HomeMy WebLinkAboutReg 2004-11-01 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET
Monday, November 1, 2004; 7 PM
1. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/ROLL CALL
2. SPECIAL a. Update on Council Chambers upgrade - Jim Morrow, Director, Public Works.
PRESENTA- b. Southwest King County Economic Development Initiative - Jack Pace,
TIONS Deputy Director,DCD.
3. CITIZEN At this time, you are invited to comment on items not included on this agenda.
COMMENT To comment on an item listed on this agenda, please save your comments until
the issue is presented for discussion.
a. Approval of Minutes: 9-20-04 (Regular); 10-4-04 (Regular); 10-18-04 (Regular);
and 10-18-04 (Special).
b. Approval of Vouchers.
c. Accept as complete the 2004 Overlay Program with Watson Asphalt Paving
Co., Inc.;authorize release of retainage subject to the standard claim and
lien release procedures (final cost of project: $762,473.38, including retainage).
An ordinance modifying the City's standards for cargo containers in zones and
amending the appeal process regarding placement of cargo containers.
a. Authorize Mayor to sign an amendment to Contract #96-110(A) with
Kirshenbaum and Goss, Inc., P.S., for public defender services.*
b. An ordinance establishing a process for attaching tax liens and recovering
costs to recoup abatement costs.
c. A resolution committing to initiate an annexation process in conjunction
with Tukwila Valley South annexation.
d. Authorize Mayor to signa supplement to Contract #03-069(A) with
ECONorthwest for services related to the Tukwila Urban Center (TUC). *
e. Authorize Mayor to sign an Interlocal Agreement with King County Rural
Library District for library services. *
f. Proposed amendments to the "Natural Environment" chapter of the
Tukwila Comprehensive Plan, and revisions to the "Sensitive Areas"
ordinance. ~ Please bring your "Natural Environment Chapter and
Sensitive Areas Ordinance" notebook. -<
g.. Continuation of Proposed 2005 Budget Review.
~ Please bringyour 2005 Proposed Budget. -<
a. . A resolution ordering cancellation of past-due accounts receivable and
returned check write-offs.
b. A resolution ordering the cancellation of outstanding court/treasurer's
checks and gift certificates.
a. Mayor c. Staff
b. City Council d. City Attorney
9. MISCELLANEOUS
10. EXECUTIVE SESSION
11. ADJOURNMENT
Tukwila City Hall is wheelchair accessible. Reasonable accommodations are available at public hearings with advance notice by
calling the City Clerk's office 206-433-1800rrDD 206-248-2933. This notice is available at www.ci.Tukwila.wa.us. and also in alternate
formats with advance notice for those with disabilities. Tukwila Council meetings are audio taped.
4. CONSENT
AGENDA
5. PUBLIC
HEARING
6. UNFINISHED
BUSINESS
(*Refer to
10/25/04 COW
packet.)
7. NEW
BUSINESS
8. REPORTS
TukwilaCity Council Agenda
.:.REGULAR MhETING .:.
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Rhonda Berry,. City Administrator
Jim Haggerton, Council President
Councilmembers: · Pam Carter · Joe Duffie
· Dave Fenton · Joan Hernandez
· Pamela Linder · Dennis Robertson
· Ord #2066
· Res #1561
'I
!-
i
'11
e. Intergovernmental
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
4 9s y Initials
o I No.
I ∎71:'� �e Meeting Date 1 Prepared by 1 Mayor's review 1 Council review
11/01/04 1 RP CVfil ,as I >t•�
V
7908
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER: 04-011 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: NOVEMBER 1, 2004
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Council Chamber Upgrade Project
CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 11 /01 /04
SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P&R Police PW
SPONSOR'S Remodel will include new audio /video equipment and furniture for the Council Chambers.
SUMMARY
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
El Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE:
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN.
COMM1 fnE
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$452,683.20 $421,569.00 $475,000.00
Fund Source: 303 Facilities
Comments:
MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
3/22/04 Council approved "Option 2"
11/01/04
MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS
11/01/04 Information Memo dated October 27, 2004
Attachments 1 through 3
INFORMATION MEMO
To:
Mayor Mull~t
From:
Public Works Director
Date:
October 27,2004
Subject:
Status of Court/Council Chamber UUf:!rade
ISSUE
City Council has requested an update on the Council Chamber Remodel Project and another review
of the scope of work. Several changes have been requested to the approved scope-of-work and Staff
needs a decision on the requested changes.
DISCUSSION
Atthe March 22, 2004 City Council Meeting, "Option 2" was approved as the scope-of-work for the
proposed project (Included a lip for the dais). Attachmentl is the approved scope-of-work. The
estimated project cost was $421,569.00 (AudioNideo $257,572; Furniture $163,997). Attachment 2 is
the "Conceptual" Layout of the Chambers.
Since March there have been numerous user group (City Clerk, Court Administrator, IT Department,
Planning Department, Council's Legislative Analyst) meetings to discuss scope, scheduling, and
financing. As a result, the design costs have grown from an original estimate of$18,385 to
$49.499.20. This increases the total project costto $452,683.20.
Recently, the users and design team have put forth additional suggestions/changes:
. Eliminate the "goose-necked" microphones and replace them with wireless microphones.
. Provide "flat-panel screens" in the dais.
. Provide lap top computers in lieu of the flat-panel screens.
In order to eliminate the labor premium costs associated with working in the evenings, provisions are
being made to accommodate the needs of the Court in Conference Room 3 (Tuesdays and Thursdays)
during business hours. This will.require that the furniture in Conference Room 3 be re-arranged for
the duration of the construction (See Attachment 3). Because of this, the Court has offered the use of
the Law Library for Department Head and other meetirigs typically scheduled for Conference Room 3.
Conference Room 3 will also have the doorknobs changed on the doors leading to the Mayor's office
to ones that will lock from the Mayor's side.
Another user group and design team (David Clark and JW Tel-Tronics) meeting has tentatively been
scheduled for November 2. This meeting will be held to finalize the scope-of-work.
Construction activities will be limited to business hours (labor premium not approved), and will most
likely occur on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Fridays (with the exception of the first Thursday and Friday
of each month). This schedule will be an inconvenience to the contractor, and they will spend
approximately 1/6 of their time mobilizing, de-mobilizing and cleanup.
DECISION NEEDED ...
I. Eliminate the "goose-necked" microphones and replace them with wireless microphones?
Estimated that there will not be any additional cost.
2. Provide "flat-panel screens" in the dais.
3. Provide lap top computers in lieu of flat-panel screens.
Note: Estimate cost for either item 2 or item 3 is an additional $25000.
RECOMMENDATION
Project Management strongly recommends that the scope-of-work be "frozen" so that design can be
finalized, a construction scheduled can be.established, and final project costs detennined.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS UPGRADE PROJECT
(Construction, Design, & Furniture- Less Labor Premium, Upper Dias & ADA Accommodations)
Page 1
Item
Estimated
Cost
Description
Demolition
$ 5,492
Carpet, Lighting, Haulin• & Dump Fees, Protection & Dust Control.
Alter Wall for Tech Racks /Cabinets; Header & Reframe.
Rough Carpentry
1,642
Finish Carpentry
30,000
Add Upper Dais, Alter Dais, Cabinet in Seating Area, Technology Cabinet, Jury Box
Plastic Laminate
9,633
Vertical Face; Countertops
Caulking
310
Was $620, now only $310 with no ADA work
Ramp-Railings
2,812
Relocate Court Doors
266
• ' - • - ' ° • - - _ - - -
-
3,640
... .. . _ .. - ....
-_-.
1,640
-• _....
5,751
i ; i
--• - __.
Elmo Stand
1,250
Prep Floor for Carpeting
2,313
Install Field Carpet
8,885
Was $3,054, now only $1,000 with no ADA work
Painting
1,000
Council Signs
1,250
Name Plates for Council Members, Mayor, City Atty & City Admin
HVACNentilation
9,000
Electrical
30,319
General Lighting, Electrical Panel, Electrical System Upgrade
New Public Seating
16,640
Executive Seating
2,175
City Atty, City Admin, Mayor
Admin Seating
850
1,390
City Clerk, Legislative Coordinator /Bailiff
Podium
Computer Cabinet
1,670
Sub -Total
$ 122,569
Design Fee
18,385
Labor Premium (25 %).
35,094
Contingency (10 %)
12,257
WSST (8.8 %)
10,786
Total (Construction, Design, Furniture)
$ 163,997
A1Tcrr*awt1 J.
yr
Page 2
COUNCIL CHAMBERS UPGRADE PROJECT
(Technology /Equipment & Labor Cost Estimate- Less Labor Premium, Upper Dias, & ADA Accommodations)
Estimated Estimated Total Line
r Costs Item Costs
Description
System Hardware & Infrastructure
$ 8,631
$ 6,500
$ 15,131
Equipment Enclosures, Connectivity Panels, Mounting
Brackets, etc.
Audio Sub- System
35,031
16,000
51,031
Gooseneck and Wireless Mics, & Gallery Speakers.
Display & Presentation Sub- System
37,352
16,600
53,952
Projectors, Screens, Video Playback, Computer
Display Connections
Control System
18,207
9,200
27,407
Integrated System Control Hardware, Touchpanels,
Preview Monitoring, System Programming
Digital Recording System
5,000
393
3,250
800
8,250
1,193
Hard Disk/CD Recording System; Fully Integrated Into
Audio System.'
Audio Feed to Police Department
Improved Audio Feed to PD to Accompany Existing
CCTV Signal.
Fully Integrate Court's existing VTC System; Eliminate
Current VTC Mobile Cart/Monitor Arrangement.
Court Videoconferencing Integration
1,561
1,650
3,211
56,637
City Information Channel
41,937
14,700
Sub -Total
Design Fee
Furniture Grand
(pg 1) Total
$ 216,812 $ 122,569 $ 339,381
18,385 18,385
17,175 35,091 52,260
$ C718,112
$ 68,700
17,175
Labor Premium (25 %)
Contingency (10 %)
WSST (8.8 %)
Total (Technology /Equipment & Labor)
21,681 12,257 33,938
19,079 10,786 29,865
$ 148112 $ 68,700
$ 257,572
$ 163,997 $ 421,569
P�od„ux3�. s
CITY OF TUKWILA COUNCIL
CHAMBERS
UPGRADE PROJECT
Covozr pikoCh`aDr.v6s
tM F i b u f' -A-T% w. CCM Ceer r BUY _ CcM c: Rao 14-1 3
b U1\ t N it Csou R-T/ C O lM Ci l.. C..1 A-u.r R CYO- v , i1•.4 -pt
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
t `s
=0 Initials ITEM NO.
N iVleetireg Date Prepared GA, Mayor's review 1 Coijncil review
+I�r 49 2 11/1/04 1 SI ,1/011-1-
H..
1908
1
1
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER: 04-150 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 11/1/04
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Southwest King County Economic Development Initiative
CATEGORY X Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date
SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P Police PW
SPONSOR'S Briefing on Southwest King County Economic Development Initiative
SUMMARY
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. X CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: October 12, 04
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN.
COMMITTEE Forward to CC
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
o $o $o
Fund Source: N/A
Comments:
MTG. DATE 1 RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
11/1/04
MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS
11/1/04 Memo dated October 26, 04
Minutes, CAP meeting October 12, 04
INFORMATION MEMO
.To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
City Council ]
Community DevelopmentDirector
October 26,04
Souiliwest ~ng COUDo/ Economic D velopment Initiative
ISSUES
Briefing on Southwest King County Economic Development Initiative
BACKGROUND
The Southwest King County Economic Development Initiative represents a cooperative
sub-regional economic development effort by the cities of Buren, Des Moines, Normandy
Park, and Tukwila, unincorporated North Highline, the Port of Seattle and King County
devoted to increasingjob opportunities and income for area residents.
The strategy focus. on the economic development potential of Southwest King County in
an effort to increase full-time permanent employment opportunities and household
incomes through enhancing the area business and investment climate. The strategy is a
collective approach to improve the area's economy. By collaborating on economic
development goals, the cities, the Port and the County will be able to achieve more than
they can accomplish by each jurisdiction acting individually.
Attached tothis memo is a brief summary of the Small Business Development Center
and the Export .Promotion Program.
CAP REVIEW
The Community Affairs and Parks Committee reviewed this issue as its October 12
meeting and recommends moving this issue to November I, 04 City Council meeting.
City of Tukwila
City Hall at 5:00 PM
October 12, 2004
A SnaDshot of The SKCEDI Small Business DeveloDment Center
SKCEDI and Small Business
SKCEDI's mission is to facilitate economic development in Southwest King County. From its
inception SKCEDI recognized that small businesses in southwest King County, when viewed
altogether, are the biggestsector in this area's economy. The numbers are substantial: there are about
65,000 small businesses in all of King County, 70% of employment within the County comes from
small and medium-sized businesses. Thatis why SKCEDI is dedicated to business development in
southwest King County. and creating opportunities for businesses to grow.
The SBDC
The Small Business Development Centers [the SBDC] provides business management and technical
assistance, training and research to small business owners and managers to improve profitability and
stimulate economic growth.
The most common services offered by the SKCEDI-SBDC in response are--
support for bank loan applications, coaching on development of written business/marketing plans,
research support for sales and marketing implementation, connections to useful organizations and
resources
Three Typical Tukwila Clients
a. Manufacturer with a a promising growth/export opportunities in one of his divisions.
b. Restaurantowner operating below break-even and sales in downward trend.
c. Sign company owner gearing up to handle higher volume in 2005.
Common Requests fromSKCEDI-SBDC Clients
The five most common requests from SKCEDI-SBDC clients are for assistance with: loan
applications, marketing upgrades to help increase sales, improved financial management, assistance
with completing an equity financing,. assistance for export and imports of services or goods.
The SKCEDI-SBDC Is In Demand
In the first eight months of this year alone, the SKCEDI-SBDC has served over 100 businesses.
This is a result of a continuous outreach program. As of September I s" there were 3 7 active clients,
ranging from owner-operated home-based enterprises to 1 00+ -person manufacturing companies.
Approximately 10% of the local SBDC clients have sales of more than $1 million. Clients are
locatedin all five of the sponsoring cities and in unincorporated King County.
Other SBDCs Serve AU Areas of Washington
There are 20 SBDC.offices in the State of Washington, staffed by 26 certified business development
specialists. The SKCEDI-SBDC is located close to Highline Community College on Pacific
Highway South;Zev Siegl is the fuU-time specialist. Most states in the USA have an SBDC network.
Tukwila City Council, Sub-Committee
October 12, 2004
Export Promotion Pro!!ram
. Origins of the Export Promotion Program: Southwest King County Economic
Development Initiative
The Export Promotion Program was a projecfthat originated from the Southwest King
County Economic Development Initiative (the Initiative.)
The goal of the program is to demystify the exporting process and highlight the benefits and
ease of exporting for small and medium-sized businesses.
The Initiative is a partnership between the cities of Burien, Des Moines, SeaTac, Tukwila,
Highline Community College, the Port of Seattle, and King County. It is dedicated to
business development and opportunities for business growth in the southwest King County
area.
Funding for the Export Promotion Program comes from a grant from the U.S. Economic
Development Administration and Initiative partners.
. Importance of Trade and Exports to the Region
International trade is vitally important to the Washington state economy. Washington
exports contribute to nearly one-half ofthe state's new jobs.
According to the Washington State Department of Community, Trade, and Economic
Development, it is estimated that by 2005, one-in-three jobs in the state will be directly or
indirectly supported by.intemational sales.
In fact, exports result in increased profits, jobs, and real personal income for our region's
companies and residents.
In a world of increased globalization and explosive growth in key Asian markets, the Export
Promotion Program emphasizes the profitability and ease of exporting to our local
businesses. '
Employment -Economic Development - Export Promotion
70 percent of employment within King County comes from small and medium-sized
businesses, the very businesses that can best be tapped for export promotion activities.
As these firms get into international sales and become more profitable, they naturally have
to expand production, leading to greater employment and economic development for the
region.
· Programs:
1) Export Promotion Symposium - 2004 and 2005:
The first Symposium was held earlier this year, in February, at the Doubletree Hotel
inSeaTac.
It was marketed extensively, with particular emphasis on southwest King County. It
was considered very successful, with 100 attendees and 50 companies represented..
Based onthe success ofthis program, we received an extension of our grant from the
U .S.Economic Development Administration to hold a King County-wide Export
Promotion Symposium in 2005.
This event will be widely marketed to small and medium-sized businesses
throughout King County and will have the same goals of emphasizing the
profitability and ease of exporting. It will take place on March 23,2005 at the
WSTCC.
~ Export Mentor Program - 2004:
The Export Mentor Program isa pilot program designed to develop the exporting
capabilities of small and medium-sized companies.
A mentor..,protegerelationship is established between larger, exporting-experienced
companies offering guidance and support to protege companies new to exporting.
The protege companies in turn design Export Plans in order to assess, finance,
market, sell, transport, and distribute their products and services overseas, with the
ultimate goal of developing successful exporting programs.
Currently, 10 companies are participating in the program from SeaTac, Tukwila,
Federal Way, Seattle, and other areas in KC.
The most successful protege company, based on progress throughout the year and
completion of the export plan, will be given a subsidized trade mission to develop
business contacts in a specific market overseas.
.
"""". .
Community and Parks Committee
October 12, 2004
\-
. ..~
"
Present:
Pam Linder, Chair; Joe Duffie, Dave Fenton.
Stephen King, Steve Lancaster, Maggie Lubov, Lynn Miranda, Jack Pace,
Joyce Trantina, Lisa Verne; Sue Carlson (Segale Properties), Martin
Dicker (King County).
-*
Southwest Kin1!County Economic Develonment Initiative (SWKCEDn
Presentation. Jack Pace provided some background on Tukwila's participation in the
SWKCEDI, .andintroducedMartin Dicker. Martin is a Senior Economic Development
Specialist with KingCounty.He described the goals of the Ecpnomic Development
. Initiative as increasing employment oppommities and hou~ehold incomes throughout
southwest King County. He recognized Pam Linder's confiibutions to the organization
as a member of the Executive Committee, and Jack Pace's contributions as a member of
the Steering Committee. Martin described two significant programs of the Economic
Develv.loauent Initiative: the small Business Assistance Centerlocated at Highline
Community College; and the Export Promotion Program. He also described how the
relatively modest but critical. financial support provided by Tukwila and other cities has
been successful in leveraging significant financial support form other sources.
Forwarded to November 1. 2004 Citv Council meetin1! as a Special Presentation.
........ ... . ......... ...... . .. . ......
. ..-.-.. - ".- .-."-. . .. " . -. .
Annroval of Metro Implementation Contract for Commute Trip Reduction Maggi
Lubov, Commute Trip Reduction(CTR) Coordinator, reported this contract is for the
City to expend funds . trom the State allocation for Commute Trip Reduction
administration to collect data relative to CTR. Monies are also used for promotional
activities and advertising of the program for City wide employers and employees. This
one-year contract is for a fiscal year from July 1,2004 - June 30, 2005. The amount to be
spent with this contract with King County Metro is $21,106.00. i
King County Metro provides technical assistance to the City for the data collection and
analysis, as well as employer CTRprogram review functions. Adrnini::;trative
consistency in implementing the State requirements, along with King County Metro's
. technical resources and skills, is the primary reason for this agreement. This is a renewal
of similar contracts in place since 1995. Maggi provided a packet of materials
highlightingCTR activities.overthe past year. The packet included the 2003 CTR Task
Force report to the legislature, ridesharing information and transit changes. Forward to
COW with recommendation to aunrove.
TUCIECONorthwest contract amendment #2. Lynn Miranda described the next
phase ofECONorthwest'g work on the Tukwila Urban Center Plan as: 1) identification of
o potential infrastructure :ft.mding strategies; 2) preparation of an "economic simulation" to
provide information on the ability of proposed City investments to "pay for themselves"
over time; and 3 ) preparation of a summary of previous economic and financial factors
reports, to be included in the proposed TUe plan. The proposed amendment increases
ECONorthwest's contract by $26,000. Forward t~ fJf)vY with recommendation to
approve.
\
117, COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
ITEM No.
Meeting Date 1 Prepared by 1 Mayors review Council review
o i 11/0 I BG A ti I f% /1'
rsoa I I
4,c,
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER: 04-151 ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: NOVEMBER 1, 2004
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Accept as complete 2004 Overlay and Repair Program Construction Contract and
release retainage.
CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 11 /01104
SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P Police PW/
SPONSOR'S Watson Asphalt Paving Company, Inc. completed the overlay and repair project on July 28,
SUMMARY 2004. One change order added work on S Glacier St, Cascade Ave S and Riverside Dr and
unit price underruns amounted to $73,466.62. The total contract amounted to
$762,473.38.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 10/25/04
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Accept contract as complete and authorize release of retainage.
COMMrrl'EE Accept contract and forward to Consent agenda for approval
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$762,473.38 $1,000,000.00
Fund Source: 104.02 Commercial Streets (page 42, 2004 CIP)
Comments:
MTG. DATE 1 RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
11/01/04 I
MTG. DATE I ATTACHMENTS
11/01/04 Information Memo dated October 15, 2004
Notice of Completion of Public Works Contract 04 -035
Transportation Committee Meeting Minutes from October 25, 2004
INFORMATION MEMO
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor Mullet
Public.WorkS.Directo~
October 15, 2004
2004 Overlay Program
Project Completion and Acceptance
ISSUE
Accept construction contra.ct as complete and authorize release of retainage in the amount of
$38,123.67.
BACKGROUND
The Notice to Proceed for Contract No. 04-035 with Watson Asphalt Paving Company, Inc.,
of Redmond,. Washington, was issued on June 1, 2004, for the construction of Project No.
04-RWOl. The base project provided repairs and overlays on five roadway segments
(Olympic Ave, ToddBlvd, Strander Blvd, 57th Ave S, and Ryan Way).
This contract was substantially completed on July 28,2004. There was one change order
during construction (due to favorable bids, added work on S Glacier St, Cascade Ave S, and
Riverside Dr). The unitprice underruns amounted to $73,466.62, primarily due to less
pavement repair required. Closeout paperwork has been completed and verified, and the
project is now ready for fmal acceptance.
The contract cost is summarized as follows:
Contract Award Amount
Change Orders
Underruns
Total Amount Paid (inc!. retainage)
$ 727,940.00
108,000.00
(73,466.62)
$ 762,473.38
ACTION TAKEN
The final payment has been issued, fmal records are being prepared, and this acceptance will
formalize the closeout of this project.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that this contract be forwarded to the Tukwila City Council on the consent
agenda for formal acceptance and authorize the release of the retainage, subject to the standard
claim and lien release procedures.
BG:ad
attachment: Notice of Completion of PublicWorks Contract
(P:Projects\A- RW\04RWOl\lnfo Memo Closeout - Watson Asphalt Paving)
~ State of Washington
u Department of Revenue
,At.:. PO Box 47474
. REVENUE Olympia W A98504-7474
Date 8/18/04
NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT
Contractor's Registration No. (UBI No.) 179017188
Assigned To
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, W A 98188
Date Assigned
Notice is hereby given relative to the completion of contract or project described below
Description of Contract
Contract Number
2004 Overlay Program (project No.04-RW01)
Contractor's Name
04-035
. Telephone Number
Watson Asphalt Paving Company, Inc.
Contractor's Address
425-883-3837
P.O. Box 845, Redmond, WA 98073
Date Work Commenced
Date Work Completed
Date Work Accepted
6/1104
Surety orBonding Company
St.Paul Fire & Marine Insurance (Bond No.TC6069)
Agent's Address
7/22/04
Bush Cotton & Scott, LLC, P.O. Box 30 18, BothelI, WA 98041-3018
Contract Amount
Additions
Reductions
$ 727,940.00
$ + 108,000.00
$ - 73,466.62
Liquidated Damages
$
0.00
Sub-Total
Amount of Sales Tax Paid at 0.0 %
(If various rates apply, please send a breakdown.)
TOTAL
$ 762,473.38
$ 0.00
Amount Disbursed $ 762,473.38
Amount Retained $ 0.00
TOTAL $ 762,473.38
$ 762,473.38
Comments: Retainage Bond No. TC6070
provided by Watson Asphalt. Sales Tax Rule
171 applies.
Signature
Type or Print Name Diane Jaber
{'\ \ Phone Number 206-433-1871
Finance AppLV v'al . ~. (. r
d #
The Disbursing Officer must complete and mail THREE copies of this notice to the Department of Revenue,
PO Box 47474, Olympia, W A 98504-7474,immediate1y after acceptance of the work done under this contract. NO
PAYMENT SHALL BE MADE FROM RETAINED FUNDS until receipt of Department's certificate, and then only in
accordance with said certificate.
To inquire about the availability of this document in an alternate fonnat for the visually impaired, please call (360) 753-3217. Teletype
(TrY) users please call (800) 451-7985. You may also access tax infonnation on our Internet home page at http://dor.wa.gov.
REV 3 J 0020e (6-27-0 J )
.
