City of Tukwila
My WebLink
|
Help
Search Tips
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Ord 2625 - TMC Title 18 Chapters - Critical Areas Regulations
COT-City
>
City Clerk
>
Ordinances
>
2011-2020 Ordinances
>
Ord 2625 - TMC Title 18 Chapters - Critical Areas Regulations
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2024 4:05:52 PM
Creation date
3/3/2020 8:57:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Ordinances
Ordinance Number
2625
Date (mm/dd/yy)
03/02/20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
c. Performance standards for fulfilling environmental goals and objectives <br />and for triggering remedial action or contingency measures. Performance standards may <br />include water quality standards, species richness and diversity targets, habitat diversity <br />indices, creation of fish habitat, or other ecological, geological or hydrological criteria. <br />d. Detailed construction plan of the written specifications and descriptions <br />of mitigation techniques. This plan should include the proposed construction sequence <br />and construction management, and be accompanied by detailed site diagrams and <br />blueprints that are an integral requirement of any development proposal. <br />e. Monitoring and/or evaluation program that outlines the approach for <br />assessing a completed project. At least five years of monitoring is required. An outline <br />shall be included that spells out how the monitoring data will be evaluated by agencies <br />that are tracking the mitigation project's process. For projects that discharge stormwater <br />to a stream, the Director may require water quality monitoring. <br />f. Contingency plan identifi <br />corrective measures to be taken when <br />performance standards have not been met. <br />,ing potential courses of action and any <br />monitoring or evaluation indicates project <br />g. Performance security or other assurance devices as described in TMC <br />Section 18.45.210. <br />Section 31. TMC Section 18.45.120 is hereby reenacted to read as follows: <br />18.45.120 Areas of Potential Geologic Instability Designations, Ratings and Buffers <br />A. DESIGNATION. Potential areas of geologic instability include areas of potential <br />erosion and landslide hazards. Areas of potential geologic instability are classified as <br />follows: <br />Class 1 areas, which have a slope of less than 15%; <br />2. Class 2 areas, which have a slope between 15% and 40%, and which are <br />underlain by relatively permeable soils; <br />3. Class 3 areas, which include areas sloping between 15% and 40%, and <br />which are underlain by relatively impermeable soils or by bedrock, and which also include <br />all areas sloping more steeply than 40%; <br />4. Class 4 areas, which include sloping areas with mappable zones of <br />groundwater seepage, and which also include existing mappable landslide deposits <br />regardless of slope. <br />1. The approximate location, extent, and designation of areas of potential <br />geologic instability are depicted in the City's Critical Areas Map. Actual boundaries and <br />designations shall be determined by a qualified professional on a site -specific basis. <br />MLegislative Development\Critical Areas update 2-25-20 <br />MD:bjs Review and analysis by Barbara Saxton Page 34 of 87 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.