HomeMy WebLinkAboutRes 1576 - Countywide Planning Policies Amendments 1LA wgsy \r�
so ti
i
r
j +z
1 gpg
C ity
of
Washington
Resolution No. I 7 J
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, RATIFYING FIVE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE
COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES FOR KING COUNTY, AS
RECOMMENDED BY THE KING COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT
PLANNING COUNCIL.
WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policies for King County were adopted and
ratified through an inter jurisdictional planning process in 1992, and
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Planning Council for King County has
recommended five proposed amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies, and
WHEREAS, on February 14, 2005, the King County Council approved and ratified
the proposed amendments on behalf of unincorporated King County through adoption
of Ordinance 15121, Ordinance No 15122 and Ordinance No 15123, and
WHEREAS, an interlocal agreement provides that amendments to the Countywide
Planning Policies become effective only if ratified by at least 30 percent of local
jurisdictions within King County, representing at least 70 percent of the County's
population, and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments have been reviewed by the Tukwila City
Council and found to be beneficial to continued regional cooperation and coordination
in managing growth,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS.
Section 1. Ratification of GMPC Motion 04 -1 The City of Tukwila supports
ratification of Growth Management Planning Council Motion 04 -1, attached hereto as
Exhibit A, amending the Countywide Planning Policies' Urban Growth Area, Interim
Potential Annexation Area and Urban Separator maps to provide consistency with the
King County Comprehensive Plan and recognize Tukwila's South Potential Annexation
Area.
Section 2. Ratification of GMPC Motion 04 -2. The City of Tukwila supports
ratification of Growth Management Planning Council Motion 04 -2, attached hereto as
Exhibit B, amending the Countywide Planning Policies' Urban Growth Area and
Interim Potential Annexation Area maps to reflect re- designation of approximately 6
acres in the Spar Road area from "Rural" to "Urban' and approximately 0.2 acres from
"Urban" to "Rural."
Section 3. Ratification of GMPC Motion 04 -3 The City of Tukwila supports
ratification of Growth Management Planning Council Motion 04 -3, attached hereto as
Exhibit E, amending the Countywide Planning Policies by designating downtown
Burien as an Urban Center
Planning Policy Amendments SL.kn 4/28/05 Page 1 of 2
Section 4. Ratification of GMPC Motion 04 -4. The City of Tukwila supports
ratification of Growth Management Planning Council Motion 04 -4, attached hereto as
Exhibit D, amending the Countywide Planning Policies by adopting technical
adjustments to employment targets for jurisdictions in King County for the period 2012
to 2022. These adjustments include projected new households and jobs in Tukwila's
recognized South Potential Annexation Area.
Section 5. Ratification of GMPC Motion 04 -5 The City of Tukwila supports
ratification of Growth Management Planning Council Motion 04 -5, attached hereto as
Exhibit C, amending the Countywide Planning Policies' Urban Growth Area Map to
include the 29 -acre area known as Covington Park, and to include this area in the City
of Covington's Potential Annexation Area.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON,
at a Regular Meeting thereof this Zr-c! day of 2005
Q
ATTEST/ AUTHENTICATED
_1_L&LA_ Pamela Linder, Council President
Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED A O FORM BY
Filed with the City Clerk: U
Passed by Cit the Ci Council. Ob 2
O�e of th Attorney Resolution Number e n
Planning Policy Amendments SL.kn 4/28/05 Page 2 of 2
EXH B 00 A
1 MOTION NO 04 -1
2 A MOTION to amend the Urban Growth Area of King
3 County This Motion also modifies the Potential Annexation
4 Area map in the Countywide Planning Policies and
5 designates a new Urban Separator
6
7
8 WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act, RCW 36 70A_ 110 requires
9 counties to designate an urban growth area or areas within which urban growth shall be
10 encouraged and outside of which growth can occur only if it is not urban in nature, and
11
12 WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policy FW -1 Step 8 recognizes that King County may
13 initiate amendments to the Urban Growth Area, and
14
15 WHEREAS, the King County Executive and the Metropolitan King County Council
16 requests the Growth Management Planning Council consider the attached amendments to
17 the Urban Growth Area for eventual adoption by the Metropolitan King County Council
18 and ratification by the cities, and
19
20 WHEREAS, the Growth Management Planning Council has directed the nnterjunsdictnonaI
21 staff team to review additional Urban Separators and present them for GMPC
22 consideration, and
23
24 WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policies LU -31 and LU -32 anticipate the collaborative
25 designation of Potential Annexation Areas and the eventual annexation of these areas by
26 cities_ The attached amendments are supported by the affected city
27
28 BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF
29 KING COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS
30
31 l Amend the Urban Growth Area as designated by the Urban Growth Areas Map in the
32 Countywide Planning Policies, the Potential Annexation Area map, and the Urban
33 Separator map as depicted on the following attached maps
34
35
36
Z
15121.
1 Attachment 1 a map showing the removal of the red "overlap" designation for the
2 unincorporated Urban area between SeaTac and Tukwila and including this area in
3 Tukwila's PAA,
4
5 Attachment 2, a map showing the redesignation of Pemgo Park from Rural to
6 Urban and including this property within Redmond s PAA,
7
8 Attachment 3, a map showing the redesignation of the Enumclaw Golf Course from
9 Rural to Urban and including this property within Enumclaw's PAA,
10
11 Attachment 4, a map` showing the redesignation of a 6 of an acre parcel on Cougar
12 Mountain from Rural to Urban and including this property within Bellevue's PAA,
13
14 Attachment 5, a map showing the redesignation of 120 acres of the Bear Creek
15 Urban Planned Development from Urban to Rural,.
16
17 Attachment 6, a map showing the redesignation of approximately 128 acres in the
18 Willows Road area from Rural to Urban and including this area within Kirkland's
19 PAA. Approximately 70 acres of this area is designated as an Urban Separator
20
21 2 Amend the Interim Potential Annexation Area Map by including any additional
22 unincorporated urban land created by these UGA amendments in the Potential
23 Annexation Area of the adjoining city
24
25 3 Amend the Urban Separator map by adding the new Urban Separator as shown on
26 attachment 6
27
28 4 These amendments are recommended to the Metropolitan King County Council and the
29 Cities of King County for adoption and ratification.
30
31
32
33 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County in open session
34 on September 15, 2004 and si chair of the GMPC
35
36
37
AAA
38 on rms, hair, Gro h Management Planning Council
39
40
2
15 12 1
Attachment i
N
Proposed Amendment
Interim PAA Map Amendment
Proposed Area
o a:+r�a•
Incorporated Areas
1000 500 0 1,000 2.000
1Feet
.,,,.,,ro.:aw.o. accro•.oe..saurw...�.Q.:u,i..w •u...e
..,cwe..>.acc+n•- ,.wenwxe. w>�w aoo.ar r...a rM w
8� i 1 I i'_ -_T� �r .I�IIA 1 ,C I i J X27../�_
iI._—.J
1 �•�J�— I�I�_�jJ lilt j
i T_ —i_i_
t ,�rv 1
—4- i 1
i b F t
i r
T. i'
7;�!
r P
i
1.
SeaTac A
•_mot
y am; T:.:
'r??
r
te l an- .fY;; t 'c_ ..c
T n �l '`f�
-f. rid
F =c` }'r err• .:F 2R
x 5t '�<..R 7, ;t:. y.� I I j i
i -lc `r- "ate TyJ• li 1
4, =j
Z ,1- ),j 'r
�r.. t'
I 1'10IIill'•�I t 1.
H t1�41 l .i 3 j 1
JUT
r j
Add Outlined Area 1
to Tukwila's PAA
A
a
�'n`°— 1 I �.1 E_
�I
t t C
I 5 1 2 1 Atfachment 2
N
Proposed Amendment
City of Redmond Perngo Community Park Site -UGA Amendment
wrg CouniY sYl uyn rery a swan an°.sa:+gM b cnaigr
yA s
Urban Growth Boundary 0 Other Parksl Wilderness
s+.a oe cau. b, anY 9un°'. ma.a ..o..a w.e°er.a a
Nmages ind Wwg Cu :.a �m:vA m.
