Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTrans 2007-06-11 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET City of Tukwila Transportation Committee Pam Carter, Chair Joe Duffle Pam Linder AGENDA Monday, June 11, 2007 Time: 5:00 p.m. Place: Conference Room No. 1 I ITEM NO. 1 BE TAKEN I. Current Agenda Review I. H. Presentation(s) H. III. Business Agenda III. A. Commute Trip Reduction Efficiency Act A. Information. and Local CTR Plan Page 1 B. Pedestrian Bridge over Green River B. Move to Committee of the Whole for Project Consultant Selection Page 11 discussion then to Regular Council for approval. IV. Old Business Next Meeting: Monday, June 25, 2007 Future Agendas: 1. The City of Tukwila strives to accommodate people with disabilities. Please contact the Public Works Department at 206 433 -0179 for assistance. City of Tukwila INFORMATION MEMO Attachment III.A. To: Transportation Committee Me From: Jack Pace, Acting DCD Director Date: June 5, 2007 Subject: Briefing on Commute Trip Reduction Efficiency Act and Local CTR Plan BACKGROUND Below is a summary of the current Commute Trip Reduction Program in Tukwila: 20 Tukwila employers (including the City of Tukwila) provide CTR programs for their employees CTR Coordinator is funded by WSDOT to manage CTR programs of employers within the City of Tukwila Employers are required to complete Annual CTR Program Reports and biennial measurement surveys for progress toward goals 2007 Survey data for Tukwila employers shows Tukwila Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) Rate is 78% and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) is 15.1 CTR Program has been mandated since 1991 The City of Tukwila provides numerous services to assist CTR- affected employers with implementation of their CTR Programs, including the following: Direction given to employers on statewide promotions such as Wheel Options and other incentive programs such as "Bike to Work Annual report training and Employee Transportation Coordinator training. Personalized assistance for coordinators and employees at Tukwila worksites. ml Page 1 06/06/2007 P: \CTR Plan\TC Memo Local CTR Plan 6- 11.doc Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director ISSUE Staff is preparing the City of Tukwila Local Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Plan that meets all required state criteria, according to the Commute Trip Reduction Efficiency Act, for submittal to the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) by July 2, 2007. The Local plan will be reviewed and packaged with plans from other jurisdictions in King, Pierce and Snohomish Counties for submittal to the Commute Trip Reduction Board in September 2007. The state CTR Board is a governor appointed board. The local CTR Plan will be certified in January 2008. Additionally, staff is preparing a plan for a Growth and Transportation and Efficiency Center (GTEC) for Tukwila's Urban Center with assistance from Perteet, Inc. The aim of the GTEC plan is to reduce single- occupancy vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled in regional growth centers. 1 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 431 -3670 Fax: 206 431 -3665 Additionally, the City of Tukwila works closely with other local agencies to implement and promote trip reduction including King County, the cities of Seattle, Renton, Kent, SeaTac and Federal Way, the Washington State Department of Transportation, the Puget Sound Regional Council, and others. The City will continue to provide base CTR services throughout 2007 and 2008 until adoption of the new Local CTR Plan as mandated by the state. CTR Proeram Chances The CTR Efficiency Act adopted in 2006 makes the following changes necessary for the City of Tukwila: Creation of an enhanced CTR Local Plan by July 2007 for submission to Puget Sound Regional Council Certification of a Local C lR Plan by the governor- appointed CTR Board by January 2008 Implementation of Local CTR Plan in mid 2008 Designation and plan for Growth Transportation and Efficiency Center in Tukwila by July 2007 for review by PSRC, and submittal to and certification by the CTR Board in 2008 Ordinance and comprehensive plan revisions for mid 2008 Educate Tukwila employers on changes in CTR and new goals for programs RECOMMENDATION No action required at this time. Staff will come back in Fall 2007 with draft CTR Plans for approval. The City's CTR Ordinance will be updated following approval and adoption of the local CTR Plan in early to mid 2008. Attachments: Commute Trip Reduction Program (WSDOT Folio November 2006) Growth and Transportation Efficiency Centers (WSDOT Folio October 2006) Z ML Page 2 06/06/2007 Washington State VI/ Department of Transportation November 2006 Commute Trip Reduction Program Implementing the CTR Efficiency Act The Washington State Legislature passed the Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) law in 1991. The CTR program uses partnerships among employers, local jurisdictions, planning organizations, transit systems, and the state to encourage employees to ride the bus, vanpool, carpool, walk, bike, work from home, or compress their workweek. The major goals for the CTR program are to: Improve transportation system efficiency Conserve energy Improve air quality In 2006, the Legislature unanimously adopted changes to the CTR law to make the program more effective, efficient, and targeted. The modified CTR program will officially start on January 1, 2008. To implement the CTR Efficiency Act, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) is working with cities, counties, planning organizations, and transit systems to develop the rules and create new plans. Current CTR Program Washington State's CTR program works with major employers in the state's ten most populous counties to encourage employees to commute without driving alone. About 500,000 employees at nearly 1,100 worksites in the state have access to CTR programs. Today: Ten Counties in the C I R Program The CTR Program Is Working The drive -alone rate at worksites participating in CTR decreased from 70.8 percent in 1993 to 65.7 percent in 2005. This contributed to Washington's overall drive -alone commuting rate declining slightly from 1990 to 2000 (one of only two states where the percentage dropped). Statewide, employees commuting to CTR worksites made over 20,000 fewer vehicle trips each weekday morning in 2005 than they did when they entered the program. CTR Enhances Transportation Efficiency Making the state's transportation system more efficient is the CTR program's most important goal. The 7 percent reduction in drive -alone trips at CTR sites from 1993 to 2005 creates substantial benefits, particularly at bottlenecks and chokepoints on key highways. CTR employees in the central Puget Sound made more than 14,200 fewer vehicle trips each weekday morning in 2005 than they did when their employers entered the program. The absence of these trips reduced travel delay by an estimated 11.6 percent on average during the peak morning commute in the region. CTR Conserves Energy and Improves Air Quality CTR worksite commuters reduced petroleum use in Washington by about 5.8 million gallons of fuel in 2005, saving $13.7 million through the choices they made. They also reduced emissions of three regulated air pollutants by nearly 3,800 tons and emissions of greenhouse gases by the equivalent of 74,200 tons of carbon dioxide. Drive Alone Comparison CTR Worksites,Washington State, a nd the United States,1990 to 2005 Percentage of commute trips taken by driving alone 78- US Average 76. 74. 72. 70- 68- 66- 64- 62- 60. J 1990 1993 1995 Public vanpools operating in Washington January 000 Washington Only CTR Sites that been with in the program since it began 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 Other Programs Support the Success of CTR Several strategies contribute to the success of the CTR program. Washington has over 2,000 vanpool vans operating on our roads, the largest vanpool program in the nation. The legislature recognized that the vanpool program increases the CTR program's effectiveness and provided an additional $3.9 million to purchase over 150 new vans in 2006, Some of the state programs that support CTR include: Trip Reduction Performance Program Rideshare Tax Credits Vanpool Grant Program Regional Mobility Grant Program Park and Ride Lots For information about these programs, visit v✓ww.wsdot.wa.gov /tdm eyu.vy 3". nx CTR Task Force Recommended Program Changes The Governor appointed CTR Task Force represents the varying statewide perspectives of residents, businesses, state agencies, transit agencies, and local jurisdictions. The Task Force reported to the Legislature in December 2005 and recommended that CTR be continued, with modifications to make the program more effective, efficient, and targeted. Modified CTR Program Governor Signs CTR Efficiency Act On March 29, Governor Chris Gregoire signed the Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Efficiency Act, Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 6566. At the signing, Governor Gregoire was surrounded by members of the CTR Task Force and program partners celebrating the culmination of two years of work to improve the CTR Program. The most significant changes to the CTR law include: Focusing the Program on Congested Highway Corridors The new CTR law shifts the program from the ten most populous counties to those urban growth areas that contain the most congested state highways. This change focuses the program on the areas of the state that will deliver a high retum on state and private investment. Other jurisdictions may participate and tribal governments are encouraged to establish CTR programs. Where Participation Who Oversees Program Performance Goals Performance Review Planning Requirements Urban Growth Areas in the CTR Program Pelf Deters a Increasing Planning Coordination Among Local, Regional, and State Levels The new CTR law establishes a state CTR planning framework that will better integrate CTR with local, regional, and state transportation and land use planning and investment. How the CTR Program is Changing Current CTR Program County -wide in ten counties Population over 150,000 Who Participates Major employers (over 100 employees) in ten counties required to participate 28- member CTR Task Force establishes policy and provides guidance All employers have same goal targets Worksite programs reviewed each year No planning required Based on an evaluation of local, regional, and state needs, local jurisdictions may create customized programs with goals and strategies that best fit the complexities of that particular area. In addition, more state agencies must participate in the modified program. Providing Flexibility to Local Jurisdictions to Develop Customized Trip Reduction Programs in Key Employment and Residential Centers The new CTR law gives local jurisdictions the option to establish Growth and Transportation Efficiency Centers (GTECs) where they may implement customized trip reduction programs and transportation efficient land use policies that go beyond the requirements of the base CTR program. Streamlining the CTR Task Force Into a Smaller, More Policy Oriented CTR Board The new CTR law reduces the size of the Task Force to 16 members and establishes it as a permanent board to review and approve local and regional plans, develop the program funding allocations and the state plan, and provide general policy guidance for the program. Modified CTR Program (effective January 1, 2008) Urban growth areas Congested highway corridors Major employers (over 100 employees) in urban growth areas required to participate; in voluntary centers, more employees and residents may participate 16- member CTR Board establishes policy, provides guidance, and allocates funding Employer goals may vary based on local and regional goals beyond the state minimum target Worksite programs may be reviewed every two years Coordination with transportation and growth planning required Implementation Process Major Milestones for Implementing the Modified CTR Program Governor Signs Rules CTR Efficiency Act Development March 2006 April July 2006 Public Comment on Rules August 2006 Implementing the CTR Efficiency Act will require updating the state guidelines into rules, creating regional plans, and updating local plans and policies. Everyone involved— affected local jurisdictions, regional transportation planning organizations RTPOs), major employers, transit agencies, WSDOT, and the CTR board —will need to work collaboratively through January 2008 and beyond to implement the changes. An implementation work group is developing the CTR program rules. The work group consists of CTR board members and staff from cities, counties, RTPOs, transit agencies, WSDOT, and others, as well as representatives from major employers. What's in the Rules? Building on the existing CTR guidelines, the new rules will specify the requirements in the CTR Efficiency Act for: Program goals and measurement Local CTR ordinances, plans, and administration Regional CTR plans State CTR plan and role of the CTR board Growth and Transportation Efficiency Centers GTECs) Other details related to the CTR Efficiency Act For more information on the CTR Program, contact WSDOT's Public Transportation and Rail Division, Keith Cotton cottonk@wsdot.wa.gov 360- 705 -7910 www.wsdot.wa.gov /tdm/ctr Washington State Department of Transportation Draft Rules Local and Released Regional Planning November 2006 November 2006 September 2007 New CTR Rules Adopted February 2007 Modified GTR Program Starts January 2008 Implementation Schedule The timeline for implementing the new law includes: WSDOT, in collaboration with the implementation work group, develops the program rules from April to July 2006. Public comment on the draft rules in August2006. WSDOT releases the final draft rules in November2006. CTR program rules are adopted into Washington Administrative Code (WAC) by February 2007. Supported by state planning funds and following the final draft program rules, local jurisdictions and RTPOs develop CTR plans in a collaborative process from November2006 to September2007. During this time, local jurisdictions may choose to designate Growth and Transportation Efficiency Centers (GTECs). The CTR board will approve local and regional plans by January 2008. The modified program begins in January 2008. Local jurisdictions begin to implement plans, update ordinances, and educate employers on the program changes; employers begin to evaluate potential program changes. How Can You Be Involved? It is vital that everyone be informed and active in the rules development process, so that WSDOT can build consensus around the changes. There are several ways to be involved: Visit the CTR Efficiency Act website often at www.wsdot.wa. gov /td m /ctr Sign up to receive e -mail announcements on the CTR program implementation and learn about opportunities to give your feedback on the draft rules. Attend one of many CTR briefings for local jurisdictions, planning organizations, employers, legislators, and others. Request a presentation for your group. November 6, 2006 0609 -0328 Washington State Department of Transportation Growth and Transportation Efficiency Centers October 2006 City of Spokane. City of Vancouver City of Bellevue (Big Picture Photograph}). New State Program Focuses on Transportation in Urban Centers and Fast Growing Areas The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) is starting a new voluntary program for communities wanting to improve the efficiency of their transportation system in order to meet their targets for future growth and economic development. Cities