HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOW 2005-06-13 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET qy Tukwila City Council Agenda
4 J -r r Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Counczlinembers. Joe Duffie Joan Hernandez
01. Rhonda Berry, City Administrator Pam Carter Jim Haggerton
ti, O Pamela Linder, Council President Dennis Robertson Dave Fenton
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
Monday, June 13, 2005; 7 PM Tukwila City Hall; Council Chambers
1 CALL TO ORDER/ PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. SPECIAL a. Oath of office administered to Dennis McOmber, Lieutenant, Police Dept.
PRESENTATIONS b Ikawa, Japan trip review Mayor Steve Mullet
c. Connectivity issues update Jim Morrow, Director, Public Works
3. CITIZEN At this time, you are invited to comment on items not included on this
COMMENT agenda. To comment on an item included on this agenda, please save your
comments until the issue is presented for discussion.
4. PUBLIC HEARING 2006 -2011 Transportation Improvement Program.
5. SPECIAL ISSUES a. Proposed resolution approving the 2006 -2011 Transportation
Improvement Program (see Item 4 above).
b. Award a construction bid to Western Asphalt, Inc., in the amount
of $635,847.09, for the 2005 Overlay Program.
c.' Authorize Mayor to sign Supplement #1 to AG05 -039, with
W &H Pacific, Inc., in the amount of $50,970 85, for construction
management services related to the 2005 Overlay Program.
d. Proposed Seattle Southside staffing considerations
e. Proposed "Community Pride" award.
f. Proposed Zoning Code amendments (nine amendments total)
6. REPORTS a. Mayor c. Staff e. Intergovernmental
b. City Council d. City Attorney
7. MISCELLANEOUS
8. EXECUTIVE SESSION
9. ADJOURNMENT
Tukwila City Hall is wheelchair accessible.
Reasonable accommodations are available at public hearings with advance notice to the
City Clerk's Office: 206 433- 1800/FDD 206 248 -2933. This notice is available at www.ci.tukwila.wa.us
and in alternate formats with advance notice for those with disabilities.
Tukwila Council meetings are audio taped.
INFORlV1ATION MEMO
To:
Mayor Mullet
From:
Public Works Director~
June 8, 2005
Date:
Subject:
Connectivity Update
ISSUE
Provide Council with an update on the City's connectivity initiative.
BACKGROUND
The City had contracted with Asset Analytics (AAI) to achieve City's goal of
constructing a metropolitan area fiber network that would provide gigabit Ethernet
connectivity to Tukwila citizens and businesses. Through a series of contract
amendments and renewals, AAI accomplished tasks critical to the deployment of a fiber
network system throughout the City. These tasks include the audit and proofmg of the
City's conduit system, network design, and the development of a business model. As
briefed to the Council, the cost to construct a fiber network that would provide gigabit
connectivity to Tukwila businesses and residents is approximately $10-$12 million.
DISCUSSSION
Due to budget considerations and competing priorities, the Council directed staff to
develop a business model that assumes fiber deployment only to the Commercial
Business District (CBD) with an option to connect from the CBD to the Sabey Data
Center. Through a contract with AAI, this task was completed in January 2005.
Mr. David Luman briefed the Council on the CBD fiber deployment business model
during the January 2005 Council Retreat. Mr. Luman estimated that the CBD
deployment along with a connection from the CBD to the Sabey Data Center would cost
approximately $2.2 million.
We expect the City's Signal Interconnect Project to offset some of the CBD fiber
deployment cost. As part of the scope of work, construction of the signal proj ect will
include repair of the broken conduits. Additionally, the conduit gaps that exist in the
CBD (see attached map) will be bridged. The project is currently in preliminary design;
construction will begin late this year.
Mayor Mullet
Page 2 _
June 9, 2005
To move forward with the connectivity project, Council must decide on the following
critical issues:
~ Accept or reject information/data provided by AAI and move forward with the
connectivity plan.
~ Given budget constraints, goals, and other competing priorities, decide whether
the fiber deployment should be City-wide or CBD-only deployment.
~ Approval of a staffmg plan to ensure effective project management and oversight.
The staffing plan must include hiring of technical personnel to handle design,
construction, and operations and maintenance requirements. Note that the hiring
process takes months to complete. Additionally, City must decide on the lead
department to manage the entire project rrom design to completion.
RECOMMENDATION
Present to the Committee of the Whole for discussion.
attachment: CBD Conduit System
Excerpt from Minutes of City Council Retreat (January 2005)
Connectivity David Lumen and Ross Schultz
Ross talked about his experience in Sherwood, Oregon, which also wanted to build a high-speed
internet network. They tried to get grants, but were unable to do so. They built one lme to a large
Sherwood server similar to Sabey's server buildings here. Developers are putting in condUIt now.
David Lumen said Verizon and Quest both said they would be interested in using our conduit,
but If they were the vendors they would have a monopoly and could just serve the low hangmg
fruit of the largest businesses. Dennis thought it would be good to get their offers, as that would
offer no risk to Tukwila.
David said if putting in gigabyte service increased city business by 9% (as Hebert Research
estimated), the city coffers would benefit. Pam L said thIs could be somethIng the City could be
proud of having once it was in. Dennis argued business that wants it in the CBD already has fast
mternet service. Pam L said the Council always thought we'd turn the operations and
maintenance of the system over to an outside vendor. The danger of the biggest operators IS that
they would only sell to a few businesses, ignoring areas they thought weren't so profitable.
Dave F said there is no gigabyte service in the CBD. He wants the City to run the system, and
thought the big vendors would just go for profit. Dennis wanted an estimate from the bIg
vendors.
Pam C asked what the city's vision was for connectivlty. Whether it's an enterprise fund or a
util1ty needs to be decided. Jim thought it could be a competitive advantage for Tukwila. It
could be tied to economic development.
Steve asked what we need to do next. There would be some cost to finishing the network of
conduit in the CBD. The larger issue may be gettmg from the street to the buildings. Dennis
argued for value engineering, and David L said the technical parts of his report had gotten that
review. An estimate IS needed for what it would take to get to an RFP for service. The issue was
referred to a COW.
City Councll Retreat
2
SEATTLE POST -INTELLlGENCER
http://seattlepi.nwsource.comlbusine~s/225514 _ broadband24.html
Seattle is told it must rewire
Advanced broadband network needed to stay ahead, task force says
Tuesday, May 24, 2005
By JOHN COOK
SEATTLE POST-INTElllGENCER REPORTER
For Seattle to remain competitive, it must develop an advanced broadband Internet network that is
capable of delivering voice, video and data to businesses and homes. And it must do so quickly, rolling
out the high-speed system within the next 10 years.
That's one of the findings of the Broadband and Telecommunications Task Force, which plans to release
a report today that encourages city leaders to act now or face the prospect of falling behind other
regions.
"Seattle cannot afford to dawdle," Steven Clifford, chairman of the task force and the former chief
executive of King Broadcasting Co., wrote in a draft report. "Broadband networks will soon become
what roads, electric systems and telephone networks are today: core infrastructure of society."
The report, which will be presented to the City Council's Utilities and Technology Committee this
afternoon, contains a number of bold recommendations. The most controversial is the suggestion that
the city support construction of a fiber-optic network, the fastest and most reliable technology but also
the most expensive to deploy.
The recommendation of fiber comes as a number of cities, including Spokane and Philadelphia, have
approved construction of less expensive wireless networks. But wireless, including an emerging
technology known as WIMax that can cover many square miles, does not provide the bandwidth or
security necessary for applications such as telemedicine, remote learning or interactive government. It
also has issues with network interference and spectrum licensing, Clifford said.
"The long-term problems and challenges that Seattle faces are not likely to be solved by wireless," he
said. "What Seattle and all cities will need is a big, big pipe capable of 25 to 1 00 megabits (per second)
each way."
The 13-member task force did not study the economics of fiber to homes, so they did not provide a
recommendation on how the city might support this effort. But although the capital costs are high,
Clifford said, the total cost per megabit makes fiber the cheapest and most compelling system they
studied.
"We did not recommend to go ahead and fiber Seattle tomorrow," he said. "There may be some new
technologies emerging that will allow you to get fiber to the neighborhood and have some other hop to
the home, other than fiber, that can still give you the fat pipe."
Task force member Ron Johnson, vice president for computing and communications at the University of
Washington, said the city is well positioned with an existing fiber optic network According to the report,
more than 450 miles of fiber optic cable runs through Seattle.
"We have fiber in places that most people don't," Johnson said. "Most of the people involved in tIlis
process saw that as ~ extraordinary asset."
(continued...)
If Seattle does not move forward with the network, it could lose its edge to cities such as Amsterdam,
Netherlands, and Seoul, South Korea, which have placed big bets on broadband, Johnson said.
"There are areas of the globe that are light years ahead, and Seattle should want to be among the global
leaders," he said.
The idea of a municipally supported network that provides high-defInition television, voice over
Internet, on-demand movies and other services could put the city in competition with telephone and
cable companies. Though there are potential ways for the city to work with those incumbents, the report
indicated that it would be a mistake for Seattle to wait for "private markets" to drive the construction of
new networks.
"Without the city playing any role and without taking the initial steps we outlined, other cities are going
to fare much better because there will be more robust competition," Clifford said.
Johnson believes it's unlikely that Comcast or Qwest would cooperate with the city on a new fiber-optic
network, but he said a third-party provider or non-profit entity could be attracted to the opportunity. The
city could operate its own network, although Johnson said he would prefer a partnership with a
telecommunications provider.
In letters to the task force earlier this year, representatives for Qwest and Comcast said they would be
willing to work with the city. However, they expressed reservations about a municipally operated
network.
"Our view is that incentives for us, as an existing broadband provider with the network and resources
already in place to operate in Seattle, would be far less expensive and far faster to market than
attempting to create a new telecommunications system," Comcast Senior Vice President Len Rozek
wrote.
Qwest \\'Tote that it would prefer that the city let the market for broadband develop in an "open and
unfettered environment."
Seattle City Council member Jim Compton, chairman of the Utilities and Technology Committee and a
sponsor of the task force, said he was surprised by the findings.
"We sent them out to find out if we should do citywide Wi-Fi, and I thought that's what the business
model would point to," Compton said. "Instead, they came back and said that is one of the things we
should do, but more important for our broadband future is a citywide fiber-optic network. "
Compton plans to introduce legislation to create an Office of Broadband to study the issues further. "I
think it is important enough that everybody will agree that we should seize this opportunity," he said.
P-IreporterJohn Cook can be reached at 206-448-8075 orjohncook@Seattlepi.com
(Q 1998-2005 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
CITY OF TUKWILA
OFFICE OF THE city CLERK
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA 98188
(206) 433-1800 - Office
(206) 433-1833 - Fax
Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk
Bob Baker. CMC. Deputv City Clerk
Date:
o IlG/6C:;-
p~+ WO~+:'SO(\
To:
From:
(:ZO~) b d---b ~ ObiS;-
B 0-- ,\0 C\. ,C\.
Fax:
Phone:
(
)
Fax: (206) 433-1833
\ \VC V\? f" r-tec- +-t 0"" Tv",,~ro \J. ~r 0-5 '
Re: d-OOb- ;2-0\\
# of Pages:
\ \
j including this cover sheet.
Hard Copy to Follow:
YES
NO
~
Notes/Message:
~~\ ~ \9 0\-\
~~~~
\Qt)"L.J2S-t - - ~b VI{\
~~c-\:=--e-+- ~\ b-~3-0S VV~~A
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FAX TRANSMISSION IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE
PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT NAMED ABOVE.
This message is intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
information, which is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the
sender immediately and return the original to the City of Tukwila, via US Mail. Thank you.
COUNCIL A GENDA SYNOPSIS
tc 1. :y Izutialr m Na
ITE N
Q 1��� Meeting Date Prepared by I Mayor's review Council review
+�x. 6/13/05 1 RT .{y am 1 PS 1 4,
1 1
5. a
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER. 05-085 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE. JUNE 13, 2005
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program 2006 -2011
CATEGORY Discusszon Motion Resolution Ordinance Bic Award Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 6/13/05 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 6/13/05 Mtg Date:
SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P&R Police PI/
SPONSOR'S The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is required by RCW to be updated
SUMMARY annually. The TIP is adopted by resolution after a public hearing at the local agency level
and incorporated into the Regional and State TIPS. The TIP is primarily a financial
planning document for projects competing for grants.
REVIEWED BY COW Ivitg CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DAIS: 5/23/05
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Hold a Public Hearing and adopt resolution for TIP.
Commrrrt;E Hold Public Hearing at COW and then on to Regular for approval of resolution.
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
N/A N/A
Fund Source:
Comments:
MTG. DATE 1 RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
6/13/05
MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS
6/13/05 Information Memo dated May 19, 2005
Resolution
Draft 2006 -2011 TIP
Current 2005 -2010 TIP
Minutes of Transportation Committee from May 23, 2005
INFORMATION l\1EMO
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor Mullet
Public W orks Directo~)
May 19, 2005
Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (2006 - 2011)
ISSUE
Annual update of the Six - Year Transportation Improvement Program for the years 2006 - 2011.
BACKGROUND
The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is updated annually as required by RCW.
The TIP is adopted by resolution after a public hearing at the local agency level and
incorporated into the Regional and State TIP's. The TIP is primarily a fmancial planning
document for projects competing for grants. Any project submitted for federal grant funding
must be included in the local, regional and state adopted TIP's.
The TIP is a rolling plan showing various funding sources: grants, developer, local funds.
Projects "roll" as funds or stages (design report, fInal design, construction) occur.
Tukwila's TIP and CIP list many of the same transportation related projects. The TIP lists
only the next six years, while the CIP lists the next six years and projects scheduled beyond six
years. The CIP also includes water, sewer, drainage, and capital facilities. The TIP is
required to be adopted by July 1, while the CIP is prepared during summer and fall in
conjunction with budget preparation. Differences between the two may be due to priority
changes, funding availability changes, or other factors that normally occur in the time between
adoption of the two documents.
ACTION TAKEN
The "Draft" 2006 - 2011 TIP was created by modifying the 2005 - 2010 TIP to add projects,
remove projects, adjust project costs, and reprioritize the list of projects.
The attached spreadsheet shows the project additions, deletions and revisions. Two projects
were deleted and two new projects were added.
RECOMMENDATION
Hold a public hearing and adopt the annual update.
RT:ad
attachments: Draft TIP Summary Spreadsheet
Current Adopted Six-Year TIP
(p:Projects\Tip\05-10 TlP\tip2006 memo)
fliI, rD) %,\ ~ 11
/1ij Ini /U
~'J uu wI..
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENT PROGl,lAM, AND DIRECTING THE SAME TO BE FILED
WITH THE STATE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BOARD.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of RCW Chapters 35.77 and 47.26 as
amended, the City Council of the City of Tukwila has previously adopted a
Transportation Improvement Program and thereafter periodically modified said
Transportation Improvement Program by resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the work accomplished under said
program, determined current and future City street and arterial needs and, based upon
these findings, has prepared a Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program for the
ensuing six calendar years (2006 - 2011), and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the said Six-Year Transportation
Improvement Program on June 13, 2005;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Filing of Program. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a copy
of this resolution, together with the exhibit attached hereto, with the Secretary of
Transportation and the Transportation Improvement Board of the State of Washington.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON,
at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of . 2005.
ATTEST/ AUTHENTICATED'
Pamela Linder, Council President
Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY.
Office of the City Attorney
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Resolution Number
TIP 2006-2011 6/9/2005
Page 1 of 1
2006-201 1 Do IFZ FF-1- _
'DRAFT 2006 - 2011 TIP SUMMARY 1
1Project Costs in Thousands of Dollars 5/25/05 1
I
Priority COP
.
05-10 06-11. PROJECT TITLE 'Page No
2006 1 2007
2008
1 I FUNDING SOURCES
1 i----
.2009 1 2010 1 2011 TOTAL, federal state/cib! developer unsecured City
TIP ' TIP I
IT
, .
