Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit D02-050 - FOSTER HEIGHTS - LOT 8FOSTER HEIGHTS - LOT 8 4825 S 145TH STREET D02 -050 Parcel No.: 2610000080 Address: 4825 S 145 ST TUKW Suite No: Tenant: Name: FOSTER HEIGHTS - LOT 8 Address: 4825 S 145 ST, TUKWILA, WA Owner: Name: TRIDOR INC Address: 2226 ELLIOTT AV, SUITE A, SEATTLE WA Contact Person: Name: CHARLES PRIB Address: 14205 SE 255 PL, KENT, WA Contractor: Name: LONG CLASSIC HOMES, LTD. Address: 1624 PIONEER ST, ENUMCLAW, WA Contractor License No: LONGCHL05409 Value of Construction: Type of Fire Protection: Type of Construction: Public Works Activities: Storm Drainage: Y Street Use: N Water Main Extension: N Water Meter: doc: Devperm City of Tukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 $224,358.40 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT Permit Number: D02 -050 Issue Date: 03/21/2002 Permit Expires On: 09/17/2002 Phone: 206 - 443 -7735 Phone: 253 - 631 -6864 Phone: Expiration Date: 11/01/2002 DESCRIPTION OF WORK: CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 2,360 SQ FT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, 400 SQ FT ATTACHED GARAGE AND 90 SQ FT COVERED DECK AREA. PUBLIC WORKS ACTIVITIES INCLUDE: ACCESS, LAND ALTERING AND STORM DRAINAGE. PROJECT ON VALVUE SEWER AND WD #125 WATER. Fees Collected: $2,958.69 Uniform Building Code Edition: 1997 Occupancy per UBC: 7 Curb Cut/Access /Sidewalk/CSS: Y Fire Loop Hydrant: N Number: 0 Size (Inches): 0 Flood Control Zone: N Hauling: N Start Time: End Time: Land Altering: Y Volumes: Cut 142 c.y. Fill 142 c.y. Landscape Irrigation: N Moving Oversize Load: N Start Time: End Time: Sanitary Side Sewer: N Sewer Main Extension: N Private: Public: D02 -050 Private: Public: Printed: 03 -21 -2002 z • ▪ W QQ � JU U O � cl • W J = f- Q LL w LL a co I 1.. w 1- 0 Z w O p O N Ww LL 0 ui Z co O ~ z Permit Center Authorized Signature: /(Ct V /lam( � I hereby certify that I have ordinances governing this The granting of this permit regulating construction qr Signature: I Print Name: doc: Devperm City of Tukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 read and examined this permit and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of law and work will be complied with, whether specified herein or not. does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any other state or local laws the performance of work. . uthorized to sign and obtain this developn}ent per mit. f-Die/5 This permit shall become null and void if the work is not commenced within 180 days from the date of issuance, or if the work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days from the last inspection. D02 -050 Date: Date: Printed: 03 -21 -2002 doc: Conditions City of Tukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 Parcel No.: 2610000080 Address: 4825 S 145 ST TUKW Suite No: Tenant: FOSTER HEIGHTS - LOT 8 PERMIT CONDITIONS D02 -050 Permit Number: D02 -050 Status: ISSUED Applied Date: 02/26/2002 Issue Date: 03/21/2002 1: ** *BUILDING DEPARTMENT * ** 2: No changes will be made to the plans unless approved by the Engineer and the Tukwila Building Division. 3: Plumbing permits shall be obtained through the Seattle -King County Department of Public Health. Plumbing will be inspected by that agency, including all gas piping (296- 4722). 4: Electrical permits shall be obtained through the Washington State Division of Labor and Industries and all electrical work will be inspected by that agency (206 -835- 1111). 5: All mechanical work shall be under separate permit issued by the City of Tukwila. 6: All permits, inspection records, and approved plans shall be available at the job site prior to the start of any construction. These documents are to be maintained and available until final inspection approval is granted. 7: Engineered truss drawings and calculations shall be on site and available to the building inspector for inspection purposes. Documents shall bear the seal and signature of a Washington State Professional Engineer. 8: Any exposed insulations backing material shall have a Flame Spread Rating of 25 or less, and material shall bear identi- fication showing the fire performance rating thereof. 9: All construction to be done in conformance with approved plans and requirements of the Uniform Building Code (1997 Edition) as amended, Uniform Mechanical Code (1997 Edition), and Washington State Energy Code (1997 Edition). 10: Notify the City of Tukwila Building Division prior to placing any concrete. This procedure is in addition to any requirements for special inspection. 11: Validity of Permit. The issuance of a permit or approval of plans, specifications, and computations shall not be con- strued to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of the building code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. No permit presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code shall be valid. 12: There shall be no occupancy of the building(s) until the final inspection has been completed by the Tukwila Building Inspector. 13: ** *PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT * ** 14: The applicant must notify the City Utility Inspector at (206)433 -0179 upon commencement and completion of work at least 24 hours in advance. All inspection requests for utility work must also be made 24 hours in advance. 15: The City of Tukwila has an undergrounding ordinance requiring the power, telecommunications, and cable service lines be underground from the point of connection on the pole to the house. 16: Any material spilled onto any street shall be cleaned up immediately. 17: Temporary erosion control measures shall be implemented as the first order of business to prevent sedimentation off -site or into existing drainage facilities. 18: The Land Altering Permit Fee is based upon an estimated 142 cubic yards of CUT and 142 cubic yards of FILL. If the final quantity exceeds this amount, the developer shall be required to RECALCULATE the final quantity and pay the difference in permit fee prior to the Final Inspection. 19: From October 1 through April 30, cover any slopes and stockpiles that are 3H :1V or steeper and have a vertical rise of 10 feet or Printed: 03 -21 -2002 z � w QQ jU 00 N 0 CO w J N U- W gQ co 0 I Z = Z- tu 0 0— 0 I— I 0 L b LLI Z co H 0 z City of Tukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 more and will be unworked for greater than 12 hours. During this time period, cover or mulch other disturbed areas, if they will be unworked more than 2 days. Covered material must be stockpiled on site at the beginning of this period. Inspect and maintain this stabilization weekly and immediately before, during and following storms. 20: From May 1 through September 30, inspect and maintain temporary erosion prevention and sediment at least monthly. All disturbed areas of the site shall be permanently stabilized prior to final construction approval. 21: The site shall have permanent erosion control measures in place as soon as possible after final grading has been completed and prior to the Final Inspection. 22: APPLICANT SHALL FOLLOW ALL THE CONDITIONS OF FINAL PLAT L2000 -026 AND COMPLY WITH GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PREPARED BY GEOSPECTRUM CONSULTANTS, INC. DATED FEB 10, 1998. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SHALL OBSERVE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE APPROVED SFR PLANS DURING CONSTRUCTION. FIELD REPORTS ARE TO BE SUBMITTED TO PUBLIC WORKS IN A TIMELY MANNER AND SHALL INCLUDE: a) TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL AND EXCAVATIONS b) IMPLEMENTATIONS OF FOOTINGS, FOUNDATIONS, RETAINING WALLS, DRIVEWAY PLACEMENT AND ASSOCIATED DRAINAGE WSYSTEM AND PLACEMENT OF BACKFILL. PRIOR TO FINAL PERMI8T SIGNOFF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER IS TO PROVIDE CERTIFICATION ON A LOT BY LOT BASIS THAT THE WORK MHAS BEEN ACCOMPLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS - REFER TO FEB 10, 1998 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION PREPARED BY GEOSPECTRUM CONSULTANTS, INC., P.O. BOX 276, ISSAQUAH, WA 98027 -0276, PHONE NO. (425) 391 -4228. I hereby certify that I have read these conditions and will comply with them as outlined. All provisions of law and ordinances governing this work will be complied with, whether specified herein or not. The granting of this permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provision of any other work or local laws regulating construction or the performance of work. / 2/7 Signature: Date: lj C. lie/0 Print Name: doc: Conditions D02 -050 Printed: 03 -21 -2002 z Z w W aa � JU U U U 11.I H- U w w0 g Q co I 1— W Z I— 0 Z I— w W 0 ON 0H W w UL O al 00 U= 0 F- z Description of work to be done: P f 2 6 f � � ( p w 4.' Value of ConstructionT2 2 Project Name/Tenant. --- _.-. - \ �-- 4E16)1 S of 6 Site Addres��G,�,.." .5 / 4t .,"5— City State /Zip: Tax Pcg�mb Dr Property Owner: Leo tiG C - SS k- oK -1,tS Phone: r��O gOD /y� ,C� g a- Street Addres City State /Zip: Fax #: ?c \ 9 Cf s _, tL.day �' \o I\ CE 51 E 1su Lo vi 9Co22- Contractor: IptiNt _. Phone: Street Address: City State /Zip: Fax #: Architect: r, Phone: Street Address: __- City State /Zip: 14 3,t. ._ 1Czi • 10 LD, Fax #: W-tiL Engineer: Phone: Street Address: City State /Zip: 7_2_9 29c Se 317 I (kat_ i t t iv∎ O I to Fax #: �"- Contact Person: C �,� Yo__\<- P h z o! la 3 1 � Street Address: City State /Zip: Fax #: s 1 a0S �c as, '� Q L ,),14+ envoy - Description of work to be done: P f 2 6 f � � ( p w 4.' Type of work: .Ngl New Single - Family Residence El Addition - Single - Family Residence El Interior Remodel- Single - Family Residence ❑ Residential Accessory Structure* ❑ Remodel /Addition to Accessory Structure ❑ Garage(s) ❑ Deck(s) - Covered & Uncovered ❑ Residential Reroof Is this site served by: Pi Sewer ❑ Septic (King County Health Dept. approval required - 296 -4722) Existing Square Footage for Structure: sq. ft. Dwelling sq. ft. Covered Deck(s) sq. ft. Garage /Carport sq. ft. Accessory Structure(s) sq. ft. Uncovered Deck Proposed New Square Footage: 0 3 ' 7 sq. ft. Dwelling 90 sq. ft. Covered Deck(s) 4zoa sq. ft. Garage /Carport sq. ft. Accessory Structure(s) sq. ft. Uncovered Deck Floor Area Ratio: (total floor area of all structures divided by the areg agept),_3.67_ - c>e For an Accessory dwelling, provide the following: Lot area Floor area of principal dwelling Floor area of accessory dwelling " Provide documentation that shows the principal owner lives in one of the dwellings as his or her primary residence. CITY OF TIE 'VILA Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 • STAFF USE ONLY Project Number: Permit Number: Single - Family Residential Permit Application Application and plans must be complete in order to be accepted for plan review. Applications will not be accepted through the mail or facsimile. ❑ Channelization /Striping Curb cut /Access /Sidewalk ❑ Fire Loop /Hydrant (main to vault)tt: Size(s): ❑ Flood Control Zone Hauling Land Altering: 0 CuP ( Z-- cubic yds. Fill 1 L IZ- cubic yds. ❑ Moving an Oversized Load: Start Time: End Time: ❑ Sanitary Side Sewer #: CI Sewer Main Extension 0 Private 0 Public A Storm Drainage ❑Street Use ❑ Water Main Extension 0 Private 0 Public Water Meter /Permanent # Size(s): ❑ Water Meter Temp It Size(s): Est. quantity: gal Schedule: ❑ Miscellaneous Value of Construction - In all cases, a value of construction amount should be entered by the applicant. This figure will be re- viewed and is subject to possible revision by the Permit Center to comply with current fee schedules. Expiration of Plan Review - Applications for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application shall ex- pire by limitation. The building official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period not exceeding 180 days upon written request by the applicant as defined in Section 107.4 of the Uniform Building Code (current edition). No application shall be extended more than once. Date application accepted: SFPERIv1IT.DOC 2/13/97 APPLICANT REQUEST FOR PUBLIC WORKS SITE/CIVIL PLAN REVIEW OF THE FOLLOWING: (Additional reviews shall be determined by the Public Works Department) Date application expires: Application taken by: (initials) iC PLEASE SIGN BACK OF APPLICATION FORM BUILDING OWNS OR AUTHORIZ AGE Signature: v . (" t Date: Print name: l/- . ` L 6 Pb( _s1.,?R' Fax II: ... ., Address: / /6' . Z 5-s ro F[_. City/State/Zip' w " II. a" V II L SING A rl Y R SIDENTI PE MIT A ' P IC ' TIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH THE FOLLOWING: DRAWINGS PREPARED BY A REGISTERED ARCHITECT OR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL )> ALL DRAWINGS SHALL BE AT A LEGIBLE SCALE AND NEATLY DRAWN Y BUILDING SITE PLANS AND UTILITY PLANS ARE TO BE COMBINED SUBMITTED Copy of recorded Legal Description from King County Certificate of water /fire flow availability (Form H -11 a). Contact the Public Works Department (206) 433 -0179 for servicing district. Certificate of sewer availability (Form H -11). Contact the Public Works Department (206) 433- 0179 for servicing district. Metro: Residential Sewer Certification (if Tukwila Sewer District) (Form H -12) King County Health Department approval for septic - 296 -4722 Four (4) sets of working drawings, which include: Site Plan (see example Form H - 16) 1. Existing fire hydrant location(s). 2. Proposed access road. 3. Driveway location- driveway shall be 10' wide minimum and 20' wide maximum. If driveway is over 150' long, driveway shall be 20' wide and have an approved turnaround (City Ordinance 1741). 4. North arrow and scale. 5. Building setback from property lines. Any proposed or existing easements must be shown on plan. 6. Public Works review requires the following on site plan: driveway location (10' min., 20' max. width), show proposed and existing power, water and sewer lines, existing storm drainage system, downspouts and foundation drains, and where drains tie -in. 7. Parking plan. 8. Lowest building elevation (if in Flood Control Zone). 9. Estimated /proposed topography at 2' intervals and proposed elevation of lowest floor level. 10. Identify location of sensitive areas slopes 20% or greater, wetlands, watercourses and their buffers. 11. Identify location and size of significant trees that are located in sensitive areas and buffers or the shoreline zone. Of those, identify which are to be removed (Title 18, City of Tukwila Zoning Code). 12. Identify location of high water mark of the Green /Duwamish River if site is located within 200' of the high water mark. 13. See Public Works Checklist for detailed site plan information required for Public Works Review (Form H -9). Foundation plan and details Floor plan Roof plan Building elevations (all views) Building height Building cross - section Structural framing plans and details necessary to completely describe construction Washington State Energy Code Data (Gas /Electric /Oil /Propane /Heat Pump) Form H -15 available at Permit Center OR Prescriptive Heating System Sizing Chap 9 Form H -6. ❑ ❑ Complete Land Use Applications if not previously submitted (i.e., Reasonable Use Exception, Variance, Shoreline or Tree Permit). ❑ ❑ Attach plans, reports or other documentation required to comply with Sensitive Area Ordinance and other land use or SEPA decisions. ❑ ❑ If dwelling has a septic tank, and a bedroom or bathroom are added, provide written approval from the King County Health Department or the Tukwila Public Works Department prior to submittal of permit application. ❑ ❑ Copy of Washington State Department of Labor and Industries Valid Contractor's License. If not available at the time of application, a copy of this license will be required before the permit is issued, unless the homeowner will be the builder OR submit Form H -4, "Affidavit in Lieu of Contractor Registration ". ❑ ❑ Building Owner /Authorized Agent If the applicant is other than the owner, registered architect /engineer, or contractor licensed by the State of Washington, a notarized letter from the property owner authorizing the agent to submit this permit application and obtain the permit will be required as part of this submittal. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, AND I AM AUTHORIZED TO APPLY FOR THIS PERMIT. SFPERMIT.DOC 2/13/97 z RECEIPT , ,. ww Parcel No.: 2610000080 Permit Number: D02-050 U O Address: 4825 S 145 ST TUKW Status: ISSUED 0 Suite No: Applied Date: 02/26/2002 w = Applicant: FOSTER HEIGHTS - LOT 8 Issue Date: 03/21/2002 rn 1.- u_ uJ O . 2 Receipt No.: R020001576 Payment Amount: 47.00 g 5 u. Q ,. Initials: SKS Payment Date: 11/14/2002 08:53 AM = CI User ID: 1165 Balance: $0.00 I— _ Z I-- I— O Z I— W U� TRANSACTION LIST: 0 '— Type Method Description = U Payment Check 5162 47.00 .. Z U Z. O I- Payee: ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: doc: Receipt City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 PAUL BECK Current Pmts Amount BUILDING INVESTIGATION Description Account Code 000/322.800 47.00 Total: 47.00 25'55 .11/18 y 71.6 TOTAL 94.00 Printed: 11 -14 -2002 z z RECEIPT I- Parcel No.: 2610000080 Permit Number: D02-050 0 O Address: 4825 S 145 ST TUKW Status: APPROVED co co Suite No: Applied Date: 02/26/2002 _. A pplicant: FOSTER HEIGHTS - LOT 8 Issue Date: w � W O . Payment Amount: 1,875.95 g 5 u, D Payment Date: 03/21/2002 10:46 AM = W Balance: $0.00 H = Z I- O Z I- W W U0 O I-- Type Method Description = U u Payment Check 21768 1,875.95 W Z U= O ff- . Receipt No.: R020000394 Initials: KAS User ID: 1684 Payee: TRANSACTION LIST: ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: doc: Receipt City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 Current Pmts LONG CLASSIC HOMES Amount BUILDING - RES INSP FEE - STORM DRAIN INSP FEE - UTILITY LAND ALTERING PERMIT FEE LAND ALTERING PLAN CHECK PLAN CHECK - RES PLAN CHECK - UTILITY STATE BUILDING SURCHARGE Description Account Code 000/322.100 412/342.400 000/342.400 000/322.100 000/345.830 000/345.830 000/345.830 000/386.904 1,693.75 15.00 15.00 72.00 37.50 18.20 20.00 4.50 Total: 1,875.95 ;•i .• 03/21 :p7:i . TOTAL 1946.20 Printed: 03 -21 -2002 ...,..�...... » ...<...�.r. aw.Hw�s'e+nxvur»n• !m.mwnO'br IMAM.M tre z RECEIPT s „_ z Parcel No.: 2610000080 Permit Number: D02 -050 U O Address: 4825 S 145 ST TUKW Status: PENDING 0 Suite No: Applied Date: 02/26/2002 W 2 Applicant: FOSTER HEIGHTS - LOT 8 Issue Date: co u u_ .w 0 Receipt No.: R020000263 Payment Amount: 1,082.74 g Q Initials: KAS Payment Date: 02/26/2002 10:24 AM = a User ID: 1684 Balance: $1,670.25 I— _ Z f.- 1- 0 Z I- U� N TRANSACTION LIST: ci H Type Method Description = 0 uj lL E” Payment Check 572 1,082.74 Z' Ili 0 I- O z Payee: ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: doc: Receipt City of 'Tukwila 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 LONG CLASSIC HOMES Current Pmts Amount PLAN CHECK - RES Description Account Code 000/345.830 1,082.74 Total: 1,082.74 4220 02/26 9716 TiOTAL 2092.6E3 Printed: 02 -26 -2002 Project: Type of Inspection: Address: G 777 ass ids sT Date C lied: is --o0 - o. Special Instructions: Date Wanted: a. 4 3) r� r� p.m. Requester: D N p //U Phor -e _o � / O/ + (0 7v 7,; )1, INSPECTION RECORD 19 Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. PERMIT CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 K A pproved per applicable codes. 0 Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: • r c.)v_ *0- V- Inspector': 'Zmifr Date: $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: COMMENTS: Special instructions: p l Date wanted: / Ua f aa' m. Requester: � ) INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 • Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. Inspectof:- INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit NO. (206)431 -3670 Date: El $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. CaII to schedule reinspection. Receip o: f r COMMENTS: Type of Ins chon: Date called: / Special instructions: Date wante : a.m. Requpter: INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 • INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit PERMIT (206)431-3670 'ApProved per applicable codes. ki Corrections required prior to approval. Inspector: Date 1--a5 El $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: v\rik‘ \ eccN . 5 Project: r o5ter Hei . i - 3b-fs Type of Inspection: R Address: 4825 s /LISA St Date Called: II-/S-02. Special Instructions: Lat g Date Wanted: i i in I I — I 7— 02. a.m. 0 Requester: f3ecK Phone No:253— 63_03g. • • 1..,14.1.*,"1,1•4447.kNoi&tiAtieliitt{ INSPECTION NO. PERMIT NO. Approved per applicable codes. , • INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit :CITYOF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 981 88 (206)431-3670 El Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS:: • iqt /01_ :j,4)14 g. N ip to- 11 s ,t ,K,1/4144 t Inspector: CSA.t Date: 4 1, $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at t300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: Project: Foster Nei ,�-s Typ of Inspection: j i ha 1 Address: , li8 25'S 1i3 St Called: 11 -13 -02 Special Instructions: Lot 3 Date Wanted: �:m. 11 1 - 02 P Requester: Pet u I Yec K Phone No 25-3— 606 — 03s72 INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO.. PERMIT NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: to AY\ — 4 (*ad, .[rte al', /kJ , C.1 .f W f :2u cdl1 L& ARTA Inspector Date: It II $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at b300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: .t; ,y ° " fit '1/ ' '74 e ki t 4;iv at Project: • � s h r S 1- o � - t er Ne Type of Inspection ! �� o Address: , + 25 �j'U £ 1 � st T Date Called: It - 02 Special Instructions:. p Lot o Date Wanted: a.m. I1- 17. - p.m Requester: T ravis Phone No 2017— /g3"30 15 INSPECTION NO. INSPECTION RECORD A1 Retain a copy with permit PERMIT NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 Approved per applicable codes. El Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: Date: I)i Iq ()I.- $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at t300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. CaII to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: <Gxfiitik E's';,W7 g Yk' Z W re 2 UO • 0 w i �- CD IL WO co a = W Z �. W 1- W U 0 O 1— W w ~ H O . ,Z to 0 Z Project: - os 1 er N e i ant Type of Inspection: li na1 5D Address: 48 25 S 1�5+� St D ate Called: I I_ 6_ 02. Special Instructions: �. t 8 D Wanted: 1 1 - 7 02. a.m. Requester: Travis Phone No: 2.06- 793 _3095 INSPECTION NO. INSPECTION RECORD CT _ Retain a copy with permit PERMIT NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 Approved per applicable codes. El Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: T ( Qt2,mO.n Ai fryirdA •OfAh/YY‘ dAtt MI) ■4 n _ c L(kL, ,c - "Lac. crw C ' )- Inspectgi.) Date: $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at b300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. CaII to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: COMMENTS: . It —Zot E Type of Inspection: / / ,. 1 - / 0 27 /1) l IP (Ai (i) k-- Al (1 -1--- (70 - i - n p 1 6=• -- 1 ( ‘ - Date Wanted; Requester g 1 / Pholie No: - ‘e6- 6),I„2. --/--/ on/ )---e t-- s fil• Proiect: i t i r:_Sier . It —Zot E Type of Inspection: / / ,. 1 - / j : q/iV , ___ .... Dateya/led: Special Instructions: Date Wanted; Requester g 1 / Pholie No: - ‘e6- 6),I„2. A" ‘ :VW xi.Vatki,#44 .014%1A CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 981 88 LI Approved per applicable codes. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit 7.00 REINSPECTIO1f FEE REQUIR Id at 6300 Southcenter (206)431-3670 Corrections required prior to approval. Date: , / / — (9 . rior to inspection, fee must be te 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: P:r ject: G — Y /-47 l tot 6 Type of In ection: t- (6 Add s : Date Called Special Instructions: Date Wante / St - 0 65.m, Requester: / Phone N c � , �.,, ^ 36 , 9 INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. PERMIT CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION \ 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 206)431-3670 Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. d 4 6e3 r �V7.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED p paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite Receip"No.: ` Date: rior to inspection, fee must be 00. CaII to schedule reinspection. Date: Z ~ w J 0O N 0 J N wO • 2 J u_ ? w a =w Z� H O W ~ w U D F- LU w 2 H - u' O • Z = z PType OSle eita f 5 of Inspection: --1) Ad d r ess: 1 085 S l Ys Date Called: o 1//( o ,� Special Instructions: Date Wanted: ( a.m. 0 9///b01 t..p.rW Requester: Phone No: 0(./ 793 - 3 0 1 5 INSPECTION NO.. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit PERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670 Corrections required prior to COMMENTS: q /l)1(2- p5. 7_; c c--4 'dh. C04/ Ct s� /77/,j, Tye / co. S je TA) c e _)X. Inspector: Date: 7/4?-- El $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at b300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: Prolect; r. u g itsit 1-1-1Ms -id Tyrsof Inspection: r\O a v 11 Acy res... - 57 1, a Date Car: 93 60) Special Instructions: , Date Want / •,; A rCri. P•m• Requestr., VA V VC, n Phone • X77 INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY-OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 206)431-3670 Approved Per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: $47.00 REINSPECTIO$ FEE REt1UIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at t 300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: '41; z re O 0 (0 0 (1., LU CO u_ u i 0 -71 • ct a 11 Z 1-0 Z 0 Lu n 0 co O — w w z I 0 L 0 0 0 F. I O I- Project: '' // ftr / 10M T of In pecti s 0 . ? I i Addr ✓ Date Calte 1) Special Instructions: Date WRte / , p j m. Reques .t ✓' Pho -7-5 (rOGr- 0077 :.k ;.t 44 INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA, BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 COMMENTS: 7V-4 Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. $47.00 REINSPECT' O1 FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 1300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: PrAect:, i i , , _ 1-51 OiffitS 5 Type of Inspection: 1 ,-- )/. t k, //b ed 7.0 4141- ate Calle • D -)R 0 4 /S -- 5 Special Instructions: , Date War3d: 1 - 2 6 p.m. Request -- G-{ 7 Phone No: INSPECTI N NO. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 981 88 (206)431-3670 Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: se or: $4 "VIAS14 r4-4, .00 REINSPECTION IEE REQUIRED. p d at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 1 Receipt No.: Date: — 07.— rior to inspection, fee must be 0. Call to schedule reinspection. Date: • ii±.41;:w■ ,1,;;;,;■;i1,•kiak , z reie 5 .-I 0 0 u) 0 (J) x F- U) uj 0 < 1 a Z I-0 Z uj 0 P- 0 I— LLJ u j 0 11- — Z 9U) o `,4 Type of Inspe ti Address : J Date Call Special Instructions: Date Wt O P Request: Phone (P °. (I/7 INSPECTION RECORD , c. .. � Retain a copy with permit P U0V- D5C) INSPECTION NO. PE CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 A pproved per applicable codes. El Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: S �t e i <LA - ) to . Date: 4 .00 REINSPECTION F REQUIRED. Prior • Inspection, fee must be p• d at 6300 Southcenter : vd., Suite 100. CaII to schedule reinspection. e ipt No.: Date: (206)431 -3670 COMMENTS: . Project: i Type oktnspection: V VlarVO 14/1 Aderess: , Special instructions: Date wanted: c",- / a.m. Requester: Phone: INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit • INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 PERMIT NO. (206)431-3670 Approved per applicable codes. - Eagrrections required prior to appro■Pal: Inspector: Date: • El $47.00 REINSPECTION EEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: Pro ct: + { ior Type of yp spection: r Ad re '� 5 0.1 5111 Date called . -- - c) 2- : Special instructions: 1-0 L-0 a Date wante • ; : a.m. - fp.m. Requester .. Phone: INSPECTION NO. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila WA 98188 0 Approved per applicable codes. PERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval: COMMENTS: c) $4 .00 REINSPECTION EE REQUIRED. Prior o inspection, fee must be paid 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. CaII to s hedule reinspection. Receipt No: Dat Date: P. 'ect: frr I . I _. i 1 9 I" i D (-017 S T of Inspection: r ci on Inc (s . A • "-es 5 :7 Lic 51— Date Calcli ( Special Instructions: i Date Want d. 3 i 00- a.m . . . Requester: 1 t I ( Phoneo (42010 o s dt? 1 MAUNial14.4 4 16v,A1A,40,4 ,5 ::;*141 1/ INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter-Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431-3670 Approved per applicable codes. El Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: clAA,e_e c.tA/__, --t T -r o_tA /417 1 spe to 7.00 REINSPECTION F E REQUIRED. Prior tf inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Ivd., Suite 100. Ctt to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: 4." 12/ g'2Z D Date: „ ' • • • • • • ' ' • ; P ject: / C 57 / ) , �( 5 r Type nspection: (j ki /W /".) f re" !?'11/7 ),' .75 dress: J s 4 1-.i" 7- D ate called-. 7/ <I1 pecial instructions: ,A./0 6717' -e f, 'r,'i °- Date wan - 5a / � a .m4_:a‘._:, p.m. Reque : stee i t J L k / .. COMMENTS: /A/ t=ie 7 /vt7,_ t '4f 't , ?&e ' €c —7 5IJS 7 ' n lao % . ,6 063 ! .p /V J _._ ..____. • w I 5 W i /9 JT'qe_/ Mi ,09/),A r i• • 6 �cced /?-etG-'" / l/1 60 ,& ,A./0 6717' -e f, 'r,'i °- V , . e : t.„ ! 1 J , .. Date: 7 5 _ 00 _, 1 d INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 Approved per applicable codes. E Corrections required prior to approval. Re -eipt No: Date: 7.00 REINSPECTION FEE R9QUIRED. nor to inspection, fee must be paid 00 Southcenter Blvd. S 100. Cal to schedule reins at 63 reinspection. .:r 3 ,soilvx•oi, '6Sr: zi4i: Sa :, 1x.4Ktii.&s z re W QQ � JU O 0 0 • w J = SQLL W O � = W ' H = Z F. ZI- W U � O � • H W W H � tL O tli U N o � z P ject 5-ier fief Yr' 5 , f_ aft' � T a o nse ion: 7x ' p h( 4r, , tAki 1 d ss; v 5 S 's Si1 e II d: Dat ' �s /d,,,, Special instructions: Dat ay�t d: L a.rl�. f / J C7� p.m Regyter: Ph , 2 . 3'' b Dco -- b >g � ai+Li. }a1A `. sG, �ikti�' iAa M f'J:: ^ INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 COMMENTS: Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. 4110 _ $47.00 REINSPECTION FE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. CaII to schedule reinspection. Date: Receipt No: 'l�Siv'k INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit PERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670 P oj ,/' �' / ,[ y - / / ) C /6-) ._ T _ as . ection: Addr s 1 4 5 ��S 5 Date call d: l (r - 2 f ( Q Special instructions: Date anted .m: Re ster: } GL v(• t r i Phone: 2.c - Loom -007 -7 INSPECTION NO. v 1 <4 d INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with per it IJ CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 PERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670 COMMENTS: Approved per applicable codes. 0 Corrections required prior to approval. $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE ' EQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: rii25LrYill ��.i6'f.'i+.�r. �4����� ��tK r1•n- x� ^.r�.;r, ! � �.. ,... , } Z W CC 2 J U 00 N J I = _ 2 u_ ua g J Ira co D I f_W Z = t-- Z 0 W W U 0 O N O F W W H �' O Z W U = 0 1-- Z l7 P }ect S- Y � �' � h - ts - L of ype of tnspecti i /, ..= �;. �Gt s Wry � �, ..... « A re s• ��5 ��S" 51 D ca Pd: CC /c9 / /o Date wanted: / m. L / /0Q Special instructions: (0 � m. Request Ank h? Phone: 5 co 00_my INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit PERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670 COMMENTS") 1 r+. f ew fps sr,/ n � S /emu s %1t / � L� aW /e/ /1 b ok- .plc � s �l� 7l 'ao,4 shoe s A-9- � . r0 4 #2 1-71 �J Of7 /,‘,/ &I'? nspector: 3 Date: 2 , Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. $47.00 REINSPECTION EE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: yy r, f .)b • jit"7:.' !':r ix'' •`d '�,• • • � • . • ' � � «�!Y'.. .:'a, >s',. • z = - ce J U 00 co 0 U) ILI J = H WO J. ? N O = W Z Z° Ill W U 0 I- LL' W r LL-: '6 W z U= O z Pr ject: f j 1 ' 1 1 1 Ile I itt.5 T pe of Inspectipn: A „.._ r,440-it; - ... Add ss: _ -,. Date called: Special instructions: Date want ed4 ': k a m p.m. Requester:7- Va/lA.44- Phone: Inspector: INSPECTION INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. (206)431-3670 Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: ; In N I S 1.1 ,1 -hAvssohc, n-eltAjef C)NeN rr4 -0 C2_12 1)1(9 +-Pt/14°j 05-k .;f:4 41 • I tN/ , r ov\o-rci ;eie I v el. / t , , c 6 5- , / Ir . q (At ')Lie • \ , S — rf,t) r . (15i \II %,-,\ y)% s YN t ) - k.-: 4 4 SL 1.4 k iv■ e I , 0 14J." .c. _1( \2, i.,-., c sly-( 4 4-1 \ 41 rf i C Date: (c) E] $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: z • • • w D —I O 0 CO 0 (O O I (.0 u_ -j uj 0 g U. < 9- a I- • in z I- z ui D O - C2 0 I 0 1— U. z • u O • F z Project: Foster ll elyrts Type of Inspection:„ under -M oe j _ Address: 4/g25 .3 /315 ST Date called: Special instructions: oi Date wanted:5 02. . p.m. Requester: Da on 0 0 -/ Phone: 253 606 00 77 , ' • INSPECTION NO, CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 COMMENTS: 0L,700, In tor , : ,444,19 Approved per applicable codes. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit ArAA..)r.4, c&Corrections required prior to ipproval.. 47.00 REINSPECTIONJJEE REQUIRED. ior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Cal to schedule reinspection. t--i =.‘ ,t! / • ?.= Receipt No: Date: tik afilif.nRi. .4A ',11,-..1AWA:41A,i4,436ii llb i&:'Xi v . , 1%1 INSPE ION NO. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 C MMENTS: , $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED Prior to inspection, fee must be paid Approved per applicable codes. 111 Corrections required prior to approval. at 6300 Southcenter BI d., Suite 100. , all to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: U= O I- z rojec (1 F$. ` 1..- + D TTe nspectio . / dress: S S S. I tc Date called: 51/u(a2 S cial instructions: 0-. Date wanted: q 61 Requeste1 - . Lv LC � 1 P 171 1 7/3 '' 3° llb i&:'Xi v . , 1%1 INSPE ION NO. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 C MMENTS: , $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED Prior to inspection, fee must be paid Approved per applicable codes. 111 Corrections required prior to approval. at 6300 Southcenter BI d., Suite 100. , all to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: Z ~ W 6 O 0 0 • ILI J N LL W O . 2 u D z a I-W Z � I— O W ~ • W U � co 0 1- WW H � O Z U= O I- z COMMENTS: INSPECTION NO. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Pf °os- r 1-He c & k )- Address: � a ,5 i y 5 * Special instructions: s INO �LT - E cis Type of Inspection: I u.) lS?OC '+ Date called: it t/U J\ Date wanted: 5/0 /va (L TD p.m. Requester: r .... Phone: CPO4)793 Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. Inspector: Date: i( 71 $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: Do a-o5o PERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670 Z H � w QQ � J U U O U W= J i-- w 0 a co ✓ d Z = W _ U a I- w W u. Q W Z . U N O • ~ z Special instructions: , .. Type o f Inspectio Date called: 5- ,<--. Special instructions: , .. Date wanted: -� Requester ,. Ph?)7 (P0 00,1 `f i4:e«v: tii .!visauinribis',:a1 .7 G'kzt ;:w�^,r.�,i i = b. ' .44.1 ;.!;,: i, +..nh INSPECTION NO. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 a- 5 0 PERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670 f Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. e El $47.00 REINSPECTIO FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. CaII to schedule reinspection. Inspector: 4 Date: Receipt No: Date: yies Special instructions: Date wanted: Requester: // INSPECTION NO. fi.. •il.{Actk 'lata..:i ti i Approved per applicable codes. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with perthit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, COMMENTS: 47.00 REINSPECTIOtj fEE REQUIRED. rior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter BI d., Suite 100. Ca I to ichedule•reinspection. Receipt No: r (206)431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. Pr ject: /- S sr Nod) f5 -1 o/ O Ty e of Inspection: hi) / f ( / / 2) i %n Address: i /o2S5 / Da al d: ;yd, /. Special instructions: Dat ted: .5 ni p.m. Req ster: LIO/..-ti Phone: Wj114. ,W 'Y.,:+i`ih«5k�+:'L" ''Yi` �G'ti1yj•Kii €I�1i'stt INSPECTION NO. f:.: INSPECTION RECORD Retain. a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 PERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670 Approved per applicable codes. El Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: � - P V ' 1 w1 -r y \ 1 ) ( L 4 pv. 1 oc 4 % S Inspecto . - /'4 Date: 2- Ei $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. CaII to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: Z c4 2 _i O 0 rn 0 J N (0 W g � d = W H = Z � I- O Z I- 0 1— W LLO W Z ' U O 1-- z 1 . !W'• vi i ..' V-4,4 j4 i ;•F• {9 ∎ yC>.14: .li^.J • Project Name S Address 1 �N : : . Rkain . ' current ._in .peti Needs shift inspection Approved without correction notice Approved with correction notice issued Sprinklers: Fire Alarm: Hood & Duct: Halon: Monitor: Pre -Fire: Permits: • 1 G \'� Authorized Signature City of Tukwila TUKWILA FIRE DEPARTMENT FINAL APPROVAL FORM 11'1 tiS/ FINALAPP.FRM Rev. 2/19/98 Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Fire Department Thomas P Keefe, Fire Chief Permit No . DbQ- " ( 50 Suite # 1t ,0 Date T.F.D. Form F.P. 85 Headquarters Station: 444 Andover Park East • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 -575 -4404 • Fax: 206-575-4439 z ~ w cc JU O 0 J I-- U) LL W O 2 �Q w _ I Z I ZO W U � 0- O I-- W w z O I I- z ti Sent by: Earth Consultants Eario {:f)nsuUanls, 111C'. Qeelowmoul f q.e.. Oeearw I E w,.rwlel S5 al CwM,sM Table 11 C0.' AMt. wy.~ raws. - ., --- sgc4. 1389, Plow N.E . Salle 201, Soliovuo. WA 811004 Bolrvuti i42$11143.3780 Toll Fro* i88e) 72514670 FAX (425) 74&0960 Daily Field Report Grading Contractor Field Rep. RE.1 Time On Site 1:30 Travel Time Permit No. Job No. E9920 Time Off Site 2:30 Miles Hrs. Charged Grading Foreman Page of 1/1 Date 11.15.02 Weather Lt showers,cool Visitors Report No. LOT 8 Day of Week FRI Project Foster Hts General Contractor Long 1 Job h 47 ave s,Tukwila General . adoes Superintendent Paul Client/Owner Lon • Classic Homes Reo n d Unchecked By Checked By Date Are approved Plans/Permits on -site 2 Yes ❑ No Project No. Permit No, pol - 3� 425 746 0860; 11/18/02 .:31PM;JetFax #410;Page 2/3 If No, contact the building department or explain below: As requested ECI returned to the job site to observe drainage plan for lot 8. Owner, contractor, and ECI toured the site and documented the location of of the yard drain catch basins and connecting pipe, which are in general accordance with the geotechnical and drainage recommendations. The location of the four foot or less in height rockeries were also observed and denoted on the as built drawings. Construction of the rockeries are in general accordance with ARC guidelines for standards and practices of the industry, and the geotechnical recommendations. COPY TO: PAGE ❑ CONTINUED ON NEXT DO-OSo z W -rU O O W = . • w .w0 2 J • a = ▪ w Z � 1— 0 z � w uj 2 U � oI— w • uj t .. Z O c � : 0 Z Project IZ. 1It General Contractor nos- Grading COPY TO: Erth ConsultanIts, Inc. none hil al tJljlKuG ('Rnkigic1s 1. ni%In animist' F 4(1 NE,t. Cu tan ilk rt That tits. taw )1 N;\tK) ktyctik•t `mkrs 1805 136th Place N.E., Suite 201 • Bellevue, WA 98005 Bellevue (425) 643.3780 • Toll Free (888) 739 -6670 FAX (425) 746-0660 DAILY FIELD REPORT Job Location IN Art~ --50,4)- T General Contractor's Superintendent Grading Foreman Field Rep. Time On Site Travel Time r Permit No. Job No. Time Off Site Checked By Page 1 / ClienUOwner L t „.t � . f Received'Unchecked By Date Report No. Date ' Day of Week 11- /2 vZ 7Z - 5 Weather t. - / LE-471/ f ��A1/i/ _5/74.t./..)67/2.5 Visitors Are approved Plans/Permits on -site ❑ Yes ❑ No Project No. Permit No. If No, contact the building department or explain below: CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE ❑ 1 D02 - z W tY 1 O 0 u) 0 N w J F- U) w 2 LLQ co = a � z = F- F- O Z l— W • w D c o • (.0 • l- w W H� U. 0 wz - I O ~ z ./ R2:9u6 rz:z, &- ,./..r 14}L e)iL/ __.s.: rT ,e '•z 4 J / 9L Lit Lk. TNizou 4 7"t16.: tiS /rte 0l 5e..wdrlv le� T1� ,i�oc S. Ztif G✓rth :c_ -ia c_ Pot: 47-1e4:-l•:lc.:4, ,n,:./ : 4ef�.r24 ..,rf- 7'.214 c T6.r` . "-/ 4r:7••/c- - P„CTi ,1 t(e) ?'G,9!--/ft' Ar I : 4 r4.�e-.da ,•4 o cr•tt S , - _ - & , ' 77.9. . /_ t S � 7'4 1 ;Z. A .:,r,•%r/4ti /P I acke`It' / u S � . L7 /.$ C a t r-a j i /a y '7 54 � rz d t_ rht L1 t1 Z .1_17: f{cr /S <. ..5 .i71z.a: .r , 4 72 , 4 74! :lee t t / !'r. : • li,3 PI/ ?Of'ffC= ,Re-. aul .4 I/A ie , , M4 / r,U ,z,V 4 /( gief / tf` 1/4 ctitliz p 1 �KVVIL (aR .. Project IZ. 1It General Contractor nos- Grading COPY TO: Erth ConsultanIts, Inc. none hil al tJljlKuG ('Rnkigic1s 1. ni%In animist' F 4(1 NE,t. Cu tan ilk rt That tits. taw )1 N;\tK) ktyctik•t `mkrs 1805 136th Place N.E., Suite 201 • Bellevue, WA 98005 Bellevue (425) 643.3780 • Toll Free (888) 739 -6670 FAX (425) 746-0660 DAILY FIELD REPORT Job Location IN Art~ --50,4)- T General Contractor's Superintendent Grading Foreman Field Rep. Time On Site Travel Time r Permit No. Job No. Time Off Site Checked By Page 1 / ClienUOwner L t „.t � . f Received'Unchecked By Date Report No. Date ' Day of Week 11- /2 vZ 7Z - 5 Weather t. - / LE-471/ f ��A1/i/ _5/74.t./..)67/2.5 Visitors Are approved Plans/Permits on -site ❑ Yes ❑ No Project No. Permit No. If No, contact the building department or explain below: CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE ❑ 1 D02 - z W tY 1 O 0 u) 0 N w J F- U) w 2 LLQ co = a � z = F- F- O Z l— W • w D c o • (.0 • l- w W H� U. 0 wz - I O ~ z DOCUMENT TITLE: 20021113001812 Maintenance Agreement REFERENCE NUMBER(S): None GRANTOR(S): Long Classic Homes, Ltd. GRANTEE(S): Long Classic Homes, Ltd. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portions of Lots 1- 9,14-16, Foster Heights, according to the plat recorded in Volume 200 of Plats at pages 89 through 91 ASSESSORS PROPERTY TAX PARCEVACCOUNT NO. After recording return to: Mr. David S. Kerruish 7016 -35 Avenue NE Seattle, Washington 98115 -5917 File Na 105.020 The undersigned owner of the property herein described does impose as an easement and covenant running with the land an obligation upon the owners and future owners of the Benefited Property (as described herein) to maintain drainage improvements located within easements imposed upon the Burdened Property (as described herein), as provided in this instrument. 1. Ownership of Property. The property which is subject to the provisions of this instrument is owned by Long Classic Homes, Ltd., and is legally described as follows: Lots 1 -9, and Lots 14-16, in Volume 200 of Plats, Pages 89 through 91 inclusive, situate in King County, State of Washington. 2. Benefited and Burdened Properties. The following Lots are benefited by an easement recorded on an adjacent Lot: MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Lot 2 is benefited by an easement imposed upon Lot 1; Lot 3 is benefited by an easement imposed upon Lot 2; Lot 4 is benefited by an easement imposed upon Lot 3; Lot 5 is benefited by an easement imposed upon Lot 6; Lot 6 is benefited by an easement imposed upon Lot 7; Lot 7 is benefited by an easement imposed upon Lot 8; RECEIVED NOV 13 2002 PUBLIC WOR g. Lot 8 is benefited by an easement imposed upon Lot 9; h. Lot 15 is benefited by an easement imposed upon Lot 14; i. Lot 16 is benefited by an easement imposed upon Lot 15. Each Lot for which there is a right to use an adjacent Lot is hereafter referred to as the "Benefited Property" with respect to the right to use the easement located on the adjacent Lot. Each Lot that has imposed upon it an easement in favor of an adjacent lot is referred to as the "Burdened Property" with respect to the easement imposed upon the Lot. A Lot may be both burdened and benefited, by different easements. The easements described herein are recorded at King County Recorder's No. and were granted for the purpose of providing drainage for the Benefited Properties. 3. Duty to Maintain Easement and Improvements. The Owner of each Benefited Property shall have the duty and obligation to maintain the easement established for the benefit of the Benefited Property, and all drainage improvements located within its easement, in a manner that preserves the function and utility of the drainage improvements within the easement and in full compliance with all applicable Taws and building or zoning codes. The Owner of the Benefited Property may not construct, place or maintain any other structures in its easement, except the drainage improvements, and may not engage in any activity in the Easement that may damage the improvements located on the Burdened Property. The Owner of the Burdened Property may not place any improvements, or engage in any activities, that materially interfere with the function or utility of the drainage improvements located within the easement. Notwithstanding the prohibition upon the placement of structures in the easement, the owner of the Burdened Property may place a fence within the easement (as long as the fence does not damage or interfere with the drainage improvements in the easement), but such fence shall be repaired or replaced at the cost of the Owner of the Burdened Property if the fence must be removed in order for the Owner of the Benefited Property to maintain the drainage improvements within the easement. 4. Access. The Owner of the Benefited Property shall have whatever right of access through the Burdened Property to construct, repair, maintain and replace drainage improvements located in the easement, and to exercise the rights granted by this easement. The Owner of the Benefited Property shall compensate the Owner of the Burdened Property for any damages to the easement or to the Burdened Property and its improvements that are caused by Owner of the Benefited Property or the Owner's agents. The Owner of the Burdened Property shall compensate the Owner of the Benefited Property for any damages to the improvements located in the easement that are caused by the Owner of the Burdened Property or the Owner's agents. 5. Indemnity. The Owner of the Benefited Property agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the owner of the Burdened Property harmless from all losses, damages, claims, obligations, liabilities and expenses (and all actions, proceedings, judgments, attomey's fees and costs incident thereto) related to the Owner of the Benefited Property's use of the easement, or the improvements located therein. 6. Compliance with Laws. All improvements, installations and work to be MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT - 2 z ~ w i 2 WV 00 • 0 w= w o • Q co i ~w Z = zF- w • w U � o - O I- w IL I- w z U i P • 1— z constructed or performed pursuant to this agreement, including, without limitation, the installation, maintenance and repair of the improvements, shall be constructed and performed in compliance with all laws, ordinances, orders, rules, regulations and requirements of any govemmental entity having jurisdiction over the easement. 7. Enforcement. This Agreement shall be govemed by and construed in accordance with the laws of Washington. In the event of any controversy, claim or dispute between the parties effecting or relating to the subject matter or performance of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the nonprevailing party all of its reasonable arbitration and litigation expenses, reasonable attorneys' fees, accountant's fees, expert witness fees and costs, on all issues of municipal, county, state, federal and bankruptcy law. If any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Easement shall remain in full force and effect. 8. Successors and Assigns. The rights and obligations of the parties shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective successors and assigns, and shall bind all invitees of Grantor. There is no restriction on the transfer of the parties' rights and /or duties under this Agreement. OWNER: LO CLASSIC HOMES, LTD. s y 11111111k..■AU _ John T n• STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF PIERCE I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that John M. Long is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the President of Long Classic Homes, Ltd. to be the free and voluntary act of ` party for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. ': �' +; a D TED: fl(W/Y 2002 i. r MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT - 3 ss. dA, Renee M. Richardson (Printed name) Notary Public j My Appointment Expires: NI LS I z ~ w QQ • � JU O 0 co • im J = � LL w O w a = ▪ W z � i- 0 z �- 11J uj U O - O H w W z w i 2 I O I-- z PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AN EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES OVER THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS WITHIN THE PLAT OF FOSTER HEIGHTS ACCORDING TO THE PLAT AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 200 OF PLATS, PAGES 89 TO 91, CITY OF TUKWILA, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 1- THE SOUTH 10 FEET THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH THE WESTERLY, NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY 5 FEET THEREOF. LOT 2 - THE SOUTH 10 FEET THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH THE WESTERLY, NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY 5 FEET THEREOF. LOT 3 - THE SOUTH 10 FEET THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH THE WESTERLY, NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY 5 FEET THEREOF. LOT 4 - THE WESTERLY, SOUTHWESTERLY AND SOUTHERLY 10 FEET THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH THE NORTH AND EAST 5 FEET THEREOF. LOT 5 - THE WESTERLY, NORTHWESTERLY AND NORTHERLY 10 FEET THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH EAST AND SOUTH 5 FEET THEREOF. LOT 6 - THE NORTH 10 FEET THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH THE WESTERLY, SOUTHERLY AND EASTERLY 5 FEET THEREOF. LOT 7 - THE NORTH 10 FEET THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH THE WESTERLY, SOUTHERLY AND EASTERLY 5 FEET THEREOF. LOT 8 - THE NORTH 10 FEET THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH THE WESTERLY, SOUTHERLY AND EASTERLY 5 FEET THEREOF. LOT 9 - THE NORTHERLY 10 FEET THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH THE EASTERLY 10 FEET OF THE NORTHERLY 40.07 FEET (AS MEASURED ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 9) THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH THE SOUTH 5 FEET THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH THE EASTERLY 5 FEET OF THE SOUTH 43.44 FEET (AS MEASURED ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 9) THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH THE WEST 10 FEET THEREOF. LOT 11- THE WESTERLY 10 FEET THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH THE NORTH AND SOUTH 5 FEET THEREOF, LESS THE EAST 25 FEET THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH THE WEST 5 FEET OF THE EAST 30 FEET OF SAID LOT 11. 1 1 1 1 1 1 .1a 7. z ~ w c QQ L W O 0 co 0 w w O J �j w d = • w z � � O w ~ U� O N O I- I 0 u' O ..z w F. z LOT 12 - THE SOUTHWESTERLY 10 FEET THEREOF AS MEASURED RADIALLY FROM NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF THE CUL -DE -SAC FOR SOUTH 145 STREET. TOGETHER WITH THE EASTERLY, NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY 5 FEET THEREOF. LOT 14 - THE SOUTHERLY 10 FEET AS MEASURED FROM THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SOUTH 145 STREET. TOGETHER WITH NORTHEASTERLY, THE NORTHWESTERLY AND SOUTHWESTERLY 5 FEET THEREOF. z z J U U 0 J = W0 CV LOT 16 - THE SOUTHERLY, SOUTHWESTERLY AND WESTERLY 10 FEET 2 . 1"+ THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY 5 FEET L. a CO THEREOF. N a r-4 H = O ?F- O ZO O 2D - U O ry 0 - H . 0 ~ W uj 1- . Z 01 L ll H= O H LOT 15 - THE SOUTH 10 FEET THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH THE EASTERLY, NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY 5 FEET THEREOF. z. Sent by: Earth Consultants October 23, 2002 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 South Center Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Attention: Mr. Greg Villanueva Subject: Final Letter Building Lots 1 through 11,14,15, and 16 Foster Heights South 148 Street and 51" Avenue South Tukwila, Washington Dear Mr. Villanueva: In accordance with the request of Long Classic Homes, Earth Consultants, Inc. (ECI) has been observing the foundation soils and slab -on -grade subgrade for the subject development. Based on our observations, the foundation soW and preparation of the slab subgrade for Building Lots 1 through 11, 14. 15, and 16 was prepared in accordance with our geotechnical recommendations and the approved plans. We trust this information meets the City of Tukwila geotechnical inspection requirements for the subject building lots. If additional information is required, please call. Respectfully submitted, EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. Raymond, Coglas, P.E. Project Manager RAC4me cc: Long Classic Homes Attention: Mr. Paul Beck F rth Consultants, Inc. I ill at. !Wiled I JII=YNVIN t..*KIr,S t. 111 m,U►M iM,d tiI k iwtas t1 .uN.I1►rikil Ii,1 s I(, 111$1•\t'.lI11 1 kb,1a INh►`>;tt%ts 425 746 0880; 10/23/02 10:47AM; Fax #670;Page 2/2 1805 138th Place N.E., Suite 201, Bellevue, WA 98005 Bellevue (425) 643.3780 FAX (425) 746.0860 Toll Free (888) 739.6670 I : : 1 9 7 5 E -9920 RECEIVE' 2 7002 BU6LDING DEPARTMENT adz- v 5-d 20021113001812 DOCUMENT TITLE: Maintenance Agreement REFERENCE NUMBER(S): None GRANTOR(S): Long Classic Homes, Ltd. GRANTEE(S): Long Classic Homes, Ltd. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portions of Lots 1- 9,1416, Foster Heights, according to the plat recorded in Volume 200 of Plats at pages 89 through 91 ASSESSOR'S PROPERTY TAX PARCEUACCOUNT NO. After recording return to: Mr. David S. Kerruish 7016 — 35 Avenue NE Seattle, Washington 98115 -5917 File No. 105.000 ` 0211 0i PAGE 551 OF 5566 23.55 11/13/2552 14:26 KING COUNTY, NA MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT The undersigned owner of the property herein described does impose as an easement and covenant running with the land an obligation upon the owners and future owners of the Benefited Property (as described herein) to maintain drainage improvements located within easements imposed upon the Burdened Property (as described herein), as provided in this instrument. 1. Ownership of Property. The property which is subject to the provisions of this instrument is owned by Long Classic Homes, Ltd., and is legally described as follows: Lots 1 -9, and Lots 14 -16, in Volume 200 of Plats, Pages 89 through 91 inclusive, situate in King County, State of Washington. 2. Benefited and Burdened Properties. The following Lots are benefited by an easement recorded on an adjacent Lot: MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT -1 Lot 2 is benefited by an easement imposed upon Lot 1; Lot 3 is benefited by an easement imposed upon Lot 2; Lot 4 is benefited by an easement imposed upon Lot 3; Lot 5 is benefited by an easement imposed upon Lot 6; Lot 6 is benefited by an easement imposed upon Lot 7; Lot 7 is benefited by an easement imposed upon Lot 8; RECEIVED NOV 13 2002 PUBLIC WORKS WOR D02- 050 20021113001812 g. Lot 8 is benefited by an easement imposed upon Lot 9; h. Lot 15 is benefited by an easement imposed upon Lot 14; i. Lot 16 is benefited by an easement imposed upon Lot 15. Each Lot for which there is a right to use an adjacent Lot is hereafter referred to as the "Benefited Property" with respect to the right to use the easement located on the adjacent Lot. Each Lot that has imposed upon it an easement in favor of an adjacent lot is referred to as the "Burdened Property" with respect to the easement imposed upon the Lot. A Lot may be both burdened and benefited, by different easements. The easements described herein are recorded at King County Recorder's No. , and were granted for the purpose of providing drainage for the Benefited Properties. 3. Duty to Maintain Easement and Improvements. The Owner of each Benefited Property shall have the duty and obligation to maintain the easement established for the benefit of the Benefited Property, and all drainage improvements located within its easement, in a manner that preserves the function and utility of the drainage improvements within the easement and in full compliance with all applicable laws and building or zoning codes. The Owner of the Benefited Property may not construct, place or maintain any other ,.• structures in its easement, except the drainage improvements, and may not engage in any Gh) activity in the Easement that may damage the improvements located on the Burdened r „ y Property. The Owner of the Burdened Property may not place any improvements, or engage in any activities, that materially interfere with the function or utility of the drainage improvements located within the easement. Notwithstanding the prohibition upon the placement of structures in the easement, the owner of the Burdened Property may place a Ceb fence within the easement (as long as the fence does not damage or interfere with the drainage improvements in the easement), but such fence shall be repaired or replaced at the cost of the Owner of the Burdened Property if the fence must be removed in order for ✓ ot the Owner of the Benefited Property to maintain the drainage improvements within the easement. 4. Access. The Owner of the Benefited Property shall have whatever right of access through the Burdened Property to construct, repair, maintain and replace drainage improvements located in the easement, and to exercise the rights granted by this easement. The Owner of the Benefited Property shall compensate the Owner of the Burdened Property for any damages to the easement or to the Burdened Property and its improvements that are caused by Owner of the Benefited Property or the Owner's agents. The Owner of the Burdened Property shall compensate the Owner of the Benefited Property for any damages to the improvements located in the easement that are caused by the Owner of the Burdened Property or the Owner's agents. 5. Indemnity. The Owner of the Benefited Property agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the owner of the Burdened Property harmless from all losses, damages, claims, obligations, liabilities and expenses (and all actions, proceedings, judgments, attomey's fees and costs incident thereto) related to the Owner of the Benefited Property's use of the easement, or the improvements located therein. 6. Compliance with Laws. All improvements, installations and work to be MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT - 2 z ~ w it 2 JU U U J • = U) w W O 2 gQ _ • a � z = zI- uj O — • aj 0 I- W w �z ui U= o � z constructed or performed pursuant to this agreement, including, without limitation, the installation, maintenance and repair of the improvements, shall be constructed and performed in compliance with all laws, ordinances, orders, rules, regulations and requirements of any governmental entity having jurisdiction over the easement. 7. Enforcement. This Agreement shall be govemed by and construed in accordance with the laws of Washington. In the event of any controversy, claim or dispute between the parties effecting or relating to the subject matter or performance of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the nonprevailing party all of its reasonable arbitration and litigation expenses, reasonable attorneys' fees, accountant's fees, expert witness fees and costs, on all issues of municipal, county, state, federal and bankruptcy law. If any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Easement shall remain in full force and effect. 8. Successors and Assigns. The rights and obligations of the parties shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective successors and assigns, and shall bind all invitees of Grantor. There is no restriction on the transfer of the parties' rights and /or duties under this Agreement. OWNER: LO CLASSIC HOMES, LTD. Ni..\ John ''n• By STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF PIERCE I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that John M. Long is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the President of Long Classic Homes, Ltd. to be the free and voluntary act of.,su tparty for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT - 3 ss. D ' TED: 2002 Renee M. Richardson (Printed name) Notary Public 017/..514 My Appointment Expires: PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AN EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES OVER THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS WITHIN THE PLAT OF FOSTER HEIGHTS ACCORDING TO THE PLAT AS z RECORDED IN VOLUME 200 OF PLATS, PAGES 89 TO 91, CITY OF TUKWILA, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 5 w LOT 1- THE SOUTH 10 FEET THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH THE WESTERLY, o NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY 5 FEET THEREOF. co W J = LOT 2 - THE SOUTH 10 FEET THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH THE WESTERLY, o NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY 5 FEET THEREOF. w LOT 3 - THE SOUTH 10 FEET THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH THE WESTERLY, NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY 5 FEET THEREOF. = a F- w z = LOT 4 - THE WESTERLY, SOUTHWESTERLY AND SOUTHERLY 10 FEET F- THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH THE NORTH AND EAST 5 FEET z o THEREOF. U � LOT 5 - THE WESTERLY, NORTHWESTERLY AND NORTHERLY 10 FEET N o '- THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH EAST AND SOUTH 5 FEET THEREOF. w • v u. LOT 6 - THE NORTH 10 FEET THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH THE WESTERLY, - O SOUTHERLY AND EASTERLY 5 FEET THEREOF. z U= LOT 7 - THE NORTH 10 FEET THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH THE WESTERLY, Off' SOUTHERLY AND EASTERLY 5 FEET THEREOF. LOT 8 - THE NORTH 10 FEET THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH THE WESTERLY, SOUTHERLY AND EASTERLY 5 FEET THEREOF. LOT 9 - THE NORTHERLY 10 FEET THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH THE EASTERLY 10 FEET OF THE NORTHERLY 40.07 FEET (AS MEASURED ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 9) THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH THE SOUTH 5 FEET THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH THE EASTERLY 5 FEET OF THE SOUTH 43.44 FEET (AS MEASURED ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 9) THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH THE WEST 10 FEET THEREOF. LOT 11 - THE WESTERLY 10 FEET THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH THE NORTH AND SOUTH 5 FEET THEREOF, LESS THE EAST 25 FEET THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH THE WEST 5 FEET OF THE EAST 30 FEET OF SAID LOT 11. z LOT 12 — THE SOUTHWESTERLY 10 FEET THEREOF AS MEASURED RADIALLY FROM NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF THE CUL -DE -SAC FOR SOUTH 145 STREET. TOGETHER WITH THE EASTERLY, NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY 5 FEET THEREOF. z LOT 14 — THE SOUTHERLY 10 FEET AS MEASURED FROM THE NORTHERLY _1 MARGIN OF SOUTH 145 STREET. TOGETHER WITH 1- w NORTHEASTERLY, THE NORTHWESTERLY AND SOUTHWESTERLY 5 FEET THEREOF. OJ � p co D LOT 15 — THE SOUTH 10 FEET THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH THE EASTERLY, co I NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY 5 FEET THEREOF. cn o W at LOT 16 — THE SOUTHERLY, SOUTHWESTERLY AND WESTERLY 10 FEET 2 r"' THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY 5 FEET u. E Sent by: Earth Consultants Project Foster Hts General Contractor Long E:arlil CoilstiLianis, lll('. 