and counties can now establish Growth and Transportation Efficiency Centers (GTECs) in their densest employment or residential areas. The program is part of the Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Efficiency Act, which encourages employees to ride the bus, vanpool, carpool, walk, bike, work from home, and use other commute options besides driving alone. The Washington State Legislature created the GTEC program in 2006 to increase the efficiency of the state's transportation system in areas of the state containing a concentration of jobs and housing. State, Regional, and Local Participation is Key to Success The state will provide technical assistance and financial incentives for GTEC programs that have the potential to improve transportation system performance. The six regional planning agencies participating in the state's Commute Trip Reduction program will develop criteria for designating GTECs in there area. Counties, cities, developers, land owners, employers, and transit agencies will work together to create customized transportation demand management programs and transportation- efficient land use policies in designated GTECs. Success Story Lloyd District Lloyd District Regional Center In 1992, the Lloyd District in Portland, Oregon, needed to figure out how to meet the city's growth goals of adding 17,000 jobs, doubling the existing employee base, and 4,000 housing units, tripling the amount of housing by 2015. With 76 percent of employees in the district driving alone to work, meeting those growth targets would mean adding $204 million in parking supply and facing ma jo r traffic congestion. To tackle this problem, Lloyd District property owners and businesses formed a partnership with_TriMet, the ,Portland- based transit system, and the city of Portland. In 1994, the partners developed and started implementing a plan to reduce congestion and improve access to the district. Strategies for decreasing the percentage of employee driving alone to work included: Significantly improving and expanding transit service Offering transit subsidy programs for employees Improving access and amenities for bicycling and walking Managing and limiting the parking supply The partnership was successful in increasing the use of public transportation and other commute options. In 1994, the average commute mode split for transit was 10 percent and bicycling was 1 percent. At the end of 2005, transit use rose to 41 percent and bikes to nearly 5 percent. The Lloyd District estimates that through this unique partnership they realized a $62 million return on investment. The Lloyd District is a model of how Growth Transportation Efficiency Centers can help a community plan for growth, improve transportation efficiency, save money on parking, and attract economic development. Urban Growth Areas in the CTR Program (Preliminary Determination) Meet Your Growth Goals With a GTEC As the job or housing market grows in your community, you need to make sure your transportation system supports that growth. Forming a GTEC helps your community focus policies, programs, and services in a core area to support local plans and goals. A GTEC helps you get the transportation system you need for the growth you want by moving more people with fewer cars in your densest employment or residential areas. Program Benefits Whether you have an established, dense urban area or a fast growing suburban area where you want to focus growth, a successful GTEC provides many benefits to your community. Residents and employers benefit from improved transportation efficiency, economic development, energy conservation, and air quality. With a GTEC, your area could: Improve Transportation Efficiency By incorporating trip reduction programs into and use and transportation, you could expand the effective capacity on roads that serve your center. A well- designed GTEC can move more people, more efficiently. The right improvements could lead to more people taking public transportation, walking, biking, and carpooling and more parking spaces for customers. Attract Growth and Economic Development Effective trip reduction strategies can benefit economic development by allowing more people to access centers for work and shopping. You'll have a competitive edge for attracting jobs and housing in an area where it's easier to get around. Employers and developers will want to locate in your area if you improve access to jobs, decrease requirements for additional parking, and increase space for commercial and residential development. The program can help decrease the space and investment needed for parking, allowing more commercial and residential development. Improve Air Quality and Public Health Getting more people out of their cars and onto buses, trains, vanpools, bikes, and other commute alternatives will improve air quality by reducing emissions. New research* is finding that programs and land uses that help residents and employees be more physically active can improve public health. Enhance Livability Establishing a GTEC can help communities grow in ways that ensure a better quality of life and strong, sustainable economic growth. By linking transportation and land -use planning through GTECs, communities will use existing programs more effectively as they seek to improve safety, reduce congestion, contribute to greater economic prosperity, and provide easier access to jobs. Focused efforts from GTEC partners would result in transportation facilities and services that are well- designed, customer friendly, and community- oriented. Expand Employer Involvement A key component of your GTEC program may be to engage employers that do not currently participate in the Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) program. This will broaden the involvement of employers in trip reduction, producing greater benefits, with less of the regulatory requirements of the base CTR program. Program Components While cities and counties will have some flexibility to customize trip reduction programs to meet local needs, project funds will support specific strategies consistent across all programs. Every GTEC program will contain: Area goals for substantive reductions in single- occupant vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled Short- and long -term strategies for achieving the area goals Performance measures to track progress toward the goal A financial plan demonstrating how the program can be implemented with resources from public and private sources An organizational structure for implementing the program An evaluation of local land use and transportation policies to determine the extent to which they complement and support trip reduction *According to Larry Franks in his book `Urban Sprawl and Public Health: Designing, Planning, and Building for Healthy Communities." Bellevue Sees Results From Transportation Demand Management Efforts City of Bellevue (Big Picture Photography). Fewer Bellevue residents are driving to work alone and more are taking public transportation. The census* shows the percentage of Bellevue residents who drove alone to work dropped from 74 percent in 2000 to 68.8 percent in 2005. From 2002 to 2005, citywide transit ridership increased 42 percent and downtown Bellevue ridership increased 70 percent. In downtown Bellevue, 14 percent of commute trips are taken by transit, up from 12 percent in 2002. The city of Bellevue, Bellevue Downtown Association, King County Metro, and others have worked together to increase the use of transit, carpooling, bicycling, and walking for Bellevue employees and residents. Strategies include: Capital Investments WSDOT completed High Occupancy Vehicle (H0V) lanes and bus ramps on Interstate 405 Bellevue Transit Center was remodeled, expanded, and opened downtown in 2002 Increased Transit Service King County Metro and Sound Transit added new Eastside bus routes and service Trip Reduction Programs Large employers participated in the state's commute trip reduction program and offered incentives such as subsidized transit passes and free carpool parking Small employers purchased FlexPasses for employees and participated in pilot incentive programs Campaigns, such as Downtown Bellevue In Motion, were launched to provide residents with information on their travel options and provide incentives for them to try using them a few times a week King County Metro provided Rideshare0nline and other tools to help people join a carpool or vanpool *U.S. Census Bureau's 2005 American Community Survey. Program Strategies The following are examples of trip reduction strategies that could be implemented in GTECs: Capital investments in nonmotorized and transit amenities identified in transportation management plans, local comprehensive plans, or the local CTR plan, such as: Signage and information Bicycle lane striping Trip reduction incentives for commuters and /or residents, such as: Incentives for carpooling, using transit, telecommuting, biking, and walking Parking pricing Transit passes Engaging and working with small employers to implement commute trip reduction programs (via contract with a transportation management association, transit agency, or local jurisdiction): Employer program development and implementation Incentives Employer training Promotions and education Potential investment in increased transit services designed to meet employer need Policy development and implementation Aligning local jurisdiction policies to address GTEC mobility goals, including parking management, design /development standards, and transit service prioritization Cities Expressing Interest in Planning a GTEC WSDOT is providing planning grants to these cities for analyzing the possibility of establishing a GTEC: Bellevue Bothell Everett Kirkland Liberty Lake Lynnwood Olympia Puyallup Redmond SeaTac Seattle Spokane Tacoma Tukwila Vancouver October 19, 2006 0609 -0348 Program Evaluation WSDOT will provide technical assistance to local jurisdictions implementing GTEC programs. GTEC administrators and the WSDOT will work together to monitor and evaluate the programs. Financial Incentives for Forming a GTEC WSDOT is providing planning grants in Fiscal Year 2007 for those who want to create a GTEC. The GTEC planning grants are provided in addition to the base commute reduction program funds. The grants are limited and might not be available in the future. The Commute Trip Reduction Board is requesting grants during the 2007 legislative session to support GTECs once they are up and running. These new grants may require a local match. A variety of funding sources may be eligible as local match such as mobility grants, Trip Reduction Performance Program, business district, and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program. We'll Help You Get Started WSDOT is creating a tool kit to help you plan, start, and run your program. Some of the tools include: Rules and guidelines Model plans and examples Staff assistance As tools are developed, we will make them available online at: www.wsdotwa.gov/tdm/taskforceitfmaterials.cfm#program For more information on Growth Transportation Efficiency Centers or the Commute Trip Reduction Program, contact: Keith Cotton cottonk @wsdot.wa.gov 360- 705 -7910 www.wsdot.wa .gov /tdm /taskforce /tfmaterials. cfm #program Washington State 711 Department of Transportation To: Mayor Mullet From: Public Works Directo Date: June 7, 2007 Subject: Pedestrian Bridge over Green River Proiect No. 05 -RWO3 Consultant Selection ISSUE Update Mayor and Transportation Committee on the design consultant selection process for the Pedestrian Bridge project. BACKGROUND In late 2005, Tukwila received a $200,000 grant for design for the Pedestrian Bridge over Green River from the Transportation Improvement Board's Statewide Enhancement fund. The Pedestrian Bridge project was identified through the Comprehensive Plan Update completed in 2005 and the work being done for the TUC Subarea Plan as well as Sound Transit's Tukwila Station project. The funds have already been obligated and are available for expenditure. The grant funds are not adequate to fully design the project but they are enough to do what is called a "Type, Size, and Location" report. This TS &L report is required of any bridge project and is the first step in designing the right bridge. Additional funds from the TOD grant are being made available for this project to ensure that planning and preliminary design work is done to connect the TOD area, and specifically the Tukwila Station project, with the Pedestrian Bridge and the rest of the TUC area. ANALYSIS In November 2006, four consultant teams were interviewed in a competitive process. The teams interviewed were KPFF, Arai Jackson, HNTB, and ABKJ. The review panel was Cyndy Knighton, Senior Engineer; Robin Tischmak, Senior Engineer; Jill Mosqueda, Development Engineer; and Lynn Miranda, Senior Planner. The four consultant teams were scored by the selection panel and the panel consistently ranked the KPFF team as the top choice. Reference checks were performed with no negative feedback. Since then, staff and consultant have been negotiating the scope and fee. The fee amount is in excess of the $200,000 grant funds and the additional monies will be transferred from the TOD grant. The actual contract is not attached to this memorandum. It is the standard WSDOT LAG Manual contract form and is quite lengthy. Only the scope and fee is included at this time as it is most pertinent. RECOMMENDATION (p: cyndy\pedestrian bridge\information memo consultant selection 6- 7.07.doe) INFORMATION MEMO Attachment III.B. Approve the selection of KPFF as the design team and forward the contract for $239,756,82 to Council for approval. 1 1 12 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Exhibit A -1 Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Type, Size And Location (TSL) Bridge Report The Green River stands as a barrier between the City's urban center and the transportation hub of the Sounder Commuter Rail /Amtrak Station. This project is a preliminary step in defining the pedestrian corridor connecting these commuter hubs. This project shall determine the type of structure and its location for crossing the Green River. The bridge is to be a signature piece of the corridor and along with the associated trail provide a direct, safe and enjoyable walking experience. PROJECT OBJECTIVES The overall objective of this project is to develop a connection from the intersection of Baker Boulevard and Christensen Road to the Sound Transit property line of the Sounder Commuter Rail /Amtrak Station. This project will take place in three phases, which include the following: o Type, Size and Location (TSL) Phase o Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimate (PSE) Phase o Construction Management Phase This scope of work shall be for the TSL Phase, which includes surveying, bridge type and size, project aesthetics, civil and structural engineering, trail alignment studies and definition of permitting requirements to enable the bridge TSL to be determined. During and /or at the conclusion of the TSL Phase, the City of Tukwila can exercise the option to supplement KPFF's contract to include the following tasks: PSE Phase o Completion of 30 60 90% and final plans o Contract Specifications o Cost Estimate o Permitting Construction Management Phase Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge TSL Bridge Report Page 2 PROJECT TEAM The project team is made up of the following firms: Owner Prime Consultant Structural Engineering Civil Engineering Urban Planning Surveying Bridge Architecture Environmental Services Geotechnical Engineering SCOPE OF WORK The following is a scope of work for the TSL phase of the project. In addition to the basic scope of services, the Consultant has included additional services that can be performed at the City's request. TASK No. 1.