w by D'o! �aaf✓9 Mom Me vt w m:wv W M
;,"°".,.:a. ��a a^ ,ti M ,y. d .a _.ao d Proposed Urban
.aaa.�✓�'�+�- "�iP�M ^P rr Rural Residential
K .,,C,,,,. Growth Boundary
400 200 0 400 600 r
1 Feel L__ Incorporated Areas
vi
ur�asaeY.wGb+.wu ]°erorta rr.urywvp'l4W a.r N�
�k,
II
IUrTI rr I 1 s
I
rr i
i
REJMOA D
I rr
E is Cre: k f
lit
t
J
15 1 2 1 AItachment 3
N
Proposed Amendment
Enumclaw Golf Course UGA Amendment
"C__"Am .Y Urban Growth Boundary
C r)( Rural City UGA
ow+ .eOmmwaom w
care¢ a.t. n.a. a¢vnry, cowYH
.iy»z b a,. vpr d surn KYp County Proposed Urban
M Growth Boundary r r Rural Residential
iJamau"on mmanW on Vis map. Y caM of Uia nv
iNam.aiono� awa map a PonL:rQ a.cep W n.ip�. p.anvaon of
�°^ry Proposed Forest Production
500 250 o Soo 1,000 District Boundary f Forest
mW Feet
Incorporated Areas
f i
ENUMCLAW i
rr
j- i rx
.N-
rr
7 rX
I t
t
s� 456u1.
rx
f
,r
ag
w
S
moo
rr
i
.r�� i
15121
Attachment 4
Proposed Amendment
Cougar. Mountain UGA Amendment
=7 1 .4
siq Ceumy n ,eywae�"alms o•
un'e� i erps Td40_ u am,ncy. owMWrti
con.ew- mm. .wa..a w ra wee n ea .r%
Urban Growth Boundary r r Rural Residential
Proposed Urban U Urban Residential, low t du /ac
Growth Boundary
300 y� 300 Study Area
I
B LL' VU
6,
j I I i i i I
r.
rr
t
I
I
i
15 Allachment 5
Proposed Amendment
Redmond Ridge UGA Amendment
Tn. d tY
Kira C_Y
z..
40V Urban Growth Boundary r Rural Residential
i„pmWMn ma on Vs map MY aaM Ns V
v c-;.r Proposed Urban upd Urban Planned Development
750 375 0 Aso 1.5W Growth Boundary
Change Area
i r
Z"
"'5
A
6.0
N
rr
upd ag
rr
_j
N
r
J
T
N
115
Attachment 6
Proposed Amendment
Willows Road Subarea Plan UGA Amendment
,e i i-, i—
K^
r'NM Iw1p 9 �Y .ep
arN.. e:qw o i,pLW, a b �m.°c1. amylelenez�
"k Urban Growth Boundary g b GreenbelVUrban Separator
sn=, op M topic b ay q«wd. specol 'vq:.d,
.ewr. aw pdus n.wq fm.. new .,cvse d e.e
4- Proposed Urban UM Urban residential, medium, 4 -12 du /ac
iJOn•we.m.pR.mpi Vd•'p�b e�'P d
Growth Boundary
rf Rural residential
400. 200 0 400 800
Feet Incorporated Areas Change Area
i
r
ME 132nd St
UM
ILI
jig
KJRKE4TvL) E
.yi
V.
,i
FXH R.