40■er•er Oe, i £ E i.•••■ Szat•a.ft G Mw�T T.... COO AM" %.4..c1104 r411.4:105 t90S • 1361h P. N.E . Suite tot. Etenovue, WA 98004 9.birvue I4251 4424780 Tail Fre* (889) 7395670 FAX (5 i 7164ea0 Daily Field Report Job Lxatiort 47' ave s,Tukwila Grading Contractor Feld Rep. RE) Time On site 1:30 Travel Time Permit No. General Contractor's Superintendent Paul Time Off Site 2:30 Grading Foreman Job No. E9920 Miles Hrs. Charged Page of 1)1 Date 1L15.02 Checked By Report No. LOT 8 Day of Week FRI Weather Lt showers,cool Visitors Client/Owner Long Classic Homes Received Unchecked By Date Are approved Plans /Permits on -site g Yes No Project No. Permit No, po l - $ COPY TO: PAGE ❑ 425 746 0860; 11 /18 /f' #410;Page 2/3 if No, contact the building department or explain below: As requested ECI returned to the job site to observe drainage plan for lot 8. Owner, contractor, and ECI toured the site and documented the location of of the yard drain catch basins and connecting pipe, which are in general accordance with the geotechnical and drainage recommendations. The location of the four foot or less in height rockeries were also observed and denoted on the as built drawings. Construction of the rockeries are in general accordance with ARC guidelines for standards and practices of the industry, and the geotechnical recommendations. ° D 02- 050 CONTINUED ON NEXT z ~ • W ul U O N W = w � 1 = • d I _ w z = Zo U o - O H w w z U= O ~ z Project ,El:;, 145 General Contractor nr I Grading Earth Consultants, Inc (trncclrta1 Ga*1 (i1sR nIMIT111111C1101 SUIV11161,4 altont *%g •k )1%% 1 )Y1.y woke' ! nkrrc 1805 136th Place N.E., Suite 201 • Bellevue, WA 98005 Bellevue (425) 643 -3780 • Toll Free (888) 739 -6670 FAX (425) 746-0860 DAILY FIELD REPORT Job location - t • c.ILL.) 1A 711 .fit .50ur General Contractor's Superintendent Grading Foreman Field Rep. Time On Site t,x:�3v Travel Time Permit No. Job No. Time Off Site 45 Miles Hrs. Charged 7 0 Page 1 Date 11./2.02 Weather .jr) Cl"IenUOwner 1( r-t Received'Unchecked By Checked By Report No. Day of Week Tic S fkA ✓y visitors Date Are approved Plans/Permits on -site ❑ Yes ❑ No Project No. Permit No. If No, contact the building department or explain below: COPY TO: COI NUED ON NE�CT PAGE ❑ 1 z W J U 0 u) J WO H 0 Y2 O )-- W w t— r " IL — U= O F- z Re_9116( rn 4�/1 MAIM a1 -Se TE AZ) ' 4 F"■ / bal c.l ? /ZOU 4 7"f/ c.. -- , re. a/,x5L g: AI /r tecr., oc..+Lc rc.1 i, S , '.;a! (,.Cth . 1E-7'71') (, ' //G >Q :- 4...c, .f:l,L -! `�• t E. /,e..4. l t, P' 7,E2 fCrE.T ,A/ 4 r :7'/ 632,ev ,4 c i 2 04' r�f }}�. ' d rr #,,-,; ,r7. rf;.rr� ,.-4, .1 ..-p r& 5 e.. . v �.w ,' /D�tsriz / 7: _ 77-P&. ` . � .4 , / r � r ' . Al a r,4 , f 120L key lz ` WA � Nl -$ r et V Pl t .i' L4 a 2 Q .0 ,z. e) r 1 1.l y ' TJi4;' 64.. [ > C.f-r": floc /.St4i .k:• ... .„4/4.:. ..„4/4.:. .. e,r: ;rj,.:. :^r•'tG�-e.r`i!••..to... G r/! /, IZ.C � fjpf / H-. A dlfA le • &es LL-4fg I4/7/Y 4 ' _ (J RPeefil i NOV 11 �(:1+l1 Pi-jai-IC p h K: -; IV)? - r1Cr\ Project ,El:;, 145 General Contractor nr I Grading Earth Consultants, Inc (trncclrta1 Ga*1 (i1sR nIMIT111111C1101 SUIV11161,4 altont *%g •k )1%% 1 )Y1.y woke' ! nkrrc 1805 136th Place N.E., Suite 201 • Bellevue, WA 98005 Bellevue (425) 643 -3780 • Toll Free (888) 739 -6670 FAX (425) 746-0860 DAILY FIELD REPORT Job location - t • c.ILL.) 1A 711 .fit .50ur General Contractor's Superintendent Grading Foreman Field Rep. Time On Site t,x:�3v Travel Time Permit No. Job No. Time Off Site 45 Miles Hrs. Charged 7 0 Page 1 Date 11./2.02 Weather .jr) Cl"IenUOwner 1( r-t Received'Unchecked By Checked By Report No. Day of Week Tic S fkA ✓y visitors Date Are approved Plans/Permits on -site ❑ Yes ❑ No Project No. Permit No. If No, contact the building department or explain below: COPY TO: COI NUED ON NE�CT PAGE ❑ 1 z W J U 0 u) J WO H 0 Y2 O )-- W w t— r " IL — U= O F- z SEGA Engineers / Structural & Civil Consulting Engineers May 8, 2002 • City of Tukwila a ' �" ' \ From: Greg Thesenvitz, P - Principal �... �; ,._: . . . , r "IA 01., Re: Long Classic Ho Resident' . roject. Plan 472. Lot 8, Fost: Heights. To: Building Inspector Please address any questions to SEGA Engineers. \\ rc) ° • SEGA Engineers has provided structural engineering including lateral Toads analysis and shear wall design for the subject project. The joists have been cantilevered over the foundation wall at a portion of the rear elevation and the holdown straps can no longer be embedded into the stem wall in this area. We recommend that a `Simpson' MSTC28 be added at each corner and at the edge of each window for a total of six (6) strap type holdowns. A typical framing detail is attached for reference. RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA REV!5IQ\j NOIL bO 060 MAY - 8 2002 PERMIT CENTER 22928 SE 312th ST • Black Diamond, Washington 98010 • (360) 886 -1017 • Fax (360) 886 -1016 v �� SHEATHING 4 NAILING PER PLAN. 'SIMPSON' MSTC28 SOLID RIM JOIST JOIST PER PLAN 2x PT SILL w/ 5 4 3 "' ANCHOR BOLT. COPYRIGHT 2002, SEGA ENGINEERS I6d e 8" O.G. SOLE PLATE NAILING. FLOOR FRAMING CANT. JOIST LCH PLAN 412 SCALE: I" = I' LOT 8, FOSTER HEIGHTS " SHEATHING Sd e 6" O.C. TJI BLOCKING w/ 10cd e 8" O.C. cOA RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWIL MAX - 8 2002. r'ERMIT CENTER DO SO SEGA Engineers, /Structural & Civil Consulting Engineers 22928 312th ST SE • Black Diamond, Washington 98010 (900) 888 -1017 • FAX 888 -1018 April 18, 2002 E -9920 Long Classic Homes 1624 Pioneer Street Enumclaw, Washington 98022 Attention: Mr. Doug Pulley Subject: Dear Mr. Pulley: Sincerely, EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. Raymond A. Coglas, P.E. Project Manager cc: City of Tukwila Attn. Mr. Dave Larsen Vapor Barrier Building Slab -On -Grade Foster Heights Subdivision Tukwila, Washington EXPIRES 1. I 10 2. Earth Consultants Inc. Gcotechnical Engineers, Geologists & Environmental Scientists In accordance with your request, Earth Consultants Inc. (ECI) has reviewed the use of the Rheo -Mix concrete additive for vapor protection of the building slabs. ECI is familiar with this product and its use on several of our commercial projects. The additive is produced by Cadman, and is intended as a substitute for a conventional vapor barrier. It is our understanding that the Rheo -Mix additive effectively reduces the porosity of the concrete, thereby inhibiting the transmission of water vapor through the slab. In our opinion, use of the Rheo -Mix is a suitable substitute for a conventional plastic sheeting vapor barrier. We trust this information meets your current needs. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact us. D03:05b D01 133 poa-osl Dot - i31 Dot - 05q Do I - 333 Doi - 060 Do t- 33 pot D�� Dot - 336 Doi-13a ,701 ._ 339 1805 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 201, Bellevue, Washington 98005 Bellevue (425) 643 -3780 FAX (425) 746 -0860 Toll Free (888) 739 -6670 z • w 6 00 u o w = JJ � H t2 u- w g co =w z � � z I- w • w o - 0 F- ill w z U = 0 F- z ' Letter of Transmitt4 1624 Pioneer Street ATTENTION: Mr. Doug Pulley ® Per Your Request APR 2 3 2002 CCi''tinvii m " TO: Long Classic Homes DEimi Enumclaw, Washington 98022 WE ARE SENDING YOU: ❑ Attached ❑ Under Separate Cover Via: THE FOLLOWING: ❑ Field Reports ❑ Reports ❑ Preliminary Drafts ❑ Test Results Copies Date Description 2 4/18/02 Vapor Building Letter THESE ARE TRANSMITTED FOR YOUR: ® Information ❑ Files ® Approval 0 Review and Comments ❑ Signature ❑ Distribution ❑ ❑ REMARKS: If you have any questions please call our office. cc: 1. City of Tukwila ATTN. Mr. Dave Larson 2. ATTN. 3. ATTN. 4. ATTN. BY Keri Bate <<�.. DATE: April 18, 2002 JOB NO.: E -9920 Earth ultants Inc. OcotcchnlcilEngineers, (icologists & Environmental Scicntists 1805 - 136 Place Northeast, Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Phone: (425) 643 -3780 / Fax: (425) 746 -0860 Toll Free: 1- 888 - 739 -6670 PROJECT: Foster Heights Subdivision Thank you! z � re w 6 O 0 u c CO ILI J CO w w O g co = � Z = 1-- Z F- w U a o — o I— wW j_ • I o . . z U - F. I O F Z SEGA Engineers Structural & Civil Consulting Engineers May 8, 2002 To: Building Inspector City of Tukwila From: Greg Thesenvitz, P Principal Re: Long Classic Ho Resident'. - roject. Plan 472. Lot 8, Fost Heights. SEGA Engineers has provided structural engineering including lateral Toads analysis and shear wall design for the subject project. The joists have been cantilevered over the foundation wall at a portion of the rear elevation and the holdown straps can no longer be embedded into the stem wall in this area. We recommend that a 'Simpson' MSTC28 be added at each corner and at the edge of each window for a total of six (6) strap type holdowns. A typical framing detail is attached for reference. Please address any questions to SEGA Engineers. •'C BUILDgAiG DEPARTM ENT 22928 SE 312th ST • Black Diamond, Washington 98010 • (360) 886 -1017 • Fax (360) 886 -1016 SHEATHING 4 NAILING PER PLAN. 'SIMPSON MSTC25 SOLID RIM JOIST 16c1 e 5" O.C. SOLE PLATE NAILING. JOIST PER PLAN 2x 9 SLL w/ 5 /84 ANCHOR BOLT. COPYRIGHT 2002, SEGA ENGINEERS FLOOR FRAMING 6 CANT. JOIST LC H PLAN 412 SCALE: 1" = LOT 5, FOSTER HEIGHTS " SHEATHING 5c1 0 6" 0.C. TJI BLOCKING w/ led 0 5" 0.0. SEGA Engineers, /Structural & Civil Consulting Engineers 2202B 312th ST SE • Black Diamond, Washington 98010 (300) 888-1017. FAX 806-1016 Sent by: Earth Consultants Project General Contractor Grading Contractor [COPY TO: Earth Consultants Inc. Comer* Id Immeccn. 4&looprnawo xneu{ 1805 136th Place N.N.. Suite 201 Ballevua, WA Da005 Bellevue (425) G43 -3780 FAX (425) 746-0900 Toll Free (888) 739 -6670 DAILY FIELD REPORT Job Location .� / s r Project No. Permit No. 425 746 0860; Grading Foreman Are approved Plans/Permits on -site ❑ Yes ❑ No Field Rep. Time On Site �M Yravel Time o Permit No, General Contractor's Superintendent 11 . Nx` JrA9t� 1.,,Proa.,:r•.y,;tre.N.vM n:n.y +tki:r oss.w.eT 04/23/02 10:01AM;JetFax #110;Page 3/3 Job No. Time Off Site .�D Hrs. Charged .3 D Page Weather Visltori Client /Owner L eyar•1cws Red Unchecked By Report No. rz. Day o Week �v Dat If No, contact the building department or explain below: CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE ❑ 1 rAt i s e'e .- - 4 277o. 047.or Lt 4n/ ...1.0 TO 11; . l6f ) �¢ L3€4.4.- o 41- ,sr y. 6re-ofanW . 7".5 Z5 e4 r F ,J rs ecra fty ace ..� .S /J6^� ... 4 -- 1 e,1- rradurcice «/ ec b1 4.r& • Qt: �. err= 05 .¢F2ct ' . tea . - - ice. _ !. I. L - / .� ( 59 4..7- ?JSre". 7 ' .. - . e142 "7&T2 _ ■ 4 0 C+ r -4,+ s . --.f l a' Rieeb/N� B C2O t t1 T 2S'o� _ Svi9L.GS r' 9� F c- .'/ /PCyellvis .Lj*6"7 =Si"- / .- -, I7}?/,3w a•• "5.e / • O856 eS-' z) �(o afro ? - rte- _1�i e. : ev-t7 o � o,t s• Ay 17/,f 7 ✓ 4E_ 6.-- k --/ 10—?4 ATi T}'z 40 , A a ll IF, - f4_T ,, 1,'" tray 'i 2.. ?UR i i . D 'PARTIVIFNT Sent by: Earth Consultants Project General Contractor Grading Contractor [COPY TO: Earth Consultants Inc. Comer* Id Immeccn. 4&looprnawo xneu{ 1805 136th Place N.N.. Suite 201 Ballevua, WA Da005 Bellevue (425) G43 -3780 FAX (425) 746-0900 Toll Free (888) 739 -6670 DAILY FIELD REPORT Job Location .� / s r Project No. Permit No. 425 746 0860; Grading Foreman Are approved Plans/Permits on -site ❑ Yes ❑ No Field Rep. Time On Site �M Yravel Time o Permit No, General Contractor's Superintendent 11 . Nx` JrA9t� 1.,,Proa.,:r•.y,;tre.N.vM n:n.y +tki:r oss.w.eT 04/23/02 10:01AM;JetFax #110;Page 3/3 Job No. Time Off Site .�D Hrs. Charged .3 D Page Weather Visltori Client /Owner L eyar•1cws Red Unchecked By Report No. rz. Day o Week �v Dat If No, contact the building department or explain below: CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE ❑ 1 Sent ,, by: Earth Consultants Long Classic Homes 1624 Pioneer Street Enumclaw, Washington 98022 Attention: Mr. Doug Pulley Subject: Dear Mr. Pulley: Sincerely, EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. Raymond A. Coglas, P.E. Project Manager cc: City of Tukwila Attn. Mr. Dave Larsen 425 746 0860; Vapor Barrier Building Slab -On -Grade Foster Heights Subdivision Tukwila, Washington Exp1RES'7 /?Pt/ w 04/18/02 11:52AM;JotFp. #8; Page 2/2 Earth Consultants Inc. 1it..aw'hhlr 1itIµi? k'* , Itt%trttrnt :II It1Y1•d% April 18, 2002 E -9920 In accordance with your request, Earth Consultants Inc. (ECI) has reviewed the use of the Rheo-Mix concrete additive for vapor protection of the building slabs. ECI is familiar with this product and its use on several of our commercial projects. The additive is produced by Cadman, and is intended as a substitute for a conventional vapor barrier. It is our understanding that the Rheo -Mix additive effectively reduces the porosity of the concrete, thereby inhibiting the transmission of water vapor through the slab. In our opinion, use of the Rheo -Mix is a suitable substitute for a conventional plastic sheeting vapor barrier. We trust this information meets your current needs. if you have any questions or need additional information, please contact us. 1 t (o 1805. 136th Place N.E , Spite 201, Bellevue, Washington 9 0J5 Bellevue (425) 643.3780 FAX (425) 746.0860 Tol: Free (888) 739.6670 January 11, 2002 E -9920 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 South Center Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Attention: Ms. Joanna Spencer, Development Engineer Subject: Geotechnical Review - Lot 8 Proposed Foster Heights Subdivision Residences South 146"' Street and 51" Avenue South King County, Washington Reference: Geospectrum Consultants, Inc. Geotechnical Evaluation Foster Heights Plat Development Tukwila, Washington Dear Ms. Spencer: Drawing FH -8 Site, Utility, and Drainage Plan Foster Heights, Lot 8 mikA Eartn Consultants Inc. Geotechnical Engineers, Geologists & Environmental Scientists In accordance with your request, Earth Consultants, Inc. (ECI) has reviewed the referenced geotechnical engineering study and drainage plan for Lot 8. At the request of Long Classic Homes, ECI has assumed the role of geotechnical engineer of record for the project. Based on our review, ECI is in agreement with the geotechnical and drainage recommendations for Lot 8. JAN 1 2002 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS 1805 - 136th Place N,E., Suite 201, Bellevue, Washington 98005 Bellevue (425) 643 -3780 FAX (425) 746 -0860 Toll Free (888) 739 -6670 DO2O5O City of Tukwila January 11, 2002 RAC /jme We trust this information meets the geotechnical plan review requirements for Lot 8. If additional information is required, please call. Respectfully submitted, EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. Raymond A. Coglas, P.E. Project Manager cc: Long Classic Homes Attention: Mr. Doug Pulley 'EXPIRES --?/ zce '2 t c L 1 Earth Consultants, Inc. January 11, 2002 E -9920 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 South Center Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Attention: Ms. Joanna Spencer, Development Engineer Subject: Geotechnical Review - Lot 8 Proposed Foster Heights Subdivision Residences South 146 Street and 51' Avenue South King County, Washington Reference: Geospectrum Consultants, Inc. Geotechnical Evaluation Foster Heights Plat Development Tukwila, Washington Dear Ms. Spencer: Drawing FH -8 Site, Utility, and Drainage Plan Foster Heights, Lot 8 Earth Consultants Inc. Geotechnical Engineers, Geologists & Environmental Scientists In accordance with your request, Earth Consultants, Inc. (ECI) has reviewed the referenced geotechnical engineering study and drainage plan for Lot 8. At the request of Long Classic Homes, ECI has assumed the role of geotechnical engineer of record for the project. Based on our review, ECI is in agreement with the geotechnical and drainage recommendations for Lot 8. J JAN 1 4 2602 1.in.. Lr .r PU3L, , JCr: \S 1805 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 201, Bellevue, Washington 98005 Bellevue (425) 643 -3780 FAX (425) 746 -0860 Toll Free (888) 739-6670 DO2O z re 6 O 0 0 U w = J w o L¢ • a = W' z � 1- 0 z I- w • w U co 0- O E- w • w L I o li.i U - H= o 1- z u City of Tukwila January 11, 2002 Raymond A. Coglas, P.E. Project Manager RAC /jme cc: Long Classic Homes Attention: Mr. Doug Pulley Earth Consultants, Inc. • ti We trust this information meets the geotechnical plan review requirements for Lot 8. If additional information is required, please call. Respectfully submitted, EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. 0 2 E -9920 Page 2 ` GEOSPECTRUN9 CONSULTANTS, INC. Geo7�ec/ r /c a./ E r / Cf1 Earf S ciences February 10, 1998 Mr. Richard Schroeder Happy Valley Land Company P.O. Box 1324 Issaquah, WA 98027 Subject: GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Proposed 16 -Lot Foster Heights Plat Development South 146th Street & 51st Avenue South Tukwila, Washington Project No. 98- 103 -01 Dear Dick, This report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation performed on the site of the proposed Foster Heights residential development. The purpose of the investigation was to provide geotechnical engineering evaluations of the site conditions and geotechnical recommendations for site grading including optimum timing of site grading and general recommendations for site development. A preliminary plat map prepared by Baima & Holmberg, Inc. dated 9/12/97 was provided to us and used as a reference for our site explorations and our evaluations and recommendations. Based on the referenced plat map shown in Figure 2, the proposed plat includes 16 lots within the subject property. Access to lots 1 -14 will be provided by new cul- de -sac streets (Road A and Road B) which will join South 146th Street at the southwest corner of the property. from 240th. Lots 15 and 16 will be accessed directly from 51st Avenue South. Although no site 'grading exists at this time is expected that cuts and fills of only about 5 to 10 feet will be required for street construction. Development of the single family residence lots is expected to be one or two story wood frame homes. Foundation load information is not available at this time but for the purpose of our evaluation bearing wall loads for the residence structures are assumed to be on the order of 1 to 2 kif. If actual structural loads exceed the above values by more than 25 %, this office should be notified. 0 . oo2a: P.O.Box 276, Issaquah, WA 98027 -0276 . Phone: (206) 391 -4228 Fax: (206) 391 -4228 Happy Valley Land Co. Subsoils recommendations. Project No. 98- 103 -01 SCOPE OF WORK February 10, 1998 Our geotechnical evaluation included subsurface exploration, engineering evaluations and the preparation of this report. The scope of work included the following specific tasks: z o Reviewed published geologic mapping of the site vicinity. , _ ~ w o Performed a reconnaissance of the site to observed surface conditions. o Observed the excavation of 5 test pits to depths ranging from 4 to 6 o o feet below the ground and excavated one hand -auger test pit on Lot co w 16. Approximate locations of the test pits are shown on Figure 2. 111 i 0w o Continuously logged the subsurface conditions, as encountered in the w o . test pits at the time of excavation. Logs of the test pits are presented 1 a on the summary sheets of Appendix A. u. 0 o Performed geotechnical engineering evaluations of the site and I W developed geotechnical recommendations for site grading and general z x site development. j o z f-- o Prepared this geotechnical report summarizing our findings and ? o U O N D 1- OBSERVED SITE CONDITIONS 111 0 At the time of our field investigation the property was undeveloped except for the w z existing residence and out - buildings on lots 5, 15 and 16 as shown on Figure 2. r) cn Vegetation on the site consisted primarily of blackberries with grass and scattered o 1 fruit trees and maple trees that ranged up to 3 + feet in diameter. z Topography in the general site vicinity is gently to moderately sloped down to the east. The referenced topography map provided to • us indicates the maximum elevation difference across the site to be on the order of about 90 feet. Most of the site is gently sloped with gradients ranging from about 7 to 22 percent based on the topography map. Steeper slopes exist on the eastern half of Lots 15 and 16 where gradients of about 40 to 50 percent exist. Our evaluation of the subsurface conditions was based on our observations of the exploratory test pits and surface observations. Subsoils encountered in the test pits were generally found to be natural glacial till soils with localized areas of fill soils. We noted apparent shallow fill deposits in the graded area of Lots 5, 15 and 16. The natural soils generally included a layer of dark brown topsoil with organics and roots which typically ranged from about 6 to 12 inches thick. The underlying weathered natural soils were typically brown to gray brown or gray and red -brown sandy silt or silty fine sand with gravel. The weathered soils were generally soft or loose to depths of about 2 to 3 feet below the natural surface based on the test pits Page 2 rf 1 • Happy Valley Land Co. February 10, ,1998 and surface probing. Deeper natural soils were firm to very stiff /hard and medium dense to very dense to the depths of the test pits. Fill soils were encountered in Test Pit 6 to a depth of about 3 feet. The fill soils were very soft/loose and wet sandy silt/silty fine sand. Surface topography of Lots' 5, 15 and 16 indicates other probable fill deposits in the graded areas around the z existing house (see Figure 2). 1 z W w 2 Ground Water .0J o W0 We observed that the surface soils were generally very moist over most of the site co W and some areas were especially wet or had surface drainage or seeps as indicated N r on Figure 2. w u.. w o The site soils were generally classified as very moist to wet and measured moisture contents were generally high, ranging from about 17.1 to 40.6 percent. Most of the a soils had moisture contents between about 20 to 30 percent. Seepage was typically CO d observed at the base of the upper weathered soils in Test Pits 1 through 5. w Ground water was observed to rise to about 9 inches below the fill surface in the ? 1- hand - augered Test Pit 6 east of the existing house on Lot 16. I-- o w • w o - Based on our experience, it is our opinion that some variation in the continuity and = w depth of subsoil deposits and ground water levels should be anticipated due to (- natural deposition variations and previous onsite structures and grading. Due to w o seasonal moisture changes, ground water conditions should be expected to change u.i z with time. Care should be exercised when interpolating or extrapolating subsurface 0 co soils and ground water conditions between or beyond our test pits. o f- z Subsurface Variations General The referenced geologic map of Figure 1 indicates the site to expose glacial till (Qt) soils. The referenced map describes the Qt soils as intimately graded mixture of clay to gravel sized soils. The glacial till was deposited during the advance of the Vashon glaciation, the last glacial advance into the Puget Sound area, approximately 13,000 to 16,000 years ago. Based on our explorations the site soils are sandy silt and silty very fine sand glacial till soils which are typically weathered, soft/loose and very moist to wet in the upper 2 to 3 feet becoming very stiff to hard below those depths. Fill soils were observed in the vicinity of lots 5, 15 and 16. The upper weathered site soils and fill are not considered suitable for direct support of pavements or foundations, however, in our opinion the site can be developed as planned provided that our recommendations are followed. Project No. 98- 103 -01 SITE EVALUATIONS Page 3 'a, • Happy Valley Lana moo. Project No. 98- 103 -01 February 10,.1 998 Site Stability The referenced geologic map of Figure 1 does not indicate any known landslides in the site vicinity. Our observations of the existing site revealed no indications of recent or current instability. In our opinion the unweathered glacial soils which underlie the site are generally stable with regard to gross stability. Z There is always risk involved with construction on or near a slope and the lot w owners must be willing to accept the risk of future instability which may result in cc 2 damage to their property or neighboring property. In general slope failures are D most likely to be shallow failures occurring during the winter and spring months due ° o to increased soil moisture conditions and during earthquake shaking due to cn w additional dynamic loads on the slope. In our opinion the risk of damage due to j i instability on Lots 1-4 and 6 -14 is low. The risk of instability damage on Lots 5, 15 u) u_ and 16 is considered moderate to high due to the wet conditions, the steeper slopes .w o and existing fill. In addition the risk of shallow failures of the very steep road cut 2 along 51st Avenue South is considered high. Risk of slope failure can be reduced u- a by incorporating proper engineering design and providing and maintaining control of u> surface runoff and subsurface drainage. � W z= 1- o Site Grading Considerations w i- w Currently no street grading plan or street profiles exist, however we expect that D ° cut/fill depths should be on the order of about 10 feet or less. We expect that the o 92 grades for Roads A and B will primarily be within the upper weathered soils which w will not be suitable for direct subgrade support. The soft/loose weathered soils = 0 should be excavated from the street subgrade areas to expose stiff /hard soils and u. o structural fill placed to the final street subgrade. — Z iii u) Based on our experience the onsite soils will be quite moisture sensitive with regard o 1. to grading and compaction characteristics and the measured moisture contents Z indicate that the onsite soils are currently too wet to obtain adequate compaction. In our experience the onsite soils will be very difficult to compact unless they are dried out sufficiently. Site grading should be scheduled during warm, low humidity weather typically occurring in the late summer months to reduce the potential problems associated with wet soils and ground water seepage. Unless the onsite soils can be dried to near optimum moisture content, site grading will require the use of imported granular fill soils for proper compaction. In addition the onsite soils are not considered suitable for backfill within the drainage zone of basement walls or other retaining walls. R.esidential Foundations Existing soft/loose, organic and fill soils are not considered suitable for foundation support. Foundations should penetrate through the upper unsuitable soils to bear in very stiff /hard natural soils. In our opinion conventional spread footings founded on the very stiff /hard natural soils should provide good support for the residence structures. Where grading is performed to level specific Tots for development, all fill should be placed and compacted as structural fill. Page 4 1 Happy Valley Land Co. February 10, .1998 The following subsections present our geotechnical recommendations for site grading, street subgrade preparation, residential foundations and retaining walls. Also included are recommendations for site drainage, erosion control, plan review and observations and testing during construction. Site Grading Site grading is expected to consist primarily of excavation and fill placement to prepare the access roads subgrade, create building pads and backfill utility trenches and possibly retaining walls. Stripping depth required in areas with no existing fill is expected to be about 2 to 3 feet. Excavation of the on -site glacial till materials is expected to be difficult at depths greater than about 5 or 6 feet. Onsite soils are not generally considered suitable for use in compacted fills because in our experience these soils are quite moisture sensitive with regard to trafficability and compaction characteristics and are currently too wet for adequate compaction. If grading is scheduled for the late summer months moisture conditions of the onsite soils may be more suitable for compaction. Site grading will likely require the use of imported granular fill soils for proper compaction and drainage. Onsite soils are not considered suitable for backfill against retaining walls because they will not be adequately free - draining. Retaining wall backfill will require clean sand /gravel soils. Recommendations for site preparation, temporary excavations, structural fill, permanent slopes and street subgrade preparation are presented below. Site Preparation: Existing vegetation, debris, and soft or loose soils and existing fill should be stripped from the areas that are to be graded. During rough grading, excess soils may be stockpiled for later use. Soils containing more than 1% by weight of organics may be used in planter areas, but should not be used for fill beneath building or pavement areas. Stumps, debris and trash, plus rocks and rubble over 6 inches in size, should be removed from the grading areas. Subsoil conditions on the site may vary from those encountered in the test pits. Therefore, the soils engineer should observe the prepared areas prior to placement of any new fills. Temporary Excavations: Sloped temporary construction excavations may be used where planned excavation limits will..not undermine structures or interfere with other construction. Where there is not enough room for sloped excavations, shoring should be provided. Contractors should note that excavation of the unweathered glacial till may be very difficult with conventional backhoe equipment. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered in our test pits, it is our opinion that sloped temporary excavations may be made vertically to depths less than 4 feet. Deeper temporary excavations up to 10 feet should be made at slope gradients no steeper than 1: 1 (horizontal:vertical) for the loose to medium dense soils and 3/4 : 1 ( horizontal:vertical) for the glacial till soils, however it should be noted that the contractor is responsible for safety and maintenance of construction slopes. Project No. 98- 103 -01 i S - - - - v+ F7r.1.m..:.0`,. ,r7WwWOYMMlas ptaY: rF. r!xMs g »o..