3 1 INeighborhood Traffic Calming Program 3
1
3501 350
3501 350 350 375 2,1251 i 2,125
k
24 2 Greenbelt Trails -7- 16
1 301 30! , 30
4 3 1Bridge Program 36 1
300, 100
1001 1001 1201 1201 8401 ! 840
:
I
5 4 !Boeing Access Rd Bridge Replace . 37
1,000
1,9001 1 2 900' 2,31)01 580; 0
10 1 5 1Southcenter Pkwy (S 180 St - S 200 St) 40
10,000 5,500
000 15,5001 1,0001 5,000, 7 7,500 1,000
i 6 S 178 St Realignment 41
7,6751
1 7,6751 1 7,675
25 7 ;Klickitat /SC Pkwy / I-5 Access Revisionl 42
2,000, 500
1
' 2,5001 500 : 1,3501 650 0
7 8 1Tukwila Int'l Blvd (S 116 - S 132) Ph 2 44
5,0001 4,186
-I 9,1861 3,686, 4,200 1,300
_
9 Tukwila Int'l Blvd (S 132 - S 138) Ph 3 45
3,600
3,085
6,6851 2,950 2,9001 I 83$
18
26 10_16 144 St (Tuk Int'l Blvd - 42 Ave S) 47
220
1,138
-
1,3581 1
753 605
j
1 11 1Overlay & Repair Program
48
1,250
1,250
1,4001 1,400
1,400
1,400
8,1001
8,100
9 12 Traffic Signal Interconnect Program
11 13 Ave (6 143 St-Ft Dent)
49
50
1,000
1,400
5,792
2,4001 1,200i L__
1,200
5,792!
1,0001 4,792
lInterurban
L
2 14 'Tukwila Urban Center - Transit Center
54
300
1,000
1,000. 200
2,5001 1,000
500
900
100
28 15 'Andover Pk W (Tuk Pkwy - Strander)
55
100
700
800
I 400
400..
30 16 'S 144th St Bridge Sidwalks (Over 1-5)
56
25
25
25
27 17 1Southcenter Blvd (1 I B - I-5)
57
600
7,000
7,600 7,600
0
15 18 Andover 'Pk E/Minkler Blvd 1
58
200
200 I,
200
14 19 1E Marginal Way (BAR - S 112 St)
59
35
1,920
1,955
990
7001 265
7--
300! 125
17 20 1W Valley Hwy/S 156 St
GO
725
725'
300
12 I 21 IS 133 St/SR 599 off ramp signal
61
30
320
3501
30-6T 50
r-Blvd (APW - SC Pkwy)
20 i22
62
425
4251
425
0
1901-- 30
80
,Mnkier
22 23 !Andover Pk 5/Industry Signal
63
220
2201
I
24 1-16 180 St/Andover Park West Intersection
64
210
210
30
100E_
16
25 IS 168 St (SC Pkwy - APE)
65
1,000
--,---
1,000,
1,000
I
29
26 LSC Blvd / 61st Ave S Bridge Widening
66
1,230
1,230
1,230
1, 080.7 170
13
27 Tukwila Int'l Blvd/S 116 St
67
1,250
1,2501
I
21
28 Tukwila Intl Blvd (BAR - S 116) Ph 4
68
-
400
400
320 80
_ 19 29 141
23 7 30
Valley Hwy (1405 - Strander)
69
580
580
5301 50
Nelsen P1 (S 156 - S 158)
71
200
200
200
31
East Marginal Way/BAR Intersection
N/A
116
116 100
1- 16
1 'TOTAL
31,836
20,409
11,785
2,805
4,965
13,077
84,877 12,756, 13,100 11,595
ri
14,9031 32,523
i
2005-2010 TIP PROJECTS REVISED
L
1---
9
TEreen Rvr Vly Signal Coordination
.
.
[Del
St (Tuk Int'l Blvd - Military Rd)
1--
8 1Del S 144
180 St - SCL)
F
10 !Rev ;Southcenter Pkwy (S
New 6
S 178 St Realignment
L___
_ ________
New 24 16 180 St/Andover Park West Intersection
- ,
New 1 r 31 IEast Marginal Way/BAR Intersection
I
Wash °r9t on State Department of Transportation
ransportation
ncy; Sukw_ a _-- -"�-f _ -'s
' No. 17 Co. Nam : King Co,
- .- N1PQlRTPO: r—
y No : 1320 -
rolect • entt tcatton
A Federal Aid No.
tl r d
G. D.
R' 1Workt
Q
•a Z
B. Dridge No.
E
o T
ar"
E
0
N
d
m
0
U
0
m
a priase
. Stan
ImmlddIYYyy
a.
8
At- 1 11112005
Page 1 J►^
`► %....
Adoption Date: 61211 �"
Hearing pate: 611111200/4 Resolution No: 1211
Funded
Federally s nIY
pntend pate: �- �-"' prof
r chedule R�
►o ors ExP`Loca1 Agency) Required
tonitation �- id 4th Envire (Ma
6th (yP
3rd 6th
al 2p
■
usan�s o
rOlec osts tnFund Source In
tot
State Local Funds
Federal Funds
d Cos Funds °15
Fund
7950 7950
1 Funding
Federal
Fee Cost by
Fun phase
Code
10
State
Fund
Code
12
1st
2nd
18
16 r_\ 1250 \ 1250
1250
4200
be 9 ' 1
protect ri a or road �q0
gtreetlRoa MP o read Number
Mp 1250 1250
geginnin9 o be Done 1250 � .
79�ia�
F Describe O 7950 10
P �1 10�
and Repair Program g To I — �.- „ -_._..
annual program,
1
over s 111t2o05 1 �� '210
City Street to: needed in an T PE —� l0 700
Various streets as need 0
P �_- - �10' 70
from: overlay City 21 a20
Report, rehabilitate, and _....._-- -_.' -. 1 420
2 enter Totals 210
_ 1t112005i 70 70 300
nsit C At `
16 CBq Central District
Central Business to: 0 1
420 7 100�'IQO
��__ S 420 p r X00 j
from: transit center fi00;
Construct __- .,s---- -.'_' - -° - - -""��
1 _ 3 program 'totals ` _ 300
Safety t 11 1005 100` 100
Pedestrian us City Streets and other pedestrian pt 1 ` 100 _ �`
to: `-- 1
Vargo - - sao
Walkway 11 S 600 '100
rom: ndlor stripe shoulder for —10d�
Pave a eats. ��- ---° "` y_..- _,- „_ ----`i `"",_140
safety improvements,
4 - -Totals 14 program
Bridge s City Streets to: Wen as T 5 l 100
Various ons as 1000 Ft
Vp Perform ratings and and maintenance. - -- ' 09 p P
from'• load
0$0025
construct necessary ...___. -- 00
- -_' _ .. a Replacement
ti4 5 ess Rd Bridge Boeing Acc to: l -5
—a
6
07
W
torn: Airport Wae 12
Reconstruct brid9 ,
Greer Signal Coordination Totals
14 6 River S 180 St Corridor Corridor to.. Improvements,
West VaUeyCs nalcoordinationimp
from d consiruct signal control upstages.
es• —
Design and equipment, and
_..- -- ` � j1 72005
100
616i ti16\
ALI Armco - -
Totals s \
---
116
16 116 16
100 .- - - --
P
r
No
No
`� CE
Supersedes Previous editions
ton State Department of Transportation
Washing
lency: Co. cam
). No.: 17_— MPOIRTPO.
,ity No.: 132` two
rolect . Watt tca
p Federal A Id No•
C. Project Title Name or Number NIP or road
E Beginning MP or road - Ending
geginnin9
F Describe W °rk to be 3
Intl Blvd, (Phase 2)
Tukwila
iltuminatian,
from: r 116 St curb & gutter. sidewalks, Illun9•
Construct landscaping• and utility
drainage,
S 144 St (Phase 1) ldlilitary Road
to: sidewalks, drainage,
Tukwila Intl Blvd & gutter,
from: d construct paving, ro� ..'��
ctp ding•
Design ti utility and 9
illumination, and
16 Traffic Signal Interconnect
CBp
from: hard wire Interco
ukwila rr tO. S132. St
17 B
Date:
Adoption 1552
Resolution No~ e
Date"- 6114120p4 Funded
Hearing Federaeic s Only
Amend pate: .- ---� prof
Required
Error pate
Type tMMlYY)
20
ousan S ,Q ars
roiect as - rnFund Source informat1on
Federal Funding
m Federal
Federal Cost al
Phase Fund Phase
Stan Code by
o (mmfddlyYYYI f 10
0.
8
CN' 11112005 \ 4900 — N
4386
1400 9286
4200 —g55� 1955 \
�_. 3688 1 10161
S
WTot � . I � - f.._ ---
CN I 11 2005 I `--
1955 '
S '
1016 8 AI 1260 60 14711
29 1 1471
P i is� 1
G Totals 1177\ 1 _ .�
C -aE 1Ht200F I ��71 ��j0`96 VI
9286
4200\ 1400\
43961 4900\
3686
OS
1,650 Ft
CBD weets to: been traffic
interconnect system
_______Design and rn CE10. _..__._.. " - -- -'"�1 --
signals in�th^e
16 10 Southcenter Parkway City Limits
lane
to: S and center turn
to 4lanes Iandter turn
torn: S 180 St coin drainage.
inciudi and curb & construct r, sidewalks, including curb & gutter,
__-- -- utility-under9rOU " drn9•
14 11 n Ave
tnteru to; Ft t) sidewalk,
rba Way
Dent numinatwn• alk.
from: r 14 a paving, curb & gutter, draina9 • I _ !_,_ v
Construct P -
ing• _ —
andlandscaP
16 112 S 133 5t 1 SR 599 Ramps Intersection Ft on each
leg
500 Ft on each 1e9 to• 500 em ents including a new
tom., intersection �"--
Design and construct
traffic signa l • ^----
12
01 \ P
G
?j� 1t1120�0 1 ' -------16-6 57 2
i. N � ._ - 7p96 r- - —I
-1374 -.c _""_� —
S `5 ?92�
P 57z�— l .__782j
G _ 5010��~
Totals _ i — _ 5is
1 CN tii1i20i0
500 iF W ' — 2 5792 � _._--- -"; 320
1.000 5t. 9 \ "' T ___ - 78 30 - I 1
S 5 10 1 1 320 1
P --- 1 _
G _ __.. \ 2s 1 1
`Cotal� 274\ —350
C _P j2009
NI CN I 11112010
5- 350
S 00
G -- ''
G -io aj�
No
0
No
No
N
N
No
Supersedes previous editions
on state Department of Transportation
v ast+in9t
ency: Nang Co -- - °�
>, N 1L -- MPOIRTPO: PSP'
O�
1320
F
iL
14
a`. Z
rolect ' enti tcatwn
A. Federal Atd No.
Title Number
road
G. Project w ber
D. g Beginning MP or road urn MP or Ending
E Beginning to be pone
pescrib � oar 3
13
B Bridge No.
BlvdIS116St
Tukwilatntl to, SR599
Stt99 Bridge widening on'{uk116 St Intl Blvd and
horn: r �°
inters end mprovements ate-------- ° r~
intersection --
16 Marginal Way St
rolect
1111 Phase N 0 a- 8 11112010
P6'
Totals \
PE 11l
P S CO '
T
W
03
Bast to: S112 curb &gutter.
from Band construct widening. dng3and util ty tub ou_ 1
side drainage u 1
sidewalks._
Andover Park E t Minkler Blvd,
16 15
to: 500 Ft each leg rovemeIlts
intersection and traffic signal imp
500 Ft each leg from: construct inte ._ —� -- -_ _. --
andvii enin9 {or ieft tum lanes.
and wui
16 park `N
16 S168 St Andover alit,
to: sidewalk,
ter Pkwy curb &gutter.
from: rust new r including ___a____.
__ -
drainaue, Ileum roadway landscaping
`nation, and i - -- -
drainage Illumination,
West Valley Hwy IS 156 St 156 St for
to: s 58 St
Southcenter Blvd d teft turn lane at S
from: boun etttu - _-
nonstruct additi�o1nto northbound 1
bound Hp - -----------
northbound
is Intl Blvd (Phase 3)
T
14 "f
14 18
Tukwila sidewalks,
to: S 138 St utter,
roadway including in p ving, d) 9\_______
rom: S 132 St
Reconstruct rainage
illumination. -- --""`�
Page a �,.,
r- -
Adoption Date:
Resolution 110• 1552
Hearing Date: 6t141201----________----- _- '
Funded
Federally FOnly
Wend Date. Projects
Schedule
ExP`Lecai Agency) Requited
-----
----° 4th emir Date
Information e IMpMM
ThN Ty4
3rd eth , 21
-20`
18
ousan s o 'o arS
osts to Inform
Fund Source
Federal Funding
Federal Federal
Fund Cost by
Start Code Phase
(mmlddlYYYY 10 11
9
01
1.500 F
12
1,000 Ft
2000 Ft
P
03 P
State
Fund
Code
State
Funds
Local
Funds
Total
Funds
15
1st
°16
1001 100
1
100 00
- -"'`35
1
- - \ 5\ 195
69 2 I
1690 1
2nd
17
100
35 ' 1920
1 1
1920
11172010 g55 35
2b5 200
2001
Totals I
1(112007 350
..p251
Al_
200 200 — -� - 7751
7T51
Totals
A�111 X007 I
--'-- 200
No
No
W
S
500 Ft
775 7 5
�
\ 125j 12bj
_ 600 1
Totals - "`
-AL i 1f112009
2100Ft
W
725
125__.393
4451
600 _�--- "-'.'. 300D1
_ 1
Totals ��' I
_ - 3860
3533
448 7393
Totals _
._ -72
No
No
No
Supersedes previous editions
on State Department of Transp°rtation
r
Washington
Tukwila � g �- — '- --�..
� pSRC
0.140:. 1720 l,►tPOtRTI'C' i . "
;itj No~ 132Q_
rolect • entt *cation
A Federal Aid No.
C. Project Title Name or Number
MP or road or road - Ending
0. StreeROad
S. Beginning a to be Done
Describe ork 3 —
m
cU
LL
. s
.9. f
14
2
19
B Bridge No.
\Nest Valley Highway
to: Strander Blvd
to 7 lanes der Blv cud & gutter,
from 1 40 �nstrudw�enn9 4
drainage. 0
sidewalks, and illumination, and
sidewalks,
1�'
05
1 21 I 16 St
to: S 1 suing, curb & gutter,
Boeing Access Ftd including t.. S 1 6 utrktY
fsidew k, drainage illumination, landscaping,
- '..1.._ d --
sidewalk, ding-- ---
__ — undor9roun
16 22 Andover Pk E t Industry Signal
to: 500 Ft on each leg
ftom: 500 Ft on ru each a tea le signal and intersection
Construct
Design and ents. �
improvements.
to: Andover Park W
phinkler Blvd & yurier, sdewalk,
from Soutt*center pkwy s lnicudin9 C`r�
for 3 fare
drainage, widening dscaPi —
draina9e� _- _- ,._ - --
TuKwila Intl Blvd. (Phase a)
03
0.5 M1
rolect
Page4 fir.,
O03n S ° o '
s
°stS *n Source Info
pond
Federa ►Fu d
m 1 Federal State Phase d e
Code
m Federa Cost by
s pha pun Phase
St
co O km-
Start
9) Code
to
Adoption Date 61't.0
6114t20� Resolution
1do.: 1552—
Date. Federally Funded
Hearing Only
Amend Date: �-- -ter projects ---
Expenditure Schedule
al Agency) Required
ars �L,OC 4th Envlr Date
Information Thru - r, e (M �
6th ,
20
State
Funds
13
Local
Funds
14
Total
ponds
15r
580
1st
17
2nd
3td
— 18
19
580
a 530 '
8 5
W AI.L I 11112010 ' .--
425
580 1 -- '- --
50
S
55-------2-----1:________ �SI 425
To 1 1 --- 425
AL. \ 11112009 100
P
G
2,000 Ft 1IT
3,500 Ft
12 1 P
17 23 place
Nelson to: S 158 st drainage,
& gutter, sidewalks,
from: S 156 COnstruct Paving, and illumination. ill mination.
and ilium
... -frail Connector
00 24 C8D interurban CBD
from'. Interurban-Trail traif from Interurban emit to C0D'
and GO
Design and construct
0
p
S
W
1,000 Ft
425
42-- � -10D1
- �— 100
Totals _.._.. -.._ — °
"PE i {*112010 I 220
- - -� 1 p 10Q
—�.— 226
Totals 1g0�
T0ta15 220
111!2009 I
30 --
�
'Totals 200
A1- i 11112009 -- --' 30 200
-r to S _ I I - - 30
P °11112009 �-- —
W
S
No
30
Totals --
No
Supersedes previous editions
Sd Washington State Department of Transportation
'"
tgency: Tu kw11a
„o, No' 17 iCo. Nagle: King Co. . --------------
---
- ~-
City No.: 132 lPO1RTP0: PSR
___.. C
rolect • entt tcatton
A. Federal Aid No.
C. Project Title
MP or road
D. Streetlitoad Name or Numbedin9
E. Beginning MP or road
F Describeto be Don-
o m
cU
w
o
0.. 2
16 25
B. Bridge No.
Klickitat t SC Pkwy 11-5 Access Revision
to: S 168 St
Ds gn a Off construct safety and capacity Improvements.
g
r
E
SS
0
05 ,500 Ft
17 26 S 144 St (Phase 2)
to: 'Tukwila tlewBlsadrainage,
from: 42nd Ave S aving, curb & gutter,
Design and construct Pundergrounding.
illumination, and utility
16 27
Southcenter Blvd.
to: Tukwila Intl Blvd.
arterial with medians, turn
16 l 28
03
from: 1 -5 to a three -lane urban Ming, and drainage.
