Laserfiche WebLink
TO: <br />FROM: <br />BY: <br />CC: <br />DATE: <br />SUBJECT: <br />ISSUE <br />Purchase an <br />City of Tukwila <br />Public Works Department - Bob Giberson, Director <br />INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM <br />Transportation and Infrastructure Committee <br />Joseph Todd, TIS Director & Bob Giberson, Public Works Director <br />Tami Eberle -Harris, Database Administrator <br />Mayor Ekberg <br />September 22, 2017 <br />Asset Management System <br />Purchase for the Public Works Department <br />Asset Management System for the Public Works Department. <br />Allan Ekberg, Mayor <br />BACKGROUND <br />Tracking assets throughout the City is currently a very manual process. Consistency and reporting is <br />difficult, and the maintenance and management tends to be reactive rather than proactive. Having the <br />ability to utilize an enterprise Asset Management System for the City would greatly improve effective <br />management of assets, include preventative maintenance tools, work order processing, and ensure <br />that mandated reporting is both efficient and consistent. <br />Public Works has budgeted for the research and implementation of an Asset Management System in <br />the 2017/2018 Budget. During 2017, Technology Information Services (TIS) teamed up with Public <br />Works to investigate available options. It was apparent that the management of assets was a <br />complex issue for many departments. A team was formed that included representatives from Public <br />Works, TIS, GIS, Finance, Parks, Fire, and Planning. <br />ANALYSIS <br />A Request for Proposals (RFP) was published on May 17, 2017 and six vendors responded. After <br />reviewing all of the RFPs, every vendor was given the opportunity to demonstrate their product for the <br />team. A scoring rubric and evaluation criteria included areas of Responsiveness/Completeness of <br />Proposal, Experience/Qualifications, Technical, Integrations, Functionality, Budget, and <br />Implementation. The top two contenders after the criteria was assessed were Lucity and City Works. <br />Subsequent to the demonstrations, the team went to City of Kirkland to see the Lucity system and the <br />City of Burien to take a closer look at City Works. <br />Lucity was unanimously selected as the Asset Management System that would best meet the needs <br />of the City. Team members agreed that Lucity was far superior in navigation and ease of use. The <br />system is capable of expanding to meet the City's requirements across departments and robust <br />enough to ensure long term stability. They have a mobile centric platform that is closely integrated <br />with our current GIS database. Additional information about Lucity can be found at: <br />http://www.lucity. com/Software/Enterprise-Asset-Manaqement-Software <br />hllps:lllukwilawa.sharepoint.comIsitesllandTSIAMT/Shared Documents'Info Memo Lucity 092217.docx <br />