- RECOMMENDATIONS Page 5 z w re 2 .J U o UU w w J H LL w o u.j O a = • w z � I- o Z I- w O • D o 1- w W u o z w U = 0 H z G Happy Valley Land Co. February 10, 1998 Surface drainage should be directed away from the top edge of cut slopes. Surcharge Toads should not be allowed within 5 feet of the top of cut slopes or within a 1 :1 (horizontal : vertical) plane extending up from the toe of excavation, whichever is greater. Structural Fill: Provided that soil moisture can be reduced and maintained near optimum, excavated onsite soils may be used for structural fill. However these soils are expected to be moisture sensitive and are currently too wet for practical compaction. Therefore imported granular fill soils should be used if moisture conditions cannot be adequately controlled. Loose soils, formwork and debris should be removed prior to placing fill or backfill. Imported free - draining granular soils should be used for backfill of retaining walls, and should be capped with pavement or 12 inches of onsite silty soils to reduce surface water infiltration. Onsite soils or imported granular fill should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding 8 inches in loose thickness and compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by the ASTM D1557 -91 test method. Imported granular fill should consist of clean, welt- graded sand and gravel materials free of organic debris and other deleterious material. Imported material for wall drainage zone backfill should be a clean sand /gravel mixture with less than 5 percent fines based on the sand fraction. Fill Slopes: All permanent fill slopes should be constructed of properly placed and compacted structural fill with gradients no steeper than 2:1 (h:v). All existing fill, vegetation, debris, and loose /medium dense soils should be removed from proposed fill slope areas prior to fill placement (see "Site Preparation "). Where underlying natural slope gradients are 20% or more, fill slopes should be keyed and benched into undisturbed dense natural soils. Key Width should be at least 8 feet or 1/3 the slope height whichever is greater. Key depth should penetrate at least 2 feet into undisturbed dense natural soils. All fill should be placed and compacted in accordance with the recommendations for "Structural Fill ". Cut Slopes: All permanent cut slopes should be made no steeper than 2 :1 (h:v). Existing trees located within 10 feet of the top of the cut slope should be cut but stumps should be left intact. Utility Trenches: Buried utility conduits should be bedded and backfilled around the conduit in accordance with the project specifications. Where conduit crosses pavement subgrade areas the backfill above the pipe should be placed and compacted in accordance with the recommendations for structural fill. Street Subgrade Preparation The street pavement section (base course and A.C. paving) should be supported on a subgrade compacted to at least 95 percent of the ASTM D1557 maximum dry density. Subgrade preparation should include stripping of existing vegetation, topsoils and soft/loose weathered soils in accordance with the "Site Preparation" recommendations. Where unsuitable soils exist at subgrade level, subgrade preparation should include over - excavation down to expose stiff to very stiff /hard natural soils and placement of structural fill to final subgrade elevation. Subgrade fill should be placed in accordance with the recommendations for structural fill except that the top 6 inches Project No. 98- 103 -01 m ,32: 1t s r, 7 R' i# IGfC 5 2T^ I.. qr twgn r. .,'�" "':d.LTiv,r,`{:. {'. >t }tllPd A` 'Yn'm.r*i)}�'3Qw;ya•. Page 6 z ~ • w 6 U O 0 0 t o J F _ � LL al L Q = • a z � z� • w U � 0 W uj u Li O (0 iz 0 z Happy Valley Land Co. February 10, 1998 of the subgrade fill should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the ASTM D1557- 91 maximum dry density. Residential Spread Footing Foundations Conventional spread footings founded on undisturbed very stiff /hard natural soils a should provide good support for residential structures within the proposed plat. All footings should be founded at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent final grade Ce iLl and should be deepened as required to penetrate existing soft/loose natural soils D and fill to bear on very stiff /hard natural soils. In addition, square footings and v o continuous footings running parallel to the slope should be deepened as required to co ° provide a set back at least 12 feet horizontally from the face of the slope. Footings w w should also be setback beyond a 1 :1 (h:v) projection from adjacent lower footings. CO All footings should be stepped as necessary to maintain a horizontal bearing w o surface. 2 J Suitable•very stiff /hard bearing soils are expected to be at depths of about 2 to 3 N a feet below the natural surface. The depth to bearing soils may be increased due to i W existing fill overlying the natural surface. _ z� As an alternative to deep spread footings to penetrate soft/loose soils or fill and /or z oo satisfy slope setback requirements, foundation loads may be transferred from the LIJ w recommended minimum foundation depths to the recommended bearing soils by a n o monolith of lean concrete having a minimum compressive strength of 1000 psi. The o width of an unreinforced lean concrete monolith should be at least as wide as the o '- footing or at least one -half of the monolith height, whichever is greater. Reinforced = w monoliths should be designed by 'a structural engineer. A suitable width trench F- 0 should be excavated with a smooth edged excavator (no teeth) to expose the IL o dense /very dense bearing soils under observation by our office and backfilled as iii Z soon as possible with the lean concrete to the footing elevation. I o I - Square footings should be at Least 24 inches wide and continuous wall footings Z should be at least 16 inches wide for two story structures. Continuous footings for garages or other light structures with loads less than 1 kip /ft may be reduced to a minimum width of 12 inches. Footings may be designed based on an allowable bearing pressure of 2000 psf. Settlement of light wood -frame structures is expected to be within tolerable limits for this type of construction. For example, the estimated settlement of a 16 inch wide continuous footing founded on very..stiff /hard natural soils and carrying a load of 2 kips /ft. is on the order of 1/2 inch. Settlements are expected to occur primarily during construction. For lateral design, resistance to lateral loads can be assumed to be provided by friction acting at the base of foundations and by passive earth pressure. A coefficient of friction of 0.35 may be assumed with the dead load forces in contact with onsite soils or structural fill. An allowable static passive earth pressure of 250 psf per foot of depth may be used for the sides of footings poured against undisturbed natural soils or properly compacted structural fill. The bearing values indicated above are for the total dead load plus frequently applied live loads. If normal code requirements are applied for design, the vertical bearing values may be increased by 50% for short durations of loading which Will Project No. 98- 103 -01 • wkw?Ya'y K,St ^•`HA\tWiRM \k<iy t . ,, ; } ; q ;;L: +wt + *'.^eT+.'�'lrtihF'; \.i{Li�N5Y4 Page 7 1 Happy Valley Land Co. February 10, 1.998 include the effects of wind or seismic forces, Allowable lateral passive pressures may be increased by 33% for wind and seismic forces. Retaining Walls Cantilevered' retaining walls as referred to in this report are walls which yield or move outward during and after backfilling. Actual wall movements will depend on the wall design and method of backfilling and can range from 0.1% to 0,3% of the wall height. Design pressures for cantilevered walls given below assume that the top of the wall will deflect at least 0.2% of the wall height. Static design of permanent cantilevered retaining walls which support a horizontal surface of properly compacted clean free - draining granular material may be based on an equivalent fluid density of 35 pcf. This pressure assumes that there is no water pressure behind the wall. A uniform lateral pressure due to backfill surcharge should be computed using a coefficient of 0.25 times the uniform vertical surcharge load. Static design of walls structurally braced against movement should be based on an equivalent fluid density of 60 pcf. This pressure assumes that the wall supports a horizontal backfill of properly compacted free - draining (imported) granular material and that there is no water pressure behind the wall. Uniform lateral pressure due to a uniform vertical surcharge behind a braced wall should be computed using a coefficient of 0.45 times the uniform vertical surcharge load. Seismic design of retaining walls should include a dynamic soil loading based on a 0.24g 475 -year UBC recurrence ground motion level. Dynamic soil pressure should be assumed to have an inverted triangular distribution. The dynamic soil pressure at the top of the wall should be at (east 20H (psf) where H is the height of the wall above the footing base. The dynamic soil pressure should diminish linearly to zero at the base of the wall. Combined static plus dynamic soil pressure should be used for seismic design of the walls. Care should be exercised in compacting backfill against retaining walls. Heavy equipment should not approach retaining walls close enough to intrude within a 1:1 line drawn upward from the bottom of the wall. Backfill close to walls should be placed and compacted with hand - operated equipment. Recommendations for placement and compaction of structural fill are presented under "Site Grading ". Design wall pressures given above assume no water pressure behind the walls. We recommend that a drainage zone be provided behind all retaining walls and a adequate drain system be provided at the base of all retaining walls. As a minimum, the 'drainage zone horizontal dimension should be 3 feet or 1/2 the wall height, whichever is less. Backfill within the drainage zone should be a clean sand /gravel mixture with Tess than 5 percent fines based on the sand fraction. A membrane of Mirafi 140 filter fabric or equivalent should be provided between the drainage zone material and onsite silty soil backfill. Wall drains should consist of a four -inch diameter perforated PVC drain pipe placed in at least one cubic foot of drain gravel per lineal foot along the base of the wall. Drain gravel should be washed material with particle sizes in the range of 3/4 to 1 -112 inches. The drainage zone backfill should be capped with paving or 12 inches of silty soils to reduce surface water infiltration. Project No. 98- 103-01 ''ikC;T!'ab't;hf Y.C:.:; ^,....c•u.....,.....,.. ..,...:....b r......,:• Page 8 z • w 6 U O 0 CO W = J CO w0 g i w z � w • w 0 0 O 1- wW o 1- w z U (0 0 o 1- z Happy Valley Land Co. February 10, ,1998 Conventional spread footing foundations founded on undisturbed very stiff /hard natural soils may be used for support of retaining walls. Design of wall foundations should be .in accordance with the recommendations presented in this report. Drainage Control . Surface drainage from the adjoining upslope areas should be controlled and diverted around the development area in a non - erosive manner. Adequate positive drainage should be provided away from the structure and on the site in general to prevent water from ponding and to reduce percolation of water into subsoils. Granular backfill should be capped with paving or 6 inches of onsite silty soils. A desirable slope for surface drainage is 2% in landscaped areas and 1% in paved areas. Roof drains should be tightiined into the storm drain system or other appropriate discharge point (no discharge on the ground surface). A permanent perimeter drain, independent of the roof drain system, should be placed adjacent to the base of the continuous exterior foundations. The drain should consist of a four -inch diameter perforated PVC drain pipe placed in at least one cubic foot of a well graded sand and gravel filter material per lineal foot along the base of the foundations. At least one interior drain should be provided beneath the basement floor connecting to the perimeter drain on the downslope side at the lowest point. If conditions exposed during construction warrant, interceptor subdrain system(s) may be required to intercept ground water migration form the upslope areas particularly in the eastern site area. Interceptor drains should consist of a filter fabric Tined trench filled with clean sand or drain rock with a perforated PVC drain pipe at the base. The drain trench should be at least 18" wide, and at least 3 feet deep and should penetrate at least one foot into the very stiff /hard natural glacial till soils. Six inches of native clay soil cover should be placed over the drain to reduce surface water infiltration. Discharge from the subdrain should be conducted via tightline to the storm drain system. In the proposed street subgrade structural fill areas a drain pipe should be installed to collect ground water infiltration which may collect in the fill and transmit it to the storm drain system. The subdrain pipe should be placed, along the lower side of under the street fill areas and should discharge to the storm drain system. As a minimum the drain should consist of a• 4" diameter perforated PVC collector pipe and a tightline discharge pipe. Additional lateral drains should be provided wherever a spring or seep is exposed during grading. Erosion Control Onsite silty materials are expected to be highly erodible when exposed to concentrated flows. Siltation fences or other detention devices should be provided around soil stockpiles and exposed soil areas during construction to control the transport of eroded material. Exposed final graded soil areas should be paved or planted immediately with grass and deep rooted plants to help reduce erosion potential. Project No. 98- 103 -01 Page 9 Happy Valley Land Co. GEOSPECTRUM CONSULTANTS, INC. &1 k James A. Doolitt Principal Engineer Encl: Figures 1 and 2 Appendix A Dist: 1 /Addressee 2 /Baima & Holmberg, Inc. Project No. 98 -103 -01 CLOSURE Plan Review This report has been prepared to aid in the evaluation of this site and to assist the civil engineers in the design and construction of the project. it is recommended that this office be provided the opportunity to review the final design drawings and specifications to determine if the recommendations of this report have been properly implemented and to make any supplemental design recommendations which may be required. Observations and Testing During Construction Recommendations given in this report are based on the assumption that all development construction will be performed under engineering observations and testing. All structural fill and backfill areas should be observed by a representative of this office after stripping and prior to placing fill. Proper fill placement and compaction should be verified with field and laboratory density testing by a qualified testing laboratory. All footing excavations should be observed prior to placement of steel and concrete to see that footings are founded on satisfactory bearing materials and have proper slope setback. This report was 'prepared for specific application to the subject site and for the exclusive use of the Happy Valley Land Company and their representatives. The findings ,and conclusions of this. report were prepared with the skill and care ordinarily exercised by local members of the' geotechnical profession practicing under similar conditions in the same locality. • We make no other warranty, either express or implied. Variations may exist in site conditions between those described in this report and actual conditions encountered during construction. Unanticipated subsurface conditions commonly occur and cannot be prevented by merely making explorations and performing reconnaissance. Such • unexpected conditions frequently require additional expenditures to achieve a properly constructed project. If conditions encountered during construction appear to be different from those indicated in this report, our office should be notified. Respectfully submitted, I EXPIRES 3/19/ ! February 10, 1998 n t 1 Page 10 o /y z z ce w J U O 0 i3O w= � w w0 co D I- IA z � � zE— w uj �o OH in Ili w z O — 0 z ref: Preliminary Geologic Map of Seattle and Vicinty, Washington, by Waldron, Liesch, Mullineaux and Crandell, USGS Map 1-354, 1962, scale: 1".2640' GEOSPECTRUM CONSULTANTS, INC. Gaicstatinlactl Enc7/1 ono' Eorth Sc Proj. No98-103 Date 2/98 SITE VICINITY GEOLOGIC MAP Proposed Foster Heights Development South 146th Street & 51st Avenue South Tukwila, Washington Figure 1 ;EATTLEI TACOMA ref: Preliminary Geologic Map of Seattle and Vicinty, Washington, by Waldron, Liesch, Mullineaux and Crandell, USGS Map 1-354, 1962, scale: 1".2640' GEOSPECTRUM CONSULTANTS, INC. . ... • • • .41 Gc•oriacrIniccil Er CIr, Earrn Sc SITE VICINITY GEOLOGIC MAP Proposed Foster Heights Development South 146th Street & 51st Avenue South Tukwila, Washington File: D 02-0050 35mm Drawing #1 Vol.11410. APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION Our field exploration included a site reconnaissance and subsurface exploration program. During the site reconnaissance, the surface site conditions were noted, and the locations of the test pits were approximately z determined. ,i z cc 2 a 1 The test pits were approximately located using existing features as a guide. D Elevations at • the test pits locations were estimated from the site plan o prepared by Baima & Holmberg dated 9/12/97 combined with our own site ❑ measurements. w= _I Test pits were advanced using a Yatani 140 -B trackhoe excavator. Soils w o were continuously logged and classified in the field by visual examination, in ` accordance with the ASTM Soil Classification system. u.Q Logs of the test pits are presented on the test pit summary sheets A -1 w a through A -3. The test pit summaries include descriptions of the soils and I w pertinent field data. Soil consistency and moisture conditions indicated on z i the Togs are interpretations based on the conditions observed in the field. z o Boundaries between soil strata indicated on the logs are approximate and 111 Lu actual transitions between strata may be gradual. 2 o O • S a 1-- w W H U F L. Z Ili 0 N : 0 z ML Topsoil /Organics w /abundant roots to 1/2" soft very moist dark rown 23.7 Sandy Silt, very..fine • w/ ,pc. rounded gravel to 4 mottled rown — ^ wet _ — — firm sdff to very stiff hard very — moist di icuif digging — Maximum depth 6 ft. Seepage at approximately 2 feet. Logged By JAD Date 1/23/98 Depth • (ft,plows USCS Logged By JAD Date 1/23/98 Topsoil /Organics Sandy Sw l occy gravelfito 4 and grading to Sandy Silt, very fine GEOSPECTRUM CONSULTANTS, INC. ,emu.. >.. Goo tochn/co/ Enpinoor /no one Eorrh Scloncoa TEST PIT NO. 1 Maximum depth 6 feet. Seepage at approximately 1 foot. Soil Description loose/ o to firm st to hard TEST PIT NO. 2 Prot. No.98 -103 most wet ver moist dk brn Date 2/98 mottled oroown red -brown Elev 464' w ( %) 29.8 Seepage difficult digging Elev. 448' TEST PIT LOGS Proposed Foster Heights Development South 146th Street & 51st Avenue South Tukwila, Washington Figure A - 1 Topsoil /Organics loose — moist very moist Dark mwn 19.1 24.1 • rCavinq _ SM • Silty very fine Sand • w/ occ. gravel to 3" brown Bro�in — medium dense mottled $roywn & reown — — —" most SP Sand, fine -med . .. dense gray — — — wet Sewage SM Silty fine Sand v.dense v.moist gray -brn — Maximum depth 6 ft. • Seepage at approximately 4.5 - 5.5 feet. • • L ogge d B JAD Date 1/23/98 (plows • USCS 0 1 — 2 -- 3 — 4 — 5 — 6 — 7 — ML Topsoil /Organics Sandy Silt ?rave to 3" wltrace clay Maximum depth 4.5 feet. Seepage at approximately 1 - 2 f TEST PIT NO. 3 Soil Description soft firm st to hard ent. moist wet very moist dk brn ra - rown mottled ra - r wn r -brown Elev 422' w ( %) 40.6 Seepage 4 Logged By JAIL Date 1/23/98 TEST PIT NO. 4 Elev. 423' GEOSPECTRUM CONSULTANTS, INC. ,�,�,,�• iNT!Q. t ��.+. 2•:N Go a r chrnlcol Enp /r rinp mind Ecirth Scl•nc•s TEST PIT LOGS Proposed Foster Heights Development South 146th Street & 51st Avenue South Washington Tukwila, as ton g ProJ. No98 -103 Date 2/98 r Figure A -2 L ogge d B JAD Date 1/23/98 Depth • (ft,plows USCS ML Topsoil /Organics w /abundant roots to 1" Sandy Silt, very fine & occ gravel to 3" & Silty fine Sand Maximum depth 4 feet. Seepage at approximately 1.5 - 2. 4 Logged By JAD Date 1/23/98 TEST PIT NO. 6 Elev. 408' Topsoil /Sod Sandy Silt/Silty fine Sand Savo becomes more STnay Maximum depth 5 ft. Water at 9 inches after 15 minute, ve l0 t edium ense to dense wet very moist dk -brn mixed r it- rn brown rn reo orn mottled gr ayd brn 30.4 20.5 FILL GEOSPECTRUM CONSULTANTS, INC. .......:::.: >; Goo toohn /ool Enpinoo, /np and Earth Sc/on=o, TEST PIT NO. 5 Soil Description soft most to wet firm very v,stiff moist 5 feet. dark brown Dro gry red- brown TEST PIT LOGS Proposed Foster Heights Development South 146th Street & 51st Avenue South Tukwila, Washington Pro). No .98 -103 Date 2/98 Bev 428' w ( %) 37.3 . av ing_ Seepage 17.1 :. Figure A -3 WATTSUN 5.5B 1994 WA STATE ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE REPORT 11/06/80 FILE: C: \ \WATTSUNS \ \LCH472.WS HEATING /COOLING /VENTILATING SYSTEMS Heating System Type: Ma'M : Model: System Efficiency: . Modified Efficiency: Design ACH: Design Load(at 44F dt) : Duct Losses(% Dsn Load): Total Load: System Size(Output): Average Annual Heat: Annual Cost: Ventilation System: Cooling System: SEER: Cooling Load(at 4F dt) : System Size ( %Over) : Annual Cool Requirement: .SUPPLY RETURN Solar Access: PROPOSED DUCT SYSTEM.: Location GLAZING ORIENTATION PROPOSED South ft2 Southeast : East Northeast : PROPOSED Gas Furnace - carrier pav pav/ Vented crawlspace Attic or garage 80 % ° 61 %, 127 MBtu $ 700 Integrated Spot & Whole House 0.60 '34393 Btu /hr 8690 Btu /hr (25 %) 43082. Btu /hr • 64500 Btu /hr (150%) NONE 0.0 (Ducted) Btu /hr tons( @125 %) kWh /yr Partially Shaded Avg Rvalue R- 8.0 R- 8.0 Surface Area '593.6 ft2 118.7 ft2 PROPOSED North 235.0ft2 Northwest : West Southwest : HOUSE ID: LCH472 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA FEB 2 6 2002 PERMIT CENTER Economic and energy consumption estimates are designed for comparative purposes only. Actual cost for heating will vary depending on weather 1 conditions, occupant lifestyle and other factors. 02 Eff S Glz: 1.6% z _ . I— • w 0 U 0 N 0 co ILI W =. J f" w • a d ▪ w Z �_.. F- 0 Z � w w O N wW LL- O iu O = ~: z A NATT S.UN 5.5B FILE: C : \ \WATTSUN5 \ \LCH472.WS Site: Homeowner: Builder: The PROPOSED design *COMPLIES* with 1994 WA State Energy Code. COMPONENT PERFORMANCE ENERGY BUDGET REFERENCE DESIGN Component Floor Glazing @15% Doors AG Wall Ceiling, Attic Infiltration PROPOSED. DESIGN COMPONENTS. Component Floor Glazing @8% Doors AG Wall Ceiling Infiltration Struc Mass 1994 WA STATE ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE REPORT 4 REFERENCE 612 10.03 Analyst: Jurisdiction: Utility: House Type: Single Family Floor Area: 2968.ft2 ' Weather Data: Seattle, WA Climate Zone: 1 Description Value R19 vented Joist 16oc U -0.041 2g1 Wood /Vinyl <1 /2 ", Clr U -0.630 Metal 1 3/4 ", urethane flush +tb f! U -0.140 R19 STD Lap Wood U -0.062 R30 blown Attic STD baffled U- 0.036 Standard Air Sealing ACH -0.350 PROPOSED 459 Btu /hr -F 8.62 kWh /ft2 -yr. Reference Value X U -0.041 U -0.650 U -0.390 U -0.062 U -0.036 ACH -0.350 Reference UA 612 • Proposed UA Items in parentheses not included in COMPONENT PERFORMANCE totals. Page 1 HOUSE ID: LCH472 Area UA 1306 53.5 445.2 289.4 100.0 39.0 2958 183.4 1306 47.0 26712ft3( 171.1) X Area = UA 1306 235.0 100.0 3168 ; Light Frame, Sheetrock walls M- 3.000 2968 1306 47.0 26712ft3 (171.1) • 11/06/80 53.5 148.1 14.0 196.4 459 8904 Z Z 6 JU U w = J 1. W 0 .. LQ CO =a F- 11 Z = i- 0 Z I- 2 j O -. � H WW L I - .0 ..Z U =' 0 Z 1 NO MANUFACTURER FRAME MATERIAL MODEL# SIZE pFlWrieiHNIER AREA S.F. . 1. HEAT SOURCE: S' TOTAL GLAZING AREA g`• Residential Energy Code Form 1115 9/10/01 CITY OrTUKWILA / -<9 Permit Center 4L7 z- 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 WASHINGTON STATE ENERGY CODE RESIDENTIAL COMPLIANCE FORM PRESCRIPTIVE APPROACH WINDOW SCHEDULE GLAZING /SKYLIGHTS BY TYPE S.F. - TOTAL CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA Z . /2. (gas, oil, propane, heat pump, electric) 2. WINDOW SCHEDULE: Fill in the window schedule based upon the proposed residential design and calculate the glazing area as % of the conditioned floor area. 3. CHECK PRESCRIPTIVE OPTION: Glazing percentage will determine which option to ch, se. Mark option at top of column. (See back of this sheet) CITY OF TUKWILA TOTAL GLAZING AREA 44 5/z (add entire column) S.F. x 100 = : coPY PROPOSED GLAZING PERCENTAGE `1 a$ FEB 26 2002 H -15 The proposed glazing percentage must be less than or equal to the glazing percentage listed under the prescriptive option that is selected. Doaoso Address: EC Chapter 6;:Quali Form- one 1,. Other: fuels esid Prescriptive' (Chapter 6) Options for Heat Source: Other fuels Instructions: 1) Carefully review the requirements for each of the options below. Choose an option that best suits your dwelling design. Glazing percentage typically determines which option to choose. Your building must match the selected option requirements without exceptions or substitutions. 2) Check ✓ the 0 above the requirements of your option. Disregard components or equipment that do not apply to your project. Your permit will be processed more efficiently if you provide all of the requested information. Department staff can help you with general questions about this•form. • Can't Comply? If none of the Prescriptive (Chapter 6) options are acceptable, consider the Component Performance (Chapter 5) Approach. Note that the Component Performance requirements are no less stnngent than the Prescriptive requirements. Calculations may be performed with a 2000 WSEC Chapter 5 Residential Qualification Form, or by using an acceptable computer program•such as WATTSUN. CHECK One 1. HVA :.Glazing: e : ,: ,:: floor actor .Overfie:a'd' Glazing . actor Slabon:grade'' OPTION::: .OPTION ' OPTION ".OPTION. OPTION OPTION::::: OPTION OPTION'-: 1 1: : : . . ` III: IV .: V .. .VI2 VI1 VIII 0 Med 10% 0.70 0.68 R -30 R -30 R -15 \ R -15 R -10 R -19 R -10 0 Med 12% 0.65 0.68 R -30 R -30 R -15 R -15 R -10 R -19 R -10 0 High 21% 0.75 0.68 0.40 0.40 0.40 (R -2.5) (R -2.5) (R -2.5) R -30 R -30 R -19 R -19 R -10 R -19 R -10 Med 21% 0.65 0.68 0.40 (R -2.5) R -19 R -19 R -10 R -19 R -10 0 Low 21% 0.60 0.68 R -30 ' R -30 R -30 R -30 0.40 0.40 0,40 (R -2.5) (R -2.5) (R -2.5) R -19 R -19 R -10 R -19 R -10 0 Med 25% 0.45 0.68 R -38 R -30 R -19 R -19 R -10 R -25 R -10 0 Med 30 °,/0 0,40 0.68 R -30 R -30 R -19 R -19 R -10 R -25 R -10 0 Med unlimited .25 0.40 0.40 (R -2.5) R -30 R -30 R -19 R -19 R -10 R -25 R -10 Footnotes: 1. Nominal R- values are for wood frame assemblies only, or assemblies built in accordance with Sec. 601.1 2. The following options are applicable to buildings 2 stories or less: 0.50 MAX for glazing areas of 25% or less; 0.45 MAX for glazing areas of 30% or less. 3. Min. HVAC equipment requirements: 'Low' AFUE >_ 0.74. 'Med' AFUE >_ 0.78. 'High' AFUE ?..088. Heat Pumps: 'low' HSPF >_ 6.35; 'Med' HSPF >_ 6.8; 'High' HSPF >_ 7.7. Water & ground source heat pumps are 'med' and shall meet a minimum COP per WSEC Table 5 -7. 4 (Vertical + Overhead Glazing) conditioned floor area = maximum glazing percentage. Overhead glazing with a U- factor of .40 or less is exempt from glazing percentage calculations. 5. Glazing, skylight, and door U- factors may be weighted to meet the U- factor requirements. .::.:.:::.:....:;.: :............... 00;i: Re val ew EFor offcc�al :use onl e selected 'piton:: a s appropriate fa.r thi dwelling;. A pproved Revised 6/25101 oac Permit # Date: Wasnngton Slate Unwerscy Energy Program CC: : : :c0. coc bee 601 MMNVJY . . was.. i- vwrwa�- rxSYxrwq+M; ;nSS.ri::4"/1∎44. *1 .n.w....,, Project Name: _ • Address: Residential Building Permit Number: . 1. Prescriptive Option W.S.E.C. Chapter 6, (check building permit option used): ❑ 1. ❑ it ❑ ill. I/ Iv. ❑ v. ❑ vl. ❑ VII. ❑ ■lll. 2. House Square Footage (HSqFt) Z6/0 3. Heating System installed, (check system type below): ❑ a. Electric Resistance /21 BTU /h per sq. ft. ❑ b. Electric (forced air) /24 BTU /h per sq. ft. c. Other Fuel , heat pump) /27 BTU /h per sq. ft. 4. Equipment: _ a., Make c� � �Ccz' b. Model j" V 070 - /Z c. Size in BTU's 6¢ 600 } 5. Calculation/(HSqFt) • Z 6/Z- (see line 2 above) ' BTU /h X 2 7 (see line 3 a, b, or c above) ' 70 '5 BTU Equipment Maximum Size 7/9/96 47Z. ' CITY OF TUKWILA Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone; (206) 431 -3670 Prescriptive Heating System Sizing for Single Family Homes - New Construction Washington State Energy Code Chapter 9, Climate Zone 1 PERMIT APPLICATION #: Applicant's Signature: Date: i H -6 PERMIT NO. ` DATE: PROJECT NAME: 4 5 f ?X. Z, WASHINGTON STATE VENTILATION AND INDOOR AIR QUALITY CODE. Mechanical ventilation criteria using prescriptive methods for Group R Occupancies four stories and less. (Group R Occupancies: Hotels, apartment houses, congregate residences, dwellings and lodging houses.) Each dwelling unit or guest room shall be equipped with source specific and whole house ventilation systems. Source specific, exhaust fans are required in the following locations: bathrooms, laundries and kitchens. Minimum fan flow rating = 50 cfm @ 0.25 inches water gauge for bathrooms and laundries, and 100 cfm @ 0.25 inches water gauge for kitchen exhaust fans. I( Locate exhaust fans on plan(s) and note fan flow performance rating for each fan. 6 Exhaust ducts shall be equipped with back -draft dampers. Note this requirement on plans. 6. All exhaust ducts located in unconditioned spaces shall be insulated to a minimum of R -4. Note this requirement on plans. Whole house ventilation shall be provided by a system that meets the requirements of either: V.I.A.Q. Section 303:4.1 Section 303.4.2 Section 303.4.3 Section 303.4.4 Indicate on plans a proposed system to be used. , 3 ©3 , ¢ (Refer to attached code sections, select one, and list here: T.C. SIZE T.C. CUT HEIGHT 2X4 tXl. VVNLL 2X6 LOADING: SPACING: ROOF COMP HEIGHT SIZE TYPE 10 -00 -15 3031 ORDER DATE BID DATE DELIVERY DATE UVEKHMNU 11/17/00 LEP I JOB NO, PLAN NO. L -S 472 B L T.C. SIZE T.C. CUT HEIGHT 2X4 tXl. VVNLL 2X6 LOADING: SPACING: ROOF COMP HEIGHT SIZE TYPE No. MK TYPE SLOPE SPAN UVEKHMNU REMARKS LEP I HIGH 6 Quad2000 15- GE OSB SHEETS OF GABLE SHEATHING TRUSS DEPARTMENT SHEET NO.1 2 LONG CLASSIC HOMES 0 1624 PIONEER STREET D ENUMCLAW, WA 98022 o (360) 802 -1880 PHONE: (425) 488 -1818 FAX: (425) 398 -3559 s LONG CLASSIC x P TUKWILA, CONTACT: PHONE: (360) 678 -4022 PROJECT: FOSTER HEIGHTS BY: KRE DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS: SALES :WAYNE BRIGDEN Total Weight: 3909 „outtern•LE wallet OA Truss Height:10 -00 -15 SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: TRUSS QUOTE /ORDER QUOTE #: B0110100 INVOICE #: CUST: LONGCLAS PO NO. TERMS ACCEPTED BY BUYER NAME: DELIVERY Included SUB -TOTAL NO SALES TAX GRAND TOTAL $3,032.00 $3,032.00 CITY OF TUKWILA FEB 2 6 2002 PERMIT CENTER Bo - oSO long classic 472b drawing !Job 18011010D M u� M 0j1 LOADING (psf) TCLL 25.0 TCDL 7.0 BCLL 0.0 BCDL 5.0 Truss T02 -1 -6 -0 l t 1 -6 -0 3x4 = LUMBER TOP CHORD 2 X 4 HF No.2 BOT CHORD 2 X 4 HF No.2 WEBS 2 X 3 SPF Stud /Std LOAD CASES) Standard 1 rue jpe ROOF TRUSS IT •; 5 -3 -4 5 -3 -4 6.00 SPACING 2 -0 -0 Plates Increase 1.15 Lumber Increase 1.15 Rep Stress Incr YES Code UBC /ANSI95 10 -0 -0 10 -0 -0 10-0 -0 4 -8 -12 CSI TC 0.35 BC 0.82 WB 0.33 REACTIONS (Ib /size) 2= 834/0 -5 -8, 6= 834/0 -5 -8 Max Horz2= 42(load case 4) FORCES (Ib) - First Load Case Only TOP CHORD 1 -2 =21, 2 -3= -1104, 3-4= -784, 4 -5= -784, 5 -6= -1104, 6 -7 =21 BOT CHORD 2 -8 =974, 6 -8 =974 WEBS 3 -8= -310, 4 -8 =388, 5.8= -310 4x4 =_ 4 14 -8 -12 4 -8 -12 e n • us ries, nc. n ' ov 20 -0 -0 5 -3 -4 2x3 2x3 5 8 3x4 = 3x8 = 20 -0 -0 10 -0 -0 DEFL in floc) 1/deft Vert(LL) -0.27 2 -8 >877 Vert(TL) -0.41 2 -8 >574 Horz(TL) 0.03 6 n/a 1st LC LL Min I /defl = 240 NOTES 1) This truss has been checked for unbalanced loading conditions. 