12-071 - King County - 2012-2017 Animal Control Services

Browse Search

Exhibit C-1, cont'd. Notes: 1. Based on various efficiencies and changes to the RASKC operating budget, adjustments for reduced intakes overall, reduced usage with Auhum out, and shifting two positions out of the model (county sponsored), Ne 2013 Estimated Budgeted Total Allocable Cost has been reduced to 05.264,057. 2. One quarter of control services costs are allocated to control districts 200 and 220, and one half of control costs are allocated to district 500, then casts are further allocated B0% by total call volume (2011 Calls - Preliminary year end) and 20% by 2011 population. 3. This excludes the cast to northern cities of sheltering their animals at PAWS under separate contracts. Shelter costs are allocated B0% by King County shelter volume Intake (2011 Preliminary year end) and 20% by 2011 population. 4. Licensing costs are allocated 20°A by population (2011) and B0% by total number of Pet Licenses Issued (2011) less $0.00 Sr. lifetime IJeenses. 5. Transition funding is allocated per capita Ina turn tier formula to cures with certain per capita net cast allocations. For additional detail, see 2010 interlocal Agreement Exhibit C-4 (2013 column) for more Information. Transition Funding does not change for years 2013- 2015. 6. Credits are ellocatod to those jurlsdic0ons whose shelter intakes per capita exceeded the system average(.0043) and are intended to help minlmlae the impact of charging the cost allocation methodology from 50% populationl50 usage to the new 20% populationl80% usage model. See Interlocal Agreement Exhibit C- 4 for more detail. 7. New Transition License Funding has been Included for certain jurisdictions to help limit the Estimated Net Final Cost to the 2012 estimated levet Receipt of support is contingent on city providing in-kind services and county ability to provide resources and%or recover costs 8. Net Final Costs greater than 50 will be reallocated to remaining jurlsdidlons with a negative net final cost, northern cities Net Final Costs shall be inclusive of their PAWS Sheltering costs. 9. Program Load Factor (LF) , per ILA Exhibit C, Pad4, Estimated Payment Calculation Formula, Is the Citys share of Budgeted Total Net Allocable Casts: Il is the CItys 2013 Service Year Total Animal Services Cost Allocation expressed ase percentage of the Budgeted Total Net Allocable Costa for 2013. Refer to the ILA for additional details. Document Dated 5-29-12 38