Laserfiche WebLink
Figure 2: Comparison of Housing Units by Type, Nearby Cities <br />. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />T 0% <br />. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />60% - <br />■ <br />1, detached <br />❑ <br />1, attached <br />5U' % <br />A <br />2 <br />40% <br />0 <br />3 r 4, <br />® <br />5 to, 9 <br />'U <br />to <br />10i to 19 <br />210% <br />200 to 49 <br />® <br />510 or nmor�e <br />10'� <br />In <br />© <br />Mob ll4e home <br />C+ <br />�.... <br />�.. <br />�. <br />�.... <br />�� <br />.... <br />....� <br />O <br />&oat, RV 'van,, eta:. <br />Kiang Aulourn 0urien De is Feder.6ll Kent Renton SeaTac TukwGilla <br />�C';o�unt Moines Way <br />Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2008 -2012 American Community Survey <br />Tenure <br />Table 4 shows Tukwila historically has had a larger percentage of renter - occupied households compared with <br />owner - occupied households. This continues to be true despite a gradual increase in the percentage of owner - <br />occupied households over in the time period. Table 5shows how the high percentage of households renting in <br />Seattle tends to drag the King County home ownership rate down. However, Tukwila is more similar to Seattle than <br />it is to the homeownership rate in the area of King County located outside of Seattle. <br />Looking at both Table 5 and Table 6, owner - occupied units are made up primarily of single - family homes and condos <br />in relatively large complexes. Townhouses and condos in developments of less than 10 units make up a small <br />percentage of the housing stock occupied by homeowners. Most renter - occupied units are in apartment complexes <br />having more than five units. Table 5 shows how the majority of multifamily housing with less than 10 units is <br />occupied by renter households. Approximately 20% of single - family homes in Tukwila are also renter - occupied. <br />16 <br />