2) This truss has been designed for the wind loads generated by 80 mph winds at 25 ft above ground level, using 7.0 psf top chord dead load and 5.0 psf bottom chord dead load, 100 mi from hurricane oceanline, on an occupancy category 1, condition I enclosed building, of dimensions 60 ft by 38 ft with exposure B ASCE 7 -93 per UBC /ANSI95 If end verticals or cantilevers exist, they are exposed to wind. If porches exist, they are not exposed to wind. The lumber DOL increase is 1.33, and the plate grip increase Is 1.33 3) This truss has been designed for a 10.0 psf bottom chord Ilve Toad nonconcurrent with any other live loads per Table No. 16 -B, UBC -94. 4) This truss has been designed with ANSI /TPI 1 -1995 criteria. WARNING Verify design parameters and READ NOTES ON THIS AND COVER PAGE BEFORE USE. This design is based only upon the parameters shown, and is for an Individual building component to be installed and loaded in the plane of the truss. Applicability of design parameters and proper incorporation of component is the responsibility of the building designer. The bracing requirements shown are for lateral stability of individual truss members. The bracing design Is the responsibility of the building designer. Additional temporary bracing to insure stability during construction is the responsibility of the erector. For general guidance regarding fabrication, quality rnnlrnl cfnrana rialivani arorlinn anti hrarinn rnncellf fST-AR i]rralifv Stanrlarri fSR-AQ Rrarinn Snarlfiratlnn PLATES M20 Weight: 66 Ib GRIP BRACING TOP CHORD Sheathed or 5 -0 -13 oc purlins. • BOT CHORD Rigid ceiling directly applied or 10 -0 -0 oc bracing. r7 7j 185/144 EXPIRES 12/7/2001 001lu■ Luos (425) 488.1818 4 40w" low (425) 21 -6 -0 1 -6 -0 Scale = 1:42.8 Job 130110100 Woodinville Lumber, Woodinville, WA 98072 u7 LOADING (pst) TCLL 25.0 TCDL 7.0 BCLL 0.0 BCDL 5.0 Truss T03 -1 -6 -0 1-6-0 I ru. ,ape COMMON 5 -7 -0. 5 -7 -0 5 -7 -0 5 -7 -0 1 Plate Ottsets (X,Y): [6:0-4-9,0-2-81, [8:0-6-0,0-5-8j LUMBER TOP CHORD 2 X 4 HF No.2 BOT CHORD 2 X 8 DF 1950F 1.7E WEBS 2 X 4 SPF Stud /Std *Except* 4 -8 2 X 4 HF No.2, 3 -8 2 X 3 SPF Stud /Std 5 -8 2 X 3 SPF Stud /Std 10-0-0 4 -5.0 10-0-0 4 -5 -0 REACTIONS (lb /size) 2= 7258/0 -5 -8, 6= 7148/0 -5-8 Max Horz2= 66(ioad case 4) FORCES (Ib) - First Load Case Only TOP CHORD 1 -2 =25, 2- 3=- 11611, 3-4= -7994, 4- 5= -7994, 5-6= -11611 BOT CHORD 2 -9= 10386, 8 -9= 10386, 7 -8= 10386, 6 -7 =10386 WEBS 3 -9 =3261, 4 -8 =6867, 5 -7 =3261, 3- 8= -3783, 5-8= -3783 optional) i 4201 5R1 s Aug 24 2000 Mi ek'I ndustries, Inc. 1-ri Nov 10 1 b:30:39 1000 Page t' 4 LIty 1 4x6 11 2 14 -5 -0 4 -5 -0 14 -5 -0 4-5-0 NOTES 1) This truss has been checked for unbalanced loading conditions. 2) This truss has been designed for the wind loads generated by 80 mph winds at 25 ft above ground level, using 7.0 psf top chord dead Toad and 5.0 psf bottom chord dead load, 100 mi from hurricane oceanline, on an occupancy category 1, condition 1 enclosed building, of dimensions 60 ft by 38 ft with exposure B ASCE 7 -93 per UBC /ANSI95 If end verticals or cantilevers exist, they are exposed to wind. If porches exist, they are not exposed to wind. The lumber DOL increase is 1.33, and the plate grip increase Is 1.33 3) This truss has been designed for a 10.0 psf bottom chord live load nonconcurrent with any other live loads per Table No. 16 -B, UBC -94. 4) This truss has been designed with ANSI /TPI 1 -1995 criteria. 5) 2 -ply truss to be connected together with 0.131 "x3" Nails as follows: Top chords connected as follows: 2 X 4 - 1 row at 0-9-0 oc. Bottom chords connected as follows: 2 X 8 - 2 rows at 0 -7 -0 oc. Webs connected as follows: 2 X 3 - 1 row at 0 -9 -0 oc, 2 X 4 - 1 raw at 0.9 -0 oc. 6) Use USP MSH29 (With 10d nails into Girder & NA9D nails into Truss) or equivalent spaced at 4 -0 -0 oc max. starting at 2 -0 -0 from the left end to 18 -0 -0 to connect truss(es) T07 (1 ply 2 X 4 HF) to back face of bottom chord. 7) Use USP TH026 (With 16d nails into Girder & NA9D nails into Truss) or equivalent spaced at 4 -0 -0 oc max. starting at 6 -0 -0 from the left end to 14 -0 -0 to connect truss(es) T07 (1 ply 2 X 4 HF) to back face of bottom chord. 8) Fill all nail holes where hanger Is in contact with lumber. COAtAmAtl6Q8) pSOril l a rd WARNING Verify design parameters and READ NOTES ON THIS AND COVER PAGE BEFORE USE. This design is based only upon the parameters shown, and Is for an individual building component to be Installed and loaded in the plane of the truss. Applicability of design parameters and proper incorporation of component Is the responsibility of the building designer. The bracing requirements shown are for lateral stability of individual truss members, The bracing design is the responsibility of the building designer. Additional temporary bracing to insure stability during construction is the responsibility of the erector. For general guidance regarding fabrication, quality rnnlrni clnrono rfalivan ararfinn and hrarinn rnnsllll ()STAB °faiity Standard. 13S8-89 Braclna Soecificatlon. Ply JNU CLA85IL 20.0 -0 5 -7 -0 20 -0 -0 5-7-0 SPACING 2-0-0 Plates Increase 1.15 Lumber Increase 1.15 Rep Stress Incr NO Code UBC /ANSI95 CS% TC 0.90 BC 0.69 WB 0.98 DEFL In (ioc) I /deft Vert(LL) -0.22 8 -9 >999 Vert(TL) -0.32 8 -9 >730 Horz(TL) 0.07 6 n/a 1st LC LL Min I /defl = 240 O YES Weight: 205 Ib Scale = 1:41.6 GRIP BRACING TOP CHORD Sheathed or 2 -9 -10 oc purlins. BOT CHORD Rigid ceiling directly applied or 10 -0 -0 oc bracing. 185/144 L EXPIRES 12/7/2001 �Y1LLi< LtiA1f� (425) 488-1818 O� IOW 141 (425)-488.8773 Fax m(;it• Job , 80110100 truss T03 oo• nvi e um•er, II 00 . invi e, i ru. ( COMMON LOAD CASE(S) Standard 1) Regular: Lumber Increase =1.15, Plate Increase =1.15 Uniform Loads (plf) Vert: 2- 6=- 667.5, 1.4= -64,0, 4 -6= -64.0 s • ug Qty 1 PIy LON 3 LLPSSTC 2 TV n• •:I • 1 • ISO . •:• • r•. - WARNING- Verify design parameters and READ NOTES ON THIS AND COVER PAGE BEFORE USE. This design is based only upon the parameters shown, and Is for an Individual building component to be Installed and loaded In the plane of the truss, Applicability of design parameters and proper incorporation of component is the responsibility of the building designer. The bracing requirements shown are for lateral stability of individual truss members. The bracing design Is the responsibility of the building designer. Additional temporary bracing to Insure stability during construction is the responsibility of the erector. For general guidance regarding fabrication, quality o • tional) n • us ties, nc. n ov otV1w LWlf 4 (425) 488.1818 0� i4r (425)488.8773 Fax 1\ age z W J U. U O co UJ N W W O �-- g u_ w n "±" H =. z � O . z t✓ LU U � O C- CI I— W UJ.. 9 - - O W U - .. O f.. z 766 I l russ i ru:... I 80110100 i ITN COMMON Woodinville Lumber, Woodinville, WA 98072 4.201 51.11 s LOADING (psf) TCLL 25.0 TCDL 7.0 BOLL 0.0 BCDL 5.0 Continued on page 2 3 -10 -0 3 -10 -0 4 -8 -10 4 -8 -10 Hate Offsets (X,Y) (1:U- 4- U,0- 1 -1bj, (5:u- 4- U,U -1 -1b) LUMBER TOP CHORD 2 X 4 HF No.2 BOT CHORD 2 X 8 DF 1950F 1.7E WEBS 2 X 3 SPF Stud /Std 'Except* 3 -8 2 X 4 SPF Stud /Std, 3 -7 2 X 4 SPF Stud /Std REACTIONS (Ib /size) 1= 4587/0 - 5 - 8, 5= 4698/0 - - Max Horz1=- 53(load case 3) FORCES (Ib) - First Load Case Only TOP CHORD 1 -2= -6658, 2 -3= -6561, 3 -4= -6561, 4 -5= -6658, 5 -6 =25 BOT CHORD 1 -8 =5956, 7 -8 =4252, 5 -7 =5956 WEBS 2 -8= -182, 3 -8 =3273, 3 -7 =3273, 4 -7= -182 6 -6 -0 i 9 -2 -0 2 -8 -0 2 -8 -0 5x8 = 3 8 -3 -6 3 -6 -11 IUty 1 1 Ply 'LUNt; CLAS5IC 13 -0 -0 4-8 -10 13 -0 -0 3 -10 -0 14.6.0 1 1 -6 -0 Scale = 1:28.0 SPACING 2-0-0 Plates Increase 1.15 Lumber Increase 1.15 Rep Stress Incr NO Code UBC /ANSI95 CSI TC 0.22 BC 0.43 WB 0.99 DEFL In (too) 1 /deft Vert(LL) -0.09 7 -8 >999 Vert(TL) -0.13 7 -8 >999 Horz(TL) 0.02 5 n/a 1st LC LL Min 1 /defl = 240 WARNING Verify design parameters and READ NOTES ON THIS AND COVER PAGE BEFORE USE. This design is based only upon the parameters shown, and is for an individual building component to be Installed and loaded in the plane of the truss. Applicability of design parameters and proper incorporation of component is the responsibility of the building designer. The bracing requirements shown are for lateral stability of individual truss members. The bracing design Is the responsibility of the building designer. Additional temporary bracing to insure stability during construction is the responsibility of the erector. For general guidance regarding fabrication, quality PLATES M20 Weight: 131 Ib NOTES 1) This truss has been checked for unbalanced loading conditions. 2) This truss has been designed for the wind loads generated by 80 mph winds at 25 ft above ground level, using 7.0 psf top chord dead load and 5.0 psf bottom chord dead load, 100 mi from hurricane oceanline, an an occupancy category I, condition I enclosed building, of dimensions 60 ft by 38 ft with exposure B ASCE 7 -93 per UBC /ANSI95 If end verticals or cantilevers exist, they are exposed to wind. If porches exist, they are not exposed to wind. The lumber DOL increase is 1.33, and the plate grip increase is 1.33 3) This truss has been designed for a 10.0 psf bottom chord live load nonconcurrent with any other live loads per Table No. 16 -B, UBC -94. 4) This truss has been designed with ANSI /TPI 1 -1995 criteria. 5) 2 -ply truss to be connected together with 0.131 "x3" Nails as follows: Top chords connected as follows: 2 X 4 - 1 row at 0 -9 -0 oc. Bottom chords connected as follows: 2 X 8 - 2 rows at 0 -7 -0 oc. Webs connected as follows: 2 X 3 - 1 row at 0 -9 -0 oc, 2 X 4 - 1 row at 0 -9 -0 oc. 6) Use USP MSH29 (With 10d nails into Girder & NA9D nails into Truss) or equivalent spaced at 4 -0-0 oc max. starting at 3 -0 -0 from the left end to 11 -0 -0 to connect truss(es) T07 (1 ply 2 X 4 HF) to front face of bottom chord. 7) Fill all nail holes where hanger is in contact with lumber. LOAD CASE(S) Standard 1) Regular: Lumber Increase =1.15, Plate Increase =1.15 GRIP BRACING TOP CHORD Sheathed or 4 -7 -10 oc purlins. BOT CHORD Rigid ceiling directly applied or 10 -0 -0 oc bracing. 185/144 EXPIRES 12/7/2001 �VItl1 Ltllyt (425) 488.1818 �� ��► (425)488.877 !Job i .90110100 truss T05 i rus , p COMMON LOAD CASE(S) Standard Uniform Loads (pH) Vert: 1- 5=- 667.5, 1 -3= -64.0, 3- 6 = -64.0 Q ty 1 Ply WARNING- Verify design parameters and READ NOTES ON THIS AND COVER PAGE BEFORE USE. This design Is based only upon the parameters shown, and Is for an Individual building component to be installed and loaded in the plane of the truss. Applicability of design parameters and proper incorporation of component is the responsibility of the building designer. The bracing requirements shown are for lateral stability of individual truss members. The bracing design is the responsibility of the building designer. Additional temporary bracing to Insure stability during construction is the responsibility of,the erector. For general guidance regarding fabrication, quality ADOILLI• LWl (425) 488 -1818 *Ow 1111W (425)-488-8773 Fax Job Truss truss ,de Qty Hy ...Nc3 CLASSIC B0110100 T07 COMMON 15 1 (optional) rn T1 1 -6 -0 LOADING (psf) TCLL 25,0 TCDL 7.0 BCLL 0.0 BCDL 5.0 LOAD CASE(S) Standard 6 -4 -5 6 -4 -5 9 -3.4 9 -3 -4 12 -2 -2 5 -9 -14 ( 6.00 [TT LUMBER TOP CHORD 2 X 4 HF No.2 BOT CHORD 2 X 4 HF No.2 WEBS 2 X 3 SPF Stud /Std *Except* 5 -12 2 X 4 SPF Stud /Std, 6 -12 2 X 4 SPF Stud /Std 7 -12 2 X 4 SPF Stud /Std Z�1 JR 1 S ug t e n us nes, nc. n ov . : age 18-0-0 5-9-14 Plate Offsets (X, Y): (2:0 -4- 12,0 -1 -8], 110:0 -4- 12,0 -1 -81, 112:0- 4- 0,0 -3 -UJ 5x6 = 6 3x4 = 18-0-0 8 -8 -12 5x8 = 23 -9 -14 5-9-14 26 -8 -12 8 -8 -12 1 WARNING- Verify design parameters and READ NOTES ON THIS AND COVER PAGE BEFORE USE. This design Is based only upon the parameters shown, and Is for an individual building component to be Installed and loaded in the plane of the truss. Applicability of design parameters and proper incorporation of component is the responsibility of the building designer. The bracing requirements shown are for lateral stability of individual truss members. The bracing design is the responsibility of the building designer. Additional temporary bracing to insure stability during construction is the responsibility of the erector. For general guidance regarding fabrication, quality 29 -7 -11 5-9-14 3x4 = { SPACING 2 -0 -0 Plates Increase 1.15 Lumber Increase 1.15 Rep Stress Incr YES Code UBC /ANS195 CSI TC 0.62 BC 0.84 WB 0.55 DEFL in (loc) 1/deft Vert(LL) -0.26 12 -13 >999 Vert(TL) - 0.4412 -13 >978 Horz(TL) 0.12 10 n/a 1st LC LL Min I /deft = 240 REACTIONS (lb /size) 2= 1426/0 -5 -8, 10= 1315/0 -5-8 Max Horz2= 90(load case 4) FORCES (Ib) - First Load Case Only TOP CHORD 1 -2 =21, 2 -3= -2315, 3-4= -2053, 4 -5= -2053, 5 -6= -1445, 6 -7= -1445, 7 -8= -2053, 8 -9= -2053, 9 -10= -2315 BOT CHORD 2 -13 =2049, 12 -13 =1688, 11 -12 =1688, 10 -11 =2049 WEBS 3 -13= -309, 5 -13 =346, 5 -12= -574, 6 -12 =920, 7 -12= -574, 7 -11 =346, 9 -11= -309 NOTES 1) This truss has been checked for unbalanced loading conditions. 2) This truss has been designed for the wind loads generated by 80 mph winds at 25 ft above ground level, using 7.0 psf top chord dead load and 5.0 psf bottom chord dead Toad, 100 mi from hurricane oceanline, on an occupancy category I, condition I enclosed building, of dimensions 60 ft by 38 ft with exposure B ASCE 7 -93 per UBC /ANSI95 If end verticals or cantilevers exist, they are exposed to wind. If porches exist, they are not exposed to wind. The lumber DOL Increase is 1.33, and the plate grip increase is 1.33 3) This truss has been designed for a 10.0 psf bottom chord live load nonconcurrent with any other live Toads per Table No. 16 -B, UBC -94. 4) This truss has been designed with ANSI /TPI 1 -1995 criteria. 36 -0 -0 9 -3 -4 PLATES M20 36 -0 -0 6-4-5 Weight: 137 Ib Scale = 1:72.7 GRIP BRACING TOP CHORD Sheathed or 3 -1 -3 oc puriins. BOT CHORD Rigid ceiling directly applied or 10 -0 -0 oc bracing. WEBS 1 Brace at midpt 5 -12, 7 -12 tct 0 185/144 l EXPIRES 12/7/2001 V►v�� LUM0i4 (425) 488-1818 , loop, (425)-488-8773 Fax \� Job Truss LOADING (psf) TCLL 25.0 TCDL 7.0 B CLL 0.0 BCDL 5.0 -1 -6 -0 1 -6 -0 LUMBER TOP CHORD 2 X 4 HF No.2 BOT CHORD 2 X 4 HF No.2 WEBS 2 X 3 SPF Stud /Std LOAD CASE(S) Standard SPACING 2 - - Plates Increase 1.15 Lumber Increase 1.15 Rep Stress Incr YES Code UBC /ANSI95 6-6-0 6 -6 -0 6 -6 -0 6 -6 -0 REACTIONS (Ib /size) 2= 575/0 -5 -8, 4= 575/0 -5 -8 Max Horz2=- 29(Ioad case 3) Max Uplift2=- 12(load case 5), 4=- 12(load case 5) FORCES (Ib) - First Load Case Only TOP CHORD 1 -2 =21, 2 -3= -499, 3-4= -499, 4 -5 =21 BOT CHORD 2 -6 =442, 4 -6 =442 WEBS 3 -6 =63 4x4 = 3 2x3 II Qty 3 CSI TC 0.62 BC 0.34 WB 0.15 DEFL Vert(LL) -0. Vert(TL) -0. Horz(TL) 0. 1st LC LL Min in (loc) I/defl 04 2 -6 >999 07 2 -6 >999 01 4 n/a I /defl = 240 NOTES 1) This truss has been checked for unbalanced loading conditions. 2) This truss has been designed for the wind Toads generated by 80 mph winds at 25 ft above ground level, using 7.0 psf top chord dead load and 5.0 psf bottom chord dead load, 100 mi from hurricane oceanline, on an occupancy category 1, condition I enclosed building, of dimensions 60 ft by 38 ft with exposure B ASCE 7 -93 per UBC /ANSI95 If end verticals or cantilevers exist, they are exposed to wind. If porches exist, they are not exposed to wind. The lumber DOL increase is 1.33, and the plate grip increase is 1.33 3) This truss has been designed for a 10.0 psf bottom chord live load nonconcurrent with any other live loads per Table No. 16 -B, UBC -94. 4) Provide mechanical connection (by others) of truss to bearing plate capable of withstanding 12 Ib uplift at joint 2 and 12 Ib uplift at joint 4. 5) This truss has been designed with ANSI /TPI 1 -1995 criteria. WARNING Verify design parameters and READ NOTES ON THIS AND COVER PAGE BEFORE USE. This design Is based only upon the parameters shown, and is for an individual building component to be installed and loaded In the plane of the truss. Applicability of design parameters and proper incorporation of component is the responsibility of the building designer. The bracing requirements shown are for lateral stability of individual truss members. The bracing design is the responsibility of the building designer. Additional temporary bracing to insure stability during construction is the responsibility of the erector. For general guidance regarding fabrication, quality rnntrnl atnrann rdaiivan arnrtinn and hrarina. consult OST-88 Quality Standard, DSB -89 Braclno Specification, Ply JNG CLASSIC 13 -0 -0 6-6-0 13 -0 -0 6-6-0 PLATES M20 Weight: 39 Ib BRACING TOP CHORD Sheathed or 6 -0 -0 oc purlins. BOT CHORD Rigid ceiling directly applied or 10 -0 -0 oc bracing. 14 -6 -0 1-6-0 Scale = 1:29.2 GRIP 185/144 EXPIRES 12/7/2001 �VILLB LW1�� (425) 488-1818 1 41k (425)-488-8773 Fax T.C. SIZE 2 X 4 T.C. CUT HEIGHT 2x4 SIZE `L 2X6 LOADING: 25.0. 7.0.0.0.5.0 SPACING: 24.0 IN. O.C. (TYP.) TYPE COMP No. MK TYPE SLOPE SPAN UVbJHPN( REMARKS Lt1- 1 HIGH! PLAN NO. L -R COM BLK'D : SHEATHED BLK'D AREA 3 T02 6 20 -05 -08 18 18 COMMON 1/2 T03 6 20 -05 -08 0 18 GIRDER : SUPTS 28 -6 1 T04 6 25 -05 -08 18 18 GABLE: SHEATHED ONE SIDE 4 T05 6 25 -05 -08 18 18 COMMON : SUPER ANCHOR (1) TRUSS 1 T06 6 28 -06 -00 18 18 COM BLK'D 4 T07 6 28 -06 -00 18 18 COMMON : SUPER ANCHOR (1) TRUSS 10 TO7A 6 28 -06 -00 18 0 COMMON : SUPER ANCHOR (1) TRUSS 28 -06 -00 18 0 GABLE 20 -00 -00 18 18 GABLE: SHEATHED ONE SIDE 4 T10 6 20 -00 -00 18 18 COMMON 1 T/ OA �r 6 20 -00 -00 18 0 COMMON 4 T1 08 6 20 -00 -00 18 0 STUB- (R)00 -05 -08 COMMON : SUPER ANCHOR (1) TRUSS 2 T11 6 10 -00 -00 18 0 MONO 1 T12 6 13 -00 -00 18 18 GABLE 3 T13 6 13 -00 -00 18 18 COMMON 1 T13A 6 13 -00 -00 0 18 COMMON 15 Hangers JL28 NEW 08 -02 -07 2914 ORDER DATE BID DATE DELIVERY DATE 11/17/00 JOB NO. PLAN NO. L -R 472 A L TRUSS DEPARTMENT SHEET NO. LONG CLASSIC HOMES L 1624 PIONEER STREET ° ENUMCLAW, WA 98022 o (360) 802 -1880 PHONE: (425) 488 -1818 FAX: (425) 398 -3559 s LONG CLASSIC P Z TUKWILA, CONTACT: PHONE: (360) 678 -4022 PROJECT: FOSTER HEIGHTS BY: DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS: nno,ar. -1+qr o vignilLE Iv r A te: SALES:WAYNE BRIGDEN hhtiRri ^N'- ^fiv.ev4reV.+W.Y.i ": t NfV N1'.YRT'w...J..u•,r.n•.xfar. -: a,I x... »... t.» uv.+a.A'war "r r�. .. SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONb: PO NO. TERMS TRUSS QUOTE /ORDER QUOTE #: B0110099 INVOICE #: CUST: LONGCLAS LONG CLASSIC HOMES RESIDENTIAL PROJECT Plan No. 472 November 29, 2000 Job No.: 00 -08 Location: Lo —16, Foster Heights ilia, Washington Copyright 2000, SEGA Engineers STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR THE PILE COPY CITY OF FEB 2 6 2002 PERMIT CENTER bO ?OSO SEGA Engineers /Structural & Civil Consulting Engineers 22928 SE 312 ST (360) 886 -1017 Black Diamond, WA 98010 SCOPE OF WORK S EGA Engineers was asked to provide a lateral loads analysis, shear wall design, review of major framing members, and drawing red -lines for a two story wood framed single family residence. The roof framing is primarily manufactured trusses, the floor framing is wood Hoists, and the foundation is typical concrete strip footings with a crawl space. The use of these calculations is limited to a single subdivision referenced on the cover sheet. The cover sheet should have an original signature in blue ink over the seal. Please contact SEGA Engineers for use at other sites. SEGA Engineers will use that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by members of the engineering profession in this local. No other warranty, either expressed or implied is made in connection with our rending of professional services. For any dispute, claim, or action arising out of this design, SEGA Engineers shall have liability limited to the amount of the total fee received by SEGA Engineers. Questions regarding the attached should be addressed to SEGA Engineers. Greg Thesenvitz, PE SEGA Engineers SEGA Engineers / -m /Structural & Civil Consulting Engineers 22928 SE 312 ST (360) 886 -1017 Black Diamond, WA 98010 LOADS ROOF WALLS DL Roofing (Comp) 3.5 psf 1 /2' OSB 1.8 2x @24" 3.5 Insulation 1.1 5/8" GWB 2.8 Misc. 1.5 14.2 psf LL Snow 25 psf (115% Load Duration) Reduction, Rs -0.82 psf 6/12 pitch = 27 deg DL Flooring 0.5 psf 3 / 4 " Plywood 2.3 11 TJI @ 16" oc 2.8 5 / 8 " GWB 2.8 Misc. 1.5 9.9 psf LL DECKS DL 2 x Decking 4.3 psf 2x10 @16 "oc 2.8 Misc 1.5 8.6 LL DL Siding 1 /2' Plywood 2x6 @16 "oc Insul '/2' GWB Copyright 2000, SEGA Engineers • Residential 40 psf Residential 40 psf Project )H #472 Job No. 00 -082 By: GAT Checked Date: 11 /28/00 Sht 1 of Total Roof Load 38.4 psf Total Floor Load 49.9 psf Total Deck Load 48.6 psf 3.0 1.5 psf 1.7 0.6 2.2 9.0 psf z Ix 2 6 J U 0 O. CO w co Li _ w o 5 u- ¢ D. = a = z � ►= z F- 0 h- tu • =U ai z H- X: O ~: z SEGA Engineers / Structural & Civil Consulting Engineers 22928 SE 312th ST • Black Diamond, Washington 98010 (360) 886 -1017 • Fax (360) 886 -1016 CHECKED BY Copyright 2000, SEGA Engineers PROJECT framing upper floor beam and garage laundry beam calculations SEGA Engineers / ,- Th , /Structural & Civil Consulting Engineers 22928 SE 312 ST (360) 886 -1017 Black Diamond, WA 98010 LATERAL LOADS Project '7#472 Job No. 00 -081 By: GAT Checked Date: 11/28/00 Sht. SEISMIC . Sect. 1630 z Maximum Base Shear, V = 2.5 C I W Eq. 30 -5 11-: R ~ w tY where, Ca = 0,36 Zone 3, So, Table 16 -Q v O 1= 1 Table 16 -K u) ILI R = 5.5 Table 16 -N � H W = Seismic Weight N v_ For W: . w O Wroor (40ft) (43ft) (16psf)+ (2) (40ft+ 43ft) (4.Oft) (9psf) = 33 kips g 5 Wfloor (40ft) (41 ft) (14psf)+ (2) (40ft+ 41 ft) (8.Oft) (9psf) = 35 kips u) W total = 68 kips H w Design Base Shear , V = ( .164) (68 kip) = 11.1 kip ? E = ( 1.00) (11 kip) = 8.0 kip Eq. 30 -1, Sect. 1630.1.1 w O 1.4 2 D WIND 0 ( . Design Wind Pressure, p = C C qs I Eq. 20 -1, Sect. 1620 o t✓ wW where, _ C. = 0.62 0 - 15 ft Exposure B Table 16 -G �!- O =0.67 20ft alN =0.72' 25ft �� O z Cq = 1.3 Method 2 qs = 16.4 psf 80 mph I= 1 Po -15 = ( 0.62) (1.3) (16.4 psf) (1) = 13.22 psf P20 = ( 0.67) (1.3) (16.4 psf) (1) = 14.28 psf P25 = ( 0.72) (1.3) (16.4 psf) (1) = 15.35 psf Design Base Shear: (Wind) Vrro (40ft) (10ft) (13.2psf) + (40ft) (5ft) (14.3psf) + (40ft) (5ft) (15.4psf) Therefore, • Table 16 -H Figure 16 -1 = 11.2 kips V (48ft) (10ft) (13.2psf) + •(38ft) (5ft) (14.3psf) • + (14 ft) (5ft) (15.4 psf) =10.1 kips Wind Loads Govern for Lateral Design - Each Way Copyright 2000, SEGA Engineers SEGA Engineers / PROJECT / Structural & Civil Consulting Engineers JOB NO. Oc.9— Pm FIGURED BY 22928 SE 312th ST • Black Diamond, Washington 98010 (360) 886-1017 • Fax (360) 886-1016 CHECKED BY DATd SHEET 4--OF shear wall design shear wall . SEGA Engineers / / Structural & Civil Consulting Engineers 22928 SE 312th ST • Black Diamond, Washington 98010 (360) 886-1017 • Fax (360) 886-1016 Copyright 2000, SEGA Engineers FIGURED BY , DATE / (OF shear wall design SEGA Engineers / PROJECT tc J .] 4 / Structural & Civil Consulting Engineers JOB NO. 00 . 0 01 22928 SE 312th ST • Black Diamond, Washington 98010 (360) 886-1017 • Fax (360) 886-1016 CHECKED BY Copyright 2000, SEGA Engineers FIGURED BY 64T shear wall design SEGA Engineers / / Structural & Civil Consulting Engineers 22928 SE 312th ST • Black Diamond, Washington 98010 (360) 886-1017 • Fax (360) 886-1016 Copyright 2000, SEGA Engineers PROJECT L FIGURED BY '647 JOB NO, ao... eve, CHECKED BY DATE/V/ Sl OF shear wall design roof frame ,SEGA Engineers PROJECT / Structural & Civil Consulting Engineers 22928 SE 312th ST • Black Diamond, Washington 98010 (360) 886 -1017 • Fax (360) 886 -1016 khlu- Copyright 2000, SEGA Engineers JOB NO. 0 0 ,. n s ) FIGURED BY 4T CHECKED BY DATE I/t WA D SHEET . OF g shear wall plan Mark Minimum Sheathing (1) Sheathing Nailing (1) Sole Plate Nailing Anchor Bolts (3) Remarks Min. 3 /8 " T1 -11 or OSB 1 /2' OSB or CDX 1 /2' OSB or CDX 6d 6" o.c. @ 8d @ 4" o.c. 8d @ 3" o.c. 16d 8 "o.c. @ N/A N/A 5 /8 " @ 60 O.C. 5 /8 " @ 32" o.c. 5 /8 " @ 19.2" O.C. Qall = 195 plf • Qall = 350 plf Qall = 450 plf Use 3x studs at 3x studs at abutting panel edges and stagger nails SHEAR WALL SCHEDULE Notes: 1) All walls designated " are shear walls. Exterior walls shall be sheathed with rated sheathing (24/0, OSB or CDX) and nailed at all panel edges (Blocked) per schedule (uno). Nailing at intermediate framing to be at 12" oc. Nailing not called out shall be per UBC Table 23- II -B -1. 2) Holdowns and other framing hardware by Simpson or equal to be used per plan. Ends of shear walls shall use double studs minimum (UNO). 3) Use minimum of (2) bolts per sill piece with one bolt located not more than 12" nor less than 5" from each end of the piece. Embed bolts a minimum of 7" into concrete. Washers to be minimum 2" x 2" x 3 /16". 4) See NER -272 for alterante nailing / staples. I SFint.by: Earth Consultants s January 11, 2002 Dear Ms. Spencer: 425 746 0860; City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 South Center Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Subject: Geotechnical Review — Lot 8 Proposed Foster Heights Subdivision Residences South 14.6' Street and 51" Avenue South King County, Washington Attention: Ms. Joanna Spencer, Development Engineer Reference: Geospectrum Consultants, Inc. Geotechnical Evaluation Foster Heights Plat Development Tukwila, Washington Drawing FH -8 Site, Utility, and Drainage Plan Foster Heights, Lot 8 FILE COPY_ 01/11/02 3:41PM;Jetfax #610;Page 14/17 rte" Earth Consultants Inc. t ;ern�i • IbIC�11I:I�uII%I ,C k•uIt; INItil4Ijviti let i iI t11.111isIs In accordance with your request, Earth Consultants, Inc. (ECI) has reviewed the referenced geotechnical engineering study and drainage plan for Lot 8. At the request of Long Classic Homes, ECI has assumed the role of geotechnical engineer of record for the project. Based on our review, ECI is in agreement with the geotechnical and drainage recommendations for Lot 8. 1805.136th Place N.E., SL,le 201, Bellevue, Washington 98005 Bellevue (425) 643.3780 FAX (425) 746 -0860 Toll Free (888) 739 -6670 RECEIVED 6'52 FEB 2 6 2002 PERMIT CENTER k Sint by: Earth Consultants City of Tukwila January 11, 2002 We trust this information meets the geotechnical plan review requirements for Lot 8. If additional information is required, please call. Respectfully submitted, EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. Raymond A. Coglas, P.E. Project Manager RAC /jme 425 746 0860; 01/11/02 3:42PM;JetFax #610;Page 15/17 cc: Long Classic Homes Attention: Mr. Doug Pulley IFXP!RES /2cli ' L J Earth Concultonto, Inc. 02. E -9920 Page 2 G e o 7`'ec/ ,i - , ica.I Er? grir - 1 /-*/ ? g' and Ear7 Scie February 10, 1998 Mr. Richard Schroeder Happy Valley Land Company P.O. Box 1324 Issaquah, WA 98027 Subject: GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Proposed 16 -Lot Foster Heights Plat Development South 146th Street & 51st Avenue South Tukwila, Washington Project No. 98- 103 -01 Dear Dick, This report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation performed on the site of the proposed Foster Heights residential development. The purpose of the investigation was to provide geotechnical engineering evaluations of the site conditions and geotechnical recommendations for site grading including optimum timing of site grading and general recommendations for site development. A preliminary plat map prepared by Baima & Holmberg, Inc. dated 9/12/97 was provided to us and used as a reference for our site explorations and our evaluations and recommendations. Based on the referenced plat map shown in Figure 2, the proposed plat includes 16 lots within the subject property. Access to lots 1 -14 will be provided by new cul- de -sac streets (Road A and Road B) which will join South 146th Street at the southwest corner of the property. from 240th. Lots 15 and 16 will be accessed directly from 51st Avenue South. Although no site •grading exists at this time is expected that cuts and fills of only about 5 to 10 feet will be required for street construction. Development of the single family residence lots is expected to be one or two story wood frame homes. Foundation load information is not available at this time but for the purpose of our evaluation bearing wall loads for the residence structures are assumed to be on the order of 1 to 2 klf. If actual structural loads exceed the above values by more than 25 %, this office should be notified P.O.Box 276, Issaquah, WA 98027 -0276 . Phone: (206) 391 -4228 Fax: (206) 391 -42 Happy Valley Land Co. 4 SCOPE OF WORK Project No. 98- 103 -01 �1+�;: L'::Jr�. �'i'�:• : _ - va' . 