Laserfiche WebLink
4L;HMJILN;NCIH DZ )H@L;MNLO=NOL? #IGGCNN?? -CHON?MȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚ3?JN?G<?L dzDzțǴDzdzǺ <br /> <br />G. Tukwila International Boulevard: Retrofit Analysis <br />The City Council has requested a status update on implementation of the Tukwila <br />International Boulevard recommendations that came out of the Congress for New Urbanism <br />report in 2015. One of those recommendations was to reduce the number of through lanes <br />on TIB by half and add bike lanes and on-street parking. Tukwila contracted with Fehr & Peers <br />to study the impacts of doing this, and their preliminary report suggested likely adverse <br />impacts to parallel residential streets. Staff believes that more analysis needs to be done, <br />including consideration of type and funding of traffic calming on side streets, since the cost of <br />implementation will be significantly higher than previously understood. In addition, when the <br />City took ownership of TIB, the state required that it still be able to absorb traffic in the event <br />of an I-5 shutdown. Councilmember Quinn noted that since the Fehr and Peers Report it <br />appears that a decision has been made to take no action without input from the City Council. <br />He asked that communication be improved and the Council should be involved since there is <br />a conflict between the CNU vision and the realities of a road diet. False information being <br />shared in the community should be corrected. Chair McLeod stated that the vision laid out in <br />the CNU report includes components other than the road diet, such as zoning changes, and <br />wondered if everything was on hold pending further study of the road decision. Staff replied <br />that from the Economic Development perspective, certain zoning decisions will be dependent <br />on the decision about on-street parking. It will be important to zone appropriately with <br />consideration of current market forces. Councilmember Quinn pointed out that Columbia <br />City implemented a successful road diet on a busy street and he would like to see this issue <br />treated with flexibility and historical consideration. Councilmember Idan noted that the <br />solution will need a cross-departmental approach. After further discussion, the Committee <br />request that staff return with more information on the costs and possibilities of further study <br />on the impacts of a road diet. Chair McLeod encouraged timeliness as he feels the City has <br />fallen behind with community expectations. DISCUSSION ONLY. RETURN TO COMMITTEE. <br /> <br />H. Traffic Calming Program <br />Staff updated the Committee on the status of efforts to formalize a traffic calming <br />prioritization program. A new Capital Improvement Program project has been proposed for <br />2019/2020, Traffic Calming/Residential Safety Improvements, with $400,000 budgeted each <br />year. This replaces the previously budgeted $750,000 for residential streets. Staff has also <br />developed a priority list for traffic safety improvements, including both commercial and <br />residential locations. Councilmember Idan asked how the $400,000 amount was determined, <br />and staff said it is a starting place that can be adjusted if needed and as budget allows. The <br />goal is to address simple residential projects. Councilmember Quinn said he is comfortable <br />starting with this amount and asked that geographic equity be considered. Councilmember <br />Idan stated that he feels the amount should be higher. Chair McLeod asked if low cost options <br />3-, and staff replied they will look <br />into it. DISCUSSION ONLY. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />