HomeMy WebLinkAboutRes 1527 - Countywide Planning Policies Amendments f J �..11LA
ti
1t jy�
1908
City o Tu
Washington
Resolution No.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, RATIFYING SEVEN PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE
COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES FOR KING COUNTY, AS
RECOMMENDED BY THE KING COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT
PLANNING COUNCIL.
WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policies for King County were adopted and
ratified through an inter jurisdictional planning process in 1992, and
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Planning Council for King County has
recommended seven proposed amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies, and
WHEREAS, on May 19, 2003 the King County Council approved and ratified the
proposed amendments on behalf of unincorporated King County through adoption of
Ordinance 14652, Ordinance 14653, Ordinance 14654, Ordinance 14655 and Ordinance
14656, and
WHEREAS, an existing interlocal agreement provides that amendments to the
Countywide Planning Policies become effective only if ratified by at least thirty percent
of local jurisdictions within King County representing at least seventy percent of the
countv's population, and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments have been reviewed by the Tukwila City
Council and found to be beneficial to continued regional cooperation and coordination
in managing growth,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Ratification of GMPC Motion 02 -04. The City of Tukwila hereby ratifies
Growth Management Planning Council Motion 02 -04, attached hereto as Exhibit A,
amending the Countywide Planning Policies to support ongoing water supply planning
and development.
Section 2. Ratification of GMPC Motion 02 -01. The City of Tukwila hereby ratifies
Growth Management Planning Council Motion 02 -01, attached hereto as Exhibit B,
amending the Countywide Planning Policies concerning the allocation and
implementation of housing and employment targets for jurisdictions within King
County
Section 3. Ratification of GMPC Motion 02 -02. The City of Tukwila hereby ratifies
Growth Management Planning Council Motion 02 -02, attached hereto as Exhibit C,
amending the Countywide Planning Policies by establishing new housing targets for
jurisdictions in King County for the 2012 to 2022 period.
Section 4. Ratification of GMPC Motion 02 -03 The City of Tukwila hereby ratifies
Growth Management Planning Council Motion 02 -03, attached hereto as Exhibit D,
King County Planning Policies 7/31/03
I
amending the Countywide Planning Policies by establishing new employment targets
for jurisdictions in King County for the 2012 to 2022 period.
Section 5. Ratification of GMPC Motion 02-05 The City of Tukwila hereby ratifies
Growth Management Planning Council Motion 02 -05, attached hereto as Exhibit E,
amending the Countywide Planning Policies' "Urban Separator Map" to reflect a
modification to the urban separator in the vicinity of the City of Renton.
Section 6. Ratification of GMPC Motion 02-06. The City of Tukwila hereby ratifies
Growth Management Planning Council Motion 02 -06, attached hereto as Exhibit F,
amending the Countywide Planning Policies by designating the Totem Lake planning
area within the City of Kirkland as an Urban Center
Section 7 Ratification of GMPC Motion 01 -2. The City of Tukwila hereby ratifies
Growth Management Planning Council Motion 01 -2, attached hereto as Exhibit G,
amending the Countywide Planning Policies to add new policies addressing the long-
term governance of Agricultural Protection Districts.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON,
at a Regular Meeting thereof this 1 4 6 day of 1 4U&, S 2003
ATTEST/ AUTHENTICATED J 99
Pam Carter, Council President
J a e E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY
n Filed with the City Clerk: 7.36 6.-
Passed b
the C Council. Q�
Y tY 17
Office of the City Attorney Resolution Number-
King County Planning Policies 7/31/03
11.1;_ Y'
September 25, 2002
Sponsored By:
Executive Committee
/cm
1 MOTION NO. 024
2 A MOTION by the Growth Management Planning Council of King
3 County recommending the amendment of the Countywide Planning
4 Policies adding a new policy to support ongoing water supply
5 planning and development.
6
7 WHEREAS, in July 2002, the Growth Management Planning Council approved additions
8 and changes to the 1994 Countywide Planning Policies approving the countywide process
9 developed to recommend a new 22-year household and employment target; and
ib
11 WHEREAS, an amendment to add a new policy supporting ongoing water supply planning
12 and development was considered and tabled; and
13
14 VaMMEAS, the GWC allowed reconsideration of the amendment at such time agreement
15 could be reached on the language; and
16
17 wHEREAS, it is in the interest of the county to encourage regional efforts to plan for and
is develop sufficient water supply sources to accommodate population growth and to meet
19 environmental needs related to conservation of fish habitat.
