Laserfiche WebLink
e. Original fish and wildlife habitat enhanced unless technically not <br />feasible; and <br />f. If onsite mitigation is not possible and to ensure there is no net loss of <br />watercourse functions including, but not limited to, shading, the applicants may pay into <br />an in -lieu fund, if available, to ensure that projects are fully mitigated. <br />2. Relocation of a watercourse shall not result in the new critical area or buffer <br />extending beyond the development site and onto adjacent property without the written <br />agreement of the affected property owners. <br />D. MITIGATION TIMING. Department of Community Development -approved plans <br />are Type 2 decisions and must have the mitigation construction completed before the <br />existing watercourse can be modified. The Director may allow activities that permanently <br />disturb a watercourse prior to implementation of the mitigation plan under the following <br />circumstances: <br />1. To allow planting or re -vegetation to occur during optimal weather <br />conditions; or <br />2. To avoid disturbance during critical wildlife periods; or <br />3. To account for unique site constraints that dictate construction timing or <br />phasing. <br />E. MITIGATION PLAN CONTENT. All impacts to a watercourse that degrade the <br />functions of the watercourse or its buffer shall be avoided. If alteration to the watercourse <br />or buffer is unavoidable, all adverse impacts resulting from a development proposal or <br />alteration shall be mitigated in accordance with an approved mitigation plan as described <br />below. <br />1. Mitigation plans shall be completed for any proposals of dredging, filling, <br />diverting, piping and rerouting of watercourses or buffer impacts and shall be developed <br />as part of a critical area study by a qualified professional. The plan must show how water <br />quality, treatment, erosion control, pollution reduction, wildlife and fish habitat, and <br />general watercourse quality would be improved. <br />2. The scope and content of a mitigation plan shall be decided on a case -by - <br />case basis taking into account the degree of impact and extent of mitigation measures <br />needed. As the impacts to the watercourse or its buffer increase, the mitigation plan to <br />offset these impacts will increase in extent and complexity. <br />3. The components of a complete mitigation plan are as follows: <br />a. Baseline information including existing watercourse conditions such as <br />hydrologic patterns/flow rates, stream gradient, bank full width, stream bed conditions, <br />bank conditions, fish and other wildlife use, in -stream structures, riparian conditions, <br />buffer characteristics, water quality, fish barriers and other relevant information. <br />b. Environmental goals and objectives that describe the purposes of the <br />mitigation measures. This should include a description of site selection criteria, <br />identification of target evaluation species and functions. <br />w:\Legislative Development\Critical Areas update 2-25-20 <br />MD:bjs Review and analysis by Barbara Saxton Page 33 of 87 <br />