Laserfiche WebLink
Page 6 <br />Public Hearing Minutes <br />June 22, 2017 <br /> <br />not know exactly how it’s going to operate, which is the key to the traffic management plan <br />recommendation on page 25 of the packet. Until they know how it works and the details of the plan are <br />rd <br />worked out with the school district it’s hard to say if 43 and other streets require additional “No Parking” <br />sign enforcement. In response to additional questions from Commissioner Mann, Mr. Giberson said for this <br />type of facility a 10-car drop-off would probably be adequate, if the school district enforces the rules. <br /> <br />Chris Partman <br />, Police Department, said the Tukwila Police Department would like to encourage a traffic <br />management plan that is staffed by school district staff. She said currently the Police Department spends a <br />huge amount of Police Officer time that is not available to the rest of the City, monitoring traffic around the <br />current elementary school. She said this is an opportunity to do it right and it seems it should be incumbent <br />on the school district to manage their own traffic flow. <br /> <br />Commissioner Martinez <br /> asked Ms. Partman if she would like the recommendation to stay. Ms. Partman <br />responded, yes. She also said maybe it could be assessed after school has been operational for a while and <br />perhaps it could be dropped, but it’s better to have it in place rather than a child be injured or have a <br />medical emergency and not be treated quickly enough because of a traffic control issue. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mann <br /> commented that the pedestrian route crosses traffic twice, and the school district <br />should manage traffic or have a traffic light. Also, she said the sidewalk is misplaced, and it should be on <br />the south side of the street. <br /> <br />Bob Giberson <br />, Public Works, Director, addressed Commissioner Mann’s comments. He said it is a very <br />peculiar topography, and the sidewalk on the south side didn’t make sense lining up with the jog in the <br />right-away. He said on the south side there is a retaining wall and grade difference where you can’t just tack <br />a sidewalk up against the retaining wall. He said it was the compromising solution, otherwise they would <br />have to rebuild portions of the site for Foster High and that was not feasible. <br /> <br />Minnie Dhaliwal <br />, Planning Supervisor, clarified that at one stage there wasn’t room to fit the tennis courts, <br />given the right of way width and the applicant didn’t want to lose more land on the south side to fit in the <br />landscaping and the tennis courts on the school property. <br /> <br />Jeff, Fenney <br />, for the applicant, said the current southern boundary of the City’s right-away and the Foster <br />High School property line and the edge of pavement are the same line, so there is no room on the south side <br />to put a sidewalk. The first 10 feet of the property is dedicated to landscaping. If a sidewalk were put in it <br />would force everything on the Foster property further south, and a bigger reduction in parking. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mann <br /> said she would give up landscaping for the safety of the children. She said a safe <br />route to school is supposed to be a priority and it’s not happening here. She said her vote is to forgo the <br />landscaping and make it a safe route to school. <br /> <br />Commissioner Alford <br /> asked if there would be crossing monitors implemented as part of the traffic <br />management plan. <br /> <br />Lindsay Brown <br />, Assistant Planner, read language from the draft traffic management plan, <br /> <br />Minnie Dhaliwal <br />, Planning Supervisor, also provided additional explanation regarding the sidewalk versus <br />landscaping. She said the tennis courts and the tall fences for the tennis courts would be across the street <br /> <br /> <br />