20
21 TIRE GROWTH MANAGEMEW PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY
22 BERFfBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS:
23
24 Add a new policy to Section 111 C of the King County Countywide Planning Policies as
25 follows:
26 FW -12c 'Ensurin-e sufficient water suphly is essential to accommodate eowth and
27 conserve fish habitat. Due to the substantial -time required to develon water sunnly.
28 sources, infrastructure and management strateeies, lone -term water sunuly vlannine efforts
29 in the Reeion must be oneoine.
30
'31
32
33
2 AMPM by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on
3 September 25, 2002 in open session.
4
6
7 l
to Ron Sims, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council
L/OMPCM2C WCUod2-4.doc 2
July 24, 2002
Sponsored By:
/cm
MOTION NO. 02-1
Executive Committee
2 A MOTION by the Growth Management Piwi ting Council of King
3 County recommending the amendment of the Countywide Planning
4 Policies revising existing policies and adding new policies to support
5 the extension of the household and employment targets for the period
6 2001 -2022.
7
8 WHEREAS, in accordance with the, Growth Management Act (GMA), the 1994
9 Countywide Planning Policies established a household and employment target range for
to each city and for King County through 2012; and
11
12 WTIF..REAS the 1994 targets need to be extended to reflect projected growth through 2022
13 in accordance with the GMA (RCW 36 70A 110); and
14
15 WMLEAS, Countywide Planning Policy FW -3 states that the adopted household and
16 employment targets shall be monitored by King County annually with adjustments made
17 by the Growth Management Planning Council utilizing the process established in FW -1,
.18 Step 6; and
19
20 W10REAS since February 2001 staff from King County and the cities in King County
21 have worked cooperatively to analyze and recommend new 20 -year household and
22 employment targets; and
23
24 WHEREAS the Growth Management Planning Council met and discussed the extension of
25 the household and employment targets for the period 2001 -2022, with opportunity for
26 public comment on March 28, 2001, July 25, 2001, October 24, 2001 and May 22, 2002.
27 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY
28 EaWMY MOVES AS POLLOWS:
29
30 Amend Sections W. C and III..F of the King County Countywide Planning Policies as
31 :Follows
32
33 Ill, Lana Use Pattern
34
35 C. Urban Areas
36
I The following policies establish an Urban Growth Area (UGA). determine the amount of
2 household and employment eowth to be accommodated within the UGA in the form of
3 targets for each iurisdietion, and identi& methods to phase development within this area in
4 order to bring certainty to long -term planning and development within the County. All
5 cities are included in the UGA, with the cities in the Rural Area identified as islands of
6 urban eowth. The (Urbas Grawth A UGA is a permanent designation. Land outside
7 the (Urbm Grtnvth A UGA is designated for permanent rural and resource uses ffi
8 Countywide Policies on Rural and Resource Areas
9 are found in Chapter M4 Resource Lands, and Chapter 111B, Rural Areas.
10
I1 in accordapice with the State Growth Manatrement Act (GMA) (36.70A.110). the State
12 Office ofFinancial Manaeement (OFM) vrovides a novulation vroiection to Each county.
13 The county. throueh a collaborative intergovernmental process established by the Growth
14 Management Plannin-e Council. allocates the population as Gowth tareets to individual
i5 iurisdictions. Forecasts Prepared by the Puget Sound RePional Council are used to
16 establish the emalowi ent oroiection.
19
18 The arocess for allocatine targets in Kine Councv is as follows:
19
20 1. The PSRC employment forecasts are calculated for the four reottraphic subareas of
21 the UGA (Sea- Shore. South. East. and Rural Cities). These then become subarea
22 employment targets.
.23 2. The iurisdictions collectively allocate the OFM population Proiection to the four
24 subarea's based on the Prolected employment for each area. A small amount of
25 growth is assumed to occur in the Rural area
26 3. The technical staff translates the Population nmiections.into Proiected households..
27 taking into account &fferent average household sires within each-subarea. These
28 proiections then become subarea household targets.
29 4. Jurisdictions within each subarea negotiate the distribution of subarea household
30 and emnlavment targets using criteria based on Countvivide Planninp Policies.
31
32 The housing capacity in the UGA (&Pgrowth)), based on adopted
33 plaits and regulations, eefa -the should accommodate the Proiected 20 -year
34- growth((
35 pepteletiejretsts)). ))Growth is to be accommodated within
36 perinanent Urban Areas by increasing densities, as needed Phasing ((is-te)) should occur
37 within the UGA. as necessarv. to ensure that services are provided
38 as growth occurs.
