City of Tukwila
My WebLink
|
Help
Search Tips
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
12-071 - King County - 2012-2017 Animal Control Services
COT-City
>
City Clerk
>
Interlocal Agreements
>
2010-2015 Interlocal Agreements
>
12-071 - King County - 2012-2017 Animal Control Services
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2021 3:41:19 PM
Creation date
6/28/2012 3:39:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Interlocal Agreements
Contract No (example 17-139)
12-071
Contractor (example *sabey*)
King County
Description (example *tourism*)
2012-2017 Animal Control Services
Document Relationships
17-116 - King County - 2018-2027 Animal Control Services
(Attachment)
Path:
\City Clerk\Interlocal Agreements\2016-2021 Interlocal Agreements
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
For Service Year 2014, if the City and County have executed a Licensing Support Contract <br />per Exhibit F, and the City is therefore providing additional in-kind services in order to <br />generate licensing revenue support in 2014, then: <br />• The Estimated Payment for 2014 will include Estimated Licensing Revenues <br />calculated at the amount of Actual Revenue ("AR") for 2012 or the Revenue Goal <br />(RG), whichever is greater. RG will be the amount in Table 1 for Licensing <br />Revenue Support Cities, or such other amount as the Parties may agree in the <br />Licensing Support Contract. <br />• At Reconciliation: <br />o For Cities with a RT > $20,000, AR 2014 will be determined by allocating 65% <br />of Licensing Revenues received (if any) over the Base Amount to determine <br />AR2o14 <br />o If Actual Licensing Revenue in 2014 is greater than the Revenue Goal (AR <br />2014 <br />>_ RG), then <br />• no Licensing Revenue Credit is payable to the City (LRC = $0), and <br />• The County shall charge the City for an amount which is the lesser of <br />(a) the cost of County's licensing support services in 2014 to the City <br />(as defined in the Licensing Support Contract for 2014), or (b) the <br />amount by which AR2014 >RG. <br />o If AR2o14 < RG, then the difference (RG-AR2014) is LRC. The LRC amount is <br />added to reduce the City's costs when calculating the Reconciliation <br />Adjustment Amount, provided that, for Cities whose RT >$20,000, 35% of <br />Licensing Revenues over the Base Amount shall be allocated to increase <br />("LRC") a when the value of ANFCo is being calculated at Reconciliation, <br />and provided further that in all cases LRC cannot exceed the 2013 Licensing <br />Revenue Target for the City. <br />For Service Year 2015, the process and calculation shall be the same as for 2014, e.g.: <br />if the City and County have executed Exhibit F, and the City is therefore providing <br />additional in-kind services in order to generate Licensing Revenue Support in 2015, then: <br />• The Estimated Payment for 2015 will include Estimated Licensing Revenues <br />calculated at the amount of Actual Revenue ("AR") for 2013 (excluding LRC paid <br />for Service Year 2013) or RG, whichever is greater. RG will be the amount in Table <br />1 for Licensing Revenue Support Cities, or such other amount as the Parties may <br />agree in the Licensing Support Contract. <br />• At Reconciliation: <br />o For Cities with a RT > $20,000, AR zoic will be determined by allocating 65% <br />of Licensing Revenues received (if any) over the Base Amount to determine <br />AR2015 <br />o If Actual 2015 Licensing Revenue is greater than the Revenue Goal (ARzois >_ <br />Document Dated 5-29-12 <br />52 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.