Laserfiche WebLink
City of Tukwila My WebLink |HelpSearch Tips |About |Sign Out
Application of ENR <br />1. For Service Years 2013 and 2016, 50% of the Estimated New Regional Revenue is <br />incorporated into the calculations of EC and ES and EL as described in Exhibit C, <br />specifically: <br />a. 17% of total Estimated New Regional Revenue is applied to reduce the total <br />Budgeted Net Allocable Control Services Cost. <br />b. 27% of total Estimated New Regional Revenue is applied to reduce the total <br />Budgeted Net Allocable Shelter Services Cost. <br />c. 6% of total Estimated New Regional Revenue is applied to reduce the total <br />Budgeted Net Allocable Licensing Services Cost. <br />These amounts are reconciled as against actual New Regional Revenue (ENRA) in <br />the annual Reconciliation process. In 2014, 2015 and 2017 the 50% is simply <br />deducted against Budgeted Total Allocable Costs to derive Budgeted Total Net <br />Allocable Costs. <br />2. For each Service Year, the remaining 50% of Estimated New Regional Revenue is <br />first applied to offset County contributions to the Program, in the following order of <br />priority. <br />a. Offset payments made by the County to fund Transition Funding Credits, <br />Shelter Credits, Impact Mitigation Credits (if any) and un -reimbursed <br />Licensing Revenue Support. <br />b. Offset County funding of Animal Services Program costs that are not <br />included in the cost allocation model described in Exhibit C, specifically, <br />costs of: <br />i. The medical director and volunteer coordinator staff at the Kent Shelter. <br />ii. Other County -sponsored costs for Animal Services that are not included <br />in the cost models described in Exhibit C. <br />c. In the event any of the 50% of Estimated New Regional Revenue remains <br />after applying it to items (a) and (b) above, the remainder ("Residual New <br />Regional Revenue") shall be held in a reserve and applied to the benefit of <br />all Contracting Parties as part of the annual Reconciliation process, in the <br />following order of priority: <br />i. First, to reduce pro -rata up to 20% of each Contracting Party's Estimated <br />Total Animal Services Cost Allocation (6th column in the spreadsheet at <br />Exhibit C-1), thereby reducing up to all cost allocations based on <br />population. This is the factor "X" in the Reconciliation formula. <br />ii. Second, to reduce pro rata the amount owing from each Contracting <br />Party with net final costs > 0 after consideration of all other factors in <br />the Reconciliation formula. <br />Document Dated 5-29-12 <br />48 <br />