39 Area am to be 64m Gmvth Area
40 FW -t i The land use pattern for King County small protect the natural
41 environment by reducing the consumption of land and 'concentrating
42 development. An urban Growth Area, Rural Areas, and resource lands
43 shall be designated and the necessary implementing regulations
44 adopted. This includes Countywide establishment of a boundary for the
45 Urban Growth Area.. Local jurisdictions shall make land use decisions
46 based on the Countywide Planning Policies.
47
LC3IVMP=GMWJMot42 -1.8oc 2
I FW -12 The Urban Growth Area shall provide enough land to accommodate
2 future urban development. Policies to phase the provision of urban
3 services and to ensure efficient use of the growth capacity within the
4 Urban Growth Area shall be instituted.
5
6 FW -12a
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25.
26
27
28
29
34
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
All jurisdictions within Kina County share the resaonsibility to
accommodate the 20 -veer population protection. The growth woiection
shall be assigned to the four subareas of Kinq County (Sea-Shore, East.
South. and the Rural Cities) proportionate with the share of oroiected
emolovment arowth. The growth shall be allocated pursuant to the
foliowina objectives:
a. To ensure efficient use of land withiri the UGA by direciina arowth to
Urban Centers and Activity Centers
b: To limit development in the Rural Areas:
c.- To orotect designated resource lands:
d. To ensure efficient use of infrastnlcture,.
e. To improve the iobslhousina balance on a subarea basis;
f. To promote a land use pattem that can be served by public
transoortation and other alternatives to the sinals occupancy vehicle:
and
g. To provide sufficient opportunities for growth within the lurisd.Mons.
FW -12b The growth targets established pursuant to the methbdoloav described in
LU 25c and 25d shall be supported by both reoional and local
transoortation investments. The avallabilhv of an adeauate
transportation system is- critically imDortant to accommodating growth.
The regional responsibility shall be met by planninn for and deWerinq
county, state, and federal investments that support the growth targets
and the land use vattem of the County. This includes investments in
transit. state hiahways in kev reoional transaortation corridors. 'and in
imoroved access to the designated Urban Centers. The local
resioohsibiiity shall be met by local transportation system investments
that support the achievement of the taroets.
LU 25a Each iurlsdiction shall plan for and accommodate the household and
emolovment targets established pursuant to LU -25c and LU -25d. This
oblWation includes:
a. Ensurina adeauate zoning cavacft and
b, Planning for and deliverina water. sewer, transportation and other
Infrastructure. in concert with federal and state investments and
reconnizina where applicable special qMose districta: and
c. Accommodatina increases in household and emolovment targets as
annexations occur.
45 The targets will be used to plan for and to accommodate growth within
46 each jurisdiction. The targets do not oblioate a jurisdiction to guarantee
47 that a aiven number of housina units will be built or lobs added durina the
49 planningperiod.
VGMPMOMMUMO2 -1.dw 3
i W25b As annexations occur, growth targets shall be adjusted. Household and
2 employment tarqets for each jurisdiction's potential annexation area. as
3 adopted in Table LU -1, shall be transferred to the annexing jurisdiction
4 follows:
5
6 a. King County and the respective city will determine new household
7 and emloyment tarqets for areas under consideration for
s annexation prior to the submittal of the annexation proposal to the
9 Kina Countv Boundary Review Boardi
io b. A city's household and emplovment targets shall be increased by a
11* share of the target for the potential annexation area proportionate to
12 the share of the potential annexation area's development cauacity
13 located within the area annexed. Each city will determine how and
14 where within their corporate boundaries to accommodate the taroet
is increases:
16 c. The County's taroet shall be corresnondinaiv decreased to ensure
17 -that overall target levels in the county remain the same:
1s d. The household and employment tamets in Table LU -1 will be
19 undated periodically to reflect changes duo to annexations. These
20 target updates do not require adoption by the Growth Management
21 Plannina Council.
22
23 LU ((67)) 2567he target ((sad- reguiagans)) oblectives identified In 6
24 FW -12a ((are based -Gn shall be realized throuah the following {(stags))
25 methodoioav for allocatind household targets:
26 a.
27
29 Determine the additional
29 doaulation that must be accommodated countvwide by calculating the
30 difference between the most recent Census count and-the State
31 Office of Financial Management DODUlation nroiection for the and of
32 the twenty ear planningperiod;
33 b.
34
35 AGW eaGh Odedictlen based an Me felley&g exite4w))
36 Subtract a nercentaae from that number to represent the amount of
37 growth that is assumed to occur in the unincorporated Rural Area:
3s
39 &iGi l fties and uffifiee,-
40
41
42
43 eiven the chsarnater of andatina dwminamaj#.
44
45
46
47
IIGMPGOYGMPCJMo102 -l.doc 4
1 C.
2
3
4
5 d.
7
-s
9'
10
11
12
13
14
I5
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
e.
Asslan proportions of the urban population growth to each of the four
subareas (Sea Shore. South. East, and Rural Cities) based on the
Proportion of future employment growth forecasted for each of those
subareas by the Puaet Sound Regional Council:
Convert the estimated projected population for each subarea to an
estimated number of households: using proiected average
household sizes that reflect the variation among those subareas
observed In the-most recent Census-,
Allocate a household target to individual iurisdictions, within each
subarea, based on FWA 2a and considerinq the following factors:
1. the availability of water and the capacity of sewer system;
2. the remaining portions of oreviousty adopted household taraetsz
3. the Presence of urban centers and activity areas within each
jurisdiction;
4. the availability of zoned development capacity in each lurisdMon:
and
5: the apparent rna�ket trends for housing in the area.
pursuant to Poky FW
Orget Fariges iA Bash 1W&diGVGWG
be GensisteAt with the taFget ranges in Appondix 2 OF shall state
tle-n's �_G_ompreheAsiye plan differs !Fem the target, the
plans))
f. Jurisdictions shall plan for household targets as adopted in Table
LU -1: and
{(f))g: Monitoring should follow the process described in policy FW-
1.•
.1 portion of the urban employment growth wN occur in Activity Areas and neighborhoods
in the Urban Area. This employment growth will support the Urban Centers, while
balancing local employment opportunities in the Urban Area
39 LU ((6$ 25d
40
41 the joint leeal and GountyMd� adopfien pr-ersW_qxG 9A #1e $91!G%"
42 steps)) The target obiectEves identifiied in FW -12a shall be realized
43 throuah the following methodoloov for allocating emplovment targets:
44
45 a. (Re GFGwlh Man InAing COURGil adopted the 20 yea
46
47
Ve NffC=G PMoM l.aoe 5
I
2
3
4
S
b
7
.9
GaPaGityj
9
d Aval l abi l i t i es
10
10 4AP19MORt P0119188
12
13
I,
14
15
residegtial- areas l) Determine the number of jobs that must be
16
accommodated in each of the four subareas of King Countv fSea
17
Shore. South. East. and the Rural Cities) in accordance with the most
1s
recent PSRC lob estimates and forecasts for the 20 -year olannina
19
period. To account for uncertainty in the forecasts,
20
establish a range of new lobs that must be accommodated in each
21
subarea. Unless exceptional circumstances dictate. the range should
22
be 5% on either side of the PSRC forecast.
23
b. (Re "at ranges do shown irt Appendix 2 were rocommanded
25
For each subarea, determine the
26
point within the range upon which jurisdictions within the subarea will
27
base their targets and allocate ernolovment growth targets to
28.
individual jurisdictions based on consideration of the following:
29
1. the PSRC small area forecasts:
30
2. the presence of urban centers. manufacturingAndustdal
31
centers, and adtMW areas within each Jurisdiction:
32
3. the availablilty of zoned commercial and industrial
33
development canacity in each Jurisdiction andi
34
4. the access to transit, as well as to existing hiahways and
35
arterials.
36
ffa. P all judsdWens shall ii;dleige
37
38
20 yeaFs. !Aside and outside Wban Centers how
and shall shew thelF
39
40
41
42
43
44
C. Jurisdictions shall plan for emolovment targets as adopted in Table
45
LU -1.
46 (INSERT TABLELU -1)
vcMrcrozaMrc oW -1.doc 6
i F.1. Urban Residential Areas
2- Urban residential areas form the bulk of the UGA, and are home to a large portion of the
3 County's population. They wz1I contain a mix of uses and will have different
4 characteristics in different neighborhoods. Generally, the character, form, preservation
5 and development of these areas ffl")) are the responsibility of the local jurisdiction ((at
6 mWettsibilky)). However, the residential areas need to support the Centers concept and
7 provide suf jiciew opportunity for growth within the UGA A substantial majority of new
8 residential units will be constructed within urban residential areas
9
10
11 LU -66 In order to ensure efficient use of the land within the UGA, provide for
12 housing opportunities, and•to support efficient use of infrastructure, each
13 jurisdiction shall:
14
is a. Establish in its comprehensive plan a target minimum number of net
16 new households the jurisdiction will accommodate In the next 20
17 years in accordance with the adopted household Growth tamets
is identified in Table LU-1. Jurisdictions shall adopt regulations to and
!9 commit to fund infrastructure sufficient to achieve the target number;
20 b. Establish a minimum density (not including critical areas) for new
21 construction in each.residential zone; and
22 c. Establish in the comprehensive plan a target mix of housing types for
23 new development and adopt regulations to achieve the target mix.
24
25 LU47
26 .a-
27
28 405;QBD;
29 b:
30
31
32
33
34
35 3. AGGes and pr4qeGWd ragional ifanski
36
37 given e GhaM4GtGF Of the amirAA9 deve
38
39 6 Fed
40
41
42 c.
43 adopted and ratified
44
45 d: Tha target mn9es in eaGh judsdiGties's
46 Gonewstent with target Fanges in Appendix 2 e-F shall state the Feaseas
47
uGMPc"JQ2omkwom2 -i.dw 7
1
2
3
4
6
7
S
9
10
,11
I2
I3
14
is.
16
17
13.
19
20
21
22
23
24
2
1
43
44
.45
46
47
49
��IAOC
VG J
1 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on July 24,
2 2002 in open session.
3
4
6
7 /Ron Sims, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
UGRFC=GMPCMoW2 -l.dW 9
A 11
July 24, 2002
Sponsored By:
Executive Committee
km
MOTION NO. 02-2
2 A MOTION by the Growth Management Planning Council of King
3 County recommending the amendment of the Countywide Planning
4 Policies adding targets far new household for the period 2001 -2022
S by deleting Appendix 2,2A and 2B and amending Table LU -1: 2001-
6 2022 Household and Employment Growth Targets which will be
7 located in Section U C of the Countywi de Planning Policies.
8
9 WHEREAS, the 1994 Countywide Planning Policies established a housing target range for
10 each city and for King County-, and
11
12 WBF11EAS, the Growth Management Act requires the 1994 targets need to be revised to
13 establish an extension of the targets through 2022; and
14
is WHEREAS the Growth Management Planning Council met and discussed the extension of
16 the household and employment targets for the period 2001 -2022, with opportunity for
17 public comment on1farbh 28, 2001, July 25, 2001, October 24, 2001 and May 22, 2002.
1s THE GROWTH MANAGENU NT PLANNING COUNCIL OF WNG COUNTY
.19 HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS:
20
21. The attached Table LU 1: 2001 -2022 Household and Employment Growth Targets
22 is hereby recommended for adoption in the Countywide Planning Policies to revise
23 the household growth targets to reflect the target extension from January 1, 2001
24 through December 31, 2022 and Appendix 2, 2A, 2B are recommended for
25 deletion.
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
1
.2
3
4
S
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on
September 25, 2002 in open session.
Ron Sims, Chair, Growth Management Planting Council
Attachment
1. Table LU 1: 2001 -2022 Household and Employment Growth Targets.
L OM 2.doc
2
1
2
S>sbstess �imwhold HE Capacity PAA BH
Target in FAA* Target
Job Targd Job Capacity PAA Job
in FAA Target
S .,u,>r X rtr Corrrtb
I
I
I
A1841Ls 1
'29�
I
A ubgw I
BlackDi 1
5
(M191
2.63$ I
I
996 I
Budgm
f I
tj73
1
Des Main s
1.576
S I
2 1
Wa I
5188 I
1 7,4)
I
I
t M
41 44
UPI
619
50 i
1 [If. I
371 I
I
19 I
I
I 1
496
1.271
4s1 1
n I
b.198
5.622 1
1 I
I
4A7A 1
l a
S
131
51
vnlacmp rmn County I
4935 I
4231
i
tq,03¢
I
4.935 I
I
1.751
rl
s
I
}lilt I
2 1 1
A'finx I
1 I
I
Y
Hum
I
•1.493 I
Re�M[[t
MUM
1
I
Kkku >I
5,W.l
x12
TAI!