"
"
Transportation Committee
October 25, 2004
Present:
Joan Hernandez, Chair; Pam Carter,Joe Duffie
Jim Morrow, Frank Iriarte, Bob Giberson, Cyndy Knighton, Robin Tischmak,
Gail Labanara, Pat Brodin, Alan Doerschel, Sara Haileh, Lucy Lauterbach;
residents Annieand J oeW ade, Heidi Watters, Becca Harlan ,Philip Smith
1. TrafticCalmin!! Citizens had come to talk about traffic calming on3ih/S. l30th Streets. Cyndy
said there are variances inbothtraffic calming measures and in programs. She and the engineering
intern have surveyed 15 cities in the US and Canada, and have found programs similar to what
Tukwila has been aiming for. Mostofthe cities foundwithtraffic calming programs are much larger
than Tukwila:Cyndy and Sara will use parts of several programs to pllt together our own program.
Jim said the city could use a full time person to do traffic calming. As there is not such a staff, the
program has to be done as time allows. If a major traffic calming project is to be done, some other
program will have to betaken offthetable.Joan corrected a neighborhood name for S. 160th from
Crestview to McMickenon the Traffic Calming Priority worksheet.
The citizens on S. Both and 37thhave formed a committee, as staff asked them to do. Their street will
be a test case of our program, once we have one. Citizens are anxious to move ahead now, but first the
program will have to beput together. Jim has ordered three rubberized street humps that can be placed
somewhere, thenlater moved and placed elsewhere. Joe warned against speed bumps that can lead to
lawsuits from low rider motorcycles sailing over them. Cyndy explained the difference between speed
bumps (higher, harder to go over) and speed humps, which are lower and more flat, and are therefore a
little easier to drive on. One thing that will need to be done on the street is an origin and destination
study. Ifthat shows people going to. one place of work, Cyndy could talk to that organization. Another
first step is to correctly identify what the problem is, and not what just anecdotal information (speeding
tra:ff.ic) people think. An accident history and traffic counters will also be helpful. Information.
.~
2. 2004 Overlay Pro~ram Close-Out The 2004 program had five roads on it: Olympic Ave, Todd
Blvd (both southofS. 180tl1), Strander, 57th Ave, and Ryan Way. The contractor, Watson Asphalt
Paving Company, Ine.started in June and was done by the end of July. Staff was very impressed with
their work, and hope they'll be able to work with them again. An under run was gained because less
paving repair than anticipated was needed. Because of the under run, a little more work could also be
done on the streets Glacier, Cascade and Riverside which are also south ofS. 180th. Committee
recommendation to accept proiect as complete. and authorize release of retaina!!e on consen~
a~enda of a Re1!ularlVleetin2.
3. 2005 CIP The Committee started with their CIPs,. In residential streets, more paybacks from the
Allentown sewer project will supply some. funds for neighborhood enhancements, which will possibly
be water/sewer projects in the other part of Allentown. Under the Bridges CIP staff reported that the
State DNR is charging the. City a fee for our pedestrian bridge, and will require other permits if any
utility pipe is hung on the bridge. 2005 will be used to close out the Interurban bridge. In commercial
streets. Alan said it would be hard to do Southcenter Parkway extension unless the project was revenue
neutral. The S.17Sth project will need Council approval to proceed (it is largely unfunded now).
Klickitat will need a payment plan, though there is a start on some mitigation funds. Reviews ended
with the Tukwila Urban Center Master Plan. Continue review next meeting.
~'
Committee chair approval
�11LA CO UNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
o r» itiars ITEM No.
Mayor's review rsr 'e Q Prepared [Vreetin Date p Ara Council reuzem
Q <v�' 06/ 28/04 Council
/04 I SL 1 1
ak 'f_ 11/01/04 SL A Q0.—
'a,
1
1 1
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER: 04-092 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 06/28/2004
AGENDA ITEM TITLE An ordinance modifiying the City's standards for cargo containers in zones and
amending the appeal process regarding placement of cargo containers.
CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date
SPONSOR Council Mayor ID Adm Svcs /1 DCD Finance Fire Legal P &R Police PWI
SPONSOR'S The proposed Ordinance would modify TMC 18.50.060(C)(1) and allow cargon containers
SUMMARY to be 40 feet instead of the current length restriction of 30 feet. The Ordinance would also
amend TMC 18.104.010 allowing the Hearing Examiner to have authority regaring appeals
of a Directors Decision regarding the placement of cargo containers.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: July 22, 2004
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Approval as submitted
CoivIMIrrlE Approval as submitted
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED- AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$NA $NA $NA
Fund Source: NA
Comments: NA
MTG. DATE 1 RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
4/15/02 Council adopted Ordinance Number 1989
6/14/04 1 COW sent the proposed changes to the Planning Commission for their review.
MTG. DATE J ATTACHMENTS
3/23 /04 1 Memo from Steve Lancaster to CAP
6/15/04 1 Minutes from Community and Parks Committee
6/15/04 1 Memo from Steve Lancaster to COW
11/01/04 1 Memo from Steve Lancaster to City Council
New Ordinance regarding Cargo Containers
Minutes from COW meeting
Minutes from Planning Commission Meeting
City 01 Tukwila
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Department of Community Deflelopment
Steve Lancaster, Director
MEMO
TO:
City Council
Steve Lancaster, Director DCD ~\N"
FROM:
RE:
Amendments to Cargo Container regulations
DATE:
October 26, 2004
Issue
At the June 28, 2004 meeting, I informed Council of the following issues regarding cargo
containers.
I. The maximum length restriction of30-feet is too restrictive. There were some pre-
existing cargo containers in the City that are 40 feet in length. These cargo
containers meet the screening requirements and setback requirements in TMC
18.50.060, however staff cannot issue a permit for the container to be permitted,
since the container does not meet the required length restriction.
Staff has also become.awarethat the predominant length of most cargo containers is
40 feet.
Originally, when theCity was drafting Ordinance 1989, the original
recommendation of staff and the Planning Commission was to have the maximum
length of the cargo containers be 40 feet.
2. Ordinance 1989 also does not clearly specify which hearing body would hear the
appeal of the Director' s Decision regarding placing of a cargo container.
Following your June 28 discussion of these issues, the Committee ofthe Whole referred this
issue to the Planning Commission.
Planning Commission Recommendation
The proposed ordinance would:
1. Increase the maximum length. of cargo containers and shipping containers used as
accessory structures within certain zones to 40 feet.
2. Clarify that the Hearing Examiner should hear appeals of decisions from the
Director regarding the placement of cargo containers.
UJVU JuuiiL(;~1lL~r Duui~v<tru,")UtL~ ttl vv WI UKWLLd., VVd.:i/WLgWIL YO 100 . ntulL~; L. UU-'+J l-JU/ U . rd.X; L- UU-</-J 1 -JUU:J
Additional Infonnation
At the June 28, 2004 meeting, council also asked staff to prepare a brief overview of
existing cargo containers within the City.. . Attached to this memo you will find photos of
cargo containers within the City that staff is aware of. Some of these cargo containers were
not part of the City's original. inventory, conducted prior to adoption of Ordinance 1989.
These containers may have been missed when staff conducted the inventory, but it is likely
that these containers have been located in the City in violation of City Code.
Planning Staff, Code Enforcement, and the City Attorney's Office is currently working to
bring these cargo containers in line with City Code, which may involve ordering the
property owners to remove the containers.
RF A03-347
Location:
Zoning:
Date of Photo:
Taken by:
-
15603 42nd A'Venue.
LDR.
August 13" 2004
Brandon J. Miles, Assistant Planner
-~
~
-- .. -
\ f?~~~~c~: ~'.~~<; ,;~.t.l..~~1 '.'.-.-.-_t'__._'-._~.'-_'.;"~_.-.t,
L03':076
Location:
Zoning:
Date of Photo:
Taken By:
4640 S. 144th Street (Showalter Middle School)
LDR'
August 13, 2004
Brandon J . Miles, Assistant Planner'
RFA04-226
Location:
Zoning:
Date of Photo:
Taken By:
13975 Interurban Avenue S
RCM
August 13, 2004
Brandon J. Miles, Assistant Planner
RF A03-353
Location:
Zoning:
Date of Photo:
Taken By:
17680 West Valley Hwy
CILI
August 13, 2004
Brandon J. Miles, Assistant Planner
RFA04-227
Location:
Zoning:
Date of Photo:
Taken By:
551-581 Strander Blvd
TUC
August 13, 2004
Brandon J. Miles, Assistant Planner
RF A03-345
Location:
Zoning:
Date of Photo:
Taken By:
13310 Interurban Avenue S
CILI
August 13, 2004
Brandon J. Miles, Assistant Planner
NO PHOTO AT THIS TIME
RF A03-344
Location:
Zoning:
Date of Photo
Taken By:
1331956 AveS
LDR
.
. >.- .
City of 'Tukwila
Washington
Ordinance No.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1989 ~9, AS CODIFIED
AT.. TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE (TMC) 8.50.060, INCREASING THE
MAXIMUM PERMITTED' LENGTH OF CARGO CONTAINERS TO 40
FEET; AMENDING ORDINANCE NOS. 1768 ~2 (PART), 1796 ~3 (PART),
1847 ~2, .1857 ~7, AND 2005 ~20, AS CODIFIED AT TMC 18.104.010,
ALLOWING THE HEARING EXAMINER TO HEAR APPEALS
REGARDING PLACEMENT OF. CARGO CONTAINERS, CLASSIFIED AS
A TYPE II DECISION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND
ESTABLISHING AN EFFELll vE DATE.
WHEREAS, Tukwila's development regulations may be reviewed and updated as
appropriate; and
WHEREAS, in 2002 the. City of Tukwila adopted development regulations to
regulate the use of cargo containers and shipping containers on residential and certain
commercial properties;. and
WHEREAS, the City established a maximum length restriction of 30 feet for cargo
containers and shipping containers within residential zones and certain commercial
zones; and
WHEREAS, the City has found that cargo containers and shipping containers tend
to be largely available in lengths of 40 feet; and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to clarify which hearing body is responsible for
hearing appeals on land use actions made by the Director of Community Development
regarding the placement of cargo containers; and
WHEREAS, appeals regarding decisions of placing cargo containers or shipping
containers can appropriately be handled by the City's Hearing Examiner; and
WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila Planning Commission has recommended the
adoption of certain Zoning Code requirements; and
WHEREAS, after proper notice, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on
the proposed amendments on July 22~ 2004; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, after having received and studied staff analysis and
comments.from members of t.~e public, believes that certain amendments to the City~s
development regulations are necessary;
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHING:!ON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Ordinance No. 1989 99~ as codified in TMC Chapter 18.50,
"Supplemental Development Standards", is hereby amended to read as follows:
Cargo 10/29104 Page 1 of 5
, .,'.
18.50.060 Cargo containers as accessory structures.
A. Cargo containers are allowed outright in the LI, HI, MIC/L, MIC/H and TVS
zones, subject to building setbacks.
B. New containers may be allowed as accessory structures in LDR, MDR, and
HDR, for institutional uses and in RC, RCM, TUC and C/LI for. any permitted or
conditional use. All new containers are subject to a Type 2 special permission decision
and the restrictions in the various zoning districts.
C. Criteria for approval are as follows:
1. Only two cargo containers will be allowed per lot, maximum length of 40
feet.
2, The container is located to mnUUllze the visual impact to. adjacent
properties, parks, trails and rights-of-way as determined by the Director.
3. The cargo container is sufficiently screened from adjacent properties,
parks, trails and rights-of-way, as d<:o::uJ.Lined by the Director. Screening may be a
combination of solid fencing, landscaping, or the placement of the cargo containers
behLTld.. between Qf within bu.ildings.
4. . If located adjacent to a building, the cargo container must be painted to
match the building's color.
5. Cargo containers may not occupy any required off-street parking spaces.
6. Cargo'containers shall meet all setback requirements for the zone.
7. Outdoor cargo containers may not be refrigerated.
8. Outdoor cargo containers may not be stacked.
D. Licensed and bonded contractors may use cargo containers in any zone for
temporary storage of equipment and/or materials at a construction site during
construction that is authorized by a City building permit.
Section 2. Ordinance Nos. 1768 ~2 (part), 1796 g3 (part), 1847 g2, 1857 g7, and 2005
620, as codified at TMC 18.104.010, "Permit Application Types and Procedures", are
hereby amended to read as follows:
18.104.010 Oassificationof Project Permit Applications
A. Project permit decisions are classified into five types, based on the degree of
discretion associated with each decision, as set forth in this section. Procedures for the
five different types are distinguished according to who makes the decision, whether
public notice is required, whether a public meeting andj or a public hearing is required
before a decision is made, and whether administrative appeals are provided.
