City of Tukwila
My WebLink
|
Help
Search Tips
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Planning 2018-08-23 Item 3 - Adoption of 7/26/18 Minutes
COT-City
>
City Clerk
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Agenda Packets
>
2011-2019 Agenda Packets
>
2018-08-23 Planning Commission / Board of Architectural Review Public Hearings - Tru by Hilton / Element by Westin / Zoning Code Amendments
>
Planning 2018-08-23 Item 3 - Adoption of 7/26/18 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2018 4:14:20 PM
Creation date
8/16/2018 4:13:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Boards and Commissions
Date (mm/dd/yy)
08/23/18
Board or Commission Name
Planning Commission
Agenda or Minutes
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 2 <br />Public Hearing Minutes <br />July 26, 2018 <br /> <br />Commissioner Stander inquired on the list of five informational items noted in the staff report <br />that were not submitted. She asked when they would be ready to submit for review. The applicant <br />responded that it would not be long. Commissioner Strander said she would like that information. <br /> <br />There were no additional comments. <br /> <br />The public hearing was closed. <br /> <br />Deliberation: <br /> <br />Commissioner Hansen said it was an exciting project, but he does not think that <br />approved yet. He said the Commission does not have the information they would typically have for <br />a project. He said his recommendation is that they get the information they need to approve the <br />project.He said he would not be willing to approve tonight. <br /> <br />Commissioner Martinez said he applauds staff and the architect on their willingness to work and <br />re-workthis. He said he likes the idea of integrating a new building material into the soffits, and <br />he'd like to see more exterior details, generally. He said we are almost at the finish line, but a <br />couple of things need to be cleaned up, and they could probably fly right through the next meeting. <br />He said it really is a shame that they <br /> <br />Chair Nguyen asked the applicant when they could submit the informational items, so the project <br />could come back to the Planning Commission. He also requested language to add a condition <br />requiring larger street trees to address the issue of masking and the number of mature trees that <br />were taken out for the projecta <br />condition for larger trees. Commissioner Nguyen revised his request (action item below, bullet <br />one). <br /> <br />Chair Nguyen re-opened the public hearing. The project will come back to the Planning <br />Commission after the applicant has submitted the informational items for review. <br /> <br />Staff asked for direction from the Commission regarding the 10 recommended conditions of <br />approval. Staff walked through the conditions with the Commission. The Commission were in <br />consensus with staffs recommended conditions of approval 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, and 10 (see action <br />item, bullet two regarding conditions 2, 5 and 8). <br /> <br />ACTION ITEMS: <br /> <br /> Staff will return to the Commission with more information on the size of the street trees <br />shown at maturity and will work with the applicant's landscape architect to select larger <br />street trees if necessary. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.