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION Task No. 1.01 Project Schedule City of Tukwila KPFF Consulting Engineers KPFF Consulting Engineers KPFF Consulting Engineers KPG Inc. KPG Inc. LMN Architects Landau Associates Landau Associates A project design schedule shall be created in Microsoft Project that spans from the notice -to- proceed to the completion of the TSL documents. The schedule shall be updated on a monthly basis. Task No. 1.02 Subconsultant Agreements KPFF shall prepare subconsultant contracts for KPG, Inc., Landau Associates, and LMN Architects. Task No. 1.03 Progress Reports A progress report form shall be provided to each subconsultant. This form shall be filled out on a monthly basis and submitted with the invoice for the work described in the progress report. KPFF shall then compile the reports into a single document to be submitted to the City with the associated monthly invoice. Task No. 1.04 Invoices Subconsultants are to prepare monthly invoices for work completed. KPFF shall compile the invoices into a single document to be submitted to the City. Task No. 1.05 Team Meetings The project team shall meet to discuss project issues, schedule, progress, and general coordination of effort as needed. 13 14 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge TSL Bridge Report Page 3 Deliverables Project work plan Project schedule with monthly updates Monthly progress reports and invoices Team meetings Participation in project meetings (Task No. 10 11) Participation in one additional project meeting to be determined TASK 2.0 DESIGN CRITERIA DOCUMENT KPFF shall prepare the design criteria based on contributions from the project team: Minimum bridge /trail widths. Horizontal geometry constraints (including minimum radii for curves) and allowable design speeds for bicycles. Maximum allowable vertical grades and rates of curvature for both bridge structures and for access ramps. Emergency access requirements. Minimum lighting requirements. Green River hydraulic opening requirements. Requirements for stormwater detention and water quality. Construction criteria within 100 -year flood plain. Utility clearance requirements. Structural loading conditions. Allowable structural deflections and vibrations. Physical /aesthetic impacts on adjacent uses, Coordination with potential future vehicular bridge in similar area. Deliverables Draft Design Criteria Document Final Design Criteria Document Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge TSL Bridge Report Page 4 TASK 3.0 TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY KPG shall provide the field survey and mapping necessary to prepare a project base map. Anticipated tasks for the project are summarized below: Task No. 3.01 Aerial Basemap for Identifying Alternatives KPG shall create aerial basemaps for identifying viable alternatives. These basemaps will include City of Tukwila GIS information and King County parcel information. The project area will include Andover Park East (west boundary), BNSF /East City limit line (east boundary), Longacres Way (north boundary) and Strander Boulevard (south boundary). Task No. 3.02 Field Surveying Services KPG shall perform topographic surveying within the entire project corridor, which is defined as Andover Park East (west boundary) to the BNSF /East City limit line (east boundary). Horizontal and vertical control shall be established that is necessary for the boundary and topographic survey of the site. The survey for the defined project corridor shall include all areas required for future pathway connections and bridge location. All field topographic surveying shall be performed to achieve 1 -foot contour interval accuracy, and shall include location of existing 6 inches plus caliper trees, streets, curb and gutter, limits of paving, fences, above- and below ground utilities, drainage features, existing shrub and lawn areas, and existing improvements within the defined project corridor. A separate cost for private utility locating services has been included that assumes 16 hours of underground utility sensing and locating. The field survey includes surveying the banks of the Green River from 50 feet upstream to 50 feet downstream. The river survey shall include top of bank on both sides of the river and cross sections from top of bank to top of water at 25 -foot intervals. Indicate limits of 100 -year flood plain, ordinary high waterline (OHWL) flagged in advance on the bank by Landau Associates. The survey crew shall use City provided Horizontal and Vertical control in the project vicinity and all surveying and mapping shall be based on City Horizontal and Vertical Datum. Task No. 3.03 CAD Base Mapping Services A base map at a scale to be selected by the project engineer shall be developed detailing the items located in the above described field survey. The map shall include positions of record and surveyed boundaries, as well as deeded and platted right -of -way margins for the project area. 15 /6 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge TSL Bridge Report Page 5 It is proposes to use KPG's existing layer standards and point codes for the survey. Once drafted, field verified, and certified, KPG shall provide the project engineer with two Xerox Bond copies of the topographic survey and one digital copy of project survey files (AutoCAD, point files, field notes). Any as -built information gathered during our research shall also be copied and submitted to the engineer with the topographic mapping package. The deliverable submittal package shall include detailed descriptions of point code and layering schema. Task No. 3.04 Project Management and Quality Control KPG has included time and expense for project meetings, management of surveying and drafting efforts, professional review and quality control in our proposal. Deliverables Aerial Project base map (two hardcopies, one electronic copy) Survey Corridor Project base map TASK 4.0 GEOTECHNICAL RESEARCH AND RECOMMENDATIONS Landau Associates shall perform geotechnical engineering. The work is to review existing subsurface soil and groundwater information. The existing information shall be used to establish a basis for providing geotechnical engineering recommendations for the design and construction of the bridge and ramp facilities. If the existing information is inadequate to develop geotechnical recommendations subsurface exploration and laboratory testing can be performed as additional services per Task No. 4.02. The geotechnical work includes the following: Task No. 4.01 Review Available Geologic and Subsurface Information Review previous geotechnical studies, geologic maps, soil surveys, and other available geotechnical information regarding subsurface soil and groundwater conditions in the vicinity of the project. Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge TSL Bridge Report Page 6 Task No. 4.02 Subsurface Explorations and Laboratory Testing Subsurface exploration or testing will by performed as an additional services if requested by the City. If existing information is not adequate for establishing geotechnical parameters and recommendations, field exploration can be performed as an additional service. Landau Associates would complete a boring to a maximum depth of 100 ft below the existing ground surface to characterize soil and groundwater conditions at the proposed bridge locations. The boring will be drilled on the west side of the Green River on the existing trail using a truck mounted drill rig and the mud rotary method. Disturbed and relatively undisturbed soil samples will be obtained from the boring on a 21/2 or 5 ft depth interval. A representative of Landau Associates will mark the exploration location in the field and complete an underground utility locate "Call Before You Dig prior to the start of work. Where underground utilities conflict with proposed exploration location, the exploration will be relocated and a recheck of utilities will be conducted. We will prepare and submit a work plan for review by the City to handle safety issues on the trail during the subsurface investigation. Assumptions: All drilling subcontractors, equipment subcontractors, laboratories, traffic control personnel and other related subcontractor personnel will be selected, hired and paid by the Consultant. Cuttings from the boring will be placed in drums and disposed of at an off site location by the drilling subcontractor. Soil sampling will be in accordance with ASTM D1586 (Standard Penetration Test procedure), ASTM D3550 (Ring -lined Barrel Sampling of Soil), and ASTM 1587 (Thin Walled Tube Sampling of Soil). Concrete pavement coring is not included in our budget. The location and elevation of the boring will not be surveyed as part of this task. A drawing showing the approximate location of the boring will be provided to KPFF so that the survey crews may pick up the location. The boring is located in a paved area and will be patched with concrete. Budget for analytical testing of suspected contaminated soil samples, or disposal of potentially contaminated soil encountered during drilling, is not included in this task. Field exploration will be performed during the daylight hours. Soil samples will be disposed of 90 days after the date of the final report. Laboratory testing will be accomplished to help determine soil classification and pertinent engineering properties of soil. We have budgeted for 15 index tests (dry unit weight, grain -size, Atterberg limit) and 5 moisture content determinations on selected samples from the borings. 18 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge TSL Bridge Report Page 7 Task No. 4.03 Provide Geotechnical Design Recommendations The following recommendations are made from interpreting existing data only. Deliverables Describe anticipated site conditions based on available data and conditions observed in the boring. A geologic description of the area shall be provided based on published information and experience in the area. Provide recommendations for earthwork and site preparation including suitability of on -site soils for reuse in ramp fills, placement and compaction of structural fill, and mitigation of unsuitable soil conditions. Provide recommendations for retaining walls for the ramp fills, including MSE walls, conventional concrete walls, geotextile walls, and others as appropriate. This shall include anticipated allowable earth pressures, soil friction, and footing support. Evaluate the stability of the riverbanks and provide recommended stabilization measures, if necessary. Evaluate estimated settlement of ramp fills and recommend mitigation measures, as appropriate. Conceptual and feasible foundation types for the substructure of the new bridge. Geotechnical design criteria for the bridge, including seismic design requirements and liquefaction hazard analysis (if applicable). Constructability issues and concerns. Draft Geotechnical Technical Memorandum (six hardcopies, one electronic copy) Final Geotechnical Technical Memorandum (six hardcopies, one electronic copy) Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge TSL Bridge Report Page 8 TASK 5.0 HYDRAULICS The Corps of Engineers (COE) has recertified the Green River Levee. The recertification is only for the west bank, so the 100 -year flood plain on the east side will be estimated. The following is proposed for the hydraulic evaluation: Task No. 5.01 Meet with Agencies Meet with the Corps of Engineers and King County Surface Water Management to obtain the best understanding of the ongoing studies and work along Green River. Task No. 5.02 Establish 100 -year Floodplain Based on existing COE data of the Green River, establish the current elevation of the 100 -year floodplain. Task No. 5.03 Establish Structural Clearance Create a reasonably conservative margin above the floodplain level for all bridge foundations. Deliverables Draft Hydraulic Technical Memorandum (six hardcopies, one electronic copy) Final Hydraulic Technical Memorandum (six hardcopies, one electronic copy) TASK 6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Landau shall determine the required project permits, and document the processes and timelines required for the anticipated permits. Landau shall also estimate the boundaries of wetlands and shorelines on the project area and identify key environmental issues. The project area will include Andover Park East (west boundary), BNSF /East City limit line (east boundary), East Longacres Way (north boundary), and Strander Boulevard (south boundary). This work shall include the following: Task No. 6.01 Data Collection Collect available public domain information concerning wetlands, shorelines, existing habitat data, soils surveys, species distribution data, and other pertinent biological and historical /archeological information. Task No. 6.02 Site Reconnaissance Conduct a site reconnaissance to gain more specific understanding of the physical and biological attributes of the project area. This reconnaissance shall be used to better define the environmental permitting. 1 9 20 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge TSL Bridge Report Page 9 Task No. 6.03 Species, Habitat and Cultural /Historical Information Obtain current species and habitat information from National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) Priority Habitats and Species database, and Washington Department of Natural Resources Heritage Data. Obtain list of known cultural /historic sites from the State of Washington Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP). Review the City's draft Shoreline Inventory and draft Shoreline Restoration Plan. Task No. 6.04 Wetlands, Fish and Wildlife Habitat, Cultural /Historic Resources Landau shall estimate the location of wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat, salmon restoration sites, and cultural /historic resources in the project area using the information from Tasks 6.01, 6.02, and 6.03. Task No. 6.05 Environmental Permits and Environmental Documentation Landau shall identify the permits and environmental documentation that is anticipated for this project. A schedule for obtaining the identified permits and completing the environmental documents shall be created. Opportunities to avoid impacts and /or minimize impacts shall be evaluated during interaction with the project team. A range of alternatives pursuant to and in the context of NEPA and SEPA shall be developed along with their associated costs. Deliverables Draft Environmental Technical Memorandum (six hardcopies, one electronic copy) Final Environmental Technical Memorandum (six hardcopies, one electronic copy) Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge TSL Bridge Report Page 10 TASK 7.0 PROJECT WORKSHOPS Task No. 7.01 Workshop No. 1 Identify Two to Three Viable Alternatives KPFF with the assistance of the subconsultants shall hold a four -hour workshop with City of Tukwila staff to discuss the trail alignment and bridge alternatives. In preparation for the workshop, the following items will be addressed: Bridge aesthetics options Structural alternatives Corridor alignment alternatives Urban design themes Aerial basemap Permit requirements search Basis of design documentation Geotechnical memorandum The topics for discussion during the workshop will include available right -of -way, pedestrian and bicyclist experiences, construction costs, City property lines, adjacent property lines, environmental considerations including wetlands, riparian habitat, flood plains, topography, and