Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Reg 2003-05-19 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Councilmembers: Joe Duffie Dave Fenton Rhonda Berry, Acting City Administrator Jim Haggerton Joan Hernandez Pam Carter, Council President Pamela Linder Richard Simpson May 19, 2003; 7 p.m. Ord #2018 Res #1523 1. CALL TO ORDER/ PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/ ROLL CALL 2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 3. PROCLAMATIONS/ a. Proclamation designating the week of May 18 -24 as National Public Works Week. b. Appointments to Boards and Commissions: Guillermo Larios, Pos. #2, Community Policing Advisory Board; term expires 3/31/06 Bruce Linton, Pos. #4, Equity Diversity Commission; term expires 7/31/04 Sarah Fenton, Pos. #7, Human Services Advisory Board; term expires 4/30/06 At this time, you are invited to comment on items not included on this agenda. To comment on an item listed on this agenda, please save your comments until the issue is presented for discussion. a. Approval of Minutes: 5/5/03 (REGULARMTG). b. Approval of Vouchers. c. Accept as complete the So. 118th St. Pedestrian Bridge and Boeing Access Road Bridge Painting project with Chayer Painting Co. of SeaTac; authorize release of retainage, subject to the standard claim and lien release procedures. (Final cost of project: $33,555.45.) a. Award a contract to Washington Industrial Coatings in Pg.13 the amount of $61,221.76 (including WSST) for the Tukwila Library, Minkler Shops and Miscellaneous Painting Projects. b. Award a contract to SCI Infrastructure LLC in the amount of $470,562.50 for the S. 134th Pl. Overlay and Drainage project. (continued...) APPOINTMENTS 4. CITIZEN COMMENT/ CORRESPONDENCE 5. CONSENT AGENDA 6. BID AWARD Tukwila City Council Agenda REGULAR MEETING a. Museum of Flight development update: Elissa Lines, Director of Development and Marketing, Museum of Flight b. City of Tukwila Pool operations update: Malcolm Neely, Aquatics Program Coordinator, Parks Recreation Dept. c. Introduction of new employee: Kristin Walquist, Recreation Program Assistant Senior Division, Parks Recreation Dept. Pg. 5 Pg. 7 Pg.19 Tukwila City Council Agenda (coat.) May 19, 2003 Page 2 7. PUBLIC HEARING [CONTINUED PROM MAY 5, 2003 REGULAR MEETING.] Final plat approval Cascade GIen Subdivision. pg. 27 (Council and staff to bring notebook distributed 4/25/03.] 8. OLD BUSINESS a. An ordinance creating an Emergency Management Pg, 59 Organization. b. An interlocal cooperative agreement for the Valley Pg. 67 Special Response Team. c. An interlocaI cooperative agreement to provide law pg. 77 enforcement mutual aid and mobilization. d. Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) request for Pg. 89 additional funding. 9. NEW BUSINESS Authorize Mayor to sign the Trans Valley Area Study pg. 93 Phase 2 interlocal agreement with King County and the cities of SeaTac, Renton and Kent. a. Mayor b. City Council c. Staff d. City Attorney e. Intergovernmental 10. REPORTS 11. MISCELLANEOUS 12. EXECUTIVE SESSION 13. ADJOURNMENT Tukwila City Hall is wheelchair accessible. Reasonable accommodations are available at public hearings with advance notice by calling the City Clerk's office 206 -433- 1800 /TDD 206 248 -2933. This notice is available in alternate formats for those with disabilities with advance notice and is also available at http: /www.ci.tukwila.wa.us. Tukwila City Council meetings are audio taped. Office of the Mayor Tukwila, Washington PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, the Public Works services provided in our community are an integral part of the daily lives of our citizens; and WHEREAS, the efficient and effective provision of these services greatly en- hances the health, safety, and welfare of our community; and WHEREAS, quality and effectiveness in the design and construction of pub- lic facilities and in the provision of public services is vitally dependent on the knowledge, skills, and dedication of the Public Works staff and officials in the City of Tukwila; and WHEREAS, the support of the community and the understanding of the importance of the work performed by Public Works staff materially influences their ability to respond to the needs of the citizens; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Steven M. Mullet, Mayor of the City of Tukwila, do hereby proclaim May 18 through May 24, 2003, with this year's theme "The Strength of Public Works," as National Public Works Week in the City of Tukwila, and I invite all citizens and civic organizations to acquaint themselves with the challenges confronted in the daily provision of public works services in our community and to recognize the daily contributions our Public Works Department staff make to our health, safety and quality of life. Signed this day of 2003. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor of Tukwila ITEM INFORMATION CAS Number: 03-066 I Original Agenda Date: May 19, 2003 Agenda Item Title: Accept as complete S. 118 St. Pedestrian Bridge Boeing Access Road Bridge Painting Contract and release retainage. Original Sponsor: Timeline: Sponsor's Summary: Meeting Date 5/19/03 1 Meeting Date 1 5/19/03 COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS Initials 1 Meeting Date I Prepared by„ 1 Mayor's review 1 Council review 1 5/19/03 1 RT y-Y9 -I 1 LeG 1 I I I I Council Admin. Public Works The painting and repair project was substantially completed by Chayer Painting Company on November 16, 2002. One change order for $1,400.00 was issued to install Foster Point overlook pile caps. Underruns amounted to $2,395.55, due to Tess than anticipated property restoration and paint testing and disposal. The total contract amounted to $33,555.45. Recommendations: Sponsor: Accept project as complete and authorize release of retainage. Committee: Forward to Consent Agenda of Regular Council. Administration: Same as sponsor. Cost Impact (if known): $33,555.45 Fund Source (if known): 104/01 Bridges RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION Action APPENDICES Attachments Information Memo dated May 8, 2003 Notice of Completion of Public Works Contract 02 -091 Transportation Committee Meeting Minutes from May 12, 2003 ITEMNO. To: From: Date: Subject: Mayor Mullet Pu blic Works Directo INFORMATION MEMO May 8, 2003 S 118`" St Ped Bridge Boeing Access Road Bridge Painting Proiect Completion and Acceptance ISSUE Accept construction contract as complete and authorize release of retainage bond. BACKGROUND The Notice to Proceed for Contract No. 02 -091 with Chayer Painting Company of SeaTac, Washington, was issued September 23, 2002, for construction of the S 118 St Pedestrian Bridge Boeing Access Road Bridge Painting project. This project provided repairs and painting of the S 118` St pedestrian bridge and minor painting on the Boeing Access Road bridge over Airport Way. This contract was totally completed on November 16, 2002. One change order was issued. The unit bid price underruns listed below were primarily due to property restoration savings and lower costs to dispose of materials. The contract costs are summarized as follows: Actual 2002 Budaet Contract Award Amount $34,551.00 $50,000.00 Change Orders 1,400.00 Underruns (2,395.55) Sales Tax (N /A Rule 171) 0.00 0.00 Total Amount Paid (incl. retainage bond) $33.555.45 S50.000.00 ACTION TAKEN The final payment has been issued, final records are being prepared, and this acceptance will formalize the closeout of this project. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that this contract be forwarded to the Tukwila City Council on the consent agenda for formal acceptance and authorize the release of the retainage bond, subject to the standard claim and lien release procedures. RT:ad attachment: Notice of Completion of Public Works Contract (P: Projects \A- RW RS Projects )99RW03\Accepmme Memo) State of Washington Department of Revenue 4►. PO Box 47474 RE VENUE Olympia WA 98504 -7474 Contractor's Registration No. (UBI No.) 601 160 579 From: City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Notice is hereby given relative to the completion of contract or project described below Description of Contract Project No. 99 RW03 Contract Number S 118th St Ped Bridge Boeing Access Road Bridge Painting 02 -091 Contractor's Name Telephone Number 206 -433 -1750 Chayer Painting Company Contractor's Address 4445 S 168th St, SeaTac, WA 98188 -3237 Date Work Commenced Date Work Completed Date Work Accepted 9/23/02 11/16/02 Surety or Bonding Company Indemnity Company of California Agent's Address 9725 3rd Ave NE, Suite 602, Seattle, WA 98115 Comments: Date 4/24/03 NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT Assigned To Date Assigned Contract Amount 34,551.00 Additions 1,400.00 Liquidated Damages 0.00 Reductions 2,395.55 Sub Total 33,555.45 Amount of Sales Tax Paid at 0.0 0.00 (If various rates apply, please send a breakdown.) TOTAL 33,555.45 Signature Type or Print Name Phone Number Amount Disbursed Amount Retained 31,877.68 1,677.77 TOTAL 33,555.45 The Disbursing Officer must complete and mail THREE copies of this notice to the Department of Revenue, PO Box 47474, Olympia, WA 98504 -7474, immediately after acceptance of the work done under this contract. NO PAYMENT SHALL BE MADE FROM RETAINED FUNDS until receipt of Department's certificate, and then only in accordance with said certificate. To inquire about the availability of this document in an alternate format for the visually impaired, please call (360) 753 -3217. Teletype (TTY) users please call (800) 451 -7985. You may also access tax information on our Internet home page at http: /dor.wa.gov. REV 31 0020e (6 -27 -0I) A Committee chair approval Transportation Coimnittee Page 2 May 12, 2003 2. S. 118th St BAR Bridges Painting Contract Chayer Painting Company of Sea Tac has finished their project of repairing and painting the S. 118` Street Duwamish ped bridge and minor painting on Boeing Access Road (BAR). Pam asked about the cost underrun, and Robin said it was because not as much property restoration was needed as planned, and paint testing and disposal were not problems. Recommend nroiect completion to consent agenda of a Regular Meeting. 3. Painting Proiects Bid Award The city has some miscellaneous painting projects plus painting the Tukwila Library and Minkler shops. Washington Industrial Coatings won the bid to do the work for $6I,221.76. Their bid was lower than ten other bidders Staff said their recommendations were fine, and they had done a walk through of the projects before they bid, so they felt comfortable about the firm's ability to do the job well. Recommend bid award to Regular Meeting. 4. Transit Plan Survey A transit plan will be folded into the city's Urban Center Study, which will be used to update the comprehensive plan. Perteet Engineering will do the study, and a sample survey was discussed. They plan to survey bus and train riders for two days eight hours /day this week. Metro has been asked to comment on the survey questions. Jim said 120 people get off the Sounder train in Tukwila Dennis had several comments to make. He thought the place of trip origin should be added, and the length of the trip. The committee agreed those were reasonable things to ask. He was also concerned with finding people who did not ride the bus, and finding what might make them ride. Brian said this survey will show existing conditions, and will establish a baseline to plan for the future from. Jim added that they are asking if this is the most efficient bus target they can have; planning how to get future riders will come later. Information. 5. Trans Vallev Area Phase 2 Interlocal Phase 1 of this study was done last year. It showed what the conditions currently are for the valley transportation, and proposed potential solutions for specific corridor problems. More work will be done on this in Phase 2. It will develop an implementation plan for improving mobility in the Trans Valley area. The cities of SeaTac, Renton, Tukwila and Kent, plus King County are all involved in the study. Tukwila's portion of the study will cost $25,000. Recommend authorizing mayor's signature on interlocal to Regular Meeting of the Citv Council. Meeting Date Prepared b j 1 5/19/03 TP I ITEM _INFORMATION Original Agenda Date: May 19, 2003 Agenda Item Title: Bid Award for Tukwila Library, Minkler Shops Misc. Painting Projects CAS Number: 03-067 I Original Sponsor: I Timeline: Sponsor's Summary: Recommendations: Sponsor: Committee: Administration: Cost Impact (if known): Fund Source (if known): Meeting Date 5/19/03 Meeting Date COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS Council Award contract to Washington Industrial Coatings. Recommend to Regular Council Same as Sponsor $61,221.76 303 Facilities -RECORD OF COIJNCILA Action I 5/19/03 Information Memo dated May 5, 2003 A_PPEND_ICE Attachments Bid Tabulation Transportation Committee Meeting Minutes from May 13, 2003 Initials ITEM NO. Mayor's review 1 Council review Ac I ei?L'. Admin. Public Works This project will provide protective maintenance of existing facilities, including some specialized coating applications in the community center's mechanical attic. The project was advertised on April 7 and eleven bids were received and opened on April 25, 2003. The low bid of $61,221.76 was from Washington Industrial Coatings, who perform quality work in a timely fashion. ISSUE BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET AND BID SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION IP:ProjecroW- BG Pralecrsl00BG181Wash Ind Coatings award memo) INFORMATION MEMO To: Mayor Mullet C From: Public Works Director Date: May 5, 2003 Subject: Bid Award Tukwila Library, Minkler Shops and Misc. Painting Projects Project No. 00 -BG18 Award the bid to Washington Industrial Coatings for the Tukwila Library, Minkler Shops and Misc. Painting Projects in the amount of $61,221.76. This is a project to provide protective maintenance of existing facilities, including some specialized coating applications in the Community Center's mechanical attic. The project was advertised for bid on April 7, 2003. Eleven (11) bids were received and opened on April 25, 2003, with the apparent low bid of $61,221.76 submitted by Washington Industrial Coatings. See attached bid tabulation. We have reviewed the bids, notified the apparent low bidder of their opportunity to claim error within 24 hours, which they have declined, and checked the low bidder's references. The estimated costs are within the project's budget with adequate contingency. 1 Bid Results 1 Engineer's Estimate N Budget Bid Amount 1 $56,270.00 1 $70,000.00 I 8.8% WSSTX 1 4,951.76 1 6,160.00 1 Subtotal $61,221.76 1 $76,160.00 1 Contingency 1 5,000.00 1 6,702.00 1 TOTAL 1 $66,221.76 1 $82,862.00 1 $90,000.00 Award the contract to Washington Industrial Coatings, 1963 Bethel Road SE, Port Orchard, WA 98366 in the amount of $61,221.76. BIDDERS Long Painting Company 188 Construction and Remodeling LLC 1 Lower 48 Contracting /Painting, Inc. 1 Pacific Painters 1 {Picture Perfect Painting LLC iDiamaco, Inc. 1 D.S. Purcell Painting, Inc. Jones Painting, Inc. Tracy's Quality Painting, Inc. Washington Industrial Coatings The Painters, Inc. BID TABULATION Tukwila Library, Minkler Shops Misc. Painting Projects Project Nos. 00 -BG18 and 00 -BG19 Shaded figures are from contractor's; proposal form. (P:Projecta1A- BG Projects)00BG18\Bid Tabulation 5-2 -03) BASE BID 8.8% WSSTX TOTAL 1 84,196.64 1 7,409.30 91,605.94 7,409.24 91,605.88 69, 988.00 I 6,158.94 76,146.94 6,158.95 76,146.95 69, 890.00 1 6,150.32 76, 040.32 I 63,187.001 5,560.46 68,747.46 66,770.00 5,875.76 72,645.76 134, 293.00 11, 817.78 146,110.78 96,788.00 1 8,517.34 I 105,305.34 8,517.35 65,305.35 65, 976.00 1 5,805.89 I 71, 781.89 88,574.00 7,794.51 1 96,368.51 56,270.00 4,951.76 61,221.76 135, 299.00 1 11, 906.31 1 147, 205.31 Transportation Committee Page 2 May 12, 2003 2. S. 118th St BAR Bridges Painting Contract Chayer Painting Company of Sea Tac has finished their project of repairing and painting the S. 118` Street Duwamish ped bridge and minor painting on Boeing Access Road (BAR). Pam asked about the cost underrun, and Robin said it was because not as much property restoration was needed as planned, and paint testing and disposal were not problems. Recommend nroiect completion to consent agenda of a Regular Meeting. 3. Painting Proiects Bid Award The city has some miscellaneous painting projects plus fainting the Tukwila Library and Minkler shops. Washington Industrial Coatings won the bid to do the work for $61,221.76. Their bid was lower than ten other bidders. Staff said their recommendations were fine, and they had done a walk- through of the projects before they bid, so they felt comfortable about the firm's ability to do the job well. Recommend bid award to Regular Meeting. 4. Transit Plan Survey A transit plan will be folded into the city's Urban Center Study, which will be used to update the comprehensive plan. Parted Engineering will do the study, and a sample survey was discussed. They plan to survey bus and train riders for two days eight hours /day this week. Metro has been asked to comment on the survey questions. Jim said 120 people get off the Sounder train in Tukwila. Dennis had several comments to make. He thought the place of trip origin should be added, and the length of the trip. The committee agreed those were reasonable things to ask. He was also concerned with finding people who did not ride the bus, and finding what might make them ride. Brian said this survey will show existing conditions, and will establish a baseline to plan for the future from. Jim added that they are asking if this is the most efficient bus target they can have; planning how to get future riders will come later. Information. 5. Trans Vallev Area Phase 2 Interlocal Phase 1 of this study was done last year. It showed what the conditions currently are for the valley transportation, and proposed potential solutions for specific corridor problems. More work will be done on this in Phase 2. It will develop an implementation plan for improving mobility in the Trans Valley area. The cities of SeaTac, Renton, Tukwila and Kent, plus King County are all involved in the study. Tukwila's portion of the study will cost $25,000. Recommend authorizing mayor's signature on interlocal to Regular Meeting of the Citv Council. ti Committee chair approval CAS Number: 03-068 Agenda Item Title: I Original Sponsor: Timeline: Sponsor's Summary: Meeting Date 5/19/03 COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS 03 Meeting Date 5/19/03 Initials Prepared byf 1 Mayor's review 1 Council review l• 1 1 41-13. I ree 1 I I I ITEM; INFORMATION Original Agenda Date: May 19, 2003 Bid Award for South 134 Place Overlay and Drainage Project Council Admin. Public Works Recommendations: Sponsor: Award contract to SCI Infrastructure LLC. Committee: Recommend to Regular Council Administration: Same as Sponsor I Cost Impact (if known): $470,562.50 I Fund Source (if known): 412 Surface Water and 104 Streets UcORDOF COUNCIL ACTION Action APPENDICES Meeting Date 1 Attachments 5/19/03 Information Memo dated May 1, 2003 Bid Tabulation KPG Recommendation Letter Utilities Committee Meeting Minutes from May 6, 2003 ITEM NO. This project will improve South 134' Place between S. 133'" St and S. 148 St, by replacing five failing driveway culverts within Southgate creek, completing the high -flow bypass and widening and overlaying the roadway. The project was advertised on April 7 and 14 and five bids were received and opened on April 22, 2003. The low bid of $470,562.50 was from SCI Infrastructure LLC., who performs quality work in a timely fashion. J TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: ISSUE Award the South 134 Place Overlay and Drainage project to the low bidder, SCI Infrastructure LLC. BACKGROUND The South 134 Place Overlay and Drainage project is a combined project originally scheduled for construction in 2002. Funding for the overlay portion of this project was pulled due to budget constraints delaying the entire project one year. This project will improve South 134 Place between S 133`" St and S 148 St and a portion of S 148'" St by replacing five failing and undersized driveway culverts within Southgate Creek, completing the high -flow bypass to the creek crossing at S 148 St, and widening and overlaying the roadway. This project was advertised on April 7 and 14, 2003. Five bids were received. The bids were opened on April 22, 2003. The engineer's estimate was $562,300. The low bid of $470,562.50 is from SCI Infrastructure LLC. All bids were reviewed and no errors were found. ANALYSIS The low bidder, SCI Infrastructure, provided references for similar work. Their references where checked and all of them reported that SCI Infrastructure performs quality work in a timely fashion. 2003 Small Drainage and Overlay Projects Budget Summary Total Budgeted Engineering 2002 Remaining Charges S 134 PI Overlay Drainage 2003 SD /Overlay Projects Total Remaining *Amount includes 10% Contingency. RECOMMENDATION INFORMATION MEMO Mayor Mullet }Public Works Directo May 1, 2003 South 134'" Place Overlay and Drainage Project Project No. 03 -DRO2 Bid Award Small Drainage 1412 Fund) $995,000 135,000 78,381 362,333 419,286 0 Overlay Repair (104 Fund) 1,595,000 322,000 12,806 155,285 1,104,909 0 Total N/A N/A N/A *517,618 N/A N/A Award the South 134" Place Overlay and Drainage project to SCI Infrastructure LLC in the amount of $470,562.50. RL:ad attachments: Bid Tabulation KPG Recommendation Letter (P:Pro*ectAA -DR Projau)03DR02)Awud Memo) CITY OF TUKWILA- Department of Public Works 5. 134th Place Overlay and Drainage By: Date: 72. rYa Project no. 03 -DR02 Certified Bid Tabulation KPG P ear's Fat'mate Total Cost SCI Infrastructure IDtarwest Development Westwater Construrttion Unit Total Cost Cost Ssndara General Cnnat Unit Total Cost Cost Dennid R. Craig Cons/ Unit Total Cost Cost Una Cost Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost Bid Section Item No. Item Quantity Unit Roadway 1 LS 550,00.00 55100.0 54500.00 545,000.00 552108.13 552,908.13 550.00.0 550.00.00 580250.00 580,250.00 57.500.0 546.606.00 57.500.00 546106.00 57.50.00 1 1 -09 Mobilization Pollution / Erosion Control 1 FA 57,50.00 57.50.0 57,50.0 57,500.00 57.500.00 57,500.00 57,500.00 57,50.00 510000.0 57,500.00 510.000.00 51000.0 510.00.00 510.00.00 2 1-07 Temporary Water Utility Conflicts 1 FA 510.00.0 510,00.0 510.000.00 $1000.00 510100.00 510,00.00 510.00.0 533,600.0 532.00 526.880.00 541.06 534.490.40 L 3 1 -09 Resolution of Control Labor (min bid $26/hr) 840 HR 532.00 526180.0 537.00 531,080.00 538.94 532,709.0 540.00 53,00.00 54,00.0 54,00.00 513,193.00 513,193.00 4 1 -10 Traffic Clearing Grubbing • 1 L5 55,000.00 55,00.0 510.00.0 51000.0 59.956.88 59,956.88 53,000.00 51.00 52,175.00 51.00 52,175.00 51.74 53,784.50 5 2 -01 and / Cement Concrete Sawcut 2,175 LF 52.00 54.350.0 53.50 57.612.0 52.78 56.046.50 51.00 51,970.00 54.00 57180.00 57.28 514,341.60 L62 -02 Asphalt Pavement 1,970 SY 1 58.00 515,760.00 55.00 59,850.00 56.40 512,608.00 51.00 5200.00 52.00 5400.00 55.06 51.012.0 7 2 -02 2 Removing Removing Extruded Curb 200 LF 53.00 5600.00 52.00 5400.00 52.78 5556.00 515.00 54.050.0 512.50 53,375.00 519.39 55.235.30 8 -02 Unsuitable Foundation Excavation 270 CY 515.00 54,050.00 525.00 56,750.00 513.91 51755.70 $10.0 55800.0 515.00 58,700.00 516.54 59,593.20 9 2 -03 Gravel Borrow including Haul 580 TN 516.00 59,280.00 511.50 56,670.00 516.13 59,355.40 5150.00 524.0010 575.00 512.00.00 $111.84 517,894.40 10 2 -03 Controlled Density Fill 160 CV 575.00 512.00.0 572.00 511,520.00 5105.69 511910.40 51.00 5500.00 53.00 51,500.00 53.20 51.600.0 11 2 -09 2 Construction Geotextile 500 SY 53.00 51.500.0 52.00 51.000.0 52.23 51.115.00 $16.775.20 515.00 515,600.00 $20.00 52000.0 536.69 531157.60 12 -12 4 Crushed Surfacing Top Course 1.040 TN 522.00 522.80.0 512.00 512,480.00 516.13 528,427.0 545,00 527.90100 565.00 540,30.00 $49.45 530.659.00 13 -04 14 5-04 Asphalt Concrete Pavement Class B 620 TN 550.00 531.00.0 549.00 530.380.0 545.85 511 424.70 545.00 58,50.0 565.00 51130.0 564.85 512,321.50 15 5 Asphalt Concrete Pavement Class B. Prelevel 190 TN 550.00 59,500.0 550.00 59.50.0 560.13 544,408.00 546.00 536.80.00 572.00 557.60.0 571.10 556,880.00 -04 16 5 -04 Asphalt Concrete Pvmt Class B for PvmL Repair 800 TN 560.00 548,00.00 552.00 541,600.00 $55.51 57,737.00 575.00 57,500.00 5100.00 510,000.00 583.45 58,345.00 17 5-04 Incidental Asphalt Concrete Pavement Class B 100 TN 560.00 56,000.00 5120.00 512,000.00 577.37 516.69 $4,172.50 58.00 52,000.00 520.00 55,000.00 515.25 53,812.50 18 5 -04 Planing Bituminous Pavement 250 SY 58.0 51.50.0 520.00 55,000.00 55.56 5834.0 56.00 5900.00 57.00 51,050.00 55.60 5840.00 19 8 -04 Extruded Curb 150 LF 58.00 51,200.00 55.50 5825.00 512.79 56,267.10 515.00 57,30.00 513.00 56.370.00 512.80 56,272.00 20 8 -04 Cement Concrete curb and gutter 490 LF 525.00 512,250.00 515.00 57.350.0 55,000.00 55,000.00 55,000.00 - Storm Drainage 1 FA 5600.00 55,00.0 55.00100 55,00.00 55.000.00 55,000.00 55,00.0 55,000.0 55,000.00 $2.000.00 52,912.00 52,912.00 21 7 -00 Potholing 1 L5 510,00.00 510,000.00 53,000.00 53,000.0 51,668.75 51,668.75 55,000.00 55.0010 52.00.00 522.500.00 $29.12 57,280.00 22 2 -09 Trench / Excavation Protection Systems PVC Drain Pipe.6inch 250 LF 520.00 55,00.00 515.00 51750.00 517.24 54,310.00 515.00 5188.00 53.70.00 556,400.00 510.00 587.00 526,10.0 585.91 525773.00 23 7 -01 Aluminum Pipe Arch, 49'x33' 300 1! % 5175.0 552.500.0 5120.00 536,000.00 $144.63 543,389.00 590.00 521,600.00 545.00 510,800.00 $39.84 59,561.60 24 7 -02 Corrugated Storm Drain Pipe, 8 -inch Ductile Iron 240 LF 530.00 57,200.00 537.00 58,880.00 522.25 55.340.00 595.00 58075.00 $60.00 55,100.00 585.97 57,307.45 25 7-04 7 Storm Drain Pipe. 12-inch Ductile Iron 85 LF 535.00 52.975.0 555.00 54.675.0 524.48 52,080.80 5556.20 590.00 51.80100 530.00 5600.00 $79.80 51,596.00 26 -04 7 Storm Drain Pipe, 12 -inch CPE 20 LF 530.00 5600.00 550.00 51,000.00 $27.81 595.00 568,875.0 541.00 529,725.00 548.93 535.474.25 27 -04 7 Storm Drain Pipe. 18 -inch CPE 725 LF 550.00 536,250.00 530.00 521,70.00 524.48 517,748.00 $ $3,066.00 28 -04 7 Remove / Abandon Storm Drain Pipe 730 $51.251.57 520.0 5600.0 510.0 5300.00 5495.12 51,485.36 29 -04 30 7 Remove Drainage Structure EA 5400.00 51.20.0 5250.00 5750.00 $417.19 5333.75 5300.00 5300.00 5600.00 500.00 5757.00 5757.00 -04 31 7-04 rri Debris Barnet 1 EA 5500.00 5500.00 5250.00 5250.00 5333.75 57,342.50 5400.00 54,400.00 5700.00 $7.700.00 5786.37 58.650.07 32 7 Concrete Inlet 11 EA 5800.00 58,8010 5600.00 56.600.0 5667.50 53,092.76 5600.00 51400.0 52.00.0 58,000.00 5906.97 53,627.88 -05 33 7 -05 Catch Basin. Type 1 4 EA 51,0010 54,00.0 5700.00 52.800.00 5773.19 5773.19 52,319.57 5800.00 52.4010 52.0010 $600.00 51.049.00 53,147.00 34 7 -05 Catch Basin, Type 1 -L 3 EA 51,20.00 53.010 5900.00 52,700.00 52.058.13 $8.232.52 51.500.00 56.0010 52.660.00 510,640.00 52,339.00 59,356.00 35 7 -05 Catch Basin, Type 2 4 EA 54,000.00 516,000.00 51,600.00 56,400.00 5472.81 54,728.10 520.00 52.000.0 5300.00 53,0010 $407.00 54170.0 36 7 -05 Adjust Catch Basin 10 EA 5400.00 54.00100 5300.00 53,000.00 5445.00 51,335.00 5150.00 5450.00 5150.00 5450.00 5320.00 5960.00 37 7 -05 Adjust Drain Cleanout 3 EA 5200.00 580.0 5200.00 5600.00 5278.13 51,668.78 5400.00 52.400.0 5150.00 5900.00 51,100.00 5635.0 52,155.00 53,810.00 52,155.00 6 EA 580.00 54,800.00 5200.00 51,200.00 38 7 -05 Connect to existing structure 1 L5 55,000.00 55,000.00 51,500.00 51.500.0 516687.0 516,687.50 53,000.0 53.00.00 51.10100 535.00 53,500.00 536.52 53,652.00 39 8 -06 Franchise Utility Coordination 100 CY 525.00 52,50.0 520.00 52.000.0 $19.47 51,947.00 520.00 52.000.0 570.00 52.800.00 5174.75 56.990.00 40 8-06 Channel excavation/grading 40 CY 550.00 52.00.0 $80.00 53,200.00 538.94 51,557.60 540.00 51100.0 525.0 52.50.0 530.17 $3,017.00 41 8 -06 Stream gravels 100 TN 550.00 55.00.0 525.00 52,500.00 538.94 53894.00 525.00 52.500.00 54.00100 54,000.00 510,262.00 510.262.00 42 8 -06 43 8 -06 Quarry Spells Temporary Water Bypass System 1 LS 520010 52,000.00 52,500.0 52.500.00 57.7870 57,787.50 53.010 53.00.00 51000.00 54,147.40 58,294.80 Water Fire Service Relocation. 10 -inch 2 EA 55,000.00 510,000.00 54,00.0 58.000.0 53,738.00 57.476.0 51,335.00 54,00.00 5150.00 58,000.00 5600.00 5500.00 5150.00 5600.00 5378.00 51,512.0 44 7 -11 4 EA 5300.00 51.20.00 5200.00 5800.00 5333.75 512,000.00 51,200.00 53,200.00 5500.00 59,60.00 51,500.00 33,956.00 5538.00 511,868.00 51,614.00 45 7 -12 Adjust Water Valve Box 3 EA 53100.00 59,00.0 52.00.0 56,000.00 51.94188 55840.64 54.000.0 5400.00 46 7 -14 Al 715 Relocate Fire Hydrant Water Service Replacement _ 3 EA 51,500.00 54,500.00 5700.00 52.10.00 51,056.88 53.170.64 4/22/2003 1 CITY OF TUKWILA - Departnent of Public Works S. 134th Place Overlay and Drainage By: G Date: y- Z. /03 Protect no. 03 -DR02 Certified Bid Tabulation KP • nojneeYS Estimate Total Cost eq In/rastra Total Unit Total Cost Cost . nrvelonment Westwaler Construrtiou Unit Total Cost Cost Sandery f nrral Cnnct Unit Total Cost Cost Rennie R Craig caner Unit Total Cost Cost Unit Cost Unit Total t Cost Cost Bid Section Item No. Item Ouant Unit 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 Sanitary Sewel Manhole 3 EA 5300.00 5900.00 5300.00 5900.00 5445.00 51.335.00 5200.00 5600.00 5200.00 5600.00 5437.00 51,311.00 48 7 -05 Adjust Manhole Ring and Cover (Val Vue) 52000.00 5600.00 5445.00 58 0.00 $1..600.00 5600.00 51,200.00 5873 00 51746.00 49 7 -05 7 Replace Replace Manhole Cone (Val Vue) 2 EA 51.000.00 5800.00 34.38 51,,668.76 50 -05 Traffic Contol Devices $4.00 5680.00 55.00 5850.00 $2.25 5382.50 Raised Pavement Marker, Type 1 170 EA 53.00 5510.00 $4.00 $680.00 53.89 5661.30 57.00 $595.00 58.00 5680.00 54.50 5382.50 51 8 -09 Raised Pavement Marker. Type 2 85 EA $4.00 5340.00 57.00 5595.00 53.89 5330.65 575.00 5525.00 5220.00 51,540.00 $215.52 51.508.64 52 8-09 Relocate Sign 7 EA 5750.00 55.250.00 5200.00 51,400.00 5500.63 53.504.41 550.00 51,050.00 $61.00 51,281.00 550.40 51,058.40 53 8 -20 8 Thermoplastic Catch Basin Marknq 21 EA $75.00 51,575.00 550.00 51,050.00 538.94 5817.74 $2.00 54,600.00 52.00 54,600.00 51.12 52,576.00 54 -22 4-inch Plastic Stripe 2,300 LF 51.00 52,300.00 52.00 54,600.00 $1.39 53.197.00 58.00 5240.00 59.50 5285.00 57.85 5235.50 55 56 8 -22 8-22 12 -inch Plastic Stop Bar 30 LF 55.00 5150.00 $8.00 5240.00 54.45 5133.50 Roadside Developrrent $7.120.00 515.00 56,000.00 525.00 510,000.00 522.36 58,944.00 57 6 -12 Modular Block Wall 400 SF 525.00 510,000.00 520.00 58,000.00 517.80 52.003.00 515.00 51,500.00 520.00 52,000.00 528.50 52,850.00 58 6-12 Chain Link Safety Railing 100 LF 525.00 52,500.00 530.00 53,000.00 520.03 51.112,50 $3.00 5750.00 55.00 51,250.00 $4.48 51,120.00 59 8-01 Coconut Fiber Matting 250 SY 56.00 51,500.00 57.00 51,750.00 54.45 51,335.00 525.00 5750.00 550.00 51.500.00 537.86 51,135.80 60 8 -01 Topsoil 30 CY 530.00 5900.00 546.00 51,380.00 544.50 51,335.00 525.00 5750.00 565.00 51.950.00 544.30 51,329.00 61 8 -01 Bark Mulch 30 CY 530.00 5900.00 546.00 51,380.00 544.50 $2.23 $2.676.00 $1.00 51,200.00 51.00 51,200.00 51.00 51,200.00 62 8 -01 Hydroseed 1.200 SY 51.00 $1.200.00 50.60 $720.00 51,390.50 54.00 5200.00 510.00 5500.00 511.65 5582.50 63 8 -01 Live Stakes 50 EA 510.00 5500.00 $2.50 5125.00 527.81 56.396.88 53,500.00 53,500.00 56,000.00 56.000.00 55,066.00 55.066.00 64 1 -09 Property Restoration 1 LS 510,000.00 510,000.00 52.500.00 52,500.00 56,396.88 530,000.00 530.000.00 530,000.00 530,000.00 530,000.00 530,000.00 530.000.00 1 FA 530,000.00 530,000.00 530,000.00 530.000.00 530,000.00 65 1 -09 Miscellaneous Work TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST Comments: 5582,300.00 5470,562.50 5521,651.23 5533,435.00 5542,247.00 5571,878.45 4/2212003 2 April 23, 2003 Mr. Ryan Larson, P.E. Project Manager City of Tukwila Public Works Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: South 134 Place Overlay and Drainage Project No. 03 -DR02 Recommendation for Contract Award Dear Ryan, KPG ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 753 9th Avenue N Seattle, \VA 98109 TEL 206/286 -1640 FAX 206/286 -1669 KPG, Inc has reviewed the projects and references submitted by SCI Infrastructure, LLC for the referenced project. All references checked indicated that SCI has done a good job with similar roadway and drainage improvement projects We are therefore recommending that the City award Project No 03 -DR02 entitled 'South 134 Place, 48 Avenue South to South 133` Street, Overlay and Drainage' to SCI Infrastructure, LLC. Please call me at (206) 286 -1640 if you should have any questions or require further information. Very truly yours, Nelson Davis, P.E. Senior Engineer Utilities Committee May 6, 2003 Present: Pam Linder, Chair; Joan Hernandez, Dave Fenton Jim Morrow, Frank Iriarte, Pat Brodin, Gail Labanara, Rhonda Berry, Lucy Lauterbach S. 134`h Place Overlay and Drainage Repairs This area near FarWest Paints has been a problem for drainage and street condition for a long time. The project, which is being funded out of both surface water and overlay repair, will fix five driveway culverts, and will widen and overlay the road The area is wet from being near Southgate Creek, and a high -flow bypass will resolve the drainage issues there. Five bids were received, with the lowest bidder being SCI Infrastructure LLC. Dave had noticed how wildly prices varied among the bidders for specific items. Award bid for S. 134 to SCI for $470.562.50 at a Regular Meeting. 2. First Ouarter Reports The committee noted the projects and plans of the department, and had no further questions.1" Ouarter Reports approved. Committee chair approval Original Sponsor: Timeline: Sponsor's Summary: Meeting Date 07 -17 -2000 05 -05 -03 Meeting Date 11011 Initials Meeting Date Prepared b 1 Mayor's review 1 Council review 05 -05 -03 CPL 05 -19 -03 CAS Number: 03-062 Original Agenda Date: 05 -05 -03 Agenda Item Title: Final Plat Approval Cascade Glen Subdivision Council Recommendations: Sponsor: Final Plat Approval Committee: Administration: Same as sponsor. Cost Impact (if known): Unknown I Fund Source (if known): Unknown I E I Il'l_! I I I I Admin. Department of Community Development ITEMNO. The applicant is requesting City Council approval of the final plat for the Cascade Glen Subdivision, subdividing two parcels totaling 6.78 acres into twenty single family lots, including one public street, stormwater detention pond, sidewalks and utilities. Action I Preliminary Plat Approval Tukwila Subdivision (Now known as Cascade Glen) 1 Public Hearing Held. Record remains open for receipt of additional infor- oration from staff and would -be homeowners. Matter continued to 05- 19 -03, Attachments 1 NOTEBOOK PREVIOUSLY DISTRIBUTED TO COUNCIL AND STAFF FOR CASCADE GLEN SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT APPROVAL (APRIL 25, 2003) 05 -05 -03 None. COUNCIL STAFF TO BRING NOTEBOOK PREVIOUSLY DISTRIBUTED. 05 -19 -03 1 Supplement to Staff Report Prepared May 9, 2003 (includes [new] Attachment City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director SUPPLEMENT TO STAFF REPORT TO THE TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL Prepared May 9, 2003 FILE NUMBER: L03 -008 Cascade Glen Final Plat ASSOCIATED FILES: L99 -0023 Planned Residential Development L99 -0024 Subdivision Preliminary Plat E99 -0012 SEPA Environmental Review MI200 -278 Land Altering Permit (road utilities) APPLICANT: J. Keirouz, Dreamcatcher Homes REQUEST: STAFF CONTACT: Carol Lumb, Senior Planner Attachments: BACKGROUND City Council approval of the final plat for the Cascade Glen Subdivision, to subdivide two parcels totaling 6.78 acres into 20 single family lots, including one public street, sidewalks, utilities and pedestrian connection to 38 Avenue South. O. Pedestrian Pathway Survey Forms P. Revised Drainage Proposal (to be provided at hearing) The Public Hearing on approval of the final plat for Cascade Glen subdivision was adjourned from May 5, 2003 to Monday, May 19, 2003 in order to obtain additional information on the views of individuals who have purchased homes in the subdivision, the residents along 38 Avenue South and 40 Avenue South on the construction of the pedestrian pathway connection between the subdivision and 38 Avenue South. Copies of the petitions signed by the homeowners in Cascade Glen and the adjacent neighborhoods are found in Attachment O. At the time the staff report was finalized, Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206- 431 -3670 Fax: 206 431 -3665 Cascade Glen Final Plat Supplemental Staff Report May 9, 2003 surveys had been received from the 6 individuals who have bought lots at Cascade Glen and one adjacent property owner on 40 Avenue South. All seven surveys indicate opposition to construction of the pedestrian pathway. Additional information will be available at the hearing on the opinions of the neighbors on 38 Avenue South and on 40 Avenue South The applicant has provided a revised plan for addressing surface water runoff on the property on which the pedestrian path is to be located if that condition is removed. This plan is labeled Attachment P and will be presented at the hearing. The applicant proposes to slope the pedestrian pathway area 1% to the west and re- hydroseed the area to divert any surface water runoff away from the adjacent property (13264 38 Avenue South). An issue related to the pedestrian pathway that was raised at the hearing on May 5 relates to the 25 -foot ingress, egress and utility easement that has been granted to the property owner at 13264 38 Avenue South. The City Attomey has reviewed the easement language and determined that two or more non exclusive easements may exist in the subject area. Additional information may become available after this staff report is finalized. This information will be presented to the Council at the May 19, 2003 public hearing. CITY COUNCIL OPTIONS As stated at the hearing on May 5, 2003, the Council cannot add new conditions in its approval of a final plat, but it may remove a preliminary plat condition if it finds changed circumstances or substantive new information is made available that was not presented at the preliminary plat hearing. There are three options available at the close of the public hearing on the final plat application for Cascade Glen: 1. Approve the final plat application based on the information and conclusions stated in the staff report dated April 24, 2003 as presented at the public hearing May 5, 2003; 2 Remove Condition #4 of the preliminary plat approval that requires a pedestrian path and dictates the material to be used for paving and then approve the final plat application. If Condition #4 is removed, findings and conclusions must be provided to support its removal. 3. Deny the final plat based on findings and conclusions that the final plat does not comply with the six approval criteria set forth in TMC 17.14.130 (C). c:Mydocs \Cascade Glen\Final Plat\ Supplemental Staffrtp.doc 2 5/8/03 ilitwJ I -fir- .dY! i live at /3cW 7C ,5 Tukwila, WA. Please C9ieck the box indicating your preference: I do want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. I do not want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. Signed: /Lest owner Signed: Tenant RECEIVED MAY 0 9 2003 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ATTACHMENT 0 To: Mr Steve Lancaster, Director of Community Development City Council Members, City of Tukwila Re: Iroposed Pedestrian Walkway at Cascade Glen We, the undersigned, are currently the Purchasers of Lot 6 at Cascade Glen In Tukwila. We dre aware of the proposed pedestrian walkway, end Its design, which is currently planned at the north and of the cul- de-eac In the plat. We have checked the appropriate box below to register our opinion with regard to this walkway; N x Z euF 4 >L:dee- Print Name Lot We are FOR having this pedestrian walkway at Cascade Glen We are AGAINST having this pedestrian walkway at Cascade Glen. We are indifferent as to whether this pedestrian walkway stays or is eliminated. Please consider our opinion in making your final decision regarding this pedestrian walkway. _.r /i a01. 0 M. ,C-ett .'jpi Purnhaser Date Purchaser 'Date rn'j 17.6T CAA7 SAW Ar$l p M.. Eisksr Print Name Lot RECEIVED MAY 0 9 2003 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1 O*QT t77an7: Y.P 4 1NRWNarINI! To: WINDERMERE Mr Steve Lancaster, Director of Community Development City Council Members, City of Tukwila Re: Proposed Pedestrian Walkway at Cascade Glen We, the undersigned, are currently the Purchasers of Lot 7 at Cascade Glen in Tukwila. We are aware of the proposed pedestrian walkway, and its design, which is currently planned at the north end of the cul -de -sac in the plat. We have checked the appropriate box below to register our opinion with regard to this walkway; Fax :2062416837 May 7 2003 13:18 P.01 We are FOR having this pedestrian walkway at Cascade Glen. We are AGAINST having this pedestrian walkway at Cascade Glen. We are indifferent as to whether this pedestrian walkway stays or is eliminated. Please consider our opinion in making your final decision regarding this pedestrian walkway. er jta/C Date (Purchaser ff cAnU XXV..-/7 Print Name l Lot 7c5 tus,\ r'S 1/A17' Z Print Name Lot RECEIVED MAY 0 9 2003 COMMUNITY OEVE OPM NT pate WINDERMERE. FaX:4Ub241bt3S( NAY-09-2003 FRI 01:44 PH KING CO RECEIVED MAY 0 9 2003 To; COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mr Steve Lancaster, ter of Community DWelopment City Council Members, City of Tukwila Re: I?rroposed Pedeetrlen Walkway at Cascade Glut we, ire undersigned. are currently the Purchasers of Lat, 13 at Cascade Glen In Tukwila. We are aware of the proposed pedestrian walkway, and Is design, which is currently planned et the Berth end of the curt-de.sec in the plat. We have Checked to aptxepriste box below to realm' our option watt ragefd to this walkway; We are FOR having this pedestrian walkway at Cascade Olen. I We are AGAINST havng this pedestrian walkway at Cascade Gies 1 We are indifferent as to whether this pedestrian walkway stays or is sllminated. Please consider our opinion In making your final decision regarding Ihls pedestrian walkway. —gd3 4.3. 9i r S 9 -03 Da Purchaser oaie Name Print Noma Lot Lot 5 er May y 2UU3 n :ut r.ut FAX 110. 2968431 P. 02/02 To: Mr Steve Lancaster, Director of Community Development City Council Members, City of Tukwila Re: Proposed Pedestrian Walkway at Cascade Glen J/ We, the undersigned, are currently the Purchasers of Lot at Cascade Glen in Tukwila. We are aware of the proposed pedestrian walkway, and its design, which is currently planned at the north end of the cul -de -sac in the plat. We have checked the appropriate box below to register our opinion with regard to this walkway; M,ck Ea- Print Name Lot /4 RECEIVED MAY 0 9 2003 DEVELOPMENT We are FOR having this pedestrian walkway at Cascade Glen. We are AGAINST having this pedestrian walkway at Cascade Glen. We are indifferent as to whether this pedestrian walkway stays or is eliminated. Please consider our opinion in making your final decision regarding this pedestrian walkway. sh43 Purcha er Date Purchaser 14e -der Leo. Print Name Lot 14 dilca Date To: Mr Steve Lancaster, Director of Community Development City Council Members, City of Tukwila Re: Proposed Pedestrian Walkway at Cascade Glen We, the undersigned, are currently the Purchasers of Lot 1 7 at Cascade Glen in Tukwila. We are aware of the proposed pedestrian walkway, and its design, which is currently planned at the north end of the cul -de -sac in the plat. We have checked the appropriate box below to register our opinion with regard to this walkway; Zovuel/46 We are FOR having this pedestrian walkway at Cascade Glen. We are AGAINST having this pedestrian walkway at Cascade Glen. We are indifferent as to whether this pedestrian walkway stays or is eliminated. Please consider our opinion in making your final decision regarding this pedestrian walkway. IAA/Pact) (4n r Print Name Lot 17 Purchaser Date _5 9-423 /fir as ‘r Date Print Name Lot 1 RECEIVED MAY 0 9 2003 DEVELOPMENT To: Mr Steve Lancaster, Director of Community Development City Council Members, City of Tukwila Re: Proposed Pedestrian Walkway at Cascade Glen We, the undersigned, are currently the Purchasers of Lot iq at Cascade Glen in Tukwila. We are aware of the proposed pedestrian walkway, and its design, which is currently planned at the north end of the cul -de -sac in the plat. We have checked the appropriate box below to register our opinion with regard to this walkway; We are FOR having this pedestrian walkway at Cascade Glen. We are AGAINST having this pedestrian walkway at Cascade Glen. RECEIVED MAY 0 9 2003 DEVELOPMENT I We are indifferent as to whether this pedestrian walkway stays or is eliminated. Please consider our opinion in making your final decision regarding this pedestrian walkway. o 5 -03 Pt rchaser Date Purchaser Date kf it A a- iloateAIYA t'AaeL k h1e~kn Print Name Print game Lot 1 Lot 161 5/8/03 I,�CNiSt fl NAS-_ live at i L4 30 (VIE S Tukwila, WA. Please Check the box indicating your preference: 0 I do want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. I do not want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. Signed: Signed: Owner Tenant Aid 1 W4 4 0 v iVifr T 5/8/03 1,UIWL �1 f. 1 Jf/L� live at /326 ,37 Sd „Tukwila, WA. 9U G r Please Check the box indicating your preference: 1 do want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. do not want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. Signed: Signed: d.2c4 .Owner 1/4571 Tenant 5/8/03 fh Able- �Ar✓�(!� 4✓ live at )7.. ..6L i Tukwila, WA. Please k�fhekx indicating your preference: D I do want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street do not want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of y street. Signed: Tenant 5/8/03 I, k%1 live at 1 r Tukwila, WA. Please Check the box indicating your preference: I do want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. I do not want the proosed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the e.'id of my street. Signed: Signed: Tenant 5/8/03 Signed: Signed: ih I n t eat E ila, W Please Check the box indicating your preference: I do want the proposed connecting walkway to the subdivision at the end of my street. )rig not want: the proposed connecting walkway to subdivision the end of my street. ner Tenant Cascade Glen the Cascade Glen 5/8/03 I, JJ.4V/7� Ai L, 14MJP live at 3c3 3P -4, e Tukwila, WA. Please. Check the box indicating your preference: I do want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. f ikdo not want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. Signed: 1- /40-34 Signed: P "rail' t (L� s. 5/8/03 I, tJ 27 live at ?3V3 .:y12 /30'6 Tukwila, A. Please Check the box indicating your preference: 0 I do want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. eicio not want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. Signed: .Owner Signed: Tenant 5/8/03 si\ i� 14 3 1 A ,live at -7-6670 3 S' Tukwila, WA. Please Check the box indicating your preference: I do want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. do not want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. Signed: Owner Signed: Tenant 5/8/03 I, 0_ l/!)/ live at 1 30 oR act 5, Tukw a, A. t Please Check the box indicating your preference: I do want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. da not want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. Signed: Owner Signed: Tenant 5/8/03 I, 7i° Z a an A" e live at /3pgo T 6 y ec E 5 Tukwila, WA. U '4 ?f//e--9&C'I 5p/mod Please Check the box indicating your preference: I do want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. IA I do not want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. Signed: e rte Owner v Signed: ,Tenant 5/8/03 47 1 7 t), Iiveat/72/ ���lfci,�S, Tukwila, WA. Please Check the box indicating your preference: I do want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. t do not want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. Signed: Owner 5j J A Signed: /�`-1 T enant 5/8/0: tTvttl 3e 5 1 ave at Tukwila, WA. Please Check the box indicating your preference: I do want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my stre do not want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of niy street. Owner Tenant 5/8/03 ve at U'"1( Please Check the box indicating your preference: J Tukwila, WA. I do want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. N4I do not want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. Signed: Signed: Tenant 5/8/03 r I 1, aw live at 179/35 g NAA.e. Tukwila, WA. Please Check the box indicating your preference: 11 1 do want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. 16 do not want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. Signed: Signed: Owner Tenant 5/8/03 I 9 v 1 live at I 32 �Y 7 IV Tukwila, WA. Please Check the boi indicating your preference: n 1 do wan street. e proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of niy I do not want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of street. Signed: Owner Sign 110./L Tenant 5/8/03 I,(CUUT V��`�j,��_ live at )?D2lo i e 1. Tukwila, WA. Please Check the box indicating your preference: i do want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. I do not want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. Signeda k atIWW' Qwner Signed: Tenant 5/8/03 I, LISA (L SQ 116 live at I3O1(-) ;A YS Tukwila, WA. Please Check the box indicating your preference: I do want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. do not want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. Signed: Signed. Owner Tenant 5/8/03 I, y� l- tee' live at c 7/r Tukwi a, WA. 543 Please Check the box indicating your preference: I do want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. %I do not want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. SigYied_ la, Owner Signed: Tenant 5/8/03 I,_1�UsI Z•)14E live at 3015 3 As>€ J Tukwila, WJ1. Please Check the box indicating your preference: A T I do want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. I do not want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. Signed: Signed: Owner Tenant 5/8/03 1, IVatieg c Lto Tukwila Please Check the box indicating your preference: 'do want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. El I do not want the proposed connecting walkway to the Cascade Glen subdivision at the end of my street. Signed: Signed: live at 136/5 SO Ate ,5). )Sotrt/, Owner Tenant CAS Number: 03-063 I Original Agenda Date: May 12, 2003 Agenda Item Title: Adopt Ordinance implementing Emergency Management Program. Original Sponsor: Timeline: Sponsor's Summary: Recommendations: Sponsor: Committee: Administration: Cost Impact (if known): Fund Source (if known): Meeting Date 5/12/03 1 Meeting Date 1 5/12/03 5/19/03 COL TCIL AGENDA SK DPSIS Meeting Date 5/12/03 5/19/03 Council Prepared by 1 Mayor's review 1 Council review 1 ✓M 1 k4 1 e ITEM INFORMATION Initials Admin. Public Works ITEM No. s a RCW Chapter 38.52 requires the City to establish an emergency management program that will provide the management structure, key responsibilities, emergency assignments, and implementing procedures to be followed during an emergency. The proposed ordinance officially establishes Tukwila's program and directs the creation of an emergency operations plan. Adopt Ordinance for Emergency Management. Forward to Committee of the Whole for discussion and approval. Same as sponsor. RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION Action Item discussed at COW Meeting. Consensus existed to forward the itme to the May 19, 2003 Regular Meeting for action. Ordinance Final format. APPENDICES Attachments Information Memo dated April 30, 2003 Ordinance TMC Chapter 2.56 Finance Safety Committee Meeting Minutes from May 5, 2003 2.57.020 Definitions. City of Tukwila Washington Ordinance No. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT; REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 594 AS CODIFIED AT TMC 2.56; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the potential exists for occurrences of natural disasters, civil disorder, terrorist acts or hostilities directly impacting the City of Tukwila; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds it necessary to create an Emergency Management Program to develop and implement an Emergency Management Plan for facilitating effective response to such occurrences; and WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila desires to bring its municipal code in line with the statutory requirements of RCW 38.52; and WHEREAS, the "Civil Defense" procedures established by Tukwila Ordinance No. 594 on November 19, 1969, no longer effectively address the emergency management requirements outlined above; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the best interests of public safety, health and welfare for its citizens to enact the provisions set forth in this ordinance; NOW HEREBY ORDAINS THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. New Emergency Management Chapter. TMC Chapter 2.57, entitled "Emergency Management is hereby established to read as follows: 2.57.010 Purpose. The declared purposes of this chapter are to provide for the preparation and implementation of plans, including mock or practice exercises, for the emergency management and protection of persons and property within the City in the event of a disaster; and to provide for the coordination of the emergency and disaster response functions of the City with all other public agencies and affected private persons, corporations and organizations. Any expenditures made in connection with emergency management and disaster activities, including mutual aid activities and mock or practice exercises, shall be deemed conclusively to be for the direct protection and benefit of the inhabitants and property of the City. As used in this chapter, these terms shall be defined as follows: 1. "Emergency Management" means the preparation for and the carrying out of all emergency functions, other than functions for which military forces are primarily responsible, to prevent, minimize and repair injury and damage resulting from disasters. It includes preparation, mitigation, response and recovery from disasters. It does not include, nor does any provision of this chapter apply to, any condition relating to a labor controversy. Emerg Mgmt 5 -03 1 2. "Disaster" includes in its meaning, but is not limited to, extraordinary fire, flood, storm, epidemic, riot, earthquake, enemy attack, sabotage, other emergencies, or similar public calamity. 3. "Preparation" means the active planning, testing, and revising of operational procedures and policies to prepare for a disaster. It includes coordination with local, County, State and Federal agencies to insure cohesive working relationships and compatible emergency plans. 4. Mitigation" includes risk analysis, review and identification of hazards both natural and man-made, development of strategies to minimize those hazards, and development of resources and capabilities to respond effectively to risks not controlled through conventional methods. 5. "Response" includes the initiation of warnings to potential disasters, initiation of actions necessary to effectively act during a disaster, damage assessment and evaluation, coordination of operations, logistics, and planning activities during a disaster, and documentation of actions taken during a disaster. 6. "Recovery" includes assessment of community needs after an event, prioritizing of actions for recovery, coordination of agencies during recovery, documentation of costs for future recovery of costs, and facilitation of disaster assistance offices in providing the community with efficient mechanisms to obtain Federal, State and local assistance after disasters. 2.57.030 City Council Duties. It shall be the duty of the City Council under the Emergency Management Program to: 1. Give advice and consent to the Mayor regarding appointments made pursuant to Section 2.57.040. 2. Consider adoption of emergency management mutual aid plans and agreements, and such ordinances, resolutions, rules and regulation as are necessary to implement such plans and agreements as are referred to them by the Emergency Management Council pursuant to Section 2.57.050. 3. Approve at the earliest practicable time after their issuance, rules and regulations reasonably related to the protection of life and property which are affected by a disaster, such rules and regulations having been made and issued by the Emergency Management Director pursuant to Section 2.57.070. 4. Distribute pursuant to resolution, the functions and duties of the City's emergency management organization among the divisions, services and special staff referred to in Section 2.57.090. 5. Approve mutual aid agreements referenced in and pursuant to Section 2.57.100. 2.57.040 Emergency Management Council Created Membership. The Emergency Management Council is hereby created, and shall consist of the following: 1. The Mayor, who shall be chairperson. 2. The Director of Emergency Management, who shall be Vice chairperson. 3. All department heads of the City of Tukwila, and the City Administrator. 4. Such City officials and other citizens with technical expertise in related areas as may be appointed by the Mayor, with the advice and consent of the City Council. Emerg Mgmt 5 -03 2 2.57.050 Emergency Management Council's Powers and Duties. It shall be the duty of the Emergency Management Council, and it is hereby empowered, to review and recommend for City Council adoption emergency management and mutual aid plans and agreements and such ordinances, resolutions, rules and regulations as are necessary to implement such plans and agreements. The Emergency Management Council shall meet upon call of the chairperson or in the chairperson's absence from the City or inability to call such meeting, upon the call of the vice chairperson. 2.57.060 Director's Powers and Duties A. The position of Director of Emergency Management is hereby created. The Director of Public Works of the City of Tukwila shall serve in such position ex officio. B. The Director or his /her designee is hereby empowered and directed to: 1. Prepare an emergency management operating plan for the City, conforming to the County and the State Office of Emergency Management plans and programs. 2. Control and direct the effort of the emergency management organization of the City for the accomplishment of the purposes of this chapter. 3. Direct coordination and cooperation between departments, divisions, services and staff of the emergency management organization of the City, and to resolve questions of authority and responsibility that may arise between them. 4. Represent the emergency management organization of the City in all dealings with public or private agencies pertaining to emergency management and response to disasters. 2.57.070 Disaster Powers of Director. In the event of disaster as herein provided, the director is hereby empowered to: 1. Make and issue rules and regulations on matters reasonably related to the protection of life and property as affected by such disaster; provided, however, such rules and regulations must be approved by the Emergency Management Council and confirmed by the City Council at the earliest practicable time. 2. Obtain vital supplies, equipment and such other properties found lacking and immediately needed for the protection of the life and property of the people, and bind the City for the fair value thereof, and, if required immediately, to commandeer the same for public use. 3. Require emergency services of any City officer or employee, and to command the aid of as many citizens of this community as he thinks necessary in the execution of his duties; such persons shall be entitled to all privileges, benefits and immunities as are provided by state law for registered Emergency worker volunteers (as defined by Washington Administrative Code 118 -30). 4. Requisition necessary personnel or material of any City department or agency. 5. Execute all of the special powers conferred by this chapter or by resolution adopted pursuant thereto, all powers conferred by statute, agreement approved by the Emergency Management Council, or by any other lawful authority. 2.57.080 Emergency Management Organization. All officers and employees of the City, together with those citizens enrolled to aid them during a disaster, and all groups, organizations and persons who may, by agreement or operation of law, including persons pressed into service under the provisions of Section 2.57.070 who shall be charged with duties incident to the protection of life and property in the City during such disaster, shall constitute the emergency preparedness organization of the City. Emerg Mgmt 5 -03 3 2.57.090 Departments, Divisions, Services and Staff. A. The functions and duties of the City emergency management organization shall be distributed among such departments, divisions, services and special staff as the City Council shall prescribe by resolution. B. Prior to the adoption of resolutions, the Emergency Management Council shall prepare a plan setting forth the form of organization; establishment and designation of departments, divisions and services; the assignment of functions, duties and powers; and the designation of officers and employees; and submit its recommendations to the City Council. 2.57.100 Mutual Aid Agreements. The Mayor shall have the power to sign, on behalf of the City and the Emergency Management Council, mutual aid agreements with other municipalities, the county and other governmental subdivisions, which have been approved by the City Council. All previous mutual aid agreements which have been signed by the Mayor are hereby confirmed and ratified, provided the same or parts thereof are not inconsistent with this chapter. 2.57.110 Punishment of Violations. It is a misdemeanor punishable as provided in TMC Section 1.08.010 for any person, during a disaster, to: 1. Willfully obstruct, hinder or delay any member of the emergency management organization in the enforcement of any Iawful rule or regulation issued pursuant to this chapter or in the performance of any duty imposed by virtue of this chapter. 2. Do any act forbidden by any lawful rules or regulations issued pursuant to this chapter, if the act is of such a nature as to give or be likely to give assistance to the enemy, or to encourage or assist in theft of or endanger property of inhabitants of the City, or to prevent, hinder or delay the defense or protection thereof. 3. Wear, carry or display, without authority, any means of identification specified by the State Department of Emergency Management. disaster. 4. In any manner loot or carry off any items of value during the aftermath of a 2.57.120 No Private Liability. No individual, firm, association, corporation or other party, owning, maintaining or controlling any building or premises who voluntarily and without compensation grants to the City a license or privilege or otherwise permits the City to inspect, designate and use the whole or any part or parts of the building or premises for the purpose of sheltering persons during an actual, impending, mock, or practice disaster, or their successors in interest, or the agents or employees of any of them, shall be subject to liability for injuries sustained by any person while in or upon the building or premises for the purpose of seeking refuge therein during an actual, impending, mock or practice disaster or test ordered by lawful authority. All legal liability for damage to property or injury or death to persons caused by acts done, or attempted, under color of this chapter and a bona fide attempt to comply therewith, other than acts done in bad faith, gross negligence, or willful misconduct shall be the obligation of the State of Washington. The City is immune from liability under this chapter to the fullest extent allowed by law. Section 2. Repealer. Tukwila Ordinance Number 594, as codified at TMC 2.56, is hereby repealed. Section 3. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Emerg Mgmt 5 -03 4 Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of the ordinance or summary thereof consisting of the title. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 2003. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Office of the City Attorney Emerg Mgmt 5 -03 Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Filed with the City Cleric Passed by the City Council: Published: Effective Date: Ordinance Number: 5 COLT Y CIL AGENDA Sr TOPSIS Meeting Date May 12, 2003 Mav 19. 2003 ITEM INFORMATION CAS Number: 03-064 Initials ITEM NO. Prevared by 1 Mayor's review I Council review Chief K. Haines 1 {ai,. 1 �j✓L� Original Agenda Date: 5/12/03 Agenda Item Title: interlocal Agreement For The Valley Special Response Team Meeting Date I 5/12/03 Meeting Date 5/12/03 5/19/03 Committee: APPENDICES: Attachments Memo to F &S Committee dated April 1, 2003 Interlocal Cooperative Agreement F&S Committee minutes dated 4/21/03 Interlocal Agreement Final format. Original Sponsor: Council Admin. XX 1 Timeline Sponsor's Summary: Our Police Department has been a full partner along with Renton P.D, Aubum P.D., Kent P.D., and the Port of Seattle P.D. in the Valley Special Response Team.. This successful combined S W.A.T team expanded to include the Federal Way Police Department which means a need for a revised interlocal agreement. Recommendations: Approve, sign, and ratify the Proposed interlocal Cooperative Agreement Sponsor: Chief Keith Haines Finance and Safety Administration: Cost Impact (if known): Continue to support the team financially as planned and approved in the 2003 Budget Fund Source (iflmown): General Fund RECORD OF COUNCIL Action Discussed at COW meeting. With minor edits, Council consensus existed to forward the proposed Interlocal to the May 19 City Cduncil Regular meeting for action. INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN AUBURN, FEDERAL WAY, KENT, RENTON, TUKWILA, AND THE PORT OF SEATTLE, FOR CREATION OF THE I. PARTIES The parties to this Agreement are the Port of Seattle and the municipalities of Auburn, Federal Way, Kent, Renton, and Tukwila, each of which is a municipal corporation operating under the laws of the State of Washington. II. AUTHORITY VALLEY SPECIAL RESPONSE TEAM This Agreement is entered into pursuant to Chapters 10.93, 39.34, and 53.08 of the Revised Code of Washington. III. PURPOSE The parties hereto desire to establish and maintain a multi jurisdictional team to effectively respond to serious criminal occurrences as described below. IV. FORMATION There is hereby created a multi jurisdictional team to be hereafter known as the "Valley Special Response Team" "SRT the members of which shall be the Port of Seattle, and the cities of Auburn, Federal Way, Kent, Renton, and Tukwila. As special needs arise, it may be necessary to request from other law enforcement agencies assistance and /or personnel, at the discretion of the SRT Incident Commander and /or the SRT Tactical Commander. V. STATEMENT OF PROBLEM King County and the municipalities within the Puget Sound area have experienced increasingly violent criminal confrontations due to increased gang activity, increased drug abuse, increased urbanization, and increased population densities. The ability to safely control, contain, and resolve criminal conduct such as civil disobedience, barricaded subjects, hostage situations, gang member arrests, high risk felony arrests, and narcotic /high risk search warrants has strained resources of the members' individual police department specialty teams. Law enforcement efforts directed at dealing with these violent confrontations have, for the most part, been conducted by law enforcement agencies working independently. A multi jurisdictional effort to handle specific serious criminal confrontations, as well as weapons of mass destruction, will result in more effective pooling of personnel, improved utilization of municipal funds, reduced duplication of equipment, improved VALLEY SPECIAL RESPONSE TEAM 1 OPERATIONAL AGREEMENT training, development of specialized expertise, and increased utilization /application of a combined special response team. The results of a multi jurisdictional effort will be improved services for the citizens of all participating jurisdictions, increased safety for officers and the community, and improved cost effectiveness. VI. TEAM OBJECTIVES The individual specialty units from each participating jurisdiction will be consolidated and combined to form the SRT. The SRT shall service each participating jurisdiction. The SRT shall also be available to outside law enforcement agencies as provided by chapter 10.93 RCW. The objective of the SRT shall be to provide enhanced use of personnel, equipment, budgeted funds, and training. The SRT shall respond as requested by any of the participating jurisdictions and provide a coordinated response to high -risk incidents. VII. DURATION AND TERMINATION The minimum term of this Agreement shall be one (1) year, effective upon its adoption. This Agreement shall automatically be extended for consecutive one (1) year terms, unless terminated pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. A jurisdiction may withdraw its participation in the SRT by providing written notice of its withdrawal, and serving such notice upon each Executive Board member of the remaining jurisdictions. A notice of withdrawal shall become effective ninety (90) days after service of the notice on all participating members. The SRT may be terminated by a majority vote of the Executive Board. Any vote for termination shall occur only when the police chief of each participating jurisdiction is present at the meeting in which such vote is taken. VIII. GOVERNANCE The affairs of the team shall be governed by an Executive Board "Board whose members are composed of the police chief, or his /her designee, from each participating jurisdiction. Each member of the Board shall have an equal vote and voice on all Board decisions. All Board decisions shall be made by a majority vote of the Board members, or their designees, appearing at the meeting in which the decision is made. A majority of Board members, or their designees, must be present at each meeting for any actions taken to be valid. A presiding officer shall be elected by the Board together with such other officers as a majority of the Board may decide. There shall be a minimum of four (4) Board meetings each year. One meeting shall be held in March of each year to review the prior year's service. Another meeting shall be held in August of each year to review and present a budget to the participating jurisdictions. At least two (2) other meetings shall be held each year to review the SRT's activities and policies. The presiding officer, or any Board member, may call extra meetings as deemed appropriate. The presiding officer shall provide no less than forty -eight (48) hours notice of all meetings to all members of the Board; PROVIDED, VALLEY SPECIAL RESPONSE TEAM 2 OPERATIONAL AGREEMENT however, that in emergency situations, the presiding officer may conduct a telephonic meeting or poll of Board members to resolve any issues related to such emergency. The Board shall develop SRT written policies, regulations, and operational procedures within ninety (90) calendar days of the execution of this Agreement. The SRT written policies, regulations, and operational procedures shall apply to all SRT operations. Thus, to the extent that the written policies, regulations, and operational procedures of the SRT conflict with the policies, regulations, and operational procedures of the individual jurisdictions, the SRT written policies, regulations, and procedures shall prevail. IX. STAFF A Tactical Commander, which shall be a command level officer, shall be appointed annually by the Board to act as the principal liaison and facilitator between the Board and the members of the SRT. The Tactical Commander shall operate under the direction of the presiding officer of the Board. The Tactical Commander shall be responsible for informing the Board on all matters relating to the function, expenditures, accomplishments, training, number of calls that the SRT responds to, problems of the SRT, and any other matter as requested by the Board. The Tactical Commander may be removed by action of the Board at anytime and for any reason, with or without cause. The Tactical Commander shall prepare monthly written reports to the Board on the actions, progress, and finances of the SRT. In addition, the Tactical Commander shall be responsible for presenting rules, procedures, regulations, and revisions thereto for Board approval. Each jurisdiction shall contribute seven (7) full -time commissioned officers, which shall include at least one (1) Sergeant or other first level supervisor, to be assigned to the SRT. The personnel assigned to the SRT shall be considered employees of the contributing jurisdiction. The contributing jurisdiction shall be solely and exclusively responsible for the compensation and benefits for the personnel it contributes to the SRT. All rights, duties, and obligations of the employer and the employee shall remain with the contributing jurisdiction. Each jurisdiction shall be responsible for ensuring compliance with all applicable laws with regard to employees and with provisions of any applicable collective bargaining agreements and civil service rules and regulations. The Board may appoint the finance department of a participating jurisdiction to manage the finances of the SRT. Before appointing the finance department of a particular jurisdiction to manage the finances of the SRT, the Board shall consult with the finance department of the jurisdiction and obtain its approval. The duty of managing the finances of the SRT shall be rotated to other participating jurisdictions at the discretion of the Board. The Board may, at its discretion, appoint one (1) or more legal advisors to advise the Board on legal issues affecting the SRT. The legal advisor(s) shall be the legal representative(s) for one or more of the jurisdictions participating in the SRT. The legal VALLEY SPECIAL RESPONSE TEAM 3 OPERATIONAL AGREEMENT advisor(s) shall, when appropriate or when requested by the Board, consult with the legal representatives of all participating jurisdictions before rendering legal advice. X. COMMAND AND CONTROL During field activation of the SRT, an Incident Commander, SRT Tactical Commander, and SRT Team Leader(s) will be designated. The duties and procedures to be utilized by the Incident Commander, the SRT Tactical Commander, and the SRT Team Leader(s) shall be set forth in the standard operating procedures approved by the Board. The standard operating procedures approved by the board may designate other personnel to be utilized during an incident. XI. EQUIPMENT, TRAINING, AND BUDGET Each participating jurisdiction shall acquire the equipment of its participating SRT members. Each participating jurisdiction shall provide sufficient funds to update, replace, repair, and maintain the equipment and supplies utilized by its participating SRT members. Each participating jurisdiction shall provide sufficient funds to provide for training of its participating SRT members. The equipment, supplies, and training provided by each jurisdiction to its personnel participating in the SRT shall be equal to those provided by the other participating jurisdictions. Each member jurisdiction shall maintain an independent budget system to account for funds allocated and expended by its participating SRT members. The Board must approve any joint capital expenditure for SRT equipment. XII. DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS UPON TERMINATION Termination shall be in accordance with those procedures set forth in prior sections. Each participating jurisdiction shall retain sole ownership of equipment purchased and provided to its participating SRT members. Any assets acquired with joint funds of the SRT shall be equally divided among the participating jurisdictions at the asset's fair market value upon termination. The value of the assets of the SRT shall be determined by using commonly accepted methods of valuation. If two (2) or more participating jurisdictions desire an asset, the final decision shall be made by arbitration (described below). Any property not claimed shall be declared surplus by the Board and disposed of pursuant to state law for the disposition of surplus property. The proceeds from the sale or disposition of any SRT property, after payment of any and all costs of sale or debts of the agency, shall be equally distributed to those jurisdictions participating in the SRT at the time of dissolution in proportion to the jurisdiction's percentage participation in the SRT as of the date of dissolution. In the event that one (1) or more jurisdictions terminate their participation in the SRT, but the SRT continues to exist, the jurisdiction terminating participation shall be deemed to have waived any right or title to any property owned by the SRT or to share in the proceeds at the time of dissolution. VALLEY SPECIAL RESPONSE TEAM 4 OPERATIONAL AGREEMENT Arbitration pursuant to this section shall occur as follows: A. The jurisdictions interested in an asset shall select one (1) person (Arbitrator) to determine which agency will receive the property. If the jurisdictions cannot agree to an Arbitrator, the chiefs of the jurisdictions participating in the SRT upon dissolution shall meet to determine who the Arbitrator will be. The Arbitrator may be any person not employed by the jurisdictions that desire the property. B. During a meeting with the Arbitrator, each jurisdiction interested in the property shall be permitted to make an oral and /or written presentation to the Arbitrator in support of its position. C. At the conclusion of the presentation, the Arbitrator shall determine which jurisdiction is to receive the property. The decision of the Arbitrator shall be final and shall not be the subject of appeal or review. XIII. LIABILITY, HOLD HARMLESS, AND INDEMNIFICATION It is the intent of the participating jurisdictions to provide services of the SRT without the threat of being subject to liability to one another and to fully cooperate in the defense of any claims or lawsuits arising out of or connected with SRT actions that are brought against the jurisdictions. To this end, the participating jurisdictions agree to equally share responsibility and liability for the acts or omissions of their participating personnel when acting in furtherance of this Agreement. In the event that an action is brought against any of the participating jurisdictions, each jurisdiction shall be responsible for an equal share of any award for or settlement of claims of damages, fines, fees, or costs, regardless of which jurisdiction or employee the action is taken against or which jurisdiction or employee is ultimately responsible for the conduct. The jurisdictions shall share equally regardless of the number of jurisdictions named in the lawsuit or claim or the number of officers from each jurisdiction named in the lawsuit or claim. This section shall be subject to the conditions and limitations set forth in subsections A through G below. A. Jurisdiction Not Involved In SRT Response. In the event that a jurisdiction or its personnel were not involved in the SRT response to the incident that gives rise to a claim or lawsuit, and judgment on the claim or lawsuit does not, in any manner, implicate the acts of a particular jurisdiction or its personnel, such jurisdiction shall not be required to share responsibility for the payment of the judgment or award. B. Intentionally Wrongful Conduct Beyond the Scope of Employment. Nothing herein shall require, or be interpreted to require indemnification or payment of any judgment against any SRT personnel for intentionally wrongful conduct that is outside of the scope of employment of any individual or for any judgment of punitive damages against any individual or jurisdiction. Payment of any award for punitive damages shall be the VALLEY SPECIAL RESPONSE TEAM 5 OPERATIONAL AGREEMENT sole responsibility of the person or jurisdiction that employs the person against whom such award is rendered. C. Collective Reoresentation and Defense. The jurisdictions may retain joint legal counsel to collectively represent and defend the jurisdictions in any legal action. Those retaining joint counsel shall share equally the costs of such representation or defense. In the event a jurisdiction does not agree to joint representation, the jurisdiction shall be solely responsible for all attorneys fees accrued by its individual representation or defense. The jurisdictions and their respective defense counsel shall make a good faith attempt to cooperate with other participating jurisdictions by, including but not limited to, providing all documentation requested, and making SRT members available for depositions, discovery, settlement conferences, strategy meetings, and trial. D. Removal From Lawsuit. In the event a jurisdiction or employee is successful in withdrawing or removing the jurisdiction or employee from a lawsuit by summary judgment, qualified immunity, or otherwise, the jurisdiction shall nonetheless be required to pay its equal share of any award for or settlement of the lawsuit; PROVIDED, however, that in the event a jurisdiction or employee is removed from the lawsuit and subsection (A) of this section is satisfied, the jurisdiction shall not be required to pay any share of the award or settlement. E. Settlement Process. It is the intent of this Agreement that the jurisdictions act in good faith on behalf of each other in conducting settlement negotiations on liability claims or lawsuits so that, whenever possible, all parties agree with the settlement or, in the alternative, agree to proceed to trial. In the event a claim or lawsuit requires the sharing of liability, no individual jurisdiction shall be authorized to enter into a settlement agreement with a claimant or plaintiff unless all jurisdictions agree with the terms of the settlement. Any settlement made by an individual jurisdiction without the agreement of the remaining jurisdictions, when required, shall not relieve the settling jurisdiction from paying an equal share of any final settlement or award. F. Defense Waiver. This section shall not be interpreted to waive any defense arising out of RCW Title 51. G. Insurance. The failure of any insurance carrier or self- insured pooling organization to agree to or follow the terms of this section shall not relieve any individual jurisdiction from its obligations under this Agreement. VALLEY SPECIAL RESPONSE TEAM 6 OPERATIONAL AGREEMENT XIV. NOTICE OF CLAIMS, LAWSUITS, AND SETTLEMENTS In the event a claim is filed or lawsuit is brought against a participating jurisdiction or its employees for actions arising out of their conduct in support of SRT operations, the jurisdiction shall promptly notify the other jurisdictions that the claim or lawsuit has been initiated. Any documentation, including the claim or legal complaints, shall promptly be provided to each participating jurisdiction. Any jurisdiction or member who believes or knows that another jurisdiction would be liable for a claim, settlement, or judgment that arises from a SRT action or operation, shall have the burden of notifying each participating jurisdiction of all claims, lawsuits, settlements, or demands made to that jurisdiction. In the event a participating jurisdiction has a right, pursuant to section XIII of this Agreement, to be defended and held harmless by another participating jurisdiction, the jurisdiction having the right to be defended and held harmless shall promptly tender the defense of such claim or lawsuit to the jurisdiction that must defend and hold the other harmless. XV. COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW The SRT and all its members shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws that apply to the SRT. XVI. ALTERATIONS This Agreement may be modified, amended, or altered by agreement of all participating jurisdictions and such alteration, amendment, or modification shall be effective when reduced to writing and executed in a manner consistent with paragraph XX of this Agreement. XVII. RECORDS Each jurisdiction shall maintain training records related to the SRT for a minimum of seven (7) years. A copy of these records will be forwarded and maintained with the designated SRT Training Coordinator. All records shall be available for full inspection and copying by each participating jurisdiction. XVIII. FILING Upon execution hereof, this Agreement shall be filed with the city clerks of the respective participating municipalities, the Director of Records and Elections of King County, the secretary of state, and such other governmental agencies as may be required by law. XIX. SEVERABILITY If any part, paragraph, section, or provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of any remaining section, part, or provision of this Agreement. VALLEY SPECIAL RESPONSE TEAM 7 OPERATIONAL AGREEMENT XX. MUNICIPAL AUTHORIZATIONS This Agreement shall be executed on behalf of each participating jurisdiction by its duly authorized representative and pursuant to an appropriate resolution or ordinance of the governing body of each participating jurisdiction. This Agreement shall be deemed effective upon the last date of execution by the last so authorized representative. This Agreement may be executed by counterparts and be valid as if each authorized representative had signed the original document. By signing below, the signor certifies that he or she has the authority to sign this Agreement on behalf of the jurisdiction, and the jurisdiction agrees to the terms of this Agreement. Mayor, City of Auburn Date City Attorney, City of Auburn Date City Clerk, City of Auburn Date Mayor, City of Renton Date City Attorney, City of Renton Date City Clerk, City of Renton Date Mayor, City of Tukwila Date City Attorney, City of Tukwila Date City Clerk, City of Tukwila Date Mayor, City of Kent Date City Attorney, City of Kent Date City Clerk, City of Kent Date City Manager, City of Federal Way Date City Attorney, City of Federal Way Date City Clerk, City of Federal Way Date Executive Director, Port of Seattle Date Port Counsel, Port of Seattle Date Ma WRC0i4W VMMSWATiwWY VALLEY SPECIAL RESPONSE TEAM 8 OPERATIONAL AGREEMENT CAS Number: 03-065 COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS Meeting Date 5/12/03 5/19/03 Prepared by K. Haines Initials yor's review I Council review 1 ITEM INFORMATION Original Agenda Date: 5/12/03 ITEM NO. Statewide Law Enforcement Emergency Mutual Aid and Mobilization Original Sponsor: Council Admin X (P.D. Admin) Timeline: Sponsor's Summary: The Washington State Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs (WASPC) has developed a Washington State Law Enforcement Mutual aid/Mobilization Plan. This plan will help facilitate a coordinated response of police resources in our state to any emergency situation for the protection of life and property when local resources become overwhehned. As a part of this plan each jurisdiction is being requested to sign and ratify the attached Interlocal Cooerative Agreement to provide mutual aid and mobilization between the many jurisdictions of King County. Recommendations: Sponsor: Forward to 5/19 Regular Meeting for formal approval. Committee: Finance and Safety Forward to COW for discussion and Regular Meeting for approval. Administration: Cost Impact (if lmown): Fund Source (if lmown): RECORD OF.COUNCIL ACTION 5/12/03 05 -12 -03 I Discussed at Council meeting. With a request of the Police Chief to inquire on (possible) inclusion into Parties Section and heading of the proposed I interlocal agreement, Council consensus existed to forward the item to the May 19, 2003, Regular meeting for action. Meeting Date 5/12/03 5/19/03 APPENDICES Attachments Memo from Chief Haines dated April 28, 2003 Interlocal Agreement and Addendum "A" F &S Committee Minutes dated 5/5/03 Proposed Interlocal Agreement Final Format INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE LAW ENFORCEMENT MUTUAL AID AND MOBILIZATION BETWEEN THE CITIES OF KING COUNTY, UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON POLICE, AND KING COUNTY 1. DATE OF AGREEMENT AND PARTIES. This agreement, dated the first day of June 2003 for reference purposes only, is entered into by the undersigned municipal corporations or towns organized or created under the laws of the State of Washington, the University of Washington Police Department, and the King County Sheriff's Office. 2. AUTHORITY FOR AGREEMENT. This Agreement is entered into as an interlocal agreement pursuant to the Interlocal Cooperation Act as codified in Chapter 39.34 of the Revised Code of Washington, specifically RCW 39.34.080. 3. PURPOSE OF THE AGREEMENT. Each party has the power, authority and responsibility to provide police protection for its citizens within its boundaries. On occasion, the demand for law enforcement services within a jurisdiction may exceed that department's ability to respond in a timely manner. When that occurs, the police department or departments of other jurisdictions may be capable of providing backup law enforcement services. In order to fulfill their respective obligations to their citizens, the parties desire to provide backup law enforcement services to each other under the terms and conditions set forth below. 4. MUTUAL AID LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES. Each party will to the best of its ability, furnish mutual aid law enforcement services to, and at the request of, any other party whose police department is taxed beyond its ability to respond, and render law enforcement services in a timely manner. Each jurisdiction shall confer police authority on those police officers from other jurisdictions providing mutual aid law enforcement services and enforcing the requesting jurisdiction's ordinances. The mutual aid officers shall proceed at the direction of the requesting department's police chief or sheriff or their designee. The responding department maintains the discretion to determine whether its own police department will not or cannot provide the requested mutual aid services. The responding department also maintains the discretion to determine at any time during the response that it may stop providing assistance. Upon determining that it will not respond or that it will stop assisting, the department shall immediately notify the requesting department of the change in mutual aid law enforcement services provided. The responding department shall be the sole judge of its ability to respond or to remain, and assumes no liability for declining to respond or for leaving. 5. SERVICES INCLUDED. For purposes of this Agreement, mutual aid law enforcement services shall mean supplemental response to assist at least one officer from the primary agency. Such services will typically be of a first responder type of service such as patrol response. Response protocols for this Agreement are outlined in "Addendum A 6. TERM. This Agreement shall be effective on June 1, 2003 for one (1) year, regardless of the date of execution and shall be automatically renewed on May 31 of each successive year. Any party may terminate its participation in this Agreement by giving 60 days notice of termination to all participating parties hereto. 7. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The parties acknowledge and agree that in the performance of this Agreement, they are acting as independent contractors and not as agents of each other. 8. INDEMNITY AND HOLD HARMLESS. Each jurisdiction which is a party to this Agreement hereby agrees to accept liability for any act, error or omission of its own employees of whatever kind and nature and from whatever cause arising out of or connected with the performance of this Agreement, and to indemnify and hold the other jurisdictions and their employees harmless from any such liability, claim, or cause of action, including amounts arising out of the performance, by that jurisdiction's employees, of this Agreement. All liability for salaries, wages and other compensation of law enforcement officers shall be that of their respective employers. 9. GOVERNING BODY. This Agreement shall be administered by a joint board, which consists of the police chief of each named jurisdiction and the King County Sheriff. Administration of this Agreement includes, but is not limited to, (1) each participant identifying the resources available to aid participating jurisdictions; (2) review of the response protocols (Addendum A); and (3) participation in the Regional and/or State Mobilization efforts. A quorum of the membership is necessary for any modification of the mobilization plan. Meetings may be called upon the request of any 3 board members with 30 days minimum notice. 10. COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement shall be signed in counterparts and, if so signed, shall be deemed one integrated agreement. 11. MODIFICATION. The parties may amend, modify, or supplement this Agreement only by written agreement executed by all the parties hereto. 12. MERGER AND ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement merges and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations and/or agreements between the parties relating to the subject matter of this Agreement and constitutes the entire contract between the parties. Signature page immediately following INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE LAW ENFORCEMENT MUTUAL AID AND MOBILIZATION BETWEEN THE CITIES OF KING COUNTY, UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON POLICE, AND KING COUNTY CITY OF Algona By: CITY OF Bellevue By: CITY OF Bothell By: CITY OF Carnation By: CITY OF Covington By: CITY OF Duvall By: By: Date Date Date Date Date Date Date SIGNATURE PAGE CITY OF Auburn By: Date CITY OF Black Diamond By: Date CITY OF Burien By: Date CITY OF Clyde Hill By: Date CITY OF Des Moines By: Date CITY OF Enumclaw CITY OF Federal Wav CITY OF Issaouah By: By: Date Date CITY OF Kenmore CITY OF Kent By: By: Date Date CITY OF Kirkland CITY OF Lake Forest Park By: By: Date Date CITY OF Maple Valley CITY OF Medina By By: Date Date CITY OF Mercer Island CITY OF Newcastle By: By: Date Date CITY OF Normandy Park CITY OF North Bend By: By: Date Date CITY OF Pacific CITY OF Redmond By: By: Date Date CITY OF Renton CITY OF Sammamish By: By: Date Date CITY OF SeaTac CITY OF By: By: Date Date CITY OF Seattle CITY OF Shoreline By: By: Date Date CITY OF Snoaualmie CITY OF Tukwila By: By: Date Date CITY OF Woodinville CITY OF By: By: Date Date County of King Port of Seattle By: County of King Airport Police By: David G. Reichert Date King County Sheriff Ron Griffin Date KC Airport Police Chief University of Washington Police By: Weldon Ihrig Date Executive Vice President By: T. M. Kimsey Date Chief of Police I. Authority ADDENDUM "A" KING COUNTY MUTUAL AID RESPONSE PROTOCOLS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT All parties to the King County Mutual Aid Agreement will ensure a process is established to commit manpower and resources. II. Reauest For Mutual Aid 1. In the event of major disorder or other law enforcement operation the first law enforcement resources to be used shall be those of the primarily responsible agency. In the event that such resources are inadequate to control the situation by the primarily responsible agency, or there is a need for a specialized unit, a request for mutual aid under this plan will be made directly to an assisting agency. Such requests for assistance shall, if possible, specify the number of police officers and types of equipment required, where and to whom such officers are to report, and where and to whom the equipment should be delivered. 2. Rendering assistance under the terms of this agreement shall not be mandatory, except that if assistance can't be rendered, the requestee should immediately inform the requestor if, for any reason, assistance can't be rendered. It is understood that consideration as to whether assistance can be provided or not must be determined by the requestee. 3. In the event of mobilization under this agreement, the primarily responsible agency shall assume incident command, unless the primarily responsible agency specifically requests that a different law enforcement agency fulfill this responsibility, or unless the scope of the problem is multi jurisdictional, in which case a unified command shall be established. This shall include directing the assignment of all personnel and equipment. The assignment of duties to officers of assisting agencies shall be made by the incident commander of the primary responsible agency unless that responsibility is delegated to a different law enforcement agency as indicated above, 4. The primary responsible agency shall have the responsibility of establishing a command post and notifying all assisting agencies at the earliest possible time of its location. The Incident Commander shall establish a- command post in such a manner as to provide an area suitable for the staging and directing of all resources. 1 Arrests Arrest policies will be determined by the Incident Commander in charge of the event. Transportation of prisoners to jail facilities will be coordinated by the Incident Commander. The primarily responsible agency will be responsible for providing supplies that are reasonably needed to sustain the responding officers in enforcing the law and maintaining order. Each agency will be responsible for any repairs and/or damages done to their own vehicles as a result of participation in mutual aid. III. Insurance No signatory shall be held liable to another signatory for damages, loss of equipment, injury to personnel, or payment of compensation arising as a result of assistance rendered under the terms of this agreement. IV. Commissions Authority Full -time, paid, commissioned officers who are responding to any call for mutual aid shall be automatically commissioned by virtue of the mutual aid agreement, through the commissioning authority of the primarily responsible agency and, therefore, shall be empowered to exercise the same police authority during the time of the mutual aid as though they were full -time commissioned officers of the primarily responsible agency. This provision shall apply whether the mutual aid request is of: (a) A formal nature between department heads; (b) A less formal nature through agreement of watch commanders or shift supervisors; or, (c) When the officers of one jurisdiction cross jurisdiction boundaries to aid or assist the officers of another jurisdiction signatory to this agreement. If signatory agencies have reserve officers or part-time officers, in addition to full -time paid, commissioned officers, they shall normally be exempt from the automatic commissioning, except those reserve officers working under the immediate supervision of a full -time officer. Reserve or part-time officers may be extended automatic commissioning at the direction of the department head who requests mutual aid, PROVIDED HOWEVER, that such determination should be worked out in advance among the heads of the signatory agencies. V. Command The underlying principle of mutual aid is that other agencies are serving as a resource to another agency's request. Therefore, the Chief of Police or his/her designee (Sergeant, Lieutenant, Captain, etc.) of the requesting agency maintains 2 incident command and is aided by those resources sent in response to this request for aid. In the event that the emergency is of such a nature that it exceeds the individual jurisdictional boundaries, a unified command shall be established until the mutual aid situation ceases to exist and operations return to normal boundaries. Whenever significant resources from other agencies must be mobilized and brought into a jurisdiction in order to resolve a given problem, even when the scope of the problem is such that it is physically contained within the boundaries of the specific single jurisdiction requesting mutual aid, it is expected that an appropriate incident command staff be developed and that the senior staff officers responsible for the mutual aid assets will fill roles within the incident command structure. Successful mutual aid operations must be based upon professional respect and also upon acknowledgement of the fact that the Incident Commander in charge also is responsible and legally liable for his decisions and actions. It must also be borne in mind that those in charge of mutual aid assets are still free to accept or refuse to carry out requests requiring specific missions, which would utilize and exhaust the assets for which they are responsible. VI. Control While the question of technical command and responsibility is one, which requires specific designation of an Incident Commander, the exercise of control over responding mutual aid units and combinations of units brings up an entirely different set of concerns. Wherever possible, the supervisor or staff officer in charge of a group of responding units from an assisting agency would report to the Incident Commander as liaison and be assigned to specific tasks or missions, for which he /she would use his own departmental personnel. NOTE: Because of the possibility that reserve officers will be used in many responses to requests for mutual aid, it is important to establish and record their presence and to verify the fact that they are certified reserves within the scope of the definition of the "Peace Officer Powers Act," and have met the requirements established by the Washington Criminal Justice Training Commission. Reserve officers should generally work under supervisors or regular officers from their own agencies, but under some circumstances (depending on the scope of the operation), might be configured into a special reserve contingent for handling special assignments such as roadblock, evacuation, fixed -point traffic control, etc. VII. Press Relations It shall be the responsibility of the requesting agency in conjunction with the Incident Commander to establish a press area and to assign a public information officer to handle immediate inquires during any given incident. All releases of information through the public information function should be approved by the Incident Commander. 3 VIII. Record Keenine It shall be the responsibility of the Incident Commander to establish a Planning and Intelligence Section. The Planning and Intelligence Section will keep an accurate log of what mutual aid agencies, personnel and vehicles are involved in the emergency, and during what periods, along with the assignments, which they were given and any actions, which they took. A formal written Incident Action Plan and After Action Report will be completed by the Planning and Intelligence Section and the requesting agency following the incident. The King County Chiefs Association through the Regional Operations Committee shall annually update and review plans and policies, and make recommendations for change. 4 CAS Number: 03-051 Agenda Item Title: Original Sponsor: Timeline: Sponsor's Summary: ©3 Recommendations: Sponsor: Committee: Administration: Cost Impact (if knnwn) Fund Source (if known) Meeting Date 4/21/03 5/19/03 1 Meetina Date 4/21/03 5/19/03 COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS Meeting Date 4/14/03 5/19/03 ITEM INFORMATION Original Agenda Date: 4/14/03 Initials ITEM NO. Prepared by 1 Mayor's review 1 Council review 1 I� I 1 _0?C. I S a I I I I 05 1 Discussion of Budgeting $50,000 in additional ACC funding to see the agency through a September decision by a US District Court Judge Council x Admin. Funds needed as soon as possible In your last discussion you wanted to know what other cities would do with their fACC funding. Burien and Normandy Park have given more funding, but a gap still remains. ACC is still asking for an additioinal $50,000 from Tukwila. Discuss need for funding N/A Same as sponsor $50,000 000.20 Ending Fund Balance Regular Meeeting RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION Action APPENDICES Attachments Selected portions of motion for summary judement Memo from Steve Lancaster dated May 7, 2003 TO: Tukwila City Council FROM: Steve Lancaster Burien Normandy Park Tukwila Federal Way Total CITY OF TUKWILA INTER OFFICE MEMO LJV SUBJECT: Supplemental funding Airport Communities Coalition DATE: May 7, 2003 Due to the withdrawal of Des Moines funding from the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) the organization is facing a budget shortfall for the remainder of 2003. The following supplemental appropriations for 2003 have been proposed to offset this shortfall and allow ACC to complete its work program for this year. $170,000 100,000 50,000 10.000 $340,000 Both Burien and Normandy Park have committed to the supplemental appropriations as proposed. Federal Way has made no commitment to date. Q:\STEVE\ACC \Supl Approp 2003.doc Page 1 of 1 1 Meeting Date 5/19/03 Original Sponsor: Timeline: Sponsor's Summary: Recommendations: Sponsor: Committee: Administration: Cost Impact (if known): Fund Source (if known): 1 Meeting Date 1 5/19/03 COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS Meeting Date 5/19/03 Council Initials Prepared by 1 Mayor's review I Council review CK I I 1i?C- I I I I I ITEM INFORMATION CAS Number: 03-069 I Original Agenda Date: May 19, 2003 Agenda Item Title: Trans- Valley Area Study Phase 2 Interlocal Agreement Authorize the Mayor to sign the Interlocal Agreement Forward to Regular Council Same as Sponsor. $25,000.00 104/02 Commercial Streets (pg. 48 in 2003 CIP) RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION Action APPENDICES Attachments Information Memo dated April 30, 2003 Interlocal Agreement (Phase 2) Transportation Committee Meeting Minutes from May 12, 2003 Admin. Public Works/DCD ITEM Na c Phase 2 is a multi jurisdictional plan that builds upon the Phase 1 Trans- Valley Study with Tukwila, King County, SeaTac, Renton, and Kent. This effort will develop an implementation plan that recommends a prioritized listing of multi -modal projects that alleviate congestion and improve mobility within the Trans Valley Area. The completion of Phase 2 is estimated to be June 2004. To: Mayor Mullet From: Public Works Director Date: April 30, 2003 Subject: Trans -Valley Area Study Phase 2 Interlocal Agreement Project No. 01 -RWO3 ISSUE The Interlocal Agreement for Phase 2 of the Trans Valley Area Study is before Tukwila City Council and Mayor for approval. Other jurisdictions party to this interlocal agreement are: King County (lead) and Cities of SeaTac, Renton, and Kent. BACKGROUND In 2002, Phase 1 of the Trans Valley Area Study was completed. The first phase provides background documentation, research, priority corridor identification, and potential solution sets by corridor and by mode of travel. This Phase 1 work will provide the basis and data for the Phase 2 Pre Design effort. As Phase 1 was concluding, the partners in the Trans Valley Area Study all agreed that further, more detailed work was still required to make an effective plan. At that time, staff began the process of developing the attached Interlocal Agreement and the Draft Scope of Work for Phase 2. The Interlocal Agreement is substantially similar to the first Interlocal agreed to by the Mayor in 2001. ANALYSIS RECOMMENDATION INFORMATION MEMO The objective of the Phase 2 Interlocal Agreement is a multi jurisdictional Implementation Plan that builds upon the Phase I Trans Valley Study. This effort will develop an implementation plan that recommends a prioritized listing of multi -modal projects that alleviate congestion and improve mobility within the Trans Valley Area. Tukwila's cost for the work is $25,000, which is included in the 2003 -2008 Capital Improvement Program approved by City Council on December 16, 2002. The timeline for this study is as follows: June 25 Before King County Council for action September 1 Notice to Proceed June 2004 Completion of Phase 2 Approve the Interlocal Agreement for the Mayor's signature. \tuk2 \voll \pubworks\cyndy \trans-valley corridor study\pbase 2 information merno.doc Trans Valley Implementation Plan Interlocal Agreement (Phase 2) 3/12/03 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT (PHASE 2) for the TRANS- VALLEY PHASE 2 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by KING COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington "King County" or "the County"), the CITY OF SEATAC ("SeaTac"), the CITY OF TUKWILA "Tukwila the CITY OF KENT "Kent and the CITY OF RENTON "Renton SeaTac, Tukwila, Kent and Renton are referred to collectively as "the Cities The County and the Cities are referred to collectively as "the Parties." RECITALS A. The Trans- Valley Transportation Improvements Implementation Plan Area "the Transportation Improvements Implementation Area is located in the Renton valley. Its boundaries are Grady Way South on the north, South 212 Street on the south, SR 99 (International Boulevard) on the west, and the urban-rural growth line as designated in the King County Comprehensive Plan on the east. The Transportation Improvements Implementation Area features high levels of commercial, industrial and residential development and is a connecting point for many multi modal, regional 1 /10 Trans Valley Implementation Plan Interlocal Agreement (Phase 2) 3/12/03 facilities including north/south freeways and arterials, rail connections, transit facilities and service, freight and trucking hubs and the region's international airport. B. Traffic congestion is a major problem in the Transportation Improvements Implementation Area, which has many regionally significant north/south highways and arterials, but few contiguous east/west roadways. C. The Parties recognize that a cooperative effort is necessary to identify and address the cross jurisdictional traffic congestion within the Transportation Improvements Implementation Area. D. Pursuant to RCW Chapter 39.34, the Interlocal Cooperation Act, the Parties are each authorized to enter into this Agreement for cooperative action. NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. OBJECTIVE OF THE AGREEMENT The objective of this agreement is a multi jurisdictional Implementation Plan that builds upon the Phase I Trans Valley Study. This effort will develop an implementation plan that recommends a prioritized listing of multimodal projects that alleviate congestion and improve mobility within the defined Transportation Improvements Implementation Area. 2/10 Trans Valley Implementation Plan Interlocal Agreement (Phase 2) 3/12/03 1.1 The product of the Implementation plan will identify high priority projects and a priority plan to implement the projects. This effort is the next step in determining the project needs along east/west and north/south arterials in the Implementation Area and is necessary to move those needed projects quickly through the preliminary engineering to construction phases. 1.2 The Implementation Plan will identify the benefits of the projects and how the projects will affect the overall Trans Valley Transportation Improvements Implementation Area transportation system. 1.3 During and following completion of the Implementation Plan, the Parties intend to work together to implement the recommended improvements, including working as a coalition in seeking grants and other funding to insure implementation of the recommended projects. However, this Agreement relates to the Implementation Plan only, and does not obligate any Party to implement any of the recommended improvements. 2. STUDY MANAGEMENT 2.1 King County has designated a Project Manager to provide direction and coordination among the Parties, other agencies not party to this Agreement, stakeholders, the public and consultants. The Project Manager will be responsible for overall project management, including, but not limited to, 3/10 Trans Valley Implementation Plan Interlocal Agreement (Phase 2) 3/12/03 2.2 The Cities shall each designate a lead person to assist the Project Manager. Each lead person shall be responsible for coordinating with the other Parties, providing the consultant with information as needed, reviewing consultant work products, and reporting to their respective elected officials and management on the Implementation Plan's progress. In the event of any disagreement among the Parties that cannot be resolved through discussion, the Project Manager shall have the final decision authority. 3. ACTION PLAN supervising the consultant and/or consultant team, directing the preparation of the Implementation Plan, and managing of all consultant contracts. The consultant and/or the consultant team shall report directly to the Project Manager. 3.1 Phase II will begin once a supplement to the Phase I effort is approved. Phase If tasks will include, but are not limited to, Project Management and Team Coordination, Partnership Chartering, Project Identification and Design Considerations within Priority Corridors, Mapped Projects within Priority Corridors, System -Wide Level Traffic Modeling, Public Outreach and Final Report. 4/10 Trans Valley Implementation Plan Interlocal Agreement (Phase 2) 3/12/03 4. FUNDING 4.1 The Parties each have agreed to provide funding for the Implementation Plan. 4.2 The Parties understand that a commitment to funding above and beyond that contained in this Agreement will require an amendment to this Agreement. 4.3 The Parties agree to pay the following amounts: Party King County Renton Tukwila Kent SeaTac TOTAL Amount $100,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $200,000 4.4 The Project Manager will maintain accurate records to allow proportional distribution and final adjustments among the Parties following completion of the Implementation Plan. 4.5 Each Party (at its expense) shall commit the personnel necessary to fulfill that Party's Phase 11 tasks and review consultant work products. This expense is considered separate from the Party's contribution described above. 5/10 Trans Valley Implementation Plan Interlocal Agreement (Phase 2) 3/12/03 4.6 The total Implementation Plan cost shall include all those costs incurred by King County in completing the items listed in the Transportation Improvements Implementation Plan Scope of Work including costs for staff, overhead, supplies, consultants, and equipment. 5. PAYMENT BY THE CITIES The Cities each shall make payment to King County no later than 90 days after the effective date of this Agreement in accordance with the amounts agreed to herein. 6. DURATION This Agreement is effective upon signature by all the Parties and remains in effect until the Phase 2 implementation plan has been completed and each Party has satisfied its obligation for payment of Study costs. 6/10 Trans Valley Implementation Plan Interlocal Agreement (Phase 2) 3/12/03 7. OTHER PROVISIONS 7.1 The Cities hereby grant to the County right of entry into their corporate limits for the purpose of performing any and all tasks related to the County's obligations under this Agreement. 7.2 Washington State law shall govern the respective liability among the parties to this Agreement for any loss due to property damage or personal injury arising out of the activities conducted pursuant to this Agreement. 7.3 Nothing contained herein is intended to, nor shall be construed to, create any rights in any party not a signatory to this Agreement, or to form the basis for any liability on the part of the Cities, the County, or their officials, employees, agents or representatives, to any party not a signatory to this Agreement. 7.4 Waiver of any breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any prior or subsequent breach and shall not be construe to be a modification of the terms of this Agreement. 7.5 If any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid, the remainder of the Agreement shall not be affected thereby if such remainder would then continue to serve the purposes and objectives of the Parties, 7.6 Time is of the essence of this Agreement. 7/10 Trans Valley Implementation Plan Interlocal Agreement (Phase 2) 3/12/03 7.7 All Parties were represented by counsel throughout the drafting and execution of this Agreement. The provisions of this Agreement shall not be construed for or against any Party. 7,8 The headings of the various sections and subsections of this Agreement are inserted for convenience only and shall not be deemed to expand, limit, or otherwise affect its terms and conditions. 7,9 This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Parties and any representations or understandings, whether oral or written, not incorporated herein are excluded. 7.10 This Agreement is not assignable by any Party, either in whole or in part. 7,11 This Agreement may be amended only by an instrument in writing, duly executed by all Parties. 8/10 Trans Valley Implementation Plan Interlocal Agreement (Phase 2) 3/12/03 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement effective as of the date last written below. KING COUNTY CITY OF RENTON King County Executive Mayor Date Date CITY OF KENT CITY OF TUKWILA Mayor Mayor Date Date CITY OF SEATAC City Manager Date 9/10 Trans Valley Implementation Plan Interlocal Agreement (Phase 2) 3/12/03 APPROVED AS TO FORM: King County Deputy Prosecuting Attorney APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kent City Attorney APPROVED AS TO FORM: SeaTac City Attorney APPROVED AS TO FORM: Renton City Attorney APPROVED AS TO FORM: Tukwila City Attorney 10 /10 DESRIPTION: EXHIBIT A SUPPLEMENT 5 DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK TRANS VALLEY CORRIDOR PHASE 2 PRE- DESIGN Project No. C61030 The Trans Valley Area study completed in March 2002 provides the background documentation, research, priority corridor identification, and potential solution sets by corridor and by mode of travel. This phase 1 work will provide the basis and data for the Phase 2 Pre Design effort. The Phase 2 work will provide pre design level of effort that produces project lists within the high priority corridors. The project lists will be to a level of' detail that preliminary cost estimate ranges can be produced and an implementation plan can be developed based on timing of design development, funding, public and political support. The Phase 2 effort will coordinate with other transportation groups such as SCATBd, WSDOT SR 405 and SR 167 teams and the partner's transportation committees to produce projects that compliment each other's programs and projects. An important outcome of this effort will be that Trans Valley Phase 2 projects are carried forward into an agency's 6 -year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP), attract funding and the partnering agencies projects are implemented through the partner's coordinated efforts. WORK ELEMENT 1: PROJECT MANAGEMENT The purpose of this work element is to provide the framework, basis, and guidance for the timely execution and delivery of the Phase 2 Pre Design within the negotiated contractual terms. TASK: WE 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT TEAM COORDINATION Objectives: Keep the Consultant Team on task, within budget, and on schedule. Manage change and meet the expectations of the County and the Project Partners. Approach: Consultant will be responsible for on -going management of this study. On -going management will include ensuring that the work is completed on time and within budget. Consultant is responsible for: Project management, schedule and budget reporting Maintenance of the electronic schedule Communication with the County and Project Partners ExhibitA Page 1 of 7 5/1/03 Assignment of work elements to managers, sub consultants, and contributing agencies Development of work products in a manner that facilitates on -going feedback from participating agencies and interest groups Integration of technical work into draft and final products and presentations Implementation of effective quality assurance /quality control procedures Consultant will be responsible for coordinating the activities of any sub consultants as necessary to complete the work elements. This coordination will include obtaining monthly progress reports and invoices, receiving timely input for meetings, incorporating work into project deliverables and obtaining answers to any issues raised by the County or the Project Partners. The Consultant Project Manager shall be the contact for questions and requests posed by the County Project Representative. Discussions, correspondence, or work requests that impact the scope of work, budget, or products shall be directed to the County Project Manager. Deliverables: Monthly invoices and progress reports, up to 2 meetings per month with County, 1 meeting per month with County and Partners, up to 3 meetings with SCATBd, presentations to the County and Partner's Transportation Committees and/or Councils, Project coordination and management. Level of Effort in Duration: 6 mos. TASK: WE 2 PARTNERSHIP RE- CHARTER PROJECT WORK PLAN Objectives: To plan for and formalize the partnership and delivery processes that will Iead the Phase 2 Pre Design effort to successful implementation. Approach: Project Work Plan: The CONSULTANT shall prepare a draft Project Work Plan that will clearly communicate the conduct and expectations of the project to all direct participants (the Project Team Partner's). The Project Work Plan will include: A statement of the project mission, vision and goals for the project, as well as roles and responsibilities for development of the pre design; A project team definition that defines roles and responsibilities of the key team members; A detailed work breakdown structure (WBS) identifying tasks necessary to complete the pre design, and determine assignments, schedule and budget for each task; A Change Management Plan outlining the process for assessing project risk and managing changes that may occur during the execution of the project; A Communication Plan outlining the process to be used to coordinate and communicate project issues to the Project Team and Partner's defining reporting, documentation and communication protocols; Exhibit A Page 2 of 7 5/1/03 A QA/QC Plan outlining the methods and schedule for identifying COUNTY and CONSULTANT expectations, quality performance measures, deliverable format, design and drafting standards, and senior review of deliverables; A baseline project schedule; and A Team Charter for endorsement of the Project Work Plan for signature by all members of the Project Team and Project Partner's indicating their concurrence with and endorsement of the Work Plan. The CONSULTANT shall prepare a preliminary draft of the Project Work Plan for review by the County's Project Manager and incorporate any comments into a final draft Project Work Plan. The CONSULTANT shall prepare 10 copies of the Project Work Plan for presentation at a Team Chartering session. Team Chartering The CONSULTANT shall facilitate a 2 -hour team chartering session to present and discuss the Project Work Plan, solicit comments from the Project Team and facilitate endorsement of the Team Charter. Any changes to the Project Work Plan resulting from the chartering session shall be made and transmitted to the County's Project Manager for distribution to the Proj ect Team Project Partner' s. The CONSULTANT shall prepare and maintain a log of Project Work Plan holders such that any changes to the Project Work Plan can be readily distributed. A Project Change Record shall be submitted to the COUNTY by the CONSULTANT for endorsement of changes to the project. Proposed changes shall be coordinated with the Project Team Project Partner's, and evaluated for impact to the overall project schedule and budget. Deliverables: Project Work Plan and Endorsed Team Charter Level of Effort in Duration: 4 weeks TASK: WE 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS AND DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS WITH IN PRIORITY CORRIDORS Objectives: To define the projects to a level of design detail that will provide definition (Type, size Location) of project elements such as signal additions or improvements, number of lanes, intersection improvements, sidewalks /pedestrian facilities, transit facilities, freight and non- motorized improvements. Approach: Using the Trans Valley phase 1 background information, deficiencies analysis, and alternative analysis identify up to three improvement projects with in each of the nine priority corridors. These improvement projects will be considered the highest value implementable projects that address the goals, purpose and needs of the corridor as defined in the phase 1 effort. Exhibit A Page 3 of 7 5/1/03 Preliminary engineering design conceptual work to a level where cost ranges can be identified shall be provided to backup each identified high priority project. Deliverables: Project descriptions, conceptual plans and cost estimates. Level of Effort in Duration: 8 weeks TASK: WE 4 MAPPED PROJECTS WITH IN PRIORITY CORRIDORS Objectives: To develop a graphical and tabular list presentation of projects. Approach: Develop a map of projects within each priority corridor along with a tabular list. The tabular list will have a reference project number that corresponds to the mapped project. The projects will be grouped by: 1. Transit Projects 2. High- Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) projects 3. Freight Mobility projects 4. Roadway projects 5. Non Motorized projects Deliverables: Mapped projects and tabular project lists. Level of Effort in Duration: 2 weeks 1 TASK: WE 5 SYSTEM -WIDE LEVEL TRAFFIC MODEL Objective: The objective of this task is to develop a Trans Valley travel forecast model that will have the capability to produce 2030 traffic volume forecasts on the network. The model will be used to evaluate the actions recommended for each of the nine corridors within the Trans Valley study area. The recommended actions in each corridor will be evaluated against the no action using the Trans Valley Model. The focus of the modeling analysis will be to show the benefits of the recommended actions in terms of traffic volumes and travel time changes. Approach: A. Definition of the recommended actions in each corridor The Project Partners with the assistance of the Consultant Team will define the recommended actions in each corridor at a level sufficient to input them into the model. The recommended actions in each corridor will be defined in terms of the number of traffic lanes and their project limits. Any special treatment at intersections or roadways will be clearly described. Exhibit A Page 4 of 7 5/1/03 B. Trans Valley Model development The Consultant will use the existing King County model methodology and the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) regional models to develop the 2030 Trans Valley Model. King County's model zone structure will be used as the basis to develop the Trans- Valley Model. The Trans Valley Model will be a PM peak model having the capability to forecast 2030 traffic conditions within the Trans Valley study area. The Trans Valley Model will be validated with the most recent PM peak hour traffic counts. To develop the 2030 Trans Valley Model, the Consultant Team will carry out the following tasks: The consultant will obtain the most current 2030 land use forecasts from King County that will correspond to the King County model zone system, if they are available. If the 2030 land use forecasts in the King County zone system are not available, the Consultant will use the PSRC land use growth forecasts between 2020 and 2030 within the study area. Growth factors will be applied to the King County 2020 land use tables to project 2030 employment and households at the King County model zone system. The Consultant will then run a trip generation model to develop 2030 trip tables, and make model traffic assignments. C. No Action Regional/Local Network The Project Partners with the assistance of the Consultant Team will discuss and make decisions on the 2030 regional network. As a starting point of the discussion, the Consultant Team will bring a list of the regional facility improvements in the Puget Sound Regional Council's 2030 regional transportation plan that may affect the travel patterns in the study area, including I -405, SR 167,1-5 and SR 518. Upon the completion of this effort, the regional network will be fixed for the 2030 Trans Valley model. The Consultant Team will review the transportation plans of each jurisdiction and develop a table indicating whether construction funding for each improvement has been or is likely to be secured. The Partners will review this table. The purpose of this exercise is to define the future baseline network within the study area. D. No Action Forecast Combining the 2030 regional network and study area baseline network, and using 2030 PM peak hour trip tables, the Consultant Team will make the 2030 no action travel forecast. The consultant will "post- process" the forecast volumes from the model to produce consistent link volumes in the network. The 2030 travel times from the model will be compared with the 2002 model travel times. E. Recommended Actions in Each Corridor Exhibit A Page 5 of 7 5/1/03 The Consultant Team will prepare a set of 2030 networks with the recommended improvements within each priority corridor. Each of the nine corridors will be modeled separately. The link volumes from the each model run will be post processed. The Consultant Team will compare the volumes and travel times of the recommended improvements with those of the no action in each corridor. The consultant will repeat this process for all nine corridors. F. Summary Report The Consultant Team will summarize in a technical report the 2030 no action conditions and 2030 conditions with the recommended improvements for the nine corridors. The report will be used to evaluate the effectiveness of the recommended actions in each corridor and to prioritize those actions. Deliverables: A technical report summarizing the following: 2002 PM peak hour travel conditions focusing on the nine corridors Description of the process used to develop the Trans Valley 2030 Model 2030 No Action travel conditions link volumes and travel time from the model 2030 Action vehicle volumes and travel times in each of the nine corridors Evaluation in term of volume and travel time of the recommended actions Level of Effort in Duration: 18 weeks 1 TASK: WE 6 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN BY CORRIDOR Objectives: Develop an implementation plan that focuses in on the high priority projects. The implementation objectives are: 1. Funding Feasibility 2. Funding Opportunities 3. Timing with other projects a. Short-term (six years or Iess) b. Long -term (greater than six years) 4. Inter Jurisdictional Support 5. Public and Political Acceptance 6. Environmentally Permittable Approach: Develop a matrix that includes columns for: 1. Anticipated current law and new funding sources. Exhibit A Page 6 of 7 5/1/03 The matrix will list the high priority projects grouped by corridor with project descriptions, costs and project types identified. Deliverables: Tabular list of projects categorized by short-term or long -term with criteria ranking, costs, lead agency, project description and limits and implementation year. Level of Effort in Duration: 2 weeks. TASK: WE 7 OUTREACH 2. Lead Agency 3. Suggested Implementation Year Objectives: Provide ways of engaging stakeholders (Partners Transportation Committees /Councils) and elected officials (SCATBd) in the process of selecting the best project level solutions for the four high priority corridors. 1. Specific objectives: Communicate to the stakeholders and elected officials the project's purpose; need for the project, proposed solutions and potential issues. 2. Document decisions reached during the pre design phase. Approach: The study team will utilize public outreach information collected during the Phase I of the Trans Valley Area Study and incorporate this information into identified project improvements. Once the project level improvements are developed, the project partners and team will host stakeholder working session(s) with SCATBd and each Partners Transportation committee's to solicit input regarding improvement proposals. With this feedback, further refinements will be made to the project improvement packages. Deliverables: Participation in 6 Project Team Partner Coordination Meetings 2 Meetings with SCATBd 5 Meetings Partners Transportation committees/Councils Level of Effort in Duration: 6 mos. 1 TASK: WE 8 FINAL REPORT Objectives: Compile work elements WE 3 through WE 7 into a single submittal for archiving, future reference and reproduction Deliverables: One (1) notebook and one (CD) with all pre design backup data Level of Effort in Duration: 2 weeks Exhibit A Page 7 of 7 5/1/03 Transportation Committee Page 2 May 12, 2003 2. S. 118th St BAR Bridges Painting Contract Chafer Painting Company of Sea Tac has finished their project of repairing and painting the S. 118' Street Duwamish ped bridge and minor painting on Boeing Access Road (BAR). Pam asked about the cost underrun, and Robin said it was because not as much property restoration was needed as planned, and paint testing and disposal were not problems. Recommend nroiect completion to consent agenda of a Regular Meeting. 3. Painting Proiects Bid Award The city has some miscellaneous painting projects plus painting the Tukwila Library and Minkler shops. Washington Industrial Coatings won the bid to do the work for $61,221.76. Their bid was lower than ten other bidders. Staff said their recommendations were fine, and they had done a walk through of the projects before they bid, so they felt comfortable about the firm's ability to do the job well. Recommend bid award to Regular Meeting. 4. Transit Plan Survey A transit plan will be folded into the city's Urban Center Study, which will be used to update the comprehensive plan. Petted Engineering will do the study, and a sample survey was discussed. They plan to survey bus and train riders for two days eight hours /day this week. Metro has been asked to comment on the survey questions. Jim said 120 people get off the Sounder train in Tukwila. Dennis had several comments to make. He thought the place of trip origin should be added, and the length of the trip. The committee agreed those were reasonable things to ask. He was also concerned with finding people who did not ride the bus, and finding what might make them ride. Brian said this survey will show existing conditions, and will establish a baseline to plan for the future from. Jim added that they are asking if this is the most efficient bus target they can have; planning how to get future riders will come later. Information. 5. Trans Vallev Area Phase 2 Interlocal Phase 1 of this study was done last year. It showed what the conditions currently are for the valley transportation, and proposed potential solutions for specific corridor problems. More work will be done on this in Phase 2. It will develop an implementation plan for improving mobility in the Trans Valley area. The cities of SeaTac, Renton, Tukwila and Kent, plus King County are all involved in the study. Tukwila's portion of the study will cost $25,000. Recommend authorizing mayor's signature on interlocal to Regular Meeting of the City Council. /I /Committee chair approval