Laserfiche WebLink
nearest square foot and the site plan modified as necessary to incorporate the survey <br />data. Exact wetland acreage will be calculated after the boundaries have been surveyed. <br />Applicant must submit electronic survey data in Autocad, GIS or similar format at the time <br />of as -built submittal. <br />(2) Cowardin (Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the <br />U.S. — U.S. Department of Interior) classification of the wetland(s). <br />(3) Hydrogeomorphic classification of the wetland(s). <br />(4) Hydroperiod. <br />(5) Brief landscape assessment of the wetland (identify hydrologic <br />basin/sub-basin; inlets, outlets; surrounding land use; habitat quality and connectivity; <br />ultimate point of discharge; presence of culverts or other constraints to flow; relationship <br />to other wetlands/watercourses adjacent to or potentially impacted by the proposed <br />project). <br />(6) Description of buffer size per this chapter, conditions (topographic <br />considerations, existing vegetation types and density, habitat features, watercourse <br />edges, presence of invasive species, etc.) and functions. <br />(7) Assessment. For proposed wetland filling or proposed projects <br />that will impact buffers, the most current Washington Wetland Classification System shall <br />be used as a functional assessment. <br />b. Characterization of the watercourses on site, adjacent to or potentially <br />impacted by the proposed project must include: <br />(1) Description of: flow regime, physical characteristics of streambed, <br />banks, dimensions and bank -full width, stream gradient, stream and buffer vegetation <br />conditions, habitat conditions, and existing modifications. <br />(2) Brief landscape assessment of the watercourse (identify hydrologic <br />basin/sub-basin, and contributing basin area acreage, outlets, surrounding land use, <br />habitat quality and connectivity, ultimate point of discharge, presence of culverts or other <br />constraints to flow, presence of man-made or natural barriers to fish passage, relationship <br />to wetlands or other watercourses adjacent to or potentially impacted by the proposed <br />project, flow regime). <br />(3) Classification of the watercourse under Tukwila's rating system. <br />(4) Description of buffer size per this chapter, conditions (topographic <br />considerations, existing vegetation types and density, habitat features, watercourse <br />edges, presence of invasive species, etc.) and functions. <br />(5) Description of habitat conditions, wildlife/fish use of the <br />watercourse, including sensitive, threatened or endangered species. <br />c. Citation of any literature or other resources utilized in preparation of <br />the report. <br />5. A statement specifying the accuracy of the study and assumptions used in <br />the study. <br />MLegislative Development\Critical Areas update 2-25-20 <br />MD:bjs Review and analysis by Barbara Saxton Page 12 of 87 <br />