Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCAP 2007-07-10 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET Distribution: V. Jessop J �`t~I L A wq City of Tukwila P. Carter S. Kerslake V. Griffin G. Labanara Community Affairs and P. Linder K. Matej gG) D. Robertson M. Miotke Parks Committee Mayor Mullet C. O'Flaherty R. Berry J. Pace Pam Linder, Chair E. Boykan D. Speck 1908 J. Cantu R. Still Pam Carter B. Fletcher CC File (cover) Dennis Robertson K. Fuhrer AGENDA Tuesday, July 10, 2007 Conference Room #3; 5 PM ITEM I ACTION TO BE TAKEN Page 1. PRESENTATION(S) 2. BUSINESS AGENDA Reinvesting in Youth; Information only. Pg. 1 Evelyn Boykan, Human Services Manager 3. ANNOUNCEMENTS 4. MISCELLANEOUS Next Scheduled Meeting: Tuesday, .Iu /y 24, 2007 The City of Tukwila strives to accommodate those with disabilities. Please contact the City Clerk's Office at 206 433 -1800 for assistance. DATE: 7/10/07 TO: TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL CC: MAYOR'S OFFICE FROM: EVIE BOYK.\AN SERVICES SUBJECT: REINVESTING IN YOUTH REQUEST ISSUE and BACKGROUND ANALYSIS and RECOMMENDATION M E M O R A N D U M Recently, the Mayor received a request from Jim Street regarding a partnership with Reinvesting In Youth. Over the past five years, Tukwila, as well as other suburban cities, has contributed to the administrative cost of this project which was aimed on keeping youth out of the criminal justice system. Funding provided technical assistance to community based agencies to help address youth at risk. While some valuable training was delivered, the outcomes of the particular approaches to working with at risk youth are unclear and inconclusive. At this time Jim seeks continued administrative support funding for a new initiative aimed at reducing dropouts in King County. Jim seeks $5,000 for the 2008 budget. This new initiative will be addressed at state level policy changes and partnerships between Reinvesting In Youth(RIY) and local school jurisdictions. Currently, local jurisdictions are not involved in this project, although several district superintendents are reported to serve on RIY's steering committee. There is no involvement from the Tukwila school district. At this time, the Human Services Division is not recommending funding for RIY. The following addresses a few concerns. These concerns are also shared by other South King County Human Service planners and managers. Prior support to RIY made by the City has not yielded much information to the City with the exception of quarterly reports. These reports, while showing the leveraging ability of our dollars, has not shown any clear cut outcomes regarding youth that have received RIY approved therapeutic, best practice interventions. ME1ifORANDUM 2 The City of Tub;vila already provides extensive financial support to children and youth in the Tukwila School district. This includes significant support for the TCSC program, and the integration of human services (mental health, substance abuse intervention, esl/literacy) into the schools. \(le believe that early intervention and identification can contribute to youth staying in school. City funding strategies support this. Jim is clearly aware that the cities have processes for distributing human service targeted dollars. A RIY funding request should be consistent with city processes. FundLl1g proposals will take place in 2008 for the years 2009 and 2010. Jim is '.velcome to apply at that time, where the proposal can be viewed by the full Human Services Advisory Board. There are no drafted cooperative agreements with South King County school districts. Upon raising this issue with Ken Heikkila, the former Student Services Director, there '.vas concern raised about unfunded mandates coming from the State with regards to dropout prevention. This effort needs to have involvement from local school districts to test out any proposed changes in approaches to dropout prevention. Tukwila need not be subsidizing other districts for this purpose given our on-going commitment to the Tukwila School District. ~t.\NVESTING IN YOUTIt A Regional Partnership June 12,2007 Mayor Steven Mullet City of Tukwila Dear Mayor Mullet, Our children belong to all of us. That is why over the past five years 13 suburban cities (including Tukwila) plus the City of Seattle, King County and the Port of Seattle have contributed to the administrative costs of Reinvesting in Youth, an incredibly successful regional juvenile justice reform project that has focused on the needs of our highest risk youth and families. Suburban city contributions have been modest, ranging from $1,500 to $10,000 per city in proportion roughly to population and tax base, but along with larger contributions from Seattle and the county, they have directly leveraged over $2.5 million from Gates and Allen and six other national and local foundations. I can assure you that the eyes of foundation representatives light up when I tell them that 16 local governments have been contributing to the success of Reinvesting in Youth. It is unprecedented. These dollars have been used to fund expanded services for youth and families involved in the juvenile justice system and to provide over $1 million in technical assistance to 21 community based agencies throughout King County to strengthen their capacity to serve youth at risk of criminal behavior. Our joint efforts have also led directly to passage and funding in 2006-07 ofthe "Reinvesting in Youth" bill in Olympia, which is bringing $3 million in new state funds to King County (and $15 million to the state as a whole) over the next 5 years. These funds replace the foundation dollars and permit the continuation of programs that recognize that it is more cost effective to invest dollars in evidence based prevention than to keep on adding dollars for incarceration. This would not have been possible if local government leaders in King County had failed to realize that their involvement in youth services needs to occur at two levels. The first, more traditional city role is to support specific youth activities and services in their local communities. The second role is to join with other public and private partners in the region to support systemic reforms that can only be addressed regionally or through changes in state policy. This second role does not necessarily fit into cities' usual human service funding mechanisms that tend to be earmarked for local community based agencies. Instead cities have made a separate general fund appropriation or taken the dollars from their public safety budgets. In its first five years Reinvesting in Youth accomplished much of what it set out to do in the area of juvenile justice, and its proven record has established credibility with foundations, the legislature and local leaders. Over the past year its Steering Committee under the leadership of Norm Maleng has been taking a hard look at where it might most effectively apply its efforts upstream from juvenile justice. That analysis led Reinvesting in Youth to focus on the chronic problem of school dropouts- what the Gates Foundation recently described as "the Silent Epidemic." 70 percent of our nation's adult prisoners are school dropouts. Approximately 60% of the youth in King County juvenile detention are dropouts or lack sufficient credits to graduate. 25 percent of King county youth drop out of our schools. 40-50% of our African - American and Latino boys drop out. And the impact of dropping out goes way beyond crime in terms of the ability of a person to support his family and contribute to his community. Because of the changing nature of our economy the consequences of dropping out have worsened; a dropout earns 30 percent less in today's dollars than he or she did in 1970. These numbers represent a fundamental discrepancy between our American dream and our reality. In March Reinvesting in Youth consultants completed an in-depth study and a recommended comprehensive strategy to reduce dropouts in King County. Schools are part of the solution, but local governments and commul1ity organizations will also have a vital role. The comprehensive strategy calls for specific state level policy changes and for partnerships between Reinvesting in Youth and a number of school districts in King County as well as community based agencies. The administrative costs for Reinvesting in Youth for 2008 will be approximately $231,000. Seattle has already committed a third of that; King County is contributing a third of this year's costs and is expected to do the same next year. That means that we must raise $77,000 from suburban cities and other local government sources. Would you consider providing the leadership to include a contribution to Reinvesting in Youth of $5000 in your 2008 budget? I would welcome the opportunity to answer your questions personally and will be contacting your office in the next week with that in mind. City Councilmembers Terry Anderson (SeaTac), Jeanne Burbidge (Federal Way), Alan Kiest (Lake Forest Park), Conrad Lee (Bellevue), Tom Rasmussen (Seattle) and Ed Sterner (Lake Forest Park), all of whom are member of the RIY Steering Committee, are also available to answer any questions you have. Thank you for your help. Sincerely, Jim Street Director, Reinvesting in Youth 206-218-4740; streeti im@comcast.net CC. Rhonda Berry; Evy Boykan Attachments: 1.2 Page Summary of Reinvesting In Youth Dropout Project 2. RlY Steering Committee Membership 3. List of Local Government Contributions to RlY in 2006 tH-..lVESTING IN YOUr; ~ A Regional Partnership It Reinvestina in Youth Mission Reinvesting in Youth (RIY) seeks to increase the graduation rates of Native-American, Hispanic, African American and Limited English students in King County from 60% to 85% by 2014 and to increase for all students enrollment in post secondary education or jobs that pay a living wage. The Dropout Challenae in Kina County Almost 3,200 high school students dropped out of King County high schools in 2004-05. Approximately 25% of all youth and 45% of African-American, Native American and Latino boys fail to finish high school. Approximately 60% of the youth in King County juvenile detention are dropouts or lack sufficient credits to graduate. 70% of adult prisoners in the United States are high school dropouts. And dropouts who stay out of trouble and find work still only earn 70% of what a dropout did 35 years ago. These numbers measure enormous losses in the lives of dropouts, their families, their communities and our nation. Reinvestina in Youth's Comprehensive Strateay RIY has produced an in-depth study that reviews national research and best practice, assesses the dropout problem in King County and Washington State and provides comprehensive recommendations for a dropout strategy at state and local levels. Its principal components are: 1. School Districts and Classrooms > Strategy: Conduct internal audit of policies, systems, structures and programs to determine and make changes needed for alignment with best practices and state policies. > Strategy: Provide support to a cross section of 4-6 school districts in King County to develop and implement comprehensive plans to reduce. dropouts; provide district- wide system capacity building technical assistance, school based professional development, improved linkages to community and family support and early warning system development to identify and intervene with students showing signs of dropping out. > Strategy: Implement or enhance school improvement practices based on research or best practices to reduce the achievement gap, reduce dropouts and improve overall achievement. > Strategy: Support expansion of research based and recommended programs for dropout prevention, intervention and retrieval. 2. Community Proarams and Practices > Strategy: Provide research-based or recommended community and family focused programs for dropout prevention, intervention and retrieval. > Strategy: Strengthen coordination and collaboration between schools and community-based programs. > Strategy: Participate in the Building Bridges Program (formerly called PathNet) to develop a coordinated dropout retrieval program in King County. 3. State Policy Reform > Strategy: Set accountability standards for each population group for current official state goals for graduation rates; provide incentives to districts with greatest need to inspire commitment and change; require annual public reporting by state and districts; increase resources to meet accountability requirements. > Strategy: Increase the knowledge/skill at state level about effective approaches to reducing the achievement gap, reducing the dropout rate, reconnecting students who leave school, increasing the graduation rate, and increasing the rate of students involved in post-secondary education. > Strategy: Create and link student and teacher data through a comprehensive data system in support of student success; modify the current state student data system so that it can support integrated early warning systems at the district level. > Strategy: Maximize use of existing resources through realignment; create mechanisms to allow state basic and special education dollars to follow the students. Realign resources through pooled or blended funding. > Strategy: Demonstrate opportunity for cost-savings at various levels of systems (education, juvenile justice, criminal justice, etc.) and advocate for implementation of savings reinvestment mechanism. 4. Evaluation and Dissemination of Lessons Learned > Strategy: Provide formative data to guide adjustments and improve implementation of comprehensive strategy; > Strategy: Implement outcome I lessons learned evaluation after 3 to 5 years; share evaluation results to increase the field knowledge and increase capacity at all levels of the system. 5. Reinvesting in Youth as Multidisciplinary Catalvst > Strategy: Leverage the leadership of the Reinvesting in Youth Steering Committee; formulate the 'case' and engage leaders across systems (e.g. juvenile justice, human services, city, county) and at the state, regional and local levels; convene high-level leaders and seek aligned actions or coordination on issues of common interest. Reinvesting in Youth: A Successful Partnership The Reinvesting in Youth Steering Committee includes representatives from suburban cities, the City of Seattle, King County, United Way, the Casey Family Program, the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction, school districts, the State legislature and community based organizations. It has been chaired by King County Prosecutor Norm Maleng. RIY has worked successfully over the last five years to bring about juvenile justice system reform and to strengthen programs serving juvenile justice involved kids and families throughout King County. It has: > Obtained over $2.5 million in funding from 8 different foundations (including Gates, Allen and> Annie E. Casey) to support juvenile justice -prevention programs; > Provided technical assistance to strengthen the capacity of 21 community-based non-profits throughout King County to serve at risk youth; > Obtained the passage of state "Reinvesting in Youth" funding reform legislation that will bring $2.6 million in new state funding to King County youth programs over the next four years; > Strengthened regional collaboration and fostered systems integration Uuvenile justice, foster care, mental health and other youth services). [These juvenile justice activities will continue.] Conclusion Reinvesting in Youth is fundamentally different than the usual non-profit agency human services program. RIY's track record is evidence that support for this regional partnership will leverage much greater amounts of foundation and state dollars and will make possible essential system reforms at the state, regional and local level. It will contribute to dropout reduction in every city and school district in King County and across the state. For more information contact RIY Executive Director Jim Street, streetiim@comcast.net; (206) 218-4740. Reinvesting in Youth Steering Committee Membership 5/30/07 Terry Anderson - Councilmember! City of SeaTac Jeanne Burbidge - Mayor! City of Federal Way Alan Kiest - Lake Forest Park City Councilmember Conrad Lee - Bellevue City Council member Tom Rasmussen --Chair! Seattle City Council Housing! Health and Human Services Cmte. Ed Sterner - Representative! King County Community Networks Coalition Kathy Lambert -Member! King County Council Law, Safety and Human Services Cmte Janice Avery - Executive Director! Treehouse for Kids Robert Boruchowitz - Citizen Edith Elion - Representative! Minority Executive Directors' Coalition Mary Lou Dickerson - Chair! State House Juvenile Justice Committee Don Felder - Citizen Darlene Flynn - Member! Seattle School Board Bonnie Glenn - Deputy Chief of Staff! King County Prosecutor's Office Kathleen Harvey - Region Director! State Juvenile Rehabilitation Administration Program Ron Hertel - Supervisor! Readiness to Learn! Student Support and Operations! O.s.P.I. Mary Alice Heuschel - Superintendent! Renton School District Fred Jarrett - Member! State House of Representatives GiI Kerlikowske - Seattle Police Chief Bruce Knutson - Administrator! King County Juvenile Court Jeanne Kohl-Welles - Member, State Senate Human Services and Corrections Cmte Anne Lee - Executive Director! Team Child Lyman Legters - Casey Family Program Raj Manhas - Superintendent! Seattle School District Mick Moore - Asst. to the Super.! Interagency Relations! puget Sound Educ. Service Dist. Tom Murphy - Superintendent! Federal Way School District Greg Nickels - Mayor! City of Seattle David Okimoto - United Way of King County Kris Stadelman - Executive Director! Work Force Development Council Michael Silver - Dir. of Educ. Admin. Programs! School of Education! Seattle University Ron Sims - King County Executive Peter Tsai - Associate Director, Center for Career Alternatives Bryan Wilson - Assoc. DiL, Policy & Research! Workforce and Education Coordinating Bd. King County I City Support f R' .. Y h' 2006 b d or emvestmg m out s u Iget Auburn 3,110 Bellevue 10,000 Burien 5,125 Federal Way 5,000 Issaquah 3,000 Kent 5,000 King County 61,000 Lake Forest Park 1,500 Mercer Island 4,000 Port of Seattle 10,000 SeaTac 5,000 Seattle $122,000 Shoreline 2,000 Tukwila 5,000 Total $241,735 C:\DOCUME-l \Evie\LOCALS-l \Temp\XPGrp Wise\Tukwila 2008 Budget letter 6-12-07.doc