I MOTION NO 04 -2
2 A MOTION to amend the Urban Growth Area of King
3 County This Motion also modifies the Potential Annexation
4 Area map in the Countywide Planning Policies-
5
6
7 WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act, RCW 36 70A.110 requires
8 counties to designate an urban growth area or areas within which urban growth shall be
9 encouraged and outside of which growth can occur only if it is not urban in nature; and
10
1 I WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policy FW -I Step 8 recognizes that King County may
12 initiate amendments to the Urban Growth Area, and
13
14 WHEREAS, the King County Executive and the Metropolitan King County Council
15 requests the Growth Management Planning Council consider the attached amendments to
16 the Urban Growth Area for eventual adoption by the Metropolitan King County Council
17 and ratification by the cities; and
18
19 WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policies LU -31 and LU -32 anticipate the collaborative
20 designation of Potential Annexation Areas and the eventual annexation of these areas by
21 cities. The attached amendments are supported by the affected city
22
23 BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF
24 KING COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS
25
26 1 Amend the. Urban Growth Area as designated by the Urban Growth Areas Map in the
27 Countywide Planning Policies and the Potential Annexation Area map as depicted on
28 the following attached maps
29
30 Attachment 1 a map showing the redesignation of an area adjoining the Issaquah
31 Spar Road from Rural to Urban and including this property within Issaquah's's
32 PAA_ There is also a very small (approximately .2 acre) redesignation from Urban
33 to Rural to correct a likely mapping error
34
35 Attachment 2, a map showing the redesignation of approximately 6 acres from
36 Rural to Urban and including this property within the City of Renton's PAA,
1
1 5 1 2 1
1
2
3 1 Amend the Interim Potential Annexation Area Map by including any additional
4 unincorporated urban land created by these UGA amendments in the Potential
5 Annexation Area of the adjoining city
6
7 3 These amendments are recommended to the Metropolitan King County Council and the
8 Cities of King County for adoption and ratification_
9
10
11
12
13 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County in open session
14 on September 15, 2004 and signed b the chair of the GMPC
15
16
17
18 Ron Stm thair, Growth Management Planning Council
19
20
2
ttachment 1
N
Proposed Amendment
Issaquah Spar Road UGA Amendment
w co..,q•s.s l.o.. nw�a.o..ms sw: „p.nnwps
ry
Urban Growth Boundary Proposed Urban
a:�e.»�d:n Growth Boundary
North Fork Issaquah Creek o
(approximate location) h e N -Spar (approximate location)
w.waa. omavw m as iw. w+r a ra map
Incorporated Areas rr Rural Residential
0 75 150 300 450 600
Feel Change Area UI Urban Low 1 du/ac
I
•'YS
y 1
SE 56th St
rr
N n
1 5 1
Attachment 2
N proposed Land Use Amendmen
Renton Christian Center -VGA Amendm
r r Rural Residential
p r -`s:. _A Urban Growth Boundary
C 4-12 dulac
proposed Urban Li rn Urban Residential, medium,
Growth Boundary o g County
Kp �•�w�, ~�na os Open Space /Recreation
Study Area
400 20U 0 Fee!
rp
OS
a wb"j8• a•.4 a M �w ue• aenan f
lj.i�• Wit- J 1 --r
S
i_ r>. J r �--ii Y xcv
OS wit
J am_ ''1 i'7 'i.1_�'_.� f\ /r .[xy.
u rTi
OS
f f
m
U
u 1 y
ql
F
Pill
rr "tom.;:. f
1
EXIN
1 MOTION NO. 04 -3
2 A MOTION to amend the Countywide PIanning Policies by
3 designating Downtown Bunen as an Urban Center_ Downtown
4 Bunen is added to the list of Urban Centers following
5 Countywide Planning Policy LU 39
6
7
8 WHEREAS A goal of the Growth Management Act is to encourage development in Urban
9 Areas where adequate public facilities exist or can be provided in an efficient manner;
10
1 I WHEREAS, Policy LU -39 of the Countywide Planning Policies of King County describes
12 the criteria for Urban Center designation;
13
14 WHEREAS, Policy LU-40 of the Countywide Planning Policies of King County describes
15 standards for planned land uses within Urban Centers;
16
17 WHEREAS, the City of Bunen has demonstrated that Downtown Bunen meets the criteria
18 for designation as an Urban Center; and
19
20 WHEREAS, King County Comprehensive Plan Pohey U -106 supports the development of
21 Urban Centers to meet the region s needs for housing, fobs, services, culture and
22 recreation.
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32.
UGM PC/2002GMPCJMoTion02fi.doc
151211
i
2
3
4 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY
5 HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS
6
7 Downtown Bunen is designated as an Urban Center The list of Urban Centers following
8 Countywide Planning Policy LU -39 is modified to include Downtown Bunen.
9
10
I I ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on
12 September 15, 2004 in open session and signed by the chair of GM
13
14
15
1
17 7
18 Ron Sims, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council
L/GMPC /2002GMPC/Motion02 -6. doc
E
I MOTION NO 04 -4
2 A MOTION by the Growth Management Planning Council of King
3 County recommending the amendment of the Countywide Planning
4 Policies, revising targets for new household and Job growth for the
5 period 2001 -2022 by amending Table LU -I 2001 -2022 Household
6 and Employment Growth Targets which will be located in Section III
7 C of the Countywide Planning Policies.
8
9 WHEREAS, the 1994 Countywide Planning Policies established a housing target range for
10 each city and for King County; and
11
12 WHEREAS, the Growth Management Planning Council adopted revised household and
13 Job growth targets for the period 2001 2022 on September 25, 2002; and
14
15 WHEREAS, on May 26, 2004, the Growth Management Planning Council met and
16 discussed revisions to the adopted household and employment targets for the period 2001-
17 2022_
18 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY
19 HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS
20
21 The attached "Revised Table LU -I 2001 -2022 Household and Employment
22 Growth Targets" is hereby recommended for adoption in the Countywide Planning
23 Policies to revise the household growth targets and potential annexation area targets
24 to reflect the target extension from January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2022.
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
UGMPC/04GMPC/Mot044.doc Z
15122
1
2
3 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on
4 September 15, 2004 in open session and signed by the chair of GMP.C_
5
6
7 l
8
9
10
11 ems, Cbair, Growth Management Planning Council
12 Attachment.
13 1 Revised Table LU -1 2001 -2022 Household and Employment Growth Targets
14 (file LU -1 Rev2004.xls)
15
16
17
VGMPC /04GMPC/Mot04 -4.doc 2
Revised Table LU 1 King County 2001 -2022 Household and Employment Targets
Subareas Household Housing Capacity in PAA HH Job Target Job Capacity in PAA Job
Target PAA*
Target PAA* Target
South King County 1 I I 1 I I
Algona 1 2981 1 1 1081 1
Auburn 1 6,0031 2,6351 8151 6,084 2521 252
Black Diamond 1 1,099+ I 1 2,5251 1
Burien 1,5521 i 1 1,7121 1
Covington 1 1,3731 I 1 9001 1
Des Moines 1 1,5761 51 21 1,6951 1
Federal Way 1 6,1881 3,754+ 1,1611 7,4811 1341 134
Kent 1 4,2841 1,7631 5461 11,5001 2871 287
Milton 1 501 1061 331; 1,0541 I
Maple Valley 1 3001 1 1 8041 1
Normandy Park 1 1001 1 671 I
Pacific 1 7211 1271 39 1031 I
Renton 1 6,1981 5,6221 1,7391 27,5971 4581 458
SeaTac 1 4,4781 01 01 9,2881 01 0
Tukwila 1 3,2001 271 81 16,0001 9931 993
Unincorp King County 1 4,9351 1,9131 5921 2,5821 4581 458
Total 1 42,3551 15,9521 4,9351 89,5001 2,5821 2,582
East King County 1 I I 1 I 1
Beaux Arts Village 1 3' 1 1 1 1
Bellevue 1 10,1171 1841 1781 40,0001 271 27
Bothell 1 1,7511 6031 5841 2,0001 1741 174
Clyde Hill 1 211 1 1 1 I
Hunts Point 1 1 I I 1 I
Issaquah 1 3,9931 8271 8021 14,0001 11 1
Kenmore 1 2,3251 I 1 2,800' 1
Kirkland 1 5,4801 7701 747 8,8001 2211 221
Medina 1 311 1 1 1
Mercer Island 1 1,4371 1 8001 I
Newcastle 1 8631 11 11 5001 I
Redmond 1 9,0831 4021 3901 21,7601 211 21
Sammamish 1 3,8421 1 1 1,2301 1
Woodinville 1 1,8691 1 1 2,0001 1
Yarrow Point 281 1 1 1 1
Unincorp King County 6,8011 *4,2221 *4,0991 4,6371 *4,1931 *4,193
Total 1 47,6451 7,0091 6,8011 98,5271 4,6371 4,637
Sea -Shore 1 I I 1 1 1
Lake Forest Park 1 5381 1 1 4551 1
Seattle 1 51,5101 1 1 92,0831 1
Shoreline 1 2,6511 1 1 2,6181 1,
Unincorp King County* 1 1,6701 1,6701 1,6701 6941 1,5441 694
Total 1 56,3691 1,6701 1,6701 95,8501 1,5441 694
Rural Cities 1 I I 1 I I
Carnation 1 2461 1 1 751 1
Duvall 1 1,0371 1 1 1,1251 1
Enumclaw 1 1,9271 1 1 1,1251 1
North Bend 1 6361 1 1 1,1251 1
Skykomish 1 201 1 1 1 1
Snoqualmie 1 1,6971 1 1 1,8001 1
Total 1 5,5631 1 1 5,2501 1
King County Total 1 151,9321 1 1 289,1271 1
*PAA. Potential Annexation Area in Unincorporated King County Urban Area; *Bear Creek UPD; *North Highline
****The Rural Cities' targets are for the current city limits and rural expansion area for each city Thus the methodology for adjusting targets
as annexations occur is not applicable to the rural cities.
Editor's Note: Source for 2001 housing and job capacity figures for PAAs is the 2002 King County Buildable Lands evaluation. Subarea
unincorporated targets were allocated to PAAs based on proportional capacity Revised per Motion 04 -4 Sept. 2004
I MOTION NO 04 -5
2 A MOTION to amend the Urban Growth Area of King
3 County This Motion also modifies the Potential Annexation
4 Area map in the Countywide Planning Policies.
5
6
7 WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act, RCW 36 70A.110 requires
8 counties to designate an urban growth area or areas within which urban growth shall be
9 encouraged and outside of which growth can _occur only if it is not urban in nature; and
10
11 WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policy FW -1 Step 8 recognizes that King County may
12 initiate amendments to the Urban Growth Area, and
13
14 WHEREAS, the King County Executive and the Metropolitan King County Council
15 requests the Growth Management Planning Council consider the attached amendment to
16 the Urban Growth Area for eventual adoption by the Metropolitan King County Council
17 and ratification by the cities; and
18
19 WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policies LU -31 and LU -32 anticipate the collaborative
20 designation of Potential Annexation Areas and the eventual annexation of these areas by
21 cities.
22
23 WHEREAS, the attached amendment is supported by the City of Covington, which has
24 taken steps to insure that the area known as Covington Park will remain in park use in
25 perpetuity
26
27 BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF
28 KING COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS
29
30 1 Amend the Urban Growth Area (UGA) as designated by the Urban Growth Areas Map
31 in the Countywide Planning Policies to include the 29 -acre area known as Covington
32 Park in the UGA, as shown on the map attached to this Motion.
33
34
35
1
15121
1 2 Amend the Interim Potential Annexation Area Map by including the 29 -acre area
2 known as Covington Park in the Potential Annexation Area of the City of Covington-
3
4 3 This amendment is recommended to the Metropolitan King County Council and the
5 Cities of King County for adoption and ratification-
6
7
8
9
10 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on
I 1 December 7, 2004 in open session and signed by the chair of the GMPC.
12
13
14 /lam ii
15 Ron in lair, wth Management Planning Council
16
17
2
1j A lrnenU
.4
Proposed Amendment
Covington Park Site UGA Amendment
w m Urban Growth Boundary rY ii Rural Residential
o i.gl,e°, x x'c.wacy. compeknss.
a,.,<:nas a ny,» b M use tl wC.'rdaw.aem. :Ciq Gou.rty
A,aX rol C< 4atle b aW d Wnial n6.eq ntiOm�al a
e, b. Proposed Urban
op Other ParksNVilderness
N low p «z./Nlin° ie.a P< �¢e a nurse d Ne
Growth Boundary
on Ors naps Pa:vuNe,apOy Mrille.. tl
Xi,q CoV.ry.
soo zso o so 1 .000 Study Area L Incorporated Areas
Feet.
..a- n wa<ua.wa_.e ewswa. y.y.... r•a_'� .v^ pG•s..ns
www«.�+xv:w.onam,zmoa -bx_ .m.ma .n+.o«nr�< W^ vrtva
rr
I rr
OP
i i
VItit6
i
t s LLB/
L
I� r i t i i �I T�� I 1. I la I I e i
i.l
x