Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRes 1229 - Deny Request for Nine Tallow Tanks Installation by Pacific Engineering ILA,.� o :2 G) 1908 C ity Washington Resolution No. 1229 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, DENYING THE REQUEST BY PACIFIC ENGINEERING ON BEHALF OF BAKER COMMODITIES, INC. FOR THE INSTALLATION OF NINE TALLOW TANKS AT 5795 SOUTH 130TH PLACE; TUKWILA, WASHINGTON. WHEREAS, Richard Tomkins of Pacific Engineering Company made application on behalf of Baker Commodities, Inc. for an Unclassified Use Permit pursuant to TMC 18.66, to install nine tallow storage tanks at an animal rendering facility located at 5795 South 130th Place in the City of Tukwila, as described in Department of Community Development File No. L92- 0010, and WHEREAS, a Mitigated Determination of Non significance was issued on April 8, 1992 and was not appealed, and WHEREAS, on April 23, 1992, the Tukwila Planning Commission held a public hearing on this application, considered the application with respect to the Unclassified Use Criteria (TMC 18.66.060), and recommended Tukwila City Council approval of the permit, and WHEREAS, the Tukwila City Council scheduled a public hearing for this application on July 13, 1992, which was continued by mutual agreement of the parties to September 14, 1992, and WHEREAS, on September 21, 1992, the City Council opened the record to receive additional information and then deliberated on the accumulated record, the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Code and the recommendation of the Planning Commission; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: 1. The application for an unclassified use permit for the installation of nine tallow tanks is denied based on the following Findings: Findings A. Testimony arguing that the tallow tanks will not contribute to air (odor) pollution is not credible. Assurances of odor elimination upon approval of two previous applications for facility improvements were given by essentially the same parties. However, for whatever engineering or operational reasons, the facility continues to generate a high level of obnoxious odor to date. No reasonable council member could be expected to believe such assurances of no odor impacts a third time, B. The tallow tanks individually and as an integral part of facility operations, contribute to the obnoxious odors being generated. The tanks are thus not generally compatible with the surrounding residential areas to the northeast (Skyway) and northwest (Foster Point), the golf course to the west, and businesses to the southwest. This compatibility is required in Unclassified Use Criteria No. 3 (TMC 18.66.060), C. The continued generation of obnoxious odors makes addition of the tallow tanks or enlargement of the facility in any way, in conflict with the following Comprehensive Plan, Commerce/Industry Element objectives and policies: Objective 1 (Pg. 60) "Encourage a smooth, steady and planned growth of the business community." Policy 1 (Pg. 60) "Encourage the grouping of uses which will mutually and economically benefit each other or provide necessary services." Facility expansion would be detrimental to surrounding businesses since this would encourage the continuation of a facility which generates a high level of obnoxious odors. Policy 2 (Pg. 60) "Allow for the location of new commercial and industrial areas and the expansion of existing ones when this expansion is compatible with surrounding land use and not detrimental to the public welfare." The historic generation of obnoxious odors and the anticipated continuation in the future makes the facility detrimental to the surrounding uses and the public, based on public testimony, the public record, and personal observations. Policy 5 (Pg. 61) 'Promote renovation of areas which are not aesthetically pleasing." Adding the proposed tanks does not promote the renovation of an aesthetically non pleasing facility. It would have a significant negative aesthetic impact on surrounding residences and golf course. Objective 2 (Pg. 62) "Provide adequate opportunity for industrial and warehouse uses." The facility expansion would inhibit the growth of warehouse and industrial areas. Policy 1 (Pg. 62) "Discourage the locating of hazardous industries or those emitting pollutants in excess of acceptable standards." (Pg. 62) Policy 2 (Pg. 63) Encourage uses which are supportive to industrial and warehouse uses to locate in or near such activities." The facility does not attract uses envisioned by the City in this area. Encouraging facility expansion would be in conflict with this policy. and D. The facility engages in an activity which is an unclassified use, was legally established prior to adoption of Zoning Code amendments in 1982, has no unclassified use permit per TMC 18.66 and testimony substantiating that it generates a significant level of obnoxious odors. Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact, the City Council hereby enters the following conclusions: The Council concludes that the proposed tallow tank expansion fails to satisfy three of the five Unclassified Use Criteria in TMC 18.66.060 as discussed below: A. The tanks and facility expansion will be detrimental to the public welfare and injurious to property and improvements in the vicinity due to the anticipated odors generated and by enhancing a facility which generates a high level of obnoxious odors (TMC 18.66.060(1)). B. The tanks and facility expansion are not compatible with surrounding land uses due to the anticipated odors generated and by enhancing a facility which generates a high level of obnoxious odors (TMC 18.66.060(3)). C. The tanks and facility expansion would not be in keeping with the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan (TMC 18.66.060(4)). 2. The City Council further resolves and concludes that the facility is currently a legally non conforming use, and that installation of the proposed tallow tanks would be an enlargement of an existing legally non conforming use which is prohibited in TMC 18.70.040(1). This is based on Finding D, above. PASSED BY THE CITY COCII, OF THE ITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a regular meeting thereof this Ic7 day of 1992. Allan Ekberg, Council Presicn ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: j e E. Cantu, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: �Y mo% OFFICE OF CTTY ATTORNEY: Filed with the City Clerk: A4' Passed by the City Council: /J Resolution Number 1,?Z 9