HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOW 2009-01-26 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET Tukwila City Council Agenda
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
Jim Haggerton, Mayor Councilmembers Joe Duffie Pamela Linder
Rhonda Berry, CityAdministrator Dennis Robertson Verna Griffin
Joan Hernandez, Council President Kathy Hougardy De'Sean Quinn
To be followed by a Special Meeting
Monday, January 26,2009,7:00 PM Tukwila City Hall; Council Chambers
1. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. CITIZEN At this time, you are invited to comment on items not included on this agenda (please
COMMENT limit your comments to five minutes per citizen). To comment on an item listed
on this agenda, please save your comments until the issue is presented for discussion.
3. SPECIAL a. A resolution establishing a petty cash fund for the City Clerk's Office. Pg.l
ISSUES b. Bid award for Foster Golf Links Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension Project. Pg.7
c. Bid award for Tukwila Village Northfield Car Wash Demolition. Pg.15
d. A resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign the 2009 -2012 Interlocal Agreement Pg.23
for the South County Area Transportation Board (SCATBd).
e. An agreement for construction management services for Tukwila International Pg.47
Boulevard Phase II and III with Harris and Associates.
f. Supplement #7 to Contract #02 -108 for Tukwila International Boulevard Phase II Pg.91
and III with KPG, Inc.
g. Authorize the purchase of a construction management trailer for Tukwila Pg.113
International Boulevard Phase II and III in the amount of $30,000.00.
h. A resolution setting a public hearing date for a street vacation on a portion of Pg.119
right -of -way along 13911 Tukwila International Boulevard.
4. NEW Discussion of 2009 Draft Legislative Priorities. Pg.129
BUSINESS
5. REPORTS a. Mayor c. Staff e. Intergovernmental
b. City Council d. City Attorney
6. MISCELLANEOUS
7. EXECUTIVE SESSION
8. ADJOURN TO SPECIAL MEETING
SPECIAL MEETING
Ord #2224 Res #2676
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. CONSENT AGENDA I Approval of Vouchers.
3. ADJOURNMENT
Tukwila City Hall is wheelchair accessible. Reasonable accommodations are available at public hearings with advance notice
to the City Clerk's Office 206 433- 1800/TDD 206 248 -2933. This notice is available at www.ci.tukwila.wa.us, and in alternate
formats with advance notice for those with disabilities. Tukwila Council meetings are audio taped.
CAS NUMBER 09-008
Establishment of a new $100.00 Change Fund Level for the City Clerk's Office and
Repeal of Resolution No. 1664.
C.\ 1'1 c tC IR\' Dzscii lion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other
SPC P'SOR n Canna/ Mcgor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal 1 P &R n Police PW
SPONSOR'S
SUMMARY
Fund Fund Source:
Comments.
02/02/09
CO UNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
Initials
ilvleeting Date Prepared by 1 Mayor's review I Council review
01/26/09 SH I aypAY
02/02/09 SH 1
ITEM INFORMATION
09 OC) 6 I ORIGINAL. AGENDA DATE. JANUARY 26, 2009
lltg Date 01/21/09 Alts Date lltg Date 02/02/09 ,lltg Date Alt& Date
tlltg Dote ditg Date
ITEM NO.
3,4.
Due to the upcoming implementation of a new cashiering system to provide greater
operational efficiency and enhanced customer service, it is necessary to establish a
$100.00 change fund for the City Clerk's Office. Council is being asked to adopt a
resolution establishing the change fund.
RI 1\ 111' COW'S Mtg. n CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. U Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DAIE. 01/21/09
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Adoption of resolution
COMMITFEB Unanimous approval; forward to next Committee of the Whole
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
E`PI;NDITURI? RI:QUI1 I D AMOUNT BUDGETED
$n /a $n /a
1 MTG. DATE 1 RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
01/26/09 1
I 1
MTG. DATE 1 ATTACHMENTS
01/26/09 Informational Memorandum dated 01/14/09
Resolution in draft form
Copy of Resolution No. 1664 to be repealed
Minutes from the Finance and Safety Committee meeting of 01/21/09
APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$n /a
TO:
City of Tukwila
ISSUE
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
Mayor Haggerton
Finance Safety Committee
FROM: Shawn Hunstock, Finance Director
Finance Department
DATE: January 14, 2009
SUBJECT: Establishment of a New $100.00 Change Fund Level for the City
Clerk's Office and Repeal of Resolution No. 1664
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
To establish a new $100.00 change fund level for the City Clerk's Office and for the repeal of
Resolution No. 1664.
BACKGROUND
As with the scheduled implementation of a new cashiering system and process for the City
Clerk's Office, it is the desire of its Staff to establish a new change fund level in the amount of
$100.00 which will provide for operational efficiency and improved customer service.
DISCUSSION
The attached proposed draft resolution will establish a new change fund level for the City
Clerk's Office as follows:
General Fund (000):
City Clerk's Office 100.00
General Fund Total 100.00
Once the City Council approves the establishment of a new change fund level for the City
Clerk's Office through the repeal of Resolution No. 1664 —a claims disbursement check will be
issued through Accounts Payable to release the funds.
RECOMMENDATION
Please forward this item to the January 26, 2009 Committee of the Whole meeting for
consideration and forward to the February 2, 2009 Regular Meeting for Council approval of final
resolution.
ATTACHMENTS
Draft copy of resolution to repeal existing Resolution No. 1664.
Copy of current Resolution No. 1664.
DRAFT
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI OF
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING A CITY CLERK'S
OFFICE CHANGE FUND LEVEL; AND REPEALING
RESOLUTION NO. 1664.
WHEREAS, the Tukwila City Council previously established Change Funds and
Petty Cash Fund levels, most recently by Resolution No. 1664, passed June 23, 2008; and
WHEREAS, for the implementation of a new cashiering system for operational
efficiency and improved customer service, associated with City Clerk operations, there
is a need to establish a new change fund level in the amount of $100.00 for the City
Clerk's Office;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Change Fund levels are hereby set as follows:
I Finance Department
City Clerk's Office
I Municipal Court
1 Parks and Recreation
I Golf Course
Section 2. The Petty Cash Fund levels are hereby set as follows:
Finance Department
Police Investigation /Tukwila
Fire Department
Parks and Recreation
Public Works Div. II
Public Works Div. I
Section 3. Resolution No. 1664 is hereby repealed.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON,
at a Regular Council Meeting thereof this day of 2009.
ATTEST/ AUTHENTICATED:
Christy O'Flaherty, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:
Office of the City Attorney
1 Water Fund 0001 100.00
1 General Fund 0001 100.00
General Fund 000 1 300.00
General Fund 000 300.00
I Foster Golf Course Fund 411 I 1,200.00
(or less as needed)
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
000 1 800.00
000 1 10,000.00
000 350.00
000 500.00
000 350.00
000 1 200.00
Joan Hernandez, Council President
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council.
Resolution Number
C \Document and Settings \All Users Desktop Kelly MSDATA Resolutions Change Fund City Cle:kdoc
LJ:KSN 1/21/2009 Page 1 of 1
City of Tukwila
Resolution No. FFY
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, INCREASING THE TUKWILA
POLICE INVESTIGATION FUND LEVEL; AND REPEALING
RESOLUTION NO. 1659.
WHEREAS, the Tukwila City Council previously established Change Funds and
Petty Cash Fund levels, most recently by Resolution No. 1659, passed March 3, 2008;
and
WHEREAS, for operational efficiency associated with Police undercover
operations, there is a need to increase the Tukwila Police Investigation Fund from
$5,000 to $10,000;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Change Fund levels are hereby set as follows:
Finance Department
Municipal Court
Parks and Recreation
Golf Course
Section 2. The Petty Cash Fund levels are hereby set as follows:
Finance Department
Police Investigation /Tukwila
Fire Department
Parks and Recreation
Public Works Div. II
Public Works Div. I
Section 3. Resolution No. 1659 is hereby repealed.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON,
at a Special Council Meeting thereof this TS' ;d' day of 4r.. LI A L 2008.
ATTEST/ AUTHENTICATED:
T 44 t i ut uncil Pre is ent"
Christy 4
erty, CMC, Cf 'y Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:
Office of the City Attorney
Washington
Water Fund 0001 100.00
1 General Fund 0001 300.00
1 General Fund 0001 300.00
Foster Golf Course Fund 411 1,200.00
(or less as needed)
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
General Fund
000
000
000
000
000
000
Filed with the City Clerk: t 1 L.F
Passed by the City Council: 1
Resolution Number: 1t
C: \Documents and Settings \All Users\ Desktop \Kelly \MSDATA \Resolutions \Change Fund Police.doc
LJ:KSN 6/18/2008
800.00
10,000.00
350.00
500.00
350.00 1
200.001
Page 1 of 1
FINANCE AND SAFETY COMMITTEE
Meeting Minutes
January 21, 2009, 5:00 p.m.; Conference Room #3
PRESENT
Councilmembers: Pam Linder, Chair; and De' Sean Quinn
Absent: Joe Duffle
Staff:
Guests:
I. PRESENTATIONS
No presentations.
City of Tukwila
Finance and Safety Committee
Shawn Hunstock, Jim Morrow, Barbara Saxton, Rebecca McGregor, Bob Giberson, Dave Haynes
and Kimberly Matej
Chuck Parrish
CALL TO ORDER: Chair Linder called the meeting to order at 5:09 p.m.
II. BUSINESS AGENDA
A. A Resolution Establishing a City Clerk's Office Change Fund Level
Staff is seeking full Council approval of a resolution that will establish a change fund in the amount of
$100.00 for the City Clerk's Office. The addition of the change fund is needed for implementation of a
new cashiering system that will increase operational efficiency and improve customer service. This will
require the repeal of Resolution No. 1664. UNANLVIOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO JANURY
26 COW FOR DISCUSSION.
B. Records Storage Facility Rental
Committee members expressed their knowledge of the City's need for a new records storage facility.
Members are in agreement that there is a need to store these records in a safe, accurate and organized
location. However, they have asked staff to make several changes to the informational memo presented
at Committee and return at a later date for approval.
Committee Chair Linder suggested that once the current records facility is vacated (old fire station
located in Allentown) it might serve as a potential location for an artists' loft. RETURN TO FINANCE
SAFETY COMMITTEE ON FEBRUARY 3, 2009.
III. MISCELLANEOUS
Meeting adjourned at 5:39 p.m.
Next meeting: Tuesday, February 3, 2009 5:00 p.m. Conference Room #3
�S Committee Chair Approval
Minutes by KAM.
I CAS NUMBER 09-009
1 MTG. DATE
01/26/09
02/02/09 J
02/02/09
09 -009
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED
$103,385.41
COUNCIL A GENDA SYNOPSIS
Meeting Date
01/26/09
02/02/09 3M
Prepared by 1 Mayor's review Council review
TEM INFORMATION
ORIGIi ALAGENDADA1E: JANUARY 26, 2009
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Bid Award for Interurban Water Reuse
Foster Golf Links Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension Project
CA'IEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance BidAzvard Public Heanng
Mtg Date 01/26/09 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 02/02/09 Mtg Date Mtg Date
SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal n P&R n Police PW
SPONSOR'S This project will allow Foster Golf Links to use King County reclaimed water for irrigation.
SIJMM RY The project was advertised on November 17 and 28, 2008 and seventeen bids were opened
on December 31, 2008. The low bid of $103,385.41 was from Precision Earthworks, Inc. of
Mukilteo, Washington, who has previously done this type of work satisfactorily for public
agencies. The Council is being asked to award the contract to Precision Earthworks, Inc.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. 1 1 Planning Comm.
DAIE: 01/13/09
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Public Works
CONMITI iEE Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole
_COST= IMPACT FUND _SOURCE
AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$110,000.00 $0.00
Fund Source: 401 WATER FUND (PAGE 90, 2009 CIP)
Comments: Construction costs will reimbursed in full by King County,
U Transportation Cmte
RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
MTG. _`ATTACHMENTS
01/26/09 Informational Memorandum dated 01/07/09
City Clerk Bid Opening Results
Bid Tabulation
Exhibit B from Agreement 08 -062 with King County (for reimbursement)
CIP Page 90 (2009 CIP)
Minutes from the Utilities Committee meeting of 01/13/09
ITEM No.
Other
City of Tukwila
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Utilities Committee
FROM: Public Works Directory(
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 7, 2009
SUBJECT: Interurban Water Reuse, Foster Golf Links Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension
Project 92 -WTO6
Bid Award
ISSUE
Award the Foster Golf Links Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension Project to Precision Earthworks, Inc.
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
BACKGROUND
This project will allow Foster Golf Links to use King County reclaimed water for irrigation The project was
advertised for bids on November 17 and 28, 2008 and bids were opened on December 31, 2008. Seven-
teen bids were received with the low bid of $103,385.05 from Precision Earthworks, Inc., of Mukilteo,
Washington. The low bid was in error by $0.36 and will be corrected to $103,385.41. This error does not
affect the bid results. The Engineer's Estimate was $129,258.00.
ANALYSIS
The bids were reviewed and minor mathematical errors were found. These math errors did not affect the
bidding outcome of the project. References indicate that Precision Earthworks has done this type of work
satisfactorily for public agencies.
BUDGET
BID RESULTS ESTIMATE BUDGET
Construction $103,385.41 $129,258.00 $110,000.00
Contingency (10 10,338.54 12,925.80 0.00
Total $113.723.95 $142.183.80 $110.000.00
All construction costs will be reimbursed by King County per Agreement 08 -062, which was approved by
Council on July 21, 2008. The original estimate for construction was $110,000, however, the agreement
allows for up to $129,758.00 (see attached Exhibit B). The budget difference will be covered by the Water
Fund until reimbursed in full by King County. Also attached is the 2009 CIP page 90.
RECOMMENDATION
Award the Foster Golf Link Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension Project to Precision Earthworks, Inc. in the
amount of $103,385.41 and consider this item at the January 26, 2009 Committee of the Whole meeting
and subsequent February 2, 2009 Regular Meeting.
Attachments: City Clerk Bid Opening Results
Bid Tabulation
Exhibit B AG 08 -062
CIP Page 90
P.IPROJECTS A- WT Praect192Wr06 Fostff Go f Red azced WaiJrdot. emo bid award.da
BIDDER NAME
DATE STAMP OF RECEIPT
Nordic Construction
12/18/08 1:50 PM
A A Excavating Inc.
12/19/08 8:15 AM
Construct Co.
12/19/08 8:35 AM
Nor Tec Construction
12/19/08 8:37 AM
Lloyd Enterprises, Inc
12/19/08 8:38 AM
Swick Son Enterprises, Inc.
12/19/08 8:39 AM
Higrade Bark, Topsoil and Rock, Inc.
12/19/08 8:40 AM
Specialized Landscaping, Inc.
12/19/08 9:44 AM
Precision Earthworks
12/19/08 8:50 AM
Kar -Vel Construction
12/23/08 8:40 AM
Talakai Construction
12/23/08 1:16 PM
Dennis R. Craig Construction, Inc.
12/30/08 10:55 AM
Shinstine Assoc.
12/30/08 1:45 PM
VLS Construction Inc
12/31/08 8:33 AM
Archer Construction
12/31/08 8:44 AM
Washington Pipeline
12/31/08 8:47 AM
Reed Trucking Excavating, Inc.
12/31/08 8:47 AM
CITY OF TUKWILA
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
Christy O'Flaherty, CMC, City Clerk
BID OPENING
Foster Golf Links Reclaim Water Pipeline Extension
92 -WTO6
December 31, 2008 10:00 A.M.
REVISED /CORRECTED BID TAB 01/08/09
DATED this 31 day of December, 2008.
GRAND TOTAL ADDENDUMS APPARENT
SECURITY Including Sales (4) LOWEST BIDDER
BID REC'D? Tax Acknowledged (Rank Order)
Y $248,990.90 Y 16
Y $125,241.00 Y
Y $396,736.02 Y
Y $117,611.00 Y
Y $196,309.00 Y
Y $147,150.00 Y
Y $107,787.92 Y
Y $144,161.22 Y
Y $103,385.05 Y
Y $150,638.00 Y
Y $214,730.00 Y
Y $144,583.05 Y
Y $188,837.00 Y
Y $189,189.12 Y
Y $174,059.92 Y
Y $179,839.10
Y $125,350.00
ENGINEER'$ ESTIMA
129,258.00
Y
Y
4
17
3
14
8
2
6
1
9
15
7
12
13
10
11
5
The above figures appear as written within bid documents; and as read aloud at bid opening.
THEY DO NOT however, REPRESENT ANY BID AWARD; apparent low, or otherwise.
Christy O'Flaherty, CMC, City Clerk
FOSTER GOLF COURSE RECLAIMED WATER PIPE LINE EXTENSION
BID RESULTS
PROJECT #92-WT06
MIKE CUSICK PE
12/31/2008
Exhibit B
Preliminary Cost Summary
Reclaimed Water Line Extension Project
P:IPROJECTSW- WT Projects192WTO6 Foster Golf Reclaimed WaterJnterlocal Exhibit B.doc
Description 1 Cost
Material and Labor Subtotal 91,447.00
Contingency 9,148.00
General Contractor Overhead 7,898.00
General Contractor Profit 5,528.00
General Contractor Mark -up on Subcontractors 875.00
Bond and Insurance 3,448.00
B &O Tax 545.00
Permit 2,378.00
General Conditions Allowance 8,491.00
GRAND TOTAL 129,758.00
08-062
PROJECT:
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
STATUS:
MAINT. IMPACT:
COMMENT:
FINANCIAL
(in $000's)
EXPENSES
Design
Land (R/W)
Const. Mgmt.
Construction
TOTAL EXPENSES
FUND SOURCES
Awarded Grant
Proposed Grant
Mitigation Actual
Mitigation Expected
Utility Revenue
TOTAL SOURCES
Interurban Water Reuse
LINE ITEM: 401.02.594.34. .21 PROJECT NO. 92 -WTO6
Develop water reuse along the Interurban corridor with Class A treated wastewater from the Eastside
Reclamation Facility for irrigation, sewer flushing, sweeping, dust control, and other non potable uses.
Using reclaimed water is an element of the City's Water Conservation Plan as well as the Cascade Water
Transmission and Supply Plan.
King County Department of Natural Resources (KCDNR) and the City are currently completing the
assessment of crossing the river through an old 6" line in order to serve Baker Commodities.
Future maintenance and operation of the new meters, tracking and preventing cross connections.
KC Dept of Natural Resources will fund the construction portion of the installation of the reuse water line
to the Foster Golf Course pond. The City will be responsible for design and construction management.
Through Estimated
2007 2008 2009
5
13 110
13 5 110
110 110
0
0
0
13 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18
13 5 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 128
Project Location
2009 2014 Capital Improvement Program
CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY
2009 to 2014
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 BEYOND TOTAL
5
0
0
123
0 0 0 0 0 0 128
90
UTILITIES COMMITTEE
Meeting Minutes
January 13, 2009 5:00 p.m. Conference Room #1
PRESENT
Councilmembers: Kathy Houagrdy, Chair; Joan Hernandez (filling in for Pam Linder), and Dennis Robertson
Staff: Jim Morrow, Frank Iriarte, Bob Giberson, Pat Brodin, Mike Cusick, Gail Labanara,
Derek Speck and Kimberly Matej
CALL TO ORDER: Committee Chair Hougardy called the meeting to order at 5:09 p.m.
I. PRESENTATIONS
No Presentations.
City of Tukwila
Utilities Committee
II. BUSINESS AGENDA
A. Interurban Water Reuse Foster Golf Links Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension Proiect Bid Award
Staff is seeking full Council approval to award a bid in the amount of $103,385.41 to Precision
Earthworks, Inc. for the Foster Golf Links Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension Project. Throughout
2007, staff brought forward information regarding this pipeline extension to the Utilities Committee as
well as full Council (see Utilities Committee minutes dated: 06/02/08, 04/07/08, 02/19/08).
The project will involve extension of the current reclaim water pipeline from Interurban Avenue South to
the existing pond at Foster Golf Links for the use of reclaimed for irrigation. The lowest bidder, in this
competitive process, was Precision Earthworks; who have previously worked with the City, but have
since expanded their services.
King County will not reimburse construction costs associated with this extension to the City until the
project is complete. UNANLMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO JANUARY 26 COW.
B. Tukwila Village Northfield Car Wash Demolition Bid Award
Staff is seeking full Council approval to award a bid in the amount of $35,109.34 to Pacific NW
Earthworks, LLC, for the Tukwila Village Northfield Car Wash Demolition.
As with the bid above, this was also a very competitive process in which 21 bids were submitted. Pacific
NW Earthworks, has not worked with the City before; however, all references have been checked and
cleared.
Staff distributed a new tabulation sheet (page 8), to replace the original, incorrect tabulation sheet (page
8) which was included in the agenda packet. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO
JANUARY 26 COW.
III. MISCELLANEOUS
For a future agenda item, Jim Morrow suggested the Committee discuss the creation of a formal policy
regarding residential and commercial water leak adjustments. Committee members concurred.
Meeting adjourned at 5:42 p.m.
Next meeting: Monday, January 27, 2009 5:00 p.m. Conference Room No. 1.
Committee Chair Approval
Minut�s�by fC ''Reviewed by GL.
1 MTG. DATE
1 01/26/09
I 02/02/09
CAS NUMBER 09-010
CATEGORY Discussion Motion
Mtg Date 01/26/09 Mtg Date
SPONSOR'S
SUMMARY
MTG. DATE
01/26/09
02/02/09
!Meeting Date
01/26/09
02/02/09
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
Prepared by
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Bid Award for Tukwila Village Northfield Car Wash Demolition
Resolution
SPONSOR Council Mayor Adrn Svcs DCD n Finance n Fire Legal P&R Police PIV
This project will demolish the Northfield Car Wash at the Tukwila Village site. The project
was advertised on November 24 and December 1, 2008 and twenty -one bids were opened
on December 31, 2008. The low bid of $35,109.34 was from Pacific NW Earthworks, LLC.
of Fall City, Washington, who has previously done this type of work satisfactorily. The
Council is being asked to award the contract to Pacific NW Earthworks, LLC.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DAZE: 01/13/09
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Public Works
COMMirrrEE Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole
COST- IMPACT =FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$35,109.34 $40,000.00 $0.00
Fund Source: 302 FUND (PAGE 74, 2009 CIP)
Comments:
Initials
Mayor's review
TEM INFORMATION
(ORIG1NALAGENDADAIb: 26, 2009
Mtg Date
RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
ATTACHMENTS
Informationat Memorandum dated 01/07/09
City Clerk Bid Opening Results
Bid Tabulation
Minutes from the Utilities Committee meeting of 01/13/09
Council review
i'ttg Date 02/02/09 Altg Date
I2EmNo.
3tC
Ordinance BtdArvard Public Hearing Other
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Utilities Committee
FROM: Public Works Director
DATE: January 7, 2009
SUBJECT: Tukwila Village Northfield Car Wash Demolition
Project 00 -BG22
Bid Award
ISSUE
Award the Northfield Car Wash Demolition Project to Pacific NW Earthworks, LLC.
BACKGROUND
This project will demolish the Northfield Car Wash at the Tukwila Village site. The project was advertised
for bids on November 24 and December 1, 2008 and bids were opened on December 31, 2008. Twenty
one bids were received with the low bid of $35,109.33 from Pacific NW Earthworks, LLC. of Fall City,
Washington. The low bid was in error by $0.01 in the calculation of sales tax and will be corrected to
$35,109.34. This error does not affect the bid results. The Engineer's Estimate was $60,000.00.
ANALYSIS
The bids were reviewed and minor mathematical errors were found. The math errors did not affect the
bidding outcome of the project. References indicate that Pacific NW Earthworks, LLC has done this type of
work satisfactorily.
BUDGET
City of Tukwila
BID RESULTS ESTIMATE BUDGET
Construction $35,109.34 $60,000.00 $40,000.00
Contingency (10 3,510.93 6,000.00 0.00
Total $38.620.27 $66.000.00 $40.000.00
Attachment: City Clerk Bid Opening Results
Bid Tabulation
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
RECOMMENDATION
Award the Northfield Car Wash Demolition Project to Pacific NW Earthworks, LLC. in the amount of
$35,109.34 and consider this item at the January 26, 2009 Committee of the Whole meeting and
subsequent February 2, 2009 Regular Meeting.
PAPROJECTSI BG Projects OQbg22 TUK VILLAGEUvc third Cawash Derry Bid Awad.doc
SECURITY
BIDDER NAME BID
DATE STAMP OF REC'D.?
RECEIPT
Sloans Enterprise
12/18/08 2:55 PM Yes
Wester Forest, LTD
12/19/08 8:10 AM Yes
Mayer Construction
12/19/08 8 :15 AM Yes
Providence Trucking
12/19/08 8:15 AM Yes
R.W. Rhine, Inc. Yes
12/19/08 8:20 AM Cashier Ck
3 Kings Environmental
12/19/08 8:30 AM Yes
Construct Co.
12/19/08 8 :33 AM Yes
Nor Tec Construction
12/19/08 8 :37 AM Yes
Higrade Bark, Topsoil
and Rock, Inc.
12/19/08 8:40 AM Yes
Advanced
Underground Yes
12/19/08 8:41 AM Cashier Ck
Buckley Recycle
Center, Inc.
12/19/08 9:40 AM Yes
ESE Corporation
12/19/08 9:00 AM Yes
Pacific Northwest
Earthworks LLC
12/23/08 8:46 AM Yes
Cutter Inc.
12/23/08 8:55 AM Yes
Carman's Construction
12/23/08 9:50 AM Yes
Brike Excavating
12/23/08 10:30 AM Yes
Shinstine Assoc.
12/30/08 1:45 PM Yes
Mike McClung Const.
12/30/08 1:56 PM Yes
CITY OF TUKWILA
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
Christy O'Flaherty, CMC, City Clerk
BID OPENING
Tukwila Village Northfield Car Wash Demo
00 -BG22
December 31, 2008 10:30 A.M.
GRAND TOTAL
Including Sales
Tax
47,006.25
56,629.86
37,105.78
49,867.50
47,690.00
43,199.97
210,697.00
42,946.00
38,027.92
39,240.00
40,875.00
54,302.71
35,109.33
86,110.00
37,550.50
39,971.86
106,734.00
55,045.00
ADDENDUMS
(2)
Acknowledged
APPARENT
LOWEST BIDDER
(RANK ORDER)
Yes 11
Yes 17
Yes 2
Yes 13
Yes 12
Yes 9
Yes 21
Yes 8
Yes 4
No 5
Yes 7
Yes 15
Yes 1
Yes 19
Yes 3
Yes 6
Yes 20
Yes 16
Global Diving
Salvage, Inc.
12/30/08 2:07 PM Yes 77,152.38 Yes 18
Reed Trucking
Excavating, Inc.
12/31/08 8:47 AM Yes 44,145.00 Yes 10
Juhl Development,
LLC
12/31/08 8:51 AM Yes 51,775.00 Yes 14
I I I I I
I I I I
ENGINEER'S
ESTIMATE
60,000.00
The above figures appear as written within bid documents; and as read aloud at bid opening.
THEY DO NOT however, REPRESENT ANY BID AWARD; apparent low, or otherwise.
DATED this 31 day of December, 2008.
/s/
Christy O'Flaherty, City Clerk
NORTHFIELD CAR WASH DEMOLITION
BID RESULTS
00-BG22
MIKE CUSICK PE
DECEMBER 31, 2008
UTILITIES COMMITTEE
Meeting Minutes
January 13, 2009 5.•00 p.m. Conference Room #1
PRESENT
Councilmembers: Kathy Houagrdy, Chair; Joan Hernandez (filling in for Pam Linder), and Dennis Robertson
Staff: Jim Morrow, Frank Iriarte, Bob Giberson, Pat Brodin, Mike Cusick, Gail Labanara,
Derek Speck and Kimberly Matej
CALL TO ORDER: Committee Chair Hougardy called the meeting to order at 5:09 p.m.
I. PRESENTATIONS
No Presentations.
City of Tukwila
Utilities Committee
II. BUSINESS AGENDA
A. Interurban Water Reuse Foster Golf Links Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension Proiect Bid Award
Staff is seeking full Council approval to award a bid in the amount of $103,385.41 to Precision
Earthworks, Inc. for the Foster Golf Links Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension Project. Throughout
2007, staff brought forward information regarding this pipeline extension to the Utilities Committee as
well as full Council (see Utilities Committee minutes dated: 06/02/08, 04/07/08, 02/19/08).
The project will involve extension of the current reclaim water pipeline from Interurban Avenue South to
the existing pond at Foster Golf Links for the use of reclaimed for irrigation. The lowest bidder, in this
competitive process, was Precision Earthworks; who have previously worked with the City, but have
since expanded their services.
King County will not reimburse construction costs associated with this extension to the City until the
project is complete. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO JANUARY 26 COW.
B. Tukwila Village Northfield Car Wash Demolition Bid Award
Staff is seeking full Council approval to award a bid in the amount of $35,109.34 to Pacific NW
Earthworks, LLC, for the Tukwila Village Northfield Car Wash Demolition.
As with the bid above, this was also a very competitive process in which 21 bids were submitted. Pacific
NW Earthworks, has not worked with the City before; however, all references have been checked and
cleared.
Staff distributed a new tabulation sheet (page 8), to replace the original, incorrect tabulation sheet (page
8) which was included in the agenda packet. UNANIiVIOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO
JANUARY 26 COW.
III. MISCELLANEOUS
For a future agenda item, Jim Morrow suggested the Committee discuss the creation of a formal policy
regarding residential and commercial water leak adjustments. Committee members concurred.
Meeting adjourned at 5:42 p.m.
Next meeting: Monday, January 27, 2009 5:00 p.m. Conference Room No. 1.
Committee Chair Approval
Minut by KA`:',.'Reviewed by GL.
CAS NUMBER 09-011
SPONSOR'S
SUMMARY
MTG. DATE
01/26/09
02/02/09
MTG. DATE
01/26/09
02/02/09
0 9 1
CATEGORY El Discussion El Motion
Mtg Date 01/26/09 Mfg Date
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED
$100.00 Annually
Fund Source:
Comments:
MeettnyDate
01/26/09
02/02/09
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
Mayor's review
Council review
4W-47 I
ITEM, INFORMATION
ORIGINAL AGENDA DA i E: JANUARY 26, 2009
El Resolution El Ordinance
Mtg Date 02/02/09 Nits Date
RECORD_OF COUNCIL ACTION
ATTACHMENTS
Imm1Vo.
AGENDA I I ENI TITLE Resolution to continue participation in the South County Area Transportation Board
(SCATBd) for 2009 through 2012.
Bit Award 0 Public Hearzng ri Other
illtg Date Mtg Date Aft Date
SPONSOR El Council 0 Mayor 0 Adra Svcs 0 DCD Finance 0 Fire n Legal 0 P&R 11 Police El PIV
Since 1992, SCATBd has been an effective South King County forum for information
sharing, consensus building, and providing valuable input on regional and state
transportation planning and implementation decisions. Annual SCATBd dues are $100.00.
The Council is being asked to approve the resolution authorizing the Mayor to enter into
the interlocal agreement with SCATBd for 2009 through 2012.
REVIEWED BY [I] COW Mtg. El CA&P Cmte LJ F&S Crate Z Transportation Cmte
0 Utilities Cmte El Arts Comm. LIJ Parks Comm. II] Planning Comm.
DATE: 01/20/09
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SpoNsoR/ADNEN. Public Works
COND -LEE Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
Informational Memorandum dated 01/12/09
Draft Resolution with Exhibit A (map) and Exhibit B (2009 2012 SCATBd Agreement)
SCATBd Letter to Mayor (12/30/08)
2008 SCATBd Annual Report and Work Program Goals
SCATBd Letter to Senator Prentice (12/30/08)
Minutes from the Transportation Committee meeting of 01/20/09
City of Tukwila
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Transportation Committee
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
FROM: Public Works Director r
DATE: January 12, 2009
SUBJECT: South County Area Transportation Board (SCATBd)
Resolution and Agreement
ISSUE
Authorize Mayor to sign a new interlocal agreement for continued participation in SCATBd.
BACKGROUND
Since 1992, SCATBd has been an effective South King County forum for information sharing,
consensus building, and providing valuable input on regional and state transportation planning
and implementation decisions. Attached are several documents providing additional insight into
the activities of SCATBd. Annual SCATBd dues are $100.00.
RECOMMENDATION
The Council is being asked to approve the resolution authorizing the Mayor to enter into the
interlocal agreement with SCATBd for 2009 -2012 and consider this item at the January 26,
2009 Committee of the Whole meeting and subsequent February 2, 2009 Regular Meeting.
Attachments: Resolution
Exhibit A (Map) and Exhibit B 2009 -2012 Agreement
SCATBd Letter to Mayor (December 30, 2008)
2008 Annual Report and Work Program Goals
SCATBd Letter to Senator Prentice (December 30, 2008)
P \BOB \SCATBanformational Memorandum SCATBd Res Agrmtdoc
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, SUPPORTING THE CONTINUATION OF THE SOUTH
COUNTY AREA TRANSPORTATION BOARD SCATBD) AS THE SOUTH
KLNG COUNTY FORUM FOR INFORMATION SHARING, CONSENSUS
BUILDING AND COORDINATING TO PROVIDE ADVICE ON
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION ISSUES AND APPROVE CONTINUED
PARTICIPATION BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA; AND AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR TO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT.
WHEREAS, the South King County subarea has been involved in multi-
jurisdictional transportation planning to develop coordinated plans for transportation
improvements and programs for this area; and
WHEREAS, these plans have been approved and efforts continue to be made to
work cooperatively to implement the recommended projects; and
WHEREAS, the SCATBd has been an effective forum for information sharing,
consensus building and providing valuable input on transportation planning and
implementation decisions; and
WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila has participated in the past as a member and finds
it to be in the interest of the City of Tukwila to continue to be a member of said South
County Area Transportation Board;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign the 2009 -2012 Interlocal Agreement,
attached hereto as Exhibit B, to continue to participate in the South County Area
Transportation Board, including identifying representatives and providing dues, and
authorizes the Mayor to enter into this Interlocal Agreement.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON,
at a Council Meeting thereof this day of 2009
ATTEST/ AUTHENTICATED:
Christy O'Flaherty, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY.
Office of the City Attorney
Da F T
C 1Documents and Settin_slA11 Users Desktop\ KellyWISDATA\Resolutions\SCATBd 2009- 2012_dec
BG:ksn 1/2012009
Joan Hernandez, Council President
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Resolution Number:
Attachments: Exhibit A, SCATBd Map
Exhibit B, 2009 -2012 Agreement for the South County Area
Transportation Board
Page 1 of 1
Norm
De
The erforrotion included on this map has been compied by Kng
County state from a variety of sources and is subject to change
without notice, King County makes no representations or
vmrarties, expressed or implied, as to accuracy, completeness,
timeliness or rights to the use of such information. Kitg County shall
not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or
consequential damages inducting, but not United to. lost revenues
or lost profs resulting from the use or misuse of the information
contained on this map. Any safe of this map or information on this
nap is prohibited except by wrbten permission of King County.
Exhibit A
ply Park,
Pierce County
King County
Cove gton
uckleshoot Tribe
ka King County
mow 40•0 Miles
Ma le Valley
South King County Subarea 2008
South County Area Transportation Board (SCATBd)
Black Diamond
Enumclaw
SCATBD and ETP
Cedar River
Roads
Parties to Agreement:
City of Algona
City of Auburn
City of Black Diamond
City of Burien
City of Covington
City of Des Moines
City of Enumclaw
City of Federal Way
City of Kent
City of Maple Valley
City of Milton
City of Normandy Park
City of Pacific
2009 -2012 AGREEMENT
FOR THE
SOUTH COUNTY AREA TRANSPORTATION BOARD
City of Renton
City of SeaTac
City of Tukwila
King County
Muckleshoot Tribe
Pierce County
Pierce Transit
Port of Seattle
Puget Sound Regional Council
Sound Transit
Transportation Improvement Board
Washington State Department of Transportation
Washington State Transportation Commission
Transmittal date to participating members for approval: December 30, 2008
Exhibit B
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and among the CITY OF ALGONA, hereafter
called "Algona the CITY OF AUBURN, hereafter called "Auburn"; the CITY OF BLACK
DIAMOND, hereafter called "Black Diamond"; the CITY OF BURIEN, hereafter called "Burien the
CITY OF COVINGTON, hereafter called "Covington the CITY OF DES MOINES, hereafter called
"Des Moines the CITY OF ENUMCLAW hereafter called "Enumclaw the CITY OF FEDERAL
WAY, hereafter called "Federal Way the CITY OF KENT, hereafter called "Kent the CITY OF
MAPLE VALLEY, hereafter called "Maple Valley CITY OF MILTON, hereafter called "Milton
the CITY OF NORMANDY PARK, hereafter called "Normandy Park the CITY OF PACIFIC,
hereafter called "Pacific the CITY OF RENTON, hereafter called "Renton the CITY OF SEATAC,
hereafter called "SeaTac the CITY OF TUKWILA, hereafter called "Tukwila the
MUCKLESHOOT TRIBE; KING COUNTY, a legal subdivision of the State of Washington, hereafter
called "King County PIERCE COUNTY, a legal subdivision of the State of Washington, hereafter
called "Pierce County; the PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL, hereafter called the "PSRC the
CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY, hereafter called "Sound
Transit PIERCE TRANSIT; the WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION, hereafter called "WSDOT"; the WASHINGTON STATE
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, hereafter called the "Transportation Commission the
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BOARD, hereafter called "TIB and the PORT OF
SEATTLE.
WHEREAS, the parties to this agreement recognize that multi jurisdictional transportation planning
and coordinated transportation plans benefit their citizens; and
WHEREAS, the South County Area Transportation Board (SCATBd) has effectively served as the
central forum for information sharing, consensus building, and coordination to develop
recommendations for transportation policies, projects and programs for the South King subarea; and
1
WHEREAS, the King County Comprehensive Plan for Public Transportation Long Range Policy
Framework, adopted in 1993, divided Metro service into three geographic subareas for the purpose of
allocating new transit subsidy; and
WHEREAS, the Six -Year Transit Development Plan, adopted in 1995, called for the three subarea
transportation boards (the Eastside Transportation Partnership, South County Area Transportation
Board, and SeaShore Transportation Forum) to review, refine, and recommend service priorities to the
King County Executive; and
WHEREAS, Sound Transit relies on the three subarea transportation boards to review and recommend
Sound Transit plans and implementation of projects and services; and
WHEREAS, the geographic subarea boundary area for the South King Subarea is the area represented
on the attached map (Exhibit A);
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties hereto
agree as follows:
1.0 Purpose of Agreement
The purpose of the Agreement is to provide for the continuation of the South County Area
Transportation Board (SCATBd) as the South forum for local governments to share infoinuation, build
consensus, and coordinate among jurisdictions and agencies with the goal of providing advice on
plans, programs, policies and priorities for regional transportation decisions.
2.0 Role of Subarea Transportation Boards
1. The South County Area Transportation Board (SCATBd) is the forum established for the
South subarea of King County for elected officials to provide advice into the following
decisions:
a. The King County Metro six -year transit development plan, and implementation of
transit service priorities.
b. Sound Transit plans and implementation of projects and services.
2. The SCATBd may also provide input on other countywide and regional transportation issues.
3. The three subarea transportation boards shall hold at least one joint meeting annually to
address issues of mutual interest and concern and promote regional decisions.
2
3.0 Voting and Non -voting Members
3.1 The voting members of SCATBd and their voting rights shall be as follows:
1 Voting Members
Algona
Auburn
Black Diamond
Burien
Covington
Des Moines
Enumclaw
Federal Way
King County
Kent
Maple Valley
Milton
Muckleshoot Tribe
Normandy Park
Pacific
Renton
SeaTac
Tukwila
Pierce County
Number of Reps.
Sound
Transit'
1 I Yes
1 I Yes
1 I No
1 I Yes
1 No
1 Yes
1 I No
1 I Yes
3 I Yes
1 Yes
1 No
1 Yes
1 I Yes
1 I Yes
1 I Yes
1 1 No
1 1 Yes
1 1 Yes
1 1 No
3.2 The non voting members of SCATBd shall be as follows:
J
Voting Rights
Metro Transit' Regional
Competition
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes. Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes*
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
No No
Non Voting Member 1 Number of Representatives
Sound Transit 1
PSRC 1
I WSDOT 1 1
ITIB 1
Pierce Transit 1
Port of Seattle I 1
Washington State Transportation Commission 1 1
1 Private sector representation (if approved by SCA"113d) 1 1
Other
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
r Recommendations on Sound Transit capital and service plans and implementation
2 Recommendations on Metro Transit service plans
3 Identification of projects for the regional competition, if prescribed by the process approved by the King County members of the Transportation
Policy Board *projects in Renton south of the Cedar River)
Other recommendations including:
Recommendations to the PSRC on plans, policies and programs, such as input on alternatives, policies and criteria for the regional transportation plan; on studies and
analyses conducted; on criteria; on funding policies; and on regional priorities.
Recommendations to the State Legislature, committees and commissions established by the Legislature, such as input on proposed legislation; on recommendations
from commissions; and on transportation budgets and priorities.
Recommendations to WSDOT on projects, policies, programs, priorities and funding, such as input on alternatives, funding, and priorities for major corridors; on
tolling; on transportation demand management; on Commute Trip Reduction; on active traffic management; and on state transportation plans.
Recommendations to the State Transportation Commission, such as input on policies regarding toiling, preservation, capacity improvements and funding.
Recommendations to the federal delegation on federal legislation, such as input on reauthorization: and on funding priorities.
3.3 A roll call vote shall be taken on recommendations from the subarea board regarding Sound
Transit capital and service plans and implementation, Metro Transit service plans, and identification
of projects for the regional competition, if prescribed by the process approved by the King County
caucus of the Transportation Policy Board. The results shall be recorded by jurisdiction.
4.0 Representation and Conduct
4.1 The representation on the South County Area Transportation Board (SCATBd) shall be as
follows:
1. Elected officials appointed for a one -year term from each of the participating counties and
cities, in the number specified above King County representation shall be a maximum of two
Councilmembers and the King County Executive or his designee.
2. High level staff from WSDOT, Pierce Transit, the Port of Seattle and the PSRC; a South King
subarea board member of Sound Transit; the Director of the TIB; and a representative
designated by the Washington Transportation Commission.
3. A representative of a private sector group or groups as determined by SCATBd.
4.2 Each participating member shall appoint an alternate. Designated alternates may vote in place
of designated voting representatives in the absence of the designated representative.
4.3 On an annual basis, member jurisdictions shall infoini the Lead Agency in writing of its
representatives and alternates and provide the appropriate contact information for each.
4.4 The SCATBd will be responsible for overall program direction, approving Technical Advisory
Committee recommendations and providing direction for input on transportation decisions
4.5 The SCATBd may establish its own bylaws and rules of procedures and may modify these as
appropriate. Such bylaws and rules shall be consistent with the provisions of this Agreement and
modifications to such bylaws and rules will not alter this Agreement.
4.6 The SCATBd may establish subcommittees as it determines appropriate.
4.7 With a simple majority of voting members as shown in Section 3.1, the SCATBd can adopt
resolutions, authorize correspondence, request studies, or provide other advisory input to member
jurisdictions or regional and state activities, including plans policies, programs, projects or legislative
issues.
4.8 Any voting member may request that a minority statement be included in communications or
otherwise distributed with the adopted majority position.
5.0 Chair and Vice Chair
5.1 The chair and vice chair of SCATBd shall be representatives of a member county or city
located within the subarea's geographic boundaries. The chair and vice chair shall be elected by a
majority of the voting representatives from jurisdictions within the subarea's geographic boundaries.
4
5.2 The chair and vice chair shall be nominated by a nominating committee established in
November of each year, and nominated in December of each year.
5.3 The chair and vice chair shall serve a term of one year from February 1 through January 31 of
the following year.
5.4 The chair and the vice chair shall conduct the SCATBd activities within adopted procedures
and guidelines. The chair and vice chair are responsible for setting meeting agendas, ensuring fair
opportunity for discussion, signing correspondence, and speaking on behalf of the SCATBd.
6.0 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
6.1 Each member jurisdiction or agency shall appoint at least one planning, public works and/or
intergovernmental staff person to the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). Private sector groups
shall not participate in TAC activities. Each member jurisdiction and agency is expected to contribute
such staff as is necessary to accomplish the work program adopted by the SCATBd.
6.2 The TAC shall provide technical assistance as requested by the SCATBd and shall advise the
SCATBd and their respective members on emergent transportation issues, and be responsible for
overall program development including drafting of the work program. The TAC shall also review
consultant work, and coordinate its activities with adjacent jurisdictions, including the other subarea
transportation forums.
6.3 When appropriate, the TAC will make recommendations for consideration of the SCATBd. The
TAC's recommendations shall be arrived at by consensus of a majority of the TAC members present.
If the Technical Advisory Committee is unable to reach consensus on a particular issue, TAC members
may present discussion questions or a dissenting opinion to the SCATBd for consideration.
7.0 Lead Agency
7.1 King County will be the lead agency for the purposes of receipt of funds, contract
administration, and disbursement of funds associated with consultant contracts and study related
expenses. King County shall appoint a staff member to serve as Project Manager for special projects.
King County shall also provide general administrative and program support for the SCATBd. King
County assumes wage and benefits cost of its staff performing Lead Agency responsibilities.
7.2 Lead Agency responsibilities include administrative and technical support for meetings and
ongoing operations; collection, administration and distribution of dues; support to the chair and vice
chair; preparation of correspondence and other materials; development and monitoring of work
program; and coordination of consultant services or other special projects as directed by the SCATBd.
8.0 Annual Work Program
The SCATBd may undertake activities consistent with its purposes and shall prepare an annual
progress report and work program for the following year for submittal to its members.
5
9.0 Financing and Cost Sharing Guidelines
9.1 Yearly Dues Each member city will contribute $100.00 annually per vote awarded to remain
members in good standing. The designated Lead Agency shall not be required to pay yearly dues.
This revenue shall be used for special events, including an annual joint meeting of the subarea
transportation boards, public education, or other expenses authorized by the SCATBd.
9.2 The following guidelines shall generally apply:
1. Annual Review of Financing: The SCATBd shall determine by June 30 of each year whether
an additional financial contribution will be requested of the SCATBd jurisdictions.
2. Voting Members: If additional financial contributions are determined to be necessary, costs
shall be shared among member jurisdictions other than King County by a method as determined
by action of the SCATBd. Unless agreed to otherwise, King County's share shall be limited to
the costs of providing staff support.
3. Non voting Members: The member agencies shall not be expected to make a direct funding
contribution.
4. Modification to Agreement Required: A modification to this agreement specifying cost
sharing, purpose, scope of work and other details is required to obligate a member jurisdiction
to funding participation.
10.0 Withdrawal of a Party from this Agreement
Each party, for its convenience and without cause or for any reason whatsoever, may withdraw from
participation in this Agreement by providing written notice, sent certified mail, return receipt required,
to all of the other parties at least thirty (30) days in advance of the effective date of the withdrawal. A
withdrawing party shall not be entitled to a refund of any payments to SCATBd but shall make any
contributions required to be paid to other parties under this Agreement for costs which had been
obligated prior to the effective date of the withdrawal. In the event a party withdraws, the remaining
parties shall amend this Agreement as necessary to reflect changes in the named parties and cost and
revenue allocations. In the event of withdrawal by a party, this Agreement shall terminate as to that
party but shall continue in effect with respect to the remaining parties. However, the termination of
this Agreement with respect to one or more parties shall not affect any of the parties' rights or
obligations, including any rights or obligations of a withdrawing party, that are expressly intended to
survive termination.
Each party's funding to perform its obligations under the Agreement, beyond the current appropriation
year, is conditional upon appropriation by the party's governing body of sufficient funds to support
said obligations. Should such an appropriation not be approved for a future year, a party may exercise
its right to withdraw as provided herein.
11.0 Duration
This Agreement shall take effect upon being duly adopted by the governing bodies of all parties and
executed by the authorized representatives of all parties. This Agreement shall remain in effect until
all the tasks have been completed to the satisfaction of the SCATBd or until such time as the
6
participating members choose to conclude the program for other reasons, but in no case shall the
program extend beyond December 31, 2012, unless terminated earlier or extended in accordance with
Section 11.0. If all parties desire to extend this Agreement beyond December 31, 2012, they shall
execute a Statement of Extension. In no event shall the Agreement be extended beyond December 31,
2014.
12.0 Termination
All parties to this Agreement must agree to terminate this Agreement in order for such termination to
be effective. If all parties desire to terminate this Agreement, they shall execute a Statement of
Termination. Upon termination, no party shall be required to make any additional contributions. Any
remaining funds shall be refunded to the parties to this Agreement according to Section 13.0.
13.0 Real and Personal Property
The acquisition of real property is not anticipated under this Agreement. Any personal property
acquired pursuant to this Agreement shall be held by the Lead Agency. In the event this Agreement
expires or is terminated in accordance with Section 11.0, any personal property other than cash shall
remain with the Lead Agency.
14.0 Return of Funds
At such time as this Agreement expires or is terminated in accordance with Section 11.0, any
unexpended and uncommitted funds shall be distributed proportionately to those parties to this
Agreement at the time of termination based on each party's percentage share of the original
contribution.
15.0 Filing
This Agreement shall be filed with the King County Department of Records and Elections.
16.0 Legal Relations
16.1 The parties shall comply with all applicable state and federal laws and regulations.
16.2 This Agreement is solely for the benefit of the parties hereto and gives no right to any other
party. No joint venture or partnership is formed as a result of this Agreement. No employees or agents
of one party or any of its contractors or subcontractors shall be deemed, or represent themselves to be,
employees of any other party.
16.3 Each party shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other party and all of its officials,
employees, principals and agents from all claims, demands, suits, actions, and liability of any kind
whatsoever which arise out of, are connected with, or are incident to any negligent acts of the first
party, its contractor, and/or employees, agents, and representatives in performing the first party's
obligations under this Agreement. The parties agree that their obligations under this paragraph extend
to claims made against one party by the other party's own employees. For this purpose, the parties, by
mutual negotiation, hereby waive any immunity that, as respects the other party only, would otherwise
be available against such claims under the industrial insurance provisions of RCW Title 51. In the
event either party incurs attorney's fees, costs or other legal expenses to enforce the provisions of this
7
section, against the other party, all such fees, costs and expenses shall be recoverable by the prevailing
party.
16.4 The provisions of this Section 16 shall survive and remain applicable to each of the parties
notwithstanding any termination or expiration of this Agreement and notwithstanding a party's
withdrawal from this Agreement.
17.0 Entirety and Modifications
17.1 This Agreement merges and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations and agreements
between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof and constitutes the entire agreement between
the parties.
17.2 This Agreement may be modified or extended only by written instrument signed by all the
parties hereto.
18.0 Counterparts
The signature pages of this Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which
shall be an original.
8
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be signed and delivered by its duly authorized
officer or representative as of the date set forth below its signature.
City of Algona
By: By: By:
Date: Date: Date.
City of Burien
City of Enumblcaw
City of Maple Valley
City of Pacific
City of Tukwila
Pierce County
Puget Sound Regional Council
City of Auburn City of Black Diamond
City of Covington City of Des Moines
By: By: By:
Date: Date: Date.
City of Federal Way City of Kent
By: By: By:
Date: Date: Date:
City of Milton City of Normandy Park
By: By: B
Date: Date: Date-
City of Renton City of Sea Tac
By: By: By:
Date: Date: Date:
King County Muckleshoot Tribe
By: By: By
Date: Date: Date
Pierce Transit Port of Seattle
By: By: By:
Date: Date: Date:
By: By: By:
Date. Date: Date:
Washington State Department of Washington State Transportation
Transportation Commission
By: By:
Date: Date:
Sound Transit Transportation Improvement Board
9
December 30, 2008
The Honorable Jim Haggerton
Mayor, City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, WA 98188
Dear Mayor Haggerton:
N J South County Area Transportation Board
MS: KSC -TR -0814
201 South Jackson Street
Seattle, WA 98104 -3856
Phone: (206) 2634710 Fax: (206) 684 -2111
On December 16, 2008 the South County Area Transportation Board (SCATBd)
approved a revised agreement to extend SCATBd's activities through 2012. The revisions
to this agreement, as well as the agreements for the Eastside Transportation Partnership
and the SeaShore Transportation Forum, were developed by a joint subcommittee with
representation from all three boards. The revisions are intended to provide more
consistency and clarity for the boards' operations, and more opportunities for
coordination among the subareas. Highlights of the proposed changes include the
following:
Clarify voting and non voting members, and seek consistency among the subareas
in representation by the Port of Seattle, State Transportation Commission and
local transit agencies from neighboring counties.
Clarify voting rights on all issues, so that broad discussion is promoted, but voting
on recommendations about subarea -based resource issues is limited to those
jurisdictions Located within the geographic boundaries of the subarea.
Establish consistent dues of $100 per voting member for each subarea.
Establish that one use of the dues shall be used to hold at least one joint meeting
annually, to promote discussion of issues that cross subarea boundaries.
Attached is the revised approved SCATBd agreement, which we are sending to all
participating cities and agencies for their individual approval. We hope that your
governing body reviews this and takes action to approve it by mid- January. Approval by
your governing body should include authorizing the appropriate person to sign the
agreement on your city's behalf. A draft resolution to facilitate that process is attached.
After your city has approved the agreement, please sign in the appropriate signature block
and return it to Sally Marks, Supervising Transportation Planner, King County
Department of Transportation, 201 S. Jackson Street, Seattle, WA. 98104.
After all the parties have signed, you will receive a completed copy of the agreement for
your records.
2009 SCATBd Agreement
December 30, 2008
Page 2 of 3
If you have questions, please contact Sally Marks at 206 -263 -4710 or
sally.marksP.kin2countv.Qov. Thank you very much for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
Suzette Cooke
Mayor, Kent
SCATBd Chair
Sue Blazak
Councilmember, Burien
SCATBd Vice Chair
Attachment: 2009 -2012 SCA "1`Bd Agreement
Draft Resolution
cc: The Honorable Dennis Robertson, Councilmember, City of Tukwila
Bob Giberson, City Engineer, City of Tukwila
Christy O'Flaherty, City Clerk, City of Tukwila
2008 Annual Report
South County Area Transportation Board (SCATBd)
Mission: The mission of SCATBd is to serve as a South King County forum for information
sharing, consensus building, and coordinating in order to resolve transportation issues and
promote transportation programs that benefit the South King County area.
Goals: To achieve its mission, SCATBd adopted the following goals:
1. Develop and promote a transportation system that will provide personal mobility choices for
South County residents consistent with the transportation goals of the Growth Management
Act and;
2. Develop and promote transportation and related actions that promote and sustain economic
development, through efficient movement of people and goods, within the South County and
contiguous areas.
History: The South County Area Transportation Board (SCATBd), composed of four cities and
King County, initially was formed in the late 1980's to identify and promote transportation
improvements in the South County. Significant funding was received from the Transportation
Improvement Board for these purposes, and the infoinial group moved toward forming a
Transportation Benefit District. At King County's request, this effort was superseded in 1992 by
the formation of a new and expanded SCATBd involving fourteen South County cities and King
County. This was accomplished through adoption of faunal motions by each participating
jurisdiction. Subsequently, interlocal agreements were adopted to guide SCATBd operations.
Since 1992, SCATBd has provided valuable input to the development of the King County Metro
Transit Six -Year Plan and service implemented in accordance with that plan and the
development and implementation of Sound Transit's Sound Move Plan. SCAI'I3d also has
competed successfully for federal funding, has provided input to State Legislative actions, and
was instrumental in providing South King County priorities for the Roads and Transit ballot
measure in 2007 and the successful Sound Transit Phase 2 ballot measure in 2008.
SCATBd Structure: Members of SCATBd for 2008 are shown on the following page. Each
elected official representing a city or county has one vote. Agency representatives are non-
voting members. In addition to formal membership, South King County Chambers of Commerce
are encouraged to attend. During 2008 Mayor Suzette Cook served as Chair and Councilmember
Sue Blazak served as Vice Chair.
SCATBd Website: Additional information about SCATBd, including meeting schedules and
summaries, is available at the following internet address:
www.kinacountv.gov/ transportation /kcdot /nlanninaandnolicv /oi to /subareas/
2008 SCATBd Work Program Goals and Accomplishments
In early 2008, SCATBd developed a work program for 2008 with four major work items. These
are shown below, with a brief indication of the accomplishments achieved for each item.
2008 Major Work Item
Administration
Planning
Implementation and
Funding: Clarify and
provide input on SCATBd
priorities for funding
Education and Advocacy:
Promote funding and
implementation of SCATBd
prionty projects and
programs
2008 Accomplishments
Approved the 2008 Work Program on February 19, 2008.
Reviewed dues as part of revisions to agreement and
accepted dues of $100 per voting member.
Approved revisions to the SCATBd agreement December 16,
2008.
Developed a list of prionty non motorized trails projects that
linked the regional trails in South King County to transit
facilities and urban areas, and provided new connections
between existing regional trails.
Provided the 520 Tolling Implementation Committee with
concerns regarding potential effects tolling may have on
South King County cities because of diverted traffic.
Monitored development of Transportation 2040 and
formulation of alternatives in preparation for 2009 draft plan.
Monitored work of the Regional Traffic Operations
Committee activities.
Provided recommendations and support to the Sound Transit
board regarding the development of a Sound Transit Phase 2
plan that was approved by voters in November, 2008.
Monitored implementation of 10,000 hours of new Transit
Now service, including the Renton and Kent partnership on
route 153, and provided input for future improvements.
Monitored implementation of Sound Move projects
including two additional Sounder south line roundtrips and
changes in Express Bus service. Also provided input in
preparation for Link Light Rail service implementation in
2009.
Received briefing on successful implementation of SR 167
HOT lane pilot project and on the status of funded and
unfunded I -405 projects.
Provided input to the 2008 Legislature regarding the Board's
recommendations on important transportation related issues
to South King County including, maintaining existing
infrastructure, ensuring the state upholds its responsibility to
the State Transportation System, bolstering funding for local,
regional and freight comdors, and developing a new state
policy requiring local input and coordination with transit
agencies when making tolling related decisions.
Provided guidance in the preparation of a report
documenting the magnitude of local transportation needs,
particularly preservation needs. The PSRC will use this as a
basis for local needs in Transportation 2040.
Reviewed existing options for local transportation funding
and included consideration of this as a priority for the 2009
legislative session.
Agreed that the three subarea boards should make efforts to
communicate more frequently on issues of mutual interest
and revised the ETP agreement to reflect this.
Adopted priority issues and a strategy for 2009 legislative
session.
December 30, 2008
The Honorable Margarita Prentice
Senator, 1 lth District
P.O. Box 40411
Olympia, WA 98504 -0411
Dear Senator Prentice:
South County Area Transportation Board
MS KSC -TR -0814
201 South Jackson Street
Seattle, WA 98104 -3856
Phone: (206) 263 -4710 Fax: (206) 684 -2111
The South King County Area Transportation Board (SCATBd) consists of elected officials
representing sixteen cities and all of unincorporated South King County representing some
650,000 people who comprise about 37% of the county's population. On behalf of SCATBd, we
are writing to transmit to you our priority transportation issues for your consideration during the
2009 Legislative session.
SCATBd's Policy Statements for the 2009 Legislative Session
Approved December 16, 2008
The SCATBd represents the largest freight, manufacturing and industrial center in the
Pacific Northwest. Along with accommodating about 37 percent of King County's overall
population, the SCATBd area serves as:
A crossroads for highways: I -5, I -405, SR -18, SR -99, SR -161, SR -162, SR -164, SR -167,
SR -169, SR -181, SR -509, SR -515, SR -516, SR -518.
The site of the region's highest commuter rail ridership segments.
The southern terminus for Link light rail, which will be extended to the northern
boundary of Federal Way under the Sound Transit 2 (ST2) plan.
Home of the state's largest airport, which is the 14 busiest airport in the United States.
The connection between the Ports of Seattle and Tacoma and the second largest
warehouse distribution center on the West Coast: SR -167 accommodates fully one -third
of all Port of Seattle and Port of Tacoma truck traffic.
A critical player in freight movement and through -put.
A major employment center for the entire region (warehousing, Weyerhaeuser, Boeing,
Sea -Tac Airport).
Host to some of the busiest park -and -ride and transit facilities within the region, and
several Transit Oriented Development projects.
Algona Auburn Black Diamond Burien Covington Des Moines Enumclaw Federal Way Kent King County Maple Valley
Milton Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Normandy Park Pacific Renton SeaTac Tukwila Pierce Transit Port of Seattle
Sound Transit Transportation Improvement Board Puget Sound Regional Council Washington State Department of Transportation
2009 Legislative Agenda
December 30, 2008
Page 2
SCATBd members are knowledgeable about transportation and play a key role in regional
discussions.
Members of SCATBd serve on the Puget Sound Re Council (PSRC)
Transportation Policy Board, the Sound Transit Board, and the state's Transportation
Improvement Board.
SCATBd has regular interactions with WSDOT officials.
SCATBd routinely weighs in on regional transportation ballot measures, and develops an
annual Legislative Agenda.
SCATBd has ongoing communications with the King County Council, the Sound Transit
Board, the PSRC and the Prosperity Partnership, and other key players across the region.
SCATBd recognizes the serious statewide budget shortfall that faces the 2009
Legislature and offers the following priorities for the Legislature's consideration:
1. The 2009 Legislature needs to protect and maintain existing projects and funding
within the 2003 Nickel Package and 2005 Transportation Partnership Act (TPA).
While SCATBd recognizes that the Legislature will need to deal with serious statewide
budget shortfalls, it continues to urge the Legislature to maintain as a top priority the
completion of critical South King County 2003 Nickel and 2005 TPA projects. This
includes improvements in the 1 -405, SR 167, SR 518 and 1 -5 corridors, including the I -5 /SR-
18 /SR -161 "Triangle" interchange project.
2. The Legislature needs to consider funding for significant state corridors.
SCATBd would like to emphasize the need for the planned, but currently unfunded,
improvements in the 1 -405 corridor between Renton and Bellevue, which experiences the
worst congestion in the state. SCATBd was gratified that the Stage 2 I -405 project is
continuing to move forward, but urges the Legislature to develop a funding plan for the
remaining improvements in the I -405 corridor.
SCATBd would also like to take this opportunity to emphasize the importance of completing
other regional projects, such as the I -5 /SR 509 project, which is ready to go and would
provide a much needed facility for freight as well as general traffic. In addition, funding for
future projects, such as those identified in the SR 518, SR 169 and SR 164 Route
Development Plans, should be pursued.
3. SCATBd urges the Legislature to revisit how transportation is funded and explore
better ways to meet the growing funding gap. The current system of financmg
transportation infrastructure is based on an outdated model and is overly dependent on a
gasoline tax that will yield less and less revenue with the delivery of more transit
alternatives, battery powered vehicles, and consumer reactions to sharply rising prices.
Given these dynamics, coupled with the inadequate funding available for transportation
needs at both the state and local levels, the Legislature should look at ways to fundamentally
refolni the current system and seek more sustainable and reliable revenue sources that fit
with the multi faceted transportation systems of tomorrow. The goal should be to assure
2009 Legislative Agenda
December 30, 2008
Page 3
sufficient revenues at the state and local levels to keep the system safe and reliable for the
traveling public. This may include establishment of a blue ribbon commission to assess the
current situation, evaluate a series of options, and make recommendations.
Consideration should be given to exploring ways to provide more direct revenues to
local jurisdictions that bear the ultimate responsibility for getting people and goods
to their final destinations.
In Lieu of new revenue, the Legislature should look at what effective tools and
options can be provided to local governments to assist with the growing backlog of
local roadway and maintenance and operations needs.
4. The 2009 Legislature should adopt a tolling model that can be applied to other
corridors in the future. SCATBd recognizes that tolling can be an effective tool to manage
traffic and also generate revenue, as demonstrated by the Tacoma Narrows Bridge and SR
167 HOT lanes pilot project. In developing tolling policies for the SR 520, I -90 and other
corridors, the Legislature should strive to design a model that passes fairness and
reasonableness tests. It will also be necessary to provide sufficient mitigation so that good
alternatives to driving in the corridor are available, and adverse effects in other corridors
from diverted traffic can be mitigated. To do this the Legislature should consider a range of
mitigation tools, including capital improvements, transportation demand management and
transit service.
5. The State needs to be a partner with local governments in meeting Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT) reduction goals. A Transportation Interim Working Group will deliver a
report and recommendations to the 2009 Legislature. The Legislature will need to find ways
to meet the funding needs for Commute Trip Reduction (CTR), transit, vanpools and other
strategies, as required by the adopted legislation, taking care that new actions do not result in
unfunded mandates to local jurisdictions.
6. The State needs to provide financial support for the basic Commute Trip Reduction
program. Over recent years, state support for the basic CTR program has been reduced,
resulting in cities' subsidizing this program, which is mandated by the State. While the state
has provided funding for vanpools and grant programs, it should fund the basic CTR
program first.
7. SCATBd recognizes that regional transportation and transit "governance" may be a
topic for the 2009 Legislature. SCATBd members continue to question if governance
changes are the best way to address a lack of investment and growing congestion in the
transportation system. However, if new governance structures are contemplated, SCATBd
requests a seat at the table to be involved in governance discussions. SCATBd also asks
legislators to consider specific "gaps," functions or areas of focus that should be addressed if
governance is examined.
2009 Legislative Agenda
December 30, 2008
Page 4
SCATBd offers its help to Legislators by
Working with legislators on creative solutions to these challenges
Identifying transportation projects and investments in infrastructure that can play a key
role in any economic stimulus package that the state or federal government undertakes
Communicating these priorities to other partners and the public.
Our members look forward to discussing these issues with you over the coming months.
Together, we hope to ensure that the 2009 session results in continued improvements in our
transportation system. Thank you in advance for your consideration of our concerns.
Sincerely,
Suzette Cooke Sue Blazak
Mayor, City of Kent Councilmember, City of Burien
Chair Vice Chair
South County Area Transportation Board
cc: SCATBd Members
TRANSPORTATION CONIlVIITTEE
Meeting Minutes
January 20, 2009 5:00 p.m. Conference Room 1
City of Tukwila
Transportation Committee
PRESENT
Councilmembers: De' Sean Quinn, Chair; Dennis Robertson and Verna Griffin
Staff: Jim Morrow, Bob Giberson, Frank Iriarte, Robin Tischmak, Pat Brodin Peter Lau, Mike
Ronda, Gail Labanara, Mike Mathia, Jack Pace, Jon Harrison and Kimberly Matej
Guests: Chuck Parrish
CALL TO ORDER: Committee Chair Quinn called the meeting to order at 5:08 p.m.
I. PRESENTATIONS
No presentations.
II. BUSINESS AGENDA
A. Boeing Access Road Bridge Replacement
Staff returned to the Transportation Committee to report out on the status of a grant application that was
submitted to Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) for replacement of the Boeing
Access Bridge (see Transportation Committee minutes dated June 10, 2008). The City was not awarded any
grant monies through this funding period, but staff will continue to submit applications for this project when
funds become available. During this first funding stage, WSDOT had a total of $31 million available for
project funding and our grant request totaled $24.8 million. Staff briefly reviewed project submissions that
did receive funding. Hopefully, future funding cycles will support larger projects. INFORMATION
ONLY.
B. 2008 Overlay and Repair Program Project Completion and Acceptance
Staff is seeking full Council approval for contract closeout and authorization to release retainage for
completed construction of the 2008 Overlay and Repair Program. The project required two change orders,
but was still completed under budget due to unit price underruns. The fmal contract cost is $690,996.40; a
savings of approximately $6,300. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO FEBRUARY 2
CONSENT AGENDA:
C. 2009 -2012 SCA'1'13d Interlocal Agreement and Resolution,
Staff is seeking full Council approval to enter into an interlocal agreement for continued participation in the
South County Area Transportation Board SCATBd). Annual dues are $100 per voting member, and
Tukwila currently has one represented voting member per the interlocal agreement. SCATBd can serve as a
unified voice to advocate for transportation issues and programs that affect South King County.
UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO JANUARY 26 COW FOR DISCUSSION.
D. Tukwila International Boulevard Phase II and 111 Construction Management Services Agreement
In December 2008, the City Council awarded the construction contract to Gary Merlino Construction
Company for Tukwila International Boulevard (TIB) Phases II and III (see Council minutes dated 12/15/08).
Staff is now seeking full Council approval to enter into a contract with Harris Associates in the amount of
$1,275,049 for construction management services for TIB Phases II and III. The City has not worked with
Harris Associates before; however, they scored highest in the City's selection process. Staff has
negotiated a lower than usual overhead and profit margin to keep costs within budget for the project. TIB
Phase II and III construction is anticipated to run on a 21 -month project schedule. UNANEVIOUS
APPROVAL. FORWARD TO JANUARY 26 COW FOR DISCUSSION.
CAS NUMBER 09-012
CATEGORY
SPONSOR
SPONSOR'S
SUMMARY
REVIEWED BY
Discussion
MTG. DATE
01/26/09
02/02/09
MTG. DATE
01/26/09
02/02/09
09l_01Z
Meeting Date
01/26/09
02/02/09
AGENDA Irr;M TITLE Tukwila International Boulevard Phase II III
Construction Management Services with Harris Associates
Motion Resolution Ordinance Bu d Award Public Hearing 1 1 Other
Mtg Date 01/26/09 Mtg Date 02/02/09 Mtg Date Mtg Date
Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD n Finance n Fire Legal P&R Police PW/
Requests for construction management proposals were advertised with seven proposals
submitted and four firms interviewed. Harris and Associates rated the highest with the
most qualified teamto deal with the complex construction issues of this project. The Harris
contract will supplement in -house construction management capabilities for a fee of
$1,275,049.00. Council is being asked to approve the contract with Harris Associates.
COW Mtg.
Utilities Cmte
DA1'E: 01/20109
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADM. Public Works
COti IrII1 E Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole
POSTIMPAGT:1 FUND SOURCE
AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED
$1,275,049.00 $2,115,000.00
Fund Source: 104 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (PAGE 16 17 2009 CIP)
Comments:
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
EM INFORMATION
1 ORIGINAL AGENDA DA E: JANUARY 26, 2009
CA &P Cmte
Arts Comm.
Initials
Mayor's review Couna44 review
F &S Cmte
n Parks Comm.
ECORD OF ACTION
ATTACHMENTS
Informational Memorandum dated 01/14/09 (revised after TC)
Consultant Selection Rating Sheet
Consultant Contract with Scope of Work and Fee
Minutes from the Transportation Committee meeting of 01/20/09
ITEMNO.
Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date
Transportation Cmte
Planning Comm.
City of Tukwila
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Transportation Committee
ISSUE
FROM: Public Works Director
DATE: January 14, 2009
SUBJECT: Tukwila International Blvd. Phases II III (S 116th St to S 139th St)
Project Nos. 95 -RWO3 95 -RWO4
Construction Management (CM) Services with Harris Associates
Approve Consultant selection and authorize the execution of a contract with Harris Associates, to provide
construction management services for TiB Phases II III Project.
BACKGROUND
While in -house City staff will provide lead construction management of the Tukwila International Blvd Phase II Ill
project, additional specialized resources will be required to supplement in -house capabilities A Request for
Proposals was advertised for consulting services and the City received seven (7) proposals that were rated by a
selection panel. The top four (4) firms were interviewed (Harris, KBA, Jacob, and CH2M Hill). Harris was rated
highest by the cumulative scores of the interview panel. It was demonstrated that they had the most qualified team to
deal with the complex construction issues of this project.
DISCUSSION
The Harris contract will include a full time senior inspector, full time junior inspector /office engineer, compliance
support, on call schedule analysis, and on call structural inspection. The fee of $1,275,049.00 is reasonable for the
scope provided by Harris for this large project. Two additional CM items are included in the budget listed below, KPG
Supplement No. 7 and the purchase of a CM trailer (each is a separate item for Council approval). The total revised
construction management budget is 15% of the new construction contract, plus contingency ($14,100,505.58 x 15%
for CM approx. $2,115,000.00).
Harris CM Inspection
KPG Sup #7 CM Testing (see separate CAS)
CM Trailer (see separate CAS)
City Staff CM, WSDOT Support Misc Expenses
TIB Phase II CM Budget (CIP page 16)
TIB Phase III CM Budget (CIP page 17)
Construction Budget to Supplement CM
Total Budget Amounts
RECOMMENDATION
The Council is being asked to approve the contract with Harris Associates to provide construction management
services for Tukwila International Blvd Phase II Ill Project in the amount of $1,275,049.00 and consider this item at
the January 26, 2009 Committee of the Whole meeting and subsequent February 2, 2009 Regular Meeting.
Attachments: Consultant Selection Rating Sheet
Consultant Contract including Scope of Work and Fee
P!PROJECTS'A- RW RS Prcjects195RW03 TIBZdnfo Memo Harris CM 01-14-09 MERdoc
CM Expenses Budget
$1,275,049.00 0.00
385,000.00 0.00
30,000.00 0 00
424,951.00 0.00
0.00 $1,211,000.00
0.00 701,000.00
0.00 203.000.00
$2.115.000.00 $2.115.000.00
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
TRANSPORTATION INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD PHASES II AND III
CM CONSULTANTS FINAL SELECTION
Local Agency
Standard Consultant
Agreement
Architectural/Engineering Agreement
Personal Services Agreement
Agreement Number
95 RWO3 (Harris 074 4038)
Federal Aid Number Phase 2: STPF STPUL 0099(077)
Phase 3: HLP- STPUL- 0099(103)
Agreement Type (Choose one)
Lump Sum
Lump Sum Amount
Cost Pius Fixed Fee
Overhead Progress Payment Rate
Overhead Cost Method
Actual Cost
Actual Cost Not To Exceed
Fixed Overhead Rate
Fixed Fee
Specific Rates Of Pay
I Negotiated Hourly Rate
Provisional Hourly Rate
Cost Per Unit of Work
Index of Exhibits (Check all that apply):
Exhibit A -1 Scope of Work
El Exhibit A-2 Task Order Agreement
Exhibit B -I DBE Utilization Certification.
Exhibit C Electronic Exrhange of Data
Exhibit D -1 Payment Lump Sam
Exhibit D-2 Payment Cost Plus
F,xhibit D -3 Payment Hourly Rate
Exhibit D-4 Payment Provisional
Exhibit E-1 Fee Lump/Fixedltanit
Exhibit E-2 Fee Specific Rates
Exhibit F Overhead Cost
Exhibit G Subcontracted Work
Exhibit G -1 Subconsultant Fee
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this
between the Local Agency of City of Tukwila
and the above organization hereinafter called the CONSULTANT'.
DOT Form 140-089 EF Page '1 of 8
Revised 30U08
Consultant/Address/Telephone
Harris Associates, inc.
1800 112th Avenue NE, #210W
Bellevue, WA 98004
425.453.0999 phone
425.453.0707 fax
'Project Titre And Work Description
Tukwila international Boulevard
Phase 11 111 Improvements
"Construction Administration Inspection
Services"
°lo
DBE Participation
Yes MN()
Federal ID Number or Social Security Number
942385238
Do you require a 1099 for IRS? Completion Date
El Yes No Dec. 31, 2010
Total Amount Authorized 1,275,049.00
Management Reserve Fund
0
Maximum Amount Payable 1,275,049.00
Exhibit 0-2 Fee -Sub Specific Rates
Exhibit G-3 Sub Overhead Cost
Exhibit H Title VI Assurances
Exhibit I Payment Upon Termination of Agreement
Exhibit 7 Alleged Consultant Design Error Procedures
Exhibit K Consultant Claim Procedures
Exhibit L Liability Insurance Increase
Exhibit M -la Consultant Certification
Exhibit M -Ib Agency Official Certification
Exhibit M -2 Certification Primary
Exhibit M -3 Lobbying Certification
Exhibit M4 Pricing Data Certification
App. 31310 Supplemental Signature Page
day of 2009
Washington, hereinafter called the AGENCY'
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, the AGENCY desires to accomplish the above referenced project, and
WHEREAS the A GENCY does not have giiffirient staff to meet the required commitment and therefore deems it
advisable and desirable to engage the assistance of a CONSULTANT to provide the necessary services for the PROJECT,
and
WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT represents that he /she is m compliance with the Washington State Statutes relating to
professional registration, if applicable, and has signified a willingness to furnish Consulting services to the AGENCY,
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions, covenants and performance contained herein, or attached
and incorporated and made a part hereof, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1 General Description of Work
The work under this AGREEMENT shall consist of the above described work and services as herein defined and
necessary to accomplish the completed work for this PROTECT. The CONSULTANT shall furnish all services, labor, and
related equipment necessary to conduct and complete the work as designated elsewhere in this AGREEMENT.
11 Scope of Work
The Scope of Work and projected level of effort required for this PROJECT is detailed m Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT.
111 General Requirements
All aspects of coordination of the work of this AGREEMENT with outside agencies, groups, or individuals shall receive
advance approval by the AGENCY. Necessary contacts and meetings with agencies, groups, and/or individuals shall be
coordinated through the AGENCY. The CONSULTANT shall attend coordination, progress and presentation meetings
with the AGENCY and/or such Federal, State, Community, City or County officials, groups or individuals as may be
requested by the AGENCY. The AGENCY will provide the CONSULTANT sufficient notice prior to meetings requiring
CONSULTANT participation. The minimum required hours or days notice shall be agreed to between the AGENCY and
the CONSULTANT and shown in Exhibit "A."
The CONSULTANT shall prepare a monthly progress report, in a form approved by the AGENCY, which will outline in
written and graphical form the various phases and the order of performance of the work in sufficient detail so that the
progress of the work can easily be evaluated.
The CONSULTANT, and each SUBCONSULTANT, shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or
sex in the performance of this contract. The CONSULTANT, and each SUBCONSULTANT, shall carry out applicable
requirements of 49 CFR Part 26 in the award and administration of USDOT assisted contracts. Failure by the
CONSULTANT to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this AGREEMENT that may result in the
termination of this AGREEMENT.
Participation for Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE), if required, per 49 CFR Part 26, or participation of Minority
Business Enterprises (MBE), and Women Business Enterprises (WBE), shall be shown on the heading of this
AGREEMENT. If D /M/WBE firms are utilized, the amounts authorized to each firm and their certification number will be
shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT. If the Prime
CONSULTANT is a DBE firm they must comply with the Commercial Useful Function (CUF) regulation outlined in the
AGENCY'S "DBE Program Participation Plan The mandatory DBE participation goals of the AGREEMENT are those
established by the WSDOT'S Highway and Local Programs Project Development Engineer in consultation with the
AGENCY.
All Reports, PS &E materials, and other data furnished to the CONSULTANT by the AGENCY shall be returned. All
electronic files, prepared by the CONSULTANT, must meet the requirements as outlined in Exhibit "C."
All designs, drawings, specifications, documents, and other work products, including all electronic files, prepared by the
CONSULTANT prior to completion or termination of this AGREEMENT are instruments of service for this PROJECT,
and are the property of the AGENCY. Reuse by the AGENCY or by others, acting through or on behalf of the AGENCY
of any such instruments of service, not occurring as a part of this PROJECT, shall be without liability or Iegal exposure to
the CONSULTANT.
Page 2 of 8
IV Time for Beginning and Completion
The CONSULTANT shall not begin any work under the terms of this AGREEMENT until authorized in writing by the
AGENCY.
All work under this AGREEIvfEN T shall be completed by the date shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT udder
completion date.
The established completion time shall not be extended because of any delays attributable to the CONSULTANT, but
may be extended by the AGENCY in the event of a delay attributable to the AGENCY, or because of unavoidable
delays caused by an act of GOD or governmental actions or other conditions beyond the control of the
CONSULTANT. A prior supplemental agreement issued by the AGENCY is required to extend the established
completion time.
V Payment Provisions
The CONSULTANT shall be paid by the AGENCY for completed work and services rendered under this
AGREEMENT as provided in Exhibit "D" attached hereto, and by reference made part of this AGREEMENT. Such
payment shall be full compensation for work performed or services rendered and for alI Iabor, materials, supplies,
equipment, and incidentals necessary to complete the work. The CONSULTANT shall conform to all applicable
portions of 48 CFR Part 31.
A post audit may be performed on this AGREEMENT The need for a post audit will be determined by the State
Auditor, WSDOT External Audit Office and/or at the request of the AGENCY'S PROJECT Manager.
VI Sub Contracting
The AGENCY permits sub contracts for those items of work as shown in Exhibit "G" attached hereto and by this
reference made part of this AGREEMENT.
Compensation for this sub consultant work shall be based on the cost factors shown on Exhibit "G
The work of the sub consultant shall not exceed its maximum amount payable unless a prior written approval has been
issued by the AGENCY.
All reimbursable direct labor, overhead, direct non -salary costs and fixed fee costs for the sub consultant shall be
substantiated in the same manner as outlined in Section V. All sub contracts shall contain all applicable provisions of
this AGREEMENT.
With respect to sub consultant payment, the CONSULTANT shall comply with all applicable sections of the Prompt
Payment laws as set forth in RCW 39.04.250 and RCW 39 76.011.
The CONSULTANT shall not sub contract for the performance of any work under this AGREEMENT without prior
written permission of the AGENCY. No permission for sub contracting shall create, between the AGENCY and sub-
contractor, any contract or any other relationship. A DBE certified sub consultant is required to perform a minimum
amount of their sub contracted agreement that is established by the WSDOT Highways and Local Programs Project
Development Engineer in consultation with the AGENCY.
VII Employment
The CONSULTANT warrants that they have not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide
employee working solely for the CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this contract, and that it has not paid or agreed to
pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the CONSULTANT, any fee,
commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or
making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warrant, the AGENCY shall have the right to annul this
AGREEMENT without liability or, in its discretion, to deduct from the AGREEMENT price or consideration or
otherwise recover the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee.
Any and all employees of the CONSULTANT or other persons while engaged in the performance of any work or
services required of the CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT, shall be considered employees of the
CONSULTANT only and not of the AGENCY, and any and all claims that may arise under any Workmen's
Compensation Act on behalf of said employees or other persons while so engaged, and any and all claims made by a
Page 3 of 8
third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of the CONSULTANT'S employees or other persons
while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein, shall be the sole obligation and
responsibility of the CONSULTANT.
The CONSULTANT shall not engage, on a full- or part-time basis, or other basis, during the period of the contract, any
professional or technical personnel who are, or have been, at any time during the period of the contract, in the employ
of the United States Department of Transportation, or the STATE, or the AGENCY, except regularly retired
employees, without written consent of the public employer of such person.
VIII Nondiscrimination
During the performance of this contract, the CONSULTANT, for itself, its assignees, and successors in interest agrees
to comply with the following Iaws and regulations.
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
(42 USC Chapter 21 Subchapter V Section 2000d through 2000d -4a)
Federal -aid Highway Act of 1973
(23 USC Chapter 3 Section 324)
Rehabilitation Act of 1973
(29 USC Chapter 16 Subchapter V Section 794)
Age Discrimination Act of 1975
(42 USC Chapter 76 Section 6101 et seq.)
Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987
(Public Law 100 -259)
American with Disabilities Act of 1990
(42 USC Chapter 126 Section 12101 et. seq.)
49 CFR Part 21
23 CFR Part 200
RCW 49.60.180
In relation to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the CONSULTANT is bound by the provisions of Exhibit "H"
attached hereto and by this reference made part of this AGREEMENT, and shall include the attached Exhibit "H" in
every sub contract, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Regulations or
directives issued pursuant thereto.
IX Termination of Agreement
The right is reserved by the AGENCY to terminate this AGREEMENT at any time upon ten (10) days written notice to
the CONSULTANT.
In the event this AGREEMENT is terminated by the AGENCY other than for default on the part of the
CONSULTANT, a final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT as shown in Exhibit "I" for the type of
AGREEMENT used.
No payment shall be made for any work completed after ten (10) days following receipt by the CONSULTANT of the
Notice to Terminate. If the accumulated payment made to the CONSULTANT prior to Notice of Termination exceeds
the total amount that would be due when computed as set forth herein above, then no final payment shall be due and the
CONSULTANT shall immediately reimburse the AGENCY for any excess paid.
If the services of the CONSULTANT are terminated by the AGENCY for default on the part of the CONSULTANT,
the above formula for payment shall not apply.
Page 4 of 8
In such an event, the amount to be paid shall be determined by the AGENCY with consideration given to the actual
costs incurred by the CONSULTANT in performing the work to the date of termination, the amount of work originally
required which was satisfactorily completed to date of termination, whether that work is in a form or a type which is
usable to the AGENCY at the time of termination, the cost to the AGENCY of employing another firm to complete the
work required and the time which may be required to do so. and other factors which affect the value to the AGENCY
of the work performed at the time of termination.
Under no circumstances shall payment made under this subsection exceed the amount, which would have been made
using the formula set forth above.
If it is determined for any reason that the CONSULTANT was not in default or that the CONSULTANT'S failure to
perform is without the CONSULTANT'S or it's employee's default or negligence, the termination shall be deemed to
be a termination for the convenience of the AGENCY. In such an event, the CONSULTANT would be reimbursed for
actual costs in accordance with the termination for other than default clauses listed previously.
In the event of the death of any member, partner or officer of the CONSULTANT or any of its supervisory personnel
assigned to the PROJECT, or dissolution of the partnership, termination of the corporation, or disaffiliation of the
principally involved employee, the surviving members of the CONSULTANT hereby agree to complete the work under
the terms of this AGREEMENT, if requested to do so by the AGENCY. This subsection shall not be a bar to
renegotiation of the AGREEMENT between the surviving members of the CONSULTANT and the AGENCY, if the
AGENCY so chooses.
In the event of the death of any of the parties listed in the previous paragraph, should the surviving members of the
CONSULTANT, with the AGENCY'S concurrence, desire to terminate this AGREEMENT, payment shall be made as
set forth in the second paragraph of this section.
Payment for any part of the work by the AGENCY shall not constitute a waiver by the AGENCY of any remedies of
any type it may have against the CONSULTANT for any breach of this AGREEMENT by the CONSULTANT, or for
failure of the CONSULTANT to perform work required of it by the AGENCY Forbearance of any rights under the
AGREEMENT will not constitute waiver of entitlement to exercise those rights with respect to any future act or
omission by the CONSULTANT.
X Changes of Work
The CONSULTANT shall make such changes and revisions in the complete work of this AGREEMENT as necessary
to correct errors appearing therein, when required to do so by the AGENCY, without additional compensation thereof.
Should the AGENCY find it desirable for its own purposes to have previously satisfactorily completed work or parts
thereof changed or revised, the CONSULTANT shall make such revisions as directed by the AGENCY. This work
shall be considered as Extra Work and will be paid for as herein provided under Section XIV.
XI Disputes
Any dispute concerning questions of fact in connection with the work not disposed of by AGREEMENT between the
CONSULTANT and the AGENCY shall be referred for determination to the Director of Public Works or AGENCY
Engineer, whose decision in the matter shall be final and binding on the parties of this AGREEMENT; provided,
however, that if an action is brought challenging the Director of Public Works or AGENCY Engineer's decision, that
decision shall be subject to de novo judicial review. If the parties to this AGREEMENT mutually agree, disputes
concerning alleged design en will be conducted under the procedures found in Exhibit "J and disputes concerning
claims will be conducted under the procedures found in Exhibit "K
XII Venue, Applicable Law, and Personal Jurisdiction
In the event that either party deems it necessary to institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any right or
obligation under this AGREEMENT, the parties hereto agree that any such action shall be initiated in the Superior
court of the State of Washington, situated in the county in which the AGENCY is located. The parties hereto agree that
all questions shall be resolved by application of Washington law and that the parties to such action shall have the right
of appeal from such decisions of the Superior court in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. The
CONSULTANT hereby consents to the personal jurisdiction of the Superior court of the State of Washington, situated
in the county in which the AGENCY is located.
Page 5 of 8
XIII Legal Relations
The CONSULTANT shall comply with all Federal, State, and local laws and ordinances applicable to the work to be
done under this AGREEMENT This contract shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with the laws of the
State of Washington.
The CONSULTANT shall mdemnify and hold the AGENCY and the STATE and its officers and employees harmless
from and shall process and defend at its own expense all claims, demands, or suits at law or equity arising in whole or
in part from the CONSULTANT'S negligence or breach of any of its obligations under this AGREEMENT, provided
that nothing herein shall require a CONSULTANT to indemnify the AGENCY or the STATE against and hold
harmless the AGENCY or the STATE from claims, demands or suits based solely upon the conduct of the AGENCY or
the STATE, their agents, officers and employees; and provided further that if the claims or suits are caused by or result
from the concurrent negligence of (a) the CONSULTANT'S agents or employees, and (b) the AGENCY or the
STATE, their agents, officers and employees, this indemnity provision with respect to (1) claims or suits based upon
such negligence (2) the costs to the AGENCY or the STATE of defending such claims and suits shall be valid and
enforceable only to the extent of the CONSULTANT'S negligence or the negligence of the CONSULTANT'S agents
or employees.
The CONSULTANT'S relation to the AGENCY shall be at all times as an independent contractor
The CONSULTANT shall comply with all applicable sections of the applicable Ethics laws, including RCW 42.23,
which is the Code of Ethics for regulating contract interest by municipal officers. The CONSULTANT specifically
assumes potential liability for actions brought by the CONSULTANT'S own employees against the AGENCY and,
solely for the purpose of this indemnification and defense, the CONSULTANT specifically waives any immunity under
the state industrial insurance law, Title 51 RCW.
Unless otherwise specified in the AGREEMENT, the AGENCY shall be responsible for administration of construction
contracts, if any, on the PROJECT. Subject to the processing of a new sole source, or an acceptable supplemental
agreement, the CONSULTANT shall provide On -Call assistance to the AGENCY during contract administration. By
providing such assistance, the CONSULTANT shall assume no responsibility for: proper construction techniques, job
site safety, or any construction contractor's failure to perform its work in accordance with the contract documents.
The CONSULTANT shall obtain and keep in force during the terms of the AGREEMENT, or as otherwise required,
the following insurance with companies or through sources approved by the State Insurance Commissioner pursuant to
Title 48 RCW.
Insurance Coverage
A. Worker's compensation and employer's liability insurance as required by the STATE.
B. Commercial general liability and property damage insurance in an aggregate amount not less than two million
dollars ($2,000,000) for bodily injury, including death and property damage. The per occurrence amount shall
not exceed one million dollars ($1,000,000).
C. Vehicle liability insurance for any automobile used in an amount not less than a one million dollar ($1,000,000)
combined single limit.
Excepting the Worker's Compensation Insurance and any Professional Liability Insurance secured by the
CONSULTANT, the AGENCY will be named on all policies as an additional insured. The CONSULTANT shall
furnish the AGENCY with verification of insurance and endorsements required by the AGREEMENT. The AGENCY
reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies at any time.
All insurance shall be obtained from an insurance company authorized to do business in the State of Washington. The
CONSULTANT shall submit a verification of insurance as outlined above within fourteen (14) days of the execution of
this AGREEMENT to the AGENCY.
No cancellation of the foregoing policies shall be effective without thirty (30) days prior notice to the AGENCY
The CONSULTANT'S professional liability to the AGENCY shall be Limited to the amount payable under this
AGREEMENT or one million ($1,000,000) dollars, whichever is the greater, unless modified by Exhibit "L In no
case shall the CONSULTANT'S professional liability to third parties be limited in any way.
Page 6of8
The AGENCY will pay no progress payments under Section V until the CONSULTANT has fully complied with this
section. This remedy is not exclusive, and the AGENCY and the STATE may take such other action as is available to it
under other provisions of this AGREEMENT, or otherwise in law.
XIV Extra Work
A. The AGENCY may at any time, by written order, make changes within the general scope of the AGREEMENT in
the services to be performed.
B. If any such change causes an increase or decrease in the estimated cost of, or the time required for, performance of
any part of the work under this AGREEMENT, whether or not changed by the order, or otherwise affects any other
terms and conditions of the AGREEMENT, the AGENCY shall make an equitable adjustment in the (1) maximum
amount payable; (2) delivery or completion schedule, or both; and (3) other affected terms and shall modify the
AGREEMENT accordingly.
C The CONSULTANT must submit any "request for equitable adjustment hereafter referred to as "CLAIM under
this clause within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of the written order However, if the AGENCY decides
that the facts justify it, the AGENCY may receive and act upon a CLAIM submitted before final payment of the
AGREEMENT.
D. Failure to agree to any adjustment shall be a dispute under the Disputes clause However, nothing in this clause
shall excuse the CONSULTANT from proceeding with the AGREEMENT as changed.
E. Notwithstanding the terms and conditions of paragraphs (A) and (B) above, the maximum amount payable for this
AGREEMENT, shall not be increased or considered to be increased except by specific written supplement to this
AGREEMENT.
XV Endorsement of Plans
If applicable, the CONSULTANT shall place their endorsement on all plans, estimates, or any other engineering data
furnished by them.
XVI Federal and State Review
The Federal Highway Administration and the Washington State Department of Transportation shall have the right to
participate in the review or examination of the work in progress.
XVII Certification of the Consultant and the Agency
Attached hereto as Exhibit "M -1(a and b)" are the Certifications of the CONSULTANT and the AGENCY, Exhibit "M
-2" Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension and Other Responsibility Matters Primary Covered Transactions,
Exhibit "M -3" Certification Regarding the Restrictions of the Use of Federal Funds for Lobbying and Exhibit "M -4"
Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data. Exhibit "M -3" is required only in AGREEMENTS over $100,000 and
Exhibit "M -4" is required only in AGREEMENTS over $500,000.
XVIII Complete Agreement
This document and referenced attachments contain all covenants, stipulations, and provisions agreed upon by the
parties. No agent, or representative of either party has authority to make, and the parties shall not be bound by or be
liable for, any statement, representation, promise or agreement not set forth herein. No changes, amendments, or
modifications of the terms hereof shall be valid unless reduced to writing and signed by the parties as an amendment to
this AGREEMENT.
XIX Execution and Acceptance
This AGREEMENT may be simultaneously executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an
original having identical legal effect. The CONSULTANT does hereby ratify and adopt all statements, representations,
warranties, covenants, and agreements contained in the proposal, and the supporting material submitted by the
CONSULTANT, and does hereby accept the AGREEMENT and agrees to all of the terms and conditions thereof.
Page 7 of 8
in witness whereof, the parties hereto have xecutect this AGREEMENT as of the day and yearshown in The
"Execution Date box can page one (1) of AGREEMENT.
By Vern Phillips, PE (2 r71--- By
Cnnsattant Harris Associates, Inc. Agency City of Tukwila
LOT Forte 144tID9 EF
Remised MOB Flagella/8
Construction Administration Services for International Blvd. Phase II 11l Improvements
The City of Tukwila, WA, January 2009
EXHIBIT A
Construction Administration Services
Scope of Work
The project will include about 5000 feet of street improvements of International Blvd. in
two phases from S.132' to south of SR 599 access ramps, new storm lines, extensive
retaining walls, new asphalt pavement, curb gutters and sidewalks.
This scope of work assumes that the City will provide one construction manager (the
City CM) to lead our team and that Harris will provide various site inspection,
documentation, and scheduling support.
Task 300 Project Management
3.1. Project Management Plan
Purpose: Provide the City and Harris with uniform procedures and standards for the
administration of the construction contract.
Approach: Using the Harris Construction Management Procedures Manual, develop a
procedures manual that is tailored specifically for the project.
Assumptions:
1. The final project manual will be bound in a three ring binder to facilitate future
revisions.
Deliverables:
1. Draft project manual for review by the City.
3.3 Harris Budget Projections
Purpose:
To provide the City with the Harris's anticipated billings in a format that is easily
accessible, easy to understand, and provides the required cost information so the City
can better manage available resources.
Assumptions:
1. Cost projections will monitor only the Harris' contract.
Deliverables:
1. Hands will furnish budget projections as part of the monthly invoice.
Task 400 Construction Management and Inspection Services
4.1 Preconstruction Conference
Purpose:
1
Construction Administration Services for International Blvd. Phase 11 III Improvements
The City of Tukwila, WA, January 2009
Provide a draft of meeting agenda for The City's CM to prepare for all essential project
participants to meet prior to the start of work. This meeting will outline the City's
administration of the contracts, introduction of the attendees, and record all comments
and questions submitted by the contractor. Provides an understanding of the procedures
to be used on the project and what the contractor can expect from the City and its
consultants.
Approach:
The City's CM will schedule, prepare agenda, chair and take minutes of the
preconstruction meeting, inform contractor of project administration procedures and
invite all affected regulatory agencies, utilities, and others to attend the meeting.
Assumptions:
1. The City will provide the meeting venue.
2. The City will develop the attendee list.
3. Harris will assist the City CM in drafting agenda meeting.
4.2 Preconstruction Walk
Purpose: To start the construction contract with an understanding between the
contractor, Harris and the City as to the existing conditions of the project before
construction begins.
Approach: Before the Notice to Proceed is given to the contractor, Harris and the City
will walk the project recording existing conditions. Project conditions are logged,
videotaped, and still photographs are taken to record existing conditions. Copies are
provided to the City. Harris will keep the originals in the project files until project
completion.
Assumptions:
1. Project walk will not take longer than one day with approximately the same amount
of time to tog, file and copy the information.
Deliverables:
1. Project photographs and video of pre construction and after construction conditions.
4.3 Communications and Correspondence
Purpose:
Provide effective written and oral communications on behalf of the City to the contractor
and other stakeholders in the administration of the contract.
Approach:
At the preconstruction conference, obtain all pertinent information from the attendees to
develop a project directory of all key personnel working on the projects. Develop a flow
chart showing how correspondence is to be handled once it is received from the
contractor or other stakeholders. Log all information received from contractor and others
In Contract Manager Software and in separate project files for action and distribution.
Prepare appropriate responses and obtain the City's approval when required. All original
2
Construction Administration Services for International Blvd. Phase 11 111 Improvements
The City of Tukwila, WA, January 2009
correspondence remains with the project files. Only copies will be distributed, except for
shop drawing submittals.
Assumptions:
1. The City file index will be used for all correspondence received from the City,
contractor and others.
Deliverables:
1. Logs of information received from the City, the contractor or others relating to the
project.
4.4 Schedule Monitoring
Purpose:
Harris will monitor baseline and progress schedules and changes to the schedule on an
ongoing basis, generally during the monthly pay estimate processing cycle and at our
weekly project meetings.
Approach:
Develop procedures, using available software, to review the contractor's schedule for
logic, duration, and resource changes in the contractors monthly updates. Notify the
contractor of changes and document its response for the record. Harris will keep the City
appraised of construction schedule and changes found in the updates.
Assumptions:
1. Contractor will submit baseline schedule per specifications.
Deliverables:
1. Harris to perform a monthly review and provide the City with a basic report by email.
4.5 Progress Coordination Meetings
Purpose:
Attend coordination meetings conducted by the City CM with the contractor and other
interested parties to discuss schedules, status of RFQs (Request For Quotes), status of
submittals, issues fog, old and new business concerning the project and any other
business that is a concern of any party attending the meeting. To keep everyone
informed as to the status of the project and discuss issues that may influence project
completion.
Approach:
Attend weekly meetings conducted by the City CM with the contractor to discuss project
schedule, current, and past issues that require action by someone other than the party
raising the issue. The City requests the contractor and Harris submit agenda items for
the weekly coordination meetings. Using the proposed agenda items and agenda items
developed in house, the City prepares an agenda for the meeting and distributes the
agenda to the parties that will attend the meeting. Harris distributes the previous meeting
minutes and asks for concurrence of those attending the meeting or suggested
corrections to the minutes. Minutes are filed as approved or amended.
3
Construction Administration Services for international Blvd. Phase 1I Ili Improvements
The City of Tukwila, WA, January 2008
Additional coordination meetings may be scheduled as needed. The City CM will call
meetings and request specific parties to attend. These attendees will be given 48 hours
notice for additional meetings.
Assumptions:
1. The City and contractor's staff will be able to meet on a regular basis with minimal
absences.
2. Meeting room provided by the City will be able to seat a minimum of 10 people.
3. Meetings will not be more than once a week.
4. Designer may be asked to attend the meetings as a participant.
5. Han will take notes of discussion items with the City CM approval.
6. Contractor is required to submit a look -ahead schedule (2 or 3 week) at each weekly
meeting.
Deliverables:
1. Weekly Agenda with status of open items from previous meetings.
2. Weekly meeting minutes with action items noted.
3.. Two or three week look ahead schedule (prepared by the Contractor)
4. Submittal log, issues log, and RFI and change order logs
4.6 Payment Recommendations
Purpose:
The City will verify the contractor's request for payment
Approach:
The City and contractor develop a procedure that is acceptable for monthly progress
payments and the final payment. The City, with the assistant of Harris's Lead Inspector,
reviews contractors payment requests and verifies contractor pay quantities. After
agreement of the payment request, the City prepares payment documentation.
Assumptions:
1. Payments will be made to the contractor once each month.
2. The City will make payments in accordance with the contract stipulations and State
Law.
Deliverables:
1. Lead inspector to assist the City CM
2. Schedule review input by Harris
4.7 Safety
Purpose:
Observe contractor's safety.
Approach:
Harris staff to observe contractor's work area. Contractor is to be informed if eminent
life /safety unsafe work conditions and /or areas are observed. If life safety danger is
observed immediate shutdown of contractor's work may be required, if conditions
4
Construction Administration Services for International Blvd. Phase II III Improvements
The City of Tukwila, WA, January 2009
endanger property and/or life and a call may be made to WISHA or L &I may need to be
alerted as appropriate.
Assumptions:
1. Contract documents require contractor to submit Its safety program and safety officer
prior to the start of work
2. Contract documents or contractor's safety program require contractor to submit
accident reports.
3. Harris assumes no responsibility or liability for safety of contractor's work areas or
personnel.
4. Harris assumes no responsibility or liability for implementation of contractor's safety
program or its construction means and methods.
5. The City's contractor is solely responsible for project safety.
Deliverables
1. Accident report notes on IDR.
4.8 Environmental Coordination
Purpose:
Verify contractor has copies of applicable permits and that the work activities abide by
the requirements of the permits granted by regulatory agencies.
Approach:
In coordination with the City CM, read and understand and enforce requirements
stipulated in permits issued by regulatory agencies.
Assumptions:
1. All permits will be provided to Harris team and the City.
2. All permits except NPDS permit will be included in the contract documents. Harris
lead inspector will review the conditions of the permit and make sure it is being
followed.
Deliverables:
1. Daily inspection reports including any pertinent Environmental issues or work will be
prepared on site by Harris inspection staff.
2. Correspondence to affected parties
4.9 Submittal Management and Review
Purpose:
Provide an efficient means of processing submittals between the contractor and
Designer. Provide a brief, initial review of the contractors shop drawing submittals
before forwarding It to Designer.
Approach:
Using Contract Manager and in coordination with the City CM, develop a submittal list for
distribution to the City, Contractor and Designer. Track and submit submittal logs at each
coordination meeting. Follow up on all submittals that are nearing the end of the review
period. The following steps will be followed In reviewing the contractor's submittals:
5
Construction Administration Services for International Blvd. Phase II III Improvements
The City of Tukwila, WA, January 2009
1. Log submittals into Contract Manager all submittals by bid item and specification
number.
2. Ensure the contractor has provided a complete submittal, it has been coordinated
with other trades and all deviations have been noted. Submittal is returned to the
contractor if it is not complete.
3. The City CM continues review for general compliance with the specification.
4. Submittal is forwarded to Designer for formal review and acceptance.
5. Harris will track the submittals to verify timely response.
6. Submittals are returned to Harris and the submittal status is logged into Contract
Manager.
7. Approved submittals are retumed to the contractor for use in work.
8. Harris to inform contractor if a resubmittal is required.
Assumptions:
1. Harris will not be responsible for errors or omissions in any submittal lists; this is the
responsibility of the construction contractor.
2. Harris will assist the City CM in reviewing contractor submittals, and not approving
them.
3. Submittals requiring any public utility review will follow specified process per
provisions.
4. Harris will assist the City CM to review and to assure full compliance with LAG
manual and correct usage of the RAM and ROM processes.
Deliverables:
1. Monthly status Togs of submittals.
2. Log of accepted submittals.
3. Log of submittals in review.
4. Log of submittals that are not approved and will require resubmission by the
contractor.
5. Final log of submittals and status at end of construction.
4.10 Request for Information (RFI) Management
Purpose:
At times, a contractor is unable to locate information that it deems critical to its
construction activity. Harris staff will receive, log and track requests for information (RFI)
submitted by the construction contractor. The efficient management of RFIs permits the
timely communication between the designer and the contractor.
Approach:
Harris will receive, log and assist the City CM to review all RFis for completeness and
verify the question is reasonable and understandable. Harris team will assist the City CM
to return the RFI if the question is unclear or, in the opinion of Harris staff, the answer is
contained in the contract documents. Harris will note where the requested information
can be found in the contract Documents. Harris will track RFIs by creating weekly logs,
using the Contract Manager software, to verify timely response from the designer.
Assumptions:
1. None.
6
Construction Administration Services for International Blvd. Phase II Ili Improvements
The City of Tukwila, WA, January 2009
Deliverables:
1. Log of all R FIs and their status.
2. Log of all RFIs answers and their status.
4.11 Document Management
Purpose:
Provide the City with an electronic means of tracking all documents exchanged between
the parties involved in the construction of the project.
Approach:
Using Primavera Web -based Contract Manager and the City File Index, all documents
will be logged in the project field office. Documents will be scanned into the document
control system and attached to Contract Manager File index categories. All documents
will be filed as a digital file and hardcopy:
Assumptions:
For the duration of contract, Harris will provide Contract Manager software for use.
Deliverables:
1. Logs of all documents in the project files (digital and hardcopy).
2. All hardcopy project documents exchanged on the project between the various
parties.
3. Harris will transfer all project documents and data generated by Contract Manager
software to the City computer system in native database format. The data will be fully
accessible and manipulatable with the City's final version of the Contract Manager
software. Harris will assist the City in acquisition and configuration of Contract
Manager during the contract startup phase.
4.12 Construction Change Order Assistance
Purpose:
To assist the City CM with assurance the contractor is presenting legitimate requests for
extra work that was not included in the original scope of the contract. To assist he City
CM to assure the associated extra work costs and time extension requests are fair and
reasonable to both the City and the contractor.
Approach:
1. Assist the City CM to review requests of the contractor's request for changes due to
cost increases and /or time impacts for merit.
2. Assist the City CM to prepare independent cost estimate and schedule analysis of
work.
3. Assist the City CM to negotiate extra work cost and time extensions with the
contractor.
4. Assist the City CM to prepare change orders for execution by the City.
Assumptions:
1. Harris will not have authority to make minor changes to work
2. The City CM will negotiate with the contractor on contract changes.
Deliverables:
7
Construction Administration Services for international Blvd. Phase 11 III Improvements
The City of Tukwila, WA, January 2009
1. Assist the City CM to prepare independent cost estimates.
2. Independent schedule analysis.
3. Assist the City CM to prepare change orders ready for execution
4.13 Review Certified Payrolls
Purpose:
To verify the contractor provides certified payroll reports in conformance with the
provisions of the contract and applicable State Law. To verify the certified payroll reports
contain information required by the Labor Code.
anroach:
Receive and review certified payrolls from the contractor and each of its subcontractors.
Check for the Statements of Compliance. Spot -check wages of each classification of
laborer or craftsperson. Notify contractor and City of all discrepancies and /or errors and
request a corrected Certified Payroll.
Assumptions:
1. Employee interviews, to verify payment of prevailing wages, will be conducted by
Harris.
2. Harris is not responsible for enforcement of the Labor Code.
3. Harris will not be responsible for identifying every worker on site.
Deliverables:
1. Hardcopies of the contractor's certified payrolls maintained in the project files.
2. A daily list of subcontractors working on the project as a part of iDR.
4.14 Inspection and Documentation
Harris will provide inspectors to provide the scope of work defined as follows.
Purpose:
Provide the City with documentation of construction activities, duration, and work
conditions using the City's form.
Approach:
Provide the City with knowledgeable people, familiar with construction activities to be
performed on the project. Using Contract Manager, document the contractor's daily
activities, labor force, equipment and items considered pertinent to the projects. The
construction manager is to review daily reports and provide instruction to inspectors on
ways to improve their daily reports. Provide documentation of Tabor, materials, and
equipment each day in various sections of the project.
Assumptions:
1. All inspections will be within the project limits.
2. Harris will provide two vehicles, two cell phones, two computers for the duration of
the contract.
Deliverables:
1. Daily inspection reports.
8
Construction Administration Services for International Blvd. Phase II fl1 Improvements
The City of Tukwila, WA, January 2009
2. Miscellaneous reports deemed necessary by the construction.
4.15 Review and Maintain "As- Built" Schedule
Purpose:
To track contractor's progress during construction of the project.
A
Using the daily inspection reports prepared by Hams inspectors, the contractor's
schedule, site observations, and other sources of information, Harris will track and
document the contractor's actual progress. The contractor's baseline critical path and
regularly updated schedules will be used as a basis for comparing planned versus actual
progress.
Assumptions:
1. Monitoring will be on a continuous basis of the contractor supplied "as- built' schedule
which will be updated monthly.
Deliverables:
1. An "as- built' schedule with one digital file, as per the City CM requirement.
4.16 Maintain Photographic and Video Records of Construction Progress
Purnose:
To provide the City with a photographic record of the project, before, during and after
construction.
Approach:
Using still, digital camera record the conditions of the project before the contractor starts
work and after the work is complete. Record the contractor's progress during
construction. During construction, care will be taken to record all items and /or conditions
that have or may have a bearing on claimed extra work.
Assumptions:
1. Photographs and videos will remain at the City's project server at all times until the
end of the project.
Deliverables:
1. All photographic and video records.
4.17 Review and Maintain Record Drawings
Purpose:
To provide the City with an accurate set of record drawings for the project.
Approach:
9
Construction Administration Services for International Blvd. Phase II 8111 Improvements
The City of Tukwila, WA, January 2009
Monitor contractor's required record drawings on a monthly basis. Review as- builts and
request changes from contractor for any changes.
Assumptions:
1. Harris will assist Designer in answering questions regarding the record drawings.
2. Contract documents will require contractor to maintain redline as -built drawings.
Deliverables:
1. One set of marked up contract drawings.
4.19 Final Inspection and Punch list
Purpose:
To identify elements of construction requiring correction prior to final acceptance by the
City.
Approach:
Following substantial completion, perform a project inspection of the completed
construction. During the inspection develop a list of contract work requiring correction or
rework. The written list of deficient work (punch list) will be delivered to the City and the
contractor within three working days of the final inspection. The final punch list will
include items to be corrected that were identified previously during the course of
construction.
Assumptions:
1. The City will identify any key City or other agency personnel to be included in the
final inspection.
2. Harris will contact and schedule all required final inspection personnel 48 hour prior
to the final inspection.
3. Harris will prepare the final punch list.
Deliverables:
Final punch list.
4.21 Final Project Report
Purpose:
To assist the City with a final status report on the project to document remaining close
out issues.
A2oroach:
1. Assist the City CM to prepare a summary of outstanding claims not resolved when
the Notice of Completion is filed.
2. Assist the City CM to prepare and discuss "Lessons learned"
3. Assist the City with all the WSDOT audits during and at the completion of the project.
Deliverables:
1. Assist the City CM to provide one hard copy and one digital file.
10
EXHIBIT B
Intentionally Left Blank (No DBE Utilization)
EXHIBIT C
Exhibit C
Electronic Exchange of Engineering and Other Data
The format and standards of electronic documents to be provided by CONSULTANT during the
course of Construction Management and Inspection services will include, but are not limited to,
the following:
I. Design Field Revisions and Independent Estimates
A. Any Computer Aided Drafting files generated during the course of
construction in support of field inspection services will be in AutoCAD 2008
version or older format.
B. Cost Estimates and other analysis will be provided in MS Excel format.
II. Construction Schedule Review Documents
A. All analysis and reporting of the contractors project schedule by outside
schedule support services will be performed using reporting tools native to
Primavera P3 Version 4.1 (including Monte Carlo tools if necessary). If
alternate tools are used City will be provided details of specific tools to allow
independent analysis.
B. Written reports may be generated in MS Word format or any common email
version which can be converted to ASCII text.
III. Electronic Data Exchange
A. The City will provide the File Index structure, Change Order, Field Directive,
Inspectors Daily Report and other common documentation forms for
integration into the project tracking system.
B. The City uses Groupwise collaboration tools for email, contact information
and calendar features. Any system used by CONSULTANT shall be
compatible with this tool.
C. Primavera Contract Manager will be used to track project correspondence and
other information relevant to the construction of the project. The City will
host this program on AGENCY computer systems and CONSULTANT will
migrate any project data from their systems to the City's system once the
program has been installed and configured and thenceforth use the City's
system to administer the project.
IV. Non Digital Source Files
A. Any standard format (8 -1/2 x 11 or 1 1x17) document not available in native
digital format will be scanned to PDF format and included in electronic
documentation upon City request.
Exhibit D-3
Payment (Negotiated Hourly Rate)
The CONSULTANT shall be paid by the AGENCY for completed work and services rendered under this
AGREEMENT as provided hereinafter. Such payment shall be full compensation for work performed or services
rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary to complete the work_ The
CONSULTANT shall conform to all applicable portions of 48 Celt Part 3 L
1. Hourly Rates: The CONSULTANT shall be paid by the AGENCY for work done, based upon the
negotiated hourly rates shown in Exhibit "E" and attached hereto and by this reference made
part of this AGREEMENT. The eates liAccl shall be al plicablc for the fir,t twelve (12) month
Revised 6/08
of the CONSULTANT or the AC]2 CY. If negotiations arc- not conducted for the second o.
period, the rates listed in this ACREEML NT, or subsequent written authorization(s) front the
AGLNCi' The rates are inclusive of direct salaries, payroll additives, overhead,
and fee. The CONSULTANT shall maintain support data to verify hours billed on the
AGREEMENT.
Not in Exhibit E
Direct Non-Salary Costs: Direct Non -Salary Costskwill be reimbursed at the Actual Cost to the
CONSULTANT. These charges may include, but are not limited to, the following items: travel,
printing, long distance telephone, supplies, computer charges and sub consultant costs.
a_ Air or train travel will be reimbursed only to economy class levels unless
otherwise approved by the AGENCY_ The CONSULTANT shall complywith
the rules and regulations regarding travel costs (excluding air, train, and rental
car costs) in accordance with the AGENCY'S Travel Rules and Procedures_
However, air, train, and rental car costs shall be reimbursed in accordance with
48 CFR Part 3 L205-46 "Travel Costs."
b. The billing for Direct Non Salary Costs shall include an itemized listing of
the charges directly identifiable with the PROJECT.
c. The CONSULTANT shall maintain the original supporting documents in their
office. Copies of the original supporting documents shall be supplied to the
AGENCY upon request.
d. All above charges must be necessary for the services provided under this
AGREEMENT_
3. Management Reserve Fund: The AGENCY may desire to establish a Management Reserve Fund to
provide the Agreement Administrator with the flexibility to authorize additional funds to the
AGREEMENT for allowable unforeseen costs, or reimbursing the CONSULTANT for additional
work beyond that already defined in this AGREEMENT. Such authorization(s) shall be in writing
and shall not exceed the lesser of $100,000 or 10% of the Total Amount Authorized as shown in the
heading of this AGREEMENT. The amount included for the Management Reserve Fund is shown
in the heading of this AGREEMENT. 'nth fund may not be replenished. Any changes requiring
additional costs in excess of the Management Reserve Fund shall be made in accordance with
Section XLV, `Extra Work"
DOT Form 140 -089 EF Exh O3
4. Maximum, Total Amount Payable: The Maximum Total Amount Payable by the AGENCY to the
CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT shall not exceed the amount shown in the heading of
this AGREEMENT. The Maximum Total Amount Payable is comprised of the Total Amount
Authorized, and the Management Reserve Fund. The Maximum Total Amount Payable does not
include payment for Extra Work as stipulated in Section XIV, "Extra Work." No minimum
amount payable is guaranteed under this AGREEMENT 5 Monthly Progress Payments: Progress
payments may be claimed on a monthly basis for all costs authorized in 1 and 2 above. The
monthly billing shall be supported by detailed statements for hours expended at the rates
established in Exhibit "E including names and classifications of all employees, and billings for
all direct non salary expenses. To provide a means of verifying the billed salary costs for the
CONSULTANT'S employees, the AGENCYmay conduct employee interviews. These interviews
may consist of recording the names, titles, salary rates, and present duties of those employees
performing work on the PROJECT at the time of the interview.
6. Final Payment Final Payment of any balance due the CONSULTANT of the gross amount earned
will be made promptly upon its verification by the AGENCY after the completion of the work
under this AGREEMENT, contingent upon receipt of all PS&P,, plans, maps, notes, reports,
electronic data and other related documents which are required to be furnished under this
AGREEMENT. Acceptance of such Final Payment by the CONSULTANT shall constitute a
release of all claims for payment, which the CONSULTANT may have against the AGENCY
unless such claims are specifically reserved in writing and transmitted to the AGENCY by the
CONSULTANT prior to its acceptance. Said Final Payment shall not, however, be a bar to any
claims that the AGENCY may have against the CONSULTANT or to any remedies the AGENCY
may pursue with respect to such claims.
The payment of any billing will not constitute agreement as to the appropriateness of any item and
at the time of final audit, all required adjustments will be made and reflected in a final payment. In
the event that such final audit reveals an overpayment to the CONSULTANT, the
CONSULTANT will refund such overpayment to the AGENCY within thirty (30) days of notice
of the overpayment. Such ref+md shall not constitute a waiver by the CONSULTANT for any
claims relating to the validity of a finding by the AGENCY of overpayment. The CONSULTANT
has twenty (20) days after receipt of the final POST AUDIT to begin the appeal process to the
AGENCY for audit findings
7. Inspection of Cost Records: The CONSULTANT and their sub- consultants shall keep available for
inspection by representatives of the AGENCY, STATE and the United States, for a period of three
(3) years after receipt of final payment, the cost records and accounts pertaining to this
AGREEMENT and all items related to or bearing upon these records with the following
exception: if any litigation, claim or audit arising out of, in connection with, or related to this
contract is initiated before the expiration of the three (3) year period, the cost records and accounts
shall be retained until such litigation, claim, or audit involving the records is completed.
Exhibit E -2
CITY OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD.
Phase II III Improvements
Consultant Fee. Determination Summary Sheet
(Specific Rates of Pay)
Fee Schedule
Discipline or Job Title Hourly Overhead Profit Rate
Rate @154% @_25% Per Hour
Sam Yaghmaie, PE Project Director 69.81 107.50 17.45 194.77
Matt Lumsden: Lead Inspector 43.25 66.60 10.81 120.67
Chan Saenphimmachak Office Eng. 28.84 44.41 7.21 80.46
Peigi barkely Administration Oversight 36.25 55.82 9.06 $101.14
Steve Flinn: Structural Inspector 43.5 66.99 10.88 121.37
Becky Pitts: Scheduler 42.00 64.68 10.50 117.18
EXHIBIT E-2
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD PHASES II AND III
NEGOTIATED BREAKDOWN OF COSTS
EXHIBIT G
intentionally Left Blank (No Subconsultants)
Exhibit H
Title VI Assurances
During the performance of this AGREEMENT, the CONSULTANT, for itself, its assignees, and successors in
interest agrees as follows:
1. Compliance with Regulations: The CONSULTANT shall comply with the Regulations relative to
non discrimination in federally assisted programs of the AGENCY, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations,
Part 21, as they may be amended from time to time thereinafter referred to as the "REGULATIONS
which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this AGREEMENT.
2. Non discrimination: The CONSULTANT, with regard to the work performed during the AGREEMENT,
shall not discriminate on. the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin in the selection and retention of
sub consultants, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The CONSULTANT shall
not participate either directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Section 21.5 of the
REGULATIONS, including employment practices when the AGREEMENT covers a program set forth in
Appendix B of the REGULATIONS.
3. Solicitations for Sub consultants, Including Procurement of Materials and Equipment: In all solicitations
either by competitive bidding or negotiations made by the CONSULTANT for work to be performed under
a sub contract, including procurement of materials or leases of equipment, each potential sub consultant or
supplier shall be notified by the CONSULTANT of the CONSULTANT'S obligations under this
AGREEMENT and the REGULATIONS relative to non discrimination on the grounds of race, color, sex,
or national origin.
4. Information and Reports: The CONSULTANT shall provide all information and reports required by the
REGULATIONS or directives issued pursuant thereto, and shall permit acces -s to its books, records,
accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined by AGENCY, STATE or the
Federal Highway Administration (FAWA) to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such
REGULATIONS, orders and instructions. Where any information required of a CONSULTANT is in the
exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish this information, the CONSULTANT shall
so certify to the AGENCY, STATE or the FHWA as appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts it has
made to obtain the information.
5. Sanctions for Non compliance: In the event of the CONSULTANTS non compliance with the
non discrimination provisions of this AGREEMENT, the AGENCY shall impose such AGREEMENT
sanctions as it, the STATE or the FHWA may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to:
Withholding of payments to the CONSULTANT under the .AGREEMENT until the CONSULTANT
complies, and/or,
Cancellation, termination, or suspension of the AGREEMENT, in whole or in part.
DOT Form 140 -089 EF Exhibit H
Reused 6I05
6. Incorporation of Provisions: The CONSULTANT shall include the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (5)
in every sub contract, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the
REGULATIONS, or directives issued pursuant thereto. The CONSULTANT shall take such action with
respect to any sub consultant or procurement as the AGENCY, STATE or FHWA may direct as a means of
enforcing such provisions including sanctions for non- compliance.
Provided, however, that in the event a CONSULTANT becomes involved in, or is threatened with,
litigation with a- sub consultant or supplier as a result of such direction, the CONSULTANT may request
the AGENCY and the STATE enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the AGENCY and the
STATE and, in addition, the CONSULTANT may request the United States enter into such litigation to
protect the interests of the United States.
Cost Plus Fixed Fee Contracts
DOT Form 14O-O89 EF Exhib.1 I
Revised Mb
Exhibit I
Payment Upon Termination of Agreement
By the Agency Other Than for
Fault of the Consultant
(Refer to Agreement, Section IX)
Lump Sum Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT which when added to any payments previously made shall
total the same percentage of the Lurnp Sum Amount as the work completed at the time of termination is to the
total work required for the PROJECT. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall be paid for any authorized extra
work completed.
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT which when added to any payments previously made, shall
total the actual costs plus the same percentage of the fixed fee as the work completed at the time of termination is
to the total work required for the Project. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall be paid for any authorized extra
work completed.
Specific Rates of Pay Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT for actual hours charged at the time of termination of this
AGREEMENT plus any direct nonsalary costs incurred at the time of termination of this AGREEMENT.
Cost Per Unit of Work Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT for actual units of work completed at the time of
termination of this AGREEMENT.
EXHIBIT J
Intentionally Left Blank
DOT Form 140 -088 EF Extilb1t K
Rovisod a/as
Exhibit K
Consultant Claim Procedures
The purpose of this exhibit is to describe a procedure regarding clairn(s) on a consultant agreement, The following
procedures should only be utilized on consultant claims greater than $1,000. If the consultant's claims) are a total of
$1,000 or less, it would not be cost effective to proceed through the outlined steps. It is suggested that the Director
of Public Works or Agency Engineer negotiate a fair and reasonable price for the consultant's claim(s) that total
$1,000 or less.
This exhibit will outline the procedures to be followed by the consultant and the agency to consider a potential claim
by the consultant
Step 1— Consultant Files a Claim with the Agency Project Manager
If the consultant determines that they were requested to perform additional services that were outside of
the agreement's scope of work, they may be entitled to a claim, The first step that must be completed is
the request for consideration of the claim to the Agency's project manager.
The consultant's claim must outline the following;
Summation of hours by classification for each firm that is included in the claim;
Any correspondence that directed the consultant to perform the additional work
Timeframe of the additional work that was outside of the project scope;
Summary of direct labor dollars, overhead costs, profit and reimbursable costs associated with
the additional work and
Explanation as to why the consultant believes the additional work was outside of the
agreement scope of work.
Step 2 Review by Agency Personnel Regarding the Consultant's Claim for Additional Compensation
After the consultant has completed step 1, the next step in the process is to forward the request to the
Agency's project manager. The project manager will review the consultant's claim and will met with the
Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer to determine lithe Agency agrees with the claim. If the
FIIWA is participating in the project's funding, forward a copy of the consultant's claim and the
Agency's recommendation for federal participation in the claim to the WSDOT Highways and Local
Programs through the Region Local Programs Engineer. if the claim is not eligible for federal
participation, payment will need to be from agency funds.
If the Agency project manager, Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer, WSDOT Highways and
Local Programs (if applicable), and FHWA (if applicable) agree with the consultant's claim, send a
request memo, including backup documentation to the consultant to either supplement the agreement, or
create a new agreement for the claim. After the requesthas been approved, the Agency shall write the
supplement andlor new agreement and pay the consultant the amount of the claim. Inform the consultant
that the final payment for the agreement is subject to audit. No further action in needed regarding the
claim procedures.
If the Agency does not agree with the consultant's claim, proceed to step 3 of the procedures.
Step 3 Preparation of Support Documentation Regarding Consultant's Claim(s)
If the Agency does not agree with the consultant's claim, the project manager shall prepare a
summary for the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer that included the following:
Copy of information supplied by the consultant regarding the claim;
Agency's summation of hours by classification for each firm that should be included in the
claim;
Any correspondence that directed the consultant to perform the additional word
Agency's summary of direct labor dollars, overhead costs, profit and reimbursable costs
associated with the additional work;
Explanation regarding those areas in which the Agency does /does not agree with the
consultant's claim(s);
Explanation to describe what has been instituted to preclude future consultant claim(s); and
Recommendations to resolve the claim.
Step 4 Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer Reviews Consultant. Claim and Agency
Documentation
The Director of Pubic Works or Agency Engineer shall review and administratively approve or
disapprove the claim, or portions thereof, which may include getting Agency Council or
Commission approval (as appropriate to agency dispute resolution procedures). If the project
involves federal participation, obtain concurrence from WSDOT Highways and Local Programs and
FHWA regarding final settlement of the claim. If the claim is not eligible for federal participation,
payment will need to be from agency funds.
Step 5 Informing Consultant of Decision Regarding the Claim
The Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer shall notify (in writing) the consultant of their
final decision regarding the consultant's claim(s). Include the final dollar amount of the accepted
claims) and rationale utilized for the decision.
Step 6—Preparation of Supplement or New Agreement for the Consultant's Claims)
The agency shall write the supplement and/or new agreement and pay the consultant the amount of
the claim Inform the consultant that the final payment for the agreement is subject to audit.
DOT Form 140 -089 EF Exhibit L
Raised 6/05
Exhibit L
(To Be Used Only If Insurance Requirements Are Increased)
The professional liability limit of the CONSULTANT to the AGENCY identified in Section XIII, Legal
Relations and Insurance of this Agreement is amended to N/A
The CONSULTANT shall provide Professional Liability insurance with minimum per occurrence limits
in the amount of 2 million per claim with an aggregate of $4 million.
Such insurance coverage shall be evidenced by one of the following methods:
Certificate of Insurance.
Self insurance through an irrevocable Letter of Credit from a qualified financial institution.
Self insurance through documentation of a separate fund established exclusively for the payment of professional
liability claims, including claim amounts already reserved against the fund, safeguards established for payment
from the fund, a copy of the latest annual financial statements, and disclosure of the investment portfolio for those
funds.
Should the minimum Professional Liability insurance limitrequired by the AGENCY as specified above exceed $1
million per occurrence or the value of the contract, whichever is greater, then justification shall be submitted to the
Federal Highway Administration (FIIWA) for approval to increase the minimum insurance limit
If FHWA approval is obtained, the AGENCY may, at its own cost, reimburse the CONSULTANT for the
additional professional liability insurance required.
Notes: Cost of added insurance requirements: N/A
Include all costs, fee increase, premiums.
This cost shall not be billed against an FHWA funded project
For final contracts, include this exhibit.
Exhibit M -1(a)
Certification Of Consultant
Project No, 074 -4038
Local Agency
I hereby certify that I am Vern Phillips, PE and duly authorized
representative of the firm of Harris Associates, Inc. whose address is
1800 112th Ave NE, #21 OW, Bellevue, WA 98004 and that neither I nor the above
firm I here represent has:
(a) Employed or retained for a commission, percentage, brokerage, contingent fee, or other
consideration, any firm or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for me or the
above CONSULTANT) to solicit or secure the AGREEMENT;
Agreed, as an express or implied condition for obtaining this contract, to employ or retain the
services of any firm or person in connection with carrying out this AGREEMENT; or
(c) Paid, or agreed to pay, to any firm, organization or person (other than a bona fide employee
working solely for me or the above CONSULTANT) any fee, contribution, donation, or
consideration of any kind for, or in connection with, procuring or carrying out this AGREEMENT;
except as hereby expressly stated (if any);
(b)
I acknowledge that this certificate is to be available to the Washington State Department of
Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation in
connection with this AGREEMENT involving participation of Federal -aid highwa 4un and is
subject to applicable State and Federal laws, both criminal and civi,L�
DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit M-1((
Rovised 8/05
Signature
DOT Form 14O -G89 EF Exhibit M-1(b)
Revised 6/a5
Exhibit M -1(b)
Certification Of Agency Official
I hereby certify that I am the AGENCY Official of the Local Agency of City of Tukwila
Washington, and that the consulting firm or its representative has not been required, directly or indirectly as an
express or implied condition in connection with obtaining or carrying out this AGREEMENT to:
(a) Employ or retain, or agree to employ to retain, any firm or person; or
(b) Pay, or agree to pay, to any firm, person, or organization, any fee, contribution, donation, or
consideration of any kind; except as hereby expressly stated (if any);
I acknowledge that this certificate is to be available to the Washington State Department of
Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, in
connection with this AGREEMENT involving participation of Federal -aid highway funds, and is
subject to applicable State and Federal laws, both criminal and civil.
Date Signature
Exhibit M -2
Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility
Matters- Primary Covered Transactions
L The prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its
principals:
A. Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily
excluded from covered transactions by any federal department or agency;
B. Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil
judgment rendered against them for commission or fraud or a criminal offense in connection with
obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (federal, state, or local) transaction or
contract under a public transaction; violation of federal or state antitrust statues or commission of
embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false
statements, or receiving stolen property;
C. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity
(federal, state, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1)(B). of
this certification; and
D. Have not within a three (3) year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public
transactions (federal, state, or local) terminated for cause or default
H. Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification,
such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.
Consultant (Firm): Harris Associates
(Date/
DOT Form 140 EF Exhibit M-2
Aevisad 6105
(Signature) President orAuthorized CPiiiclef of consultant
Exhibit M -3
Certification Regarding The Restrictions
of The use of Federal Funds for Lobbying
The prospective participant certifies, by signing and submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her
knowledge and belief, that
1. No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to
any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency,
a member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of
Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the malting of any Federal grant,
the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension,
continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or
cooperative agreement.
2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for
influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a member of
Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in
connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall
complete and submit Standard FonmLLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance
with its instructions.
DOT Form 140-069 EF Exhibit M-3
Revised 6/05
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this
transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for malting
or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who
fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and
not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall
require that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier subcontracts which exceed
$100,000 and that all such subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
Consultant (Firm): Harris Associates
(1)ffitl/
(bye) (Signature'IPresident0f Mthorized Official of Consultant
Firm Harris Associates, Inc.
Name Vern Phillips, PE
Title Northwest Regional Manager
Date of Execution
TIB Phase 2/3 Roadway Improvements
Identify the proposal, quotation, request for price adjustment, or other submission involved,
giving the appropriate identifying number (e.g., RFP No.).
Insert the day, month, and yearwhen price negotiations were concluded and price agreement
was reached.
Insert the day, month, and year of signing which should be as close as practicable to the date
when the price negotiations were concluded and the contract price was agreed to.
This is to certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the cost or pricing data (as defined in
section 15.401 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and required under FAR subsection 15.403 -4)
submitted, either actually or by specific identification in writing, to the contracting officer or to the
contracting officer's representative in support of Negotiated breakdown of costs
are accurate, complete, and current as of January.13, 2009 This certification includes
the cost or pricing data supporting any advance agreements and forward pricing rate agreements between
the offeror and the Government that are part of the proposal.
DOT Form 140 EF Exhibit M-4
No/Fuld 6
Exhibit M-4
Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data
3/09
Agreement Number
95 -RWO3 (Harris 074 -4038)
Federal Aid Number Phase 2: STPF STPUL 0099(077)
Phase 3: HLP -STPUL -0099(103)
Local Agency
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of
between the Local Agency of City of Tukwila Washington, hereinafter called the
'AGENCY° and the above organization hereinafter called the "CONSULTANT'.
In witness whereof, the parties hereto have ecuted this AGREEMENT as of the day and year first
above written.
CONSULTANT
By Vern Philips, PE
Consultant Harris Associates, Inc
BY
Consultant
Supplemental Signature
Page for
Standard Consultant
Agreement
DOT Form 540 -039 EFAppandoc 31.910
Revised was
Consultant/Address/Telephone
Harris Associates, Inc.
1800 112th Avenue NE, #210W
Bellevue, WA 98004
425.453.0999 phone
Project Title And Work Description
Tukwila International Boulevard
Phase II III Improvements
"Construction Administration Inspection
Services"
LOCAL AGENCY
By
Agency City of Tukwila
By
Agency
By
Agency
By
Agency
TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
Meeting Minutes
January 20, 2009 5:00 p.m. Conference Room 1
PRESENT
Councilmembers:
Staff:
Guests:
CALL TO ORDER: Committee Chair Quinn called the meeting to order at 5:08 p.m.
I. PRESENTATIONS
No presentations.
B. 2008 Overlay and Rep air Program Proiect Completion
Staff is seeking full Council approval for contract
completed construction of the 2008 Overlay and Repa
but was still completed under budget due to unit price
savings of approximately $6,300. UNAiNLVIOUS
CONSENT AGENDA.
Git-v of Tukwila
Transportation Committee
De' Sean Quinn, Chair; Dennis Robertson and Verna Griffin
Jim Morrow, Bob Giberson, Frank Iriarte, Robin Tischmak, Pat Brodin Peter Lau, Mike
Ronda, Gail Labanara, Mike Mathia, Jack Pace, Jon Harrison and Kimberly Matej
Chuck Parrish
II. BUSINESS AGENDA
A. Boeing Access Road Bridge Replacement
Staff returned to the Transportation Committee to report out on the status of a grant application that was
submitted to Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) for replacement of the Boeing
Access Bridge (see Transportation Committee minutes dated June 10, 2008). The City was not awarded any
grant monies through this funding period, but staff will continue to submit applications for this project when
funds become available. During this first funding stage, WSDOT had a total of $31 million available for
project funding and our grant request totaled $24.8 million. Staff briefly reviewed project submissions that
did receive funding. Hopefully, future funding cycles will support larger projects. INFORMATION
ONLY.
and Acceptance
closeout and authorization to release retamage for
it Program. The project required two change orders,
underruns. The final contract cost is $690,996.40; a
APPROVAL. FORWARD TO FEBRUARY 2
C. 2009 -2012 SCA1Bd Interlocal Agreement and Resolution
Staff is seeking full Council approval to enter into an interlocal agreement for continued participation in the
South County Area Transportation Board (SCATBd). Annual dues are $100 per voting member, and
Tukwila currently has one represented voting member per the interlocal agreement. SCATBd can serve as a
unified voice to advocate for transportation issues and programs that affect South King County.
UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO JANUARY 26 COW FOR DISCUSSION.
D. Tukwila International Boulevard Phase II and III Construction Management Services Agreement
In December 2008, the City Council awarded the construction contract to Gary Merlino Construction
Company for Tukwila International Boulevard (TIB) Phases II and III (see Council minutes dated 12/15/08).
Staff is now seeking full Council approval to enter into a contract with Harris Associates in the amount of
$1,275,049 for construction management services for TIB Phases II and III. The City has not worked with
Harris Associates before; however, they scored highest in the City's selection process. Staff has
negotiated a lower than usual overhead and profit margin to keep costs within budget for the project. TIB
Phase II and III construction is anticipated to run on a 21 -month project schedule. UNANIMOUS
APPROVAL. FORWARD TO JANUARY 26 COW FOR DISCUSSION.
I CAS NUMBER 09-013
CATEGORY
SPONSOR
SPONSOR'S
SUbLM RY
MTG: DATE
01/26/09
02/02/09
MTG. DATE
01/26/09
02/02/09
013
A'Ieeting Date
01/26/09
02/02/09
Discussion Motion Resolution
Mtg Date 01/26/09 Mtg Date 02/02/09 Mtg Date
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
Inzttals
Prepared by I Mayor's review Counczl review
J M
JMs fd
a
I
1TEMINFORMATION
ORIGTIV 3I. AGENDA DAZE: JANUARY 26, 2009
RECORD.OF- COUNCIL_ACTION
ATTACHMENTS
Informational Memorandum dated 01/14/09
Contract 02 -108 Supplement No. 7 with Scope of Work and Fee
Minutes from the Transportation Committee meeting of 01/20/09
ITEM No.
R
AGENDA I I EN TITLE Tukwila International Boulevard Phase II III
Supplemental Agreement No. 7 for Construction Management Services with KPG.
Ordinance Bid Award 7 Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date
Council Mayor Adm Svcs n DCD Finance Fire U Legal n P&R Police PTV
Base Contract 02 -108 with KPG, Inc. included design services for the Tukwila
International Blvd Phase II and III Project. Supplement No. 7, for construction
management services, has been negotiated with KPG in the amount of $385,000. The
scope of work includes construction management support to augment the field team of
City personnel and Harris Assoc. The Council is being asked to approve Contract 02 -108
Supplement No. 7 with KPG.
REV)IBWED BY COW Mtg. n CA &P Cmte U F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm Planning Comm.
DATE: 01/20/09
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR/ADMIN. Public Works
COM ffTTEE Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole
COST°IMPACT FUND
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED
$385,000.00 $2,115,000.00
Fund Source: 104 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (PAGE 16 17, 2009 CIP)
Comments:
APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
TO:
City of Tukwila
FROM: Public Works Director
DATE: January 14, 2009
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
Mayor Haggerton
Transportation Committee
SUBJECT: Tukwila International Blvd Phase II Ill (S 116 St to S 139 St)
Project Nos. 95 -RWO3 95 -RW04, Contract 02 -108 Supplement No. 7
Construction Management (CM) Services with KPG
ISSUE
Approve Contract 02 -108 Supplement 7 with KPG, Inc. for the Tukwila international Blvd
Phase II III Street Improvement Project construction management and material testing
services.
BACKGROUND
The City contracted with KPG, Inc. to design Tukwila international Blvd Phase II Ill Project
from S 116 St to S 139 St. The construction contract was awarded to Gary Merlino
Construction on December 15, 2008. The City wishes to retain KPG during the construction
phase to provide engineering support as necessary for issues related to design and other
technical support services.
ANALYSIS
The Supplemental Agreement for KPG includes civil, electrical, surveying, utility coordination
technical support, structural and wall construction engineering, geotechnical support and
materials testing services.
These services will augment the construction field team composed primarily of Harris
Associates and City personnel. The negotiated fee of $385,000.00 is reasonable for this project.
See adjacent Harris memo for budget information.
RECOMMENDATION
The Council is being asked to approve Contract 02 -108 Supplement #7 with KPG, Inc. to
provide construction management support for Tukwila International Blvd Phase II III Project in
the amount of $385,000.00 and consider this item at the January 26, 2009 Committee of the
Whole meeting and subsequent February 2, 2009 Regular Meeting.
Attachment: Consultant Contract 02 -108 Sup #7 including Scope of Work and Fee
P\PROJECTS\A- RW RS Projects \95RW03 TIB2 \Info Memo KPG Sup #7 01 -14-09 MER.doc
VI Washington State
Department of Transportation
Supplemental Agreement
Number 7
Original Agreement Number
LA -5329 O 1 08(g)
Project Number
STPF 0099(007) 1-]LP- STPUL- 0099(103)
Project Title
Tukwila International Boulevard Phase 2 3
Description of Work
South 139th Street to South 116th Street
Construction Engineering and Materials Testing ServicesSelvices
The Local Agency of City of Tukwila
desires to supplement the agreement entered into with KPG, Inc. P.S.
and executed on 11/18/2002 and identified as Agreement No.
All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement.
The changes to the agreement are described as follows:
Section 1, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read:
this reference made a part of this agreement.
Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the number of calendar days for
completion of the work to read: Time for completion shall he December 31, 2010
Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows:
Additional services for this supplement No. 7 are estimated at 5385.000 based on_tlie level of effort indicated on the
attached Exhibit `D -7'.
If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the appropriate spaces
below and return to this office for final action.
By: Nelson Davis, KPG
DOT Form 140 -063 EF
Revised 9/2005
Consultant Signature
Organization and Address
KPG, Inc. P.S.
KPG, Inc. P.S.
753 9th Avenue North
Seattle, WA 98109
Phone: 206.286.1640
Execution Date Completion Date
11/18/2002
New Maximum Amount Payable
2,127,637.00
111
12/31/2010
By City of Tukwila
Approving Authority Signature
Date
03-1006)
LA -5329
A. BACKGROUND
0
Exhibit 13 -7
City of Tukwila
Tukwila International Boulevard, Phases 2 3
South 139 Street to South 116 Street
Scope of Work
Supplemental Agreement No. 7
Construction Engineering and Support
KPG, Inc
January 9, 2009
The scope of work is provided to include additional support throughout the construction phase of the Tukwila
International Boulevard Project. This work includes preconstruction support, construction phase services, material
testing services, on -call construction surveying, franchise utility assistance, and preparation of record drawings as
described herein.
B. Score: or WORK
TASK 1 MANAGEMENT COORDINATION ADMINISTRATION
1.1 The Consultant shall provide continuous project management for the project duration (estimate 20 months).
1.2 The Consultant shall prepare monthly progress reports identifying work completed in the previous month,
work in progress, upcoming work elements, and reporting of any delays, problems, or additional
information needs. These reports shall be submitted with the Consultant invoices.
1.3 The Consultant shall provide continuous management and administration of all subcontractors included in
this scope of work.
Task 1 Deliverables: Monthly progress reports (20 months)
TASK 2 CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES
2.1 The Consultant shall provide on -call support, which may include, attending preconstruction meeting,
weekly progress meetings, review shop drawings, accuracy checks of construction surveying and staking,
interpretation of plans and specifications, and construction change order assistance on an as- needed basis.
Specific tasks are anticipated to include:
Preconstruction Services: Assistance with utility coordination, coordination with City field and
administrative staff, attendanc a t preconsft mee ting and other support os requested by the
t meeting YY... equ t
w..
City in preparation for construction.
Construction Meetings: Attend weekly construction meetings or other project meetings at the
construction site to review, in conjunction with the City, the Contractor's progress and
construction schedule. Weekly attendance is not anticipated for the project duration; however, the
project design engineer and other engineers will attend as requested. Provide feedback and follow
up as appropriate. Budget allowances for meeting attendance is shown on the attached hour
estimate.
Submittals: Review and comment on the Contractor's submittals, including shop drawings.
Interpretation of Plans and Specifications: Provide technical assistance to clarify and interpret the
contract documents at the request of the City Assist the City in answering Contractor questions.
Page 1 of 2
TASK 5 RECORD DRAWINGS
Respond to requests for information (RFIs), prepare requests for quotation (RFQs), and prepare
construction field directives (CFDs).
Change Order Assistance: In the event that the provisions of the Contract Documents need to be
revised, prepare the necessary revisions to the drawings and specifications.
O Subconsultant Construction Support: Project Subconsultants for geotechnical (Landau
Associates), Structural Engineering (KPFF) and material testing services (Krazan and Associates)
will be retained for construction support on an as requested basis. Day to day coordination with
the material testing service will be the responsibility of the City. The provisions of Exhibit C -2
(Payment Cost plus Fixed Fee) shall not apply to materials testing. Material testing rates shall
be in accordance with the fee schedule attached as Exhibit G -7. Budget allowances for each
Subconsultant are shown on the attached reimbursable breakdown.
O Assist with preparation and attendance at special events, such as public meeting, groundbreaking,
ribbon cuttings, council updates, and other events as requested.
Task.2 Deliverables: Documentation as requested in support of on -call construction support
TASK.3 UTILITY COORDINATION ALLOWANCES
3.1 The Consultant will provide assistance to facilitate franchise utility relocations and adjustments as
requested by the City. These services may include design modifications that may be required to facilitate
franchise utility work. The purpose of this task is to provide a budget allowance and tracking mechanism
for possible reimbursement to the City by the franchise utilities. Work for each utility will be tracked
separately on monthly invoices. The City will be responsible for obtaining reimbursement on these charges
when applicable.
TASK.4 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING AND STAKING
4.1 The Consultant will provide construction surveying and staking on an as requested basis. Primary survey
will be provided by the Contractor; however, the City may request verification survey and staking or
assistance with as -built survey. We have included an allowance of 80 hours of survey crew time with
necessary office support.
5.1 The Consultant will provide record drawings within 60 days of receipt of information provided by the
construction contractor and the City of Tukwila.
Task.5 Deliverables:
Record Drawing A'fylars (full size)
Half -size copy of draft
Full-size and hal`si e copses of f nal record drawings
Electronic files
C. FUTURE SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
The City of Tukwila may require other services of the Consultant these services could include other work tasks not
included in the scope of work. These services may include, but are not necessarily limited to, additional
construction support, engineering or independent peer review of contractor, City, or utility proposed plan changes,
assistance with property issues, or other services deemed necessary by the City. At the time these services are
required, the Consultant shall provide the City with a detailed scope of work and an estimate of costs. The
Consultant shall not proceed with the work until the City has authorized the work and issued a Notice to Proceed.
Tukwila International Boulevard, Phase 2 3
Supplement No. 7
Page 2 of 2
January 9, 2009
EXHIBIT D-7
FEE SUMMARY
TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD PHASES II AND III
SUPPLEMENT NO 7 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND SUPPORT
EXHIBIT D-7
HOUR AND FEE ESTIMATE
TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD PHASES II AND III
SUPPLEMENT NO 7 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND SUPPORT
EXHIBIT D-7
HOUR AND FEE ESTIMATE
TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD PHASES II AND III
SUPPLEMENT NO 7 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND SUPPORT
REIMBURSABLE BREAKDOWN
EXHIBIT D-7
TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD PHASES II AND III
SUPPLEMENT NO 7 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND SUPPORT
Deliverables:
1. Monthly Progress Report.
2. Monthly Invoice.
EXHIBIT G -7
SCOPE OF SERVICES
CONSULTING GEOTECRNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CITY OF TUKWILA
This scope of services covers consulting geotechnical engineering services during construction of
improvements to Tukwila International Boulevard in Tukwila, Washington.
TASK 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION
Objective: To manage, administer and provide ongoing coordination for the project. This task
includes technical and financial management, and liaison with KPG and City of Tukwila (CITY)
staff.
Approach:
1. Prepare monthly progress reports for submittal with progress payment invoices with backup
as required. Progress reports will identify progress status, and major activities completed
during the invoicing period, and out of scope of services.
CIient Responsibilities:
1. Timely review of deliverables and decisions on issues critical to scheduled progress.
2. Identification and involvement of Client Staff.
TASK 2 SITE VISITS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING DURING CONSTRUCTION
Objective: Provide geotechnical assistance to KPG and the CITY during construction of the
project.
Approach:
1. Periodic site visits as requested by KPG and /or the CITY to observe geotechnical-related
construction aspects of the project. We have budgeted for up to eight (8) site visits
2. Review the geotechnical aspects of CONTRACTOR submittals.
3. Provide consulting on geotechnical-related construction issues.
Deliverables:
1. Construction field reports summarizing observations and recommendations (if any).
2. Brief memorandums summarizing review comments on CONTRACTOR submittals.
1/13109 C:1Docurn: ms and Seuingsl,Nel:en'Lo t Seuirgs\Temp nary Internal Piles\OLKS417113 ccnst scopc_r v.dec
1 LANE
EXHIBIT G-7
LANDAU ASSOCIATES
TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
EXHIBIT G -7
Landau Associates, Inc.
Overhead Schedule
Fiscal Year Ended dune 30, 2007
of
Income Landau WSDOT Accepted Direct
Description Statement Adj. Adj. Ref. Amount Labor
Direct Labor $2,740,431 ($7,846) A $2,732,585
Fringe
Overhead Labor $1,875,092 ($4,151) A $1,870,941 68.47%
Vacation/Sick Leave /Holidays 585,443 585,443 21.42%
Payroll Taxes 467,324 467,324 17.10%
Medical Insurances 375,196 3 75,19 6 13.73%
Bonus /Severance 424,613 (4,650) B 419,963 15.37%
Profit Sharing/ESOP 250,525 250,525 9.17%
Total Fringe $3,978,193 ($8,801) $3,969,392 145.26%
General Overhead
Field/Laboratory $84,485 ($84,485) C $0 0.00%
Temporary Help 34,024 34,024 1.25%
Health Safety 11,479 11,479 0.42%
Mileage 8c, Vehicle 69,433 (65,969) D 3,464 0.13%
Travel Lodging 50,859 (7,292) E 43,567 1.59%
Office Supplies/Equipment 136,333 (23,177) F 113,156 4.14%
Computer. Supplies/Maintenance 41,816 41,816 1.53%
Postage 17,272 17,272 0.63%
Telecommunications 78,969 78,969 2.89%
Tax License 197,239 197,239 7.22%
Professional License Dues 39,928 (2,672) O 37,256 1.36%
Building Expense 571,159 571,159 20.90%
Insurance 103,041 103,041 3.77%
Depreciation 208,470 (69,109) 0 139,361 5.10%
Imputed Cost•of Money 27,510 3,526 P 31,036 1.14%
Technical References' 9,018 9,018 0.33%
Recruiting 14,387 (2,707) H 11,680 0.43%
A Cost 100,077 100,077 -3 c
Personnel Relations 46,058 (10,246) I 35,812 1.31%
Professional Services 206,666 (1,921) J 204,745 7.49%
Marketing Expenses 186,982 (24,258) K 162,724 5.95%
Service Charges Interest 39,815 (39,815) L 0 0.00%
Donations 13,284 (13,284) M 0 0.00%
Miscellaneous Expense 7,214 (7,214) N 0 0.00%
Total General Overhead $2,295,518 ($349,477) $854 $1,946,895 71.25%
Overhead $6,273,711 ($358,278) $854 $5,916,287 216.51%
Overhead Rate 228.93% 216.51%
Page 2
Description
EXHIBIT G -7
Landau Associates, Inc.
Overhead Schedule
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2007
%of
Income Landau WSDOT Accepted Direct
Statement Adj. Adj. Ref. Amount Labor
Landau Associates Reviewed Accepted 10/18/07 CG
Financial Statements' compiled by Finney, Neill Company, P.S.
Landau Associates References
A. Direct and indirect labor overtime premiums unallowable per 48 CFR 22.103 -2.
B. Signing bonuses and moving bonuses in excess of $1,000 per person unallowable per 48 CFR 31.205 -35
and 48 CFR 31.201 -4. Bonuses in excess of 15% of allowable overhead also excluded per WSDOT policy.
C. Field supplies inventory, eventually charged to projects, related to job chargeable activity.
D. Vehicle gas, repairs maintenance most related to rental revenue.
E. Local meals, employee business meals Unallowable per 48 CFR 31.205 -14 and WSDOT Accounting
Manual, M13 -82, Chapter 10 Travel.
F. Estimated cost of direct photocopies related to job chargeable activity.
G. Depreciation on lab field equipment, field vehicles CAD equipment related to job chargeable activity.
H. Local meals recruiting unallowable per 48 CFR 31.205 -14 and. WSDOT Accounting Manual, M13-82,
Chapter 10 Travel.
L Mariner tickets; liquor, Christmas party expenses in excess of $25 per employee unallowable per
48 CFR 31.205 -14.
J. Federal income tax preparation fees over $250 unallowable per 48 CFR 31.205- 41(b)(1), 48 CFR 201 -6(d),
and WSDOT policy.
K. Advertising; client entertainment, campaign contributions; and other costs unallowable per 48 CFR 31.205 -1(d),
48 CFR 31.205 -8, 48 CFR 31.205 -14, and 48 CFR 31.205 -38.
L. Service charges and interest unallowable per 48 CFR 31.205 -20.
M. Donations unallowable per 48 CFR 31.205 -8.
N. Miscellaneous undocumented costs removed.
WSDOT References
O. Lobbying unallowable per 48 CFR 31.205 -22.
P. Imputed cost of money calculation used the wrong rate for July through December 2006.
Page 3
Sec
No
EXHIBIT G -7
ENGINEERING COST ESTIMATE:
Tukwila international Blvd Walls
Structural: Engineering Construction Support Services
Scope Of Work
1.0 Management, Admin. Meetings
Project Management 1 1 I 8
'Precon Meetings Assume 1 meeting) 4
Subtotals: �f 1 :2 :0"
5.0 Construction Support Services
Site Visits /Meetings (assume 5) 18 12
Submittal Review:
Steel Pile Shop Dwgs /Lists 1 4 24
Tieback 1 4
Shotcrete 1 4
Reber Shop Drawings 4 40
'Testing Reports 1 2 8
Miscellaneous Submittals 1 -4 8
RF1's 40 80
As- builts 8 40
7.0 Reimbursables
Courier and FedEx
Subtotals: 0 :82 :220 .1. -40
Note: 2.58 multiplier is determined as follows: 1.0 Base Rate +'1.329 Overhead 0.25'Pro,it
Fife: KPFF- Tukwila Wail CSS Fee Rev.xls Date: 1/12/2009
CATEGORY HOURS Sheet COSTS
Proj. Sen. Pro. CADDI 2.580
Princ. Manag. Engr. Tech. Admin. Multiplier
$64 855 835 1 832 1 $16 1 Reimb j Fee
40
$0
1 $1,300
$568
$0
:$1,868
$0
$3,638
$0
$2,735
$503
$503
$4,180
$1,006
$1,290
.$0
$12,900
$8,050
so
;$34;804
$100 j $100
Q1
TOTALS J 1 I 94 220 I 40 0 1 1 ..3 4,9o'- I
Page 1 of 1
excluding DCAA audit items
DIRECT LABOR
PERSONNEL 538,985,142
PRINCIPALS 53,744,812
OPS- CHARGEABLE 876,277
TOTAL 542,806,231
LABOR RELATED OVERHEAD
SICK LEAVE, PERSONNEL 51,320,316
SICK LEAVE, PRINCIPALS 5130,480
VACATION, PERSONNEL 52,236,648
VACATION, PRINCIPALS 5441,104
HOLIDAY, PERSONNEL. 51,598,414
HOLIDAY, PRINCIPALS 5207,411
PAYROLL TAXES 54,764 351
EMPLOYEE MED INSURANCE 54,071,630
TOTAL 514,770,354
LABOR RELATED tv1ULT 34 51%
Total With FAR
FY2007/8 adjustments
$38,985,142
53,744,812
$76,277
542,806,231
51,320,316
5130,480
52,236,648
5441,104
51,598,414
5207,411
54,764,351
54,071,630
514,770, 354
34.51%
GENERAL OVERHEAD
OVERHEAD WAGES, PERSONNEL 513,892,252 513,892,252
OVERHEAD WAGES, PRINCIPALS 512,079,652 (51,708,657) 510,370,995
OPS -NON CHARGEABLE 5721,980 5721,980
BLUEPRINTING AND DUPLICATING 5312,995 (598,599) 5214,396
RENT 56,754,181 56,754,181
REPAIR MAINTENANCE 5212,054 5212,054
CITY STATE BUSINESS TAX 5941,372 $941,372
DEPRECIATION 51,016 782 5 1,016,782
OTHER TAXES LICENSES 5170,468 5170,468
INSURANCE, OTHER THAN LIFE 5597,720 5597,720
OFFICE SUPS, POSTAGE, DEL. 51,445,014 51,445,014
TELEPHONE 5459,065 5459,065
PROF DUES, FEES, BKS, CONFS 5621,194 5621,194
CAR $818,405 5818,405
TRAVEL $767,500 5767,500
LEGAL $413,145 5413,145
ACCOUNTING 5184,871 5184,871
EMPLOYEE MORALE Meals 5780,755 (5351,340) 5429,415
MOVING 543,451 543,451
SCHOOL 569,958 569,958
PERSONNEL PROCUREMENT $312,289 $312,289
N1ISC JOB FIXES 582,198 (582,198) (50)
BAD DEBT 50 50 50
CONTRIB 3186,153 186,153) (50)
COMPUTER 51,643,436 51,643,436
Cost of money 50
TOTAL 544,526,888 (52,426,947) 542,099,941
GENERAL OVERHEAD MULTIPLE 104 02% 98.35%
OVERHEAD MULTIPLE 1 385 1 329
EXHIBIT 0 -7
PROJECT NOTES
EXHIBIT G -7
s ar ene o atta• d an.:.co c ed ll b s re -rence.
KA Proposal No. T08011
Tukwila International Blvd.
Phases 2 3 Improvements
Revised: January 6, 2009
Page No. 2
Scope and pricing is based on correspondence and conversations with lvfr. Ronda during the months of September
2008 through January 2009, and without the assistance of a construction schedule. Krazan Associates, Inc. is
willing to revise the estimate once a construction schedule is made available.
Consultant Project Management charges are included in the estimate at unit rates quoted.
Quantities are based on WSDOT minimums and are subject to decrease; thus all tests performed are based on
a time and materials basis.
Prices are subject to change if this Agreement is not executed within thirty (30) calendar days.
Services will be performed on a "tinge and materials" basis. Any total estimates provided are merely estimates
and are not a guaranteed maximum price.
All testing/inspections performed will be billed on a portal to portal basis unless specifically noted otherwise.
Maxirnum'h hour travel time, each way will be charged for site visits,
Twelve (12) hours notice of cancellation is required on all jobs.
Additional services requested in addition to the above will be billed at our current rates (see Attachment C).
ce• nce f Krazan's proposal constitu s yo agreement of Kraz comm t a1 k -r- our
I. The technician's reserved for this project are multi qualified and will be available for a variety of services.
FEE STRUCTURE
We will perform the services listed above on a time and material basis in accordance with our 2008 standard rate
schedule (see Attachment C). Based on the scope of work described in this proposal and our experience with similar
projects, Krazan and Associates' estimates the costs for testing and inspection services to be about $94 A
detailed breakdown of this cost estimate is attached as Attachment B. Costs for construction testing and inspection
services are highly dependent on contractors schedule; weather, overlapping of work, additional inspections required
by the building official and other factors. Krazan Associates does not control the work or production rate. Actual
costs will vary due to the frequency of scheduling by others. Therefore the quantities listed in our cost estimate
should be considered approximate. The estimate provided herein does not imply a lump sum fee, not -to- exceed
fee or a guaranteed maximum price. Consistent with good engineering practice, we will work with the contractor to
keep inspection costs at a minimum. If provided with a construction schedule this cost estimate can be further refined
and quantified.
COORDINATION
The above scope of services will be performed when scheduled by the General Contractor or the client's designated
representative. Proper scheduling is imperative to the success of the special inspections program. Krazan
Associates cannot take responsibility for work that has not been inspected if we have not been scheduled nor can we
take responsibility for delays due to insufficient lead -time in scheduling inspections. We recommend that the person
Krazan Associates, Inc.
With Offices Serving The Western United States
CONDITIONS
EXHIBIT G -7
KA Proposal No. T08011
Tukwila International Blvd,
Phases 2 3 Improvements
Revised: January 6, 2009
Page No. 3
scheduling the inspections contact our office prior to the job starting to discuss required inspection and scheduling
procedures.
1. Additional services requested outside of our stated scope of work will be billed in excess of the estimated
amount at our current rates. A price list for these services will be provided upon request (see Attachment C).
2. This offer terminates ninety calendar days from the dated of issue, unless otherwise stated and agreed.
3. Inspections which are canceled with Less than twelve (12) hours notice, or after an inspector has been dispatched
to the project site, will be charged the 2 -hour minimum fee associated with the type of inspection or testing
requested.
4. All concrete samples will be cast in 4 -inch diameter x 8 -inch high molds unless otherwise agreed.
5. Additional samples for contractor convenience testing and/or field cure samples are not included in this estimate.
6. Contractor will provide curing facilities in accordance with ASTM requirements for initial curing (the first 24
hours after specimens are cast) and protection of concrete test specimens on site.
7. Krazan and Associates, as a professional services fine, is typically not subject to the prevailing wage
agreements. Should by Federal ruling, our services be subject to prevailing wage rates, this proposal is null and
void. A new proposal will be provided to account for additional services and increased wage rates associated
with the ruling. This includes any apprenticeship programs, equal opportunity submittals, affirmative action,
union referral statements and /or certified payroll. These items were excluded from this proposal.
8. This estimate is based on structural steel being fabricated in a local (within a 25 mile radius of an existing
Krazan and Associates Inc. office) ANSI Certified structural steel fabrication facility. Should fabrication occur
outside this range additional costs for travel, time, mileage and/or per -diem will be charged.
Krazan Associates, Inc.
With Offices Serving The Western United States
171.0292 mtumvon :inulkvi_rq- ft1:.3ti33
r.." �_':/A�rrhl->�R�' c =ice_: O7a'i
6116090654890
I P arm, 42 flcpSY
Gavel Ucoor6
CS6c
HMn CI 112' -Ease 11200700
03 3 2 0 57 112' •Orc0ay
N HA 1/2 SGT
OSLO 90:0
91112000‘ Cceomio
57;4000 Cora
VonadCu&
Curb aM G43u
SCO33543pp5124
SCeoalc
3rd Parly Uli av TooOn,
Sa19
1COF
CS7C
400.160 322 To 1 411525 F1002,5,
9 Ccrlv0la
1 W0653030040u 1400 CY 4050 psi
1 Y781 601 554 15 CY 4000 psi
I SoIf Pao Cn000b(Faoib *65 200 CY Sn064o2o
)Soklcr PM Gene ref, (F66311 -505 1603 CY 274:4:410
1?$,If'o Pis COF got Sh711 510) 500
)Ur Tren [0815465
I 902483y T1a1ra, Crosilp
Wa0Tr 1 Bah2
Storm Plrc
E0p1r5.I
71410 6014
099085/5
617.7or AN adsslmsnb
65.046,160419
7o0WaiSece.I n2re�
/T5101T05 0100.3 1065
7 JS•10 Cede $$¢03
T4441T2 Cast 556.630.00
117c011711.757 r17170..0. 02,0 520430.00
57 P61Ux1d lh Hours
IPc05:5T524.5111n Cos/
17501 hvri :n CooO
17c01.00. 7
25015
43 LF
6680 LF
750 SY
6060 SY
150000' GB for Pp67rsa Grs4326n 11300 Tun 20
EE 1 -1300 Ton 25
Prod^_- 11-00 4
25.70 a:.v1T V 16 CY 5O
10600 CY .156000 G250162$14 for 4r2U GtatVon 1.130370n 20
5E 1.(00)T60 20
17108070 1- 1000TO0 20
FIctice 1000 3
2. L 07.±.1 1I47I 000 22
1
$1201,6
66.1761)0
EXHIBIT G -7
EXHIBIT G -7
On Site Mobile Laboratory (Asphalt Batch Plant)
On Site Mobile Laboratory Mobilization
On Site Mobile Laboratory De- Mobilization
Asphalt/Concrete Coring
Core Density Charge
Compression Samples (Concrete, Mortar, Grout)
Proctor Analysis (AASHTO T99 or TI 80)
Sieve Analysis AASHTO Ti 1 and T27)
Extraction/Gradation (AASHTO T308, Ti I, and T27)
Rice Density Analysis (AASHTO T209)
Marshall
Saud Equivalent AASHTO T176)
Degradation (WSDOTT113)
Atterberg Limits (ASTM 4318)
Hydrometer (ASTM 422)
Fracture Face AASHTO TP 61)
Shot Crete Test Panels (Includes 4 Cores) AASHTO T24)
Sample Pick -Up
Trip Charge/ Mileage
TRANSPORTATION SUPPORT DIVISION
FEE SCHEDULE
:T= -k_ DRSCRiPTION?lScoire :oZ= Scr9(ecs)- �M- ==lli1TE
I'WSDOT Validated Field Tester Concrete, Aggregate, HMA, Embankment, Welding) 1 S55/hr+ 15%
WSDOT Validated Lead Inspector Senior inpector- Non -PE; Project Lead Inspector) i 569 Hour
JOTS Manager WSDOT Experienced PE) 5125 /Hour
*15% Shift Differential
*=Batch Plant mobile laboratory costs include all Pests performed at that location.
CDF Cylinders
Structural Steel Inspection
Structural Steel Fabrication Shop Inspections
Concrete Fabrication Shop Inspections
Welder OualiTcation (AWS)
Non Destructive EXr (NDFJND2) Enuipmeot Usane
Welding Procedure
Bend or Tensile Test (Welded oatmeal Set of 3
Torque Tension Device (Skidmore- Wilhelm) if required
Cross Hole Sonic Testing
SWPP/Turbidity monitoring
Per Diem (Outside 50 Mile Radius of Bellevue, Spokane or Portland)
Mileage (Outside 50 Mile Radius of Bellevue, Spokane or Portland)
Supetpave Mix Design
CBR. (Wish Proctor Analysis) (ASTM D1883)
Soundness (Coarse Aggregate) (ASTM C88)
Durability (ASTM 3744)
!Relative De:sit/ 14=44in (AM D1253)
!Accelerated Expansion (CRD 148)
ILA Abrasion AASHTO T96)
'Permeability (flexabie wall) (ASTM D50841
Direct Shear (ASTM D3080)
Full Size Masonry Prism Samoles (ASTM 5477)
Flex Beam Compression Samples
NCAT Correbaticn Factcr (Asphalt Oven Cooreiation)
NOTES:
A 2 br minimum applies to each daily visit
Costs associated trilh an on site mobile laboratory nssunres Client supplied power, phone and Internet access
Costs associated yaith field tester and QTS Inspector includes all report writing, maintaining and processing.
Additionally, Sample pickup cast are Included as \yell.
Krazan Associates, Inc.
With Offices Servicing fhe Western United States
**52,000.00 /Month
51,500.00 /Ea.
51,500.00 /Ea.
570.00 Hr.
535.00 Ea.
520.00 /Es.
5200.00 Ea.
$90.00 Ea.
5200.00/ Ea
$90.00 Ea.
5180.00 Ea.
560.00 /Ea.
585.00 Ea.
580.00 Ea.
5150.00/Ea.
560.00 !Ea,
5140.00 Ea.
NO CJIARGE
NO CHARGE
580.00 Ea.
$75.00 Hr.
575.00/ Hr.
565.00 /llr.
$75.00/ Hr.
525.00 Day
575.00/ Hr.
5300.00 Set
550.00 Day
$2C-00 /Shalt
570.00 /Hr.
5110.00 /Day
50.60 /Mile
$4,500.00 /Ea.
$500.00 Ea.
5160.00 Ea
5200.00 Ea.
5175.00 ,L
5350.00 /Ea.
5175.00/Ea.
5500.00 Fa.
5200.00 /Ea.
5100.00 Ea.
580.00 Ea.
NO CHARGE
KA Proposal fro. T08011
TIDP 2 3
January 5, 2030
Transnortation Committee Minutes January 20, 2009 Pale 2
E. Tukwila International Boulevard Phase II and III Construction Management Support Supplemental
Agreement #7
Staff is seeking full Council approval to enter into Supplemental Agreement #7 with KPG, Inc. in the
amount of $385,000 to provide construction management support for Tukwila International Boulevard
Phases If and H.
The services provided by the supplemental agreement will complement the construction management
services that will be provided by Harris Associates (above) and the City. KPG was the design consultant
for TIB Phase II and III from South 116 Street to South 139 Street, and their presence providing
engineering support during the construction phase will be an essential element to the management team.
Additionally, KPG will be handling the material testing required by WSDOT. UNANIMOUS
APPROVAL. FORWARD TO JANUARY 26 COW FOR DISCUSSION.
F. Tukwila International Boulevard Phase II and III Construction Management Trailer Purchase
Staff is seeking full Council approval to purchase a field office trailer in the amount of $30,000 for on -site
construction management of the TIB Phase II and III project.
Large construction projects require a field office trailer for on -site construction management. Usually, the
trailer is rented as outlined in a construction contract, returned when the project is completed, and rented
again with each project that requires a field office. Given the almost two -year construction time frame for
TIB Phase II and III as well as other upcoming projects, it is more cost effective for the City to purchase a
trailer. Leases are estimated to cost approximately 4% of the purchase price per month. The trailer is
anticipated to last 10 -15 years, and will pay for itself within five years. The trailer can also be utilized as an
infield command post in an emergency situation. Liability for the trailer will be covered within the City's
self insured coverage with WCIA. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO JANUARY 26 COW
FOR DISCUSSION..
G. Street Vacation at 13911 Tukwila International Boulevard
Staff is seeking Council approval of a resolution setting a public hearing date of February 23, 2009 for a 128
foot street vacation along 13911 Tukwila International Boulevard. The street vacation is being requested by
the only abutting property owner located at 13911 Tukwila International Boulevard. UNANIIVIOUS
APPROVAL. FORWARD TO JANUARY 26 COW FOR DISCUSSION.
M. MISCELLANEOUS
Meeting adjourned at 6:16 p.m.
Next meeting: Monday, February 2, 2009 5:00 p.m. Conference Room 1
Committee Chair Approval
Minutes by KAM. Reviewed by GL.
SPONSOR'S
SUMMARY
MTG. DATE
01/26/09
02/02/09
MTG. DATE
01/26/09
02/02/09
Meeting Date
01/26/09
02/02/09
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
rnttta /s
Prepared by 1 Mayor's review
TEM INFORMATION
Council review
1 ORIGLNAL AGENDA DA I'h: JANUARY 26, 2009
CAS NUMBER: 09-014
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Tukwila International Boulevard Phase II III
Purchase a Construction Management Field Trailer
RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
ATTACHMENTS
Informational Memorandum dated 01/14/09
General Trailer specifications with approximate picture
Minutes from the Transportation Committee meeting of 01/20/09
I MNo.
,3 G
CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance n Bid Award U Public Heating n Other
Mtg Date 01/26/09 Mtg Date 02/02/09 ibitg Date Aftg Date Mtg Date Ivitg Date Mtg Date
SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs n DCD n Finance U Fire Legal Pe7R n Police PT/
The City has typically provisioned a field office for the management of large construction
projects through the construction contract. Valuable field time is used to get the trailer set
up at the start of each project. A review of the purchase vs. lease costs show that the City
would pay for the $30,000.00 trailer in approximately 5 years. The trailer has a 10 -15 -year l
life span. The Council is being asked to approve the purchase of a mobile field trailer for
the TIB Phase II I1I Project.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. 1 1 Parks Comm. U Planning Comm.
DAL 01/20/09
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADM :N. Public Works
COMMITTEE Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole
COST IMPACT SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$30,000.00 $2,115,000.00 $0.00
Fund Source: 104 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (PAGE 16 17 2009 CIP)
Comments:
City of Tukwila
TO Mayor Haggerton
Transportation Committee
FROM: Public Works Director
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 14, 2009
SUBJECT Tukwila International Blvd Phase II 111 (S 116 St to S 139 St)
Project Nos. 95 -RWO3 95 -RWO4
Purchase Field Trailer
ISSUE
Approve purchase of a field office trailer for construction management.
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
BACKGROUND
The City has typically provisioned a field office for the management of large construction
projects through the construction contract. The responsibility is placed on the contractor to lease
a field trailer and provide it for the City's use throughout the project. While the cost is charged to
the project and the majority of the set up is the responsibility of the contractor, in -house staff is
responsible for moving equipment into the space and configuring it to work with the specific
office layout. This uses valuable field time at the start of each large project and puts the field
teams in a reactive stance with the contractor at a time when they should be the most proactive
ANALYSIS
A review of the purchase vs. lease costs for typical office trailers of this type show a lease rate
which would pay for the capital expenditure in approximately 5 years While some risk is
involved with the City owning a trailer, we have demonstrated a steady need for our own trailer
We expect to be able to use this structure for our major projects in the foreseeable future
In an attempt to reduce the majority of our risk, we customized the basic trailer specification
from a classroom portable design to provide improved durability and maximum flexibility for the
variety and size of the anticipated upcoming projects The trailer is fully mobile and will be fitted
with a special hitch to allow it to be moved with standard City equipment. The size was chosen
to provide shared office space for up to five field personnel with a dual use conference space for
field meetings. At a nominal 10' x 32' dimension it is easily placed and stored with a compliment
of field equipment.
We chose to purchase the field trailer through the King County Director's Association (KCDA), a
purchasing cooperative. This service provides support with specification and bid administration
similar to the state purchasing system. The base trailer cost with modifications is $26,190 and
with tax and a small KCDA fee, the total purchase price is just under $30,000
RECOMMENDATION
The Council is being asked to approve the purchase of a mobile field trailer for the TIB Phase II
III project and additional projects in the amount of $30,000.00 and consider this item at the
January 26, 2009 Committee of the Whole meeting and subsequent February 2, 2009 Regular
Meeting
Attachment: General trailer specification with approximate picture
P'PROJECTSW- RW RS Prerects195RWO3 T1B2 Jnfo Memo Tra'?r CM 01 -15 -09-1 ER dooc
Modern Building Systems 10 x 32 office Windows Internet Explorer-
ig http: jjmodernbuildingsystems .rnmgloorplansflOx32o.html
General Specifications:
All trailer dimensions are ADA compliant
Bow truss
Suspended T -grin} ceiling with fluorescent lights
Exterior hollow core metal door with entrance lever
handle
T1 11 siding
Heating and air conditioning
VC tile flooring
KCDA Field Spec Office
32'
Close Print
10' x 10'
i i Internet
`t t
Transoortation Committee Minutes January 20. 2009 Paae 2
E. Tukwila International Boulevard Phase II and III Construction Management Support Sun plemental
Agreement #7
Staff is seeking full Council approval to enter into Supplemental Agreement #7 with KPG, Inc. in the
amount of $385,000 to provide construction management support for Tukwila International Boulevard
Phases II and II.
The services provided by the supplemental agreement will ,complement the construction management
services that will be provided by Harris Associates (above) and the City. KPG was the design consultant
for TIB Phase II and III from South 116`" Street to South 139 Street, and their presence providing
engineering support during the construction phase will be an essential element to the management team.
Additionally, KPG will be handling the material testing required by WSDOT. UNANIMOUS
APPROVAL. FORWARD TO JANUARY 26 COW FOR DISCUSSION.
F. Tukwila International Boulevard Phase II and III Construction Management Trailer Purchase
Staff is seeking full Council approval to purchase a field office trailer in the amount of $30,000 for on -site
construction management of the TIB Phase If and III project.
Large construction projects require a field office trailer for on -site construction management. Usually, the
j trailer is rented as outlined in a construction contract, returned when the project is completed, and rented
again with each project that requires a field office. Given the almost two -year construction time frame for
TIB Phase II and ill as well as other upcoming projects, it is more cost effective for the City to purchase a
trailer. Leases are estimated to cost approximately 4% of the purchase price per month. The trailer is
anticipated to last 10 -15 years, and will pay for itself within five years. The trailer can also be utilized as an
infield command post in an emergency situation. Liability for the trailer will be covered within the City's
self insured coverage with WCIA. UNANEVIOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO JANUARY 26 COW
FOR DISCUSSION..
G. Street Vacation at 13911 Tukwila International Boulevard
Staff is seeking Council approval of a resolution setting a public hearing date of February 23, 2009 for a 128
foot street vacation along 13911 Tukwila International Boulevard. The street vacation is being requested by
the only abutting property owner located at 13911 Tukwila International Boulevard. UNANDIOUS
APPROVAL. FORWARD TO JANUARY 26 COW FOR DISCUSSION.
III. MISCELLANEOUS
Meeting adjourned at 6:16 p.m.
Next meeting. Monday, February 2, 2009 5:00 p.m. Conference Room 1
Committee Chair Approval
Minutes by KAM. Reviewed by GL.
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
C y�1LQ y i
J 9 Initials Il hM No.
O b y Meeting Date 1 Prepared by 1 Mayors r, 1 Council review
a n 1 01/26/09 JM'; I .��,G J 1 t
02/02/09 JM
1 I I 3i14
290= 1 1 1 I 1
IT EM INFORMATION
I CAS NUMBER: 09-015 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: JANUARY 26, 2009
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Resolution setting a Public Hearing date of February 23, 2009
for the 13911 Tukwila International Blvd Street Vacation Request
CATEGORY Discussion Iviotion X Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date 01/26/09 Mg Date 02/02/09 Mtg Dat2 2/ 0 9 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date
I SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P&R n Police PTV
SPONSOR'S Petitioner, 139 LLC, provided a complete request for a street vacation of the property
SUMMARY abutting 13911 Tukwila International Boulevard (TIB) and a comprehensive appraisal.
139 LLC is the only abutting property owner. The Council is being asked to approve the
resolution setting a Public Hearing date for February 23, 2009.
REVIEWED BY COW Mt CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. n Parks Comm. n Planning Comm.
DA' E: 01/20/09
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Public Works
COMMITTEE Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole
COST IMPACT -I FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGE 1ED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Fund Source:
Comments:
MTG. DATE I RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
01/26/09
02/02/09 1
MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS
01/26/09 1 Informational Memorandum dated 01/13/09
Draft Resolution
Petition for Vacation of Streets 3.40.71
Vicinity maps and Right -of -Way Vacation Exhibit
Minutes from the Transportation Committee meeting of 01/20/09
02/02/09 1
1
fi ®f Tukwila
4 7 Jim Haggerton Mayor
:t -9oa= INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Transportation Committee
FROM: Public Works Director
DATE: January 13, 2009
SUBJECT: 13911 Tukwila International Boulevard
Street Vacation File Number 340.71
ISSUE
Approve resolution setting a date for a Public Hearing.
BACKGROUND
Petitioner, 139 LLC, provided a complete request for a street vacation of the property abutting
13911 Tukwila International Blvd and a comprehensive appraisal (139 LLC is the only abutting
property owner).
ANALYSIS
The Council may approve the resolution to set a Public Hearing date for February 23, 2009 or
may deny the request for the street vacation.
RECOMMENDATION
The Council is being asked to approve the resolution and consider this item at the January 26,
2009 Committee of the Whole meeting and subsequent February 2, 2009 Regular Meeting.
Attachments: Resolution
Petition for Vacation of Street
Vicinity Map Right -of -Way Vacation Exhibit
P: \STREET VACATIONS 3.40.71 13911 TIB\info memo 011309.doc
1v t
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C1I Y OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, FIXING THE TIME FOR A PUBLIC HEARING FOR
VACATION OF RIGHT -OF -WAY WITHIN THE CITY OF TUKWILA
DEDICATED FOR STREET PURPOSES, GENERALLY DESCRIBED AS
APPROXIMATELY 128 FEET BY 10 FEET ALONG 13911 TUKWILA
INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD.
WHEREAS, the property owner abutting the right -of -way has petitioned the City to
vacate a portion of Tukwila International Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, RCW 35.79.010 requires setting a public hearing by resolution;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. A public hearing upon the vacation of a portion of Tukwila International
Boulevard, adjacent to 13911 Tukwila International Boulevard, shall be held before the
Tukwila City Council in the City Council Chambers at Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter
Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington, on February 23, 2009, which is not less than 20, nor more
than 60 days from the date of passage of this resolution, at which time all persons interested
in said right -of -way vacation are invited to appear and be heard.
Section 2. The City Clerk is directed to post written notice of pendency of the public
hearing in three public places in the City of Tukwila and in one additional conspicuous place
on the right -of -way sought to be vacated at least 20 days prior to the date set for hearing.
PASSED BY THE CFI Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a
Regular Council Meeting thereof this day of 2009.
ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED:
Joan Hernandez, Council President
Christy O'Flaherty, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Office of the City Attorney Resolution Number:
C:\Docuntents and Settings\All Users\ Des. top\Kelly\MSDATA'Resolutions \TIB Street Vacatien.doc
ML:ksn 120/2 2009 Page 1 of 1
PETITION FOR VACATION OF STREETS 3.40.71
PURSUANT TO RCW 35.79
TO THE TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL:
1. The undersigned petitioners hereby request vacation of the following described property located in the
City of Tukwila:
(Provide legal description. If legal description is long, please attach. Attach a site plan of the area to be
vacated.)
2. The names and addresses of ALL property owners abutting on the property to be vacated are as
follows: (do not include City-owned property)
Owner Name property Address Total frontage
I f riint) 14a91/4 ,n (feet)
3 G/ L j39 TAla Yth
t�G, t7 r}
3. Petitioner signatures. Only owners of property abutting the street to be vacated may petition. For
the petition to be valid, the signers must account for at least 2/3 of the property, by length, abutting
the right -of -way: (do not include City -owned property)
Owner Name Property Address Total frontage
(signature) (feet)
0)c/1 I' 5iwi l,. t 3 y rd
1
1 1
4. In accordance with Resolution 1499, the $1200 fee for street vacation has been received.
DATE RECEIPT NO. CLERK SIGNATURE
t
--s:-
ici 1.:_z_.7_,_________„„__________ _.„.„:..,f___________.,
V_
i 3 SALAAMA RESTAURAN
2- s
_____1;._, 1
3 t T EGONO LODGE
131x19 ti .B• F_ y 1
f
GROCERY -F
T�
TT F
o-� 89 ft
t CityGIS
1.41'. i!
N
Copyright 2008 All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein is the pro�xietary property of the
contributor supplied under license and may not be approved except as licensed by Digital Map Products
I
I
1
N88'11'40 "E N88'11'401
23.61' 1025
i
O 00G 1---
B oa z N 1' =60'
A
Q
0_. O_ G
rJ J
rs N N
J` �p O Ti
Z Y
o
N N
O Z
575 E
10.00' 2
c -.7
iCt
<X"':;'.. Q O
0
o G a
J
is
N G O
co
:P. 3
c cp
o
O
Q
I
O
Q i
1 1 W
E W A S '`r
,`c- otii c) -Y 1
4 Z N87'50'26 "W
-d. 109.99'
i
F j}/04/ y 41298�
C i $T c� <j o
q LO
AREA OF RIGHT -OF -WAY VACATION a i
J
oATE f �y CONTAINS 1272 SQUARE FEET r a
SIGNED f 8JO1yZ U 6
44 \,................,,,,,,,,,././2./...4.3 is
Scale: For Job Number
Horizontal 1' =60 Vertical 139 L L C 13335
G} 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH
P KENT, WA 98032 Sheet
S
m ,4 (425)251-6222
FAX Title:
y j CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND RIGHT-OF-WAY
G T NG ENG\ \k PLANNING, SURVEYING, VACATION EXHIBIT 1 1
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES of
Designed 1 Drawn PCW I Checked WRW 1 Aooroved .VLRW I Date.- 07- _1. -08
Transportation Committee Minutes January 20. 2009 Paae 2
E. Tukwila International Boulevard Phase II and lll Construction Management Sunnort Sunb lemental
Agreement #7
Staff is seeking full Council approval to enter into Supplemental Agreement #7 with KPG, Inc. in the
amount of $385,000 to provide construction management support for Tukwila International Boulevard
Phases 11 and II.
The services provided by the supplemental agreement will complement the construction management
services that will be provided by Harris Associates (above) and the City. KPG was the design consultant
for TIB Phase II and 111 from South 116 Street to South 139 Street, and their presence providing
engineering support during the construction phase will be an essential element to the management team.
Additionally, KPG will be handling the material testing required by WSDOT. UNAN MOUS
APPROVAL. FORWARD TO JANUARY 26 COW FOR DISCUSSION.
F. Tukwila International Boulevard Phase II and III Construction Management Trailer Purchase
Staff is seeking full Council approval to purchase a field office trailer in the amount of $30,000 for on -site
construction management of the TIB Phase II and 111 project.
Large construction projects require a field office trailer for on -site construction management. Usually, the
trailer is rented as outlined in a construction contract, returned when the project is completed, and rented
again with each project that requires a field office. Given the almost two -year construction time frame for
TIB Phase II and III as well as other upcoming projects, it is more cost effective for the City to purchase a
trailer. Leases are estimated to cost approximately 4% of the purchase price per month. The trailer is
anticipated to last 10 -15 years, and will pay for itself within five years. The trailer can also be utilized as an
infield command post in an emergency situation. Liability for the trailer will be covered within the City's
self- insured coverage with WCIA. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO JANUARY 26 COW
FOR DISCUSSION..
G. Street Vacation at 13911 Tukwila International Boulevard
Staff is seeking Council approval of a resolution setting a public hearing date of February 23, 2009 for a 128
foot street vacation along 13911 Tukwila International Boulevard. The street vacation is being requested by
the only abutting property owner located at 13911 Tukwila International Boulevard. UNANIMOUS
APPROVAL. FORWARD TO JANUARY 26 COW FOR DISCUSSION.
III. MISCELLANEOUS
Meeting adjourned at 6:16 p.m.
Next meeting: Monday, February 2, 2009 5:00 p.m. Conference Room 1
X- Committee Chair Approval
Minutes by KAM. Reviewed by GL.
r��a rw
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
�J7 q Initials ITEM NO.
�t Meeting Date Prepared by Mayor's revievr Council rz�;iery
;:f UR 1 01/26/09 1 KAM 1 71.1--e I (VYL✓
2906
ITEM INFORMATION
I CAS numbeR: 09-016 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: JANUARY 26, 2009
AGENDA ITEM TPr1,1. Discussion of 2009 DRAFT Legislative Priorities
C. \'1•I GORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award n Public Mean" ng Other
llt3 Date 01/26/09 lltg Date Mfg Date Mfg Date lltg Date Aft; Date Mtg Date
SPONS( )R Council !Major 1 I Adm Svcs DCD Finance E Fire Legal P&R Police PW
SPONSOR'S Staff has prepared a DRAFT 2009 Legislative Agenda for Council consideration. The agenda
SUMMARY is intended to be utilized as a tool for Councilmembers when they meet with State
legislators in Olympia this February.
RI•:\'I1 {l \•i ?D BY COW mtg. 1 1 CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
n Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DA 1•E:
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /AD\MIN. Council President
CO`IMnTEE
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXVI:;NDFI URE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
Fund Source:
Comments:
MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS
01/26/09 DRAFT 2009 Legislative Agenda.
2009 Legislative Agenda State Issues
The City of Tukwila seeks sustainability of services, flexibility in local decision making and
transparency in government in order to continue serving our community in the ways our citizens
need and expect. During questionable economic times, this desire can be more difficult to
achieve. Solutions to challenges can be identified more quickly when local leaders retain the
ability to manage their resources in a manner that works best in their community. During the
first year of the Washington State Legislature's biennium legislative cycle, the City will focus on the
following legislative priorities:
City Fiscal Health
MONITOR: Streamlined Sales Tax
Ensure that state monies committed for streamlined sales tax mitigation continue to remain
dedicated to that source and are not utilized to balance the state budget.
SUPPORT: Flexibility on Use of Existing Revenue Sources
Increased flexibility in the spending of revenues such as locally imposed Real Estate Excises
Taxes (REET) will allow cities to respond more appropriately to growth needs and essential
services.
Transportation Infrastructure
SUPPORT: Transportation En 1 n it
Support legislation -'1 itic ea es tbi `ty (f e e istang 'even es nd implements new
revenues for use in e anion, a. to 'ce and re 'f t ns:. or ation e anisms.
SUPPORT: Federal ti ul PI k a.•
In anticipation of a pro .os d re• -r'l s i du >ac age, "ay of Tukwila has several projects
ready to implement and ligtble for -gi.na e and federal funding opportunities:
Klickitat Proj ct
Tukwila Pond Park
Duwamish Riverbend Hill Phase II
Non- motorized Capital Facilities as Identified in the Tukwila Walk Roll Plan
General Government Operations
OPPOSE: Taping of Executive Sessions
Transparency in government operations and decision making is extremely important to City of
Tukwila elected officials. There are very few exceptions to the Open Public Meeting Act in which
legislative bodies have the right to discuss matters in an executive session. Limiting these
exemptions further by mandating recordings of executive session can interfere with and hinder
the optimization of City processes and candid discussions.
Partnerships
The City of Tukwila recognizes that the fiscal condition of the state budget impacts every city by
reducing state funding opportunities. We also acknowledge that state aid for local governments
is becoming increasingly more difficult to secure. City officials are committed to doing their part
to foster relationships within local, regional and state entities that encourage opportunities for
joint partnership and outreach.
Tentative Agenda Schedule
MONTH MEETING 1 MEETING 2 MEETING 3 MEETING 4
REGULAR C.O.W. REGULAR C.O.W.
January 5 12 20 (Tuesday) 26
1. —New Years Day
(City offices closed) See agenda packet
19th cover sheet for this
M.L. King, Jr. Day week's agenda
(City offices closed) (Januan� 26, 2009
Committee of the Whole
Meeting, to be
immediately followed by
a Special Meeting)
February 2 9 17 (Tuesday) 23
16. Special Presentation: Special Presentation: Public Hearing:
Presidents' Day 2008 COPCAB awards to Seattle Southside Street vacation of a
(City offices closed) a citizen and a Police community report portion of right -of -way
Department employee, along 13911 Tukwila
and year -end Intl. Blvd.
presentation
Bid Awards:
Foster Golf Links
Reclaimed Water
Pipeline Extension
Project bid award
Tukwila Village
Northfield Car Wash
Demolition bid award
Unfinished Business:
Resolution establishing
a petty cash fund for
the City Clerk's Office
Resolution authorizing
the Mayor to sign the
2009-2012 interlocal
agreement for SCATBd
Agreement for
construction manage-
ment services for
Tukwila Int'I. Blvd.
Phase IIandIII
Supplement #7 to
consultant agreement
for Tukwila Intl. Blvd.
Phase II and III
Authorize the purchase
of a construction
management trailer for
Tukwila Intl. Blvd.
Phase 11 and III.
Resolution setting a
public hearing date for
a street vacation for a
portion of right -of -way
along 13911 Tukwila
Intl. Blvd.
Upcoming Meetings Events
JANUARY FEBRUARY 2009
26th (Monday) 27th (Tuesday) 28th (Wednesday) 29th (Thursday) 30th (Friday) 31st (Saturdav)
Community Utilities Cmte, COPCAB, City Council Highway 99
Affairs 5:00 PM 6:30 PM Planning Trash Pickup Day
Parks Cmte, (CR 61) (CR 65) Commission 9:00 10:00 AM
5: 00 PM Joint Session For locatior,
(CR 43) (regarding call Donna at
First class in the Sion Code)
"Citizens' Police 206- 242 -5556
Academy" r� 6:00 R
City Council y„ series Court (Council
Committee of sponsored by
the hole
Tukwila Police Chambers)
Whole
Mtg., Department
7:00 PM (Tuesdays through
(Council April 7)
Chambers) 6:30 PM
[C.O.W. to be (First class will
immediately meet in CR 43)
followed by a For more
Special information contact
Meeting] Chris Portman at
206 -431 -2197 (or
cparanan@
ci.tukwila.wa.us)
2nd (Monday) 3rd (Tuesday) 4th (Wednesday) 5th (Thursday) 6th (Friday) 7th (Saturdav)
Transportation Chamber of Sister City Cmte, Equity
Cmte, Commerce 6:30 PM Diversity
5:00 PM Gov't. (CR 43) Commission,
(CR 41) Community 5:15 PM
Affairs Cmte., (CR 63)
Civil Service 12:00 NOON
(Chamber
Commission,
5:00 PM ice) Planning
(CR 43) Commission
(Work Session
Arts on the Shoreline
Commission, Master
City Council 5:00 PM Program),
Regular Mtg., (Community 6:00 PM
7:00 PM Center) (Council
(Council Chambers)
Chambers)
Finance
Safety Cmte,
5:00 PM
(CR 43)
Court
Arts Commission: 1st Tues., 5:00 PM, Tukwila Community Center. Contact Stephanie Gardner at 206 -767 -2342.
Chamber of Commerce's Tukwila Government and Community Affairs Committee: 1st Tues., 12:00 Noon, Chamber Offices.
Contact Nancy Damon at 206 -575 -1633.
>City Council Committee of Whole (C.O.W.) Meeting: 2nd 4th Mon., 7:00 PM, Council Chambers at City Hall.
City Council Regular Meeting: 1st 3rd Mon., 7:00 PM, Council Chambers at City Hall.
Civil Service Commission: 1st Mon., 5:00 PM, Conf. Room 63. Contact Bev Willison at 206- 433 -1844.
Community Affairs Parks Committee: 2nd 4th Mon., 5:00 PM, Conf. Room 43. Agenda items for 1/26/09 meeting:
(A) Human Services contracts.
COPCAB (Community Oriented Policing Citizens Adv. Board): 4th Wed., 6:30 PM, Conf. Rm 65. Phi Huynh (206- 433 7175).
Crime Hot Spots Task Force: 3rd Wed., 10:00 AM, Conf. Room 65. Contact Phi Huy' h at 206- 433 -7175.
Domestic Violence Task Force: 3rd Thurs., 12:00 Noon, Conf. Room 45. Contact Erie Boykan or Stacy Hansen at 206 433 -7180.
Equity Diversity Commission: 1st Thurs., 5:15 PM, Conf. Room 63. Contact Kimberly Matej at 206 -433 -1834.
Finance Safety Committee: 1st 3rd Tues., 5:00 PM, Conf Room 83.
>Highway 99 Action Committee: 2nd Tues., 7:00 PAL Tukwila Community Center. Contact Chief Dave Haynes at 206 -433 -1812.
>Human Services Advisory Brd: 2nd Fri. of even months, 10:00 AM, Human Services Office. Contact Evie Boykan at 206 -433 -7180.
Library Advisory Board: 3rd Wed., 7:00 PM, Foster Library. Contact Stephanie Gardner at 206 -767 -2342.
Parks Commission: 3rd Wed., 5:30 PM, Senior Game Room at Community Center. Contact Stephanie Gardner at 206- 767 -2342.
Planning Commission/Board of Architectural Review: 4th Thurs., except 2nd Thursday in Nov. Dec., 7:00 PM,
Council Chambers at City Hall. Contact Wynetta Bivens at 206 -431 -3670.
Sister City Committee: 1st Wed., 5:30 PM, Conf. Room 43. Contact Bev Willison at 206 433 -1844.
>Transportation Committee: 1st 3rd Mon., 5:00 PM, Conf. Room 61.
Tukwila Historical Society: 3rd Thurs., 7:00 PM (meeting location varies). Contact Pat Brodin at 206 -433 -1860.
Utilities Committee: 2nd 4th Tues., 5:00 PM, Conf. Room 61. Agenda items for 1/27109 meeting: (A) Comcast franchise
agreement (amend ordinance for a time extension). (B) 2009 Annual Small Drainage Program consultant selection and agreement.
Court Busy Court and/or Jury Calendar (noted to alert employees and citizens of potential parking difficulty).