B. Type 1 decisions are made by City administrators who have technical expertise
as designated by ordinance. Type 1 decisions may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner
who will hold a closed record appeal hearing based on the information presented to the
City administrator who made the decision. Public notice is not required for Type 1
decisions or for the appeals of those decisions.
TYPE OF PERMIT
Building Permit
Utility Permit
TYPE 1 DECISIONS
I DECISION MAKER
I Building Official
I Public Works Director
Community Development Director
Sign Permit, except for those sign
permits specifically requiring
approval of the Planning
Commission or denials of sign
permits which are appealable
Land Alteration
Boundary Line Adjustment,
includinR Lot Consolidation
Minor Modification to PRD (TMC
18.46.130)
Minor modification to BAR approved
desiRll (TMC 18.60.030)
Any land use permit or approval
issued by the City,. unless specifically
ca~gorized as a Type 2, 3, 4, or 5
. decision by this Chapter
I Public Works Director
Community Development Director
Community Development Director
Community Development Director
As specified by Ordinance
C. Type 2 decisions. are decisions which are initially made by the Director or, in
certain cases, other City administrators or committees, but which are subject to an open
record appeal to the Hearing Examiner, Planning Commission, City Council, or, in the
case of shoreline permits, an appeal to .the State Shorelines Hearings Board pursuant to
RCW 90.58.
.
TYPE OF PERMIT
Administrative Design
Review (TMC
18.60.030)
Administrative
Planned Residential
Development
(TMC 17.08.040)
Short Plat
(TMC 17.08.060)
Binding Site
Improvement Plan
(TMC Chap.17.16)
Shoreline Substantial
Development Permit
(TMC Chapter 18.44)
Decision regarding
Sensitive Areas (except
Reasonable Use
Excepnon)
(TMC 18.45.125)
TYPE 2 DECISIONS
INITIAL DECISION
MAKER
Community
Development Director
Short Plat Committee
Short Plat Committee
Short Plat Committee
Community
Development Director
Community
Development Director
APPEAL BODY
(open record appeal)
Board of Architectural
Review
Hearing Examiner
Hearing Examiner
Hearing Examiner
State Shoreline Hearings
Board
Planning Commission
Special Permission
Parl<ing, and
Modifications to
Certain Parking
Standards
(TMC 18.56.060 and
.070)
Parking standard for
use not
specified
(TMC 18.56.100)
Code Interpretation
(TMC18.90.010)
Special Permission
Sign, except "unique
sign" (various sections
of TMC Title 19)
Sign Permit Denial
(TMC Chapter 19.12)
Sign Area Increase
(TMC 19.32.140)
Placement of Cargo
Container
(TMC 18.50.060)
Community
Development Director
Community
Development Director
Community
Development Director
Community
Development Director
Community .
Development Director
Community
Development Director
Community
Development Director
City Council
City Council
Hearing Examiner
Planning Commission
Planning Commission
Planning Commission
Hearing Examiner
D. Type 3 decisions are quasi~judicial decisions made by the Hearing Examiner
following an open~ecord hearing. Type 3 decisions may be appealed only to Superior
Court, except for shoreline variances that may be appealed to the State Shoreline
Hearings Board pursuant toRCW 90.58.
TYPE 3 DECISIONS
I DECISION MAKER
Hearing Examiner
TYPE OF PERMIT
Variance (zoning, shoreline, sidewalk,
land alteration, si~)
Resolve uncertain zone district
boundary
Hearing Examiner
E. Type 4 decisions are quasi-judicial decisions made by the Board of
Architectural Review or the Planning Commission, following an open record hearing.
Type 4decisions may be appealed to the City Council, which will hold a closed record
appeal hearing based on the record established by the Board of Architectural Review or
Planning Commission, except Shoreline Conditional Use Permits, which are appealable
to the State Shoreline Hearings Board pursuant to RCW 90.58.
TYPE 4 DECISIONS
INITIAL DECISION
MAKER
TYPE OF PERMIT
Shoreline Conditional Planning Commission
Use Permit
(TMC 18.44.050)
Reasonable Use Planning Commission
Exceptlons under
Sensitive Areas
Ordinance
(TMC 18.45.115)
Cargo 10/28/04 Page 4 of 5
APPEAL BODY (closed
record appeal)
State Shorelines
Hearings Board
City Council
.
Puplic HearingDesign
Review (TMCChapter
18.60, 18.56.040 and
Shoreline Master
Program)
Modifications to
Certain Parking
Standards
(TMCChapter 18.56.)
Conditional Use
Permit
(TMC Chapter 18.64)
Unique Signs
(TMC 19.28.010)
Boardof Architectural
Review
City Council
Planning Commission
City Council
PlannL11.g Commission
I City Council
Planning Commission
City Council
F. Type 5 decisions are quasi-judicial decisions made by the City Council
following an open record hearing. Type 5 decisions may be appealed only to Superior
Court.
TYPE 5 DECISIONS
I DECISION MAKER
City Council
I TYPE OF PERMIT
Subdivision - Preliminary Plat
(TMC 17.12.020)
Subdivision - Final Plat
(TMC 17.12.030)
Planned Residential Development
(PRD), includihg Major Modifications
(TMCChapter 18.46)
Unclassified Use
(TMC Chapter 18.66)
I Rezone (TMC Chapter 18.84)
Shoreline Environment
Redesignation
(Shoreline Master Program)
City Council
City Council
City Council
I City Council
City Council
Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to
be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the
remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation.
Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published
in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force and effect
five (5) days after passage and publication as provided by law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON,
ata Regular Meeting thereof this day of . 2004.
AITEST/ AUTHENTICATED:
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Published:
Effective Date:
Ordinance Number:
Office of the City Attorney
Cargo 10/28/04 Page 50f5
Minutes, 6/28/04
. Page 3 of9
(. ~
4) Establishim! certain fire protection standards for the construction of high-rise buildings within the
City
Finally, Captain Tomaso noted changes to this proposed ordinance and stated they are no more stringent
and no more lax than the former (current) ordinance. Calling it mostly housekeeping, he said the
proposed ordinance just re..;organizes that which is currently written. .
Consensus existed to move item 4 to thisevcning's special meeting agenda.
b. Authorize City to continue serving as fiscal agent for the Valley Narcotics Enforcement Team
(VNET) forthe period 07-01-04 to 06-30-05
Alan Doerschel, Finance Director, reported the City has budgeted for a full year on this item. The City
of Auburn will handle the task beginning July 1,2005. Therefore, when preparing next year's budget,
Mr. Doerschel noted only'i1 of the income amount will be reflected. Calling VNET a "very successful
operation," Mr. Doerschel reported most of the money accrued to the seizure fund comes from this
program.
Consensus existed to move the item to this evening's special meeting agenda.
~ . .c. Modify the length re~tricti<)n <)fl cargo containers that are used as accessory structures in certain
zoning districts and clarify anpeal rights inregard to cargo container nermit applications
. . - - - "0 _
Pam Linder reported an update on this issue at a March Community Affairs and Parks Committee
meeting. It was in 2002 thatthe.City Council approved an ordinance regulating the use of cargo
containers within City limits. That ordinance allowed for a one-year grace period for existing containers
to be grandfathered if they met certain . location and screen requirements. The regulations allowed the
existi~gcontainers in zones where they would not normally be permitted, if an application was
submitted by the owneronlby April 15, 2003. Additionally, containers in excess of the allowed 30-foot
limit were to be grandfathered if they niet all other development standards and applied for permits.
After City staff sent out second notices of violation to property owners, an inventory of the remaining
sites was taken. To date, there are five sites on the inyentory where non-permitted cargo containers exist
and staff has had no contact with the tenants (renters or property owners).
After receiving a list of "Permits applied for.butnot issued," and "No Response From Two Notices,"
Ms. Linder has driven to each site to personally view the properties. She is not opposed to their
remaining on site so long as conditions of the ordinance are met (proper screen and a permit). At issue
now is how to bestpro~eed with regard to those from both (above-referenced) lists.
Steve Lancaster, Director of Community Development, reported most property owners who had cargo
containers have complied with the new regulation by submitting permit applications or removing their
containers. While enforcing the new regulations, City staff has discovered others are still non-
conforming (over 30 feet). Many of those meetIocation and screening requirements, yet no applications
have been submitted allowing them to remain. Thus, the issue at hand.
After presenting several options to Council on how best to handle the situation, discussion was held.
Issues.ofpermitting and the idea of reviewing the length requirements once more were raised. The
Planning Commission could review the matter to determine whether or not it's in the best interests of the
City to increase the maximum allowable length.
.
. .httD:! /www.ci.tukwila.wa~tls/clerk/docs04/cow6-28.htm
10/27/2004
Minutes, 6/28/04
.. Page 4 of9
Additionally, Mr. Lancaster noted the need to clarify the appeals process in a newly proposed ordinance
for respondents to Notices of Violations. The Hearing Examiner is the most suitable person to hear such
appeals.
Councilmembers asked staff to prepare and submit a list of those property owners who are in violation
in approximately two weeks. Mr. Lancaster agreed to the request. Additionally, 'the Director of
Community Development noted a reminder may be in order in the next edition of The Hazelnut.
Consensus existed to remand the matter to the Planning Commission for a public hearing and to
consider increasing the maximum length of cargo containers to 40 feet.
d. A contract with Freedman Tung & Bottomlev for services related to the Tukwila Urban Center
Pam Linder noted review of this item at the June 15 Community Affairs and Parks Committee meeting.
The proposed contract (distributed by Lynn Miranda, Senior Planner, Department of Community
Development) allows for additional land use and urban design services (related to the Tukwila Urban
Center [TUe] and Transit-Oriented Development [TOD] area) not included in a previous contract with
Freedman Tung and Bottomley. The fund source. for the contract is the Tukwila Urban Center federal
grant.
Lynn Miranda addressed the Council and informed them the contract scope remains the same as in the
past, yet includes a new expiration date of June 30,2005. The new contract also provides for additional
work sessions with the Council and Planning Commission to review the TUC and TOD draft plans.
Councilmember Carter reported no trouble with the proposed contract as it is entirely paid for with grant
funds. Said grant has already been received by the City ofTukwila.
Cons~nsus existed to move this item to this. evening's special meeting agenda.
e. An amendment to Contract 04-015 with Martin Durkan. extending the contract through 12-31-04
CouncilmemberFenton reported review and approval of this item at the June 21, 2004 Finance and
Safety Committee meeting. To be paidfor from the general fund/professional services, the six-month
cost impact is "up to $27,000.00" ($4,000.00 per month, plus a maximum of $500.00 per month in
expenses).
Rhonda Berry, City Administrator, explained Mr. Durkan has been able to do what was anticipated and
expects to be able to complete the projects by year's end. For those reasons, City administration seeks
just a six-month extension to allow the contractor time to secure financial support for critical City
projects. Top priority is to seekState funding for the TUC and TOD projects.
Consensus existed to move this item to this evening's special meeting agenda.
f A Dfofessional services contractwith Ball Janik LLP. in the amount of$9.500 Der month. for federal
reDresentation and lobbvine services related to securine federal authorization and aDDrolJriation for kev
protects identified bv the Citv ofTukwila
Councilmember Fenton reported review and approval of this item at the June 21, 2004 Finance and
Safety Committee meeting. Reflected in the contractisa $1,000.00 per month increase. Since
performing services without an actual contract between January 2004 and this date, the rate is retroactive
http://w.ww.ci.tll).{wila.\Va~t1s/clyrk/docs04/cow6-28.htm
10/27/2004
Page 4
Planning Commission Minutes
August 26,2004
PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING - 7:05 P.M.
7(/ Va.
LOCATION:
L04~041
City Staff
. Revisions to 18.50.060 (C) (1), changing the length
restriction of cargo containers being used as accessory
structures in the LDR, MDR, HDR, RC, RCM, TUC, and
C/Llfrom 30 feet to 40 feet. Clarifying the appeal rights for
submitted applications.
City Wide
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
REQUEST:
Brandon Miles gave the presentation for staff~ In April 2002 City Council adopted ordinance 19.89,
which regulated the use of cargo containers in every zone except the low industrial zones. The applicant
met all requirements, except a maximum length 30 ft. restriction. Staff detennined that the 30 ft.
restriction could not be met, because there are pre-existing cargo containers that are 40 ft.. The proposed
project went before Community Parks and Affairs and Committee of the Whole. Their recommendation
was to forward it to the Planning Cuuuuission for consideration to increase the length restriction to 40
feet. When the original order was passed there was no appeal provisions regarding who would hear the
appeal if an application were denied or a condition were appealed. To clarify the appeal process staff is
adding verbiage, which states that the hearing examiner shall hear all appeals. Staff asks that the
Planning Commission make a recommendation to the City Council that the ordinance be approved.
