Laserfiche WebLink
&CH;H=?#IGGCNN?? -CHON?MȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚ&?<LO;LS Ǵdzț ǴDzdzǺ <br /> <br />Public Safety Plan Financing <br />C. <br /> <br />Committee members and staff continued the discussion on financing the Public Safety Plan <br />budget gap. Using feedback from the February 6, 2018 meeting, staff began building an iterative <br />financial planning matrix that will evolve to show financial implications of potential policy <br />decisions. There are currently two versions, one showing 20-year councilmanic bonds and one <br />showing 30-year, both including the full cost of debt service and annual payment. Land sales, <br />one-time funds and ongoing REET 1 are also reflected. <br /> <br />Staff provided a review of new revenue options available to the Council, including levy lid lift, <br />voter-approved bond, B&O tax, Transportation Benefit District (voter-approved and <br />councilmanic), Local Improvement District, reexamination of existing taxes/fees, Utility Tax, and <br />Utility Franchise Fee. Councilmember Robertson asked that Line 8 of the new revenue table <br />show which fees and taxes Tukwila currently collects. Staff asked the Committee which of these <br />options should be investigated further for inclusion in the planning matrix. The Committee made <br />it clear they were not interested in a levy lid lift or additional bond measure. The following items <br />were requested: <br />Possibility of structuring a B&O tax because businesses are a large consumer of public- <br /> <br />safety related services and such a tax could provide more parity with the residential <br />population; any such tax would be levied only on larger businesses <br />Local Improvement District <br /> <br /> <br />Staff then reviewed the follow ups to requests made at the last meeting as shown underlined in <br />the packet. Committee members and staff next reviewed the financial planning matrices <br />described above. Councilmember Robertson asked for a list of City-owned properties. <br /> <br />Staff will add to the financial planning matrix discussion, and the next <br />meeting will include discussion on potential changes to operations and capital project <br />prioritization. RETURN TO COMMITTEE. <br /> <br />Potential Sale of City Properties <br />D. <br /> <br />Staff is seeking Council approval of a process to sell three parcels of City-owned land at 3747 <br />South 146 Street (formerly Travelers Choice Motel), 12026 42 Avenue South (formerly <br />thnd <br />Allentown fire station), and the Longacres Parcel (north of Longacres Way). If the Council <br />approves of the process, staff will solicit proposals and negotiate terms, then return to the <br />Council to execute purchase and sale agreements. Councilmembers Quinn and Robertson were <br />supportive of the plan to sell all three properties for reasons outlined in the memo. <br />Councilmember Kruller supports the sale of the Allentown and Longacres property, but not the <br />former Travelers Choice property on the grounds that the value could grow significantly. Several <br />City officials will be attending a regional economic forecast conference that may provide <br />information on this. DIVIDED RECOMMENDATION. FORWARD TO FEBRUARY 26, 2018 <br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />