%
256.42%
53.14%
27.08%
41.26%
31.39%
82.7596
0.00%
74.18%
74.25%
0.00%
0.00%
1,846,644
75,305
4,783
143,676
138,271
12,415
270,644
299
22,443
57,993
257
3,227
478
25,606
8,678
44,907
27,505
2
77,938
**Variance = Actual over (under) prorated budget Fund 000 By Dept
14
63,351
36,655
111
10,368
(22,581)
1,191
(4,792)
(1,506)
(11,738)
(600)
(28,290)
(4,243)
(9,273)
478
(8,169)
(1,000)
(53,512)
23,597
9,505
2
2,938
103.55%
194.84%
102.38%
107.78%
85.96%
110.61%
98.26%
16.58%
65.66%
0.00%
67.21%
5.71%
25.82%
0.00%
75.81%
0.00%
13.95%
210.73%
152.80%
0.00%
101.68%
CITY OF TUKWILA
General Fund Expenditures - By Department
As of December 31 2012
% of year expired
IAA lig..
11 SALARIES
12 EXTRA LABOR
13 OVERTIME
21 FICA
23 PERS
24 INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE
25 MED|CAL.DENTAL.L|FE.OPT|CAL
31 OFFICE & OPERATING SUPPLIES
35 SMALL TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPMENT
41 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
42 COMMUNICATION
43 TRAVEL
45 OPERATING RENTALS &LEASES
48 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
49 MISCELLANEOUS
53 EXT TAXES & OPERATING ASSMNTS
m
11
12
13
21
22
23
24
25
31
35
41
42
43
44
45
46
48
49
51
64
104
m
SALARIES
EXTRA LABOR
OVERTIME
FICA
LEOFF
PERS
INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE
MEDICAL,DENTAL,LIFE,OPTICAL
OFFICE & OPERATING SUPPLIES
SMALL TOOLS & MINOR EQU!PMENT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMMUNICATION
TRAVEL
ADVERTISING
OPERATING RENTALS & LEASES
INSURANCE
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
MISCELLANEOUS
INTERGVRNMTL PROFESSIONAL SVCS
MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT
^K4
,�
639,552
2,500
5,016
4O.379
60.453
3,432
102,906
10,908
1,200
108,000
5,550
6,215
2,300
654,082
162
1,071
48,265
48,381
2,301
109,060
12,615
1,201
112,333
8.624
4,169
939
318
12,849
71,1"
7.209,468
5,000
930,062
544,835
325,645
93,745
137,676
1.642,640
156,428
600
72,175
62,031
23,300
800
908,531
225,080
1O7.894
56,245
1.6B2.555
20,000
7,281,322
889,318
604,432
365,543
74,551
107,659
1,475,651
138,983
389
72,955
60,521
44,398
874,744
225,000
157,270
71,896
1.500.730
8,321
14,530
(2,338)
(3,945)
(114)
(12,072)
(1,131)
6,154
1,707
1
4,333
1,074
(2,046)
939
(1,982)
(6,589)
1
71,854
(5,000)
(40,744)
59,597
39,898
(19,194)
(30,017)
(166,989)
(17,445)
(211)
780
(1,510)
21,098
(800)
(33,787)
(80)
(10,624)
15,651
(125,816)
(11,679)
** Variance = Actual over (under) prorated budget Fund 000 By Dept
4Pilifq 4,,
102.27%
6.48%
21.35%
99.77%
80.03%
67.06%
105.98%
11585%
100.11%
104.01%
119.36%
67.08%
0.00%
13.81%
66.10%
0.00%
01.00%
0.00%
95.62%
110.94%
11225%
79.53%
78.20%
89.83%
88.85%
84.81%
101.08%
97.57%
190.55%
0.00%
96.28%
99.96%
93.67%
127.83%
92.57%
41.60%
CITY OF TUKWILA
General Fund Expenditures - By Department
As of Decem ber 31 2012
% of year expired
11 SALARIES
12 EXTRA LABOR
13 OVERTIME
15 HOLIDAY PAY
21 FICA
22 LEOFF
23 PERS
24 INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE
25 K8ED|CALDENTAL.UFE.OPT|CAL
28 UNIFORM CLOTHING
31 OFFICE & OPERATING SUPPLIES
35 SMALL TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPMENT
41 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
42 COMMUNICATION
43 TRAVEL
45 OPERATING RENTALS & LEASES
46 INSURANCE
47 PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICES
48 REPAIRS &MAINTENANCE
49 MISCELLANEOUS
51 INTERGVRNMTL PROFESSIONAL SVCS
O4 MACHINERY &EQUIPMENT
6,359,535
416,552
178,248
92,289
264,752
32,766
107.748
1,599,900
1,140
187,080
28,500
65,300
44,670
14.500
489.962
90,000
60,000
41,000
111,601
285,420
12,000
6,552,58
13
442,124
186,764
103,212
326,042
22,843
124,113
1,353,481
183,779
30,394
36,635
22,088
4,012
518,831
90,000
73,116
67,685
33,898
304,778
11 SALARIES
12 EXTRA LABOR
13 OVERTIME
21 FICA
23 PERS
24 INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE
25 MEDICAL,DENTAL,LIFE,OPTICAL
31 OFFICE & OPERATING SUPPLIES
35 SMALL TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPMENT
41 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
42 COMMUNICATION
43 TRAVEL
45 OPERATING RENTALS & LEASES
48 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
49 MISCELLANEOUS
64 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT
t�
44fr ti
581,079
2,500
44,335
52,041
3,228
135,998
5,766
122,000
1,000
99,000
1,500
1,500
31,500
40.500
32,000
JYrr
Aow
588,735
799
43,605
42,368
1,918
130,366
3,280
104,073
1,451
128,850
1,352
935
12,900
25,523
19,984
,"
** Variance = Actual over (under) prorated budget Fund 000 By Dept
°
ni •45011
193,050
13
25,572
8,516
10,923
61,290
(9,923)
(43,633)
(246,419)
(1,140)
(3,301)
1,894
(28,665)
(22,582)
(10,488)
28,869
13,116
26,685
(77,703)
19,358
(12,000)
103.04%
0.00%
106.14%
104.78%
111.84%
123.15%
69.72%
73.99%
84.60%
0.00%
98.24%
106.65%
56.10%
49.45%
27.67%
105.89%
100.00%
121.86%
165.09%
30.37%
106.78%
0.00%
'FIA4 446'40'4%4
7,656
(2,500)
799
(730)
(9,673)
(1,310)
(5,632)
(2,486)
(17,927)
451
29,850
(148)
(565)
(18,600)
(14,977)
(12.O1G)
C,71m~�����Mer��r��
01.32%
0.00%
0.00%
98.35%
81.41%
59.41%
95.86%
56.88%
85.31%
145.07%
130.15%
90.12%
62.33%
40.95%
63.02%
62.45%
CITY OF TUKWILA
General Fund Expenditures - By Department
AeofOecembar313Oi2
m'wme 4,4 a efil
11 SALARIES
12 EXTRA LABOR
13 OVERTIME
21 FICA
23 PERS
24 INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE
25 k8ED|CAL.DENTAL.L|FE.OPT|CAL
28 UNIFORM CLOTHING
31 OFFICE & OPERATING SUPPLIES
35 SMALL TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPMENT
41 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
42 COMMUNICATION
43 TRAVEL
45 OPERATING RENTALS &LEASES
47 PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICES
48 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
49 MISCELLANEOUS
64 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT
00114' tj
MON
% of year expired
1.912.535
3.500
4.550
140.874
171,274
28,420
387.834
3,800
99,460
3,750
70,400
7,750
800
177,745
379,449
165,521
21,035
35,000
--- ---
„Owl 44444 Nfi ,15f, ..Tkppgegl
6,44 ie,44#44e040, vole, 4:4104*ei
11 SALARIES
12 EXTRA LABOR
13 OVERTIME
21 FICA
23 PERS
24 INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE
25 K4ED|CALDENTALUFE.OPT|CAL
28 UNIFORM CLOTHING
31 OFFICE & OPERATING SUPPLIES
35 SMALL TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPMENT
41 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
43 TRAVEL
45 OPERATING RENTALS & LEASES
47 PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICES
48 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
49 MISCELLANEOUS
63 OTHER MPROVEMENTS
L
Air���
an~����
1,715,166
5,884
125,460
123,407
17,912
307,629
1,193
85,264
5,514
37,996
6,983
1,562
167,235
330,264
210,454
13,655
11,20
(197,369)
(3,500)
1,328
(15,414)
(47,867)
(10,508)
(80,305)
(2,607)
(14,196)
1,764
(32,404)
(767)
762
(10,510)
(49,185)
44,933
(7,380)
(23.7A1)
503,045
35,020
2,295
37,909
43,550
13,573
82,092
1,425
36.968
1,500
25,000
70,270
169.000
40,000
4,000
7,000
prig dt,4!
496,087
3,151
37,332
35,778
11,593
76,845
1,167
40,739
382
26,389
103
104,558
202,730
31,337
4,113
40�
89.68%
0.00%
129.14%
89.06%
72.05%
63.03%
79.30%
31.41%
85.73%
147.04%
53.97%
90.11%
195.22%
94.09%
87.04%
127.15%
64.92%
32.03%
** Variance Actual over (under) prorated budget Fund 000 By Dept
(6,958)
(35,020)
856
(577)
(7,772)
(1,980)
(5,247)
(258)
3,771
(1,118)
1,389
103
34,288
33,730
(8,664)
113
(7,000)
98.62%
0.00%
137.30%
98.48%
82.15%
85.4196
93.61%
81.90%
110.20%
25.45%
105.56%
0.00%
148.80%
119.96%
78.34%
102.83%
0.00%
CITY OF TUKWILA
General Fund Expenditures -ByDepartment
As of December 31 2012
% of year expired
°
11 SALARIES
12 EXTRA LABOR
13 OVERTIME
21 FICA
23 PERS
24 INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE
25 K4E0CAL.DENTAL.L|FE.OPT|CAL
28 UNIFORM CLOTHING
31 OFFICE & OPERATING SUPPLIES
35 SMALL TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPMENT
41 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
42 COMMUNICATION
43 TRAVEL
44 ADVERTISING
45 OPERATING RENTALS & LEASES
46 INSURANCE
47 PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICES
48 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
49 MISCELLANEOUS
53 EXT TAXES & OPERATING ASSMNTS
64 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT
01 TRANSFERS OUT
26 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION
46 INSURANCE
49 MISCELLANEOUS
52 MPD LOANS
776,843
43.72J
11,474
58,961
69,571
22.944
181,879
2.375
318,800
1U.931
4,000
4,300
2,700
1.500
381.943
35,455
796.836
27,100
5,200
7,532,717
30.000
200,000
323,000
.825,000
724,583
52,374
20,213
60,725
57,356
19,966
164,394
2,045
297,981
8,292
12,774
1,332
1,000
361
396,675
35,455
789,823
36,171
1,341
17
28,538
(52,260)
8,651
8,739
1,764
(12,215)
(2,978)
(17,485)
(330)
(20,819)
(2,639)
8,774
(2,968)
(1,700)
(1,139)
14,732
9,071
(3,859)
17
28,538
5,618,587
14,945
222,738
440,285
658,706
** Variance = Actual over (under) prorated budget Fund 000 By Dept
18
93.27%
119.78%
176.16%
102.99%
82.44%
87.02%
90.39%
86.12%
93.47%
75.86%
319.36%
30.98%
37.05%
24.05%
103.86%
100.00%
99.12%
133.47%
25.79%
0.00%
0.00%
���%�
ptotephikumioo
(1,914,130)
(15,055)
22,738
117,285
74.59%
49.82%
111.37%
136.31%
City of Tukwila
Hotel/Motel Tax Fund 101 - Revenue and Expenditures
As of December 31 2012
% of year expired
Revenue
General Revenue
Hotel/Motel Taxes
Total General Revenue
Intergovernmental Revenue
Miscellaneous Revenue
Investment Earnings
Other Misc Revenue
Total Miscellaneous Revenue
Expenditures
11 Salaries
12 Extra Labor
13 Overtime
21 FICA
23 PERS
24 Industrial Insurance
25 Medims|, Denta|, Life, Optical
31 Office & Operating Supplies
41 Professional Services
42 Communication
43 Travel
44 Advertising
45 Operating Rentals & Leases
47 PubIic Utility Services
48 Repairs & Maintenance
49 Miscellaneous
64 Capital Outlay
Total Hotel/Motel Tax Fund
Transfers Out / Indirec cost allocation
Change in Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance
Cash and investments
(a) Hotel/motel taxes:
(b) Misc:
385.4O1
522,033
385 401 522,033
853 000 857,763
1.70O
15.953
17,719
283,378
24,000
10,110
21,679
25,380
2,033
38,304
16,000
223,000
60,000
23,000
657,000
49,000
1^5OO
1,000
21,400
10,000
1,466,784
91,442
(302,106)
451,952
724
12,677
13,401
136,632
136,632
135.45% (a)
4,763 100.56%
(1,042)
(3,276)
(4,318)
284,134
21,640
12,131
24,091
22,454
1,312
39,081
20,541
164,231
67,494
13,150
619,394
43,319
857
821
38,471
1,373,121
96,937
(76,861)
787,568
41.01%
79.46%
75.63%
11411111,- Ai#111151112,11
756
(2,360)
2,021
2,412
(2,926)
(721)
777
4,541
(58,769)
7,494
(9,850)
(37,606)
(5,681)
(643)
(179)
17,071
(10,000)
(93,663)
5,495
Irogty
398,276
225,245
335,616
100.27%
90.17%
119.99%
111.12%
88.47%
64.56%
102.03%
128.38%
73.65%
112.49%
57.17%
94.28%
88.41%
57.12%
82.10%
179.77% (b)
0.00%
93.61%
106.01%
25.44%
174.26%
Budget was reduced due to economic situation, Kept conservative as economy recovered.
Has been readusted upward for 2013-2014.
Additional memberships. Budget adjusted in 2013-2014 to refiect increase in
membership costs.
** Variance = Actual over (under) prorated budget Fund 101
City of Tukwila
Street Fund 103 - Revenue and Expenditure
As of December 31 2012
% of year expired
100.00%
Revenue
Intergovernmental Revenue (MVFT Taxes)
Miscellaneous Revenue
Investment Ear inga
Total Miscellaneous Revenue
Transfers In
Expenditures
11 Salaries
21 FICA
23 PERS
24 Industrial Insurance
25 K8odicm|, Denta|, LUe, Optical
41 Professional Services
Total
Transfers Out / Indirect cost allocation
Ark
Change in Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance
1
Cash and investments
(a) Professional services:
1,000
1,000
220,000
650,000
650,000
264,565
1,775
1,775
32,565
775
775
(220,000)
3,109
227
224
8
237
107,807
111,612
3,109
227
224
8
237
(542,193)
(538,388)
114.04%
177.47%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
16.59% (a)
17.1796
10\124 11.894 1,770 117.48%
MEM 7, 1111011E,7 .arr, ERN 34.0.511
(207,124)
571.171
142,834
903,937
1,031,761
349,958
332,766
Work on 40-42 Ave S (S 160st - S 131P1) delayed.
** Variance = Actual over (under) prorated budget Fund 103
20
-68.96%
158.26%
City of Tukwila
Arterial Street Fund 104 - Revenue and Expenditures
As of December 31 2012
Revenue
General Revenue
Parking Taxes
Real Estate Excise Taxes
Total General Revenue
Charges for Services
ROW Contribution /Impact Fees
Total Charges for Services
Intergovernmental Revenue
Miscellaneous Revenue
Investment Eamings
Contributions /Donations
Other Misc Revenue
Total Miscellaneous Revenue
Transfer In
Debt Proceeds
Expenditures
11 Salaries
12
13
21
23
24
25
31
41
42
43
44
45
Extra Labor
Overtime
FICA
PERS
Industrial Insurance
Medical, Dental, Life, Optical
Office & Operating Supplies
Professional Services
Communication
Travel
Advertising
Operating Rentals & Leases
47 Public Utility Services
48 Repairs & Maintenance
49 Miscellaneous
64 Capital Outlay
Total Arterial Streets 104
Transfers Out / Indirect cost allocation
Change in Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance
Cash and investments
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
Parking taxes:
REET:
ROW Contribution /Impact Fees:
Intergovernmental revenue:
Contributions /donations:
Debt proceeds:
Salaries:
Professional services, capital:
Debt service interest and costs:
111,257
100,000
211,257
9.941,581
3,820
466,000
469,820
2,000,000
9,230,000
149.082
374,001
523,083
846,240
846,240
% of year expired
37,825
274,001
311,826
846,240
846,240
1,006,599 (8,934,982)
3,153
42,671
600
46,424
1,314,132
(667)
(423,329)
600
(423,396)
(685,868)
(9,230,000)
100.00%
134.00% (a)
374.00% (b)
247.60%
0.00% (c)
0.00%
10.13% (d)
82.53%
9.16% (e)
0%
9.88%
65.71%
0.00% (f)
207,768
3,000
15,417
18,606
686
27,727
4,589,000
11,221,000
16,083,204
123,933
¢o °
5,645,521
4,789,469
415,547
5,861
31,498
30,261
2,587
64,205
839
2,535,765
256
10
1,887
2,964
2,056
7,405
722
6,694,118
9,795,981
386,56
207,779
(3,000)
5,861
16,081
11,655
1,901
36,478
839
(2,053,235)
256
10
1,887
2,964
2,056
7,405
722
(4,526,882)
(6,287,223)
262,630
200.01% (g)
0.00%
0.00%
204.31%
162.64%
377.05%
231.56%
0.00%
55.26% (h)
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
59.66% (h)
60.91%
11.91%
(6,446,066)
6,929,396
394,755
(12,091,587)
2,139,927
- 114.18%
144.68%
Since 2007 parking taxes have averaged $150k a year.
Based on property sales and budget is conservative.
Westfield ROW dedication.
Funding for SC Pky, Tuk ped bridge, mobility, not received yet.
Traffic impact fees are based on development so are never budgeted.
LID was delayed until 2013.
More spent on Southcenter Parkway extension than budgeted.
Transit center and Andover Park West projects delayed.
Fund 104 loaned funds to the LID project and this is the interest incurred on
the loan.
**Variance = Actual over (under) prorated budget Fund 104
21
City of Tukwila
Contingency Fund 105 - Revenue and Expenditures
As of December 31 2012
% of year expired
100.00%
Revenue
Miscellaneous Revenue
Investment Earnings
Total Miscellaneous Revenue
rm
'
Change in Fund Baance
Beginning Fund Balance
Cash and inveoments
vow t .,01$11114a
TY *41
121'�
1,816
1,816
1,816
1.293,816
2,726
2,726
910
910
2,726
1,457,728
1,460,454
** Variance = Actual over (under) prorated budget Fund 105
22
910
163,912
150.12%
150.12%
150.12%
112.67%
City of Tukwila
Fire Equipment Cum, Reserve 107 - Revenue and Expenditures
As of December 31 2012
% of year expired
Revenue
Intergovernmental Revenue
Miscellaneous Revenue
Investment Earnings
Total Miscellaneous Revenue
Transfers In
Expenditures
31 Office & Operating Supplies
Transfers Out / Indirec cost aUooation
Change in Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance
Cash and investments
1.685
1,685
130,000
12,000
12,000
6,393
6,393
1,821 $ 136
1,836 151
(130,000)
0.00%
108.09%
108.98%
0.00%
6,393
6,393
ZEE AINERMIL
(5,607)
(5,607)
53.27%
53.27%
15 561 546 3740.00%
filiSEMEr
119,670
769,671
'foiri
1,275
890,797
944,770
** Variance = Actual over (under) prorated budget Fund 107
(118,395)
121,126
1.07%
City of Tukwila
Drug Seizure Fund 109 - Revenue and Expenditures
As of December 31 2012
% of year expired
100.00%
Revenue
Miscellaneous Revenue
Investment Earnings
Seizure Revenue
Total Miscellaneous Revenue
Transfers In
•��fN;sli�I
Expenditures
31 Office & Operating Supplies
35 Small Tools & Minor Equipment
41 Professional Services
43 Travel
45 Operating Rentals & Leases
48 Repairs & Maintenance
49 Miscellaneous
64 Capital Outlay
Total
Change in Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance
Cash and investments
(a) Seizure revenue:
(b) Small tools & minor equipment:
(c) Operating rentals & leases:
(d) Capital outlay:
1.000
20,000
21,000
75,000
3,000
10;000
10,000
2,000
53,000
78,000
18,000
112,000
($0) $ (1,000)
(20,000)
(21, 000)
(0)
2,395
7,233
5,858
4,697
6,009
1,704
41,690
69,586
(75,000)
-0.01%
0.00% (a)
0.00%
0.00%
It
(605)
7,233
(4,142)
4,697
(10,000)
6,009
(296)
(11,310)
(8,414)
79.85%
0.00% (b)
58.58%
0.00%
0.00% (c)
0.00%
85.20%
78.66% (d)
89.21%
nytt
(69,586)
229,711
161,355
ittt To
(87,586)
117,711
- 386.59%
205.10%
Itt
No seized items sold.
Expenditures budgeted as capital recorded as minor equip. Did not meet
capitalization threshold.
Rentals not needed in 2012.
Expenditures budgeted as capital recorded as minor equip. Did not meet
capitalization threshold.
** Variance = Actual over (under) prorated budget Fund 109
24
City of Tukwila
Debt Service Funds 2)O( - Revenue and Expenditures
As of December 31 2012
Revenue
Intergovernmental Revenue
Miscellaneous Revenue
Investment Earnings
Total Miscellaneous Revenue
Transfers In
Expenditures
80 Debt Service Principal
81 Debt Service Interest
Total Debt Service Funds
Transfers Out / Indirec cost allocation
��
�
Change in Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance
Cash and investments
(a) Investment earnings:
(b) Debt service:
66,657
3,000
3,000
3,126,717
TIE
2,386,658
1,249,003
3,635,661
46,664
% of year expired
66,657 $
28,421
28,421
2,770,995
0
25,421
25,421
(355,722)
�1'
(485,951)
1,991,540
1,178,464
(395,118)
(70,539)
(465,657)
(46,664)
100.00%
947.36% (a)
947.36%
88.62%
83.44% (b)
9435% (b)
87.19%
(303,931)
3,316,312
3,012,381
182,020
3,316,312
62.54%
Funds set aside to pay off golf course debt in 2013. Funds have been invested and
earning interest.
Contributed capital for SCORE debt.
** Variance = Actual over (under) prorated budget Fund 2XX
City of Tukwila
Open Space and Parks Acq. Fund 301 - Revenue and Expenditures
As of December 31 2012
Revenue
General Revenue
Property Taxes
Real Estate Excise Taxes
Total General Revenue
Charges for Services
Park Impact Fees
Total Charges for Services
Intergovernmental Revenue
Miscellaneous Revenue
Investment Earnings
Rents and Concessions
Total Miscel/aneous Revenue
4,4
Expenditures
11 Salaries
21 FICA
23 PERS
24 Industrial Insurance
25 Medical, Dental, Life, Optical
31 Office & Operating Supplies
41 Professional Services
44 Advertising
47 Public Uti!ity Services
48 Repairs & Maintenance
64 Capital Outlay
Total Park Acquisition Fund
Transfers Out / lndirect cost allocation
Change in Fund Balanc
Beginning Fund Balance
Stit
Cash and investments
65,000
100,250
165,250
25,000
25,000
500,000
7,000
5,000
12,000
241,849
375,255
617,104
21,128
21,128
% of year expired
176,849
275 005
451,854
(3,872)
410,888 (8S.112)
2,678
31,101
33,779
r• '1,
14,531
1.O78
1,044
68
2,265
6,735
239,000 216.432
867
5,664
29,706
1,110,278
1,388,669
1.010 000
2,049,000
100,653
(1,447,403)
32,016
(337,785)
1,427,973
1,068,126
(4 322)
26 .1O1
21,779
14,531
1,079
1,044
68
2,265
6,735
(22,568)
867
5,664
29,706
(699,722)
(660,331)
68,637
1,109,618
(2,565,549)
372.08% (a)
374.32% (b)
373.44%
84.51%
84.51%
82.1896
38.26%
622.02% (c)
281.50%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
90.56%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
61.34% (d)
67.77%
31.81%
23.34%
(a) Property taxes Revenue received in 2008, 2009 2010 receipted into deferred revenue. Funds have now
been earned so reclassified to revenue. Funds are from King County Proposition 1
for Duwamish Hill Preserve.
(b) REET: Budget was conservative and based on previous years revenue.
(c) Rents & concessions: Clearvvire Channel rental of property. Paid $25k for 1 year lease. Will be recorded
in general fund beginning in 2013.
(d) Capital outlay: Purchased land for $1.1M in 2012.
** Variance = Actual over (under) prorated budge Fund 301
26
City of Tukwila
Facility Replacement Fund 302 Revenue and Expenditures
As of December 31 2012
Revenue
Charges for Sorvices
Sales and Use Taxes
Total Charges for Services
Miscellaneous Revenue
Investment Earnings
Total Miscellaneous Revenue
�
Expenditures
11 Salaries
21 FICA
23 PERS
24 Industrial Insurance
25 Medical, Dental, Life, Optical
31 Office & Operating Supplies
41 Professional Services
45 Operating Rentals & Leases
47 Public Utility Services
49 Miscellaneous
64 Capital Outlay
Total Expenditures
Transfers Out / Indirect cos allocation
Change in Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance
Cash and investments
(a) Capital outlay:
326 $
326
5,602
5,602
14,000
87,000
(106,372)
1,880,193
% of year expired
25 $ (301)
25
3,727
3,727
870
59
63
9
92
385
14,008
105
7,872
657
24,119
1,127
(21,494)
2,027,014
2,105,864
(1,875)
(1,875)
870
59
63
9
92
385
8
105
7,872
657
(73,000)
(62,881)
(24,173
7.82%
66.52%
66.52%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
100.05%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00% (a)
27.7296
4.45%
84,878
146,821
Demo ofToquahaRicnnahoonTlB that didn't happen.
** Variance = Actual over (under) prorated budget Fund 302
20.21%
107.81%
City of Tukwila
General Government Improvements 303 - Revenue and Expenditures
As of December 31 2012
% of year expired
100.00%
Revenue
Intergovernmental Revenue
Miscellaneous Revenue
Investment Earnings
Other Misc Revenue
Total Miscellaneous Revenue
Transfers In
Expenditures
11 Salaries
13 Overtime
21 FICA
23 PERS
24 Industrial Insurance
25 Medical, Dental, Life, Optical
31 Office & Operating Supplies
35 Small Tools & Minor Equipment
41 Professional Services
44 Advertising
48 Repairs & Maintenance
49 Miscellaneous
64 Capital Outlay
Total Fire Impact Fees
Transfers Out / Indirect cost allocation
Change in Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance
58,077
842
842
1,650,000
97,296
7,819
8,800
1,100
14,798
440,000
1,160,000
1,729,813
43,179
1,169,003 $ 1,110,926
885
4,939
5,824
1,210,000
43
4,939
4,982
(440,000)
49,791
783
3,794
3,622
757
8,642
10,068
57,193
1,403,580
2,030
127,038
79,593
306,046
2,052,937
(47, 505)
783
(4,025)
(5,178)
(343)
(6,156)
10,068
57,193
963,580
2,030
127,038
79,593
(853,954)
323,124
26,673 (16,506)
2012.85% (a)
105.15%
- (b)
691.73%
73.33%
51.17%
0.00%
48.52%
41.15%
68.85%
58.40%
0.00%
0.00%
319.00% (c)
0.00%
0.00% (d)
0.00%
26.38% (c)
118.68%
61.77%
(64,073)
291,987
305,218
608,612
369,291
316,625
- 476.36%
208.44%
Cash and investments
(a) Intergovernmental revenue:
(b) Misc revenue:
(c) Professional svcs & capital:
(d) Repairs & maintenance:
164,599
Received funds from King County Flood Control District to help pay for removal
of Hesco containers.
Grant received from PSE.
Hesco removal budgeted as capital but recorded properly as professional services,
not capital.
6300 bldg fire alarm upgrade, installation of furniture for police dept remodel.
** Variance = Actual over (under) prorated budget Fund 303
28
City of Tukw la
Fire Impact Fees 304 - Revenue and Expenthtures
As of December 31 2012
Revenue
Charges for Se,vices
Fire Impact Fees
Total Charges for Services
Investment Earnings
Total Miscellaneous Revenue
Expenditures
64 Capital Outlay
r
Change in Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance
Cash and investments
(a) Fire impact fees:
50,000
50,000
100
100
% of year expired
33.086 $ (16.314)
33,686 (16,314)
505
505
iht
50,100
190,100
roo
11° RTILISO°
34,191
313,819
$ 348,010
OnIy assessed on new constructiori.
^^Vahanco= Actual over (under) prorated budget Fund 304
405
405
(15,909)
123,719
67.37% (a)
67.37%
504.64%
504.64%
0.00%
City of Tukwila
Water Fund 401 - Revenue and Expenditures
As of December 31 2012
Revenue
Charges for Services
Water Sales
Security
Total Charges for Services
Intergovernmental Revenue
Miscellaneous Revenue
Investment Eamings
Connection fees
Other Misc Revenue
Total Miscellaneous Revenue
Transfers In hydrant rental
Expenditures
11 Salaries
12 Extra Labor
13 Overtime
21 FICA
23 PERS
24 Industrial Insurance
25 Medical, Dental, Life, Optical
26 Unemployment Compensation
28 Uniform Clothing
31 Office & Operating Supplies
33 Water Purchased for Resale
35 Small Tools & Minor Equipment
41 Professional Services
42 Communication
43 Travel
45 Operating Rentals & Leases
46 Insurance
47 Public Utility Services
48 Repairs & Maintenance
49 Miscellaneous
53 Excise Taxes
54 Interfund utility taxes
64 Capital Outlay
80 Debt Service Principal
81 Debt Service Interest
Total Water Fund
Transfers Out / Indirect cost allocation
Change in Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance
Cash and investments
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
Investment eamings:
Water purchased for resale:
Professional services:
Operating rentals & leases:
Misc:
Excise taxes:
Capital outlay:
5,041,000
1.000
5,042,000
9,234
25,000
300
34,534
106,000
5.181,455
90
5,181,545
% of year expired
140,455
(910)
139,545
3,791 3,791
57,370
3,550
9,318
70,238
98,460
48,136
(21,450)
9,018
35,704
(7,540)
100.00%
102.79%
9.00%
102.77%
0.00%
621.30% (a)
14.20%
3106.00%
203.39%
92.89%
556,692 553,275 (3,417) 99.39%
6,000 3,220 (2,780) 53.67%
5,738 5,501 (237) 95.87%
42,472 42,251 (221) 99.48%
49.851 39,596 (10,255) 79.43%
14,137 11,198 (2,939) 79.21%
113,690 121,487 7,797 106.86%
1,000 - (1,000) 0.00%
1,330 1,237 (93) 92.98%
93,181 97,764 4,583 104.92%
2,068,000 2,203,061 135,061 106.53% (b)
9,500 17,987 8,487 189.33% (c)
314,300 141,390 (172,910) 44.99% (d)
2,500 530 (1,970) 21.19%
1,500 1,336 (164) 89.09%
60,919 67,416 6,497 110.66%
20,260 20,260 - 100.00%
23,000 19,494 (3,506) 84.76%
3,000 2,624 (376) 87.46%
14,811 36,518 21,707 246.56% (e)
184,000 216,870 32,870 117.86% (f)
517,000 518,461 1,461 100.28%
1,287,000 59,921 (1,227,079) 4.66% (g)
438,881 438,880 (1) 100.00%
116,111 121,082 4,971 104.28%
5,944,873 4,741,356 (1,203,517) 79.76%
517,377 517,377 100.00%
(1,279,716) 95,300 1,375,016 -7.45%
1,959,365 5,982,649 4,023,284 305.34%
f
$ 4,635,412
US Bank CD interest not budgeted.
Based on actual consumption.
Did not complete Andover Park West project in 2012.
Ajustment of ER &R costs to actual.
Fees for processing credit cards.
Budget has been $184k since 2008 but as revenue increases, so does the tax.
Need to revise budget to reflect current taxes owed.
Did not complete Andover Park West Project in 2012.
**Variance = Actual over (under) prorated budget Fund 401
30
City of Tukwila
Sewer Fund 402 - Revenue and Expenditures
As of December 31 2012
% of year expired
100.00%
Revenue
Charges for Services
Sewer Sales
Total Charges for Services
Miscellaneous Revenue
Investment Earnings
Connection fees
Total Miscellaneous Revenue
Expenditures
11 Salaries
12 Extra Labor
13 Overtime
21 FICA
23 PERS
24 Industrial Insurance
25 Medical, Dental, Life, Optical
26 Unemployment Compensation
28 Uniform Clothing
31 Office & Operating Supplies
33 Metro Sewage Treatment
35 Small Tools & Minor Equipment
41 Professional Services
42 Communication
43 Travel
44 Advertising
45 Operating Rentals & Leases
46 Insurance
47 Public Utility Services
48 Repairs & Maintenance
49 Miscellaneous
53 Excise Taxes
54 Interfund utility tax
64 Capital Outlay
80 Debt Service Principal
81 Debt Service Interest
Total Sewer Fund
Transfers Out/Indirect cost allocation
Change in Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance
5,398,000 5 6,468,930 $ 1,070,930
5,398,000 6,468,930 1,070,930
4,426
120,000
124,426
267.360
8,000
3,442
20,338
23,943
6,156
50,356
1.000
570
22,491
3,749,000
4,000
161,600
2.500
500
150
124,415
15,195
22,050
43,000
8.799
40.000
543,000
770,000
272.861
83,337
6,244,063
21,084
103,800
139,990
307,638
4,233
4,036
24,073
22,542
5,340
55,565
579
17,731
3,611,261
6,592
13,347
1,467
940
128,375
15,195
31,085
25,865
35,958
83,069
647,043
469,386
272,861
66,278
5,850,458
446,980 446,980
(1,168,617)
1,158.774
312,996
1,886,825
16,658
(16,200)
15,564
40,278
(3,768)
594
3,735
(1,401)
(816)
5,209
(1,000)
9
(4,760)
(137,739)
2,592
(148,253)
(1,033)
440
(150)
3,960
9,035
(17,135)
27,159
43,069
104,043
(300,614)
(0)
(17,059)
(393,605)
0
1,481,613
728,051
119.84% (a)
119.84%
476.37% (b)
86.50%
112.51%
115.07% (c)
52.91%
117.25%
118.36%
94.15%
86.75%
110.35%
0.00%
101.60%
78.84%
96.33% (d)
164.79%
8.26% (e)
58.68%
187.96%
0.00%
103.18%
100.00%
140.97%
60.15% (f)
408.65% (g)
207.67% (h)
119.16% (i)
60.96% (j)
100.00%
79.53% (k)
93.70%
100.00%
- 26.78%
162.83%
Cash and investments
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
Sewer sales:
Investment earnings:
Salaries:
Metro sewage treatment:
Professional services:
Repairs & maintenance:
Misc:
Excise taxes:
Interfund utility taxes:
Capital outlay:
Debt service interest:
1,584,458
Sewer rates raised but budget not adjusted.
Interest earned on receivables included in this category.
Staff from Water, Surface Water, and Street help out during the year when Sewer
is short due to employee leave.
Based on actual usage.
Comprehensive sewer plan will be completed in 2013 rather than 2012.
Actual needed repairs lower than estimated.
Additional costs for Eden support, credit card processing fees.
Budget has been $40k since 2005 but as revenue increases, so does the tax.
Need to revise budget to reflect current taxes owed.
based on actual earnings and budget is conservative.
South city limits sewer extension (Southcenter Pkway extension).
Interest paid in full.
** Variance = Actual over (under) prorated budget Fund 402
31
City of Tukwila
Foster Golf Course 411- Revenue and Expenditures
As of December 31 2012
Revenue
General Revenue
Excise Taxes
Total General Revenue
Charges for Services
Sale of Merchandise
Greens Fees, Instruction
Total Charges for Services
Miscellaneous Revenue
Investment Earnings
Rents and Concessions
Other Misc Revenue
Total Miscellaneous Revenue
Transfers In
Expenditures
11 Salaries
12 Extra Labor
13 Overtime
21 FICA
23 PERS
24 Industrial Insurance
25 Medical, Dental, Life, Optical
26 Unemployment Compensation
28 Uniform Clothing
31 Office & Operating Supplies
34 Items Purchased for Resale
35 Small Tools & Minor Equipment
41 Professional Services
42 Communication
43 Travel
44 Advertising
45 Operating Rentals & Leases
46 Insurance
47 Public Utility Services
48 Repairs & Maintenance
49 Miscellaneous
53 Excise Taxes
54 Interfund admissions tax
64 Capital Outlay
80 Debt Service Principal
81 Debt Service Interest
Total Foster Golf Course Fund
Transfers Out / Indirect cost allocation
Change in Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance
Cash and investments
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(t)
(9)
(h)
(i)
G)
(k)
Green fees /instruction:
Investment earnings:
Rents & concessions:
Salaries:
Office & operating supplies:
Items purchased for resales:
Professional services:
Communication:
Public utility sery ices:
Capital outlay:
Debt service:
% of year expired
1,617 $ 3,531 $ 1,914
1,617
151,000
1,205,500
1,356,500
1,130
331,000
332,130
225,000
1
686,142
133,900
6,885
51,306
61,449
15,565
123,977
11,000
1,164
98,908
130.500
2,500
10,000
9,700
1.250
7,000
101,650
15,195
64,765
36,000
39,722
6.000
67,000
25,000
212,959
138,064
2,057,601
15,160
(157, 514)
52,831
3,531
139,673
1,005,602
1,145,274
21,660
278,758
(494)
299,924
225,000
590,738
102,784
1,211
52,633
48,185
16,568
102,586
941
81,522
95,484
1,653
5.830
2,847
127
3,936
95,598
15,195
46,956
31,739
32,725
6,203
59,268
1,394,730
15,160
1,914
(11,327)
(199,898)
(211,226)
20,530
(52,242)
(494)
(32,206)
(95,404)
(31,116)
(5,674)
1,327
(13,264)
1,003
(21,391)
(11,000)
(223)
(17, 386)
(35,016)
(847)
(4,170)
(6,853)
(1,123)
(3,064)
(6,052)
(17,809)
(4,261)
(6,997)
203
(7,732)
(25,000)
(212,959)
(138,064)
(662,871)
(0)
100.00%
218.37%
218.37%
92.50%
83.42% (a)
84.43%
1916.82% (b)
84.22% (c)
0.00%
90.30%
100.00%
86.10% (d)
76.76%
17.58%
102.59%
78.41%
106.44%
82.75%
0.00%
80.85%
82.42% (e)
73.17% (f)
66.14%
58.30% (g)
29.35% (h)
10.19%
56.23%
94.05%
100.00%
72.50% (i)
88.17%
82.39%
103.38%
88.46%
0.00% (j)
0.00% (k)
0.00% (k)
67.78%
100.00%
VSP
263,840
140,550
$ 309,581
421,354
87,719
- 167.50%
266.04%
Golf is subject to weather and economy. Not as many rounds as expected.
Conservative budget.
Revenue stream directly tied to number of rounds.
Director of Parks /Recreation originally budgeted 25% of salary to golf course.
Charged 100% to Parks /Rec.
Staff tried to watch all costs and be as efficient as possible.
Reduction in number of rounds also results in reduction in items needed for resale.
Staff tried to watch all costs and be as efficient as possible.
Staff tried to watch all costs and be as efficient as possible.
Based on actual comsumption.
Replacement of bathroom counters has been put on hold.
Bond debt of 13.4 million to finance the construction of the clubhouse was transferred
** Variance = Actual over (under) prorated budget
32
Fund 411
City of Tukwila
Surface Water Fund 412 - Revenue and Expenditures
As of December 31 2012
Revenue
Charges for Services
Surface Water Sales
Total Charges for Services
Intergovernmental Revenue
Miscellaneous Revenue
Investment Earnings
Capital contributions
Other Misc Revenue
Total Miscellaneous Revenue
Gain /(Loss) Sale of Capital Assets
f'
Expenditures
11 Salaries
12 Extra Labor
13 Overtime
21 FICA
23 PERS
24 Industrial Insurance
25 Medical, Dental, Life, Optical
26 Unemployment Compensation
28 Uniform Clothing
31 Office & Operating Supplies
35 Small Tools & Minor Equipment
41 Professional Services
42 Communication
43 Travel
44 Advertising
45 Operating Rentals & Leases
46 Insurance
47 Public Utility Services
48 Repairs & Maintenance
49 Miscellaneous
53 Excise Taxes
54 Interfund utility tax
64 Capital Outlay
80 Debt Service Principal
81 Debt Service Interest
Total Surface Water Fund
Transfers Out
Change in Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance
Cash and investments
(a) Intergovernmental revenue:
(b) Capital contributions:
(c) Office & operating supplies:
(d) Professional services:
(e) Operating rentals & leases:
(f) Public utility services:
(f) Repairs & maintenance:
(h) Excise taxes:
(i) Capital outlay:
3,660,309
3,660,309
44,000
11,091
11,091
% of year expired
3,675,605 $ 15,296
15,296
130,714 86,714
3,675,605
20,401
25,253
362
49,016
(72)
g�anod7,
9,310
28,253
362
37,925
(72)
100.00%
100.42%
100.42%
297.08% (a)
183.94%
0.00% (b)
0.00%
441.95%
0.00%
721,168 721,712 544 100.08%
23,000 21,972 (1,029) 95.53%
11,653 11,626 (27) 99.77%
54,463 56,117 1,654 103.04%
64,589 51,602 (12,987) 79.89%
17,301 13,049 (4,252) 75.42%
167,666 149,952 (17,714) 89.43%
1,000 - (1,000) 0.00%
1,425 1,080 (345) 75.78%
42,521 67.632 25,111 159.06% (c)
3,000 2,501 (499) 83.36%
628,570 483,129 (145,441) 76.86% (d)
2.000 361 (1,639) 18.04%
2,000 1,752 (248) 87.58%
500 1,494 994 298.82%
96,638 86,632 (10,006) 89.65% (e)
15,195 15,195 - 100.00%
61,600 81,433 19,833 132.20% (f)
13,965 44,739 30,774 320.36% (g)
6,685 32,932 24,247 379.19%
25,000 50,728 25,728 202.91% (h)
371,000 369,077 (1,923) 99.48%
1,510,000 666,092 (843,908) 44.11% (1)
286,554 286,553 (1) 100.00%
30,514 30,572 58 100.19%
4,160,007 3,247,930 (912,077) 78.08%
400,786 400,786 0 100.00%
)it�P.
(845,393) 206,547 1,051,940 24.43%
937,263 2.122.611 1,185,348 226.47%
$ 2,344,887
Received $50,000 grant from Municipal Stormwater Capacity Grant program
that was not budgeted. Budgeted $44,000 for KCFCAD opportunity funds but
received $65,000.
Infrastructure built by contractors and turned over to the City. Never budgeted.
Supplies for NPDES program (national pollutant discharge elimination system).
Reclassification of capital expenditures to non - capital.
Reduction in monthly transfers to fund 501.
Reflects increase in waste materials disposal for 2012.
Reclassification of expenditures from capital.
Budget has been $25k since 2007 but as revenue increases, so does tax.
Need to revise budget.
Private storm system adoption, storm lift station #15, reclass expenditures from
capital to non - capital.
* *Variance = Actual over (under) prorated budget Fund 412
33
City of Tukwila
Equipment Rental /Replacement Fund 501 - Revenue and Expenditures
As of December 31 2012
% of year expired
100.00%
Revenue
Charges for Services
ERR O &M Dept Charges
Equipment Replacement Charges
Fuel Sales
Transportation
Total Charges for Services
Intergovernmental Revenue
Miscellaneous Revenue
Investment Earnings
Other Misc Revenue
Total Miscellaneous Revenue
Sale of Capital Assets
Expenditures
11 Salaries
12 Extra Labor
13 Overtime
21 FICA
23 PERS
24 Industrial Insurance
25 Medical, Dental, Life, Optical
26 Unemployment Compensation
28 Uniform Clothing
31 Office & Operating Supplies
34 Items Purchased for Resale
35 Small Tools & Minor Equipment
41 Professional Services
42 Communication
43 Travel
45 Operating Rentals & Leases
46 Insurance
48 Repairs & Maintenance
49 Miscellaneous
64 Capital Outlay
Total Equipment Rental Fund
Transfers Out
Change in Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance
Cash and investments
(a) ERR O &M Dept Charges:
(b) Equip replacement chgs:
(c) Fuel sales:
(c) Investment Earnings:
(e) Repairs & Maintenance:
(f) Capital Outlay:
1.099,806
777.801
474,000
150
2,351,757
14,269
14,269
1,212,055
717,452
454,368
2,383,875
10,783
47,672
252
47,923
59,790
112,249
(60.349)
(19,632)
(150)
32,118
10,783
33,403
252
33,654
59,790
352.844 353,961 1,117
10,000 12,177 2,177
1.147 1,970 823
26,814 28,050 1,236
31,601 26,458 (5,143)
9.976 8,788 (1,188)
82,161 77,902 (4,259)
1,000 - (1,000)
950 701 (249)
2,979 1,370 (1,609)
689,000 669,148 (19,852)
2,500 4,484 1,984
550 1,652 1,102
2,000 1,294 (706)
- 144 144
37.399 33,204 (4,195)
10,130 10,130 -
130,781 111,371 (19,410)
6,500 8,413 1,913
322,000 241,246 (80,754)
1,720,332 1,592,463 (127,869)
09;667 309,667 0
5.
7
336,027 600,243 264,216
3,410,129 3,532,153 122,024
4,143,268
110.21% (a)
92.24% (b)
95.86% (c)
0.00%
101.37%
0.00%
334.09% (d)
0.00%
335.86%
0.00%
100.32%
121.77%
171.78%
104.61%
83.73%
88.10%
94.82%
0.00%
73.81%
46.00%
97.12%
179.35%
300.32%
64.70%
0.00%
88.78%
100.00%
85.16% (e)
129.42%
74.92% (f)
92.57%
100.00%
1
178.63%
103.58%
Additional charges over budget to reconcile to actual exenditures; mostly depts fire,
public works, parks maintenance, and street maintenance.
Adjusted in December to reflect actual
Adjusted in December to reflect actual
Fund bought investments from other funds and interest earnings followed the investment
Repairs less than budgeted. Standard budget but actual costs each year fluxuate.
2012 was higher than normal.
Command car for BC (fire) was not purchased as planned
** Variance = Actual over (under) prorated budget Fund 501
34
City of Tukwila
lnsurance Fund 502 - Revenue and Expenditures
As of December 31 2012
% of year expired
100.00%
Revenue
Charges for Service
Employee Benefit Programs
Total Charges for Services
Miscellaneous Revenue
Investment Earnings
Employer Trust Contributions
Employee Contributions
Other Misc Revenue
Total Miscellaneous Revenue
Expenditures
25 Medical, Derital, Life, Optical
41 Professional Services
49 Miscellaneous
Total
Transfe
Mt
s Ou / Indirect cost allocation
Change in Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance
*�01:kr[d/������
Cash and investments
(a) Investment earnings:
(b) Professional services:
� 621
621
�
10,032
$ 4.367.715
�
60,000
�
6,200
4,443,947
4,700,000
25.000
20,500
4,745,500
113,548
attfier
(414,480)
4,431,820
748 $
127
748 127 120.42%
261,668
4,329,483
63,766
4,654,916
4,713,591
34,354
16,509
4,764,454
80,305
(189,094)
4,983,480
5,988,312
251,636
(38,232)
3,766
(6,200)
210,969
2608.33%(a)
99.12%
106.28%
0.00%
104.75%
�
ARENET 737$ MUM
13,591
9,354
(3,991)
18,954
100.29%
137.42% (b)
80.53%
100.40%
(33,243) 70.72%
225,386
551,660
45.62%
112.45%
Fund bough investments from other funds that needed the cash in 2011 but budge
for interest earnings never adjusted.
Fund is now required to have an actuarial valuation performed for fund projections on
an annual basis at a cost of $10,500 Budget for 2013-2014 is still $25k a year.
Budget may need to be adjusted to reflect the additional required expense.
** Variance = Actual over (under) prorated rated budget Fund 502
City of Tukwila
LEOFF Insurance Fund 503 - Revenue and Expenditures
As of December 31 2012
% of year expired
100.00%
Revenue
Miscellaneous Revenue
Investment Earnings
Employer Trust Contributions
Other Misc Revenue
Expenditures
25 Medical, Dental, Life, Optical
41 Professional Services
49 Miscellaneous
Total
Transfers Out
Change in Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance
Cash and investments
(a; Employer Trust Contributions:
(b; Medical, dental, life, optical:
(c; Miscellaneous:
3,340
575,000
700
659,530
3,000
10,000
672,530
9,995
(103,485)
1,246,806
3,565
467,007
$ 225
(107,993)
(700)
106.73%
81.22% (a)
0.00%
380,867
1,870
670
383,407
4,619
1'1 git
82,546
1,628,986
$ 1,921,032
If
(278, 663)
(1,130)
(9,330)
(289,123)
(5,376)
186,031
382,180
idt
57.75% (b)
62.33%
6.70% (c)
57.01%
46.21%
- 79.77%
130.65%
Budget was set at 2010 actual contribution rates. There was a decision to lower
contribution rates due to fund balances exceeding required minimums.
Budget was set at 2010 actual expenditures. Actual expenditures were lower than
expected and budget was not adjusted
Budget was increased in 2010 but expenses have not been even close to the budget
of $10k. Highest was in 2011 of $3,100
*" Variance = Actual over (under) prorated budget Fund 503
36
COUNCIL AGENDA *SYNOPSIS
Initials
Meeting Date
Prepared by
Mayor's review
ounci eview
05/28/13
BB
fil/P(
2
06/03/13
BB
E Public Hearing
Mtg Date
Other
Mtg Date
Mtg Date
SPONSOR Counti l E Mayor E HR Z DCD E. Finance LI Fire E IT E P&R E Polzce NV
SPONSOR'S The State Building Code Council has adopted the 2012 Washington State Building Code
SUMMARY with a statewide effective date of July 1,2013. The State Building Code and related
construction codes must be adopted by the local jurisdiction to be enforceable as the City's
Building construction code. The Council is being asked to approve the adopting ordinance
and related fee schedules.
REVIEWED BY E COW Mtg. Z CA&P Cmte E F&S Cmte E Transportation Cmte
Ei Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. E Parks Comm. r Planning Comm.
DATE: 5/13/13 COMMITTEE CHAIR: EKBERG
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR/ADMIN.
COMMITTEE
Department of Community Development
Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole
COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE
ITEM INFORMATION
ITEM NO.
4.A.
37
STAFF SPONSOR: BOB BENEDICTO
ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 5/28/13
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Ordinance to adopt the 2012 State Building Code and Washington State Energy
Code.
CATEGORY Discussion
Mtg Date 05/28/13
[ Motion
Mtg Date
E Resolution
Mtg Date
Z Ordinance
Mtg Date 06/03/13
1 Bid
Award
E Public Hearing
Mtg Date
Other
Mtg Date
Mtg Date
SPONSOR Counti l E Mayor E HR Z DCD E. Finance LI Fire E IT E P&R E Polzce NV
SPONSOR'S The State Building Code Council has adopted the 2012 Washington State Building Code
SUMMARY with a statewide effective date of July 1,2013. The State Building Code and related
construction codes must be adopted by the local jurisdiction to be enforceable as the City's
Building construction code. The Council is being asked to approve the adopting ordinance
and related fee schedules.
REVIEWED BY E COW Mtg. Z CA&P Cmte E F&S Cmte E Transportation Cmte
Ei Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. E Parks Comm. r Planning Comm.
DATE: 5/13/13 COMMITTEE CHAIR: EKBERG
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR/ADMIN.
COMMITTEE
Department of Community Development
Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole
COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
SO SO $0
Fund Source: N/A
Contments: No negative impact to general fund.
MTG. DATE
RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
05/28/13
MTG. DATE
ATTACHMENTS
05/28/13
Informational Memorandum dated 5/6/13
Draft Ordinance
Minutes from the Community Affairs and Parks Committee meeting of 5/13/13
06/3/13
37
38
TO:
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
Mayor Haggerton,
Community Affairs and Parks Committee
FROM: Jack Pace, DCD Director
BY: Bob Benedicto, Building Official
DATE: May 6, 2013
SUBJECT: Adoption of the 2012 State Building Code, 2012 Washington State Energy
Code, related permit fee schedules and fee adjustment methodology.
ISSUE
The State Building Code Council has adopted the 2012 Washington State Building Codes with a
state wide effective date of July 1, 2013. Shall the City Council approve the adoption of the
2012 State Building Code, 2012 Washington State Energy Code and related fee adjustment
methodology?
BACKGROUND
The State Building Code Council was created to advise the legislature on building code issues
and to develop the building codes used in the State of Washington. In the course of
development of the State Building Code the Council holds public hearings, considers proposed
state amendments and finally adopts the international model codes and amendments. This
occurs on a three year cycle. The following 2012 editions of the model codes make up the
referenced State Building Code:
• International Building Code, standards and amendments.
• International Residential Code, standards and amendments.
• International Mechanical Code, standards and amendments.
• International Fire Code, standards and amendments.
• Uniform Plumbing Code, standards and amendments.
In conjunction with the adoption of the State Building Code the State Building Code Council has
replaced the 2009 Washington State Energy Code with the 2012 International Energy
Conservation Code with state amendments.
The State Building Code Council is continuing to work towards a goal of 70 %reduction in net
annual energy consumption in newly constructed residential and nonresidential buildings by
2031. The reduction is being made by an incremental reduction during each code cycle
compared to the benchmark 2006 Washington State Energy Code.
The 2012 Washington State Energy Code is intended to produce a total 24% reduction in
energy consumption for residential buildings and 18% reduction in energy consumption for
commercial buildings. Adoption of the 2012 Washington State Energy Code will allow the
building and inspection program to enforce this law in Tukwila and maintain all new construction
on a path leading to the State's energy reduction goal.
39
40
INFORMATIONAL MEMO
Page 2
DISCUSSION
Why adopt the codes. - Adoption of the State Building Codes by the City Council is necessary
to enable legal enforcement of the new codes within the jurisdiction. The design community,
contractors, developers, manufacturers, material suppliers and the standards publishers all
depend on state wide uniformity in the codes that impact their businesses. More importantly the
citizens of Tukwila deserve to know that the built environment that they live, work and play in
are designed with the latest health, fire and life safety measures.
The model codes listed herein are revised in a code change process that takes place on a three
year cycle. In the listed code change year the State building Code Council reviews the codes
and adds State amendments that reflect conditions that are unique to Washington State. The
2012 International Building Code (for example) is composed of 585 pages and 34 chapters.
Virtually every chapter has amendments made in the national code change process. Add to this
the State amendments, and there is an enormous amount of change taking place in each code
cycle.
To forego adoption of the new edition of the construction codes would leave Tukwila in the
position of not being able to enforce the current State law. The result could impact the design
and construction industries in Tukwila and at some point it could affect the City's insurance
classification through the Washington Surveying & Rating Bureau.
Fee Adjustment Methodology. - Nothing in Chapter 82.02.020 RCW of the State law prohibits
cities from collecting reasonable fees from an applicant for a permit or other governmental
approval to cover the cost to the city of processing applications, inspecting, reviewing plans, and
preparing detailed statements required by Chapter 43.21 C RCW (State Environmental Policy
Act). By this authority, all jurisdictions that administer a building permit and inspection program
are allowed to collect reasonable fees and recover the costs related to a permit and inspection
program.
The City's construction permit and inspection program is funded through Tukwila's general fund.
The permit fees serve to recover some of the program funding. The last permit fee adjustment
occurred in conjunction with the adoption of the 2009 State Building Code. A permit fee
adjustment has not occurred since then. Prior to the last fee adjustment there has not been a
consistent method for determining or justifying when a permit fee adjustment should be made.
In 2012 our development permit and inspection program recovered 47.5 %1 of the cost budgeted
to the department for administration of the permit and inspection program. As future
expenditures in personnel salaries, wages and benefits rise, the program's recovery rate will
decrease. In time the recovery rate would become marginal as it relates to recovery of funding
for the program.
The proposed permit fee adjustment methodology is intended to maintain no Tess than our
current recovery rate by indexing our permit fee schedules to the Consumer Price Index for
Seattle, Tacoma, and Bremerton. There would be a 2.7% increase in the fee schedules that
would be effective July 1, 2013 through 2014. The need for all future fee adjustments would be
reviewed with the adoption of each biennium budget. Factors involved in the permit fee review
would be the consumer price index, the projected department budget and the total fee recovery
of the previous year.
1 Permit revenue of $1.53 million as a percent of Building Div. Planning Div. and Permit Coordination's combined budgets for 2012
($2.424 million).
W:12013 Info Memos- CouncillBuildingCode.doc
INFORMATIONAL MEMO
Page 3
In this manner a recovery rate of 50% would be maintained as the benchmark for the
permit/inspection program. As the CPI remains constant and does not affect the recovery rate,
there would be no adjustments to the fee schedules. Consequently, this methodology would
provide incremental increases in fees (when necessary) and provide for an audit of the fee
schedules during each biennium budget process. The proposed adopting ordinance includes
the code related fee schedules with a 2.7% increase.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The adjustment to the fee schedules will provide an increase in the collected fees for the
remainder of the biennium (eighteen months). There will be a need for private special inspection
services due to the expansion of the special inspection requirements in the new codes. These
inspection services are performed by private agencies and not City inspectors. Consequently,
there will be an increase in opportunities for the special inspection and testing agencies.
Implementation of the new codes will not have a negative effect on the general fund.
RECOMMENDATION
The Council is being asked to approve the adopting ordinance for the 2012 State Building code,
the 2012 Washington State Energy Code and proposed permit fee adjustments and consider
this at the May 28, 2013 Committee of the Whole meeting and subsequent June 3, 2013
Regular meeting.
ATTACHMENTS
Draft Ordinance
W:12013 Info Memos- CouncillBuildingCode.doc
41
42
DRAFT
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NOS. 2121 (PART) AND
2171 (PART), AS CODIFIED IN TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE
CHAPTER 16.04, "BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION," ADOPTING
THE 2012 STATE BUILDING CODE AND INTERNATIONAL ENERGY
CONSERVATION CODE, 2012 EDITION; PROVIDING FOR THE
ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND COLLECTION OF FEES; REPEALING
ORDINANCE NOS. 2157, 2189, 2215, 2249 AND 2295, REPEALING
ORDINANCE NOS. 2121 §1 (PART) AND 2171 §1 (PART), AS
CODIFIED AT TMC SECTION 16.04.160, "WASHINGTON STATE
ENERGY CODE ADOPTED;" PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND
ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Codes enumerated in Chapter 19.27.031 RCW shall become
effective in all counties and cities of Washington State on July 1, 2013, and all
jurisdictions in the state shall enforce the State Building Code, as adopted by the State
Building Code Council, effective July 1, 2013; and
WHEREAS, the International Building Code, International Residential Code,
International Mechanical Code, and Uniform Plumbing Code are adopted by the State
Building Code Council as parts of the State Building Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt the 2012 edition of the International
Fuel Gas Code and the International Energy Conservation Code, 2012 Edition;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. TMC 16.04.010 Amended. Ordinance Nos. 2121 §1 (part) and 2171
§1 (part), as codified at TMC Section 16.04.010, "Purpose of Chapter," are amended to
read as follows:
16.04.010 Purpose of Chapter
TMC Chapter 16.04 is enacted for the purpose of adopting rules and regulations
governing the conditions and maintenance of all property, buildings and structures by
providing standards for supplied utilities, facilities and other physical things and
W: Word Processing \Ordinances\Building Code -2012 5 -6 -13
BB:bjs
Page 1 of 12
43
conditions essential to ensure that structures are safe, sanitary and fit for occupation
and use; governing the condemnation of buildings and structures unfit for human
occupancy, and use and abatement of such structures in Tukwila; regulating the
issuance of permits and the collection of fees; to help ensure the protection of the
health, safety and the general welfare of the public; and governing the creation,
construction, enlargement, conversion, alteration, repair, occupancy, use, height, court
area, sanitation, ventilation and maintenance of all buildings and structures within this
jurisdiction. The purpose of the codes adopted herein is not to create or otherwise
establish or designate any particular class or group of persons who will or should be
especially protected or benefited by the terms of these codes.
Section 2. TMC 16.04.020 Amended. Ordinance Nos. 2121 §1 (part) and 2171
§1 (part), as codified at TMC Section 16.04.020, "Codes Adopted," are amended to read
as follows:
16.04.020 Codes Adopted
Effective July 1, 20132010, the following codes are adopted by reference as if fully set
forth:
1. The International Building Code, 20122009 Edition, and referenced
standards hereto as published by the International Code Council, Inc., and as adopted
by the State of Washington in Chapter 51 -50 WAC. The following Appendices,
standards and amendments are specifically adopted:
a. Appendix E, Supplementary Accessibility Requirements.
b. ICC /ANSI A117.1- 20092003, American National Standard.
c. Work exempt from a building permit. Section 105.2 of the
International Building Code, 20122049 Edition, is amended to include provisions
regarding the following work exempt from a building permit:
(1) Work performed by the City of Tukwila and located in City of
Tukwila right -of -way; work performed by Washington State Department of
Transportation and located in WSDOT right -of -way to include public utility towers and
poles, mechanical equipment not specifically regulated in this code, hydraulic flood
control structures including levees; provided that any structure or building constructed in
a municipal or state right -of -way and intended to be used as any occupancy
classification of the State Building Code is not exempt from the provisions of this code
or the related permit requirements.
(2) One -story detached accessory structures used as tool and storage
sheds, playhouses and similar uses, provided the floor area does not exceed 120
square feet, and such structure is outside of and entirely separated, as prescribed by
Code, from any existing building on the premises.
(3) Decks not more than 30 inches abovc adjacent grade.
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Building Code -2012 5 -6 -13
BB:bjs
44
Page 2 of 12
2. The International Residential Code, 20122009 Edition as amended by
the State; provided that Chapters 11 and 25 through 43 of this code are not adopted.
Appendix G, "Swimming Pools, Spas and Hot Tubs," is included in the adoption of the
International Residential Code.
3. The Uniform Plumbing Code and the Uniform Plumbing Code
Standards, 20122009 Edition, published by the International Association of Plumbing
and Mechanical Officials, and as amended by the State of Washington, provided that
Chapters 12 and 15 of this code are not adopted. Provided further that those
requirements of the Uniform Plumbing Code relating to venting and combustion air of
fuel fired appliances as found in Chapter 5 and those portions of the code addressing
building sewers are not adopted. Appendixes A, B, D, E and I of the Uniform Plumbing
Code are hereby adopted by reference. Provided further that the following amendments
to the Uniform Plumbing Code are adopted:
a. All reference to and definition of "authority having jurisdiction" is
deemed to refer to and shall mean the "Building Official."
b. Water Supply and Distribution. Cross connection control for
premises isolation related to the City's public water system shall be in accordance with
the City of Tukwila Public Works Department's "Development Guidelines and Design
and Construction Standards." Cross connection control for premises isolation related to
water purveyors outside of the City of Tukwila water system shall be in accordance with
that water purveyor's policies and standards.
c. Sanitary Drainage. Side sewer, private sewer main extensions
beyond a point defined in the plumbing code as the building drain, and required grease
interceptors all within the City's sewer districts shall be in accordance with the City of
Tukwila Public Works Department's "Development Guidelines and Design and
Construction Standards," in conjunction with the Uniform Plumbing Code requirements.
"Sanitary drainage, side sewers, private sewer main extensions beyond the building
drain and grease interceptors outside the Tukwila sewer district shall be in compliance
with that purveyor's policies and standards.
4. The International Mechanical Code 20122009, as published by the
International Code Council and as amended by the State of Washington, Chapter 51 -52
WAC.
5. The International Fuel Gas Code, 20122009 Edition, as published by the
International Code Council, Inc. and as amended and adopted by the State of
Washington.
6. The Washington Cities Electrical Code. Article 80.3 of the National
Electrical Code: The 2008 Edition of the National Electrical Code (NFPA 70), including
Annex A, B and C; the 2007 Edition of Standard for the Installation of Stationary Pumps
for Fire Protection (NFPA 20- 2007); the 2005 Edition of Standard for Emergency and
Standby Power Systems (NFPA 110 - 2005); Commercial Building Telecommunications
Cabling Standard (ANSI/TIA/EIA 568 -B.1 June 2002 including Annex 1 through 5);
Commercial Building Standard for Telecommunications Pathway and Spaces
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Building Code -2012 5 -6 -13
BB:bjs
Page 3 of 12
45
(ANSI/TIA/EIA 569 -A -7 December 2001 including Annex 1 through 4); Commercial
Building Grounding and Bonding Requirements for Telecommunications (ANSI/TIA/EIA
607 -A- 2002); and the Residential Telecommunications Cable Standard (ANSI/TIA/EIA
570 -B -2004 are adopted and shall be applicable within the City of Tukwila as amended,
added to and excepted in the Washington Cities Electrical Code.
(a) Article 85.11 of the National Electrical Code, sections (A), (B) and (C),
is amended entirely and replaced as follows: The authority having jurisdiction within the
City of Tukwila shall mean the Building Official, and shall include the Chief Electrical
Inspector or other individuals or jurisdictions when designated by the Building Official.
All references to "Code Official" shall mean the Building Official or designee.
7. The International Property Maintenance Code, 2009 Edition, as
published by the International Code Council; including a new Section 404.8 as follows:
Dwelling as defined in Section 202 and pursuant to Section 404.7 shall be provided with
a kitchen sink, cooking appliances and refrigeration facilities, each having a clear
working space of not Tess than 30 inches (762mm) in front. Light and ventilation
conforming to this code shall be provided.
8. International Energy Conservation Code, 2012 Edition, as published by
the International Code Council, Inc. and as amended and adopted by the State of
Washington.
Section 3. TMC 16.04.030 Restated. TMC Section 16.04.030, "Filing Copies of
State Building Codes," is restated to read as follows:
16.04.030 Filing Copies of State Building Codes
The City Clerk shall maintain on file not less than one copy of the codes referred to
in TMC 16.04.020 and the codes shall be open to public inspection.
Section 4. TMC 16.04.250 Amended. Ordinance Nos. 2121 §1 (part) and 2171
§1 (part), as codified at TMC Section 16.04.250, "Schedule of Permit Fees," are
amended to read as follows:
16.04.250 Schedule of Permit Fees
A. Building permit fee schedule.
Total Valuation
Building Permit Fees
$1 to $500
$65.00 6300
$501 to $2,000
$65.00 63.00 for the first $500, plus $4.30 /1.20 for each
additional $100, or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000
$2,001 to $25,000
$129.50 126.00 for the first $2,000, $19.60 1-940 for
plus
each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, to and including
$25,000
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Building Code -2012 5 -6 -13
BB:bjs
46
Page 4 of 12
$25,001 to $50,000
$600.40 584.65 for the first $25,000, plus $15.30 44-90 for
each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, to and including
$50,000
$50,001 to $100,000
$983.25 957.'10 for the first $50,000, $10.60 10.30 for
plus
each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, to and including
$100,000
$100,001 to $500,000
$1,511.60 1,471.90 for the first $100,000, plus $8.50 85 for
each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, to and including
$500,000
$500,001 to
$4,906.30 4,777.30 for the first $500,000, plus $7.00 6-90 for
$1,000,000
each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, to and including
$1,000,000
$1,000,001 to
$8,443.25 8221.30 for the first $1,000,000, plus $4.70 4.55
$5,000,000 and-up
for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, to and
including $5,000,000
$5,000,001 and up
$27,243.25 for the first $5,000.000, plus $4.50 for each
$1,000 or fraction thereof
B. Non - Structural Plan Review Fee. A non - structural plan review fee shall be
paid at the time of submitting plans and specifications for review. The non - structural
plan review fee shall be 65% of the calculated permit fee as set forth in the permit fee
schedule. The non - structural plan review fee specified herein is a separate fee from the
permit fee and is in addition to the permit fee.
C. Structural Plan Review Fee. Where a structural plan review is deemed
necessary, a structural plan review fee shall be charged. The structural plan review fee
shall be 33% of the calculated non - structural plan review fee.
C. Other Fees.
1. Inspections outside normalbusiness hours: $9 ,1.50 per hour (Three hour
minimum charge).
2. Re inspection fee: $63.00 per hour assessed upon call for third inspection
of same correction notice.
3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated: $63.00 per hour (one
half hour minimum charge).
.,
4. Additional plan review necessary due to additions or revisions to the plans:
5. Work commencing before permit issuance shall be subject to an
investigation fee of 100% of the usual permit fee.
6. Renewal of expired permits: The fee shall be one half the amount
not exceeded one year. Renewals after expiration of more than one year shall require a
full permit fee and plan review fce where applicable.
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Building Code -2012 5 -6 -13
BB:bjs
Page 5 of 12
47
D. Mechanical permit fee schedule.
Valuation of
Work (Total
Contract Amount)
Mechanical Permit Fee
$32.50 33.60 For issuance of each (base fee)
permit
$250 or less
$65.00 63.00
$251 to $500
$65.00 63.00 for first $250, plus $7.83 7.65 for each $100
or fraction thereof, to and including $500
$501 to $1,000
$84.60 82.15 for the first $500, plus $8.70 8.50 for each
$100 or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000
$1,001 to $5,000
$128.10 124.70 for the first $1,000, plus $9.65 940 for
each $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $5,000
$5,001 to $50,000
$166.70 162.25 for the first $5,000, plus $10.05 &80 for
each $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000
$50,001 to $250,000
$639.20 604.05 for the first $50,000, plus $8.40 840 for
each $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $250,000
$250,001 to $1,000,000
$2,319.20 2,2 '12.05 for the first $250,000, $7.40 7:20
plus
for each $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including
$1,000,000
$1,000,001 and up
$7,869.20 7,636.45 for the first $1,000,000, $6.70 6:55
plus
for each $1,000 or fraction thereof
1. When a plan or other data is required to be submitted with a permit
application, a plan review fee shall be paid at the time of submitting plans and
L .
o_
completed: $63.00 per hour (one half hour minimum)
2. Other fees.
(a) Work commencing before permit issuance shall be subject to an
invcstigation fee of 100% of the usual permit fee.
b. Inspections outside of normal business hours: $91.50 per hour with a
c. Re inspection fee asseosed: $63.00 per hour.
E. Plumbing permit fee schedule.
1. Permit Issuance - Issuance of each permit (base fee): $32.50 33.60.
2. Unit Fee Schedule (in addition toitems 1 & 2 above base fee in
subparagraph E.1.
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Building Code -2012 5 -6 -13
BB:bjs
48
Page 6 of 12
For one plumbing fixture (a fixture is a sink, toilet, bathtub, etc.)
$65.00 63.00
For each additional fixture
$14.00 4-3.65
For each building sewer and each trailer park sewer
$24.80 24.15
Rain water system -- per drain (inside building)
$14.00 13.65
For each water heater and /or vent
$14.00 4 -3.65
For each industrial waste pretreatment interceptor, including its trap
and vent, except for kitchen type grease interceptors
$28.001 -3.65
$1-7,05
interceptor for kitchens than 750
$29.10 28.35
For each grease commercial (less
gallon capacity)
For each repair or alteration of water piping and /or water treating
equipment, each occurrence
$14.001 -3:-65
For each repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping, each fixture
$14.00165
For each medical gas piping system serving one to five inlets /outlets for
a specific gas
$82.00 79.80
For each additional medical gas inlets /outlets
$16.20 15.75
For each lawn sprinkler system on any one (1) meter; including
$29.10 28.35
devices therefor.(1 5) ATMOS breakers,
backflow protection vacuum
For atmospheric -type vacuum breakers not included in lawn sprinkler
backflow protection:
1 to 5: $14.001- 3.65;
Over 5: $14.001 for first 5 $3.25 3.15 for each additional
-3.65 plus
For each backflow protective device other than atmospheric type
vacuum breakers:
2 -inch diameter and smaller: $29.10 2- 8.35;
Over 2 -inch diameter: $32.25 30.45
it Other Inspectiens & Fees (Plumbing):
Inspection outside of normal business hours (minimum 3 hours)
$91.50 /hour
Re-inspection-fee
Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated
$63,00thouF
requirecIL:
•Emergency conditions
permit fee
*No fee.
-Fec is 100%
of-permit-fee.
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Building Code -2012 5 -6 -13
BB:bjs
Page 7 of 12
49
permit fee. The plan review fee is a separatc fee from the permit fee,
with the code.
Fce is 25% of
permit fee
F. Fuel gas permit fee schedule.
1. Permit Issuance:
For issuing each permit (base fee): ($0 if permit is in conjunction with
a plumbing permit for an appliance with both plumbing and gas
connection.)
$32.50 33,50
Garages, pools, spas and outbuildings
For issuing
$ 55
each supplemental permit
Circuits $54.60 added /altered without service change (more than 5
circuits); $7.65 for each added circuit (maximum permit fee $98.70)
2. Unit Fee Schedule (in addition to items in subparagraph F.1.- above):
For each gas piping system of one to five outlets
$65.00 63.00
For each additional gas piping system outlet, per outlet
$14.00 5
G. Electrical permit fee schedule.
1. NEW SINGLE - FAMILY DWELLINGS
New single - family dwellings (including a garage)
$152.85
Garages, pools, spas and outbuildings
$81.90
Low voltage systems
$59.85
2. SINGLE - FAMILY REMODEL AND SERVICE CHANGES
Service change or alteration —no added /altered circuits
$81.90
Service change $81.90 with added /altered circuits, plus $11.55 for each
added circuit (maximum permit fee $152.85)
$81.90
Circuits added /altered without service change (includes up to 5 circuits)
$54.60
Circuits $54.60 added /altered without service change (more than 5
circuits); $7.65 for each added circuit (maximum permit fee $98.70)
$54.60
Meter /mast repair
$68.25
Low voltage systems
$59.85
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Building Code -2012 5 -6 -13
BB:bjs
50
Page 8 of 12
3. MULTI - FAMILY AND COMMERCIAL (including low voltage)
Valuation of
Work (Total
Contract Amount)
Permit Fee
$250 or less
$65.00 63.00
$80.90 78.75
$251 - $1,000
$65.00 63.00 for the first $250 plus $4.30 440 for each $100 or
fraction thereof, to and including $1,000
$1,001 - $5,000
$97.00 94.50 for the first $1,000 $21.60 21.00 for each
plus
$1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $5,000
$5,001 - $50,000
$183.30 178.50 for the first $5,000 $17.70 17.20 for each
plus
$1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000
$50,001 - $250,000
953.10 for the first $50,000 $12.90 12.60 for each
$979.15 plus
$1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $250,000
$250,001 - $1,000,000
$3,567.20 3,473.40 for the first $250,000 plus $9.15 8-90 for
each $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000
Over $1,000,000
$10,440.70 10,167.15 0.5% of cost over $1,000,000.00
plus
Disaster recovery emergency repair permit (residential structures only)
4. Plan review fee. In addition to the permit fee, when plan review is
required, a plan review fee must be paid at the time of permit application equal to 25%
of the calculated permit fee.
45. MISCELLANEOUS ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES
Temporary service (residential)
$65.00 63:00
Temporary service /generators
$80.90 78.75
Manufactured /mobile home parks and RV park sites, each service and
feeder.
$86.25 84.0 -0
Carnivals:
• Base fee
$80.60 78.50
• Each concession fee
$10.80 10.50
• Each ride and generator truck
$10.80 1-0.50
Inspections or plan review not specified elsewhere (one -half hour
minimum). Safety inspections, plan revisions.
$65.00
63.00 /hour
Adult family home inspection (paid at the time of scheduling the
inspection)
$65.00 63.00
Disaster recovery emergency repair permit (residential structures only)
$20.00
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Building Code -2012 5 -6 -13
BB:bjs
Page 9 of 12
51
H. Other inspections and fees (fuel gas piping):
Inspections outside of normal business hours (three hour minimum
$97.50
charge)
94.50 /hour
Re- inspection fee
$65.00
63:00 /hour
Inspection for which no fee is specifically indicated — investigations or
$65.00
safety inspections
63.00 /hour
Additional plan review required by changes, additions, or revisions to
approved plans (minimum charge one -half hour)
$65.00
63.00 /hour
Work commencing before permit issuance shall be subject to an
investigation fee equal to 100% of the permit fee
100% of the
permit fee
Plan review fee — Mechanical, Plumbing, Fuel Gas Piping and
Electrical: The fee for review shall be 25% of the total calculated fuel
gas piping permit fee. The plan review fee is a separate fee from the
permit fee and is required when plans are required in order to
document show- compliance with the code.
Work covered without inspection or work not ready at the time of
inspection may be charged a re- inspection fee of $65.00.
I. Applicable to all construction permits:
1. Work covered without inspection or work not ready at the time of
inspection may be charged a re- inspection fee at the hourly rate listed in the fee
schedules. - above.
2. Work without a permit. Any person who commences electrical work
before obtaining the necessary permits shall be subject to an investigation fee. The
investigation fee shall be equal to the established permit fee as set forth in the electrical
fee schedules. This fee, which shall constitute an investigation fee, shall be imposed
and collected in all cases, whether or not a permit is subsequently issued.
3. Fee refunds. The Building Official may refund any permit fee paid by the
original permit applicant that was erroneously paid or collected. The Building Official
may also authorize the refund of not more than 80% of the permit fee when no work has
been done under a permit issued in accordance with the code. Where a plan review fee
has been collected, no refund will be authorized once it has been determined that the
application is complete and the plan review process has commenced. Refund of any
permit fee paid shall be requested by the original permittee applicant in writing and not
later than 180 days after the date of fee payment.
4. Expiration of Permits. All building, mechanical, plumbing, fuel gas piping
and electrical permits shall become invalid unless the work on the site authorized by
such permit is commenced within 180 days after issuance or the work is suspended or
abandoned for a period of 180 days after the time the work is commenced. The
Building Official may grant one or more extensions for periods not more than 180 days
each. The extension shall be requested in writing and justifiable cause demonstrated.
W: Word Processing \Ordinances\Building Code -2012 5 -6 -13
BB:bjs
52
Page 10 of 12
All extension requests beyond one year shall include an administrative fee of $65.00
with the extension request.
5. Appeals. All references to Board of appeals is amended as follows: Any
person, firm or corporation may register an appeal of a decision or determination of the
Building Official provided that such appeal is made in writing within 14 calendar days
after such person firm or corporation shall have been notified of the Building Official's
decision. Any person, firm or corporation shall be permitted to appeal a decision of the
Building Official to the Tukwila Hearing Examiner when it is claimed that any one of the
following conditions exists.
a. The true intent of the code or ordinance has been incorrectly
interpreted.
b. The provisions of the code or ordinance do not fully apply.
c. The decision is unreasonable or arbitrary as it applies to alternatives or
new materials.
d. Appeals procedures shall be in accordance with TMC Chapter
18.116.030.
6. Violations. Whenever the authority having jurisdiction determines that
there are violations of this code, a written notice shall be issued to confirm such
findings. Any Notice of Violations --Oer issued pursuant to this code shall be served
upon the owner, operator, occupant or other person responsible for the condition or
violation, either by personal service or mail, or by delivering the same to and leaving it
with some person of responsibility upon the premises. For unattended or abandoned
locations, a copy of such Notice of Violation --Or-der shall be posted on the premises in
a conspicuous place, at or near the entrance to such premises, and the Notice of
Violation- -Order shall be mailed by registered or certified mail, with return receipt
requested, to the last known address of the owner, occupant or both.
7. Penalties. Any person, firm or corporation who shall willfully violate or fails
to comply with a Notice of Violation& —Oder is liable for the monetary penalties .
prescribed in TMC Section 8.45.100.A.2.
Section 5. Repealer. Ordinance Nos. 2121 §1 (part) and 2171 §1 (part), as
codified at TMC Section 16.04.160, "Washington State Energy Code Adopted," are
repealed, thereby eliminating TMC Section 16.04.160, "Washington State Energy Code
Adopted."
Section 6. Repealer. Ordinance Nos. 2157, 2189, 2215, 2249 and 2295 are
hereby repealed.
Section 7. Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the
City Attorney, the City Clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary
corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; references to
other local, state or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations; or ordinance numbering
and section /subsection numbering.
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Building Code -2012 5 -6 -13
BB:bjs
Page 11 of 12
53
Section 8. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause
or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to
be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the
remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation.
Section 9. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be
published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force
and effect July 1, 2013.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at
a Regular Meeting thereof this day of , 2013.
ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED:
Christy O'Flaherty, MMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:
Office of the City Attorney
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Building Code -2012 5 -6 -13
BB:bjs
54
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Published:
Effective Date:
Ordinance Number:
Page 12 of 12
City of Tukwila
Community Affairs and Parks Committee
COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND PARKS COMMITTEE - Meeting Minutes
May 13, 2013 — 5:15 p.m.
PRESENT
Councilmembers: Allan Ekberg, Chair; De'Sean Quinn and Kate Kruller
Staff: Bob Benedicto, Rick Still, Tracy Gallaway, Shannon Fisher, Amy Kindell, Jack Pace, Joyce
Trantina
Guests: Sharon Baker, Andrew Kindell, Vanessa Zapatul and Ellen Gengler
CALL TO ORDER: Committee Chair Ekberg called the meeting to order at 5:15 p.m.
I. PRESENTATIONS
No presentations.
II. BUSINESS AGENDA
A. Ordinance: 2012 State Building Codes
Staff is seeking Council approval to adopt the 2012 State Building Code, 2012 Washington State Energy
Code, and related permit fee schedules and fee adjustment. Codes change every three years, requiring
adoption by City Council via ordinance. This ordinance adjusts the fees and ties them to the Consumer
Price Index. This reflects the City's goal of providing a 50% recovery rate for the direct costs associated
with permits and inspections in the Department of Community Development. On average, the adjustment
outlined in the ordinance reflects an increase of about 2.7 %. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD
TO MAY 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION.
B. Sister Cities Committee Report and Recommendation
Staff is seeking Committee approval to change status to emeritus. There has been a decline in the program
for the past several years. Costs of trips to Japan are expensive, and it has become difficult to find students
who can afford to participate and families to host visiting students. Putting our relationship with Miyoshi on
an "emeritus" status would maintain the relationship, but it be would inactive. Regionally, many other cities
are also reducing their activities in this area. The Sister Cities Committee will continue fundraising,
participating in meetings, and working together to determine the next steps. Staff will work with City
Administration on the best method of communication with officials in Miyoshi. The Council will be
provided information once the appropriate course has been determined. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL TO
ACCEPT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
C. Community Transformation Grant: Seattle Children's Hospital
Staff is seeking Council approval to accept a $48,000 grant from Seattle Children's Hospital, Healthy King
County Coalition, and Seattle and King County Public Health, with funding from the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention. The funding will be used to support policies that support universal swimming
opportunities and overcoming barriers to participation in aquatic activities. Both the City and MPD will be
kept updated regarding progress of the project. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO MAY 20
REGULAR MEETING CONSENT AGENDA.
D. Update: Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan (PROS)
As information only, staff updated the Committee on the status of the PROS Plan. The online survey has
been started, with hard copies provided to teens and seniors. Information is being shared and surveys
conducted at community events, such as the recent Backyard Wildlife Fair. A community workshop is
scheduled for May 22, 2013. On June 1 there will be a mobile listening event, for four different cultural
groups at Cascade View Park. INFORMATION ONLY.
55
56
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
Initials
Meeting Date
Prepared by
Mayor's review
cjorl r iew
05/28/13
ph
Motion
Mtg Date
06/03/13
ph
Bid Award
Mtg Date
E Public Hearing
Mtg Date
iii. Other
Mtg. Date
CATEGORY 1 Discussion
Mtg. Date
SPONSOR Council E Mayor E HR E DCD I Finance L Fire IT .1 P e.,R Police
SPONSOR'S The Council is being asked to consider and approve amendment to TMC 7.20.020 which
SUMMARY will allow law enforcement officers the authority to issue civil infractions if they observe
violations. The current ordinance does not expressly provide anyone the authority to
enforce the leash law.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA&P Cmte Ei F&S Cmte E Transportation Cmte
E Utilities Cmte n Arts Comm. _ Parks Comm. 0 Planning Comm.
DATE: 5/21/13 COMMITTEE CHAIR: ROBERTSON
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR/ADMIN.
COMMITTEE
ITEM INFORMATION
ITEM No.
4.B.
57
STAFF SPONSOR: JON HARRISON
ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 5/28/13
AGENDA ITEM TITLE An ordinance amending Ordinance No. 2306 as codified at TMC Section 7.20.020
"Dogs at Large-Requirement of a Leash or Chain"
05/28/13
Motion
Mtg Date
Resolution
Mtg Date
[2] Ordinance
Mtg Date 6/3/13
Bid Award
Mtg Date
E Public Hearing
Mtg Date
iii. Other
Mtg. Date
CATEGORY 1 Discussion
Mtg. Date
SPONSOR Council E Mayor E HR E DCD I Finance L Fire IT .1 P e.,R Police
SPONSOR'S The Council is being asked to consider and approve amendment to TMC 7.20.020 which
SUMMARY will allow law enforcement officers the authority to issue civil infractions if they observe
violations. The current ordinance does not expressly provide anyone the authority to
enforce the leash law.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA&P Cmte Ei F&S Cmte E Transportation Cmte
E Utilities Cmte n Arts Comm. _ Parks Comm. 0 Planning Comm.
DATE: 5/21/13 COMMITTEE CHAIR: ROBERTSON
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR/ADMIN.
COMMITTEE
Police Department
Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole
COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$0 $0 $0
Fund Source:
Comments..
MTG. DATE
RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
05/28/13
MTG. DATE
ATTACHMENTS
05/28/13
Informational Memorandum dated 4/30/13
Draft ordinance amending "Dogs at Large-Requirement of a Leash or Chain"
TMC Chapter 7.20 "Dogs at Large and Leashes"
Minutes from the Finance and Safety Committee meeting of 5/21/13
06/03/13
57
58
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Finance and Safety Committee
FROM: Jon Harrison, Police Patrol Commander
DATE: April 30, 2013
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO TMC SECTION 7.20.020 "DOGS AT LARGE -
REQUIREMENT OF A LEASH OR CHAIN" OF ORDINANCE NO. 2306.
ISSUE
The Council is being asked to consider and approve amendment of TMC 7.20.020 that provides
law enforcement officers the authority to enforce the leash law.
BACKGROUND
Section 7.20.020 of the TMC provides that dogs must be on a leash or chain if away from the
premises where the dog is owned, harbored, controlled or kept.
DISCUSSION
When Section 7.20.020 "Dogs at Large - Requirement of a Leash or Chain" was created, it did
not expressly provide anyone the authority to enforce this section. While the police department
does not plan on taking over animal control duties, we would like to be the designee for the
purposes of enforcing the leash law. Amendment to TMC Section 7.20.020 would provide our
officers the authority to issue civil infractions if they observe violations.
RECOMMENDATION
The amendment has been reviewed and approved by legal and city administration. The Council
is being asked to consider this item and approve at the May 28, 2012 Committee of the Whole
meeting and subsequent June 3, 2013 Regular Meeting.
ATTACHMENTS
-Draft ordinance amending "Dogs at Large- Requirement of a Leash or Chain"
-TMC Chapter 7.20 "Dogs at Large and Leashes"
59
60
CRAFT
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2306 §4,
AS CODIFIED AT TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 7.20.020,
"DOGS AT LARGE — REQUIREMENT OF A LEASH OR CHAIN,"
TO PROVIDE FOR ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY; PROVIDING
FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila regulates animals within the City and Tukwila
Municipal Code Section 7.20.020 specifically provides that dogs must be on a leash or
chain if away from the premises where the dog is owned, harbored, controlled or kept;
and
WHEREAS, Title 7 of the Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) does not authorize a
specific person to enforce this provision; and
WHEREAS, in the interest of public health, safety, and welfare, the City Council
desires to provide law enforcement officers with the authority to issue civil infractions for
such violations;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. TMC Section 7.20.020, "Dogs at Large— Requirement of a Leash or
Chain," Amended. Ordinance No. 2306 §4, as codified at TMC Section 7.20.020,
"Dogs at Large— Requirement of a Leash or Chain," is hereby amended to read as
follows:
It shall be a violation of this chapter for any owner or custodian to cause, permit or
allow any dog owned, harbored, controlled or kept by him /her in the City to roam, run or
stray away from the premises where the dog is owned, harbored, controlled or kept;
except that, while away from the premises, the dog shall at all times be controlled by the
owner or some duly authorized and competent person by means of a leash or chain not
exceeding eight feet in length, provided that such leash or chain is not required for any
dog when otherwise safely and securely confined or completely controlled while in or
upon any vehicle. Any law enforcement officer shall have the authority to issue
civil infractions under this provision.
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Leash law amended 4 -2 -13 strike -thru
SK:bjs
Page 1 of 2
61
Section 2. Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the
City Attorney, the City Clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary
corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; references to
other local, state or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations; or ordinance numbering
and section /subsection numbering.
Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be
invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the
remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation.
Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published
in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days
after passage and publication as provided by law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at
a Regular Meeting thereof this day of , 2013.
ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED:
Christy O'Flaherty, MMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:
Shelley M. Kerslake, City Attorney
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Published:
Effective Date:
Ordinance Number:
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Leash law amended 4 -2 -13 strike -thru
SK:bjs
62
Page 2 of 2
TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE
CHAPTER 7.20
DOGS AT LARGE AND LEASHES
Sections:
7.20.010 Definitions
7.20.020 Dogs at Large -- Requirement of a Leash or
Chain
7.20.030 Penalties
7.20.010 Definitions
A. 'Anima / "means any living creature except Homo Sa-
piens, insects and worms.
B. "City "shall mean the City of Tukwila
C. "Owner "means any person, firm, corporation, organi-
zation or department having an interest in or right of posses-
sion to an animal, or having control, custody or possession of
an animal, including possession by reason of the animal being
seen residing consistently at a location.
D. "Person" means any individual, partnership, firm, joint
stock company, corporation, association, trust, estate, or other
legal entity
(Ord. 2306 §4, 2010)
7.20.020 Dogs at Large -- Requirement of a Leash
or Chain
It shall be a violation of this chapter for any owner or cus-
todian to cause, permit or allow any dog owned, harbored,
controlled or kept by him /her in the City to roam, run or stray
away from the premises where the dog is owned, harbored,
controlled or kept; except that, while away from the premises,
the dog shall at all times be controlled by the owner or some
duly authorized and competent person by means of a leash or
chain not exceeding eight feet in length, provided that such
leash or chain is not required for any dog when otherwise safe-
ly and securely confined or completely controlled while in or
upon any vehicle.
(Ord. 2306 §4, 2010)
7.20.030 Penalties
A. Violation, civil penalty. In addition to any other pe-
nalty provided in this title or by law, any person whose dog is
maintained in violation of this title shall incur a civil penalty plus
billable costs of the Animal Control Authority. The penalty
shall be $50 for the first notice of violation, $75 for the second
violation in any one -year period, and $200 for each successive
violation.
B. Civil penalty, collection. The civil penalty described
in TMC Section 7.20.030(A) is the personal obligation of the
dog owner. The Animal Control Authority, on behalf of King
County, and the City Attorney, on behalf of the City, may col-
lect the civil penalty by use of all appropriate legal remedies.
C. Cost of enforcement, collection. In addition to the
costs and disbursements provided for by statute, the prevailing
party in a collective action under this chapter may, in the
court's discretion, be allowed interest and a reasonable attor-
ney's fee. The City Attorney shall seek such costs, interest,
and reasonable attorney's fees on behalf of the City or County
when the City is the prevailing party.
(Ord. 2306 §4, 2010)
Page 7 -26 Produced by the City of Tukwila, City Clerk's Office
63
64
Finance & Safety Committee Minutes May 21, 2013 — Page 2
After discussion, Committee Members requested that two changes be made to the draft resolution:
1. Remove the words "salaries and" from the first sentence on page 41 of the Committee agenda
packet under B. Compensation Policy No. 4
2. Add another item under B. Compensation Policy (after No. 4) that addresses the mitigation or
avoidance of salary compression issues whenever possible
Staff will make the requested changes in the draft resolution that comes before Council at the next
Committee of the Whole. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO MAY 28 COW FOR
DISCUSSION.
C. Ordinance: Leash Law
Staff is seeking Council approval of an amendment to Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Section 7.20.020
regarding leash requirements for dogs away from a premise where it is owned and /or controlled and kept.
As currently written, the TMC does not provide authority for a police officer to enforce the Code through a
civil infraction. This amendment will update the Code, and allow for enforcement.
Committee Members expressed concerns regarding the generality of Chapter 7.20, and believe that it is
important to define the actual intent of the Code. The Committee requested that this section of the TMC be
re- drafted to specifically address citizen concerns of unwanted /nuisance dogs as well as threatening and
dangerous dogs. Commander Harrison suggested the Committee consider recommending immediate
passage of the current proposed amendment so that the police department is able to levy a penalty as a
deterrent in circumstances when animal control representatives are not immediately available. In the
meantime, staff will begin a re -write of this section of the Code and return to the Finance & Safety
Committee when it is ready for review (anticipated time frame to return to Committee is September).
UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO MAY 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION.
D. Police Department Update: 2013 1st Quarter Report
As information only, staff utilized a PowerPoint presentation to update the Committee on items of
significance that occurred in the Police Department during the first quarter. The information included
highlights, crime statistics and crime reduction strategies.
Chief Villa mentioned that the Police Department is going to begin a department -wide strategic planning
process, and will utilize BERK for the plan strategy and formulation. INFORMATION ONLY.
III. MISCELLANEOUS
Meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m.
Next meeting: Tuesday, June 4, 2013 — 5:15 p.m. — Conference Room #3
Committee Chair Approval
Minutes bj ‘KAM.
65
66
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
Initials
MeetinDate
Pre ,ared b 1
BG AiMrdfSNIILIII.,
BG
Ma or's review
' a iuncil view
05/28/13
06/03/13
Study
05/28/13
E Motion
Mtg Date 06/03/13
fl Resolution
Mtg Date
Lj Ordinance
Mtg Date
Award
Public Hearing
Mtg Date
E Other
Mtg Date
ITEM INFORMATION
ITEM NO.
4.C.
67
STAFF SPONSOR: BOB GIBERSON
ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 05/28/13
AGENDA ITEM TITLE
City Facilities Needs Assessment and Feasibility
Consultant Agreement with Rice Fergus Miller
Study
05/28/13
E Motion
Mtg Date 06/03/13
fl Resolution
Mtg Date
Lj Ordinance
Mtg Date
Award
Public Hearing
Mtg Date
E Other
Mtg Date
CATEGORY 0 Discussion
• Bid
Mtg Date
ilk Date
SPONSOR E Cooney' l Mayor L HR E DCD 11 Finance 11 Fire jIJ IT E P&R E Police P 7
SPONSOR'S This contract is for a City Facilities Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study. Staff
SUMMARY advertised Request for Proposals on February 8 & 15 and interviewed the two consultants
on March 12 & 18, 2013. Rice Fergus Miller ranked highest. The agreement includes four
phases; visioning and information gathering, development, feasibility, and risk
assessment. Council is being asked to approve the consultant agreement with Rice Fergus
Miller in the amount of $349,135.00.
REVIEWED BY El COW Mtg. E CA&P Cmte Ej F&S Cmte
E Utilities Cmte E Arts Comm. E Parks Comm.
DATE: 05/21/13 COMMITTEE CHAIR: DENNIS
• Transportation
Cmte
Planning Comm.
ROBERTSON
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR/ADMIN.
COMMIT1EE
Public Works Department
Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of he Whole
COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$349,135.00 $500,000.00 $0.00
Fund Source: 302 FACILITIES (PAGE 73, 2013 CIP)
Comments:
MTG. DATE
RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
05/28/13
06/03/13
MTG. DATE
ATTACHMENTS
05/28/13
Informational Memorandum dated 05/17/13
Proposed Project Work Plan & Organization Chart
Consultant Agreement, Scope of Work, and Fee
2013 CIP, page 73
Minutes from the Finance & Safety Committee meeting of 05/21/13
06/03/13
67
68
TO:
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
Mayor Haggerton
Finance and Safety Committee
FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director
DATE: May 17, 2013
SUBJECT: City Facilities Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study
Project No. 91230201
Consultant Selection and Agreement
ISSUE
Approve consultant agreement with Rice Fergus Miller for architectural services for the City
Facilities Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study.
BACKGROUND
As part of the 2013 -2014 biennial budget and CIP, City Council approved $500,000 for the City
Facilities Project. Staff advertised a Request for Proposals on February 8 and 15, 2013 with a
proposal deadline of February 22, 2013. The selection committee met to evaluate the two (2)
proposals received from the Beckwith Consulting Group and Rice Fergus Miller. Interviews were
held on March 12 and 18 and references were then checked. Both consultants scored very well
in the overall process, however, Rice Fergus Miller ranked higher. Staff has negotiated a scope
of work and fee with Rice Fergus Miller for the City Facilities Needs Assessment and Feasibility
Study.
DISCUSSION
The Rice Fergus Miller team includes BERK, Inc., Reid Middleton, Matson /Carlson, and Long Bay
Enterprises as sub - consultants for the project. The proposed scope of work includes four phases of
work to produce the Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study. Exhibit A to the consultant
agreement provides details of all the work tasks proposed for these four phases:
• Phase 1 Visioning and Information Gathering
• Phase 2 Development of Need and Prioritization of Findings
• Phase 3 Feasibility Study
• Phase 4 Risk Assessment
BUDGET SUMMARY
The proposed contract amount of $349,135.00 is well within the $500,000.00 budget.
RECOMMENDATION
The Council is being asked to approve the consultant agreement with Rice Fergus Miller in the
amount of $349,135.00 for the City Facilities project and consider this item at the May 28, 2013
Committee of the Whole meeting and subsequent June 3, 2013 Regular Meeting.
Attachments: Proposed Project Work Plan
Team Organization Chart
Consultant Agreement
City Facilities page 73, 2013 CIP
w: \pw eng \projects \a - bg projects \city facilities (91230201)\ information memo rfm selection_scope_fee.doc
69
70
Pro
E
its w
i E
C
VI 0
C
Proi,Jct
17. ',Dlrl_
FACILITY NEED ANALYSIS
2 months
• Identify steering committee
and stakeholders
• Present and gain approval of
project work plan /schedule
• Define/tabulate and reach
consensus on community
values and organizational
philosophies
• Review /document existing
facilities and tabulate space
utilization
• Develop space need
projections (10, 25, 50 yrs.)
• Steering committee and
City Council meeting for
confirmation
• Adjust as required
• Gain phase approval - move
to next phase
Q��I IIIII�II i
I�u�Jlll��ii���
Rice Fergus Miller
BERK
Reid Middleton
Deliverables
- Work plan schedule
- Space needs
- Confirm existing building
conditions
- Statement of community
values and organizational
philosphy
2 months
111 uuupullglll l.11upiIIIIIIIIIIIIV'
II
• Match projected needs
to space currently utilized
- document overage/
shortcoming
• Develop criteria for
establishing prioritizatin
City services
• Establish prioritization based
on public safety criteria
• Steering committee &
C'ty Council presentation/
confirmation
Adjust as required
• Ga n p`"1 ii Wifpval -
move to uu ion
Rice Fergus Miller
BERK
Reid Middleton
- Prioritization of need
- Final needs assessment
FEASIBILITY STUDY
2 months
Rice Fergus Miller
BERK
Reid Middleton
Long Bay Enterprises
- Evaluation of property
response to need
- New vs. existing
2 months
Rice Fergus Miller
BERK
Carlson / Matson
Long Bay Enterprises
- Financial analysis
- Confirmation of prioritization
- Analysis and feasibility study
into final document
- Recommendations
- lssual final report
- Merge facility needs
71
Team Organization Chart
CITY OF TUKWILA
David Fergus
Comprehensive Review
Principal -in- Charge
Rice Fergus Miller
NANA EPA NT
Ron Easterday
Need Assessment/
Feasiblity Input
Project Manager
Rice Fergus Miller
PLANNING
Bob Hutchinson
Planning and Concept
Development
Project Architect
Rice Fergus Miller
Hope Zorrozua
Project Coordinator
Rice Fergus Miller
RUCT U l' i
MATINf
LAN USE EXPERTISE
Michael Hodgins
Finance Policy
BERK, Inc.
Dave Swanson
Principal Engineer
Reid Middleton
Sandra Matson
Cost Estimating
Matson / Carlson
Cynthia Berne
Real Estate Advisory Input
Long Bay Enterprises
Dawn Couch
Public Engagement
BERK, Inc.
Corbin Hammer
Senior Engineer
Reid Middleton
72
Erik Runde!!
Policy and GIS Analyst
BERK, Inc.
Suzie Brendle
Senior Engineer
Reid Middleton
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188
Contract Number:
CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR
ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Tukwila, Washington, hereinafter
referred to as "the City ", and Rice Fergus Miller. Inc., hereinafter referred to as "the Consultant ", in
consideration of the mutual benefits, terms, and conditions hereinafter specified.
1. Project Designation. The Consultant is retained by the City to perform Architectural services
in connection with the project titled Facility Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study.
2, Scope of Services. The Consultant agrees to perform the services, identified on Exhibit "A"
attached hereto, including the provision of all labor, materials, equipment and supplies.
3. Duration of Agreement; Time for Performance. This Agreement shall be in full force and
effect for a period commencing upon execution and ending January 27, 2014, unless sooner
terminated under the provisions hereinafter specified. Work under this Agreement shall
commence upon written notice by the City to the Consultant to proceed. The Consultant shall
perform all services and provide all work product required pursuant to this Agreement no later
than January 27, 2014 unless an extension of such time is granted in writing by the City.
4. Payment. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work and for services
rendered under this Agreement as follows:
A. Payment for the work provided by the Consultant shall be made as provided on Exhibit
"B" attached hereto, provided that the total amount of payment to the Consultant shall not
exceed $349.135.00 without express written modification of the Agreement signed by the
City.
B. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City once per month during the progress of
the work for partial payment for that portion of the project completed to date. Such
vouchers will be checked by the City and, upon approval thereof, payment shall be made
to the Consultant in the amount approved.
C. Final payment of any balance due the Consultant of the total contract price earned will be
made promptly upon its ascertainment and verification by the City after the completion of
the work under this Agreement and its acceptance by the City.
D. Payment as provided in this section shall be full compensation for work performed,
services rendered, and for all materials, supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary to
complete the work.
E. The Consultant's records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to be kept
available for inspection by representatives of the City and the state of Washington for a
period of three (3) years after final payments. Copies shall be made available upon
request.
73
5. Ownership and Use of Documents. All documents, drawings, specifications and other
materials produced by the Consultant in connection with the services rendered under this
Agreement shall be the property of the City whether the project for which they are made is
executed or not. The Consultant shall be permitted to retain copies, including reproducible
copies, of drawings and specifications for information, reference and use in connection with
the Consultant's endeavors. The Consultant shall not be responsible for any use of the said
documents, drawings, specifications or other materials by the City on any project other than
the project specified in this Agreement.
6. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant shall, in performing the services contemplated by
this Agreement, faithfully observe and comply with all federal, state, and local laws,
ordinances and regulations, applicable to the services rendered under this Agreement.
7. Indemnification. The Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages,
losses or suits including attorney fees, arising out of or resulting from the acts, errors or
omissions of the Consultant in performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and
damages caused by the sole negligence of the City.
Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW
4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or
damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant
and the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, the Consultant's liability
hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence. It is further specifically
and expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein constitutes the Consultant's
waiver of immunity under Industrial Insurance, Title 51 RCW, solely for the purposes of this
indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of
this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
8. Insurance. The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement,
insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from
or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents,
representatives, or employees. Consultant's maintenance of insurance as required by the
agreement shall not be construed to limit the liability of the Consultant to the coverage
provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City's recourse to any remedy available at
law or in equity.
A. Minimum Amounts and Scope of Insurance. Consultant shall obtain insurance of the
types and with the limits described below:
1. Automobile Liability insurance with a minimum combined single limit for bodily
injury and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident. Automobile Liability
insurance shall cover all owned, non - owned, hired and leased vehicles. Coverage
shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute
form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be
endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage.
74 CA revised : 1 -2013
Page 2
2. Commercial General Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 each
occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate. Commercial General Liability
insurance shall be written on ISO occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover
liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractors and personal
injury and advertising injury. The City shall be named as an insured under the
Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to the
work performed for the City.
3. Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of
the State of Washington.
4. Professional Liability with limits no less than $1,000,000 per claim and
$1,000,000 policy aggregate limit. Professional Liability insurance shall be
appropriate to the Consultant's profession.
B. Other Insurance Provision. The Consultant's Automobile Liability and Commercial
General Liability insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain that they
shall be primary insurance with respect to the City. Any Insurance, self- insurance, or
insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of the Consultant's
insurance and shall not be contributed or combined with it.
C. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.
Best rating of not less than A:VII.
D. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and
a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the
additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the Consultant
before commencement of the work. Certificates of coverage and endorsements as required
by this section shall be delivered to the City within fifteen (15) days of execution of this
Agreement.
E. Notice of Cancellation. The Consultant shall provide the City with written notice of any
policy cancellation, within two business days of their receipt of such notice.
F. Failure to Maintain Insurance. Failure on the part of the Consultant to maintain the
insurance as required shall constitute a material breach of contract, upon which the City
may, after giving five business days notice to the Consultant to correct the breach,
immediately terminate the contract or, at its discretion, procure or renew such insurance
and pay any and all premiums in connection therewith, with any sums so expended to be
repaid to the City on demand, or at the sole discretion of the City, offset against funds due
the Consultant from the City.
9. Independent Contractor. The Consultant and the City agree that the Consultant is an
independent contractor with respect to the services provided pursuant to this Agreement.
Nothing in this Agreement shall be considered to create the relationship of employer and
employee between the parties hereto. Neither the Consultant nor any employee of the
Consultant shall be entitled to any benefits accorded City employees by virtue of the services
provided under this Agreement. The City shall not be responsible for withholding or
otherwise deducting federal income tax or social security or for contributing to the state
industrial insurance program, otherwise assuming the duties of an employer with respect to
the Consultant, or any employee of the Consultant.
CA revised : 1 -2013
Page 3
75
10. Covenant Against Contingent Fees. The Consultant warrants that he has not employed or
retained any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the
Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any
company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, any
fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration contingent upon
or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warrant,
the City shall have the right to annul this contract without liability, or in its discretion to
deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such
fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee.
11. Discrimination Prohibited. The Consultant, with regard to the work performed by it under
this Agreement, will not discriminate on the grounds of race, religion, creed, color, national
origin, age, veteran status, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, political
affiliation or the presence of any disability in the selection and retention of employees or
procurement of materials or supplies.
12. Assignment. The Consultant shall not sublet or assign any of the services covered by this
Agreement without the express written consent of the City.
13. Non - Waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation
provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision.
14. Termination.
A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time by giving ten (10)
days written notice to the Consultant.
B. In the event of the death of a member, partner or officer of the Consultant, or any of its
supervisory personnel assigned to the project, the surviving members of the Consultant
hereby agree to complete the work under the terms of this Agreement, if requested to do
so by the City. This section shall not be a bar to renegotiations of this Agreement
between surviving members of the Consultant and the City, if the City so chooses.
15. Applicable Law; Venue; Attorney's Fees. This Agreement shall be subject to, and the
Consultant shall at all times comply with, all applicable federal, state and local laws,
regulations, and rules, including the provisions of the City of Tukwila Municipal Code and
ordinances of the City of Tukwila. In the event any suit, arbitration, or other proceeding is
instituted to enforce any term of this Agreement, the parties specifically understand and agree
that venue shall be properly laid in King County, Washington. The prevailing party in any
such action shall be entitled to its attorney's fees and costs of suit. Venue for any action
arising from or related to this Agreement shall be exclusively in King County Superior Court.
16. Severability and Survival. If any term, condition or provision of this Agreement is declared
void or unenforceable or limited in its application or effect, such event shall not affect any
other provisions hereof and all other provisions shall remain fully enforceable. The provisions
of this Agreement, which by their sense and context are reasonably intended to survive the
completion, expiration or cancellation of this Agreement, shall survive termination of this
Agreement.
76 CA revised : 1 -2013
Page 4
17. Notices. Notices to the City of Tukwila shall be sent to the following address:
City Clerk
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA 98188
Notices to Consultant shall be sent to the following address:
Rice Fergus Miller, Inc
275 5th Street, Suite 100
Bremerton, WA 98337
18. Entire Agreement; Modification. This Agreement, together with attachments or addenda,
represents the entire and integrated Agreement between the City and the Consultant and
supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements written or oral. No
amendment or modification of this Agreement shall be of any force or effect unless it is in
writing and signed by the parties.
DATED this
CITY OF TUKWILA
Mayor, Jim Haggerton
Attest/Authenticated:
day of , 20
CO'' LTANT
By:
Printed Name: NO IVJ
Title: Witt ,)tz,wcfeAt...
Approved as to Form:
City Clerk, Christy O'Flaherty Office of the City Attorney
CA revised : 1 -2013
Page 5
77
78
RIC�21^gUSMILLER
ExhibitA ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING
City of Tukwila Facility Needs Analysis and Feasibility Study
Scope of Work 4/23/13
Phase 1: Visioning and Information Gathering
Task 1: Kickoff Meeting and Project Plan Presentation /Refinement
• Discuss overall project engagement, process design and identify the members of the steering
committee and the stakeholders that will be part of the decision making process. Define
appropriate level of engagement for the following groups:
o Internal stakeholders (both departmental leads as well as broader staff)
o Decision makers (primarily senior management, the Mayor and Council)
o External stakeholders and community interests
o The broader public
• Review and revise the project work plan, clarifying the responsibilities of Rice Fergus Miller
(RFM) and City staff. Determine how to best communicate and work together and codify means
and methods of communication.
• Discuss components of a Community Outreach Plan strategy and how it will be implemented.
Identify key roles of City Staff and RFM team in conducting plan and expected deliverables.
• Based on these discussions, prepare a final task - loaded schedule for the entire project scope.
Task 2: Steering Committee Meeting
• Introductions, presentation and agreement of operating principals, and discussion of work plan,
schedule, and end product.
• Discuss what project success would look like.
• Define methodology for soliciting staff and community input, means of conflict resolution, and
presenting reviewed information back. Define iterations of process allowed to maintain
schedule milestones.
o Strategies for Information Gathering
• Stakeholder interviews
• Online surveys
• Website presentation of project status
• Gather comments /revisions for edits to plan and submission to Steering Committee for record.
1
79
RICkceYgZIbMILLER
ExhibitA ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING
Task 3: Executive Staff Work Session
• First presentation of schedule, work plan and expectations for the planning process. Gather
comments /revisions for edits to plan and submission to Steering Committee.
Task 4: Compiling Information on Existing City Facilities
• Review City records and ask Department Heads to tabulate square footage of use by
department.
• Research City records and obtain all available drawings of buildings currently in use.
• Obtain staffing organizational chart for each department that is part of study.
• Physically survey each department to confirm how space is utilized.
Task 5: Develop Space Needs Projections (10, 25 and 50 year Benchmarks)
• Kickoff Meeting with Department Heads to discuss process and methodology of approach.
• Discuss and document future projected needs with each Department Head.
• Distribute and discuss survey form to be distributed to staff by Department Heads, and schedule
follow -up discussion with each Department Head to discuss results and reconcile conflicts.
Task 6: Strategize Funding Opportunities for Future City Development
• Extract demographic information and financial projections from the Tukwila Strategic Plan to
serve as a springboard for supporting funding discussion.
• Conduct workshop with Steering Committee to discuss current fiscal situation and the Tong -term
capital funding needs city wide. This will provide important context for developing facility plans
that reflect the future as envisioned by the City and to set realistic budgetary goals to drive
development.
• Document consensus reached in workshop for fiscal projections.
Task 7: Outreach and Stakeholder Engagement
• Prepare public information materials summarizing:
o Project purpose
o Schedule and phases
o Next Steps
Task 8: City Council Work Session
• Solicit input from Steering Committee in preparation for a Council Study Session presentation.
• Adjust presentation of data to reflect comments.
• Present to Council in study session. Revise as needed for task 8 presentation to full City Council.
21
80
RICOi"gZISMILLER
ExhibitA ARCHITECTURE Z PLANNING
Task 9: Present and Obtain City Council Acceptance of Phase 1 Facility Needs Analysis
Deliverables:
• Work plan and task loaded schedule.
• Space needs tabulation by Department (current and projected to 10, 25 and 50 year
benchmark).
• Department organizational charts that illustrate current occupancy, current need, and projected
need to a 10, 25 and 50 year benchmark.
• Summary of the current fiscal situation and long -term capital funding needs to establish
financial boundaries of City property development.
RFM Site Visits Included in Phase 1:
• 14
RFM Meetings included in Phase 1:
• 7
Assumptions:
• All client /meeting coordination will occur from RFM's office through the internet and WebEx
conferencing.
3
81
82
Exhibit A
RICei"gusIIIILLER
A R C H I T E C T U R E & P L A N N I N G
City of Tukwila Facility Needs Analysis and Feasibility Study
Scope of Work 4/23/13
Phase 2: Development of Need and Prioritization of Findings
Task 1: Update and Present Work Plan and Schedule
• Present and discuss deliverable from Phase 1 with Steering Committee.
• Reach consensus /confirm dates required for City input and participation relative to tasks in this
phase.
Task 2: Projected Needs vs. Existing Facilities Occupancy
• Overlay future needs projections with existing facilities occupied and document projected
shortfall /overage. Present results in conceptual level floor plans.
• Review 2008 Reid Middleton survey of City- occupied buildings and confirm applicability for
continued use.
• Present findings to Steering Committee for comment /agreement.
• Refine space needs analysis based on Steering Committee input.
Task 3: Outreach and Stakeholder Engagement
• Prepare summary public information materials summarizing:
o Project purpose
o Schedule and phases
o The results of the Needs vs Existing Facilities analysis
o Next Steps
• As needed, provide support at public meetings, where the Facilities Study can be added to a
broader agenda (i.e. Comp Plan meeting)
Task 4: Executive Staff Work Session
• Present space need projections and prioritization findings. Incorporate comments and submit
revisions to Steering Committee as needed.
1
83
Exhibit A
RICef"gUSMILLER
ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING
Task 5: Present and Obtain City Council Acceptance of Phase 2 Facility Needs Projections
• Present space need projections in regular session of City Council.
• Incorporate City Council comments and submit to Steering Committee /City Council for
review /acceptance.
Deliverables:
• Documented City space needs for 10, 25, and 50 year benchmarks with conceptual level floor
plans..
• Confirmation of existing City facilities defined by 2008 Reid Middleton survey.
RFM Site Visits Included in Phase 2:
• 7
RFM Meetings Included in Phase 2:
• 4
Assumptions:
• All client /meeting coordination will occur from RFM's office through the internet and WebEx
conferencing.
2
84
Exhibit A
RICOYgZISMILIER
ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING
City of Tukwila Facility Needs Analysis and Feasibility Study
Scope of Work 4/23/13
Phase 3: Feasibility Study
Task 1: Update and Present Work Plan and Schedule
• Present and discuss deliverable from Phase 2 with Steering Committee.
• Reach consensus /confirm dates required for City input and participation relative to tasks in this
phase.
Task 2: Determine Needs Justification for New Construction /Existing Facility Purchase /New
Construction
• Conduct test -to -fit plan /site examinations for the capacity of existing facilities to accommodate
projected future needs. Document deficiencies due to site, building size /condition, seismic and
locational constraints.
• Evaluate current and future space needs against buildings currently in the City inventory and
determine if Department shifts make sense logistically and provide relief.
• Assemble test -to -fit graphics and discuss results in a workshop with the Steering committee to
narrow initial range of options.
• If need demands new property acquisition(s) and /or construction of new facilities, proceed as
follows;
o Find and conceptually analyze suitable properties in locations that are mutually
determined to be suitable. Block diagram needs onto candidate parcel(s) and evaluate.
o Present results of accommodating projected City needs to Steering Committee in a
vetting process prior to cost analyzing options.
Task 3: Produce a Costing Matrix for Proposed Development Options
• Provide cost of development summaries for the options as discussed in task 2.
• Present development summaries to the Steering Committee for input. Revise the options as
agreed upon.
1
85
Exhibit A
Task 4: Threshold Funding Assessment
RlcergusmIuER
ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING
• Based on the initial fiscal situation assessment, conduct a threshold funding assessment that will
identify financial implications of the options with respect to ongoing operations and capital
investment needs.
• Identify if there are any unique characteristics of any of the options which might present funding
opportunities or otherwise reduce the financial impact to the City.
Task 5: Outreach and Stakeholder Engagement
• Prepare a Phase 3 folio -type public information packet summarizing:
o Project purpose
o Schedule and phases
o The results of the options development process, preliminary cost matrix and threshold
funding assessment
o Next Steps
• As needed, provide support at public meetings, where the Facilities Study can be added to a
broader agenda (i.e. Comp Plan meeting)
• Consider the option of an online survey to solicit feedback on the preliminary options:
o Staff survey
o Community and external stakeholder survey
Task 6: City Council Work Session
• Present the development options with cost summaries for input. Incorporate comments and
submit revisions to Steering Committee as needed.
Task 7: Present and Obtain City council acceptance of Phase 3 Feasibility Study
• Present development options with cost summaries in regular session of City Council.
• Incorporate City Council comments and submit to Steering Committee /City Council for
review /acceptance.
Deliverables:
• Documented development options and associated project costs.
RFM Site Visits Included in Phase 3:
• 10
86
2J
Exhibit A
RFM Meetings Included in Phase 3:
• 5
RICe7"gUAVIILLER
ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING
Assumptions:
• All client /meeting coordination will occur from RFM's office through the internet and WebEx
conferencing.
3
87
88
Exhibit A
RICei"gZI,sNIILLER
ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING
City of Tukwila Facility Needs Analysis and Feasibility Study
Scope of Work 4/23/13
Phase 4: Risk Assessment
Task 1: Update and Present Work Plan and Schedule
• Present and discuss deliverable from Phase 3 with Steering Committee.
• Reach consensus /confirm dates required for City input and participation relative to tasks in this
phase.
Task 2: Conduct a Risk Assessment Analysis of City Services
• Research City records for information and past planning efforts relative to emergency response
to natural /man -made disasters.
o Obtain current flood plain data.
o Obtain current Tukwila Emergency Management Plan.
• Workshop Session with Steering Committee to assess risk /define potential solutions, topics to
include;
o Definition /identification of vulnerable conditions and prioritization within City
boundaries.
• Fire and Emergency services
■ Law Enforcement (services)
• Utilities (gas, electricity, water, sewer)
■ Hospitals
• Public Works
■ School
• Nursing Homes
• Detention Facilities
• Food Distribution
■ Other
• Determine how prioritization of City services reduces risk.
• Illustrate pros /cons of new municipal facilities development and if it will assist in reducing risk
exposure.
• Financial Impacts and potential funding mechanisms.
o Existing resources
o Property tax increase
1
89
Exhibit A
RIC�21^gUSVIILLER
ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING
o Grant opportunities
o Special financing options
o Increased mutual aid opportunities
• Strategies for soliciting public buy -in for supporting proposed solutions.
o Email surveys
o Public open house presentations
Task 3: Examine Optimum Solution Given Phase 1 Financial Parameters, Phase 2 Development
Options, and Phase 3 Risk Assessment Criteria
• Workshop Session with Steering Committee to weigh and evaluate all the potential combination
of options available. Reach consensus on prioritizing approaches and reach conclusion on final
recommendations.
• Document and prioritize options examined.
Task 4: Outreach and Stakeholder Engagement
• Prepare a Phase 4 folio -type public information packet summarizing:
o Project purpose
o Schedule and phases
o The results of the risk assessment analysis
o Next Steps
• Conduct a community workshop to review the risk assessment and gather feedback on the
analysis and choices available.
Task 5: Conceptual -level Phasing and Funding Plan
• Based on the risk assessment, develop a preferred phasing and prioritization plan to guide
future investments in the City's facilities
• Develop a conceptual level funding plan that would identify options for supporting the
investments called for in the phasing and prioritization plan and the operational and
maintenance needs.
Task 6: City Council Work Session
• Present the prioritization of options and final recommendations for input. The analysis will
include the input gathered from the community workshop
2
90
Exhibit A
RICpre3"giZVIILLER
ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING
Task 7: Present and Obtain City Council Acceptance of Phase 4 Risk Assessment
• Present study options and final recommendations for comment in regular session of City
Council.
• Incorporate City Council comments and submit to Steering Committee /City Council for
review /acceptance.
Task 8: Assemble Draft Document in Final Format for Review by Steering Committee
• Conduct final workshop to review comments.
Task 9: Submit Final Document for City Council Acceptance
Deliverables:
• Final Study with recommendations.
RFM Site Visits Included in Phase 4:
• 8
RFM Meetings Included in Phase 4:
• 6
Assumptions:
• All client /meeting coordination will occur from RFM's office through the internet and WebEx
conferencing.
3
91
92
CITY OF TUKWILA FEASIBILITY NEEDS ANALYSIS AND FEASIBILITY STUDY
FEE
APRIL 23, 2013
RICE FERGUS MILLER
Exhibit B
RICfeYgZd,9V1111ER
Total Estimated Hours (RFM)
Cost
Subtotal RFM Cost
Subtotal Berk Associates Cost
Subtotal Matson Carlson Cost
Subtotal Reid Middleton Cost
Subtotal Long Bay Cost
10% Consultant Markup
Total (Fixed Fee)
$216,600
$65,070
$14,160
$8,590
$6,555
$9,438
5320,413
Reimbursement Budget (Rate Schedule Per 2/22/13 - Statement of Qualifications) $15,000
Travel Budget (Assume 61 visits, 108 mi. R.T. @ .565 cents /mi.) 53,722
Owner Contingency
Total Budget
$10,000
$349,135
7,496
5216,600
93
Principal -in-
Charge
Project
Manager
Project
Architect
Project
Coordinator
Graphic
Designer
Total Hours
and
Estimated
Cost by Task
2013 Billing Rates
220
170
160
80
140
Phase 1: Visioning and Information Gathering
Task 1: Kickoff Meeting and Project Plan Presentation / Refinement
8
3
24
8
8
Task 2: Steering Committee Meeting
5
1
14
8
4
Task 3: Executive Staff Work Session
5
14
6
Task 4: Compiling Information on Existing City Facilities
1
34
6
Task 5: Develop Space Needs Projection (10, 25 and 50 year benchmarks)
1
1
45
24
10
Task 6: Strategize Funding Opportunities for Future City Development
6
2
12
8
Task 7: Outreach and Stakeholder Engagement
1
24
4
8
Task 8: City Council Work Session
6
1
16
6
8
Task 9: Present and Obtain City Council Acceptance of Phase 1 Facility Needs Analysis
4
1
12
6
8
Subtotal Hours
36
10
195
76
46
363
Subtotal Cost
$7,920
$1,700
$31,200
$6,080
$6,440
$53,340
Phase 2: Development of Need and Prioritization of Findings
Task 1: Update and Present Work Plan Schedule
5
6
24
6
6
Task 2: Projected Needs vs. Existing Facilities Occupancy
5
1
50
12
12
Task 3: Outreach and Stakeholder Engagement
1
1
14
8
Task 4: Executive Staff Work Session
5
16
8
6
Task 5: Present and Obtain City Council Acceptance of Phase 2 Facility Needs Projections
6
1
20
16
6
Subtotal Hours
22
9
124
50
30
235
Subtotal Cost
$4,840
$1,530
$19,840
$4,000
$4,200
$34,410
Phase 3: Feasibility Study
Task 1: Update and Present Work Plan and Schedule
6
6
24
8
4
Task 2: Determine Needs Justification for New Construction /Existing Facility Purchase /New Const
4
2
40
8
8
Task 3: Produce a Costing Matrix for Proposed Development Options
4
2
24
8
4
Task 4: Threshold Funding Assessment
1
1
6
8
4
Task 5: Outreach and Stakeholder Engagement
1
1
8
12
6
Task 6: City Council Work Session
6
1
16
12
10
Task 7: Present and Obtain City Council Acceptance of Phase 3 Feasibility Study
9
1
16
8
6
Subtotal Hours
31
14
134
64
42
285
Subtotal Cost
$6,820
$2,380
$21,440
$5,120
55,880
$41,640
Phase 4: Risk Assessment
Task 1: Update and Present Work Plan and Schedule
6
8
24
12
6
Task 2: Conduct a Risk Assessment Analysis of City Services
8
6
50
36
12
Task 3: Examine Optimum Solution Given Phase 1 Financial Parameters, Phase 2 Development Op
6
1
24
8
12
and Phase 3 Risk Assessment Criteria
6
2
36
10
8
Task 4 Outreach and Stakeholder Engagement
2
1
12
8
6
Task 5 Conceptual -level Phasing and Funding Plan
2
1
12
8
2
Task 6: City Council Work Session
6
1
16
6
8
Task 7: Present and Obtain City Council Acceptance of Phase 4 Risk Assessment
6
1
24
12
6
Task 8: Assemble Draft Document in Final Format for Review by Steering Committee
2
2
40
10
54
Task 9: Submit Final Document for City Council Acceptance
2
2
30
30
20
Subtotal Hours
46
25
268
740
134
613
Subtotal Cost
$10,120
$4,250
$42,880
$11,200
$18,760
$87,210
Total Estimated Hours (RFM)
Cost
Subtotal RFM Cost
Subtotal Berk Associates Cost
Subtotal Matson Carlson Cost
Subtotal Reid Middleton Cost
Subtotal Long Bay Cost
10% Consultant Markup
Total (Fixed Fee)
$216,600
$65,070
$14,160
$8,590
$6,555
$9,438
5320,413
Reimbursement Budget (Rate Schedule Per 2/22/13 - Statement of Qualifications) $15,000
Travel Budget (Assume 61 visits, 108 mi. R.T. @ .565 cents /mi.) 53,722
Owner Contingency
Total Budget
$10,000
$349,135
7,496
5216,600
93
CITY OF TUKWILA FACILITY NEEDS ANALYSIS AND FEASIBILITY STUDY
FEE
APRIL 23, 2013
BERK ASSOCIATES
Exhibit B
RICEf21 U SMILLER
Total Estimated Hours
Cost
Totals
Subtotal Consultant Cost
94
5/7/2013
565,070
471
565,070
2
Strategic
Advisor
Lead
Analyst&
Facilitator
Survey&
Public
Engagement
Support
Financial
&
Market
Analyst
Supporting
Analyst
Total Hours
and
Estimated
Cost by
Task
2013 Billing Rates
5250
5140
5110
5110
$70
Phase 1: Visioning and Information Gathering
Task 1: Kickoff Meeting and Project Plan Presentation / Refinement
4
4
Task 2: Steering Committee Meeting #1
4
4
Task 3: Executive Staff Work Session
4
Task4: Compiling Information on Existing City Facilities
Task 5: Develop Space Needs Projection (10, 25 and 50 year benchmarks)
Task 6: Strategize Funding Opportunities for Future City Development
8
24
16
Task 7: Outreach and Stakeholder Engagement
4
16
8
Task 8: City County Work Session
4
4
Task 9: Present and Obtain City Council Acceptance of Phase 1 Facility Needs Analysis
Subtotal Hours
28
28
8
24
16
104
Subtotal Cost
57,000
$3,920
5880
$2,640
51,120
515,560
Phase 2: Development of Need and Prioritization of Findings
Task 1: Update and Present Work Plan Schedule
Task 2: Projected Needs vs. Existing Facilities Occupancy
Task 3: Outreach and Stakeholder Engagement
4
16
24
Task 4: Executive Staff Work Session
4
4
Task 5: Present and Obtain City Council Acceptance of Phase 2 Facility Needs Projections
Subtotal Hours
8
20
24
0
0
52
Subtotal Cost
52,000
52,800
52,640
50
50
57,440
Phase 3: Feasibility Study
Task 1: Update and Present Work Plan and Schedule
Task 2: Determine Needs Justification for New Construction /Existing Facility Purchase /New Construction
Task 3: Produce a Costing Matrix for Proposed Development Options
Task 4: Threshold Funding Assessment
12
40
16
Task 5: Outreach and Stakeholder Engagement
16
24
Task 6: City Council Work Session
4
4
8
Task 7: Present and Obtain City Council Acceptance of Phase 3 Feasibility Study
Subtotal Hours
16
20
32
40
16
124
Subtotal Cost
54,000
52,800
53,520
54,400
$1,120
515,840
Phase 4: Risk Assessment
Task 1: Update and Present Work Plan and Schedule
Task 2: Conduct a Risk Assessment Analysis of City Services
Task 3: Examine Optimum Solution Given Phase 1 Financial Parameters, Phase 2 Development Options,
8
4
and Phase 3 Risk Assessment Criteria
Task 4: Outreach and Stakeholder Engagement
24
32
Task 5: Concept Level Phasing and Funding Plan
12
40
Task 6: City Council Work Session
4
4
8
Task 7: Present and Obtain City Council Acceptance of Phase 4 Risk Assessment
Task 8: Assemble Draft Document in Final Format for Review by Steering Committee
3
16
12
24
Task 9: Submit Final Document for City Council Acceptance
Subtotal Hours
27
48
52
64
0
191
Subtotal Cost
56,750
56,720
55,720
57,040
50
526,230
Total Estimated Hours
Cost
Totals
Subtotal Consultant Cost
94
5/7/2013
565,070
471
565,070
2
CITY OF TUKWILA FACILITY NEEDS ANALYSIS AND FEASIBILITY STUDY
FEE
APRIL 23, 2013
MATSON CARLSON
5/7/2013
Exhibit B
RICFf2rgZ/.AVIILlER
Total Estimated Hours
Cost
Totals
Subtotal Consulant Cost
$14,160
118
$14,160
95
Principal
Total Hours
and
Estimated
Cost by
Task
2013 Billing Rates
$120
Phase 1: Visioning and Information Gathering
Task 1: Kickoff Meeting and Project Plan Presentation / Refinement
Task 2: Steering Committee Meeting
Task 3: Executive Staff Work Session
Task 4: Compiling Information on Existing City Facilities
Task 5: Develop Space Needs Projection (10, 25 and 50 year benchmarks)
Task 6: Strategize Funding Opportunities for Future City Development
Task 7: Outreach and Stakeholder Engagement
Task 8: City County Work Session
Task 9: Present and Obtain City Council Acceptance of Phase 1 Facility Needs Analysis
Subtotal Hours
Subtotal Cost
Phase 2: Development of Need and Prioritization of Findings
Task 1: Update and Present Work Plan Schedule
Task 2: Projected Needs vs. Existing Facilities Occupancy
Task 3: Outreach and Stakeholder Engagment
Task 4: Executive Staff Work Session
Task 5: Present and Obtain City Council Acceptance of Phase 2 Facility Needs Projections
Subtotal Hours
Subtotal Cost
Phase 3: Feasibility Study
Task 1: Update and Present Work Plan and Schedule
Task 2: Determine Needs Justification for New Construction /Existing Facility Purchase /New Construction
Task 3: Produce a Costing Matrix for Proposed Development Options
114
Task 4: Threshold Funding Assessment
Task 5: Outreach and Stakeholder Engagement
Task 6: City Council Work Session
Task 7: Present and Obtain City Council Acceptance of Phase 3 Feasibility Study
Subtotal Hours
114
Subtotal Cost
$13,680
Phase 4: Risk Assessment
Task 1: Update and Present Work Plan and Schedule
Task 2: Conduct a Risk Assessment Analysis of City Services
Task 3: Examine Optimum Solution Given Phase 1 Financial Parameters, Phase 2 Development Options,
and Phase 3 Risk Assessment Criteria
Task 4: Outreach and Stakeholder Engagement
Task 5: Concept Level Phasing and Funding Plan
4
Task 6: City Council Work Session
Task 7: Present and Obtain City Council Acceptance of Phase 4 Risk Assessment
Task 8: Assemble Draft Document in Final Format for Review by Steering Committee
Task 9: Submit Final Document for City Council Acceptance
Subtotal Hours
4
Subtotal Cost
$480
Total Estimated Hours
Cost
Totals
Subtotal Consulant Cost
$14,160
118
$14,160
95
CITY OF TUKWILA FACILITY NEEDS ANALYSIS AND FEASIBILTY STUDY
FEE
APRIL 23, 2013
REID MIDDLETON
Exhibit B
RICO)"g2l,AWILLER
Total Estimated Hours
Cost
Totals
Subtotal Consulant Cost
58,590
59
58,590
Principal
Senior
Engineer
Total Hours
and
Estimated
Cost by
Task
12013 Billing Rates
$250
5140
Phase 1: Visioning and Information Gathering
Task 1: Kickoff Meeting and Project Plan Presentation / Refinement
1
4
Task 2: Steering Committee Meeting #1
Task 3: Executive Staff Work Session
Task 4: Compiling Information on Existing City Facilities
8
Task 5: Develop Space Needs Projection (10, 25 and 50 year benchmarks)
Task 6: Strategize Funding Opportunities for Future City Development
Task 7: Outreach and Stakeholder Engagement
Task 8: City County Work Session
Task 9: Present and Obtain City Council Acceptance of Phase 1 Facility Needs Analysis
Subtotal Hours
1
12
13
Subtotal Cost
$250
51,680
$1,930
Phase 2: Development of Need and Prioritization of Findings
Task 1: Update and Present Work Plan Schedule
Task 2: Projected Needs vs. Existing Facilities Occupancy
1
8
Task 3: Outreach and Stakeholder Engagement
Task 4: Executive Staff Work Session
Task 5: Present and Obtain City Council Acceptance of Phase 2 Facility Needs Projections
Subtotal Hours
1
8
9
Subtotal Cost
5250
51,120
51,370
Phase 3: Feasibility Study
Task 1: Update and Present Work Plan and Schedule
Task 2: Determine Needs Justification for New Construction /Existing Facility Purchase /New Construction
12
Task 3: Produce a Costing Matrix for Proposed Development Options
Task 4: Threshold Funding Assessment
Task 5: Outreach and Stakeholder Engagement
Task 6: City Council Work Session
Task 7: Present and Obtain City Council Acceptance of Phase 3 Feasibility Study
Subtotal Hours
0
12
12
Subtotal Cost
50
$1,680
51,680
Phase 4: Risk Assessment
Task 1: Update and Present Work Plan and Schedule
Task 2: Conduct a Risk Assessment Analysis of City Services
1
16
Task 3: Examine Optimum Solution Given Phase 1 Financial Parameters, Phase 2 Development Options
8
and Phase 3 Risk Assessment Criteria
Task 4: Outreach and Stakeholder Engagement
Task 5: Conceptual Level Phasing and Funding Planning
Task 6: City Council Work Session
Task 7 : Present and Obtain City Council Acceptance of Phase 4 Risk Assessment
Task 8: Assemble Draft Document in Final Format for Review by Steering Committee
Task 9: Submit Final Document for City Council Acceptance
Subtotal Hours
1
24
25
Subtotal Cost
5250
53,360
$3,610
Total Estimated Hours
Cost
Totals
Subtotal Consulant Cost
58,590
59
58,590
CITY OF TUKWILA FACILITY NEEDS ANALYSIS AND FEASIBILITY STUDY
FEE
APRIL 23, 2013
LONG BAY ENTERPRISES
5/7/2013
Exhibit B
RICqceYgZdSMILIER
Totals
Subtotal Consulant Cost
6
56,555
97
Principal
Researcher
Admin Assist.
Total
Hours
and
Estimated
Cost by
Task
2013 Billing Rates
$175
$100
$55
Phase 1: Visioning and Information Gathering
Task 1: Kickoff Meeting and Project Plan Presentation / Refinement
Task 2: Steering Committee Meeting
Task 3: Executive Staff Work Session
Task 4: Compiling Information on Existing City Facilities
Task 5: Develop Space Needs Projection (10, 25 and 50 year benchmarks)
Task 6: Strategize Funding Opportunities for Future City Development
Task 7: Outreach and Stakeholder Engagement .
Task 8: City County Work Session
Task 9: Present and Obtain City Council Acceptance of Phase 1 Facility Needs Analysis
Subtotal Hours
Subtotal Cost
Phase 2: Development of Need and Prioritization of Findings
Task 1: Update and Present Work Plan Schedule
Task 2: Projected Needs vs. Existing Facilities Occupancy
Task 3: Outreach and Stakeholder Engagement
Task 4: Executive Staff Work Session
Task 5: Present and Obtain City Council Acceptance of Phase 2 Facility Needs Projections
Subtotal Hours
Subtotal Cost
Phase 3: Feasibility Study
Task 1: Update and Present Work Plan and Schedule
Task 2: Determine Needs Justification for New Construction /Existing Facility Purchase /New Constructio
25
6
4
Task 3: Produce a Costing Matrix for Proposed Development Options
6
2
2
Task 4: Threshold Funding Assessment
Task 5: Outreach and Stakeholder Engagement
Task 6: City Council Work Session
Task 7: Present and Obtain City Council Acceptance of Phase 3 Feasibility Study
Subtotal Hours
31
8
6
45
Subtotal Cost
$5,425
5800
5330
56,555
Phase 4: Risk Assessment
Task 1: Update and Present Work Plan and Schedule
Task 2: Conduct a Risk Assessment Analysis of City Services
Task 3: Examine Optimum Solution Given Phase 1 Financial Parameters, Phase 2 Development Options,
and Phase 3 Risk Assessment Criteria
Task 4: Outreach and Stakeholder Engagement
Task 5: Concept Level Funding and Phasing Plan
Task 6: City Council Work Session
Task 7: Present and Obtain City Council Acceptance of Phase 4 Risk Assessment
Task 8: Assemble Draft Document in Final Format for Review by Steering Committee
Task 9: Submit Final Document for City Council Acceptance
Subtotal Hours
Subtotal Cost
Total Estimated Hours
Cost
45
56,555
Totals
Subtotal Consulant Cost
6
56,555
97
98
ID
Task Task Name
Duration :Start Finish ,Predecessors
quarter 13rd Quarter 4th Quarter j 1st Quarte
0 Mode May Jun , Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec I Jan Feb
o Tukwila Schedule 169 days Tue 6/4/13 Mon 1/27/11
1
2
___
3
4
10
11 1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Phase One 70 days Tue 6/4/13 Mon 9/9/13
Council Work Session 0 days Mon 8/26/13 Mon 8/26/13
City Council 0 days Mon 9/2/13 Mon 9/2/13
Presentation
Phase Two 35 days Mon 9/9/13 Fri 10/25/13
Council Work Session 0 days Mon 10/14/12 Mon 10/14/12
City Council 0 days Mon Mon
Presentation 10/21/13 10/21/13
Phase Three 25 days Fri 10/25/13 Thu 11/28/13
Council Work Session 0 days Mon 11/11/12 Mon 11/11/12
City Council 0 days Mon Mon
Presentation 11/18/13 11/18/13
Phase Four
Council Work Session
City Council
Presentation
36 days
0 days
0 days
Mon 11/18/12Sun 1/5/14
Mon 1/13/14 Mon 1/13/14
Mon 1/20/14 Mon 1/20/14
Project Completion 0 days Mon 1/27/14 Mon 1/27/14
Project: Tukwila Schedule
Date: Wed 5/8/13
4. 8/26
9/2
10/14
10/21
11/11
11/18
1/2
Task External Milestone
Split,,,,,,,,,,,,,„,,,,,.■■■■ Inactive Task
Milestone ® Inactive Milestone
Summary Inactive Summary
Project Summary ' Manual Task
External Tasks Duration -only
Manual Summary Rollup
Manual Summary
Start -only E
Finish -only 3
'° Deadline
Progress
Page 1
100
CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY
2013 to 2018
PROJECT: City Facilities Project No. 91230201
First step is to examine all City facilities to determine priorities with a needs analysis and the possibility
DESCRIPTION: of combining existing structures. Second step is to prioritize those needs based on public safety. Third step
will be to determine prudent financing options. Results may include constructing new combined City Facilities.
JUSTIFICATION: Almost all city buildings have structural and seismic concerns for public safety. Existing facilities are located
throughout the City and could be consolidated for better function, use of space, and service to our citizens.
STATUS: Part of the Facilities Plan.
MAINT. IMPACT: Improves public safety and efficiency for City operations.
COMMENT: Scoping and analysis of all City facilities is scheduled for 2013 and will include Police, Fire, and Public Works.
FINANCIAL Through Estimated
in $000's
2011 2012 2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
BEYOND TOTAL
EXPENSES
Analysis
500
500
Design
2,500
2,500
Land (R/W)
0
Const. Mgmt.
3,500
3,500
Construction
28,500
28,500
TOTAL EXPENSES
0
0
500
0
0
0
0
0
34,500
35,000
FUND SOURCES
Grant
0
Bond
33,500
33,500
Mitigation Expected
0
City Oper. Revenue
0
0
500
0
0
0
0
0
1,000
1,500
TOTAL SOURCES
0
0
500
0
0
0
0
0
34,500
35,000
2013 - 2018 Capital Improvement Program
73
101
102
FINANCE AND SAFETY COMMITTEE
Meeting Minutes
May 21, 2013 — 5:30p.m.; Conference Room #3
City of Tukwila
Finance and Safety Committee
PRESENT
Councilmembers: Dennis Robertson, Chair, Chair; Verna Seal and De'Sean Quinn
Staff: Bob Giberson, Mike Villa, Kim Gilman, Jon Harrison, David Cline, Laurel Humphrey and
Kimberly Matej
Guests: Chuck Parrish, resident; and Jerry Thornton, COPCAB
CALL TO ORDER: Committee Chair Robertson called the meeting to order at 5:26 p.m.
I. PRESENTATIONS
No presentations.
II. BUSINESS AGENDA
A. City Facilities Needs Assessment & Feasibility Study Agreement
Staff is seeking Council approval of a consultant agreement with Rice Fergus Miller for architectural
services relating to the City's Facilities Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study in the amount of
$349,135.
Request for Proposals for the study were advertised in February, and Rice Fergus Miller was chosen by a
selection committee after evaluations, interviews and references checks. Subconsultants for the project
include: BERK, Inc.; Reid Middleton; Matson /Carlson; and Long Bay Enterprises. Rice Fergus Miller
will complete the following four (4) phases as the scope of work for this agreement:
• Phase 1— Visioning and Information Gathering
• Phase 2 — Development of Need and Prioritization of Findings
• Phase 3 — Feasibility Study
• Phase 4 — Risk Assessment
Each phase includes and builds in outreach and stakeholder engagement. Consultant work is to be
completed no later than January 27, 2014, but the aggressive timeline could require a contract extension.
The funding for this agreement is budgeted in the 2013 -2018 CIP Page 73, as $500,000. The proposed
contract is currently under budget. Committee Members discussed the possible membership of the Steering
Committee, and agreed that due to the number of times each phase builds in a Council Work Session
and /or involvement that a Council representative does not necessarily need to serve on the Steering
Committee. Committee Members suggested that consideration be given to board and commission members
inside the City such as the Planning Commission, Parks Commission, COPCAB, etc. UNANIMOUS
APPROVAL. FORWARD TO MAY 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION.
B. Resolution: Compensation Policies
As per ongoing conversations over the past several months, as well as the 2013 Finance & Safety
Committee work plan, representatives of the Committee have met with Human Resources and the Mayor's
Office to develop a strategy that sets a new compensation policy for represented and non - represented
which will replace and repeal Resolution No. 1387. In summary, the new policy:
• Formalizes the process of providing information to the City Council relating to salary and benefits
• Defines comparable jurisdictions based on annual assessed valuation
• Outlines average comparable salary ranges
• Provides for cost -of- living adjustment calculation
103
104
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
Meeting Date
Prepared by
tylayr's review
/*Council review
05/28/13
SB
we
06/03/13
SB
E Bi d Award
Mtg Date
Public Hearing
Mtg Date
Other
Mtg Date
CATEGORY I Discussion
Mtg Date
SPONSOR E Council 1 Mayor Z HR E DCD E Finance _Fire E IT P&R Li Police 11 13 IF
SPONSOR'S It is the City Council's and City Administration's desire to repeal Resolution No 1387, and
SUMMARY to establish a new compensation policy to guide the development and application of the
City's overall compensation programs for employees of the City of Tukwila.
REVIEWED BY — COW Mtg. CA&P Cmte EZ F&S Cmte E Transportation Cmte
L Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. _ Planning Comm.
DATE: 05/21/13 COMMITTEE CHAIR: ROBERTSON
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR/ADMIN.
COMMITTEE
Human Resources Department
ITEM INFORMATION
ITEM No.
4.D.
105
STAFF SPONSOR: STEPHANIE BROWN
ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 5/28/13
AGENDA ITEM TITLE
A resolution establishing a Compensation Policy
05/28/13
Motion
Mtg Date
Z Resolution
Mtg Date 06/03/13
Lil Ordinance
Mtg Date
E Bi d Award
Mtg Date
Public Hearing
Mtg Date
Other
Mtg Date
CATEGORY I Discussion
Mtg Date
SPONSOR E Council 1 Mayor Z HR E DCD E Finance _Fire E IT P&R Li Police 11 13 IF
SPONSOR'S It is the City Council's and City Administration's desire to repeal Resolution No 1387, and
SUMMARY to establish a new compensation policy to guide the development and application of the
City's overall compensation programs for employees of the City of Tukwila.
REVIEWED BY — COW Mtg. CA&P Cmte EZ F&S Cmte E Transportation Cmte
L Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. _ Planning Comm.
DATE: 05/21/13 COMMITTEE CHAIR: ROBERTSON
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR/ADMIN.
COMMITTEE
Human Resources Department
Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole
COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$ $ $
Fund Source:
Comments:
MTG. DATE
RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
05/28/13
MTG. DATE
ATTACHMENTS
05/28/13
Informational Memorandum dated 05/22/13 (changes made after FS Committee)
Draft Resolution
Resolution No. 1387
Minutes from the Finance and Safety Committee meeting of 05/21/13
06/03/13
105
106
TO:
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
Mayor Haggerton
Finance & Safety Committee
FROM: Stephanie Brown, Human Resources Director
DATE: May 22, 2013
Revised after Finance & Safety Committee Meeting
SUBJECT: City Compensation Policy
ISSUE
To repeal Resolution No. 1387, the City's existing policy on compensation for represented and
non - represented employees.
BACKGROUND
It is the City Council and City Administrations' desire to repeal Resolution No. 1387, and to
establish a new compensation policy to guide the development and application of the City's
overall compensation programs for employees of the City of Tukwila.
DISCUSSION
Discussion of the attached Compensation Policy resolution.
Finance & Safety Committee Members requested the following revisions be made to the draft
resolution:
• Delete the word "salaries and" from Section 1, Goal #4 (last page of the draft
resolution).
• Add a goal addressing "salary compression issues"
Based on these changes, the resolution would then read like this:
4. The goal of the City is to establish parity between represented and non - represented
employees' benefits. The City desires to provide employee benefits that are competitive to the
comparable cities, described herein. The City will endeavor to keep increases to annual health
care costs under market averages. If costs exceed market averages, adjustments will be made
to reduce benefit costs.
5. The goal of the City is to mitigate or avoid salary compression issues where possible.
Salary compression may exist when a non - represented supervisor earns less, or is projected to
earn less than those that he /she supervises due to contracted wage increases.
RECOMMENDATION
The Council is being asked to consider this item at the May 28, Committee of the Whole
meeting and approve at the subsequent June 3, Regular Meeting.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 1387
Compensation Policy Resolution
107
108
DRAFT
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING A COMPENSATION
POLICY FOR CITY OF TUKWILA EMPLOYEES AND
REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 1387.
WHEREAS, the City believes that the purpose of a compensation program is to
facilitate recruiting, retention, development and productivity of employees; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to utilize standardized policies, procedures and
processes, wherever possible, for compensating all employee groups, both represented
and non - represented; and
WHEREAS, the City recognizes that current economic conditions and forecasts,
long -range City budget forecasts, position rates for comparable jurisdictions, as well as
internal equity considerations should assist in guiding in the compensation of
employees; and
WHEREAS, the City has made a determination to, when economic conditions
allow, review and adjust non - represented employee salaries via a market analysis to
that of the average of comparable jurisdictions in even - numbered years, and to provide
a cost -of- living (COLA) allowance in odd - numbered years; and
WHEREAS, the City has made a determination to, when economic conditions and
negotiations allow, provide represented employees with salaries that reflect the average
of comparable jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, the City has made a determination to, when economic conditions
allow, provide benefits to represented and non - represented employees that are slightly
above the average of comparable jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, the City Council will participate in setting negotiation expectations and
reviewing and approving represented employee group contracts;
W: \Word Processing \Resolutions \Compensation policy for City employees 5 -22 -13
SB:bjs
Page 1 of 3
109
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The following statements and processes are adopted for the purpose of
guiding compensation programs for employees of the City of Tukwila.
A. Information to be provided to the City Council.
1. For Represented Employees. A written presentation of current internal
and local external public agency salary and benefit trends, including a salary and
benefits market survey of comparable jurisdictions, as defined herein, will be provided
to the City Council. This presentation must be made to the Council prior to the
commencement of negotiations with the bargaining units regarding salary and benefits.
The City Council and Administration will discuss represented employee group
negotiation expectations, negotiating points, salary and benefit change floors and /or
ceilings prior to the beginning and at appropriate points during negotiation sessions.
2. For Non - Represented Employees. A written presentation of current
internal and local external public agency salary and benefit trends, including a salary
and benefits market survey of comparable jurisdictions, as defined herein, will be
provided to the City Council every year that a non - represented salary increase is due.
Relevant Association of Washington Cities (AWC) data from the previous year's
Washington City and County Employee Salary and Benefit Survey, for the comparable
jurisdictions, will be used in the salary market survey.
B. Compensation Policy.
1. All Puget Sound jurisdictions with +/ -50% of Tukwila's annual assessed
valuation, based upon the Department of Revenue data, will be used to create the list of
comparable jurisdictions for evaluation of salary information. It is desirable to use the
same comparable jurisdictions for both represented and non - represented employee
groups.
2. For non - represented employees, the City desires to pay the average salary
for the particular pay scale, as derived from the comparable jurisdiction data described
in Section B.1. If the City's pay scale for any classification does not represent the
average of comparable salary ranges ( +/ -5 %), written justification must be provided to
the City Council. For represented employees, the City desires to pay salaries that are
competitive to the City's comparable jurisdictions.
3. The cost -of- living adjustment (COLA) in odd - numbered years for non -
represented employees shall be based upon 90% of the Seattle- Tacoma - Bremerton
Consumer Price Index (CPI -W) Average (June to June). It is desirable to calculate
represented cost -of- living adjustments the same way, unless a different method is
authorized by the Council.
W: \Word Processing \Resolutions \Compensation policy for City employees 5 -22 -13
SB:bjs
110
Page 2 of 3
4. The goal of the City is to establish parity between represented and non -
represented employees' salaries and benefits. The City desires to provide employee
benefits that are competitive to the comparable cities described herein. The City will
endeavor to keep increases to annual health care costs under market averages. If
costs exceed market averages, adjustments will be made to reduce benefit costs.
5. The goal of the City is to mitigate or avoid salary compression issues
where possible. Salary compression may exist when a non - represented supervisor
earns Tess, or is projected to earn less than those that he /she supervises due to
contracted wage increases.
56. If the Administration determines that a deviation from the above process
(in its entirety or for individual positions) is necessary, it will provide justification to the
City Council for review and approval prior to the adoption of any process change.
Section 2. Resolution No. 1387 is hereby repealed.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON,
at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of , 2013.
ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED:
Christy O'Flaherty, MMC, City Clerk Kathy Hougardy, Council President
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Resolution Number:
Shelley M. Kerslake, City Attorney
W: \Word Processing \Resolutions \Compensation policy for City employees 5 -22 -13
SB:bjs
Page 3 of 3
111
112
City of Tukwila
Washington
Resolution No. /Jig 7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING A
COMPENSATION POLICY FOR CITY OF TUKWILA
EMPLOYEES, AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO.
1271.
WHEREAS, the Tukwila City Council finds it necessary and desirable to establish
a compensation policy to guide the development and application of the City's overall
compensation and benefit philosophy; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed its compensation philosophy and
reached a determination with regards to its application;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The following policy statements are adopted for the purpose of
establishing and administering compensation programs for employees of the City of
Tukwila:
A. Intent of the System. The classification and compensation system of the City
should encourage the selection and reasonable retention of qualified and productive
employees in order to best serve the City.
B. Competitive Position. The City should maintain a competitive position and
ability to select and retain a competent, qualified and productive work force. The City's
compensation system should reflect average compensation among the various
employment markets in which the City competes for qualified labor.
C. Employment. Salary ranges shall be periodically compared and established
based on the geographic area from which each position is recruited. Positions shall be
recruited from the local to the national base, depending on the level of position being
recruited and on the availability and caliber of potential recruits in the local, regional or
national area.
D. Classifications. Classifications shall be based on the Decision Band method
for the non - represented employees. Comparative analysis for all other positions shall
be as determined by the Administrative Services Director based on internal and
external factors inherent to the specific classifications.
E. Salary. Market wages will be determined in relationship to similarly valued
jobs in competitive employment markets.
F. Salary and Benefit Mix. A mix of wages and benefits shall be provided based
on a value equal to that of the average of the defined market.
113
G. Optional Benefits. Where feasible, optional cafeteria -style benefit options,
above and beyond a base core of standard benefits, shall be developed which address
the unique needs of the various types of employee classifications. Total benefits shall
not exceed the average of the defined market.
Section 2. Resolution No. 1271 is hereby repealed.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL C F THE CI�Y OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON,
at a regular meeting thereof this / day of 1997.
ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED:
ne E. Cantu, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
• ''CE • F TH . ITY ATTORNEY
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Resolution Number: /3S7
114
Hagge/9 Council President
FINANCE AND SAFETY COMMITTEE
Meeting Minutes
May 21, 2013 — 5:30p.m.; Conference Room #3
PRESENT
Councilmembers:
Staff:
Guests:
City of Tukwila
Finance and Safety Committee
Dennis Robertson, Chair, Chair; Verna Seal and De'Sean Quinn
Bob Giberson, Mike Villa, Kim Gilman, Jon Harrison, David Cline, Laurel Humphrey and
Kimberly Matej
Chuck Parrish, resident; and Jerry Thornton, COPCAB
CALL TO ORDER: Committee Chair Robertson called the meeting to order at 5:26 p.m.
I. PRESENTATIONS
No presentations.
II. BUSINESS AGENDA
A. City Facilities Needs Assessment & Feasibility Study Agreement
Staff is seeking Council approval of a consultant agreement with Rice Fergus Miller for architectural
services relating to the City's Facilities Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study in the amount of
$349,135.
Request for Proposals for the study were advertised in February, and Rice Fergus Miller was chosen by a
selection committee after evaluations, interviews and references checks. Subconsultants for the project
include: BERK, Inc.; Reid Middleton; Matson/Carlson; and Long Bay Enterprises. Rice Fergus Miller
will complete the following four (4) phases as the scope of work for this agreement:
• Phase 1— Visioning and Information Gathering
• Phase 2 — Development of Need and Prioritization of Findings
• Phase 3 — Feasibility Study
• Phase 4 — Risk Assessment
Each phase includes and builds in outreach and stakeholder engagement. Consultant work is to be
completed no later than January 27, 2014, but the aggressive timeline could require a contract extension.
The funding for this agreement is budgeted in the 2013 -2018 CIP Page 73, as $500,000. The proposed
contract is currently under budget. Committee Members discussed the possible membership of the Steering
Committee, and agreed that due to the number of times each phase builds in a Council Work Session
and /or involvement that a Council representative does not necessarily need to serve on the Steering
Committee. Committee Members suggested that consideration be given to board and commission members
inside the City such as the Planning Commission, Parks Commission, COPCAB, etc. UNANIMOUS
APPROVAL. FORWARD TO MAY 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION.
B. Resolution: Compensation Policies
As per ongoing conversations over the past several months, as well as the 2013 Finance & Safety
Committee work plan, representatives of the Committee have met with Human Resources and the Mayor's
Office to develop a strategy that sets a new compensation policy for represented and non- represented
which will replace and repeal Resolution No. 1387. In summary, the new policy:
• Formalizes the process of providing information to the City Council relating to salary and benefits
• Defines comparable jurisdictions based on annual assessed valuation
• Outlines average comparable salary ranges
• Provides for cost -of- living adjustment calculation
115
Finance & Safety Committee Minutes May 21, 2013 — Page 2
After discussion, Committee Members requested that two changes be made to the draft resolution:
1. Remove the words "salaries and" from the first sentence on page 41 of the Committee agenda
packet under B. Compensation Policy No. 4
2. Add another item under B. Compensation Policy (after No. 4) that addresses the mitigation or
avoidance of salary compression issues whenever possible
Staff will make the requested changes in the draft resolution that comes before Council at the next
Committee of the Whole. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO MAY 28 COW FOR
DISCUSSION.
C. Ordinance: Leash Law
Staff is seeking Council approval of an amendment to Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Section 7.20.020
regarding leash requirements for dogs away from a premise where it is owned and /or controlled and kept.
As currently written, the TMC does not provide authority for a police officer to enforce the Code through a
civil infraction. This amendment will update the Code, and allow for enforcement.
Committee Members expressed concerns regarding the generality of Chapter 7.20, and believe that it is
important to define the actual intent of the Code. The Committee requested that this section of the TMC be
re- drafted to specifically address citizen concerns of unwanted /nuisance dogs as well as threatening and
dangerous dogs. Commander Harrison suggested the Committee consider recommending immediate
passage of the current proposed amendment so that the police department is able to levy a penalty as a
deterrent in circumstances when animal control representatives are not immediately available. In the
meantime, staff will begin a re -write of this section of the Code and return to the Finance & Safety
Committee when it is ready for review (anticipated time frame to return to Committee is September).
UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO MAY 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION.
D. Police Department Update: 2013 ls` Quarter Report
As information only, staff utilized a PowerPoint presentation to update the Committee on items of
significance that occurred in the Police Department during the first quarter. The information included
highlights, crime statistics and crime reduction strategies.
Chief Villa mentioned that the Police Department is going to begin a department -wide strategic planning
process, and will utilize BERK for the plan strategy and formulation. INFORMATION ONLY.
III. MISCELLANEOUS
Meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m.
Next meeting: Tuesday, June 4, 2013 — 5:15 p.m. — Conference Room #3
Committee Chair Approval
Minutes by ,,KAM.
116
Upcoming Meetings & Events
May /June 2013
27th (Monday)
28th (Tuesday)
29th (Wednesday)
30th (Thursday)
31st (Friday)
1st (Saturday)
Memorial Day
> Community
Affairs & Park.
➢ Transportation
Pitch in for Parks!
City offices closed
Crate,
Join the Parks
Crate,
r ag
5:15 PM
Department for a
Cancelled
w�ww sti�
(CR #1)
monthly cleanup at
Cascade View Park
i 111111111
(14211 37th Avenue S)
➢ City Council
Tukwila Tree and
9:00 AM
Executive
Environment
r Saturday of each
Session,
Advisory
month
°'" °��
6:30 PM
Committee Meeting,
5:30- 7:00PM
,( /'7,\
(CR #2 — 6300
\ f ''`„
Southcenter Blvd)
®I
➢ City Council
�
Committee of
the Whole Mtg.,
7:00 PM
II
).
(Council
Chambers)
3rd (Monday)
4th (Tuesday)
5th (Wednesday)
6th (Thursday)
7th (Friday)
8th (Saturday)
➢ Utilities Crate,
➢ Chamber of
➢ Equity &
Council Chat
5:00 PM
Commerce
Diversity
10:00 AM to
(CR 41)
Gov't. &
Commission,
12:00 NOON
Community
5:15 PM
Stop by and informally
➢ Civil Service
Affairs Crate,
(CR #3)
talk with a Tukwila
Commission,
12:00 NOON
City Councilmember
Cancelled
(Chamber
about anything on
(Rescheduled to
Office)
your mind regarding
6/10/13)
Tukwila.
➢ Finance &
Foster Golf Links
Safety Crate,
Clubhouse
City Council
5:30 PM
(13500 Interurban Ave S)
Regular Mtg.,
(CR #3)
7:00 PM
Territorial Voices:
A Civil War
(Council
So. Arts
Chambers)
Commission,
Reader's Theater
5:30 PM
1:00- 2:30PM
(Community
An interactive, living
Center)
theater piece
revealing varied
opinions on race and
slavery from our
State's own Civil
War history.
(Community Center)
For more
information, visit
t E,J3.0 ..v..les.o1.1
> Arts Commission: 1st Tues., 5:30 PM, Tukwila Community Center. Contact Stephanie Gardner at 206 -767 -2342.
> Chamber of Commerce's Tukwila Government and Community Affairs Committee: 1st Tues., 12:00 Noon, Chamber Offices.
> City Council Committee of Whole (C.O.W.) Meeting: 2nd & 4th Mon., 7:00 PM, Council Chambers at City Hall.
> City Council Regular Meeting: 1st & 3rd Mon., 7:00 PM, Council Chambers at City Hall.
➢ Civil Service Commission: 1st Mon., 5:00 PM, Conf. Room #3. Contact Kim Gilman at 206 - 431 -2187.
> Community Affairs & Parks Committee: 2nd & 4th Mon., 5:15 PM, Conf Room #3 Meeting Cancelled.
➢ COPCAB (Community Oriented Policing Citizens Adv. Board): 4th Thurs., 6:30 PM, Conf Rm #5. Chris Partman (206 -431- 2197).
> Equity & Diversity Commission: 1st Thurs., 5:15 PM, Conf Room #3. Contact Joyce Trantina at 206 - 433 -1850.
> Finance & Safety Committee: 1st & 3rd Tues., 5:30 PM, Conf. Room #3
> Library Advisory Board: 3rd Wed., 7:00 PM, Foster Library. Contact Stephanie Gardner at 206 -767 -2342.
> Parks Commission: 3rd Wed., 5:30 PM, Meeting Room B at Community Center. Contact Dave Johnson at 206 - 767 -2308.
> Planning Commission /Board of Architectural Review: 4th Thurs., except 2nd Thursday in Nov. & Dec., 6:30 PM,
Council Chambers at City Hall. Contact YVynetta Bivens at 206 - 431 -3670.
> Transportation Committee: 2nd & 4th Tues., 5:15 PM, Conf. Room #1 (A) Resolution for Six -Year Transportation Program (2014-
2019). SCATBd April 16, 2013 Meeting Summary, SCA TBd May 21, 2013 Meeting Agenda, SCATBd Substitute House Bill 1954 Draft
Support Letter.
> Tukwila Historical Society: 3rd Thurs., 7:00 PM , Tukwila Heritage & Cultural Center. Contact Pat Brodin at 206 -433 -1861
>Tukwila Int'l. Blvd. Action Cmte: 2nd Tues., 7:00 PM, Tukwila Community Center. Contact Chief Villa at 206 - 433 -1815.
> Utilities Committee: 1st & 3rd Mon., 5:00 PM, Conf. Room #1
117
Tentative Agenda Schedule
MONTH
MEETING 1-
REGULAR
MEETING 2 -
C.O.W.
MEETING 3 -
REGULAR
MEETING 4 -
C.O.W.
May
6
13
20
28 (Tuesday)
See agenda packet
cover sheet for this
week's agenda
(May 28, 2013
Committee of the Whole
Meeting).
June
3
Consent Agenda:
10
Special Presentations:
17
24
Special Presentations:
Annual Small
Drainage Program -
2013 Consultant
Selection and
Contract.
Unfinished Business:
Community Oriented
Citizens Advisory
Board (COPCAB)
Annual Report.
Police Annual Report
to the Council.
Public Hearing:
A proclamation
supporting Childhood
Cancer Awareness
Week.
An ordinance
adopting the 2012
State Building Codes.
An ordinance
amending Ordinance
No. 2304, as codified
at Tukwila Municipal
Code Section 7.20.020,
"Dogs at Large -
Requirement of a
Leash or Chain," to
provide for
enforcement
authority.
Authorize the Mayor
to a consultant
agreement with Rice
Fergus Miller in the
amount of $349,135
for the City Facilities
Needs Assessment
and Feasibility Study.
A resolution
establishing a
compensation policy
for the City of
Tukwila employees.
New Business:
A resolution adopting
the 2014 -2019
Transportation
Improvement Program.
An ordinance
confirming and
levying the
assessments for LID
#33.
118