Laserfiche WebLink
INFORMATIONAL MEMO <br />Page 4 <br />4 <br />5. B3 — Staff is currently analyzing the data per the item above. At the October 14, 2019 <br />Finance Committee staff will provide all documentation defined in this section of the <br />resolution. <br />B3. As staff analyzed the data, we found several issues in using our current DBM system. <br />One of the most important is that it is difficult when there is only one benchmark for several <br />different positions: For example, at the C42 Band, there are four Analyst positions (Council <br />Analyst, Human Resources Analyst, Parks & Recreation Analyst, Public Works Analyst) but <br />only one, Human Resources Analyst, is a market benchmark with the AWC Survey. This <br />causes the other three positions to be shown as overmarket more than 10%, as the City <br />lacks true benchmarks with the other positions to determine whether this is an accurate <br />reflection of the market. In other words, four employees in the band are being impacted by <br />only having on benchmark out of 4 different jobs in the C42 band; this issue would be <br />resolved with the market -based system. <br />Staff recognizes that the lower banded positions in the current DBM system are over market <br />whereas the higher banded positions are under market. This can be related to the obscurity <br />of the AWC survey, in that the higher end bands are more common job descriptions across <br />agencies within the market. Another reason behind the disparity between the lower and <br />upper bands, is a result of over time the bands not moving together throughout the years, <br />not maintaining the chart over time to show a true regression. <br />As noted in the meeting on September 23, 2019, without a significant refresh of our system, <br />the City is not able to provide a true market analysis for non -represented positions. When <br />the City moves to the market -based system in 2020, and a new analysis is complete, <br />positions that are found to be under market will be retroactively adjusted to January 1, 2020. <br />Option 1:Due to the high value that the City places on the employees, as well as <br />consideration of equity and parity with our represented staff, all non -represented employees <br />receive 90% CPI-W (June to June 2019) 1.53% in 2020, in order to maintain the current <br />market and allow time for the City to convert to the new market -based non -represented <br />compensation system. <br />Option 2: Freeze the positions that are over 10% and apply the 2020, 90% CPI-W 1.53% for <br />the positions between -5% to +10%. <br />Recommendation: Option 1 and conduct an RFP in the 1st quarter of 2020, to develop the <br />new market -based non -represented compensation system. <br />6. B4 — This section, non -represented COLA for odd years, was implemented in November <br />of 2018 for the 2019 Fiscal Year as a part of the biennial budget process. <br />B4. No Change <br />7. B5 — Staff is not suggesting any changes to employee benefits at this time. The <br />Administration expects there will be a discussion on health care costs during the <br />2021/2022 budget process. <br />B5. No Change <br />8. B6 — Analysis to date shows that there is salary compression within the organization. <br />Specifically, recent contract changes have resulted in compression between the Police <br />https://tukwilawa-my.sharepoint.com/personal/juan_padilla_tukwilawa_gov/Documents/Bargaining/Non-Rep/2019 Non Rep memo Final.docx <br />