HomeMy WebLinkAboutTrans 2008-01-15 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET J lW City of Tukwila Distribution:
l.A, P. Linder S. Norris B. Arthur
D. Robertson Jon Harrison K. Fuhrer
\s y Transportation Committee D. Quinn N. Olivas S. Kerslake
r
15 Mayor Haggerton S. Anderson M. Miotkc
Q 0 J. Duffie P. Brodin J. Pace
i` Pam Linder, Chair V. Griffin B. Giberson C. Parrish
Dennis Robertson R. Berr F. K ra ig
IC Matej C. Knighton File Copy
i D. Speck G. Labanara 3 Extra Copies
De Sean Quinn
J. Cantu J. Morrow 4 to FTana
C. O'Flaherty R. Tischmak e- mairto B.Sax F
AGENDA
TUESDAY, JANUARY 15, 2008
Time; 5;00_ PM Place; Conference Room #1
I. Current Agenda Review I.
II. Presentation(s) II.
III. Business Agenda III•
A. Strander Boulevard Extension Interlocal A. Forward to COW 1/28/08 Pg. 1
Agreement with City of Renton
B. Ordinance adopting 2008 Standard Specifications B. Forward to COW 1/28/08 Pg. 17
C. Ordinance adopting WSDOT Access Permitting C. Forward to COW 1/28/08 Pg. 21
Standards for SR-181
D. Interurban Avenue Pavement Repair Bid Award D. Forward to COW 1/28/08 Pg. 27
E. South 144 St Improvements Contract E. Forward to Regular Consent Pg. 31
Acceptance and Closeout Agenda 1/22/08
F. 2008 Transportation Issues F. Discussion Pg. 33
IV. Old Business Future Agendas:
Next Scheduled Meeting: Tuesday, January 29, 2008
I The City of Tukwila strives to accommodate individuals with disabilities
Please contact the Public Works Department at 206- 433 -0179 for assistance.
To: Mayor Haggerton
From: Public Works Director
Date: January 9, 2008
Subject: Strander Boulevard Extension Proiect
Project No. 86 -RWO3
Interlocal Agreement with the City of Renton
ISSUE
Approve the Interlocal Agreement (ILA) with the City of Renton for the Strander Boulevard
Extension Project.
BACKGROUND
INFORMATION MEMO
In 1986, as part of a reciprocal annexation agreement, the Cities of Renton and Tukwila agreed
to cooperate with each other to ensure the construction of the Strander Boulevard /SW 27
Street Improvements and the SW 43 Street/South 180t Street Grade Separation Project.
Strander Boulevard currently extends from Southcenter Parkway on the west to SR 181 (West
Valley Highway) on the east. The project will extend Strander Boulevard across both the
Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) and Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad tracks,
across the Boeing Longacres site, and connect to existing SW 27t Street at Oakesdale Avenue.
The project as a whole includes the existing SW 27t Street in Renton all the way to East
Valley Highway, but this ILA between the two cities covers only the segment from West
Valley Highway (SR 181) and Oakesdale Ave.
The City of Renton has prepared a project definition report that selected an alternative for
construction. Subsequently, Renton contracted with Perteet Engineering to provide a 30%
design of the roadway and the associated railroad relocations and railroad bridges.
The City of Renton has invested $1,178,659 in the corridor to date and has a remaining 2007
budget of $870,312 to continue the 30% design work through the end of the year.
The City of Renton has been aggressively pursuing funding for Strander Boulevard. So far,
they have received federal grants of $5,690,563.00. The City of Renton has also negotiated
with Boeing to dedicate right -of -way needed for the project at a value of $2,500,000. The
Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board (FMSIB) has awarded $4,000,000 to the Strander
Boulevard Project for construction, pending future legislative funding (all project grants are
summarized in Attachment 1 to the ILA).
P:\PROJECTS\A- RW RS Projects\66nv03 strndr extNInfo Memo Renton ILA Strander Blvd.doc
Mayor Haggerton
Page 2
January 9, 2008
Traffic projections show that Strander Boulevard will carry 46,000 vehicles per day in the
year 2030 (with the direct HOV connection to SR 167), and 20,000 vehicles per day in 2015
(without the direct HOV connection to SR 167). The completion of the route will provide
significant traffic relief to S 180 Street and Grady Way, and will also relieve some traffic
from I-405.
The total project is estimated to cost approximately $52 million with $23 million for Phase I
and $29 million for the bridge construction. This includes the UPRR rail relocation and the
roadway /bridge from West Valley Highway to Oakesdale. The next phase of the work will be
the relocation of the UPRR tracks during 2008 -2010.
ANALYSIS
The City of Renton is requesting that the City of Tukwila commit City funding in the
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for
Strander Boulevard. Attached is the City of Tukwila 2008 -2013 CIP page for the Strander
Blvd Extension Project. It is anticipated that this action will strengthen grant funding requests
for the project.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the Interlocal Agreement with the City of Renton for the Strander Boulevard
Extension Project.
Attachments: Interlocal Agreement with the City of Renton
Attachment 1: Funding
Attachment 2: Vicinity/Phasing Map
2008 CIP Page Strander Blvd Extension Project
P: \PRO)ECTS\A- RW RS Projects \86rw03 stmdr ext\Info Memo Renton ILA Strander Blvd.doc
C \Temp\XPGrpWise \Tukwila Strander ILA 11.6- 07.doc
1. SCOPE OF WORK
BETWEEN THE CITY OF RENTON AND THE CITY OF TUKWILA
REGARDING
PARTICIPATION IN THE SW 27TH STREET/ STRANDER BLVD. EXTENSION PROJECT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between and the City of Renton,( "Renton")
and the City of Tukwila, "Tukwila This Agreement is made for the purpose of performing the
planning, design, acquisition of necessary property, and construction of improvements to the SW 27th
Street/Strander Blvd. Extension Project between West Valley Highway (SR -181) and Oakesdale Ave.
SW "Project
RECITALS
INTERLO CAL AGREEMENT
A. Part of the Project is within the City of Renton and part of the Project is within the City of
Tukwila.
B. The cities of Renton and Tukwila have both identified:`the need for extending Strander Blvd./
SW 27th Street to connect to Oakesdale AveniiE,,Soiith to provide an additional east/west
arterial connection between the cities.
C. It is in the best interest of Renton and Tukwila to establish a lead agency to manage this
Project and to provide for the design-environmental review, property acquisition and
construction of the Project. ~a
D. Renton and Tukwila are authorized; pursuant to RCW Chapter 39.34, to enter into an
interlocal government cooperative agreement of this nature.
NOW, THEREFORE, Renton and Tukwila agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
This Project will extend Strander Blvd./ SW 27th Street between West Valley Highway (SR -181) and
Oakesdale Ave. SW in order to provide a new east/west arterial connection between Renton and
Tukwila. This project will provide a link between Strander Boulevard and SW 27th Street, including
grade separated crossing of the UPRR and BNSF railroads and access to the Sound Transit
commuter rail station.
2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS
2.1 Renton shall be the lead agency for the Project with regard to design, environmental
review, obtaining right -of -way and other property, if needed, construction and all other
matters pertinent to accomplishment of the Project.
2.2 Renton shall be responsible for the advertisement and selection of engineering and other
design consultants as necessary for the completion of the engineering design.
2.3 Renton shall be responsible for coordinating the public information and involvement
effort in both Cities. Tukwila shall be given the opportunity to attend and participate in
any public meetings.
2.4 Renton shall provide to Tukwila the necessary-Permit applications for the construction of
that portion of the Project within Tukwila's jurisdiction.
C: \Temp\XPGrpWise \Tukwila Strander ILA 11- 6.07.doc
2.5 The parties to this Agreement shall aipbint`'a contact person or persons to act as haison
for the Project. These contact, persons will meet on an as needed" basis to provide
guidance for the Project and:;seive as a coordination body between the two agencies.
2.6 Renton will provide 70 and 65=percent plans and specifications to Tukwila for review.
Tukwila will provide written comments, if any, to Renton within the shortest time
possible (goal: 30 days or less) after Tukwila receives the plans and specifications.
2.7 Renton shall be responsible for the acquisition of all property necessary for the Project.
Tukwila agrees to cooperate in Renton's efforts to acquire property that lies within
Tukwila's portion of the Project area. Any eminent domain proceedings which are
instituted as a result of this agreement in either Renton's boundaries or Tukwila's
boundaries will be funded by the Project.
2.8 Tukwila hereby grants Renton right -of -entry into the incorporated limits of Tukwila for
the purpose of performing any and all tasks necessary to complete the Project.
2.9 The final acceptance of the Project design shall be by Renton after review by Tukwila.
3. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT BIDDING
3.1 Renton shall perform project planning, provide a project definition and prepare the
contract bid documents for the Project.
3.2 Renton shall advertise the contract in the official legal publication for the City of Renton
and, if necessary, other newspapers to provide the widest possible coverage
commensurate with the size of the Project.
3.3 Renton will provide to Tukwila a copy of the plans and specifications advertised for bid.
3.4 Renton will open the bids. Renton will notify Tukwila of the time and date of the opening
of the bids, which will be approximately five to six weeks after the Project is advertised.
Tukwila may, but need not, attend the opening of the bids.
3.5 Renton will tabulate the bids. Renton shall provide a dated, verified copy of the bid
4• a
tabulations to Tukwila. The bid tabulA ng"will identify the estimated construction,
inspection, and overhead cost, based)upon_.tle lowest responsible bid.
3.6 Renton shall award the cor;<tract'to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder for the total
Project, subject to applicdble laws and regulations.
4. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
4.1 Renton shall provide the necessary engineering, administrative, inspection, clerical and
other services necessary for the execution of the Project. In providing such services
within Tukwila, Renton's PlanningBuilding/Public AForks Administrator may exercise
all the powers and perform all the duties vested by law or ordinance in the City of
Tukwila Engineer or other Tukwila officer or department charged with street
administration.
4.2 Renton will at all times keep Tukwila advised as to the progress of the Project, and shall
not order or approve any changes in the approved Project design that substantially
change the nature of the Project within the limits of the City of Tukwila without first
consulting with and gaining the approval of Tukwila.
C: \Temp` XPGrpwise \Tukwila Strander 11.A 11.6.07.doc
4.3 Prior to Project completion, both parties shall perform a mutual final inspection of the
Project. Tukwila may provide a written deficiency list to Renton within ten working days
after the final inspection. The contractor will complete only construction deficiencies
that comply with the contract specifications. Final Project acceptance will be by Renton's
Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator.
5. OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE
5.1 Relocated water and sewer utilities in Tukwila currently owned and operated by Renton
will remain City of Renton facilities and Renton will assume ownership and maintenance
after final contract acceptance by the City of Renton.
5.2 The cities will own and maintain Project facilities within their respective political
boundaries after project acceptance. Accordingly, stormwater detention will be in
Tukwila's ownership and maintenance responsibility. Wetland mitigation will be m
Renton's ownership and maintenance responsibility. The new SW27 /Strander Blvd.
roadway will be owned and maintained ly. each city within its political boundaries.
6. COST SHARING Phase 1
C: \Temp\XPGrpwise \Tukwila Strander ILA 1I- 6- O7.doc
This section provides for the sharing of;cpsts by the two parties for the purpose of performing the
planning, design, appraisals, acquisition of`ecessary property, and construction of improvements to
the SW 27th Street/Strander Blvd. Extension Project between West Valley Highway (SR -181) and
Oakesdale Ave. SW.
The project as described above has two phases, shown in Attachment 2: Phase 1 includes all the
ROW, road construction, retention of a Longacres Way access through the railroad embankment, and
relocation of the UPRR tracks (including utility relocation); Phase 2 includes the construction of the
bridge itself (overcrossing), and access to the bridge including the main approaches.
It is anticipated that the parties will move ahead with Phase 1 with the costs shown in Attachment
1. Attachment 1 is illustrative in the sense that it includes some actual costs and grants and also
estimated future expenditures and potential additional grants. The final cost table would likely be
different than the attachment included in the agreement in 2007. The following applies to Phase 1:
6.1 For the purpose of this project, "local funding" shall mean the value of city funds
(including mitigation fees used for the project), construction of any part of the project by
other entities as part of mitigation requirements, city owned property, and present value
of ongoing and future operation and maintenance costs (including staff costs) for any
created wetlands and storm water facilities contributed to the project, exclusive of funds
contributed by grants, project funding partners, and costs of city staff, materials, and
equipment contributed to the project.
6.2 Tukwila and Renton agree to contribute 50% of the local funding needed to plan, design,
permit and build the portion of the Strander Blvd/SW 27th Street Extension
Transportation Improvement project between and including the intersections with West
Valley Highway and Oakesdale Ave. SW. Tukwila's contribution to the Strander
Blvd. /SW 27th Street project shall include a credit of $262,622, which is the difference
between Tukwila's contribution and Renton's contribution to the South 180th Street
Improvement project. In addition, Tukwila's contribution will include, as part of its local
share, the entire city owned property to the south of the future Strander Blvd/SW27th
Street. Bridge (approximately 5.5 acres). The value of this contribution will be
determined through a fair market value appraisal, which will be completed by December
31, 2007. Appraisals will also determine the'fair market values of the various properties
which involved in the securing of the neNir RR Right of Way. North of Longacres Way,
Tukwila will provide UPRR with the new right of way for the track relocation and receive
the vacated right of way from LIRR.R. South of Strander Blvd., Tukwila will convey the
necessary right of way to UPRR fbr the track relocation within the 5.5 acres owned by the
city and which are credited =_in full value toward Tukwila's cost share. All credit will be
applied to the project before any additional funds are required to be paid by Tukwila.
6.3 The parties agree to proceed on the basis of the projected revenues and expenditures
shown in Attachment 1. The parties agree that their maximum respective local share
will be $4.5 million each (including values of land). The parties must both agree to any
bid award for Phase I whereby the net local share for each exceeds the $4.5 million local
share projected in Attachment 1. Failure of a party to agree to a bid award that exceeds
the $4.5 million local share per party shall suspend the project until the parties are able
to secure more funding, or agree to a higher local share than $4.5 million.
6.4 The parties agree that no later than January, 2009, Tukwila will pay Renton an amount
of money which will achieve an even 50/50 split of all previous expenditures made by
Renton for the project as shown on Attachment 1.
C: \Temp\XPOrpWise\Tuka l Strander ILA 11- 6.07.doc
6.5 Subsequent to the physical completion of Phase 1 of the project, Renton and Tukwila will
review the amount of local funding each party has applied to the project and determine
final, reconciled local funding numbers. Renton and Tukwila shall share these numbers,
along with backup proof or substantiation of these numbers as requested by the other city.
6.6 In addition to the foregoing funding to be provided to the Project by Tukwila, Tukwila will
pay Renton for those requested construction changes if they are betterment changes that
significantly change the scope of work of the approved construction plans. Tukwila will not
be responsible for the costs of change orders that are due to unknown field conditions or
design problems that are identified during the project construction.
6.7 In the event a lawsuit is instituted to enforce the payment obligations of Tukwila, the
prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all costs of such a lawsuit, including reasonable
attorney's fees.
7 Phase II The bridge and bridge approaches
C: \Temp\XPGrpWise \ltikwila Strander ILA 11- 6.07.doc
7.1 The parties agree to pursue a bridge design that is affordable ($21 -25 million in 2006
estimates), and is most likely-:to Beta concrete box girder design. The design of such a
bridge shall include attractive de'igri features of a "gateway character" in the amount of
$500,000, equally shared by ead1party. Either party shall have the right to exceed its
stated contribution toward these special design features as long as the timing or the
content of such features does not impact the cost of the basic bridge.
7.2 The parties agree to make a best effort to program $2.5 million each toward the $21 -25
million estimated cost of the bridge in the 2009 -2015 respective Transportation
Improvement Programs (TIP's). The exact timing of programming these amounts in the
TIP will be done so as to ensure a local match for additional external funding to be sought
for the bridge. However, any decision to proceed on any aspect of the bridge will require
an amendment to this agreement.
7.3 The parties may agree to include some of the bridge approach costs as part of the Phase 1
project if such opportunities present themselves, and if the costs of these improvements
do not change the local share as shown in Attachment 1. Any increase in local share
beyond the $4.5 million as shown in Attachment 1, whether used for Phase 1 or Phase 2,
has to be approved by both parties unless one party opts to pay for the other party's
share beyond $4.5 million.
8. DURATION/TERMINATION
8.1 This Agreement shall remain in effect until final acceptance of the Project and payment
by Tukwila of all monies due from Tukwila to Renton.
8.2 If expected or actual funding is withdrawn, reduced or limited in any way prior to the
completion of the Project, either party may, with 30 days written notice to the other
party, terminate this Agreement.
8.3 In the event of termination prior to completion of the Project:
8.3.1 The party requesting termination shall=pay all direct and indirect phasing -out
costs. 4
8.3.2 Termination costs payable slrall';not'exceed the actual costs incurred as a result of
termination of the Pro
9. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS
Washington State law shall govern the respective liability between the parties to this Agreement for
any loss due to property damage or personal injury arising out of the activities conducted pursuant
to this Agreement.
10. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
10.1 In the event of a dispute between the parties regarding this Agreement, the parties shall
attempt to resolve the matter informally. If the parties are unable to resolve the matter
informally within 30 days, the matter shall be decided by the Administrator of
Planning/Building/ Public Works of the City of Renton and the City of Tukwila Public
Works Director.
C: \Temp\}PGrpWise \Tukwila Strander ILA 11- 6- 07.doc
10.2 The parties may also agree to an alternative dispute resolution process.
11. OTHER PROVISIONS
11.1 Renton shall be deemed an independent contractor for all purposes and the employees of
Renton, or any of its contractors, subcontractors, and their employees shall not in any
manner be deemed to be employees of Tukwila.
11.2 Nothing contained herein is intended to, nor shall be construed to, create any rights in
any party not a signatory to this Agreement, or to form the basis for any liability on the
part of Renton, Tukwila, or their officials, employees, agents, or representatives, to any
party not a signatory to this Agreement.
11.3 Waiver of any breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a
waiver of any prior or subsequent breach.and shall not be construed to be a modification
of the terms of this Agreement.
11.4 With the exception of those facilities included in sections 5.1 and 5.2 of this agreement,
each party shall retain ownel"slii4 and`usual maintenance responsibility for the road,
drainage system, signs, sdewal], and other property within its jurisdiction.
11.5 If any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid, the remainder of the Agreement
shall not be affected thereby if such remainder would then continue to serve the purposes
and objectives of the parties.
11.6 The captions in this Agreement are for convenience only and do not in any way limit or
amplify the provisions of this Agreement.
11.7 This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and any representations or
understandings, whether oral or written, not incorporated herein are excluded.
11.8 This Agreement may be amended only by an instrument in writing, duly executed by
both parties.
C: \Temp\XPGrpWise \Tukwila Strander ILA 11.6- 07.doc
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have entered into this Agreement effective as of the date last
written below.
CITY OF RENTON CITY OF TUKWILA
Title: Title:
Date Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM: -APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Renton City Attorney Tukwila City Attorney
C: \Temp\XPGrpWise \Tukwila Strander ILA 11- 6- 07.doc
Line EXPENDITURES
1 Project Definition Report (1992 -2006)
2 SW27 /Strander Road (2005 -07)
3 ROW in Renton
4 30% Design/Track Moving Design
5 Saving through Wetland Bank
6 Tukwila 5.5 acres
7 Track Moving (2008 -9)
8
9
10
11 REVENUES
12 Grants
13 Sound Transit
14 Urban Mobility Grant (WSDOT)
15 Other Federal Grants
16 Metro
17 Potential 2007 Fed. Earmark
18 Total External Funding:
19
20 Local Shares Needed
21 Total Exp less Revenues:
22 50%
23
24
25
26 LOCAL SHARE OBLIGATIONS
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
SW27 Strander Project Cost Sharing Preliminary Estimates
This is a compilation of past cost, and costs anticipated in 2006 -2008. No Future Bridge costs.
Some costs are still planning stage with considerable contingency built in.
Contributions to Date:
Previously Paid (w. grants subtracted)
Property Contribution
Previously Paid (w. mitigation fees)
Total Estimated Expenditures:
Sub Total
To Equalize Phase I Funding:
Payment by Tukwila to achieve 50/50
Payment from Tukwila to achieve 50/50
Adjusted Total Paid
Potential Additional Needed (depends on shortfall):
Tukwila- Renton Interlocal Agreement Attachment 1 (Cost Sharing)
Total payment by each city:
(A)
Renton
(4,163,897)
(2,500,000)
(6,663,897)
2.800.949
(3,862,949)
(397,715)
4,260,664
C:1TempD(PGrpWiselStrander Spreadsheet attachment 1
354,338 Completed
3,009,443 As of 5/17/07
2,500,000 Completed
2,637,546 Current Contract, Perteet. As of 5/17/07
(1,380,000) Using Springbrook Bank.
800,000 Est. -2006 Appraisals needed.
15,500.000 Oct. 2006 Estimate
23,421,327
8,600,000
2,300,000
1,000,000
2,500,000
500,000
14,900,000
8,521,327
4,260,664
FMSIB; SAFETEA -LU
(of ST $4 m., S1.7 m. is for next phase)
($5.5 m.; not sure how much to Strander)
Both cities will seek additional S's in 2007 -8
(B)
Tukwila
(262,000)
(800,000)
(1,062,000)
(2,800,949)
(3,862,949)
(397,715)
4,260,664
Actual.
Est.
Actual.
ATTACHMENT 1
LVD. Overpass
PHASE
SW 27TH STreet / Strander Boulevard Connection
"UPRR Track Relocation
Begin Construction 2008-20( o
Completed 2006
"Overcrossing Connection
Begin Construction 2010-2012:4,97-0
"Oakesdale to
E. Valley Road Widening",
Begin Construction 2015
RENTON
BNSF
SOUND TRANSIT
A MI'
SW 4 ST TSE 1
Typical
Roadway
SCAL
@clam 4
PROJECT:
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
STATUS:
MAINT. IMPACT:
COMMENT:
FINANCIAL
(in $000's)
EXPENSES
Design
Land(R/W)
Const. Mgmt.
Tukwila's Share
TOTAL EXPENSES
FUND SOURCES
Awarded Grant
Proposed Grant
Bond
Mitigation Expected
City Oper. Revenue
TOTAL SOURCES
Strander Blvd Extension to SW 27 St (Oaksdale)
New street.
104
CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY
2008 to 2013
LINE ITEM: 104.02.595. .57 PROJECT NO. 86 -RWO3
Renton to design and construct arterial improvements for a new roadway extending Strander Blvd from West
Valley Highway to SW 27th St. Project will now be a bridge over the railroad tracks. Phase I is to move the
UPRR tracks closer to the BNSF track. Phase 11 is to construct the bridge.
East/west capacity between 1-405 and S 180 St is needed to serve Tukwila and Renton access.
City of Renton received a grant to move UPRR tracks to the east. Renton's definition report was completed in
2002 for entire corridor between SR167 and West Valley Hwy. McLeod land was purchased by the City of
Tukwila in 2002. Tukwila's share of project costs is listed below and will be bonded. Renton's construction
schedule indicateds funds would be expended over two years.
Project partners include the City of Renton, Boeing, WSDOT, Sound Transit, Metro, Amtrak, and BNSF
and UP Railroads. Tukwila's project share is McLeod land for wetland mitigation and storm mitigation site
related to the S 180th St Grade Separation project (completed by Tukwila in 2004).
Through Estimated
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 BEYOND TOTAL
26 1
130 1 0 0
130 1 801 2,000
Project Location
r
801 2,000 2,500
130 1 801 2,000 0 0 0 0 2,500
801 2,000
50
0
0
0
2,500
27
104
0
5,301
5,432
0
0
5,301
0
0 0 0 0 0 131
0 2,500 5,432
To: Mayor Haggeron
From: Public Works Directo
Date: January 9, 2008
Subject: 2008 Standard Specifications
Adoption by Ordinance
ISSUE:
INFORMATION MEMO
Local agencies utilizing federal funds for transportation contracts must incorporate and adopt the
2008 Standard Specifications, as published by the Washington State Department of
Transportation and the Washington State Chapter of the American Public Works Association
(WSDOT /APWA).
BACKGROUND:
Previously, the 2006 WSDOT /APWA Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge and Municipal
Construction (Standard Specifications) were adopted by City of Tukwila Ordinance 2113.
The 2008 edition of the Standard Specifications has been published by the Washington State
Department of Transportation and the American Public Works Association (Washington
Chapter) and my staff has revised and updated our construction contract boilerplate documents
and General Special Provisions (GSP's) accordingly. Local Agencies must adopt the 2008
Standard Specifications for use in all federally funded projects that are advertised after March 1,
2008.
ACTION TAKEN:
An ordinance has been drafted to adopt the 2008 edition of the Standard Specifications, future
amendments, general special provisions and construction contract boilerplate documents. This
ordinance also repeals the previous Ordinance 2113.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve ordinance adopting the 2008 edition and all future editions of the Standard
Specifications.
Attachments: Draft Ordinance
Ordinance 2113
F\BOB\Standard Specifications \2008 Standard Specs Info Memo.dac
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING TMC 16.34, ADOPTING THE 2008 AND ALL FUTURE AMENDMENTS OF THE
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION,
SETTING NUMBER OF COPIES TO BE HELD FOR PUBLIC REVIEW; REPEALING ORDINANCE
NO. 2113; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila utilizes standard specifications for the construction of public improvements,
as well as supplemental requirements; and
WHEREAS, the City has previously adopted standard specifications by Ordinance 2113; and
WHEREAS, more current standard specifications are provided by the Washington State Department of
Transportation and American Public Works Association, Washington Chapter,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY
ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. TMC Chapter 16.34, "Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction Specifications," is hereby amended
to read as follows:
16.34.010 Adopted. The 2008 edition of the Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction,
prepared by the Washington State Department of Transportation and the Washington State Chapter of the
American Public Works Association, as presently existing or as may be subsequently be amended, is hereby
adopted as the Code of the City of Tukwila, Washington, for regulating the construction and maintenance of public
works, including streets, bridges, sanitary sewers; storm sewers, water distribution, structures and other public
works. The Public Works Director may allow the use of American Institute of Architects (AIA), Construction
Specifications Institute (CSI), or other building and facilities standard specifications, on a case -by -case basis.
16.34.020 Copies to be on file. Not Less than three copies of said Standard Specifications and City of Tukwila
supplements shall remain on file for use in examination by the public in the Public Works Department.
Section 2. Repealer. Ordinance No. 2131, as codified at TMC 16.34, is hereby repealed.
Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or
its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court
of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of
the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation.
Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of
the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days after passage and publication as provided by law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting
thereof this day of 2008.
ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED:
Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:
Office of the City Attorney
CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON
Ordinance No.
C: \Temp \XPGrpWise \2008 Standard Specification Adoption ORDINANCE.doc
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Published:
Effective Date:
Ordinance Number:
City of Tukwila
Washington
Ordinance No. 11 .3
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING TMC 16.34, ADOPTING THE 2006 EDITION
OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE AND
MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION, SETTING NUMBER OF COPIES TO BE
HELD FOR PUBLIC REVIEW; REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 2040;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila utilizes standard specifications for the construction
of public improvements, as well as supplemental requirements; and
WHEREAS, the City has previously adopted standard specifications by Ordinance
No 2040; and
WHEREAS, more current standard specifications are provided by the Washington
State Department of Transportation and American Public Works Association,
Washington Chapter;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. TMC Chapter 16.34, "Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction
Specifications," is hereby amended to read as follows:
16.34.010 Adopted. The 2006 edition of the Standard Specifications for Road,
Bridge, and Municipal Construction, prepared by the Washington State Department of
Transportation and the Washington State Chapter of the American Public Works
Association, is hereby adopted as the Code of the City of Tukwila, Washington, for
regulating the construction and maintenance of public works, including streets, bridges,
sanitary sewers, storm sewers, water distribution, structures and other public works.
The Public Works Director may allow the use of American Institute of Architects (AIA),
Construction Specifications Institute (CSI), or other building and facilities standard
specifications, on a case -by -case basis.
16.34.020 Copies to be on file. Not less than three copies of said Standard
Specifications and City of Tukwila supplements shall remain on file for use in
examination by the public in the Public Works Department.
Section 2. Repealer. Ordinance No 2040, as codified at TMC 16.34, is hereby
repealed.
Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to
be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the
remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation.
C. \Documents and Settings \All Users\ Desktop \Kelly \MSDATA\ Ordinances \Standard Speclfications.doc 2/17/2006
GL.kn Page 1 of 2
To: Mayor Haggeron
From: Public Works Director
Date: January 9, 2008
Subject: WSDOT Access Management Permitting Standards
Adoption by Ordinance
ISSUE:
In 2007, the Washington State Legislature tasked Washington Dept. of Transportation (WSDOT)
and the Association of Washington Cities (AWC) with inventorying and assisting cities with
managing access on state highways within city limits.
BACKGROUND:
INFORMATION MEMO
Current state law requires cities to be the permitting authority for state managed access highways
within city boundaries (Chapters 468 -51 and 468 -52 of the Washington Administrative Code and
Chapter 47.50 of the Revised Code of Washington).
Current law only applies to SR -181 (West Valley Highway).
SR -99 (Tukwila Intl Blvd., formerly Pacific Highway South) has been turned over to Tukwila;
SR -900 (M.L. King Jr., Way) is limited access, 1 -5 is limited access, I -405 is limited access; and
SR -518 is limited access.
ACTION TAKEN:
An ordinance has been drafted to adopt the WSDOT access permitting standards on state
highways within the City of Tukwila limits.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve ordinance adopting the WSDOT access permitting standards on state highways within
the City of Tukwila limits
Attachments: Draft Ordinance
October 3, 2007 letter from WSDOT and AWC
Managed Access in Washington A Progress Report to the Legislature (September, 2007)
P:\BOB\Access Management \WSDOT Access Mgmt Info Memo.doc
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON; PROVIDING FOR HIGHWAY ACCESS MANAGEMENT,
ACCESS PERMITS AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS PURSUANT TO
RCW 47.50; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council finds it necessary to provide regulation and control of
vehicular access and connection points of ingress to, and egress from, the state highway
system within the incorporated areas of the City of Tukwila.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. THAT RCW Chapter 47.50 is hereby adopted by reference to provide for
the regulation and control of vehicular access and connection points of ingress to, and
egress from, the state highway system within the incorporated areas of the City of
Tukwila.
Section 2. Pursuant to the requirements and authority of RCW 47.50, there is
hereby adopted by reference the provisions of Chapter 468 -51 and 468 -52 of the
Washington Administrative Code, together with all future amendments, in order to
implement the requirements of Chapter 47.50 RCW.
Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to
be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the
remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation.
Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published
in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days
after passage and publication as provided by law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON,
at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 2008.
ATTEST/ AUTHENTICATED:
Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:
Office of the City Attorney
G \Temp \XPGrpWise\ WSDOT Access Mgmt Ordinance.doc
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Published:
Effective Date:
Ordinance Number:
Washington State
1 Department of transportation
Paula Mammend, P.E.
Interim Secretary at Transportation
lwanspertvtion euifang
310 H10M Park Amu. SE.
P.O Box arm
OyrrpY.14A 965044300
360405 -1000
MI 140023343ee
wAwAidift.vr JDr
October 3, 2007
Mr. Jim Morrow
Director, Public Works, City of Tukwila
6300 Southcenter Blvd #100
Tukwila, WA 98188
Dear Mr. Morrow:
Beginning Ending
State Route Milepost Milepost
181 9.75 11.23
Current
Access
Classification
M3
RECEIVED
OCT 0 5 2007
1 UKWILA
PUBLIC WORKS
Planned
Access
Classification
Established
Access
Classification
RCW 47.50.030(3)
2 Limited access is established but access sights have not yet been entirely purchased.
A
ASSOUAT1O
0 1 }�7N U7
Ci T iE5
Assodst.e of Wightnaten Cu 1tl
1076 FtaNOn SUNK S.E.
Wm :a. WA 96501
3067534131
t400.5e24961
vrww.t.crpt erg
In its 2007 session, the Washington State Legislature tasked WSDOT with inventorying
how cities have implemented current laws for managing access on state highways within
their boundaries. The Association of Washington Cities and WSDOT are collaborating
to complete this task.
Established in 1991, current law requires cities and towns to be the permitting authorities
for state managed access highways within their boundaries. Current law also requires
cities and towns to adopt access permitting standards for these highways that meet or
exceed the state's access standards.'
The 2007 Washington State Legislature directed WSDOT to require your confirmation
that the City of Tukwila has adopted the required access permitting standards for the
following managed access state highways within its boundaries:
WSDOT
Region
Northwest
To provide the legislature with the best possible information about the status of access
management on state highways within cities, we strongly encourage you to:
Review the enclosed state access standards,
Review your jurisdiction's adopted ordinances,
Confirm by your signature on the enclosed form that your adopted access
permitting standards meet or exceed state access standards, or detail your
progress towards adopting the required standards if they have not yet been
adopted, and
Submit your confirmation and a signed copy of applicable
ordinance to WSDOT at the address indicated on the form no
later than November 30, 2007.
Mr. Jim Morrow
October 3, 2007
Page 2
In 20Q8 and 2009, WSDOT will submit reports to the legislature detailing each
jurisdiction's progress toward adopting the required access permitting standards. Our
intent is to help cities and towns successfully demonstrate to the legislature their
commitment to protecting the safety and capacity of the state highway system through
good access management practices.
Please refer to the enclosed managed access information sheet for more information
about access control on state highways and the progress report requested by the
legislature. If you have any questions, please contact Karena Houser at (360) 705 -7876
or HouserKawsdot.wa.aov.
Thank you for your help!
Sincerely,
leleatzA. r.,..41,„;‘..
Elizabeth Robbins
Transportation Planning Manager
Washington State Department of Transportation
ER:kh
Enclosure
cc: w /attachments
MPO/RTPO
WSDOT Region Office
A,A-L ?Ix6
cl
Ashley Probart
Transportation Coordinator
Association of Washington Cities
Washington State
VI/ Department of Transportation
Managed Access in Washington
A Progress Report to the Legislature
I n its 2007 transportation budget, the legislature tasked the Washington
State Department of Transportation WSDOT) with reporting the progress
of local jurisdictions toward fulfilling their responsibilities under the highway
access management statutes enacted in 1991. WSDOT is working with a
number of stakeholders to complete this task, including the Community,
Trade and Economic Development Department (CTED), the Association of
Washington Cities (AWC), and the Washington State Association of Counties
(WSAC). Our intent is to help local governments successfully demonstrate to
the legislature their commitment to protecting the safety and capacity of the
state highway system through good access management.
Access Control on State Highways
Access control manages traffic movements onto and off of state highways to improve
system performance, minimize traffic conflicts, and increase traffic flow. Typical access
management techniques include minimum spacing between intersections and driveways,
dedicated turn lanes, and median treatments. Access control preserves a highway's safety
and capacity, reducing accidents by as much as 50 percent and increasing road capacity by
as much as 45 percent.'
In Washington, state highways are classified as either limited or managed access. The basic
policy for limited access highways was established in 1951 and is based on the purchase of
access rights from the owners of property abutting the highway. There are three levels of
limited access control with progressive restrictions. Approaches to all limited access routes,
except interstates, must be approved by the Washington State Department of Transportation
(WSDOT). Interstate approaches are approved by the Federal Highway Administration.
Managed access legislation was enacted in 1991 to address the portion of the state
transportation system that was not established as limited access.' Managed access is based
on the premise that the access rights of a property owner are subordinate to the public's
right and interest in a safe and efficient highway system. A property owner's direct access
to a state highway may be restricted if reasonable access can be provided to another public
road
WSDOT consulted and cooperated with local and regional governments to implement
managed access legislation. WSDOT developed access design standards, adopted
permitting procedures, established a five -tier classification system, and assigned specific
highway segments to those classifications. The City Design Standards Committee,
consisting of the state aid engineer and six AWC appointees, participated in crafting the new
access management code and formally concurred with it in 1992. Additionally, about half
of cities and towns officially concurred with the access classifications WSDOT assigned to
the managed access highways within their boundaries.
1. Access Regulation A Balancing Act Between Access and Mobility. WSDOT. 2005.
2. RCW 47.52
3. RCW 47.50.010(2)
4. RCW 4750.010(3)
September, 2007
Managed Access Highway Classifications
Class One:
Mobility is primary function
Speeds of 50 to 65 mph
1,320 ft. minimum access spacing
No direct access if alternate public
road is available
Restrictive median for some multi-
lane configurations
Class Two:
Mobility favored over access
Speed of 35 to 50 mph in urban ar-
eas and 45 to 55 mph in rural areas
660 ft minimum access spacing
No direct access if alternative public
road is available
Restrictive median for some multi-
lane configurations
Class Three:
Balance between mobility and access
in areas with less than maximum
build out
Speeds of 30 to 40 mph in urban ar-
eas and 45 to 55 mph in rural areas j
330 ft. minimum access spacing i
Restrictive median may be warranted
Class Four.
Balance between mobility and access
in areas with near maximum build
out
Speeds of 30 to 35 mph in urban
areas and 35 to 45 in rural areas
250 ft. minimum access spacing
Non restrictive medians
Class Five:
Access needs generally have priority
over mobility needs
Speeds of 25 to 35 mph
125 ft. minimum access spacing
Non restrictive medians
WAC 468 -52 -040
State law splits the responsibility for state managed access highway permitting based
on the location of the state highway. In unincorporated areas, access permitting is
the responsibility of the WSDOT region offices. Cities and towns are the permitting
authorities for the state managed access highways within their boundaries Cities and
towns are required by statute to adopt access permitting standards for the state managed
access highways within their boundaries that meet or exceed WSDOT standards
The initial deadline for adoption was July 1, 1993. If cities fail to adopt the required
standards, WSDOT standards may be used as a default'
The Legislative Request
The legislature's 2007 transportation budget included a proviso directing WSDOT to
require local jurisdictions to confirm they have adopted access permitting standards for
state managed access highways. The standards must meet or exceed WSDOT standards,
as required by statute. The proviso also directed WSDOT to submit a report to the
IegisIature detailing local jurisdictions' progress toward adopting the standards.
A work group of stakeholders met in July and advised WSDOT to seek confirmation from
all 205 cities that contain managed access highways. WSDOT will contact the public
works directors of these cities by mail, provide them with a description of the managed
access highways within their boundaries, and request them to submit:
either a statement confirming their adoption of the required access permitting
standards or a description of their progress toward adopting the standards,
a statement concurring with the managed access classifications assigned to the
highways within their boundaries, if applicable, and
a copy of their access permitting standards ordinance.
The 76 cities that do not contain managed access highways will not be contacted.
In the interest of providing the best possible information to the legislature about the status
of access management in Washington, the work group also decided to survey counties
with managed access highways within their unincorporated areas. Although WSDOT is
the permitting authority for these highways, the county development permitting office
is often a point of first contact for developers who may require a state access permit.
The survey's intent is to help us understand how counties coordinate with the state on
development permitting for properties adjacent to state managed access highways. The
electronic survey will be distributed to county engineers by e-mail, except in San Juan
County which does not contain any managed access highways.
WSDOT is requesting city and county responses by November 30, 2007. This allows
ample time for cities that have not yet adopted appropriate access permitting standards to
do so prior to the December, 2008 final deadline. This will also allow WSDOT, CTED,
and AWC time to provide additional technical assistance to cities and towns that have not
yet adopted the required standards.
WSDOT will summarize the information provided by the cities and counties in a
preliminary report to the 2008 Legislature and a final report to the 2009 Legislature.
5. RCW 47.50.020(3)
6. RCW 47.50.030(3)
7. WAC 468 51-010
The Legislative Access Proviso:
"By December 1, 2008, the department
shall require confirmation from jurisdictions
that plan under the growth management
act, chapter 36.70A RCW, and that
receive state transportation funding
under this act, that the jurisdictions have
adopted standards for access permitting
on state highways that meet or exceed
departrnent standards in accordance
with RCW 47.50.030. The objective of
this subsection is to encourage local
governments, through the receipt of state
transportation funding, to adhere to best
practices in access control applicable to
development activity significantly impacting
state transportation facilities. By January
1, 2009, the department shall submit a
report to the appropriate committees of the
legislature detailing the progress of the local
jurisdictions in adopting the highway access
permitting standards."
ESNS 1094, Sec 222 (4)
For More Information
For more information about the access
proviso, please contact:
Karena Houser
WSDOT Transportation Planner
HouserK@wsdot.wa.gov
(360) 705 -7876
www.wsdot.wa.gov /planning
Ashley Probart
AWC Transportation Coordinator
AshleyP @awcnetorg
(360) 753 -4137
www.awcnet.org
Julia Murray
WSAC Policy Director
jmurray@wacounties.org
(360) 586 4219 ext 104
www.wacounties.org/wsac
For more Information about access con-
trol on state highways, please contact:
Barb De Ste. Croix, P.E.
WSDOT Access Hearings Engineer
DestecB@wsdot.wa.gov
(360) 705 -7251
www. wsdot.wa.gov /eesc /design/access
INFORMATION MEMO
To: Mayor Haggerton
From: Public Works Directo((..r
Date: January 9, 2008
Subject: Interurban Ave. .S Pavement Repair (14900 Interurban Ave. S. Vicinity)
Project No. 07 -RWO1
BID AWARD
ISSUE
Award the Interurban Avenue South Pavement Repair contract to Lakeridge Paving Company.
BACKGROUND
It has been brought to our attention that the recent Fort Dent/Interurban Ave. S. sewer project left a very
rough pavement surface. While the sewer contractor met the design and specifications for that project, the
wearing surface is very rough and trucks bounce over the bumps and rattle the windows at the Interurban
Plaza building (14900 Interurban Ave. S.).
ACTION TAKEN
After field reviewing the rough road situation, a design was completed for a small pavement repair project
(see attached vicinity map).
Letters requesting bids were sent out to companies on the Small Works Roster qualified for this type of work.
Six (6) bids were received with Lakeridge Paving Company submitting the lowest bid at $28,574.00. The
remaining bids, from low to high, were received from Western Asphalt at $33,736.00, Watson Asphalt at
$35,900.00, Superior Asphalt at $43,225.00, Lakeside Industries at $52,600.00 and AA Asphalt at
$63,731.00. The bid tabulation is attached.
Lakeridge Paving Company has completed several recent projects for the City, including the 2007 Overlay
Program, and has performed very good work.
BUDGET AND BID SUMMARY
Bid Results Engineer's Estimate Budeet
Bid Amount $28,574.00 $30,000.00 $700,000.00
Contingency (10 2.857.40 3,000.00
Total $_31 .431.400 31000.00 $700.000.00
RECOMMENDATION
Award the construction contract for the Interurban Ave. S. Pavement Repair project to Lakeridge Paving
Company in the amount of $28,574.00.
Attachment: Bid Tabulation
Vicinity Map
P:\PROJECTS\A- RW RS Projects \07RWO12007 Overlay\14900 Interurban SWR fix'Jnfo Memo Bid Award IU Pvmt Rpr.doc
INTERURBAN AVENUE S. PAVEMENT REPAIRS
(14900 Interurban Ave S. Vicinity)
Project 07RWO1
Bid Due Date: 4pm November 30, 2007
Bid Tabulation
Item
No. Item Description
1 Plan
1 !Project Temporary Traffic Control' 1 1 LS 1
2 Adjust Utility Castings 1 3 1 EA 1
3 Pavement Grinding 1 1 1 LS 1
4 HMA Class 1/2" PG 64-22 1 130 I TN
5 Restore Channelization 1 1 1 LS 1
1 Plan
No. 1 Item Description 1 Qty
GENERAL
Project Temporary Traffic Control' 1
1
2
3
4
5
Adjust Utility Castings
Pavement Grinding
HMA Class 1/2 PG 64-22 1 130
Restore Channelization
Qty Unit Unit Price Total Unit Price
$5,000.00
$500.00
$7,500.00
$100.00
$3,000.00
TOTAL BID
*sales tax included in bid amounts
per Std Spec 1-07.2(1) and WAC 458-20-171
1 3
1
11
Engineer's Estimate [SUPERIOR ASPHALT MAINT. INC
Unit Unit Price Total 1 Unit Price 1 Total
LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.001 $4,700.001
EA 1 $500.00 $1,500.00 1 $500.001
LS 1 $7,500.00
TN $100.00
LS $3,000.00
TOTAL BID
*sales tax included in bid amounts
per Std Spec 1-07.2(1) and WAC 458-20-171
Apparent 1st Low
Engineer's Estimate 1 LAKERIDGE PAVING COMPANY 1
$5,000.00
$1,500.00
$7,500.00
$13,000.00
$3,000.00
$30,000.00
$2,500.001
$750.001
$9,500.001
$94.801
$2,000.001
AVAILABLE START DATE. December 17, 2007
ANTICIPATED CONST. DURATION: 3 working days
$7,500.00 1
$13,000.00 1
$3,000.00 1
$30,000.00 1
4th
$14,150.001
$150.001
$3,375.001
AVAILABLE START DATE: December 12, 2007
ANTICIPATED CONST DURATION: 2 working days
pAprojects\rw...\07RWOVU\IU Ave S Pavement Repair Bid Tab.xls
Total Unit Price
$2,500.00
$2,250.00
$9,500.00
$12,324.00
$2,000.00
$28,574.00
$4,700.00
$1,500.00
$14,150.00
$19,500.00
$3,375.00
$43,225.00
2nd Low
10 days
5th
WESTERN ASPHALT 'WATSON ASPHALT PAVING CO.
$6,400.001
$700.001
$6,900.001
$134.001
$940.001
LAKESIDE INDUSTRIES
Unit Price
$16,000.00
$2,000.00
$12,000.00
$120 00
$3,000.00
December 10
5 working days
Total
3rd
KPG
Unit Price
Total
$6,400.00 $4,500.001 $4,500.00
$1,400.00 $1,500.001 $4,500.00
$20,700.00 $8,500.001 $8,500.00
$536.00 $130.00 $16,900.00
$4,700.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00
$33,736.00 $35,900.00
As soon as weather permits anytime (weather dependant)
Total
$16,000.00
$6,000.00
$12,000.001
$15,600.001
$3,000.001
$52,600.001
3 working days
6th
M ASPHALT
Unit Price Total
$15,276.00 $15,276.00
$2,860.00 $8,580.00
$16,175.00 $16,175.00
$170.00 $22,100.00
$1,600.00 $1,600.00
$63,731.00
March 2008
5 Days
INTERURBAN AVENUE S
PAVEMENT REPAIR
MAYOR
STEVE MULLET
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
JAMES MORROW, PE
ACTING CITY ENGINEER
BOB GIBERSON, P.E.
SCHEDULE OF DRAWINGS
SHEET
NO. TITLE
1 COVER SHEET
2 PLAN AND DETAILS
CITY COUNCIL
VERNA GRIFFIN, PRESIDENT
PAM CARTER
JOE DUFFIE
JIM HAGGERTON
JOAN HERNANDEZ
PAMELA LINDER
DENNIS ROBERTSON
LEGEND
EXISTING:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPT_
ENOINEERINO •STREETS•WATER•SEWER•BUILDWQ•
PROPOSED:
N WV WATER VALVE
O SMH SANITARY SEWER
u CB CATCH BASIN
FH FIRE HYDRANT
PP POWER POLE
MON MONUMENT
m WM WATER METER
1 HOT MIX ASPHALT
A+JIWV.
CIA 11ffiglamerl.
Mina th.4.
BID
DOCUMENT
INTERURBAN AVENUE S
PAVEMENT REPAIR
COVER
PROJECT
LOCATION
I I 1
1 1
I I I
I I
I I 1 Illo roOp•4MR•oOflw,
I 1 I I KAI NIA
W Id11'I mvi,iNU 11 d•Io 1407
2
INFORMATION MEMO
To: Mayor Haggerton
From: Public Works Director In
Date: January 9, 2008 UU
Subject: S 144 Street Improvement Proiect
Project No. 95 -RS01, Contract No. 05 -057
Project Completion and Acceptance
ISSUE
Accept contract as complete and authorize release of retainage of $103,357.70.
BACKGROUND
The Notice to Proceed for Contract No. 05 -057 with Rodarte Construction, Inc. of Auburn,
Washington, was issued June 13, 2005 for construction of the South 144th Street Improvement
Project.
This contract was completed on June 15, 2007. Eight (8) change orders were issued during
construction for extra work due to Seattle City Light impacts to curbs, sidewalks, roadway
and storm drainage. The unit price item underruns were due to adjusting fewer existing water
valves than estimated as part of Schedule B.
The City's portion of the contract was $2,038,845.00 and the contract also included work for
Water District 125 (Schedule B) and their final amount was $30,800.79. Water District 125
has reimbursed the City for all of Schedule B except $3,076.85 (a final invoice has been
mailed as we were waiting for final closeout of the contract).
Contract Award Amount
Change Orders
Unit price item underruns
Sales Tax (Schedule B water district work only)
Total Amount Paid (incl. tax and retainage)
Attachment: Notice of Completion of Public Works Contract
P: \PROJECIS\A- RW RS Projects \95RS01 S 144th\ Construction INFO MEMO Acceptance S 144th St.doc
$1,840,465.60
241,569.31
<14,880.91>
2,491.79
$2.069.645.79
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that this contract be forwarded to the Tukwila City Council on the consent
agenda for formal acceptance and authorize the release of the retainage, subject to the
standard claim and lien release procedures.
From:
State of Washington
Department of Revenue
�4► PO Box 47474
REV Olympia WA 98504 -7474
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA 98188
Contractor's Registration No. (UBI No.) 600 264 803
Date 11/19/04
NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT
ame Address` of PubIc_Agee
Notice is hereby given relative to the completion of contract or project described below
Description of Contract Contract Number
S 144` Street Improvement Project #95 -RS01)
Contractor's Name
Rodarte Construction, Inc.
Contractor's Address
P.O. Box 1875, Auburn, WA 98071
Date Work Commenced
6/13/05
Surety or Bonding Company
St. Paul Travelers Bond
Agent's Address
701 5th Ave., Suite 3850, Seattle, WA 98104
Contract Amount
Additions
Reductions
Sub -Total
Amount of Sales Tax Paid at 8.8
(If various rates apply, please send a breakdown.)
TOTAL
Comments: Sales Tax Rule 171 applies on
Schedule A; Tax paid on Schedule B water at
8.8% and 8.9% per attached.
Finance Approval T
Date Work Completed
9/17/07
1,840,465.60
226,688.40
0.00
2,067,154.00
2,491.79
2,069,645.79
Date Assigned
1 Disbrsug.
Signature
Type or Print Name Diane Jaber
Phone Number 206 433 -1871
Department Use Only
Assigned To
Amount Disbursed
Amount Retained
05 -057
Telephone Number
253 -939 -0532
Date Work Accepted
Liquidated Damages 0.00
1,966,288.09
103,357.70
TOTAL 2,069,645.79
The Disbursing Officer must complete and mail THREE copies of this notice to the Department of Revenue,
PO Box 47474, Olympia, WA 98504 -7474, immediately after acceptance of the work done under this contract. NO
PAYMENT SHALL BE MADE FROM RETAINED FUNDS until receipt of Department's certificate, and then only in
accordance with said certificate.
To inquire about the availability of this document in an alternate format for the visually impaired, please call (360) 753 -3217. Teletype
(TTY) users please call (800) 451 -7985. You may also access tax information on our Internet home page at http: /dor.wa.gov.
REV 31 0020e (6-27-01)
ISSUE
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
RECOMMENDATION
For discussion.
P :\BOB \TC UC\TC 2008 Transportation Issues gl.doc
INFORMATION MEMO
To: Mayor Haggerton
From: Public Works Director,T't)
Date: January 9, 2008
Subject: 2008 Transportation Eneineerine Issues
Discuss transportation issues that will be top priorities for the 2008 Transportation Committee and
select Council meetings.
The 2008 2013 CIP and Planning Model was adopted on December 3, 2007, and includes numerous
projects that are slated for design and construction in 2008. Also, numerous development projects are
in the works that have indirect impacts on our engineering program and projects.
The following are potential agenda issues very likely to be brought forward to Committee:
Tukwila International Blvd. Phases Il III
Local Improvement Districts (LID's)
Tukwila Urban Center Access Improvements (Klickitat Dr. /Southcenter Pkwy.)
Annual Bridge Inspection Repair Program
Boeing Access Road Bridge grant application for bridge replacement
Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian Bridge
Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center /Andover Park West street improvements
Interurban Ave. (S. 143r St. to Fort Dent Way)
Southcenter Parkway Extension
Tukwila South Development
Southcenter Blvd. Construction by Sound Transit
Strander Blvd. Extension Project by City of Renton
Museum of Flight Pedestrian Bridge
Pavement Management System (PMS) update
Residential Street Ratings update
Residential Commercial Street Annual Overlay Repair Programs
Traffic Calming
WSDOT Projects (SR 518, I-405, etc.)