Brandon and Steve answered questions for the Commissioners
There were no further comments.
The Public Hearing was closed.
The Commission deliberated.
BILL ARJ.nUR MADE AMOTION TO APPROVE THE DRAFT ORDINANCE PRESENTED
BY STAFF FOR CASE NUMBER L04-041.KIRSTINE WHISLER SECONDED ItlE MOTION,
ALL VOTED IN FAVOR.
Chair Malina announced that Commissioner Whisler sent the Mayor a letter resigning from the Planning
Commission, effective 7-22-04.
Commissioner Whisler said she enjoyed working with everyone and complimented her fellow
Commissioners, and stated she has learned a lot. She thanked Steve and his staff for their support.
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:20 PM
Submitted by:Wynetta Bivens
Administrative Secretary
Page 4
Planning Commission Minutes
August 26, 2004
PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING - 7:05 P.M.
~/vn.
LOCATION:
L04-041
City Staff
Revisions to 18.50.060 (C) (I), changing the length
restriction of cargo containers being used as accessory
structures in the LDR, MDR, HDR, RC, RCM, TUC, and
CILI from 30 feet to 40 feet. Clarifying the appeal rights for
submitted applications.
City Wide
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
REQUEST:
Brandon Miles gave the presentation for staff. In April 2002 City Council adopted ordinance 19.89,
which regulated the use of cargo containers in every zone except the low industrial zones. The applicant
met all requirements, except a maximum length 30 ft. restriction. Staff detennined that the 30 ft.
restriction could not be met, because there are pre-existing cargo containers that are 40 ft.. The proposed
project went before Community Parks and Affairs and Committee of the Whole. Their recommendation
was to forward it to the Planning Commission for consideration to increase the length restriction to 40
feet. When the original order was passed there was no appeal provisions regarding who would hear the
appeal if an application were denied ora condition were appealed. To clarify the appeal process staff is
adding verbiage, which states that the hearing examiner shall hear all appeals. Staff asks that the
Planning Commission make a recommendation to the City Council that the ordinance be approved.
Brandon and Steve answered questions for the Cuuuuissioners
There were no further comments.
The Public Hearing was closed.
The Commission deliberated.
BILL ARnllJR MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE TtlE DRAFT ORDINANCE PRESENTED
BY STAFF FOR CASE NUMBER L04-041. KIRSTINE WHISLER SECONDED TtlE MOTION,
ALL VOTED IN FAVOR.
Chair Malina announced that Commissioner Whisler sent the Mayor a letter resigning from the Planning
Commission, effective 7 -22-04.
Commissioner Whisler said she enjoyed working with everyone and complimented her fellow
Commissioners,. and stated she has learned a lot. She thanked Steve and his staff for their support.
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:20 PM
Submitted by:Wynetta Bivens
Administrative Secretary
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
s Initials ITEM No.
Meeting Date 1 Prepared by Mayor's wziew 1 Coitnal mum
Ni' i 10/25/04 1 dh I���" I tJi/h -/-J
p 11/01/04 1bb for dh 1 1c /2,4,11 1
.M._ 1 Q.. 6. 1 1-
1 1
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER: 04-143 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 10/ 25/04
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Public defender contract renewal and payment increase
CATEGORY El Disarssion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid A yard PublicHG,4.,wa Other
MtgDate MtgDate MtgDate MtgDate MtgDate MtgDate MtgDate 10 /25/04
SPONSOR Council Map. A dmSvs El DCD Finance Fire Legal P& R Police PW
SPONSOR'S *COURT
SUMMARY Renew Kirshenbaum Goss /Public Defender Services contract for 3 years:
1 -1 -2005 to 12 -31 -2008
Increase monthly payment to $9,000.00 per mo ($500.00 per month increase)
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. (10 -25) CA&P Cmte F&S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 10/18/2004
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR/ADM[N. Recommend 3 yr contract renewal and payment increase to $9000 mo
COMMrITEE send to. COW for consideration
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$108,000.00 $108,000.00 $108,000.00
Fund Source: GENERAL FUND
Comments:
MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
10/25/04 Item reveiwed. Consensus existed to forward item to the November 1 Regular Mtg.
MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS
10/25/04 MEMORANDUM FROM JUDGE WALDEN DATED OCTOBER 10 -18 -04
11/01/04 None. Refer to packet of 10- 25 -04.
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
O f t A HZ S Initials ITEM ND.
Q ;AO 1 E Meeting Date Prepared by 1 Mayor's review 1 Cowl/ review,
11 -1 -04 1 1 1
rgQa 1 I 1 1 1 0
1 1
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER: Ref 04-145 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 10/25/04
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Ordinance Amending Chapter 8.45 Enforcement of the TMC to Implement Provisions
of RCW 35.80.
CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 11/1/04 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date
SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P &R Police PTV
SPONSOR'S The Proposed Ordinance establishes a process for attaching tax liens and recovering its
SUMMARY costs to recoup abatement costs in a more timely manner. It was reviewed by the
Community and Parks Committee on October 12, 2004. The Committee recommended that
it be sent to COW for approval. The Committee of the Whole reviewed the Ordinance on
October 25, 2004 and recommended it be set for the regular meeting on November 1,
2004.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 10/25/04 (COW); 10/12/04 (CA &P)
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Adoption of Ordinance amending Chapter 8.45 of the TMC
COMMITTEE
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
-0- -0- -0-
Fund Source:
Comments:
,.z.;< Hm is RE 't✓G RID OF' .aOUvDI
10/25/04 I Discussed at COW; consensus existed to forward to Regular mtg. for action.
MTG.SDATE �a iNs g s �..,:,a _..._ATTACHMENTS
11/1/04 Memo, Proposed Ordinance, excerpt from Minutes of COW October 25, 2004
INFORMATION MEMO
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Project No.
City Council
Shelley Kerslake
October 27, 2004
Code Enforcement Lien Ordinance
ISSUE
The Department of CommunityDevelopment requests an amendment to Chapter 8.45 of the
TMC and adoption of RCW 35 .80 allowing the City to recoup abatements costs by filing tax
liens.
BACKGROUND
The Tukwila City Council adopted the International Property Maintenance Code in July, 2004.
The new code replaced most ofTMC Chapter 8.28 ''Nuisances'' and Chapter 16.06 "buildings
and Construction: HOllsing Code oftheTMC.
In the past, the City could only recoup its abatement costs by filing a lien against the subject
property. Costs would then be recovered when the property sold, which could take 20 years or
longer. If adopted, the City would be ab1eto file a tax lien under RCW 35.80 and recoup clean-
up costs in a timely manner.
DISCUSSION/ ANALYSIS/AL TERNATIVES
The City can continue its present policy of filing property liens and recouping costs at the time
the property is sold or refinance, a procedure which can take as long as 20 years to complete. By
adopting the proposed ordinance the City\vould be able to recoup its costs in as little as three
years by filing a tax lien instead.
RECOMMENDATION
Adoption ofthe Code Enforcement Tax Lien Ordinance.
Attachments:
Proposed. Ordinance
Minutes from October 12, 2004 Community and Parks Committee
Excerpt from Minutes from October 25,2004 COW
Aso@
C ity of Tukw
Washington
=I Ordinance No
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
;43:'• WASHINGTON, IMPLEMENTING THE PROVISIONS OF RCW
CHAPTER 35.80, WHICH ENABLE THE CITY TO ORDER THE REPAIR
OR DEMOLITION OF DANGEROUS OR SUBSTANDARD
f STRUCTURES, AND ASSESS THE COST OF ANY ACTION TAKEN
:V. AGAINST THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS A TAX LIEN; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
1
WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted various codes relating to dangerous and
substandard buildings and structures, including the 2003 edition of the International
7 Property Maintenance Code; and
A f WHEREAS, Chapter 8.45 of the Tukwila Municipal Code sets forth the enforcement
mechanisms available to the City to protect the public from such buildings and structures;
and
WHEREAS, RCW Chapter 35.80 authorizes the City to adopt an additional
enforcement mechanism under which the City may order the repair or demolition of
i buildings and structures that are unfit for human habitation and use; and
:f WHEREAS, if the responsible parties do not comply with the City's order, RCW
Chap 35.80 also authorizes the City to undertake the demolition or repair of buildings
a ..:::5;10: and structures and to place the cost of the remediation on the tax roles as assessment
against the property; and
fry f.
f. -f WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the costs of repairing or demolishing an
k unfit building or structure should be borne by the owner of that building or structure,
rather than the general public;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. TMC 8.45 Amended. Chapter 8.45, Enforcement, of the Tukwila Municipal
Code, is hereby amended by the addition of the following sections:
8.45.110. Additional Enforcement Mechanism. In addition to, and in
combination with, the enforcement methods set forth in TMC Chapter 8.45 and
elsewhere in the Tukwila Municipal Code, violations of the Tukwila Municipal
Code may be enforced under the following provisions.
8.45.120. RCW Chapter 35.80 Adopted. RCW Chapter 35.80, Unfit Dwellings,
Buildin and Structures, as it currently exists or is hereinafter amended, is hereby
adopted.
8.45.130. Improvement Officer and Appeals Commission Designated. The
:.::„'::.w, Code Enforcement Officer, and the Code Enforcement Officer's designee, is
designated as the City's "Improvement Officer,' and shall have the full scope
of authority granted to that official under RCW Chapter 35.80. The City of
Tukwila Hearing Examiner is designated as the City's "Appeals Commission,"
and shall have the full scope of authority granted to that commission under
RCW Chapter 35.80.
Tax Liens and Abatement Costs 10/29/04 Page 1 of 3
8.45.140. Improvement Officer Authority Issuance of Complaint. If, after a
preliminary investigation of any dwelling, building, structure, or premises, the
Improvement Officer finds that it is unfit for human habitation or other use,
the Improvement Officer may issue a complaint conforming to the provisions
of RCW 35.80.030, stating in what respects such dwelling, building, structure
or premises is unfit for human habitation or other use. In determining whether
a dwelling, building, structure or premises should be repaired or demolished,
the Improvement Officer shall be guided by the Tukwila Municipal Code and
such other codes adopted pursuant to the Tukwila Municipal Code as the
Improvement Officer deems applicable, in particular the most recent edition of
the International Property Maintenance Code.
8.45.150. Service of Complaint. A complaint issued under TMC Chapter 8.45
shall be served on the parties and posted on the subject property pursuant to
RCW 35.80.030, and shall also be filed with the King County Auditor. All
complaints or other documents posted on the subject property shall remain in
place until the complaint has been resolved. For purposes of service, such
complaints or other documents are deemed effective on the day of posting.
8.45.160. Complaint Hearing. Not less than ten days nor more than 30 days
after serving a complaint, the Improvement Officer shall hold a hearing
s conforming to the provisions of RCW 35.80.030, at which all parties in interest
shall be given the right to appear in person, to bring witnesses, and to give
`j'::f5;; testimony regarding the complaint. At any time prior to or at the time of the
-r.
hearing, any party may file an answer to the complaint. The Improvement
Officer shall adopt procedural rules governing the procedure of such hearing,
`'a- which shall be available for public inspection at the Tukwila Department of
::•3;:: Community Development.
-s% 8.45.170. Determination, Findings of Fact, and Order. Within ten days of the
complaint hearing, the Im rovement Officer shall issue a Determination,
Findings of Fact, and Order stating the Improvement Officer's determination
as to whether the subject dwelling, building, structure or premises is unfit for
human habitation or other use, the findings of fact supporting the
determination, and an order specifying the actions necessary to address any
unfitness and a deadline for completing the actions. The Determination,
Findings of Fact, and Order shall be served and posted as set forth in TMC
i.' 8.45.150, and if no appeal is filed within the deadline specified in TMC
7 8.45.180, a copy of the Determination, Findings of Fact, and Order shall be filed
with the King County Auditor.
8.45.180. Appeal to Appeals Commission. Within 30 days of service of a
Determination, Findings of Fact, and Order, any party may file an appeal to
the Appeals Commission. Such an appeal shall be governed by the City of
Tukwila Hearing Examiner's procedural rules, except that the Appeals
Commission shall conduct a hearing on the appeal and issue a ruling within 60
days from the date the appeal is filed; and if the Appeals Commission issues
any oral findings of fact, the ruling shall contain a transcript of such findings in
addition to any findings issued at the time of the ruling. The ruling shall be
served and posted as set forth in TMC 8.45.150, and if no appeal is filed within
the deadline specified in TMC 8.45.190, a copy of the ruling shall be filed with
:::f.::
the King County Auditor.
8.45.190. Appeal to Superior Court. Any person affected by a Determination,
Findings of Fact, and Order issued by the Improvement Officer, who has
brought an appeal before the Appeals Commission pursuant to TMC 8.45.180
may, within 30 days after the Appeals Commission's ruling has been served
and posted pursuant to TMC 8.45.150, petition the King County Superior Court
for an injunction restraining the Improvement Officer from carrying out the
provisions of the Determination, Findings of Fact, and Order. In all such
proceedings, the Court is authorized to affirm, reverse or modify the order,
and such trial shall be heard de novo.
Tax Liens and Abatement Costs 10/29/04 Page 2 of 3
8.45.200. Remediation/Penalties. If a party, following exhaustion of the
party's rights to appeal, fails to comply with the Determination, Findings of
Fact, and Order, the Officer may direct or cause the subject dwelling, building,
structure or premises to be repaired, altered, improved, vacated, and closed,
removed, or demolished pursuant to RCW Chapter 35.80.
8.45.210. Tax Lien. The cost of any action taken by the Improvement Officer
under TMC 8.45.200 shall be assessed against the subject property pursuant to
RCW Chapter 35.80. Upon certification by the City of Tukwila Finance
Director that the assessment amount is due and owing, the King County
Treasurer shall enter the amount of such assessment upon the tax rolls against
the subject property pursuant to the provisions of RCW 35.80.030.
8.45.220. Salvage. Materials from any dwelling, building, structure, or
premises removed or demolished by the Improvement Officer shall, if possible,
be salvage and sold as if the materials were surplus property of the City of
Tukwila, and the funds received from the sale shall be credited against the cost
s of the removal or demolition; and if there be any balance remaining, it shall be
paid to the parties entitled thereto, as determined by the Improvement Officer,
after deducting the costs incident thereto.
Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to
be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the
remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published
in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days
after passage and publication as provided by law.
PASSED BY THE CrrY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON,
at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 2004.
ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED:
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk
Filed with the City Clerk.
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Passed by the City Council-
Published.
Effective Date.
;y;: Office of the City Attorney Ordinance Number.
Tax Liens and Abatement Costs 10/29/04 Page 3 of 3
EXCERPT FROM MINUTES OF OCTOBER 25, 2004 COW MEETING
c. An ordinance establishino a orocess forattachino tax liens and recoverino costs to
recouo abatement costs.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE em OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 8.45, ENFORCEMENT, OF THE TUKWILA MUNICIPAL
CODE, TO IMPLEMENT THE PROVISIONS OF RCW CHAPTER 35.80
Councilmember Linder reported consideration and approval of this item at their October 12 Community Affairs and
Parks Committee meeting. Atissueis whether or riotthe Council should adopt an ordinance which would allow
the City to recoup abatement costs by filing tax liens with King County, on buildings which impact public safety.
Steve King, municipal attorney with Kenyon-Disend, reported the proposed ordinance gives the City an additional
enforcement mechanism. The proposed ordinance adopts RCW 35.80 by reference and allowsfor the attachment
of tax liens and recovery of costs in a timely manner. More limited than other Code Enforcement mechanisms, this
ordinance. may only be applied to structures that are. unfit for human habitation or use. The tool may not be used
where need exists for improved aesthetics or for those violations which not impact safety and welfare.
Mr. King relayed the legal process associated, including the filing of an appeal with King County Superior Court,
after exhausting administrative remedies at the City level. He also addressed the affect of a tax lien on a property
being filed and automatically considered a "delinquent tax." A delinquent tax after three years can trigger King
County to "force a sale" of the property.
Mr. King hoted Tukwila is the first jurisdiction (of which he is aware) to adopt this section of the RCW by
reference. Calling the provision "under-utilized," Mr. King said the provision has rarely been used and no case law
exists with respect its use.
For consideration, consensus existed to forward the proposed ordinance to the November 1 Regular
meeting.
`.pilLA, w COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
'4 Initials ITEM NO.
O i�Zs
0, k„•�,fi�' Meeting Date 1 Prepared by 1 iVIa yor's review I Council review
Q t
+V/
r 10/25/04 1 sl I I
t e 11/01/04 I sl j 1 �4.a�Pr Imo //n 11
1
ITEM INFORMATION
(f
CAS NUMBER: Ref 04-146 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 10/25/04
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Tukwila South Annexation Resolution
CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 11/01/04 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date
SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P&R Police PW
SPONSOR'S King County has indicated it will support annexation of the Segale property if the City
SUMMARY commits to annexing the entire south potential annexation.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 10/12/04; 10/25/04
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Adopt resolution
COMMITTEE Adopt resolution
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
so so so
Fund Source: N/A
Comments:
MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
10/25/04 Reviewed by COW; forwarded to Council
MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS
10/25/04 Memo from Steve Lancaster datedOctober 20, 2004
Draft resolution
Map showing annexation area and remainder
Minutes, CAP meeting 10/12/04
11/01/04 Final resolution (revised, with exhibits)
Notice of Intention to Commence Annexation
Map showing annexation area and remainder (revised)
City of Tukwila
Washington
Resolution No.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 1 tit CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, COMMITTING TO INITIATE AN ANNEXATION PROCESS
FORA CERTAIN UNINCORPORATED ISLAND OF TERRITORY AFTER
SUc:H ISLAND BECOMES CONTIGUOUS TO THE CITY.
WHEREAS, . the City has received a notice of intention to commence annexation
proceedings related to the territory known as the La Pianta annexation area, the boundaries of
which are described in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated as if set forth in
full; and
WHEREAS, the City Council intends to authorize the circulation of an annexation
petition for the La Pianta annexation area; and
WHEREAS, the La Pianta annexation area lies within the Tukwila South Potential
Atmexation Area identified by the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan; and
WHEREAS, the La Pianta annexation will reduce but not eliminate King COlmty's
obligation to provide municipal services to an area that is difficult for the County to serve due
to its size and isolation from other County service areas; and
WHEREAS, the King County Countywide Planning Policies recognize cities as the
appropriate provider of local urban services to urban areas; and
WHEREAS, King County has indicated it will support the La Pianta annexation if the
City commits to timely annex the remainder of its Tukwila South Potential Atmexation Area,
the boundaries of said remainder being described in Exhibit B, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if setforth in full; and
WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila is willing to annex the area described in Exhibit B, but
would like to delay action on this annexation until after a final resolution his been reached with
respect to the. La Pianta. annexation area;
NOW, .. THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
W ASHINCTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
. Section 1.. Withinthtee weeks after the area described in Exhibit A becomes contiguous
to the City of Tukwila, the City Council will adopt a resolution commencing negotiations
. pursuant to RCW 35A. 14.460 for an interlocal agreement between the City and King County to
accomplish the annexation of the area described in Exhibit B to the City, and directing staff to
complete said negotiations on an expedited basis.. Within six weeks of approval of said
negotiatedinterlocal agreement by the City and King County, the City will adopt an ordinance
providing for the armexation of the area described in Exhibit B, which ordinance shall provide
for an effective date of annexation not later than sixty (60) days after adoption of the ordinance.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a
Regular Meeting thereof this day of , 2004.
ATTEST/ AUTHENTICATED:
Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:
Jim Haggerton, Council President
Office of the City Attorney
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Resolution Number:
"EXHIBIT A"
(toresolutioncommitting to initiate an annexation process...)
THAT PORTION OFUNINCORPORATED KING COUNTY LYING SOUTH OF
THE CITY OF TUKWILA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
"THAT PORTION OFUNINCORPORA TED KING
COUNTY, WASHINGTON:
BOUNDED.. ON THE NORTH BY THE EXISTING
SOUTHERLY CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF
TUKWILA,IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF THE
SOUTH 188TH STREET INTER-CHANGE;
BOUNDED ON THE EAST BY THE WEST MARGIN
OF ORILLlA ROAD SOUTH;
BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY THE CENTERLINE
OFSOUTH204THSTREET, EXTENDEDWESTERL Y
TO ITS POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE
EXISTING EASTERLY CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY
OFSEATAC; AND
BOUNDED ON THE . WEST BY THE EXISTING
EASTERLY . CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF
SEATAC."
"EXHIBIT B"
(to resolution committing to initiate an annexation process...)
THAT PORTION OF UNINCORPORATED KING COUNTY lYING SOUTH OF
THE CITY OFTUKWllADESCRIBED AS FOllOWS:
"THAT PORTION OF UNINCORPORATED KING
COUNTY, WASHINGTON:
BOUNDED ... ON THE NORTH BY THE EXISTING
SOUTHERLY CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF
TUKWILA ... RUNNING EASTERLY FROM THE
VICINITY OF THE SOUTH 188TH STREET
INTERCHANGE TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE
CITY LIMITS WITH THE GREEN RIVER;
BOUNDED ON THE EAST BY THE GREEN RIVER;
BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY THE NORTH
MARGIN OF SOUTH204TH STREET; AND
BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY THE WEST MARGIN
OF ORILLlA ROAD SOUTH RUNNING NORTH TO
THE INTERSECTION OF ORILLlA ROAD SOUTH
WITH .. THE CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF
TUKWILA IN THE VICINITY OF THE SOUTH 188TH
STREET INTERCHANGE."
/
LA PlANT A LLC
5811 Segale Park Drive C
Tukwila, Washington 98188
P.O. Box 88028
Tukwila, Washington 98138-2028
Telephone: (206) 575-2000
Facsimile: (206) 575-1837
ANNEXATION PETITION
The undersigned property owner hereby notifies the City of Tukwila of the
property owner's intent. to... commence annexation proceedings pursuant to RCW
35A.14.120. The proposed annexation territory is solely owned by the undersigned and a
map and legal description is attached to this petition. . As the undersigned is the property
owner of the majority of the proposed annexation area, the 10% requirement of RCW
35A.14.120 is hereby met. The undersigned requests that the City Council set a date, no
more than sixty (60) days after the filing of this request, for a meeting with the
undersigned to determine whether the City Council will accept, reject or modify the
proposed annexation and resolve other issues as required by state law.
JRL:n/ni
PROPERTY OWNER:
LAPlANT A LLC, a Washington limited
liability company
By Metro Land Development, Inc.,
aB:~Wn7i};1o;;;;:g~
Mark A; Segate, ~ice:president
\
C:\Documents andSettings\ECampbell\LocaI Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK3\ANNEXA TION PETITION (IO%).doc
"."
Segale Annexation Vicinity Map
J ILA, 47
Go UNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
<L �yS Initials ITEM NO.
i 1 1, t Meeting Date 1 Prepared 1 Mayor's review C�icil review
+ui
j o 10.25.04 1 SL X 11/01/04 I I ✓4-a-� I tm L A
x908
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER: 04-147 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: October 25, 2004
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Proposed contract supplement with ECONorthwest for services related to the TUC plan
CATEGORY X Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date 10.25.04 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date MYltg Date Mtg Date
SPONSOR Council OM ayor
Adm Svcs X DCD Finance Fire Legal P&R Police PW
SPONSOR'S This contract supplements ECOs previous work on the TUC Plan, providing more detailed analysis on: 1) at
SUMMARY a policy level, potential financial strategy packages; and 2) the extent to which City investments could pay
for themselves. ECO will also summarize previous reports for the Final TUC plan. The $26,000 contract will
be 100% funded by the City's federal grant for TUC /TOD planning.
REVIEWED BY Ef COW Mtg. (10 -25)X CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 10.12.04
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Recommend approval of contract supplement.
CoMMII [EE Forward to Committee of the Whole for discussion.
1COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE'
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$26,000 $26,000
Fund Source: Federal grant for preparing the TUC /TOD plan.
Comments:
MTG. DATE 1 RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
10 -25 -04 (Presented to COW for discussion. Consensus existed to forward item to
INovember 1 Regular meeting.
MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS
10.25.04 I Staff memo to COW RE: Proposed contract supplement with ECONorthwest
Proposed ECONorthwest Contract Supplement
Staff Memo to CAP RE: Proposed contract supplement with ECONorthwest
Copy of minutes of CAP meeting, October 12, 2004
1 11/01/04 'None. See packet from 10- 25 -04.
C L) UNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
ITEM NO.
ir 1 Meeti, Date 1 Prepared by 1 Mayor's review 1 Co jjcil review 1
e, 10/25/04 1 LL 1 1 `.l<. f 1
11/01/04 I bb for LL 1 s -/ti t a
rsos I 1
E ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER: 04-148 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 10/25/04
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Interlocal Agreement for Library Services
CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date 10/25/04 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 10/25/04
SPONSOR Council z Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P &R Police PIV
SPONSOR'S King County Library District staff are interested in a new interlocal before they start
SUMMARY putting in improvements into the Tukwila Library on the North Hill. Approval of the
interlocal will show the District the City is interested in working with the District.
REVIEWED BY 11 COW Mtg.(10 -25) CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm.. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: October 12, 2004
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Discuss the interlocal agreement; recommend it for approval
COMMITIEE Community and Parks sent it to the COW.
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
Fund Source:
Comments:
MTG. DATE I RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
10/25/04 Discussion held. Consensus existed to recommend approval of the Interlocal
Agreement proposed by King County Library Services.
MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS
10/25/04 Memo from L. Lauterbach dated October 20, 2004
Draft Interlocal Agreement
10/25/04 None. Refer to packet of 10/25/04.
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
Jam,. w
off Z!, Initialr ITEM NO.
Q;
141, 11,
lo Meeting Date I Prepared by Mayor's review I Council review
09/20/04 1
tb
10/04/04 SL I 1
10/25/04 1 SL
11/01/04 1 SL I l .J 1
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER: Ref 04-130 'ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 9-20-04
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Proposed Amendments to Natural Environment Chapter of Tukwila Comprehensive
Plan and revisions to Sensitive Areas Ordinance, Zoning Code Defintions and
Supplemental Development Conditions Chapters of the Zoning Code.
CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance ['Bid Award Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date
SPONSOR Council El Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P&R Police El PWI
SPONSOR'S Confirm revisions made to Natural Environment Chapter of Tukwila Comprehensive Plan
SUMMARY and continue review of Planning Commission recommended Sensitive Areas Ordinance and
time permitting, begin review of proposed revisions to the Definitions Chapter of the
Zoning Code (TMC 18.06) and TMC 18.50.110, Supplemental Development Standards.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. El CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte El Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 4 /29/04;5/13/04;5 /20/04;6/10/04; 6/24/04; 7/22/04; 9/16/04
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN.
COMMIt 1EE planning Commission
COST.IIVMPACT. FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
N/A N/A N/A
Fund Source:
Comments:
co OF COUN ACTION
9 -20 -04 1 Briefing on Natural Environment Chapter and Sensitive Areas Ordinance revisions
10 -04 -04 1 Public Hearing on 2004 Amdts to Tukwila Comp Plan and regulations
10 -25 -04 1 Begin deliberations on Natural Environment Chapter and regulations
MTG' DATE ATTACHMENTS
11 -01 -04 Memo
*Please bring notebook labeled "Natural Environment Sensitive Areas Ordinance."
Citjl oj Tukvvila
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Department of Community Development
INFORMATION MEMO
Steve Lancaster, Director
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor Mullet, Members.ofthe City Council V ;v.../
Steve Lancaster, Director, Department of, Community Development/\..#'
October 27, 2004 .----->
Confirm Council Revisions to Natural Environment Chapter and Continue
Review of Sensitive Areas Ordinance
ISSUE
The City is required by the Growth Management Act to adopt a Comprehensive Plan and
regulations that incorporate Best Available Science.
BACKGROUND
The Council reviewed proposed amendments to the Natural Environment Chapter of the City's
Comprehensive Plan at its meeting on October 25,2004 and began its review ofthe proposed
revisions to the City's regulations to incorporate BAS starting with the Sensitive Areas
Ordinance.
DISCUSSION
Staff received direction from the Council at its meeting on October 25,2004 on revisions to the
Natural Environment Chapter. The revisions to the Natural Environment Chapter have been
placed in the Council mail boxes Jor your review. The Council also began. its review of the
Planning Commission recommendedSAo and provided staff with direction on revisions and
identified issues to be discussed further on the Sensitive Areas Ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION
Staffhas the following recommendations:
I. Please review the revised. Comprehensive Plan chapters in your mail box to ensure that
they.reflect the changes Council requested. Please be prepared to direct staff on any
revisions that staff overlooked.
2. Continue review of the Planning Commission recommended Sensitive Areas Ordinance
and identify any additional issues on which the Council wants further briefing. Any new
issues will be combined with those identified on 10/25/04 and addressed in one briefing.
3. Consider setting up a stand alone meeting at which the Council would be presented with
information on the issues identified during review of the SAo.
OJUU :>oucnce~rerJjoUlevara,:>Ulle#luu. lUKWii;;., Wasnzngwn 'Itilljl:J · rnone: ~uo"4ji-jo/u . Fax: ~UO-4.jl-.jOO:>
COUNCIL A GENDA SYNOPSIS
of J� ti Initials ITEM NO.
Q; 4,s kt�� O i ?Yleetin� Date Prepared by I Mayor's review I Council review
0-
0R- I 10/25/04 I LL I itAir• I 1 iM
I 11/01/04 1 bb for LL 1 �4_e L i- k l-/
r9o 1 g
I I 1
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER: 04-149 !ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 10/25/04
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Review of 2005 Budget and 2005-2010 CIP
CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date 10/25/04 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mg Date Mtg Date
SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P&'R Police PW
SPONSOR'S
SUMMARY Review of proposed budget and /or CIP (refer attached memo for
specific items to be reviewed this week).
REVIEWED BY a COW Mtg. (10 -25) CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE:
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Review budgets
COMMITTEE Two committees have started their budget reviews
COST IMPACT i FUND. SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
Fund Source:
Comments:
MTG. DATE I RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
10/25/04 Discussion held. Council consensus existed to forward the item to the Nov. 1
Regular meeting for additional discussion, edits, etc.
MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS
10/25/04 Memo from Lucy Lauterbach dated October 20, 2004
Minutes from Finance and Safety Committee (10- 18 -04)
Minutes from Utilities Committee (10- 19 -04)
11/01/04 Memorandum to Council from Lauterbach /Doerschel dated November 1, 2004.
To:
City Council
From:
Lucy Lauterbach
Alan Doerschel
Date:
November!, 2004
Subject:
2005 Bud1!et Review
Alan prefers that the entire.CIP hereviewed, and since committees won't be finished reviewing
their CIPs for two weeks, we'll work on budgets that have been reviewed. You can get as far as
you like on the following budgets. We currently plan to have two extra Tuesday budget
meetings. They were planned forNovember 9th and 16th, but as there is an open house on
Cascade Vievvdrainage November 9th we will try to reschedule that meeting. Can you meet at
5:000n Wednesday, November loth?
Tonight's review will only involve one department (Police). Alan wanted to prevent people
staying until late whic~is when the budget review is generally done.
November .1
Police Department
pp.81-96
Revenues
pp. 1-'-21
City Council
pp.26-27
Mayor
pp.29-32
Sister City Committee
p.33
p.37
Equity and Diversity
Finance Department
pp. 53-54
Dept. 20 Fund Balances
p.134
Contingency Fund
p. 143
Debt Service Funds
pp.146-149
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
q
r 't ti 5 Initials ITEM NO.
1
p! \Z.'
11 f ,�1) `�f�' )921 Meeting Date 1 Prepared by Mayor's,review I Council review 1
.,t ,'t 11/01/04 I ARD .i, J i /7 1
790 0 1 1 1 1
8 1 1 1 1
1
i ITEM': INF.ORMATION
I CAS NUMBER: 04-152 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 11/1/04
AGENDA PVEM TITLE Resolution ordering cancellation of Past Due Accounts Receivable and Returned
Check Write -offs.
CATEGORY Discussion Motion E Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 10/18/04 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date
SPONSOR Council Mayon Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P &R Police Pr
SPONSOR'S There are certain receivables that have been deemed uncollectible and need to be removed
SUMMARY from the Accounts Receivable Ledger. See Staff Report.
RIWIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte El F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DA'Z'E: 10/18/04
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Move to November 1, 2004 Regular Meeting
COMMI'ITIE Move to November 1, 2004 Regular Meeting
C FUND- SO
EXPENDITURE RF,QUTRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$N /A $N /A $N /A
Fund Source: N/A
Comments:
MTG DATE I rA t .RE,CORD O F:000NCIL ACTION
11/1/04 1
MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS
11/1/04 1 Staff Report dated October 14, 2004
Resolution (1-�,i a prr -E)
Minutes from October 18, 2004 Finance Safety Committee meeting
MEMORANDUM
From:
Mayor / City Council
Alan R.. Doerschel (].~{J
To:
Date:
October 14, 2004
Subject:
CANCELLATION OF ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
The annual proposed resolution totaling $2,433.89 reflects amounts deemed
un-collectible. The items listed have been through the City's collection
program and have not been successfully resolved. Although we are writing
them off the "official" . City books, these amounts will still be subject to
collection. False alarms account for $643.00, NSF checks $286.35 and all
others total $1,504,54. The funds affected will be properly adjusted.
The process for tracking accounts receivable is quite thorough. The steps
below are followed prior to the attachedwrite-offresolution:
. Invoice is sent to recipient by the Finance Department, payable in 30
days.
. A second notice is then sent specifying due date before receivable is
forwarded to collection agency.
. Collection agency sends a series of three letters for the original amount
due, with the final letter advising that legal action will be taken if
payment is not made. If there is no response from debtor after the first
letter in the series, the debt is then reported to the National Credit
Bureaus.
. Collection agency then pursues legal action after the debtor is given a
final opportunity to dispute the claim. This includes attaching checking
accounts, garnishments, lawsuits and other legal methods.
The items on the proposed resolution reflect those that have been through the
process above and receivables are still due with the likelihood of collection
being very low. We do collect amounts after write-offs, but very seldom.
The City cannot.revoke or deny a business license for non-payment of an
accounts receivable claim.
- .
to f s .k4,
1908�-
..,:„...,,,,:,:,,:c.,;,:.
of
"I-;- City Washington
Resolution No.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, ORDERING THE CANCELLATION OF PAST DUE
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND RETURNED CHECK WRITE -OFFS.
l,.
WHEREAS, certain receivables and checks have been deemed uncollectible after
efforts by both the City and a collection agency have been unsuccessful; and
WHEREAS, the City will continue to pursue these receivables when practical;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
li, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
f pi r
f Section 1. Miscellaneous Accounts Receivable. The total of $2,433.89 is deemed
uncollectible. See Attachment A.
COUNCIL OF THE CITY O TUKWILA WASHINGTON,
CITY CO
PASSED BY THE C 2004.
at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of
Al "1'hST /AUT'HENTICATED:
Jim Haggerton, Council President
Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
;'A Filed with the City Clerk
By Passed by the City Council
Office of the City Attorney Resolution Number
1
;r;; Write Offs 10/29/04
ATTACHMENT A as of 10/13/04
MISCELLANEOUS
06/17/03
Airpro Equipment
Best Buy
General
General
R06160
R09204
$ 40.00
33.00
I To Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
I Balance after EPR payment
09/18/02
11/01/02
Christian Health Services
General
R1.0248
40.00
I Bankruptcy 04 /23/03
11/27/02
Cloud Electric Vehicles
General
R11271
40.00
I To Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
12/19/02
Electronics Boutique
General
R12285
40.00
, To Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
12/19/02
Electronics Boutique
General
R12286
40.00
"To Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
In dispute
09/18/02
Foster Library
General
R09205
40.00'
03/12/03
Gary's Tux Shop
General Electric Industrial
General
General
R03079
R05123
40.00
40.00
I To Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
ITo Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
'Was making pymts-in military
I To Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
05/13/03
08/31 /03
Joshua Dale Harris
General
M -0816
591.07
05/30/03
Home Depot
General
R05142
40.00
06/17/03
Home Depot
General
R06156
40.00
ITo Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
® Balance after EPR payment
07/01/03
Kit's One Hour Photo
General
R07169
17.00
07/01/03
Lane Bryant "
General
R07165
40.00
ITo Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
ITo Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
ITo Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
ITo Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
ITo Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
I To Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
07/25/03
Lane Bryant
General
R07189
40.00
09/03/02
Mr. Bill Lipscomb
General
R09186
40.00
09/18/02
Mr. Bill Lipscomb
General
R09218
40.00
11/04/02
Mr. Bill-Lipscomb
Tony Morelli
General
Water
R11256
M -0302
40.00
46.47
03/29/02
10/15/02
Pacific 76 /David Malik
General
R10230
40.00
'To Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
I To Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
08/12/03
Southcenter Shell
General
R08207
40.00
09/03/02
Simply Thai II
General
R09185
40.00
ITo Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
I To Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
09/18/02
Simply Thai I I
General
R09210
40.00
11/01/02
Simply Thai II
General
R10251
40.00
ITo Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
'Balance after EPR payment
01/30/03
Watch World
General
R01027
17.00
Miscellaneous Billing Total
FALSE
ALARMS
$ 1,504.54
12/09/02
s
David's Bridal
General
F -1223
$ 21.00
Balance after EPR payment
11/25/02
Globix
General
F -1122
25.00
To Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
05/14/03
Home Depot (S 180th)
General
F -0510
25.00
To Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
06/17/03
Home Depot (S 180th)
General
FF6162
50.00
To Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
03/31/03
K and G Men's Mart
General
FA0316
11.00
Balance after EPR payment
07/31/03
Loan Mart
General
F -0824
11.00
Balance after. EPR payment
12/09/02
The McCoy Residence
General
F -1256
25.00
To Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
12/09/02
The McCoy Residence
General
F -1257
25.00
To Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
02/28/03
The McCoy Residence
General
F -0203
25.00
To Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
02/28/03
The McCoy Residence
General
F -0204
25.00
To Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
Page 1
ATTACHMENT A as of 10/13/04
02/28/03
The McCoy Residence
General.
F -0205
25.00
To Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
02/28/03
The McCoy Residence
General
F -0210
25.00
To Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
02/28/03
The McCoy Residence
General
F -0212
25.00
To Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
03/31/03
The McCoy Residence
General
FA0317
25.00
To Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
03/31/03
The McCoy Residence
General
FA0318
25.00
To Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
03/31/03
The McCoy Residence
General
FA0319
25.00
To Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
03/31 /03
The McCoy Residence
General
FA0320
25.00
To Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
03/31/03
The McCoy Residence
General
FA0321
25:00
To Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
04/15/03
The McCoy Residence
General
F -0421
25.00
To Evergreen prof. Recoveries
04/15/03
The McCoy Residence
General
F -0422
25.00
To Evergreen Prof: Recoveries
08/25/03
Nasia Restaurant
General
F -0872
25.00
To EPR -Out of business
09/30/03
Nasia Restaurant
General
F -0932
25.00
To EPR -Out of business
09/30/03
Nasia Restaurant
General
F -0933
25.00
To EPR -Out of business
09/30/03
`
Nasia Restaurant
General
F -0934
25.00
To EPR -Out of business
08/25/03
Quik Framing
General
F -0880
25.00
To Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
05/14/03
Wireless Retail
General
F -0532
25.00
To Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
False Alarm Total
RETURNED
CHECKS
$ 643.00
10/21/02
Willie Ray Evans, Jr.
TCC
5034
$ 90.00
To Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
12/13/02
Daniel R. Parent
TCC
4251
20.00
Balance after EPR payment
01/27/03
Bill D. Stills
Golf
878
140.35
To Evergreen Prof. Recoveries
07/02/03
Lailani G. Tuiolemotu
Pool
1314
36.00
Bankruptcy 01 /13/04
Returned Check Total
$ 286.35
WRITE -OFF GRAND TOTAL
$ 2,433.89
Page 2
Finance and Safety Committee
October18,2004
Present:
Dave Fenton, Chair; Joan Hernandez, Dennis Robertson
Alan Doerschel,Darlene Heskett, Rhonda Berry, Peter Beckwith, Lucy
Lauterbach; Kevin Fuhrer; resident Ron Phelps
1. AmendmenttoPublic DefellderContract . David Kirshenbaum's finn has handled public
defender services for the City for many years. Their reputation is very good, and they have not
had a pay increase for three years. They asked for an increase of 6%, to $9,OOO/month, or
$1 08,000/year.Darlene had compared their cost to similar costs of defense attorneys for King
County and for the national average. The annual cost for those attorneys was $292,740 at King
County and $328,000 nationally. Tukwila gets a very good rate for good work. Recommend
contract to COW.
,J,/2o.C3ncelbitlOnOf A. ccounts Receiv..able . Each year Alan has to write offuncollectable bills
1'owed by people. This year there are fewer write offs; Alan said they were the lowest they've
been in ten years. The fines they owe are mostlyfrom fire inspection fees when they fail multiple
times and need to be retested. There are disputes between the equipment providers and the clients
who fail the tests. One family, the McCoy residence,.had fourteen charges for false alarms, with
five on one day. Alan thoughtthey'dleft town. Recommend resolution to Ref!ular Meetin!!.
3. Annual Write-Off of Warrants. Checks and Gift Certificates Just as the City writes off
uncollectablebills, they also write offuncashed checks from the City to individuals or
companies. The largest number of gift. certificates that were not cashed in were from golf course
certificates. One water cUstomer who the City owes money to was also listed in the accounts
receivable list. Recommend issue to Ref!ular Meetin!!.
4. Animal Control Issue The City Attorney's office had drafted new language for, the animal
control ordinance. The new language gives the City specific authority that had been!listed for
King County to do. The appeal process is also being changed to go the City's hearing exa.rpjner
rather than King County's. The Committee heard from Ron Phelps who lives next to three pit
bulls that escape with some regularity. He cannot use his back yard because the dogs are so loud
in their barking and charging the fence whenever anyone is in Ron's yard. Ron is not anxious to
complain because the home with the dogs has retaliated in the past when people have
complained about the dogs. All the negatively affected people are somewhat fearful ofthe house
and the dogs that have gotten out at least six times in the past year. Ron said the pit bulls could
eat his small dogs easily if they were in the yard when the pit bulls escaped. Peter did not know
if the City could regulate back yard behavior, but said he' would check. At the next Committee
meeting Walt Washington, the head of Animal Control, will be invited. Reschedule.
5.Clearnath Consultant Af!reement Alan noted that this Agreement had been in Committee
last month, andit has been refined and changed according to the Committee's wishes. The Scope
of Services had one new item of providing technical assistance to the new Economic
Development Administrator, and the Committee recommended deleting that. Otherwise they
recommended thecontractto Council. Recommend contract to COW.
1LA COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
p t 6►' \2 '1, Initials ITEM No.
-.i 4 p I s Meeting Date 1 Prepared by 1 Mayor's review Council review
a ��i� p> 11/01/04 1 ARD 1 ,A,vi
7908 1
1 1 1 1
ITE IN FORMATION
CAS NUMBER: 04-153 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 11./1/04
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Annual write -off of Outstanding Court Treasurer's Checks and Gift Certificates.
CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 10/18/04 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date
SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P&R Police PTY/
SPONSOR'S Annual write -offs per RCW. See attachments
SUMMARY
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 10/18/04
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Move to Regular Meeting
COMMITTEE Move to Regular Meeting
COST IMPACT /..FUND SOURCE:
EXPENDITURE REQUIRE D AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$N /A $N /A $N /A
Fund Source: N/A
Comments:
MTG. DATE I iff*f RECORD OF COU NCI L ACTI
11/1/04 I
MTG. DATE r ATTACHMENTS
11/1/04 1 Staff Report from October 18, 2004
1 Resolution (i na_Q form() 4-
1 Minutes from Finance &'Safety Committee meeting on October 18, 2004
1
1
1
1
To:
MayorSteve Mullet
From:
Alan Doerschel,Director
Finance Department
Date:
October 18,2004
Subject:
Annual Write-Off of Outstanding Municipal Court I Treasurer's Checks and
Gift Certificates
The attached proposedresoluticmwill write-offa total of$4,189.90 in unclaimed/outstanding
items.
General Fund
Municipal Court Checks
Treasurer's Checks Canceled
General Subtotal.
$1,697.01
205.69
$1,902.70
Water Fund
Treasurer's Check Canceled
58.70
Golf Course
Gift Certificates Canceled
Grand Total
$2,228.50
$4,189.90
Once the City cancels these outstanding items, the amounts will be returned to the General and
Water Utility funds respectively.
4 y am
j.;r 1908
'Washingto
Was
R esolution 14 o.
t 7 :::t: i:� O F THE CITY pg1}ERIN'G
UTION TONS G
;f... A gESOL WASHING pSTANDIN
CITY Of TUKWILA, OF
CANCELLATION TREAS ER S CHECKS
'f��: THE. ICIPACERTCOURT ATES•
ed f AND GIFT Unclaimed Property
Department of Revenue orrnancY period of
Washington, P a ;cates ending rop 3
ft c ertificate s WHEREAS
d the Teporcourt /treasurer's checks and
;aj' municipal unable attempts to
o utstandi n g all reas
carer s
2002, and finance Department has
unredeemed all re municipal court/treasurer's
Vii
WHEREAS, the City of outstanding uru
cancel all
resolve the non-collection wishes to
d t certificates, and of Tu kwila 2003,
checks an g Council of the ecks issued prior to Jul 1,
City court /treasurer's ch
WHEREAS, the unicipal
a rced rn 2002; L OF THE KWILA,
outstanding,a eS s ued prior to ICY CITY OF TU
and gift certificates COUNCIL THE CITY ALL OWS'
EFORf
N HEREBY RESOLVES AS F Nation of municipal courtltTeasurex s
t w ASHIN es the canoe
Council declares Attachment A.
w1 C it y A W
led on GT ON
The Tuk detailed CITY OF TU
checks and g
certificates, d OF T� 2004.
i T CITY CO d of
r.;; ED BY thi
PASS s
lar Meeting
at a Reg
TED:
;ic;,;:. erton, Councii Pxesident
ATTEST/ AHEICA Tim Hagg
CMG, City Clerk City Clerk:
Cantu, Filed with the City Council'
Jane E•
BY: Passed by r
`:;;;fir.":: APPROVED ASTO R
Attorney
Office of the City
puts
W 2004 10129/04 Page 1 of 1
Attachment "A"
ID NUMBER
,
000 - General Fund
Various
11164
11199
11300
11406
7239
DATE
VENDOR
~..._.~
Various
08/30/02
10/03/02
02/14/03
06/20/03
09/27/02
Aggregate-Various (under $50)
Kim Alan Kirkpatrick
Curtis Garfield Thomuson
Henry Demetrius Taylor
Viking Valiente-Gramajo
First American Title Insurance Co.
General Fund Total:
401- Water Utility Fund
12739 10/22/01
12739 10/22/01
Toni Morelli
Toni Morelli
411 -Foster Golf Course
Sixty-four (64) miscellaneous gift certificates
GRAND TOTAL:
AMOUNT
$211.01
$400.00
$59.00
$820.00
$253.00
$159.69
$1,902.70
$300.00 '
($241.30) ,
$2,228.50
$4,189.90
Finance and Safety Committee
October 18, 2004
Present:
Dave Fenton, Chair; Joan Hernandez, Dennis Robertson
Alan Doerschel, Darlene Heskett, Rhonda Berry, Peter Beckwith, Lucy
Lauterbach; Kevin Fuhrer; resident Ron Phelps
1. Amendment to Public Defender Contract David Kirshenbaum's firm has handled public
defender services for the City for many years. Their reputation is very good, and they have not
had a pay increase for three years. They asked Jor an increase of 6%, to $9,000/month, or
$108,000/year. Darlene had compared their cost to similar costs of defense attorneys for King
County and for the national average. The annual cost for those attorneys was $292,740 at King
County and $328,000 nationally. Tukwilagetsa very good rate for good work. Recommend
contract to COW.
2. Cancellation of Accounts Receivable Each year Alan has to write offuncollectable bills
. owed by people. This year there are fewer write offs; Alan said they were the lowest they've
been in ten years. The fines they owe are mostly from fire inspection fees when they fail multiple
times and need to be retested. There are disputes between the equipment providers and the clients
who fail the tests. One family,the McCoy residence, had fourteen charges for false alarms, with
>k. five on one day. Alan thought they'd left town. Recommend resolution to Regular Meeting.
.3. . Annual Write-Off of Warrants. Checks and Gift Certificates Just as the City writes off
... .. · ... uncollectable bills, they al~o write off uncashed checks from the City to individuals or
I companies. The largest number of gift certificates that were not cashed in were from golf course
certificates. One water customer who the City owes money to was also listed in the accounts
receivable list. Recommend issue to Regular Meeting.,
4. Animal Control Issue The City Attorney's office had drafted new language for, the animal
control ordinance. The new language gives the City specific authority that had been listed for
King County to do. The appeal process is also being changed to go the City's hearing examiner
rather than King County's. The Committee heard from Ron Phelps who lives next to three pit
bulls that escape with some regularity. He cannot use his back yard because the dogs are so loud
in their barking. and charging the. fence whenever anyone is in Ron's yard. Ron is not anxious to
complain because the home with the dogs has retaliated in the past when people have
complained about the dogs. All the negatively affected people are somewhat fearful of the house
and the dogs that have gotten out at least six times ,in the past year~ Ron said the pit bulls could
eat his small dogs easily if they were in the yard when the pit bulls escaped. Peter did not know
ifthe City could regulate back yard behavior, but said he would check. At the next Committee
meeting Walt Washington, the head of A_l1imal Control, will be invited. Reschedule.
5. ClearDathConsuItant Agreement Alan noted that this Agreement had been in Committee
last month, and it has been refined and changed according to the Committee's wishes. The Scope
of Services had one new item of providing technical assistance to the new Economic
Development Administrator, and the Committee recommended deleting that. Otherwise they
recommended the contract to Council. Recommend contract to COW.
.