Laserfiche WebLink
PC Worksession Minutes <br />May 24, 2012 <br />In addition to the noted changes, instead of reviewing the code page by page, staff walked through examples <br />of development scenarios from start to finish of how an applicant would figure out what they would need to <br />do on a specific site to meet the code requirements. Examples were provided on the vacant Circuit City site, <br />and the Macy's warehouse site. <br />Commissioner Strander commented that she would be comfortable reviewing the code page by page. Staff <br />asked the other Commissioners their preference. The Commissioners elected to hear staff's examples. <br />Staff addressed several questions. Following are some of the issues raised: <br />Commissioner Hundtofte commented on the importance of code clarity for the developers. <br />There was extensive discussion on when a project would trigger the code requiring putting in a new street. <br />Commissioner Strander inquired whether a traffic study was completed on the level of service on the <br />existing streets, and asked that she receives a copy of the report. Staff said they would get one to her. <br />Commissioner Hundtofte noted that there would be a lot of empty balconies in private spaces for mixed use, <br />which may be visually unappealing. He commented that they want development sites that are consistently <br />uniform across the areas and appealing. He was also concerned about the added cost for developers. Some <br />commissioners noted that they would like a balcony if they lived there. Staff indicated that the balconies are <br />an option for meeting the private open space requirements, and that current open space standards for <br />residential developments require a larger amount of space than the proposed standards. <br />Commissioner Standers made inquiry on corridor types. <br />There were no additional questions or comments. <br />Commissioner Alford suggested discussing the timeframe for completing review and to hold the public <br />hearing on the Southcenter Plan. <br />Staff noted that the Commission has not seen/reviewed the Southcenter Architectural Design Manual which <br />they intend on providing to the Commission in June. There will be a worksession in June followed by a <br />public hearing in July. It was decided that the public hearing will be scheduled for July 19` leaving July 26 <br />available to continue the public hearing for any additional testimony that can't be heard on July 19` Staff <br />will also schedule an open house prior to the public hearing, so questions can be asked in a less formal <br />environment. In August, staff will provide the Commission with a matrix of all changes from the <br />Commissioners suggestions, suggestions from the public comments, and staff's recommendations. After <br />review, the Planning Commission will forward their recommendations to the City Council. <br />Commissioner Hansen provided an update on the opportunity for student participation. Due to schedules, it <br />was decided that he and the school will meet in the fall when school resumes. <br />Adjourned: 8:15 PM <br />Submitted By: Wynetta Bivens <br />Planning Commission Secretary <br />Adopted: 6/28/12 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />