City of Tukwila
My WebLink
|
Help
Search Tips
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Planning 2012-09-27 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET
COT-City
>
City Clerk
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Agenda Packets
>
2011-2019 Agenda Packets
>
2012-09-27 Planning Commission - McMicken Court / Work Session
>
Planning 2012-09-27 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2014 4:07:30 PM
Creation date
9/21/2012 11:12:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Boards and Commissions
Date (mm/dd/yy)
09/27/12
Board or Commission Name
Planning Commission
Agenda or Minutes
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PC Public I fearing Minutes <br />August 23, 2012 <br />losing potential developers, retail and sales tax leakage to other jurisdictions, concern with the City's approach, <br />burdens on regulations in the TUC on existing business ov,-ners, new requirements and impacts to landlords and <br />tenants such as replacing a roof, which would trigger new requirements, no transportation impact analysis on <br />draft plan, sufficient capital facilities such as utilities, sewer system capacity- for growth and development, cost of <br />off -site improvements on new development, urban center goals, obligations of an urban center and what it means <br />to be an urban center, what the obligations are as a City, strict design guidelines; growth targets, concerned that <br />the TUC Plan does the opposite of encouraging growth and meeting certain thresholds. Ms. Balint raised issues <br />of concerns as a result of an EcoNorthwest study completed on the earlier version of the plan, Ms. Balint said she <br />is not ready to address the level of detail for specific concerns until after the general concerns are addressed. <br />Commissioner McLeod asked if Ms. Balint's letter would suggest the recommended changes, she's requesting. <br />Ms. Balint said there are specific recommendations in her documentation, but if the Commission does not want <br />staff to go back and do more work then they would like the opportunity to meet with staff one on one to discuss <br />their specific concerns. She also mentioned that SEPA is supposed to be performed at the earliest point and time <br />possible, as a tool to guide decision malting to inform decision makers. So she hopes the enviromnental review is <br />done as early in the process as possible at this point. <br />Commissioner Mann inquired on the City's participation in developer incentives. <br />Staff confirmed that incentives have been added to the current draft of the plan. <br />Chair Alford stated that some of Ms. Balint's comments did not seem consistent with the current draft plan. <br />Ms. Balint said she was looking at the most recent draft. <br />Commissioner Hanson asked staff to address the comment that Ms. Balint made regarding impacts to a property <br />ov,ner replacing a roof. He asked if it was an accurate depiction of what's possible. <br />Staff said in accordance with the current code, if exterior changes are greater than 10% of the building value, it <br />would trigger Design Review. For non conforming buildings, when a building is destroyed by more than 50%, it <br />needs to be rebuilt. Staff said that generally roof replacements have not triggered Design Review. <br />Mr. Balint requested that the code is clarified regarding required improvements to existing buildings, etc. when a <br />property- owner makes improvements that exceed 10% of the value of the building. <br />Commissioner Strander inquired whether the EcoNoitivvest study was on the City's -,vebsite. <br />Staff replied that it had not been removed from the web site since it was presented in 2(_)(_)9. <br />I T 1 <br />Bob Schofield, developer, said that he has been developing on Southcenter Parke ay since 1974, and provided <br />comments on where he thinks the Citv is economically. He said there are lots of vacancies and the stores are <br />hurting vei N- badly. He doesn't thinit that the rents on West Vallev Highway- and Strander are one quarter of the <br />rents on Southcenter Parke ay anymore. He said Southcenter should be a much more powerful market, but the <br />ability to gain new tenants and hold onto old ones has really declined over the last three or four years. Mr. <br />Schofield said that he really admires staff and their work greatly- and he understands what they are doing, but he <br />laiows that we are facing vein tough times and we have to be vein careful with what we do and when we do it. <br />He encourages staff to be extremely carefid in considering their tax base. <br />Commissioner Mann inquired about the decline in sales, and asked Mr. Schofield if he saw development of the <br />residential area in Southcenter as a potential built -in clientele that are more apt to shop in the area. <br />Mr. Scolfield said that you have to be vein careful to what you impose on eveiNthing in the plan, and said that he <br />thinks there's a bigger problem that he doesn't want the City to lose sight of He said the Citv needs to keep a <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.