Laserfiche WebLink
City of Tukwila My WebLink |HelpSearch Tips |About |Sign Out
Cof Tukwila Allan Ekberg,Mayor <br /> Public Works Department—Bob Giberson,Director <br /> INFOR0���m���N� ��0x��� � � U��0�u�� ������� <br /> MATIONAL m��x����� n�m��*�m��mm��w��"��m�m <br /> TO: Transportation and Infrastructure Committee <br /> FROM: Bob Gibonaon, Public Works Director <br /> BY: Stove Cal atenm, Senior Program Manager <br /> CC: Mayor Ekberg <br /> DATE: April 21,2D17 <br /> SUBJECT: Major Maintenance of 3 Bridges(Grady Way, Frank Zepp, and Beacon Ave) <br /> Project No 91510406,91510407,and 91510408 <br /> Resolution Rejecting A|| Bido <br /> ISSUE <br /> The one bid received for the Major Maint8nanC8Of3Bridg8SP jeCtVv8ahighe[ihGn1h8Engin88/GEG\i0gd88Odth8 <br /> available grant project funding. <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> The Major Main18O8nC8Of3BhdggSP jnct was advertised for bids 0O March 8 and 15, 2017. One bid was received and <br /> opened OD April 5' 2017 from Orion Marine Contractors, Inc.for$8'90O'SO5.00 (see attached bid tabu|8kiOn).The Engineer's <br /> Estimate was$2'57O'OSOUO and the available construction budget in the 2017C|PiS$2.880.00O.O0. <br /> ANALYSIS <br /> Staff has certified the bid and did not find any errors. The bid received is significantly higher than the Engineer's Estimate and <br /> 8O analysis (f the project dSsignandbidph:8Gw8sCOOducted. Thgn3w@anoxing|or8a80ntOexp|8iOwhythRbidw@G0O[g <br /> than 50% above the Engineer's Estimate, but staff and the design COnGU|t8O[ David Evans and Associates (DFA)' Gp8CU|818 <br /> that the lack Of other bidders may b8 the reason 8S well 8S@O over-abundance Of projects biddiOgatth8S808h08.AO8O8|yuiS <br /> of the Engineer's Estimate was also conducted based UO [8C8Ot bid r88U|tS from the area and this 8n8|yGiG did not reveal any <br /> significant issues with the estimate nor reasons to think that it did not accurately reflect the likely cost of constructing the project <br /> in 8 competitive bidding environment. <br /> DEA also looked for reasons that only one bid was received. The bidding climate remains competitive, which is reducing the <br /> number Of bidders OO projects ond |o8dingk) iOCnB8S8dCODSi0C\iOOCOsto. Twouthorp|8nhO|dSnGw8reCOn18Cted8Dd8Sked <br /> why they had not submitted bids UO the project.Th8tw0p|@OhO|d8[Sst@1ndihGtth9ydidOOtGUb0it8bid8Sth9Vw8R;focuSed <br /> oO other projects thatbidODtheSam8date8ndth9ir8XiGhOg0sti08iiDg|O8dw8S0Doheavy. <br /> Staff R%O0mondS rejecting the bid and re-advertising the project inM8y.DEAVViU0Odih/thep|8OG8OdaddresoSu0oqu8GdOOG <br /> that arose during the bid process. The new bid ad date should allow additional time and flexibility to complete the project. <br /> FISCAL IMPACT <br /> Rejecting the bid does not have 8fiO8OCi8| impact in and of dG8|f^ but it will n8GU|t in 8ddidOOG| design costs k) repackage it as <br /> well 8G the additional costs for advertising. Overall, repackaging of the project is anticipated to save the City money. <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> Council is being asked 10 approve the Resolution rejecting the bid for the Major Maint8n8OC8Uf3BhdggSPmen and consider <br /> this item oD the Consent Agenda ak the May 1' 2U17 Regular Meeting. <br /> Attachments: Draft Resolution <br /> Bid Tabulation <br /> oonQP.page 1u <br /> WAPWsng\pROJsCTowmxanoprojectmw*,Maintenance ono Bridges(9m,0406)m,smails Genera)mrr=,smammernaP20,mwmmoMemmwectmdsw=.do= 25 <br />