Improve roadway sidewalks, street lighting,
lanes, curbs, gutters,
Andover Park West
torn: Tukwila Parkway
Complete widening for center tett turn lane.
14 29 1 61st Ave S Bridge Widening
SC Blvd.
to: 62nd Ave S e to add a lane
nter Blvd, and the 61st Ave S Bndg
from: I -5
Widen Southce rowth. ---- --"
for future traffic g
17- \30 e Sidewalks
S 144th St Bridge
from: 51st Ave S
to: 53rd Ave S
bridge over 1 -5 between 51st Ave S
Widen exis sting sidewalks on
and 53rd Ave S.
to: Strander Blvd,
03
0
P
a>
m
0-
d
0
7
page 5 bI) t
Nearing Date:
Amend Date:
roiect osts to ousan • s o o ars
Fund Source Information
Federal Funding
Federal
Cost by
Phase
Phase F deral
Start Fund
(mmlddlyYYy) Code
10
11
State
Fund
Code
12
State
Funds
13
From Auv.. `- __ _ ..
Adoption Date: 612112004
611412004 , Resolution No. 1552
Total
Funds
15�
Expenditure Schedule
(Local Agency)
3rd Thru
6th
1st
2nd
Local
Funds
14
500 300
200
500
1'7
Federally Funded
protects Only
-
Required
Envir Date
Type (Mmpri)
W
PE \ 11112005
-- -- o j__
c� �__� 500 --- -`i 2G_ 04
P 2s`o 1
\ i` 5�; 1400
Totals
PE 11112006
1000 I P 014 \ 11112007 52 1400 -1-600
Feet { I
1650
W ` �0.�� I_ i
$ _..
Totals _� --- 150 ` 150 1 I`
` �� II 1600 1600
G ot --- i ��
\NG- 1MI2007 - ~
GN `` 111120D8 - �- --"""' 150 � ~�t600
1750 - ' 1750 �`___ 100 ^'
- _ ---- -- 100 400
Totals
P PE llarzoos
11
Miles
W
p4 p 0.5
I I Miles G
S
T
05 P 1les
100
100 _._._.._- - -i-'_.`1�01 .
__----- --- -- 10 _,__- 1
Totals _ --
100
_.--- -`"-"` 100
1001. 25I Zr�I - -�... 0I
Totals
W- -PE- y 11112005 I�
G -- --
25 25 25
o —
S
Totals
W
Grand Totals for
No
No
No
No
No
Supersedes previous editions
Transportation Committee
May 23, 2005
Page 2
3. 2005 Overlay Program Construction l\tlanagement A Supplemental Agreement to
Contract 05-039 for constructlOn management servIces has been prepared to be added to the
existmg W &H Pacific desIgn contract. They have expenence and are qualified. Their cost of
550,970.85 IS about 9% of the Engmeer's Estunate for constructlOn. The historical average for
such work has been atout 15% Authorize mayor's signature on Supplemental Agreement
No.1 to Contract 05-039 with \V& H Pacific for 550,970.85 at CO\V and Regular Meetings.
Xf=
4. Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) The 2006-2011 TIP IS sImllar to
the previous year's TIP, though two projects were deleted and three were added. The Green
RIver Valley SIgnal CoordmatIon was deleted as complete, and the S 144th Street (TIB-MIhtary)
wIll be done thIS year, so it was removed. Southcenter Parkway S 180th - South CIty LImIts was
revised to be S. 180th-S. 200~h. The new projects are S. 178th realignment, the S. 180th/Andover
intersection, and East Marginal 'vVay(EMW)/Boeing Access Road (BAR) intersectIOn. The
EM'vV/BAR project has received $100,000 in federal funds and $16,000 in Tukwila matching
funds. Jim M emphasIzed the projects are not m a pnonty order, but are on the list to be ehgible
for grants. A public heanng is needed, and will be held the same evening as the COW If possIble.
Recommend TIP to COvV and Regular lYleeting.
5. Bidding Climate Jim M spoke of the a~arming new bidding climate The CIty of Kent's
International Boulevard project had only two bidders, and bids were $1-3 ffiIll10n over the
expected cost. The nickel package passed in 2004 wIll result in work beginning on 1-405 this
year. The Viaduct, SR 520, and the rest ofI-405 will be done in the next several years.
Contractors such as SCI Infrastructure, which is doing the Cascade View neIghborhood
improvements work, are running out of bondmg capacIty with all the work they have won.
Sound Transit work is also llsmg contractors Jim saId bIds wouldn't be competItive for several
years. Information.
6. First Quarter Reports Jim M talked about a training mCIdent the City took part in recently.
City staff members were better trained than others, mostly as a result of their having taken the
NatIonal Incident Management System (N11v1S) training. IfPohce, Fire, and Public Works are all
NTh1S trained, the City can be NIMS-certified. Information.
~/!
--..... ) .h ,CommIttee chaIr approval
Co UNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
ITEM NO.
Q 1I Aleeting Date 1 Prepared by 1 Mayor' review Council review I
,y V i
1 6/13/05 1 BG 1
7908 1 1
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER. 05-086 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE. DUNE 13, 2005
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Bid Award for 2005 Overlay Repair Program
CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 6 /13/ 05 Mtg Date Mtg Date:
SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P&R Police PTV I
SPONSOR'S This project will provide roadway repairs and overlays on city street segments. The project
SUMMARY was advertised on May 4 and 11, and three bids were opened on May 18, 2005. The low
bid of $635,847.09 was from Western Asphalt, Inc. All references contacted provided
positive recommendations for Western Asphalt's work.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DAI'B: 5/23/05
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Award contract to the low bidder Western Asphalt, Inc.
CoM fITrEE Forward to COW and Regular with approval.
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$635,847.09 $1,391,000.00
Fund Source: 104 Commercial Streets (page 48, 2005 CIP)
Comments
1 MTG. DATE I RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
6/13/05 I
MTG. DATE I ATTACHMENTS 1
6/13/05 Information Memo dated May 19, 2005 1
Map I
Bid Tabulation 1
Minutes of Transportation Committee on May 23, 2005
I
INFORLvlATION MEMO
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor Mullet
Public -Works Directo6l:fr')
May 19, 2005 U \
2005 Annual Overlay & Repair Program
Project No. 05-RW01
Bid Award
ISSUE
Award the bid for construction of the 2005 Annual Overlay & Repair Program.
BACKGROUND
This project will provide roadway repairs and overlays on the following street segments:
S 164th St (Military Rd to 51 51 Ave S)
49th Ave S (S 164m St to N cul-de-sac)
Ma~:l(Iam R.d ~ (~ 12gl1> ~t to S L13'" ~
Macadam Rd S (S 144th St to 5 150th St)
Southcenter Blvd (61"[ Ave 5 to 66th Ave S)
42nd Ave S (S 1241h St to Duwamish Bridge)
The project was advertised for bids for two weeks and bids were opened May 18, 2005. Three bids were
received with the low bid of $635,847.09 from Western Asphalt, Inc. The engineer's estimate was
$663,939.50.
ANALYSIS
All bids were checked and tabulated and no errors were found. Western Asphalt, Inc., provided references
for jobs of similar scope and size and has performed work successfully in Tukwila.
During advertisement for bids, developer and franchise utility work were identified to be constructed on
Macadam Road from S 12Slh St to 5 133rd 51., so City staff may delete this project from the 2005 Overlay
Program and add it to the 2006 Overlay Program.
BUDGET AND BID SU1\.fMARY
Actual
$ 38,384.92
90,000.00
635,847.09
50,970.85
45,000.00
250,000.00
116,307.00
95,000.00
63,584.71
$ 1,385,094.57
Design Engineering (W & H Pacific)
Estimate for 2006 Design (done in 2005)
Construction (Western Asphalt)
Construction Engineering (W &H)
City of Seattle Overlay 16th Ave S
Strander Blvd Overlay
S. 180th St Underpass Repair
Transfer to 412 for Cascade View
Contingency (10%)
Total
Budget
$ 175,000.00
0.00
1,021,000.00
100,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
95,000.00
0.00
$ 1,391,000.00
RECOMMENDATION
Award the construction bid for the 2005 Overlay Program to Western Asphalt, Inc., in the amount of
$635,847.09.
attachments: Map of Projects
Bid Tabulation
(p:Pn>joaslA- RW d: RS Prt>p.I05RWOI\200S 0vcrl2, AInn! tor. /ofemo)
Street
City of Tukvvila
2005 Overlay Program
Not to Scale
Overlay Locations
From
To
1 S 164th Street Military Road
2, 49th Avenue S S 164th Street
3, Macadam Road 220' S of S 131 st PI
4 Macadam Road S 150th Street
5, Southcenter Blvd 61st Avenue S
6, 42nd Avenue S Interurban Avenue S
. 43rd Avenue S S 160th Street
(Street Deleted for WD 125 Worn)
S 115th Street Interurban Avenue S
(Street Deleted for Sound Transit Worn)
51st Avenue S
North End of Road
170' N of S 128th St
S 144th Street
66th Avenue S
S 124th Street
North End of Road
40th Avenue S
~
Transportation Committee
May 23,2005
Present
Jim Haggerton, Cha-ir; Joe Duffie, Pam Carter ~
Jim Morrow, Frank Inarte, Bob Giberson, Robm TIschmak, Pat Brodm, Bnan
Shelton, Lucy Lauterbach, Rod Kempkes-Sound TransIt
1. Sound Transit Proiect Status Bnan and Rod told the committee of some of the work they
would do beginnmg thIS year and contmumg through 2007. The- phase currently bemg worked on
is the utility undergroundmg Already fimshed are condUlts m 42nd Ave S , Southcenter
Boulevard, and 51 st. \Vork IS starting on 52nd Ave S and East Margmal \Vay New retammg-
walls wIll be put In on the north side of Southcenter Boulevard, and pIers will be placed on tlie
south sIde ofthe road. The road WIll need to be moved north, wrnch wIll make some apartment
dnveways short, but they are workmg wIth the affected propertIes to make It as easy as possible
on them. Detours are possible while the pIers are beIng put m. PIers requmng detours WIll also
be put in on 52nd A venue, East MargInal vVay, and MartIn Luther Kmg 'vVay.
Two of the more dIfficult sectlons wIll be the 350 foot bndge over the DuwamIsh River, and a
350 foot bndge parallel to Boemg Access Road gomg over rmlroads and 1-5 Some sectlOllS wIll
be cut and cover 'Nhere bridge pIers are put in, Sound TransIt wIll work from south to north,
Some pIers are 10' m diameter. Rebar cages are put m after very large cranes and diggers remove
the dirt from the 60-100' depths. As the cages are filled at one time, concrete trucks WIll be
constantly movrng in and out until the pIers are filled.
The guideway will be built in sectlOns that are pre-cast m Cashmere. Bndges are built by addmg
sections on each sIde at one tIme. The statlOn wIll be built at the Ajax site, with storm water
detention bemg done near Southcenter Boulevard and 42nd Ave S. JIm H asked If Sound TransIt
would repmr their haul routes, and was told they WIll restore them once all the macrnnes have
come and gone. Joe wanted to be certaIn the nOlse and dust were controlled, and there were
people to call if constructlOn bothered cItizens Bnan and Rod assured the commIttee there wIll
be people to respond to citizen requests. Information.
2. 2005 Overlay and Repair Program The commIttee members had received two papers on
the overlay program. One showed the bId amount, engIneer's estImate, and budget. The other
showed the budget summary for several PublIc 'Norks projects thIs year. Some proJects' funds
. came from the overlay project that came m under budget. Macadam Road S. was removed from
;+th~ overlay b.ecause Water Distnct #125 IS PUttlI:,g in a new mam there thIS year, and NorMed
\ wIll be working there, also. JIm H asked when 4.Jrd Ave S. would be put back m the overlay
\ program, and staff smd HIghlme IS expected to work there this summer, so It was put off. Jim H
also saId he had driven around and looked at the streets on the overlay lIst, and not notIcmg some
were in need of obvious repairs. Pat assured Jim they have a pavement mahagement program that
lets them know what street problems to look for Jim M smd overlay and repaIr are so Important
that if you delay work for a year or two, you can never catch back up wIth street repairs
Recommend bid award to Western Asphalt. Inc. for 5635.847.09 to CO\V and Regular
Meetings.
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
ITEM NO.
i tbleeting Date 1 Prepared by I i Teem) Council revzev
r 6/13/05 I BG'� J L�
i
5, c
soa 1 1 1 1
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER. 05-087 I ORIGINALAGENDADATE: JUNE 13, 2005
AGENDA ITEM TITLE 2005 Overlay Repair Program Consultant's Supplement
CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bad Award Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date llltg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date: 6/13105
SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P&R Police PW"
SPONSOR'S In March, W &H Pacific began design of the 2005 Overlay and Repair Program. Final design
SUMMARY is complete and the bid award for construction is underway. This supplement is for W &H
Pacific to perform construction management services for the overlay program for a fee not
to exceed $50,970.85. Budget information is included in bid award memo.
REVIEWED BY COW Ivitg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DA'T'E. 5/23/05
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN Authorize Mayor to sign supplement with W &H Pacific.
Colitis IITTEE Forward to COW and Regular with approval.
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$50,970.85 $100,000.00
Fund Source: 104 Commercial Streets (page 48, 2005 CIP)
Comments
MTG. DATE I RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
6/13/05 1
1
1 MTG. DATE I ATTACHMENTS
6/13/05 1 Information Memo dated May 16, 2005
Supplement
Minutes of Transportation Committee on May 23, 2005
1
INFORLY1ATION :MEMO
Date:
Subject:
Mayor Mullet
Public W orks DireC~
May 16, 2005
2005 Overlay Program - Construction Management Services
Supplemental Agreement No.1 to Contract No. 05-039
Project No. 05-RWOl
To:
From:
ISSUE
Authorize the Mayor to sign Supplemental Agreement No.1 for construction management
services.
BACKGROUND
W&H Pacific and Tukwila entered into Contract No. 05-039 for design services related to the
2005 Overlay Program. W &H Pacific has the experience and qualifications to provide
construction management services, and was asked to prepare a draft scope and fee for a
potential contract supplement.
ANALYSIS
The attached scope and fee for Supplemental Agreement No.1, in the amount of $50,970.85,
is well within budget and is about 9% of the Engineer's Estimate for construction. The
historical average for construction engineering is about 15 % of the construction value.
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the Mayor to sign Supplemental Agreement No.1 to Contract No. 05-039 with
W&H Pacific in the amount of $50,970.85.
attachment: Supplemental Agreement No. 1
(p:Projects\A- RW & RS ProjeclS\05RWOl\Construction\lNFO MEMO 2005 Overlay W&H CM Supp No 1)
SUPPLEl\tIENT AL AGREEMENT NUIHBER ONE (1)
TO
CONSULTANT AGREEMENT NUIVIBER AG-05-039
THIS SUPPLEl\tIENT AL AGREEMENT is entered mto between the CIty of TukwIla,
vVashmgton, herem-after referred to as "the City", and vV&H PacIfic, Tnc, hereinafter referred to
as "the Consultant", in consideration of the mutual benefits, tenns, and condItIOns heremafter
specified.
The CIty desires to supplement the agreement entered mto wIth the Consultant and executed on,
February 28, 2005, and identIfied as Agreement No. AG-05-039 All provIsIOns in the basIc
agreement remain in effect except as expressly modIfied by thIs supplement.
The changes to the agreement are described as follows:
2. Scope of Services, IS hereby changed to mclude constructIOn admInIstratIOn, mspectIOn
and matenal testing services as Identified m ExhibIt A attached hereto.
3. Time for Performance, shall be amended as follows:
Work under thIS Supplement shall commence upon the gIvmg of written notIce by the
City to the Consultant to proceed. The contract completIOn tIme IS extended to
December 31, 2005
4. Payment, shall be amended as follows:
Payment for the work provided by the Consultant as part of thIS supplement shall be
made as provided on Exhibit B attached hereto and the total amount of payment to the
Consultant for thI$ work shall not exceed $50,970 85 wIthout express wntten
modification ofthe Agreement sIgned by the City.
The maXImum amount payable under this agreement as supplemented inclusive of all
fees and other costs is now $89,355.77.
DATED thIS 3b
day of
M A,IZ. C;oj
,2005
CITY OF TUKWILA
CONSULTANT
BY' Yh/i~
~
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Prmted Name David WillIams
Title DIrector of TransportatIOn
Exhibit A
City of Tukwila
Supplement No.1
Construction Administrative Services
2005 Overlay Projects
The Consultant shall provide Construction AdnurnstratIon Services mcludIng, office admInistration, field Inspection,
material testIng, coordmatlOn with utility compames, busInesses and property owners and project completIOn, all in
accordance with tills Scope of Work and the reqUIrements of WashIngton State Department of Transportation's
Local Agency GUIdelmes and Construction Manuals.
100. Office Administration:
Assist the City In providmg documents and records of general complIance with City and State
Requirements, The City shall be fI~~sponsible preparmg the Agenda bills for CIty CouncIl actIOns, The CIty
shall also prepare documents for coordmatlOn wIth utilIty compames and pnvate utilIty owners, Items of
work will include the following:
101 Prepare Record ofMatenal LIstIng,
102. Recommend approval of Progress Schedule.
103 Prepare for and lead pre-constructIOn conference meeting,
104 Prepare meeting nunutes and distribute to attendees.
105 Obtain Request to Sublet and recohllnend approval.
106. Obtam and approve Request for Material Sources. Review and monitor for acceptance
107. Mamtam record of earth, gravel, concrete, and asphalt delivelY tICkets (If reqUIred) that are collected by the
Field Inspector.
108 Collect and reVIew for acceptance Manufacturer's CertIficates of Compliance.
109 Prepare any suspensIOn letters and letters acknowledging substantIal completion and final completion for
City approval.
110 Obtam Contractor's Certified Payrolls each week and check.
III Obtain Notice ofIntent to Pay Prevaihng Wage and Affidavit of Wages Paid,
112, Prepare construction change orders and negotiate with Contractor
113 Collect test reports from the materIals testmg consultant for complIance wIth the mformatlOn given in the
contract documents,
114. Prepare and momtor monthly pay estImates for agreement wIth Contractor and CIty, and subnut monthly
billing for Contractor payment.
115. Prepare and submit FIeld Note Record for payment.
116 Review and provide written recommendation for Contractor claims.
117 Prepare and submIt weekly statement of workmg days by Contractor.
118. Prepare monthly progress report, mvoice and cost data and subrmt to the City for reVIew and payment.
200. Field Inspection:
ASSIst the City In providing field mspectIon of the Contractor's activItIes. Items of work mclude the
following:
201 ProvIde the services ofresident project representatIves who wIll observe the techmcal conduct of the
construction on a daily basIs.
202. Attend weekly project sIte meetings WIth the Contractor, City staff, utilItIes, and others assocIated with the
project construction.
203 Inspect Contractor's work to ensure that the project is built accordmg to the Plans and SpecIficatIOns.
204 Prepare daily inspection reports,
205. Monitor the Contractor's traffic control procedures and systems and provide recommendations mc1udIng
signage and notIficatIOn of changes.
206 Morutor the Contractor's temporary erosIOn and sedIment control procedures and systems and provide
recommendations,
207 Monitor the Contractors complIance with perrrut reqUirements
208 Document Plan Changes.
300. Other Services:
1:IProjec!s\('ity ofTukwiloU2407l005 OverlayIOffice\CMScop"-Exhibh ADOC
ASSISt the CIty by provIdmg other servIces necessary for the constructIOn of the Improvements, Items of
work shall-mclude.
301 Coordmate wIth utilIty companies,
302, Review and certify manufacturer matenal subilllttals.
303 Conduct matenals testing in accordance with LAG Manual and \VSDOT ConstructIOn Manual.
304 Coordmate sIgnal tiilllng and operation with CIty Personnel.
305 Coordmate wIth Property Owners and Busmesses.
400. Project Completion:
ASSISt the City wIth the close-out of the proJect. Items of work mclude the fol1owmg:
401 Prepare reproducible drawings of the completed project based on Contractor and W &H PacIfic, Inc. 's
(WHP) mspectIon drawmgs that cle~rly IdentIfies changes to the approved construction drawings.
402, Transfer Fmal Records books to CIty
1:\Projecls"\('ily ofTuk\Vila\..'2~07 2005 OYerlay\Office\CMScope-Exhibit ADOC
City of Tukwila
Labor Hour Estimate
Construction Services
Project Project
Task Description Manager Inspector Coord. Total
Advertisement and Award 0 0 0 0
Office Administration 25 0 40 65
Field Inspection 23 360 0 383
Other Services 15 0 0 15
Project Complete 2 0 5 7
Totals 65 360 45 470
This is based on a 45 working-day contract with no overtime with 3 pay estimates,
one (1) change order and 6 weekly meetings
l:\Projecls\Cily of Snohomish\817392 City of Snchcmish\Office\ExceI\(Labor Hour Esl..xIs]Sheel1
3/1812005
City of Tukwila
Supplement No: 1
Exhibit B
Construction and Inspection services labor costs
Project: 2005 Overlays
Direct Salary Cost (DSC):
Classification
Project Manager
Project Coordinator
Project Inspector
Total DSC
Overhead (OH cost -
Including Salary
Additives):
OH Rate x DSC of
Fixed Fee (FF):
FF Rate x DSC of
Sub Total
Reimbursibles
Vehicle
Cell Phone
Subconsultant Material Testing
Sub Total
Grand Total
Prepared by' Sam Richard
Date March 17,2005
Man Hours Rate Cost
65 x $45 00 = $2,925 00
45 x $20 00 = $900 00
360 x $31 00 = $11 ,160 00
$14,985.00
1.6931 x $14,98500 = $ 25,371 10
035 x $14,98500 = $ 5,244 75
$30,615.85
45 x $50 00 = $ 2,250 00
Days
3 x $40 00 $ 120 00
Months
$3,000 00
$ 5,370.00
$50,970.85
I \Projects\City of Tukwjla\32407 2005 Overlay\Office\Excel\CMCost 03 17 05.xls
Transportation Committee
May 23, 2005
Page 2
3. 2005 Overlay Program Construction I\tlanagement A Supplemental Agreement to
Contract 05-039 for constructIOn management servIces has been prepared to be added to the
'J. e~isting y~ ~H Pacific desIgn cont~act. -:hey have expenence and are quah.fied. TheIr cost of
~ $)0,970.8) IS about 9% of the Engmeer s EstImate for constructIOn. The hlstoncat average for
such work has been about 15% Authorize mavor's signature on Supplemental Agreement
No.1 to Contract 05-039 with \Y& H Pacific for $50.970.85 at cavv and Regular Meetings.
4. Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) The 2006-2011 TIP IS silmlar to
the previous year's TIP, though two projects were deleted and three were added. The Green
River Valley Signal CoordinatlOn was deleted as complete, and the S 144th Street (TIB-MIlItary)
will be done thiS year, so it was removed. Southcenter Parkway S. 180th - South CIty Limits was
revised to be S. 180th-S. 200th. The new projects are S 178th realignment, the S 180th/Andover
intersection, and East Marginal \Vay(EMW)/Boeing Access Road (BAR) intersectIOn. The
EM\VIBAR project has receIved 5100,000 in federal funds and $16,000 in TukwIla matching
funds. Iun M emphasIzed the projects are not m a prionty order, but are on the lIst to be eligIble
for grants. A publIc heanng IS needed, and will be held the same evemng as the cavv If possible.
Recommend TIP to COvY and Regular Meeting.
5. Bidding Climate Jim M spoke of the a!arming new blddmg clunate. The City of Kent's
International Boulevard project had only two bIdders, and bIds were $1-3 mIllIon over the
expected cost. The nIckel package passed in 2004 will result in work begImIing on 1-405 this
year. The Viaduct, SR 520, and the rest ofI-405 wIll be done III the next several years.
Contractors such as SCI Infrastructure, wh1ch is doing the Cascade View neighborhood
improvements work, are running out ofbondmg capacity with all the work they have won.
Sound Transit work is also using contractors. Jim smd bIds wouldn't be competItive for several
years. Information.
6. First Quarter Reports JIm M talked about a traming incident the City took part in recently.
CIty staff members were better tramed than others, mostly as a result of their having taken the
National Incident Management System (NIMS) traimng IfPol1ce, FIre, and Public Works are all
NThtfS trained, the CIty can be l\i1MS-certIfied. Information.
/ J-I
___ },h Iff CommIttee chair approval
.111L A:..,..,. CO U 1 CIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
!yq`� Irntds ITEM NO.
o j
14":" 4 Mott Date Prepared by 1 Mayors Qytnczl rzuezv
a` 06/13/05 DCS J
?o
r ;t�= 5. 0,.
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER 05-088 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 6/13/05
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Seattle Southside staffing considerations
CATEGORY Dzsaisszon Motion Resclutum Ordinance BzdAuard ❑PublicHeanng Other
MtgDate MtgDate MtgDate MtgDate MtgDate MtgDate MtgDate
SPONSOR Coundl Mayor AdmSus DCD Finance Fire Legal P&R Polue PW
SPONSOR'S This item seeks approval to: (1) increase the Marketing and Communications Coordinator
SUM position from 0.6 time to full -time and (2) eliminate the Administrative Support Assistant
position and replace it with an Administrative Support Specialist position.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA&P Cmte F&S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 6/6/05
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR/ADMTN. Approve staffing changes.
COMIIIIEE Same as sponsor.
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$0 $0 $0
Fund Source- HOTEL /MOTEL LODGING TAX
Comments. No net budget impact. Reduced consulting advertising will match /offset increase in labor,
1 MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
1 MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS
1 6/13/05 Information memo dated June 2, 2005 from Derek Speck to Mayor Mullet
Information memo dated June 2, 2005 from Viki Jessop to Mayor Mullet
Finance Safety Cmte mtg. minutes of 6/6/05
1
City '0 f Tukwila
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Office of the Mayor
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, \VA 98188
www.c1.tukwila.wa.us
Date: June 2, 2005
To:
Mayor Mullet
....---~
....::::.i-;.o"'''''\..-
From: Derek Speck, EconomIC Development Administrator
Re: Seattle Southside Staff PositIOn Changes
ISSUE
Approval to increase the Marketing and Communications Coordinator posItion from 0.6 tIme to
full-time, and to eliminate the Administrative Support Assistant position and replace It with an
Admimstrative Support Specialist position.
BACKGROUND
Seattle SouthsIde VisItor Services (SSVS) currently has four authorized staff positIOns: Program
Manager, Busmess Community Liaison, Marketing Communications Coordmator, and
Administrative Support Assistant. The Marketmg and Communications Coordinator posItIon is
authonzed in the 2005 budget at 0.6 tIme. Currently, the Marketing and CommunicatIOns
Coordmator position is vacant. The Admmistrative Support Assistant posItion IS also vacant,
however, the work is being covered by a temporary employee.
DISCUSSION
Because the positions are vacant, now is a good time to re-evaluate the duties and make changes.
I recommend the following two changes: (1) Increase the Marketmg and Commumcations
Coordmator position to full-time and (2) elIminate the AdmmistratIVe Suppport AssIstant
position and replace it with an Administrative Support Specialist positIOn.
Two primary duties of the Marketing and Communications Coordmator position are developmg
and managing the advertising program and working with the medIa outlets to get Seattle
Southside highlighted in articles in travel magazines and other press. By mcreasing the position
from 0.6 time to full-time, this person can invest more time in getting "free press" resultmg in
less money spent on advertising. It will also be easier to hire for this position if It IS full-time.
The Administrative Suppport AssIstant position is Teamsters' DeCISIOn Based Methodology
(DBM) ratmg of All (an entry level position). At Seattle SouthsIde, m addItIOn to havmg
pnmary responsibility for assisting ViSItorS wIth theIr travel plans and questions, this posItIOn has
a number of other significant duties such as overseeing volunteers, Increasing volunteers, and
initiating the "sale" for group reservations when we receIve customer inquines. Given the scope
of work, I believe the Administrative Support SpecialIst (Teamsters' DBM ratIng of A13)
position is a more appropriate fit.
Budget impacts: The annual salary midpoInt of the Administrative Support Assistant position is
$35,064. The midpoint of the proposed Administrative Support Specialist position is $40,146.
Assuming benefits and payroll taxes are 30% of salary, the estimated annual increase would be
approximately $6,600.
The annual salary midpoint of the Marketing and CommunicatIOns Coordinator position is
$45,960. Since it was 0.6 time, the amount budgeted for 2005 was approximately $28,000.
Increasing the posItion to full-time would increase the estimated expenditures to the mid-point of
$45,960, or an increase of Just under $18,000. Including taxes and benefits at 30%, the estImated
annual increase would be approximately $23,500.
The above amounts are estimates that may dIffer from actual expenditures depending on the
timing of when the positions are filled and the salaries the successful candidates' received.
I believe both of these changes can occur without increasing the total 2005 budget for Seattle
Southside for two reasons. First, the changes are occuring mid-year and the budget impact
would be only for a p~rtial year, plus we have had salary savings resulting from the vacancies.
Second, the increased time for the Marketing and Communications Coordinator position will
result in less need to spend money on advertising. Although we are not requesting a change to
the total Seattle Southside budget, the changes may result In some movement within the budget
from Other Services and Charges (e.g. advertising) to Salaries & Wages.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve increasing the Marketing and Communications Coordinator position from 0.6 time to
full-time. Approve eliminating the Administrative Support Assistant position and replacing it
with an Administrative Support Specialist position.
Please let me know if you have any questIOns.
lVI E lVI 0 RAN D U lVI
TO:
Steve Mullet, Mayor
FROM:
Viki Jessop, Administrative Services DIrector
DATE:
June 2, 2005
\)LS
RE:
Tourism and Marketmg Positions
Included with this packet is a memorandum from Derek Speck, requesting changes in
staffing configuration for Tourism and Marketing. His memo is self-explanatory m its
description of the request for additional hours for the Marketing and Communications
Coordinator and change of the front desk positIOn (currently vacant) from that of an
Administrative Support Assistant to an Admimstrative Support Specialist.
Derek and Kathryn have done an excellent job In the review of the divisIOn's needs and
In working with Personnel to determine the correct placement of their positions. A
review by Personnel of the Position Description Questionnaire information elements
using the Decision Based Methodology (DBM) supports the need for the Administrative
Support Assistant position to be upgraded to that of an AdmmIstrative Support Specialist.
The volume of work currently facing Tourism and Marketing necessitates the Increase in
hours for the Marketing and Communications Coordinator.
It IS requested that the Mayor endorse the changes as submitted. If you need further
information, please let me know.
Cc: Rhonda Berry, City Administrator
Derek Speck, EDA
Katherine Kertzman, Tourism and Marketing
Finance and Safety Committee
June 6, 2005
Present:
Dennis Robertson, Chair; Dave Fenton
Kevin Fuhrer, Derek Speck, Jim Morrow, Nick Olivas, Don Tomaso,
Kathryn Kertzman, Lucy Lauterbach
1. Permit for 4th of Julv Fireworks Don Tomaso explained this year's show was to be put on
by the same person who has done it in the past, and It will be in the same 10catlOn at Fort Dent
Park. The fireworks show will be from the back edge of the baseball field, and some fallout may
fall in Renton. Though Don has tried to contact the right people in Renton he has not gotten
written permissIOn from them yet, but he promised he would get It before the permit was issued.
There will be two extra policemen to direct traffic this year. Recommend permit approval to
that evening's Regular Meeting.
*
2. Seattle Southside Staff Kathryn talked about how much the foot traffic m the office has
increased since their move to the Interurban offices VISItS and revenues have increased, as they
can often direct visitors to motels just down the street. Their hotel bookings are up, especially in
Tukwila, though also in Sea Tac and Kent, our partners. Dave complimented Kathryn and the
group on their excellent work.
Derek explained the tourism group now has four positions, with one position at .6 time and one
position vacant. They would like to increase the .6 part tIme position to full time and change the
description of the Administrative Support Assistant to Administrative Support Specialist. Staff
believes these changes can be made without increasing the Seattle Southside budget this year by
reallocating existing budget dollars from advertising and hiring public relations consultants, and
putting that money into salaries instead. Staff does not anticipate the change will cause an
increase to the 2006 budget. The committee members said they appreciated the increasing
revenues from tourism projects, and would gladly approve the changes as the work seems to
warrant it. The office IS havmg an open house thIS weekend, with kids' events, and a classIc car
show from noon to 4 p.m. Recommend staff changes to COW.
3. Station 51 Traffic Safety Nick said the issues raised by a citizen who works across the
street from Station 51 are issues that have been around for many years. Though there have not
been accidents, it is common for apparatus that pull out of the station to have to wait a minute or
two to be able to turn into traffic. \Vhen responding to a call, that wait can add to response times.
Traffic on Andover Park East is often traveling 40-50 mph. After discussion, there was
agreement between Nick and Jim Morrow that first would be a definition of what the problem is
(if there is a problem), and second, defining the magmtude and solution to the problem. Jim M
said he had pulled accident history for the past 5 12 years, and found 7 accidents, though none at
the fire station wIth apparatus. A traffic count in 2002 showed there was a reduction in traffic
volume from a prevIOus report. Jim said he would do a further study. Issue recommended to
Public'Vorks.
COUNCIL AGENDA SY'N0PsI5
N Drawls ITEM NO.
o; .�y
Q 1 1G) S dleetuiR Date Prepared r reuleru 1 Council review l
�-0 'o I 06/13/05
r so8 I I I
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER. 05-089 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE. JUNE 13, 2005
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Proposal for New Community Pride Award.
C.\TEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution n Ordinance n Bid Award Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date 06/13/05 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date
SPQNSOR Council Alajor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal Pd:R Police PIh
SPONSOR'S Members of the Arts Commission have proposed a new award for the Tukwila community
SUMMARY that would be given yearly to a residence that is selected as an outstanding house and
yard that demonstrates the owner's pride in the upkeep of both the home and grounds.
REVIEWED BY COW Ibitg CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utihttes Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE. April 26, 2005
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN Arts Comm(sponsor) Approve award forward to COW for discussion
COMMITTEE Approve award forward to COW for discusssion.
COS T: IM PACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$N /A $N /A
Fund Source. N/A
Comments
MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
MTG. DATE 1 ATTACHMENTS
06/13/05 Memorandum from C. Chesak to Mayor Council dated June 8, 2005
Minutes Community Affairs and Parks April 26, 2005
1
1
<(.-;~~\LA. W.
ff",'0 _"', '1<5'
;; l.t.. ,-,,~<":? ~.
-'''0.:" ~_ir3 ;:::;"'f.
o ,~" -~ '" ~
1, -1 i <;5"B,Y "fi*,1 GJ "
~,~ \ '0!tJ"\'~ d ~
o OJ\ \f7i'01 <:9
't;,-~j~".
~# ' "'", .
j~-, 1908 ~ if
,,~
Parks and Recreation Department
Bruce Fletcher, Director
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
cc:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor Mullet
Tukwila City Council
Cynthia Chesak, Arts Commissioner t~f>..' ~~
Bruce Fletcher, Director of Parks & Recreation
June 8, 2005
Proposal for New Community Pride Award
TO:
Members of the Arts Commission have proposed a new award for the Tukwila community that would
be given yearly to a residence that is selected as an outstanding house and yard that demonstrates
the owner's pride in the upkeep of both the home and grounds
Nominations will be taken from Arts Commissioners, Parks Commissioners and City Council
members only There will be no applications taken from resident owners The nominees will be kept
confidential, and a committee comprised of one Arts Commissioner, one Parks Commissioner and
one City Council member will review the nominees and select one to receive the award
Nomination criteria will include the following'
. Home and grounds must be visible from street
. Home and grounds have a pleasing and aesthetic appeal
. Home and grounds are seasonally maintained
. Home and grounds enhance the surrounding environment
The award will consist of the winner's name being placed on a plaque (such as Tukwila Treasures)
and a gift basket that will be presented to the winner by a surprise visit to the home Additionally, the
winning residence will be spotlighted in the Hazelnut.
The gift basket, created by the Arts Commission with the assistance from the Parks and Recreation
Department, will consist of donations collected from local merchants in Tukwila such as a gift
certificate from Home Dept, Lowe's, Star Nursery, restaurants and others
Nominations are geared toward homeowners and/or renters that pride in the outward appearance of
their Tukwila home Residences that utilize the ongoing services of a professional maintenance
company should be excluded from nomination
At this time, the Arts Commission would like to request Council approval for this award The Council's
comments are welcomed and encouraged
Community and Parks Committee
Apn126,2005
Present:
Joe Duffie, Chair; Joan Hernandez, Dennis Robertson
Steve Lancaster, Bruce Fletcher, Rhonda Berry, Brandon Miles, Lucy Lauterbach,
CynthIa Chesak-Arts C0I11l111SSlOn
4'
1. Proposed Community Pride Award The Arts Commission has been dIscussing the Idea of
encouragmg Tukwila cItIzens to take pnde m their homes. They have now proposed an award to promote
the idea. The focus will be on encouragmg people to take good care of their homes, yards, and gardens
that can be seen from the street, and to reward those who do a particularly good Job. Cntena proposed
would require a pleasmg and aesthetic appeal of home and grounds, seasonal mamtenance, and an
enhancement of the surroundmg enviwnment. Cynthia said the Comn1lSslOn had proposed that Council,
Arts ComnnsslOners and Parks Comnl1sslOners be the ones who nommate homes and yards for an award.
ProfesslOnally mamtamed yards would be excluded, but renters' and employees' yards would be ehgible.
The comrmttee members expressed enthusIasm for the award, and encouraged Cynthia and the Arts
Commission to continue to work on the proposal. The Arts Commission would like a good tItle for theIr
award, which IS currently named Cornmumty Pnde award. Present award idea to Council.
2. Duwamish Riverbend Hill Grant The Land Conservancy applied for and got capItal fundmg from
the LegIslature for Grandmother's Hill. The grant was for $112,500. The funds were to pay for fencmg,
trail Improvements, SignS, a parking area and environmental Improvements. The grant will be added to the
fundmg receIved from Sound TransIt for use of the property as a staging area. Bruce wIll bnng back to the
comrrnttee a plan covenng what the money will be used for and how the Land Conservancy will be
mvolved. DennIS noted WRIA 9IS very mterested m opemng up the North TukwIla nverbank shorelme to
be more natural than it currently IS. They want to return the flver to ItS onginal banks below the Hill by
wIdemng it. The funding mformatlOn WIll go to the full Council. Information only.
3. Draft Chan2es to Si2n Code Brandon had researched other citIes' sign codes regardmg scoreboards,
and listed them m a matrix. Dennis suggested addmg wordmg to the language regulatmg scoreboards
wIth video dIsplays, and better defining scoreboards. Seattle and Sea Tac both regulate the bnghtness of
signs through measuring umts of brightness. The comrmttee wanted mformation on what the umts
sIgnIfied. Joan said she did not want signs to be dIstractIng from publIc nghts of way. She wanted
scoreboard signs not to become a nUisance for some citIzens, but she balanced that wIth recogmzmg SIgnS
can't be regulated so much they're not useful or viable. Brandon saId we're the strictest CIty regardmg
vIdeo dIsplays. Our standards for brightness are comparable to the other citIes that were surveyed. The
comrrnttee asked staff to add constramts to the installatIon of video scoreboards that dealt with the
legibilIty from off-site and potentIal for becommg a distraction or interfenng wIth the enjoyment of
resIdential property. Reschedule in Committee.
Minutes by LL
c ~~.;~ Committee chair approval
v
COUNCIL A G 'NDA S Y O SIS
J��t1LA, yy�s
y Initmis ITEmNo.
144 r lleetnie, Date Prepared In• 3 \Jaya s reweu• I Council reczen•
t 0 6 -13 -05 I Sl/ /A%` 1 PS L—
5. --C.
ITEM INFORMATION
q
CAS NUMBER. 05-090 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE. 6 -13 -05
AGENDA I IEM TITLE Zoning Code Amendments
CATEGORY X Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance 1 1 Bid Amaral Public Hearing 1 Other
Mtg Date 6 -13 jltg Date lltg Date Mfg, Date _litg Date dltg Date illtg Date
SPONSOR Council A/4
Arbil Svcs X DCD n Finance Fire n Legal P &R 1 1 Police PIh
SPONSOR'S A group of 9 Zoning Code amendments ranging from minor housekeeping or clarification
SU \LIIARY to policy decisions about allowed uses and development standards.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. X CA &P Cmte 1 1 F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utiltties Cmte 1 Arts Comm. 1 1 Parks Comm. C Planting Comm.
DATE. 3- 15 -05, 5 -24 -05 (CA 4 -28 -05 (Planning Cmsn)
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /AD:\IIN
CON II11EE Hold a hearing and adopt recommended changes
I COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE'
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
Fund Source
Comments
MTG. DATE I RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
6 -13 -05
MTG. DATE I ATTACHMENTS
6 -13 -05 Staff Memo Dated 6 -7 -05 with Attachments
5 -24 -05 CAP Minutes and 3 -15 -05 CAP Minutes
4 -28 -05 Planning Commission Minutes
City of Tukwila
Steven M. Mullet} Mayor
Department of Community Development
MEMORANDUM
Steve Lancaster, Director
TO Mayor Mullet
CommIttee of the \\'hole
FROM Steve Lancaster, DCD DIrector &- LJ\--
RE' Proposed Code Amendments
DATE: June 7, 2005
BACKGROUND
On March 15 th Staff presented a group of 10 Zomng Code amendments to the CAP The tOpICS
ranged from mInor housekeepIng or clanfication to polIcy decIsIons about allowed uses and
development standards. The CommIttee chose a preferred optIOn for each tOpIC Staff then
worked to translate thIS polIcy dIrectIon Into code language We decIded that the new sectIOn
dealIng wIth MobIle!NIanufactured Home Parks needed addItIOnal work so that was pulled out to
be handled separately. The other 9 Items were presented to the Planmng CommISSIOn at a publIc
hearing on Apnl28th.
The Planmng CommI~sIOn endorsed the CAP's recommendatIOns for all Items except the new
desIgn standards to apply to all sIngle famIly houses, Includmg manufactured homes. The
CommIsSIOn did not want to reqUIre that all new single-famIly houses have an attached garage,
front door that faced the street or a mmImum roof pItch of 5 '12. They dId support a mmimum
roof pItch reqUIrement of 3 : 12, \vith an exceptIOn process through the DCD DIrector for flat
roofs on archItecturally desIgned houses.
The PC recommendatIOn was presented to CAP on May 24th. The Committee decided to
remstate theIr ongmal desIgn standards, however they wanted allow detached garages for alley
accessed lots only.
PROPOSED CHANGES
The CAP recommendatIOns are reflected m the strikeout/underlme Code language m Attachment
A. The changes are dIscussed below.
A. Manufactured Homes in Residential Zones
The 2004 State LegIslature passed legIslatIOn requIrIng that manufactured housmg be treated
sl1111larly to other types ofhousmg (stIck bUIlt or modular), see Attachment B ThIs means that
TukwIla cannot exclude manufactured housmg from mdIvIduallots In the LDR, MDR and HDR
zones as is our current practIce \Ve can however Impose desIgn standards that would apply to
NG
Q",CODEAMND\6-13CO\V,DOC
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 · Tukwila, Washington 98188 · Phone: 206-431-3670 · Fax: 206-431-3665
Page I or I
OGifJ7 :2005 3 -12 P\,I
all new sIngle famIly houses, see TMC 18 50 050 In Attachment A. The CAP IS recommendIng
the following design standards
a) A one car or larger attached garage unless the lot has alley access, In whIch case
the garage could be det,ached In the rear yard,
b) A front door facIng the front yard setback,
c) A minImum roof pItch of5:12
- - - ----.......---
~--
-------
-...--.......
J~~~~-l ,- -- . ~~- ------- :;:00-
l ' r"". ~ml'::'::11 [1':1 !'p ~ ~'C ::~
]'! I Yijj,:,:;jll.';! ~LI !fl i .~~ f~' -i~~, '"
!Q:~~,f-'.. ~_~<_Y ~}i~J~~J
-< '
',-~ .
'-":x;: .~ ~~,~'?-~':;r~~f=t;::.~~~~~~-;~~ .-'~
n -:ft!/-.I
3D ~fil! I
g1 ?-dr'
<,:1'-''-<.' I
.u-;: ~
!>
t1
II!
n~~D
1IllIlIiit!
~
;I
- III
- -=--=-=-
~
~--
_ ~d~~~~~
. .
.r_ ....:;_
c:=-\-... .
~ -
- ...;.
Manufactured House wIth 3:12 Roof PItch
Manufactured House wIth 5:12 Roof PItch
The COW should consIder the attached garage recommendatIOn in the context of the cottage
housmg proposal. Wf! are cun-ently considenng changes to our code to encourage new housmg
types, not all of whIch typIcally have attached garages
The reqUIrement that a front door must open on to the front or second front yard would not
necessanly produce a consIstent streetscape as we have typIcally granted some flexIbIlIty m
determinIng whIch yard IS the front when the lot does not touch a publIc nght-of-way
The Commission and CAP retamed the requirements specIfic to manufactured housmg allowed
by the State:
a) only new manufactured homes may be used outside of mobIle home parks,
b) the manufactured home must be set on a permanent foundatIOn with the space from
the bottom of the home to the ground enclosed by concrete or an approved concrete
product that can be eIther load beanng or decoratIve,
c) the home must be thermally eqUIvalent to the state energy code, and
d) the home must be at least a "double wIde".
SeaTac, Renton, Burien and Kent all allow manufactured hOUSIng In smgle famIly resIdential
areas subject only to the state allowed reqUIrements.
OptIOns.
1) RetaIn the CAP recommended sIngle famIly desIgn standards,
NG ,
Q. .CODEAi....IND,6-13COW.DOC
Page 2 of2
06'0712005 3 ~2 Pi\l
.2) Apply one or two of the above standards to all houses, or
3) Follow the PC recommendatlOn that only Imposes the standard State
regulatIOns on manufactured homes, including the defimtIOn of "desIgnated
manufactured home," see attached RCW code language,
B. Residential Short Plats in Commercial Zones
The Zonmg Code allows for one smgle famIly house per lot In the MUO, 0, RCC, NCC and
TVS zones whIch are pnmanly Intended for lIght commercial and multI-family uses. However,
some ofthese zones have either no mmImum lot SIze, or lot SIzes as small as 5,000 square feet
while LDR, our smgle famIly zone, has a 6,500 square foot mmllTIUm lot SIze ThIS has created
interest among developers m short plattmg commercIal land for single famIly resIdentIal
development. The PC concurred wIth CAP's recommendatlOn to adopt a clanficatlOn that single
famIly houses are only allowed on existing lots, not those created through new short plats
C. Condominium Conversions
The Zonmg Code reqUIres that an apartment bUIldmg owner obtam an UnclassIfied Use PermIt
from the CIty Council pnor to convertmg the umts to condommIUms for mdlvIdual sale. The
UUP process is time consuming and may dIscourage the owner of a troubled apartment buIlding
from consIdenng that alternatIve. State law (RCW 64.34 440) has requirements for tenant
notIficatlOn, first nght of refusal and publIc offering statements that dIsclose any bUIldmg,
mechamcal or electncal code vlOlatlOns to prospectIve purchasers
The PC concurred with the CAP's recommendatlOn to repeal the UUP requirement. Under the
IntematlOnal Housmg Code, unlike the Umform BUIldmg Code, the converSlOn of an apartment
bUIlding to condommiums IS a change m Occupancy ClassIficatlOn Group ThIS reqUIres an
mspectlOn and corrections to any code violatlOns before Issuance of a new CertIficate of
Occupancy Therefore no addItlOns to the Zomng Code are reqUIred to Implement the CAP's
recommendatlOn that the buildmg be inspected and code vIOlations addressed prior to sale.
D. Expiration of Inactive Permits
Currently If an applIcant for a land use permIt does not resubmIt m response to a Notice of
Incomplete Application within 90 days the Department can close the permit. However, once the
applIcation IS complete there IS no mechamsm to close an mactIVe permit when the applIcant
does not respond to a request for more mformatlOn. The PC concurred with CAP's
recommendatIOn to extend the 90 day response reqUIrement to complete permits.
E. Kennels as Conditional Uses in the TUC
NG ,
Q.CODEA:vIND:6-13COW.DOC
Page 3 of3
06,072005 3 -12 I'M
The CIty has been approached by a representative from PetsMart about the possiblhty of addIng
a "pet hotel" for dog and cat boardIng wIthIn theIr eXIstIng store Kennels for 4 or more cats or
dogs are a condItional use In the RC, RCM, C/LI, LI, HI and TVS zones but are not permItted at
all In TUC AnImal vetennary clInICS WIth assocIated temporary Indoor boardIng are allowed
outnght In all zones except 0, LI, HI, MIC/L and MIC/H. The PC concUlTed wIth CAP's
recommendatIOn allowIng Indoor kennels as a condItIonal use In the TUC.
F. Administrative Planned Residential Developments
When the CIty updated the SubdIvI~IOn OrdInance In 1997 the reference to admImstratIve PRDs
was madvertently deleted. It has been DCD's practice that If an apphcant wIth property
contaIning a wetland or watercourse chose to apply for the lot SIze or setback reductIons allowed
under the PRD chapter the process would follow the type of the underlYIng permIt. The PC
concurred wIth CAP's recommendatIon to COdIfy thIS practIce In the PRD chapter for clanty
There are two expIratIOn deadlInes for PRDs, see TMC 18 46.120. The first reqUIrement IS that a
complete bUIldIng penmt for the apphcatIOn be submItted wIthIn 12 months of the date of CIty
Council approval The second reqUIrement IS that once DCD determInes that the bUIldIng penmt
IS In conformance wIth the approval the CIty Clerk shall record a copy ofthe PRD \vlth KIng
County and amend the zonmg of the sIte wIth a PRD suffix. ConstructIon of Improvements must
begin wIthIn 12 months from the date of the CIty Clerk filIng. In practIce the CIty has not
recorded the PRD separately with Kmg County or modIfied the sIte zoning wIth the suffix. The
PC concurred wIth CAP's recommendatIOn to change the second deadlIne to reqUIre that
constructIOn begIn withIn 6 months ofbUIldmg permIt Issuance. If that bUIldmg permIt expIres,
so would the PRD approval
G. Lot of Record Changes
Tukwila's current definitIons oflot and sIte don't clearly define the CIrcumstances under whIch a
parcells consIdered a separate, buildable lot. The CIty Attorney has revIewed our code language
and suggested changes that wIll tIe our defimtions to the reqUIrements of State law See
Attachment A for the new language.
In addItIon the CIty Attorney recommends replacing TMC 18.70.030 PreexIstmg Legal Lots of
Record wIth amended language clanfymg the development nghts for substandard lots We
would contmue to allow lots that do not meet cun-ent SIze reqUIrements to be developed, so long
as they can meet current development, land use and envIronmental standards. If they could not
meet standards they would have to be consohdated wIth an adJomIng lot or request a vanance
The PC concurred wIth CAP's support for all of these proposed changes
NG ,
Q',CODEAMND6-I3CO\\ .DOC
Page -\ 01'-\
060rW053 -\2 I'i\!
H. Housekeeping
There are several outdated or mcorrect TMC cItations at TMC 18.104 010 Staff would lIke to
update, correct or delete these references, see Attachment A for the revIsed tables The PC
concurred wIth CAP's support for all of these housekeepmg changes
I. Use Definition
To address a recent concern regarding the applIcatIOn of the non-conformmg use chapter, the
CIty Attorney proposes that the defimtIOn of use be changed, see Attachment A for the new
language The PC concurred wIth CAP's support of thIS proposed change.
REQUESTED ACTION
Set a date for a public heanng on the proposed code amendments
NG ,
Q.'CODEAMND'6-13COW.DOC
!'ag~ 5 of 5
06,07 20D5 3 -n !,,,, I
Draft Zoning Code Changes ear in the
Attachment A -- would app �e The PC
addressed order
the specific code chance
recommendations are listed below lin the order they to implement the CAP i
The code changes necessary • the explanation column references which issue is
T The bold title in
Zoning Code lamed in italics
Explanation DR, HDR
recommendations are explained
Manufactured Homes types D f st� structures and
They are two differ
will be regulated differently.
Manufactured iloine
7ulations ado )ted under the national m�
Cet standards act of 1974.
accordance with the re
construction and sa..
Proposed Changes�i #� -1eme
Pvl a + fac-
* �m ' _ s e13ile- 1e
ati t11ilcir
fabfie f an ratio
dwell+ bye" a k � � -tt tai
:I= i.}13ta� ....
} SttGt38i
. �tl r al aj act�lfe 14eus1 �-
� kt�ta��1�e --
tl���- tt- t��utl� ttrce�-la es:
S-a =ety- andar -cl Hnailufaetu e+�
XX Dwellino Manufactured Home manufactured hoitstn 7
,2 " means a sin le -famtl dWel�ii1`7 re aired to be built in
lx.oc
accordance
XX Dwellin Mobile 1'Lorric built dwc:llun' constructed before .lone 15
18.0 ell
>tost standards other means a factor codes in construction
at the time of
We the national manufactured jnOUSCIO� CQ11StruCtlOtt and safet
D
1976 to standards other tdan t
aids act of 1974 and acce)ta�nhomunder
to to this licable stand ____- —
con._, 5truction or introduction of �s� ra Mile or
Dwelling, �r at= ,modular home, otter- -Elsa'- ' _
1 F milt' dwelling." 7" means a building
to contain no more than one dwelling unit plus one
"Single CW m Family manufactured borne, €, designed
new manufactured l
accessory dwelling
Manufactured Hom es in LllR, MDR, HDR
This is the Washington State Labor a L &1
Industry (L&I) Department
regulate the manufactured tructto n of homes yln the
They inspect the con
the appropriate insignia onto
factories, apply
the homes and issue
home and Iter it ect any
after left the
alterations of
factor . MDR, %IDlt
Manufactured ll�� mon State and
This st y the
(LW Department definition.
Industry ( )
Page 1
NG
n \CODs^ AMND \kttachnnentn.doc
Manufactured Homes in LDR, MDR, HDR
M single family dwelling
This change redefines sins
to include certain types of manufactured
homes.
06/08 /2005
�e�� a was
property valhiclh �1p
parcel of
and distinct parcel
binding site owned arcs b plat, be
. aratel own created y exe�hh �t be
as se that lots be which was
"Lots' ma
the created requirement transaction Y site *Ian.
shot .1at or bindin_ 1 of
b a
as created tha
15.0 Lot separate t plan,
„ means a physically or
Lot tat short p sal
created by l as bou,lht or
to tl
1�i-stor�'' • ► a ' • prior
lot sho fact
tan :, or c the
bin .ro ert but .
�r site p be created e it itha fact th • binding lots ►arcels of
re uiremellt that mean that
sold t" as se orate
�ou<<1ht or a "lot" does not i1ecessaril
defined as
ate
ert . lot, or
1 of ►ro short
ChaoaeS f lot doesn't
Lot of Recora definition o under *knelt
Tukwila 's current
rl define the circumstances buildable
Breda separate, ed our code
clearly considered has review changes
a parcel is Attorney wing chant
City suggested the follo uirelh ngts
lot. Thee and sugg the recl
thatwill definition to
that will tie our
of State law.
Sits
borne re
manufactured home manufactured a retail
"'New New hp11Ae» beans an tided to
of been xeviousl .,
��New manufactured
1�a11 ttwha 1� has n in 'I�Cw 8� 45.:02 � .
Title 46 KC* home" as defined
"used mobile ite rrOU of ad o1
15.06.180 lot or
location for a develo
letal ;its' means any
ose z � h re ui -
other acti eti- � -o
se ii ai`-es-
.� MC 15.06.8
Use' mean$ ai3C , __,,f{adt .-
s tbercolh °c- �r-ila �`_
�ic and- -r
StCUCtL1Ce�Ly1��,'t
1ihY�i� �atiel�c��w� 1
Uses
x- r�r -es-t � ° a' ��e��- oelad°r'�- r1:11x��i��- k'r-o.
sir uk--e t> a s on-st t
Unclassified 15.XX.oso
Ciwi` xckr
1�uslxs`b ��� {�D
�Z�lt- rf- ���1�-
o�ul�.i�,d`t�n
d is the res a
ro vii which
nt
to ert
1S
, a ►arcs Luldln�
ed as a se orate
` dta
be titled under
•
lire and is not a
iarchaser
y C 18.06.500
defined in TM 26. or
titles ed4�
which
for some
n• lots as
merit as deal
•�s,��eiilhd`a� -�
are
ernhit 01" a
'royal
•
efil�e l b l 1 or 18
defined in TMC 18.06-
C tit
iirsuant to
e
Or
r1 oin
talcuh T dace on 1�a1��.�a'1�- - --
65 Use activities Akio c
nature °f th��f act voted. the
►
vate
►
'O
ert
within
Manufacttired tom es in OR,
MDR, 11pa
This is the state definition froi hh RC W
35.63.160•
d Changes site isn't cl„�..
Lot of. Record definition initian of The City
that a site current d multiple lots 'Thee and
inGlud �d our code language 111 tie
site Gan w
that a has reviewed
7 changes that
Attorney following is of State
eefin the uiremen
sub deS'inrtton � the r Q
to �
our
Page 2
law sardine the
Use Definition recent concern regarding
To address a reG conformiing
of the non- proposes that the
chapter, the City attorney ea
defin limn of use be char
Condominium Conversions
GorldOlhlUh1L11h1S
Conversio apartments to
s of from the list of
Conversion ved DR, 1p[�,
would be removed in the M
Unclassified Uses
RCM, and TUC
0610812005
Uv,
18.XX.020 Permitted Uses g per existin< lot.
x. Dwelling — One detached single - family dwelhn --
Residential Short Plats � 1d in be °mde to the Zones This change
MUO, 0, RCC, NCC and TVS zones.
Kennels as Conditional Uses in the TUC
18.28.040 Conditional Uses
x. ]indoor animal shelters and kennels sub'ect to all additional State and local regulations
less than 4 cats or do 7s does not need a ermit
18.46.110 Application Procedure Required for PRO Approval d in the
Application. Application for approval of the lPRD shall be u made on forms
A Filing of pPp accompanied by filing prescribed by the DCD and shall be accomp
Application Fees chapter of this title and by the .following:
on for the density increases, or lot size and setback reductions, if
1 Just►ficati
requested by the applicant;
2. Program for development including staging r timing n of development;
Program
ownership pattern upon completion
3 Prop open space
4 Basic content assure any restrictive
and maintenance association, co no pe
through Provisions to assure p
through a homeowners'
ome other means acceptable 1 table to the City; application if rezoning
6 or
6 An application for rezone may bFecib(ortrezo elrequest shall be in addition to
is necessary for proposed density
those of the PRD application,
7 application for preliminary plat may be submittedto the
of PRD
PRDication, if
necessary ssary Fees for the subdivision shall be in addition including
application,
ted nerspecttvee in a standardized format required
8 Graphic images of development nera in ly sensitive area or u e,
photomontage or coinnputei be vegetation
by the Director; reserve existing trees and veb
nn into the subdivision's design by preparing a tree inventory of the
9 Every reasonable effort shall be made top • plat application lication p tree and
and integrate them preliminary p pp iot aA treetio d
signifcant vegetation on -site as part of the pail of any preliminary p
vegetation retention/removal plan shall be p' •
>e and vegetation retention /removal plan shall assure the preservation of
Such tic.
significant trees and vegetation
Administrative Planned Residential
Developments
It has been DCD's practice that if an applicant
with property containing elan for sate or for
watercourse chose to apply
setback reductions allowed under the PRD
.f
chapter the process would follow the type of
the underlying permit. This change will
codify this practice m the PRD chapter for
clarity.
NG
Q• \CODhAMN1 ttaclvznentA.doc
processed as Type
ermit shall be plats boL►ndax
des► n review to short T as
2
Public Tearing PRD' s related .rocessed as
Council P to a subdivision TMC 18108.050 shed be
B City s related Mans
1 pea oven-vent ing zoning
s p►,ixsuailt t °a M site im 0. f the underly the site
5 decision or bin C 18.108.02 d design ents regulations ° Yn o
line ad ustm the reg use an
.ursuant to T exception to on the
decisions shall be an limitation
2 The pRD shall constitute a .for the proposed The PRO fox 13ui1ding permit
district. b ordinance
of construction unless modified � ri
procedures �ed
dur es f approval be filed by
lrroce aired for app permit probed the
18.46.120 App educes are reel buildin£, p
Y roc development: the initial City Cermit all be writing iledby
The follo`vinl' procedures
application for which the be requested inthe Director
planned applicant residential complete app o f the date on which
may
�x an app be granted y or within
1 Time Limitation. A clue months months
licant witllm twelve submitting ms, six months may twelve
the app of time for exceed of Made within e considered is and
p�D An extension tension not the plan shall b the onthsreillen
an extension � building permit is n
applicant, and been granted, h e a shall e
the app the initial bion has e ity a cxibed by the
if applicaeon for extension the prop' code.
for which an ent of division ,l forms Arcs
the tune d the development e and the sub be made o T code
►led an ing Lon <7 permit shall the building ul the
abandoned, underly or required of the for building as prescribed by presented presented in
limitations an►ed y a fee Mans either p' application
b landscape'
2. Application Application cconlp All schematic plans �Y permit app public
.pCD and shall be z�i� ed in the building 1 not limited o
RG�I plats and p o of any
� but ate rival
shall be included hall include tans.
3 poein��efvttrf ion airs before the issuance c d p(n s p These plans subdivision p
approved for'' and site or Council b
detailed roved by the City sureties or
finalized, circulation cud u-, stages, for the
open space' ►crust be app required .
Utility, °p cements is to be developed shall be proportion
if the pg.D City Attorney e the same e plan.
dedication ri Staging b edby the shall proved the final p
building permits. rov pRD provided 111 the
eclti�i� ed.�'" be app with
4 Sureties c as shall ,es or Darts °f the density as pT sub ►�litte
device 7 unit io�ect plans la
Security The various stages dwelling the p' of the approved
other D overall whether ectlanS � p'�
complete PR and the sane determine out the ob }_ the
pace shall d with and carry 1klictiv Ql of �' witkr
of open sAction. The DCD ac-slra e.-i -ee hal
compliance ! lire arty -C-a'i biilals sly a }s i f is
5 17� aracl t13e appi_ov
permit are irl tire- C -ity -- kt
building n o.c m`F`app► 1 rec-o' f.-ice
p1ZD itk� tl�i �c cards`"
11-1Z. �t�ipaa -ter'i
1�tir p�ige 4
lve �,lanned ��esraential
Aanvn►strat lar pRDS�
Developments
deadliness f first
seereoa stwo 61.20tand 140
MC 1$' cp1-nplete building, permit
see T that a submitted ildinl 12
for t rerappl c be subm approval.
ov a1
licatrbn b Council ` 1 p .
for the app City' pCD
months of the date of t is that once
d requirement permit iS in Cleric
The sewn that the b per the City
determines with the approval With l y Cleric
shall
conformance copy of the PRO of the site
shall County and a end the zoning improvements
aril o ii P date Of
Cowlty an Construction
suffix• months from t e has
a PRD City
within 12 1n practice with City h
illust begin Eking irately
the City' the PRI) separates!
with the
not recorded site
County or modified the
suffix•
10) be • tD by adding- the-suffix
zon+i g-map (Figure 18 shall amend- = : -
' ig zone.
e-dc gn-atio :
18.46.140 Expiration of Time Limits
Construction of improvements in the PRD shall begin within six twelve months from the
date of the issuance of the building /development permit. If this permit expires the plan
Administrative Planned Residential
Developments
The CAP recommended that we change the
second deadline to require that construction
begin within 6 months of building permit
issuance. .If that building permit expires, so
would the PRD approval.
shall be considered abandoned, and the development of the property shall be subject to
the requirements and limitations of the underlying zone and the subdivision coded -mg
r ! - _ . iii- hie -I'-I mr et n ,s a oltral
e 1- e4inal- - . .rovided
Le this title. An extensionn of time for beginning
.Develepnn . er of
construction may be requested in writing by the applicant, and such extension not
exceeding six months may be granted by the Department upon showing of good cause. If
issuance 1
construction does not occur within 128 months from the date of permit ing-ef
► -0nl -the officia-1
PR- p- ,-inn —s-b he -Gin -y C1ethrthe PAD ;=1 -tn st+14x shallbe-(h'ep
—map 18 1-0)-anc4 the zoning shall revert to the underlying designation
zon-in (Figure
** New Section **
18.50.050 Single Family Dwelling Design Standards
All single family dwellings constructed under building permits submitted to the City
after July 15, 2005 must:
A. be set upon a permanent foundation with the space from the bottom of the home
to the ground enclosed by concrete or an approved concrete product that can be
either load bearing or decorative,
B if a manufactured home, be comprised of at least two fully enclosed parallel
sections each of not less than twelve feet wide by thirty -six feet long,
C be thermally equivalent to the state energy code,
D have a one car or larger attached garage, unless the garage is accessed from an
Manufactured Homes in LDR , MDR,
HDR
This new section would implement the
design standards that the CAP recommended
be applied to all single family dwellings.
The PC was concerned that item B would
require stick -built houses to be at least 24
feet wide, but they wanted to retain the
"double wide" requirement
The PC did not see the need to require any
.type of garage
The PC thought that the front door
requirement would be confusing on irregular
lots or those fronting private access
easements
alley in which case it can be detached in the rear of the house,
E. have the front door facing the front or second front yard street;
F have a roofing material that is residential in appearance including but not limited
to wood shakes or shingles, asphalt composition shingles or tile with a minimum
roof pitch of 5.12, and
G have exterior siding that is residential in appearance including but not limited to
wood clapboards, shingles or shakes, brick, conventional vinyl siding, fiber
l,/_,,,,a,,t C ,fi,,,,Y f,ff/,,,, ,,,,,/,C•,,P ,,,,,,i i0 Oi,,,,,,,,ill,, Cl li„1CY 'sr O11 ,i fl ,,,,• +r,r1niO
NG
Q \CODEAMND \AttachmentA.doc
Page 5
06/08/2005
cement slams, wood-composite p
anels, aluminum
siding or S1111
r materials.
Materials such as smooth, ribbed or corrugated metal o gplastic panels are no
t
acceptable.
30 ega1- r _ rlc-e le
A-• b�all�
2- -h a
x�
Nov Section
500, which dpes developed as e11t c
tots
C 18 06• still be proposed development
the
Substandard TM located may the p
1 A Lot, as defined In w111ch It is In the tone and me11t standards
for the zone In permitted raiding baste development
development
standards is one w111e11 is p environmental levelop l bask rds the
is of this title CSC and.,
proposed use meet environmental
with the regulrGn T which cannot use and
other applicable land s� land In a j11an11Cr
comply C lg_06 ',applicable acent lot(
s) ed In TM and other app comply CSC the
lone an •ldl
applicable
as deem combined with zone which does
applicable `� It It is Llse and
for the pbin eloped only cd .111 a planner applicable land with the
standards may e develop' fore and other app to comply the
lots r b applicable nl order that
requirements the combated for the app conlbined shall occur so
In the event lots are
whlcll allows lent standards line adlustnlent lot
basic development bse a boundary of a substandard
subsection, considered a single 101 the owner l8 �2
environmental requirements.
sLlbseC C Ch.
consld ' to prevent requirements mbedo shall er deemed p Lu pursuant to TM
combined lots are henceforth
receiving, 1 s val of variances p
�r u1 tilts s approval Noth111, for or
from applying only C�
f a taoles 1� b tit �'
8e lie H�v d1.L rl
a�I:"} alVy- 2-- 111$brle- aid -1 • nfae 1 `'
roof
itch as
The PC thought that a 3 12 r pitch
pat roofs
w
Th o allow the DCD
acceptable and wanted t
with special permission Y
Director
Lot of Record Changes
The non -conforming
letely replaced by the
he e�lsting section In
111 be comp
chapter w e that follows
new languag
d1me11s1oL1al
the m inimum lot if the
of meet separate ar
0
Page 6
UDR, MlT ,1�DR
Manufactured Vlomes rn , C chapter
N[anufation of the nonconforming home
11en a newer manufactured
This section
outlines w
0610812005
na feet te- fok d -
lajb�
i-fe d-l3eie- and -i -tst -a}se -tip
l }
a
efnit t� t�rra1 at
1-- ,S4- 11-re w sec-l- tea- -ate t-�-td
a e
eta-t i-al -tta- `a e u� el-Vat ed-
eOffi aOS+tr o =
: bet g -area =tai etal -reef;
es-a rt firer alarm`
• e.skp- s�eataens fetstiar�e-
+aaaaa -a aai-1 er-1-t.etw;
at�� as�clei =tt�al �5- sKC-I�
4-- ppee1-afic-e-x - tinaited -to; E1 -apbea -ids; s t� arc -kcal to
+.�pea&ak�tc -e-i�
eati�- eaatata�-�l- v�aya- errt�etal- sad }►�" �t�Elyattel -s;
ibbeel erccat' aced- ae "l -a
�- t- e- �ltttl- taa��"- staa�oetl�;-' �u��etaaaWt�:
�;.la.�- i>>ave�-lae- la- i -tc-l�
Project Permit Applications degree of
18.1Q4.010 Classification of I roj types, based on the deg '
A Protect permit decisions are classified into five typ whether
ted with each decision, as set forth in this se the section. decision, Procedures for the
fverdi ffe associated Lyra
five different types are distinguished according to who
required, whether a public meeting and /or a public
bli provided. rand is required
before a decision is made, and whether a
public notice is expertise as
City administrators who have o technical x Examiner
administrative le
d igpa 1 decisions are Typb1 decisions may be appealed designated l ordinance. clo closed r Type
who will hold a c
loed record appeal hearing based °iree the
isinotirequ information
for Type l the
City administrator who ds'fthe
thosecde�rstonsfhc no
decisions or for the
TYPE 1 DECISIONS
DECISION MAKER
Building; Official
P- rrk�l- rt—�1� r1 «Darcx;te+
Comrnuiut
may replace a legally preexisting longer needed
manufactured home. ed code changes
as under the proposed any
y
l in be ac
manufactured homes may bp ain have y
residential zone. These requirements
been incorporated into the definitions and
design standards above.
TYPE OF PERMIT
P3- LttOd -ri3 �x D evelo lment Permit
�
l tuft -c' snit
Sign Permit, exce t for those sign
NG
Q TODEAMND \AttachmentA.doc
Page 7
Housekeeping
The Public Works Department and
ons aPe Permit
Center have adopted
changed the names of
some pc to its, making
some Type 1 categories
06/08/2005
sign G
lHlts which are a • eal
able
Boundary Line Adjustment, Community
including Lot Consolidation �� Development
17.08 Director
ntct altor c���
ir�ee
Mnor Modification to PRD Community Development Director
Minor l
odrficatiol to BAR approved Community Development Director
(TMC 18 q6130)
design (TMC 18 60 030)
ernllt or approval issued
Any land use p specifically
by the City, unless s1
�orizedasaType2,3,`1,or5
catch the Director or, in certain
decision b this Cha ?ter made by en record
City Council, et or, in the se, of
f
. r committees, but which are subject to an o
2 decisions are decisions which are initially tl It t
C Type adtnilistrator �r Comnlissto , pursuant other City ' Planning earmgs Board p
cases, Hearing Examiner,
appeal to the is an appeal to the State Shorelines
shoreline peti
9058
TYPE OF PERMIT
Administrative Design
Review (TMC 18 60.030)
Administrative Planned
Residential Development
(TMC 1_8,21(2-14,0-8:02M
Short
TMC 17 08- 06012)
Binding Site Improvement
Plan 17 16)
(TMC Chap
NC;
As specified by Ordinance
TYPE 2 DECISIONS
INITIAL DECISION
MAKER
Community
Development
Director
Short Plat Committee
Short Plat
Committee
Short Plat
Committee
nnii.l \AttachinentA doc
Page 8
APPEAL BODY
o pen record appeal
Board of
Architectural
Review
Hearing Exanviler
1-learing
Exanllller
l learillg
Examiner
06/08/2005
Shoreline Substantial
Development
Permit (TMC
Chapter 18 44)
Community
Development
Director
State Shoreline
Hearings Board.
Decision regarding
Sensitive Areas
(except Reasonable Use
Exception) (TMC
18 45 125)
Community
Development
Director
Planning
Commission
Special Permission Parking,
and Shared, Covenant or
Complimentary
Med+1°ieat -fens to Certain
Parking &- tand-a ds (TMC
18 56 0650 and 070)
Community
Development
Director
City Council
Parking standard for use not
Specified (TMC 18 56 100)
Community
Development
Director
City Council
Code Interpretation
(TMC 18 90 010)
Community
Development
Director
Hearing
Examiner
Special Permission Sign,
except "unique sign"
(various sections of TMC
Title 19)
Community
Development
Director
Planning
Commission
Sign Permit Denial
(TMC Chapter 19 12.020)
Community
Development
Director
Planning
Commission
Sign Area Increase
(TMC 19.32 140)
Community
Development
Director
Planning
Commission
D Type 3 decisions are quasi-judicial decisions
made by the Hearing Examiner following an open
record hearing. Type 3 decisions may be appealed only
to Superior Court, except for shoreline variances that
NO Page 9 06/08/2005
Q \COD1?AMND \AttachmentA.doc
may be appealed to the State Shoreline Hearings Board
W 90 58 3 DECISION
pursuant to RC
Variance (' ionun, shoreline,
alteration, sip)
srde`'`'a11c, land
taus Zone ral
Resolve L1neer YC11lteCtY1
boundary the Board °� N e 4 decisions
district b record heating. Type ammis'caal decrswrna a° open. closed retard appeal
rew or
decisions are �Lr mrss�on, folio will Bold a c1 eatable
may 7 Com which Board of losedtectural Rev
the Planning City Council, the B Permits, which ate app
Review n or t0 the P
he appealed Conditional Use
n1ay based on the record established
Shoreline y uant to RC W 94 58
�T bas exGCp Board puts
Plannrr���te Shoreline l�earinn I'VE 4 DECISIONS
to the
Page 10
061081? 005
CoMmisslon
City Council
Loadin 7 Zone or Bic cle
Liireme 130
parkin�T Re
l8 "56.060 or
TMC e permit
Conditional ter 18 64 Planning
(TMC Cha Commission
Council following an
(TMC 9.2S b the Co Superior Court.
Ty 19 28 0101 decisions made y only
u 5 dec lions maybe appealed
Type 5 decisions are
P TyP bearing. Type 5 DECISIONS M�,KER
open record TYPE 5 D DECISION .
City Council
Planning
Commission
prelu11u1ary plat
T`/'PE
Or PERMIT
Subdivision 1�142 0201
C� M
Subdivision F alai Plat
(TMC 111 q 0301
Planned Residential De
velo
ment
Mnclu dMlg Maor Modifications
(TMC C1ioter 18 46)
Council
Use
C It
Unclassified 18 66 18 8�1 Clt CoL�11ci1
(TMC Cha Dt C Cha ter
Rezone (TMC plan Overly
R', Area M�
Sensitive �' edes1�11ati0n
18 5.160
f� reline Environn'en rRed
pro days from the
(Shoreline li Mister wlthn1 120 fete The
SSllorehne lssualrce e issued comp
�� CC[Yi►t application 1S
> periods for ermwts shall b City
Time on all p the any
idate d 130 the City e artment that the
period. omple
decisions by b t11e'Q Department
been requested of the
A. 1 anal tlfied y ed from "cant has aspect �1iCai1t is n0 cXC1Lld" Offer s0111e 1
a ds shall be " ictloLl additional
date during which the applicant
or proved'
the p1 b"
ep periods of trine hears body WO I
follow Arlo rewired studies'
1 any period
o corr or hearing s, p
1 to correct plans, perform l
department,
information
City Council
City Council
City Council
City Covincil
City Council
Page 11
per�►its iise peri�vt
Iraactive for a land
Currntly i o applicant to dNOtice 01
Currently e n app e 0 days the
does not to Npp ication response
9 Tly
d fete Pp ermit'
� ethep ability to
'Incomplete that
would extend
Department can close
to include
proposed permit close an inactive -
0610812 005
■
applicant is notified of te1 y or
for
a the date the department, , request, r
Tine period
shall a calculated e earlier of n(e)lie date
the de satisfies r et, a ncy
whether the additional e provided to the department, ert that
additional information until the been p , body
(bhearing 1 body der the determines �7bee or vide lb
s after the date the information a �°ent ag the applicant of the
(b) l4 day body if the dep it shah notify as if a new request for
agency or hearing, tapplicant is insufficient,
the app
the action by the procedures of this section shall apply additional information
anon
deficiencies and nested correction or
information had been made.
1lcant Earls to rovide a re
act statement is being
itl�a
within 90 RG 43.21C
<Y which an environmental st r s aType 2
inactivtt significance pursuant cal hearing, 2 The a period of time during open record app cal .2 a Type 4
following a determination a ° for an o1 closed record app
prepared ecisi days for a
3 A period of no more that190 days agreed upon by the
and no more than 60 y
appealable to the City Council.
land use decision,
land use decision additional time period for administrative review t t and any
4 Any additton4 the applicant
Department upon by the Department,
�licant greed up property, if permit
and the apt period as post the
Any additional time 1 applicant fails top 1p4,110
appeal
g which an apt TMC 18
parties to an apl ' pursuant to ect penult
period of time suspended by the Department 1 i if a prof
6 Any p ,T is susablis d by plan or a development
processul, established u1 this section shall not app
the comprehensive p vacations or
p'
B The time limits an amendment to 1 to street C
appl1Cati0ll requires pursuant to TMC in this section shall l ties sued p
regulation public areas or section,
The time 1tn11talate to the use of p by this s
approvals related established y The
the project applicant. an
other zipp � be issued within file time limits
Title 11
this fact t0 " 1 not been met and `
provide written notice
the time t 111he have
i ii a lllnill decision cannot
he Department shall p � final decision.
> 1a11 include a statement of reasons why
entice shall
estimated date for issuance of the notice of
artment ma
cancel the a
•
)lication due to
nest the De
•
da
s 0f tile re
applications that haVe been declared
complete.
a,,,,ent doe
Page 12
0610812 005
Ne,v Manufactured Home Regulations
RC\V ~
Authority to regulate placement or use of homes -- Regulation of manufactured homes --
Issuance of permits. (Effective July 1, 2005.)
(1) A city or town may not enact any statute or ordinance that has the effect, directly or
indirectly, of discriminating against consumers' choices in the placement or use of a
home in such a manner that is not equally applicable to all homes. Homes built to 42
U S.C. Sec. 5401-5403 standards (as amended in 2000) must be regulated for the
purposes of siting in the same manner as site built homes, factory built homes, or
homes built to any other state construction or local design standard However, any city
or town may require that (a) a manufactured home be a new manufactured home; (b)
the manufactured home be set upon a permanent foundation, as specified by the
manufacturer, and that the space from the bottom of the home to the ground be
enclosed by concrete or an approved concrete product which can be either load bearing
or decorative, (c) the manufactured home comply with all local design standards
applicable to all other homes within the neighborhood in which the manufactured home
is to be located; (d)-the home is thermally equivalent to the state energy code; and (e)
the manufactured home otherwise meets all other requirements for a designated
manufactured home as defined in RCW 35 63 160 A city with a population of one
hundred thirty-five thousand or more may choose to designate its building official as the
person responsible for issuing all permits, including department of labor and industries
permits issued under chapter 43 22 RCW in accordance with an interlocal agreement
under chapter 39.34 RCW, for alterations, remodeling, or expansion of manufactured
housing located within the city limits under this section
(2) This section does not override any legally recorded covenants or deed
restrictions of record
(3) This section does not affect the authority granted under chapter 43 22 RCW
Attachment B
NG ,
Q' ,COD EA i\1NDiMan tR CW s.doc
Page I of I
U5f12 2005 3 43 Pi\1
RCW 35.63.1.60
Regulation of manufactured homes -- Definitions. (Effective July 1, 2005.)
(1) A "designated manufactured home" is a manufactured home constructed after June
15, 1976, in accordance with state and federal requirements for manufactured homes,
which.
(a) Is comprised of at least two fully enclosed parallel sections each of not less than
twelve feet wide by thirty-six feet long;
(b) Was originally constructed with and now has a composition or wood shake or
shingle, coated metal, or similar roof of nominal 3:12 pitch; and
(c) Has exterior siding similar in appearance to siding materials commonly used on
conventional site-built uniform building code single-family residences
(2) "New manufactured home" means any manufactured home required to be titled
under Title 46 RCW, which has not been previously titled to a retail purchaser, and is
not a "used mobile home" as defined in RCW 82 45 032(2)
(3) Nothing in this section precludes cities from allowing any manufactured home
from being sited on individual lots through local standards which differ from the
designated manufactured home or new manufactured home as described in this
section, except that the term "designated manufactured home" and "new manufactured
home" shall not be used except as defined in subsections (1) and (2) of this section
NG ,
Q.CODEAivl0iD :VlantRC\\ s.doc
Page 2 of2
05' 122005 3 43 1',\'1
, Community and Parks Committee
May 24, 2005
Page 2
The land costs are high enough that the developer wants to get a good return on investment,
which he/she cannot do with trmlers. Dennis also raised the issue of neighborhoods being very
wary of changes in density, types of housing, and rental housing.
Joan initIally thought allowing up to 36 cottage homes in a development was too many, but after
hearing that developers sometimes require 36 homes to make a development profitable enough to
build, she changed her mind and thought 36 homes could be allowed. The size and location of a
development would be important. Dennis worried about a large development going into a
neighborhood when it would be surrounded by traditIOnal housing.
The current sIte for a very draft proposal for non-traditional housing is below the hospital and
adjacent to the cemetery on one side and the large back yard of the veterinary office on Military.
Matt said the design review process would help ensure the buildings in a demonstration sIte were
attractive. Dennis' comments concerning changmg the character of a neighborhood could be
calmed by a demonstration that showed different methods of housing in an area like the proposed
demonstration site. To do a project like this would take a large amount ofland, and those large
parcels are generally not in the middle of densely populated areas.
Joan said she supported cottage housing that was not cookie cutter in appearance, but had
modulation and pitched roofs instead. Steve mentioned that often this new type of housing is not
cheap, and may not be as easily rented as something less expensive. The Committee members
had some comments about the draft demonstration housing outline. Joe said he would like
pictures of how some of these areas could look. Refer issue to COW.
-> 3. Proposed Code Amendments The set of zoning code amendments that addressed changes
required by state law regarding manufactured housing as well as some other changes was sent
from the Committee to the Planning Commission. The CommIssion held a hearing and endorsed
the Committee's recommendation on all the Items except the manufactured housing section. The
Commission did not want to require all new single- family houses to have an attached garage,
have a front door that faced the street, or have a minimum roof pitch of 5:12. The Committee
agreed to reinstate their original design standards for a 5:12 pitched roof, a front door that faces
the front yard, and they wanted to allow detached garages for alley-accessed lots. The issue of
requiring attached garages on manufactured homes can still be kept if detached garages can be
dealt with separately. Dennis asked that the Planning Commission minutes be included in the
Council packet. Recommend code amendments to COW.
4. Comp Plan Amendment Update Two proposed changes to the comprehensive plan were
submitted for 2005. The first III the Tukwila Public \-Vorks Transportation Element of the comp
plan. The other was a request from a resident on Onlha Road who wanted a zoning designation
though he is outside the Potential Annexation Area. Steve has asked that person to wait until
annexation for his request, which the applicant has agreed to. The Transportation Plan is
scheduled for the end of this year. Information.
Commumty AffaIrs and Parks Committee
March 15, 2005
A second decision is whether the city should require a business license for multi-family and
accessory dwelling units. Dennis thought there was not a council consensus on this issue, though
he and Joe supported it and Joan would like more information on it. Kathy reported being
allowed in one apartment unit with obvious health and safety violations. Mandatory inspections
of apartment units is also an option that could come with licensing, though the legality of that is
unclear. Refer issue to COW.
-1
4. Proposed code amendments Th~ committee consIdered ten draft code amendments. Staff
had listed options, and included recommendations on each amendment. Because cities are
required by State law to accept manufactured homes beginning July 1 st this year, City standards
need to be established.. Nora said manufactured homes come in a range of quality, ftom very
basic trailer types to homes hard to distinguish from stick-built homes. Staff had written changes
to the single family dwelling code that manufactured homes would need to follow, and the
recommendations would lead to a higher quality manufactured home: The committee largely
followed the staff recommendations. Committee members had some questions about appropriate
requirements for condo conversions and which requirements might be appropriate, and on
whether a dog kennel was appropriate in the urban center. Refer issues to Planning
Commission.
5. Single Family Neighborhood Housing Options Moira said most developments for single
family homes put in a standard home with a garage in ftont. The Comprehensive Plan
encourages a range of housing types. Some options include cottage housing, where small homes
are clustered around a common green, with parking in the back or on the sides, and porches
facing one another. There is an opportunity for this type of housing in a demonstration project in
the city, though an ordinance would need to be passed to allow that. The committee supported
cottage housing on a demonstration project basis. Return to Committee with specific
recommendations for allowing demonstration proiects.
6. Aerial survey DCD has budgeted an aenal survey ofthF entire city and is eager to proceed
with that survey before the trees leaf out any more than they already have. The photos will be
used to update the city GIS (geographic information system). Funding comes from both the DCD
and Public Works budgets. Recommend contract for aerial ,photographY to Regular Meeting.
Minutes by L. Lauter~ach
<;;1-------.,
!A'/,C/
Q
Committee chair approval
Planning Commission Minutes
i\f ,-, \ ;<'8 -MarcJrl--t;-2005
Page 3 of4
COMMISSIONER MERYHEW MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE STAFF'S FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOlVIIVIENDATIONS, FOR CASE NUMBER L05-014 Al\1]) L05-0l5.
COMlVllSSIONER MARVIN' SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL VOTED IN FAVOR.
Chair Bratcher called a recess at 8:23.
The public heanng reconvened at 8.28
-'). CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
REQUEST:
LOCATION'
LOS-018
CIty OfTukwila
Consider 10 amendments to the Zomng Code.
CItywIde
Nora Gierlofffor staff gave a bnefing on the proposed changes to the code amendments. Staff IS askmg the
Planmng Corrumssion to make a recommendatlOn and forward It to the CIty Council. Each amendment was
revIewed and the followmg modIficahons were made:
Attachment A - Draft Zonmg Code Changes:
Manufactured Homes in LDR
~ SectIon 18.50.050, letter B, strike the rest of the sentence after "each" (no dImensions, but still double
wIde)
delete letter D, no requrrement for a garage (four m favor two agamst)
delete letter E, the front door does not need to face the street.
letter F, replace "5:12 to "3'12" (Type 2 - requrres approval by DCD DIrector If less
than 3:12)
~ "
~ "
~ "
"
"
The COffiffilssIOn was m agreement wIth all of the remammg proposed Code Amendment changes.
There were no further comments.
The PublIc Heanng was closed.
The Planning CommissIOn Deliberated.
COMMISSIONER lVIERYHEW MADE A MOTION ON CASE NUMBER L05-DI8 CODE
Al"IENDMENTS TO FORWARD TO THE CITY COUNCIL. THE PLAl~NING
COMMISSIONERS RECOM1VIENDATIONS AS PROPOSED Ai'ID PRESENTED BY STAFF
EXCEPT FOR MODIFICATIONS TO: SECTION 18.50.050 ITEM B. STRIKE THE REST OF
THE SENTENCE AFTER "EACH"; DELETE - ITEM D Ai'ID ITEM E; CHANGE - ITEM F "5:12"
TO "3:12" (requires approval by the DCD Director with criteria yet to be established for lower pitch).
COMlVlISSIONER ARTHUR SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL VOTED 11'J FAVOR.
Director's Report
~ A schedule of upcommg meetmgs for the remamder of the year was provIded to the CommIssIOners.
Jack Pace dIscussed some upcommg Jomt meetmg dates. He also, mfonned the CommISSIOners that
on June 30th, they would begm the process on the Tukwila South Master Plan.
~ For the record, Corm111ssIOner Arthur gave a dec1aratlOn. Due to hIs employment relatIonshIp wIth the
applIcant, he excused 1umselfupon heanng that LIsa Verner would be gIvrng a bnefing on theTukwila
South Project. ,CornrrussIOner Arthur eXIted the buildmg.
Tentative Agenda Schedule
MONTH MEETING 1 - MEETING 2- MEETING 3 - MEETING 4 -
REGULAR c. O. w. REGULAR c.o.w.
June 6 13 20 27
AppoIntments ProclamatIOn
See agenda packet SIster CItIes CommIttee DesIgnatmg July 2005
cover sheet for this PublIc HearIng: "Parks and RecreatIOn
week's agenda Proposed SIgn Code Month"
(June 13, 2005 amendments regarding
Cpmmittee of the Whole scoreboards, ammated
j\;[eeting) sIgns at publIc facIlItIes,
sIgns not visIble from June 30 (Thurs.)
adjacent busInesses and Special Meeting
nght-of-way, and sIgns
located at museums (JOl11t Council/
Unfinished BusIness Planlllng CommlsslOn
ResolutIOn adoptIng the work sesslOn)
2006-2011 Transpor- 6:00-9:00 PM at the
tatIon Improvement Community Center
Program. Unfimshed BusIness
New BusIness ConsIderatIOn of
ShorelIne Master Plan Master Plan, zonIng
map amendment. Issues and finances for
Public meeting format, TukwIla South project,
July 5 (Tuesday) 11 18 25
41"_
Independence
Day
(City offices
closed)
August 1 8 15 22
291"- PublIc HearIng: Unfimshed BusIness
Fifth Monday TukwIla South project. TukwIla South project.
of the month- August3 (We_d.) COMMITIEE OF THE
no Council Special Meeting WHOLE MEETING TO
meeting (Work Session) BE FOLLOWED BY A
scheduled SPECIAL MEETING
5:00-8:00 PM at the
Community Center
Unfinished Business
ConsIderatIon of Master
Plan, zomng Issues,
finances and devel-
oper's agreement for
TukwIla South project.
Upcoming Meetings & Events
JUNE 2005
)> Civil Service
Commission,
5:00 PM (CR #3)
)> Parks
Commission,
5.30 PM
(Community
Center)
y Apt. Managers
Networking
Lunch,
12:00 NOON
(Community
Center)
y Library Advisory
Board, 7:00 PM
(Foster LibralJ~
y City Council
Committee of the
Whole Mtg"
7'00 PM
(Council
Chambers)
)> Highway 99
Action Cmte,
7:00 PM
(Community Ctr.)
OPEN HOUSE &
PUBLIC HEARING
Learn more about the
airport extension of
Link Light Rail,
comment on the
Environmental
Assessment document
and the station name,
6:00 -- 8:00 PM
(Public hearing
begins at 7:00 PM)
SeaTac City Hall
(4800 S. I 88th St.)
22nd 1Vednesday.
IHeth awareness
presentation by
WSP Clandestine
Drug Lab Unit &
Dept. of Health
9:00 AM-12:30 PM
at the Tukwila
Community Center
Space is limited-
RSVP required to
Robbie Burns at
206-242-8084
).> City Council
Regular Mtg"
7:00 PM
(Council
Chambers)
)> COPCAB,
6:30 PM (CR #5)
18th (Saturday)
Chipper Day
....,
\.~J
7Q~'\
25th (Saturda ,)
Highway 99
Trash Pickup
Day
9'00 - 10:00 AM
For location call
Donna at
206-242-5556
;- Apartment Managers' Networking Lunch: 3rd Thurs" 12:00 Noon (bring a lunch). TCC. Contact Robbie Burns at 206-242-8084,
>- Arts Commission: 1st Tues" 5:00 PM, Tukwila Community Center Contact Kimberly Matej at 206-767-2342,
).> Chamber of Commerce's Tukwila Government and Community Affairs Committee: 1st Tues., 12:00 Noon, Chamber Offices,
Contact Nancy Damon at 206-575-1633
>- Chipper Days, sponsored by the Washington State Dept. of Agriculture: 3rd Sat., 10:00 AM. Foster HS Main Parking Lot.
Dispose ofprunings and plant materials from the Longhorned Beetle quarantine area. Drive your truckload of materials to the
parking lot and we'll help unload, chip, and dispose of materials free of charge, Be sure to bring 10 with quarantine area address,
y City Council Committee of Whole (C.O.W.) Meeting: 2nd & 4th Mon" 7:00 PM, Council Chambers at City Hall.
>- City Council Regular Meeting: 1st & 3rd Mon., 7:00 PI\'I. Council Chambers at Citv Hall.
).> Civil Service Commission: 2nd Mon" 5:00 PM. Cone. Room #3 Contact Bev Willison at 206-433-1844
y Community Affairs & Parks Committee: 2nd & 4th Tues" 5:00 PM. Conf, Room #3
)> COPCAB (Community Oriented Policing Citizens Adv Board): 4th Wed" 6.30 PM. Conf, RID #5 Marja Murray (206-433-7175).
)> Crime Hot Spots Task Force: 3rd Wed" 10:00 AM, Cone. Room #5 Contact Marja Murray at 206-433-7175,
).> Domestic Violence Task Force: 3rd Thurs" 12:00 Noon, Cone. Room #5 Contact Evie Boykan or Stacy Hansen at 206-433-7 I 80,
)> Equity & Diversity Commission: 1st Thurs" 5.15 PM. Showalter Middle School Library Contact Lucy Lauterbach at 206-433-1834.
y Finance & Safety Committee: 1st & 3rd Mon" 5:00 PM, Conf. Room #3
>-Highway 99 Action Committee: 2nd Tues" 7:00 PM, Tukwila Community Center Contact ChiefDaye Haynes at 206-433-1812.
yHuman Services Advisory Brd: 2nd Fri. of even months, 10:00 AM. Human Services Office, Contact Evie Boykan at 206-433-7180,
>- Human Services Providers: 11.30 AM, TCC. (tentative schedule: 3/18. 6/17. 9/16, 12/2). Contact Stacy Hansen at 206-433-7181
y Library Advisory Board: 2nd Tues" 7:00 PM. Foster Library Contact Bruce Fletcher at 206-767-2343
)> Parks Commission: 3rd Wed" 5.30 PM, Senior Game Room at Communitv Center Contact Kimberly Matej at 206-767-2342,
).> Planning CommissionlBoard of Architectural Review' 4th Thurs" except 2nd Thursday in Nov & Dec" 7:00 PM,
Council Chambers at City Hall. Contact Wynetta Bivens at 206-431-3670,
~ Sister City Committee: Contact Lucy Lauterbach at 206-433-1834
>-Transportation Committee: 2nd & 4th Mon., 5:00 PM, Conf, Room #1
)> Utilities Committee: 1st & 3rd Tues" 5:00 PM. Conf. Room #1
~ Court = Busy Court and/or Jury Calendar (noted to alert employees and citizens of potential parking difilculty),