Laserfiche WebLink
Existing TMC Provisions proposed for Deletion <br />TMC 2.04.080(C) <br />and 2.04.090 <br />These sections describe City Clerk staffing and administrative procedures for processing agendas. <br />VIII. Public Records Compliance <br />A. Compliance <br />VIII(A) <br />1. Each Councilmember is responsible for complying with laws that govern public records. <br />2. Paper and electronic records that relate to the functional responsibility of the recipient or sender as a public official constitute a public <br />record, which is subject to public inspection in accordance with RCW 42.56. <br />3. Councilmembers should send and receive messages related to City business through the City's email system <br />4. Emails and/or text messages transmitted through personal accounts and devices are public records and must be retained accordingly. <br />5. Councilmembers shall not communicate in any electronic format with another Councilmember during a Council meeting. <br />6. Social media posts are a public record. Wherever possible, posting should contain links directing users back to the City's official website <br />for in-depth information, forms, documents, or online services necessary to conduct official City business. <br />7. Public records created or received by a Councilmember will be transferred to the Legislative Analyst for retention by the City in <br />accordance with retention requirements under state law. <br />8. Public records that are duplicates of those in the possession of City staff, such as meeting agendas, are not required to be retained. <br />New <br />Existing TMC Provisions proposed for Deletion <br />TMC 2.04.080(C) <br />and 2.04.090 <br />These sections describe City Clerk staffing and administrative procedures for processing agendas. <br />TMC 2.04.110(C)3 <br />This describes an outdated practice that does not make sense in the context of current workflow and agenda procedures. Councilmembers must give direction in public <br />meetings, and if there is an issue that an individual Councilmember would like the City to consider, they may seek consensus during a meeting. Removing this would not <br />interfere with that right. <br />TMC 2.04.110(D) <br />The City Council President has the authority to approve the Committee of the Whole and Regular Meeting agendas, which includes providing input into the amount of <br />time given to specific items. Calling this out specifically seems unnecessary. <br />TMC 2.04.120(6)1 <br />TMC 2.04.120 combines speaking procedures for the City Council and for the public in the same section, which is totally inappropriate. Subsection B is outdated and does <br />not match current public comment procedures or best practices. The new draft Rules of Procedure separates public comment into its own section and provides better <br />description on how it works. <br />TMC 2.04.120(6)4 <br />This section is not appropriate or in alignment with current laws and best practices pertaining to First Amendment rights. The new draft Rules includes a section about <br />how to handle interruptions in the Council Chamber. <br />