'iq February 10, 1998 Our geotechnical evaluation included subsurface exploration, engineering evaluations and the preparation of this report. The scope of work included the following specific tasks: o Reviewed published geologic mapping of the site vicinity. o Performed a reconnaissance of the site to observed surface conditions. o Observed the excavation of 5 test pits to depths ranging from 4 to 6 feet below the ground and excavated one hand -auger test pit on Lot 16. Approximate locations of the test pits are shown on Figure 2. o Continuously logged the subsurface conditions, as encountered in the test pits at the time of excavation. Logs of the test pits are presented on the summary sheets of Appendix A. o Performed geotechnical engineering evaluations of the site and developed geotechnical recommendations for site grading and general site development. o Prepared this geotechnical report summarizing our findings and recommendations. OBSERVED SITE CONDITIONS At the time of our field investigation the property was undeveloped except for the existing residence and out - buildings on Tots 5, 15 and 16 as shown on Figure 2. Vegetation on the site consisted primarily of blackberries with grass and scattered fruit trees and maple trees that ranged up to 3 + feet in diameter. Topography in the general site vicinity is gently to moderately sloped down to the east. The referenced topography map provided to - us indicates the maximum elevation difference across the site to be on the order of about 90 feet. Most of the site is gently sloped with gradients ranging from about 7 to 22 percent based on the topography map. Steeper slopes exist on the eastern half of Lots 15 and 16 where gradients of about 40 to 50 percent exist. Subsoils Our evaluation of the subsurface conditions was based on our observations of the exploratory test pits and surface observations. Subsoils encountered in the test pits were generally found to be natural glacial till soils with localized areas of fill soils. We noted apparent shallow fill deposits in the graded area of Lots 5, 15 and 16. The natural soils generally included a layer of dark brown topsoil with organics and roots which typically ranged from about 6 to 12 inches thick. The underlying weathered natural soils were typically brown to gray brown or gray and red -brown sandy silt or silty fine sand with gravel. The weathered soils were generally soft or loose to depths of about 2 to 3 feet below the natural surface based on the test pits Page 2 !xon.; 19Ltv1:41 14tPtoss'-c„..._ z w re 6 00 w I � W ? • a = w H- _ z � I- o z � w • w U o 0 I- w w L I o z w U= o ~ z Happy Valley Land Co. February 10, .1998 and surface probing. Deeper natural soils were firm to very stiff /hard and medium dense to very dense to the depths of the test pits. Fill soils were encountered in Test Pit 6 to a depth of about 3 feet. The fill soils were very soft/loose and wet sandy silt/silty fine sand. Surface topography of Lots 5, 15 and 16 indicates other probable fill deposits in the graded areas around the existing house (see Figure 2). Ground Water We observed that the surface soils were generally very moist over most of the site and some areas were especially wet or had surface drainage or seeps as indicated on Figure 2. The site soils were generally classified as very moist to wet and measured moisture contents were generally high, ranging from about 17:1 to 40.6 percent. Most of the soils had moisture contents between about 20 to 30 percent. Seepage was typically observed at the base of the upper weathered soils in Test Pits 1 through 5. Ground water was observed to rise to about 9 inches below the fill surface in the hand - augered Test Pit 6 east of the existing house on Lot 16. . ubsurface Variations Based on our experience, it is our opinion that some variation in the continuity and depth of subsoil deposits and ground water levels should be anticipated due to natural deposition variations and previous onsite structures and grading. Due to seasonal moisture changes, ground water conditions should be expected to change with time. Care should be exercised when interpolating or extrapolating subsurface soils and ground water conditions between or beyond our test pits. General The referenced geologic map of Figure 1 indicates the site to expose glacial till (Qt) soils. The referenced map describes the Qt soils as intimately graded mixture of clay to gravel sized soils. The glacial till was deposited during the advance of the Vashon glaciation, the last glacial advance into the Puget Sound area, approximately 13,000 to 16,000 years ago. Based on our explorations the site soils are sandy silt and silty very fine sand glacial till soils which are typically weathered, soft/loose and very moist to wet in the upper 2 to 3 feet becoming very stiff to hard below those depths. Fill soils were observed in the vicinity of lots 5, 15 and 16. The upper weathered site soils and fill are not considered suitable for direct support of pavements or foundations, however, in our opinion the site can be developed as planned provided that our recommendations are followed. Project No. 98- 103 -01 SITE EVALUATIONS Page 3 z ~ w a L O 0 CO CO la -i _ w 2 uQ c o = a I- La ? _ Zo w W U � 0 - O F- wW I- • U IL w z U = o z Happy Valley Lanu moo. February 10,,1998 Site Stability The referenced geologic map of Figure 1 does not indicate any known landslides in the site vicinity. Our observations of the existing site revealed no indications of recent or current instability. In our opinion the unweathered glacial soils which underlie the site are generally stable with regard to gross stability. There is always risk involved with construction on or near a slope and the lot owners must be willing to accept the risk of future instability which may result in damage to their property or neighboring property. In general slope failures are most likely to be shallow failures occurring during the winter and spring months due to increased soil moisture conditions and during earthquake shaking due to additional dynamic loads on the slope. In our opinion the risk of damage due to instability on Lots 1-4 and 6 -14 is low. The risk of instability damage on Lots 5, 15 and 16 is considered moderate to high due to the wet conditions, the steeper slopes and existing fill, In addition the risk of shallow failures of the very steep road cut along 51st Avenue South is considered high. Risk of slope failure can be reduced by incorporating proper engineering design and providing and maintaining control of surface runoff and subsurface drainage. 5jte Grading Considerations Currently no street grading plan or street profiles exist, however we expect that cut/fill depths should be on the order of about 10 feet or less. We expect that the grades for Roads A and B will primarily be within the upper weathered soils which will not be suitable for direct subgrade support. The soft/loose weathered soils should be excavated from the street subgrade areas to expose stiff /hard soils and structural fill placed to the final street subgrade. Based on our experience the onsite soils will be quite moisture sensitive with regard to grading and compaction characteristics and the measured moisture contents indicate that the onsite soils are currently too wet to obtain adequate compaction. in our experience the onsite soils will be very difficult to compact unless they are dried out sufficiently. Site grading should be scheduled during warm, low humidity weather typically occurring in the late summer months to reduce the potential problems associated with wet soils and ground water seepage. Unless the onsite soils can be dried to near optimum moisture content, site grading will require the use of imported granular fill soils for proper compaction. In addition the onsite soils are not considered suitable for backfill within the drainage zone of basement walls or other retaining walls. Residential Foundations Existing soft loose, organic and fill soils are not considered suitable for foundation support. Foundations should penetrate through the upper unsuitable soils to bear in very stiff /hard natural soils. In our opinion conventional spread footings founded on the very stiff /hard natural soils should provide good support for the residence structures. Where grading is performed to level specific lots for development, all fill should be placed and compacted as structural fill. Project No. 98- 103 -01 IYM!YNA�.Vi+M.Y�rKA CM ySRiN xre'+`+A�n+n�rr*m•*nu.v✓«•�w. -a •ax. a �Irr �.�r rs�' aiYM1OAi:t �4�0.' h1fiYYJY ^�'w1�"5'k'•"""•:•ti'r.�Y.. Page 4 �.MY•^.4�'� : :7iRi":n:7;j".m : r'IV+t. R :r z w CC 2 00 w = al u. ? c o =w z � o z � uj o -- o � wW u- C5 w z 0 U H= o ~ z r Project No. 98- 103 -01 rY :+e�armq.�w.•.n+t�k�l� Happy Valley Land Co. February 10, .1998 The following subsections present our geotechnical recommendations for site grading,. street subgrade preparation, residential foundations and retaining walls. Also included are recommendations for site drainage, erosion control, plan review and observations and testing during construction. z z 1-z Site Grading 6 w =. U Site grading is expected to consist primarily of excavation and fill placement to o o prepare the access roads subgrade, create building pads and backfill utility w c trenches and possibly retaining walls. Stripping depth required in areas with no l- e xisting fill is expected to be about 2 to 3 feet. Excavation of the on -site glacial till w materials is expected to be difficult at depths greater than about 5 or 6 feet. Onsite w o soils are not generally considered suitable for use in compacted fills because in our experience these soils are quite moisture sensitive with regard to trafficability and compaction characteristics and are currently too wet for adequate compaction. If N d grading is scheduled for the late summer months moisture conditions of the onsite 1 w soils may be more suitable for compaction. Site grading will likely require the use z x of imported granular fill soils for proper compaction and drainage. z o LIJ Onsite soils are not considered suitable for backfill against retaining walls because w they will not be adequately free- draining. Retaining wall backfill will require clean w o C sand /gravel soils. oi-- w Recommendations for site preparation, temporary excavations, structural fill, x o permanent slopes and street subgrade preparation are presented below. w o z Ili Site Preparation: Existing vegetation, debris, and soft or loose soils and existing fill o N should be stripped from the areas that are to be graded. During rough grading, o I excess soils may be stockpiled for later use. Soils containing more than 1% by z weight of organics may be used in planter areas, but should not be used for fill beneath building or pavement areas. Stumps, debris and trash, plus rocks and rubble over 6 inches in size, should be removed from the grading areas. Subsoil conditions on the site may vary from those encountered in the test pits. Therefore, the soils engineer should observe the prepared areas prior to placement of any new fills. Temporary Excavations: Sloped temporary construction excavations may be used where planned excavation limits will..not undermine structures or interfere with other construction. Where there is not enough room for sloped excavations, shoring should be provided. Contractors should note that excavation of the unweathered glacial till may be very difficult with conventional backhoe equipment. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered in our test pits, it is our opinion that sloped temporary excavations may be made vertically to depths less than 4 feet. Deeper temporary excavations up to 10 feet should be made at slope gradients no steeper than 1: 1 (horizontal :vertical) for the loose to medium dense soils and 3/4 : 1 (horizontal :vertical) for the glacial till soils, however it should be noted that the contractor is responsible for safety and maintenance of construction slopes. RECOMMENDATIONS Page 5 Happy Valley Land Co. February 10, 1998 Surface drainage should be directed away from the top edge of cut slopes. Surcharge loads should not be allowed within 5 feet of the top of cut slopes or within a 1 :1 (horizontal : vertical) plane extending up from the toe of excavation, whichever is greater. S .tructural Fill: Provided that soil moisture can be reduced and maintained near optimum, excavated onsite soils may be used for structural fill. However these soils are expected to be moisture sensitive and are currently too wet for practical compaction. Therefore imported granular fill soils should be used if moisture conditions cannot be adequately controlled. Loose soils, formwork and debris should be removed prior to placing fill or backfill. Imported free - draining granular soils should be used for backfill of retaining walls, and should be capped with pavement or 12 inches of onsite silty soils to reduce surface water infiltration. Onsite soils or imported granular fill should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding 8 inches in loose thickness and compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by the ASTM D1557 -91 test method, imported granular fill should consist of clean, well - graded sand and gravel materials free of organic debris and other deleterious material. Imported material for wall drainage zone backfill should be a clean sand /gravel mixture with less than 5 percent fines based on the sand fraction. Fill Slopes: All permanent fill slopes should be constructed of properly placed and compacted structural fill with gradients no steeper than 2:1 (h:v). All existing fill, vegetation, debris, and loose /medium dense soils should be removed from proposed fill slope areas prior to fill placement (see "Site Preparation "). Where underlying natural slope gradients are 20% or more, fill slopes should be keyed and benched into undisturbed dense natural soils. Key width should be at least 8 feet or 1/3 the slope height whichever is greater. Key depth should penetrate at least 2 feet into undisturbed dense natural soils. All fill should be placed and compacted in accordance with the recommendations for "Structural Fill ". Cut Slopes: All permanent cut slopes should be made no steeper than 2:1 (h:v). Existing trees located within 10 feet of the top of the cut slope should be cut but stumps should be left intact. Utility Trenches: Buried utility conduits should be bedded and backfilled around the conduit in accordance with the project specifications. Where conduit crosses pavement subgrade areas the backfill above the pipe should be placed and compacted in accordance with the recommendations for structural fill. Strut Subgrade Preparation The street pavement section (base course and A.C. paving) should be supported on a subgrade compacted to at least 95 percent of the ASTM D1557 maximum dry density. Subgrade preparation should include stripping of existing vegetation, topsoils and soft/loose weathered soils in accordance with the "Site Preparation" recommendations. Where unsuitable soils exist at subgrade level, subgrade preparation should include over - excavation down to expose stiff to very stiff /hard natural soils'and placement of structural fill to final subgrade elevation. Subgrade fill should be placed in accordance with the recommendations for structural fill except that the top 6 inches Project No. 98- 103 -01 Page 6 �auNY:��np u. s ..:•. . . .) "NYYI uw' �ra. Y., 4+ wrnk��.,. 1�. �: w4�t .M...{....4:.v..aSl.��c.M1+i • Happy Valley Land Co. February 10, 1998 of the subgrade fill should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the ASTM D1557- 91 maximum dry density. Residential Spread Faotin9 Foundations Conventional spread footings founded on undisturbed very stiff /hard natural soils should provide good support for residential structures within the proposed plat. AU footings should be founded at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent final grade and should be deepened as required to penetrate existing soft/loose natural soils and fill to bear on very stiff /hard natural soils. In addition, square footings and continuous footings running parallel to the slope should be deepened as required to provide a set back at least 12 feet horizontally from the face of the slope. Footings should also be setback beyond a 1:1 (h:v) projection from adjacent lower footings. All footings should be stepped as necessary to maintain a horizontal bearing surface. Suitable•very stiff /hard bearing soils are expected to be at depths of about 2 to 3 feet below the natural surface. The depth to bearing soils may be increased due to existing fill overlying the natural surface. As an alternative to deep spread footings to penetrate soft/loose soils or fill and /or satisfy slope setback requirements, foundation loads may be transferred from the recommended minimum foundation depths to the recommended bearing soils by a monolith of lean concrete having a minimum compressive strength of 1000 psi. The width of an unreinforced lean concrete monolith should be at least as wide as the footing or at least one -half of the monolith height, whichever is greater. Reinforced monoliths should be designed by structural engineer. A suitable width trench should be excavated with a smooth edged excavator (no teeth) to expose the dense /very dense bearing soils under observation by our office and backfilled as soon as possible with the lean concrete to the footing elevation. Square footings should be at least 24 inches wide and continuous wall footings should be at least 16 inches wide for two story structures. Continuous footings for garages or other light structures with loads less than 1 kip /ft may be reduced to a minimum width of 12 inches. Footings may be designed based on an allowable bearing pressure of 2000 psf. Settlement of light wood -frame structures is expected to be within tolerable limits for this type of construction. For example, the estimated settlement of a 16 inch wide continuous footing founded on very. /hard natural soils and carrying a load of 2 kips /ft. is on the order of 1/2 inch. Settlements are expected to occur primarily during construction. For lateral design, resistance to lateral loads can be assumed to be provided by friction acting at the base of foundations and by passive earth pressure. A coefficient of friction of 0.35 may be assumed with the dead load forces in contact with onsite soils or structural fill. An allowable static passive earth pressure of 250 psf per foot of depth may be used for the sides of footings poured against undisturbed natural soils or properly compacted structural fill. The bearing values indicated above are for the total dead load plus frequently applied live loads. If normal code requirements are applied for design, the vertical bearing values may be increased by 50% for short durations of loading which Will Project No. 98- 103 -01 . agsfsxevtoam",tyzf=wa== »nyo rr r •tt v r. nnnrMwxtR Page 7 z w WV O 0 CO 0 W 1- U) u_ u o uQ = a � z = � w ~ • w U o - 1 — wW o I— LL. w z o 2 0 z Project No. 98- 103-01 Happy Valley Land Co. February 10, 1.998 include the effects of wind or seismic forces. Allowable lateral passive pressures may be increased by 33% for wind and seismic forces. Retaining Walls Cantilevered retaining walls as referred to in this report are walls which yield or move outward during and after backfilling. Actual wall movements will depend on the wall design and method of backfilling and can range from 0.1% to 0.3% of the wall height. Design pressures for cantilevered walls given below assume that the top of the wall will deflect at least 0.2% of the wall height. Static design of permanent cantilevered retaining walls which support a horizontal surface of properly compacted clean free - draining granular material may be based on an equivalent fluid density of 35 pcf. This pressure assumes that there is no water pressure behind the wall. A uniform lateral pressure due to backfill surcharge should be computed using a coefficient of 0.25 times the uniform vertical surcharge load. Static design of walls structurally braced against movement should be based on an equivalent fluid density of 60 pcf. This pressure assumes that the wall supports a horizontal backfill of properly compacted free - draining (imported) granular material and that there is no water pressure behind the wall. Uniform lateral pressure due to a uniform vertical surcharge behind a braced wall should be computed using a coefficient of 0.45 times the uniform vertical surcharge load. Seismic design of retaining walls should include a dynamic soil loading based on a 0.24g 475 -year UBC recurrence ground motion level. Dynamic soil pressure should be assumed to have an inverted triangular distribution. The dynamic soil pressure at the top of the wall should be at least 20H (psf) where H is the height of the wall above the footing base. The dynamic soil pressure should diminish linearly to zero at the base of the wall. Combined static plus dynamic soil pressure should be used for seismic design of the walls. Care should be exercised in compacting backfill against retaining walls. Heavy equipment should not approach retaining walls close enough to intrude within a 1:1 line drawn upward from the bottom of the wall. Backfill close to walls should be placed and compacted with hand - operated equipment. Recommendations for placement and compaction of structural fill are presented under "Site Grading ". Design wall pressures given above assume no water pressure behind the walls. We recommend that a drainage zone be provided behind all retaining walls and a adequate drain system be provided at the base of all retaining walls. As a minimum, the •drainage zone horizontal dimension should be 3 feet or 1/2 the wall height, whichever is less. Backfill within the drainage zone should be a clean sand /gravel mixture with less than 5 percent fines based on the sand fraction. A membrane of Mirafi 140 filter fabric or equivalent should be provided between the drainage zone material and onsite silty soil backfill. Wall drains should consist of a four -inch diameter perforated PVC drain pipe placed in at least one cubic foot of drain gravel per lineal foot along the base of the wall. Drain gravel should be washed material with particle sizes in the range of 3/4 to 1-1/2 inches. The drainage zone backfill should be capped with paving or 12 inches of silty soils to reduce surface water infiltration. Page 8 z 0U 000 co J = co w w 2 �Q a w z= o w ~ E o U o o 1- wW �U `-` o z w U= oI z ' Happy Valley Land Co. February 10, ,1998 Conventional spread footing foundations founded on undisturbed very stiff /hard natural soils may be used for support of retaining walls. Design of wall foundations should be in accordance with the recommendations presented in this report. Qrainage Control Surface drainage from the adjoining upslope areas should be controlled and diverted around the development area in a non - erosive manner. Adequate positive drainage should be provided away from the structure and on the site in general to prevent water from ponding and to reduce percolation of water into subsoils. Granular backfill should be capped with paving or 6 inches of onsite silty soils. A desirable slope for surface drainage is 2% in landscaped areas and 1% in paved areas. Roof drains should be tightlined into the storm drain system or other appropriate discharge point (no discharge on the ground surface). A permanent perimeter drain, independent of the roof drain system, should be placed adjacent to the base of the continuous exterior foundations. The drain should consist of a four -inch diameter perforated PVC drain pipe placed in at least one cubic foot of a well graded sand and gravel filter material per lineal foot along the base of the foundations. At least one interior drain should be provided beneath the basement floor connecting to the perimeter drain on the downslope side at the lowest point. If conditions exposed during construction warrant, interceptor subdrain system(s) may be required to intercept ground water migration form the upslope areas particularly in the eastern site area. Interceptor drains should consist of a filter fabric lined trench filled with clean sand or drain rock with a perforated PVC drain pipe at the base. The drain trench should be at (east 18" wide, and at least 3 feet deep and should penetrate at least one foot into the very stiff /hard natural glacial till soils. Six inches of native clay soil cover should be placed over the drain to reduce surface water infiltration. Discharge from the subdrain should be conducted via tightline to the storm drain system. In the proposed street subgrade structural fill areas a drain pipe should be installed to collect ground water infiltration which may collect in the fill and transmit it to the storm •drain system. The subdrain pipe should be placed along the lower side of under the street fill areas and should discharge to the storm drain system. As a minimum the drain should consist of a 4" diameter perforated PVC collector pipe and a tightline discharge pipe. Additional lateral drains should be provided wherever a spring or seep is exposed during grading. Erosion Control Onsite silty materials are expected to be highly erodible when exposed to concentrated flows. Siltation fences or other detention devices should be provided around soil stockpiles and exposed soil areas during construction to control the transport of eroded material. Exposed final graded soil areas should be paved or planted immediately with grass and deep rooted plants to help reduce erosion potential. Project No. 98- 103 -01 Page 9 z w ce 6U 00 (n0 at J = U) LL iv J LL Q a � zf- Z'- W W 0 — o WW 1 - - w z = o~ z Happy Valley Land Co. February 10, 1998 Plan Review This report has been prepared to aid in the evaluation of this site and to assist the civil engineers in the design and construction of the project. It is recommended that this office be provided the opportunity to review the final design drawings and specifications to determine if the recommendations of this report have been properly implemented and to make any supplemental design recommendations which may be required. z re QQ6 JU Observations and Testing During Construction o o Recommendations given in this report are based on the assumption that all development construction will be performed under engineering observations and testing. All structural fill and backfill areas should be observed by a representative w o of this office after stripping and prior to placing fill. Proper fill placement and 1 compaction should be verified with field and laboratory density testing by a qualified a testing laboratory: All footing excavations should be observed prior to placement of u) a steel and concrete to see that footings are founded on satisfactory bearing materials w and have proper slope setback. z = This report was prepared for specific application to the subject site and for the exclusive use of the Happy Valley Land Company and their representatives. The findings .and conclusions of this. report were prepared with the skill and care ordinarily exercised by local members of the geotechnical profession practicing under similar conditions in the same locality. • We make no other warranty, either 'express or implied. Variations may exist in site conditions between those described in this report and actual conditions encountered during construction. Unanticipated subsurface conditions commonly occur and cannot be prevented by merely making explorations and performing reconnaissance. Such unexpected conditions frequently require additional expenditures to achieve a properly constructed project. If conditions encountered during construction appear to be different from those indicated in this report, our office should be notified. Respectfully submitted, GEOSPECTRUM QONSULTANTS, INC. James A. Doolitt Principal Engineer End: Figures 1 and 2 Appendix A Dist: 1 /Addressee 2 /Baima & Holmberg, Inc. Project No. 98 -103 -01 CLOSURE EXPIRES 3/19/ ref: Preliminary Geologic Map of Seattle and Vicinty, Washington, by Waldron, Liesch, Mullineaux and Crandell, USGS Map 1-354, 1962, scale: 1"=2640' GEOSPECTRUM CONSULTANTS, INC. • C2 roahr Enalmocirina cirscl Earth Sclon=ai Proj. No98-103 SITE VICINITY GEOLOGIC MAP Proposed Foster Heights Development South 146th Street & 51st Avenue South TUkwila, Washington Date 2/98 Figure 1 ref: Preliminary Geologic Map of Seattle and Vicinty, Washington, by Waldron, Liesch, Mullineaux and Crandell, USGS Map I-354, 1962, scale: 1".2640' GEOSPECTRUM CONSULTANTS, INC. SITE VICINITY GEOLOGIC MAP Proposed Foster Heights Development South 146th Street & 51st Avenue South Tukwila, Washington Proj. No98-103 File: D 02 -0050 35mm Drawing #2 • APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION Our field exploration included a site reconnaissance and subsurface exploration program. During the site reconnaissance, the surface site conditions were noted, and the locations of the test pits were approximately determined. The test pits were approximately located using existing features as a guide. Elevations at the test pits locations were estimated from the site plan prepared by Baima & Holmberg dated 9/12197 combined with our own site measurements. Test pits were advanced using a Yatani 140 -B trackhoe excavator. Soils were continuously logged and classified in the field by visual examination, in accordance with the ASTM Soil Classification system. Logs of the test pits are presented on the test pit summary sheets A -1 through A -3. The test pit summaries include descriptions of the soils and pertinent field data. Soil consistency and moisture conditions indicated on the logs are interpretations based on the conditions observed in the field. Boundaries between soil strata indicated on the logs are approximate and actual transitions between strata may be gradual. . . .. ... 41�1"A:tH'f++1N+iYbV�4 \liM'aAE. r lhOw -1« t+ • .www4r�it�r�v'W�.a. w.• Topsoil /Organics w /abundant roots to 1/2" soft very moist dark rown . 23.7 Sandy Silt, very. fine • w/ ,Fc. rounded gravel mottled crown firm —wet stiff to very stiff hard — very moist _.Seepa 015A ricu)t digging —_ , Maximum depth 6 ft. • Seepage at approximately 2 feet. lI , Logged By JAD Date 1/23/98 Elev 464' Depth • Yy (ft,plows USCS Soli Description (%) Logged By JAD Date 1/23/98 ML Topsoil /Organics Sandy Sw/ ocicygr pelf ito 4 and grading to Sandy Silt, very fine Maximum depth 6 feet. Seepage at approximately 1 foot. GEOSPECTRUM CONSULTANTS, INC. ootochl7 /C O/ Enp /noor/r, and E , S /anooa TEST PIT NO. 1 loos to firm su� to hard �n?� rnrnwe • suw ut awrm*0Ma+3nv� , ,r, •ir, a TIMMY. u.. Pro). No.98 -103 moist wet ver most dk brn TEST PIT NO. 2 Date 2/98 mottled ra - rown red & -brown 29.8 Seepage Elev. 448' difficult digging TEST PIT LOGS Proposed Foster Heights Development South 146th Street & 51st Avenue South Tukwila, Washington Figure A -1 Topsoil /Organics loose moist very m oist lark rnwn 19.1 24.1 • aving_ SM Silty very fine Sand w/ occ. gravel to 3" brown Brorn —medium— dens mottled Ebro a vn reown — — — most SP Sand, fine -med • dense gray - -- wet Seepage SM Silty fine Sand v.dense v.moist gray -brn Maximum depth 6 ft. • . Seepage at approximately 4.5 - 5. feet. I • • • Logged By JAD Date 1/23/98 Depth USCS ML Topsoil /Organics Sandy Silt fine to 3" w /trace clay Maximum depth 4.5 feet. Seepage at approximately 1 - 2 f GEOSPECTRUM CONSULTANTS, INC. ................... GcaatcsahnIc al Enp/noor/ng and Earth Salon co. TEST PIT NO. 3 Soli Description soft firm stein to hard very wet very moist eet. Proj. No98 -103 Date 2/98 dk brn E r ro �v n mottled ra - O r W n re -brown Elev 422' W ( %) 40.6 Seepage Logged By .IAn Date 1/23/98 TEST PIT NO, 4 Elev 423' TEST PIT LOGS Proposed Foster Heights Development South 146th Street & 51st Avenue' South Tukwila, Washington Figure A -2 L ogge d By JAD Date 1/23/98 Depth (f. lows USCS 0• 1 — 2 — 3 — 4 5 — 6 — 7 — ML Topsoil /Organics w /abundant roots to 1" Sandy Silt, very fine & occ gravel to 3" & Silty fine Sand Maximum depth 4 feet. Seepage at approximately 1.5 - 2. GEOSPECTRUM CONSULTANTS, INC. G•orochn /col Eric Mooring and Earth Scloncos TEST PIT NO. 5 Soil Description soft firm /hard 5 feet. Pro). No .98 -103 most to wet very moist dark brown oro in gry red - rown Date 2/98 Eiev 428' W ( %) 37.3 17.1 . C.auing_ Seepage 4 Logged By JAD Date 1/23/98 0 1 2 3 5 6 7 TEST PIT NO. 6 Bev 408' Topsoil /Sod Sandy Silt/Silty fine Sand avef becomes more Sa�'Icn y Maximum depth 5 ft. Water at 9 inches after 15 minute vey i e d edium ense to dense s. wet very moist dk -brn fixed rn It- rn • brown r a rn orn mottld &r dbrn 30.4 20.5 FILL TEST PIT LOGS Proposed Foster Heights Development South 146th Street & 51st Avenue South Tukwila, Washington Figure A -3 tomm=su wwrs•cwv+ymmy l000w*nn::y.t ti vr:�.r�,t..��'gn1, Revision I No. I Date . Staff I Received I Initials I Date i • *Staff Issued I Initials i ! 