Hubp
311
t
mumlsland
[A3ZI
1
NCWCA
a 61 1
t 1
11 I
9_olp 1
4021
34tH 1
I
woofuldl
L a69 I
I
I
Y.now Pioits
221
I
I I
tylamm rme Comtv
I
6.801 1
a a.64s I
*'4222 I
•'4099 I
TetaT
"fin. I
I
I,
AIM FO= Polk I
538 1
I
I
I
51.51► I
I
I I
UnbwomIQot:Comttv* I
16101
_1.6701
r90
sup
�t.6�701
on I
7A6
I
I
6%41
1
Sntxtttaltaia
1.6971
I
I
t7osmtr Total I
tum21
I
I
*PAA: Peftntisl Auw=tloo Am inUmlm- tinted
lflag Coma' Usb- Area: s►g Cm& UM
MA Rtaal Citro targets an for fltz
cWMW city limits and anal oxpa m ma for cub city. 71M lb
for sdjw6ng IWFU u ea aexaliams
==is 9M appttabk w the neat
cities.
JIOMPMGMPOMMO2 2.400
t
I
I
N
I
I
I
f
I
I
I
I
1
i
I
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
1-
I
i
I
t
1
1
I
1
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
asalt lfibhtiee
=obey
f s' 11; if
July 24, 2002
Sponsored By:
/cm
MOTION NO. 02-3
Executive Committee
2 A MOTION by the Growth Management Planning Council of King
3 County recommending the amendment of the Countywide Planning
4 Policies adding targets for new jobs for the period 2001- -2022 by
5 amending Table LU-1: 2001-2022 Household and Employment
b Growth Targets which will be located in Section 1IL C of the
7 Countywide Planning Policies.
9 WHEREAS, the 1994 Countywide Planning policies established an employment target
10 range for each city and for King County; and
11
12 WHEREAS, the 1994 targets need to be revised to establish an extension of the targets
13 through 2022 as required by the Growth Management Act.
14
15 'WHEREAS the Growth Management Planning Council met and discussed the extension of
16 the household and employment targets for the period 2001 -2022, with opportunity for
17 public comment on March 28, 2001, July 25, 2001, October 24, 2001 and May 22, 2002.
is THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY
19 HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS:
20
21 The attached Table LU -1: 2001 -2022 Household and Employment Growth Targets
22 is hereby recommended for adoption in the Countywide Planning Policies to revise
23 the employment growth targets to reflect the target extension from January 1, 2001
24 through December 31, 2022.
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
2
9 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on
4 September 25, 2002 in open session.
5
b
7
8
9
10 IN
lI r'
12 Ron Sims, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council
13
14 Attachment:
15 1. Table LU 1: 2001 -2022 Household and Employment Growth Targets.
U0MPL'f02GMPGMot02.3.d= 2 L.
Subareas Haue6oId HH Capacity PAA HH lob Tar8e t Job Capacity PAA Jab
Target in PAA* Target is PAA* Target
n
I
I I
I log I
I
AI=W
n ra 1 1
Black MaMm d r
4.l)79
I 75251
2j
1
Badf- 1 I
1 1161
I
k I I
I 90D I
I
Ralbiars 1 1 1
EqdwJ I 1
l 1 051
I 7.4
1
I
X 41
r i I
I
I 1S1M1
eal
ml= I 1
I 1541
I
VaHB 1
.8041
I
mmmax 1 I
1 671
I
a I 1 I
I log
1
I
Roam I I I
1
45R1
a I I I
I I
1
mmi
496
49ZI
Utriacmv ICmst O mrty 1 I
I U921
701
TOW I 1 f
East rag Cosm" t 1 I
WOO I
I
zsn I
I
IRD"Ve k I I
Botb I I
I ao ,,��,I
I 21I
271
Hauls
14
j
�I
I
I I
1 g. sno 1
I
2211
edina
d I I 1
I
ano I
I
I
I I
I 51x1 I
I
I 1
XLMM Pnin
Unis"m 1Cma County I 1
I
4.63
I
*41
1 1
9a x
Lake Pared
1 I I
I
I
i
1
uninoor+a Kiss Cotmty* I I
'i."rUC irlfiF� I 1
t I I
I I
1 p� 69
1 7.191
I
1J25
I
1,
I
1
Naft d I I I
1�
i
Saoouaimie I I l
I
I 1.800
I
�1 I I I
I s sso I
1
Lmn Cormtl Total 1 1
?�,j�Y 1
*PAA. Pnte WAnuerod -Area inU==Mp —ted MaZC Mty Urbau Area: "Bear CaeaWD. *wNonb M*Moe
3ba Ruea7 dOq'tatgets are for dra au+ ante ➢q dmta udaonl expaarim area for sacb c3ty.7Lw an mefbodulogy
Ia adjusdag tswu n watudow awe is nos aQpliwbb m tba rural ores
252
134
44
4,14
45
497
701
2_ot
27
U-4
22 1
2 1
**4143
4. 07
694
w
LAAGVA 26wPCW -3.dos 3
M: oila
October 23, 2002
Sponsored By:
MOTION NO. 02-5
Executive Committee
2 A MOTION to amend the Urban Separator Map in the
3 Countywide Planning Policies to reflect the negotiated
4 modifications of the Renton Urban Separator.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2$
29
30
31
32
33
34
WHEREAS, The Growth Management Act states that each Urban Growth Area shall
permit urban densities and shall include 'greenbelt and open space areas;
VME EAS, Urban Separators are an adopted regional stmtegy multiple functions
and providing environmental, visual, recreational and wildlife benefits to the citizens and
communities of King County;
WHERP.AS, Consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies, the King County
Comprehensive Plan recognizes that Urban Separators mate open space corridors, provide
a visual contrast to continuous development, and reinforce the unique identities of
communities;
WHEREAS, King County has designated Urban Separators on the Land Use 2000 map in
the Bing County Comprehensive Plan, and King County has provided advance copies of
Urban Separator maps to cities that have designated Urban Separators located within their
Potential Annexation Areas;
WFIEREAS, the City of Renton disagreed with Urban Separator designation for 76 acres of
land within its Potential Annexation Area; and
WTiFdiEAS, the Growth Management Planning Council directed staff to attempt to
negotiate a mutually acceptable resolution of this disagreement
2
3 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COY7NT'Y
4 HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS:
5
6 The Urban Separators map included within the Countywide Planning Policies document is
7 amended to reflect the negotiated modifications of the Renton Urban Separator described
8 and mapped in the September 25, 2002 GMPC staff report. Specifically, 76 acres of
9 unincorporated land is deleted from Urban Separator designation and 118.8 acres within
10 the City of Renton shall be deli grated_ Urban Separator.
11
12 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on
13 October 23, 2002 in open session.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22 Ron Sims, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council
UGMPCnMGMMWod=02 -5 Aoc
October 23, 2002
Sponsored By:
Executive Committee
M0110N NO. 02Ȣ
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2$
29
30
31
32
33
A MOTION to amend the Countywide Planning Policies by
designating Totem Lake as an Urban Center. Totem Lake is
added to the list of Urban Centers following Countywide
Planning Policy LU -39.
WHEREAS, A goal of the Growth Management Act is to encourage development in Urban
Areas where adequate public facilities exist or can be provided in an efficient manner,
WHEREAS, Policy LU 39 of the Countywide Planning Policies of Ring County describes
the criteria for Urban Center designation;
WIJRBAS, Policy LU-40 of the Countywide Planning Policies of King County describes
standards for planned land uses within Urban Centers;
WHEREAS, the City of Kirkland has demonstrated that Totem Lake meets the criteria for
designation as an Urban Center, and that Kirkland's `Totem Lake Activity Area"
designated on the City's comprehensive plan lafld use map is consistent with the standards
established by the Countywide Planning Policies for Urban Center designation.
WIMUBAS, King County Comprehensive Plan Policy U -106 supports the development of
Urban Centers to meet the region's needs for housing, jobs, services, culture and
recreation.
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY
HEREBY MOVES AS POLLOWS:
Totem Lake is designated as an Urban Center. The list of Urban Centers following
Countywide PlanWng Policy LU -39 is modified to include Totem Lake.
ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of Ding County on
October 23, 2002 in open session.
Ron Sims, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council
�ai+n�cizoozo�rncnu«j�oz�.a�
September 26, 2001
Sponsored By:
Executive Coriamittee
/pr
1 MOTION NO. 01 -2
2 A MOTION reaffirming Motion 99-3 passed by the GMPC on Irene 16,
3 1999 amending the Countywide Planning Policies to add new policies that
4 address the long -term governance of Agricultural Production Districts.