trail geometrical constraints. A summary of the workshop discussions shall be documented in the TSL report. The goal of Workshop No. 1 is the selection of two to three bridge types and trail alignments. These alternatives shall be further refined prior to Workshop No. 2. Task No. 7.02 Workshop No. 2 Public Involvement A public open house or one -on -one contacts will be used to provide project information to and solicited input from affected property owners and the general public. The project consultants will work with the City to develop the open house or one -on -one contact format and materials. Task No. 7.03 Workshop No. 3 Select Preferred Alternative A third workshop shall be held with City staff to examine the cost/benefit of the alternative designs. Trail alignments and bridge types shall be examined to determine the best combination of alignment and type of structure. Drawings and schematic renderings shall be prepared to assist in visualizing the various options. Evaluation matrices shall be examined that rate the alternatives against the project goals. z/ 2 2 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge TSL Bridge Report Page 11 The end of Workshop No. 3 should leave the City with a reasonable idea of the preferred alternative. The preferred alternative shall then be incorporated into the TSL Report. Deliverables Workshop materials Workshop meeting minutes (six hardcopies, one electronic copy) Attending 3 workshops TASK 8.0 CIVIL ENGINEERING KPFF shall perform the civil engineering support work necessary to complete the Design Criteria and TSL Report. Task No. 8.01 Support for Pedestrian Trail Route Assessment This work consists of assisting with the assessment and evaluation of the pedestrian trail alignment concepts, including participation in the project meetings described in Task No. 10 and 11. Task No. 8.02 General Plans and Profiles The Civil portion of the TSL report shall layout the preferred concept alignment including general plan and profile of the bridge and street connection. Profile shall be generated from terrain model information provided within Task 3. Drawings will show essential clearances. Written descriptions of the alignment and associated benefits and complications shall be integrated into the TSL Report. Task No. 8.03 Concept Utility Relocation Plans The Civil portion of the TSL report shall document the preferred concept alignment and shall include concept utility relocation plans for all utilities shown and identified within Task 3. Task No. 8.04 Earthwork Assessment The Civil work includes identifying all volumetric changes within the floodplain based upon the preferred concept alignment. Cut and Fill boundaries will be shown on the General Plan and Profiles, and Typical Sections will be shown on a separate plan. Task No. 8.05 Stormwater Improvements The Civil work includes identifying concept conveyance, treatment, and detention systems for stormwater that would need to be constructed based upon the preferred concept alignment. Stormwater facilities will be designed in accordance with the current City guidelines. Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge TSL Bridge Report Page 12 Task No. 8.06 Cost Estimate The Civil work includes identifying quantities of proposed civil road and site work, and assessing costs for said work for the preferred concept alignment. Costs shall include other associated items such as administration, design and construction management. Deliverables Participation in project meetings (Task No. 10 11) Civil sections of the TSL Report Stormwater conveyance and treatment concepts Cost Estimate for civil components of preferred alternative Assumptions Traffic and Accident Data for SR 181 (West Valley Highway) and Christensen Road will be provided by others. TASK 9.0 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING KPFF shall perform the structural engineering work. Task No. 9.01 Bridge Alternative Analysis Once the trail alignment has been determined, the bridge alternatives shall be developed. The member types and sizes shall be determined for discussion in the workshops and inclusion in the TSL report. Conceptual level structural analysis shall establish the member types and depth, railing types, types of foundations, abutment types and sizes, depths of footings and estimated numbers of piles (if piles are required). This work will be done in coordination with the work done under Task 10. Task No. 9.02 Bridge Cost Analysis Cost Estimate: Program costs including administration, design and construction costs shall be estimated for the proposed structures. Funding Sources: As part of the bridge alternative analysis KPFF will assist the City in completing the documentation necessary for seeking additional funding. Task No. 9.03 Bridge Conceptual Drawings Conceptual plan drawings shall show the plan, elevation and typical section for each bridge alternative. The drawings will be supplemented as necessary to define any unique features being implemented. 23 24 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge TSL Bridge Report Page 13 Task No. 9.04 Bridge Sections for TSL Report The criteria, constraints and procedures used in determining the structural alternatives will be included in the bridge sections of the TSL Report. Advantages and disadvantages will be outlined for each alternative including cost and constructability. Deliverables Bridge type alternatives Participation in project meetings (Task No. 10 11) Structural sections of the TSL Report Bridge TSL drawings Cost estimate for structural components TASK 10.0 BRIDGE AESTHETICS COLLABORATION LMN will be providing architectural collaboration through the project alternative analysis. They will assist in creating conceptual bridge forms. LMN along with KPFF will prepare computer generated renderings and /or hand drawings of a maximum of three preferred aesthetic design concepts. A four -hour bridge aesthetic meeting will be held to develop aesthetic design concepts to be presented in Workshop No.1. These early conceptual designs will be used to show the range of options and also stimulate ideas and discussion during the initial workshop. LMN shall create larger scale and more refined renderings of the project alternatives being moved forward from Workshop No.1. These drawings will then be used during Workshop No. 2 to inform the public of the alternatives being considered and during Workshop No. 3 to assist in the preferred alternative selection. After the preferred alternative is selected, LMN will create final renderings and one physical model. LMN as an additional service to the City can produce renderings for more than the three prescribed alternatives and can construct physical models for project alternatives in addition to the preferred alternative. Deliverables Bridge altemative renderings (Assume 3 bridge renderings) Physical model of preferred bridge alternative Participation in project meetings (Task No. 10 11) Participation in Workshop #1 and #3 (Task No. 7.01 7.03) Architectural treatments Cost estimate for architectural treatments Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge TSL Bridge Report Page 14 TASK 11.0 —URBAN DESIGN AND WAYFINDING KPG shall perform the work integrating this project with the Tukwila Urban Center vision. KPG shall lead the urban design and trail alignment options through the project alternative analysis. Urban design and trail alignment alternatives shall include the following components: Bridge Approaches Wayfinding Trail Alignment Alternatives Landscape Identify Pathway (Tukwila Urban Center) Character Pedestrian Safety Assist with Pathway Design Parameters Identify adjacent roadway crossings at West Valley Highway and Christensen A four -hour corridor project meeting will be held to develop conceptual ideas for the urban design to be presented in Workshop No.1. These early conceptual designs will be used to show the range of options and also stimulate ideas and discussion during the initial workshop. Deliverables Alternative trail alignment renderings Draft Technical Memorandum on evaluation of concept alignments Final Technical Memorandum on evaluation of concept alignments Participation in project meetings (Task No. 10 11) Participation in Workshop #1 and #3 (Task No. 7.01 7.03) Pathway sections Urban design construction materials Cost estimate for trail alignment alternatives 25 26 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge TSL Bridge Report Page 15 TASK 12.0 TYPE, SIZE AND LOCATION (TSL) REPORT The TSL report shall describe the project, the proposed structure, and give reasons why the bridge type, size, and location were selected. The report shall include the following items: Cover, Title Sheet, and Index Executive Summary Introduction Project Description Design Criteria Conceptual Studies o Aesthetics o Site constraints o Regulatory constraints o Construction requirements o Foundations o Hydraulics o Urban design o Structure types o Approach styles o Maintenance Project alternatives Cost estimates Appendices o Photographs o Workshop Meeting Minutes o Technical Memorandums Deliverables Draft TSL Report (six hardcopies, one electronic copy) Final TSL Report (six hardcopies, one electronic copy) Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge TSL Bridge Report Page 16 SCHEDULE It is anticipated that this proposed work should be completed by March 31, 2008. ASSUMPTIONS The scope of work for obtaining permits, right -of -way acquisition, right -of -way plans, environmental assessment, and construction document preparation shall be proposed and negotiated after the TSL phase of work is complete. The City of Tukwila shall provide the following: o AU support files including aerial contours, mapping, photography, and any GIS information that is available for this project site. o Current City Standard Plans. TASK 13.0 PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS (PSE) PHASE The PSE Phase shall take the preferred alternative selected in the TSL Study through final design and construction documentation. The PSE Phase will include the completion of the design calculations, contract plans, contract specification and the engineer's estimated construction costs. The scope and fee for this task will be determined at a later date. TASK 14.0 GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS This task will include the completion of all field exploration and laboratory testing needed to finalize the geotechnical recommendations for the project. Tasks are expected to include field borings, laboratory testing, and foundation type recommendations. The scope and fee for this task will be determined at a later date. TASK 15.0 HYDRAULIC AND SCOUR ANALYSIS This task shall cover the investigation of the hydraulics and scour associated with constructing a bridge over the Green River. This study involves performing a hydraulic analysis, determining the bridge hydraulic opening, calculating scour depths, evaluating abutment and bank protection measures, and preparing documentation to meet the needs and requirements of the project. The scope and fee for this task will be determined at a later date. TASK 16.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Environmental services will include the finalization of the list of permits required for the project and the completion of these permits. The scope and fee for this task will be determined at a later date. 27 28 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge TSL Bridge Report Page 17 TASK 17.0 RIGHT -OF-WAY SERVICES This task will include the preparation of right -of -way plans and legal descriptions. It is assumed at this time that the City would determine property values and conduct land acquisition negotiations, as necessary. The scope and fee for this task will be determined at a later date. TASK 18.0 LAND SURVEYING The survey will include locations of utilities, surface features, drainage corridors, and roadway and bridge features. The survey will also include locating test pits and borings and any wetland delineations. The scope and fee for this task will be determined at a later date. TASK 19.0 CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES The project team can provide construction support to the City as the project design is completed and the project goes to advertisement and then construction. Tasks could include attending preconstruction meetings, answering contractors' requests for information (RFI), submittal review and site visits. The scope and fee for this task will be determined at a later date. Exhibit E -1 Consultant Fee Determination Summary Sheet (Lump Sum, Cost Plus Fixed Fee, Cost Per Unit of Work) Project: Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge Type, Size And Location (TSL) Bridge Report Direct Salary Cost (DSC): Classification Man Hours Rate Cost Principal 72.0 X 56.00 4,032.00 Project Manager 232.0 X 50.00 11,600.00 Senior Engineer II 392.0 X 47.00 18,424.00 Design Engineer II 184.0 X 35.00 6,440.00 Project Coordinator 12.0 X 30.00 360.00 CAD Drafter 272.0 X 30.00 8,160.00 Administration 11.0 X 20.00 220.00 X X Total DSC 49,236.00 Overhead (OH Cost including Salary Additives): OH Rate x DSC of 1.2827 x 49,236.00 63,155.02 Fixed Fee (FF): FF Rate x DSC of 0.30 x 49,236.00 14,770.80 Reimbursables: Itemized 500.00 Subconsultant Costs (See Exhibit G): 112,095.00 Grand Total 239,756.82 Prepared By: KPFF Date: June 5, 2007 DOT Form 140 -089 EF Exhibit E -1 Revised 6/05 2cf 30 Exhibit G -1 Subconsultant Fee Determination Summary Sheet Project: Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge Type, Size And Location (TSL) Bridge Report Direct Salary Cost (DSC): Classification Man Hours Rate Cost Senior Designer 51.0 X 60.10 3,065.10 Project Surveyor 4.0 X 43.75 175.00 Designer Surveyor 183.0 X 38.46 7,038.18 2 Man Survey Crew 40.0 X 67.30 2,692.00 Technician 210.0 X 19.23 4,038.30 X X X X Total DSC 17,008.58 Overhead (OH Cost including Salary Additives): OH Rate x DSC of 1.5677 x 17,008.58 26,664.35 Fixed Fee (FF): FF Rate x DSC of 0.35 x 17,008.58 5,953.00 Reimbursables: Itemized 1,940.00 Grand Total 51,565.93 Prepared By: KPG Date: June 5, 2007 DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit G -1 Revised 6/05 Exhibit G -1 Subconsultant Fee Determination Summary Sheet Project: Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge Type, Size And Location (TSL) Bridge Report Direct Salary Cost (DSC): Classification Man Hours Rate Cost Senior Associate 18.0 X 48.00 864.00 Senior Project 36.0 X 32.00 1,152.00 Project 66.0 X 27.00 1,782.00 Assistant 20.0 X 18.00 360.00 CAD 10.0 X 26.00 260.00 Project Coordinator 13.0 X 22.00 286.00 X X X Total DSC 4,704.00 Overhead (OH Cost including Salary Additives): OH Rate x DSC of 2.1113 x 4,704.00 9,931.56 Fixed Fee (FF): FF Rate x DSC of 0.30 x 4,704.00 1,411.20 Reimbursables: Itemized 800.00 Grand Total Prepared By: Landau Associates Date: June 5, 2007 DOT Form 140 -089 EF Exhibit G -1 Revised 6/05 16,846.76 3/ 32 Fixed Fee (FF): FF Rate x DSC of Reimbursables: Itemized Exhibit G -1 Subconsultant Fee Determination Summary Sheet Project: Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge Type, Size And Location (TSL) Bridge Report Direct Salary Cost (DSC): Classification Man Hours Rate Cost Partner 21.0 X 258.77 5,434.17 Project Manager 31.0 X 122.92 3,810.52 Project Designer 55.0 X 116.45 6,404.75 Project Architect 134.0 X 103.51 13,870.34 Intern 200.0 X 61.46 12,292.00 Administration 12.0 X 80.87 970.44 X X X Overhead (OH Cost including Salary Additives): OH Rate x DSC of Total DSC 42,782.22 x 42,782.22 x 42,782.22 Grand Total Prepared By: LMN Architects Date: June 5, 2007 DOT Form 140 -069 EF Exhibit G -1 Revised 6/05 0.00 0.00 900.00 43,682.22