6 g-ol_ i .6 Summary of Revision: Mary/ INV 4 U-11-02 ae5 Summary of Revision: Received By: Revision No. I Date Received ! Staff 1 Initials Date Issued I 1 i Staff Initials Z I U-11-02 ae5 Summary of Revision: p a , a 4 .0 , % jc, 7- c 9 el . ifocii/u, 7 . y,r.r..rea Received By: Received By: Revision No. . Date Received Staff Initials I Date Issued I 1 i Staff Initials I I Summary of Revision: Summary of Revision: . • Received By: Revision No. Date Received j Staff Initials - Date Issued ! Staff Initials Summary of Revision: Received By: PROJECT NAME: FOSicrHeittikfc PERM I 'JO:. Original Issue Date: Site Address: 1 -18615 5 145 5-1 - REVISION LOG (please print) Revision No. Summary of Revision: Date Received Staff Initials Received By: Date Issued (please print) " (please print) (please print) please print Staff Initials gillarlaritigiabbWrAtf,ftwasogsr .. , . ACTIVITY NUMBER: D02 -050 PROJECT NAME: Foster Heights — Lot 8 SITE ADDRESS: /N Original Plan Submittal 4825 S 145 St Response to Correction Letter # Revision # DATE: 2 -26 -02 SUITE # Response to Incomplete Letter # After Permit Is Issued DEPARTMENTS: Buildi►1 el4 Division Awe 3 •�S•ov Public Wo[ks Aug, 4z-a-.02.- DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues., Thurs.) Complete Incomplete TUES /THURS ROUTING: Please Route APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: (4 weeks) Approved CORRECTION DETERMINATION: Approved \PRROUTE.DOC 5/99 PERMIT COORD COPY PLAN REVIEW /ROUTING SLIP 05 Fire Prevention Structural Structural Review Required Approved with Conditions Approved with Conditions Comments: REVIEWER'S INITIALS: REVIEWER'S INITIALS: REVIEWER'S INITIALS: PERMIT COORD COPY 0 Plannik Division 2.28.oZ Permit Coordinator DUE DATE: 02-28-02 Not Applicable No further Review Required DATE: DUE DATE 03 -28 -02 H Not Approved (attach comments) DATE: DUE DATE Not Approved (attach comments) DATE: It w ce J U 00 OD 0 w = F- .w O L Q I Z = I— 0 W ~ :3 c) O N CI I-- w W w Z ui o f O z ACTIVITY NUMBER: D02 -050 PROJECT NAME: FOSTER HEIGHTS - LOT 8 SITE ADDRESS: 4825 S 145 STREET Original Plan Submittal Response to Incomplete Letter # Response to Correction Letter # DATE: 11 -18 -02 X Revision # 2 After Permit Is Issued DEPARTMENTS: Building Division Public Works Complete Documents/routing slip,doc 2.28 -02 cJ APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: PERMIT COORD COPY PLAN REVIEW /ROUTING SLIP Fire Prevention Structural DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues., Thurs.) Incomplete Comments: Permit Center Use Only INCOMPLETE LETTER MAILED: LETTER OF COMPLETENESS MAILED: Departments determined incomplete: Bldg ❑ Fire ❑ Ping ❑ PW ❑ Staff Initials: TUES /THURS ROUTING: Please Route g Structural Review Required ❑ No further Review Required ❑ REVIEWER'S INITIALS: DATE: Approved ❑ Approved with Conditions ❑ Not Approved (attach comments) ❑ Notation: REVIEWER'S INITIALS: Permit. Center Use Only CORRECTION LETTER MAILED: Departments issued corrections: Bldg ❑ Fire ❑ Ping ❑ PW ❑ Staff Initials: Ti PIT r ", _ . ,r ❑ Planning Division ❑ Permit Coordinator DUE DATE: 11 -19-02 Not Applicable ❑ DUE DATE: 12 -17 -02 DATE: z ce 6 0 N U) ILI J = �u. WO �Q . co w Z = I— O Z I— W ON CI I-- W W H EL-O Z W O ~ Z ACTIVITY NUMBER: D02 -050 DATE: 05 -08 -02 PROJECT NAME: Foster Heights SITE ADDRESS: 4825 S 145 St Original Plan Submittal Response to Incomplete Letter # Response to Correction Letter # X Revision # 1 After Permit Is Issued DEPARTMENTS: Building ivision Public Works DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues., Thurs.) Complete C TUES /THURS ROUTING: Please Route Structural Review Required APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: Approved Notation: Documents/routing siip.doc 2.28 -02 PLAN REVIEW /ROUTING SLIP Fire Prevention Structural Incomplete Approved with Conditions n n n Comments: Permit Center Use Only INCOMPLETE LETTER MAILED: LETTER OF COMPLETENESS MAILED: Departments determined incomplete: Bldg ❑ Fire ❑ Ping ❑ PW 0 Staff Initials: n PERMIT COORD COP': Planning Division Permit Coordinator DUE DATE: 05-09-02 Not Applicable n No further Review Required n REVIEWER'S INITIALS: DATE: DUE DATE: 06 -06 -02 Not Approved (attach comments) REVIEWER'S INITIALS: DATE: Permit Center Use Only CORRECTION LETTER MAILED: Departments issued corrections: Bldg ❑ Fire ❑ Ping ❑ PW ❑ Staff Initials: z ~ w QQ • � U O N J ill u_ Q I w Z = I— O ZI- W U � O — • I— w L I O .•z W = O I— z ACTIVITY NUMBER: D02 -050 PROJECT NAME: FOSTER HEIGHTS — LOT 8 SITE ADDRESS: 4825 S 145 STREET DATE: 11 -18 -02 Original Plan Submittal Response to Incomplete Letter # Response to Correction Letter # X Revision # 2 After Permit Is Issued DEPARTMENTS: Building Division ❑ Fire Prevention ❑ Planning Division ❑ Public Works V Structural ❑ Permit Coordinator ❑ DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues., Thurs.) Complete ❑ APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: Documents/routing slip,doc 2 -28 -02 PLAN REVIEW /ROUTING SLIP Incomplete DUE DATE: 11-19-02 Not Applicable ❑ Comments: Permit Center Use Only INCOMPLETE LETTER MAILED: LETTER OF COMPLETENESS MAILED: Departments determined incomplete: Bldg ❑ Fire ❑ Ping ❑ PW ❑ Staff Initials: TUES /THURS ROUTING: Please Route 'Er Structural Review Required ❑ No further Review Required ❑ REVIEWER'S INITIALS: Clay/\ DATE: DUE DATE: 12 -17 -02 Approved X Approved with Conditions ❑ Not Approved (attach comments) ❑ Notation: �/+ ZD !O REVIEWER'S INITIALS: , j DATE: Permit Center Use Only CORRECTION LETTER MAILED: Departments issued corrections: Bldg ❑ Fire ❑ Ping ❑ PW ❑ Staff Initials: z w re J U O 0 co CI J = H w 0 w ? N d = w Z I- H Z W W U � 0 E 0 I— w w - I- Z w • ± O Z DEPARTMENTS: Building Division Public Works TUES /THURS ROUTING: APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: Approved Notation: Documents/routing slip.doc 2 -28-02 n REVIEWER'S INITIALS: Fire Prevention Structural Incomplete n n n PLAN REVIEW /ROUTING SLIP ACTIVITY NUMBER: D02 - 050 DATE: 05 - - PROJECT NAME: Foster Heights SITE ADDRESS: 4825 S 145 St Original Plan Submittal Response to Incomplete Letter # Response to Correction Letter # X Revision # After Permit Is Issued DUE DATE: 05-09-02 Not Applicable n DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues., Thurs.) Complete Comments: Permit Center Use Only INCOMPLETE LETTER MAILED: LETTER OF COMPLETENESS MAILED: Departments determined incomplete: Bldg ❑ Fire ❑ Ping ❑ PW ❑ Staff Initials: Please Route n Structural Review Required n No further Review Required REVIEWER'S INITIALS: DATE: DUE DATE: 06-06-02 Approved with Conditions n Not Approved (attach comments) DATE: Planning Division Permit Coordinator n n Permit Center Use Only CORRECTION LETTER MAILED: Departments issued corrections: Bldg ❑ Fire ❑ Ping ❑ PW ❑ Staff Initials: z ~ w r aa m J O 0 CO CI • LU LU � U W O QQ _ • ° I— _ Z � I— O Z I— W U � 0- O E- w w I u. 1 6 il Z O - O E .. z ACTIVITY NUMBER: D02 -050 PROJECT NAME: SITE ADDRESS: X Original Plan Submittal Foster Heights — Lot 8 4825 S 145 St DATE: 2 -26 -02 SUITE # Response to Incomplete Letter # Response to Correction Letter # Revision # After Permit Is Issued DEPARTMENTS: Building Division Public Works DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues., Thurs.) Complete Comments: Please Route \PRROUTC.DOC 5/99 TUES /THURS ROUTING: PLAN REVIEW /ROUTING SLIP n REVIEWER'S INITIALS: REVIEWER'S INITIALS: Structural Review Required 4 {� APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: (4 weeks) Approved n Approved wit Conditions Fire Prevention Structural Incomplete CORRECTION DETERMINATION: Approved n Approved with Conditions n REVIEWER'S INITIALS: Planning Division Permit Coordinator DUE DATE: 02-28-02 Not Applicable n No further Review R-quired DATE: 2 DUE DATE 03 -28 -02 Not Approved (atta h co pp ments) DATE: V DUE DATE Not Approved (attach comments) DATE: PERMIT NO.: VOZ" 05 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS ❑ 1 Progress Inspection Status ❑ 2 Pre- construction ❑ 3 Investigation ❑ 4 OK to Occupy ❑ 5 Remove Stop Work Order ❑ 6 Follow -up ❑ 7 Pre -Move Inspection ❑ 50 WSEC Residential ❑ 60 WA Ventilation/Indoor AQC ❑ 70 NLEA Inspection /Modular Struct ❑ 71 Mobile Home Tie Down Insp ❑ 7'/ Marriage Lines 90 Rested 95 Footing Drains 100 Foundation Footings 200 Foundation Walls 250 Foundation Insulation ❑ 300 Concrete Slab /Slab Insulation 350 Crawl Space 400 Shear Wall Nailing 450 Plywood Wall Sheathing 500 Roof Sheathing Nailing 525 Plywood Deck Nailing 50 Exterior Wall Sheathing 600 Masonry Chimney 610 Chimney Installation/All Types 700 Framing 750 Roof /Ceiling Insulation 800 Floor Insulation 801 Wall Insulation 802 Exterior Roof Insulation 803 Glazing Inspection ❑ 815 Lighting and Controls ❑ '00 Suspended Ceiling 1000 Interior Wallboard Fastening ❑ 1001 Exterior Wallboard Fastening ❑ 1110 Pre -Move Inspection ❑ 1115 Motor Inspection ❑ 1120 Pre -Demo ❑ 1140 Pre - reroof ❑ 1400 Final -Fire 1700 Final - Building ❑ 1900 Final - Reroof ❑ 3100 Site Visit ❑ 4000 Special - Concrete ❑ 4001 Special -Bolts in Concrete ❑ 4001 Special - Mom/Resist Conc Frame ❑ 4003 Special -Reinf Steel Prestress ❑ 4004 Special - Welding ❑ 4005 Special- High- Strength Bolting ❑ 4006 Special- Structural Masonry ❑ 4007 Special -Reinf Gypsum Concrete ❑ 4008 Special - Insulating Conc Fill ❑ 4009 Special -Spray Fireproofing ❑ 4010 Special - Piling, Piers, Caissons ❑ 4011 Special - Shotcrete ❑ 401 Special- Grading, Excav /Fill ❑ 4013 Special- Retaining Wall ❑ 4014 Special- Panels ❑ 4015 Special -Smoke Control System TENANT NAME: CONDITIONS 10001 No changes will be made to the plans unless approved by the Engineer and the Tukwila Building Division 10002 Plumbing permits shall be obtained through King Co 10003 Electrical permits obtained through L & I 10004 All mechanical work shall be under separate permit 10005 All permits, insp records & approved plans available 10006 All structural concrete shall be special inspected 10007 All structural welding shall be done by WABO certified inspector 10008 All high- strength bolting shall be special inspected 10009 Bolts installed in concrete shall be special inspected 10010 When special inspection is required...notify Tukwila Building Division 10011 The special inspector shall submit a final signed report 10012 Any new ceiling grid and light fixture installation 10013 Partition walls attached to ceiling grid 10014 Readily accessible access to roof mounted equipment 015 Engineered truss drawings & calcs shall be on site 10016 Any exposed insulation backing material shall have 10017 Subgrade preparation including drainage, excavation ❑ 10018 A statement from the roofing contractor verifying tire retardant class of roof 10019 All construction to be done in conformance w /approved plans ❑ 10020 Structural observation shall be provided for this project ❑ 10021 All food preparation establishments must have King Co 10022 Fire retardant treated wood shall have flame spread of 10023 Notify Building Division prior to placing any concrete ❑ 10024 All spray applied fireproofing shall be special inspected ❑ 10025 All wood to remain in placed concrete shall be treated „ 10026 All structural masonry shall be special inspected 10027 Validity of Permit ❑ 10028 Rack storage requires separate permit 10030 No occupancy of building until final insp by Bldg Div ❑ 10031 Comply with requirements of TIvIC 16.04 ❑ 10032 Remove all weeds, concrete, stone foundations, flat concrete ❑ 10034 Removal of septic tanks require approval and compliance with King Co Health Dept. ❑ 10035 Contact PW Div to obtain insp for water /sewer connect ❑ 10036 Manufacturers installation instructions required on site ❑ 10038 A C of 0 will be required for this permit ❑ 10039 Final approval for all TI w /in the limits of the SC Mall ❑ 10040 All construction noise to be in compliance with 8.2 TMC ❑ 10041 Ventilation is required for all new rooms & spaces ❑ 10042 .Fuel burning appliances ❑ 10043 Appliances, which generate ❑ 10044 Water heater shall be anchored ❑ 10045 .. Reroof ❑ "Anchoring — All new construct and substantial improvement shall be anchored to prevent flotation" Plan Reviewer: Permit Tech: Date: Date: 3 -!(poz Z W re J U U W I JF CO W O g W Q to � I Cl Z = ZI W W O O N O I— W H P . Z W U = O ~ Z DEPARTMENTS: Building Division Public Works Please Route Approved \PRROUTE.DOC 5/99 PLAN REVIEW /ROUTING SLIP ACTIVITY NUMBER: D02 -050 PROJECT NAME: Foster Heights — Lot 8 SITE ADDRESS: 4825 S 145 St DATE: 2 -26 -02 SUITE # !\ Original Plan Submittal Response to Incomplete Letter # Response to Correction Letter # Revision # After Permit Is Issued n TUES /THURS ROUTING: REVIEWER'S INITIALS: APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: (4 weeks) CORRECTION DETERMINATION: Fire Prevention Structural DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues., Thurs.) Complete ri Incomplete Structural Review Required Approved with Conditions Comments: REVIEWER'S INITIALS: REVIEWER'S INITIALS: Planning Division Permit Coordinator DUE DATE: 02-28 -02 Not Applicable n No further Review Required DATE: � � (12- DUE DATE 03 -28 -02 Approved ri Approved with Conditions n Not Approved (attach comments) n n DATE: DUE DATE Not Approved (attach comments) n DATE: ti �1 Please Route ACTIVITY NUMBER: D02 -050 DATE: 2 -26 -02 PROJECT NAME: Foster Heights — Lot 8 SITE ADDRESS: 4825 S 145 St SUITE # / `Original Plan Submittal Response to Incomplete Letter # Response to Correction Letter # Revision # After Permit Is Issued DEPARTMENTS: Building Division Public Works PLAN REVIEW /ROUTING SLIP DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues., Thurs.) Complete U Incomplete Comments: TUES /THURS ROUTING: REVIEWER'S INITIALS: Structural Review Required APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: (4 weeks) Approved Approved \PRROUTE.DOC 5/99 Fire Prevention Structural Approved with Conditions REVIEWER'S INITIALS: CORRECTION DETERMINATION: Approved with Conditions REVIEWER'S INITIALS: Planning Division Permit Coordinator DUE DATE: 02 -28-02 Not Applicable I I No further Review Required DATE: 04 2 2/0 DUE DATE 03 -28 -02 Not Approved (attach comments) DATE: DUE DATE Not Approved (attach comments) DATE: ACTIVITY NUMBER: D02 -050 DATE: 2 -26 -02 PROJECT NAME: Foster Heights — Lot 8 SITE ADDRESS: 4825 S 145 St SUITE # >( Original Plan Submittal Response to Incomplete Letter # Response to Correction Letter # Revision # After Permit Is Issued DEPARTMENTS: Building Division Public Works DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues., Thurs.) Complete Please Route Approved \PRROUTE.DOC 5/99 Comments: TUES /THURS ROUTING: REVIEWER'S INITIALS: PLAN REVIEW /ROUTING SLIP CORRECTION DETERMINATION: Fire Prevention Structural Incomplete Structural Review Required APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: (4 weeks) Approved with Conditions I I REVIEWER'S INITIALS: Planning Division Permit Coordinator DUE DATE: 02-28-02 Not Applicable No further Review Required DATE: 2 - 2.1 12Q— DUE DATE 03 -28 -02 n Approved Approve with Conditions 1$ Not Approved (attach comments) n REVIEWER'S INITIALS: DATE: 3 '04 osoazi DUE DATE Not Approved (attach comments) DATE: z w re LA J 0 • 0 w = � LL wO ga = w z = F- O z 1- W W U 0 O N O E- w w . tL O ..z w U= O 1 ". z Date: //' /,r, Z City of Tukwila Department of Community Development - Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Plan Check/Permit Number: ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # ❑ Response to Correction Letter # ®' Revision # Z. after Permit is Issued Project Name: /c9STF7 lies W7C 1 0 P2 z,'" ✓( � Project Address: Y�� S' eS /yam Sr Contact Person: t t44 , / '-t Phone Number: Summary of Revision: ' 7° EP c V V17.1- 6 z • / Q g' 7 / C6 ,ix,p20/97 (7474 a/x-6 'sr fAcez) ocyzrrri Gfl c i~r ECEIVPI - s Cl/ Y' i.39= /"Lne,tr;,.A Sheet Number(s): NOV 1 8 od2 "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision PE'R',' ; Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: t=D� r kr Entered in Sierra on / /' X02 - O HO (sue- 1 c. /? 2 Z 08/30/00 z Z 111 J U O 0 w= H co w w 2 u. Q = • a t _ lu I— O w ~ • w U O D 0 w w I- u_O ..z w U O 1— Date: Sheet Number(s): City of Tukwila Department of Community Development - Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Plan Check/Permit Number: "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: ( )(ad-) g Entered in Sierra on 5 Fr -0 it)-. oho ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # ❑ Response to Correction Letter # Revision # / after Permit is Issued Project Name: r��' Project Address: 49Z5 S zf5 7� LT' Contact Person: �AWZGri 72i15 Phone Number: Z5.-6&/- Summary of Revision: cl ECEIVED TU PE r IT CE R REC CITY OF TUKWILA Y I S'0 PERMIT CENTER 08/30/00 20010803000206 Return Address CITY OF TUKWILA Office of the City Clerk 6200 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Parties: Other: WIKLOF Last CITY OF TUKWILA DOCUMENT RECORDING COVER SHEET Document Title(s). City of Tukwila, WA 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 SCOTT First T RIDOR Incomov1 Company Name (if bu iness) 2220 Eiliati Ave. rzca,ike A Address 5Qi4e k)f 98121 City State u Zip Legal Description: Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number(s): 261000 -0010 2 61000 -0020 Lot No. Tax Parcel No. ' UND + RGROUNUING AGREEMENT WAIVER TO UNIERGROUNDING ORDINANCE OiILIGATION FOR FUTURE UNUERGROUNDiNG The proposed system upgrade at Foster Ileights 16 -lot subdivision development, Pile No L2000 -026, at 47 Ave South and South 145''' Sheet requires undergroundtng per Ordinance 486, 924 and 1321 ALOIS& 5. 14b{.h 1Rt:ET - 5E8 hflRCH ME141 A, In compliance with the requirements of Otdmance No 1607 the property owner of this single-family development has demonstrated application of the Underground Ordinance writ create undue hardship if cart red out as part of the development The Owner is obligated to patticipate in funding future undergrounding improvements for their proportionate share o" said undetgtounding fronting their property Furthermore, if the .L I D !U L I I) procebs is used to carry out the construction of this undergroundtng, the Owner waives the right to pi otest L I D or U LID formation for this under grounding Owner retains the right to contest the method of calculating assessments in such L 1 D and the amount thereof to be levied against the Owner's subject property, and other property owned by Owner which would be within such L I 1) This Agteement shall be recorded by the City Clerk with the King County Auditor as required by Chapter 35 91 RCW and the cost of said recording will be paid by the City This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties, their respective heirs, legal rept esentatives, assignees, transferees and successors 'I'hts Agreement runs with the land ir APPLICANT: Applicant (Signature) Applicant (Print Name) � Z2� l //e, fir 1 Street Address Date Phone City, State, Zip STATE OF WASHINGTON ) L ) ss County of Icl ) On this day personally appeared before me (mot KI(A to be known to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged tha to she /they signed the same a:4 i ter /their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned Given under my hand and official seal this l - day of – SIA1 Oa) t CITY OP TUKWILA u he Works Director Signature Pnnt Nano NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT NI CAA My commisstdn expires Tfrilao01 Date attachment a site plan ORGANIZATION TYPE DOMESTIC PROFIT CORPORATION LONG CLASSIC HOMES, LTD. 1624 PIONEER ST ENUMCLAW WA 98022 1 DOMESTIC PROFIT CORPORATION RENEWED BY AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF STATE REGISTERED TRADE NAMES: JML HOMES INC. LONG. CLASSIC HOMES •I REGISTERED 'AS PROVIDED BY LAW AS CONS T CONT GENERAL REGIST . # EXP . DATE CCO1. LONGCHL05409 11/01/2002 EFFECTIVE DATE 09/29/1995 LONG CLASSIC. HOMES LTD. . 1624 PIONEER STREET ENUMCLAW WA 98022 • Signature Issued by DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES 'CUrrent COntractOr Registration to Enter Contractor Information in Sierra: 171 Yes Thcsc Plans have been reviewed l v the Public Works Department for conformance with current City standards. Acceptance is subject to errors and omissions which do not authorize violations of adopted standards or ordinances. The responsibility for the adequacy of the design rests totally with the designer. Additions, deletions or revisions to these drawings after this date will void this acceptance and will nc ;uire a resubmittal of revised drawings for subsequent approvaL Final acceptance is subject to field inspection by the Public Works utilities inspector. llate: By: REVIEWED MID APPROVED POR GEOTECHN I CAL DRAINAGE CONS IDERRTIONS . PERMIT CENTER RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA NOV 1 8 2002 DATE REVISIONS NO DATE TYPE OF REVISION • A PPROVED BY Site plan UTILITY plan DRAINAGE Plan LONG CLASSIC HOMES ENIIMCLAW , WA LOT 8 FOSTER HEIGHTS KING COUNTY, WA APPR BY DRAWN BY p7 REVISED ( IQK; NUMBER i;?o2- c60 REVISIONS . NO DATE TYPE OF REVISION APPR BY LONG CLASSIC HOMM ENUMCLAW , WA SCALE: I` y , ( V , f ' APPROVED BY: . DRAWN sY f C - i DATE: LOT 8 FOSTER HEIGHTS } KING COUNTY, WA SITE, UTILITY • DRAINAGE R A W - L UMBER --- RAW These rfans have been reviewed by the Public Forks Department for conformance with current City standards Acceptance is subject to errors and emissions which do not antboriie violations of adopted standardds or ordinances. The tes ons:ibtility for the adequacy of the design is totally with the designer. Additions, deletions re revisions to these drawings after this date will void this acceptance and will regime s leaebeittal et revised *mins for subsequent approval Final atzeptimce Is meet to lidd inmactioa by the Public Wadi; utilities irpeestoe. Date: al: SEPARATE PERMIT ' ELECTRICAL GAS PIPING CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION - Permit No EASEMENT [EXPIRES 3'19/ REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR • GEOTECHNICAL DRAINAGE CONS R I understand that the Plan Check approvals are subject to errors and omissions and approvat pla s does not authorize the violation of any I adopted code cr ordinance. Receipt of con- tractor's copy of approved plans acknowledge REVISIONS NO CHANGES SHALL BE MADE TO THE SCOPE OF WORK WITHOUT PRIOR A- FROVAL OF TUKWILA BUILDING ^ 1 , ;. t-1TE: REVISIONS WILL REWIRE A NEW PLA i V 1 CITY E RECEIVED FEB 2 6 2002 PERMIT CENTER 1 WALL G f''5 PREPARED BY ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS 100 FRONT STREET SOUTH ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON 98027 JOB NO. 1736 -001 DATE' (425) 392 - 0280 1736- 1FP.DWG LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF RECORD PARCEL A: THE WEST HALF OF LOTS 10 AND 11, BLOCK 4, ADAMS HOME ACRE TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 31, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER THE SOUTH 15 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF LOT 11, SAID BLOCK 4, AS SET FORTH IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 3573883. PARCEL B: LOT 12, BLOCK 4, ADAMS HOME TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 31, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL C: WEST HALF OF LOT 13, BLOCK 4, ADAMS HOME TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 31, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL D: LOT 14, BLOCK 4, ADAMS HOME ACRE TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 31, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. METES AND BOUNDS LEGAL bESCRIPTION A PORTION OF BLOCK 4 OF ADAMS HOME TRACTS ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 31 IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 4; THENCE NORTH 01 EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID BLOCK 103.09 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 01'30'37" EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE 103.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87'53'42" WEST 189.29 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0127'47" EAST 206.31 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87'51'26" WEST 189.46 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01'24'57" WEST 103.22 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87'52'34" WEST 126.11 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01'23'03" WEST 309.78 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87'55'58" EAST 315.06 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01'27'47" EAST 103.16. FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87'54'50" EAST 189.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THEREFROM THE ROAD RIGHT_ OF WAYS AS SHOWN TO BE DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC ON THE MAP PAGE (PAGE 3 OF 3) OF THIS PLAT. DEDICATION :" ✓t.' ' '. `• 0 C v,• ?,:`FIa�� its �L �f +�,l l C''_ ' ..L Li-NC i ;EF,LVI. :;�ESr'RIFEP no H *J FFEPY fVE A SI I F, r. �� Z►+ERFr r P1 {T TO PCW 5p17,i TNT' I iK,nFP Ich$rn FI_)PTPFP U:.t:LAkE THIS F'LA t lu 1St THE GRAPHIC kEPkLSEN1ATION OF THE SAID SUbDIViSI.N AND THE SAME IS MADE WITH THE FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIRE OF THE OWNER(S). KNOW ALL PEOPLE BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, OWNERS IN FEE SIMPLE AND LIEN HOLDERS OF THE LAND HEREBY PLATTED, HEREBY DECLARE, DEDICATE AND CONVEY TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA FOR THE USE OF THE PUBUC FOREVER ALL STREETS, WATER, STORM DRAINAGE AND SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS LOCATED ON EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS - OF-WAY SHOWN THEREON AND THE USE THEREOF FOR ALL PUBUC PURPOSES NOT INCONSSTENT WITH THE USE THEREOF FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY AND UTILITY PURPOSES; ALSO THE RIGHT TO MAKE ALL NECESSAR' SLOPES FOR CUTS AND FILLS UPON THE LOTS AND BLOCKS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT IN THE ORIGINAL REASONABLE GRADING OF SAID STREETS AND ALLEYS SHOWN THEREON. THIS DEDICATION OF THE PROPOSED PUBLIC ROADWAYS AND UTILITIES IS SUBJECT TO THEIR COMPLETION BY THE DEVELOPER AND THE ACCEPTANCE AND APPROVAL BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR THAT THEY HAVE BEEN COMPLETED TO CITY STANDARDS. WE AND ALL OF OUR SUCCESSORS WAIVE ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES AGAINST ANY GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY ARISING FROM THE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC FACILITIES AND PUBLIC PROPERTY WITHIN THE: SUBDIVISION. (17.04.060 8.2.) REOF WE HAVE SET OUR HANDS AND SEALS. IN WITN - COUNTY OF KING MICHAEL .K AN PRESLEN i, T,RIL:C:k, INC. • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS ON THE 31 k° DAY OF - t)4.1 20 a I BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, PERSONALLY APPEARED MICHAEL S.K. C1-IAN TO ME KNOWN TO BE PRESIDENT • OF TR/DOR, tNC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, THAT EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGED SAID INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED OF SAID CORPORATION FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED AND ON OATH STATED THAT u e AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE SAID INSTRUMENT. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND AND AFFIXED MY OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. SHEN ••$'16;;4 I o NOTAR f • 0 •--- -- co: i PUBUG i STATE Of WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) ON THE 3 ID_ DAY OF �� 200_ BEFORE ME, UNDERSIGNED NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOI THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, PERSONALLY APPEARED r _ • - r __ TO ME KNOWN TO BE \/L = _ OE CITYBANK, THAT EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGED SAID INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED OF SAID CORPORATION FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED AND ON OATH STATED THAT I•l AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE SAID INSTRUMENT. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND AND AFFIXED MY OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. S N Sg sWOH tO j TARY�: O 1 i 1St •: PUBLIC - • ■ Is 9 - OP SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, . 6 I. PREUMINARY PLAT NO. L98 -0019 FINAL PLAT NO. L2000 -026 C BANK /I i .7 PRINT NAME OF NOT T' tiS SLR �j PN SIGNATURE OF NOTARY PUBLIC DATED S. Zoo MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES S4- t o9, ' - u 0 3 STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF WAS THE WAS J PRINT NAME OF N(gRYOhzls SIGNATURE OF NOTARY PUBUC 3 Zoo MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES 5tQt 09 , Z003 • ilqt 4 ' • • ' . , REGISTERED AS A LAND SURVEYOR BY THE STATE aj WASHINGTON, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT IS BASED ON AN ACTUAL SURVEY OF . E LAND DESCRIBED HEREIN, CONDUCTED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION; THAT THE DISTANCES, COURSES AND ANGLES ARE SHOWN THEREON CORRECTLY; AND THAT MONUMENTS OTHER THAN THOSE MONUMENTS APPROVED FOR SETTING AT A LATER DATE, HAVE BEEN SET AND LOT CORNERS STAKED ON THE GROUND AS DEPICTED ON THE PLAT. S e A.,/ L..„J STATE OF WASHINGTON �J j COUNTY OF NUJ 9 FOSTEI HEIGHTS A POiTION OF THE NE1 /4, SEO.22 T.23N., R.4E. KING COUNTY, WASHINGtON CITY OF TUKWILA I' INN \ N N W N M M A N W// // / /I/ I// / f f/ 1 CITY OF TUKWILA AOPROVALS PUBLIC WORKS DIREQIQQ'S CERABLATE I HEREBY APPROVE THE SURVEY DATA, THE LAYOUT OF THE STREETS, AIlEYS AND OTHER RIGHTS — — WAY, DESIGN OF SEWAGE AND WATER SYSTEMS, DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND OTHER STRUCTURES. I CERTIFY THAT THE SUBDIVIDER HAS COMPUED WITH ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: A. ALL IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN INSTALLEC IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REOUIREMENTS OF THIS TITLE AND WITH THE PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROW.L, AND THAT ORIGINAL AND REPRODUCIBLE MYLAR OR ELECTRONIC RECORDS IN A FORMAT APPROVED BY PUBUC WORKS AND MEETING CURRENT PUBLIC WORKS DRAWING STANDARDS FOR ROAD. UTILITY AND DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION PLANS CERTIFIED BY THE DESIGNING ENGINEER AS BEING "AS CONSTRUCTED" HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED FOR CITY RECORDS. B. AN AGREEMENT AND BOND OR OTHER FINANCIAL SECURITY HAVE BEEN EXECUTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 17.24.030 OF THIS TITLE SUFFICIENT TO ASSURE COMPLETION OF REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION PLANS. EXAMINE AN1D APPROVED BY THE CITY OP TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS THIS_ y __DAY_ti ,20�L_.. z, _ _ -%._ FINANCE DIRECTOR DIRECTOR CITY TREASURE'S CERTIFICATE THERE ARE NO DELINQUENT SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. AND ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON ANY OF THE PROPERTY . 1; L , ALLEYS OR I• Vk U1-iLk PUBLIC USE AKL F'AIU IN FULL. o.0 R Oo/4JQL MAY_QR AND CITY CLERK'S APPROVAL EXAMINED AND APP u VFD BY _ 2 THE CITY _ OF TUKWILA THIS_J2 AY. OQL TUKWILA ''AYOR kING COUNTY APPROVALS kINQ COUNTY TREASURER'S CERTIFICATE t CERTIFY THAT ALL PROPERTY TAXES ARE PAID AND THAT A DEPOSIT HAS BEEN MADE IN SUFFICIENT AMOUNT TO PAY THE TAXES FOR THE FOLLOWING YEAR; THAT THERE ARE NO DELINQUENT SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS CERTIFIED TO THIS OFFICE FOR COLLECTION; AND THAT ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON ANY OF THE PROPERTY HEREIN DEDICATED AS STREETS, ALLEYS, OR FOR OTHER PUBLIC USE ARE PAID IN FULL. lHIS__1_1'DAY OF 0 -1(, ‘ . 2011E A.D. TY KING COUNTY • URER C>r' KING COUNTY ASSESSOR DIVISION OF RECORDS AND ELECTIONS DEPUTY DIRECTOR, KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF RECORDS AND ELECTIONS . 7Ii T DATE ✓✓ COUNTY REASURER , ‘,..0,64G te r, A f1NAN 1°' $ �o��'oFic ••'' • ,1HtNge‘° . kING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS l7 .DAY 20 a1 A. Imes DEPUTY KING COUNTY ASSESSOR RECORDING CERTIFICATE FILED OR RECORD AT THE REQUEST OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA THIS .L8_ DAY OF , 20.121.. A.D., AT 3�_ MINUT S PA T �_ d _v_ AND RECORDED VOLUME�.0cl _ PLATS, PAGES 9 _ 7 / RECORDS OF kING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. " NOTE ” WATER AND SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PROVIDED BY DISTRICTS. 1 77C _1 CD ..Jt..... RECEIVED JUL 1 9 7001 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR, KING COUNTY ASSESSOR DEPARTMENT OF RECORDS AND ELECTIONS RECORDING NO. .n?6 C' / / J' O o 0 ' 1 .']_ . 7C) t"' '7" 446 N 0 RESTRICTIONS NOTES: NOTE 1. NO LOT OR PORTION OF A LOT IN THIS PLAT SHALL BE DIVIDED AND SOLD OR RESOLD OR OWNERSHIP CHANGED OR TRANSFERRED WHEREBY THE OWNERSHIP OF ANY PORTION OF THIS PLAT SHALL BE LESS THAN THE AREA REQUIRED FOR THE USE DISTRICT IN WHICH LOCATED. 2. TRACT 'A" IS A JOINT ACCESS AND UTILITY TRACT. 12. THE RESIDENCE ON LOT 15 SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A SPRINKLER SYSTEM. PRELIMINARY PLAT NO. L98 -0019 FINAL PLAT NO. L2000 -026 UTILITY EASEMENTS AN EASEMENT IS HEREBY RESERVED FOR AND GRANTED TO SEATTLE CITY LIGHT, US WEST TELEPHONE COMPANY, AT &T CABLE TV CC'APANY AND OTHER UTILITIES, AND THEIR RESPECTIVE SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, UNDER AND UPON THE EXTERIOR 10 FEET OF ALL LOTS AND TRACTS, PARALLEL WITH AND ADJOINING EXISTING OR PROPOSED ACCESS RIGHTS OF WAY AND TRACTS (BOTH PRIVATE AND PUBLIC). AS WELL AS AN EASEMENT WITHIN ALL PRIVATE ROADS, TRACTS, AND DRIVES, IN WHICH TO INSTALL, LAY, CONSTRUCT, RENEW, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN UNDERGROUND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS WITH NECESSARY FACILITIES AND OTHER EQUIPMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF SERVING THIS SUBDIVISION, AND OTHER PROPERTY. WITH UTILITY SERVICES, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO ENTER UPON THE LOTS AT ALL TIMES FOR THE PURPOSES HEREIN STATED. NO LINES OR WIRES FOR THE TRANSMISSION OF ELECTRIC CURRENT, OR FOR TELEPHONE USE, CABLE TELEVISION, FIRE OR POLICE SIGNALS, OR FOR OTHER PURPOSES. SHALL BE PLACED UPON ANY LOT UNLESS THE SAME SHALL BE UNDERGROUND OR IN CONDUIT ATTACHED TO A BUILDING. 1. SET i/2" REBAR AND CAP (LS #11332) AT ALL REAR CORNERS. SET TACK IN LEAD IN CURB AT THE SIDE LOT LINES PRODUCED TO AN INTERSECTION Vfj1TH THE CURB LINE. 3. THE LOT OWNERS OF- LOT P. 1 h A!\7` 1/ HAM' A ti. t molvinlr!? Tp ecT '``. SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE At.AIN?ENANCE 1HL�LOF. 4. THE FIVE (5) FOOT PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT WITHIN LOTS 6 AND 7 IS FOR THE BENEFIT OF LOT 5 AND 6. THE OWNERS OF SAID LOTS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THAT PORTION OF THE DRAINAGE FACILITIES THEY HAVE BENEFIT OF USE. AND SHALL EQUALLY SHARE IN THE MAINTENANCE OF THAT PORTION OF THE DRAINAGE FACILITIES -' 'SED IN COMMON. 5. THE FIVE () FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT WITHIN LOTS - 12, 13 AND 14 1S FOR THE BENEFIT OF LOTS 13, 14 AND 15. THE OWNER OF SAID LOT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THAT PORTION OF THE DRAINAGE FACILITIES THEY HAVE RENFrIT OF USE. A' SP ALL, EQUALLY SHAFcE IN THE MAINTENANCE OF THAT PORTION OF THE. DRAINAGE FACILITIES USED IN COMMON 6. THE FIVE ` J FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT WITHIN LOT f . IS FOR THE BENEFIT OF LOT 1O. . k THE OWNER OF SAID LOT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THAT PORTION OF THE DRAINAGE FACIUTIES THEY HAVE BENEFIT OF USE, AND SHALL EQUALLY SHARE IN THE MAINTENANCE OF THAT PORTION OF THE DRAINAGE FACILITIES USED IN COMMON. • 7. THE FIVE (5) FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT WITHIN LOTS 1. 2 AND 3 IS FOR THE BENEFIT OF LOTS 1, 2, 3 AND 4. THE OWNERS OF SAID LOTS SHALL $E RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THAT PORTION OF THE DRAINAGE FACILITIES THEY HAVE BENEFIT OF USE, AND SHALL EQUALLY SHARE IN THE MAINTENANCE OF THAT PORTION OF THE DRAINAGE FACILITIES USED IN COMMON. 8. THE FIVE (5) FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT WITHIN LOTS 14 AND 15 IS FOR THE BENEFIT OF LOT 16. THE OWNERS OF SAID LOTS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THAT PORTION OF THE DRAINAGE FACILITIES THAT THEY HAVE BENEFIT OF USE, AND SHALL EQUALLY SHARE THE MAINTENANCE OF THAT PORTION OF THE DRAINAGE FACILITIES USED IN COMMON. 9. THE 1'EN (10) FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT WITHIN LOT 9 IS F'OR THE BENEFIT OF LOTS 1 -4. THE OWNERS OF SAID LOTS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THAT PORTION OF THE DRAINAGE FACIUTIES THEY HAVE BENEFIT OF USE, AND SHALL EQUALLY SHARE IN THE MAINTENANCE OF THAT PORTION OF THE DRAINAGE FACIUTIES USED IN COMMON. 10. ALL BUILDING DOWNSPOUTS, FOOTING DRAINS, AND DRAINS FROM ALL IMPERVIOU.' SURFACES SUCH AS PATIOS AND DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE PERMANENT STORM DRAIN OUTLET AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS ON FILE WITH THE CITY OF TIJKVALA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THIS PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED VATH THE APPLICATION FOR ANY BUILDING PERMIT. ALL COQ•INECTIONS OF THE DRAINS MUST BE CONSTRUCTED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION APPROVAL, FOR THOSE LOTS THAT ARE DESIGNATED FOR INDIVIDUAL LOT INFILTRA SYSTEMS, THE SYSTEMS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT THE TIME OF THE BUILDING PERMIT AND AND SHALL COMPLY WITH PLANS ON FILE. 11. THE ROAD AND STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED PLAN AND PROFILE ON FILE WITH THE CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. ANY DEVIATION FROM THE APPROVED PLANS WILL REQUIRE WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE PROPER AGENCY. 13. THE OWNERS OF LOTS 10 AND 11 OWN AND ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE TREES PLANTED ON THOSE LOTS AS REPLACEMENT TREES FOR TREES REMOVED IN STEEP SLOPE SENSITIVE AREAS. LOTS 10 AND 11 ALSO OWN AND ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE TREES PLANTED TO SCREEN THE STORM WATER DETENTION VAULT LOCATED ON THESE LOTS. THESE TREES ARE IDENTIFIED AS THE - TREE REPLACEMENT AND VAULT SCREENING EASEMENT" AREA ON THE PLAT MAP. THESE TREES ARE SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF TMC 18.54, TREE REGULATIONS, AND SHALL NOT BE REMOVED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. THE DEVELOPER SHALL COMPLY WITH GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PREPARED BY GEOSPECTRUM CONSULTANTS, INC. DATED FEBRUARY 10, 1998 AND SUBSEQUENT GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS. APPLICANT IS TO INCLUDE, AS PART OF THEIR SINGLE FAMILY PERMIT APPLICATION, A LETTER FROM THEIR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER THAT CERTIFIES ON A LOT BY LOT BASIS THAT THE HOME FOOTING AND FOUNDATION DESIGN INCLUDING FOOTING/FOUNDATION DRAINAGE SYSTEM ADDRESSES AND FULFILLS THEIR GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS. DURING HOME CONSTRUCTION, THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER IS TO OBSERVE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE HOUSE DEVELOPMENT PLANS. FIELD REPORTS ARE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY AND TO INCLUDE: A) TEMPORARY EROSION OONTROL AND TEMPORARY EXCAVATIONS, B) IMPLEMENTATIONS OF FOOTINGS, FOUNDATIONS. RETAINING WALLS, DRIVEWAY PLACEMENT AND ASSOCIATED DRAINAGE SYSTEM AND PLACEMENT OF BACKFILL. THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER IS TO PROVIDE CERTIFICATION ON A LOT BY LOT BASIS THAT THE WORK HAS BEEN ACCOMPLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS. EACH OWNER IN ITS PURCHASE OF A LOT. HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE PLAT OF FOSTER HEIGHTS, AS APPROVED BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA, CONTAINS AREAS CONSISTING OF STEEP SLOPES. EACH OWNER _. HEREBY RELEASES THE CITY Of TUKWILA AND ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES FROM ALL CLAIMS. ACTIONS, CAUSES OF ACTION. COSTS. ATTORNEYS AND EXPERTS FEES OR PROPERTY DAMAGE ARISING FROM THE PRESENCE OF STEP SLOPES WITHIN THE PLAT; PROVIDED, THAT THIS RELEASE SHALL OT APPLY TO CLAIMS, ACTIONS, CAUSES OF ACTION, COSTS, ATTORNEY'S AND EXPERTS FEES AND PROPERTY DAMAGE RESULTING, FROM THE SOLE OR CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES. FOSTEV HEIGHTS A PORTION OF THE NE1/4, SEC.22, T.23N., R.4E. KING COUNTY, WASHINGtON CITY OF TUKWILA L<. fAMAAAAAAAGIAKAWANNAMANWAI 1 1 S 87 E 126.11' PARCEL 'D' T.L. 0040000560 PREPARED BY DRAWN BY' -4 • c S 144TH ST S 146TH ST to 15411-1 5 S148r4ST F 15 S 150TH ST 2ND S1 \ p S MILIT • Y RD SITE A 1 MM 0 F- 1 S 87'55'58 "E 315.06' S 87'51'26 E PARCEL 'A' T.L. 0040000539 PARCEL 'B' T.L. 0040000550 PARCEL 'C' T.L. 0040000554 INSTRUMENTATION INSTRUMENT USED: FIVE SECOND TOTAL STATION. CHECKED BY' WSH VICINITY MAP NTS DATE' S. 144114 ST. 189.20' t0 0 N S. 146TH ST. INDEX LOCATION: THE NE1/4 OF SEC. 22, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. BASIS OF BEARING: NORTH LINE OF NORTHEAST QUARTER N 87'49'18' W PER R.0.S. RECORDED IN VOLUME 30 OF SURVEYS, PAGE 57 ENGINEERS do SURVEYORS 100 FRONT STREET SOUTH ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON 98027 JOB NO. 1736 -001 6 -13 -01 S 87'53 E 189.29' S 87'54'50" E 189.20' FIELD SURVEY CONTROL WAS BY CLOSED TRAVERSE LOOPS, MINIMUM CLOSURE OF LOOPS WAS 1:22000. Balma Holmberg inc, SHEETS (425) 392 — 0250 1736- 1FP.DWG 2 OF 3 17 11- 1F A- 1 1: ?1:2R nm FC VOL. / PG. 2 0 1 T _I 1 RECEIVED JUL 1 9 ?00 TUKWII A PUBLIC WORKS 33 vp34 4 t 5 balms & holmbera PD. 4 "x4" CONC. MON. WITH COPPER PLUG & PUNCH MARK (ENCASED) WITH COPPER PLUG & PUNCH MARK 0.04 NO. OF LINE (ENCASED) VISITED 7 -22 -97 FD. 2" BRASS DISC IN CONC. WITH PUNCH MARK (ENCASED) VISITED 7 -22 -97 WEST LINE LOT 10 BLOCK 4 ADAMS HOME TRACTS NORTH LINE LOT 14 BLOCK 4 ADAMS HOME TRACTS PREUMINARY PLAT NO. L98 -0019 FINAL PLAT NO. L2000 -026 86.11 10' SANITARY \ SEE NOTE 5 & 8 ON PAGE . SEWER ESM'T ' tP \` ill 15' POWER ES/J I - RECORDING NO ; t o \ \-A. , TO SEATTLE CI �` I ' 1L -- 19990812000314 ': ‘ , - � ( LIGHT - UPON /' / / I SEE NOTE 8 _ON PAGE 2 - � > R CO R PING_. / 6-n./. 6-n./. S' . F T . - 0 E ...el/ I- 5' WATER ESM'T \ . 1 I ' j I SOUTH 145th STREET 20 SANITARY SEWER ESM'T PER RECORDING NO. 1 999 ^31200031 1 SEE NOTE 4 ON PAGE 2 6500 SO. FT. � 10' UTILITY l EASEMENT N 88'36'57" W 3 66.62 6500 SO. 5'x25' PUBLIC SIDEWALK EASEMENT SEE NOTE 7 PAGE 2 ° 7265 SO. FT. 5* PRIVATE DRA.;NAGE ESM'T LOT 6 & 7 6 500 So FT SEE NOTE 4 ON PAGE 2 50.63 _JDJ.L 5' PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT 5FF NOTF 7 PAGE 2 5' WA TER ESM' !- DEDICATED TO 1. WD 125, TYP. 6500 SQ. FT. ° I h FOSTER HEIGHTS A PORTION OF THE E1/4, SEC.22, '.:2 i. RI4 . RING COUNTY, 'WASHINGTON CITY 07 72,7,W1 N 67'49'13 W N B7'49'16" W NORTH LINE W1/2 LOT 10 BLOCK 4 ADAMS HOME TRACTS SEE NOTE 5 & 8 ON SHEET 2 OF 3 OF THIS PLAT. \ a, 15' POWER ESM'T (/) i V SEATTLE fell ( / 5' PRIVATE _� LIGHT - UPON \! uRAINAGt. RECORDING \ `A � f EASEMENT \ a 6500 SO. FT. SEE NOTE ON PAGE 2 60.63 9 2 S 8836'57" E SEE NOTE 7 PALE 7 6 -D. 4-J S 87'51' SEE NOTE 5 z ON PAGE 2 SEE NOTE 5 ON PAGE 2 0 6500 SO. FT. 2637.87 (ROS) 2637.84 MEAS. 1318.54 " E 189.46 10' PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT 8 6500 SQ. FT. 10' SANITARY SEWER ESM'T RECORDING NO 1999081200031 SEWER ESM'T p RECORDING NO e ° 1999081200031 S 87'55'53 z 315.06 DEDICA TED TO rriE PUBLIC FOR ROAD PURPOSES UPON THE RECORDING OF THIS PLAT BASIS OF BEARING 6500 S0. FT. SEE NOTE 7 PACE 2 8 62.88 12 SQ. FT. SEE J SEE NOTE 3 ON PAGE 2 ' NOTE 9 ON PACE 2 68.21 S 146TH ST EAST LINE OF W1/2 LOTS 10 AND 11 BLOCK 4 ADAMS HOME TRACTS i5' WATER E ∎A'T r _ IC WA IER ESM' T k SCALE: 1"= 40' .4211NEMii 20 40 80 15 ' REC. N( LEGEND 6 FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED E� MONUMENT TO BE SET ROS RECORD OF SUP.VEY RECORDED IN VOLUME 30 OF SURVEYS. PACE 57 ORIGINAL LOT L?NES ® SET REBAR AND CAP. LS# 11332 CURVE TABLE NO DELTA RADIUS LENGTH CI 90'00'00" 25.00 39.27 C2 72'47'45" 25.00 31.76 C.3 37'38'36" 46.00 .30.22 C4 51'42'32 " 46.00 41,51 C5 73'31'21" 46.00 59.03 C6 62'49'32" 46.00 50.44 C7 40'43'38" 46.00 32.70 08 13'37'54" 25.00 5.95 09 90'00'00" 25.00 .39.27 89 25.00 38 97 C11 62'11 25.00 27.73 LINE TABLE NO. BEARING DISTANCE L1 S 88'32'13" E 5.00 L2 S 25'4241 E 16. 97 L4 S � j •4241 " E 9. ' NOR fli LINE LOT 12 BLOCK ADAMS H()'.4 TR ACTS S 37'63'42 E 189.29 732.15 - _ 5 PRIVATE DRAINAIlt. c \ 11 EASEMENT w ` c- 6500 S0. 3 6 p O C ACCESS 39. 10' UTILITY ` f� EASEMENT ` r TuL.. EE NOTE 13 ON PAGE 112. 6533 SQ. FT. \ ` s 8754' 50' f 139. 36 i 4-I 6503 SQ. FT. 10 1(.)' SAN. SEWER EASEV'NT� �- cri v. RECORDING N0,1999Q 2UUO314 SEE NOTE 3 ON PAGE 2 SEE NOTE 6 ON . PAGE 2 SEE NOTE 13 ON PAGE 2 120.99 S 8 7'54'5 E 189 SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS AS SHOWN ARE PER RECORDING NUMBER I ')99081 200031 4 ,EAST LINE W1, /2 LOT 13 Fit OCK 4 ADAMS HOME TRAC rs SOUTH LINE LOT 12 BLOCK ADAMS HCME TRAC 1 51 14 FD CONC. MON WITH - 22 II 23 LEAD & PUNCH MARK (ENCASED) VISITED 7 -22 -97 PRIVATE TREE REPLACVENT AND VAULT SCREENING EASEM "N T 100 FRONT STREET SOUTH ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON 98027 CHECKED BY1 WSH DATE' (425) 392 - 0250 CALCULA TED - . INTERSECTION POST TION RE EIVED PUBLIC WORKS elevation PERMIT CENTER lower floor plan SINGLE POLE SWITCH --- .. FLUORESCENT TAGRT THREE WAY SWITCH D REEL f 4 FOUR WAY SWITCH CHIME CONVENIENCE-DUELET MN .,o YOW WAY GNUS -m. 15!� /'LIGHT HALE OUTLET SWITCHED SMOK DETECTOR' l CEILING LIGHT TELEPHONE PREWIRE SPECIALITY OUTLET 220 V TV tEE . RECESSED ROUND LIGHT SP P REWIRE; ,. RECESSED SQUARE LICIT THERMOSTAT APPROVED MAR 19 2002 CITY RECEIVED PERMIT upper level floor plan ELECTRICAL SYMBO ,SINGLE POLE SWITCH THREE WAY SWITCH FOUR WAY SWITCH CONVENIENCE OUTLET FOUR WAY OUTLET HALF OUTLET SWITCHED RECESSED SQUARE UGHT 4 CSUNG LIGHT - SPECIALITY OUTLET 220 V tj■T RECESSED ROUND LIGHT E 'pASOTII Ammar DUCTS SHALL SE EQUIPPED WITH IMCE-DRAFT DAMPERS. CAIN Of TUKYALA ' • APPROWD MAR 1 9 200Z XS WO DOOR BELL • ctivAE FF1 flt.DING DiVtSION - 7 FLUORESCENT LIGHT FAN FAN / LIGHT SMOKE DETECTOR TELEPHONE PREWIRE TV PREWIRE SPEAKER PREWIRE THERMOSTAT RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA PERMIT CENTER "boa-ow _ • ; i1WflOLE HOUSE VENTILATION SHALL COMPLY i 'WITH WASHINGTON STATE VENTILATION i- AND INDOOR QUALITY CODE USE SYSTEM V./.A.Q. SECTION 303.4.1 Whole House Ventilation Fans . -AL= EXHAUST DUCTS IN UNCONDITIONED 'SPACES slum. as INSULATED TO A Km OF R-4 INSULATION. :F: O S WILL REQUIRE A New PLAN SL I };',L • cD MAY INCLUDE aDIT, ,..L PLAN REVIEW PEES. I understand that the Plan Ceeck ap,provais approvals are subject to errors and omissions and approval of plans does not authorize the violation of any adopted code or Ordinance. Receipt of con- tractors copy of approved plans acknowledged. By Date Permit No. POs-c0 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA 8 2Q02 PERMIT CENTER foundation plan revision PERMIT CENTER foundation plan 472 optional bonus room plan APPROVED MAR 1 9 2002 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA PERMIT CENTER lower floor framing 'REVISION lower floor framing long Classic HOmes r*1P46 the right to maks' adjustments, changes and variations from plans , and specifications during construction . upper level floor framing Long classic Homes reserves the right to *tak• adjustments, changes and variations from plans , and specifications during construction ROOF VENTING ALL RAFTERS SHALL BE * 2 HEM/FIR SIZE AND SPACING PER APPROVED DESIGN ALL METAL HANGERS SHALL BE 'SIMPSON' STRONG - TIE - SERIES OR EQUAL , Upper Roof 1306 SQ FT/300=4.34SQ FT= 627SQ IN - REQUIRED PROVIDE 20-3 HOLE SCREENED VENT BLOCKS (.14 SQ IN) = 280 Sq IN 8-9 x 7 ROOF VENTS (SO SQ IN) = 400 SQ IN 2- BASLE END VENTS 12 x 24 (140 In) = 280 SQ IN TOTAL PROVIDED 960 SQ IN Lower Roof 560 FT/300=1.86 SQ FT= 2705Q IN - REQUIRED PROVIDE 14-3 HOLE SCREENED VENT BLOCKS (.14 SQ IN) = 196 Sq IN 4-9 x 7 ROOF VENTS (SO SQ IN) = 200 SQ IN MAR 1 9 2002 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA PERMIT CENTER upper roof framing lower roof framing roof framing bonus room optional Long Classic Homes reserves the right to make adjustments, changes and variations from plans 0, and specifications during construction ALL WALLS DESIGNATED " " ARE SHEAR WALLS. EXTERIOR WALLS . SHALL BE SHEATHED WITH RATED SHEATHING (24/0, OSB OR CDX) AND NAILED AT ALL PANEL EDGES (BLOCKED) PER SONDULE (UNO). 1 • NAILING AT INTERMEDIATE FRAMING TO BE AT lr ox. NAILING NOT CALLED OUT SHALL BE PER UBC TABLE 23-11-11-1. 2.) HOLDO•VNS AND OTHER FRAMING HARDWARE BY SIMPSON OR EQUAL TO BE USED PER PLAN. ENDS OF SHEAR WALLS SHALL USE DOUBLE ; .. STUDS MINIMUM (UNO). 2 L.. • . 3.) USE MINIMUM OF (2) BOLTS PER SILL PIECE WITH ONE BOLT LOCATED NOT MORE THAN 12" NOR LESS THAN 5" FROM EACH END OF THE PIECE. EMBEDED BOLTS A MINIMUM OF 7" INTO CONCRETE. 4.) SEE NER - 272 FOR ALTERNATE NAILING / STAPLES. APPROVED MAR 1 9 2002 BUILDING =MCA section a-a shear wall schedule , CRAWLIPACS VENTILATION , NM RV AAA I S4 PT Poa. rI1 j . 110 SQ FT OF MOOR Ate, OPENINGS TO MI FLACCID AS CIPSII i TO IORNERS AS AND SNAIL C : ACCESS Am ell was • -In SOFFIT AND HAW= 3' MOVE PLATE UNE WIC WC. 1.116.3 .. _Arne ACCESS MEI 22•X 311" WITH N1$ 3S uroassiotucm ACCIESSIBLE OPENING UK SEC 3,506.1. yv OF FLOOR AREA OR 3 IQ YT, I i . VCAPAIIII OF PROVIDING 5 AIR CHANGES PER HOUR MALL' ~ PliOVIDED UK= Ott VENT, FANS AND RANGE$/O� SHAWL ENE VEII'TED ABOVE DRAIN' yam ' f MIN NET CLEAR OPENING tilIGH14 ,BALL SE zr urn , NET amR operator wants DIM OP , IOTION OF OPENING SHALL NOT `SE MORE THAI tf SIDE OF OPENING. CONCRETE OR MASONRY SNORTED ON WOOD FRAMING. APPL PAID INSTALL. O P noSULATION AND VAPOR 'AMUR S H A L L , AMPLY WITH 1994 STATE OF WASH ENERGY C OM. WASH STATE wiry LASS LAW. Ek PTIOI4S A O ft1N AND LOCATION S `I TO MAW waviCT, Stmt Ai GLASS ON DOORS, GAZING WITH 1Y ON EITHER SIDE OF R ' DOOR OPENING, GLAZING CLOSER THAN 1S" TO A FLOOR OF SHOWER DOOR AND THE Tt/S ENCLOSURE SHALL BE WNW TEMPERED GLASS, LAMINATED SAFETY GLASS OR SHAM R RESISTANT PLASTIC, OR WIRE REIMFOROD GLASS TOR SKYUTES. 3 - M 4 j SLIDING GLASS DOORS f BLAZING TO SE tAIONATED OR TEMPERED GLASS. • istioweit ENCLOStlRES SHALL SE APPROVED WIRE RSIIROC, J E 1RED OR LAMINATED SAFETY OR SHATTER RESISTANT PLASTIC SIC 2406 UK. tatAnta WITiiIN la" OF FLOOR AND GREATER THAN Pt /EAST "DIMENSION SHALL COMPLY WITH IMPACT LOADS, SEE VC 2406 AND UK STD 24 A. 4 , • ALL EXTIRIOR WALL GLAZING MALL SE DOUSLA GLAZED AND COMPLY WITH 1994 STATE OF WASH ENERGY CODE. ; . ',lb: � ,; :TREATED WOOD /WEATHER PER UK SIC 2317 SID, STANDARDS detail bearing wall framing floor and roof framing stair notes roofing stud walls wood structural framing concrete reinforced steel foundation design loads structural notes LONG CL4SSIC PLAN 220211 SE 312th Streit Sit • Black Diamond, Washriigtoil 081)10 (360) 686 -1X117 • FAX 6116 - -11)10 Civil Consulting F;ngfneers general structural notes inspections concrete reinforcing steel prefabricated joists parallel strand bearing wall framing shear walls floor and roof framing roof trusses general construction notes plan 472 sega engineers MARK MINIMUM S1 -4EATI -1ING (D S1-1EATI -1ING NAILING (1) SILL PLATE NAILING ANCHOR BOLTS (3) REMARK'S 06L-k> OR 05 T! -11 OR 055 kid • 6" O.C. I6d • 8" O.C. 0" o 6 @" OL. Gall = t5 PLF �> MIN. 3 4" TI -II OR 055 'd • 4" OG. N / A `%' • 48" O.G. Gal! it 295 FLF 1/ CDX Sd • 4" OC. • N / A %" e 32" OC Qa ll = 350 PLF � OR OSB 'i2" CDX 8d • 2" O.C. N / A sr *16" O.C. Qat! . 600 PLF � OR OSB USE 3x STUDS � STAGGER EDGE NAILING. qt' RATED SNEATi4NG 1x VENTED BLOCKING_ NAIL TO TF3 55 • EAC 4 END. SI4EATi4IN G AND NAILING PER PLAN OR SC: FDULE. 2x STUD PER PLAN. 15E OBL STUD a ENDS OF SHEAR WALLS I HOLDOUtJ4S. 51-1E.':THING i NAILING PER PLAN. 5IMF5 HOLDOWN PER PLAN. 522) 24" 8d • 6' OC. 520 CONTINUOUS FTG. REINFORCEMENT GIRDER TRUSS PER PLAN FOUNDATION AT CRAW- SPACE \/\ STEM WALL 12" MIN. FO TI • TAI 'SIMPSON 141 Ff2:.MNCG 7AOR MISS PER PLAN TYPICAL ROOF FRAMING CONNECTION DBL 2x TOP PLATE. LAP SPLICE 4' -0" MIN, 4 NAIL w/ ibd • 6' 0.C. 5TAGGERED 2x SW ' SIMPSON' 1-IT520 TWIST STRAP. DBL 2x TOP PLATE SOLE PLATE NAILING. USE 16d • 16" O.G. MIN. 34" SHEATHING 2x PT SILL WITH ANCHOR BOLT PER PLAN OR SCHEDULE. USE 5 6 60" 0L. MIN. 44 4 BAR CONTINUOUS. (TYP.) •4 BAR CONTINUOUS (TYP.) It RATED StATiollING 8d • 6' S - EATHNG t NAILING 1PER PLAN OR SAAR WAL_ SCI-EDULE. SAMPSON' 14OLDCUN STRAP PER PLAN SHEATHING I NAILING PER PLAN. SPLICE TO OCCUR ON COI"1P' ION MEMBER OR BLOCKING 2x STUDS PER PLAN. (BEAM AT SIM) 6 TYPICAL FLOOR FRAMING CONNECTION NOTE: DO NOT BACICFILL UNTIL FLOOR SHEATHING, PONY WALL SHEATHING, AND SLAB ON GRADE ARE INSTALLED PER FLAN. 2x PT SILL u/ L/e "0ANC14OR BOLT • 32"0.C. UNO. *4 BAR • 10" O.C. HORIZONTAL '5 BAR a 10" OC. VERTICAL 4 "4. FTG DRAIN 14 r 8" GABLE END TRUSS "SIMPSON' 435 • 31' OL. / DBL 2x TOP PLATE LAP SPLICE 4' - 0' MIN. 4 NAIL */16d • 8" OL. STAGGERED ROCS FRAMING • GABLE END SOLE PLATE NAILING. USE I6d • 16' OL. MIN. SOLID RIM JOIST 3 /4" SUBFLOOR 4 JOIST PER PLAN (2)•4 BAR eTOP 8" ~� \_•4 BAR CONT -�-� 1' -6" (TYP) FOUNDATION AT BASEMENT JOIST PER PLAN 1x DBL TOP PLATE. LAP SPLICE 6' -0" MIN. I NAIL w/ 16d • 6" OC. STAGGERED. ['SIMPSON' A35 / 3 /4" SHEATHING (40/20) 4" SLAB ON GRADE 9' MAX. • EXIERl WEANING PeR PLAN OR �r'CI€DLLE ed OC 2x BLOQCING v 160 MAIL • 8' OC t' RATED 5 €ATHNG 'TRUSS OR RAFTER PER PLAN 520 �ou� ROOF �ar�n� • s+�aR WALL I0d • 4" O.G. - STAGGER SIDES. 5NE,4Tr -IMCs t NAILING PER PLAN OR SCHEDULE. —PIPE SLEEVE — z FRAMING AT INTERIOR 5 -EAR WALL V §CTIQN ELEVATION FOUNDATION PENETRATION Ix BL OCKING 2x 51110 PER PLAN SHEAR WALL SCHEDULE yy• lx4 'E 66.6A'wING 414.8, VENTED BLOCKING 4ATHIN6 4 NAILING PER PLAN OR SCHEDULE SHEATHING PER PLAN OR SCHEDULE i •4 BAR CONTINUOUS_ (TYP TOP 4 BOTTOM) 'SIMPSON' 14OLDOWN PER PLAN NOTES I) ALL WALLS DESIGNATED" ARE SHEAR WALLS. EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE SHEATHED WITH RATED SHEATHING (24/0, 055 OR CDX) AND NAILED AT ALL PANEL EDGES ( BLOCKED) PER SCHEDULE). ■AIILING AT INTERMEDIATE FRAMING TO BE AT 12" OC. NAILING NOT CALLED OUT SHALL BE PER UCB TABLE 23- II -B -I. 2) 14OLDOWN5 AND OTHER FRAMING HARDWARE BY SIMPSON STRONG TIE OR EQUIVALENT TO BE USED PER PLAN. ENDS OF SHEAR WALLS SHALL USE DOUBLE STUDS MINIMUM. 3) USE MINIMUM OF TWO (2) BOLTS PER SILL PIECE WIN ONE BOLT LOCATED NOT MORE THAN 12" NOR LESS THAN 5" FROM EACH END OF EACH PIECE. EMBED BOLTS MINI OF 1" INTO CONCRETE. WASHERS TO BE MINIMUM 2" x 2" x 3/I6 " Of O C ITRECEIVED ed • &' OC _C • BER 62 T e \____�1t4 TION AT SLAB ON GRAPE .0J1 - 6" 1, AR A 9 "" t� >U1 tU tOLpttld p1V1StON RAPER PER PLAN '—'5 425 Olt • GM. 1x 'CP PLATE LAP SPLICE 4' -0' !!'!N 4 NAIL of I6c1 • 8' CC. STAhJEREO 2, SW PER PLAN. USE DBL • HOLDOUN. SLAB ON GRADE PER PLAN OVER 6 MIL vAPOR BARRIER ON COMPACT BASE ; 4 s — 2x PT SILL w/ %No ANCHOR BOLT. '' --- •4 BAR CONT (TYP PERMIT CENTER COPYRIGHT 2001, SEGA ENGINEERS IEXPIRES: 3/12/03 I Nt "NO PARKING ON ASPHALT" SIGNS ALONG WALKWAY @ 100' SPACING, TYP. WIDEN EXISTING ASPHALT EXISTING I ROAD 5' MIN. FOR PEDESTRIAN T AS b WALKWAY TO 46TH AVE S. TYP. ! - SEE DETAIL STA. 3 +25 END - IMPROVEMENTS STA. 3+10, 27'LT CURB INLE BOX 4.63 .25 IN V= 4-593E STA. 3 +00 - END ROCKERY TCP = 466.0 TCE = 10P =468.0 TOE= 464. TOP OF CUkB= 4t4.;:::_ TOP = 468.9 TOE =465.0 STA. 1- 50 -BEGIN ROCKERY TOP =469.0 TOE= 466.5 ENTERING SIGHT DISTANCE 438 FEET LOOKING WEST 323 FEET LOOKING EAST (INSTRUMENT HEIGHT - 3.50 FEET, MEASURED 10 FEET OEF EDGE OF ASPHALT, OBJECT HEIGHT = 4.25 FEET) POSTED SPEED LIMIT = 25 MPH RE LOCATE EXISTING FENCE AS NEEDED, TYP. e I T PE II BARRICADE RELOCATE UTILITIES AS NEEDED. TYP. PRIVATE I PRIVATE CB #14, TYPE I -48" •I `DRAINAGE I EASEMENT W/ LOCKING VANED GRATE 1 •4 t RIM= ' 413.13 \ 1 INV = '07.78 401,7.3 \ \ \ PVC ROOF DRAIN !PRIVATE 2 1 'VAR IJI f I ;'CB+ 13, TYPE I ( !RAIN \ W/ LOCKIJ4G ACCESSS I VANED GRATF�� I MANHOLE, RIM -4.. ; - 4 TYP. I I INV - 4f+i- 4'o4.4L, STEEL HANDRAIL I ( OR CHa LINK FENCE DRAINAG ESM T:' WALK ME NT STA. 0 +49, 13.25 T I CB# 10, TYPE I W/ `VANED GRATE RIM= "t,C.EF 451. 4 STR T INV =4rr 434. 5' 7 LIGHT\ WATER. E T (TYP.) - DEDICATED C 5' WATER ESMT. DEDICATED TO I WD 126, TYP. -BOX MAILBOX RPCK LEARANCE BETWE€N I BOX & BACK OF VDE WALK DETAIL CB# 13. TYPE I W/ VANED GRA4TE (MATCH PAVIN) 1 INV =4WQ 4 4. T'IKWILA 5' PRIVA IDRAIIrA.GE ESMT STA. 1+ 3, 13.25'RT CB# 8, YPE I W/ VANE GRATE RIM =• "IT...' 441.01 INV ^ 434.97 STREET YARD DRAIN TREES, TYP, 101'12" HDPP'SD 44 14I•:•="rt 19.1$p• W /(2) PIPE ANCHORS SPACED ALONG ( PIPE -SEE DETAIL I � I PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT � I YARD DRAIN, TYP. Z 79 e EXIST. WELL, TO BE ABANDONED PER : ►.O.E. REQUIREMENTS 10' PRIVATE I l DRAINAGE 9 ESMT PRIVATE CBI '61 I I I W/ LOCKING GRA ,IM= 427.00 INV 4 n = 4129 5 'RELOCATE EXISTING UTILITIES I AS NEEDED, TYP. TREF, TYP SCALE 1' = 30 E" ADS N -12 TIGHTLINE FROM ROCKERY DRAIN 0 1% 11IN. l NV 440,58 0 STA. 3 +24, 13.25 k CB# 12, TYPE RIM =+=_r l,7i 146TH" ST POTHOLE WATERLINE PRIOR TO SD C P STRUCTION TO VERIFY C E • FOSTER HEIGHTS STA. 2 +49.89 CB# 12, TYPE I W/ VANED GRATE RIM =4 .7 EUf (MATCH PAVING) ACCESS ESMT -0- CB#! 7. TYPE CURB - RIM - 4Z4• IS INV= 419 . q L CBJ 5, TYPE II - 54" WI SOLID LOCKING LID STA. 2 +74, 18.5'RT RIM= 4:. 417 N 87'53'42" Wl EX�ST. 0110 THESE PLANS ARE "AS- BUILT" AND THE INFORMATION SHOWN ACCURATELY REFLECTS EXISTING FIELD CONDITIONS AS OF THIS DATE: JZ- 05 -Zecc 5) 47 WILLIAM SHUPE HOLM ERI3 PLS .6332 15' UTILITY j EASEMENT 0 0 CONSTRUCT /REBUILD ROCKI.INED DITCH -SEE DETAIL CB# 4, TYPE II - 48 W/ SCUD LOCKING RIM =d• : rn 413.01 INV= %=-=_� 40941 CB p 3 . TYPE :1 -48" LID W/ SOLID LOCKING LID I C I RIM= 1 C`.CC 384 6 / 3$0.85 ' 23.137 i ^1 2� H D�F r W/ (2) PIPE ANCHORS I I SPACED ALONG PIPE E XISTING 1 I DITCH EXIST r CP I RIM - 377.7 INV= 375.0 0 EXISTING STORM D PAVED !MAIN ACCESS PAR AREA I VAULT DRAIN GATE VALVE EXPOSE/PER PIPC INLL1 (xIS11NG 12' IJANCE ING IN 0 ') CB# 2, TYPE .I- 45" RIM - +Hf-F� 379.73 __----- INV 37C,C'( "W) 374.33 I INV -i'3.; ,C 8,12 "E) 373.43 20' COMBINATION DETENTION/WATER QUALITY VAULT - SEE DETAIL I CB# 1, TYPE I CONSTRUCT OVER EXIST. SD RIM .?7C.21 375.11 (MATCH ROAD) INV- ?+-3•+ (VERIFY 31Z.76 PRIOR TO VAULT CONSTRUCTION) Call before you 1 -800- 424 -5555 UNDERGROUND SERVICE (USA) WOODCUTTING u,araa,o V41T INNS TS COST', OWNER HAPPY VALLEY LAND CO. P.O. BOX 1324 ISSAQUAH, WA 98027 INSTRUMENTATION NOTE NOTE: VICINITY MAP NTS INDEX 1 ROAD /STORM /GRADING PLAN 2 ROAD /STORM PROFILES 3 ROAD /STORM PROFILES 4 OFFSITE WALKWAY 5 NOTES /DETAILS 6 STANDARD DETAILS 7 COMPOSITE UTILITY PLAN 8 T_E.S.C. PLAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 12 AND 14, TOGETHER WITH THE WEST HALF OF LOTS 10, 11 AND 13, ALL IN BLOCK 4, PLAT OF ADAMS HOME TRACTS, RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 31, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. INSTRUMENT USED: 5 SECOND ELECTRONIC DISTANCE MEASuR.ING UNIT. FIELD SURVEY CONTROL WAS BY CLOSED TRAVERSE LOOPS, MINIMUM CLOSURE OF LOOPS WAS 1:22,000, IN ACCORDANCE WITH WAC 332 -130 -100. 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, ALL STORM PIPE (SD) SHALL BE ADS N -12 OR EQUAL. 2. STREET LIGHT MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL MEET CITY OF TUKWILA STANDARDS. 3. INTERIOR ROADS SHALL HAVE THERMOPLASTIC CROSSWALK AND STOP BAR STRIPING AND CENTERLINE BUTTONS. 4. INSTALL STREET NAME SIGNS, STOP SIGNS, ETC. PER CITY OF TUKWILA STANDARDS. APPROXIMATE CUT = 1,150 CUBIC YARDS APPROXIMATE FILL = 400 CUBIC YARDS D02 -050 EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. T SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE THE EXACT VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UNDER- GROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. NO REPRESENTATION IS MADE THAT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES ARE SHOWN HEREON. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR UTILITIES NOT SHOWN OR UTILITIES NOT SHOWN IN THEIR PROPER LOCATION. CAI BEFORE YOU DIG; 1 800 474 '+555. DATE 2/10/98 SHEET 1 of 8 JOB NO. 1422 -004 DRAWING S' WATER ESM1. DEDICATED TO WD 125, TYP. BOX MAILBOX RACK TH MINIMUM LEARANCE BETWEEN Al BOX & BACK OF SIDEWALK S DETAIL ;i ' 4 SID WALK EA MUNI 5' PRIVATE DRAINAGE ESMT LOT LINE TO BE ELIMINATED POST Wi • is /j R 5' PRIVATE DRAINAGE ESMT PRIVATE CB# 14 PRIVATE CB 13 T I PRIVATE ,DRAINAGE EASEMENT 5' PRATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT _ N 87'55'58" W EX4SI. DITC "NO PARKING ON ASPHALT" SIGNS ALONG WALKWAY ® 100' SPACING, TYP. WIDEN EXISTING ASPHALT EXISTING I ROAD 5' MIN. FOR PEDESTRIAN _ T AS O WALKWAY TO 461H AVE S. , TYP. I f - SEE DETAIL STA. 3 +`5 END • IMPROVEMENTS ENTERING SIGHT DISTANCE 438 FEET LOOKING WEST 323 FEET LOOKING EAST (INSTRUMENT HEIGHT = 3.50 FEET, MEASURED 10 FEET OFF EDGE OF ASPHALT, OBJECT HEIGHT = 4 25 FELT) POSTED SPEED LIMIT = 25 MPH TOP OF CURB= 464.23f RELOCATE EXISTING FENCE AS NEEDED, TYP. BARR'CADE N o 8" THERMOPLASTIC EDGE 1 0 SEPARATE PEDESTRIAN o FROM AU TOS' S. 146TH" ST. FOSTER HEIGHTS CB# 12 SSMH CBA 7 FIRE HYDRANT CESS ESMT T. RMN 87'53'42" Wof MIN. 20' WIDE DRIVEWAY FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT TURNAROUND CB?' .. STORM EXI STING DITCH L COST. Call before you 1- 800 - 424 -5555 UNDERGROUND SERVICE USA THESE PLANS ARE "AS- BUILT" AND THE INFORMATION SHOWN ACCURATELY REFLECTS EXISTING FIELD CONDITIONS AS OF THIS EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE THE EXACT VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UNDER- GROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. NO REPRESENTATION IS MADE THAT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES ARE SHOWN HEREON. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR UTILITIES NOT SHOWN OR UTILITIES NOT SHOWN IN THEIR PROPER LOCATION. L I BEFORE YOLI DIG 1 800 424 5555. DRAWING NO. 1427 -4C1 File: D 02 -0050 35mm Drawing #1 PRINTED ON NO. 1000H CIEARPRINT • ref: Preliminary Plat Map by Baima & Holmberg Inc. dated 9/12/97, reduced scale 1" =.60' r -15' EASEMENT drainage /seepage • : GEOSPECTRUM CONSULTANTS, INC. Proposed Foster Heights Development South 146th Street & 51st Avenue South Tukwila, Washington SITE EXPLORATIONS PLAN Date 2/98 Figure File: D 02 -0050 35mm Drawing #2 ref: Preliminary Plat Map by Baima & Holmberg Inc. dated 9/12/97, reduced scale 1" = 60' FENCE 1 Proposed Foster Heights Development South 146th Street & 51st Avenue South Tukwila, Washington Proj. No.98-1 03 Date 2/98 Figure EASEMENT drainage/Seepage SITE EXPLORATIONS PLAN