5
6 WHHRF.AS, The Growth Management Act requires the maintenance, enhancement and
7 conservation of agricultural industries and lands through a variety of methods and programs;
8
9 WFMREAS, King County residents have supported efforts to presdrve good farmland and active
10 farms for the value of local crops, dairy and livestock and for scenic and historic values;
I1
12 WHEREAS, King County, through the Farmlands Preservation Program, has purchased the
13 development rights of 12,600 acres of farmland and has established the Agricultural Production
14 Districts (AM) to further protect these and adjacent prime agricultural lands;
15
16 WMMEAS, the Lower Green River APD is completely surrounded by Urban designated lands and
17 as such is under immense pressure for development and annexation; and'
18
19 W RREAS, King County and the City of Auburn have signed an interlocal agretment-thar
20 removes the southern portion of the Lower Cmeen APD out of the city's potential aw=ation aaea.
21 TBE GROW IH MANAGBh1ENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KINO "COLITM B EMY
22 MOVES AS FOLLOWS:
23
24 Reaffam the unanimous vote by this Council on June 16,1999 to add the following new
25 Countywide Planning Policies:
26
-27 LIJ 2A Designated Agricultural Production District lands shall not be annexed by
28 cities.
29
30 LU 2B The Lower Green River Agricultural Production District is a regionally
31 designated resource that is to remain in unincorporated King County.
32 Preservation of the Lower Green River Agricultural Production District will
33 provide an.urban separator as surrounding Urban areas are annexed. and
34 developed. King County may contract with other jurisdictions to provide
35 some local services to this area as appropriate.
1
2
3
4
5
6
.7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
In the event that this motion is ratified by the member jurisdictions of Growth Management
Planning Council, then the Interim Potential Annexation Area Map shall be revised
accordingly and the Urban Growth Boundary will be drawn around the Lower Green
Agricultural Production District (APD) to clarify that the APD is outside of the Urban area.
ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on September 26.2001
in open session.
Ron Sys, Growlh Planning Council
1JGMPCJ2001GMPCWodm0l -7-d= 2
IL `'�'f�►�
initials ITEMNO.
O� Z Meeting Date f Prepared by Mayor's review i Council review
Bbaker for
c 2 08 04_Q3 Lt DJ Baskin
CAS Number: 0 3 p t I Original Agenda Date: 08 -04 -03
Agenda Item Title: Proposed resolution indicating the City's desire to apply for Local Law
Enforcement Block Grant Funds, and authorizing the Mayor to make formal
application to the program.
Original Sponsor: Council Admin. X— Police Department
Timeline: Fully completed application due no later than August 28, 2003.
Sponsor's Summary: 08 -04 -03 Each year, Tukwila Police Department personnel are responsible for the
application of funds from the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant. The
proposed use of funds remains the same as last year to reduce crime
and improve public safety.
The application process timeline has been greatly reduced this year from
that of the past. As applications are due by August 28, 2003, time is of
the essence for this item and due to late notification to Police Personnel;
time did not allow the item to go through the proper committee process.
Recommendations:
Sponsor:
Committee:
Administration:
Cost Impact (if known):
Fund Source (if known):
Meeting Date
06 -04 -03
I
I
08 -18 -03 Hold public hearing.
Accept and sign the proposed resolution on 08 -04 -03; Hold public hearing 08- 18 -03.
NIA
Same as sponsor.
Action
reeting Date j Attachments
06 -04 -03 1 Proposed Resolution Final Fonnat
TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL
*PRELIMINARY AGENDA*
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING
a W
F�clau� �pec�
August 22, 2005
1. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
Update Washington D.C. Issues Hal Hiemstra and Michelle Giguerre
3. CITIZENS COMMENTS
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
5. SPECIAL ISSUES
1. Update 2005 Transportation Funding and Proposed Projects (from Transportation
Committee July 25)
2. Proposed ordinance regarding cheating in cardrooms, mini casinos and gambling
establishments (from Finance Safety Committee 08- 15 -05)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON,
ADOPTING BY REFERENCE GAMBLING OFFENSES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND
ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATED
3. Proposed Financial Policies (from Finance Safety Committee 08- 15 -05)
4. Proposed ordinance granting a non- exclusive franchise to Clearwater Corporation
(from Utilities Committee 08- 16 -05)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON,
GRANTING A NON EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT TO CLEARWATER
CORPORATION
6. REPORTS
7. MISCELLANEOUS
8. EXECUTIVE SESSION
9. ADJOURNMENT
r:.
CrITYrtE. 0 PIA` EEA I
CALL MEETING TO ORDER:
CONSENT AGENDA: