Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit D98-0340 - CLAIM JUMPER RESTAURANT - BUILDINGD98 -0340 5901 So. 180 St. Claim Jumper Restaurant = CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY CITY OF TUKWILA 6300 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, SUITE 100 TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 L OFFICIAL Parcel #: 352304-9031' 'Owner: CNN MANAGEMENT INC ticcupancy: :RESiAURANT, Occupancy THIS , CERTIFICATE ISSUW.00RSUANT1 THE REOUIREMENTSY,OFSECTION 109 OF THE , UNIFORM BUILDING copt AT THE TIME OF ISSUANCE THIS STRUCTURE WAS IN COMPLIANCE,-*TH THE VARIOUS ORDINANCES OF CITY REGULATING BUILDING CONSTRUCTION OR lisE FOR THE FOLLOWING , - , • Occupant : CLAIM JUMPER ,RESTAURANT , pe'r0No:•408-0340: Building AdOr'4s,:•• '5901 S80 'suita. . , UccupantLoad 41.6 Type of Cafti4: CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 14,417 SOTT-RESTAURANT. . , -I■ TER SERVI:CEJPROVIDED BY HIGHLINE/WATER , J : , . • e , o • , . ... . THIS CERTIFICATE;..MUST BE„::CONOICLIOUSLY POSTEDO THE PREMISES • 4 City of Tukwila 1 Community Development / Public Works • 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 WARNING: IF CONSTRUCTION BEGINS BEFORE APPEAL PERIOD EXPIRES, APPLICANT IS PROCEEDING AT THEIR OWN RISK. Parcel No: 352304 -9031 Address: 5901 S 180 ST Suite No: Location: Category: NRST Type: DEVPERM Zoning: Const Type: V -1HR Gas /Elec.: Units: 001 Setbacks: North: Water: TUKWILA Wetlands: Contractor License No: OCCUPANT OWNER CONTACT CONTRACTOR CLAIM JUMPER RESTAURANT 590,1 S 180 ST, TUKWILA WA 98188. CNN MANAGEMENT INC 16721 MILLIKAN AV, IRVINE CA 92606 JERRY DENNEHY .18201 MCDURMOTT W SUITE A, IRVINE CA 92614 ;ADLIN CONSTRUCTION Permit Center Authorized Signature: DEVELOPMENT PERMIT .0 South: .0 East: .0 West: Sewer: TUKWILA Slopes: N ADLINCA077LH A� Permit No: D98 -0340 Status: ISSUED Issued: 04/16/1999 Expires: 10/13/1999 Occupancy: UBC: Fire Protection: Streams: (206) 431 -3670 RESTAURANT 1997 SPRINKLER 3 .0 Phone: 949-86.s-1960 Phone: 949-951-9115 '25971 PALA, MISSION VIJAO CA' 92691 * k****k********* . ** *k *•k * *•k * * *** * **k** * * * **** kit * * *k *k * * * * *A** ** * * * * *•k * ** * * * * * * *•*•k *kk Permit Description: CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 14,417 SQ.FT RESTAURANT. WATER SERVICE PROVIDED BY HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT. k * * * * * ** * * * * ** k************ ** *k * * * ** ** * * * * * * * *** *k * **•k k * *•k ** k * *•k * * * *•k * * * ** k * * **ie`; Construction Valuation: $ 973,348.52 PUBLIC WORKS PERMITS: *(Water Meter Permits Listed Separate.) Eng. Appr: Curb Cut /Access /Sidewalk /CSS: N Fire Loop Hydrant: N .'No: Flood Control Zone: N Hauling: N Start Time: End Time: Land Altering: N Cut: Fill: Landscape Irrigation: N Moving" Oversized Load: N Start Time: EndTime: Sanitary Side Sewer: N No: Sewer. Main Extension: N Private: N Public: N Storm Drainage: N Street Use: N Water Main Extension: N Private: N Sizet in), .00 Date: RO I hereby certify that I have read and examined this permit and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of law and ordinances governing this work will be complied with, whether specified herein or not. The granting of this permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provision of any other s ate or local laws regulating construction or the performance of wo .k. /I a authorized to sign for and obtain this development permit. Signature:ft Print Nam Cji te 416: 5 This permit shall become null and void if the work is not commenced within 180 days from the date of issuance, or if the work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days from the last inspection. Public: N **** k***********• k**** k********** k* *•kk ** * *•k * * * * * * * * * * *•kk * * ** ilk* * ** * *•kk * *•k *k•k•kk * *•k * * *�tk TOTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FEES: $ 9,055.16 * k*********** kk* k******** k** k*********** k**** k***** * *•k * * ** * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***•kk ,,y CITY OF TUKWILA Address: 5901 S 180 ST Permit No: D98-0340 Suite: Tenant: Status: ISSUED Type: DEVPERM Applied: 10/07/3998 Parcel #: 352304-9031 Issued: 04/16/1999 *A*11***lek4 k****k******kkkkk****k***klelick*k* Permit Conditions: 1. No changes will be made to the plans unless approved by the Engineer and the Tukwila Buildtnt“jvlsion. 2. When special inspection-iS,:feApTre owner, architect or engineeshall not tlie Division of appoftitmehtof the inspection agencies prior to the first buijdf,t4 inspectOon Copies ofallspecOal inspection reportsshatl: be submitted tothe„.Build4,19 • • Division in timer manner. Report S shalt project naMe,perMit number and tYpe beIng • performed. , - , 3. The speoJal inspector shall'sdbMit a final Signedreport,:.:,, statin§ whether the work requiring,Lspecial inspection,,was to tild:, the ins knowledge, in conformance withYaPpr6ved plans and specifications and the applicable workManship prOvisionS'..of the UGC% 4. Any,:new.ceilinggrld'and l. required to meet lateral bracing req:61"rements for Seismic Partition . walls attached tp'ceiling 4ridmUst be lateral:1 braced if over eight (8) in=lepth., 6. ReadilvaCcessible access'toroof'Mounted requrtd 7. Engineered jtrust drawings and 'cal culattoris"-shal 1 be on sit and available to the building inspector to ipspec,tiori purpoSes. , Document s shall hear the seal and signatureof Washington Professional Engineer: 8. Any exposed instilations backinvmaterial ,ihaM have a FlaMe/i SpreadiRating of 25 or less, and materiaLshal) bear iden'tj- ficationshowing the fire performance'ratIngthereof. 9. All constructiop,•to be done in conformancefWithr4pproved plans andrequi'rements of -the Uniform,Building,OOde (1997 Edition) as amended, Uniform'Meohanidal Code (1997 E4flon), and Washin4tOn,State Ener9Y.,gode,. Edition) , 10. Plumbing permItS shall be obtained through the .SOttie-King County Department ,:of Public Health. °P1 umbing,W'01 be inspected by that 'agency, including a1,1_,gai:piping • -" .•• (296-4722). 11. All food preparation establiShMents'mUSt have Seattle-King County Department of Public Health sign-off prior to opening or doing any food processing. Arrangements for final Health Department inspection should be made by calling Seattle-King County Department of Public Health, 296-4787, at least three working days prior to desired inspection date. On work requiring Health Department approval, it is the contractor's responsibility to have a set of plans approved by that agency on the Job site. 12. Notify the City of Tukwila Building Division prior to placing any concrete. This procedure is in addition to any requirements for special inspection. 13. All wood to remain in placed concrete shall be treated wood. 14. All structural masonry shall be special inspected per UBC Sec. 306(a)7. 15. .Validity of permit., The issuance of a permit or approval of plans, specif icati.ons t 'and computations'. shall not be core -. t trued to be a permit for or an approval of any violation :of any of the provi. ions of the bui lding. code or of . any other '.ordinance of the jurisdiction., No permit :presuming to give authority to 'violate or cancel the provisions of this code shall be valid. :ElectricaV permits shai 1 he obtained through the Washington... State of Labor and Industries and a'11 electrical work w.i 11 be inspected by that agency (248- 6630) 17. There shall be no occupancy of the buildingls) until the. final inspection has been completed `by the Tukwi la Building Inspector 18. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL BE REQUIRED FOR: THIS PERMIT:: 19. :Al 1.`:mechanical work shall be,_un_derr. separate permit issued' by the' C'l.ty ,of . Tu6;w i l a 'VENTILATION IS REQU'IR'ED.—FOR'' ALL NEW 7 ROGMS} AND:.SPACES OF NEW OR ; EXISTING BUILciINGS`� SIN CONFORMAN,CE WITH TH UNI BUI.L.DING CODE. AND THE WASHINGTON. STATE VENTrILArION .AND INDOOR AIR �QUALITY ,CODEs,'zi CHAPTER X 51 13 41Ap All permits ;ryinspection re cords, and "appr;o sia11 avai 1 able�4at the job si te 9pr for t"he s}tartF'ot any • s t r ti t. i . These ,dour }m'ent ti ?are . to be ma i hta able until " f i na•1 r nspect i pn ,appi;ova,l is gr anted All t4,wttura1 corl:crete , :halrl be s cia1 irlspe tech �UB :7 _ rc 406(2).1) x� �'., ,' r ROOW RAFTERS SPACES SHALL B0 , CROS VENTILATED AND BE f , PRo DED WLTH A MINIMUM 1 IN.GH' V AIR, SPACE PER U B C 5EpIO ;15o, r, t > - ` °- ;' d 4 Temporary ' erosion i eorttroJ n1ea'.ures':harl11be implementeda, th F � irst order cat ,busj -nessi toz re ant' sed .of ixe£ or into re ist. i.riy St urn ~ drain +t a ge~ aci,l;itie t� 5 t t fy � { / TheA —1 "'sha11 have,: pernanetq ere ion `control urea .ur es i place a- soon a4 possih1 ; e ; af t e r, ng has beer completed} and,,pr i or ` to Final Inspect'ioh .. 26. APPL + 'S + HALL OBTAIN WATER METER PERMIT' FROM HIGHLI Ef0 WATERk,` DIS,TR'ICT'.:,@ (206)824-0375. Project Name/Tenant: /mil Ldl z 4 € Feat /eel TAg./X -Acir Value of Cons lruc tion: J �J Site Address: City State /Zip: s 9 o i J !r) r7" ie.srz.ie -+4 Ldp 91r SS Tax Parcel Number: 15 2304 — R031 Property Owner: J C A/'eV / 4- cliie,14- !ii'L 10 4 4 ii / . YGS Phone: Street Address: City State /Zip: /e7 2-/ ,e -Z-f c ' 4i/e /CI -t. La 4 Fax #: Contractor: �-� - !o ,- '4 C kvac- Will there be storage of flammable /combustible hazardous material in the building? Attach list of materials and storage location on separate 8 1/2 X 11 paper indicating Phone: Street Address: City State /Zip: Fax #: Architect: 1 G e g Ice. 1;4i/A a ` ,t7divI• 4 / w , Phone: Phone: / g(,_ /q67 Street Address: /e2- a / `me. eu�r ° Tt 447 City State /Zip: Air 4i 92-6 Fax #: � 9i/n ) g77 -f /(' Engineer: / Phone: Street Address: City State /Zip: Fax #: Contact Person: � '�'RR y �dev�`rY�'f Phone: / 9LrJ B3 . / fj Street Address: f'jG,,qq� City State /Zip: /8za( he ;���r,�o n 4/41 /�ti� C4 9 2'/Y Fax #:/ (1 ) y 7l(0 Description of work to be done: ep N,/r ' 7- &no Et/1.-1... f 12 4 Gd' /f tfl7f vie' MT Existing use: ❑ Retail ❑ Restaurant ❑ Multi- family ❑ Warehouse ❑Hospital ❑ Church ❑ Manufacturing ❑ Motel /Hotel ❑ Office ❑ School/College/University Other Mo4/l Proposad use: ❑ Retail Restaurant ❑ Multi- family ❑ Warehouse ❑Hospital ❑ Church Manufacturing ❑ Motel /Hotel ❑ Office ❑ School /College /University ❑ Other Will there be a change of use? la yes ❑ no 1 If yes, extent of change: 10 4 4 ii / . YGS Existing fire protection features: .sprinklers ❑ automatic fire alarm in none ❑ other (specify) Building Square Feet: — existing l /`/i new Area of Construction: /yt /7 Will there be storage of flammable /combustible hazardous material in the building? Attach list of materials and storage location on separate 8 1/2 X 11 paper indicating ❑ yes ® no quantities & Material Safety Data Sheets D ate application accepted: l - 7 rte CITY OF TU Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 Date application expires: New Commercial / Addition / Multi - Family Permit Application Application and plans must be complete in order to be accepted for plan review. Applications will not be accepted through the mail or facsimile. APPLICANT REQUEST FOR PUBLIC WORKS SITE/CIVIL PLAN REVIEW OF THE FOLLOWING: (Additional reviews may be determined by the.Public Works Department) ❑ Channelization /Striping ❑ Curb cut/Access /Sidewalk ❑ Fire Loop /Hydrant (main to vault) #: Size(s): ❑ Flood Control Zone ❑ Hauling ❑ Land Altering 0 Cut cubic yds. 0 Fill cubic yds. ❑ Moving an Oversized Load: Start Time: End Time: ❑ Sanitary Side Sewer #: ❑ Sewer Main Extension 0 Private 0 Public ❑ Storm Drainage ❑ Street Use ❑ Water Main Extension 0 Private 0 Public ❑ Water Meter /Exempt #: Size(s): 0 Deduct 0 Water Only ❑ Water Meter /Permanent # Size(s): ❑ Water Meter Temp # Size(s): Est. quantity: gal Schedule: ❑ Miscellaneous Value of Construction - In all cases, a value of construction amount should be entered by the applicant. This figure will be reviewed and is subject to possible revision by the Permit Center to comply with current fee schedules. Expiration of Plan Review - Applications for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application shall expire by limitation. The building official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period not exceeding 180 days upon written request by the applicant as defined in Section 107.4 of the Uniform Building Code (current edition). No application shall be extended more than once. Applicatiop taken by: (initials) PLEASE SIGN BACK OF APPLICATION FORM NCI'ERMIT.DOC 1 /29/97 BUILDING OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT: Signature: �t� '�,s��/ / / , 1 h_ Date: , 9 Print name: ' . -; fit F " [J�eL 1 f Phon .gr�i )ft ?,_ Fax #r4i)£ -eriztV / Address: City /State /Zip: t AL' Al'-Vv r:OlonnirRC''!" )DITION /M■ _t :li _ •► li L E SUBMITTED WITH THE FOLLOWING: )'• , EER INIVCTQ BfiSTAMPED BY WASHINGTON STATE LICENSED ARCHITECT, STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OR CIVIL .rM ALL DRAWINGS SHALL BE AT A LEGIBLE SCALE AND NEATLY DRAWN BUILDING SITE PLANS AND UTILITY PLANS ARE TO BE COMBINED N/A SUBMITTED ❑ ❑ Copy of recorded Legal Description from King County ❑ ❑ Certificate of water /fire flow availability (Form H -11a). Contact the Public Works Department (206) 433- 0179 for servicing district. ❑ ❑ Certificate of sewer availability (Form H -11). Contact the Public Works Department (206) 433-0179 for servicing district. ❑ ❑ Metro: Non - Residential Sewer Use Certification if there is a change in the amount of plumbing fixtures (Form H -13). Business Declaration required (Form H -10). Five (5) sets of working drawings, which include : ❑ ❑ Site Plan 1. North arrow and scale. 2. Existing and proposed utilities and existing hydrant location(s). 3. Property lines, dimensions, setbacks, names of adjacent roads, any proposed or existing easements. 4. Parking Analysis of existing and proposed capacity; proposed stalls with dimensions. 5. Location of driveways, parking, loading & service areas, with parking calculations & location & type of dump - ster recycling screening. 6. Location and screening of outdoor storage. 7. Limits of clearing /grading with existing & proposed topography at 2' intervals extending 5' beyond property's boundaries, erosion control measures & three buffer protection measures. 8. Identify location of sensitive areas slopes 20% or greater, wetlands, watercourses and their buffers (TMC 18.45.040). 9. Identify location and size of existing trees, note by size and species those to be maintained and those to be removed. 10. Landscape plan with irrigation: Existing trees to be saved by size and species. Proposed: Include size, species, location and spacing. Location of service areas and vault with proposed screening. 11. Location of high water mark of the Green /Duwamish River if site is located within 200' of the high water mark. 12. Lowest finished floor elevation (if flood control zone permit required). 13. Civil plans to include size of water supply to sprinkler vault with documentation from contractor stating supply line will meet or exceed sprinkler system design criteria as identified by the Fire Department. 14. See Public Works Checklist for detailed civil /site plan information required for Public Works Review (Form H -9). ❑ ❑ Vicinity Map showing location of site ❑ ❑ Building Elevations (Include dimensions of all building facades and major architectural elements) ❑ ❑ Mechanical Drawings ❑ ❑ Structural Drawings (detail of sprinkler hangers, pipe, duct & vent penetrations in structure) ❑ ❑ Architectural drawings ❑ ❑ Specifications (if separate document) ❑ ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ ❑ Sprinkler structural calculations indicating Toad of water - filled sprinkler piping ❑ ❑ Height Analysis ❑ ❑ Soils Report stamped by Washington State licensed Geotechnical Engineer ❑ ❑ Topographical and Boundary Survey a Tree Coverage Analysis (Multifamily only ) ❑ ❑ Washington State Energy Code Data and Non - Residential Energy Code Compliance Form H -7 ❑ ❑ Completed Land Use Applications if not previously submitted (i.e. SEPA, BAR, Variance, Shoreline or Tree permit) ❑ ❑ Attach plans, reports or other documentation required to comply with Sensitive Area Ordinance or other land use or SEPA decisions ❑ ❑ Food service establishments require two (2) sets of stamped approved plans by the Seattle -King County Department of Public Health prior to submitting for building permit application. The Department of Pub- lic Health is located at 201 Smith Tower, Seattle, WA or call (206) 296 -4787. (Form H -5) ❑ ❑ Copy of Washington State Department of Labor and Industries valid Contractor's License. If no contractor has been selected at time of application a copy of this license will be required before the permit is issued OR submit Form H -4, "Affidavit in Lieu of Contractor Registration ". I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, AND I AM AUTHORIZED TO APPLY FOR THIS PERMIT. NCPERMIT.DOC 1 /29/97 Building Owner /Authorized Agent If the applicant Is other than the owner, registered architect/engineer, or contractor licensed by the State of Washington, a notarized letter from the property owner authorizing the agent to submit this permit application and obtain the permlt will be required as part of this submittal. . "_/ �� 'CITY OF TUKNILA.�NA �` r� �~'� / � . TRANSMIT ' ~^ ��* `~~ ��� °~~ /� ^ ^ «�+*�*++�� ��*�*a�*+�*+*�+*�+**+++�...�� m�� �+*+ * ++� + *^+ TRANSMIT' Number: R9800048'Amount: 10 04/16/99 14:43 Pa‘,/men Method: CHECK Notation: CNN MANAGEMENT .Init:'TLO '_--- _---_---. --_---. ----^_-~__---~-_------'----�-�-_^---_ -�-__ Permit Not D98-0340 Type: DEVPEHM - DEVELOPMENT PEA#IT' ,� , Parcel Na : 35230 ` � ' ` �_ `�� ' ` • Site Qddress: 5901 S 180 ST' ' � � ` 'Iota] Fees: t4,089.52` This Payment 10,524.11 ' Total ALL Pmto: 14,089.52` Balance:: :' .00 +^a*** Account Code 00O/322 O0 000/386:904 Description �' � Amount BUILDING - NONRES ' 5,485.25 STATL8UILDING SURCHARGE 4.50' SEWER ASSEGSMENT FLES 5 , O34.36 ` '���`'/ . .� 2493 /04/19 9717 TOTAL 10524.11 " — . .. . ' :•i'- . . . , . . . • . , . , . .: ..,. . . . . **Al!*'*****4**A4**4.t*44; CITY OF TWKWI441: CITY OF TUKWILA ,: WA : .1. • ', :‘ - • ! i . •,. IR ANS:rt,1::q.:1',: , ,;•,.• RECEIPT . . ,..:, ..• .,- ITAN,SMIT: Number: R9700843 Amount: ; .,:. 31. 10/07/98: 3 1 ; ..!:•er:.7,- • Payment Method: CHECK Notation: . CNN NANAEEMENT, .-. Initi PerMit No: D98-0340 • Type: DEUPERM 1 212 . EVELOPNENT l'ER 14 :1.: Site :Address: 5901. 180 i'ST• : ‘. •. . :: . 'I; ..., " .. . 'Total Fee.e.: This Payment 3 t ,565.41 To t a 1 A l.L oio P :.:.., 3 PW EICD 3565.41 t Code . . ..„-• AMOw.1./c• .- :' CHECK 3565.41 Accoun • ;,-..:-.,V .. '- Description . • 10/12/98 : 19 000 . PLAN CHECK 7 NONRESI . . '3 ,56 5 .,:4 ,:'; ,- ''.4 : 16:47 0097 6642L „ . . . , . , . ,. . . . ..: Pe(� t),7,) Typ Ins ection: Adde i l t 3 � �+ J7 f Date ca 0 1 n Ov d/ Special instructions: Date wanted: ( / / m. l/tO p.m. Requester: n m Phone: / {0 7 . , Sk. INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 INSPECTION RECO( Retain a copy with permit proved per applicable codes. COMMENTS: f ® ° -6 .6 0 Cs AE.e -t./o7' � ro-frtovee 7`>' 0 7V FA/46. t Ins 0 $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: 08- 03 PERMIT NO. 1 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. Project: CIPowt J.v.iss■1*--.4— Type of Inspection: Pw 1pc4,....04) Address: 6-ctio/ 5, /s Cr Date called: Special itistructions: Date wanted: / a.m. I / I LI /C3C)13'n/' Requesterp 6 14,in Phone: INSPECTION NO. INSPECTION RECOR Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Dq8. PERMIT NO. (206)431-3670 El Approved per applicable codes. 0 Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: 1/190,0 P (c) R QA i..?),‘,.Q 7v- sc-c2- Inspector: Date: $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: Pr9 ct: L...-' C�:trY. -- Sl..*w4 1r Type of Inspe 0r.r u,pcNyv- i Address: C- i 01 5 I 4 SA- Date called: Special instructions: Date wanted: X* uv 1 y ?Uoo a.m. p. m. Requester: -'' Phone: 5/g— 21-C INSPECTION NO. INSPECTION RECO(' Retain a copy with pet CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 9818 PERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670 n Approved per applicable codes. n Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: it al/- 4c) Cce-Lktj Olnei P -VI t1 r 2 �ti� , r, rem �.� g4-v-v k i vtp 1r Inspector: Date: El $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: project: — S - urn (es7 of Inspection: r i a rt,N,CeK. I Address: Date 11 d: '......) : 1/6/ . D 77715 1 7 c i Vc.9 a.m. p.m. Special instn3gtions: • • . - .. .13.eester: ...).Q r (-L Phone: / .D,(0(41. • 515 '45(, S INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 \ N., Inspector-r Date: \ )41 Approved per applicable codes. COMMENTS: LGQ\cCOMMENTS: Receipt No: Date: INSPECTION REC, 1D Retain a copy with permit )96-034+ PERMIT NO. (206)431-3670 Corrections required prior to approval. C CLQ.:E.Sta) $47.0 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. P bj ct: (iU4-yi Qwi40c / Type77 Date called: 1 n/6 O ,--. Address: ��D S• m j 5-f Special instructions: Date wanted /j 9/ ! a.m. ! p.m. Requester: - L Q/ Phone: U0 _'5 72 "dam 5 3 c Inspector: �l < / 970 , Date: INSPECTION RECOI Retain a copy with pertrnt 7 INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA;BUILDING-DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 Approvedsper applicable codes. ( I Corrections required prior to approval: COMMENTS: L1 $47.00 REINSPECTION E REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: Pro 1 _ • f . • f Ins clion: ,--1 Sy Ad ss: W) 1 } • Date ca led: li - CI 1 f Special instructions: Date wanted: l 40' 9q a.m.) p.m. Reques er:\ Phone: /�.ry /� �l _ egOt o .'7 I. elf , t INSPECTION NO. (7: INSPECTION RECORD I � 03 Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 PERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670 El Approved per applicable codes. orrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: LqPte - 00/# Inspector: O rc. ( i-eri ,7C Date: IZ 2 -� El $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No; Date: ProjefEttk A T e of Ins ection: ' Address: Date called!: - CR Special instructions: Date waa M nted: �q a m. Reque Phone: c-.1'(n gi6 ,P. /v, CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 • • INSPECTION RECORIT Retain a copy with permit PERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670 Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: 5,/ J J. --s6 Inspector Date: / , f4 El $47. &REINSPECTIOTI E REQUYRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: COMMENTS: f eA90 Accoe / se//�4/ e. 0 Pj ou1 ve 361 Ar /Aft~ Ie4 - . '77c1 ,9r ,9cces9, et6 ,a. P{S - /114r,tf7 ,-At 4 01OF 01O s 6i col-1i I ZO ,!/ir?/ovr (O Date called: `/ p/€01.0.4 1,4 4 T Special instructions: poo - £c r r .4 r e4c re. eac ,f--i r-, ,c 163" C'C- ©x! God rcil 5 .0. /911 a.m. m. fr 0" e-ad PtaDre e 4z f Z6 Vet. -r p .�,e_oxic,w,vcr Phone: i . 119p6 /• 8 20 i)-7, -- Rior /Wig° f°c. S Pr 'pct: , ` e. Type o ect' n: J ;9 A ee s: 14 01 --s. (O Date called: `/ Special instructions: L:) L:). �� /�� a.m. m. Reyeste Phone: i INSPECTION NO. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 . PERMIT NO. \.),\,) , (206)431 -3670 Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. � Inspect Da /,,4 Ei $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must I4 aid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. CaII to schedule reinspection.. Receipt No: Date: INNWM I Tup of Ins -:-.1 /ma— ection: ' c Add e : i i • I i Dat I II Ay mom Special instructions: Da Reques •-e‘r Pho e• in._ ,......0 .-- — .... INSPECTION RECO Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 ' "!. , '• PERMIT NO. (206)431-3670 Approved per applicable codes. eaorrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: ‘ /Af &cc/ Z,55 ,e6(Vree-1 26-c/7roYcaS ,4e fi rexcivece- TA/c_rwee_ ,47 "Alrijr, E:1 $47.10 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: 7 2 oja: z4n Q/j, Type - -11 e�tion: d90/ ,4 ! /g ,/{ Date called: i /f ( // 1 Special instructions: f Date wanted: k91 1 46/P?nHaY r Requester: Phone: �00 5 7 5 540 INSPECTION NO. INSPECTION RECO , Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 PERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670 proved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: so.co r gvie $ 7.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: COMMENTS: L gSS +ZEST 24t5 4rir s' Sf 0 (C itlo - j,47/L 7e7.4 -4 O.7L7 Special instructions: OM IL.14477 , 41-6-Al Date wanted: , %/99 �J p.m. Requeste : Phone: .7 (0 5 -- 07503 50 rcr 7S .t..f p? Lier AerVe -.-b .."17 /I , r ep: TylfVfe .Address: 59 s• �g .5/ Date called: % 99 Special instructions: Date wanted: , %/99 �J p.m. Requeste : Phone: .7 (0 5 -- 07503 [Receipt No: INSPECTION NO. INSPECTION RECO D C E(t o3 PERMIT NO. Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. Date: C.� ED $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Date: COMMENTS: �,�y , /4 mI • e/0.4 b p J i , � , f .P..�._ 01 ° � Tip ni Pc t S . IA) C, 4 Ce.:_/L /.(Jcl 425(77/ D i Ai /AA", ( 'rb), 'z.c 'TIc»i f (o3)i -10 wa A> t (re 4'-,.t ( 6e,, -L rr, e„ties .E-) 00( f.Gr e-r J S o4e>7 //1i - rift'S 4,e64 ;49 A./ c , 4.s nt c4. t SP,e /Afic- S L1 C6( 614 - 167 4d .ei ,,e-e0i-f ,,e / 7v Z ova' ' ,&srec l s / n /1 f . Project: (j \(4 V\ ,...3.)( t1 Type of Inspetn: +„ , . C)✓ , r v L 6 (6V V Date called: � /a a Special instructions: Date wanted: CI ott p.m. Requester T riq -% ept,f, P te — 5 D-51,3 INSPECTION NO. INSPECTION RECD Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Sou nter Blvd, #100 WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. (206)431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. E] $47,00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. CaII to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: . , P reti; i_e_ i n a _ 4x Typf InspectAre Ad s • • . • - date called: q4 ' Date wanted: 9,1pn 7 . Special instructions: ) Requester: -a/ 1: INSPECTION NO. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila WA 98188 UV PERMIT NO. (2(4_431-3670 pproved per applicable codes. ri Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: Date: El $47.00 REINSPECTION FIE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: COMMENTS: 1/ I .� - - o1 J l F .4 s: /O / E e !� / rchi t/ Gt /4zie-s r Da al ed: Special instructions: Dat . ed: •;..; 3 , Uo7' / 1 c -,y. .&i 44 .75 Alive /i,/ :11G� E -FSEgv A- cc(S goi . ,,c..FS,E -c7'7c , f 7 �, - 1S .iCior 7-e&t:sztA .r-r -r')7.x- , .7lT,: m00%- GP?4 f44E.. /krS Pe' c.72 , e7__ o f,S t- r CJ,g 54-474A 5 e •&e, ,,, e x_fC7 Gtir S ,A /7 /1 �.C/t L C w r! V f fir• �, /- T pe of I s•ecti1 � s: /O 1? r Da al ed: Special instructions: Dat . ed: •;..; u ster• .�t INSPECTION NO. pproved per applicable codes. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 PERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. 0 $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: y September 17, 1999 City of Tukwila Building Department 6300 South Center Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, Washington 98118 Reference: Claim Jumper Restaurant Construction 5901 South 180 Street, Tukwila, WA Structural Observation To whom.it may concern: Per Section 1702 of the Uniform Building Code, a representative of STDR Architects has visited the above referenced Project and observed, to the best of our knowledge, that the structural portion of the work has been installed in substantial conformance with the permitted Construction Documents. Please feel free to contact me should you have questions or require additional information. Thank you. Patrick Scheer cc: D. Parsen, T. McWhorter, and file . 3724 RE;,i - _ ., • E'!1J MK E. SCHER STftTE•OF W ShlNf;T0( SCHEER TANAKA DENNEHY RILEY ARCHITECTS 18201 Mc0URMOTT WEST, SUITE A IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92814 PHONE 949.863.1960 FAX 949.863.3160 ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN Project: L A i A I m Jumper i Type of Ins PIA) F . I nal Address: 6QD) S 180141 St St Date called: )2 — i . r _ a i 1 Special instructions: Date wanted: q a.m. 1'2' -� t p.m. Requester: rr( Se ach Phone: 206 5.7 5 - 25 INSPE . LION RECORD Retain a copy with permit TION NO. 'TUKWILA BUILDING VISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 ❑ Approved per applicable codes. fr oR� 03L/o PERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: wr Inspector: Date: $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: CORRECTIONS LIST Claim Jumper Restaurant 5901 South 180th Street Permit No. D98 -0340 Sewer 1. Clean all manhole lids. 2. Clean all sewer shelves of debris. 3. Install clean -outs per Standard Plan SS -2 with screw plug. 4. Fill grease interceptor vault with water. 5. Open access lids for inspection. Water 1. Provide City of Tukwila with backflow test reports for a. fire line DDCVA b. irrigation c. premises DDCVA d. all other assemblies 2. Permit sign -off from Water District (Highline) 3. Fire Dept. sign -off. Storm On Site 1. Provide silt fence around empty lot. 2. Provide design engineer's evaluation on bio- swale. As- built. 3. Regrade swale to make mowable. 4. Provide maintenance agreement on mowing swale. Page 1 of 3 1 Storm Right -of -Way 12. Cut wall chains in swale to face of rockery. Street 1. Channelization. 2. Provide all signing per plan. 3. Replace City sign along 57th — steep grades. Page 2 of 3 5. Jet and vac all storm on site. 6. Add ladders in wet vaults. 7. Add ladders or rungs in all manholes. 8. Mark asphalt in parking lot above vault per plan. 9. Provide as- builts for Claim Jumper roof drains and area drains. Show all tie -ins. 10. Provide gate at fence around bio -swale to access manual gate valve, at gate valve. 11. Provide another access gate on fence that goes over existing manhole. Manhole is not accessible as built. 13. Some manhole including vault access have necks greater than 2 feet in length — provide fix. 14. Provide trash racks at outfalls per plan. 15. Work with City Storm Engineer in bio -swale grades to resolve problem of flow, etc. 16. Hang sheer gate handles on ladder,rungs. 1. Turnover documents on easements, right -of -way and maintenance agreement. Might . want to dedicate right -of -way along 180th as well for storm. Need easement for sidewalk at 180th. 2. Catch basin #7 flat top lid needs spun to give access to ladder. 3. Jet and vac all storm. 4. Provide City with storm video tape for review. 5. Rock outfall to stream per plan. (doe397) 4. Energize street lights. 5. Replace pole to aluminum poles per plan. Submit shop drawings. 6. Clean all junction box lids. 7. Clean Type III junction box at corner of 180th & 57th and add washed rock to bottom. Also add bell ends to all conduit including existing. Page 3 of 3 Replace all broken curb from 57th to property line along 180th. 9. Repair patches on 180th. 10. On 180th, grind all existing mid -block crosswalk. 11. Replace missing curb at mid -block crosswalk. 12. Provide guardrail from bridge to new sidewalk due to extra asphalt being added on 57th, east side. T or: h riff f J i /�. , � T YP e »� do ori 6 Ac"Eni.d./g/i-st Date called: / 0 FQ Special instructions: Date wanted: / p 7 a, C Requester: Phone ed:7 —5�0 3 INSPECTION NO. INSPECTION RECO Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 PERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670 0 Approved per applicable codes. $ rrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: d __ _ __ fr "' $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspect' • 1, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: P yl t: 9i Type a� y J�I n: V (,c4) .0 Cree &te %we& s : Date called: Special instructions: a.m. Date wanted: //10 Requester: , Phone: lv ^ s - 5(0 INSPECTION RECORi, Retain a copy with permit b8- Q3 •INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98k (206)431 -3670 PERMIT NO. Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: s � ‘/-- A/A., t4.. - 2L -►ld' l f� (OA '-'i r 6, r ' 4 $47,00 REINSPECTION FE ! EQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Date: Receipt No: Project: ' 'ULAIM`ZdAAPE,..■ . Type oas eAtiz . 5 /1507"itegr Date called: Special instructions: -• Date ?I mo 1 a.m. P.m. Reqtt ei Phone: INSPECTION RECOR Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 9818 (206)431-3670 pproved per applicable codes. El Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: 0 a.rsoc.i.gre $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: Pr • ct: r46-01.T.a/nP4-€ Type of Inspection: t(*96a4.- A dress: /60m sr a D te called: Special instructions: Date wanted: a.m. p.m. Reques0/ z Phone: INSPECTION NO. lie f Approved per applicable codes. INSPECTION RECO Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 §outhcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 PERMIT NO. (206)431-3670 Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: Alo ,4-4*m ( 7 7* -,/f /fol> - 77/ 4 Ai r 67I 7 SS 11 $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: COMMENTS: "Jj./ 7-�•4,e_,.sr.; Q� a, e" 1 C 9 /' /`'mil � J�—F�C�T" C�.�/`7 . (76.74,-.6 c, i ,(J0 7Z S /71 7-0 (r. T Special instructions: J Date vya ed: /t, „ C � l { / a.m. p.m. Request r: r: Phon WAN ' c.rt/O-e/.4(. -. A ce.2e/ -4/z 3e1 Aeclef cT- czoe 4cr 1 b 'Zi,+ 4T(/iJe- TYPeg In A e �O / — *5 . / /4540 1-ii 5T Date called: Special instructions: J Date vya ed: /t, „ C � l { / a.m. p.m. Request r: r: Phon INSPECTION NO. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 PERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670 pproved per applicable codes. El Corrections required prior to approval. DV /9'9, $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. CaII to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: Prgekt: ( W „WI 9(1414S/7 Type of3Wy5 _ sel 18 7 ) / k ii. Date called: Special instructions: e l 1 . i Date wanted: //07 r ' 6) Requester: ift Phone: '7 / •‘•- ,1,0-.—, ,. • Approved per applicable codes. INSPECTION RECO Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 097c-03vo PERMIT NO. t - r ■gro (206)431-3670 Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: A /10 fo'f) 04-7 'I 124 A.. .• cl 4 4d// i S r',06 Date: El $47.00 REINSPECTION F REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: la • fectc4 itIL.UAAVC-4e— Type of Inspection: oe SU Jai igSkAA Adress: 18o s Date cally I /... 7 7(9", Special instructions: DI7cv . ti. .m. Re. . Phone: INSPECTION NO. INSPECTION RECO Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 9818 D/8-03443 PERMIT NO. (206)431-367 roved per applicable codes. El Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: ,e;■rAilr.ouisrammor.or • V17.11 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to ins ction, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: COMMENTS: , ,7, / & p`_, AYL ( nci_ To B. 2 S C-74,1? eiktE s F i .... ,� 14 -SE -5 5 ° ' -- � l/i' / i 0 6Y� - � 7 Aet94.4 I S X Uc,J 47 --ziee Cr- / -.‘A -r ,es -- 6 4 s • 0 U,). 7- ,y -c (J et za-r TO 7X1/53 s Tie -4/T - /- '"SIGSF. 7)ee/SSE:S Q 1,t/G12r, PoLFs /- 4/4x:5 . ,, v3e. , 04;e(.c 4f, 6.06T 4 4/17 s'¢ 0 bow 3_ Ap > r°4'e C0 (bry iAe Comte 3,e c, 7e) so r r S G�/A & r`c,. . /� f t 1 R1-1 96e P �4: ( e-/€ Pro 1 (41 --711714 Type of�(nspect Address; 1gi9/ _5 (80 .7 -- Date called: Special instructions: Date wante 7 1 Requ • Phone: INSPECTION R E C O �� Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. PERMIT NO. / CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION a 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188, (206)431 -3670 Approved per applicable codes. '" e rrections required prior to approval. $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: COMMENt8 I "'mfe,4C t2 (C.s .A.657- t % C670/ r et., /f. r/eeccc.Ly /c9- coF,4 >S ga..�? fez/9 L 0 C./ 1' 07 L /c 6 )770 //or ( /z./- ./i(- c Fx1.c, r , (Tc- f qty 64:0.0 e.... y.. -- -.,r .../H i.-.!.....r /.-!. 11A i iote--re 9 f - 1. ! • , / 11 � 11� r / /. -�^ 3ff C/7i »{ " t& St t: o F_ roc "�Y+rf., m x_r [rCey Requester: Phone: Pr g Nue/A Type of I p tion Address: � e /�� Dat called: Special instructions: Date Date wanted: �y_y. 7 Y % P.m. Requester: Phone: /7 INSPECTION RECO Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. PERMIT NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION CO 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 - 3670 El Approved per applicable codes. orrections required prior to approval. E] $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. CaII to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: 7. tryixon c/ t�1 cifInspe •n1 �.._ •tiie"...4„:, g i r e ss: .t . / q�� / S�- / D er ._ D ca df�(/ 9 9/".119, Special instructions: Date wanted: CeS a.m. Requester: f " 44t) Phon 5 .„ 2 INSPECTION NO. INSPECTION RECO Retain a copy with permit \ PERMIT NO. , CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila 1.887 -f (2 )4 ,b . iliK Approved per applicable codes. 0 Corrections required prior to approval. _ r;61.) 3 >t.,..io�.../ G..., `,/ Ai lo - / ee 1 . / 1 e COMMENTS: r" 44 al, Gar h 4 . $47.00 REINSPECTIO "EE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: Prgg�t: me Type of Inspection: 4? ?7% Addre 17/ — s . 15D77� Date called: Special instructions: Datw p.m. Requester: "e Phone: r INSPECTION NO. CITY OFTUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. INSPECTION RECOR Retain a copy with permit ', I PERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670 COMMENTS: /L / r &L ! 414A .per .4�p/Zeri !°G 4 �F P &..c0ovs fYWK_ rrections required prior to approval. ;47 El $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: COMMENTS: /90(7 e.,6 e ion: 7 ." A 27t0 (/t.i PSI-0- itr&ank -A(or - V6.(f - Date called: -- &(0T c4u- 4 Date 4.: • ielit107 f/t,(Sle-c-72eW P.m. 0A17 — 1/4"_77. — Phone: 301( t mac_ r ii- 7" .494. 4:: ,Zege/vs ( pi 6-M-(6-$ \ pa Alo:jf,-€ picie(4-(_ sC & 6 r IT ..,Y ,.. ..-7 . . f j . j) plct p e ion: Date called: Special instructions: —...-----) Date 4.: • 2) 4 0 a. P.m. Reppester. ti Phone: INSPECTION RECO Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 9818 D Approved per applicable codes. PERMIT NO. (206)431-3670 rrechons required prior to approval. $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: • COMMENTS: 47 f/SV. 4/P $ CIO O f 9? e- fk . 7" - Z",e60 - )C, /J/ /L4\ 1O ac12 y ©l., (') .T.4(G .Cl e-11). . 410 c ,4,P 1.v.4-4e - • 7 0 . CA /46c - e- 4 • -e?G, es - Date wanted: r. - n, 7?), R#4-7 s a r m . p.m. Requester: 6 �i�1.6 / 9- //,(7 54 / '<J3P (»H C A - Ct 47t1c, P S bs ' 7 S 'cc f.C.IS, ? CCX,/' .I, c / o ,O d G C' 3yr-t' 7 P 11 t Typ f Inspec Ion f�1at /we S96 _5. /OA S , y Date called: 3/Z7 iq Special instructions: / •7 L.• Date wanted: or . / a r m . p.m. Requester: 6 Phon � �'� �'6 .675 - &-?50 3 INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. INSPECTION RECO Retain a copy with permit '0 (206)431 -3670 orrections required prior to approval. $4 .00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. CaII to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: rorkitir g $I: Date called: / Date wanted: •' ir 8* */ 7 1(M1 Special instructions: • :, Requester: .67 ....,647 Phone: 2 -- INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 D?g• 03e/e) PERMIT NO. (206)431-3670 Approved per applicable codes. ri Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: S 6-p TO 4A.r7:). 17- 16 Ej $47.60 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No Date: roject: \ c`*t_krt\' . T ie °On '''' ' p tron: (\ • X),S8 Ct Address: X9oi S. f • rorc c-,(\e.e.4-Al k Lk .4spe (T)- qg Special instructions: ... Date.nted: a.m. P Requester ( \ P hone: 44 A c ae63 COMMENTS: , C rorc c-,(\e.e.4-Al k Lk .4spe ---)41R p.c ,V (A. Ce rk t P 4/ CCA. 1 r , V( $C>- V\ (A) 1)1.4, p) v.. C(k k--, ctecle ea me a kA 1 .. Pre -t.pairrtok- 'I (4 e 1 •. Date:gi Inspector: Z ‘ 11 Le INSPECTION NO. INSPECTION RECO Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431-3670 3 PERMIT NO. Z El Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. $47.00 EINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. [Receipt No: Date: COMMENTS: ?ALT- roge4 -- c .- 4 . rs t:ykik4 04.e.4 iCITC-i-4-4-Ai Cia- ,--r IDA/ 047UP 11- 18.5 i gp Ai #3 AA AT AC._ IVIV.C.--SSez2) fa to - r Tr) ac,(7404.C. special instructions: Ctif &ACtrici4 2 s V A IP Ill 4 C .111..11 _. (rviCri) UST s rii5AA (T f2-&cry_st Oki_ rii9 "ID_-stE7A( • . , 49 //A • .., u /UM/ T p of a iliow l e gg it . — r —, v ' A4d4s6 .5, Date called: .., I ., / 9 6 / i 1 special instructions: Date wanted: 8/ Requester / e.4/ Phone: 10 Ins INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 9111138 (206)431 INSPECTION RECD Retain a copy with permit pproved per applicable codes. corrections required prior to approval. II $47 10 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. or Date: Receipt No: J PERMIT NO. Date. ACIP 41 dp .0 Project: p\ a\ vi� - ---S+ tk— � X 1.1V1 f� - Type of Inspection}:, � aC f 6 t ` l { :ntructs: �' • � Date wanted: a.m. 9 p.m. ,Requester: `\ ](f ' n�y� Phone: (J — 5 9-- St Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. -. COMMENTS: i^ 4 r1414. 5f (- 000?rr, t ` .f�C, // •,,,,, , 0 _.., " C" / /)-11.-; A INSPECTION NO. Inspector: INSPECTION REC Retain a copy with permit 'CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcdnter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date: (447 Ei $47.00 REINSPECTION F REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. CaII to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: PERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670 COMMENTS: ' AM . _ 5 . • • : 4 rai4 5 ”, Date ca1,7, ct /0 /,. 0 41 Special instructions: 4 ..-1-•, ' -f ..A1 ( it=. • ...,- /...') .....,>,, , 6, 4.• P-719 /.:4'...i /to ,sele.0.,V „,, 1,.... _ 4.44. / ( 1 „,d ,), 7 ,, i ..„. , '119 e ,,,,,, / (e) 4 :,,, f'f' ..., , , ,..k. 4 t.• #470 - elil • 641 r a, ("2.-1 c. 5 i r ,,4.....,__ i , f Or i 1 / 4 A/ Typrof Ins • ectiry AM . _ 5 . • • : 4 rai4 5 ”, Date ca1,7, ct /0 /,. 0 41 Special instructions: Date wanted: • g . , Requester: Ph°4 CO —. 47Z56- 5 • • INSPECTION NO. 4. Inspector: \., INSPECTION REC Retain a copy with permit Date: PERMIT NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 981881*Q .(206)431-3670 7 .7 7 • • Approved per applicable codes. 0 Corrections required prior to approval. 1:11 imarr $47. EINSPECTION F REQUIRED. Prior to inipection, fee must 6e paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Date: Receipt No: Pr ct: '. Type of I pection: A zi ot tic) at Date c • Special instructions: 4 .06.2..) e / ` S 5.4.624S: Date wanted: st d . C� p .m. Requester: ��arr .5 5 h ,O� 1 i INSPECTION REC Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. • CITY.OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 a Approved per applicable codes. CKCorrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: 5 , 6 -41 /a( ∎l /f) /i1 ry e_ /' e y %' Svc .G 1ILd rA11. $47,00 REINSPECTIO V REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: } •Dg868o PERMIT NO. ' ~ . .: (206)431 -3670 COMMEVS: s' . t" (j Srf6bk AS 44* Date ?)e_cl: .. ,„(i ' -..cc -v - • . ReM Phone 7L) 266) 3 3 -----2 -. 5 . W cr ‘ 577 l � /1/ e 9 t 9 - 7re 4/ Zgec 7 , .. c 0 ( k4 ('l' .. 44) //eN/ 1 7 " ::7 - Liee,' Type of Inspection: 60060/2 a Addres . clbi /ff- Date ?)e_cl: .. ,„(i Special instructions: Date / _ g9 On. P.m. ReM Phone 7L) 266) 3 3 -----2 -. 5 . Insp INSPECTION NO. INSPECTION REC Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 -34'O PERMIT NO. (206)431-3670 Approved per applicable codes. CCorrections required prior to approval. iL NI $47.01 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspec ion, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: COMMENTS: Pek SP6c.(4c_ i k-(V&c-rne-S Ali(Cre- - 00-0Arl1F,Axm.. S( 041 P excc-ii- '( pkx.- ciocc-0 LUE-af6eeieS - deeewit. Date wanted: .-7/y //f/P a (- _5A6 ,--/~ "44A e0 7 3 P 41 e t . , t- tffil 94.4 ' Type flwection: Ace9: 4 ' (Mi ... St Date ailed: 1/ Special instructions: itn4 Date wanted: .-7/y e- P.m. Requester 147 3 • • •-••••^•^-•• '' • INSPECTION NO. • ) INSPECTION RECO Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431-3670 Approved per applicable codes. 1:2F6orrections required prior to approval. $47 0 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Date: Receipt No: Projef �t �� t .r' l� t'it fri noel 7 Type of ecti �Q c ,L Add f 5 /gfI I I Date called: o ��/ 9 Special instructions: Date wanted: //-- Requester Phone: -5 5-;.567 Insp INSPECTION NO. Approved per applicable codes. COMMENTS: R eceipt No: INSPECTION RECO Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWtjLA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 SAC( , k f Ai SA'c. %Dim 7'T' D Date: D7P0 PERMIT NO. • ►\ (206)431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. • 0 /1 - ro-, .6Y( rCZef25 $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to in pection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. CaII to schedule reinspection. COMMENTS: ' . z / i _ Til es! .....5 . /10/ 4/ / Date called: / /� /�� Special instructions: Date wanted: &/ / p m Re quester: /� f.III c l(� v . Phone: _5 _a 5 6 ? 0(c 4725 Sc/v67,-04- 6 ao ; PIC( AL I,L. p :. (72, -e_ 70 &c ovLI 4. /r/X- 44./t,'X /S AJ07 100 41 'Y7' :`�' �' / f - 4 ■ 44 ■ e !l {1 ill � / i T p of Inspe �ion1 , pai_obf;pcei /47.7 Til es! .....5 . /10/ 4/ / Date called: / /� /�� Special instructions: Date wanted: &/ / p m Re quester: /� f.III c l(� v . Phone: _5 _a 5 6 K INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per',applicable codes. El $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: • INSPECTION RECO Retain a copy with permit PERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. l5l 99 P Mm L.V IA.� Type pecti rf: ",.. '\ �~- Address: ° l. I fi" - r - Date called: Special instructions: Date wanted: a.m. P.m. Res t/ /l. -b /KCG^ /4.i5P Phone: INSPECTION RECOIL Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. . . CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 9818 Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: ti i .5 thoit y Caiztk r.c..f 4 ,¢f7enl we ) f — l ei) OV — C, U.S ail eAA l/�, yr) X.(67 .5 erSF2445 Ej $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: PERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670 P Ctcc_.i -PlAd 20-4/14)/0 Typ��b f Inspect' A Datey�lJd Gate wanted : n/�+ rr // ``��!! a.m. p :m. /r v Special instructions: INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: 1 • $4 .'' ' EINSPECTION trE REQ IRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. 'Receipt No: INSPECTION RECO Retain a copy with permit Date: PERMIT NO. Physical Site Inspection Report Date: 8/31/99 Inspector: M. Sorantino Job Time: • Date Mailed: 9/17/99 Reviewer: J. Hicks Air Temperature: Inspection Performed Visually witnessed installation of a number of 5/8" threaded rods with adhesive fill (epoxy), along shearwalls D and E, running east to west at sill plate steel, ground level. Material used appeared correct, holes appeared adequately cleaned. Method of installation appeared satisfactory and adequate as per manufacturers, recommendation, and depth & spacing of holes appeared in conformance with approved revised drawing drawing provided. (attached) FIELD REPORT A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. P.O. BOX 2523 Phone: (425) 881- 5812 REDMOND, WA 98073 FAX: (425) 881 - 5441 CLIENT Adlin Construction ATTN ADDRESS 25971 Pala Mission Viejo, Ca 92694 Copies To: I © Building Department Job No. 99 -218 Project Claim Jumper Address 5901 S. 180th St. City . Tukwiila Permit Number: =10 Number :226791 ii U ) 2 0 1999 ALL REPORTS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE CLIENT AND A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC, REPRODUCTION EXCEPT IN FULL, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. Physical Site Inspection Report Date: 8/23/99 Inspector: A. Wycoff Job Time: Date Mailed: 9/10/99 Reviewer: J. Hicks '. Air Temperature: Inspection Performed :Q Reinforced masonry units, ties for stonework, resteel, and grout mix at final lift at 2 each fireplaces. Resteel and ties installed per plans & specifications. Grout placed by pump and vibrated. Contractor placed Icy of Cadman mix #654100 ticket #28353, a 70/30 pea gravel 6 1/2 sack mix. FIELD REPORT A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. P.O. BOX 2523 Phone: (425) 881- 5812 REDMOND, WA 98073 FAX: (425) 881 - 5441 CLIENT Adlin Construction ATTN ADDRESS 25971 Pala Mission Viejo, Ca 92694 Copies To: © Building Department 1)% -01 Old I Report Number : ;228621 Job No: 99-218 Project Claim Jumper Address 5901 S. 180th St. City Tukwilla Permit Number: ALL REPORTS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE CLIENT AND A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. REPRODUCTION EXCEPT IN FULL, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. FIELD REPORT Field Report Number: 12132 A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. P.O. BOX 2523 Phone: (425) 881- REDMOND, WA 98073 FAX: (425) 881- 5812 5441 Job No. Project Address City Permit Number: 99 -218 Claim Jumper 5901 S. 180th St. Tukwilla Vic- 2,1. J CLIENT Adlin Construction ATTN ADDRESS 25971 Pala Mission Viejo, Ca 92694 Physical Site Inspection Report Date: 7/19/99 Date Mailed: 8/6/99 Copies To: Building Department Inspector: K. Hasu Reviewer: T. Maddock Inspection Performed Job Time:. Air Temperature:. Inspection performed was structural masonry at reinforcing steel at walls. Fire place at approximate grid intersection H/2 and service yard walls. Observed grout pour in third lift of fireplace at H/2 and first lift of service yard walls. R/S placements per approved plans and specifications. Grout placed by pump and consolidated with a vibration. No samples taken at this time. Material: Grout Supplier: Cadman Plant: 54 Mix Number: 645100 Design Cement Type: I /11 Air Temp: 69 Time 10:45am Concrete Temp: 75 Slump fluid Truck #: 206 Ticket: 14990 Yards placed: 8 1/2 Design (F'C) at 28 days: 2000 Cement: 64Ibs Sand: 19341bs Aggregate: 3/8 9491bs Water: 310 Water Added: 10ga1 ALL REPORTS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE CLIENT AND A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC, REPRODUCTION EXCEPT IN FULL, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. '1 FIELD / MATERIAL TEST REPbRT ASTM: C172, C1019, C780 Ma..■ Report Number: 11883 Test Strength Material Data Job No. 99 -218 Project Claim Jumper Address 5901 S. 180th St. ''w' h "�`. ~ :f CI, 1 pY r ' ;1 � . City Tukwilla Permit Number: c 7 ;s ,i.° - ` (NI 9 1999 p l,i. i , C .: ` ;MO N‘} iti CLIENT Adlin Construction ATTN ADDRESS 25971 Pala Mission Viejo, Ca 92694 Type of Material: Concrete Supplier: Miles S & G Plant #: 3 ID # Job Time: Set # I Yards placed: 80 Coarse Aggregate: 7 /81860 Air Temperature: 70 Design (F'C) @ 28: 2500 Coarse Aggregate: 8/5/99 28 6X12 Material Temperature Truck Number: 022 Sand: 1554 Yield Unit Weight: Ticket Number: 464399 Fly Ash: Slump Inches: 5.5 Job Mix? No Water: 22.1 Slump Specification: 4 + -1 Mix Number: 1500 Water Added: 16 G Air Percentage: Cement Type: 1 Air Entrain: Air Specification: Cement: 470 Admixture: Conformance Conforming to Plan? yes Inspector: G,KENT Reviewer: 1".." .: Explain if "No ": FIELD / MATERIAL TEST REPbRT ASTM: C172, C1019, C780 Ma..■ Report Number: 11883 Test Strength A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. P.O. BOX 2523 Phone: (425) 881- 5812 REDMOND, WA 98073 FAX: (425) 881- 5441 Job No. 99 -218 Project Claim Jumper Address 5901 S. 180th St. ''w' h "�`. ~ :f CI, 1 pY r ' ;1 � . City Tukwilla Permit Number: c 7 ;s ,i.° - ` (NI 9 1999 p l,i. i , C .: ` ;MO N‘} iti CLIENT Adlin Construction ATTN ADDRESS 25971 Pala Mission Viejo, Ca 92694 J.HOUSER A.HALE Report Data Report Date: 7/8/99 Inspection Performed / Location Test Strength Grids Tested Per: Conforms Y /N: Compressive Y /N: ASTM C39 & C1231 Cast Date: 7/8/99 Tested By: Fracture Type: Reviewed By: Yes (If "Other, than Cone.) J.HOUSER A.HALE Test Results ID # Test Date I Field Cure I Age Days 'Size InchlArea Sq Inl Weight Lbs IMax Load LbslStrength PSI Set # I 5836 7/15/99 7 6X12 28.27 108860 3850 1 5837 8/5/99 28 6X12 1 5838 8/5/99 28 6X12 1 Inspection Performed / Location Inspection Type: Reinforced Concrete Location: Slab -on -grade Grids Completion of floor slab G- N/1 -13. Remarks R/S =6x6 mesh in place in substantial accordance w /plans & specifications. Concrete placed by pump & manually consolidated. Spoke to City of Tukwilla who called Engineer for approval. Copies To 1 Date Mailed: 7/8/99 Y .1 Building Department ALL REPORTS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE CLIENT AND A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. REPRODUCTION EXCEPT IN FULL, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. FIELD / MATERIAL TEST REP( .o ASTM: C172, C1019, C780 Mc ial Report Number: 11883 5836 Material Data Job No. 99 -218 Project Claim Jumper Address 5901 S. 180th St. City Tukwilla Permit Number: CLIENT Adlin Construction ATTN ADDRESS 25971 Pala Mission Viejo, Ca 92694 Type of Material: Concrete Supplier: Miles S & G Plant #: 3 1 1547101 Job Time: 1 Yards placed: 80 Coarse Aggregate: 7/81860 Air Temperature: 70 Design (F'C) @ 28: 2500 Coarse Aggregate: 56601 Material Temperature Truck Number: 022 Sand: 1554 Yield Unit Weight: Ticket Number: 464399 Fly Ash: Slump Inches: 5.5 Job Mix? No Water: 22.1 Slump Specification: 4 + -1 Mix Number: 1500 Water Added: 16 G Air Percentage: Cement Type: 1 Air Entrain: Air Specification: Cement: 470 Admixture: Conformance Conforming to Plan? yes Inspector: G.KENT Reviewer: Explain if "No ": FIELD / MATERIAL TEST REP( .o ASTM: C172, C1019, C780 Mc ial Report Number: 11883 5836 A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. P.O. BOX 2523 Phone: (425) 881- 5812 REDMOND, WA 98073 FAX: (425) 881- 5441 Job No. 99 -218 Project Claim Jumper Address 5901 S. 180th St. City Tukwilla Permit Number: CLIENT Adlin Construction ATTN ADDRESS 25971 Pala Mission Viejo, Ca 92694 281 Report Data Report Date: 7/8/99 ID # 'Test Date Field Cure I Age Days (Size InchlArea Sq In Weight Lbs 'Max Load LbslStrength PSI I Set # 5836 7/15/99 1 71 6X121 28.271 1 1088601 38501 1 58371 8/5/991 1 281 6X121 28.271 1 1547101 54701 1 58381 8/5/991 1 281 6X121 28.451 1 1609901 56601 1 Inspection Performed / Location Inspection Type: Reinforced Concrete Location: Slab -on -grade Grids Completion of floor slab G- N/1 -13. Remarks R/S =6x6 mesh in place in substantial accordance w /plans & specifications. Concrete placed by pump & manually consolidated. Spoke to City of Tukwilla who called Engineer for approval. Test Strength Tested Per: ASTM C39 & C1231 Conforms Y /N: Yes Compressive Y /N: Yes Cast Date: 7/8/99 Fracture Type: (If 'Other, than Cone.) Tested By: J.HOUSER Reviewed By: A.HALE Test Results Copies To 1 Date Mailed: 8/13/99 U Building Department ALL REPORTS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE CLIENT AND A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. REPRODUCTION EXCEPT IN FULL, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF A.A.R, TESTING LABORATORY, INC. IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. FIELD / MATERIAL TEST REPt. J ASTM: C172, C1019, 0780 MEt .a1 Report Number: 10974 Inspection Type: Reinf Conc & Other Location: Slab -on -grade Material Data Job No. 99 -218 Project Claim Jumper Address 5901 S. 180th St. City Tukwilla Permit Number: p its...03i CLIENT Adlin Construction ATTN ADDRESS 25971 Pala Mission Viejo, Ca 92694 Type of Material: Job Time: Air Temperature: Material Temperature Yield Unit Weight: Slump Inches: Slump Specification: Air Percentage: Air Specification: Concrete 7:20:00 AM 54 74 7 5 + -1 Supplier: Miles S & G Plant #: 1 Yards placed: 114 Design (F'C) @ 28: 2500 Truck Number: 729 Ticket Number: 464132 Job Mix? No Mix Number: 01500 Cement Type: 1 -2 Cement: 470 Coarse Aggregate: Coarse Aggregate: Sand: Fly Ash: Water: Water Added: Air Entrain: Admixture: 1860 718x#4 1480 270# unknown 1 57531 8/4/991 Conformance 281 4x81 Conforming to Plan? Explain if "No ": yes Inspector: L.Waybright Reviewer: f M/W1 X I'- FIELD / MATERIAL TEST REPt. J ASTM: C172, C1019, 0780 MEt .a1 Report Number: 10974 Inspection Type: Reinf Conc & Other Location: Slab -on -grade A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. P.O. BOX 2523 Phone: (425) 881- 5812 REDMOND, WA 98073 FAX: (425) 881- 5441 Job No. 99 -218 Project Claim Jumper Address 5901 S. 180th St. City Tukwilla Permit Number: p its...03i CLIENT Adlin Construction ATTN ADDRESS 25971 Pala Mission Viejo, Ca 92694 Resteel and W.W.F. placed per plans and specifications. Concrete was pumped into place and not vibrated. Anchor bolts for walls were wet set. These test cylinders were taken from a wet load. The finishers were told that excessive slumps would not be allowed. Report Data Report Date: 7/7/99 Inspection Performed / Location Inspection Type: Reinf Conc & Other Location: Slab -on -grade Grids Inspection performed: Reinforcing steel, Concrete and Anchor Bolt Installation. Assembly rooms no.s 1, 2, 3 & 4 slab on grade. Remarks _ Resteel and W.W.F. placed per plans and specifications. Concrete was pumped into place and not vibrated. Anchor bolts for walls were wet set. These test cylinders were taken from a wet load. The finishers were told that excessive slumps would not be allowed. ID # I Test Date I Field Cure I Age Days (Size InchlArea Sq In' Weight Lbs IMax Load LbsLStrength PSI I Set # 57511 7/14/991 1 71 4x81 12.561 1 328801 26201 1 57521 8/4/991 1 281 4x81 12.561 1 499401 3980 1 57531 8/4/991 1 281 4x81 12.561 1 498401 39701 1 Test Strength Tested Per: ASTM C39 & C1231 Conforms Y /N: Yes Compressive Y /N: Yes Cast Date: 7/7/99 Fracture Type: (If 'Other, than Cone.) Tested By: J.HOUSER Reviewed By: A.HALE Test Results Coples To I Date Mailed: 8/13/99 lJ Building Department ALL REPORTS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE CLIENT AND A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. REPRODUCTION EXCEPT IN FULL, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. Pc) FIELD / MATERIAL TEST REFk_ . tT ASTM: C172, C1019, C780 Mt ial Report Number: 10975 Material Data A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. P.O. BOX 2523 Phone: (425) 881- 5812 REDMOND, WA 98073 FAX: (425) 881- 5441 Type of Material: Concrete Job Time: 10:30:00 AM Air Temperature: 62 Material Temperature 74 Yield Unit Weight: Slump Inches: 6 Slump Specification: 5 + -1 Air Percentage: Air Specification: Supplier: Miles S & G Plant #: 3 Yards placed: 114 Design (F'C) @ 28: 2500 Truck Number: 725 Ticket Number: 464186 Job Mix? No Mix Number: 01500 Cement Type: 1 -2 Cement: 470 Coarse Aggregate: 1860 Coarse Aggregate: 7/8x#4 Sand: 1480 Fly Ash: Water: 270# Water Added: see * Air Entrain: Admixture: Report Data Conformance 57561 8/4/991 Conforming to Plan? yes Explain if "No ": Inspector: L.WAYBRIGHT Reviewer:? MA D DOCK FIELD / MATERIAL TEST REFk_ . tT ASTM: C172, C1019, C780 Mt ial Report Number: 10975 Inspection Type: Reinf Conc & Other Location: Slab -on -grade A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. P.O. BOX 2523 Phone: (425) 881- 5812 REDMOND, WA 98073 FAX: (425) 881- 5441 Job No. 99.218 Project Claim Jumper Address 5901 S. 180th St. City Tukwilla Permit Number. pct$ _ 01740 CLIENT Adlin Construction ATTN ADDRESS 25971 Pala Mission Viejo, Ca 92694 R/S W.W.F. and anchor bolts placed per plans and specs. Concrete placed by pump and not vibrated. Slumps Report Data Report Date: 7/7/99 Inspection Performed / Location Inspection Type: Reinf Conc & Other Location: Slab -on -grade Grids Slab on grade for assembly rooms no.s 1, 2, 3 & 4. Remarks R/S W.W.F. and anchor bolts placed per plans and specs. Concrete placed by pump and not vibrated. Slumps averaged 6 ". Water added: 15 galsll l c.y. ID # I Test Date I Field Cure I Age Days (Size InchlArea Sq InI Weight Lbs IMax Load Lbs IStrength PSI I Set # 57541 7/14/99 1 71 4X81 12561 1 386801 3080 2 57551 8/4/99 1 28 4X81 12.561 1 568801 45301 2 57561 8/4/991 1 281 4X81 12.561 1 566301 45101 2 • Test Strength Tested Per: ASTM C39 & C1231 Conforms Y /N: Yes Compressive Y /N: Yes Cast Date: 7/7/99 Fracture Type: (If "Other', than Cone.) Tested By: J.HOUSER Reviewed By: A.HALE Test Results Copies To 1 Date Mailed: 8/13/99 Building Department ALL REPORTS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE CLIENT AND A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. REPRODUCTION EXCEPT IN FULL, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. FIELD / MATERIAL TEST LL-PORT ASTM: C172, C1019, C780 "Material Report Number: 10975 Inspection Type: Reinf Conc & Other Location: Slab -on -grade Material Data Job No. 99 -218 Project Claim Jumper Address 5901 S. 180th St. City Tukwilla . ` '. � F. 7. Permit Number: D 98 -03.0 :; ? ? 2 1909 .. ; ' ! -, '' v CLIENT Adlin Construction ATTN ADDRESS 25971 Pala Mission Viejo, Ca 92694 Type of Material: Concrete Supplier: Miles S & G Plant #: 3 Job Time: 10:30:00 AM Yards placed: 114 Coarse Aggregate: 1860 Air Temperature: 62 Design (F'C) @ 28: 2500 Coarse Aggregate: 7/8x#4 Material Temperature 74 Truck Number: 725 Sand: 1480 Yield Unit Weight: Ticket Number: 464186 Fly Ash: Slump Inches: 6 Job Mix? No Water: 270# Slump Specification: 5 + -1 Mix Number: 01500 Water Added: see * Air Percentage: Cement Type: 1 -2 Air Entrain: Air Specification: Cement: 470 Admixture: Conformance Conforming to Plan? yes Inspector: L.WAYBRIGHT Reviewer: Explain if "No ": FIELD / MATERIAL TEST LL-PORT ASTM: C172, C1019, C780 "Material Report Number: 10975 Inspection Type: Reinf Conc & Other Location: Slab -on -grade A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. P.O. BOX 2523 Phone: (425) 881- 5812 REDMOND, WA 98073 FAX: (425) 881- 5441 Job No. 99 -218 Project Claim Jumper Address 5901 S. 180th St. City Tukwilla . ` '. � F. 7. Permit Number: D 98 -03.0 :; ? ? 2 1909 .. ; ' ! -, '' v CLIENT Adlin Construction ATTN ADDRESS 25971 Pala Mission Viejo, Ca 92694 R/S W.W.F. and anchor bolts placed per plans and specs. Concrete placed by pump and not vibrated. Slumps Report Data Report Date: 7/7/99 Inspection Performed / Location Inspection Type: Reinf Conc & Other Location: Slab -on -grade Grids !Slab on grade for assembly rooms no.s 1, 2, 3 & 4. Remarks R/S W.W.F. and anchor bolts placed per plans and specs. Concrete placed by pump and not vibrated. Slumps averaged 6 ". Water added: 15 gals /11 c.y. Test Strength Tested Per: Conforms Y /N: Compressive Y /N: Yes ASTM C39 & C1231 Cast Date: 7/7/99 Fracture Type: (If "Other, than Cone.) Tested By: J.HOUSER Reviewed By: A.HALE 5755 8/4/991 5756; 8/4/991 i 281 4X81 Test Results ID # I Test Date I Field Cure I Age Days 'Size InchlArea Sq Int Weight Lbs 'Max Load Os 'Strength PSI I Set # 5754! 7/14/99! 7! 4X81 1256; 386801 3080: 21 28. 4X8! I i 21 21 Copies To] Date Mailed: 7/30/99 U Building Department ALL REPORTS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE CLIENT AND A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. REPRODUCTION EXCEPT IN FULL, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. FIELD / MATERIAL TEST REPk.)RT ASTM: C172, C1019, C780 M wrial Report Number: 10974 Test Strength Material Data Job No. 99-218 Project Claim Jumper Address 5901 S. 180th St. City Tukwilla Permit Number: L - ; CLIENT Adlin Construction ATTN ADDRESS 25971 Pala Mission Viejo, Ca 92694 Type of Material: Concrete Supplier: Miles S & G Plant #: 1 5751 7/14/99 7 4x8. 12.56 32880 2620 1 Job Time: 7:20:00 AM Yards placed: 114 Coarse Aggregate: 1860 Air Temperature: 54 Design (F'C) @ 28: 2500 Coarse Aggregate: 7/8x#4 Material Temperature 74 Truck Number: 729 Sand: 1480 Yield Unit Weight: Ticket Number: 464132 Fly Ash: Slump Inches: 7 Job Mix? No Water: 270# Slump Specification: 5 + -1 Mix Number: 01500 Water Added: unknown Air Percentage: Cement Type: 1 -2 Air Entrain: Air Specification: Cement: 470 Admixture: Conformance Conforming to Plan? yes Inspector: L.Waybright Reviewer: i ''^ ( =t:' i% ^ R- Explain if "No ": FIELD / MATERIAL TEST REPk.)RT ASTM: C172, C1019, C780 M wrial Report Number: 10974 Test Strength A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. P.O. BOX 2523 Phone: (425) 881- 5812 REDMOND, WA 98073 FAX: (425) 881- 5441 Job No. 99-218 Project Claim Jumper Address 5901 S. 180th St. City Tukwilla Permit Number: L - ; CLIENT Adlin Construction ATTN ADDRESS 25971 Pala Mission Viejo, Ca 92694 Test Results Report Data Report Date: 7/7/99 Inspection Performed / Location Test Strength Tested Per: Conforms Y /N: Compressive Y /N: ASTM C39 & C1231 Cast Date: 7/7/99 Tested By: J.HOUSER Fracture Type: Reviewed By: A.HALE Yes (If "Other", than Cone.) Remarks Test Results ID # I Test Date I Field Cure I Age Days (Size InchlArea Sq Inl Weight Lbs IMax Load Lbs 'Strength PSII Set # 1 5751 7/14/99 7 4x8. 12.56 32880 2620 1 5752 8/4/99 28 4x8 1 5753 8/4/99 28 4x8 1 Inspection Performed / Location Inspection Type: Reinf Conc & Other Location: Slab -on -grade Grids Inspection performed: Reinforcing steel, Concrete and Anchor Bolt Installation. Assembly rooms no.s 1, 2, 3 & 4 .slab on grade. Remarks Resteel and W.W.F. placed per plans and specifications. Concrete was pumped into place and not vibrated. Anchor bolts for walls were wet set. These test cylinders were taken from a wet load. The finishers were told that excessive slumps would not be allowed. Copies To 1 Date Mailed: 7/30/99 6/i Building Department ALL REPORTS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE CLIENT AND A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. REPRODUCTION EXCEPT IN FULL, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. ft FIELD / MATERIAL TEST REF.r2T ASTM: C172, C1019, C780 Mi_ ;'rial Report Number: 11586 Inspection Type: Reinforced Concrete Location: Footings Material Data Job No. 99 -218 Project Claim Jumper Address 5901 S. 180th St. City Tukwilla -r " • U A x r , r ' ? % 1-- fj Permit Number: 9 -t 2 .: -� -%.. r -' - D 96- o34O / ' f t 0 9 1999 (;ty n v/ UN; a'f CLIENT Adlin Construction ATTN ADDRESS 25971 Pala Mission Viejo, Ca 92694 Type of Material: Concrete Supplier: Miles S & G Plant #: 2 Test Results Job Time: 10:47:00 AM Yards placed: 33 Coarse Aggregate: 1860 7/8 Air Temperature: 58 Design (F'C) @ 28: 2500 Coarse Aggregate: 159580 5610 1 Material Temperature 64 Truck Number: 48 Sand: 1480 Yield Unit Weight: Ticket Number: 463502 Fly Ash: Slump Inches: 3 Job Mix? No Water: 32.5 g Slump Specification: 4 + -1 Mix Number: 1500 Water Added: 10 g Air Percentage: Cement Type: 1 Air Entrain: Air Specification: Cement: 470 Admixture: Conformance Conforming to Plan? yes Inspector: J.GRAHAM Reviewer: Explain if "No ": FIELD / MATERIAL TEST REF.r2T ASTM: C172, C1019, C780 Mi_ ;'rial Report Number: 11586 Inspection Type: Reinforced Concrete Location: Footings A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. P.O. BOX 2523 Phone: (425) 881- 5812 REDMOND, WA 98073 FAX: (425) 881- 5441 Job No. 99 -218 Project Claim Jumper Address 5901 S. 180th St. City Tukwilla -r " • U A x r , r ' ? % 1-- fj Permit Number: 9 -t 2 .: -� -%.. r -' - D 96- o34O / ' f t 0 9 1999 (;ty n v/ UN; a'f CLIENT Adlin Construction ATTN ADDRESS 25971 Pala Mission Viejo, Ca 92694 ASTM C39 & C1231 Yes Yes Report Data Report Date: 6/30/99 Inspection Performed / Location Inspection Type: Reinforced Concrete Location: Footings Test Strength ,Wall footings: 9 -17, S. of & including N. line. Tested Per: Conforms YiN: Compressive Y /N: ASTM C39 & C1231 Yes Yes Cast Date: 6/30/99 Fracture Type: (If "Other ", than Cone.) Tested By: J.HOUSER Reviewed By: A,HALE Test Results ID # I Test Date I Field Cure I Age Days 'Size InchlArea Sq In' Weight Lbs IMax Load LbslStrength PSI I Set # 5603 7/7/99 7 6X12 28.27 112830 3990 1 5604 7/28/99 28 6X12 28.45 159580 5610 1 5605 7/28/99 28 6X12 28.27 159430 5640 1 Inspection Performed / Location Inspection Type: Reinforced Concrete Location: Footings Grids ,Wall footings: 9 -17, S. of & including N. line. Remarks Resteel was properly installed in accordance with approved plans. Concrete was mechanically consolidated. L/J Building Department Copies To I Date Mailed: 8/6/99 ALL REPORTS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE CLIENT AND A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. REPRODUCTION EXCEPT IN FULL, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. FIELD / MATERIAL TEST II. _ PORT ASTM: C172, C1019, C780 _ •,Aaterial Report Number: 11586 Inspection Type: Reinforced Concrete Location: Footings Material Data Job No. 99 -218 Project Claim Jumper Address 5901 S. 180th St. City Tukwilla Permit Number: D 980344 CLIENT Adlin Construction ATTN ADDRESS 25971 Pala Mission Viejo, Ca 92694 Type of Material: Concrete Supplier: Miles S & G Plant #: 2 Job Time: 10:47:00 AM Yards placed: 33 Coarse Aggregate: 1860 7/8 Air Temperature: 58 Design (F'C) @ 28: 2500 Coarse Aggregate: Material Temperature 64 Truck Number: 48 Sand: 1480 Yield Unit Weight: Ticket Number: 463502 Fly Ash: Slump Inches: 3 Job Mix? No Water: 32.5 g Slump Specification: 4 + -1 Mix Number: 1500 Water Added: 10 g Air Percentage: Cement Type: 1 Air Entrain: Air Specification: Cement: 470 Admixture: Conformance Conforming to Plan? yes Inspector: J.GRAHAM Reviewer: T. MAPPQC- Explain if "No ": FIELD / MATERIAL TEST II. _ PORT ASTM: C172, C1019, C780 _ •,Aaterial Report Number: 11586 Inspection Type: Reinforced Concrete Location: Footings A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. P.O. BOX 2523 Phone: (425) 881- 5812 REDMOND, WA 98073 FAX: (425) 881- 5441 Job No. 99 -218 Project Claim Jumper Address 5901 S. 180th St. City Tukwilla Permit Number: D 980344 CLIENT Adlin Construction ATTN ADDRESS 25971 Pala Mission Viejo, Ca 92694 Resteel was properly installed in accordance with approved plans. Concrete was mechanically consolidated. Report Data Report Date: 6/30/99 Inspection Performed / Location Inspection Type: Reinforced Concrete Location: Footings Grids Wall footings: 9 -17, S. of & including N. line. Remarks Resteel was properly installed in accordance with approved plans. Concrete was mechanically consolidated. Test Strength Tested Per: Conforms Y /N: Compressive Y /N: Yes ASTM C39 & C1231 Cast Date: 6130/99 Fracture Type: (If "Other", than Cone.) Tested By: J.HOUSER Reviewed By: A.HALE Test Results ID # I Test Date I Field Cure I Age Days rSize Inc1Area Sq Inl Weight Lbs 'Max Load LbslStrength PSI I Set # 5603' 7/7/99i 7! 6X12' 28.271 ! 1128301 3990' 1 5604; 7/28/991 5605; 7/28/991 28! 6X12! 28: 6X12' Copies To I Date Mailed: 7/16/99 ii Building Department ALL REPORTS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE CLIENT AND A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. REPRODUCTION EXCEPT IN FULL, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. fU PRISM NO. TEST DATE AGE (DAYS) LENGTH (IN) WIDTH (IN) HEIGHT (IN) GROSS AREA (SQ.IN) NET AREA (SQ. IN) HIW RATIO CoRR. FACTOR MAX. LOAD (LBS) STRENGTH (PSI) 5678 8 28 7.5 7.5 15.75 56.25 56.25 2.1 1. 169280 3010 5679 8 28 7.5 7.5 15.75 56.25 56.25 2.1 1. 149980 2670 5680 8 - 10 28 7.5 7.5 15.75 56.25 56.25 2.1 1. 157620 2800 5681 8 28 7.5 7.5 15.75 56.25 56.25 2.1 1. 172140 3060 5682 8 28 7.5 7.5 15.75 56.25 56.25 2.1 1. 169310 3010 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF MASONRY PRISMS ASTM C 1314 -95 /ASTM E 447 -92B A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. P.O. BOX 2523 REDMOND, WA 98073 -2523 (425) 881 -5812 (425) 881-5441 Fax Sheet # 1 of 1 Grouted 1 1 Ungrouted FILE NO.:99 -218 DATE:6 -30 -99 PROJECT:CIaim Jumper. PERMIT N REPORT NO.:11587 MASONRY UNIT Grade & Type: Design Strength (PSI): 1900 Mfgr. Dimensions (Inches) 8x8x8 MORTAR Type: S Remarks: Tested By: Calculated By: Strength (psi) 2000 Supplier. On -site mix Additives: Type S lime N Mutual 2" 5' lift on both fireplaces J. Houser J.Houser GROUT Mix No.: Strength (psi): 2000 Supplier: Cadman 654100 Net Cross - Sectional Area Determined from a Representative Masonry Unit (Ungrouted Prisms Only) UBC 21.1707.1 /ASTM C140 -96 Average Compressive Strength of Masonry/Prism Unit fm NON CONFORMANCE THIS REPORT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, EXCEPT IN FULL, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF AA.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. PRISMS Reviewed By: A. Hale Size: Date Assembled: 6 -30 -99 Design Strength: 1500 WX HX L 8x16x8 CONFORMANCE: 39.72 Inch 2 2560P.S.I. FIELD REPORT Field Report Number: 20856 A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. P.O. BOX 2523 Phone: (425) 881- REDMOND, WA 98073 FAX: (425) 881- 5812 5441 Job No. 99 - 218 Project Claim Jumper Address 5901 S. 180th St. City Tukwilla Permit Number: 1:31 ry CLIENT Adlin Construction ATTN ADDRESS 25971 Pala Mission Viejo, Ca 92694 Physical Site Inspection Report Date: 6/28/99 Date Mailed: 7/16/99 Inspector: J. Graham Reviewer: T. Maddock Inspection Performed Job Time: 3:53 Air Temperature: 56 Performed inspection of placement of 4 yards of grout mix #654100 (from Cadman) for the first 5' of fireplace walls. Resteel was properly installed in accordance with approved plans. Grout was mechanically consolidated. Contractor didn't construct preconstruction prisms. Informed him that 5 prisms must be constructed soon. No mortar was available at this time. Copies To: 1 © Building Department ALL REPORTS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE CLIENT AND A.A,R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC, REPRODUCTION EXCEPT IN FULL, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. IS STRICTLY. FORBIDDEN, FIELD / MATERIAL TEST If. .PORT ASTM: C172, C1019, C780 ,Jlaterial Report Number: 10968 Inspection Type: Reinf Cone & Other Location: Footings & Walls Material Data Job No. 99 -218 Project Claim Jumper Address 5901 S. 180th St. City Tukw r' -,,, r"'1 Permit Num , . `` +07 `t JUL. _j 9 1999 LtmmuNI t' ' uEVELo� ME CLIENT Adlin Construction ATTN ADDRESS 25971 Pala Mission Viejo, Ca 92694 Type of Material: Concrete Supplier: Miles S & G Plant #: 3 Job Time: 9:45:00 AM Yards placed: 60 Coarse Aggregate: 1860 Air Temperature: 56 Design (F'C) @ 28: 2500 Coarse Aggregate: Material Temperature 70 Truck Number: 042 Sand: 1480 Yield Unit Weight: Ticket Number: 0462736 Fly Ash: Slump Inches: 2 3/4 Job Mix? No Water: Slump Specification: Mix Number: 1500 Water Added: 8 G Air Percentage: Cement Type: Air Entrain: Air Specification: Cement: 470 Admixture: Conformance Conforming to Plan? YES Inspector: WAYBRIGHT /FLINT Reviewer: i . N4/ WFGC,I'- Explain if "No ": FIELD / MATERIAL TEST If. .PORT ASTM: C172, C1019, C780 ,Jlaterial Report Number: 10968 Inspection Type: Reinf Cone & Other Location: Footings & Walls A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. P.O. BOX 2523 Phone: (425) 881- 5812 REDMOND, WA 98073 FAX: (425) 881- 5441 Job No. 99 -218 Project Claim Jumper Address 5901 S. 180th St. City Tukw r' -,,, r"'1 Permit Num , . `` +07 `t JUL. _j 9 1999 LtmmuNI t' ' uEVELo� ME CLIENT Adlin Construction ATTN ADDRESS 25971 Pala Mission Viejo, Ca 92694 Report Data Report Date: 6/23/99 Inspection Performed / Location Inspection Type: Reinf Cone & Other Location: Footings & Walls Grids Footing /stem walls placed monolithically. Grid lines 1. 14 to 17 onNline. 2. A -line 15 to A. 3. Interior footings /stem walls within above grid lines. Remarks Reinforcing steel was correct per plans and specs. Anchor bolts and hold -down bolts were also in per plans. Exact location /layout of bolts was contractor's responsibility. Test Strength Tested Per: Conforms Y /N: Compressive Y /N: Yes ASTM C39 & C1231 Cast Date: 6/22/99 Fracture Type: (If "Other", than Cone.) Tested By: J.HOUSER Reviewed By: A.HALE Test Results ID # I Test Date I Field Cure I Age Days (Size InchlArea Sq In Weight Lbs'Max Load Lbs'Strength PSI I Set # 1 5376. 6/30/99 5377! 7/21/99' 28! 6X12' 5378: 7/21/991 7' 6X12' 28.45. i 91650! 32201 11 11 28' 6X12 1 1 1 11 Copies To bi Building Department Date Mailed: 7/9/99 ALL REPORTS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE CLIENT AND A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. REPRODUCTION EXCEPT IN FULL, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. �G� FIELD / MATERIAL TEST k_PORT ASTM: C172, C1019, C 14 • raterial Report Number: 10968 Material Data A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. P.O. BOX 2523 Phone: (425) 881- 5812 REDMOND, WA 98073 FAX: (425) 881- 5441 Type of Material: Concrete Job Time: 9:45:00 AM Air Temperature: 56 Material Temperature 70 Yield Unit Weight: Slump Inches: 2 3/4 Slump Specification: Air Percentage: Air Specification: Supplier: Miles S & G Plant #: 3 Yards placed: 60 Design (F'C) @ 28: 2500 Truck Number: 042 Ticket Number: 0462736 Job Mix? No Mix Number: 1500 Cement Type: Cement: 470 Coarse Aggregate: 1860 Coarse Aggregate: Sand: 1480 Fly Ash: Water: Water Added: 8 G Air Entrain: Admixture: Conformance Report Data Conforming to Plan? YES Explain if "No ": Inspector: WAYBRIGHT /FLINT Reviewer: T. MA'VPOLIC FIELD / MATERIAL TEST k_PORT ASTM: C172, C1019, C 14 • raterial Report Number: 10968 Inspection Type: Reinf Conc & Other Location: Footings & Walls A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. P.O. BOX 2523 Phone: (425) 881- 5812 REDMOND, WA 98073 FAX: (425) 881- 5441 Job No. 99 -218 r Project Claim Jumper Address 5901 S. 180th St. City Tukwilla /`' Permit Number: Y 8 (, IJ ` 7 1 -^ n - ° r ~ ��; ^ )�� ° ' p " 1999 , ,, M ij;` ''1 ,'i f '.E ..OP i ENT CLIENT Adlin Construction ATTN ADDRESS 25971 Pala Mission Viejo, Ca 92694 Report Data Report Date: 6/23/99 Inspection Performed / Location Inspection Type: Reinf Conc & Other Location: Footings & Walls Grids Footing /stem walls placed monolithically. Grid lines 1. 14 to 17 on N Tine. 2. A -line 15 to A. 3. Interior footings /stem walls within above grid lines. Remarks Reinforcing steel was correct per plans and specs. Anchor bolts and hold -down bolts were also in per plans. Fxact Incatinn /Iavout of hnits was contractor's resoonsibility Copies To Test Strength Tested Per: ASTM C39 & C1231 Conforms Y /N: Yes Compressive Y /N: Yes Cast Date: 6/22/99 Fracture Type: (If Other", than Cone.) Tested By: J.HOUSER Reviewed By: A.HALE Test Results I ID # I Test Date I Field Cure I Age Days (Size InchlArea Sq InI Weight Lbs IMax Load LbsIStrength PSI I Set # I 5376' 6/30/99; 71 6X12! 28.45', 1 916501 32201 11 1 5377' 7/21/991 28' 6X12: 28.45' 1368101 48101 11 ' 53781 7/21/991 281 6X12' 28.271 ( 1408501 49801 11 1J Building Department Date Mailed: 7/30/99 ALL REPORTS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE CLIENT AND A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. REPRODUCTION EXCEPT IN FULL, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. (......... FIELD / MATERIAL TEST F .. _.JORT ASTM: C172, C1019, C780 ( aterial Report Number: 11748 A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. P.O. BOX 2523 Phone: (425) 881- 5812 REDMOND, WA 98073 FAX: (425) 881- 5441 Material Data CLIENT Adlin Construction ATTN ADDRESS 25971 Pala Mission Viejo, Ca 92694 Remarks Type of Material: Concrete Supplier: Miles S & G Plant #: 3 Job Time: 10:00 :00 AM Yards placed: 70 Coarse Aggregate: 7/81860 Air Temperature: 60 Design (F'C) @ 28: 2500 Coarse Aggregate: Material Temperature 68 Truck Number: 023 Sand: 1480 Yield Unit Weight: Ticket Number: 461845 Fly Ash: Slump Inches: 3 Job Mix? No Water: 32.5 Slump Specification: 5 max Mix Number: 01500 Water Added: Air Percentage: Cement Type: 1 -2 Air Entrain: Air Specification: Cement: 470 Admixture: Conformance Conforming to Plan? yes Inspector: Hasu/Wycoff Reviewer: J •• N Explain if "No": FIELD / MATERIAL TEST F .. _.JORT ASTM: C172, C1019, C780 ( aterial Report Number: 11748 A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. P.O. BOX 2523 Phone: (425) 881- 5812 REDMOND, WA 98073 FAX: (425) 881- 5441 Job No. 99-218 Project Claim Jumper Address 5901 S. 180th St. City Tukwilla Permit Number: DOW - 340 CLIENT Adlin Construction ATTN ADDRESS 25971 Pala Mission Viejo, Ca 92694 Remarks Report Data Report Date: 6/16/99 Inspection Performed / Location Inspection Type: Reinforced Concrete Location: Footings Grids Footings and fire place pads @ approx grid lines A to M @ 1 line, 1 to 15 @ A line, 1 to 8.5 @ M line. Remarks Concrete placed by pump and consolidated with a vibrator. R/S placements per approved plans & specs. Test Strength Tested Per: Conforms Y /N: Compressive Y /N: Yes ASTM C39 & C -617 Cast Date: 6/16/99 Fracture Type: (It 'Other, than Cone.) Tested By: J.HOUSER Reviewed By: A.HALE 5342' 7/14/99: 5343: 7/14/99 28 6X12; 28 6X121 Test Results ID # I Test Date I Field Cure I Age Days (Size InchlArea Sq Int Weight Lbs IMax Load LbslStrength PSI I Set # 5341' 6/23/99 7 6X121 28.27; 115830 41001 1 1 1 1 Copies To I Date Mailed: 7/9/99 U Building Department ALL REPORTS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE CLIENT AND A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. REPRODUCTION EXCEPT IN FULL, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. ' FIELD / MATERIAL TEST L.PORT ASTM: 0172, C1019, C780 k. i,I aterial Report Number: 11748 Inspection Type: Reinforced Concrete Location: Footings Material Data Job No. 99-218 Project Claim Jumper ") �--, ,--r \ , i ... . Address 5901 S. 180th St. City Tukwilla l � ��9 � 6 Permit Number: { �� , coo .,,� f JUL �f f Cr ". /i!\ /i�, UNITY ELOPMENI CLIENT Adlin Construction ATTN ADDRESS 25971 Pala Mission Viejo, Ca 92694 Type of Material: Concrete Supplier: Miles S & G Plant #: 3 Report Date: 6/16/99 Job Time: 10:00:00 AM Yards placed: 70 Coarse Aggregate: 7/81860 Air Temperature: 60 Design (F'C) @ 28: 2500 Coarse Aggregate: Material Temperature 68 Truck Number: 023 Sand: 1480 Yield Unit Weight: Ticket Number: 461845 Fly Ash: Slump Inches: 3 Job Mix? No Water: 32.5 Slump Specification: 5 max Mix Number: 01500 Water Added: Air Percentage: Cement Type: 1 -2 Air Entrain: Air Specification: Cement: 470 Admixture: Conformance Conforming to Plan? yes Inspector: Hasu /Wycoff Reviewer: .!'ill..-`. Explain if "No ": FIELD / MATERIAL TEST L.PORT ASTM: 0172, C1019, C780 k. i,I aterial Report Number: 11748 Inspection Type: Reinforced Concrete Location: Footings A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. P.O. BOX 2523 Phone: (425) 881- 5812 REDMOND, WA 98073 FAX: (425) 881- 5441 Job No. 99-218 Project Claim Jumper ") �--, ,--r \ , i ... . Address 5901 S. 180th St. City Tukwilla l � ��9 � 6 Permit Number: { �� , coo .,,� f JUL �f f Cr ". /i!\ /i�, UNITY ELOPMENI CLIENT Adlin Construction ATTN ADDRESS 25971 Pala Mission Viejo, Ca 92694 Concrete placed by pump and consolidated with a vibrator. R/S placements per approved plans & specs. Report Data Report Date: 6/16/99 Inspection Performed / Location Inspection Type: Reinforced Concrete Location: Footings Grids Footings and fire place pads © approx grid lines A to M @ 1 line, 1 to 15 @ A line, 1 to 8.5 @ M line. Remarks Concrete placed by pump and consolidated with a vibrator. R/S placements per approved plans & specs. Test Strength Tested Per: ASTM C39 & C -617 Conforms Y /N: Yes Compressive Y /N: Yes Cast Date: 6/16/99 Fracture Type: (If "other, than Cone.) Tested By: J.HOUSER Reviewed By: A.HALE ID # Test Date I Field Cure Age Days (Size InchlArea Sq Int Weight Lbs Max Load Lbs 'Strength PSI I Set # 5341 6/23/99 5342 7/14/99 5343 7/14/99 7 6X12 28 6X12 28' 6X12 Test Results 28.27 28.27, 28.27 115830; 145890 150880' 4100 5160 5340 Copies To Date Mailed: 7/23/99 L6 Building Department ALL REPORTS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE CLIENT AND A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. REPRODUCTION EXCEPT IN FULL, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. {, APR -05 -99 14:57 FROM- CLAIM JUkir RESTAURANT April 5, 1999 Joanna Spencer Public Works Department City of Tukwilla 6300 Southcenter Blvd Ste 100 Tukwilla, WA 98188 VIA FACSIMILE 206 -431 -3665 RE: Claim Jumper Restaurant Permit Number: D98 -0340 Dear Joanna, e Doug Parsen Vice President of Construction mass LW 16721 MILLIKAN AVENUE • IRVINE, CA 922606-6009 949.766.9001 • FAX 949.756.8733 CLAIM J LIMPER ENTERPRISES, INC • CWN M At4 .L MENt INC T -021 P.O1 /01 F -089 RECEIVED APR 0 6 1999 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS Please be advised that the grease interceptor for our project will be provided and installed by MBK, the developer of the mall. The interceptor is specified and located on the site plans provided by MBK. Claim Jumper Restaurant will be responsible for paying the sewer assessment fee of $5, 034.36 Sincerely, 1Lq 1905 A'ea® Area Area Area Area® COMUTA11ON CNECK 5 ou , 89,06 x 6,40 =- 859,06 x 012,00 Lob eve /c2 ''s /2% ✓�, • Computation — pCW 35 ,A4,040 (1) 218.37f . PKO'ERIY LINE - 'ECIAL A5`c1 Mr 6GtNDARY 16,97 fit, x 0.019000 = 254,65 17,7 rt. x 0,0085,5 = 147,95 17,868.615x,11. x 0.006666 - 119.12 1 7,973,025x, fit, x 0,005555 - 99.91 1 ft,x 0,0016666= 297.47 if 5 ,%9I98 010 ;068,71 City of Tukwtila op 839,06 e NOTES: I) 1MC 14.16.0741A81..E 9NOW5 $12,00 PER A55E51[3I.E 1 V OF FRONTAGE FOR SEAR, AND $6.4O Fog Wing, IN at NOTED WAR OF CON51KUC11GN 019 Li 2) NO 51.1Z1gY PROVIDED. DIMENSIONS Ale (3A.' ON at M051 CUMENIKING COINNY A55E5GR' 5 MAPS. ) Se c Water Special f`' -t-- Hem fre, Sewer Special /112/L5 S ©g, Zane Area x Zone Factor x Fee / Assemble Unit = if Special Charge 0 3 " C(Ax45) +( 6x2 +(Cx 20) +(12 x10) + x5)7x#6.40/3000 =#5,%9,98 ,1 i C(A x 49) + (6x25) + (C x 20) + (n x10) + 0x9)7 x 012,00/ 3000 010,068,71 I . - Sewer Special Connection Charge TMC 14,16,074; pCW 35,44,040 Sheet I of 1 Re ort P Geotechnical Engineering Services Proposed Parkway Supercenter. Tukwila, Washington ' Geotti MBK Northwest 7690 Southwest Mohawk Street Tualatin, Oregon 97062 Attention: Mason Frank We are pleased to submit four copies of our report, "Geotechnical Engineering Services, Proposed Parkway Supercenter, Tukwila, Washington." Our geotechnical engineering services were completed in general accordance with our proposal dated August 13, 1997. A preliminary report was submitted for your review and comment on September 24, 1997. Site grading plans were developed for Building Area `2', Pad `A', and the restaurant building pad in January 1998. We presented detailed preload /surcharge recommendations for these buildings in a design memorandum dated February 5, 1998. We appreciate the opportunity to work with MBK on this project. Please call if you have any questions regarding this report. Document ID: 1284028R.DOC cc: KPFF Consulting Engineers Attn: Jerry Mitchell 111 Southwest Fifth Avenue, Suite 2500 Portland, Oregon 97204 -3628 File No. 1284-028 -01 CeoEngineers, Inc. 8410 154th Avenue N.G. Redmond, WA 98052 Telephone (425) 861-6000 Fax (425) 861-6050 www.geoengineers.com Yours very truly, February 23, 1998 neers, Inc. K. Tuttle, P.E. incipal Consulting Engineers and Geoscientists Offices in Washington, Oregon, and Alaska TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1 1 2 2 AND FOUNDATION DESIGN 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 6 6 6 7 7 7 8 9 9 10 : 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 13 INTRODUCTION SCOPE SITE CONDITIONS AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION EXISTING SURFACE CONDITIONS BACKGROUND INFORMATION - SURCHARGING Surcharge Foundation Design SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS GROUND WATER CONDITIONS CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL SITE PREPARATION EARTHWORK General Structural Fill Use of Existing Site Soils SETTLEMENTS PRELOAD /SURCHARGE FILL SETTLEMENT MONITORING SHALLOW FOUNDATION SUPPORT FLOOR SLAB SUPPORT RETAINING WALLS LATERAL RESISTANCE PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS Liquefaction Potential Site Coefficient CONSTRUCTION MONITORING LIMITATIONS FIGURES Figure No. Vicinity Map 1 Existing Site Plan 2 Proposed Redevelopment Plan 3 Settlement Plate Detail 4 APPENDIX Pane No. APPENDIX A - SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS AND LABORATORY TESTING A -1 SUBSUFACE EXPLORATIONS A -1 LABORATORY TESTING A -1 FIELD SCREENING OF SOIL SAMPLES A -1 APPENDIX FIGURES Figure No. Soil Classification System A -1 Key to Boring Log Symbol A -2 Logs of Borings A- 3...13 Consolidation Test Results A-14.. ,A-15 G e o E n g i n e e r s i File No. 1284- 028 -01- 1130/022398 FOR MBK NORTHWEST INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical engineering services for your proposed Parkway Supercenter located in Tukwila, Washington. The property is currently the Parkway Plaza located along Southcenter Parkway extending north from South 180th Street to the street right -of -way along the south side of the JC Penney Clearance warehouse. We understand four buildings along the west side of Southcenter Parkway will also be acquired. These include the Azteca, Winners and Tony Roma's restaurants and the Ethan Allen Furniture store. A vicinity map showing the project locations is provided as Figure 1. The existing site configuration is shown in detail in Figure 2, and the proposed redevelopment plan is shown in Figure 3. We understand that construction activities for the portion of the project east of Southcenter Parkway will include the renovation of a number of the existing buildings, partial demolition of the westerly portion of the larger segment of the building partially occupied by CompUSA, and total demolition of the existing Pavilion building. Major new construction will include a cinema building immediately north of the existing Pavilion building, a fill -in building between the existing Sportmart and CompUSA stores, and 6 buildings on new pads to be located in the existing parking areas. Four of these buildings will be located north of South 180th Street and two will be located in the existing parking area south of South 180th Street. No major changes are planned for the buildings west of Southcenter Parkway. We understand that design loading of the structures will include floor loads in the range of 125 to 300 psf (pounds per square foot). SCOPE The purpose of our geotechnical engineering services is to develop geotechnical engineering design criteria and performance estimates for the proposed new construction. Our services include completing new explorations for the new building pads and a series of borings around the Pavilion building. Specifically, our scope of services includes the following tasks: 1. Compile a summary of site conditions, foundation design criteria, and general preload /surcharge requirements from past work on and in close proximity to the property. 2. Perform a reconnaissance of surficial conditions around the four buildings on the west side of Southcenter Parkway to examine the extent of periodic releveling which was been necessary to maintain the exterior grade due to compression of underlying soils to O e o E n g in e e r s 1 File No. 1284-028 -01 - 1130/022398 REPORT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES PROPOSED PARKWAY SUPERCENTER TUKWILA, WASHINGTON ; determine if alternative repairs such as replacement of a portion of the mineral fill and pavement with a zone of lightweight fill might successfully stop or at least slow the recurring need for repair work. 3. Complete a series of exploration borings at the locations of planned new construction to provide location - specific subsurface data for foundation design and performance analyses. 4. Drill four borings around the perimeter of the Pavilion building to assess subsurface conditions, perform field screening for possible contamination and, if judged necessary, install monitoring wells which would permit subsequent water sampling for chemical analyses. 5. Complete a series of laboratory tests on selected samples to provide grain -size, moisture - density and consolidation parameters for correlation with data from previous investigations in this area and for use in engineering analyses. 6. Develop specific design recommendations for new construction including foundation design criteria and any special site preparation requirements (such as preloading or surcharging of new building areas which have not been so loaded in the past). 7. Prepare a written report presenting the results of our study, including supporting field and laboratory data, for use by other members of the design team in preparation of construction documents and in support of the building permit application. 8. Provide consultation, as required by you or members of the design team during design and construction document preparation, to assist in the implementation of our recommendations as intended. SITE CONDITIONS AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION EXISTING SURFACE CONDITIONS In addition to the Pavilion building, the existing Parkway Plaza contains more than 25 retail tenants with surrounding parking lot and drive areas. With the exception of concrete aprons located near the existing loading dock areas, the parking lots are surfaced with asphalt concrete. The asphalt concrete located east of Southcenter Parkway exhibits little to no surface distress. On the west side of Southcenter Parkway, we observed relatively recent asphalt overlays in the parking and drive areas adjacent to the three northern buildings, Tony Roma's, Ethan Allen Furniture, and Winners. We also observed settlement around the perimeter of all four buildings between the bottom of the siding and the concrete or timber blocks placed in the landscaping. The magnitude of settlement appeared to be between 1 and 6 inches. We understand that the asphalt overlays are periodically placed as leveling courses due to the differential settlement occurring between the pile - supported structures and the adjacent ground surface. C3 e o E n g in ear s 2 File No. 1284- 028 -01 - 1130/022398 BACKGROUND INFORMATION - SURCHARGING AND FOUNDATION DESIGN Surcharge Significant thicknesses of surcharge have been placed across the Parkway Plaza site. The surcharge fill is placed to preinduce ground surface settlements which occur as the underlying silt and organic soils consolidate. Approximately 6 to 10 feet of surcharge fill was placed prior to construction of the central building (existing Sportmart), and between 4 and 12 feet of surcharge fill was placed at the location of the north retail stores prior to construction. The upper 12- foot - height of surcharge was in the location of a fill stockpile situated in the northeast corner of the property. Specific information regarding the actual surcharge placed in the south portion of the plaza and in the vicinity of the Pavilion is not available, although information in our files indicates a minimum 3- foot -high surcharge was recommended for a period of 3 months. The significant height of the surcharge fill placed in the central and north areas of the property was necessary to preinduce settlements during an accelerated project schedule. The duration of these surcharge fills ranged from about 30 to 45 days. For a typical preload program where the weight of the fill placed above finished floor elevations is roughly equivalent to the design floor loads, a preload duration 'between 3 and 8 months was anticipated. Actual measured settlement during the central surcharge program was close to the estimated values ranging from 8.5 to 13 inches for the 6- to 10 -foot surcharge height. Foundation Design Previous foundation design recommendations included footings be underlain by a minimum 4 -foot thickness of compacted structural fill for an allowable design bearing pressure of 2500 psf. A 4- to 6 -inch thickness of capillary break material was recommended for placement beneath the floor slabs. Rebar reinforcement was also recommended for constructing the floor slabs to help distribute loading conditions and bridge zones of differential settlement. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface soil and ground water conditions were evaluated by reviewing the previous explorations completed at the site and by drilling eleven borings at the approximate locations shown on the Site Plan, Figure 3. Details of the field exploration program and the exploration logs are presented in Appendix A. The Site Plan also shows the locations of previous borings completed at the site. Subsurface conditions encountered in our borings are generally consistent with conditions encountered in previous explorations. In general, we encountered 2 to 10 feet of loose to medium dense silty sand and gravel fill overlying alluvial deposits. The alluvial deposits consist of very soft to soft silt and organic silt interlayered with loose silty sand and sand. The 0 co E n g i n e e r s 3 File No. 1284-028 -01 - 1130/022398 .." sand becomes clean and medium dense to dense at a depth ranging from 30 to 50 feet below the existing ground surface. Field screening for possible contamination was completed on samples obtained from the four borings around the existing Pavilion building (GEI -5, GEI-6, GEI -9 and GEI -10). Soil samples were obtained at approximately 5- foot -depth intervals for field screening and soil classification. Field screening results did not suggest the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil samples. A detailed description of the field screening techniques are provided in Appendix A. GROUND WATER CONDITIONS Ground water seepage was encountered about 5 to 9 feet below the ground surface in our borings completed at the site. Based on our experience on nearby sites, as much as 2 feet of seasonal fluctuation in ground water level is typical. Also, during the wet time of the year, perched ground water is often encountered near the ground surface. Therefore, ground water seepage may be encountered in excavations made at the site. The contractor should be prepared to handle small quantities of ground water when excavating for footings or utility construction. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL We conclude that the site is suitable for constructing the proposed redevelopment, provided a preload /surcharge program is completed within the new building areas to reduce postconstruction settlements to acceptable limits. This includes the new CompUSA building, the new ACT III theater, and the six new building pads to be located within the existing parking areas. A sixth building location was added since the time of our initial study (Wickes Furniture in Area `C'). We recommend that one to two borings be drilled within the proposed building footprint prior to final design. We recommend that the new buildings be supported on shallow spread footings founded on a minimum of 3 to 4 feet of compacted structural fill. Placement of fill above the existing grades and application of building loads in the new building areas will cause consolidation in the underlying silt and organic soils. Building fill pads and preload /surcharge fill should be constructed far enough in advance of erection of the building walls, so that the majority of settlement due to these loads will have occurred before constructing footings. We understand that a maximum 30 -day period is available during the construction schedule for preloading or surcharging some of the buildings. For this period, we recommend a 5- to 6- foot -thick surcharge be placed above the proposed finished floor elevation. A 3- foot -high preload fill is appropriate when the construction schedule can accommodate a two- to three -month period for the preload duration. To reduce the risk of settlements in the existing structures, the preload /surcharge fills will need to be gradually tapered to a height of zero feet adjacent to the existing buildings. Recommended preload and surcharge configurations are discussed in more detail in a following section of this report. Q e o E n g i n e e r s 4 File No. 1284-028-01-1130/022398 The existing fill soils beneath the asphalt pavement combined with the anticipated 1- to 2- foot thickness of structural fill required to achieve slab subgrade elevation will provide an adequate fill pad for floor slab support over much of the site. However, the existing fill is relatively thin in the extreme south portion of the site. Excavation and replacement of soft/loose fill or native soils should be anticipated to construct the new building pads in areas `B', 'B1', and `C'. Also, excavation and replacement of loose fill will likely be required to construct the recommended minimum thickness of structural fill for support of perimeter footings across all of the site, and might be needed for some interior footings. Much of the existing fill on the site appears to be close to adequate density. The fill was near optimum moisture content at the time of our explorations. The fill soils are extremely moisture - sensitive, and compactive efforts will only be effective during extended periods of dry weather. We recommend that the floor slab be found on a capillary break overlying the fill pad. The capillary break material should consist of a minimum 4 -inch thickness of sand and gravel with less than 5 percent fines (material passing No. 200 sieve) by weight relative to the fraction passing the 3/4 -inch sieve. Prior to capillary break placement, the existing fill soils should be proofrolled or probed to locate any loose zones. Some excavation and replacement of the on- site soils may be required to form the building pad for slab support. The following sections of this report provide more detailed recommendations for design and construction. SITE PREPARATION Site development will require removal of some of the existing buildings, pavements, buried utilities and other structures present at the site. Much of the fill soils encountered below the asphalt concrete possess high fines (silt) content such that repeated construction traffic will result in considerable disturbance during wet weather construction. Therefore, we suggest leaving the existing asphalt concrete as long as practical to protect the subgrade during construction. If the existing pavement does not pose a hindrance to future development (i.e. utility installations or other excavations), it may be left beneath the new building pads. If left in place, the asphalt concrete should be broken into pieces with a maximum dimension of 12 inches or less. Following pavement breakup or removal, we recommend that the areas be thoroughly proofrolled with heavily loaded rubber -tired construction equipment to identify the adequacy of the underlying fill soils. If soft or otherwise unsuitable areas revealed during proofrolling cannot be compacted to a stable and uniformly dense condition, excavation and replacement with structural fill should be accomplished, or as otherwise recommended by the geotechnical engineer. Localized zones of perched ground water may be present in shallow excavations made at the site. We expect that any ground water encountered during shallow excavations will be relatively minor and can be handled adequately with collection ditches and sump pumps. 0 e o E n g i n e e r s 5 File No. 1284028 -01 - 1130/022398 EARTHWORK General The proposed new buildings can be satisfactorily supported on shallow footings bearing on a zone of compacted structural fill. As described in subsequent sections of this report, we recommend that floor slabs be underlain by a minimum of 18 inches of structural fill, and that a minimum 8 inches of subbase (clean sand and gravel) be specified for areas to be paved. We recommend that individual spread footings supporting total design column loads of 100 kips or less, and all continuous wall footings bear on a minimum 3 -foot thickness of structural fill. The fill pad beneath individual footings designed for larger column loads should have a minimum thickness of 4 feet. Structural Fill During dry weather, structural fill placed at a depth more than 6 inches below slab subgrades can contain an increased fines content provided that the minimum compaction criteria can be achieved. The maximum particle size in borrow material for general site grading should be limited to 6 inches. The pavement subbase and the upper 6 inches of building pad fill should consist of a well - graded, free- draining sand and gravel free of organic matter and debris. The sand and gravel fill should contain less than 5 percent fines (material passing No. 200 sieve) by weight relative to the fraction passing the 3/4 -inch sieve. The maximum particle size should be limited to 12 inches. If the fill is placed during wet weather, we recommend that the entire building pad fill be constructed of borrow soils having less than 5 percent fines. We should be provided samples of the proposed borrow material for evaluation prior to approving it as acceptable material. Structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts which are 10 inches or less in loose thickness. During wet weather, the initial lift may need to be somewhat thicker in order to reduce the chance of pumping of the fine - grained subgrade soils and to provide adequate support for construction equipment. Within building footprint areas and within 2 feet of the finished subgrade surface for pavement areas, each lift should be uniformly compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined in accordance with the ASTM D -1557 test method. For fill more than 2 feet below the finished pavement subgrade surface, the compaction criteria can be reduced to 90 percent of the maximum dry density (ASTM D- 1557). The moisture content of the fill material may need to be adjusted to achieve the specified compaction. A representative from our staff should be present at the site to observe and evaluate fill placement and compaction operations, and to complete a representative number of in -place density tests to determine if compaction criteria are being achieved. D e o E n g 1 n e e r s 6 File No. 1284-028 -01 - 1130/022398 Use of Existing Site Soils The existing fill can be reused as structural fill provided it is moisture - conditioned (aerated) and compacted, if needed, to meet the specified compaction criteria. Most of the surficial native soils contain substantial fines, are extremely moisture- sensitive, and have a natural moisture content considerably above that necessary to achieve compaction. As such, they will not be suitable for use as fill without prolonged aeration. SETTLEMENTS Placement of fill to establish design grades and application of new building loads will cause consolidation in the underlying soils. Differential settlements will occur between areas which have previously been filled, surcharged, or otherwise loaded and the adjacent, unloaded areas. Based on our review of previous surcharge programs, actual settlements, and additional laboratory consolidation tests, we estimate that 2 to 5 inches of settlement will occur as a result of the new planned areal floor loads ranging from 125 to 300 psf. Therefore, we recommend a preload /surcharge program to induce the major portion of settlements that would otherwise occur during and following construction. A preload /surcharge program is deemed necessary for all planned new construction. Because of the expected settlements, it is critical that building construction not be started until most of the settlement from the building pad and preload /surcharge (recommended below) has occurred. Because of the thickness and organic content of the compressible layer, a long and variable preload duration is anticipated. We estimate that 90 percent of the settlement should occur within about 6 to 10 weeks. It is possible to accelerate the consolidation by placing additional fill (surcharge) above the preload fill placed to simulate building loads. This is discussed in more detail in the following section. PRELOAD /SURCHARGE FILL The purpose of a preload or surcharge program is to induce a major portion of the settlements which would otherwise occur when building and floor loads are applied. We recommend a 3- foot -thick preload fill be placed to simulate the expected floor loads. Additional surcharge can be placed to shorten the required duration of a preload program. We understand that a maximum 30 -day period is available during the construction schedule for preloading or surcharging the new buildings in Area `A'. Anticipated floor loads for these three building (Building Area No. `2', Pad `A', and the restaurant building) are 125 psf. For these conditions, we recommend a 5- foot -thick surcharge be placed above the proposed finished floor elevation. For the remaining buildings proposed in areas `B', 131', and 'C', a surcharge thickness of 5 feet is adequate where floor loads will be 125 psf or less. We recommend a 6- foot -thick surcharge be placed above finished floor elevation where floor loads are expected to be between 200 and 300 psf. Q e o E n g i n e e r s 7 File No. 1284028-01 - 1130/022398 The crest of the preload /surcharge fill should extend to full height above the proposed finished floor elevation for a distance of at least 5 feet outside of the building footprints. In areas of possible future building construction, the full fill heights should extend into the proposed expansion area for a distance of at least 15 feet beyond the initial building footprints. Along the north and south sides of the footprint of the new Building Area No. `2' (adjacent to the existing structures), we recommend that the crest of the surcharge extend full height to a distance of 5 feet from the existing building walls. From this point, the surcharge should be tapered to the new finished floor grade level at the location of the existing building walls. Preload /surcharge fill need be compacted only to the extent necessary to support construction equipment. The preload /surcharge surface should be sealed and crowned to promote runoff of surface water. Following the preloading or surcharging period, the excess fill can be removed from the building areas and used as structural fill in parking or other building areas. We recommend that building pad fill and surcharge placed during the wet spring months consist of clean material (sand and gravel with less than 5 percent fines) to be able to achieve adequate compaction of the material. The clean material will also reduce the potential for schedule delays that could arise in rehandling and compacting the surcharge fill when it is moved to another building pad. • We should be provided a sample of the proposed material for evaluation and approval before any material is brought to the site. SETTLEMENT MONITORING In order to evaluate the magnitude and time rate of settlement of the building pad fill and the preload /surcharge fill, we recommend that several settlement monitoring plates be installed prior to placing any new or additional fill in the building areas. An example of a suitable settlement plate, and a description of monitoring procedures are presented in Figure 4. We recommend that settlement plates be placed approximately 25 feet in from each corner of the new buildings. A minimum of 2 additional plates should be placed within the central area of the smaller buildings, and an additional 4 plates should be placed in the central area of the larger buildings. Initial elevation readings of the settlement plates must be obtained when they are installed and before any fill is placed. If this is not done, the initial settlement behavior of the fill pad will not be recorded and the value of the observations significantly diminish in that neither the total magnitudes nor rates of settlement will be known. The elevations of the plates and the adjacent ground surface need to be determined twice each week during filling so that settlement progress in relation to the amount of fill in place can be defined. We recommend that readings be obtained weekly after completion of filling. We recommend that the readings be taken by the project civil engineer and the results forwarded to our office on the day of each reading for evaluation. The presence of the measurement rods which extend from the settlement plates through the fill will inhibit the mobility of earthmoving equipment to some extent. The contractor will have d e o E n g i n e e r s 8 File No. 1284-028-01 - 1130/022398 to exercise care to avoid damaging the rods. The construction documents should emphasize the importance of protecting the settlement plates and measuring rods from disturbance. SHALLOW FOUNDATION SUPPORT We recommend that the buildings be supported on shallow foundations, provided that the footings are placed on a pad of compacted structural fill as recommended in the "Earthwork" section of this report and as discussed below. Foundation construction should not be started until settlements from filling and preload /surcharge operations are complete. We recommend that all footings be supported on structural fill extending to a depth of 3 to 4 feet below the footing subgrade elevation. A 3 -foot thickness is appropriate for design column loads of 100 kips or less and a 4 -foot thickness is appropriate for heavier design loads. We recommend that the compacted structural fill form a prism of fill below the footing which extends a minimum distance of 3 feet beyond the edge of the footing. The requirements for overexcavation of existing soils and placement of structural fill for footing support should be determined and the work accomplished before placing the building pad fill. We recommend that a representative from our firm evaluate the soils exposed in these excavations before placement of structural fill to determine that the footing subgrade is acceptable. If excessively soft soils are exposed at subgrade level, additional excavation and replacement with structural fill may be necessary. We recommend that the bottom elevations of all exterior footings be a minimum of 18 inches below the lowest adjacent finished grade, while interior footings have a minimum embedment of 12 inches. We recommend that continuous footings and isolated column footings have minimum widths of 18 and 24 inches, respectively. Footings can be designed using an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,500 psf for dead plus long -term live loads. This value may be increased by one -third when considering transient loads, such as wind or seismic. The weight of the footing and any backfill over the footing may be neglected in determining the applied bearing pressure. We estimate that the settlement of continuous strip and column footings will be on the order of 1/2 to 1 inch for the assumed loading conditions providing preloading is completed as recommended. Differential settlements should not exceed about 3/4 inch in about 40 to 50 feet. These settlements should occur within several weeks after applying load to the footings. FLOOR SLAB SUPPORT All slab subgrade areas should be stripped and proofrolled or otherwise evaluated as recommended in "Site Preparation" before placing any fill. As discussed in the "Earthwork" section of this report, we recommend that floor slabs be underlain by a minimum of 18 inches of structural fill. The upper 6 inches of fill placed to form the building pad should consist of 3/4 -inch minus free draining sand and gravel with less than 5 percent fines. If fill placement and slab construction will proceed during extended periods of dry weather, the import fill G e o E n g i n e e r 9 File No. 1284- 028 -01 - 1130/022398 placed below the upper 6 inches of slab subgrade can contain an increased percentage of fines, provided the fill can be compacted as recommended above. Because differential settlement is likely across the site, due to variable loading history and variable soil conditions, we recommend that floor slabs be constructed using reinforcement. A vapor barrier should be placed beneath all on -grade floor slabs where moisture control in the slab is critical (e.g., if tile or carpeting is to be glued to the slab). This vapor barrier should consist of polyethylene sheeting and should be overlain by a 2 -inch thickness of clean sand to protect it from damage during slab construction and to aid concrete curing. RETAINING WALLS We recommend that walls for loading docks or other building walls which will serve as retaining walls, be designed for lateral pressures based on an equivalent fluid density of 35 pcf (pounds per cubic foot). This value applies to walls not restrained against rotation when backfill is placed. The above - recommended lateral soil pressure does not include the effects of surcharges such as floor loads, traffic loads or other surface loading. Surcharge effects should be considered as appropriate. In settlement - sensitive areas (e.g., beneath on -grade slabs), the upper 2 feet of backfill for subgrade walls should be compacted to 95 percent of the maximum dry density determined in accordance with ASTM D -1557. At other locations and below a depth of 2 feet, wall backfill should be compacted to between 90 and 92 percent of ASTM D -1557. Measures should be taken to prevent overcompaction of the backfill against the wall. The recommended equivalent fluid density assumes a free - draining condition behind the wall. If any walls are placed where water may have access to the fill behind, drainage should be provided by placing an 18- to 24- inch -wide zone of sand and gravel containing less than 5 percent fines against the wall. Weep holes at about 4 -foot centers at the base of the wall should be sufficient to drain water from exterior walls. Alternatively, perforated drainpipe could be embedded in the free - draining sand and gravel zone along the base of retaining walls to remove any water which collects in this zone. The drainpipe should be tightlined to an appropriate discharge point. LATERAL RESISTANCE The soil resistance available to resist lateral loads is a function of the frictional resistance which can develop on the base of footings and slabs, and the passive resistance which can develop on the face of below -grade elements of the structure as these elements tend to move into the soil. For footings and floor slabs founded on structural fill placed and compacted in accordance with our recommendations, the allowable frictional resistance can be computed using a coefficient of friction of 0.35 applied to vertical dead -load forces. The allowable passive resistance on the face of footings, grade beams or other embedded foundation elements can be computed using an equivalent fluid density of 300 pcf (triangular distribution) if cast G 0 o E n g I n c o r s 10 File No. 1284-028-01-1130/022398 neat against structural fill soils. This value assumes all soil extending out from the face of the foundation element for a distance at least equal to two and one -half times the depth of the element consists of structural fill compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum dry density (ASTM D- 1557). The above coefficient of friction and passive equivalent fluid density values include a factor of safety of about 1.5. PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS Assuming that proper site preparation is accomplished and a relatively firm subgrade can be achieved, we recommend a minimum 8- inch -thick subbase layer be provided beneath the base course of new pavement sections. The subbase should consist of a 12 -inch minus sand and gravel with less than 5 percent fines. This recommendation assumes that the existing fill and native soils can be compacted to the criteria defined in the "Earthwork, Structural Fill" section. If the existing fill and native soils are soft, it will be necessary to increase the subbase thickness and possibly provide a geotextile separation layer. It has been our experience that 12 to 24 inches of subbase overlying a geotextile separation layer is required on soft, wet soils, or during wet weather. To avoid the cost of additional overexcavation, the pavement subgrade preparation should occur during the summer and allow time for the parking subgrade soils to "heal" prior to paving. The recommended subbase thickness is not intended to nor will it support construction traffic. Construction haul roads should be as required. We recommend that the pavement section in automobile parking areas consist of a minimum of 2 inches of Class B asphalt concrete over a minimum of 4 inches of free - draining crushed rock. The free - draining crushed rock should be similar to Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Standard Specification 9 -03.9(3), except with less than 5 percent passing the U.S. No. 200 sieve. In roadway areas and pavement areas which will be subject to truck traffic, we recommend that the minimum thicknesses of asphalt concrete and crushed rock be increased to 3 and 6 inches, respectively. These design recommendations are predicated on construction of the pavement section being accomplished during extended periods of dry weather. The crushed rock base course and subbase fill should both be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density determined, in accordance with ASTM D -1557. Backfill in utility trenches underlying paved areas should also be compacted in accordance with the recommendations for structural fill presented in this report. The asphalt concrete should be compacted, in accordance with WSDOT specifications (to at least 91 percent maximum density based on WSDOT Test Method 705). DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS We recommend that pavement surfaces be sloped so that surface drainage flows away from the buildings. We recommend that all roof drainage be collected in tight lines for diversion into C3 eoEngineers 11 File No. 1284- 028 -01 - 1130/022398 the storm drain system. A perimeter footing drain is not considered necessary provided that the building floor is above the parking grades. SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS Liquefaction Potential The Puget Sound basin is located within a seismically- active area in which numerous earthquakes have been recorded. Of the more recent events, two were large which resulted in significant damage to some structures. The earlier earthquake, which was centered in the Olympia area, occurred in 1949 with a Richter magnitude of 7.1. The later earthquake, which was centered between Seattle and Tacoma, occurred in 1965 with a Richter magnitude of 6.5. Damage, which in some instances may have been related to localized liquefaction, was reported in many areas within the greater Puget Sound region. Liquefaction refers to a condition where vibration or shaking of the ground, usually from earthquake forces, results in the development of excess pore pressures in saturated soils and subsequent loss of strength. This can result in consolidation and /or lateral spreading of the affected soils with accompanying surface subsidence and /or heaving. In general, soils which are susceptible to liquefaction include loose- to medium -dense clean to silty sands which are saturated (i.e., below the water table). The evaluation of liquefaction potential is complex and is dependent on numerous parameters including soil grain size, soil density, site geometry, static stresses, level of ground acceleration considered, and duration of the event. Typically, the liquefaction potential of a site is evaluated by comparing the cyclic shear stress ratio (the ratio of the cyclic shear stress to the initial effective overburden stress) induced by an earthquake to the cyclic shear stress ratio required to cause liquefaction. We made a preliminary evaluation of the liquefaction potential at this site based on subsurface information obtained in the borings. Based on the data obtained for this site, the interbedded silt layers have a low risk of liquefaction. However, the loose - to medium -dense sandy soils encountered below the water have a high -to- moderate risk of liquefaction, respectively. Layers of loose silty sand were encountered below the water table in several of the explorations. The sand typically graded to dense below a depth of about 40 to 50 feet. Because of the variable thickness of liquefiable soil across the site, it is likely that several discontinuous zones could liquefy causing isolated areal subsidence. Because the floor slab and foundation elements will be supported on a mat of densely compacted structural fill that will be above the highest probable ground water level, significant differential subsidence due to liquefaction is not expected. Specifically, this site will have a nonliquefiable soil cap with a thickness to about 8 to 15 feet. Therefore, abrupt differential settlements of high magnitude are not expected, although settlement could occur and cause distress to the structures during a large seismic event (magnitude 6.5 or greater), or a long duration event. Q e o E n g i n e e r s 12 File No. 1284- 028 -01 - 1130/022398 To reduce the potential for differential settlements (more than can be accomplished with a structural fill building pad), three options can be considered. The first option, which is the most economical and provides some protection against minor earthquake shaking, consists of tying the foundations together with grade beams. The second option consists of supporting the structures on piles which would afford more protection against earthquake - induced differential settlements.' The third option consists of general site improvement by densifying the building pad areas, thereby reducing the potential for settlement. We are available to discuss the relative merits of each of these options with you should you decide to pursue an increase in protection to the structures against potential settlement damage due to an earthquake. Site Coefficient Based on our subsurface explorations and our experience in the area, the recommended Uniform Building Code (1994) soil profile type is S for a corresponding site coefficient of 1.5. CONSTRUCTION MONITORING The site preparation and earthwork phases of construction are critical to the successful completion of this project. We recommend that GeoEngineers be retained to provide monitoring and testing services during the site work and foundation installation to assess when the preloading or surcharging has been successfully completed, and to determine if the work is completed in general accordance with the intent of our recommendations. These services should include monitoring of the site preparation and proofrolling to advise on any remedial work that may be needed to repair areas of subgrade, observation and testing during filling, review of settlement marker data (the surveying would be done by others) to advise when the majority of the settlement has occurred, observations during footing subgrade preparation, and final subgrade preparation for floor slab and pavement areas. LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for use by MBK Northwest and other members of the project team for use in the design of a portion of this project. The report is not intended for use by others and the information contained herein is not applicable to other sites. The data and report should be provided to prospective contractors for estimating purposes, but our report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. Portions of the site redevelopment was in the preliminary design stages at the time of this writing. When the design has been finalized, we recommend that our firm be retained to review the final design and specifications to see that our recommendations have been interpreted and implemented as intended. G e oE n g i n e e r s 13 File No. 1284-028 -01- 1130/022398 Our scope does not include services related to construction safety precautions and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. There are probable variations in subsurface conditions between the explorations and variations which are also possible over time. A contingency for unanticipated conditions should be included in the budget and schedule. Sufficient monitoring, testing and consultation should be provided by our firm during construction to confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations, to provide recommendations for design changes should the conditions revealed during the work differ from those anticipated, and to evaluate whether or not earthwork and foundation installation activities comply with the contract plans and specifications. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with generally- accepted geotechnical practices in this area at the time the report was prepared. No warranty or other conditions, express or implied, should be understood. DCO:JKT:wd Doc. ID: P:\FINA1S\ 1284028.8 O e o E n g i n e e r s 4 Respectfully submitted, GeoEngineers, Inc. o2ca C. Debra C. Overbay, P.E. Senior Engineer Jack K. Tuttle, P.E. Principal 14 File No. 1284028-01 - 1130/022398 imam l S 184TH 5 184TH< !�E �® " 34 ion, 5 laSix ST GM ST 4 4 F t PARK 187TH m A ST " RIDE ■ ,GREEN 36 GREEMIELT rn al 0 5 0 0 0 0 Geo O Engineers 2000 4000 SCALE IN FEET VICINITY MAP FIGURE 1 S 1 T ST 190TH ST S 196TH ST ItnIs 1 Reproduced with permission granted by THOMAS BROS. MAPS. This map is copyrighted by THOMAS BROS. MAPS. It is unlawful to copy or reproduce all or any part thereof, whether for personal use or resale, without permission. •,,, L DRUG EMPORIUM .•r rRiiiiriiinifITTTTTITTTTTI 1 1 ��llllll 111111111111111111 SURPLUS LAND ETHAN ALLEN TONY ROMA 1111111111111111111111111111 SITE PLAN (EXISTING PARKWAY PLAZA) iui 1111 SPORTMART 207,120 SF oc kkkkkk k REFERENCE: Drawing provided by MBK Northwest 111111II1IIIi11111111111 ii TH 0 200 SCALE IN FE G j Engineer, (...............- " SITE PLAN XISTING PARKWAY PLAZA) SPORTMART 207,120 SF ROSS :FERENCE: Drawing provided by MBK Northwest 1111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111 0 200 SCALE IN FEET Geo Engineers THE BON 400 !EXISTING SITS PLAN FIGURE 2 Dry Emporlme KM SP. AREA 'A' — LABTEMEGEMMIS GEI -2 Y TENANT 0 C= C v — T ^� • E fm 140 QIOT A PANT) III 14800 SP. COMP 176-3;il,GEI'13 ,.1 CJ7 ismatiffr 41.020 -+ 72 -2� - !� GART s orts : Ti 63 -1 SEE BHEET A3 1. S EE HEET S A4 �, r PO II Tt•A AREA • TENANT F l ie c+ C=1 - 1....111J1111111111111:!1: C)=2 o • II —+ = -8,=:-. ==f=",--., = _ �.. GEO jC 0 ckm = r WEB 40.030 SP. 72 -1 ! i eriNIS C REFERENCE: Drawing 'Al' by Benner Stange Associates Architects dated 11/20/97 E NAT SP. II '1111 11 ti Ii1111111I11 1111 l tit Iiltl lilt I! Q .0 • •:6i0 r !t.n;lltllllr PEMART a. COSP PLUS cattOe . ya.r •..r 12200 SP. 72 -6 9 ti �! t 1 I ff � .j,, L. j( I i t ! II "( f ilt I i :111 I t t I td 11i i�l1 .1 ( !t I.�iiIi MINIS .P. ' f .1•• !ASTMS OCT A PMT) suer SEE SHE A4 APEA LEVI TZ MO NMI . j, SEE SHEE P011 T1A AI j , GEI -5 I - A GEI-6 KRAUSE'S I Sofo roctory i THE HEN " 1"*". 63-3 EXPLAN 4- GO 72- 76- 63— GeokOEngines ' it 1 I1i11i 1 1 11 111 1 111 I 1 1 I 111111 1,1 1. = Ill !I Llii I��,f I1I !� !I II��.�I,jI ! f `� QLI ��I f ,1 liioi11!I 1 'Ult 1 111.! , iil I flljUi.1 .i:1o1.1i 1� cts dated 11/20/97 PETrMAFir E ROAM sr. SEE LEV[TZ E Er AS . wn nip J, GEI -5 .. .., 1 = EXPLANATION: - GEI -5 -4} 72 -1 76 -2 63 -1 AREA 'B' GEI :..::s:ssss:�.'.•rLj • o o ca o :� - =1::: o - o e e -_ '-_ B -1 hi • AREA 'C' i • • AREA 'B1' mow 0 200 SCALE IN FEET 400 BORING COMPLETED BY GEOENGINEERS - SEPTEMBER 1997 BORING COMPLETED BY DAMES AND MOORE 1963 TO 1976 PROPOSID R *DIIIIVILOPNINT PLAN FIGURE 3 i Measurement Rod, 1/2 -inch- diameter Pipe or Rebar Existing Ground Surface Sand Pad, if Necessary Casing, 2- inch - diameter Pipe (set on plate, not fastened) Coupling Welded to Plate Settlement Plate, 16" x 16" x 1/4" NOTES: 1. Install settlement plates on firm ground or on sand pads if needed for stability. Take initial reading on top of rod and at adjacent ground level prior to placement of any fill. 2. For ease in handling, rod and casing are usually installed in 5 -foot sections. As fill progresses, couplings are used to install additional lengths. Continuity is maintained by reading the top of the measurement rod, then immediately adding the new section and reading the top of the added rod. Both readings are recorded. 3. Record the elevation of the top of the measurement rod at the recommended time intervals. Record the elevation of the adjacent fill surface every time a measurement is taken. 4. Record the elevation of the top of the measurement rod to the nearest 0.01 foot, or 0.005 foot if possible. Record the fill elevation to the nearest 0.1 foot. 5. The elevations should be referenced to a temporary benchmark located on stable ground at least 100 feet from the area being filled. Geo O Engineers SETTLEMENT PLATE DETAIL FIGURE 4 - r L APPENDIX A SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS AND LABORATORY TESTING SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS Subsurface conditions at the project site were explored by drilling eleven borings at the approximate locations shown in Figure 3. The explorations were located in the field by pacing from existing site features. The borings were drilled between August 29, 1997 and September 5, 1997 using hollow - stem auger drilling equipment. Because much of the development is currently occupied with retail tenants, the borings were drilled during restricted work hours between 8pm and loam. Soil samples were obtained from the borings using a 3- inch - outside - diameter split - barrel sampler driven into the soil with a 300 -pound hammer free - falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler the last 12 inches, or other indicated distance, is recorded on the boring logs. The borings were continuously monitored by a representative from our firm who examined and classified the soils encountered, obtained representative soil samples, observed ground water conditions, and prepared a detailed log of each exploration. Soils were visually classified in general accordance with ASTM D- 2488 -90, which is described in Figure A -1. An explanation of the_boring log symbols is presented in Figure A -2. The logs of the borings are presented in Figures A -3 through A -13. The logs are based on our interpretation of the field and laboratory data and indicate the various types of soils encountered. They also indicate the depths at which these soils or their characteristics change, although the change might actually be gradual. If the change occurred between samples in the borings, it was interpreted. LABORATORY TESTING All soil samples were brought to our laboratory for further examination. Selected samples were tested to determine moisture content, dry density, and grain size characteristics. The results of the moisture content and dry density tests are presented on the boring logs. Two one - dimensional consolidation tests were performed on selected samples from the borings to measure the dimensional and time -rate compressibility characteristics of representative fine- grained soil samples. The consolidation test results are presented in Figures A -14 and A -15. FIELD SCREENING OF SOIL SAMPLES A GeoEngineers representative conducted field screening on soil samples obtained from the subsurface explorations located around the Pavilion building (borings GEI -5, GEI-6, GEI -9, and GEI -10). Field screening results are used as a general guideline to delineate areas of G e o E n g i n e e r A -1 File No. 1284- 028-01 - 1130/022398 possible hydrocarbon contamination in soils. In addition, screening results are used to aid in the selection of soil samples for chemical analysis. The field screening methods used include (1) visual examination, (2) sheen screening, and (3) headspace vapor screening using a Bacharach TLV Sniffer calibrated to hexane. Visual screening consists of inspecting the soil for stains indicative of hydrocarbon contamination. Sheen screening and headspace vapor screening are more sensitive screening methods that have been effective in detecting hydrocarbon contamination at concentrations less than regulatory cleanup guidelines. Sheen screening involves placing soil in a pan of water and observing the water surface for signs of sheen. Sheens classifications are as follow: No visible sheen on water surface. Light, colorless, dull sheen; spread is irregular, not rapid; sheen dissipates rapidly. Light to heavy sheen; may have some color /iridescence; spread is irregular to flowing, may be rapid; few remaining areas of no sheen on water surface. Heavy sheen with color /iridescence; spread is rapid; entire water surface may be covered with sheen. Headspace vapor screening involves placing a soil sample in a plastic sample bag. Air is captured in the bag and the bag is shaken to expose the soil to the air trapped in the bag. The probe of a Bacharach TLV Sniffer is inserted in the bag, and the device measures the concentration of combustible vapors present within the sample bag headspace. The TLV Sniffer measures combustible vapor concentrations in ppm (parts per million). The TLV Sniffer is designed to quantify combustible gas concentrations up to 10,000 ppm. Field screening results are site - specific. The results vary with ambient air temperature, soil type, soil moisture and organic content, and type of contaminant. No Sheen (NS) Slight Sheen (SS) Moderate Sheen (MS) Heavy Sheen (HS) a o o E n g i n e e r s A -2 F ilo No. 1284-028 -01 - 1130/022398 r 1 1 SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP SYMBOL GROUP NAME COARSE GRAINED SOILS More Than 50% Retained on No. 200 Sieve GRAVEL More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction Retained on No. 4 Sieve CLEAN GRAVEL GW WELL- GRADED GRAVEL, FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL GP POORLY GRADED GRAVEL . GRAVEL WITH FINES GM SILTY GRAVEL GC CLAYEY GRAVEL SAND More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction Passes No. 4 Sieve CLEAN SAND SW WELL GRADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SAND SP POORLY- GRADED SAND SAND WITH FINES SM SILTY SAND SC CLAYEY SAND FINE GRAINED SOILS More Than 50% Passes No. 200 Sieve SILT AND CLAY Liquid Limit Less Than 50 INORGANIC ML SILT CL CLAY ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY SILT AND CLAY Liquid Limit 50 or More INORGANIC MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT NOTES: SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS: 1. Field classification is based on visual examination of soil Dry - Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch in general accordance with ASTM D2488 -90. Moist - Damp, but no visible water 2. Soil classification using laboratory tests is based on ASTM D2487 -90. Wet - Visible free water or saturated, usually soil is obtained from below water table 3. Descriptions of soil density or consistency are based on interpretation of blow count data, visual appearance of soils, and /or test data. 1 Geo �� Engineers SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FIGURE A -1 r 1 1 LABORATORY TESTS AL Atterberg Limits CP Compaction CS Consolidation DS Direct shear GS Grain size %F Percent fines HA Hydrometer Analysis SK Permeability SM Moisture Content MD Moisture and density SP Swelling pressure TX Triaxial compression UC Unconfined compression CA Chemical analysis BLOW COUNT /SAMPLE DATA: Blows required to drive a 2.4 -inch I.D. split - barrel sampler 12 inches or other indicated distances using a 300 -pound hammer falling 30 inches. Blows required to drive a 1.5 -inch I.D. (SPT) split - barrel sampler 12 inches or other indicated distances using a 140 -pound hammer falling 30 inches. "P" indicates sampler pushed with weight of hammer or against weight of drill rig. SOIL GRAPH: 22 1 SM Soil Group Symbol (See Note 2) Distinct Contact Between Soil Strata Gradual or Approximate Location of Change Between Soil Strata S7 Water Level Bottom of Boring Location of relatively undisturbed sample 12 ® Location of disturbed sample 170 260 Location of sampling attempt with no recovery 10 0 Location of sample obtained in general accordance with Standard Penetration Test (ASTM D -1586) procedures Location of SPT sampling attempt with no recovery Location of grab sample NOTES: 1. The reader must refer to the discussion in the report text, the Key to Boring Log Symbols and the exploration logs for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions. 2. Soil classification system is summarized in Figure A -1. Geo Engineers KEY TO BORING LOG SYMBOLS FIGURE A -2 Geo Engineers LOG OF BORING FIGURE A -3 0 5 — 10— 15— 25 — 30— 35— 40— Lab Tests TEST DATA Moisture Content (%) MD 16 118 MD 34 87 D ensity Blow Group (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 10 ■ 9 16 5 3 6 ■ 14 ■ 2 0 O ASPHALT GM SM SP SM Note: See Figure A -2 for explanation of symbols BORING GEI -1 DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation (ft.): 2 inches asphalt concrete Brown silty fine gravel with sand (medium dense, moist) (fill) Gray and brown silty fine sand with occasional gravel (loose to medium dense, moist) (fill) Gray fine sandy silt (stiff to medium stiff, wet) Dark gray fine to medium sand (medium dense, wet) Gray silty fine to medium sand with occasional gravel (very loose, wet) 0 —5 — —15 — 20 — 25 — 30 - 35 —40 3 a 45 — 50— 55— W LL z w p 60— 65 — 70 -- 75— 80 — TEST DATA Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 40 3 38 ■ Geo Engineers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c c c Note: See Figure A -2 for explanation of symbols BORING GEI -1 (Continued) Becomes loose DESCRIPTION GP -GM Gray fine to coarse gravel with silt and sand (dense, wet) Boring completed at 54.0 feet on 09/04/97 Ground water encountered at approximately 8 feet during drilling LOG OF BORING FIGURE A -3 —40 —45 — 50 —55 — 60 — 85 — 70 —75 — 80 5— 10— 15— 25— 30— 35— 40 Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Lab Tess (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol SM 66 TEST DATA BORING GEI -2 58 61 36 4 2/18" 8 4 3 2 4 22 Geo Engineers 0 SP -SM/ML Dark gray fine sand with silt interbedded with gray silt (loose, wet) �/ ML Gray and brown silt (soft, wet) SP Dark gray fine to medium sand (very loose, wet) l Note: See Figure A -2 for explanation of symbols ASPHALT GP -GM SM SP Dark gray fine to medium sand (medium dense, wet) 1 DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation (ft.): 2.5 inches asphalt concrete Grayish brown fine gravel with silt and sand (medium dense, moist) (fill) Gray silty fine sand with occasional gravel and wood fragments (dense, moist) (fill) Gray silt with occasional gravel and organic matter (soft, wet) (fill) Gray organic silt (very soft, wet) Gray organic silt (very soft to soft, wet) LOG OF BORING FIGURE A -4 —5 —10 —15 — 20 — 25 — 30 — 35 — 40 Geo Engineers LOG OF BORING FIGURE A -4 45— 50— 55— 60 — 65— 70— 75— 80 — TEST DATA BORING GEI -2 (Continued) Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group 40 — Lab Tests (%) (pct) Count Samples Symbol 15 18 Note: See Figure A -2 for explanation of symbols DESCRIPTION Boring completed at 49.0 feet on 09/05/97 Ground water encountered at approximately 6 feet during drilling — 40 —45 — 50 - 55 — 60 — —70 — 75 -- 80 0—+ 5 — 1 15— uJ _ u. z x - p 20— 25— 30— 35— 40-- TEST DATA Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count 27 95 212 24 37 81 14 57 11 Group Samples Symbol o o. ■ 11 ■ 32 ■ J l Note: See Figure A -2 for explanation of symbols ASPHALT GP -GM ML BORING GEI -3 DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation (ft.): c 1.5 inches asphalt concrete Brown fine gravel with silt and sand (medium dense, moist) (fill) Gray sandy silt with gravel (medium stiff, moist to wet) (fill) Blow count not representative SP Dark gray fine to medium sand (medium dense, wet) Brown and gray.organic silt with wood fragments (very soft, wet) Light gray silt with lenses of silty fine sand and a trace of organic matter (very soft to soft, wet) SM Dark gray silt (medium dense to dense, wet) SP Dark gray fine to medium sand (dense, wet) —0 —5 — 1 0 — 15 — 20 — 25 — 30 —35 — 40 Geo CO Engineers LOG OF BORING FIGURE A -5 : Geo SEngineers LOG OF BORING FIGURE A -5 Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests ( %) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 40— 45 — 50— 55— 60 — 65— 70 — 75— 80 — TEST DATA BORING GEI -3 (Continued) 31 27 .. Note: See Figure A -2 for explanation of symbols DESCRIPTION Boring completed at 49.0 feet on 09/04/99 Ground water encountered at approximately 7 feet during drilling 40 — 45 — 50 —55 — 60 — 65 — 70 -76 — 80 Geo Engineers LOG OF BORING FIGURE A -6 Lab Tests 0 — 5— 10— 15— 20— 25 — 30— 35— 40 — TEST DATA DESCRIPTION Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation (ft.): ( %) (pcf) Count Samples S lmbol MD 18 112 MD 18 112 14 ❑ 0 2/18" ❑ 4 ■ 2/18" El 2 14 ■ Note: See Figure A -2 for explanation of symbols BORING GEI -4 ASPHALT 2 inches asphalt concrete GM Brown silty fine gravel with sand (medium dense, moist) (fill) SM Gray silty fine to medium sand with gravel (medium dense, moist to wet) (fill) 13 ■ ▪ ML Gray sandy silt with gravel (medium stiff, moist to wet) (fill) 9 ■ o. C • o O C .O O C Gray silt with a trace of organic matter (very soft to soft, wet) SM Gray silty fine to medium sand with gravel (very loose, wet) GP -GM Gray fine gravel with silt, sand and a trace of wood fragments (medium dense to dense, wet) 0 — 5 — 10 —15 — 20 — 25 — 30 —35 rat— j —40 Geo SEngineers LOG OF BORING FIGURE A -6 40 45— 50— 55 — W - LL p 60— 65— 70— 75 — 80— TEST DATA Moisture Dry ' Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 31 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'o 0 .0 '0 0 0 c c c c c c Note: See Figure A -2 for explanation of symbols BORING GEI -4 (Continued) DESCRIPTION Boring completed at 47.5 feet on 09/04/97 due to caving soils Ground water encountered at approximately 7 feet during drilling 40 -45 — 50 - 55 — 60 — 65 — 70 —75 80 10— 15— 25— 30— 35 — 40 — TEST DATA BORING GEI -5 Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests ( %) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 29 95 56 63 2/18" 12 12 12 ASPHALT 4 inches asphalt concrete ' o ° o ° GP Brownish gray fine gravel with sand (medium dense, moist) ML (fill) Gray silt with gravel (medium stiff, moist to wet) (fill) / ML Note: See Figure A -2 for explanation of symbols DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation (ft.): ML Gray organic silt (very soft, moist to wet) Gray fine sandy silt (very soft to stiff, wet) SP /SM Gray fine sand with a trace of silt with lenses of silty fine sand (loose to medium dense, wet) SP Dark gray fine to medium sand (medium dense, wet) — 5 —1 —15 — 20 — 25 — 30 — 35 — 40 Geo CO Engineers LOG OF BORING FIGURE A -7 40 45— 50— 55— 60 — 65 — 70— 75- 80— TEST DATA BORING GEI -5 (Continued) Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 24 ■ 13 26 13 Note: See Figure A -2 for explanation of symbols DESCRIPTION Boring completed at 56.5 feet on 08/29/97 Ground water encountered at 9.0 feet during drilling 40 — 45 — 50 —55 —60 • — 65 - 70 —75 — 80 Geo SEngineers LOG OF BORING FIGURE A -7 Geo CO Engineers LOG OF BORING FIGURE A -8 0— Lab Tests 5— 10 15— 20— 25— 30— 35— 40 — TEST DATA Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group ( %) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol MD 10 96 MD 39 80 MD 26 92 MD 33 87 2/18" 5 5 4 ■ 16 ■ 18 ■ , 0; r SM Note: See Figure A -2 for explanation of symbols BORING GEI -6 DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation (ft.): ASPHALT 2 inches asphalt concrete GM Brown and gray fine gravel with sand (medium dense, moist) SM (fill) Gray and brown silty fine sand (loose, moist) (fill) ML /SM Gray organic silt (very soft, wet) SM Gray silty fine sand (loose, wet) ML Gray fine sandy silt (medium stiff, wet) Gray silty fine sand (medium dense, wet) ML /SM Gray silt interbedded with silty fine sand (stiff /medium dense, wet) Boring completed at 39,0 feet on 09/03/97 Ground water encountered at approximately 5 feet during drilling 0 —5 — 10 — 15 — 20 — 25 — 30 — 35 -- 40 0 5 — 10 15 — w - LL p 20— 25— 30— 35— 40 — Lab Tests MD 77 58 MD TEST DATA BORING GEI -7 Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group (%) (pcf) Count Samples S mbol 58 68 5 ■ 3 ■ 2/18" ■ 2 ■ 5 ■ 2 ■ 18 5 ■ 38 ■ 11 o c ASPHALT 3 inches asphalt concrete o GP -GM Brown fine gravel with silt and sand (medium dense, moist) O . c (fill) o / l Note: See Figure A -2 for explanation of symbols Geo ki Engineers DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation (ft.): SM Gray silty fine sand with organic matter (loose, moist) (fill ?) ML Gray organic silt (very soft to medium stiff, moist to wet) Grades with lenses of fine sandy silt SP Black fine to medium sand (medium dense, wet) Gray silt (medium stiff, wet) SP Black fine to medium sand (dense, moist) SM Gray silty fine sand (medium dense, moist) 0 —5 —10 —15 — 20 — 25 — 30 — 35 — 40 LOG OF BORING FIGURE A -9 Geo Engineers LOG OF BORING FIGURE A -9 40 — 45 — 50— 55— 60 — 65 — 70— 75— 80 — TEST DATA Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests (%) Oct) Count Samples Symbol 2 ■ 10 ■ 16 ■ Note: See Figure A -2 for explanation of symbols BORING GEI -7 (Continued) DESCRIPTION ML Dark gray silt (very soft, wet) SM Gray silty fine sand (medium dense, wet) Boring completed at 51.5 feet on 09/02/97 Ground water encountered at approximately 5 feet during drilling 40 —45 — 50 — 55 — 60 - 65 —70 —75 — 80 Geo COEngineers LOG OF BORING FIGURE A -10 0 5— 10— 15— 20— 25— 30— 35— 40— Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol TEST DATA BORING GEI -8 MD, 40 77 CS 42 80 MD 37 83 2 2/18" ■ 2 ■ 2 ■ 4 17 ■ 15 ■ 3 ❑ 0 c 22 ■ 8 ■ Note: See Figure A -2 for explanation of symbols DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation (ft.): ASPHALT 2.5 inches asphalt concrete GP -GM Gray fine gravel with silt and sand (medium dense, moist) (fill) ML /SM Gray silt with sand interbedded with brown and gray silty fine sand (very soft/very loose, moist) ML Brown and gray silt with a trace of organic matter (very soft, moist) SM Grayish brown silty fine sand (very loose, wet) ML Gray silt (soft, wet) Wood (tree stump ?) ML Brown silt (very soft, wet) SP Gray and black fine to medium sand (loose to medium dense, moist) 0 — 5 — 10 —15 — 20 - 25 — 30 — 35 x- 40 Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 40 45 — 50— 55— W u- z - ca 60— 65— 70— 75 -- 80— TEST DATA BORING GEI -8 (Continued) Note: See Figure A -2 for explanation of symbols Geo SEngineers Boring completed at 46.5 feet on 09/02/97 Ground water encountered at approximately 5 feet during drilling LOG OF BORING FIGURE A -10 Geo COEngineers LOG OF BORING FIGURE A -11 10— 15— w - u _ 2 - x p 20— 25— 30— Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests ( %) (pct) Count Samples Symbol CS TEST DATA BORING GEI -9 46 74 38 81 13 18 ASPHALT GP -GM SM ML Gray silt with fine sand (very soft, moist) SP S SP DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation (ft.): 2.5 inches asphalt concrete Gray and brown fine gravel with silt and sand (medium dense, moist) Brownish gray silty fine to medium sand with gravel (loose, moist) (fill) Gray fine sand with a trace of silt (very loose, wet) Gray silt with a trace of fine sand (soft, wet) Gray silty fine sand (very loose, wet) Gray fine sand (medium dense, wet) —5 — 10 —15 20 — 25 30 35— 40-- f Note: See Figure A -2 for explanation of symbols Gray silt (soft, wet) SM Gray silty fine sand (medium dense, wet) — 35 '— 40 Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 40— 45— 50— 55— H w w w Z_ uJ p 60— 65— 70— 75— 80— TEST DATA BORING GEI -9 (Continued) 17 ■ Note: See Figure A -2 for explanation of symbols Geo Engineers DESCRIPTION Boring completed at 41.5 feet on 08/29/97 Ground water encountered at 9.0 feet during drilling 40 — 45 — 50 — 55 — .60 — 65 — 70 — 75 '- 80 LOG OF BORING FIGURE A -11 Geo Engineers LOG OF BORING FIGURE A -12 10— 15— 20 — 25 — 30— 35— 40 — TEST DATA Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 29 92 36 85 11 11 11 21 0 I t C Note: See Figure A -2 for explanation of symbols BORING GEI -10 ASPHALT GP -GM SP -SM ML DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation (ft.): 3 inches asphalt concrete Brown and gray fine gravel with silt and sand Brown sand with silt and gravel (medium dense, moist) (fill) Gray silt (medium stiff, moist) SM Gray silty fine sand (loose to medium dense, wet) SP Gray fine to medium sand (medium dense, wet) — 5 — 10 —15 — 20 — 25 — 30 — 35 — 40 r 3 i 3 J 3 40 45 — 55— TEST DATA BORING GEI -10 (Continued) Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests (%) (pct) Count Samples Symbol 20 ■ Geo N Engineers DESCRIPTION Boring completed at 41.5 feet on 08/29/97 Ground water encountered at 8.5 feet during drilling — 40 — 45 50— —50 —55 — 60 65— —65 70— —70 75— —75 80— —80 Note: See Figure A -2 for explanation of symbols LOG OF BORING FIGURE A -12 Geo Engineers LOG OF BORING FIGURE A -13 5— 10— 25 — 30— 35— 40 — TEST DATA Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples S mbol 37 82 38 84 40 79 24 ■ o c ASPHALT 3 inches asphalt concrete o GP -GM Brown and gray fine gravel with silt and sand (medium dense, o • c moist) (fill) 0 O '"' SP SM 1 l Note: See Figure A -2 for explanation of symbols BORING GEI -11 DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation (ft.): Black fine sand (loose, moist) Gray silt (very soft, moist to wet) Gray silty fine sand (very loose, wet) Gray silt (medium stiff, wet) SP -SM Gray silty fine to coarse sand with gravel (loose, wet) SP Gray fine to medium sand (medium dense, wet) Gray silt (very soft, wet) — 5 — 10 —15 — 20 — 25 — 30 —35 — 40 Geo Engineers LOG OF BORING FIGURE A -13 45 — 50— 55— 60— 65 — 70— 75— 80 — TEST DATA Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group 40 — Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 33 Note: See Figure A -2 for explanation of symbols BORING GEI -11 (Continued) DESCRIPTION SP -SM Dark gray fine to medium sand with silt (loose, wet) SP Gray fine to medium sand with occasional gravel (dense, wet) Boring completed at 46.5 feet on 09/02/97 Ground water encountered at approximately 5 feet during drilling 40 — 45 -50 —55 — 60 — 65 — 70 —76 — 80 KEY BORING NUMBER SAMPLE DEPTH (FEET) SOIL CLASSIFICATION INITIAL MOISTURE CONTENT INITIAL DRY DENSITY (LBS /FT • GEI -8 5.5 Brown and gray silt with a trace of organic matter (ML) 39.5 76.6 w J 0 0) z 0 a a) rn 8 0 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 U J 0 . 06 O 0.07 u 9 0.08 U 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 PRESSURE (Ibs/ft 10 10 20 50 Geo O Engineers CONSOLIDATION TEST, RESULTS FIGURE A -14 1284-028-01-1130 DCO:JKT:cms KEY BORING NUMBER SAMPLE DEPTH (FEET) SOIL CLASSIFICATION INITIAL MOISTURE CONTENT INITIAL DRY DENSITY (LBS /FT • GEI -9 5.5 Gray silt with fine sand 46.4 74.0 rt a _I 0 z 0 a n rn 0 0 _ N C 0 0 0 0 M N co N 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 N w U J O 0.06 O 0.07 0 0.08 z 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 PRESSURE (Ibs /ft 10 10 20 50 Geo O Engineers CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE A -15 8 -27 -1998 11:53AM FROM e TDA 7148633160 To: - - - =., -ept of Public Health Date: 8/27/98 Job No: 98495.1 Phone: 206- 296 -9741 Fax No: 206- 296 -4919 Attention: Mike Bratche Re: Claim Jum96r Tukwila Pub. Hearing Pages: 2 (Including Cover Sheet) RI ED Message: Mike...a ached find a Partial Floor Plan suggesting STDA's response solution to your r uest for one additional water closet and lavatory within each of the public Restro ms. Kindly examine the information provided, and contact me to discuss acceptability, next s eps, etc. On behalf of Claim Jumper Restaurants, thanks for your assist nce with this matter. Sy: Jerry Dennehy Copies to: Doug Parsen, File NOTE: IF YO DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASE CALL (714) 8634980 rchitects, 18201 McDunnott West, Suite A, Irvine, CA 92614 4) 883 -1960 P. 1 8 -27 -1998 11:54AM FROM TPA Sehcu lmaka Dennehy At t.cts 1no, 162011IcDvsob 1<e,SuitcA tine, CA 82611 (714)863-1%0W714)643-3160 7148633160 •\ - nu 4 PVrr) CLAIM JUMPER RESTAURANT i PARKWAY SUPCRCCNTCR SCC. 33, TOWNSNIP 23 WORTH RANI 4 CAST, W.M. TUKWILA. WASHINCTON P. 2 Doty F 0,; - i 7 -11 -1998 10:07AM FROM "AND "ASSOCIATES 7143679667 27071 Cabot Road, Suite 118 Laguna Hills, CA 92653 Phone: (949) 357-3090 Fax (949) 367 -9667 To:EASTGATE IINVIRON. HEALTH AU= MIKE 'KATCHER Pages: 5 Pep: 206 266 4619 MRD & Associates, Inc. From, Michael Draguesku Ditto: July 11, 1998 Ila: CLAIM JUMPER, TUKWILA, WA CC: STDA, JERRY DEHNINY ® Urger! ❑ For ReWew 0 Pismo Commont 0 Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle Pursuant to our phone conversation Friday, July 10 1998 we are enclosing the following revisions per your request: 1. Bar area, add hand sink at underbar area. Clarify dump sink to right of glass washer. . 2. Cooldine in main kitchen area, add hand sink to cookline side, to right of cooks equipment stand. 3. Restrooms issues will be addressed by Scheer Tanaka Dennehy Architects. They are the project Architects. Please advise if you require anything further from MRD & Associates, Inc. regarding food service equipment issues. Per our conversation faxed oorrections will be sufficient. P. 417 Or Q - W n N 11 !.1 CD MA II CD, 11117n "Mr... dam- aim le a MEM • A Iffilt MEE — 1=1 • s teatviamiumagliunimai nr:Itos 11111111111111MIIIIIVA111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111iMBEF, 12 3'-3' l'-9• 7-11-1998 10 : OSAM FT' ' MRD " AND " ASSOC I A TES 71413379661 P . 3 ad ilelba,141 WO UV 10/4 An* PV Ai, 0 el 0 • lhaL 0 cs o 1. 5� Aor LIAIf-f �uHr¢e e Tur�np,ud. PNIOW) ilw'ga raG x• 0 3 7 -11 -1998 10:09AM FROM 7 "AND ^ASSOCIATES 7143679667 ! +40 R.O. WATER OUTLET A P. 5 8I1tr, 1141111,14- � 1-104111 RSV, 7/0 jqg A vellt, rye ihrt Cal 'r am ; 1.„ irt i -1 till tw Ce Del C) iai !l! a: M2 F.O.4 SCHEER TANAKA DENNEHY RILEY ARCHITECTS 18201 McDURMOTT WEST, SUITE A IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614 PHONE (949) 863 -1960 FAX (949) 863 -3160 ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN Fax Cover Sheet To: City of Tukwila - Dept. of Community Developm Date: 12/16/98 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite #100 Job No: 98230 Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: 206/431 -3670 Attention: Ken Nelsen - Plans Examiner Fax No: 206/431 -3665 Re: Claim Jumper- Arizona Mills Pages: 17 (Including Cover Sheet) RM E LJ Message: Ken...per our conversation yesterday, please find attached Washington State Energy Code. Including a Puet Sound Engergy "New Customer Construction" Application for Commercial Project, and 1994 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Form. Please call if you have any questions. Thank you. By: Jerry Dennehy /fmv Copies to: File. NOTE: IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASE CALL (949) 863 -1960 RECEIVED cm? OF TUKWILA ;O E D i 1998 PERMIT CENTER l "d 09 l 8E98V l L VC1S NIMU 111471 8661791-Z1 �GY I 01.11E11 oject Name :vice Address N "lief dress .ntrVDev. :dress .ctriCian arms Plumber .cress ;hitt = Site Coordinator at Sq. Fc. 0 11.4271. ! ,e of Building and Use: ondary Conductor Size: .strucrion Start Date: •iing mg ators (see detail below) :r :Motors (see detail below) Houine :.ilmcow: .ing Land Can LOW -:tai Demand Electrical Panel 1:Nato', Number :then 1` aA SSURE REQUIRED gas be used for dry out? PUGET SOUND ENERGY '('4 171% .O l•I bt Received Oct -02-9e a6 5llam ;1U s - no 0.004M ; ry r. # of Tenant Spaces: /10e5 V: Neuaal Size: ELECTRICAL LOAD IN KW? 1 PHASE e 7737P :Fk Frem -206 :656819 State Zip ?hone Phone • ) — City —. I 12. _j_ lie _ _ - State CA- Zip 2 2 1,4,. Phone ( ) Fax (► ) City State ; Zip ` Phone ( ) Fax ( ) State ' Zip Phone ( ) Pax ( ) Slate Zip Phone ( ) City Phone ( ) Tenant 2.. .1. 4. 5. 6. 7. Phase l :sting Hours: 11 .41-4 ~ • 11 PM ; _ Days per week: Indicate 1 or 3 Phase and NEMA Code if over 7 14 .HP 9. 10. l I. ruuct run= — New Cus.:...aer onstr1ictilon Application for Commercial Project 2282%.63 Avenue So., Si�ita 102, Kent, A 98032 Project Manager • Phone Number. LIST GAS METERS rt TENANT SIZE (TOTAL CFRm Type Customer 1 It of Floors: t/ sq. ft. Pcr k Wire -- Number of Ryes: HP • 6 HP Phase 14EMA Code INCHES WATER COLUMN POUNDS PRLE551J1 Phase I4EMA Code Q Yes O No Has yjovr plumper con oelivery pressarc7 0 Yes 0 No 1 affirm that the above information Is correct toithc best of my knowledge. I understand that any chzng(;s 1 make in l avc information or attached drawings may increase the time required for Puget Sound Eziergy to provide service to my proj .c I might be liable for additional engineering and ccultructiun costs. DATE / 1'i• 1,1411 d ; J Tenant 2; 4; 5; 7 • 8. 9. 10. To -41 KARJALA ASSOC, Page 03 11.151- j,.ECYRIC1114E7US av TEN MT SP .. Type Customer le : t, and 09 t ETr98V L L dais WOLid Writ'? 866 L —9 L —Z l Project mIlfO ProjeaAd4tess CLa /al /t.Hlp RWr�up pate f . 5- 9e • pA•,¢le_LJ4 c/ A c.tia 77 yw 6 go_ of oTitc 4.7-* peziciti sp.L . For Scalding Oeoartrnent use flSTAu I.BAR Applicant Name: ,DD[1 el pAK.`J E. 1 Applicant Adorers: ee 2 1 L.L.I k- b1 ✓l elf . A Applicant Phone: 714 - 900/ locum (floor/room no.) Occupancy oes=io'tfon glowed Watts per rt — Area in ft Allowed x Area flSTAu I.BAR 1 0 - ' , 7 449 app -:: - - ■ ;, 5 1 EXF�►'!o 1, -. -?. Coo 1 1 l I i I I t /IV Gfwc. Dcw&11 -/6i/ r r' A " ! i • 1 1441.9 •' From Table IS-1 (evert - don rfr..; - srPOr ,s tacen (rem 1oerrieras Dowd Allowed watts Location { ;(floor /room no,) I Fitjre Oeacnotion Area in ft (or 11 for perirneter) ` i Numcer of Pictures 1 Watts/ t reduce War Proposed I =rt /rev � =1..C.^.,2A T /Vc P£NDA •'0G'' I -?. Coo 1 1 l ;t t /IV Gfwc. Dcw&11 -/6i/ r r' A " ! i • Gov [ f 780 I 1 ' 1u 04 ' 5ro15 if ; " 1 1 EX t i. I 'WA171W6 ! '3 S. , p r poi5 •i a " _.+ - I 1 .. -8o 1,,1 V'lwwicmi4iI COr "fpAC- ...0 C AL OWAIL: ' . ' ^ .. 0 9)&//06 112 i PECoj : Palomar " P6i• 1 3 1 - - c 1 i&C; t ! 1 CZIE. pE:A1c * r " 01 " I 2 I 1 DG 1 200 '' I l 7 ECo RAT /Va. p€jw .rr " 02" 1 3 { 40 ( ( 2•p Total Propo .e0 Watts may not exceed Total Allowed Watts for interior Total Proposed Watts( '2480 Location 1 Desenoticn Allowed Warts per ft a per ff Area in ft (or 11 for perirneter) Allowed Watts x re (or z )1) ;Covered Panong I 02 W/R [Coen Penang ICutdoor Area 1 0.2 wife. • t Bldg. (by ( acaoe) • 0.Z WIR= - �� I Bldg. (by perm) bW 011r,• r r Nate: for bti extenor. Choose either the facade area or the oenmeter tnemed but not bath) ~ 5 Total Allowed Watts! (E Nurser' of Watts/ Watts ca Lotion y Fixture Description Fixtures Fixture proPopropose d ' 4A n 1 DM EC tv -ore - - •Ant ii 1 "D 9 (2 , ti 1 'nt:LAT h ea vii i '1. ,, u a in - n Project Description 1994. Wash ir tat Lighting Summary Compliance Option Maximum Allowed Lizh 6 'd ate Nonresidential Enerav Coc ew Building 0 Ad itlicrt Maximum Allowed Lighting Wattage (Interior) Q Alteration mofiarice Form ?A ( Q Prescriptive Ugntng Power Allowance ' • (See Qualification CtteciCtst (over). indicate Presar�ieelve & LPA spaces dearly on plans.) Alteration Exceptions 1 dm, Q No ges are being made tope fighting • c (onec approortate box) Q Less than 60 `,6 or the fortes are new, and instated tigntirg wattage (s not ibeirtg increased Prop osed Lizhtint? Wattage ( Interior) (May not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Interior) Wattage (Exterior Proposed Lizhtin� Wattage xterior (M y n« exceed Total Allowed Watts for Exterior) 09 l ££98V 1 L VOlS Wald 1051:8 866L-9L- Project Description 1994. Wash ir tat Lighting Summary Compliance Option Maximum Allowed Lizh 6 'd ate Nonresidential Enerav Coc ew Building 0 Ad itlicrt Maximum Allowed Lighting Wattage (Interior) Q Alteration mofiarice Form ?A ( Q Prescriptive Ugntng Power Allowance ' • (See Qualification CtteciCtst (over). indicate Presar�ieelve & LPA spaces dearly on plans.) Alteration Exceptions 1 dm, Q No ges are being made tope fighting • c (onec approortate box) Q Less than 60 `,6 or the fortes are new, and instated tigntirg wattage (s not ibeirtg increased Prop osed Lizhtint? Wattage ( Interior) (May not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Interior) Wattage (Exterior Proposed Lizhtin� Wattage xterior (M y n« exceed Total Allowed Watts for Exterior) 09 l ££98V 1 L VOlS Wald 1051:8 866L-9L- Project Info Pro)eCiAd4resr' CL JU /APE/2 RE5rA UPAArr Cate t _ rt increased Number of W or Building Department Use Watts/ W Watts Applicane Name_ : 7 Applicant morons: • ;. Applicant Phone: " I Alteration Exceptions (check appropriate t cx) . Cl No changes are t em Trade to the lighting. _ • Paiute Oescrit tian F CI Less than 60 % of the foaures are new. anti InsraNed lighting wattage is net be increased Location N Paiute Oescrit tian F Number of W Watts/ W Watts ' juN/,ie : : 7 7 -S- w: p ovo " " o=•• 1 1 6 " I tf 1 1 • - Acr Qs..'LA/ , - CTS . .. 5y I I 0 1 _004;6 goon1 ! 9Ecotm•T(v6 alGRitr . .4%4' 2 2 • • & 20 • 1 i i xC.012.1q l yE .'£4VO • 1 1, pg ' - - 1 1 2 /0c 1994• Washinott :ate Nonresidential E erav Codt Lighting Sumrnary Project Description Q New Building Q Aele ion 0 Alteration Compliance Option Q Prescriptive Ugntinq Power Allowance • (See Qualification Cl1erxiist (over). Indicate Prescriptive & LPA spaces any on owes.) Maximum Allowed Lighting Wattage (Interior) Location I (rloa /rtaom no.) occupancy Oesrsiptfon Frcm Table 15-1 (over) - doa,menrateviceptions taken from footnotes Mowed watts ter ft" Area at fe I Total Allowed Watts Allowed x Area Proposed Lighting Wattage (Interior) (May not exceed Total Allowed Wads for Interior) Maximum Allowed Lighting Wattage (Exterior) Location Correa Panang Ooen P anang !Cutdooe Areas 1 Bldg. (by facade) 8idg• (by oenm) Location N ER a- $ • rr pLtjaf. i11 V 'd Deschotion Frxture Description 04 w frinA/ s'JS / Ina r'1 nwry r If (1 Allowed Watts per cel or per If 02 wnt 0.2 wit" • 0.2 WITi 0.25 W/rr 7.s wnf Proposed Lighting Wattage (Exterior) (May hat exceed Total Allowed Watts Tor Extenor) I 5 I Number of Fodureo 1 091EE98V1L va1S WObd moiiance Form Area in t! (or tt for perimeter) Ncte: for touting extenor, choose either the facade area or the penmeter method. but not both) Total Allotted Watts Watts/ Future Pitis 2 Allowed Watts r 11 (cr x f) wan P l omsed Wd909 8661 -91 —ZL Alteration Exceptions (o2seclt appropriate box) CI No changes ve being made to I* lightirx3. • C:1 Less than 60 % of cie tbatrea are new, and insestled lighting wattage is not being increased [Project Info A Project Addresz / - C 1 - 1 ' fi •11 EWER REBTA • Dale • / . . For Building Department Use ----' War= Proposed Applicant Name: Aopiicant Address: Applicant Phone: 2. G Project Description CI New Building 1 7.1 Addition CI Marion ;Location l(fIcotwoom no.) Fbaure Oescnotion Numoer of Ficures . . _ Watts/ I roaure j War= Proposed 1 0/Milth 1 EaRA NE. - EXIO AAP 0 0 " / 1 2. G 21 v 8 IA 1 a i 1 a. WAtt iv 4.94a. t1Al 1 co 150 It A'gr/P4CT of5‘ 5 "no Z 1 EXEMyr I 40 5, 13/412. 1 DEGaVri/VE eff.--k..icsAir ..,95.- , . IL-, I 76 A PE .1' " T 5CW- "03" 4 25- I 100 14 PVC/Kip: LOW AIL/ CoHT "Al" . 1 1 - . 0 *:.. 1( 141271r-09cl" 1,75P L/ 67 "e'' 12- Eke? rv71- P 22A 1 GO/4A/ Li 6 H 7- cf A3Jr 11 1 6 a Total Proposed Warts may not exceed Total Alla...ea Watts for Interior Total Proposed Watts • . . . . . _ _ . . .. Covered Panono o o..2 wife 1 1 Ooen Panting : :. 0 0.2 WIft 1 1 Outdoor Are= 0 . 0.2 win.' 'Bldg. (by facaoe) • • 0 0,Z Wife . .. 81 : 1 9. f by perm) 7 7.5 WM Lighting Summary Compliance Option CI Prescriptive CI Ugnting Power Allowance • • (See cattalificatcn ChedaLst (oyer). Indicate PtesciptiNe & LPA somas drafty on plans.) Maximum Allowed Lighting Wattage (Interior) Location (floor/mom no.) Occupancy Description Allowed Watts w - Area in te Allowed x Area Proposed Lighting Wattage (Interior) (may= exceed Total Atlayeect Wafts to Interior) Maximum Allowed Li htiziz Watta e Exterior Norte: for building exienix, choose timer tfle lacade area or me oenrneter method. but not Pain) Proposed Lighting Wattage (Exterior) (May not exceed Total Awed Watts or &tenor) Lo=tion cow iI S 'd 1994:W6sninat tate Nonresidential Enero Cod ( snoliaike From Tale 15.1 (over) • oce.anitnt aiLf toeptions taken from toometes Total Allowed Watts in Era- 1RL.ij Ltio Fr, - geoPATIVP f ixture Description 1.0 4 N umoer of Fixtures e9LE98VU. VaLS 1^10?:Id PA E" 3 Total Allowed Watts Warm/ Fixture 5 I Watts Pieboaed 1^1V91 866L-9L—Zt Alteration Exceptions (click appropriate box) Cl No changes are being mode tote* timing. _ CI Lass than 60 % of the bares are new, and irstaSed lighting wattage is not tieing increased Pro(ea Address C 011 kkimp57 fiE57At1RA ' Dale /c7- 6_4? v Area in ft Allowed z Area For Building Department Use . • • watts/ Fount Applicant Narne: E P/ZZ Applicant Address: ,: Applicant Phtme: l • 1 Locators (flax /room no.) Occupancy Oeseritxfon Allowed Watts per ft"" Area in ft Allowed z Area Covered Panong 0 watts/ Fount 1 watts Proposed Proposed E P/ZZ 1 L 5 ?�+ SPOTS �r r:3' • 1 i 5A 6 U 1._ I Dl`fli41 PG74 '' B" tc 1 f?E �<<% Try ?�( lotr •' Dom" ► 1 I 40 ea 1L=non 1(0odr /room no.) I 1 Fixture Description Area n R A I Number of F'ptures Covered Panong 0 watts/ Fount 1 watts Proposed Proposed E P/ZZ 1 L 5 ?�+ SPOTS �r r:3' f 3 / o 1 �F Pj I 0 I Via. 47PT 1 0 5A 6 U 1._ I Dl`fli41 PG74 '' B" tc 1 f?E �<<% Try ?�( lotr •' Dom" ► 2 40 ea !1 1 /Alc.0 ?.'cam - TM - c -- '0 I . OG •cc V A/ 6E ! EGoR. 1/G Prow ' .' 06" 1 .DI.G ,1 1 GE4oRArriV. PE 04/./r "QZ I I 4o Location O Oescnocon p Allowed Watts A Area n R A Allowed Watts Covered Panong 0 0.2 W/tt Open Parking 0 0.2 w • Lighting Summary. Project Info Project Description Q New Building CI Adoi4ort Cl Alteration Compliance Option 1994• Washino' Mate Nonresidential Enerav Coc 1 omoliance Form Maximum Allowed Lighting Wattage (Interior) • =ram i able t S•1 (a•er) • 0o mafg tt. xc.epnats 1 1.en from footnotes Total Aio 'ed Watts Proposed Lighting Wattage (Interior) (may not e:reed Total Allowed Watts for Interior) I ! DErrogATV_ f'EUGwir ''95" /1 i DscuitjL /C3r -f i ',Ai' Total Proposed Watts may not exceed Tctai Aila ed Watts for Intenor Maximum Allowed Ligh tin gWattage (Exterior Pro • osed Li • kiting Watta Location 9'd C] Presaiptive C1 Lighting Power Allowance • . ; (See Qualification Cheddist (aver. Indicate Prescriptive & LPA spaces drafty on ptans,) (Exterior) (May not exceed Tow Allowed Watts for Exterior) Number of Fodures Fixture description 1 1.5 !�G Watts/ Fixture 7 Total Proposed Watts ( 16 wa, �--� I P ��� I 09LEE98VtL Vd1S W02id WVLI'8 866L -9L -Z1 Proj Address G � JU� p�� Dc r-i, / d r' W/'T ^� Area st ft Date / O — f 7 "" • Watts! Fixture • - 6O Watts Proposed a ace, 5. ar eui+alr,9 oepatem ---._• - PEG " ' l I Appticant Name: Applicant A4dr �' 1 App P I Location (floor/room no.) occupancy Description Allowed Watts per re ~ Area st ft Allowed x Area Number of Fi Bares 1.. 1 Watts! Fixture • - 6O Watts Proposed a ace, d - - PEG " ' l I I I I . •• From TaDfe 15-I (over) - document err ex-caDttom taxen from footnotes Total Allowed Watts! Location (floor /room no.) Fixture Descrotion IP! - -t P INS 54e4"/CZ ilk„ rrr c, Number of Fi Bares 1.. 1 Watts! Fixture • - 6O Watts Proposed a ace, d - - PEG " ' l I L i , . I I _ I t I L i • Project Info Project Description Compliance Option Alteration Exceptions 0. No changes are acing trade to the Iigftting • _ (check approonate box) Q Less than 60 'b of the fixtures are new, and installed li i watts is not Kl�g 9e being increased Maximum Allowed Lighting Wattage (Interior) Proposed Lighting Wattage (Interior) (May not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Interior) Total Proposed Watts may not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Irttenor Maximum Allowed Li- tin Watta e (Exterior) Location Covered P3rlong Oven Panting CutCoor Are33 Bldg. (by facade) Bldg. (by term) 0.: W/re 0.25w 7.5 Wnf mote: (or twdding extent, cr•oo•..e either the facade area or me perimeter method. but not Dash) Proposed Lightin& Wattage (Exterior) Location L.' d 1994: Wsh inot. sate Nonresidential Enercl Form ❑ New euid4ing Q Melton Q Prescipttve 0 Lighting Power Allowance (see Qualification Cttecldist (over). Indicate Prescriptive & IPA spaces Grady en plans,) Oescrlotion Fodure Description 0 Alteration Allowed Wass per a cc per ti 02 w,frt 0 WRtt • (May not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Exterior) Number of Futures 09 l S898D l L b'alS Wt7aW • 1 Total Proposra Watts Area in ft (or If for penrrteter) Total Allowed Watts Wally Fixture PaG Allowed Watts x f 2 (Or x if) WattS Prvponed r i r1 Wb'L L t 8 8661, —9L — L Envelope Requirements .(enter values as applicable) _ O Electric resistance X Art other ' (see over for definitions) Fully heated/cooled space Minimum "' insulation A.values Roofs Over Attic Q Cher here if using this option and it project meats all requirements for me C Concreterboasonry Option. 5« Decision Flowchart (over) for quatirnuens. Enter requirements for each qua1Nying sesame/yin ttw able below. 12-- v All Other Roofs R- 2 t Opaque woos I'7-- 1 1 Below Grade Walls N / Floors Over Unconditioned Space vaes-0r1- Grade 10 Radiant Floors 1.11A Maximum U- /actors Opaque Coors e Vertical Glazing - Overhead Glazing L.40 SHGC (ar Maxonum VerticaUOvemead Glaring • 1 ' . CO Space Heat Type _ O Electric resistance X Art other ' (see over for definitions) Glazing Area Calculation Note. Below glade `.ells rimy be included in the Gress Exterior Wail Arc W they are insulates to me ie.N required rot opaque wraps, Total Glazing Area (rough wing) ' Gross Exterior • (vertical b everbd) divided by Wan Area times 100 equals % Glaring 918 _ 4604 X 1 QQ = 11,13/4 Conerete/Masonry Option Q Cher here if using this option and it project meats all requirements for me C Concreterboasonry Option. 5« Decision Flowchart (over) for quatirnuens. Enter requirements for each qua1Nying sesame/yin ttw able below. Project Info Project Address G LAI NI u M Pee. Res`, oats z • /t q S B AR W� g for Building Department Use TL.M4K1 LA WA Applicant Name: S tQ R t� T!� Applicant Address: 1, 20 t N g e D M O w `,J I) w/ (14 Applicant Phone: _r i NE, . , _ 1994 Washin•to. Cate Nonresidential Ener. Code ■( .'•Hance Form Envelope Summary Climate Zone 1 ENV -SUM 1994 We7MgWI Shn Pb■resdenml Enemy Cede CORIeir)nce Fomht Project Description New Building 0 Addition O Alteration 0 Change or Use Compliance Option Sernl•heated space* N/A 'Refer to Section 1310 for qualifications and requirements Notes: Roots Over Semi.Heated Spaces' 8 'd PPrescnptive O Component Performance (See Decision Flowchart (over) far qualifications) Minimum insulation R- values 0 ENVSTD 0 Systems Analysis ADM 1004 Opaque Concrete/Masonry Wal) Requirements Insulation on interior - maximum U- factor is 0.19 Insulation on exterior or integral - maxim an U- factor is 0.25 It project qualifies for Concrete/Masonry Option, list walls with HC >_ 9.0 BtWfta. F below (other wails must meet Opaque Wall requirements), Use descriptions and values from Table 20-5b In the Code. Wall Description (including insulation R -value & position) N/A U -factor N/A `• `�.. �i VIED Vwe 1o1998 S'UR ARCHITECTS 0918898P14 VOIS 1 WV81 8661 -91 -Z1 H -7 Protect Address F ' 9 1� /� 4 1 UIW l ! i D Date [2. „„ 4 ,. , { Opaque 1 Overhead 1 Doors Glazing 1an0 Ifrooti %rood t110 Opaque Walls' savitA apeIJ Mora e Slab-on- floors Over gr ade � Uncond Sp • • 1994 Washinc ( Jtate Nonresidential Enera Cod n•Iiance Form Envelope UA Calculations Climate Zone 1 ENV -UA • 994 •N414 .-4/m4 -;ate `b' c "r9r =o.. CZORN PCe Fenno 4401 `9N 1) Proposed Total Area shall equal Ta get Total Area, and 2) Proposed Total (JA shall not exceed Target Total UA. 6•d 09tEE98VLL bd1S WObd WV8L:8 8661 -9L -Z1 Bui • ing • Permit Plans Checklist ENV -CHK 1244 Wastwrq.. Sate ErrwlY Coen Commare. Forms Apu, tw4 Project Address Kate • • The following information is necessary to check a building permit application for cemplance with the building envelope requirements in the Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code. Applicability (circle one) 1 Code Section Component information Required Location on Plans, Building Ot pntZrrlent Notes GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (Sections 1301 -1314) 1301 Scope - Uneondt'b'oned spaces identified on plans if allowed it 1302 Space hest type . . yes no n.a. Electric resistance yes no n.a. Other Indicate on plans that electric resistance heat is not allowed yes no n.a. 1310.2 Semi.heated spaces Semi- +tested spaces identified on plans if allowed 1311 Insulation yes no n.a. 1311.1 Instil. installation Indicate densities and clearances yes no n,a, 1311,2 Roof (ceiling insuL Indicate R•value on roof sections for attics and other roofs, Indicate clearances for attic insulation; Indicate baffles if cave vents installed: Indicate race stap6no of faced balls yes no n.a. 1311.3 Wall Insulation Indicate R -value on wall sections; Indicate face stapling of Paced Dias: Indicate above grade eiae for insulation is protected; Indicate toose•rUl core insutatlon for masonry walls as necess: Indicate heat capacity of masonry walls _ if masonry option is used or if credit taken in ENVSTO; Indicate R -value on floor sections; Indicate substantial contact with surface; • Indicate supports not more than 24 o.c.; Indicate that insulation does not block airflow through foundation vents .• • , • yes no n.a. 1311.4 Floor insulation yes no n.a. 1311.5 Stab on-grade floor indicate R -value on wall section or foundation detail; Ind'.. to stab insulation extends down vertically 24 from top; • Indicate above grade exterior insulation is•proteded yes no n.a. 1311.6 Radiant floor Indicate R -value on wall section or foundation detail; Indicate stab insulation extends down vertically 3C from the top; indicate above grade exterior insulation is protected; Indicate 'mutation also under entire slab where recd. by Official yes no n.a. 1312 Glazing and doors Provide calculation of grazing area (including both vertical vertical and overhead) as percent ojross wall area y es no n:a. 1312,1 U•factors • Indicate glazing and door U- factors on glazing and door schedule (provide area - weighted calculations as necessary); Indicate it values are NFRC or default if values are default then specify frame type, glazing tayers, gapwidth, low-e =mines. cas filli yes no n,a, 1312.2 $I-IGC a. SC Indicate glazing solar heat gain coefficient or shading coefficient on glazing schedule (provide area - weighted calculations as necessary) 1313 Moisture control yes no n.a. 1313.1 Vapor retarders Indicate vapor retarders on warm side yes no n.a. 1313,2 Roof /ce�ling vap.ret. Indicate vapor retarder on roof section: ' Indicate vao. retard. with sealed seams for non -wood strue. yes no n.a, 1313.3 Wall vapor retarder Indicate vapor retarder on wall section yes no n.a. 1313.4 Floor vapor retarder Indicate vapor• retarder on floor section . yes no n.a. 1313.5 Crawl space vap. ret. ,Indicate srx mil black polyethylene overlapped IT on ground • 1314 Air lealmge - yes no n.a, yes no n.a. 1314.1 1314.2 Bldg. envei. sealing Glazing/door seating indicate sealing, caulking, gasketing, and weatherstripping indicate weatherstripping no n.a, 1314.3 Assemb. as ducts Indicate sealing cauYOng and asketing �C-•) �- . PRESCRIPTIVEJCOMPONENT PERFORMANCE (Sections 13ZO -23 or 13304) no Et Envelope Sum. Form Completed and attached. . Provide component performance worksheet if necessary Provide ENVSTO screen 1 output if necessary 01 ' d 1994 Washingtr ate Nonresidential Energy Code , pliance Form is circle f any question, provide explanation: 09LEE98PLL t1alS HObd N 6Lt8 866L -9L —n Cooling Equipment Schedule _: 10 Bra4 Name' model No ' %a.racly OSA CFM I 'scat CFM co Eert SEER cr EE WW t.ocatiall 1 1t Heating E•uipment Schedule Equip. IO Brand Name' Mosel No ' Capaexy` . Total CFM OSA efm Econo input Stun Output Stuh Efficiency' • Fan Equi • meat Schedule Equip. 10 Brand Name' Model No.' CFM SP' HPIBHP Flow Control location of SKVIcu i �t r .4 1'r oject De cri; t:ior r qe w: *Mirk Compliance Option Equipment Schedules i' �c^'d" '.tlua �: �. , a a s � ;c.. `. t i a i ^' C e _ s. 4.zince w .t:t: , Mechanical Suni.rnaty MECH.-SUM Project in a : _ h i t P A =cr r..titStv. Ce shirt .:•* ..t...2 - t , �i�[�!. p4 C r w pb[ :' s -crira't L!3 ',�3 1. •T�f AT. .� tip, ,r. 'If evadable. 3 As tested according to Table 1 4.1. 14-2 oe a.3 S Flow control typos. VAV, constant rol jrne. 9f r9nOtile speed l l 'd `, )607; 4 -GI aNR ' pAr.44, t"Sa g 7c Fr ✓ p &A s Htp • %% PAc TV '( � , -;; � .:� t - c C Hor■cY►4.: 77:7 Pf.� i 6. "4¢"'1 7 i; TZMOSSA -;' A _.r^(?! Sry 'x \S.'eh^ :.i SvsteC•s :.tic See C = ewc%se twel t-e zatts'a s1 7: e rlcrTSS«t a Mcurec tr x tec t1e meG^in•cal eyucoment 3:003%0S en tt+t ptars Fc aoces's 'WOW - t ;mess, ty ;n ? re .:na antecmanon betas. 11 /mitred, ' COP, N$PF, Combustion Efficiency,..or AFUE.» applkable, 09LEE98VLL baiS W02i. 1 8661 -9L —Z1 Project Address Date The fotlowlnq information is necessary to check 1 mechanical permit application for compliance with the mechanical requirements in the Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code. , i Applicability Code (owe!. one) i Section Component Information Resulted 1 Loeaden on Pins ( building Department Nixes HVAC REUIREM NTS Sectionsi -1 141 t egpmt performance no n.a 1411,4 Pkg. elec. htg,3 dg. list heat pumps on schedule no n.a. tat 1,1 Minimum efficiency HVAC eontrots Equipment schedule with type. capicity, efficiency AC-1 1412 no no n.a. 1412.1 Temperature zones Indicate locations on plans AG- 4 s n.a. 1412.2 Devilsand control Indicate 5 degree eleadband minimum _A[ 1 yes no pia) 1412,3 Humid control Indicate numidistat • n.a. 1412,4 Automatic setback Indicate themloszat with night setback and 7 different day types 1 s no n.a. 1412.4.1 Dam)?ers Indicate damper location and automatic controls 4& 1 no 1412.5 , Heat pump control Indicate microprocessor on thermostat schedule • ���► no n.a, 1412.6 Combustion Ng. - " Indicate modulating or staged control • . es no n.a 1412.7 Balancing Indicate balancing features on plans • no Ct., 1422 Thermostat interlock Indicate thermostat interlock onplans es� ne n,a. 1423 Economizers . — Equipment schedule . 1 • 1 413 Air economizers _ n.a 1413.1 Operation Indicate 100% capabiley on schedule 04- 1 es no n.a. 1413.2 Control Indicate controls able to evaluate outside air A& 1 no n a, 1413.3 Integrated operation Indicate capability for paMl cooling 1 1414 Ducting systems ifs no n.a. 1414.1 Duct sealing Indicate sealin necessary AC 1 es n.a, 1414.2 Duct insulation Indicate R -value of insulation on duct AC " yes no r a` 1415.1 Pipli5 insulation Indicate R •valu• of insulation on piping deitno n.a. 1424 Separate air sys, -- Inc.itIate separate systems on ',tans t(s 4 yes u' - v .• - Mech. Sum. Form • • • • l a • Completed and attached. Equipment schedule with types, input/avian. elk' • . ctm. ha, economizer . a ••• ections •' 1 • •' • 1 Service water Mg. yes no n.a. 1441 Elec. water heater Indicate R - 10 insulation under lank yes no n.a. 1442 Shut -off controls Indicate automatic snot -off • 1450 Heated pools yes no n:a. 1452 Pool water heaters Indicate not electric resistance yes no ma. 145 Pool heater controls Indicate switch and 65 degree control y es no 'n.a, 1454 Pool covers tndlcate vapor retardant cover no n.a._ 1454 Poets 90. degrees Indicate R -12 pool cover 1994 Washington ;state Nonresidential Energy Code t,(iance Form. Mechanical Permit Plans Checklist 199a wastioolon slate evagy Co Oe C mekae4e a•1Ma MECH -CHK Apr/ 1 O F R .t c4 Syrt1 Comp ik•IGL, Zl 'd 091SS98V1L vas WObd 1 ;8 8661 -91 -Z1 Mechanical - Complex Systems hecklist MECH -COMP 1994 Waienglon Sete Gimpy Coes Compliance Fenno __ * i1. t99 4 Project Address Date The following additional information is necessary to check a mechanical permit application for a complex mechanicai system for compliance with the mechanical requirements in the Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code. Use the checklist as a reference for rotes added to the mechanical drawings (see the MECH -CHK ehec list for additional system requirements). This information must be on the plans since this is me official record of the pemut. Having this Information in separate specifications alone is NOT an acceptable alternative. i For Building Department Use ' • Applicability (circle one) Code Section Component ITEMS FOR • f: Informatics R •tired COMPLEX SYSTEMS ONLY Location on Plans Building Department Notes ADDITIONAL CHECKUST no .a. 1431.1 Field assem. sys. Provide calculations 1432 Controls • Yes no 411P 1432.1 Setback & shut-off Indicate separate systems or show isolation devices on plans 1432.2 Temp, resat control . yes no I 432.2.1 Air systems Indicate automatic reset yes no 432.2.2 Hydronic systems Indicate automatic resat yes no „1 1433 Economizers - - Indicate economizer on equipment schedule or provide . calculations to justify exemption s yes no jet 1434 Separate air sys. Indicate sarate systems on plate yes no OF 143S Shaul. htg. 6 chg. Indicate that simultaneous heating and cooling is prohibited, unless use of exception is justified yes no 1436 Heat recovery Indicate heat recovery on plans; complete and attseh heat recovery calculations yes no . ' 1437 Elec. motor effic. MECH -MOT or Equip. Schedule with hp. rpm. efficiency d es no . 1438 Variable flaw sys. Indicate variable flow on fan and pume sehedulee no "'tScircled for any question, provide ex anation: 1994 Washjngt (tate Nonresidential Energy Code Decision Flowchart 1. Use this flowchart to determine how the requirements of Inc Complex Systems Option apply to the ( project. Refer to the indicated Code sections for more complete information on the requirements. EL 'd 1 I Swam MI I.1 Eeuf+orK red. SAW Mon Tae I 114 Wane ILI l SA 941.1 row. Yo Caleulaewn sr meoMyad Told 04.04 Ens1• • . EeiniwK! tape e tt■ese • Amsted Net \ • 1 Siefows 16JU . Caraary arHW ' ' , 300tae 1413.1.1 Hot Wins Si** Y° Manatf System No SYStan Ma* Al PAM T.mputre Itch Gnaw Than S � • `� Commie • Controls Raatrad Kf Btup ", •, ' Roomed • (continued on back) appliance Form 09LEE98PLL t'CiS WOb.d WVIZ °8 8661 -91 —ZL Open Motors . Closed Motors 3.600 • 1,800 1.200 3,600 1,800 _ 1.200 Efficiency - ( %) 82.5 80.0 Effiicienc 75.5 j%) 82.5 80.0 82.5 84.0 84.0 82.5 840 85.5 84.0 84.0 ' 85.5 84 0 64.0 86.5 84.0 86.5 86.5 85,5 87.5 87.5 85.5 87.5. 87.5 87,5 87,5 87,5 • 87.5 88.5 88.5 88,5 89.5 89.5 88.5 89.5 90.2 89,5 89.5 89.5 89.5 91.0 90.2 90.2 91.0 90.2 90.2 91.0 91.0 90.2 91,0 90.2 91.0 91.7 91.7 91.0 92.4 91.7 91.0 92.4 92.4 91,0 92,4 91.7 917 93.0 93.0 91.7 93.0 93.0 92,4 93.0 93.0 92.4 93.0 93.0 93.0 93.6 93.6 93.0 93.6 93.6 93.0 94.1 93.6 93.0 94.1 93,6 93.0 94,1 94.1 93.6 94.5 94.1 93.6 94.5 94.1 94.5 94.5 94.1 93.6 95.0 94.5. 94.5 95,0 , 95.0 94.5 95.0 94.5 95.0 95,0 95.0 Electric Motors MECH -MOT isev wavAvniri4 Suva E COO. C.mpwnee cams Project Andress emzi4lAmoy 5 .. Th lew 1 LA Complete the following for all design A & 8 squirrel-cage. T -frame induction permanently wired polyptlase motors from 1 hp to 200 hp having synchronous speeds of 3600, 1800 or 1200 rpm (unless one of the exceptions below apples) Motor No or Type Location HP (open or closed) Mme• Synchronous Speed (RPM) HP• 1 15 2.0 3.0 5.0 7.5 10 15 20 25 30 40 SO 60 75 I00 125 150 200 V 1 'd 1994 Washingtot . ;ate Nonresidential Energy Code (S. pliance Form Desc titton of Aop0cation or Use Oate 12 - � For Building Department Use Synch. Exceptions: 1. Motors in systems designed to use mote than one speed of a multi-speed motor, 2. Motors already included in the efficiency requirements for HVAC equipment (Tables 14-1 or 14.2) . 3. Motors mat are an integral part (Le. not easily removed and replaced of specialized process equipment (i.e. equipment which requires a special motor, such u an explosion -proof motor). 4. Motors integral to 8 listed piece of equipment for wniCh no qualifying motor has been approved (i.e. if the only U.L. listing for the equipment is with a less-efficient motor and tape is no energy - eMiehnt motor option). For motors claiming an exception. list motor and note wnien exception applies. Min.Nom. Full Toad £ppl 1W4 • 091EE98VIL dais HOaa Hd1Z °8 8661 -91 -Z1 Organization of Forms ORG 199 Wasmegfon State EnefeyCaae Camceanee fomn This document introduces the forms to be used for showing compliance with the 1994 Nonresi- dential Energy Code (NREC). The following fig- ure shows the overall organization .of the form set. For simple projects, only a few forms are required: more complex projects will require addi- tional forms, The forms explain the decision cri- teria for determining when a more complicated form is required, 5l 'd 1994 Wasnine.(.3tate Nonresidential Energy Code Com; (,le Form ENV Summary Project information Type of project Compliance opts. Glazing area % Can use simple? Summ. of Req. MECH Summary Project information Type of project Compliance opts Can use simple? Basic equip efficiencies LTG Summary Project information Type of project Compliance opts. Can use most simple? Allowed and Proposed Watts ENV Gaullist What goes on plans? Where 4 goes Reprint of General Regents. I EN1/STV Component Performance Wee sno0 Target & Pro- . posed UA Md. Avg. SHGC Area Adjustment MECH Ckrst What goes on plans? Where it goes Reprint of General Rooms. Conrpier Systems Additional Checklist and decisionmaidng for Complex Systems LTG CtreNret What goes on plans? Where k goes Reprint 01 General Regmq. All projects should complete the Summary forms which apply (envelope, mechanical and /or light- ing). All projects should also review the Checklist forms to make sure all necessary information on compliance is pkovided. Applicable excerpts from the General Requirements sections of the Code are reprinted on the back of the Checklist forms. The need for other forms will be determined by project specifics. Motors Checklist For any project with motors cov- ered by 1437 or 1511 Awl, 1994 09lEE98VlL ValS 110dd WVZZ'8 8661 -9l —n 1g ing ermit 4 'swim., S4ti E ^trp ans ec is LTG -CHK Coee eo/ mWS tors ' Apq ttpe Prolect Address Date The foifowMg information is necessary to check a lighting permit application for compliance with the lighting requirements in the 1994 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code. • Applicability (citcle•one) Code Section :.t Information R •aired Location on Mans Budding Oepanment Notes 1 c no n.a. 1513.1 local controuaccess Schedule with ,• . indicate bcations i 1513.2 Area controls Maximum limit • r switch 1513 3 Da,,,, t z• Schedule with • and features. indicate locations ralIZZEI grlrMnIIIIIIIM MIMEO 1513.4 vertical lax EZI=CaMr=12=3111.11111111.M.1111111.1111 owm•aa -ta21 Dis • rexhibis • ia1 Indicate s - e contras 1513.5 Exterior srwt•of Schedule with 4 - and features. indicate location MEM (a) timer w/DICINO Indicate location (b - hotocelf. Indicate location 1513.6 Inter. auto shut -off Indicate ocation - S 1513,6.1 triMMII=Ill Schedule with ,- and locations • 1513,6.2 b) auto. switches ,• IllirortIR WAT'll Indicate size of zone on • tans II /lei lif 1 1 fi Ilk 31 no — I' ft • • Sum. form Com- ad and attaenad. Schedule with velure ,• . • la .s. ballasts. watts par fixture ' t • • ' ectfon 1 - - Ala -Li, •,Li , - MECI 4MOT or E- 1 :, l.,•u . ua.im -1 �ra. • 1994 Washingt Ctate Nonresidential Energy Code ()pianos Form 1s crrctee ror an y question, provtae explanation: 91 'd 09 l EE98q l L VC'S WOMJ WbZZ o 8 866 l —91—Z 1 . Location Description Altoiled Watts per R' or per It Area in ft (or If for perimeter) Allowed Watts x a (or x It) Coveied Panting Applicant Name: 0.2 W /tt' .. Applicant Phone. Open Parking Cl New Building • 0 Addition 0 Alteration 0.2 Wife Compliance Option 0 Prescrptive 0 Lighting Power Allowance 0 systems Analysis (see Ouallfication Checklist (over). indicate Prescriptive d LPA spaces clearly on plans.) Outdoor Areas 0,2 Wirt' . __ Bldg. (by facade) 0.25 wit Bldg, (by perim) 7 5 Wilt — Location Fixture Desuiption Number of Fixtures . Watts/ Fixture Watts Proper Applicant Name: Applicant Address: Applicant Phone. Project Description Cl New Building • 0 Addition 0 Alteration Compliance Option 0 Prescrptive 0 Lighting Power Allowance 0 systems Analysis (see Ouallfication Checklist (over). indicate Prescriptive d LPA spaces clearly on plans.) Alteration Exceptions (check appropriate box) 0 No changes are being made to the lighting 0 Less than 60 % of me fixtures are new. and installed lighting wattage rs not being increased Project Info Protect Address Oate ....._ Area in ft= For Building Department use Applicant Name: Applicant Address: Applicant Phone. Project Description Cl New Building • 0 Addition 0 Alteration Compliance Option 0 Prescrptive 0 Lighting Power Allowance 0 systems Analysis (see Ouallfication Checklist (over). indicate Prescriptive d LPA spaces clearly on plans.) Location (noor /room no.) Occupancy Description ' Allowed watts per re " Area in ft= Allowed x Area " From Table 15.1 (over) • document all exceptions taken from footnotes Total Allowed Warts Lighting Summary • LTG -SUM 994 W J3r.'44on State non.es.temoi E■t.gv Coat danosaIce ea.ms Maximum Allowed Lightung Wattage (Interior) Proposed Lighting Wattage (Interior) (May not exceed Total Allowed Warts for Interior) Number of Watts/ Fixtures Fixture Locaucn • (floor /room no.) Watts Proposed Fixture Description Total Proposed Warts may not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Intenor • Total Proposed Watts Maximum Allowed Li>;htinz Wattas±e (Exterior Note: for building exterior, choose either the facade area or the perimeter method, but not bath) Proposed Lighting Wattage (Exterior) (may Aix exceed Total Allowed Waal for Exterior) Ll 'd 1994 Washin ton State Nonresidential Enemy Code Com•liance Form Total Allowed Watts 4 d41494 09LSS98VLL va1S 1 WVSZ'8 8661 -9L -Zl BY: CONCRETE: CONCRETE BLOCK: REINFORCED STEEL: STRUCTURAL STEEL: STRUCTURAL PIPE: PLYWOOD SHEATHING: GLUED LAM. BEAMS: LUMBER: SOIL PRESSURE: c KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, INC. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS PROJECT: CLAIM JUMPER TUKWILA, WA STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS JOB #: 98252 CRITERIA: UNIFORM, AND /OR LOCAL BLDG. CODE, LATEST EDITION. MATERIALS: EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED HEREIN y 3u4rY t4 2,500 PSI AT 28 DAYS. GRADE N, LT. WT. UNITS, ASTM C -90. 20,000 PSI (ASTM A615, GRADE 60). 24,000 PSI (COMPACT) (ASTM A -36). 22,000 PSI (ASTM A -53, GRADE "B "). DOUGLAS FIR, STRUCTURAL 1, P.S. 1 -83. 2,400 PSI (D.F. COMB. "24F "). GRADE MARKED D.F. PER W.C.L.B. GRDG. RULE 16. SEE FOUNDATION PLAN FOR COMPLETE DATA. DESIGN REFERENCES: INCLUDING CHARTS AND TABLES FROM: LUMBER & TIMBER: WOOD STRUCTURAL DESIGN DATA (VOLUME 1), NATIONAL LUMBER MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION STEEL: MANUAL OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION, AISC. CONCRETE BLOCK: CONCRETE MASONRY DESIGN MANUAL, CONCRETE j. - ASONRY ASSOCIATION CONCRETE: . �� g � NESIGN HANDBOOK r) vRf �yl REET�- ` US , CALIFORNIA 92780 -2050 - 7 8.4960 FILE COPY „ � !;l;;t the Plan rti ,�, +� ,� •;�..: �'... •,�. ! .r rrt � .. �•. � • DATE: 3, 6 /Cf KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, INt SHEET STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS JOB 4 1 25 Reve,(= 6.evalos /2F 4 pfz.m GL S'friefAit Aeff s c . 4- 3 /: 4. 5 18 psF LA■1 20 • St Ps 544 2S 5 P P / S'etty • 14001 YORSA STREET, SUITE 105 • TusuN, CAUFORNIA 92040 • (714) 1130-4900 deoQF 70. 2: • 3 • •• ...'20• .,..• k r BY P� :4 KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, MCI- SHEET STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS JOB e ‘ ') 8252 BY, 40 g •t I 4 v • - 4 .% ;fr KAY . PLAN • 14081 YORBA STREET, SUITE 105 • TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 • (714) 8364960 wibtflis , ReomA. • I Cfbp 6 El 2 0'' LL 44_ S(° oa3 2-5 I 2-tug 50?-`r r 71 7/4 1 e' KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS ("tie 3res) I. ?ayD = tw 17,1-11 1 1°C, 4•34- u) = 4 • CXT c ocn--A 4rio 5 t too = 8 it C -1 0 /_. �. /y1 =o b S = 40,9 2. �Z = eSs `* B4 s /0,4la= 2B 6up s,430.2.5 /!'t= X S 17Ze.6 2 j : 2:41 t /oo 0"/‘07= !l # zP 32, z$5 5.•- /58-34. I'us _ _ / 1 f Z w 135 L ew 7 v SHEET JOB (2 ")$ ZS e a— BY kee 'f Zo C2oYYCz.Sk io' - �1S•.i� 104 mo s40.0 Di = , trot � 25a WI 14001 YORBA STREET, SUITE 105 • TUSTIN, CAUFORNIA 92600 • (114) 936.4960 %4x14, L V4 x�b Ps c 5'/axi8 Psi "s "7 sd - 1 ) / x tij, 2 9 ,S r= C ; S. 4 229 ,. - z^^ 4.2z,= L94f (s-z4 r) 21i dnio 2j,2$3c-- aor 133HS 096►-989 (►iL) • O99Z6 VIN11OA111/3'NLLSAl • COI 311AS'133H1S VERIOA 19O1i „2S'=riw foss =(s24991? n 7 )22 t e'S - 3Nna%aD9 prw 6Z 49 7. 5 L2? z =G� < _ r'! A 417 Er/ , /frc'S 22 V2 = 4t/'! 15VZJ' �s S'/ = n� er / G(/ 2/sa ar. (574E AP 92f1'dr�� 2L_40 / 27/ Zg••°? J = 9 z 6s -**/ pi, ,c4.1 yt ea 01.4. CS ICAO VE) g 4-4 � OZ. =fii c'5 kale rml $1133N1ON3 1VNA17AN1! )NI `S311►I3OSSd V O INV)IO N3)I ive 54t P KEN OKAMO O & ASSOCIATES, IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS zet - - r- - c � p4t-i— tbo k)'= 6.5 (231 -24.) , e•SCjatzs)=. .72,5 /hz 2 7 / ?S / R- c /cow Bio 5508r26) - /ao = 334,S4.% 4w 3 36.S /4S 5sf*03 t ` S — fir 44. ms' Z= /66 3 'c 61/ &lie N 1((( r ZS) 41 - 2 *z� 5 & (t s S fete f 7 ) •19-e-4-6 Gww (S t#2.5 /-=. / 7L S G• ac 14001 YORBA STREET, SUITE 105 • TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92600 • (714) 838.4060 SHEET 5 JOB_ •2' •+ = By /pt a sgt Ps c CPxi G Y(p e (3 &vim, 1.vo€ Le hue= * !o = 4'-604 AI= s SO 0 /6/4 KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, IN yM: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS uJ = /c):21/ 18 tS 5p / soV uI= a�_2- 3 tZ5 ) 3 zdf 3a¢ S = iottrso N 3 7 3 2 . / L) le/4 s.o4 = //' Al- 86 2 ' tSf, 13 ) A = /3, // S ._= 305 "4 = Aa. 867 SHEET c JOB_ _ 7cr'1 BY �i/f't 14081 YORBA STREET, SUITE 105 • TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 • (714) 038.4960 OP sY¢xi4 PS C. )(/ • KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, IN 23 e- = ¢ 3t = (63G wr = 740c1 ---� id= ,b 25) - SCZ3. -z) b4gt M4f* 44.e 5 /Pif /l= /// ,41= "boy / 5 = S 7t (2 Ax- 41•6(/ . e9 4,ot sv =Gbit STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Ai' 17 C23tzS) = ¢08t 7k = S• S . 12-s- /3G 8 = - 7 G. 4 / �= 2- 7 /2=-2442 /3 2d 5 24 c--/ = <o '0 C / / 2 ) *623r 2 S) = 74 /4- ,_ 9 "IL 5 8z 6? f 7 le = 372--0 /3 ZZ /Yr= 4 25 / '210 14081 YORBA STREET, SUITE 105 • TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 • (714) 130.4960 SHEET 7 JOB Z �72 BY tAf-t 4 .)c12 • ,6 a 3 24 Z■ ' B as r KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, INC. 2g f b' •• 4 C-4 3/4 i STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 52Z- 4)=- 2ILX (23 >- 25). 55 7 4 f - 14' /0= i .Z-- 6 - pro "a UJ= 5507 I 5,4 ? Go 2 = 341 / 5 - 30.3 z w, = . z C231 24- i.57 -zz. s )J 65 C23t25) = 3d. 3 7,S w2 W3 = 9u e23f25) = Zo* _z4 M = 44 71 . �= 1UU �= l &7 `J wz = tZ 63 C, = ifss Zt2,5 = q; 7 121 = 7. 73%- /4 G4 re.. 2/7 14081 YORBA STREET, SUITE 105 • TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92000 • (714)13$-4I>60 SHEET JOB BY '64( r 6116 °/410(8) 5/f r20 c �� �� • 1 KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, INC. 5A,4-e - 4 G 4>= �ZCz3r -z5 M= 7-5£7 z-3 82? 1 lb° 6A, 4- 7-5) 36:.a /VV. 2 2ce S Ito i = /2...c. c: /" 428 0/2/Pr? s'°�.1= 2 a Al= i k (2 3 ZS)at /40 too X4= fa, =G¢ 5=370.9 ,e (-85 ,2 q ')f APL rl! /!li'rrl a �4g 1- O5 Z5) = 7. ?3 1 t - P iczN) STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 4-16.7 = S 74 '` /s 70 1( 4 Cs cam' t -l6 J AP l ? oo a7 • , e 5' /QxZ‘ £ =.S7" e(( 2 2 1 SV • 7 . Sdee ex 14081 VORBA STREET, SUITE 105 • TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92610 • (714) 131.4960 SHEET I T JOB BY (L/rt a /570 r Psc. • '4X20 /°SC • 2 4553 KEN OKAMO 'O & ASSOCIATES, INC • 2 63 5, z-f3 . 2= STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Pr: #70 0 4e. a�- g.sOti?,0 f 9-cCt3> �- 2./ t6 fe &°"-* sia CO= z- c /St2.5) _ !07C'' 0 =1 S -.¢3 .4 s Pr 322 5P4 / t(-' 10'75 M= 4F *7.5 14081 YORBA STREET, SUITE 105 • TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 • (714) 838 -4960 SHEET 10 JOB 4 ) . 246Z. BY 8t 6V4 Es : , x lGr:› 634- So *dem /1 t ow 1.04Q3 l 7 f 0.S) (a I Zvi c •/ _ /0/4 M= 4-5,vmo L= /734 oe = gb0o 5 KEN OKAM01'O & ASSOCIATES, INC. • 837 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS ul = 4 7 ; !.✓` a St? S *i /of 5 .1 I� j)# = �3•¢'c A",=0,4 7E = 13 /2,,z= (7(47 = 2?!e ?. W e O f2 t'Z. a 7 * / 4/j— V ?,8e /. 4et8 t ' ( / Goit _ w42 X k bss K , S =• 65" = 73/ tit = Z S (8 ?.S3 /r4-? ,p S,aei= 14081 YORBA STREET, SUITE 105 • TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 • (714) 838-4960 SHEET JOB l s .5.7._ BY 4--r 4 sf*¢< 5'4x2/ Ps co t- e °S • a 38 ZOO KEN OKAM(S I'O & ASSOCIATES, INC. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS zzs b sq 7Z � &t/= e2 *r /2 = q tzs S = So, z 7 0 36.6 ' l /lCi(4 ? �— 3' ?v Gt/ = l76•46 r =8(7t M 827 a. x. ' 1 3 3s. eF$ /41 ,6w 5*4 =!! w \ i / 02-- (art.- t- s) • a , ¢ S n,g L2 S S 7 L = Z.5 G 14061 YORBA STREET, SUITE 105 • TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92600 • (714) 638 -4960 SHEET / Z. JOB PLvim. . _ BY 6.1 5 %q l4 6 (e 5 xi/ T Psc- oer 11 I I 4r= 48/1;- 7: I)2.1 , ; - - 1 . • . . • , , •KEN 'OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES INC JOB _STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS . , . . 4'y z7.66" • . . :Iv. ..- _ f , V° 1 .---- T . ' .....-6-.- . j . . . ... 1 • ,_. _ ,, •• . . 1_•.... _±, , ; i ; • . • -1 • , • , .............: ..._• .. • [ LJ 0.•■••••••••■■ • . • L • • -1 f ; . ; • • 44. ' HH I I • ; „ . 14081 YORBA STREET, SUITE 105 'TUSTIN, CAUFORNIA 92780 0(714) 838-4980 - -------- • • ■fro_lo•PA4o..c. 1 • •• ; • ■* Pa rs KEN OKAMSfO & ASSOCIATES, INC STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS • 1 P/ sail f- = /5 /a 3 . • IL, P2 334 - , D f$• 3* 2 r 7. 5fa 2-25.02)* t *- 9,03 t.4 MSS k F5 7` o 3tr* - .7�o3�i P7 C') 9 4 , 1 I"2 1 (747A /q! 6S7-r r8.04r3ar `/c13 ¢E (/Z //r 31-40,04 — etc j 4k P /.3 /63 E (/ek CPI Pis 4 5E 470 -are G et , a 8. /7 ht 14081 VORBA STREET, SUITE 105 • TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92630 • (714) E38.4960 SHEET / JOB_ BY k 2 1 "d ■ ■ I (If ciG4Pc > ¢ > C.409e > 4475 P //" 6k( s > 6.?(Co • Cow 4-0 ,D fi P1? e'er /3? 3$. Gfoo J W ? fa' e e l7 S3 7o ' I° /8 48e ' 3 Sea q / 7 -41(4 Posy fit= Ott a, 2 /klo�c (2.5 . / o,, i. k i i) 24 a 4-44- -9 KEN OKAM0c0 & ASSOCIATES, IN 6.- STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS —I 10 0 2 " S • Go, =1',Zitf GU- (Ip42 1,33 _ 7 / , L 14iwaf R Pecs 3 27,2s; SHEET /5 JOB "8.752.. BY - � fiz' wv z ) 57 i►4 34 *- sr = (. Z i113 Z - 261d+- 12.- 9 r = 27613 1 -- 22l 40 25)1 =57 S - I7,2tJ' I I5iaJ p 5 At- 14081 YORBA STREET, SUITE 105 • TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 • (714) Sad -4960 boa •xl) CzAt A // KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES,INC. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 14081 YORBA ST., SUITE 105, TUSTIN, CA. 92880 (714) 838 -4960 SHEET ( (p Joe J SZ62 SHEAR WALL SCHEDULE 91 USG MARK ALLOW. SHEAR SHEATHING AND NAILING ANCHOR SOLT5 SILL PL. NAILING AT UPPER STORIES REMARKS 260 */FT. 3/8" CM PLYWOOD (BLOCK ALL ED6ES) W/ bd COMMON NAILS • 6' E.N., • 12" FN. I/2'0 AB 3' -0' 5/b'0 A.B. • 4•-O' • 6' 0.6. OR 20d • 1 1/2' . Jr,. 360 •I/2'1 . 3/8' GDX PLYWOOD (BLOCK ALL ED6E5) W/ bd COMMON NAILS • 4' EN., • 12" F.N. USE 3x STUD • ADJ. PANEL ED6E5, t 3x SILL PL. AB. • 2' -0" OR 5/8'1 AB. • 3' -0' 16d • 4• OR 20d • 5' O 490 •/FT. 3/b' GDX PL YWOOD (bLOGK ALL ED6E5 W/ bd CO M M ON NAILS • 3' EN., • IT RN. USE 5x STUD • ADJ. PANEL ED6E5, i 3x SILL PL. I/2'0 AB. • I' -b' OR 5/8'0 AB. • 2•-4' 16d • 3' OR 20d • 4' 0 650 •/FT. 3/b' 5TRUGT, I PL) W/ bd COMM NAILS • S' E.N., • I2' F.N. USE 3x STUD • ADJ. PANEL ED6ES, 1 3x SILL PL. 1/70 AB. • I OR 5/b'0 AB. • 7-0' ski • 3' OL. OR 20d • 31/2' © 640 II/FT. 3/8' GDX PLYW0OD MK. ALL ED6E5) W/ bd COMMON NAILS • 2' E.N., • 12' FN. USE 5x STUD • ADJ. PANEL ED6E5, t 3x SILL PL. 1/2'1 AB. • I' -3' OR 5/b'• AB. • I` -I0' 16d • 2 I/Z' OR 20d • 3' 0 760 •/FT. 3/8" STR I PLYWD. BOTH SIDES (bLK ALL ED6E5) W/ bd GOMMON NAILS • 4'E.N., • 12'F.N. USE 5x STUD • ADJ. PANEL ED6E5, t 3x SILL PL. I/2'1 A8. • I' -0' OR 5/b'0 AB. • 14' 16d • 2' OR 204 • 2 I/2' . 980 II/FT. 5/6' GDX PLYWOOD BOTH SIDES (BLK ALL ED6E5) W/ bd COMMON NAILS .3" E.N., IZ'F N USE 3x STUD • ADJ. PANEL ED6E5, 1 5x SIU. PL. 1/2'0 AB. • 10' 5/8'0 AB. • 1' -2' S/8 X 7' LA6 BOLTS • 12' 0L. O 3/b" I28O •/FT, COX PLYWOOD BOTH SIDES MILK ALL ED6E5) Pit bd COMMON NAILS • 2' E.N., 12'F.N. USE 3x STUD • ADJ. PANEL ED6ES, t 3x SILL PL. 5/b'0 AB. • 11' OR , ' 3/4 ' 0 AB. • I _ Z 5/b'0 x 1' LA6 BOLTS. 9' O0.G. . O 1460 8/FT. 3/b' STR. PLD 60TH SI S MIL ALL ED6E5) W1 YWOO / bd COMM NAILS • Z' E.N. , • 12' F.N. USE 3x 5TUD • ADJ. PANEL ED6ES, t 3x SILL PL. 5/6 "1 AB. • ' OR 3/4.0 AB. • 1' -0' 5J0'0 x 1' LA6 BOLTS • b' 0.C. I I // KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES,INC. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 14081 YORBA ST., SUITE 105, TUSTIN, CA. 92880 (714) 838 -4960 SHEET ( (p Joe J SZ62 • r-' I f I i , 1 I _B i lc* 11111111111 ,44 I ; J f - t - ----- PE • EMMEN IMINEMEMEMEIMI =Er 1 - 114081 YORBA STRgET; SUITE 105 •TUSTiN, CAL1HORNIA 98780 •(714) 8364960 -- ) • c KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, INC. lS �1lc. .w F STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 01/0 rrA 1Z- - .._ 3t7 - X 0. I 13z 1Nfi X- 'xg o. 1494- 7-0 fi vJAW 1C 1l� fs g`., o .104- _ 4 ? 445 `���� X X 20 VN - = Z� )( ( ( = 2 14081 YORBA STREET, SUITE 105 • TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 • (714) 8384960 SHEET ( 7 JOB °)8Z5 BY �' -S 20 /�„Z90*F/F LPG -r czA-� �.. r KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, INC. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 2 >c *45 p! t 2 1s 1193) =(l l err ) EGA -- - xx 44 s - 13 o 0 �3�5 ' l 1335 ./U6 b r ter —130 ( qC2 _Gi1,o d- = ►: `a-�} S A a y �a �( 1 / 514, Sal 1 k- -1 ,22, y.p /27 1 • 7.25 3.83 '' 11 /3,350 � 1894(d UtQJ , 4 .13 o, Bf2M " /0•8-7 1(4• F = . 5 x 1.3'x,• 1.(01.= . 11.11'. 14081 YORBA STREET, SUITE 105 • TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 • (714) 838-4960 SHEET 1 €' JOB 6 '0,Z5 -4 BY (1,14-) to dra J ICI ' _.. tib2r4 VIII:: r47)(0•4 5.7/a i¢ M,P,. S Sib(' OK M .I 9 PS{.O. 1 . 7 .. Igt;70.P � _ .3x s Xg t (ad- -.o c KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, IN: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS +qtr - -,g _. _)( 1 6oX to X .‘ co4r -- 11 8 x � '`) ¢� . 88 'lie- x'17 -* 29° - - x +17 =- 12. bl _ P .4 1 7 X601/1X 101N =712( is t� _ x Z3 8 - z�z3 . )‹ - = 3� - • V 1 s 17 = tt S 7,S z loft fl/I = l° 17 4..S srr&dT e P = - ,qo )( = 47 o • (10414 1 Ile lroq t-PS 14081 YORBA STREET, SUITE 105 • TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92880 • (714) 838.4880 SHEET JOB ° )e , BY ■ srr - t o� I 0 Plp, 4121/1 z)MS1I GO W A ( ' / 0 9 toe 5 1 Eng °1 1\A" =7 I a AY 2 4A • 4 -114 7 51 ‘ 1 — 5/6 Lttd 41-1 \1 1 ' 7 4" - . 0 11V1 1• 4 "-rel..•=0.1 1.6 KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, INL P-r - 5; 1,1'7 1, tc: • STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 0,ss For. A40x ofiG)i--(2.g.A. A koc 4:10) v . 5 46'4 145-4e = /6 K 59 1 5 11Pb =. 5, 4-cm C 4/A /e MtE-ra. Y e F 8, erc, 6 1.9 14- c,orz..)( QTNI „ Gv. 7 .01. Ii-lK1 0 6 x0, s - 1 - 6•6:WK;le PArv- 5 ▪ 47. . 0 tc— • 14081 YORBA STREET, SUITE 105 • TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 • (714) 838-4960 BY SHEET JOB 6 29V/Hcrefr 1*kx`IX'4 KEN OKAMO O & ASSOCIATES, IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Sir l�- LN d (, (d 9/ (702,3 t 2,6X3)4,1- c )10€ 44. Pte- '7 I t 2 � X . q ?� -Sx. itr9/CH �. 14081 YORBA STREET, SUITE 105 • TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 • (714) 838-4960 SHEET 2 JOB €25Z BY • KEN OKAMSO & ASSOCIATES, IN y,442_49 V4 t/VS 2 O OD t''S 2111 I- r f r) 3 >c:3 4. >. 00)(10 ti STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS JOB ( ..r2,767.... t�1 = 4, -� z =6�� 4�'iF 1�1 =L 5 14081 YORBA STREET, SUITE 105 • TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92880 • (714) 838.4080 SHEET 22 BY ' iekA F. 8 ...11.Sx $t�p5� �-���� x z1 ` =1 psr = (o00 A z ( g2 3 � 3 -z- , a X13 �y� - - _ l �6 G = o . 5" ` p= I, s 464 _ , �8 � <2k 6 7 If I O N • N 1 9; PIE; 1 0 ;1 2 1 - 1j1k KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, IN6 S PN z 1 el Cr 5o/c.5 2t � - DK --eD leol Z,o CeN - -r • K - f -. �.I a P . *We As 1 = [ - S 4 ' - 3 SP > -+--I 2 x 1 4 r s r - = ' 4 _ , / 8 / I N Pvo1 N, _ STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 0 on 7.8 9' z 14081 YORBA STREET, SUITE 105 • TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 • (714) 838.4980 SHEET JOB 6i [‘41; I'S i P //0- P = ryv. = /b3/ ', Pi - k A- /5,3 $' y j BY ty e'er, Pre 15110_ 1 81 : 17e 4_. S i15 '... .:: • .: • • 14 '00 0/ 25PM ADLIN CONSTR 94 951 5210 ••••■•■■•• Ask Well & ItatnIts, Iuc 2M1 MP Ave. A' Greham, WA Mt (St) 11474113 AWN Construction Project: Claim Sumps, Tukwila. WA ATT.: In Beath. City of Wiwi!' RE: Roofing System on Clam Jumper Built up P.00fng is per pi end Specification and is a class A4 ply built up roofing system and is installed per menuflicturen requirements to meet 20yr application guidelines by the rnenulkturers requirements to meet 20yr application. • Guidelines by the manufacture. The manufacturer is Field, Corp. ofFife, WA. This system consists of 1 layer 2111b base mechenically attached 3 plies of type Vi ply sheet set in Mopping* of hot alpholt. 1 layer of mineral surfaced cap sheet sot M bot mopping of uphalt. All bus fleshings are SOS modified. To moot flail* requirements by the manufbaturer. The composition roofing ii 014111111 Corning clam A shingle.. The tile at Mansards are bladed per Monier Tile Specification. GO 6 11 *VIM .-,kJ 1 I r•411.101 P 2. 1) 8 - 04 0 CfTY JAN 1 4 2000 MITT CENTER NUMBER PRODUCT INFORMATION ASTM D226 ASPHALT SATURATED FELT Fields ASTM asphalt saturated felts are manufactured to meet the needs of many types of uses. The following six product numbers are available: PRODUCT NAME -TYPE F15 Shakeliner ASTM Hea F25 Type 30 ASTM Heavy 1'35 -89 Type 15 ASTM F35 -82 Type 15 3 square ASTM Heavy Duty F45 -89 Type 15 4 square ASTM ASTP, 1 square D- 226 -89 TYPE II 2 square D- 226 -89 TYp! II) Duty _.. • 3 square F45 -82 Type 15 4 square 0 - 226 - 82 TYPE I ASTM Heavy Duty Typical Test Data For ASTM D226 Felts D- 226 -89 TYPE I D-226-82 TYPE I D- 226 -89 TYPE 1 Roll width, Minimum inchesype 1 Ty 3 6 15 OR 30 Area of Roll, Minimum S.F. 324 or 432 324 or 432 216 or 180 Net Mass Satur. Felt Minimum Lb. 100 S.F. 13 11.5 26 Mass of Saturant Minimum Lb. 100 S.F. 7.3 6.2 Mass of Desatur. Felt Minimum lb. 100 S.F. 5.2 5.2 Ash; Maximum percent 10 10 Average Area of Hole Size When Perforated Maximum square inch .05 .05 Average Venting Area Minimum percent .1 . 1 .1 15 10 10 22 Taylor Way • Tacoma, WA, 98248 (206) 627 4098 Fa .05 GUARANTEE/DISCLAIMER: Fields Corporation guarantees t products to be free from manufacturing defects at the tim shipnent and suitable for their intended use. Fields Co ration will not be liable for the performance of their p ucts when damaged or impaired by construction design or w manehip errors, improper storage or use, inclusions or omissions. FIELDS Cl)RPORAMON HI N 1 INl i Id A. MI M71111114 8'd 0T2S TSE 6P6 1SN60 WrICH W090:60 66, TT ! NAILASLE DECK ONE PLY F11LDS GLAIS BASE THREE PLIES RELDS GLASS PLY ASPHALT APPLICATION RECOMMENDATIONS Roof deck shall be firm, clean, dry and smooth, Apply "Fields Glass' be sheet so low of water is over or parallel to, bul never against the laps. H shall be lapped 2' on aides and 6' on ends. Extend base sheet 2' above the top of the cant step. Nail the base sheet A' on center on the laps, and stagger nail two rows 18' on cenler,12' distant from each edge. AI TFANATF METHOD; Mechanically attach with approved laps and staple" method. Rows of tape shal be installed 12' on center. Stapie spacing shall comply with fastener manufacturer's requirements. Install an extra layer of 'Fields Glass' ply sheet in valeys and waterways. This 36' wide layer shell extend et least 5' up the inclines out of the valleys, set in a uniform layer of hot asphalt at a nominal rate o130lbs.lsquare. This ply shall he laid prior to the application of the roofing plies. Install 'Fields Glass' ply sheet so that the low of water is over or parallel to, but never against the laps, End laps she be at least 4' and adjacent end laps shall be at least 12' apart, Install three plies of 'Fields Glass" ply sheet in shingle fashion, lapping 243/4' with a 111/4' exposure. Starter strips of 12', 24' and 36' shall be used and the second full sheet shall be laid with a maximum exposure of 10'. Embed the lull vridth of the ply shoot In hot asphalt applied as a uniform nominal rate of 30 Tbs/squue. The ply shall be lightly browned ash is applied. Cut 'Fields Glass' cap sheet into 12.18' lengths depending upon temporatura and weather conditions, and allow lo relax, Apply 'Fields Glass' Cap Sheet so the low of water is over or parallel to but never against the laps. Embed "Fields Glass' Cap Sheet into a uniform solid mopping of hot asphalt applied m a nominal rate of 251bsJaquare, Set neatly in place with 2' side lap and 4' end lap. Adjacent end laps shall be at least 3' put, There must be complete adhesion between the 'Fields Glass' Cap Sheaf and the mopping asphalt. All guaranteed roof systems must be lashed according to the 'Flashing Details" section of this manual. All application recommendations and General Requirements Included In this manual are considered part of this specification. MINERAL SURFACE ROOF OVER NAILABLE DECK OVER 15132" COMBUSTIBLE DECKS MORASS U.L. Clans "A" up to 1/2" slope CAP SHEET U.L. Class "B" up to 3/4" slope ASPHALT SPECIFICATION NO: With Ply III: GLASS -1033 With Ply IV: GLASS -103.1 With Ply VI: GLASS-103-6 MICENALIngtagatila 1. "Fields Glass" base sheet -1 ply 2, "Fields Glass" ply sheet -3 plies 3. "Fields Giese" cap sheet -1 ply 4. Fields Asphalt-as required 5. Accessories and Flashing materials -as required. FIELDS CORPORATION C FIELDS CORPORATION Product Information F52 GlasBase2 Type 2 Glass Base Sheet USES F32 GlasBase2 is used to construct built -up roofing and waterproofing membranes. These membranes form a water shield over such structures as roofs, foundations, and decks, DESCRrPTION: F52 GlasBase2 is an asphalt coated fiberglass base sheet. Select raw materials have been for- mulated into a 1.80 lb fiberglass sheet. GlaaBeae2 is your best defense against attacks from weather, acid rain, ozone, and chemicals. With GlasBase2, your roofing and water- proofing membranes will perform much longer. GlasBase2 hal an Underwriters Laboratories (UL) CIass A Fire Rating when installed in specified systems. DIRECTIONS: Store F52 GlasBase2 on end, Keep pro- tected from damage and humidity. Tb install base sheets, the substrate is required to be firm, clean, dry, and smooth, Apply the GlasBase2 base sheet so that the flow of water is over or parallel to the seams. Lap the GiesBase2 2" or. the side laps and a minimum of 4" on the end laps, Extend the GlasBase2 to the head of all cants. Secure the GlasBase2 to the substrate by either nailing or adhering. For nailed base sheets, use nails with 1" heads and nail the GlasBase2 9" on center on both the outside edges and the seams, Also, nail two rows 12" in from each edge on 18" centers, and alter- nate the nails in each row so that they are offset from each other. For adhered base sheets, apply either Fields hot as- phalt or ambient asphalt and lightly broom the GlasBase2 into the asphalt as it is unrolled. For hot asphalt installa- tions, apply either MT3 RubrPae or T3 MeltPac at the rate of 25 lbs per 100 square feet. For ambient asphalt installations, use either M150 RubrSeal, M100 RubrCoat, or F100 PowrCoat at the rate of 5 gallons per 100 square feet. Install an extra sheet of GlaaBase2 in valleys and wa- terways. This extra sheet shall extend at least 8" up the in- clines of valleys and be applied as specified for adhered base sheets. To install ply shuts, the GlasBase2 is required to be firm, clean, dry, and smooth. Apply any one of the follow- ing as the ply sheets: M60 RubrPoly, M64 RubrPoly2, DIIR.ECTIONS CONTINUED F50 PolyBase, M62 RubrGles, M66 RubrGlas2, F56 GlasPly6, F32 GlasBase2, or FS4 GlaaPIy4. Install the ply sheets parallel to the base sheet so that the flow of water is over or parallel to the sea Apply 2, 3, or 4 ply sheets in shingle fashion on the cctrect laylines. Start by curing and installing the starter strips and continue by installing the ply sheets in a uniform interply application of either MT3 RubrPac or T3 MeltPac hot asphalt at the rate of 25 lbs per ply sheet per 100 square feet: Or apply M1SO RubrSeal, M100 RubrCoat, or F100 PowrCoat ambient asphalt et the rate of 5 gallons per ply sheet per 100 square feet. Magic: end laps a minimum of 4 ", Adjacent end laps shall be offset at least 12" apart. Lightly broom the ply sheets into the as- phalt as they are unrolled. To install the surface coating, the ply sheets are required to be firm, clean, dry, and smooth. Adhere an extra base flashing strip of GlasBase2 on all flashings at the same rate of asphalt as required for adhering base shees. Extend the extra base flashing a minimum of 2" above the head of the cants and a minium of 4" beycnd the toe of the cants. Then, uniformly coat the entire surface with any one of the following: M RubrPac, T3 MeltPac, M150 RubrSeal, M100 RubrCoat, F100 PowrCoat, M700 RubrGard, or F700 PowrGard. For hot asphalt coatings, apply 25 lbs per 100 square feet. For ambient as- phalt coatings, apply 5 gallons per 100 square feet. For maxi• mtun protection and reduced energy costs, apply M800 RubrStar reflective rubber asphalt over the asphalt coating. Allow the asphalt coating a minimum of 90 days to setup before applying RubrStar. TECHNICAL INFORMATION: Number of Rolls Per Pallet ...,... 30 Roll Dimensions and Size 36,0" x 108.0' = 324sf Typical Finished Roll Weight in lbs 65 SPEC F1CATIONS: FS2 GlasBase2 exceeds the stan- dards of the American Society for Testing and Materials ASTM D 46011ype II. — The above information is sit olec change without notice (5 /1/97). MANUFACTURER OF a UALITY ROOFING & WATERPROOFING PRODUCTS 2240 Tayl •.yay, Tacoma, WA 08421 • (253) or (800) 6 e r dn `'grennortipM iti r .,'el' 't ' }•t't prp,com FIELDS CORPORATION Product Information FS6 GlasPly6 Type 6 Glass Ply Sheet USES F56 GlasPly6 is used to construct built -up roofing and wa- terproofing membranes. These membranes form a water shield over such structures as roofs, foundations, and decks. DESCRIPTION: F36 GlasPly6 is an asphalt coated fiber- glass ply sheet, Select raw materials have been formulated into a 2.351b fiberglass sheet, GIasPIy6 is your best defense against attacks from weather, acid rain, ozone, and chemi- cals. With GlasPly6, your roofing and waterproofing mem- branes will perform much longer. GIasPly6 has an Under- writers Laboratories (UL) Class A Fire Razing when installed in specified systems. DIRECTIONS: StoreFS6 GlasPly6 on end. Keep protected from damage and humidity. To install base sheets, the sub- strate is required to be firm, clean, dry, and smooth. Use any of the following as a base sheet: M60 RubrPoly, M64 RubrPoly2, F50 PolyBase, M62 RubrGlas, M66 RubrGlas2, or FS2 GlasRase2. Apply the base sheet so that the flow of water is over or parallel to the seams. Lap the base sheet 2" on the side laps and a minimum of 4" on the end laps. Extend the base sheet to the head of all cants. Secure the base sheet to the substrate by either nailing or adhering. For nailed base sheets, use nails with 1" heads and nail the base sheet 9" on center on both the outside edges and the seams. Also, nail two rows 12" in from each edge on 18" centers, and alternate the nails in each row so that they are offset from each other. For adhered base sheets, appiy either Fields hot asphalt or ambient asphalt and lightly broom the base sheet into the asphalt as it is unrolled. For hot as- phalt installations, apply either MT3 RubrPac or T3 MeltPac at the rate of 25 lbs per 100 square feet. For am- bient asphalt installations, use either M150 RubrSeal, M100 RubrCoat, or F100 PowrCoat at the rate of 5 gal- lons per 100 square feet. Install an extra base sheet in val- leys and waterways. This extra sheet shall extend at least 8" up the inclines of valleys and be applied as specified for ad- hered base sheets. To install ply sheets, the base sheet or substrate is required to be firm, clean, dry, and smooch. Ap- ply GlasPly6 ply sheets parallel to the base sheet so that the DIRECTIONS CONTINUED flow of water is over or parallel to the seams. Apply 2, 3, ct 4 ply sheets in shingle fashion or, the correct laylines. Star by cutting and installing the starter strips and continue by installing the ply sheets in a uniform interply application ct either MT3 RubrPac or T3 MeltPac hot asphalt at the rate of 25 lbs per ply sheet per 100 square feet: Or apply M150 RubrSeal, M100 RubrCoat, or F100 Pos rCoet ambient asphalt at the rate of 5 gallons per ply sheet per :0C square feet, Make end laps a minimum of 4 ". Adjacent end laps shall be offset it least 12" apart. Lightly brocrn the ply sheets into the asphalt as they are unrolled. To install the surface coating, the ply sheets are required to be firm, clean. dry, and smooth. Adhere an extra base flashing strip on all fleshings at the same rate of asphalt as required for adhering base sheets. Extend the extra base flashing a minimum of 2" above the head of the cants and a minium of 4" beyond :he toe 6f the cants. Then, uniformly coat the entire surface with any one of the following: MT3 RubrPac, T3 MeltPac. M150 RubrSeal, M100 RubrCoat, F100 PowrCoat. M700 RubrGard, or F700 PowrGard. For hot asphalt coatings, apply 25 lbs per 100 square feet. For ambient as. phalt coatings, apply 5 gallons per 100 square feet.Fvrmaxi. mum protection and reduced energy costs, apply M800 RubrStar reflective rubber asphalt over the asphalt coating. Allow the asphalt coating a minimum of 90 days to setup before applying RubrStar. TECHNICAL INFORMATION: Number of Rolls Per Pallet Roll Dimensions and Size 36.0" x 180.0' 540sf Typical Finished Roll Weight in lbs 50 25 SPECIFICATIONS: F36 GlasPly6 exceeds the stan- dards of the American Society for Testing and Materials ASTM D 2178 Type VI. The above information is sub ect to chart e without notice S/1/97 , MANUFACTURER OF a UALITY ROOFING & WATERPROOFING PRODUCTS 2240 Tat,' Way, Tacoma, WA 98421 % (253) or (800) & 35lf/ . 676 . AO'=i nitrcWildir3 :r0 ", ii - -ti scorp,com C FIELDS CORPORATION Product I.nformation M68 RubrCap SBS Glass Cap Sheet ._._. USES M68 RubrCap is used as a mineral cap sheet in the con- struction of built -up roofing and waterproofing membranes. These membranes form a water shield over such structures as roofs, foundations, and decks. DESCRIPTION: M68 RubrCap is an asphalt coated fiberglass sheet. Select raw materials have been formulated into an SBS rubber mineral cap sheet. RubrCap protects from weather, acid rain, ozone, and chemicals. The SBS rub- ber in RubrCap provides maximum clastic performance against thermal shock, the daily expansion and contraction of a membrane caused by temperance changes. Membranes made weak from the assault of thermal shock cycles begin to break apart. RubrCap is your best defense against these attacks. With RubrCap, your roofing and waterproofing mem- branes will perform much longer. RubrCap has an Under- writers Laboratories (UL) Class A Fire Rating when installed in specified systems. DIRECTIONS: Store M68 RubrCap on end. Keep pro- tected from damage and humidity. To install base sheets, the substrate is required to be firm, clean, dry, and smooth. Use any of the following as a base sheet; M60 RubrPoly, M64 RubrPoly2, FS0 PolyBase, M62 RubrGlas, M66 RubrGlas2, or F52 GlasBase2. Apply the base sheet so that the flow of water is over or parallel to the seams. Lap the base sheet 2" on the side laps and a minimum of 4" en the end laps. Extend the base sheet to the head of all cants. Secure the base sheet to the substrate by either nailing or adhering. For nailed base sheets, use nails with 1" heads and nai the base sheet 9" on center on both the outside edges and the seams. Also, nail two rows 12" in from each edge on 18" centers, and alternate the nails in each row so that they are offset from each other. For adhered base sheets, apply either Fields hoe asphalt or ambient asphalt and lightly broom the base sheet into the asphalt as it is unrolled. For hot as- phalt installations, apply either MT3 RubrPac or T3 MeltPac at the rate of 25 lbs per 100 square feet. For am- bient asphalt installations, use wither M1SO RubrStal, Guaranteed to Perform Friendly to Apply Conforms to Most Surfaces Professional Grade Resists Sun's UV Rays Flexes with Thermal Shock DIRECTIONS CONTINUED M100 RubrCoat, or F100 PowrCoat at the rate of gallons per 100 square feet. Instal an extra base sheet it valleys and waterways. This extra sheet shall extend at leas; 8" up the inclines of valleys and be applied as specified for adhered base sheets. To install ply sheets, the base sheet or substrate is required to be firm, clean, dry, and smooth. Apply any one of the following as the ply sheets: M60 RubrPoly, M64 RubrPoly2, F50 PolyBase, M62 RubrGlas, M66 RubrGlas2, F52 GlasBase2, F56 G1aaPly6, or F54 GlasPly4. Install the ply sheets parallel to the base sheet so that the flow of water is over or parallel to the seams. Apply 1, 2, or 3 ply sheets in shingle fashion on the correct laylines. Start by cutting and installing the starer strips and continue by installing the ply sheets in a uniform: interply application of either MT3 RubrPac or T3 MeltPac hot asphalt at the rate of 25 lbs per ply sheet per 100 square feet: Or apply MiSO RubrSeal, M100 RubrCoat, or F100 PowrCoat ambient asphalt at the rate of 5 gallons per ply sheet per 100 square feet. Make end laps a minimum of 4 ". Adjacent and laps shall be offset at least 12" apart. Lightly broom the ply sheets into the asphalt as they are unrolled. To install the cap sheet, the ply, sheets are required to be flan. clean, dry, and smooth. Adhere an extra base flashing s - p on all fleshings at the same rate of asphalt as required for adhering base sheets. Extend the extra base flashing a mini- mum of 2" above the head of the cants and a rniti:urn of 4" beyond the toe of the cants. Then, use any one of the follow- ing as an adhesive to secure the RubrCap: MT3 RubrPac. T3 MeltPac, MIS0 RubrSeal, M100 RubrCoat, F100 PowrCoat, M700 RubrGard, orF700 PowrGard. For hot asphalt coatings, apply 25 lbs per 100 square feet. For ambi- ent asphalt coatings, apply 5 gallons per 100 square feet. TECHNICAL INFORMATION: Number of Rolls Per Pallet 23 Roll Dimensions and Size . 39.4" x 33.5' = 110sf Typical Finished Roll Weight in Founds 100 SPECIFICATIONS: M68 RubrCap exceeds the stan- dards of the American Society for Testing and Materials ASTM D 5147. The above information Is subject to chanac without notice (511/97). MANUFACTURER OF QUALITY ROOFING & 'WATERPROOFING PRODUCTS 2240 TayIS'dWay, Tacoma, WA 98421 • (253). or (800) t0t2S 1S6 6b6 1,6N0.D tJI idh :o0 65, IT• 61 corp.com FIELDS CORPORATION Product Information P58 GlasCap Glass Cap Sheet USES F58 GlasCap is used as a mineral cap sheet in the construc- tion of built -up roofing and waterproofing membranes. These membranes form a water shield over such structures as roofs, foundatipps, and decks. DESCRIPTION: F58 GlasCap is an asphalt coated fiber- glass sheet. Select raw materials have been formulated into a mineral surface cap sheet. GlasCap is your best defence against attacks from weather, acid rain, ozone, and chemi- cals. With GlasCap, your roofing and waterproofing rrem- branes will perform much longer. GlasCap has an Under- writers Laboratories (UL) Class A Fire Rating when installed in specified systems. DIRECTIONS: Store FS8 GlasCap on end. Keep pro- tected from damage and humidity. To install base sheets, the substrate is required to be firm, clout, dry, and smooth. Use any of the following as a base sheet: M60 RubrPoly, M64 RubrPoly2, F50 PolyBase, M62 RubrGlas, M66 RubrGlas2, or F52 GlasBase2. Apply the base sheet so that the flow of water is over or parallel to the seams. Lap the base sheet 2" on the side tapes and a minimum of 4" on the end laps. Extend the be sheet to the head of all cants. Secure the base sheet to the substrate by either nailing or adhering. For nailed base sheets, use nails with 1" heads Lnd nail the base sheet 9" on center on both the outside edges and the seams. Also, nail two rows 12" in from each edge on 18" centers, and alternate the nails in each row so that they are offset from each other. For adhered base sheets, apply either Fields hot asphalt or ambient asphalt and lightly broom the base sheet into the asphalt as it is unrolled. For hat asphalt installations, apply either MT3 RubrPac or T3 MeltPac at the rate of 25 lbs per 100 square feet. For ambient asphalt installations, use either M150 RubrSeal, M100 RubrCoat, or F100 PowrCoat at the rate of 5 gal- lons per 100 square feet. Install an extra base sheet in val- leys and waterways. This extra sheet shall extend at least DIRECTIONS CONTINUED 8" up the inclines of valleys and be applied as specified for adhered base sheets. To install ply sheets, the base sheet or substrate is required to be firm, clean, dry, and smooth. Apply any one of the following as the ply sheets: M60 RubrPoly, M64 Rubrpoly2, F50 PolyBase, M62 RubrGlas, M66 RubrGlas2, F56 GIasPly6, F52 GlasBase2, or F34 GlasPly4. Install the ply sheets paral- lel to the base sheet so that the flow of water is over or parallel to the seams. Apply.1,2, or 3 ply sheets Li shingle fashion on the correct laylines. Stan by cutting and installing the starter strips and continue by installing the ply sheers in a uniform interply application of either MT3 RubrPac or T3 MeltPac hot asphalt at the rate of 25 lbs per ply sheer per 100 square feet: Or apply M150 RubrSeal, M100 RubrCoat, or F100 PowrCoat ambient asphalt at tne rate of 5 gallons per ply sheet per 100 square feet. Make and laps a minimum of 4 ". Adjacent end laps shall be offset at least 12" apart. Lightly broom the ply sheets into the asphalt as they are unrolled. To install the cap sheet, the ply sheets are required to be firm, clean, dry, and smooth. Adhere an extra base flashing strip on all fleshings at the same rate of asphalt as required for adhering base sheets. Extend the extra base flashing a minimum of 2" above the head of the cants and a minimum of 4" beyond the toe of the cants. Then, use any one of the following a; an adhesive to secure the GlasCap: MT3 RubrPac, T3 MeltPac, M150 RubrSeal, M100 RubrCoat, or F100 PowrCoat. For het asphalt coatings, apply 25 Ibs per 100 square feet. Tor ambient as- phalt coatings, apply 5 gallons per 100 square feet. TECHNICAL. INFORMATION: Number of Rolls Per Pallet 30 Roll Dimensions and Size 36.0" x 36.0' = 108sf Typical Finished Roll Weight in Pounds 72 SPECYFICATIONS: P58 GlasCap exceeds the standards of the American Society for Testing and Materials ASTM The above Information is subject to char }e without notice (5 /1/97). MANUFACTURER Ole UAUTY ROOFING & 'WATERPROOFING PRODUCTS 2340 TayI9'4Vay, Tacoma, WA 98421 • (253) or (800) 6;et8 6b6 :1Sfs)05 Nfjd6 WH :60 66,- ft ']ftterp,com , PRODVT INFORMATION HOT ASPHALT 6 •.. (400 430 2240 Taylor Way • Tacoma, WA, 98421 (206) 827.4098 Fax (206) 383.2181 FIELDS HOT ROOFING ASPHALT COMES IN FOUR TYPES: Type I - , Dead Level; Type II - Flat; Type III - Steep; Type IV - Spe- cial Steep. This product is available in bulk, 100 pound cartons, and 50 pound Melt Pecs (Type III and Type IV. All four types Meet the Federal Specification SS- A -666D and ASTM D312 -89. FIELDS CoRPORATION does not specifically recommend the type of asphalt to be used an any particular roof. The selection or type of asphalt must be made by the specifier based on many variables including, but not limited to, roof pitch, type of construction, local roofing practices and weather conditions. Construction detail is the responsibil- ity of the built -up roofing specifier. The temperature at point of application will be EVT plus or minus 20 degrees Fahrenheit. Application conditions on the roof deck will vary with ambient temperature and wind conditions. A cold deck acts as a heat sink. In cold conditions, the tem- perature at point of application should, be near the high end of the tolerance. Do not heat the asphalt closer than•50 de- grees Fahrenheit to the flash point. The FIELDS container is meant to be a for only; it is not intended for unprotected long term storage. FIELDS CORPORATION tests and selects the best quality crude to ensure that our product meets ASTM re- quirements. TYPICAL TEST DATA Type I Type xI min max min max Softening Point ( F) 135 151 158 176 Flash Point ( 1') 475 ... 475 ... Penetration, units at (32 F) 3 ... 6 at (77 7) 18 60 18 .•40 at (115 F) 90 180 ... 100 Ductility at (77 7), cm 10.0 3.0 ... EVT (340'- 3707') (370'- 400'F) Solubility in Trichloroethylene 99 ... 99 r ... Type III Type IV min max min max Softening Point ( F) 185 205 210 225 Flash Point ( F) 475 ... 475 ... Penetration, units at (32 F) at (77 F) 15 35 at (11,5 F) 90 Ductility at (77 7), cm 2.5 EVT Solubility in Trichloroethy1ene 99 .,. 99 6 ... 12 25 75 1.8 (435 463'F) FJE'f.l).S' CORPORA HON 1 M N 1I Ir. . hLW it A,' 1111,! H C>" ©T2S TS6 6'76 49400 NI1pd Wd90 :60 66( TT mk, Qnce basic roof preparations have been completed (decking, Underlayment, battens and loading), insinuation of tiles may cbmmence. throughout this section of the installation Guide many conditions and related details will he covered. It is important to examine each condition carefully as to how it may or may not pertain to your particular roofing situation. Various roofing conditions will be addressed In a progressive manner. Care should he taken to ;niece both horizontal and vertical adlgnment of the courses. Mission :OW If battens are used, position first batten so that tile cxiends beyond fascia between ` /." and In • anplcations nt be placid over or andcr the hirdstnp or em ri ser strip. in f felt (n. applicaUons, a drip edge must first he lnsi,dlcd prior to fell installation. BIrdstnp or cave riser metal must lt'stalled heneuth felt or settled on to of the felt. No4e: MonlerLlfetile birdstops and cave risers are designed as accessary components to elevate the first course of field 1140 i'' \R APP1,1CATiON---- INs'1 ;\I,I,ING MORTAR Apply tortar along the cave edge, applying enough mortar to to elevate the ea a end of the tile to be even with the remaining roof tile. Point and smooth finish flush to cave lint. Minimum Vs' weep hole flush All di are apprru iniare 0 • d MonierLifetile tiles are installed with straight hood vertical alignment .111 others may be Installed straight or staggered. although it k rectum:10ndt d that Oat tiles be Installed with a vertleal stagger. Foreign panicles nun: be cleaned front all inlerlockintt urru to prevent tile breakage and water damming, Cracked or h. nken tiles should not he installed ur tttiouetl to remain on the roof. Tilc cuttings and dint should he removed nt the end of each day's work. tile to tine proper plane. if the birdstop or cove riser grip is installed under the rooting felt withhut art additinnal drip edge flashing in place beneath it. it is then considered rout flashing and must have it minimum d'' flange onto the roof or be settled to the roofing felt with roofing cement or other aaphalt•cnmpntihle adhesive. Since raised fascia. and 2" 2" starter strips create the same tnpt' of water chin situation, they both require an ttnti•pondinp sstent to allow water to Now off the roof. Fascia raised I If with nrlt•pondiii uu'tui Rashh►g, hlpered foam nr cant .t'lp ' .VX1 ' 1? E1 vi; I Ra:nh:utcrs should he minimum i' or (i depending en pitch. Tile nvc7hang should he tiro to a In t' / ;" npic.tl) Rccnnnnended Nnnt,•ri.detilc MVnd :ov Rlsrr Clouse Strip CS. Pal No..141KiN with the root deck shall he formed ttt :t spacing of ntd less than one Weep hole per ills. ''lONIEI414In I lLl: / 3.\N! IAI2Y 1 QfR 0618 9t'8 2%Z ONI 'ONId4O2 '2 113M 31tia WA ro:Fof 66- 90-0110 01;12/00 WED 17:45 FAX 425 861 6050 GEO ENGINEERS Engineers Prods° N1 .•icY0100 V4i01. Adlin Construction 25971 Pala Mission Viejo, Califomia 98062 Attention: Jerry Beach (Fax: 206 -575 -2624) January 12, 2000 Summary Letter — Construction Monitoring Claim Jumper Restaurant Parkway Supercenter Tukwila, Washington File No. 7539- 001 -01 j'-'0510 tt 001 REC CfTN OF M JAN I ' 201 r•�� consulting Engineers and Geoscientists 'Offices in Washington, Oregon, and Alaska INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE This letter presents a summary of our construction monitoring services during footing preparation for the Claim Jumper restaurant recently completed at the Parkway Supercenter site. The restaurant is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of South 180 Street and Southcenter Parkway. The purpose of our geotechnical engineering services for this stage of construction at the site was to evaluate the building pad and footing subgrade conditions prior to foundation construction. These services are a continuation of our construction monitoring services completed at the site during initial fill and surcharge placement that was accomplished by MBK Northwest in August 1998. We also prepared a geotechnical design report and design memorandum dated February 23 and April 8, 1998, respectively (GEI File No. 1284- 028 -01). Our specific scope of services included the following: 1. Provide geotechnical consultation during construction on a part -time, as- requested basis. 2. Review the project plans and specifications to see that our recommendations have been interpreted and implemented as intended. 3. Complete laboratory density and grain -size tests as appropriate to characterize import and on- site fill soils. 4. Evaluate the condition of footing subgrades and recommend excavation of soft, loose soils as necessary. 5. Evaluate structural fill placement and conduct field density tests. 6. Complete other site visits to evaluate earthwork activities on an as- requested basis. 7. Prepare a summary letter regarding our monitoring services. CeoEnglnccrs, Inc. 8410 154th Avenue N.E. Redmond, \VA 98052 Telephone (425) 861.6000 Fax (425) 8614050 vnmgeocngincers.com 01/12 /00 WED 17:46 FAX 425 861 6050 Adlin Construction January 12, 2000 Page 2 SUMMARY OF OBSERVATIONS M engineering technician visited the site a total of 6 times during footing preparation for the new building. The site visits were accomplished between June 3 and June 29, 1999. Observations and field density test results are summarized in the attached daily field reports numbered 1 through 6. The engineering technician evaluated the exposed subgrade by probing with a 'h -inch diameter steel probe rod and performing in -place density tests using a nuclear density gauge. Our observations and the results of in -place density tests performed in a random pattern along various building footing lines indicate that the slab subgrade was compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum dry density in accordance with ASTM D -1557. CONCLUSIONS Based on the fill testing that we completed as described above, we conclude that the work discussed herein was completed in substantial compliance with our recommendations and the project plans and specifications. We trust that this letter satisfies your current needs. Please call if you have any questions. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. G e oE n g i n e e r s s Attachments — Field Reports 1 through 6 DWM: Y;\70Iw799`7539001 \01\7539001 c1.doc GEO ENGINEERS o ► 1 &)el-16. Debra C. Overbay, P.E. Senior Engineer Daniel Mageau, P.E. Principal 7539.001 -01.1130 Quo: GeoEngineers 8410 154 Ave NE Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 861 -6000 FIELD REPORT Fde NUtnew 7539-00100 P •otect Claim Jumper Restaurant Omar June 29, 1999 freport Mune' in 6 O.vret: Claim Jumper Restaurants lerepme by: Don Huff Leeatien: Tukwila, WA ArnvMI 1000 Pep 1 of 1 Purges/tot Volt Construction Monitoring Wother Cloudy Gperturs: 1130 Perrot Number. We visited that site today at the request of Jerry Beach with Adlin Construction PERIMETER WALL FOOTING SUBGRADE PREPARATION: Since our to monitor earthwork activities. last visit, the foundation contractor perimeter located along Col. Line fill consists of grayish brown silty No. I, 131.5 pcf at 7.9 percent a front end loader and compacted subgrade with a 1/2-inch diameter the grade beam subgrade has interior utility contractors (sewer, Company, the backfdls were both a Wacker type hand tamper Water was added prior to the probe rod with penetrations on the adequately and the building pad is placed structural fill for the grade beam along the west perimeter wall footing 19 from Col. Lines F.1 to E as shown on the attached site plan excerpt. The fine to medium gravel with fine to coarse sand (recycled concrete, Curve optimum moisture content), The fill was placed in 4 to 6 inch loose lifts with with a Wacker type hand tamper (jumping jack). We probed the grade beam steel probe rod with penetrations on the order of rh to 1 inch. In our opinion, been prepared adequately and is ready for the grade beam concrete at this time. INTERIOR UTILITIES TRENCH BACKFILL: Since our last visit, the water and electric) Tines have been backfilled. According to Adlin Construction placed with a front end loader in 2 to 6 inch loose lifts and compacted with (jumping jack) and a 1.5' X 1.5' walk behind vibratory plate compactor. compaction process. We probed the backfdls with a 1/2-inch diameter steel order of 1 inch, In our opinion, all the utility backfills were compacted ready for floor slab concrete. Jerry Beach with Adlin Construction will call us if we are needed again. Thle report oomph, opnions fonned as a moue oi our throughout the duratan of the pro*, *ranks of tee employees or agenk Our firm will not b. reepons,bls for Attachments, Sununary of In -place Distribution: DCO, Adlut, FF obsorvarlons of activitles reeating to ae.YChntuel enctneefhp We ray on the contactor to comply vSO the plans ana ape iflosaons pnssnoe of ow reprosontotiwo. Our rwrk dos nut Inc'uds super.ision or grsptkn of the WAYN Wit Of lM eentlaet0L In job of sits safety On thle ♦!relic. Moisture and Density Tests and Site PI Excerpt Signed: se 01 1FED 17:47 FAX 425 8131 6050 GEO ENGINEERS X 003 01i12/00 WED 17:48 P,'X 425 861 6050 , GEO ENGINEERS 004 1 G` eo E[1gineerS 8410 154 Ave NE Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 861-6000 FIELD REPORT F.le Number 7539.001-00 ibrolect Claim Jumper Restaurant Date: June 17, 1999 OA,rer: Claim Jumper Restaurants ReportNumW 5 Prepared by. Lon Huff Location: Tukwila, WA Arrival: 1000 Pape 1 of 1 Purpose of vlsiK Construction Mowtoria8 Wather. Cloudy Cepedure: 1130 Permit Nunber. We visited that site today at the request of Jerry Beach with Adlin Construction PERIM WAL FOOTING SUBORADE PREPARA Since our to monitor earthwork activities. last visit, the foundation contractor 19 from Col. Lines F.1 to E as silty fine to medium gravel with optimum moisture content). The with a Wacker type hand tamper The test results indicated that the in accordance with ASTM D- for a city inspection prior to placed 2 -feet of structural fill for the perimeter footing located along Col. Line shown on the attached site plan excerpt. The fill consists of grayish brown fine to coarse sand (recycled concrete, Curve No. 1, 131,5 pcf at 7.9 percent fill was placed in 4 to 6 inch loose lifts with a front end loader and compacted (jumping jack). Two in -place density tests were taken in the structural fill. fill was compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density determined 1557. Thee interior utility lines have not been backfilled. The contractor is waiting backfilling, Jerry Beach with Adlin Construction will call us when we are needed again. This rapers present. eginlone forted as a fowl, of our obserwtions of ectMtlee te:etllp to puotechniOM engineering. We rely an the Cvnpaotpr to °amply WOUphout tM duration of the po Ineepevbse Of tie preaenoe of our represenletire, Qw Y.rprl does not mate a superhslon of dredion a employees or sperms. Out firm will not be rsepmelble far jab or sire safety an this propecl, Attachments: Summary of In -place Moisture and Density Tests and Site P1. Exce . Distribution; DCO, Adlln, FP Signori; /� i, _ , . , I_ /.. / WIM the pmns and specUlcetons the aivai work of lho vuntia°Wi, hie // 01/12/00 WED 17:51 FAX 425 861 6050 GEO ENGINEERS 2005 1 , Test Number' Test Date Test Method General Location Elev. (feet) Feet to Grade Soil Type Type Corn- pactor Field Moist. (%) Vi'} OMC Oiy Density (PCF) % Compaction Field Max. Field Spec. ( ,.y t 1 l44'�er''1 S(i 6 -er ___N____ 11 �� 5•A. Ad}i+irtesi.PEflafrl —' 3'5 6,4 '11 7.4 r, S ta:.1 IZL,T (I 14 2 %3 — — FidroidiL 5.T _ 'f A 1 G -try N 5•• hicliki Ste Quay+ f 1 1 1 Project: C. 1r i /YYL i u 'A? per CaiS4ot >!ataA4 Percent Compactor' Based on : fl Density Teal Method H - Nuclear (AS774 0-2922) SC - Send Cons (ASTM D -1556) 776 - Rubber Balloon (ASTM O-3167) Soil Typo S - Send a - sandy O - Gravel g . gravelly Si - Silt sI -silty C - Clay c - clayey t�* theveldom SUMMARY OF IN -PLACE MOISTURE AND DENSITY TESTS Standard Proctor (AASHTO T99.57, ASTM D-698) Modited Proctor (AASHTO T180.57, ASTM 0 -1557) Type of Compactor R - Rubber -Med Roller V - Vibratory Compactor S - Streepstoot father OD - Gdd Roller L- Loaded Scroper JJ - Jumping Jack BV - Backhoo Vibrator y Plate VP - Vibratory Plata HT - f land Tamper Abbreviations CMG - Optimum Moisture Content TIT - Retest of an nrel SI - Slightly File No. 1 1134- 5eInSer_ ._____ Page of _1 G G CO 01/12/00 WED 17:54 FAX 425 881 6050 GEO ENGINEERS 2007 01/12/00 WED 18:11 FAX 425 861 8050 Proured by. Dori Huff �uiFO1s of wet Geo 1'' Engineers 8410154 Ave NE Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 861 -� +000 Construction Monitoriug Attachments; Site Plan Excerpt FIELD REPORT Pw)ect. Claim Jumper Restaurant `iwnK. Claim Jumper Restaurants location: Tukwila, WA Wool 9.. Cloudy Jerry Beach with Adlin Construction will call us when we are needed again. Distribution; DCO. Adlin, PF Signed: GEO ENGINEERS 1J008 Anivsl. 1000 Peeerture: 1130 irs Number 7539-001-00 Otte Juoc 14, 1999 Royer? Nonoer. 4 Pogo 1 of 1 Penh Numbs!. We visited that site today at the request of Jerry Beach with Adlin Construction to monitor earthwork activities. PERIMETER WALL FOOTiNC SUBGRADE_P FpARAT f �N: Since our last visit, the foundation contractor excavated the deepened perimeter wall footing located along Col. Line 19 from Col. Lines F.1 to E as shown on the attached site plan excerpt. The exposed soil in the excavation consists of dense grayish brawn silty fine sand with occ. fine to medium gravel. The contractor re- compacted the exposed excavated subgrade with a Wacker type hand tamper (jumping jack). We probed the exposed excavated subgrade with a th -inch diameter steel probe rod with penetrations on the order of 1 to 2 inches. `Ilie depth of the footing excavation was sufficient to allow placement of a minimum 2.-feet of structural fill under the footings. In our opinion, the excavated subgrade has been prepared adequately for the 2 feet of structural fill under the footings. The interior utility lines have not been backfilled. Apparently, the contractor is waiting for a city inspection prior to backfilling. /no roar loosen% opinions !owned as mot a our obcerwuohs of eosxlia t.latnp to yoeteehnic.. snprtesunp. We lely on the ooSee for to eamply wih the plane end soscNoaeoes tnroupnout the dureton oI dis project Irr.specthe of IM presence of our ispresentetivs. Our work does not include sepsrvIsien or direction of the eats work of Ins so nls empXoy.ss el epenls. O r y rmt wdl net be respeMlble for job or lb gaiety on eh» mien. Ala • 01 /12 /00 WED 18 :11 FAX 425 861 6050 ••: i r • • i . y . • • •• • GEO ENGINEERS tJ 009 C 01/12/00 WED 18:13 FAX 425 861 6050 GEO ENGINEERS 2010 Geo Engineers 8410 154" Ave NE Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 861-6000 Prepared by Don Huff Purpmee d Mart: Construction Monitoring Protect • Claim Jumper Resiaurant OMter Claim Jumper Restaurants Location: Tukwila, WA - Mather. Partly Cloudy FIELD REPORT Mir*: 0930 Departure: 1200 Fri* Morrow 7539-001-00 June 9, 1999 Cow Numb.: 3 pal. 1 of 1 Pe umtvr. We visited that site today at the request of Jerry Beach with Adlin Construction to monitor earthwork activities. PERIMETER WALL FOOTING SUBQ&6.DE PRE RATION: Since our last visit, the foundation contractor completed excavating the perimeter wall footings and re- compacted the exposed footing subgrade. The exposed footing subgrade soil consists of grayish brown silty fine to medium gravel with fine to coarse sand (recycled concrete, Curve No. 1, 131,5 pcf at 7.9 percent optimum moisture content). The contractor used a Wacker type hand tamper (jumping jack) to re - compact the exposed footing subgrade. Eight in -place density tests were taken in the footing subgrade. The test results indicated that the areas tested were compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density determined in accordance with ASTM D -1557. There is a deep footing to be excavated along the west side of the building next week. They also plan to backfill a sewer line trench running east and west through the center of the structure next week. Jerry Beach with Adlin Construction will call us when they are ready for us to observe the deep footing and to test the sewer line trench backfill. Tbrs repel presents cpl'U n Conned s a result of our eetervorisrs of act 4UM ("litho to gootechnIcat englnebiing We raly on the eeetmctef b eampIy uirel the Pane Ind speclIcabont throughout the duration of the project Ineip•e■ve at the Pwience al our representethe. Our wed; Ores net Include suaenleion or direction of Me actual wars of the conaaror, his emproyone or agent. Our Inn , 1I not be responshNe err lob or site 'stow qn ft* profost. Attachments: Summary of to -place Moisture and Density Tests Distribution: DCO. Adlin, FP' Signed: ' test um' : , Test Date Test Meth. s General Location Elev. (feet) Feet to Grade Son Typo Type Come pador Moist. (%) OMC Peroont Comps:Son eased on : Q Standard Proctor (MSHTO T6357, ASTM D -4598) IS Modified Proctor PASHTO T100-157. ASTM D -15573 Nasky Test tAolhod • Type of Compactor M- *dear (AST/AD-2M) R - Rubber -6e Rater SC -Se dCoro(ASTMD-1E5) V- Vibratory Compactor Rt3 -Fiubbet Moon (AVM D-3 167) S - Sbeepsfoct Roller G D. fled Honor L- Loaded Scraper JJ - JumpkrQJack t3V - Bedew° Vibratory Pfeie VP - Vibratory Pieta HT- Hand Temper Soft type S -Send s -sandy Q -Gravel g- gantry St -Slit - s1 -dty o - clayey C Clay r Abbreviations OMC- Openers t`tobkiro Content RT- Retest el en area 51- Straitly Page 01 _1_ d N U 00 CO Q a S213314 I DO OD Geo 0 Engineers 8410 154" Ave NE Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 861-6000 FIELD REPORT umber: 753 9-001-00 Project. Claim Jumper Restaurant Data. June 4, 1999 owner Claim Jumper Restaurants Rep Number. 2 Prepared by. Don Huff location Tukwila, WA Arnvsl: 1000 Departure; 1200 Pays 1 of 1 Norma Number. Purpose or vim Construction Monitoring Mutter. Partly Cloudy We visited that site today at the request of' Jerry Beach with Adlin Construction PERIMETER WALL FOOTING EXCAVATION: The foundation contractor to monitor earthwork activities. continued excavating the footing subgrade during our this afternoon. They plan to of the re -compacted footing perimeter wall footing today. They have not started re- compacting the exposed visit today however they plan to start re compacting the footing subgrade later complete the footing excavations early next week, Jerry Beach with Adlin Construction will call us next week for density testing subgrades. nos presents opinions formed ei a fKYtt of ow observationa throughout the duration of eve pio)act irraspecave of the employees or agents. Our firm will riot be responsible for Attachments: Distribution: DCO, Adlin, P of activities fetating to geotechmlcai emgWMaring• We rely on the coMrae%or to ce1Ply with tM plans ervd ipeclN$one presence of our representative. Our week does not include supeMaien 01 direction vl the ai%si wort of the eontrecbr, his job or sits safety on this project Signed: .L . , - - Y. . 01/12/00 WED 18:15 FAX 425 861 6050 GEO ENGINEERS Z012 0 1/12/00 WED 18:17 FAX 425 881 8050 GEO EYGINEERS GeoEngineers 8410 154 Ave NE Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 861.6000 Prepared by Dan Huff Woo* vox: Construction Monitoring IIPMPOOMMOOMONOVOIOW Attachments: Distribution: DCO, Adlin, FT FIELD REPORT Rrle NvTber ro t. Claim Jumper Restaurant r' Claim Jumper Restaurants Location: Tukwila, WA Bather Partly Cloudy Signed: 1030 Deem* 1230 At the request of Jerry Beach with Adlin Construction, we plan to visit the site tomorrow. 7539.001-00 June 3, 1999 Ripon Number: 1 Pape 1 Pmt Number: 81013 We visited that site today at the request of Jerry Beach with Adlin Construction to monitor earthwork activities. pENELFTEEI WALLED EXCAVATION• The foundation contractor started excavating the perimeter wall footing today. Four test pits were excavated at each corner of the building to determine the depth of compacted fill above the underlying soft and wet silt and silty sands. These test pits were located at Col. Lines M -la (southwest corner), Col. Lines M -19 (northwest corner), A -18 (northeast corner) and D -1 (southeast corner. The exposed soil at the required footing depth (18 inches) consists of douse brownish gray recycled concrete. We excavated to a depth of 2 to 2,5 feet below the bottom of the proposed footing to determine the depth of the dense recycled concrete. In all four test pits, there was 2 to 2,5 feet of dense recycled concrete (structural fill). The underlying silt and silty sand was probed with a 1/2-inch diameter steel probe rod with penetrations on the order of 1 inch. In our opinion, it appears that there is at least 2 feet of compacted structural fill under the proposed perimeter wail footing as recommended in our Geotechnical Report dated 2- 23-98. We recommend that the contractor re- compact the exposed footing subgrade after the excavation. We plan to test the footing subgrade prior to pouring the footing. This meal prevents opinions formed BO a reeuh of ow easenitrone of activities rNating to geetechnlal eogkNNing. We rely en the contractor u oterety oat We alma ens wow throughout Mt ovation of the project if:espsc of the presrwe of our rewrewntetho. Ow work Oar no ieekrde WparvinIOrt or *motion of the newel work of V* collector emeoyaes or agents. Our firm will not be resparelWu for jar or sib safely on tfmis pct JOIST SPAN pow a n. HOLE FACTOR A . II C 0 6 14' 1=3' TO 2.6 3"-9' 5-0^ Ill 1 -3' 2' -3' 3-3» 4'6" 5.9 1A' F-6" 3 -0 4 5:6 6-9' 20' r -9 3' -0' 4' -3' 5'-6' T -o' I2 7 -0' 3., -0- 4•-3- 5 .. 4 . 73 •• 24' 2-3" 3' -3' 4'46 5'4' 7-6" 26 2-3' 3 -4' 4'-9' 6•0" J -9" Z8' 2 -6' 4'-0" : 5' -3 1 6'4" ir0" 30' 2-9' 4•-3' 5 . -9 .. l ?V t-6.. 32 3'•0' 4 -6 6 -C' 7.6 9' -3 34' 3' -0' 5•' 6'-6 T0' 4' -9 36' 3 3 ' 5 -4r 6' -4" 84' 10=3 Round Has Shia r r 4r" r 1■r 12" 14" 16" isamidist Min Slat SW 2W• 314 Iii' 6" OW 9W 11%l 14' 0 E Tr' 1i' w OKI 11 4] jj,, C] I V D C E a f 24' 4' 1'.3' A C D E 26" 4' 1' -3" A e C E I -3' r A 4' I -3' , v L HOLE CHARTS AND TJI BLOCKING PANELS t••; t r rn HOLE CHART INSTRUCTIONS: IONS: 1. Knowing joist depth and desired hole site, find hale factor or hale location on Table I . 2. Refer to Table 2. The distension shown where the joist span and hole factor thorn Table I i intersect is the minimum distance from inside 1. ace ul support to neared edge of hole. Ecample: l8 - Tr" joist with Performance Plus "treb. 8' diameter round hole. 21 %0" joist spas reenter -to- center of suppodl. L. Frc I Table I. factor I; C. 2. From Table 2. the newest edge of the hole must be least 4 from inside face of support. TABLE 1 - HOLE FACTORS AND LOCATIONS -r• ASSUMPTIONS: Tables ate Itasca w► 'Wore* loaded applications or buik1ing cu k: provisions Fur concentrated loath; 121 1)1 lb. "vet 2 4kca squat with 25 p f dead .uuf NO l tradition loading. RN f►hIs supporting concentrated loaA:mother atmlitiontv Woltbiie excepting. contort Tuur•Tns lots[ MacMillan representative. Tables ate based on simple spas applications. For uniIoui y loaded cantilever and continuous span applicitinns. the hales oust be located one inch further from the support lot each loot of jdst seam than the values Indicated In the tables. Ds aotest hobs w cadaver arse tsitheut contudtw pour Wes {obi Machiliaa reprasentatlw. r .1....- l._..._. TABLE 2 - HOLE LOCATIONS GENERAL NOTES: Yttftlp a Notre Where more than one hole is to be col m the web. the length of the man web between holes must be twice rte length of the lon ension of the brggestacent hole. stole Siam The saes given in the table ate hole sixes, not duct sites. Rectangular Me sizes are based on meawrtasenl oI the longest side TA* BLOCKING PANELS / TimberStrande LSL RIM BOARD - t0 N t0 t0 0 tD 01 • 0 Aug -25 -99 O9:57A ScheerTa kaDctucbyArthll4C4lec. 11201 DA !trite, CA 92614 (714) B63-19C0 Pu (714)663-3160 _'_.1- trA‘7•14 ca-114 vet-tfi CLAIM JUMPER RESTAURANT TUKWILA - kei.10 ti 4UL - n r - -12! 1 * Hol.0 s .ek44 . P.O3 OQ Job No.; . 9 d r/ ...- . -..... Poo No.. Valuation Summary Occupancy Restaurants Decks Type Type V N Deck - Covered CITY OF TUKWILA Id: ACTP125 Keyword: ®ACTM User: 1671 Activity Table Processing Permit No: EST98 -01 Status: PENDING Enter Table Screen Number: 7 or ESC =Exit Table Processing CITY OF TUKWILA Id: ACTP130. Keyword: ®ACTM Activity Maintenance - Valuation Calculator Permit No: EST98 -01 Status: PENDING 77.80 12,185 11.36 2,232 Subtotal: 14,417 Multiplier 1.00: Addl Fixed Amount: Total Valuation: Enter factors or F2.Select Occupancy ESC•Exit Val Calc 10/01/98 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT Type: DEVPERM Vers: 9801 Screen: 06 Building and Demolition Permit Fees Only Temporary Bldg Fee(Y /N)..:N .00 Building Fee (Y /N) •Y 5,485.25 Other Bldg Fee (enter $): .00 Rack Storage Fee .00 Plan Review Fee (Y /N) Y 3,565.41 Total Building Fees: Other Plan Rev (enter $): .00 $ 9,055.16 Building Surcharge (Y /N).:Y 4.50 Demolition Fee (Y /N).:N 00 Other Demo Fee (enter$): .00 Work w/o a Permit (Y /N)..:N .00 Inspect After Hrs (hrs)..: .00 Reinspections (hrs) • .00 Other Inspections (hrs)..: .00 Add'l Plan Review (hrs)..: .00 F1 =List Screens User: 1671 10/01/98 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT Date of Table used: 04/01/1998 Factor Sq. Feet Valuation 947,993.00 25,355.52 973,348.52 973,348.52 .00 973,348.52 12 te4 vet+. isb 1)4W covord4 1460 4w�rf �uti Ci #i JL4NVW R eakuw+wt APPLICATION TO OPERATE A PERMANENT FOO BUSINESS NAME AND ADDRESS � i 9A iuIcA t !£g MAILING ADDRESS (if different from above): Seattle -ring County Department of Public Health Environmental Health Division- Licenses and Permits 999 3`'t r., Suite 700 - Seattle, WA 98104- 2311- (306) 29' 7 PLEASE CHECK ALL BOXES THAT APPL / /0 ermic Renewal ,� � New Operation / / Change of Name' 'If change, what was previous name? WHAT CLASSIFICATION ARE YOU APPLYING FOR? (See re e) If a restaurant or cavern, what is seating capacity? 8 P ty ESTABLISHMENT DIFORMATION / / Sole Owner / Corporation / / Partnership If a restaurant, is establishment 100% non - smoking? / / Yes / / No If a grocery store, 4 of checkout stands? / / Change of Ownership MANAGER/OPERATOR NAME Name Address OWNERSHIP INFORMATION NAME OF OWNER (if partnership, list names of all partners. Attach additional sheets if necessary) 3i 1 CE ESTA r {.LSHMENT OFFICE USE ONLY BID = i'-4B - 54 II LI 3 PaMET APPROVED / / SIGNED FEE SCHEDULE — SEE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS FORM. , ap F S PRORATION (PERIOD — 10 /1 T'rRU 3/31 1 /.1 annual fee) .S PENALTY TOTAL FE . DUE .5 Phone Del:PORTANT MESSAGE TO APPLICANT: Please complete all information requested above and return this form and your check to the address at the top of this form. Failure to fully complete form may result in it being returned for completion. All permanent food establishment permits expire on March 31st of the permit year. Renewal applications are mailed each year in late February. This otI'ice should be notified of any change in your mailing address. If you do not receive a renewal application by February 23th, please notify this office at the phone number listed above. Late fees are charged if permits are riot renewed prior to expiration. Signed/' DISAPPROVED / / DATE Date CLASS CODE 1.A. RESTAURANTS (2) Seating Capacity 1 -75 (3) Seating Capacity 76 -150 (4) Seating Capacity 151 -250 (5) Seating Capacity over 250 1OD SERVICE FEE SCHEDULE -199` 19. C?,i .EIS (if not part of another food service establishment) l.C. FOOD - PROCESSING ESTABLISHMENTS ID. SNACK BARS (no food preparation) LE. MOBILE FOOD SERVICE UNITS (1) Mobile Food Carts. base re- S190 S190 5190 S 65 • S185 (IA) Additional locations. each S 65 (2) Restricted Mobile Food Vehicles, base fee S185 (2A) Additional vehicles, each • S 65 (3) Unrestricted Mobile Food Vehicle, base fee 5215 (3A) .Additional vehicles, each S 65 12. TEMPORARY FOOD SERVICE ESTABLIS'F CENTS — Food service establishment operating at a fixed location for not more than twenty -one (21) consecutive days in conjunction with a single event or celebration. (See fee schedule on Te.nnnrari Food .3er/ice Aoolication) 1.G.1. FOOD DEMONSTRATORS S115 1.0.2. FOOD PROMOTES S250 1.E TAVERNS (no food preparation) S 90 2 A. GROCERY STORES (1) Lass than 4 checkout devices S 65 (2) 4-3 checkout devices S140 (3) Over 3 dheckout devices S250 2.B. BED A,W BREAIGAST (1) Continental Breakfast S 65 (2) Full Service Breakfast S155 3. RETAZ BA:C:RES 5155 4. REDUCED FEE ESTABLISIL LENTS Religious, charitable, or educational organization or institution with an Internal Revenue Service 501(CX3) nonprofit tax - exempt status operating a food service establishment S 50 School luncheon '/z fee for applicable category above Vending facility under the supervisiuri of the Washington State Commission for the Blind '/-. fee for applicable category above PLAY REVIEW AND REINSPECTION FEES New construction S270 Remodel 5205 Multiple permits in one facility (2+) (each) 5135 Rcsubmittal (per hour) Cost of Service Subsequent pre -occupancies, on -site inspection prior to plan submittal, or on -site inspection when no plan review is required 5100 Temporary establishment (see Temporary Application Fonn) Second reinspecrion '/2 fee for applicable category above Permit reinspection fee following permit suspension Full annual permit fee for applicable category LATE FEES Annual permits, 10 -30 days 15% Annual permits, more than 30 days 50% School lunchroom -0- Seasonal permit. S 25 MIISCELLA.NEOUS FEES Duplicate permit 5 25 Change of name, no other change S 25 Request for variance S150 Check returned by the bank S 25 Processing of a refund S 25 .Ater hours inspections requested by food establishment owner Cost of Service Provided, that if the application pertains to a seasonal food service establishment or a food service establishment that is to be operated only attcr October 1 in any year, the applicable permit tee shall he one -half (112) the annual fee specified above. SENT BY:KEN -OFC Type of Building and Use: Secondary Conductor Size: )perating Hours: SIGNATURE PUGET SOUND ENERGY ;10- 2-98 ; 5 :33AM ; Project Name Service Address N Owner D pA 2SF �[ Address 1 Lp 2. J 14 t Lt-/ kA-I, Contr./Dev. Address Electrician Address Gas Plumber Address Architect On Site Coordinator kE.GEJVED Et.c ' 9 58 Received Oct -02-88 08 :S0am �S A-t1 itrt Total Sq. Ft, g # of Tenant Spaces: Secondary Voltage: I J s tog V: ; %7j Neutral Size: Construction Start Date: ELECTRICAL LOAD IN 1.C■ 1 1 PHASE L p . , r i S E L ,C) igniting :voting °_levators (sex detail below) 7thcr Motors (see detail below) Mater Heating :ooking .iixollaneoua Existing Load "oral Conn Load , .st. Total Demand 4ain Electrical Panel 2�� ( ' e , i 4 1 1 s // 44-4 -- / / PLet Motors: Indicate I or 3 Phase and NEMA Code if over 7 V HP ] Elevator: Number X Other Map -J 'RESSURE REQUIRED Vill gas bc used for dry out? 0 Ye From-206 3656818 City City City City sq. ft. Per !pace: Phase Wire Number of Rums: Tenant 3. 4. 5. 7. a. Days per Week: PUGET POWER 7147514216;# 3 New us. inter Constr ction Application for Commercial Project 22828 68 Avenue So., Nita 102, Kent, A 98032 Project Manager: Phone Number: State (,jf} Zip Phone (I ) Phone (7,I) .''7 -9 0o _/ 1_te State , Zip +L Fax ( ) Zip Fax ( ) Zip Fax ( ) Zip � Phone Phone Phone LIST GAS METERS_Il'X TENANT SIZE (TOTAL CFR) Phone ( 3 State ( ) State ' Phone ( ) State ' ( ) ( ) Type Customer `7 To -OLP KARJALA ASSOC, CAI it of Floors: UV' ELECTR1CIMLTES BV TENANT PA Tenant I u 2; 31 4; 5; 6. - HP Phase I'IEMA Code 1-HP ?* Phase 1VEMA Code INCHES WATER COLUMN POUNDS PRESSURE ❑ No Has your plumber confirmed delivery pressure? ❑ Yes t] No 1 affirm that the above information is correct to9thc best of my knowledge. I understand that any changes I make in f above information or attached drawings may increase the time required for Puget Sound Energy to pr • sv •icc to my proj that I might bc liable for additional engineering and coltltructiun costs. 1 DATE . Type Customer e ct, and CI OF TUKWILA Pain 03 OCT 0 7 1998 PERMIT CENTER Project Info Project Address C LAY "/ JV tylp Z ii.orw lighting ge being ❑ Less than 60 % of the fcdures are new, and installed Ii wattage is not i Date /0. ,5_ 9i pR gM ' 6 UPO4 . C•t 77i . -' LJ _ • ., E. • 0 •vL ..sit. " 4l •, :_: For Building Department Use J cJkL - / Ar , ii Applicant Name: Pea ( v /_ ��,� E. 14 1 p J AIL Applicant Address: / Z r" 1 ! i r i Lt..' l ich AIL 1 EXEMP f Applicant Phone: 714 '1 -400/ ., Alteration Exceptions (check appropriate box) 0 No changes are being made to the lighting • _ lighting ge being ❑ Less than 60 % of the fcdures are new, and installed Ii wattage is not i cation (floor /room no.) Occupancy Description Allowed Watts per re — Area in a Allowed x Area . =/V IPA i = C.%RAT /V . PaIDA Air " O4 'r i .r r % i t I 1 O ii , r 1 m 0 - a- - _ ::.'5 1 EXEMP L�k• ., Outdoor Area - .i; Ti1alll - H M_MEr I (to •' .. 80 'n/A /T1W44 I ' 3v / ..4 ' „ - , r s „ S /)%1/ /wcmgl i COM• LI/a/z PWAIL7 ". ' r7Mv/a/6 /a2 1 PELo.,:g r ioAMr ' Pb" 11 Ag ,ea -rive paIA ' " pi " 2 I c c Z oo 11 1 P ECoRArive, p.wa r " 02" 3 40 120 1 2.490 Total Proposed Watts may not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Intenor Total Proposed Watts •- From Table 15-1 (over) - document all exceptions taken from footnotes Total Allowed Watts -7444 Location (floor /room no.) Fixture Oescriotion Number of Fixtures I Watts/ I Fodure Watts Proposed . =/V IPA i = C.%RAT /V . PaIDA Air " O4 'r -'Z, I o i I2o et 1 /n/c4vc. /0WAIL/ //t (" " 1 1 Go i so t I : -• it.= a - 7 075 11 p" Outdoor Area - .i; Ti1alll - H M_MEr I (to •' .. 80 'n/A /T1W44 I ' 3v / ..4 ' „ - , r s „ S /)%1/ /wcmgl i COM• LI/a/z PWAIL7 ". ' r7Mv/a/6 /a2 1 PELo.,:g r ioAMr ' Pb" 11 Ag ,ea -rive paIA ' " pi " 2 I c c Z oo 11 1 P ECoRArive, p.wa r " 02" 3 40 120 1 2.490 Total Proposed Watts may not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Intenor Total Proposed Watts Location r .r v Description Allowed Watts per ft or per tf Area in tt2 (or If for perimeter) Allowed Watts x 11 (or x If) Covered Panang 02 Wflt Open Parking 0.2 W/1t Outdoor Area 0.2 W/R Bldg. (by facade) . 0.25 W/11 Bldg. (by penm) 717AL bl -P4 igvnE, -o-- 7.5 WAf 3 7-5 Nate: for building extenor, choose edher the facade area or the oenmeter method. but not both) Total Allowed Watts Sj • COM 'AC" LU GaoOL Number of Fixtures Fixture Description Total Proposed Watts may not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Exte nor Total Proposed Watts 1 Washinat State Nonresidential Ener. Coc liance Form Lighting Summary Project Description New Building Q Addition ❑ Alteration Compliance Option ❑ Prescriptive gUghUng Power Allowance (See Qualification Checklist (over). indicate Prescriptive 8 LPA spaces dearly on plans.) Maximum Allowed Lighting Wattage (Interior) Proposed Lighting Wattage (Interior) Way not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Interior) Maximum Allowed Lighting Wattage (Exterior Proposed Lightin , Watta e (Exterior) (May not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Exterior) ?AcE/ Project Info Project Address CL'//l ✓0PIPE2 P 7 4 ( 4 / / 7 Date / 0 . 6 _ q g Watts/ Failure For Building Department Use • , � � ca, - l u g p � vo ' V ,' • Applicant Name: Applicant Address: . Applicant Phone: Alteration Exceptions (check appropriate box) ❑ No changes are being made to the lighting • _ ❑ Less than 60 % of the fodures are new, and installed lighting wattage is not being increased location (floor /room no.) F'o:ture Description Number of Fixtures Watts/ Failure Watts Proposed 4 ; 4 / W A / I . ? f , � � ca, - l u g p � vo ' V ,' • Nil ' WWI ,I r, " DrGo 2 T/VF ,L O SCE "DB" 1 s , ri klzTt W7` D/ °°.4 5007: •' 5" 4 EX iiItifT Co LOD(6 .mom DECOA4rtvE talChltr 11 96, „ I. 60 (10 '' 2Ec PJ T / VE ?St/o'Rir t' D5 " 4 ?. ;' / 00 1, /ti c�+uo. lv�cl[ " A {' . '1 I. bC 5 0 <{ 20 44 / c: 4 iD WALL A c2- " 2 " A -77F %r Ri5 PlAy 5 Po7v7 " t 4 �x1 » r r) - ______ L4/ 3 Total Proposed Watts may not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Interior Total Proposed Watts Location Fixture Description Number of Fixtures Watts/ Fixture Watts ProPo C Nil ' WWI ,I Al- , Lh/oK. CV, ::r .■ ... • N r'/ rt I .- 2 11- Lighting Summary Project Description Compliance Option ❑ Prescriptive ❑ Lighting Power Allowance (See Qualification Chec1dist (over). indicate Prescriptive 8 LPA spaces dearly on plans.) Maximum Allowed Lighting Wattage (Interior) Location (floor /room no.) Occupancy Description AJiawed Watts per tt' 1 " From Table 15-1 (over) - oocument all exceptions taken from footnotes Area in ft Total Allowed Watts Allowed x Area Proposed Lighting Wattage (Interior) (May not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Interior) Maximum Allowed Lighting Wattage (Exterior) Outdoor Areas Bldg. (by facade) Bldg. (by penm) 1.994.Washinatr State Nonresidential Enera Cod :dmolianceForm ❑ New Building ❑ Addition Description Note: for building exterior, choose either the facade area or the perimeter method, but not both) ❑ Alteration 0.25 W/ft 7.5 will Proposed Lighting Wattage (Exterior) (May not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Exterior) Total Allowed Watts Total Proposed Watts may hot exceed Total Allowed Watts for Exterior Total Proposed Watts P4& 6 2 Allowed Watts x tt (or x If) Location Description Allowed Watts per ft or per If Area in ft (or if for perimeter) Allowed Watts x ft (or x If) Covered Parting Applicant Name: 0.2 W/R Applicant Phone: 2'1 Open Parting ❑ New Building ❑ Adddbn ❑ Alteration • 0.2 Wes' Compliance Option C2 Prescriptive ❑ Lighting Power Allowance (See Qualification Checklist (over). Indicate Prescriptive & LPA spaces dearly on ptarts.) Outdoor Areas 0.2 W/ft Bldg. (by facade) I OE .•z.:, !i:,. 0.25 W/ft . 2 5 7'. Bldg. (by perm) PC • ■L_ 45CCIAJCa t, 7.5 W/U 2173 /00 �.:' � ._• Alteration Exceptions (check appropriate box) ❑. No changes are being made to the lighting. _ ' Date /0 — 5 - 9 ghting ❑ Less than 60 % of the fixtures are new, and installed lighting atts is not increased ge tieing increased Info Project Address c fir .IUmPER RESTA-0 • Date /0 — 5 - 9 Area in ft2 For Building Department Use 0IN1lJ6 t I Applicant Name: Applicant Address: • Applicant Phone: 2'1 Project Description ❑ New Building ❑ Adddbn ❑ Alteration • 3 Compliance Option C2 Prescriptive ❑ Lighting Power Allowance (See Qualification Checklist (over). Indicate Prescriptive & LPA spaces dearly on ptarts.) Location (floor /room no.) V Y Occupancy Description Allowed Watts per ft " Area in ft2 Mowed x Area 0IN1lJ6 t I DECo - = DA- 116 ' 11 2 5 2'1 tr A/C"49, 1,At IPA5 = uiize 3 0 150 �� 5Aulv ekifg. I OE .•z.:, !i:,. 3 . 2 5 7'. It PC • ■L_ 45CCIAJCa t, 4 2173 /00 �.:' � ._• ti /NCA ): DOW AA/ E MAP l Pi I A- .y r' 0 rr " •- From Table 15-1 (over) - document all exceptions taken from footnotes Total Allowed Watts VJWAll4G r '31r Location (floor /room no.) Fi:cture Description Number of Fixtures Watts/ Fcdure Watts Proposed 0IN1lJ6 t I DECo - = DA- 116 ' 11 2 5 2'1 tr A/C"49, 1,At IPA5 = uiize 3 0 150 �� 5Aulv ekifg. I OE .•z.:, !i:,. 3 . 2 5 7'. It PC • ■L_ 45CCIAJCa t, 4 2173 /00 �.:' � ._• ti /NCA ): DOW AA/ E MAP . 1 - - 0 1111111011111111111MMAIMINV 11 o Pi I A- .y r' 0 rr " F ..- VJWAll4G r '31r Total Proposed Watts may not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Interior Total Proposed Watts '2.160 Location Fixture Description Number of Fixtures Watts/ Fodure ;, Wat Proposed imiri4111111111111 Kr= / i . ' L.� u w 1 ( Co LL hiMarl,"11111W 1 '2. MEN- bra. JoCL Lt rl 1 If If LI0 11 it aLCZKallir0 ,r • to rr �� 1994:Washinat _ State .Nonresidential Enera Co Lighting Summary Maximum Allowed Lighting Watta>?e (Interior ;omoliarice Form 3 Proposed Lighting Wattage (Interior) (May not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Interior) Maximum Allowed Lighting Wattage (Exterior Note: for building extenor, choose either the facade area or the penmeter method, but not both) i otal Allowed Watts Proposed Lighting Wattage (Exterior) (May not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Exterior) Total Proposed Watts may not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Exterior Total Proposed Watts Project Info Project Address fin Jvm fJ P672 �•I� fi � p� r /`'rT/"` 1 Date / 0 _ 6 _ 4 0 Allowed Watts x f2 (or x If) Covered Parking • For Building Department Use • I rf4 SPOT „ ,• • Applicant Name: 0.2 W/1t2i Applicant Address: - 4 " /LL Applicant Phone: 0.2 Wtfl Location Description Allowed Watts per t 2 or per If Area in ft' (or tf for perimeter) Allowed Watts x f2 (or x If) Covered Parking • 0.2 Witt' I rf4 SPOT „ ,• .__ Open Parking 0.2 W/1t2i - 4 " /LL Outdoor Areas 0.2 Wtfl )( 47 Bldg. (by facade) 1 • 0.25 W/ft 1 i • __ I.r_- / mo ii , - Bldg. (by penm) 7.5 Wllf so 41 Location Fixture Description Number of Fixtures Watts/ Fixture Watts Proposed Watts Proposed '!ZZ I rf4 SPOT „ ,• _4" - 4 " /LL Dl�r, ,- ;, / - )( 47 4 1 i • __ I.r_- / mo ii , - $o so 41 /$JC.1iUQ, y }T G •'!a4" Location (floor /room no.) Occupancy Description Allowed Watts per re " Area (n II Allowed x Area Watts Proposed '!ZZ I rf4 SPOT „ ,• _4" - 4 " /LL Dl�r, ,- ;, / - )( 47 4 1 i • __ I.r_- / mo ii , - $o so 41 /$JC.1iUQ, y }T G •'!a4" • • /oo 'Co '- From Table 15-1 (over) - aocument all exceptions taken from footnotes Total Allowed Watts it Location (floor /room no.) _ Fixture Description Number of Fixtures Watts/ Fodure Watts Proposed '!ZZ I rf4 SPOT „ ,• _4" - 4 " /LL Dl�r, ,- ;, / - )( 47 4 1 i • __ I.r_- / mo ii , - $o so 41 /$JC.1iUQ, y }T G •'!a4" • /oo 'Co it DECala . a PEt/o4ir " , " . o D it De toRA•TNE P e.-4uca7+rr ,, ps- r; t 7 11 pow A/ L/614'- , Ai" 5 !oa Total Pr000sed Watts may not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Interior Total Proposed Watts SW 1.994• Washina'"� ' State Nonresidential Enera Co t Camoliarice Form Lighting Summary Project Desc iption 0 New Building 0 Addition 0 Alteration Compliance Option 0 Prescriptive 0 Lighting Power Allowance (See Qualification Checklist (over). Indicate Prescriptive & LPA spaces dearty on plans.) Alteration Exceptions (check approprate box) 0 No changes are being made to the lighting • ❑ Less than 60 % of the fixtures are new, and installed lighting wattage is not being increased Maximum Allowed Lighting Wattage (Interior) Proposed Lighting Wattage (Interior/ (May not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Interior) Maximum Allowed Lighting Wattage (Exterior) Note: for building extenor, choose either the facade area or the penmeter method, but not both) Total Allowed Watts Proposed Lighting Wattage (Exterior) (May not exceed Total Allowed Watts tor Exterior:) Total Proposed Watts may not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Extenor Total Proposed Watts Project Info Project Address �/� � /U/I,- RFyriz /Q 4. • ''/ /T Date / ".1' ''', �2 ' For Building Department J U se se • y 0.2 W/R _ " i J i' Age Open Parting i f i: „ 0.2 W/ft 2. . . . Applicant Name: 0,2 W/fts TVg. Sal cE Applicant Address: Bldg. (by facade) • Applicant Phone: 81dg. (by penm) Location Description Allowed Watts per ft oc per tf Area in ft (or if for perimeter) Allowed Watts x il (or x If) Covered Panting Watts/ Foaure 0.2 W/R _ " i J i' Age Open Parting i f i: „ 0.2 W/ft 2. . . . Outdoor Areas 0,2 W/fts TVg. Sal cE v c, Bldg. (by facade) 0. W/R Q 81dg. (by penm) 7.5 WAf Alteration Exceptions (check appropriate box) ❑a No changes are being made to the lighting • lighting ge being • ❑ Less than 60 % of the fixtures are new, and instatled I' wattage is no increased Location (floor /room no.) Occupancy Description Allowed Watts per 11 " Area'sn ttl Allowed x Area Number of I Fixtures I. Watts/ Foaure Watts Promised _ " i J i' Age / ! a' - s' P- . i f i: „ _'- 2. . . . ,, . PeCP - ' TVg. Sal cE v c, 6O Q •• From Table 15-1 (over) - document all exceptions taken from footnotes Total Allowed Watts Location (floorlroom no.) - Fixture Description Number of Fixtures Watts/ Fixture Number of I Fixtures I. Watts/ Foaure Watts Promised _ " i J i' Age / ! a' - s' P- . i f i: „ _'- 2. . . . ,, . PeCP - ' TVg. Sal cE v c, 6O Q . I I Project Description 1994 :Washinat State Nonresidential Enera Co ❑ New Building ❑ Addition Maximum Allowed Lighting Wattage (Interior) Total Proposed Watts may not exceed Total Mowed Warts for Intenor Maximum Allowed Light i Wattage (Exterior Note: for building extenor, cnoose erther the facade area or the penmeter method, but not both) Total Proposed Watts may not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Extenor ❑ Alteration Prota Lizhtint? Wattage (Interior) (May not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Interior) �amolianceForm Lighting Summary Compliance Option ❑ Prescriptive ❑ Lighting Power Allowance (See Qualification Checidtst (over). Indicate Prescriptive 8 LPA spaces r; earty on plans.) Total Proposed Watts exceed Total Allowed Watts for Exterior Total Allowed Watts Total Proposed Watts ■ Is a firs' - resistive separation I'('Illiirt't1 I)t'IWeen aI Illt`- ■ ater (:Iassified is a Group A. Division 2.1 Oc:rupan y and ai lobby? A ■ A theater lobby is usually a ( ;rasp A, I )ivisrnn '3 (')c • cupdilcy or, in the cause of a l;rge lobby, may be ;t Group A, Division 2.1 Occupancy. Refreshment stands for the - ater patrons are generally permitted within lobbies ainrl are not required to be separated from the balance of the lobby. Since both the lobby and theater err C Troup A Occupancies, an occu- pancy separation is nut required by fable 3 -13. ■ 15 11 perm issible to have electrical switch boxes hack • to back in an occupancy separation wall between a single-family residence and g;atral;e? ■ Table 3.13 requires a one -hour oCCuparicy senalr& • tion between a Group R, Di 3 Occupancy arid a Group LI, Division 1 Occupancy. Section 302,4, Lxception 3, permits three reductions in the occupancy sepairation: (1) wall construction, (2) (Door openings and (.3) air ducts. The re- duction in the wall construction pr-rnlits the omission of the fir(' - resistive membrane on the residence side. Therefore, elec iric:al switch boxes should be installed in ac'rnrdancr, will, the provisions of Section 709.7 for membrane penetrations. How - ever, discretion may he used by the building official in cnnsid- ering the 24-inch (61(1 mm) sparing since tliere are no fire -resin live requirements on the residence side. Section 303.1.1 303.1.1 Group A Occupancies defined. (Troup A Occupancies include the use of a huilding or structure. or portion thereof. fur the gathering together of 50 or more persons fur pu rpose such as civic, social or religious functions, recreation. education or instruction, food) or drink consumption. or awaiting transportation. A room or spate used for assembly purposes by less than 50 persons and acces- sory to another occupancy shall he included as a part of that major occupancy. Asscui hly occupancies shall include the following,;: Division 1. A building or portion of a building having an assembly route with an occupant load all 1,t1O0 or more and a legitimate siege. Division 2. A building; or portion ill a building having an assert bly room with an occupant load of lass than 1,(111(1 and a legitimate Division 2.1. A building or portion of a building having an assem- bly room with an occupant toad of .3(1(1 ur enure without a legitimate stage, including such buildings used fen educational purposes and not classed as Group 13 or 1= Occupancies. Division 3. A building or portion of a building having; an assem- bly room with an occupant toad or less t 300 without a legitimate stage. including such buildings used for educational purposes and tint classed as Group I2 or li'Oct :upancies, Division 4. Stadiums, reviewing stands and , park structures mnl included within other Group A Occupancies. Specil e and general requirements for grandstands. bleachers and reviewing stands are to be found in Chapter 10. ZO'd Q • What is the o(:( :upatnc'y classification of a howling; • alley and how is the occupant loan( determined? A ■ Buildings housing bowling alleys are normally clas- ■ silied as Group A Occupancies. In establishing the iota' occupant load, the area of the allay may be disregarded. I;thl(t 10.A, Footnote 4, states thrtl I'll,' occupant load is baSec1 on .5 people. per alley, including 1', feet (4'i/2 n of runway. The occupant load of other areas is based on 100 square feet (9.:3 111') per person. However, if the building contains a restanr• rant or cocktail lniingc', the occupant Toad in such restaurant or Cocktail lounge areas should be based on I square feet (1.19 1 m per person. aaaaaalJ■a■- 16 MIIMIOND Q ■ Wi :iuld a, building or portion of a building; be t Group • A, livision 2.1 or i Group A, Division '3 ( )cc upancy if the building; Iris three separate assembly rcionls with r'irh room having; an occupant load of 120, or does the total occu pant load determine the Group A, 3 )ivision 2.1 or Croup A. Di- vision 3 Occupancy? There are no stales in the building, and the rooms are nut used for educational purposes. A ■ The building or any portion of the described build• • ing would be classified as at Group A, Division '3( )c- e:upane:y. The language of the code in Section 303 was chosr'n specifically to base the occupancy classification on the occu- pant load of any one individual assembly ram and not on the tnt,il occupant Inad for all assembly rooms in the building. I.ven if the total occupant Toad ht the blinding exceeds .3(1(1, the prop- er classification for each assembly room( and the building would be Group A, Division 3 as Ion); as no individual assem- hly room has an occupant lead of 300 or more. Q ■ I have been working with ar university laboratory/ • classroom building on the local university campus. Phis project involves an eight story addition (approximately 100,000 square feet (9290 111 that will be added unto an exist ing .eight - story building. located within chic addition( is a single large lecture. hall (soaring 175 students) along with numerous other Offices, reaching labs, research lab'; and work/prep aireas. The inrc'rprera(inn of occupancy has b('('n questioned regarding, this building. I would appreciate your Interpretation of which occupancy or occupancies you would plaice this building in. A ■ A lecture hall with an occupant land of 175 with no • stage would be consiclerr:'d at Group A, Division 3 ( )crrrpancy in a'rcrorrlalncc with Section 3O 1, 1. Office's, labora- tories and rooms used for educational purposes beyond the 1 2331 grade with less than 5(1 occupants in any room and similar trees would be considered Group f3 Occupancies on acroreJ- nru :e with Section 30411 See also Su'c'tions 302.5 arid 30.1.t3 for spec dal 1) izarcls, I or those rooms used for educational purpaseS beyond the 12th grade with an occupant Inad greater than SO, the occupancy classification would be Group A, Division 3. Suit Section 303.1. We have been told that. when reviewing schools • with gymnasiums and multi -use morns used for pub lir assembly in addition to l'latsSeS, w'i• must review the area for both Crr -,up 1 and Croup A Occupancy requirements. My lolal confusion arises front the statement, "... including such build ing3 used for r•dticalt purposes and nor rlas t'd as a (,;roue F or (Troup B Occupancy." It would shunt that if an areai is classed as a Grorro 1, we must only review Cut Croup l: Occu- pancy requirements. Could you please explain why we then must review for Group A Occupancy requirements also? I his requirement seems to be in direct conflict with the printed word of the code contained in Section '30'3.1. A ■ Section 301 c:harges the building official with (he re. • sponslhility for classification of the occupancy of every building; in ,tccordanc:e with its use or the chatacicr of the occupancy, In the c :asa of a school gymnasium or multiple -use assembly room, a multiple occupancy classification is possible, Suction 1d££ s OT 66 -9Z —use . 7ot : KEN OKAMOTO &ASSOCIATES PHONE NQ, CL NIC UMPER. TaF jd„WA Flls No. Checker: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 24-98- 022-020-01 Crystal Kolke Mar, 17 1999 09:48AM P6 2 11 $ "00)a -) O KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, INC. SHEET BD -1 JOB 98232 BY ..._._.. 1 1 i. 1 ' • r„ .r k' ; •rr ' in tor; ' & STR CTURAL ITEMS ONI�.Y.: General: Item 1. Please see revised 'General Constucdon Notes' note #1 on sheet 81. Item 2. Please see revised'FouadationNotes' note 14 on sheet SI. Item 3. Please sae enclosed correspondence from soils engineer. S, is used. Item 4. Please see added 'Design Criteria' notes on sheet S1. Item 5, Type M or S mortar specified in 'Concrete Block Masonry' notes on sheet SI. Item 6. Please see 'Concrete and Embedded Items', note 11 on :beet SI. Item 7. Please see revised 'Concrete Block Masonry' notes on sheet 51. Items 8. Please see added 'Wood Construction' note 10 on sheet S1 . Vertical Item 9. Please sego typical continuous footing callout on sheet S2. Item 10. Please see typical continuous footing callout on sheet S2. Lateral: Item 11. Please see revised plywood shear wall schedule on sheet S1 and in calculations. Item 12. Please see revised shear wall callout cm foundation plans, sheet S2. Item 13. Please see revised plans sheets S2 & S3A. MAR 1 91999 1 REID MIDDLETON J Nom,,,,.... -- F1LE ��........•_ ECEIVED MAR 1 8 1999 STDR ARCHITECTS `FROM : KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES PHONE NO. Mar. 17 1999 09:49AM P7 KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, INC. SHEET BD -2 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS JOB 98232 Item 14. Adjoining panel edges along roof joists will not be continuous. Nailing at joists is 4" o.c. Item 15. Please sec added MST37 drag strap and blocked diaphragm at Dining Room shear wall on sheet S3. Item 16. Please see new calculation page 16A. Item 17. Force is applied to the top of the steel columns. The bolts only need to be designed for shear. The moment is resisted by the ankle beam in the foundation. Item 18. Please see revised detai18/SI BY JM RECEIVED MAR I iyi ST DR ARCHITECTS Fireproofing Aggregates Shotcrete Concrete Masonry Asphalt Roofing P i l i n g S t e e l S o i l s W o o d December 10, 1999 File: 99 -218 Dave Larson City of Tukwila Building Department 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Project: Address: Permit No.: This is to advise you that special inspections are completed on the above referenced project. The following inspection was required and a copy of that inspection report is attached. 1. Reinforced concrete 2. Structural masonry 3. Epoxy items To the best of our knowledge all work inspected conformed to Tukwila Building Department approved plans, specifications, UBC and related codes and/or verbal or written instructions from the Engineer,of Record. Sincerely, A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. i• Kimberle Anderson President Claim Jumper 5901 S. 180th St. Adlin Construction -Jerry, faxed to jobsite Tel: 881-5812 Fax 881 - 5441 • P. 0. Box 2523, Redmond, WA 98073 A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION AND MATERIAL TESTING NATIONALLY ACCREDITED LABORATORY • DFD 13 199 o coMMU 9 �V $ � op N T 9 -01 -1999 3 : 56PM FROM Sp,A 7148633160 SCHEER TANAKA DENNEHY RILEY ARCHITECTS 18201 McDURMOTT WEST, SUITE A IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614 PHONE (949) 863 -1960 FAX (949) 8633160 ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN 1Zr ole FI COPY ..r..wwrINAS. aw -. ast C h a ws.MO/•sM�.Ol Fax Cover Sheet To: City of Tukwila Date: 9/1/99 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Job No: 98497 Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: (206) 431 -3670 Attention: Ken Nelsen Fax No: (206) 431 -3665 Re: Claim Jumper Tukwila Const. Admin. Pages: 1 (Including Cover Sheet) R E I'� Message: Ken...as a follow -up to your phone conversations with John Hamilton -STDR, and subsequent telecon with Ted McWhorter -Adlin Construction, regarding attic space ventilation /vapor barrier resolution find the following as a resolution to compliance with State of Washington moisture control guidelines: -where as attic ventilation is not possible at all locations due to construction constraints, a vapor barrier of 6m11 visqueen will be applied directly to the bottom of roof framing members, less the Kitchen area; - visqueen will be of 20' -0" wide stock; -laps will be installed in a downhill fashion; - laps will be of at least one framing member space; - in locations where vapor barrier terminates at a beam, sealant will be used to insure integrity; and - previously proposed ventilation in joist bays will be provided where possible. Would appreciate your review of this proposal, and a response to STDR at your earliest convenience as to acceptability. Claim Jumper is anxious to proceed with implementation of the proposed resolution and the continuance of construction. Appreciate your assistance with this matter. Thank you. By: Jerry Dennehy Copies to: T. McWhorter, Fil NOTE: IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASE CALL (949) 863.1960 CITY OF TUKWILA APPROVED SEP 2 1999 Chi :ILDING DIVISION P. 1; CIT O T UKWIL SEP - 2 1999 PERMIT CENTER Aug -25 -99 09:56A SCHEER TANAKA DENNEHY RILEY ARCHITECTS 18201 McDURMOTT WEST, SUITE A IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614 PHONE (949) 863 -1960 FAX (949) 863 -3160 ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN To: City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Attention: Ken Nelsen Re: Claim Jumper Tukwila Const. Admin. Message: 9:19 AM. Return phone call to Ted. Got the fax copt of the schematic vent system. Wanted tto know how to vent the hips and the skylight. JRH said that in talking to Ken Nelson that an honest attempt at venting would work for him. Therefor drilling holes at the end of the TJI's at the hip and skylight according to the hole chart faxed would work. Ted said that the TJI's have knock outs (see chart) w /in a couple of inches of the top chord. He will check to see if the knock outs are subject to the same end distance restrictions as holes. Please find copies of the vent schematic and a TJI hole cart. By: John Hamilton Copies to: File. Fax Cover Sheet Date: 8/25/99 Job No: 98497 Phone: (206) 431 -3670 Fax No: (206) 431 -3665 Pages: 3 NOTE: IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASE CALL (949) 863 -1960 (Including cover Sheet) R l E - ; P.01 Copies Date Description 2 3 -25 -99 Bluelines of Sheet T -1, wet signed and stamped *UPS Tracking No.: N370 946 247 2 To: City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Attn: Brenda Holt Re: Claim Jumper Tukwila Con. Docs. We are sending you Via: UPS Next Day* Copy to: SCHEER TANAKA DENNEHY RILEY ARCHITECTS 18201 McDURMOTT WEST, SUITE A IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614 PHONE (949) 863.1960 FAX (949) 863 -3160 ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN File. Separate Cover Via: Transmittal Date: 12 April 1999 Phone: (206) 431 -3670 Fax No: (206) 431 -3665 job No: 98496 R As Requested By: Yourself Purpose: For your review and use in assembling Permit issuance sets. Action Brenda...please examine the attached information, contact me should you require Requested: additional information and to provide the necessary fees required prior to Permit issuance. On behalf of Claim Jumper, thanks for your assistance through this Phase of the Project. CITy APR 1 9 1999 PERMIT CENTER Signed: Jerry Dennehy SCHEER TANAKA DENNEHY RILEY ARCHITECTS, 18201 McDurmott West, Suite A, Irvine, CA 92614 (949) 863 -1960 FAX (949) 863.3160 PROM :KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATESC. p■ ill • *omm.M.: KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, INC. Structural Engineers TO: REID MIDDLETON, INC. JOB NUMBER: 98262 ATTN: KYLIE YAMATFUKA PAGES 2 FROM: KEN OKAMOTO DATE: MARCH 23, 1999 RE: CLAIM JUMPER - TUKWILA, WA CC: JERRY DENNEHY - S.T.D.R. 0 Urgent X For Review On.... Conom.nt ❑PI•as. Reply DPI.... RR.y.I. IF INCLOSURCU ARE NOT Ai NOTED, KINDLY NOTIFY Ui AT ONCE. PHONE NO. : Mar. 22 1999.02:19PM P1 14081 Yurba Street, Suite • Tustin, Ca 92780 • (714) 838 -4960 • Fax (714) 838 -3928 • FROM : KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES PHONE NO. : MARCH 23, 1999 REID MIDDLETON, INC. A1TN: KYLIE YAMATFUKA RE: CLAIM JUMPER - TUKWILA, WA. PLAN CHECK FILE NO. 24 -9S- 022 -020-01 DEAR MR. YAMATFUICA, THE FOLLOWING REVISIONS WERE MADE ON OUR SHEET Si UNDER DESIGN CRITERIA: IF YOU HAVE ANY • UESTIONS, PLEASE CALL OUR OFFICE. THANK YOU. KO/BC Mar. 22 1999 02:20PM P2 II 4 KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, INC. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 1. REVISED SNOW LOAD TO READ 25PSF IN LIEU OF 20PSF. 2. REVISED REFERENCE TO READ R IN LIEU OF RW. 14081 YORBA STREET, SUITE 105 • TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 99860 • (714) 038 -4960 • FAX (714) 838•3929 Mar -23 -99 11r55A SCHEER TANAKA DENNEHY RILEY ARCHITECTS 18201 McDURMOTT WEST, SUITE A IRVINE, CAUFORNIA 92614 PHONE (949)863 -1960 FAX (949) 863 -3160 ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN I ttn d rc;tane•... -' �_.. ��_ _ n,. Fax Cover Shee To City of Tukwila Date: 3/23/99 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Job No: 98496 Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: (206) 431 -3670 Attention: Ken Nelsen Fax No: (206) 431 -3665 Re: Claim Jumper Tukwila Con. Docs. Pages: 1 (Including Cover Sheet) Raj E Message: Thanks for your help. STDR agrees to issue ventilation details for eave and roof top termination. Also, that the air space against the roof sheathing shall be a minimum of 1" and exceed it where possible. The details will be issued prior to construction to Building and Safety for approval... By: John Hamilton Copies to: File. NOTE: IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASE CALL (949) 863 -1960 P.O1 Reid iddleton March 23, 1999 File No. 24 -98- 022 - 020 -02 Mr. Duane Griffin City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Subject: Building Permit Plan Review - Final Submittal Claim Jumper Restaurant (D98 -0340) Dear Mr. Griffin: We reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the structural provisions of the 1997 Edition of the Uniform Building Code as amended and adopted by the City of Tukwila. The applicant has responded successfully to our comments. As directed by the Engineer of Record, we have made the following red - marks: • Sheet S 1, Design Criteria: Revised Factor to R in lieu of R • Sheet S1, Design Criteria: Revised Snow Load to 25 psf in lieu of 20 psf Enclosed are the drawings, structural calculations, geotechnical report, and correspondence from the engineer for your records. If you have any questions or require any additional clarification, please call. Sincerely, Middleton, In David B. Swanson Director, Structural Engineering Group RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA MAR 2 4 1999 PERMIT CENTER bji\ se\ planrevw \tukwila\984020r2.doc\kky Enclosure cc: Jerry Dennehy, Scheer Tanaka Dennehy Architects K y K. Yatiatsuka, E.I.T. Plan Review Engineer Engineers Planners Surveyors Reid Middleton, Inc. 728 134th Street SW Suite 200 Everett, Washington 98204 Ph: 425 741 -3800 Fax: 425 741 -3900 3 -19 -1999 8:214M FROM STDA • 7148633160 SCHEER TANAKA DENNEHY RILEY ARCHITECTS 18201 McDURMOTT WEST, SUITE A IRVINE, CAUFORNIA 92614 PHONE (949) 863.1980 FAX (949) 8633160 ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN Attention: Ken Nelsen Re: Claim Jumper Tukwila WA Fax Cover. Sheet To: City of Tukwila Date: 3/19/99 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 job No: 98495 Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: (206) 431 -3670 Fax No: (206) 431 -3665 Pages: 2 (Including Cover Sheet) R l Message: Ken...attached find a copy of our Transmittal to Reid Middleton regarding Structural Plan Check corrections. We had previously transmitted the structural corrections to your office along with our response to the Building comments. Am forwarding this info to you for your reference. Would appreciate your response as soon as Reid 'Middleton returns an approval to your office. Thanks. By: Jerry Dennehy Copies to: File NOTE: IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASE CALL (949) 863 -1960 P. 1 Copies Data Description 2 • 2-8-99 Bluelines of amended Structural Construction Documents wet signed and stamped Sheets S1, S2, S3, S3A revisions are clouded and Identified with a delta no. 1 2 106-98 Bluelines of Structural Construction Documents wet signed end stamped Sheets S4, and SS 2 3 -16.99 Structural Calculations (8 1/2" x 11" format) wet signed and stamped 1 .— 1' Copy of KOA Plan Check Corrections Response listing (2 pages, BO-1, & BD- 2...18 items-812" x 11" form 1-14-99 Copy of Reid Middleton's Plan Cheek Correction listing (4 pages-8 1/2" x 11• format) 'UPS Traddng No. N370 946 223 0 3 -19 -1999 8:21AM To: Reid Middleton, Inc. 728 134th Street SW Everett, Washington 98204 Attn: Crystal Kolke- Senior Plan Reviewer Re: Claim Jumper Tukwila WA File No. 24- 98 -022- 020-01 R We are sending you Via: UPS Next Day* Separate Cover Via: As Requested By: Yourself Purpose: For your review, comment, approval, and return to the City of Tukwila. Action Crystal...per our 3- 16-99, telecon, the Structural Plan Check correction responses Requested: have been previously transmitted directly to the City of Tukwila Building Department, and I'm told they will complete their review of the resubmittal package today, 3- 18 -99. Would appreciate your examination of the structural responses as soon as possible, so that Claim Jumper may obtain their building permit. Feel free to contact me with questions, and/or to alert me of that your review has been completed and approved. Thank you. Copy to: FROM STDA 7148633160 P.2 SCHEER TANAKA DENNEHY RILEY ARCHITECTS 18201 McDURMOTT WEST, SUITE A IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614 PHONE (949) 863-1960 FAX (949) 8633160 ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN Ken Nelson -City of Tukwila (Transmittal), File Transmittal Date: 18 March 1999 Phone: (425)741 -3800 Fax No: (425)741 -3900 Job No: 98495 Signed: Jerry Dennehy SCHEER TANAKA DENNEHY RILEY ARCHITECTS, 18201 McDurmon West, Suits A, Irvine, CA 92614 (949) 863.1960 FAX (949) 8633160 E❑ TO: Brenda Holt, Permit Coordinator FROM Joanna J. Spencer, Public Works Development Engineer DATE: March 2, 1999 SUBJECT: Claim Jumpers Restaurant Permit Number: D98 -0340 Clarification of PW Comments JJS /jjs City of Tukwila Department of Public Works John W. Rants, Mayor Ross A. Eamst, P. E., Director PW will will proceed with Claim Jumpers Restaurant permit review and aproval despite pending MI permit application for site utilities for parcel C of Parkway Supercenter, a.k.a. South Lot. Janury 26, 1999 PW comment letter was issued in order to release plan review comments from remaining reviewing City departments, and does not preclude PW department from approving Claim Jumpers Restaurant permit prior to parcel C site utilities approval. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: (206) 433.0179 • Fax• (206) 4313665 1 Atch Fax from Jerry Dennehy, dtd 2/10/99 MEMO FOR RECORD DATE: 2/11/99 FROM: Duane Griffin, Bldg Off' SUBJECT: Claim Jumper Restaurant Construction Requirements I received a call from a guy (I think he said Jerry Dennehy) on 2/11/99 wanting to know if I had received his fax from yesterday regarding the construction classification for the Claim Jumper restaurant. I told him I had received and read it and my interpretation and response was going to be that it would be required to be an A2.1 Occupancy and that the sprinkler system could not be used as a substitute for 1 -hour construction because alcohol is consumed, thereby requiring that the building have sprinklers, and Sec 508 states that sprinklers can't be used as substitution for 1 -hour construction if they are otherwise required. He said that was all he needed to know and they would proceed with their plans based on that information. I asked if he wanted a written response and he said it would not be necessary. SCHEER TANAKA DENNEHY RILEY ARCHITECTS 18201 McDURMOTT WEST, SUITE A IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614 PHONE (949) 863 -1960 FAX (949) 863.3160 ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN To: City of Tukwila Building Division Attention: Duane Griffen Re: Claim Jumper Tukwila Con. Docs. Pages: 1 Fax Cover Sheet Date: Job No: Phone: Fax No: 2/10/99 98496 (206)431 -3670 (206) 431 -3665 (Including Cover Sheet) Riv1 E I .. I Message: Duane,..STDR is attempting to complete Plan Check corrections for the above listed Project (a freestanding, family oriented, sit down Restaurant with Bar /Lounge). As a part of the initial Plan Check submittal, we originally classified the Restaurant as an 43 Occupancy, in that no space within the Restaurant exceeded 300 occupants, although the total occupant load is greater than 300 (no stage is included). Per conversations with Ken Nelson, after receipt of Building Department Plan Check corrections, it was determined that the City of Tukwila considers the Claim Jumper Restaurant an A2.1 Occupancy. This occupancy classification requires, if the structure is of Type V Construction, that the classification be Type V , one hour. That being the case, would appreciate your interpretation as to whether we may utilize the fire sprinkler system to obtain the Type V, one hour construction requirement, in that the Code also requires a fire sprinkler system (Section 904.2.3.1) due to consumption of alcohol. I've talked to Mr. Nelson about this matter and he suggested that I run same by you. Our Client is anxious for us to resubmit. Would appreciate a response at your earliest convenience. Thank you. By: Jerry Dennehy Copies to: File NOTE: IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASE CALL (949) 863 -1960 09 t ££989 t L VOIS W02id WVL4 : l l 666 l -0 l -Z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COMMENTS DATE:. January 26, 1999 PROJECT: Claim Jumper Restaurant PERMIT NO: D98 -0340 PLAN REVIEWER: Contact Joanna Spencer at (206) 433 - 0179, if, you have any questions ` regarding the following comments. 1. Public Works can not approve plans for the above development until the site utility plan submitted under a separate permit is reviewed and approved. Reid iddleton January 14, 1999 File No. 24 -98- 022 - 020 -01 Mr. Duane Griffin City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Subject: Building Permit Plan Review - First Submittal Claim Jumper Restaurant (D98 -0340) Dear Mr. Griffin: We reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the structural provisions of the 1997 Edition of the Uniform Building Code as amended and adopted by the City of Tukwila. The following comments should be addressed by the permit applicant: General RECEIVED JAN 1 5 1999 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1. The 1997 Edition of the UBC is applicable for this project. The project data on Sheet T -1 needs to be revised. The Structural Notes on Sheet S1 need to reference this edition of the UBC. 2. Pages 12 and 13 of the geotechnical report discuss the potential for liquefaction and the mitigating procedures necessary to reduce risk. Refer to UBC Section 1804.5. The report discusses 3 options: tying the foundation together with grade beams, providing a pile foundation, or providing general site improvements by densifying the building pad area. Since it is obvious that the first two options are not being considered, we assume that there will be appropriate site improvements. The Structural Notes should indicate this option and the Engineer of Record should address the steps taken to meet the intent of the geotechnical recommendations. The geotechnical engineer should make additional recommendations, as necessary. 3. The geotechnical report recommends a Soil Profile Type S3. The 1997 UBC equivalent needs to be provided by the geotechnical engineer in accordance with UBC Section 1629.3 and UBC Table 16 -J. The design is based on a Soil Profile Type SD. Engineers Planners Surveyors Reid Middleton, Inc. 728 1341h Street SW Suite 200 Everett, Washington 98204 Ph: 425 741.3800 Fax: 425 741.3900 Mr. Duane Griffin City of Tukwila January 14, 1999 File No. 24 -98- 022 - 020 -01 Page 2 4. Design parameters should be indicated on the Structural Notes. 5. The mortar type needs to be specified in the Structural Notes. Type N mortar is not permitted in Seismic Zone 3. Refer to UBC Sections 2103.3 and 2106.1.12.4.3. 6. The compressive strength of grout needs to be specified in the Structural Notes. Refer to UBC Section 2103.4.1. 7. The test method for providing special inspection for masonry needs to be indicated in the Structural Notes per the requirements UBC Sections 1701.5.7 and 2105.3. 8. Simpson connectors, or equivalent, should be specified in the Structural Notes. Vertical a) Wind Exposure Factor per UBC Section 1619 and UBC Table 16 -G. Exposure B is used in the design. b) Seismic Zone 3 needs to be referenced per UBC Section 1629.4.1. c) The Seismic Response Coefficient, R, needs to be referenced in the Structural Notes per UBC Section 1629.4.3. R =5.5 per the design. d) Live loads used for design need to be indicated. 9. There are only limited dimensions on the Foundation Plan indicating footing widths. Typical dimensions should be referenced. The geotechnical report requires continuous footings to have a minimum width of 18 inches. Twelve -inch wide footings would not be permitted. 10. The details on Sheet S4 refer to the plan for the footing depth; however, we do not find the footing depths called out in plan. The geotechnical report requires a minimum depth of 18 inches at exterior conditions and 12 inches at interior conditions. Coordinate with page 23 of the calculations. Reid iddleton Mr. Duane Griffin City of Tukwila January 14, 1999 File No. 24 -98- 022 - 020 -01 Page 3 Lateral 11. Evaluating the Shear Wall Schedule, Sheet S1, we have the following concerns: a) Shear Wall B has an allowable shear value of more than 350 plf, therefore, the foundation sill plates and framing members that receive edge nailing from abutting panels need to be 3x members. A single 2x sill plate may be used if anchor bolts are designed for a 50 percent or less load capacity and 2" x 2" x 3/16" plate washers are specified on the drawings. Refer to UBC Table 23- II -I -1, including Footnote 3. c) The terminology at Shear Walls D and E in the Shear Wall Schedule is "use offset panel joint or 3x stud at joint." This statement is not clear. Since there is a design shear greater than 600 plf on these walls, UBC Table 23- II -I -1, Footnote 3, requires that foundation sill plates and all framing members receiving edge nailing from abutting panels to be not less than a single 3x. You cannot offset abutting panel edges. The Shear Wall Schedule needs to be revised to clarify. Shear Wall C has an allowable shear value of 640 plf, not 730 plf as indicated. Refer to UBC Table 23- II -I -1. Shears used in the design appear adequate; the Shear Wall Schedule just needs to be revised. The Shear Wall Schedule should note that plywood joints and sill plate nailing will be staggered in all cases. Refer to UBC Table 23- II -I -1, Footnote 3. 12. Page 18 of the calculations indicates that Shear Wall Type D is intended along Grid G. Shear Wall Type C is actually called out on Sheet S2. The Engineer of Record should determine the appropriate wall type. 13. Page 18 of the calculations indicates that a 6x member is needed at the HD6A Holdowns along Grid A. The Foundation Plan, Sheet S2, calls for 4x members. 14. At the blocked roof diaphragm area at Grids D -F and 1 -2, where the nailing is at 2-1/2 inches on center, a note indicates that 3x members will be used at this nailing condition, as would be required by UBC Table 23 -II -H, Footnote 2. The drawings should clarify if this means that 3 x 12 roof framing members are intended. Reid iddleton Mr. Duane Griffin City of Tukwila January 14, 1999 File No. 24 -98- 022 - 020 -01 Page 4 15. According to the calculations on page 19 for the shear walls along Grid 8, struts are to be used along the entire reaction line (of 112 feet). If the strut is dragging forces to the roof diaphragm between Grids A and E, then the roof diaphragm will need to be blocked from the strut to the shear wall. Refer to Sheet S3 and UBC Section 1633.2.6. 16. Calculations need to be provided that check the redundancy of the elements in the lateral force - resisting system per UBC Section 1630.1.1. 17. The Engineer of Record needs to verify that the bolted connections in Details 9 and 10 /S5 can withstand the applied moments on page 20 of the calculations. 18. Page 22 of the calculations evaluates the service yard freestanding CMU walls. The upper seven feet are to be provided with #5's at 24 inches on center. Section 8/S1 only shows #5's at 32 inches on center. The review comments listed above should be responded to in itemized letter form. We recommend that the permit applicant have the Engineer of Record respond and resubmit two copies of the revised set of structural drawings and one copy of supplemental calculations directly to our office. We forwarded a copy of this letter to the project contact for your convenience. Please note that corrections or comments made during the review process do not relieve the project applicant or designer from compliance with code requirements, conditions of approval, and permit requirements; nor is the designer relieved of responsibility for a complete design in accordance with the laws of the state of Washington. This plan review check is for general compliance with the Uniform Building Code as it relates to the project. If you have any questions or require any additional clarification, please call. Sincerely, Reid Middleton, Inc. Cryst Kolke Senior Plan Reviewer h:\ doc \se \planrevw \tukwila \98 \t020r I .doc \clk -s cc: Jerry Dennehy, Scheer Tanaka Dennehy Architects Reid iddleton FROM : KEN OKAMOTO 8. ASSOCIATES MEM imo.ry 14, 1999 Fse No. 24.96.022-020.01 & Duette Gt City of Tukwila 4300 Soothe/seer Blvd., Suite 100 Tire, WA 91111 Dc r Mr. Gs PHONE NO. : S hiset:. Handier Perak Flu A r - Pint Babmittal CWrq haoper' I aeaurs t (D911-0340) ( Mar. 01 1999 11:29AM P2 ILE We mimed ebe proposed mect tae compiiaoe vAds do ttnropssdpravideas oft s 1947 Edition of der t) ihret Dad* Code es.meaded sod adopted by the atr of Tukwl4. Tba 1,9ottiag mimeo* *NO be alarmed by the mak *aced: rimer r.,at." The 1997 Edidos Odle UDC b ip hit's lder this zwoJsat. 1tis pt t deice ce Shit T'-t needs to be wind. The $e:ttoteral Notes en Shalt Sl teed to 2, Pages 12 and 13 of U ge to eaice1 report df 'tae *Said ifar 3qua&rtion and the mid pevadw.s ooe siy to seduce at • Raw to UBC Section 111044. The report Comm 3 optima tying Go daredetion sogether vi It t grads beam prvvld~ieg a Se *nmmdeeioa, or' 'fit bpprovenvene ttlensiiring diabidlgatiiedaret. trim Is ravel*, dig the tiitia�o 4pttiat a teiop aooljdbtdd, wie thane that there wBbe * r+oms* e+'ts hoprovecoeets. Tds_Sb cant 1.Nobs oho* ledioaa tm. optba �•_ .o(* : . es v_>ctteto.tolotot i#e. c of The , geotedsoicellosieser Amid Bodo 3 'I1rs 6aateohaio sport i :caeca:Writ Sall beige Typopi, i'l bb'1997 uac equivalent "acids to be provided d * the g.oacbniml of goer be madam m with TIC ' ' a 11 3iaali MC!T'sblo 164. The d■tipt is •.: as. Soil Profile Mtiei glop Soh tit 1 RECEIVED, JAW 1 8 MI 7414101 STAR ARCHITECTS RECEIVED wr as MAO fiECt:IVED C ' "')F TUKWILA f ti. is 9 199 • .1 MAR U 21999 OM CV0i2 etI / wet c WWI G.(A1 MGR ...4 0340 STpR ARCHITECTS � . - FROM : KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES Mt. Dumas O City of Tidies Marty 14619!9 Fib No. 21444224I Page 2 PHONE MO. : (4. ,• Design peremetars dotal be Maned an the &monad NNatio. LUCEIVED MAR 0 21999 STDR ARCHITECTS a) Sind Expecte Paetnc per uric Saetioa 1619 and UDC Twit 164. Bxpoatgs B in toed b the design. b) Made Zoos 3 needs so be re8roaaead per UBG Section 160.4.1. c) Tbs Sebago ire poaee Coaioiee. L math* basred&aorad le the • lecwasral Note, per UDC Section 1629.4.3. *1.5 per der 'du h. d) Yfre bsel. god fat daoigp mad to be indicated. d. The =oar type a rab tts bb apooitSsd la t 4 l Woke. Doe N mores is act peraeiised ies Sauk Tope 3. Rehr to UBC Swims 2103.3 and M.1.12.41. 6� The to t e Nom. Raw o MC Section .4.1. - 7. The teat aatbod 8e, write* amid impacsi i for 21aooea1 maim be iedlowd la tba 6lturatual Noaha pa the table mod UDC %Odom 1701.5.7 need 210S3. S®p.oa ooaeeotocs, oc eg iinl.at, should be opaoi8od m thli Sduotars1 Nein. '9. There aura only narked diconeiaae on the Powtdadoa Pica iodieatiog bodes widths. Typical diaro■.bss should be relle aced, The foteehak el report regtd rce continuous Oho*. to love a Woks= width of Macho. Twahle-iocb wide costly weak, tot be pemitted. 0.`,) The detail on Skid S4 Vet tb the phut be the looting depth boowawr, we do not Sod the Rhothhg depths aled out is pies The deotechoica1 matt tae &es a minimax depth one Whoa ad exterior eothdltione and 12 India at loksior cords too.. Coos with page 23 of the eskai lieah, Mar. 01 1993 11: 30AM P3 rxa, crrow4. i t Hl7 O a wrw.t Ww i c. m i AewR i .1+t 11 1 (: ,,-..'- FROM,: KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES htr. Mere Griffin CIfiy ofTuk nla January 141, 1999 Me No. 24-44-022-020-01 Page 3 11. Evaluating the Shear Wall Schedule, Sheet Sloe" have the Sallawles oonogras: Shear Wall H bas as allowable sheer Woe ofsare than 350 pit, tberetbre, dee bnttdation s111 plates std Sumba nenabea that mashy e d g e abutting pawls toed to be 3x a ber . • A ask 2x sQ plat* way bs need ifasa6orboW atedemigod kr a< SO moot oriisS bid capacity and r' a 2N x 3116" plea sodas= eta spsdged on t6s drawings. Rc*r a UDC Table 23 114•1, iadading Footaols 3, Shear WaU C has IS slbwabie shear who of 640 pi& not 730 pits Indiaan& lithe to UDC Table 23- 114.1. Sims end tads appear adequate; dm 8iaar Wan Scbedula jest steeds to bs *rated. + / c) The tettaioaiogy at Elms Wails D sin E In the Shear Wag Sehedltla b {/ `ate oRist panel)** or31 sad at jobs." This mateco t is not clear. Since there is $ dad& slow gar dot 600 pion these walls, LThC T.,bis 23-11-I-1, Footnote 3, mares that Inab os diiphoss and all maid* framing trsenbeal edge 8 tom ubi ponds to be not leas ilea a single 3x. Too comet abet *hot* pod edges. The Shear Wig Schedule needs to be revised to cist ►. 'Ms Shaw Wog Soirltbdo should rots that plywood joluta rind sill plata ailing aid b, stamped in allows. Refer to UDC Table 23.111 -1, Footnote 3. Page 18 of tbo caloniatbtm indicates that Shaer Wd igd along Grid G. Shear Was! Type C ih actually caned oat on Sheet S2. TIN Waver of / Record should do appropriate wall type. 1l 13. Page 1ti *Me calculation' Miter= that aftegagaitemmet the 33i?6A Holdowas slang Grid dl. Tits Foundation Plot, Oast S2, calk tat' dx members At the Malted tnofd *s area at Cldds D-P and 1.2, where the b at 2.1/2 incites on catser, a nob indicates that 3x *ambers w81 be :sod at this asiang coadidoq M would be Maid by UBC T .�-1- Pootttoso 2. The drawing, should a edit wens tht x .t,gwf tying i+ioi are Wendel. V a) v)( PHONE NO. : Mar. 01 1999 11:30AM P4 RECEIVED MAR 0 21999 ST ARCHITECTS 1710 1 C0001,1 / Nell* WP9W J WHIPO S 1 i3Ai31 -iZ 1 ..1 FROM : K94 OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES eVei sraoensa. Reid hilddktoo ]Gala Senior lien Reviewer Mr. Drone Or Co af'[tiice% Jaawy 14. 11133 Fde 24410- 022.20411 Page 4 15. Accordhu to the o*o detioa wimps 19 Or do rhea wadio aims Grid koala are to be mod dug tte eatke radio" Ina 00112 ha*. fhb me le droning tweet b fbe roof dimpbregm between Grids A and R, dean rise. dlapbrage verb nai6 to be linked tom the cant tothee their wit Ra r to Sheet 33 end UDC Saabs 16336. 16. G1au4tions arced to be provided dtrt chink the Maeda n/ 0th. demeeid in the Wend iear.ael iii gam per UDC Seddon 1630.1.1. A1, The 6nib aej o tAsooed needs* vaib dot the bolted aaaetemica to Doubt end 10/85 or woad the applied mooeeats on pep 20 oldraloalsHow. ,38. Arse 22 albs orioul ions awisas do seevbe yard damtesdieg CMU wade. T e upper seven fret ere to be provided with #s's et 24 incites on center. Section 341 clay thaws tlS's at 32 Int im on atom. Tb review comma loud above should be napom 1rd to in itemised iries. OJUSI WO reootataead dot the pstmit sppticate Dome the Be+gieeet telexed replied ctrl madasit two copies oft& tensed set of onotatd drawing" sod cm copy otappiemaood ralwoTwtioas directly to our onion We lbswirded s copy of die Were to the plow owns% rise year cascsdases. Plow Dote that oorroolb or common node dozing der review dwarfs do not relieve the project apps or dsdpaer doom voaplsoos with *ode tagdrsaenas aondbioas of approval, and permit requirements; no it the dsolicer tskwd of noponeibility rise a oompiote design la acoadaacs with the isms of lio stabs of Whtbloom This plan review check iw the ip weal oampaa with tic Uniform Bundling Oade as it r dews to the project. Ceroa haw lay aueedoae or requite way additbtcladddoefb, puss all. cc: Sorry Dennehy, Scheer 7ynefr Dante Arehheo , RECEIVED MAR 0 21999 STAR ARCHITECTS PHONE NO. : " ' Mar. 01 1999 11: 31AM P5 aaIE 9Q tt, Vale v4011.1 vives•il arils►- 4►e- -t 1 'd Attention: Ken Nelson SCMEER TANAKA DENNEHY RILEY ARCHITECTS 9'"q 18201 McDURMOTT WEST, SUITE A IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614 PHONE (949) 863 -1960 PAX (940) 8633160 ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN F 9 ,'" 1999 To: City of Tukwila Building Division c v EzLOPMEAr r Date: 2/9/99 Job No: 98496 Re: Claim Jumper Tukwila Con. Docs. Pages: 1 (Including Cover Sheet) R Ei..l Message: Ken...STDR is attempting to address Plan Check corrections for the above listed Project, and per a previous conversation have determined that the City of Tukwila considers the Claim Jumper Restaurant as an A2.1 Occupancy. That being the case, would appreciate your interpretation as to whether we may utilize the fire sprinkler system to obtain a Type V, one hour construction requirement, in that the Code also requires a fire sprinkler system Section 904.2.3.1 due to consumption of alcohol. Please review and contact me at your earliest convenience to further discuss. Thank you. By: Jerry Dennehy Copies to: File. NOTE: IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASE CALL (949) 8634960 j ea ‘o -I 091EE98VlG VOls HOCIJ Fax Cover Sheet Phone: (206)431 -3670 Fax No: (206) 431 -3665 4 °E 6661 -60 - tO'd To: Attention: Re: Message: By: Copies to: SCHEER TANAKA DENNEHY RILEY ARCHITEOFit E C 1 V 18201 McOURMOTT WEST, SUITE A IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614 JAN 281999 COMMUNITY City of Tukwila Building DivisiorP T 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Ken Nelson PHONE (949) 863 -1960 FAX (949) 663.3160 ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN 2 (Including Cover Sheet) R id. E CI Ken...STDR was yesterday, 1- 27 -99, in receipt of Plan Check corrections for the above listed Project, and after review of same, have the following comments/questions: -item 2. The A -3 occupancy listed within the Construction Documents is based on U.B.C., Table 3 -A which defines an A -3 occupancy as, "any building or portion of a building having an assembly room with an occupant load of less than 300 without a legitimate stage, including such buildings used for educational purposes and not classed as a Group E or Group B Occupancy ". Although Claim Jumper Restaurant has a total occupant count exceeding 300, the Restaurant is comprised of a series of assembly spaces, none of which exceed 300 occupants. We have used this approach previously, have agreement from ICBO, as well as UBC's Interpretive Manual (see attached) Section 303.1.1, Page 16. Claim Jumper Tukwila WA Date: Job No: Phone: Fax No: Pages: 1/28/99 98495 206/431 -3677 206/431 - 3665 Would appreciate your re- examination of this situation, and a call to further discuss. Thank you. Jerry Dennehy File. NOTE: IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASE CALL (949) 863 -1960 VEE ; O'E 66 -8 -uvC January 27, 1999 C City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Jerry Dennehy 18201 McDurmott West, Suite A Irvine, CA 92614 Dear Mr. Dennehy: SUBJECT: CORRECTION LETTER #1 Development Permit Application Number D98 -0340 Claim Jumper Restaurant 5901 S 180 St Brenda Holt Permit Technician Enclosures File: D98 -0340 John W. Rants, Mayor This letter is to inform you of corrections that must be addressed before your application for development permit can be approved. All correction requests from each department must be addressed at the same time and reflected on your drawings. I have enclosed review comments from the Building Division and Public Works Department. At this time the Fire Department and Planning Division have no comments regarding your application for permit. The City requires that four (4) complete sets of revised plans be resubmitted with the appropriate revision block. If your review does not require revised plans but requires additional reports or other documentation, please submit four (4) copies of each document. In order to better expedite your resubmittal a Revision Sheet must accompany every resubmittal. I have enclosed one for your convenience. Corrections /revisions must be made in person and will not be accepted through the mail or by a messenger service. If you have any questions please contact me at the City of Tukwila Permit Center at (206) 431- 3671. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 SCHEER 'IANAKA DENNEHYARCHIT'E I5 October 6, 1998 Mr. Bob Benedicto City of Tukwila Building Dep ipnent 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, uite 100. I . Tukwila, WA 98118 Reference: Claim Jumper Restaurant Tukwila, WA MISC. T -1 T -2 C -1 ARCHITECTURAL Title Sheet 3 Disable Access Requirements 3 Site Plan A1.1 Site Plan A2.1 • Overall Floor & Seating Plan A2.1 a Floor Plan A2.1b Floor/ Seating, Reflected Ceiling Plans and Details A2.2 Overall Reflected Ceiling Plan F A2.2a Reflected Ceiling Plan A3.1 Room Material / Finish Schedule A4.1 Exterior Elevations A4.2 Exterior Elevations A4.3 Building Sections A5.1 Roof Plan and Details A6.1 Interior Elevations A6.2 Interior Elevations A6.3 Interior Elevations STRUCTURAL S -1 General Notes and Details 5 -2 Foundation Plan S -3 Roof Framing Plan S -3A Dining Room Foundation and Framing Plan RECEIVED DEC 2 91 3 . FILE COPY Pagel of 3 The following is a matrix of the most current issue dates for all Construction Documents related to Building Department Plan Check Submittal. SHEET SHEET TITLE NO. ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION NO. 10 -6 -98 10 -6-98 10 -6-98 3 10 -6 -98 3 10 -6 -98 3 10 -6 -98 3 10 -6 -98 3 10 -6 -98 3 10 -6 -98 3 10 -6 -98 3 10 -6 -98 3 10 -6 -98 3 10 -6 -98 3 10 -6 -98 3 10 -6 -98 3 10 -6 -98 3 10.6 -98 3 10.6 -98 3 10 -6 -98 3 10 -6 -98 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal. Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal Bldg, Dept. P.C. Submittal Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal Bldg, Dept. P.C. Submittal Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal Bldg. Dept. P.C, Submittal Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal P{�9'I -0'51 Vfs DELTA trrtitertnre Interior Design 11121)1 31rDurnwtt We: Suite A Irvine, (t 92614 Phone: 714.1163.19611 Fax: 714.1163.3160 CITY RECEIVED WIL•A OCT 071998 PERMIT CENTER SrD1i SCHEER T NAKA DENNEHY ARCHITEC'IS October 6, 1998 • Claim Jumper Restaurant — Tukwila, WA Document Matrix cont'd MECHANICAL Specifications P -3 Waste & Vent Piping Plan P-4 Water & Gas Piping Plan P -5 Details P -6 Gas Piping Isometric SHEET SHEET TITLE ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION DELTA NO. NO. S-4 Details 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal S -5 Details 3 10 -6-98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal AC -1 Air Conditioning Schedules, Notes 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal & Details AC -2 Air Conditioning Wiring Diagrams 3 10 -6-98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal AC -3 Air Conditioning Roof Plan 3 10 -6-98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal AC-4 Air Conditioning Floor Plan 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal AC -5 Air Conditioning Roof Floor Plan 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg, Dept. P.C. Submittal & Hood Sections PLUMBING P -1 Numbing Site Plan 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal P -2 Schedules, Notes and 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal. ELECTRICAL E -1 Site Electrical Plan, Electrical 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal Symbols and Details E -2 Single Line Diagram and Panel 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal Schedules E -3 Lighting Plan 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal E-4 Power Plan 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal E -5 Roof Electrical Plan , 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal E -6 Fixture Schedule, Dimmer 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal Schedule, Details & Notes E -7 Partial Lighting & Power Plans 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal E -8 Service Yard Plan and Title 24 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal E -9 Electrical Specifications 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal Page 2 of 3 • SC.HEER TANAKA DENNEHY ARCHITECTS October 6, 1998 Claim Jumper Restaurant — Tukwila, WA Document Matrix cont'd SHEET SHEET TITLE NO. FOOD SERVICE K -1.1 Equipment Floor Plan 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal K -1.2 Equipment Floor Plan, Plumbing, 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal and Electrical K -2.1 Equipment Schedule 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal K -2.2 Equipment Schedule 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C: Submittal K -3 Equipment Plumbing Plan 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal K-4 Equipment Electrical Plan 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal K -5 Equipment Building Work Plan 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal K -6 Equipment Refrigeration Plan 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal. K -7 Wallbacking Plan & Exhaust 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal Make -Up Air Plan K -D Standard Details 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal R -1 Refrigeration System 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal K -10.1 Fixture Details 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal K -10.2 Fixture Details 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal K -10.3 Fixture Details 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal %. K -10.4 Fixture Details 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal K -11.1 Fixture Details 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal K -11.2 Fixture Details 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal K -11.3 Fixture Details 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal K -11.6 Fixture Details 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal K -11.7 Fixture Details 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal K -11.8 Fixture Details 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal K -12.1 Fixture Details 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal K -12.2 Fixture Details 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal K -12.3 Fixture Details 3 10 -6 -98 Bldg. Dept. P.C. Submittal Please make sure that you are using the most current Documents at all times. Kindly advise us immediately if you do not have all the above referenced exhibits. Thank you. Respectfully, JPD:fmv g:klaIm \95495 \1d 10.6 Page 3 of 3 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION DELTA NO. December 29, 1998 Dave Swanson, P.E. Reid Middleton 728 - 134th Street SW, Suite 200 Everett, WA 98204 RE: Structural Review Claim Jumper Restaurant (D98 -0340) .. Dear Mr. Swanson: Please review the enclosed plans Building Code. If you should have any questions, Sincerely, 2 mlL /47 Brenda Holt Permit Technician encl xc: D98 -0340 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development John W. Rants, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director and documents for structural compliance: with the 1997 Uniform' please feel free to contact me at 206 -4317 3671.. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206).4313670 • 'Fax (206) 4313665 December 28, 1998 • Jerry Dennehy 18201 McDurmott West, Suite A Irvine, CA 92614 Dear Mr. Dennehy: SUBJECT: LETTER OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Development Permit Application Number D98-0340 Claim Jumper Restaurant •5901 S 180 St Sincerely, Brenda Holt Permit Technician File: D98-0340 • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development John W. Rants, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431•3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 This letter is to inform you that your permit application received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center on October 7, 1998, was reviewed at the December 22, 1998, plan review meeting. Your application has now been determined to be complete. Your permit has begun the plan review process, you will be notified of any required corrections or when your plan is approved. If you have any concerns or questions please contact me at the City of Tukwila Permit Center at (206) 431-3671. October 15, 1998 Jerry Dennehy 18201 McDurmott West, Suite A Irvine, CA 92614 Dear Mr. Dennehy: c City of Tukwila Department of Community Development SUBJECT: LETTER OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION Development Permit Application Number D98 -0340 Claim Jumper Restaurant 5901 S 180 Street John W. Rants, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director This letter is to inform you that your permit application received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center on October 7, 1998, was determined to be incomplete. Before your permit application can begin the plan review process the following items need to be addressed. Building Division: Contact Ken Nelsen, Plans Examiner, at (206)431 -3677 if you have any questions regarding the following items. 1. Provide Washington State Energy Code information. Complete. form H -7 (enclosed). This item will need to be reflected on the architectural plans. The City requires that four (4) complete sets of revised plans be resubmitted with the appropriate revision block. If your revision does not require revised plans but requires additional reports or other documentation please submit four (4) copies of each document. In order to better expedite your resubmittal a Revision Sheet must accompany every resubmittal. I have enclosed one for your convenience. Revisions must be made in person and will not be accepted through the mail or by a messenger service. If you have any questions please contact me at the City of Tukwila Permit Center at (206) 431 -3671. Sincerely, ( 41/1.k Brenda Holt Permit Technician encl File: 098.0340 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 4313665 Copies Date Description 1 10 -2 -98 CWN Management Submittal Check No. 090400 for $3,565.41, payable to the City of Tukwila 1 10 -6 -98 Document Matrix Listing (8 1/2" x 11" format) 2 10 -5 -98 Puget Sound Energy New Customer Construction Application 1 . 2 -23 -98 Geotechnical Engineering Services Report 1 4 -8 -98 Geo Engineers Memo re: Surcharge Recommendations 5 10 -6 -98 Bluelines of Construction Documents -Plan Check Submittal Issuance (see Document Matrix Listing) 2 10 -2 -98 Structural Calculations 1 Approved Health Department Drawings (bluelines) 1 9 -2 -98 Copy of Health Department Approval letter SCHEER TANAKADENNEHY ARCHITECTS 18201 McDunnoit West Strife 4 Irvine, Callfornla 92614 To: City of Tukwila Building Department 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite100 Tukwila, WA 98118 Attn: Bob Benedicto Re: Claim Jumper Tukwila Con. Docs. We are sending you Via: Pat O'Daly -STDA As Requested By: Yourself /Claim Jumper Purpose: For Plan Check Review, comment and approval. Copy to: File R Cover Via: Transmittal Date: 5 October 1998 Phone: (206)431 -1670 Fax No: Job No: 98496 Action Please examine the attached exhibits and contact me with questions and to Requested: alert STDA when Plan Check corrections are available. Thank you Signed: Jerry Dennehy Scheer Tanaka Dennehy Architects, Inc. 18201 McDurmott West, Suite A Irvine, CA 92614 (714) 863-1960 FAX (714) 863.3160 SEP -25 -88 08:58 FROM -CLAIM JUMPE$,RESTAURANT Jerry Dennehy, STDA Architects 18'201 McDermott W., Suite A Irvine, CA 92614 RE: Claim Jumper Restaurant Parkway Supercenter Tukwila, WA 98188 tit..N n i ;Ir king GSM, p.,„1•.1,41 Pl.. H.m 7un.. LIr.•y1n r •attla►Itint{ t :uanty Uwparintent of Public Health 4lango L. Plough, Ph.D., 11PH, Dlrrelnr We have approved the plans for your new food service establishment. Before you can open for business: ichael 8 atc ''. 206-2 6 -9741 Senior Environmental Health Specialist/Plans Examiner Eastgate District Service Center L..ts.b 1 Il..d1h l:vuu , Ihu...•1 •m 11...• b,$ Py, l T -855 P.O1 /01 F -512 September 2, 1998 1. You must complete the attached application for a permit and return it vtith the correct ice. 2. The food service establishment manager /operator mint schedule s "prel•'upening" inspection of your establishment with the Environmental Health Specialist (EHS) in your area. Please contact the Alder Square Service Center at 206- 296 - 47111 for this inspection. I1i114I: EL.l,:al, N'.,. Is•Ih ,,a•. d%h•ujNn1 ' /:N (jU61 dq6• pr o Your establishment has been assigned a new business identification number: (B1D #) Hi- 54143. Please use this BID# in all future contact with us. _ Bc sure all other final Inspections are done (plumbing, building, tire, etc...) before You 'Fall. Be aware that if you open for business before the permit fee has been paid and/or befog your required pre - opening inspection, your establishment may be closed and /or there may 124. a late fee charge of 100% of the permit fee. A pre - opening inspection by the King County Health Department is required prir to opening. Applicant plan set is required to be available on site during that inspec on. , Provide hundwash sucks to kitchen and bar areas, and handwash sinks and tglle s to cast • stwooms as noted on plan drawings. RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA OCT 0 7 1998 PERMIT CENTER RECEIVED SEP 2 STDA ** * ** **** * *** * * * * * *1I( *** ***1K**** (*****1K**** * *** K * ***lK***** *** *** ** ( **** **** *1 KKK * *** **** *>K*** ** * * ** ( * (7- P.01 * * TRANSACTION REPORT *• * SEP -03 -98 THU 07:54 AM * * * * DATE START RECEIVER TX TIME PAGES TYPE NOTE M# DP * * * * SEP -03 07:53 AM 8- 745945 - 7148633160 44" 1 SEND OK 545 * * * * * * TOTAL : 44S PAGES: 1 * * * ** ** c*************** ***** **> K*> K> K*** *****> K***** *****> K> K *** *** **** * ** *** ***** *** * ***** KKK *>K*>k>K>K*>K>K>K** **** Jerry Dennehy, STDA Architects 18201 McDurmott W., Suite A Irvine, CA 92614 RE: • Claim Jumper Restaurant Parkway Supercenter Tukwila, WA 98188 Cloy al Spnitla unni Srhrll, Afuvur King (u', Run Sinm, E•A rnti n ►rattle -King Cnunly Departmont of Public Ileallh Alonzo I.. Plough, Ph.D., M1'H, Direc•tur September 2, 1998 We have approved the plans for your new food service establishment. Your establishment has been assigned a new business identification number: (111D#) 11B-54143. Please use this BID# in all future contact with us. Before you can open for business: 1. You trust complete the attached application for a permit and return it with the correct fee. Jerry Dennehy, STDA Architects 18201 McDurmott W., Suite A Irvine, CA 92614 RE: Claim Jumper Restaurant Parkway Supercenter Tukwila, WA 98188 Before you can open for business: City of Seattle King C ly Ihud Srhrll.,lln1'nr lino Siaw. Ex'cutire Seal Ile -King C Department of Peddle Health Alonzo 1. Plough, Ph.D., MPII, Director We have approved the plans for your new food service establishment. ichael Bratc " 206 - 296 -9741 Senior Environmental Health Specialist/Plans Examiner Eastgate District Service Center September 2, 1998 Your establishment has been assigned a new business identification number: (BID #) HB- 54143. Please use this BID# in all future contact with us. 1. You must complete the attached application for a permit and return it with the correct fee. 2. The food service establishment manager /operator must schedule a "pre- opening" inspection of your establishment with the Environmental Health Specialist (EHS) in your area. Please contact the Alder Square Service Center at 206 - 296 -4708 for this inspection. Be sure all other final inspections are done (plumbing, building, fire, etc...) before you call. Be aware that if you open for business before the permit fee has been paid and /or before your required pre - opening inspection, your establishment may be closed and /or there may be a late fee charge of 100% of the permit fee. A pre - opening inspection by the King County Health Department is required prior to opening. Applicant plan set is required to be available on site during that inspection. Provide handwash sinks to kitchen and bar areas, and /randwas/ sinks and toilets to casto stroorns as noted on plan drawings. I' :ustgtlle Public l loullh Center 1.1350 Sts. Eu.tgute \\'u)• Bellevue, \1'unitingluu 9011117 (206)'296 -1920 "Printed "II Ilrryrlyd Ihiper" Geo p Engineers MEMORANDUM Ro • r Stange, 503) 70 -0 35 TO: le and ebra Overbay, Geo ngineers DATE: April 8, 1998 FILE: 1284- 028 -00 SUBJECT: Surcharge Recommendations — Proposed Claim Jumper Restaurant RECEIVED APR 2 7 1998 SCHEER TANAKA DENNEHY ARCHITECTS Redmond This memorandum presents detailed surcharge recommendations for the proposed Claim Jumper Restaurant building pad to be located on the southeast corner of the intersection of South 180 Street and Southcenter Parkway in Tukwila, Washington. We previously presented preload /surcharge recommendations for the overall project area in our design report for the project dated February 23, 1998. The recommendations are provided to supplement, not supercede, our previous recommendations. We understand that the building will be located within the existing parking lot and that less than 2 feet of fill will be placed to achieve slab subgrade elevation. Floor loads are expected to range from about 100 to 125 psf and column loads are expected to be Less than about 150 kips. Because of the presence of very soft compressible silt soils beneath the proposed building, we recommend that a preload /surcharge program be completed to reduce post - construction settlements to within tolerable limits. The purpose of a preload program is to induce a major portion of the settlements which would otherwise occur when areal building loads are applied. A preload typically simulates the same loading as future slab loadings. Additional surcharge can be placed to shorten the required duration of a preload program. We estimate that about 6 weeks will be required for a preload /surcharge height of 2 feet above finished floor elevation. We estimate that the duration can be shortened to about 3 weeks if the surcharge height is increased to 4 feet above finished floor elevation. The crest of the surcharge should extend 5 feet outside the building footprint. The building pad fill should be compacted to the recommended criteria to an elevation about 6 inches above finished subgrade level to allow for settlements. Surcharge fill need be compacted only to the extent necessary to support construction equipment. The surcharge surface should be sealed and crowned to promote runoff of surface water. Following the surcharge period, the excess fill can be removed from the building area and used as structural fill or surcharge fill in other areas. We recommend that several settlement monitoring plates be installed prior to placing any new or additional fill in the building areas. Please refer to our design report for an example of a suitable settlement plate and detailed settlement monitoring recommendations. Cc: MBK Northwest Mason Frank, Fax (503) 684 -7272 Rob King, Fax (425) 778 -1921 RECEIVED DEC 2. 9 1998 Sierra Construction Co. Todd Rankin, Fax No. 206 -574 -0925 PIa't1.o37 I>ib -09415 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA OCT 0 7 1998 PERMIT CENTER f C. BUILDING DIVISION DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS DATE: January 12, 1998 PROJECT NAME: Claim Jumper Restaurant permit application APPLICATION NO: D98 - 0340 PLAN REVIEWER: Ken Nelsen, Plans Examiner (206) 431 -3670 The submitted plans have been determined to be incomplete by the Building Division, please review the following comment. 1. On title sheet T -1 change all 1994 Uniform Code references to the 1997 Editions. All other project document must reflect the same. Examples; Project Data, Building Dept. Notes regarding wood burning fireplaces, etc.. 2. The Project Data notes on sheet T -1 list the proposed restaurant occupancy as A -3. An occupancy count per U.B.C. 1003.2.2 exceeded well over 400 persons, as a result the restaurant will be classified as an A -2.1 occupancy. The Project Data and plans must be revised to accommodate the A -2.1 occupancy requirements starting with type V -One Hour construction. 3. Regarding the allowable building area, the Exterior Lounge Patio must be included in the buildings overall allowable area calculation. 4. The Project Data notes make reference to, "allowable area increase per section 501.1.2 ". This U.B.C. Section does not exist, please correct. 5. U.B.C. Washington State Amendment Section 1107.1.6 requires that the two proposed accessible parking stalls be relocated with those stalls closer to the main restaurant entry. 6. A number of building sections keyed on plan sheets A2.1, A2.1a, and A2.2b refer to plan sheet A4.4. Sheet A4.4 has not been submitted and is not listed on the title sheet index. Provide the missing sheet A4.4 and include it in the index. 7. U.B.C. Section 1505.3 requires that cross ventilation be provided above the ceiling cavity insulation. Detail the ventilation requirement on the Architectural and structural plans. No further comments at this time. ACTIVITY NUMBER: D98 -0340 PROJECT NAME: CLAIM JUMPER RESTAURANT Original Plan Submittal XX Response to Correction Letter # 1 DEPARTMENTS: Btfilding Division BOG 3 432 - ejq Public Works 9 i AY' 4-6) 1 DETE OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues, Thurs) COMPLETENESS: (Tues, Thurs) Complete , F Approved ❑ Approved with Conditions Approved E \PR•ROUTE.DOC 6/98 e,cm't ;-"" aDrad . Incomplete ❑ PLAN REVIEW /ROUTING SLIP DATE: 3 -9 -99 Response to Incomplete Letter Revision # After Permit Is Issued FirPrevention IN Planning'Div R1 G 10-20 -q8 tructural Permit Coordinator IN DUE DATE: 3 -11 -99 Not Applicable TUES /THURS ROUTING: Please Route No further Review Required Routed by Staff E (if routed by staff, make copy to master file and enter into Sierra) Comments: REVIEWERS INITIALS: DATE. APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: (ten days) DUE DATE: 4 -8 -99 Not Approved (attach comments) E REVIEWERS INITIALS: DATE: CORRECTION DETERMINATION: DUE DATE: Approved with Conditions ❑ Not Approved (attach comments) ❑ REVIEWERS INITIALS: DATE: ) ACTIVITY NUMBER: D98 -0340 DATE: 12 -17 -98 PROJECT NAME: Original Plan Submittal Response to Correction Letter # CLAIM JUMPER RESTAURANT x% Response to Incomplete Letter Revision # After Permit Is Issued DEPARTMENTS: Buildin: Division J5 x,1 • is Works �s do jo ( - DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues, Thurs) Complete Incomplete E Com ents: TUES /THURS ROUTING: Routed by Staff 0 (if routed by staff, make copy to master file and enter into Sierra) REVIEWERS INITIALS: APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: (ten days) DUE DATE: 1 - 19 - 99 Approved 0 Approved with Conditions 0 Not Approved (attach comments) C b w e * fr l &4 - - I Rada /-Z?-?' REVIEWERS INITIALS: CORRECTION DETERMINATION,: Approved 0 Approved with Conditions \PR•ROUTE,DOC 6/98 &OW PLA(N�EW TI afiti( SLIP 6 ev a Awc, Fire Preve 5 Structural Please Route No further Review Required Planni Di vision Permit Coordinator DUE DATE: 12 - 22 - 98 Not Applicable 0 DATE: DATE: DUE DATE: Not Approved (attach comments) 0 REVIEWERS INITIALS: DATE. DEPARTMENTS: BLIPAg Division ID -13 orks Complete Comments: Li JSJL A#I 1:t� TUES /THURS ROUTING: REVIEWERS INITIALS: \PR•ROUTE.DOC 6/98 C C` PLAN TI � I � � SLIP ACTIVITY : NUMBER: D98 -0340 . DATE:. 10 -7-98 PROJECT NAME: CLAIM JIDIPER'RESTAURANT Original plan Submittal'. Response to Incomplete Letter Res onse to Correction. Letter IV R evision . #. After Issued P DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues, Thurs) DUE DATE: 10 - 13 - 98 Incomplete Fire Prev 1 d'2-t Structural XI 1 Please Route 4iO Routed by Staff (if routed by staff, make copy to master file and enter into Sierra) Approved ❑ Approved with Conditions ❑ ' Plann Division Permit Coordinator Not Applicable No further Review Required APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: (ten days) DUE DATE: 11 - 10 - 98 DATE: Approved ❑ Approved with Conditions Not Approved (attach comments) ❑ REVIEWERS INITIALS: DATE: CORRECTION DETERMINATION: DUE DATE: Not Approved (attach comments) REVIEWERS INITIALS: DATE: CONTACT PERSON: SHEET NUMBER(S) Bldg. CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development Building Division - Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 REVISION SUBMITTAL - PROJECT NAME: ei44 � Re*wa PROJECT ADDRESS: 0' 6 I BO 4 5t DATE: PLAN CHECK/PERMIT NUMBER: SUBMITTED TO: -- REVISION SUMMARY: fl 94 le f}' �"r��/1 1� • "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revisions and date revisions. CITY USE ONLY Planning Fire PHONE: CInyQF �LJ kWiLA ~" • 19 99 plr coNTER erlietera terrrt P, ublic:Works 3/19/96 KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, INC. SHEET BD -1 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS JOB 98232 BY JM CLAIM JUMPER, TUKWILA, WA BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION RESPONSE SHT. (STRUCTURAL ONLY): File No.: 24 -98- 022 - 020 -01 Checker: Crystal Kolke STRUCTURAL ITEMS ONLY: General: Item 1. Please see revised `General Construction Notes' note #1 on sheet S l . Item 2. Please see revised `Foundation Notes' note #4 on sheet SI. Item 3. Please see enclosed correspondence from soils engineer. SD is used. Item 4. Please see added `Design Criteria' notes on sheet SI. Item 5. Type M or S mortar specified in `Concrete Block Masonry' notes on sheet S 1. Item 6. Please see `Concrete and Embedded Items', note 11 on sheet S 1. Item 7. Please see revised `Concrete Block Masonry' notes on sheet SI. Item 8. Please see added `Wood Construction' note, l0 on sheet S I. Vertical Item 9. Please see typical continuous footing callout on sheet S2. Item 10. Please see typical continuous footing callout on sheet S2. Lateral: Item 11. Please see revised plywood shear wall schedule on sheet S1 and in calculations. Item 12. Please see revised shear wall callout on foundation plans, sheet S2. Item 13. Please see revised plans sheets S2 & S3A. Item 17. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Item 16. Please see new calculation page 16A. Item 18. Please see revised detail 8/S 1. , .• KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, INC. SHEET BD-2 • JOB 98232 BY JM Item 14. Adjoining panel edges along roof joists will not be continuous. Nailing at joists is 4" o.c. Item 15. Please see added MST37 drag strap and blocked diaphragm at Dining Room shear wall on sheet S3. Force is applied to the top of the steel columns. The bolts only need to be designed for shear. The moment is resisted by the grade beam in the foundation. DATE: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT ADDRESS: CONTACT PERSON: REVISION SUMMARY: SHEET NUMBER(S) CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development Building Division-Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 REVISION SUBMITTAL PLAN CHECK/PERMIT NUMBER: 1>181340 6i01 $f PHONE: "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revisions and date revisions. facsgtout+ o rd OF PEO C84 SUBMITTED TO: CITY USE ONLY Plannlng • 3/19/96 •1 Fire Department Review Control #D98 -0340 (510) Dear Sir: C. City of Tukwila Fire Department October 20, 1998 Re: Claim Jumper Restaurant - 5901 South 180th Street Extinguishers shall be located so as to be in plain view (if at all possible), or if not in plain view, they shall be identified with a sign stating, "Fire John W. Rants, Mayor Thomas P. Keefe, Fire Chief The attached set of building plans have been reviewed by The Fire Prevention Bureau and are acceptable with the following concerns: 1. The total number of fire extinguishers required for your establishment is calculated at one extinguisher for each 3000 sq. ft. of area. The extinguisher(s) should be of the "All Purpose" (2A, 10B:C) dry chemical type. Travel distance to any fire extinguisher must be 75' or less. (NFPA 10, 3 -1.1) 2. A sodium bicarbonate or potassium bicarbonate dry - chemical -type portable fire extinguisher having a minimum rating of 40 -B shall be installed within 30 feet (9144 mm) of commercial food heat - processing equipment, as measured along an unobstructed path of travel. (UFC 1006.2.7) Portable fire extinguishers shall be securely installed on the hanger or in the bracket supplied, placed in cabinets or wall recesses. The hanger or bracket shall be securely and properly anchored to the mounting surface in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The extinguisher shall be installed so that the top of the extinguisher is not more than 5 feet above the floor and the clearance between the bottom of the extinguisher and the floor shall not be less than 4 inches. Headquarters Station: 444 Andover Park East • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: (206) 5754404 • Fax (206) 5754439 C City of Tukwila Fire Department Page number 2 Extinguisher ", with an arrow pointing to the unit. (NFPA 10, 1 -6.3) (UFC Standard 10 -1) Clear access to fire extinguishers is required at all times. They may not be hidden or obstructed. (NFPA 10, 1 -6.5) Fire extinguishers require monthly and yearly inspections. They must have a tag or label securely attached that indicates the month and year that the inspection was performed and shall identify the company or person performing the service. (NFPA 10, 4 -3, 4 -4 and 4 -4.3) Every six years, dry chemical and halon type fire extinguishers shall be emptied and subjected to the applicable recharge procedures. (NFPA 10, 4 -4.1) If the required monthly and yearly inspections of the fire extinguisher(s) are not accomplished or the inspection tag is not completed, a reputable fire extinguisher service company will be required to conduct these required surveys. (NFPA 10, 4 -3, 4 -4) 3. Commercial -type food heat- processing equipment from which grease -laden vapors emanate in normal cooking application shall be protected by an approved automatic extinguishing system. The extinguisher system shall be interconnected to the fuel and current supply so that the fuel or current is automatically shut off to all equipment under the hood, when the system is actuated. (UFC 1006) All new automatic fire - extinguishing systems and all modifications to existing automatic fire - extinguishing systems shall have fire department review and approval of drawings prior to installation or modification. 4. Exit doors shall be openable from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. Exit doors shall not be locked, chained, bolted, barred, latched or otherwise rendered unusable. All locking devices shall be of an approved type. (UFC 1207.3) John W. Rants, Mayor Thomas P. Keefe, Fitt. Chief Headquarters Station: 444 Andover Park East • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: (206) 57$.4404 • Fax (206) 575.4439 City of Tukwila Fire Department Page number 3 Exits shall not pass through kitchens, storerooms, restrooms, closets or spaces used for similar purposes. (UBC 1004.2.2) John W. Rants, Mayor Thomas P. Keefe, Fire Chief Exit doors shall swing in the direction of exit travel when serving any hazardous area or when serving an occupant load of 50 or more. (UBC 1003.3.1.5) Exit doors shall be openable from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. Exit doors shall not be locked, chained, bolted, barred, latched or otherwise rendered unusable. All locking devices shall be of an approved type. (UFC 1207.3) Dead bolts are not allowed on auxiliary exit doors unless the dead bolt is automatically retracted when the door handle is engaged from inside the tenant space. (UFC 1207.3) Exit hardware and marking shall meet the requirements of the Uniform Fire Code. (UFC 1207 -1212) Exits shall be illuminated any time the building is occupied with light having an intensity of not less than 1 foot candle at floor level. Fixtures required for exit illumination shall be supplied from separate sources of power for Group T, Divisions 1.1 and 1.2 occupancies and for all other occupancies where the exiting system serves an occupant load of 100 or more. (UBC 1003.2.9, 1003.2.9.2) Any room having an occupant load of more than 50 where fixed seats are not installed, and which is used for classroom, assembly or similar purpose, shall have the capacity of the room posted in a conspicuous place on an approved sign near the main exit from the room. Such sign shall be maintained legible by the owner or the owner's authorized agent and shall indicate the number of occupants permitted for each room use. (UFC 2501.16.1) Headquarters Station: 444 Andover Park East • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: (206) 575-4404 • Fax (206) 575.4439 c City of Tukwila Fire Department Page number 4 Thomas P. Keefe, Fire Chief The power supply for means of egress illumination shall normally be provided by the premises' electrical . supply. In the event of it's failure, illumination shall be automatically provided from an emergency system for Group I, Divisions 1.1 and 1.2 occupancies and for all other occupancies where the means of egress system serves an occupant load of 100 or more. Such emergency systems shall be installed in accordance with the electrical code. (UBC 1003.9.2) Manually operated edge- or surface - mounted flush bolts and surface bolts are prohibited. When exit doors are used in pairs and approved automatic flush bolts are used, the door leaf having the automatic flush bolts shall have no door knob or surface - mounted hardware. The unlatching of any leaf shall not require more than one operation. (UFC 1207.3) 5. An approved automatic fire sprinkler extinguishing system is required for this project. (City Ordinance #1742) All new sprinkler systems and all modifications to existing sprinkler systems shall have fire department review and approval of drawings prior to installation or modification. New sprinkler systems and all modifications to sprinkler systems involving more than 50 heads shall have the written approval of the W.S.R.B., Factory Mutual, Industrial Risk Insurers, Kemper or any other representative designated and /or recognized by The City of Tukwila, prior to submittal to the Tukwila Fire Prevention Bureau. No sprinkler work shall commence without approved drawings. (City Ordinance #1742) Contact The Tukwila Fire Prevention Bureau to witness all required inspections and tests. (UFC 10.503) (City Ordinance #1742) 6. An approved manual fire alarm system is required for John W. Rants, Mayor Headquarters Station: 444 Andover Park East • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: (206) 575.4404 • Fax (206) 575-4439 City of Tukwila Fire Department Page number 5 this project. The fire alarm system shall meet the requirements of the Americans With Disabilities' Act, chapter 51 -20 WAC (Chapter 31 Accessibility), N.F.P.A. 72 and the City of Tukwila Ordinance #1742. All new fire alarm systems or modifications to existing systems shall have the written approval of The Tukwila Fire Prevention Bureau. No work shall commence until a fire department permit has been obtained. (City Ordinance #1742) (UFC 1001.3) Local U.L. central station supervision is required. (City Ordinance #1742) Remote alarm annunciation indication is required if the control panel is not visible from the main entrance. (City Ordinance #1742) When the control panel is located inside a room, the door to the room shall have a sign with one -inch letters which reads "Fire Alarm" or "Fire Alarm Control ". (City Ordinance #1742) Key box - When access to or within a structure or an area is unduly difficult because of secured openings or where immediate access is necessary for life - saving or fire - fighting purposes, the Chief may require a key box to be installed in an accessible location. The key box shall be a type approved by the Chief and shall contain keys to gain necessary access as required by the Chief. (UFC 902.4) Dedicated fire alarm system circuit breaker(s) shall be equipped with a mechanical lockout device. (NFPA 72 (1- 5.2.8.2)) 7. All electrical work and equipment shall conform strictly to the standards of The National Electrical Code. (NFPA 70) An aisle to and working space shall be provided for John W. Rants, Mayor Thomas P. Keefe, Fire Chief Headquarters Station: 444 Andover Park East • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: (206) 5754404 • Fax (206) 5754439 City of Tukwila Fire Department Page number 6 each electrical panel. An aisle width not less than 24 inches shall provide access to the panel and 30 inches of working space shall be provided directly in front of the panel. (NEC 110-16(a), NEC 110-16(c)) Thomas P. Keefe, Fire Chief Each circuit breaker shall be legibly marked to indicate it's purpose. (NEC 110 -22) 8. Your street address must be conspicuously posted on the building and shall be plainly visible and legible from the street. (UFC 901.4.4) 9. Fire doors, fire windows and fire dampers shall have a label or other identification showing the fire protection rating. Such label shall be approved and shall be permanently affixed. (UBC 713.3) 10. Draft stops shall be installed in attics, mansards, overhangs, false fronts set out from walls and similar concealed spaces of buildings having uses other than dwellings or hotels so that the area between draft stops does not exceed 3,000 square feet and the greatest horizontal dimension does not exceed 60 feet. Where approved automative sprinklers are installed, the area betwen draft stops may be 9,000 square feet and the greatest horizontal dimension may be 100 feet. (UFC 708.3.1.2.2) 11. Every building shall be accessible to Fire Department apparatus by way of access roadways with all- weather driving surface of not less than 20' wide and 13'6" vertical clearance. Access roads in excess of 150' shall be provided with an approved turn - around area. Access shall be within 150' of all portions of the buildings. (City Ordinance #1846) 12. For all commercial, multifamily and single family subdivisions, hydrants shall be placed so that a hydrant is within 150 feet of a building and so that no point of a building (around it's perimeter) is greater than 300 feet from a hydrant. Distance from a hydrant to a building is John W. Rants, Mayor Headquarters Station: 444 Andover Park East • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: (206) 575 • Fax (206) 575-4439 Page number Yours truly, City of Tukwila Fire Department measured along the path of vehicular travel. (City Ordinance #1692) 13. Fire hydrants shall conform to American Water Works Association specifications C- 502 -54; it shall be compression type, equipped with two 2 1/2" N.S.T. hose ports and one 5" Storz pumper discharge port, and shall have a 1 1/4" Pentagon open -lift operating nut. (City Ordinance #1692) 14. Install access platforms on the parapet at the building corners. Contact the fire department for information. Any overlooked hazardous condition and /or violation of the adopted Fire or Building Codes does not imply approval of such condition or violation. Fl o The Tukwila Fire Prevention Bureau cc: TFD file ncd John W Rants, Mayor Thomas P. Keefe, Ftm Chief Headquarters Station: 444Andover Park East • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone (206) 575-4404 • Fax (206) 5754439 04/14 ' 99 1334 I D : LAN ERF Department of Labor & Industries Canoes Re fl ation Section PO Box 44450 Olympia WA 48504 -4450 F62S -036-000 re.6iiaatian verification 2 -95 FAX PAGE REGISTRATION VERIFICATION TEMPORARY (360) 902 -5n6 PAX (360) 902.5228 r T id Of C ief r mpia Headgwners + � C't � a g iut etion num . ka1 � itrition expire q t.. L N C . 077 L tti �, " Contractor: Your Certificate of Registration will be sent from the Olympia office and should be received within 2 to 3 weeks. Please keep this record until you receive your Certificate of Registration. expiires Receipt '7— 'Thank you